The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14, 43–64.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adam, M. (2004). Why worry about theory-dependence? Circularity, minimal empiricality and reliability. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 18, 117–132.

Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2001). The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14, 43–64.

Ahn, W., Kalish, C., Gelman, S. A., Medin, D. L., Luhmann, C., Atran, S., Coley, J. D., & Shafto, P. (2001). Why essences are essential in the psychology of concepts. Cognition, 82, 59–69.

Ahn, W., Kalish, C. W., Medin, D. L., & Gelman, S. A. (1995). The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution.

Cognition, 54, 299–352.

Aiello, L. C., & Wheeler, P.(1995). The expensive-tissue hypothesis. The brain and the digestive system in human and primate evolution.

Current Anthropology, 36, 199–221.

Akins, K. (1996). Of sensory systems and the “aboutness” of mental states. Journal of Philosophy, 93, 337–372.

Alibali, M., & DiRusso, A. A.(1999). The function of gesture in learning to count: More than keeping track. Cognitive Development, 14, 37–56.

Andres, M., Seron, X., & Olivier, E. (2007). Contribution of hand motor circuits to counting. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 563– 576.

Anggoro, F. K., Waxman, S. R., & Medin, D. L. (2005). The e↵ects 267

268

Bibliography

of naming practices on children’s understanding of living things.

In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 139–144). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Antell, S. E., & Keating, D. P.(1983). Perception of numerical invariance in neonates. Child Development, 54, 695–701.

Aristotle. (ca. 340 B.C.E.).

Meteorologica.

Retrieved May 20, 2011, from http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/a/aristotle/ meteorology/book1.html.

Atran, S.(1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 547–569.

Atran, S. (2001). The case for modularity: Sin or salvation? Evolution and Cognition, 7, 1–10.

Atran, S., Medin, D. L., & Ross, N. (2004). Evolution and devolution of knowledge: A tale of two biologies. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 10, 395–420.

Aunger, R. (Ed.). (2000). Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baillargeon, R.(2004). Infants’ reasoning about hidden objects: Evidence for event-general and event-specific expectations. Developmental Science, 7, 391–424.

Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E. S., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Object permanence in five-month-old infants. Cognition, 20, 191–208.

Barabashev, A. G. (1997). In support of significant modernization of original mathematical texts (in defense of presentism). Philosophia Mathematica, 5, 21–41.

Barrett, H. C.(2004). Design versus descent in Shuar children’s reasoning about animals. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4, 25–50.

Barrett, H. C. (2005). Enzymatic computation and cognitive modularity.

Mind & Language, 20, 259–287.

Barrett, H. C., & Kurzban, R. (2006). Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review, 113, 628–647.

Barrett, J. L. (1998). Cognitive constraints on Hindu concepts of the divine. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 608–619.

Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.

Barrett, J. L., Burdett, E. R., & Porter, T. J.(2009). Counterintuitiveness

Bibliography

269

in folktales: Finding the cognitive optimum. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 9, 271–287.

Barrett, J. L., & Keil, F. C. (1996). Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 219–247.

Barrett, J. L., & Nyhof, M. A. (2001). Spreading non-natural concepts: The role of intuitive conceptual structures in memory and transmission of cultural materials. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1, 69–100.

Barth, H., La Mont, K., Lipton, J., Dehaene, S., Kanwisher, N., & Spelke, E. S.(2006). Non-symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children.

Cognition, 98, 199–222.

Basalla, G. (1988). The evolution of technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bassi, M. (1988). On the Borana calendrical system: A preliminary field report. Current Anthropology, 29, 619–624.

Benacerraf, P. (1973). Mathematical truth. Journal of Philosophy, 70, 661–680.

Berger, A., Tzur, G., & Posner, M. I. (2006). Infant brains detect arithmetic errors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 12649–12653.

Berger, L. R., Churchill, S. E., De Klerk, B., & Quinn, R. L. (2008).

Small-bodied humans from Palau, Micronesia. PLoS One, 3, e1780.

Bering, J. M. (2006). The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 453–462.

Bering, J. M. (2011). The God instinct. The psychology of souls, destiny and the meaning of life. London: Nicholas Brealy.

Bering, J. M., McLeod, K., & Shackelford, T. (2005). Reasoning about dead agents reveals possible adaptive trends. Human Nature, 16, 360–381.

Biro, D., & Matsuzawa, T. (2001a). Chimpanzee numerical competence: Cardinal and ordinal skills. In T. Matsuzawa (Ed.), Primate origins of human cognition and behavior (pp. 199–225). Tokyo: Springer.

Biro, D., & Matsuzawa, T. (2001b). Use of numerical symbols by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): Cardinals, ordinals, and the introduction of zero. Animal Cognition, 4, 193–199.

Bisazza, A., Pi↵er, L., Serena, G., & Agrillo, C. (2010). Ontogeny of numerical abilities in fish. PLoS ONE, 5, e15516.

270

Bibliography

Blackburn, S. (2001). Normativity ` a la mode. Journal of Ethics, 5, 139– 153.

Blaisdell, A. P., Sawa, K., Leising, K. J., & Waldmann, M. R. (2006).

Causal reasoning in rats. Science, 311, 1020–1022.

Bloom, P. (2004). Descartes’ baby. How child development explains what makes us human. London: Arrow Books.

Bloom, P. (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental Science, 10, 147– 151.

Bloom, P. (2009). Religious belief as an evolutionary accident. In J. Schloss & M. Murray (Eds.), The believing primate. Scientific, philosophical, and theological reflections on the origin of religion (pp. 118–127). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bloom, P., & Weisberg, D. S.(2007). Childhood origins of adult resistance to science. Science, 316, 996–997.

Bloom, P., & Wynn, K. (1992). The origins of psychological axioms of arithmetic and geometry. Mind & Language, 7, 409–416.

Blyth, E. (1835). An attempt to classify the “varieties” of animals, with observations on the marked seasonal and other changes which naturally take place in various British species, and which do not constitute varieties. Magazine of Natural History, 8, 40–53.

Boesch, C., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Chimpanzee and human cultures.

Current Anthropology, 39, 591–614.

Bonatti, L., Frot, E., Zangl, R., & Mehler, J.(2002). The human first hypothesis: Identification of conspecifics and individuation of objects in the young infant. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 388–426.

Boudry, M., Blancke, S., & Braeckman, J. (2010). How not to attack Intelligent Design Creationism: Philosophical misconceptions about methodological naturalism. Foundations of Science, 15, 227–244.

Boulter, S. J. (2007). The “evolutionary argument” and the metaphilosophy of commonsense. Biology & Philosophy, 22, 369–382.

Bowler, P. J.(2003). Evolution. The history of an idea (3rd ed.). Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Bowler, P. J. (2008). What Darwin disturbed. Isis, 99, 560–567.

Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1995). Why does culture increase human adaptability? Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 125–143.

Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J.(1996). Why culture is common, but cultural evolution is rare. Proceedings of the British Academy, 88, 77–93.

Boyer, C. B.(1944). Fundamental steps in the development of numeration.

Bibliography

271

Isis, 35, 153–168.

Boyer, P. (1998). Cognitive tracks of cultural inheritance: How evolved intuitive ontology governs cultural transmission. American Anthropologist, 100, 876–889.

Boyer, P. (2000). Natural epistemology or evolved metaphysics? Developmental evidence for early-developed, intuitive, category-specific, incomplete, and stubborn metaphysical presumptions. Philosophical Psychology, 13, 277–296.

Boyer, P.(2002). Religion explained. The evolutionary origins of religious thought. London: Vintage.

Boyer, P., & Barrett, H. C. (2005). Domain specicity and intuitive ontology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 96–118). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.

Boyer, P., & Ramble, C. (2001). Cognitive templates for religious concepts: Cross-cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive representations. Cognitive Science, 25, 535–564.

Brannon, E. M.(2002). The development of ordinal numerical knowledge in infancy. Cognition, 83, 223–240.

Brannon, E. M., & Terrace, H. S. (2002). The evolution and ontogeny of ordinal numerical ability. In M. Beko↵, C. Allen, & G. M. Burghardt (Eds.), The cognitive animal: Empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition (pp. 197–204). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Br¨auer, J., Kaminski, J., Riedel, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2006).

Making inferences about the location of hidden food: Social dog, causal ape. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120, 38–46.

Breuer, T., Ndoundou-Hockembal, M., & Fishlock, V. (2005). First observation of tool use in wild gorillas. PLoS Biology, 3, e380.S. Brewer, W., Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2000). Explanation in scientists and children. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 279–298). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Brown, P., Sutikna, T., Morwood, M. J., Soejono, R. P., Jatmiko, Saptomo, E. W., & Due, R. A. (2004). A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature, 431, 1055– 1061.

Brunet, M., F., G., Pilbeam, D., Mackaye, H. T., Likius, A., Ahounta, D., Beauvilain, A., Blondel, C., Bocherens, H., Boisserie, J.-R., De Bonis, L., Coppens, Y., Dejax, J., Denys, C., Duringer, P., Eisenmann,

272

Bibliography

V., Fanone, G., Fronty, P., Geraads, D., Lehmann, T., Lihoreau, F., Louchart, A., Mahamat, A., Merceron, G., Mouchelin, G., Otero, O., Campomanes, P. P., Ponce De Le´on, M., Rage, J. C., Sapanet, M., Schuster, M., Sudre, J., Tassy, P., Valentin, X., Vignaud, P., Viriot, L., Zazzo, A., & Zollikofer, C. (2002). A new hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad, Central Africa. Nature, 418, 145–151.

Bu↵on, comte de, G.-L. L. (1766). Histoire naturelle g´en´erale et particuli`ere. Avec la description du cabinet du roi (Vol. 14). Paris: Imprimerie royale.

Buridan, J.(14th c. [2009]). Impetus and its applications. In T. McGrew, M. Alspector-Kelly, & F. Allho↵ (Eds.), Philosophy of science. An historical anthology (pp. 86–90). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Burkart, J., & Heschl, A. (2005, August). Do nonhuman primates understand the mentalistic content of seeing? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, Italy.

Bushnell, I. W. R. (2001). Mother’s face recognition in newborn infants: Learning and memory. Infant and Child Development, 10, 67–74.

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

Butterworth, B. (1999). The mathematical brain. London: Macmillan.

Butterworth, B. (2005). The development of arithmetical abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 3–18.

Butterworth, B., Reeve, R., Reynolds, F., & Lloyd, D.(2008). Numerical thought with and without words: Evidence from indigenous Australian children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 13179–13184.

Buzaglo, M. (2002). The logic of concept expansion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cacciari, C., Levorato, M. C., & Cicogna, P.(1997). Imagination at work: Conceptual and linguistic creativity in children. In T. B. Ward, S. S. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought. An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 145–177). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Cain, C. R. (2006). Implications of the marked artifacts of the Middle Stone Age of Africa. Current Anthropology, 47, 675–681.

Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (1999). A non-verbal false belief task: The performance of children and great apes. Child Development, 70,

Bibliography

273

381–395.

Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 Years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 187–192.

Callaghan, T., Rochat, P., Lillard, A., Claux, M. L., Odden, H., Itakura, S., Tapanya, S., & Singh, S. (2005). Synchrony in the onset of mental-state reasoning. Evidence from five cultures. Psychological Science, 16, 378–384.

Callebaut, W. (Ed.). (1993). Taking the naturalistic turn, or, how real philosophy of science is done. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Cantlon, J. F., Brannon, E. M., Carter, E. J., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2006).

Functional imaging of numerical processing in adults and 4-y-old children. PLoS Biology, 4, e125.

Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B., & Caramazza, A. (2003). What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Neuropsychology, 20, 213–261.

Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z. (2003). The organization of conceptual knowledge: The evidence from category-specific deficits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 354–361.

Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1–34.

Carey, S. (2004). Bootstrapping and the origin of concepts. Daedalus, 133, 59–68.

Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S.(1996). Science and core knowledge. Philosophy of Science, 63, 515–533.

Carnap, R.(1945). On inductive logic. Philosophy of Science, 12, 288–309.

Carreiras, M., Seghier, M. L., Baquero, S., Est´evez, A., Lozano, A., Devlin, J. T., & Price, C. J. (2009). An anatomical signature for literacy. Nature, 461, 983–986.

Carruthers, P. (2002). The roots of scientific reasoning: Infancy, modularity and the art of tracking. In P. Carruthers, S. Stich, & M. Siegal (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 73–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carruthers, P. (2006). The architecture of the mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Carruthers, P., Stich, S., & Siegal, M. (Eds.). (2002). The cognitive basis of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cela-Conde, C. J., & Ayala, F. J. (2003). Genera of the human lin-

274

Bibliography

eage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 7684–7689.

Chambers, R.(1844). Vestiges of the natural history of creation. London: John Churchill.

Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chemla, K. (2003). Generality above abstraction: The general expressed in terms of the paradigmatic in mathematics in ancient China. Science in Context, 16, 413–458.

Chemla, K., & Guo, S. (2004). Les neuf chapitres. Le classique math´ematique de la Chine ancienne et ses commentaires. Paris: Dunod.

Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Santos, L. R. (2006). How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 517–537.

Chittka, L., & Niven, J. (2009). Are bigger brains better? Current Biology, 19, 995–1008.

Chochon, F., Cohen, L., van de Moortele, P. F., & Dehaene, S. (1999).

Di↵erential contributions of the left and right inferior parietal lobules to number processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 617–630.

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Den Haag & Paris: Mouton.

Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford: Blackwell.

Chrisomalis, S.(2004). A cognitive typology for numerical notation. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 14, 37–52.

Chrisomalis, S. (2010). Numerical notation: A comparative history. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Churchland, P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective. The nature of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Clark, A. (2006). Material symbols. Philosophical Psychology, 19, 291– 307.

Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 7–19.

Clendinnen, F. J.(1989). Evolutionary explanation and the justification of belief. In K. Hahlweg & C. A. Hooker (Eds.), Issues in evolutionary epistemology (pp. 458–474). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Code, L.(1996). What is natural about epistemology naturalized? Amer-

Bibliography

275

ican Philosophical Quarterly, 33, 1–22.

Cohen, L. B., & Marks, K. S. (2002). How infants process addition and subtraction events. Developmental Science, 5, 186–212.

Cordes, S., Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (2001). Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 698–707.

Corsi, P. (2005). Before Darwin: Transformist concepts in European natural history. Journal of the History of Biology, 38, 67–83.

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1994a). Beyond intuition and instinct blindness: Toward an evolutionarily rigorous cognitive science. Cognition, 50, 41–77.

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1994b). Origins of domain specificity: The evolution of functional organization. In L. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind. Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 85–116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58, 1–73.

Dacke, M., & Srinivasan, M. V. (2008). Evidence for counting in insects.

Animal Cognition, 11, 683–689.

Dantzig, T. (1954). Number, the language of science (4th, revised and augmented ed.). New York: Macmillan.

Dark, V. J., & Benbow, C. P. (1991). Di↵erential enhancement of working memory with mathematical versus verbal precocity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 48–56.

Dart, R. A. (1925). Australopithecus africanus: The man-ape of South Africa. Nature, 115, 195–199.

Dartnall, T. (2005). Does the world leak into the mind? Active externalism, ‘internalism’ and epistemology. Cognitive Science, 29, 135–143.

Darwin, C. (1838). Notebook d: Transmutation of species. Retrieved December 15, 2009, from http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/ frameset?itemID=CUL-DAR123.-&viewtype=text&pageseq=1.

Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.

Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex.

London: John Murray.

Darwin, C. (1881). Letter 13230, C. Darwin to W. Graham, July 1881.

276

Bibliography

Retrieved May 20, 2010, from http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/ entry-13230.

Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1983). The mathematical experience. London: Pelican.

Dawkins, R.(1989). The selfish gene (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. Boston: Houghton Mi✏in.

Dear, P. (2006). The intelligibility of nature. How science makes sense of the world. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Decock, L. (2008). The conceptual basis of numerical abilities: Oneto-one correspondence versus the successor relation. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 459–473.

De Cruz, H. (2006). Why are some numerical concepts more successful than others? An evolutionary perspective on the history of number concepts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 306–323.

De Cruz, H. (2008). An extended mind perspective on natural number representation. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 475–490.

De Cruz, H. (2009a). An enhanced argument for innate elementary geometric knowledge and its philosophical implications. In B. Van Kerkhove (Ed.), New perspectives on mathematical practices. Essays in philosophy and history of mathematics (pp. 185– 206). New Jersey: World Scientific.

De Cruz, H. (2009b). Is linguistic determinism an empirically testable hypothesis? Logique et Analyse, 208, 327–341.

De Cruz, H., Boudry, M., De Smedt, J., & Blancke, S. (in press). Evolutionary approaches to epistemic justification. Dialectica.

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2007). The role of intuitive ontologies in scientific understanding—The case of human evolution. Biology & Philosophy, 22, 351–368.

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2010a). The innateness hypothesis and mathematical concepts. Topoi, 29, 3–13.

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2010b). Paley’s iPod: The cognitive basis of the design argument within natural theology. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 45, 665–684.

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2010c). Science as structured imagination.

Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 29–44.

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (in press a). Evolved cognitive biases and the epistemic status of scientific beliefs. Philosophical Studies.

Bibliography

277

De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (in press b). Mathematical symbols as epistemic actions. Synthese.

De Cruz, H., Neth, H., & Schlimm, D. (2010). The cognitive basis of arithmetic. In B. L¨ owe & T. M¨ uller (Eds.), PhiMSAMP. Philosophy of mathematics: Sociological aspects and mathematical practice (pp.

59–106). London: College Publications.

Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense. New York: Oxford University Press.

Dehaene, S. (2003). The neural basis of the Weber-Fechner law: A logarithmic mental number line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 145– 147.

Dehaene, S. (2005). Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and arithmetic: The “neuronal recycling” hypothesis. In S. Dehaene, J. Duhamel, M. D. Hauser, & G. Rizzolatti (Eds.), From monkey brain to human brain (pp. 133–157). Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.

Dehaene, S.(2009). Origins of mathematical intuitions. The case of arithmetic. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 232–259.

Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Spelke, E., & Pica, P. (2008). Log or linear?

Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures. Science, 320, 1217–1220.

Dehaene, S., Spelke, E. S., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999).

Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970–974.

Delagnes, A., & Roche, H.(2005). Late Pliocene hominid knapping skills: The case of Lokalalei 2C, West Turkana, Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution, 48, 435–472.

DeLoache, J. S. (2004). Becoming symbol-minded. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 66–70. de Maillet, B.(1748). Telliamed ou entretiens d’un philosophe indien avec un missionnaire fran¸cois sur la diminution de la mer, la formation de la terre, l’origine de l’homme, & c. Amsterdam: Honor´e & Fils.

De Morgan, A. (1830). On the study and difficulties of mathematics.

London: Paul Kegan.

Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. London: Penguin.

Dennett, D. C.(1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea. Evolution and the meanings of life. London: Allen Lane.

Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the spell. Religion as a natural phe-

278

Bibliography

nomenon. Oxford: Allen Lane.

De Regt, H. W., & Dieks, D. (2005). A contextual approach to scientific understanding. Synthese, 144, 137–170. d’Errico, F. (1995). A new model and its implications for the origin of writing: The La Marche antler revisited. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 5, 163–206. d’Errico, F. (1998). Palaeolithic origins of artificial memory systems: An evolutionary perspective. In C. Renfrew & C. Scarre (Eds.), Cognition and material culture: The archaeology of symbolic storage (pp. 19–50). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

Descartes, R. (1637 [1988]). Le discours de la m´ethode, la dioptrique, les m´et´eores et la g´eom´etrie. In F. Alqui´e (Ed.), Œuvres philosophiques de Descartes (pp. 549–761). Paris: Classiques Garnier.

De Smedt, J. (2011). Common minds, uncommon thoughts. A philosophical anthropological investigation of uniquely human creative behavior, with an emphasis on artistic ability, religious reflection, and scientific study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Ghent University.

De Smedt, J., & De Cruz, H. (2010). Toward an integrative approach of cognitive neuroscientific and evolutionary psychological studies of art. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 695–719.

De Smedt, J., & De Cruz, H. (2011a). The cognitive appeal of the cosmological argument. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 23, 103-122.

De Smedt, J., & De Cruz, H. (2011b). The role of material culture in human time representation: Calendrical systems as extensions of mental time travel. Adaptive Behavior, 19, 63–76.

De Smedt, J., De Cruz, H., & Braeckman, J. (2009). Why the human brain is not an enlarged chimpanzee brain. In H. Høgh-Olesen, J. Tønnesvang, & P. Bertelsen (Eds.), Human characteristics. Evolutionary perspectives on human mind and kind (pp. 168–181). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.

Devitt, M. (1996). Coming to our senses. A naturalistic program for semantic localism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. de Waal, F. B. M. (1999). Cultural primatology comes of age. Nature, 399, 635–636. d’Halloy, J.-J. d’Omalius.(1846). Note sur la succession des ˆetres vivants.

Bulletins de l’acad´emie royale des sciences, des lettres et des beaux-

Bibliography

279

arts de Belgique, 13, 581–591.

Diamond, J. (1992). The rise and fall of the third chimpanzee. How our animal heritage a↵ects the way we live. London: Vintage.

