«Антропогенне навантаження, впливи і ризик на поверхневі водні ресурси. Концепція і приклади»

Page 1

European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Easter Partnership

PRESSURES, IMPACTS AND RISK ON SURFACE WATER CONCEPT AND EXAMPLES EU Member States Consortium, Kyiv, 16 April 2019


EUROPEAN UNION WATER INITIATIVE PLUS FOR THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP


EUROPEAN UNION WATER INITIATIVE PLUS FOR THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP

БЕЛАРУСЬ

МОЛДОВА

УКРАЇНА

ВІРМЕНІЯ

АЗЕРБАЙДЖАН

ГРУЗІЯ

АВСТРІЯ

ФРАНЦІЯ

МЕЖНАРОДНІ ОРГАНІЗАЦІЇ :


Правова база та система регулювання

РЕЗУЛЬТАТ 1

поліпшені відповідно до Водної рамкової директиви ЄС (ВРД), інтегрованим управлінням водними ресурсами та багатосторонніми природоохоронними угодами.

Національний політичний діалог

Зміцнення потенціалу РЕЗУЛЬТАТ 2

Плани управління водними ресурсами розроблені і виконуються відповідно до принципів ВРД ЄС, від пілотних басейнів і до масштабів країни.

Залучення зацікавлених комунікація

сторін

Реформа законодавства і регулювання

Планування управління річковими басейнами

Моніторинг та лаболаторії

Управління даними

та

Отримані уроки регулярно збираються, поширюються і передаються зацікавленим сторонам.

РЕЗУЛЬТАТ 3

Залучення зацікавлених сторін

Комунікація


PRESSURES, IMPACTS AND RISK ON SURFACE WATER


Water Framework European Directive (WFD) 2000 Objectives: obligatory results Non deterioration of the current status Good status not later than 2027* Dangerous substances reduced or removed Protected areas concerned by others directives

Consultation & participation 3 planning cycles: 2010-2015; 2016-2021; 2022-2027

80% of French regulation for water come from European regulation

* Possibility of exemptions (delay 2021 or 2027 or less stringent objectives) : technical feasability, disproportionate costs, and/or natural conditions




Pristine river basin


Human activities & river basins changes: Pressures


Pristine river basin Climate change is a pressure on water resources. But solutions are not at River Basin level.


APPROACH

1. 2. 3. 4.

What are the human activities in the River Basin? What are the Pressures due to human activities? What are the trends of the Pressures in the coming years? What is the Status of the water bodies from the available monitoring results? 5. What will be the status of the water bodies at the end of the planning cycle?

12


APPROACH

• • • •

What are the human activities in the River Basin? What are the Pressures due to human activities? What are the trends of the Pressures in the coming years? What is the Status of the water bodies from the available monitoring results? • What will be the status of the water bodies at the end of the planning cycle?

13


DATA COLLECTION

• Required first step: Inventory and collection of relevant data • Data sharing between the data producers • To produce the River Basin characterisation


Land use

In red, a lot of urban areas: urban pressure on water supply

In yellow, agriculture, main land user, pressure on water quality


France 552,000 km² 66 million inhabitants


Loire-Bretagne basin example

Loire-Bretagne: 160,000 km², 13 million inhabitants

2,000 rivers water bodies


Water body identification (rivers)

Loire-Brittany:. 135,000 km watercourses, 2,250 WaterBodies: 1900 River WB (30 main river basins and 1,870 small river basins more than 10 km²), 140 Lakes WB, 30 Esturian WB, 40 Coastal WB, 140 GroundWB

Waterbodies delineation (rivers)


Land use In red, a lot of urban areas: urban pressure on water supply

In brown, agriculture, main land user, pressure on water quality

Urban area

Agriculture area

Forest area Water area

Baseline data


Population growth for 2000 river water bodies

Population

Decreasing population Decreased pressure

Growth more than 30% in ten years Increased pressure

-

Growth of population between 1999 and 2009

+++ Baseline data


Livestock for 29 river sub-basins

Agriculture - breeding Concentration of the production in the western river basins Increased water pollution (nutrient)

Growth of hens between 2000 and 2010

+++ -

Growth of pig between 2000 and 2010

+++

+++

Cattles density per agricultural area, 2010

Baseline data


APPROACH

• • • •

What are the human activities in the River Basin? What are the Pressures due to human activities? What are the trends of the Pressures in the coming years? What is the Status of the water bodies from the available monitoring results? • What will be the status of the water bodies at the end of the planning cycle?

