European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Easter Partnership
PRESSURES, IMPACTS AND RISK ON SURFACE WATER CONCEPT AND EXAMPLES EU Member States Consortium, Kyiv, 16 April 2019
EUROPEAN UNION WATER INITIATIVE PLUS FOR THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP
EUROPEAN UNION WATER INITIATIVE PLUS FOR THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP
БЕЛАРУСЬ
МОЛДОВА
УКРАЇНА
ВІРМЕНІЯ
АЗЕРБАЙДЖАН
ГРУЗІЯ
АВСТРІЯ
ФРАНЦІЯ
МЕЖНАРОДНІ ОРГАНІЗАЦІЇ :
Правова база та система регулювання
РЕЗУЛЬТАТ 1
поліпшені відповідно до Водної рамкової директиви ЄС (ВРД), інтегрованим управлінням водними ресурсами та багатосторонніми природоохоронними угодами.
Національний політичний діалог
Зміцнення потенціалу РЕЗУЛЬТАТ 2
Плани управління водними ресурсами розроблені і виконуються відповідно до принципів ВРД ЄС, від пілотних басейнів і до масштабів країни.
Залучення зацікавлених комунікація
сторін
Реформа законодавства і регулювання
Планування управління річковими басейнами
Моніторинг та лаболаторії
Управління даними
та
Отримані уроки регулярно збираються, поширюються і передаються зацікавленим сторонам.
РЕЗУЛЬТАТ 3
Залучення зацікавлених сторін
Комунікація
PRESSURES, IMPACTS AND RISK ON SURFACE WATER
Water Framework European Directive (WFD) 2000 Objectives: obligatory results Non deterioration of the current status Good status not later than 2027* Dangerous substances reduced or removed Protected areas concerned by others directives
Consultation & participation 3 planning cycles: 2010-2015; 2016-2021; 2022-2027
80% of French regulation for water come from European regulation
* Possibility of exemptions (delay 2021 or 2027 or less stringent objectives) : technical feasability, disproportionate costs, and/or natural conditions
Pristine river basin
Human activities & river basins changes: Pressures
Pristine river basin Climate change is a pressure on water resources. But solutions are not at River Basin level.
APPROACH
1. 2. 3. 4.
What are the human activities in the River Basin? What are the Pressures due to human activities? What are the trends of the Pressures in the coming years? What is the Status of the water bodies from the available monitoring results? 5. What will be the status of the water bodies at the end of the planning cycle?
12
APPROACH
• • • •
What are the human activities in the River Basin? What are the Pressures due to human activities? What are the trends of the Pressures in the coming years? What is the Status of the water bodies from the available monitoring results? • What will be the status of the water bodies at the end of the planning cycle?
13
DATA COLLECTION
• Required first step: Inventory and collection of relevant data • Data sharing between the data producers • To produce the River Basin characterisation
Land use
In red, a lot of urban areas: urban pressure on water supply
In yellow, agriculture, main land user, pressure on water quality
France 552,000 km² 66 million inhabitants
Loire-Bretagne basin example
Loire-Bretagne: 160,000 km², 13 million inhabitants
2,000 rivers water bodies
Water body identification (rivers)
Loire-Brittany:. 135,000 km watercourses, 2,250 WaterBodies: 1900 River WB (30 main river basins and 1,870 small river basins more than 10 km²), 140 Lakes WB, 30 Esturian WB, 40 Coastal WB, 140 GroundWB
Waterbodies delineation (rivers)
Land use In red, a lot of urban areas: urban pressure on water supply
In brown, agriculture, main land user, pressure on water quality
Urban area
Agriculture area
Forest area Water area
Baseline data
Population growth for 2000 river water bodies
Population
Decreasing population Decreased pressure
Growth more than 30% in ten years Increased pressure
-
Growth of population between 1999 and 2009
+++ Baseline data
Livestock for 29 river sub-basins
Agriculture - breeding Concentration of the production in the western river basins Increased water pollution (nutrient)
Growth of hens between 2000 and 2010
+++ -
Growth of pig between 2000 and 2010
+++
+++
Cattles density per agricultural area, 2010
Baseline data
APPROACH
• • • •
What are the human activities in the River Basin? What are the Pressures due to human activities? What are the trends of the Pressures in the coming years? What is the Status of the water bodies from the available monitoring results? • What will be the status of the water bodies at the end of the planning cycle?