Diamond, J., & Bishop, K. D.(1999). Ethno-ornithology of the Ketengban people, Indonesian New Guinea. In D. L. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.), Folkbiology (pp. 17–45). Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press. diSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Dobzhansky, T. (1944). On species and races of living and fossil man.

American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2, 251–265.

Donald, M.(1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Douven, I., & van Brakel, J. (1995). Is scientific realism an empirical hypothesis? Dialectica, 49, 3–14.

Downes, S. M. (1993). Naturalized philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science, 60, 452–468.

Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. S. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought. An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 461–493). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Dunbar, K., & Blanchette, I. (2001). The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: The case of analogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 334–339.

Dunbar, K., & Fugelsang, J.(2005). Scientific thinking and reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 705–725). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dunbar, R. I. M., & Barrett, L. (Eds.). (2007). Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dupr´e, J. (1999). Are whales fish? In D. L. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.), Folkbiology (pp. 461–476). Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.

Eddington, A. (1928). The nature of the physical world. Retrieved April 3, 2011, from http://www.giffordlectures.org/Browse .asp?PubID=TPNOPW&Volume=0&Issue=0&ArticleID=2.

Eger, E., Sterzer, P., Russ, M. O., Giraud, A.-L., & Kleinschmidt, A.

280

Bibliography

(2003). A supramodal number representation in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron, 37, 1–20.

Ekert, A. (2008). Complex and unpredictable Cardano. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 47, 2101–2119.

Elga, A. (2007). Reflection and disagreement. Noˆ us, 41, 478–502.

Elqayam, S., & Evans, J. B.(in press). Subtracting ‘ought’ from ‘is’: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of the human thinking.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

Ericsson, K., Krampe, R., & Tesch-R¨ omer, C.(1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological review, 100, 363–406.

Ernest, P. (1998). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics.

Albany: State University of New York Press.

Evans, E. M. (2000). Beyond Scopes. Why creationism is here to stay.

In K. Rosengren, C. Johnson, & P. Harris (Eds.), Imaging the impossible: Magical, scientific and religious thinking in children (pp.

305–331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Everett, D. L. (2005). Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirah˜a. Current Anthropology, 46, 621–634.

Fabre-Thorpe, M., Richard, G., & Thorpe, S. J. (1998). Rapid categorization of natural images by rhesus monkeys. NeuroReport, 9, 303–308.

Fales, E. (1996). Plantinga’s case against naturalistic epistemology. Philosophy of Science, 63, 432–451.

Farah, M. J., & Rabinowitz, C. (2003). Genetic and environmental influences on the organization of semantic memory in the brain: Is “living things” an innate category? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 401–408.

Farroni, T., Csibra, G., Simion, F., & Johnson, M. H. (2002). Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 9602– 9605.

Farroni, T., Johnson, M. H., Menon, E., Zulian, L., Faraguna, D., & Csibra, G. (2005). Newborns’ preference for face-relevant stimuli: E↵ects of contrast polarity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 17245–17250.

Fehr, E., & G¨achter, S.(2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137–140.

Bibliography

281

Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Hauser, M. D. (2002). The representations underlying infants’ choice of more: Object files versus analog magnitudes. Psychological Science, 13, 150–156.

Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. S. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307–314.

Feist, G. J. (2006). The psychology of science and the origins of the scientific mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Feldman, R. (2007). Reasonable religious disagreements. In L. Anthony (Ed.), Philosophers without gods (pp. 194–214). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

F´eron, J., Gentaz, E., & Streri, A.(2006). Evidence of amodal representation of small numbers across visuo-tactile modalities in 5-month-old infants. Cognitive Development, 21, 81–92.

Fischer, M. H. (2003). Cognitive representation of negative numbers.

Psychological Science, 14, 278–282.

Flombaum, J. I., Junge, J. A., & Hauser, M. D. (2005). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) spontaneously compute addition operations over large numbers. Cognition, 97, 315–325.

Flombaum, J. I., & Santos, L. R. (2005). Rhesus monkeys attribute perceptions to others. Current Biology, 15, 447–452.

Focquaert, F., Braeckman, J., & Platek, S. M. (2008). An evolutionary cognitive neuroscience perspective on human self-awareness and theory of mind. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 47–68.

Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell.

Fodor, J. A. (1981). Representations: Philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fodor, J. A.(1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fodor, J. A. (2000). The mind doesn’t work that way. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Foley, R.(1987). Another unique species: Patterns in human evolutionary ecology. Harlow: Longman.

Foley, R.(2001). In the shadow of the modern synthesis? Alternative perspectives on the last fifty years of paleoanthropology. Evolutionary Anthropology, 10, 5–14.

Forrest, B. (2000). Methodological naturalism and philosophical naturalism: Clarifying the connection. Philo, 3, 7–29.

Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2008). Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirah˜a language and

282

Bibliography

cognition. Cognition, 108, 819–824.

Frank, M. C., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E.(2008). Language as a cognitive technology: English-speakers match like Pirah˜a when you don’t let them count. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXX annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 439–444). Austin, Texas: Cognitive Science Society.

Frankenhuis, W. E., & Ploeger, A.(2007). Evolutionary psychology versus Fodor: Arguments for and against the massive modularity hypothesis. Philosophical Psychology, 20, 687–710.

Fricker, E. (2002). Trusting others in the sciences: A priori or empirical warrant? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33, 373– 383.

Friedman, M. (1997). Philosophical naturalism. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 71, 7–21.

Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (1999). Interacting minds—A biological basis.

Science, 286, 1692–1695.

Gabunia, L., Vekua, A., Lordkipanidze, D., Swisher III, C. C., Ferring, R., Justus, A., Nioradze, M., Tvalchrelidze, M., Ant´on, S. C., Bosinski, G., J¨oris, O., de Lumley, M.-A., Majsuradze, G., & Moukhelishvili, A. (2000). Earliest Pleistocene hominid cranial remains of Georgia: Taxonomy, geological setting, and age. Science, 288, 1019–1025.

Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gallistel, C. R.(1995). The replacement of general-purpose theories with adaptive specializations. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1255–1267). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (2000). Non-verbal numerical cognition: From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 59–65.

Gaser, C., & Schlaug, G.(2003). Brain structures di↵er between musicians and non-musicians. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 9240–9245.

Geary, D. C.(1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in children’s cognition. Implications for mathematical development and instruction.

American Psychologist, 50, 24–37.

Geary, D. C. (2002). Principles of evolutionary educational psychology.

Learning and Individual Di↵erences, 12, 317–345.

Geary, D. C. (2007a). Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology. In J. S. Carlson & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Educating the evolved mind. Psychological

Bibliography

283

perspectives on contemporary educational issues (Vol. 2, pp. 1–99).

Greenwich, CT: Information Age. Geary, D. C. (2007b). An evolutionary perspective on learning disability in mathematics. Developmental Neuropsychology, 32, 471–519.

Geary, D. C., Bow-Thomas, C. C., Liu, F., & Siegler, R. S. (1996). Development of arithmetical competencies in Chinese and American children: Influence of age, language, and schooling. Child Development, 67, 2022–2044.

Geist, C., L¨ owe, B., & Van Kerkhove, B. (2010). Peer review and knowledge by testimony in mathematics. In B. L¨owe & T. M¨ uller (Eds.), PhiMSAMP. Philosophy of mathematics: Sociological aspects and mathematical practice (pp. 155–178). London: College Publications.

Gelman, S. A. (2004). Psychological essentialism in children. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 404–409.

Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J. (1990). The importance of knowing a dodo is a bird: Categories and inferences in 2-year-old children. Developmental Psychology, 26, 796–804.

Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991). Insides and essences: Early understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition, 38, 213–244.

Gentner, D. (1983). Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.

Gentner, D., Brem, S., Ferguson, R. W., Markman, A. B., Levidow, B. B., Wol↵, P., & Forbus, K. D. (1997). Analogical reasoning and conceptual change: A case-study of Johannes Kepler. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 3–40.

Gentner, T. Q., Fenn, K. M., Margoliash, D., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2006).

Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds. Nature, 440, 1204–1207.

Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., & Kir´ aly, I. (2002). Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature, 415, 755.

Gerstmann, J. (1940). Syndrome of finger agnosia: Disorientation for right and left, agraphia and acalculia. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 44, 398–408.

Gettier, E. L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23, 121–123.

Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38.

284

Bibliography

Giere, R. N. (2004). The problem of agency in scientific distributed cognitive systems. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4, 759–774.

Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650–669.

Gigerenzer, G., & Ho↵rage, U.(1999). Overcoming difficulties in Bayesian reasoning: A reply to Lewis and Keren (1999) and Mellers and McGraw (1999). Psychological Review, 2, 425–430.

Gilad, Y., Wiebe, V., Przeworski, M., Lancet, D., & P¨a¨abo, S. (2004).

Loss of olfactory receptor genes coincides with the acquisition of full trichromatic vision in primates. PLoS Biology, 2, 120–125.

Gilmore, C. K., McCarthy, S. E., & Spelke, E. S. (2007). Symbolic arithmetic knowledge without instruction. Nature, 447, 589–591.

Gil-White, F. J.(2001). Are ethnic groups biological “species” to the human brain? Essentialism in our cognition of some social categories.

Current Anthropology, 42, 515–536.

Glass, B. (1979). Milestones and rates of growth in the development of biology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 54, 31–53.

Godfrey-Smith, P.(1991). Signal, decision, action. Journal of Philosophy, 88, 709–722.

Goldin-Meadow, S., Cook, S. W., & Mitchell, Z. A. (2009). Gesturing gives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science, 20, 267–272.

Goldin-Meadow, S., & Wagner, S. M. (2005). How our hands help us learn. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 234–241.

Goldman, A. I. (1990). Natural selection, justification, and inference to the best explanation. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Evolution, cognition and realism. Studies in evolutionary epistemology (pp. 39–46). Lanham: University Press of America.

Goldman, A. I. (1999). A priori warrant and naturalistic epistemology.

In J. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 13, Epistemology (pp. 1–28). Oxford: Blackwell.

Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating minds. The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. New York: Oxford University Press.

Goodman, N. D. (1981). The experiential foundations of mathematical knowledge. History and Philosophy of Logic, 2, 55–65.

Gopnik, A. (1996). The scientist as child. Philosophy of Science, 63,

Bibliography

285

485–514.

Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., Kushnir, T., & Danks, D. (2004). A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review, 111, 3–32.

Gopnik, A., & Meltzo↵, A. (1997). Words, thoughts and theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gopnik, A., & Schulz, L.(2004). Mechanisms of theory formation in young children. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 371–377.

Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306, 496–499.

Gottfried, G., Gelman, S. A., & Schultz, J. (1999). Children’s understanding of the brain: From early essentialism to biological theory.