22


WFD Annex 7 – River Basin Management Plans: A summary of significant pressures and impact of human activity on the status of surface water and groundwater, including: • Estimation of point source pollution, • Estimation of diffuse source pollution, including a summary of land use, • Estiation of pressures on the quantitative status of water including abstractions, • Analysis of other impacts of human activity on the status of water.



http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/facts_figures/guidance_docs_en.htm


http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/facts_figures/guidance_docs_en.htm


http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/facts_figures/guidance_docs_en.htm



http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/facts_figures/guidance_docs_en.htm


MORPHOLOGICAL PRESSURES

SOLUTION


http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/facts_figures/guidance_docs_en.htm


ALIEN INVASIVE SPECIES


ECOLOGICAL STATUS IN EUROPEAN UNION VERSUS POPULATION DENSITY / % ARABLE LAND

European water –assessment of status and pressure p 39 – 2012, WIE Database May 2011-2012


Pressure 1.1 Point – Urban waste water

Main Driver(s) Urban development

Clarification on pressures Included or not in the UWWT Directive. Includes discharges from non-manufacturing commercial areas which can largely be assimilated to urban waste water. Includes discharges of raw or partially treated urban waste water which are identified as point sources.

1.2 Point - Storm Overflows

Urban development

Overflows from separated or combined sewers identified as point sources (for diffuse see ‘Diffuse – Urban run-off’ below). Industrial point sources from plants included in the E-PRTR. Any industrial point sources not included in the E-PRTR. Pollution resulting from an abandoned industrial site or a site contaminated due to past industrial activities, illegal dumping of industrial waste or a pollution accident and which is identified as point source (for diffuse see below ‘Diffuse – Contaminated sites/abandoned industrial sites). This category does not cover existing industrial activities.

1.3 Point - IED plants Industry 1.4 Point - Non IED plants Industry 1.5 Point - Contaminated Sites/Abandoned Industry industrial sites

1.6 Point - Waste disposal sites 1.7 Point - Mine waters

Urban development Industry

1.8 Point - Aquaculture 1.9 Point – Other 2.1 Diffuse - Urban run off 2.2 Diffuse – Agricultural 2.3 Diffuse – Forestry 2.4 Diffuse – Transport 2.5 Diffuse – Contaminated sites/Abandoned industrial sites

Aquaculture

2.6 Diffuse - Discharges not connected to sewerage network 2.7 Diffuse - Atmospheric deposition

Urban development

2.8 Diffuse – Mining 2.9 Diffuse – Aquaculture 2.10 Diffuse – Other 3.1 Abstraction/Flow Diversion – Agriculture 3.2 Abstraction/Flow Diversion – Public Water Supply 3.3 Abstraction/Flow Diversion – Industry

Urban development, Industry Agriculture Forestry Transport Industry

Agriculture, Energy nonhydro, Industry, Transport, Urban development Industry

Point sources due to urban or industrial waste disposal sites. Point sources due to the collection of water in an open pit or underground mine which has to be brought to the surface in order to enable the mine to continue working. It does not include waste water from the industrial processes. Other point sources not included in the categories above. Storm overflows and discharges in urbanized areas not identified as point sources

Diffuse pollution from road and train traffic, aviation and infrastructure. Pollution resulting from an abandoned industrial site or a site contaminated due to past industrial activities, illegal dumping of industrial waste or a pollution accident and which is identified as diffuse source (for point see above ‘Point – Contaminated sites/abandoned industrial sites). This category does not cover existing industrial activities. Pollution resulting from urban waste water not connected to sewers and identified as a diffuse source. Diffuse pollution from atmospheric deposition from any origin

Pollution from mining activities which are identified as diffuse (for point sources see categories above )

Aquaculture Any driver/Other Agriculture

Other diffuse sources not included in the categories above. Includes water transfers and abstractions for irrigation and livestock breeding.