22
WFD Annex 7 – River Basin Management Plans: A summary of significant pressures and impact of human activity on the status of surface water and groundwater, including: • Estimation of point source pollution, • Estimation of diffuse source pollution, including a summary of land use, • Estiation of pressures on the quantitative status of water including abstractions, • Analysis of other impacts of human activity on the status of water.
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/facts_figures/guidance_docs_en.htm
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/facts_figures/guidance_docs_en.htm
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/facts_figures/guidance_docs_en.htm
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/facts_figures/guidance_docs_en.htm
MORPHOLOGICAL PRESSURES
SOLUTION
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/facts_figures/guidance_docs_en.htm
ALIEN INVASIVE SPECIES
ECOLOGICAL STATUS IN EUROPEAN UNION VERSUS POPULATION DENSITY / % ARABLE LAND
European water –assessment of status and pressure p 39 – 2012, WIE Database May 2011-2012
Pressure 1.1 Point – Urban waste water
Main Driver(s) Urban development
Clarification on pressures Included or not in the UWWT Directive. Includes discharges from non-manufacturing commercial areas which can largely be assimilated to urban waste water. Includes discharges of raw or partially treated urban waste water which are identified as point sources.
1.2 Point - Storm Overflows
Urban development
Overflows from separated or combined sewers identified as point sources (for diffuse see ‘Diffuse – Urban run-off’ below). Industrial point sources from plants included in the E-PRTR. Any industrial point sources not included in the E-PRTR. Pollution resulting from an abandoned industrial site or a site contaminated due to past industrial activities, illegal dumping of industrial waste or a pollution accident and which is identified as point source (for diffuse see below ‘Diffuse – Contaminated sites/abandoned industrial sites). This category does not cover existing industrial activities.
1.3 Point - IED plants Industry 1.4 Point - Non IED plants Industry 1.5 Point - Contaminated Sites/Abandoned Industry industrial sites
1.6 Point - Waste disposal sites 1.7 Point - Mine waters
Urban development Industry
1.8 Point - Aquaculture 1.9 Point – Other 2.1 Diffuse - Urban run off 2.2 Diffuse – Agricultural 2.3 Diffuse – Forestry 2.4 Diffuse – Transport 2.5 Diffuse – Contaminated sites/Abandoned industrial sites
Aquaculture
2.6 Diffuse - Discharges not connected to sewerage network 2.7 Diffuse - Atmospheric deposition
Urban development
2.8 Diffuse – Mining 2.9 Diffuse – Aquaculture 2.10 Diffuse – Other 3.1 Abstraction/Flow Diversion – Agriculture 3.2 Abstraction/Flow Diversion – Public Water Supply 3.3 Abstraction/Flow Diversion – Industry
Urban development, Industry Agriculture Forestry Transport Industry
Agriculture, Energy nonhydro, Industry, Transport, Urban development Industry
Point sources due to urban or industrial waste disposal sites. Point sources due to the collection of water in an open pit or underground mine which has to be brought to the surface in order to enable the mine to continue working. It does not include waste water from the industrial processes. Other point sources not included in the categories above. Storm overflows and discharges in urbanized areas not identified as point sources
Diffuse pollution from road and train traffic, aviation and infrastructure. Pollution resulting from an abandoned industrial site or a site contaminated due to past industrial activities, illegal dumping of industrial waste or a pollution accident and which is identified as diffuse source (for point see above ‘Point – Contaminated sites/abandoned industrial sites). This category does not cover existing industrial activities. Pollution resulting from urban waste water not connected to sewers and identified as a diffuse source. Diffuse pollution from atmospheric deposition from any origin
Pollution from mining activities which are identified as diffuse (for point sources see categories above )
Aquaculture Any driver/Other Agriculture
Other diffuse sources not included in the categories above. Includes water transfers and abstractions for irrigation and livestock breeding.