Cognitive Development, 14, 147–174.

Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA & London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Grabiner, J. V.(1986). Is mathematical truth time-dependent? In T. Tymoczko (Ed.), New directions in the philosophy of mathematics (pp.

201–213). Boston: Birkh¨ auser.

Greenblatt, S. H. (1995). Phrenology in the science and culture of the 19th century. Neurosurgery, 37, 790–805.

Greer, B.(2004). The growth of mathematics through conceptual restructuring. Learning and Instruction, 14, 541–548.

Gregory, A. (2001). Harvey, Aristotle and the weather cycle. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology & Biomedical Sciences, 32, 153–168.

Grei↵enhagen, C., & Sharrock, W. (2006). Mathematical relativism: Logic, grammar and arithmetic in cultural comparison. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36, 97–117.

Grei↵enhagen, C., & Sherman, W. (2008). Kuhn and conceptual change: On the analogy between conceptual changes in science and children.

Science & Education, 17, 1–26.

Gu, J., & Gu, X. (2003). Induced gene expression in human brain after the split from chimpanzee. Trends in Genetics, 19, 63–65.

Guthrie, S. E.(1993). Faces in the clouds. A new theory of religion. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gutting, G. (2009). What philosophers know: Case studies in recent analytic philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haile-Selassie, Y., Suwa, G., & White, T. D. (2004). Late Miocene teeth

286

Bibliography

from Middle Awash, Ethiopia, and early hominid dental evolution.

Science, 303, 1503–1505.

Haith, M. M. (1998). Who put the cog in infant cognition? Is rich interpretation too costly? Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 167–179.

Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455, 665–668.

Hare, B., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2001). Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know? Animal Behaviour, 61, 139–151.

Harper, E. (1987). Ghosts of Diophantus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 75–90.

Harris, J. (1982). Facts and fallacies of Aboriginal number systems. In S. Hargrave (Ed.), Language and culture (pp. 153–181). Darwin: Summer Institute of Linguistics.

Harris, P. L. (2002). Checking our sources: The origins of trust in testimony. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33, 315–333.

Harris, P. L., Pasquini, E. S., Duke, S., Asscher, J. J., & Pons, F. (2006).

Germs and angels: The role of testimony in young children’s ontology. Developmental Science, 9, 76–96.

Hart, R. (2010). The Chinese roots of linear algebra. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Harvey, W. (1628 [1847]). An anatomical disquisition on the motion of the heart and blood in animals. In R. Willis (Trans.), The works of Willam Harvey, M.D. Physician to the king, professor of anatomy and surgery to the college of physicians. Translated from the Latin with a life of the author (pp. 1–86). London: Sydenham Society.

Hassin, R. R., Bargh, J. A., & Uleman, J. S. (2002). Spontaneous causal inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 515–522.

Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W.(2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569– 1579.

Hawking, S., & Mlodinow, L.(2010). The grand design. London: Bantam.

Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.

Held, R., Ostrovsky, Y., de Gelder, B., Gandhi, T., Ganesh, S., Mathur, U., & Sinha, P. (2011). The newly sighted fail to match seen with felt. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 551–553.

Henrich, J. (2004). Demography and cultural evolution: How adaptive

Bibliography

287

cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses—The Tasmanian case. American Antiquity, 69, 197–211.

Henrich, J., & Boyd, R.(2002). On modeling cognition and culture. Why cultural evolution does not require replication of representations.

Journal of Cognition and Culture, 2, 87–112.

Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Smith Henrich, N., Hill, K., Gil-White, F., Gurven, M., Marlowe, F. W., Patton, J. Q., & Tracer, D.(2005). “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 795–815.

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 61–83.

Herbert, S. (2005). The Darwinian revolution revisited. Journal of the History of Biology, 38, 51–66.

Hespos, S. J. (2007). Language acquisition: When does the learning begin? Current Biology, 17, 628–630.

Hoddeson, L.(2007). Analogy and cognitive style in the history of invention: Inventor independence and closeness of compared domains. In S. Vosniadou, D. Kayser, & A. Protopapas (Eds.), Proceedings of the European cognitive science conference (pp. 413–417). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Horner, V., & Whiten, A. (2005). Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition, 8, 164–181.

Hull, D. L.(1964). The e↵ect of essentialism on taxonomy—Two thousand years of stasis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 15, 314–326.

Hume, D. (1739 [2001]). A treatise of human nature (D. F. Norton & M. J. Norton, Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hume, D.(1779). Dialogues concerning natural religion. London: Hafner.

Hunt, G. R., & Gray, R. D.(2003). Diversification and cumulative evolution in New Caledonian crow tool manufacture. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 867–874.

Hurley, S. (2003). Animal action in the space of reasons. Mind & Language, 18, 231–257.

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hutto, D. D.(2011). Presumptuous naturalism: A cautionary tale. Amer-

288

Bibliography

ican Philosophical Quarterly, 48, 129–145.

Huxley, T. H. (1863). Evidences as to man’s place in nature. London: Williams and Norgate.

Ifrah, G. (1985). Les chi↵res, ou l’histoire d’une grande invention. Paris: La↵ont.

Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2004). Vitalistic causality in young children’s naive biology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 356–362.

Ingman, M., Kaessmann, H., P¨ a¨ abo, S., & Gyllensten, U. (2000). Mitochondrial genome variation and the origin of modern humans.

Nature, 408, 708–713.

Irving, E.(2005). The role of latitude in mobilism debates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 1821–1828.

Itakura, S.(2004). Gaze-following and joint visual attention in nonhuman animals. Japanese Psychological Research, 46, 216–226.

Izard, V., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Dehaene, S.(2008). Distinct cerebral pathways for object identity and number in human infants. PLoS Biology, 6, e11.

Izard, V., Pica, P., Spelke, E. S., & Dehaene, S.(2011). Flexible intuitions of Euclidean geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 9782–9787.

Jackson, D. E., Holcombe, M., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2004). Trail geometry gives polarity to ant foraging networks. Nature, 432, 907–909.

Jacob, F. (1977). Evolution and tinkering. Science, 196, 1161–1166.

Jacobs, R. A., Jordan, M. I., & Barto, A. G. (1991). Task decomposition through competition in a modular connectionist architecture: The what and where vision tasks. Cognitive Science, 15, 219–250.

Janik, V. M., Sayigh, L. S., & Wells, R. S.(2006). Signature whistle shape conveys identity information to bottlenose dolphins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 8293–8297.

Jansson, D. G., Condoor, S. S., & Brock, H. R. (1993). Cognition in design: Viewing the hidden side of the design process. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20, 257–271.

Jordan, K. E., & Brannon, E. M. (2006). The multisensory representation of number in infancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 3486–3489.

Bibliography

289

Jordan, K. E., Brannon, E. M., Logothetis, N. K., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2005). Monkeys match the number of voices they hear to the number of faces they see. Current Biology, 15, 1–5.

Joseph, G. G. (2000). The crest of the peacock: Non-European roots of mathematics (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kahane, G. (2011). Evolutionary debunking arguments. Noˆ us, 45, 103– 125.

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.(1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions.

Psychological Review, 103, 582–591.

Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Chimpanzees know what others know, but not what they believe. Cognition, 109, 224–234.

Kant, I.(1781 [2005]). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M.(1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302–4311.

Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams. Small Business Reports, 18, 68–71.

Kaufmann, E. (2010). Shall the religious inherit the Earth? Demography and politics in the twenty-first century. London: Profile Books.

Keil, F. C.(1989). Concepts, kinds and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Keil, F. C. (2003). Folkscience: Coarse interpretations of a complex reality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 368–373.

Kelemen, D.(2003). British and American children’s preferences for teleofunctional explanations of the natural world. Cognition, 88, 201– 221.

Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children “intuitive theists”? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15, 295–301.

Kelemen, D., Callanan, M. A., Casler, K., & P´erez-Granados, D. R. (2005). Why things happen: Teleological explanation in parentchild conversations. Developmental Psychology, 41, 251–264.

Kelemen, D., & Rosset, E. (2009). The human function compunction: Teleological explanation in adults. Cognition, 111, 138–143.

Kelemen, D., Widdowson, D., Posner, T., Brown, A., & Casler, K.(2003).

290

Bibliography

Teleo-functional constraints on preschool children’s reasoning about living things. Developmental Science, 6, 329–345.

Kert´esz, A. (2004). Cognitive semantics and scientific knowledge: Case studies in the cognitive science of science. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Khan, I. A., Daya, S. K., & Gowda, R. M.(2005). Evolution of the theory of circulation. International Journal of Cardiology, 98, 519–521.

Kilian, A., Yaman, S., von Fersen, L., & G¨ unt¨ urk¨ un, O. (2003). A bottlenose dolphin discriminates visual stimuli di↵ering in numerosity.

Learning and Behavior, 31, 133–142.

Kim, J. (1988). What is “naturalized epistemology?”. Philosophical Perspectives, 2, 381–405.

King, M.-C., & Wilson, A. C. (1975). Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science, 188, 107–116.

Kirsh, D. (1995). Complementary strategies: Why we use our hands when we think. In J. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.), Proceedings of the XVII annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.

212–217). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kirsh, D. (1996). Adapting the environment instead of oneself. Adaptive Behavior, 4, 415–452.

Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.

Kitcher, P.(1990). The division of cognitive labor. Journal of Philosophy, 87, 5–22.

Kitcher, P. (1992). The naturalists return. Philosophical Review, 101, 53–114.

Kitcher, P.(2008). Science, religion, and democracy. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, 5, 5–18.

Kobayashi, T., Hiraki, K., Mugitani, R., & Hasegawa, T. (2004). Baby arithmetic: One object plus one tone. Cognition, 91, B23–B34.

Koechlin, E., Dehaene, S., & Mehler, J.(1998). Numerical transformations in five-month-old human infants. Mathematical Cognition, 3, 89– 104.

Kornblith, H.(1994). Naturalism: Both metaphysical and epistemological.

In P. French, T. E. Uehling, & H. K. Wettstein (Eds.), Midwest studies in philosophy, volume XIX, Philosophical naturalism (pp.

39–52). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Koten Jr., J. W., Wood, G., Hagoort, P., Goebel, R., Propping, P.,

Bibliography

291

Willmes, K., & Boomsma, D. I. (2009). Genetic contribution to variation in cognitive function: An fMRI study in twins. Science, 323, 1737–1740. ´ M., T´egl´ Kov´acs, A. as, E., & Endress, A. D.(2010). The social sense: Susceptibility to others’ beliefs in human infants and adults. Science, 330, 1830–1834.

Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M.(2001). Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 439–453.

Krieger, M. H.(1991). Theorems as meaningful cultural artifacts: Making the world additive. Synthese, 144, 135–154.