Urban development

Includes water transfers. Affection to TW and/or CW possible only in case of desalination plants.

Industry

Abstraction for industrial processes (cooling water is covered under the category ‘Abstraction –


3.4 Abstraction/Flow Diversion – Cooling water 3.5 Abstraction/Flow Diversion - Fish farms 3.6 Abstraction/Flow Diversion – other 4.1.1 Physical alteration of channel/bed/riparian area/shore of water body for flood protection 4.1.2 Physical alteration of channel/bed/riparian area/shore of water body for agriculture 4.1.3 Physical alteration of channel/bed/riparian area/shore of water body for navigation 4.1.4 Physical alteration of channel/bed/riparian area/shore – other 4.1.5 Physical alteration of channel/bed/riparian area/shore – unknown or obsolete 4.2.1 Dams, barriers and locks for hydropower 4.2.2 Dams, barriers and locks for flood protection 4.2.3 Dams, barriers and locks for drinking water 4.2.4 Dams, barriers and locks for irrigation 4.2.5 Dams, barriers and locks for recreation

Industry; Energy non-hydro Aquaculture Recreation Flood protection

4.2.6 Dams, barriers and locks for industry

Industry, Energy non-hydro

4.2.7 Dams, barriers and locks for navigation 4.2.8 Dams, barriers and locks – other 4.2.9 Dams, barriers and locks – unknown or obsolete 4.3.1 Hydrological alteration – agriculture 4.3.2 Hydrological alteration – transport 4.3.3 Hydrological alteration – hydropower 4.3.Hydrological alteration – public water supply 4.3.5 Hydrological alteration - aquaculture 4.3.6 Hydrological alteration – other 4.4 Physical loss (or part of) whole water bodies

Transport

Agriculture Transport

Refers largely to longitudinal alterations to water bodies. Includes land drainage to enable agriculture activities. Refers largely to longitudinal alterations to water bodies. Refers largely to longitudinal alterations to water bodies. In case the driver for the physical modification is unknown.

Energy – hydropower Flood Protection Urban development Agriculture Recreation

Small dams are used in rivers to create recreational areas (bathing waters) and also angling areas Dams are sometimes created to provide freshwater for large industry e.g. typically for cooling purposes

Agriculture, Transport Transport Energy – hydropower Urban development Fisheries and aquaculture

A change in the flow regime (e.g. due to land drainage). A change in the flow regime - typically due to inland navigation A change in the flow regime (e.g. hydropeaking) A change in the flow regime A change in the flow regime

Flood Protection, Climate change

Dry river beds etc.

4.5 Other hydromorphological alterations 5.1 Introduced species and diseases

Typically off-line fish farms Abstraction for any other purpose not listed above. Refers largely to longitudinal alterations to water bodies.

Transport, Fisheries and aquaculture, Tourism and recreation.

Other hydromorphological alterations not included in any of the categories above, including alteration of water level or volume for purposes not identified above. Includes invasive alien species.


http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/facts_figures/guidance_docs_en.htm

5.2 Exploitation of/removal of animals/plants 5.3 Litter/fly tipping

Recreation, Fisheries and aquaculture Urban development, Transport

6.1 Groundwater recharges

Agriculture Energy – non-hydro Industry Urban development

6.2 Groundwater – alteration of water level or volume

Industry Urban development

Commercial fishing or recreational/sports angling, commercial harvesting of plants or algae from water bodies. Includes illegal waste deposits, litter from ships, etc. (All waste from land area)

This category includes activities to alter the level of groundwater in order to carry out an underground activity (typically mining or large civil works). This does not include the alteration of the water level due to current or past overexploitation of the groundwater resources (this case is captured under the categories ‘Abstraction’ above).

7 Other anthropogenic pressures

Other pressures not included in any other category.