Urban development
Includes water transfers. Affection to TW and/or CW possible only in case of desalination plants.
Industry
Abstraction for industrial processes (cooling water is covered under the category ‘Abstraction –
3.4 Abstraction/Flow Diversion – Cooling water 3.5 Abstraction/Flow Diversion - Fish farms 3.6 Abstraction/Flow Diversion – other 4.1.1 Physical alteration of channel/bed/riparian area/shore of water body for flood protection 4.1.2 Physical alteration of channel/bed/riparian area/shore of water body for agriculture 4.1.3 Physical alteration of channel/bed/riparian area/shore of water body for navigation 4.1.4 Physical alteration of channel/bed/riparian area/shore – other 4.1.5 Physical alteration of channel/bed/riparian area/shore – unknown or obsolete 4.2.1 Dams, barriers and locks for hydropower 4.2.2 Dams, barriers and locks for flood protection 4.2.3 Dams, barriers and locks for drinking water 4.2.4 Dams, barriers and locks for irrigation 4.2.5 Dams, barriers and locks for recreation
Industry; Energy non-hydro Aquaculture Recreation Flood protection
4.2.6 Dams, barriers and locks for industry
Industry, Energy non-hydro
4.2.7 Dams, barriers and locks for navigation 4.2.8 Dams, barriers and locks – other 4.2.9 Dams, barriers and locks – unknown or obsolete 4.3.1 Hydrological alteration – agriculture 4.3.2 Hydrological alteration – transport 4.3.3 Hydrological alteration – hydropower 4.3.Hydrological alteration – public water supply 4.3.5 Hydrological alteration - aquaculture 4.3.6 Hydrological alteration – other 4.4 Physical loss (or part of) whole water bodies
Transport
Agriculture Transport
Refers largely to longitudinal alterations to water bodies. Includes land drainage to enable agriculture activities. Refers largely to longitudinal alterations to water bodies. Refers largely to longitudinal alterations to water bodies. In case the driver for the physical modification is unknown.
Energy – hydropower Flood Protection Urban development Agriculture Recreation
Small dams are used in rivers to create recreational areas (bathing waters) and also angling areas Dams are sometimes created to provide freshwater for large industry e.g. typically for cooling purposes
Agriculture, Transport Transport Energy – hydropower Urban development Fisheries and aquaculture
A change in the flow regime (e.g. due to land drainage). A change in the flow regime - typically due to inland navigation A change in the flow regime (e.g. hydropeaking) A change in the flow regime A change in the flow regime
Flood Protection, Climate change
Dry river beds etc.
4.5 Other hydromorphological alterations 5.1 Introduced species and diseases
Typically off-line fish farms Abstraction for any other purpose not listed above. Refers largely to longitudinal alterations to water bodies.
Transport, Fisheries and aquaculture, Tourism and recreation.
Other hydromorphological alterations not included in any of the categories above, including alteration of water level or volume for purposes not identified above. Includes invasive alien species.
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/facts_figures/guidance_docs_en.htm
5.2 Exploitation of/removal of animals/plants 5.3 Litter/fly tipping
Recreation, Fisheries and aquaculture Urban development, Transport
6.1 Groundwater recharges
Agriculture Energy – non-hydro Industry Urban development
6.2 Groundwater – alteration of water level or volume
Industry Urban development
Commercial fishing or recreational/sports angling, commercial harvesting of plants or algae from water bodies. Includes illegal waste deposits, litter from ships, etc. (All waste from land area)
This category includes activities to alter the level of groundwater in order to carry out an underground activity (typically mining or large civil works). This does not include the alteration of the water level due to current or past overexploitation of the groundwater resources (this case is captured under the categories ‘Abstraction’ above).
7 Other anthropogenic pressures
Other pressures not included in any other category.
8 Unknown Pressures
Only relevant where status is lower than good and pressure is unknown. In cases where for example a groundwater body is significantly polluted by past activities / pressures that no longer exist.