Kuhlmeier, V., Bloom, P., & Wynn, K. (2004). Do 5-month-old infants see humans as material objects? Cognition, 94, 95–103.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension: Tradition and innovation in scientific research. In T. S. Kuhn (Ed.), The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change (pp. 225–239).

Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kummer, H. (1995). Causal knowledge in animals. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition. A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 26–36). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ladyman, J.(2007). Does physics answer metaphysical questions? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 61, 179–202.

Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes.

Philosophical papers (J. Worrall & G. Currie, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lako↵, G., & N´ un ˜ez, R. E.(2000). Where mathematics comes from. How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.

Laland, K. N., & Brown, G. R.(2006). Niche construction, human behavior, and the adaptive-lag hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology, 15, 95–104.

Lamarck, J.-B. (1809). Philosophie zoologique, ou exposition des consid´erations relatives ` a l’histoire naturelle des animaux. Retrieved August 20, 2009, from http://www.lamarck.cnrs.fr/ice/ ice book detail.php?lang=fr&type=text&bdd=lamarck&table= ouvrages lamarck&bookId=29&typeofbookId=1&num=0.

292

Bibliography

Laudan, L. (1981). A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of Science, 48, 19–49.

Laughlin, P. R., Hatch, E. C., Silver, J. S., & Boh, L.(2006). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: E↵ects of group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 644–651.

Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2005). Number and natural language. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind.

Structure and contents (pp. 216–235). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2007). Linguistic determinism and the innate basis of number. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind. Foundations and the future (pp. 139–170).

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Leakey, M. G., Spoor, F., Brown, F. H., Gathogo, P. N., Kiarie, C., Leakey, L. N., & McDougall, I. (2001). New hominin genus from eastern Africa shows diverse Middle Pliocene lineages. Nature, 410, 433–440.

Leakey, R. E. F., & Walker, A. C.(1976). Australopithecus , Homo erectus, and the single species hypothesis. Nature, 261, 572–574.

Le Clec’H, G., Dehaene, S., Cohen, C., Mehler, J., Dupoux, E., Poline, J. B., Lehricy, S., van de Moortele, P. F., & Le Bihan, D. (2000).

Distinct cortical areas for names of numbers and body parts independent of language and input modality. NeuroImage, 12, 381–391.

Le Corre, M., & Carey, S. (2007). One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles. Cognition, 105, 395–438.

Leibniz, G. W. (1765 [2001]). New essays on human understanding (P. Remnant & J. F. Bennett, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lemer, C., Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., & Cohen, L. (2003). Approximate quantities and exact number words: Dissociable systems. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1942–1958.

Leslie, A. M.(1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “Theory of Mind”. Psychological Review, 94, 412–426.

Leslie, A. M., Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. (2008). The generative basis of natural number concepts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 213– 218.

Bibliography

293

Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2003). Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments relating to incest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 819–826.

Lipton, J. S., & Spelke, E. S. (2003). Origins of number sense: Largenumber discrimination in human infants. Psychological Science, 14, 396–401.

Lipton, P. (1991). Inference to the best explanation. London: Routledge.

Lipton, P. (2004). What good is an explanation? In J. Cornwell (Ed.), Explanations. Styles of explanation in science (pp. 1–21). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Liu, X., & MacIsaac, D. (2005). An investigation of factors a↵ecting the degree of na¨ıve impetus theory application. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 101–116.

Lloyd, G. E. R.(2007). Cognitive variations: Reflections on the unity and diversity of the human mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Lockard, R. B. (1971). Reflections on the fall of comparative psychology: Is there a message for us all? American Psychologist, 26, 168–179.

Locke, J. (1689). An essay concerning human understanding. Retrieved September 20, 2007, from http://etext.library.adelaide.edu .au/l/locke/john/l81u/index.html.

Loftus, E. (2003). Make-believe memories. American Psychologist, 58, 867–873.

Lombard, M., & Phillipson, L. (2010). Indications of bow and stonetipped arrow use 64000 years ago in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Antiquity, 84, 635–648.

Lombrozo, T. (2007). Simplicity and probability in causal explanation.

Cognitive Psychology, 55, 232–257.

Lombrozo, T., Kelemen, D., & Zaitchik, D. (2007). Inferring design: Evidence of a preference for teleological explanations in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Psychological Science, 18, 999–1006.

Lombrozo, T., Thanukos, A., & Weisberg, M. (2008). The importance of understanding the nature of science for accepting evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1, 290–298.

Lutz, D. J., & Keil, F. C. (2002). Early understanding of the division of cognitive labor. Child Development, 73, 1073–1084.

Machery, E.(2006). Two dogmas of neo-empiricism. Philosophy Compass, 1, 398–412.

294

Bibliography

Maddy, P.(1997). Naturalism in mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Mahon, B. Z., Anzellotti, S., Schwarzbach, J., Zampini, M., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Category-specific organization in the human brain does not require visual experience. Neuron, 63, 397–405.

Malthus, T. R. (1826). An essay on the principle of population or a view of its past and present e↵ects on human happiness; with an inquiry into our prospects respecting the future removal or mitigation of the evils which it occasions (6th ed.). London: John Murray.

Mameli, M., & Bateson, P. (2006). Innateness and the sciences. Biology & Philosophy, 21, 155–188.

Marcus, G. F.(2004). The birth of the mind. How a tiny number of genes creates the complexities of human thought. New York: Basic Books.

Margolis, E., & Laurence, S.(2007). The ontology of concepts—Abstract objects or mental representations? Noˆ us, 41, 561–593.

Marks, J. (2003). What it means to be 98% chimpanzee. Apes, people, and their genes. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Marr, D. C.(1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representational system and processing of visual information. San Francisco: Freeman.

Marshall-Pescini, S., & Whiten, A.(2008). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and the question of cumulative culture: An experimental approach.

Animal Cognition, 11, 449–456.

Martin, A., & Weisberg, J. (2003). Neural foundations for understanding social and mechanical concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 575–587.

Mart´ın-Loeches, M., Casado, P., Gonzalo, R., de Heras, L., & Fern´andezFr´ıas, C.(2006). Brain potentials to mathematical syntax problems.

Psychophysiology, 43, 579–591.

Martzlo↵, J. C.(1995). Review of Lam Lay Yong and Ang Tian Se (1992) Fleeting footsteps: Tracing the conception of arithmetic and algebra in ancient China. Historia Mathematica, 22, 67–87.

Masataka, N., Ohnishi, T., Imabayashi, E., Hirakata, M., & Matsuda, H. (2007). Neural correlates for learning to read roman numerals.

Brain and Language, 100, 276–282.

Massey, C. M., & Gelman, R. (1988). Preschooler’s ability to decide whether a photographed unfamiliar object can move itself. Developmental psychology, 24, 307–317.

Bibliography

295

Matsuzawa, T.(2007). Comparative cognitive development. Developmental Science, 10, 97–103.

Matthew, P. (1831). On naval timber and arboriculture; with critical notes on authors who have recently treated the subject of planting.

Edinburgh: Adam Black.

Mattusch, C. C.(2003). Corinthian bronze: Famous, but elusive. Corinth, 20, 219–232.

Mayr, E. (1950). Taxonomic categories in fossil hominids. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 15, 109–117.

Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Mayr, E.(1987). The ontological status of species: Scientific progress and philosophical terminology. Biology & Philosophy, 2, 145–166.

McCauley, R. N.(2000). The naturalness of religion and the unnaturalness of science. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 61–85). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

McCauley, R. N. (in press). Why religion is natural and science is not.

New York: Oxford University Press.

McCauley, R. N., & Henrich, J. (2006). Susceptibility to the M¨ uller-Lyer illusion, theory-neutral observation, and the diachronic penetrability of the visual input system. Philosophical Psychology, 19, 79–101.

McCloskey, M. (1983). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 249, 122– 130.

McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A., & Green, B. (1980). Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: Naive beliefs about the motion of objects. Science, 210, 1139–1141.

McCloskey, M., Washburn, A., & Felch, L. (1983). Intuitive physics: The straight-down belief and its origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 636–649.

McComb, K., Packer, C., & Pusey, A. E. (1994). Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo.

Animal Behaviour, 47, 379–387.

McCrink, K., & Wynn, K.(2004). Large-number addition and subtraction by 9-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 15, 776–781.

McDowell, J. (1996). Mind and world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

McKay, R. T., & Dennett, D. C. (2009). The evolution of misbelief.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 493–510.

296

Bibliography

McRoberts, R. W. (1990). Counting at Pularumpi: A survey of a traditional mathematics and its implications for modern learning. Aboriginal Child at School, 18, 19–43.

Meck, W. H., & Church, R. M.(1983). A mode control model of counting and timing processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 320–334.

Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (Eds.). (1999). Folkbiology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A.(1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp.

179–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Meltzo↵, A. N. (1988). Infant imitation after a 1-week delay: Longterm memory for novel acts and multiple stimuli. Developmental Psychology, 24, 470–476.

Meltzo↵, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75–78.

Menary, R. (2006). Attacking the bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 19, 329–344.

Menary, R. (2007). Cognitive integration: Attacking the bounds of cognition. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Mercader, J., Barton, H., Gillespie, J., Harris, J., Kuhn, S., Tyler, R., & Boesch, C. (2007). 4,300-Year-old chimpanzee sites and the origins of percussive stone technology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 3043–3048.

Mercier, H. (2010). The social origins of folk epistemology. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 499–514.

Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57–74.

Mikkelsen, T. S., Hillier, L. W., Eichler, E. E., Zody, M. C., Ja↵e, D. B., Yang, S., Enard, W., Hellmann, I., Lindblad-Toh, K., Altheide, T. K., Archidiacono, N., Bork, P., Butler, J., Chang, J. L., Cheng, Z., Chinwalla, A. T., & deJong, P. (2005). Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature, 473, 69–87.

Miller, G. (2000). The mating mind. How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. London: William Heineman.

Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of

Bibliography

297

evolution. Science, 313, 765–766.

Miller, R., Owens, S. J., & Rørslett, B.(2011). Plants and colour: Flowers and pollination. Optics and Laser Technology, 43, 282–294.

Millikan, R. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories.

Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

Millikan, R.(1998). A common structure for concepts of individuals, stu↵s and real kinds: More mama, more milk and more mouse. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 55–65.

Millman, A. B., & Smith, C. L. (1997). Darwin’s use of analogical reasoning in theory construction. Metaphor and Symbol, 12, 159–187.

Mills, C. M., & Keil, F. C.(2005). The development of cynicism. Psychological Science, 16, 385–390.

Mithen, S. (1988). Looking and learning: Upper Palaeolithic art and information gathering. World Archaeology, 19, 297–327.

Mithen, S.(1996). The prehistory of the mind: A search for the origins of art, religion and science. Boston & New York: Houghton Mi✏in.