8 Unknown Pressures

Only relevant where status is lower than good and pressure is unknown. In cases where for example a groundwater body is significantly polluted by past activities / pressures that no longer exist.

9 Historical pollution


WHAT ARE THE PRESSURES DUE TO HUMAN ACTIVITIES?

GEOLOCALISATION OF THE PRESSURES • Point sources: which waterbody is concerned? • Diffuse source: as data are available at administrative level (Oblast, Rayon), pressures are estimated in proportion to the area at water body or sub-basin scale. ORDER OF MAGNITUDE OF IDENTIFIED PRESSURES • Comparison with monitoring results (water bodies status) • Relative significance between the water bodies in the basin • Simple estimation (0 low, 1 medium, 2 high pressure) • Fixed thresholds (e.g. Ukrainian National Methodology) • Experts’ judgement


PRESSURES: RBMP CONTENT 1. Point source pollution (macro pollutants, micro pollutants, 2.

3. 4. 5.

fishfarm, drug and pesticides residues, polluted sites, thermal discharges) Non point source pollution or diffuse pollution (nitrates, phosphorus, pesticides, rural sanitation, breedings, micropollutants) Abstractions (abstractions, transfers, impact of ponds, drainage, hydrological pressures) Hydromorphological alterations (hydrological regime – abstractions, works, hydropeaking-, continuity, morphological conditions -channeling, river bed, banks-) Other pressures (fishing, pests, alien species proliferation)

If necesary, distinction between pressures on surface water and pressures on groundwater.


Pressures: RBMP content

• Data collection

Main data Land use

• Analysis with European, National and Basin methodologies

• Technical local consultation (6,300 comments collected for 2016-2021 cycle)

Population Agriculture Abstractions Fishing Navigation Tourism Industry Energy Transport


Pressures: RBMP content

• Level 1: pressures with high stakes for Loire-

Bretagne River Basin and easy to characterise (e.g. macropolluants point discharges); waterbodies scale Level 2: pressures with high stakes for LoireBretagne River Basin but uneasy to characterise (e.g. pesticides from diffuse sources); sub-basins scale Level 3: pressures with low stakes and uneasy to characterise (e.g. rural sanitation); light analysis


Pressures Point source pollution Discharges of Chemical Oxygen Demand Industries, wastewater treatement plants


Pressures Diffuse sources pollution Nitrogen surplus + Nitrates quality Agriculture


Pressures Hydromorphological: Continuity Height rate = Sum of artificial falls / natural drop

Risk of Sum of artificial falls / natural drop > 40%




ESTIMATION OF POLLUTION FLOWS FROM SOCIO-ECONOMY TO INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IWRM) • How to estimate pressures from socio-economic data (population, agriculture census, etc) in order to compare pressures of various origins? • Example: pressures on water quality


Pollution mass balance or pollution flow estimation


HOW TO ESTIMATE POLLUTION FLOWS SIMPLY ? Wastewater treatment plant Industrial Treatment plant

Fish farming Rural sanitation

Direct discharge

Direct discharge

R I V E R

Direct discharge

Indirect discharge 5 % or more

Percolation N 15-80 %

Manure Surplus Fertilizers Pesticides

Harvests Manure treatment

Erosion P 3-10 %


SCREENING POLLUTION SOURCES (1) • Inventories in the river basin : population Population (connected to waste treatment plant or not, coverage rate) Waste treatment plant (location, process, polluting load, performance, discharges) for towns or industries 1 population equivalent (per day) : 90 g SS (suspended solids) 60 g oxidizable matters (=2/3 BOD5 + 1/3 COD) 15 g organic nitrogen and ammonia compounds 2 - 4 g Phosphorus compounds 100 – 150 liters/day

BOD5 : 5-day biochemical oxygen demand, COD : chemical oxygen demand)


SCREENING POLLUTION SOURCES (2) Inventories of industrial activities in the river basin :

• Fish farming : type of species, food Pollution downstream (theoretical) : 30 kg N/year/t food 5 kg P/year/t food

• Beer : Pollution downstream (theoretical) : 400 g SS/100 liters 1700 g OM/100 liters 20 g N/100 liters 5 g P/100 liters