9 Historical pollution
WHAT ARE THE PRESSURES DUE TO HUMAN ACTIVITIES?
GEOLOCALISATION OF THE PRESSURES • Point sources: which waterbody is concerned? • Diffuse source: as data are available at administrative level (Oblast, Rayon), pressures are estimated in proportion to the area at water body or sub-basin scale. ORDER OF MAGNITUDE OF IDENTIFIED PRESSURES • Comparison with monitoring results (water bodies status) • Relative significance between the water bodies in the basin • Simple estimation (0 low, 1 medium, 2 high pressure) • Fixed thresholds (e.g. Ukrainian National Methodology) • Experts’ judgement
PRESSURES: RBMP CONTENT 1. Point source pollution (macro pollutants, micro pollutants, 2.
3. 4. 5.
fishfarm, drug and pesticides residues, polluted sites, thermal discharges) Non point source pollution or diffuse pollution (nitrates, phosphorus, pesticides, rural sanitation, breedings, micropollutants) Abstractions (abstractions, transfers, impact of ponds, drainage, hydrological pressures) Hydromorphological alterations (hydrological regime – abstractions, works, hydropeaking-, continuity, morphological conditions -channeling, river bed, banks-) Other pressures (fishing, pests, alien species proliferation)
If necesary, distinction between pressures on surface water and pressures on groundwater.
Pressures: RBMP content
• Data collection
Main data Land use
• Analysis with European, National and Basin methodologies
• Technical local consultation (6,300 comments collected for 2016-2021 cycle)
Population Agriculture Abstractions Fishing Navigation Tourism Industry Energy Transport
Pressures: RBMP content
• Level 1: pressures with high stakes for Loire-
•
•
Bretagne River Basin and easy to characterise (e.g. macropolluants point discharges); waterbodies scale Level 2: pressures with high stakes for LoireBretagne River Basin but uneasy to characterise (e.g. pesticides from diffuse sources); sub-basins scale Level 3: pressures with low stakes and uneasy to characterise (e.g. rural sanitation); light analysis
Pressures Point source pollution Discharges of Chemical Oxygen Demand Industries, wastewater treatement plants
Pressures Diffuse sources pollution Nitrogen surplus + Nitrates quality Agriculture
Pressures Hydromorphological: Continuity Height rate = Sum of artificial falls / natural drop
Risk of Sum of artificial falls / natural drop > 40%
ESTIMATION OF POLLUTION FLOWS FROM SOCIO-ECONOMY TO INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IWRM) • How to estimate pressures from socio-economic data (population, agriculture census, etc) in order to compare pressures of various origins? • Example: pressures on water quality
Pollution mass balance or pollution flow estimation
HOW TO ESTIMATE POLLUTION FLOWS SIMPLY ? Wastewater treatment plant Industrial Treatment plant
Fish farming Rural sanitation
Direct discharge
Direct discharge
R I V E R
Direct discharge
Indirect discharge 5 % or more
Percolation N 15-80 %
Manure Surplus Fertilizers Pesticides
Harvests Manure treatment
Erosion P 3-10 %
SCREENING POLLUTION SOURCES (1) • Inventories in the river basin : population Population (connected to waste treatment plant or not, coverage rate) Waste treatment plant (location, process, polluting load, performance, discharges) for towns or industries 1 population equivalent (per day) : 90 g SS (suspended solids) 60 g oxidizable matters (=2/3 BOD5 + 1/3 COD) 15 g organic nitrogen and ammonia compounds 2 - 4 g Phosphorus compounds 100 – 150 liters/day
BOD5 : 5-day biochemical oxygen demand, COD : chemical oxygen demand)
SCREENING POLLUTION SOURCES (2) Inventories of industrial activities in the river basin :