Mithen, S. (2000). Mind, brain and material culture: An archaeological perspective. In P. Carruthers & A. Chamberlain (Eds.), Evolution and the human mind. Modularity, language and meta-cognition (pp.

207–217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Molko, N., Cachia, A., Rivi`ere, D., Mangin, J.-F., Bruandet, M., Le Bihan, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S.(2004). Brain anatomy in Turner syndrome: Evidence for impaired social and spatial–numerical networks. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 840–850.

Molko, N., Cachia, A., Rivi`ere, D., Mangin, J.-F., Bruandet, M., Le Bihan, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S.(2003). Functional and structural alterations of the intraparietal sulcus in a developmental dyscalculia of genetic origin. Neuron, 40, 847–858.

Morewedge, C. K., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2005). The least likely of times: How remembering the past biases forecasts of the future. Psychological Science, 16, 626–630.

Morris, S. C., Taplin, J. E., & Gelman, S. (2000). Vitalism in naive biological thinking. Developmental Psychology, 36, 582–595.

Moutier, S., & Houd´e, O. (2003). Judgement under uncertainty and conjunction fallacy inhibition training. Thinking and Reasoning, 9, 185–201.

Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K.(1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519–1520.

298

Bibliography

Muntersbjorn, M. M.(2003). Representational innovation and mathematical ontology. Synthese, 134, 159–180.

Murray, M.(2008). Four arguments that the cognitive psychology of religion undermines the justification of religious belief. In J. Bulbulia, R. Sosis, E. Harris, R. Genet, C. Genet, & K. Wyman (Eds.), The evolution of religion: Studies, theories, and critiques (pp. 393–398).

Santa Margarita: Collins Foundation Press.

Naets, J. (2010). How to define a number? A general epistemological account of Simon Stevin’s art of defining. Topoi, 29, 77–86.

Nagel, J. (in press). Intuitions and experiments: A defense of the case method in epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83, 435–450.

Negishi, H., Ueda, K., Kuriyama, M., Kato, M., Kawaguchi, H., & Atsumori, H.(2005). Change of mental representation with the expertise of mental abacus. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXVII annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1606–1611). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Nersessian, N. J.(1999). Model-based reasoning in conceptual change. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 5–22). Malden & Oxford: Blackwell.

Netz, R. (1999). Linguistic formulae as cognitive tools. Pragmatics and Cognition, 7, 147–176.

Netz, R. (2002). Counter culture: Towards a history of Greek numeracy.

History of Science, 40, 321–352.

New, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2007). Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 16598—16603.

Nichols, R. (2006). Why is the history of philosophy worth our study?

Metaphilosophy, 37, 34–52.

Nichols, S. (2002). On the genealogy of norms: A case for the role of emotion in cultural evolution. Philosophy of Science, 69, 234–255.

Nieder, A., & Miller, E. K.(2003). Coding of cognitive magnitude: Compressed scaling of numerical information in the primate prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 37, 149–157.

Bibliography

299

Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought. How Asians and westerners think di↵erently . . . and why. New York: Free Press.

Norenzayan, A., Atran, S., Faulkner, J., & Schaller, M. (2006). Memory and mystery: The cultural selection of minimally counterintuitive narratives. Cognitive Science, 30, 531–553.

Novell, J. R. (1990). From Da Vinci to Harvey: The development of mechanical analogy from 1500 to 1650. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 83, 396–398.

Oaks, J. A. (2007). Medieval Arabic algebra as an artificial language.

Journal of Indian Philosophy, 35, 543–575.

O’Brien, M. J., & Lyman, R. L. (2000). Darwinian evolutionism is applicable to historical archaeology. International Journal of Historical Archaeology,, 4, 71–112.

Okasha, S. (2003). Fodor on cognition, modularity, and adaptationism.

Philosophy of Science, 70, 68–88.

Okasha, S. (2006). Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Okasha, S. (2010). Altruism researchers must cooperate. Nature, 467, 653–655.

Oldham, M. C., Horvath, S., & Geschwind, D. H. (2006). Conservation and evolution of gene coexpression networks in human and chimpanzee brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 17973–17978.

Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308, 255–258.

Osawa, A., & Maeshima, S. (2009). Gerstmann’s syndrome in a patient with left thalamic hemorrhage. Neurology Asia, 14, 161–164.

Owen, R.(1849). On the nature of limbs. A discourse. London: John Van Voorst.

Papineau, D. (1993). Philosophical naturalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

Papineau, D. (2000). The evolution of knowledge. In P. Carruthers & A. Chamberlain (Eds.), Evolution and the human mind. Modularity, language and meta-cognition (pp. 170–206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pascalis, O., & Bachevalier, J. (1998). Face recognition in primates: A cross-species study. Behavioural Processes, 43, 87–96.

Pelletier, F. J., Elio, R., & Hanson, P. (2008). Is logic all in our heads?

From naturalism to psychologism. Studia Logica, 88, 3–66.

300

Bibliography

Petersson, K. M., Silva, C., Castro-Caldas, A., Ingvar, M., & Reis, A. (2007). Literacy: A cultural influence on functional left-right differences in the inferior parietal cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 791–799.

Pfungst, O.(1911 [2001]). Clever Hans (The horse of Mr. von Osten): A contribution to experimental animal and human psychology (C. L. Rahn, Trans.). New York, NY: Henry Holt.

Phillips, W., Shankar, M., & Santos, L.(2010). Essentialism in the absence of language? Evidence from rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Developmental Science, 13, F1–F7.

Piaget, J. (1929 [2007]). The child’s conception of the world. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.

Piaget, J. (1952). The child’s conception of number. New York: Norton.

Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 306, 499–503.

Pigliucci, M., & Boudry, M.(2011). Why machine-information metaphors are bad for science and science education. Science & Education, 20, 453–471.

Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. London: Allen Lane.

Pinker, S. (2005). So how does the mind work? Mind & Language, 20, 1–24.

Pinker, S.(2007). The stu↵ of thought: Language as a window into human nature. New York: Viking.

Plantinga, A. (1993). Warrant and proper function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian belief. New York: Oxford University Press.

Plato. (ca. 380 B.C.E. [2000]). Meno. In S. M. Cahn (Ed.), Exploring philosophy. An introductory anthology (pp. 117–151). New York: Oxford University Press.

Pletser, V., & Huylebrouck, D.(1999). The Ishango artefact: The missing base 12 link. Forma, 14, 339–346.

Poling, D. A., & Evans, E. M. (2004). Are dinosaurs the rule or the exception? Developing concepts of death and extinction. Cognitive Development, 19, 363–383.

Pollard, B.(2005). Naturalizing the space of reasons. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 13, 69–82.

Bibliography

301

Popper, K. (1994). In search of a better world. Lectures and essays from thirty years. London: Routledge.

Potts, R. (1998). Variation selection in hominid evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 7, 81–96.

Povinelli, D. J. (2000a). Folk physics for apes. The chimpanzee’s theory of how the world works. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Povinelli, D. J.(2000b). The minds of humans and apes are di↵erent outcomes of an evolutionary experiment. In S. Fitzpatrick & J. Bruer (Eds.), Carving our destiny: Scientific research faces a new millennium (pp. 1–40). Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences and John Henry Press.

Povinelli, D. J., & Vonk, J. (2003). Chimpanzee minds: Suspiciously human? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 157–160.

Preissler, M. A., & Bloom, P. (2007). Two-year-olds appreciate the dual nature of pictures. Psychological Science, 18, 1-2.

Preuss, T. M., C´ aceres, M., Oldham, M. C., & Geschwind, D. H. (2004).

Human brain evolution: Insights from microarrays. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5, 850–860.

Price, G. (1972). Extension of covariance selection mathematics. Annals of Human Genetics, 35, 485–490.

Prinz, J. J. (2002). Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptual basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Pyysi¨ainen, I.(2003). True fiction: Philosophy and psychology of religious belief. Philosophical Psychology, 16, 109–125.

Pyysi¨ainen, I., Lindeman, M., & Honkela, T.(2003). Counterintuitiveness as the hallmark of religiosity. Religion, 33, 341–355.

Qin, Y., Carter, C. S., Silk, E. M., Stenger, V. A., Fissell, K., Goode, A., & Anderson, J. R. (2004). The change of the brain activation patterns as children learn algebra equation solving. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 5686–5691.

Quallo, M. M., Price, C. J., Ueno, K., Asamizuya, T., Cheng, K., Lemon, R. N., & Iriki, A.(2009). Gray and white matter changes associated with tool-use learning in macaque monkeys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 18379–18384.

Quine, W. V. O. (1969a). Epistemology naturalized. In W. V. O. Quine

302

Bibliography

(Ed.), Ontological relativity and other essays (pp. 69–90). New York: Columbia University Press.

Quine, W. V. O. (1969b). Natural kinds. In W. V. O. Quine (Ed.), Ontological relativity and other essays (pp. 114–138). New York: Columbia University Press.

Quine, W. V. O. (1975). The nature of natural knowledge. In S. Guttenplan (Ed.), Mind and language: Wolfson College lectures (pp.

67–81). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Quine, W. V. O. (1995). From stimulus to science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ramsey, G. (2006). Block fitness. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 37, 484–498.

Real, L. A.(1991). Animal choice behavior and the evolution of cognitive architecture. Science, 253, 980–986.

Recanati, F. (1997). Can we believe what we do not understand? Mind & Language, 12, 84–100.

Regier, T., Kay, P., Gilbert, A. L., & Ivry, R. B. (2010). Language and thought: Which side are you on, anyway? In B. Malt & P. Wol↵ (Eds.), Words and the mind: How words capture human experience (pp. 165–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reid, T. (1764). An inquiry into the human mind, on the principles of common sense. Edinburgh: Millar, Kincaid and Bell.

Resnik, M. D.(1982). Mathematics as the science of patterns: Epistemology. Noˆ us, 16, 95–105.

Restivo, S. (1992). Mathematics in society and history. Sociological inquiries. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone. How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rips, L. J., Asmuth, J., & Bloomfield, A. (2006). Giving the boot to the bootstrap: How not to learn the natural numbers. Cognition, 101, B51–B60.

Rips, L. J., Bloomfield, A., & Asmuth, J.(2008). From numerical concepts to concepts of number. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 623–642.

Robillard, P.-Y., Dekker, G. A., & Hulsey, T. C. (2002). Evolutionary adaptations to pre-eclampsia/eclampsia in humans: Low fecundability rate, loss of oestrus, prohibitions of incest and systematic polyandry. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 47, 104–

Bibliography

303

111.

Rogers, A. R.(1988). Does biology constrain culture? American Anthropologist, 90, 819–831.