SS: Suspended solids


AGRICULTURE: BALANCE METHOD

INPUT

OUTPUT

Mineral fertiliser Organic fertiliser

Harvested crops Grazing Manure treatment

Agricultural land

Surplus = Input - Output Transfer assumption river


AGRICULTURE: BALANCE METHOD

INPUT Mineral fertiliser: from statistics Organic fertiliser: Number of animals from statistics

Agricultural land: Agricultural area in the sub-basin or the catchment area of the water body

Surplus = Input - Output Transfer assumption: to be estimated river

OUTPUT Harvested crops: From statistics Grazing Manure treatment


QUANTITIES OF NITROGEN FROM LIVESTOCK Comparison with a cow (kg N/year)


QUANTITIES OF NUTRIENTS REQUIRED FOR CROPS (KG/100 KG GRAIN) Kg/100 kg grain harvested

Common wheat

Oat Barley Triticale

Rye Corn Colza

Sunflower


• AGRICULTURE: NUTRIENTS PRESSURE ESTIMATION PER WATER BODY OR PER SUB-BASIN INPUTN = mineral fertilisers + number of animals x nutrients production per animal

OUTPUTN = CROP (nitrogen need x average yield x area) SURPLUS = INPUT - OUTPUT For phosphorus: P2O5 in agriculture (P2O5 X 0.44 = P)



Loire-Bretagne Basin (160,000 km², 13 millions inhabitants) NITROGEN N t N/day Gross Net Net/Gross % t N/day Gross Net Net/Gross %

Municipalities Industries 157 112 109 13 69% 12%

Crops 1534 470 31%

Municipalities Industries Agriculture 157 112 3614 109 13 490 69% 12% 14%

12 millions inhabitants

Breeding 2080 20 1% Total 3883 612 16%

10 millions hectars

g/day/inhabitant

9

50 g/day/hectare

Kg/year/inhabitant

3

18 kg/year/hectare

Total 3883 612 16%


Loire-Bretagne Basin (160,000 km², 13 millions inhabitants) NITROGEN N t N/day Gross Net Net/rough % t N/day Gross Net Net/Gross %

Muncipalities Industries 157 112 109 13 69% 12%

Crops 1534 470 31%

Breeding 2080 20 1%

Total 3883 612 16%

Total Collectivities 3883 Industry612 16% Agriculture

CollectivitĂŠs Industries Agriculture 157 112 3614 109 13 490 69% 12% 14%

12 millions inhabitants

10 millions hectars

g/day/inhabitant

9

50 g/day/hectare

Kg/year/inhabitant

3

18 kg/year/hectare


Loire-Bretagne Basin (160,000 km², 13 millions inhabitants) PHOSPHORUS P t P/day Gross Net Net/Gross % t P/day Gross Net Net/Gross %

Municipalities Industries 27 19 17 2 63% 11%

Crops

Breeding

33 24 73%

Municipalities Industries Agriculture 27 19 489 17 2 28 63% 11% 6%

12 millions inhabitants

456 4 1% Total 535 47 9%

10 millions hectars

g/day/inhabitant

1,5

3 g/day/hectare

Kg/year/inhabitant

0,5

1 kg/year/hectare

Total 535 47 9%


Loire-Bretagne Basin (160,000 km², 13 millions inhabitants) PHOSPHORUS P t P/day Gross Net Net/rough % t P/day Gross Net Net/Gross %

Muncipalities Industries 27 19 17 2 63% 11%

Crops

Breeding

33 24 73%

Muncipalities Industries Agriculture 27 19 489 17 2 28 63% 11% 6%

12 millions inhabitants

456 4 1%

Total 535 47 9%

Total 535 Muncipalities 47 Industries 9% Agriculture

10 millions hectars

g/day/inhabitant

1,5

3 g/day/hectare

Kg/year/inhabitant

0,5

1 kg/year/hectare


WHAT ARE THE PRESSURES DUE TO HUMAN ACTIVITIES: RECOMMENDATIONS

• Data available: Collect the data at the smaller administrative unit in order to be able to valorise them at different scales (water bodies, sub basins, etc). • Relevant Pressures: Focus on very relevant data as population, waste water treatment plants, significant industries, fertilising practices (mineral, organic), irrigation areas, significant structures on rivers. • Link pressures/rivers: Small discharges can produce big impacts on small rivers. • Pressures ranking: Use simple approach to define “high, medium, low” level of pressures.