• Fish farming : type of species, food Pollution downstream (theoretical) : 30 kg N/year/t food 5 kg P/year/t food
• Beer : Pollution downstream (theoretical) : 400 g SS/100 liters 1700 g OM/100 liters 20 g N/100 liters 5 g P/100 liters
SS: Suspended solids
AGRICULTURE: BALANCE METHOD
INPUT
OUTPUT
Mineral fertiliser Organic fertiliser
Harvested crops Grazing Manure treatment
Agricultural land
Surplus = Input - Output Transfer assumption river
AGRICULTURE: BALANCE METHOD
INPUT Mineral fertiliser: from statistics Organic fertiliser: Number of animals from statistics
Agricultural land: Agricultural area in the sub-basin or the catchment area of the water body
Surplus = Input - Output Transfer assumption: to be estimated river
OUTPUT Harvested crops: From statistics Grazing Manure treatment
QUANTITIES OF NITROGEN FROM LIVESTOCK Comparison with a cow (kg N/year)
QUANTITIES OF NUTRIENTS REQUIRED FOR CROPS (KG/100 KG GRAIN) Kg/100 kg grain harvested
Common wheat
Oat Barley Triticale
Rye Corn Colza
Sunflower
• AGRICULTURE: NUTRIENTS PRESSURE ESTIMATION PER WATER BODY OR PER SUB-BASIN INPUTN = mineral fertilisers + number of animals x nutrients production per animal
OUTPUTN = CROP (nitrogen need x average yield x area) SURPLUS = INPUT - OUTPUT For phosphorus: P2O5 in agriculture (P2O5 X 0.44 = P)
Loire-Bretagne Basin (160,000 km², 13 millions inhabitants) NITROGEN N t N/day Gross Net Net/Gross % t N/day Gross Net Net/Gross %
Municipalities Industries 157 112 109 13 69% 12%
Crops 1534 470 31%
Municipalities Industries Agriculture 157 112 3614 109 13 490 69% 12% 14%
12 millions inhabitants
Breeding 2080 20 1% Total 3883 612 16%
10 millions hectars
g/day/inhabitant
9
50 g/day/hectare
Kg/year/inhabitant
3
18 kg/year/hectare
Total 3883 612 16%
Loire-Bretagne Basin (160,000 km², 13 millions inhabitants) NITROGEN N t N/day Gross Net Net/rough % t N/day Gross Net Net/Gross %
Muncipalities Industries 157 112 109 13 69% 12%
Crops 1534 470 31%
Breeding 2080 20 1%
Total 3883 612 16%
Total Collectivities 3883 Industry612 16% Agriculture
CollectivitĂŠs Industries Agriculture 157 112 3614 109 13 490 69% 12% 14%
12 millions inhabitants
10 millions hectars
g/day/inhabitant
9
50 g/day/hectare
Kg/year/inhabitant
3
18 kg/year/hectare
Loire-Bretagne Basin (160,000 km², 13 millions inhabitants) PHOSPHORUS P t P/day Gross Net Net/Gross % t P/day Gross Net Net/Gross %
Municipalities Industries 27 19 17 2 63% 11%
Crops
Breeding
33 24 73%
Municipalities Industries Agriculture 27 19 489 17 2 28 63% 11% 6%
12 millions inhabitants
456 4 1% Total 535 47 9%
10 millions hectars
g/day/inhabitant
1,5
3 g/day/hectare
Kg/year/inhabitant
0,5
1 kg/year/hectare
Total 535 47 9%
Loire-Bretagne Basin (160,000 km², 13 millions inhabitants) PHOSPHORUS P t P/day Gross Net Net/rough % t P/day Gross Net Net/Gross %
Muncipalities Industries 27 19 17 2 63% 11%
Crops
Breeding
33 24 73%
Muncipalities Industries Agriculture 27 19 489 17 2 28 63% 11% 6%
12 millions inhabitants
456 4 1%
Total 535 47 9%
Total 535 Muncipalities 47 Industries 9% Agriculture
10 millions hectars
g/day/inhabitant
1,5
3 g/day/hectare
Kg/year/inhabitant
0,5
1 kg/year/hectare
WHAT ARE THE PRESSURES DUE TO HUMAN ACTIVITIES: RECOMMENDATIONS
• Data available: Collect the data at the smaller administrative unit in order to be able to valorise them at different scales (water bodies, sub basins, etc). • Relevant Pressures: Focus on very relevant data as population, waste water treatment plants, significant industries, fertilising practices (mineral, organic), irrigation areas, significant structures on rivers. • Link pressures/rivers: Small discharges can produce big impacts on small rivers. • Pressures ranking: Use simple approach to define “high, medium, low” level of pressures.