Rogers, D. S., & Ehrlich, P. R. (2008). Natural selection and cultural rates of change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 3416–3420.

Rollenhagen, J. E., & Olson, C. R. (2000). Mirror-image confusion in single neurons of the macaque inferotemporal cortex. Science, 287, 1506–1508.

Rosenberg, K., & Trevathan, W.(2002). Birth, obstetrics and human evolution. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 109, 1199– 1206.

Roth, P. (2007). Naturalism without fears. In S. P. Turner & M. W. Risjord (Eds.), Philosophy of anthropology and sociology (pp. 683– 708). Amsterdam & Oxford: North-Holland.

Rowlands, M. (1997). Teleological semantics. Mind, 106, 279–303.

Roy, R.(2003). Babylonian Pythagoras’ theorem, the early history of zero and a polemic on the study of the history of science. Resonance, 8, 30–40.

Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F.(2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521–562.

Rugani, R., Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G.(2008). Discrimination of small numerosities in young chicks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 388–399.

Rusconi, E., Walsh, V., & Butterworth, B. (2005). Dexterity with numbers: rTMS over left angular gyrus disrupts finger gnosis and number processing. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1609–1624.

Samarapungavan, A., Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. (1996). Mental models of the Earth, Sun, and Moon: Indian children’s cosmologies.

Cognitive Development, 11, 491–521.

Samarapungavan, A., & Wiers, R. W. (1997). Children’s thoughts on the origin of species: A study of explanatory coherence. Cognitive Science, 21, 147–177.

Samuels, R. (2000). Massively modular minds: Evolutionary psychology and cognitive architecture. In P. Carruthers & A. Chamberlain (Eds.), Evolution and the human mind. Modularity, language and meta-cognition (pp. 13–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

304

Bibliography

Samuels, R.(2002). Nativism in cognitive science. Mind & Language, 17, 233–265.

Samuels, R. (2004). Innateness in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 136–141.

Sandler, W., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Arono↵, M. (2005). The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 2661–2665.

Sandrini, M., Rossini, P. M., & Miniussi, C. (2004). The di↵erential involvement of inferior parietal lobule in number comparison: A rTMS study. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1902–1909.

Sarich, V. M., & Wilson, A. C. (1967). Immunological time scale for hominid evolution. Science, 158, 1200–1203.

Sarnecka, B. W., & Gelman, S. A. (2004). Six does not just mean a lot: Preschoolers see number words as specific. Cognition, 92, 329–352.

Saxe, G. B. (1981). Body parts as numerals: A developmental analysis of numeration among the Oksapmin in Papua New Guinea. Child Development, 52, 306–316.

Saxe, G. B. (1985). E↵ects of schooling on arithmetical understandings: Studies with Oksapmin children in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 503–513.

Saxe, R., Tenenbaum, J., & Carey, S. (2005). Secret agents: Inferences about hidden causes by 10- and 12-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 16, 995–1001.

Schick, K. D., Toth, N., Garufi, G., Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., Rumbaugh, D., & Sevcik, R. (1999). Continuing investigations into the stone tool-making and tool-using capabilities of a bonobo (Pan paniscus).

Journal of Archaeological Science, 26, 821–832.

Schliesser, E.(2011). Newton’s challenge to philosophy: A programmatic essay. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 1, 101–128.

Schlimm, D., & Neth, H.(2008). Modeling ancient and modern arithmetic practices: Addition and multiplication with arabic and roman numerals. In V. Sloutsky, B. Love, & K. McRae (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Frey, D. (2006). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dis-

Bibliography

305

sent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1080–1093.

Schwartz, D. L., Martin, T., & Pfa↵man, J. (2005). How mathematics propels the development of physical knowledge. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 65–88.

Schwitzgebel, E., & Gordon, M. S.(2000). How well do we know our own conscious experience? The case of human echolocation. Philosophical Topics, 28, 235–246.

Segal, G. (1996). The modularity of theory of mind. In P. Carruthers & P. K. Smith (Eds.), Theories of theories of mind (pp. 141–157).

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In H. Feigl & M. Scriven (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, foundations of science and the concepts of psychology and psychoanalysis (pp. 253–329). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Semaw, S., Renne, P., Harris, J. W. K., Feibel, C. S., Bernor, R. L., Fesseha, N., & Mowbray, K.(1997). 2.5-Million-year-old stone tools from Gona, Ethiopia. Nature, 385, 333–336.

Senut, B., Pickford, M., Gommery, D., Mein, P., Cheboi, K., & Coppens, Y. (2001). First hominid from the Miocene (Lukeino Formation, Kenya). Comptes Rendus de l’Acad´emie des Sciences–Series IIA, 332, 137–144.

Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L., & Marler, P.(1980). Monkey responses to three di↵erent alarm calls: Evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. Science, 210, 801–803.

Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as di↵erent sides of the same coin.

Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1–36.

Sha↵er, M. (2008). Bayesianism, convergence and social epistemology.

Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, 5, 203–219.

Shapiro, L., & Epstein, W. (1998). Evolutionary theory meets cognitive psychology: A more selective perspective. Mind & Language, 13, 171–194.

Shapiro, S. (1997). Philosophy of mathematics: Structure and ontology.

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shelishch, P. (1982). A quantitative study of biologists in the 18th and 19th centuries. Scientometrics, 4, 317–329.

306

Bibliography

Shelley, C. (1999). Multiple analogies in archaeology. Philosophy of Science, 66, 579–605.

Sherry, D. F., & Schacter, D. L.(1987). The evolution of multiple memory systems. Psychological Review, 94, 439–454.

Shimojo, S., & Ichikawa, S. (1989). Intuitive reasoning about probability: Theoretical and experimental analyses of the “problem of three prisoners”. Cognition, 32, 1–24.

Shogenji, T. (2000). Self-dependent justification without circularity.

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51, 287–298.

Shtulman, A., & Schulz, L. (2008). The relation between essentialist beliefs and evolutionary reasoning. Cognitive Science, 32, 1049– 1062.

Shultz, T. R.(1982a). Causal reasoning in the social and nonsocial realms.

Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 14, 307–322.

Shultz, T. R. (1982b). Rules of causal attribution. Monographs for the Society for Research in Child Development, 47, 1–51.

Siegal, M., Butterworth, G., & Newcombe, P. A. (2004). Culture and children’s cosmology. Developmental Science, 7, 308–324.

Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L.(2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Development, 75, 428–444.

Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E.(2003). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity.

Psychological Science, 14, 237–243.

Siegler, R. S., Thompson, C. A., & Schneider, M. (2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 273–296.

Simon, H. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment.

Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.

Simon, H. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 457–482.

Simon, O., Mangin, J.-F., Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S.(2002).

Topographical layout of hand, eye, calculation, and languagerelated areas in the human parietal lobe. Neuron, 33, 475–487.

Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained, stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475–494.

Simpson, G. G. (1950). Some principles of historical biology bearing on human origins. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative

Bibliography

307

Biology, 15, 55–66.

Slater, A., & Quinn, P. C.(2001). Face recognition in the newborn infant.

Infant and Child Development, 10, 21–24.

Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.

Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.

Soon, C. S., Brass, M., Heinze, H. J., & Haynes, J. D. (2008). Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 543–545.

Spaepen, E., Coppola, M., Spelke, E. S., Carey, S. E., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2011). Number without a language model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 3163–3168.

Spelke, E. S. (1990). Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science, 14, 29–56.

Spelke, E. S.(2003). What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind. Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 277–311).

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science, 10, 89–96.

Spelke, E. S., Phillips, A., & Woodward, A. L.(1995). Infants’ knowledge of object motion and human action. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition. A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 44–78). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Spelke, E. S., & Tsivkin, A. (2001). Language and number: A bilingual training study. Cognition, 78, 45–88.

Sperber, D. (1985). Anthropology and psychology: Towards an epidemiology of representations. Man, 20, 73–89.

Sperber, D. (1994). The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In L. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind. Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 39–67).

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture. A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sperber, D.(1997). Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind & Language, 12, 67–83.

Sperber, D., & Hirschfeld, L. A. (2004). The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8,

308

Bibliography

40–46.

Spicer, F. (2010). Cultural variations in folk epistemic intuitions. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 515–529.

Staal, F. (2006). Artificial languages across sciences and civilizations.

Journal of Indian Philosophy, 34, 89–141.

Staddon, J. E. R. (1983). Adaptive behavior and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stamos, D. N. (1996). Popper, falsifiability, and evolutionary biology.

Biology & Philosophy, 11, 161–191.

Stamos, D. N. (2003). The species problem. Biological species, ontology, and the metaphysics of biology. Lanham: Lexington.

Stamos, D. N.(2005). Pre-Darwinian taxonomy and essentialism—A reply to Mary Winsor. Biology & Philosophy, 20, 79–96.

Starkey, P., & Cooper, R. G. (1980). Perception of numbers by human infants. Science, 210, 1033–1035.

Stedall, J. A. (2001). Of our own nation: John Wallis’s account of mathematical learning in medieval England. Historia Mathematica, 2, 73–122.

Stephens, C. L. (2001). When is it selectively advantageous to have true beliefs? Sandwiching the better safe than sorry argument. Philosophical Studies, 105, 161–189.

Sterelny, K. (2003). Thought in a hostile world: The evolution of human cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sterelny, K. (2004). Externalism, epistemic artefacts and the extended mind. In R. Schantz (Ed.), The externalist challenge (pp. 239–254).

Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Sterelny, K. (2006). Folk logic and animal rationality. In S. Hurley & M. Nudds (Eds.), Rational animals? (pp. 293–311). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sterelny, K. (2007). SNAFUS: An evolutionary perspective. Biological Theory, 2, 317–328.

Stewart-Williams, S.(2005). Innate ideas as a naturalistic source of metaphysical knowledge. Biology & Philosophy, 20, 791–814.

Stich, S. (1990). The fragmentation of reason: Preface to a pragmatic theory of cognitive evaluation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Stout, D., Quade, J., Semaw, S., Rogers, M., & Levin, N. E.(2005). Raw material selectivity of the earliest stone toolmakers at Gona, Afar, Ethiopia. Journal of Human Evolution, 48, 365–380.

Bibliography

309

Suddendorf, T., Addis, D. R., & Corballis, M. C. (2009). Mental time travel and the shaping of the human mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1317–1324.

Sullivan, P. R. (2009). Objects limit human comprehension. Biology & Philosophy, 24, 65–79.

Surian, L., Caldi, S., & Sperber, D. (2007). Attribution of beliefs by 13-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 18, 580–586.

Swisher III, C. C., Curtis, G. H., Jacob, T., Getty, A. G., Suprijo, A., & Widiasmoro. (1994). Age of the earliest known hominids in Java, Indonesia. Science, 263, 1118–1121.