APPROACH

• • • •

What are the human activities in the River Basin? What are the Pressures due to human activities? What are the trends of the Pressures in the coming years? What is the Status of the water bodies from the available monitoring results? • What will be the status of the water bodies at the end of the planning cycle?

62


POPULATION TRENDS


POPULATION TRENDS


POPULATION TRENDS


AGRICULTURE TRENDS

Average nitrogen application level with mineral fertilizers in Dnieper river basin in Belarus


AGRICULTURE TRENDS

Results of phosphorus (P2O5) surplus assessment in Dnieper river basin in Belarus


BUSINESS AS USUAL SCENARIO: LOIRE-BRETAGNE CYCLE 2016-2021

Parameter

Scenario at basin scale

Macropollutants from point sources

Stable

Abstractions

Scenario for each water body or sub-basin

Nitrates

Scenario for each water body or sub-basin

Pesticides

No scenario (not enough data)

Morphology

No global trend at basin scale


APPROACH

• • • •

What are the human activities in the River Basin? What are the Pressures due to human activities? What are the trends of the Pressures in the coming years? What is the Status of the water bodies from the available monitoring results? • What will be the status of the water bodies at the end of the planning cycle?

69


How to evaluate the ecological status of an aquatic ecosystem ?

WATER CHEMICAL COMPOSITION HABITATS

FAUNA & FLORA (BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS)


BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS


SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF N-NH4+ CONCENTRATIONS IN THE SURFACE WATERS WITHIN THE DNIPRO BASIN, 2017

Spatial distribution of N-NH4+ concentrations in the surface waters within the Dnipro basin, 2017


SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF P-PO43- CONCENTRATIONS IN SURFACE WATERS WITHIN THE DNIPRO BASIN, 2017


SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF N-NO3- CONCENTRATIONS IN THE SURFACE WATERS WITHIN THE DNIPRO BASIN, 2017



For the Loire Brittany basin, 30 % of the rivers waterbodies would be already in good status

Results of Monitoring: Surface Water bodies status

Status


APPROACH

• • • •

What are the human activities in the River Basin? What are the Pressures due to human activities? What are the trends of the Pressures in the coming years? What is the Status of the water bodies from the available monitoring results? • What will be the status of the water bodies at the end of the planning cycle?

77


APPROACH

• • • •

What are the human activities in the River Basin? What are the Pressures due to human activities? What are the trends of the Pressures in the coming years? What is the Status of the water bodies from the available monitoring results? • What will be the status of the water bodies at the end of the planning cycle? = risk assessment

78


STATUS ASSESSMENT: A LOOK INTO THE PAST What is the status of the water bodies from the available results in recent years?

TODAY

Source: CIS Guidance Document No. 18 on groundwater status and trend assessment


RISK ASSESSMENT: A LOOK INTO THE FUTURE RISK means:

Is there a risk that the good status cannot be achieved at the end of the plan period?

TODAY

Source: CIS Guidance Document No. 18 on groundwater status and trend assessment


RISK ASSESSMENT Likelihood that a water body will fail to achieve environmental objectives for water bodies required by the WFD (good status) due to the impact from significant human pressures 3 categories of results:

at risk

not at risk Possibly at risk (Surface water) lack of data/information or significant pressures but unclear if also significant effects on biology


Risk assessment PRESSURES

STATUS

Discharges Non-point sources Abstraction Hydromorphology

Current waterbodies status

Comparison, analysis

Character isation updating

Business as usual scenario

Risk not to reach environmental objectives

Programme of Measures 2016 - 2021

RBMP 2016-2021


Risk assessment

PRESSURES Discharges Non-point sources Abstraction Hydromorphology Not obvious to link pressures and status One goal: to link driving forces and status