APPROACH
• • • •
What are the human activities in the River Basin? What are the Pressures due to human activities? What are the trends of the Pressures in the coming years? What is the Status of the water bodies from the available monitoring results? • What will be the status of the water bodies at the end of the planning cycle?
62
POPULATION TRENDS
POPULATION TRENDS
POPULATION TRENDS
AGRICULTURE TRENDS
Average nitrogen application level with mineral fertilizers in Dnieper river basin in Belarus
AGRICULTURE TRENDS
Results of phosphorus (P2O5) surplus assessment in Dnieper river basin in Belarus
BUSINESS AS USUAL SCENARIO: LOIRE-BRETAGNE CYCLE 2016-2021
Parameter
Scenario at basin scale
Macropollutants from point sources
Stable
Abstractions
Scenario for each water body or sub-basin
Nitrates
Scenario for each water body or sub-basin
Pesticides
No scenario (not enough data)
Morphology
No global trend at basin scale
APPROACH
• • • •
What are the human activities in the River Basin? What are the Pressures due to human activities? What are the trends of the Pressures in the coming years? What is the Status of the water bodies from the available monitoring results? • What will be the status of the water bodies at the end of the planning cycle?
69
How to evaluate the ecological status of an aquatic ecosystem ?
WATER CHEMICAL COMPOSITION HABITATS
FAUNA & FLORA (BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS)
BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS
SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF N-NH4+ CONCENTRATIONS IN THE SURFACE WATERS WITHIN THE DNIPRO BASIN, 2017
Spatial distribution of N-NH4+ concentrations in the surface waters within the Dnipro basin, 2017
SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF P-PO43- CONCENTRATIONS IN SURFACE WATERS WITHIN THE DNIPRO BASIN, 2017
SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF N-NO3- CONCENTRATIONS IN THE SURFACE WATERS WITHIN THE DNIPRO BASIN, 2017
For the Loire Brittany basin, 30 % of the rivers waterbodies would be already in good status
Results of Monitoring: Surface Water bodies status
Status
APPROACH
• • • •
What are the human activities in the River Basin? What are the Pressures due to human activities? What are the trends of the Pressures in the coming years? What is the Status of the water bodies from the available monitoring results? • What will be the status of the water bodies at the end of the planning cycle?
77
APPROACH
• • • •
What are the human activities in the River Basin? What are the Pressures due to human activities? What are the trends of the Pressures in the coming years? What is the Status of the water bodies from the available monitoring results? • What will be the status of the water bodies at the end of the planning cycle? = risk assessment
78
STATUS ASSESSMENT: A LOOK INTO THE PAST What is the status of the water bodies from the available results in recent years?
TODAY
Source: CIS Guidance Document No. 18 on groundwater status and trend assessment
RISK ASSESSMENT: A LOOK INTO THE FUTURE RISK means:
Is there a risk that the good status cannot be achieved at the end of the plan period?
TODAY
Source: CIS Guidance Document No. 18 on groundwater status and trend assessment
RISK ASSESSMENT Likelihood that a water body will fail to achieve environmental objectives for water bodies required by the WFD (good status) due to the impact from significant human pressures 3 categories of results:
at risk
not at risk Possibly at risk (Surface water) lack of data/information or significant pressures but unclear if also significant effects on biology
Risk assessment PRESSURES
STATUS
Discharges Non-point sources Abstraction Hydromorphology
Current waterbodies status
Comparison, analysis
Character isation updating
Business as usual scenario
Risk not to reach environmental objectives
Programme of Measures 2016 - 2021
RBMP 2016-2021
Risk assessment
PRESSURES Discharges Non-point sources Abstraction Hydromorphology Not obvious to link pressures and status One goal: to link driving forces and status
First cycle: 22% of water bodies with complete monitoring in France STATUS Current waterbodies status
Comparison, analysis
Character isation updating
Business as usual scenario
Risk not to reach environmental objectives
Programme of Measures 2016 - 2021
RBMP 2016-2021
Risk assessment
RESPECTED DOUBTFUL AT RISK
Main reasons: river morphology and diffuse pollution from agriculture
Risk (rivers)
PURPOSE OF RISK ASSESSMENT
• Synthetises the process (grouping of information, understandable map). • Helps designing target-oriented and cost-effective monitoring system (network, parameters, frequency). • Helps designing effective and efficient programme of measures.
PRESSURES, IMPACTS AND RISK ON SURFACE WATER
Example from Macedonia: Vardar River Basin
MACEDONIA: METHOD ADJUSTED TO AVAILABLE DATA
88
FIRST STEP – SCREENING
Probabl y not at risk; 28
Probabl y at Risk; 18
Doubt; 110
SURFACE WATER BODY 89
PHYSICAL
Water body code
ABSTRACTION
Category Water Body
DIFFUSE
SWB Name
POINT
SYNTHESIS BY WATER BODY OF SIGNIFICANT PRESSURES
Overall Pressure type existence
Treska1
River
Var_MK_Treska_28
Zajaska reka
River
Var_MK_Treska_20
1
Azirit1
River
Var_MK_Treska_18
1
Azirit2
River
Var_MK_Treska_22
1
1
Treska2
River
Var_MK_Treska_26
1
1
Rabetinska reka
River
Var_MK_Treska_24
0
Treska3
River
Var_MK_Treska_10
0
Treska4
River
Var_MK_Treska_30
0
Mala reka
River
Var_MK_Treska_16
0
Belichka reka
1
1
1
2 1 2 1
3
River
Var_MK_Treska_14
HMWB
Var_MK_Treska_10b
Ocha
River
Var_MK_Treska_12
Rasova
River
Var_MK_Treska_08
1
Reka
River
Var_MK_Treska_04
1
Matka
HMWB
Var_MK_Treska_02
0
Treska 5
HMWB
Var_MK_Treska_06
0
Kozjak reservoir
93
0 1
1
2 0 1
1
2
EXAMPLE OF OUTCOME
94
95
CONCLUSIONS
• The pressures analysis gives objective elements to communicate with decision-makers and stakeholders in order to raise awareness and mobilise for actions. • The pressures analysis gives rational elements to establish a programme of measures in order to improve the water resources in balance with socio-economics uses and ecosystems functions.
THANK YOU
International Office for Water (France): p.seguin@oieau.fr
www.facebook.com/euwiplus/ www.euwipluseast.eu
• WATER BODIES CHARACTERISATION: SYNTHETIC TABLE District
WFD District Sub_District ID ID
WATER BODY
Water body ID
Water body name
Basin
Water Main Province Other Provinces body type
FRG
GALA
FRGR0002
Loire River from La Palisse Bond to confluence with Borne River
LOIRE
Natural
FRG FRG FRG FRG
GVCB GVCB GVCB GVC
FRGR0030b FRGR0031a FRGR0032c FRGR1328
Trieux from Pont Caffin Intake to estuary Fremur River from source to Bois Joli Pond Arguenon River from Ville-Hatte Reservoir to the sea Lauzat River from source to confluence with Vienne River
TRIEUX Natural FREMUR DE LANCIEUX Natural ARGUENON Natural LAUZAT Natural
FRG
GALA
FRGR1539
Veyradere river from source to confluence with Loire River
VEYRADEYRE
Natural
FRG FRG FRG FRG
GLACV GLMCI GALA GVCB
FRGR1551 FRGR1553 FRGR2097 FRGR0081
Etang Herve River from source to confluence with Erdre River Rere River from source to Nançay Vernasson River from source to La Palisse Pond Goyen River from Plogastel-St-Germain to estuary
ETANG HERVE RERE VERNASON GOYEN
Natural Natural Natural Natural
Auvergne;RhôneAlpes Bretagne Bretagne Bretagne Bretagne Bretagne Bretagne Limousin Limousin Auvergne;RhôneRhône-Alpes Alpes Pays de la Loire Pays de la Loire Centre Centre Rhône-Alpes Rhône-Alpes Bretagne Bretagne Auvergne
• WATER BODIES CHARACTERISATION: SYNTHETIC TABLE MONITORING STATION
Monitoring station ID
Name