First cycle: 22% of water bodies with complete monitoring in France STATUS Current waterbodies status

Comparison, analysis

Character isation updating

Business as usual scenario

Risk not to reach environmental objectives

Programme of Measures 2016 - 2021

RBMP 2016-2021


Risk assessment

RESPECTED DOUBTFUL AT RISK

Main reasons: river morphology and diffuse pollution from agriculture

Risk (rivers)



PURPOSE OF RISK ASSESSMENT

• Synthetises the process (grouping of information, understandable map). • Helps designing target-oriented and cost-effective monitoring system (network, parameters, frequency). • Helps designing effective and efficient programme of measures.


PRESSURES, IMPACTS AND RISK ON SURFACE WATER

Example from Macedonia: Vardar River Basin


MACEDONIA: METHOD ADJUSTED TO AVAILABLE DATA

88


FIRST STEP – SCREENING

Probabl y not at risk; 28

Probabl y at Risk; 18

Doubt; 110

SURFACE WATER BODY 89





PHYSICAL

Water body code

ABSTRACTION

Category Water Body

DIFFUSE

SWB Name

POINT

SYNTHESIS BY WATER BODY OF SIGNIFICANT PRESSURES

Overall Pressure type existence

Treska1

River

Var_MK_Treska_28

Zajaska reka

River

Var_MK_Treska_20

1

Azirit1

River

Var_MK_Treska_18

1

Azirit2

River

Var_MK_Treska_22

1

1

Treska2

River

Var_MK_Treska_26

1

1

Rabetinska reka

River

Var_MK_Treska_24

0

Treska3

River

Var_MK_Treska_10

0

Treska4

River

Var_MK_Treska_30

0

Mala reka

River

Var_MK_Treska_16

0

Belichka reka

1

1

1

2 1 2 1

3

River

Var_MK_Treska_14

HMWB

Var_MK_Treska_10b

Ocha

River

Var_MK_Treska_12

Rasova

River

Var_MK_Treska_08

1

Reka

River

Var_MK_Treska_04

1

Matka

HMWB

Var_MK_Treska_02

0

Treska 5

HMWB

Var_MK_Treska_06

0

Kozjak reservoir

93

0 1

1

2 0 1

1

2


EXAMPLE OF OUTCOME

94


95


CONCLUSIONS

• The pressures analysis gives objective elements to communicate with decision-makers and stakeholders in order to raise awareness and mobilise for actions. • The pressures analysis gives rational elements to establish a programme of measures in order to improve the water resources in balance with socio-economics uses and ecosystems functions.


THANK YOU

International Office for Water (France): p.seguin@oieau.fr

www.facebook.com/euwiplus/ www.euwipluseast.eu



• WATER BODIES CHARACTERISATION: SYNTHETIC TABLE District

WFD District Sub_District ID ID

WATER BODY

Water body ID

Water body name

Basin

Water Main Province Other Provinces body type

FRG

GALA

FRGR0002

Loire River from La Palisse Bond to confluence with Borne River

LOIRE

Natural

FRG FRG FRG FRG

GVCB GVCB GVCB GVC

FRGR0030b FRGR0031a FRGR0032c FRGR1328

Trieux from Pont Caffin Intake to estuary Fremur River from source to Bois Joli Pond Arguenon River from Ville-Hatte Reservoir to the sea Lauzat River from source to confluence with Vienne River

TRIEUX Natural FREMUR DE LANCIEUX Natural ARGUENON Natural LAUZAT Natural

FRG

GALA

FRGR1539

Veyradere river from source to confluence with Loire River

VEYRADEYRE

Natural

FRG FRG FRG FRG

GLACV GLMCI GALA GVCB

FRGR1551 FRGR1553 FRGR2097 FRGR0081

Etang Herve River from source to confluence with Erdre River Rere River from source to Nançay Vernasson River from source to La Palisse Pond Goyen River from Plogastel-St-Germain to estuary