4000600 LOIRE a GOUDET TRIEUX a PLOUEC-DU4172060 TRIEUX FREMUR (DE LANCIEUX 4166250 PLOUBALAY) a PLESLINTRIGAVOU FL ARGUENON A 4311001 BOURSEUL 4500006 LE LAUZAT A NEDDE VEYRADEYRE a LE LAC4000350 D'ISSARLES RAU DE L'ETANG HERVE 4146750 ou CHARBONNEAU à CARQUEFOU 4068918 RERE A NANCAY VERNASON a MAZAN4000200 L'ABBAYE 4180100 GOYEN a PONT-CROIX
WATER BODY STATUS
Localisation
Evaluation period
Updating date
GLOBAL STATUS
Level of ECOLOGIC Level of confidence AL STATUS confidence
Specific Biological Physicochem pollutants status ical status status
AU CAMPING AVAL DU PONT D49
2011-2012-2013
16/07/2015
2
3
2
3
2
2
PONT AU DROIT DE PLOUEC
2011-2012-2013
16/07/2015
3
3
3
3
3
2
LE CHESNAY
2011-2012-2013
07/07/2015
5
3
5
3
5
3
LIEU DIT LA BOUSSERIE ACCES PAR LA D792 2011-2012-2013
21/05/2015
3
1
3
1
PETITE PASSERELLE A 250M AMONT PT D992
2011-2012-2013
21/05/2015
2
3
2
3
1
2
AVAL DU PONT D'ARCONS
2011-2012-2013
21/05/2015
1
3
1
3
1
1
LE CLOUSIS
2011-2012-2013
21/05/2015
4
2
4
2
4
2
PONT D29
2011-2012-2013
2
2
21/05/2015
2
3
2
3
2
2
POMEYROL - PASSERELLE ANCIEN MOULIN 2010-2011
04/12/2012
1
3
1
3
1
1
PONT RD 8
17/05/2012
2
3
2
3
1
2
2009-2010
CHEMICAL Level of STATUS confidence
2
1
1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1 1
TOTAL
Invasive alien species
Morphology
Hydropeaking
Impoundment
Insufficent ecological flow
Continuity
Diffuse sources Livestock
Diffuse sources Crops
Point sources
• WATER BODIES CHARACTERISATION: SYNTHETIC TABLE PRESSURES
0 1 2 2 0 0 5 4 2 1
• WATER BODIES CHARACTERISATION: SYNTHETIC TABLE
2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2010-2015 2010-2015
Respect Respect Risk Risk Respect Respect Risk Risk Risk Respect
Respect Respect Risk Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect
Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect
Respect Respect Risk Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect
Respect Respect Risk Risk Respect Respect Risk Risk Respect Respect
Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Respect Risk Respect Respect Respect
Respect Respect Risk Risk Respect Respect Risk Risk Risk Respect
Respect Respect Risk Risk Respect Respect Risk Risk Unknown Unknown
Hydrology
Continuity
Morphology
Toxics
Pesticides
Phosphorus
Nitrates
Risk analysis result
Macropollutants
Respective cycle
RISK ANALYSIS
Respect Respect Risk Respect Respect Respect Risk Risk Respect Respect
• WATER BODIES CHARACTERISATION: SYNTHETIC TABLE
2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2016-2021 2010-2015 2010-2015
Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status
2015 2021 2027 2027 2015 2015 2027 2021 2015 2015
Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status Good status
Timeframe to reach chemical objective
Chemical objective
Concerned parameters
Timeframe to reach ecological objective
Ecological objective
Respective cycle
ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES
Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
2015 2015