ETANG HERVE RERE VERNASON GOYEN

Natural Natural Natural Natural

Auvergne;RhôneAlpes Bretagne Bretagne Bretagne Bretagne Bretagne Bretagne Limousin Limousin Auvergne;RhôneRhône-Alpes Alpes Pays de la Loire Pays de la Loire Centre Centre Rhône-Alpes Rhône-Alpes Bretagne Bretagne Auvergne


• WATER BODIES CHARACTERISATION: SYNTHETIC TABLE MONITORING STATION

Monitoring station ID

Name

4000600 LOIRE a GOUDET TRIEUX a PLOUEC-DU4172060 TRIEUX FREMUR (DE LANCIEUX 4166250 PLOUBALAY) a PLESLINTRIGAVOU FL ARGUENON A 4311001 BOURSEUL 4500006 LE LAUZAT A NEDDE VEYRADEYRE a LE LAC4000350 D'ISSARLES RAU DE L'ETANG HERVE 4146750 ou CHARBONNEAU à CARQUEFOU 4068918 RERE A NANCAY VERNASON a MAZAN4000200 L'ABBAYE 4180100 GOYEN a PONT-CROIX

WATER BODY STATUS

Localisation

Evaluation period

Updating date

GLOBAL STATUS

Level of ECOLOGIC Level of confidence AL STATUS confidence

Specific Biological Physicochem pollutants status ical status status

AU CAMPING AVAL DU PONT D49

2011-2012-2013

16/07/2015

2

3

2

3

2

2

PONT AU DROIT DE PLOUEC

2011-2012-2013

16/07/2015

3

3

3

3

3

2

LE CHESNAY

2011-2012-2013

07/07/2015

5

3

5

3

5

3

LIEU DIT LA BOUSSERIE ACCES PAR LA D792 2011-2012-2013

21/05/2015

3

1

3

1

PETITE PASSERELLE A 250M AMONT PT D992

2011-2012-2013

21/05/2015

2

3

2

3

1

2

AVAL DU PONT D'ARCONS

2011-2012-2013

21/05/2015

1

3

1

3

1

1

LE CLOUSIS

2011-2012-2013

21/05/2015

4

2

4

2

4

2

PONT D29

2011-2012-2013

2

2

21/05/2015

2

3

2

3

2

2

POMEYROL - PASSERELLE ANCIEN MOULIN 2010-2011

04/12/2012

1

3

1

3

1

1

PONT RD 8

17/05/2012

2

3

2

3

1

2

2009-2010

CHEMICAL Level of STATUS confidence

2


1

1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1

1 1

1 1 1

TOTAL

Invasive alien species

Morphology

Hydropeaking

Impoundment

Insufficent ecological flow

Continuity

Diffuse sources Livestock

Diffuse sources Crops

Point sources

• WATER BODIES CHARACTERISATION: SYNTHETIC TABLE PRESSURES

0 1 2 2 0 0 5 4 2 1


• WATER BODIES CHARACTERISATION: SYNTHETIC TABLE

2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2010-2015 2010-2015

Respect Respect Risk Risk Respect Respect Risk Risk Risk Respect

Respect Respect Risk Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect

Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect

Respect Respect Risk Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect

Respect Respect Risk Risk Respect Respect Risk Risk Respect Respect

Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Risk Respect Respect Respect

Respect Respect Risk Risk Respect Respect Risk Risk Risk Respect

Respect Respect Risk Risk Respect Respect Risk Risk Unknown Unknown

Hydrology

Continuity

Morphology

Toxics

Pesticides

Phosphorus

Nitrates

Risk analysis result

Macropollutants

Respective cycle

RISK ANALYSIS

Respect Respect Risk Respect Respect Respect Risk Risk Respect Respect


• WATER BODIES CHARACTERISATION: SYNTHETIC TABLE

2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2010-2015 2010-2015

Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status

2015 2021 2027 2027 2015 2015 2027 2021 2015 2015

Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status

Timeframe to reach chemical objective

Chemical objective

Concerned parameters

Timeframe to reach ecological objective

Ecological objective

Respective cycle

ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES

Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown

2015 2015


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.