Tan, L. H., Feng, C. M., Fox, P. T., & Gao, J. H.(2001). An fMRI study with written Chinese. NeuroReport, 12, 83–88.

Tang, Y., Zhang, W., Chen, K., Feng, S., Ji, Y., Shen, J., Reiman, E., & Liu, Y. (2006). Arithmetic processing in the brain shaped by cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 10775–10780.

Tattersall, I. (2000). Paleoanthropology: The last half-century. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9, 2–15.

Taylor, M., Esbensen, B., & Bennett, R. (1994). Children’s understanding of knowledge acquisition: The tendency for children to report that they have always known what they have just learned. Child Development, 65, 1581–1604.

Temple, E., & Posner, M. I. (1998). Brain mechanisms of quantity are similar in 5-year-old children and adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 7836– 7841.

Tentori, K., Bonini, N., & Osherson, D. (2004). The conjunction fallacy: A misunderstanding about conjunction? Cognitive Science, 28, 467–477.

Thieme, H. (1997). Lower Palaeolithic hunting spears from Germany.

Nature, 385, 807–810.

Thune, C. E. (1978). Numbers and counting in Loboda: An example of a non-numerical oriented culture. Papua New Guinea Journal of Education, 14, 69–80.

Thurston, W.(2006). On proof and progress in mathematics. In R. Hersh (Ed.), 18 unconventional essays on the nature of mathematics (pp.

37–55). New York: Springer.

Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cam-

310

Bibliography

bridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Tomasello, M., & Rakoczy, H. (2003). What makes human cognition unique? From individual to shared to collective intentionality. Mind & Language, 18, 121–147.

Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Moscovitch, M., Weinrib, O., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Response properties of the human fusiform face area.

Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 257–280.

Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp.

19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.

Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1995). Foreword. In S. Baron-Cohen. Mindblindness. An essay on autism and theory of mind (pp. xi–xviii).

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tratman, E. K.(1976). A late Upper Palaeolithic calculator (?), Gough’s cave, Cheddar, Somerset. Proceedings of the University of Bristol Spelaeological Society, 14, 123–129.

Tudusciuc, O., & Nieder, A. (2007). Neuronal population coding of continuous and discrete quantity in the primate posterior parietal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 14513–14518.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

Uller, C., Carey, S., Huntley-Fenner, G., & Klatt, L. (1999). What representations might underlie infant numerical knowledge? Cognitive Development, 14, 1–36.

Uller, C., Jaeger, R., Guidry, G., & Martin, C. (2003). Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: Rudiments of number in an amphibian. Animal Cognition, 6, 105–112.

Uttal, D. H., Scudder, K. V., & DeLoache, J. S. (1997). Manipulatives as symbols: A new perspective on the use of concrete objects to teach mathematics. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 18, 37–54. van Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Clarendon. van Ginkel, W. P., & van Knippenberg, D. (2009). Knowledge about the distribution of information and group decision making: When and why does it work? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 218–229.

Bibliography

311

van Inwagen, P. (2006). What is naturalism? What is analytical philosophy? In A. Corradini, S. Galvan, & E. J. Lowe (Eds.), Analytic philosophy without naturalism (pp. 74–88). London & New York: Routledge.

Van Schaik, C. P., Ancrenaz, M., Borgen, G., Galdikas, B., Knott, C., Singleton, I., Suzuki, A., Utami, S. S., & Merrill, M.(2003). Orangutan cultures and the evolution of material culture. Science, 299, 102– 105.

Varley, R. A., Klessinger, N. J. C., Romanowski, C. A. J., & Siegal, M. (2005). Agrammatic but numerate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 3519– 3524.

Vartanian, O., & Goel, G.(2007). Neural correlates of creative cognition.

In C. Martindale, P. Locher, & V. M. Petrov (Eds.), Evolutionary and neurocognitive approaches to aesthetics, creativity and the arts (pp. 195–207). Amityville: Baywood Publishing.

Venkatraman, V., Ansari, D., & Chee, M. W. L.(2005). Neural correlates of symbolic and non-symbolic arithmetic. Neuropsychologia, 43, 744–753.

Vlassis, J.(2004). Making sense of the minus sign or becoming flexible in ‘negativity’. Learning and Instruction, 14, 469–484.

Vlassis, J.(2008). The role of mathematical symbols in the development of number conceptualization: The case of the minus sign. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 555–570.

Vonk, J., & Povinelli, D. J. (2006). Similarity and di↵erence in the conceptual systems of primates: The unobservability hypothesis. In E. Wasserman & T. Zentall (Eds.), Comparative cognition: Experimental explorations of animal intelligence (pp. 363–387). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Vosniadou, S. (1994). Universal and culture-specific properties of children’s mental models of the Earth. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind. Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 412–430). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W.(1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development. Review of Educational Research, 57, 51–67.

Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. (1992). Mental models of the Earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535–585.

312

Bibliography

Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123–183.

Vosniadou, S., & Ioannides, C. (1998). From conceptual development to science education: A psychological point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1213–1230.

Vosniadou, S., Skopeliti, I., & Ikospentaki, K. (2004). Modes of knowing and ways of reasoning in elementary astronomy. Cognitive Development, 19, 203–222.

Wagner, G. P., & Altenberg, L. (1996). Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution, 50, 967–976.

Wagner-D¨obler, R., & Berg, J.(1999). Physics 1800–1900: A quantitative outline. Scientometrics, 46, 213–285.

Wallace, A. R.(1855). On the law which has regulated the introduction of new species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 16, 184–196.

Wallace, A. R. (1858). On the tendency of varieties to depart indefinitely from the original type. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, 3, 53–62.

Wallace, A. R.(1905). My life: A record of events and opinions. London: Chapman & Hall.

Walsh, D. M., Lewens, T., & Ariew, A.(2002). The trials of life: Natural selection and random drift. Philosophy of Science, 69, 452–473.

Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1–40.

Ward, T. B.(1998). Analogical distance and purpose in creative thought: Mental leaps versus mental hops. In K. Holyoak, D. Gentner, & B. Kokinov (Eds.), Advances in analogy research: Integration of theory and data from the cognitive, computational , and neural sciences (pp. 221–230). Sofia: New Bulgarian University.

Ward, T. B., Patterson, M. J., Sifonis, C. M., Dodds, R. A., & Saunders, K. N. (2002). The role of graded category structure in imaginative thought. Memory and Cognition, 30, 199–216.

Wassmann, J., & Dasen, P. R. (1994). Yupno number system and counting. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 78–94.

Watson, J. C., & Arp, R.(2008). Checks and balances: The welcomed tension between philosophy and science. Quarterly Review of Biology, 83, 17–28.

Waxman, S. (2005). Why is the concept ‘living thing’ so elusive? Concepts, languages, and the development of folkbiology. In W.-K.

Bibliography

313

Ahn, R. L. Goldstone, B. C. Love, A. B. Markman, & P. Wol↵ (Eds.), Categorization inside and outside the laboratory. Essays in honor of Douglas L. Medin (pp. 49–67). Washington: American Psychological Association.

Wegener, A. (1912). Die Entstehung der Kontinente. Geologische Rundschau, 3, 276–292.

Wegner, D. M. (2003a). The mind’s best trick: How we experience conscious will. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 65–69.

Wegner, D. M.(2003b). The mind’s self-portrait. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1001, 212–225.

Weinberg, J. S., Nichols, S., & Stich, S.(2001). What is a mechanism? A counterfactual account. Philosophical Topics, 21, 429–460.

Weisberg, M., & Muldoon, R.(2009). Epistemic landscapes and the division of cognitive labor. Philosophy of Science, 76, 225–252.

Wellman, H. M., & Miller, K. F. (1986). Thinking about nothing: Development of concepts of zero. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4, 31–42.

Wells, W. C. (1818). Two essays: One upon single vision with two eyes; the other on dew. A letter to the Right Hon. Lloyd, Lord Kenyon and an account of a female of the white race of mankind, part of whose skin resembles that of a negro; with some observations on the causes of the di↵erences in colour and form between the white and negro races of men. Edinburgh: Archibald Constable & Co. Wenger, A., & Fowers, B. J.(2008). Positive illusions in parenting: Every child is above average. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 611–634.

Whalen, J., Gallistel, C., & Gelman, R.(1999). Nonverbal counting in humans: The psychophysics of number representation. Psychological Science, 10, 130–137.

White, T. D.(1995). African omnivores: Global climatic change and PlioPleistocene hominids and suids. In E. S. Vrba, G. H. Denton, T. C. Partridge, & L. H. Burckle (Eds.), Paleoclimate and evolution, with emphasis on human origins (pp. 369–384). New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

White, T. D., Suwa, G., & Asfaw, B.(1995). Australopithecus ramidus, a new species of early hominid from Aramis, Ethiopia (corrigendum).

Nature, 375, 88.

Whitehead, A. N. (1911). An introduction to mathematics. London:

314

Bibliography

Williams & Northgate.

Whiten, A., Goodall, J., McGrew, W. C., Nishida, T., Reynolds, V., Sugiyama, Y., Tutin, C. E. G., Wrangham, R. W., & Boesch, C. (1999). Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature, 399, 682–685.

Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (J. B. Carroll, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wimpenny, J. H., Weir, A. A. S., & Kachelnik, A.(2011). New Caledonian crows use tools for non-foraging activities. Animal Cognition, 14, 459–464.

Wolpo↵, M. H., Hawks, J., & Caspari, R. (2000). Multiregional, not multiple origins. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 112, 129–136.

Wylie, A.(1985). The reaction against analogy. Advances in archaeological method and theory, 8, 63–111.

Wynn, K. (1990). Children’s understanding of counting. Cognition, 36, 155–193.

Wynn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358, 749–750.

Wynn, K.(1998a). An evolved capacity for number. In D. D. Cummins & C. Allen (Eds.), The evolution of mind (pp. 107–126). New York: Oxford University Press.

Wynn, K.(1998b). Psychological foundations of number: Numerical competence in human infants. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 296–303.

Wynn, K., & Chiang, W.(1998). Limits to infants’ knowledge of objects: The case of magical appearance. Psychological Science, 9, 448–455.

Xu, F., & Carey, S. (1996). Infants’ metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111–153.

Xu, F., & Spelke, E. S. (2000). Large number discrimination in 6-monthold infants. Cognition, 74, B1–B11.

Yellen, J. E., Brooks, A. S., Cornelissen, E., Mehlman, M. J., & Stewart, K.(1995). A Middle Stone Age worked bone industry from Katanda, Upper Semliki Valley, Zaire. Science, 268, 553–556.

Zeki, S., Watson, J. D. G., Lueck, C. J., Friston, K. J., Kennard, C., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1991). A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 641–649.

Zhang, J., & Norman, D. A. (1995). A representational analysis of nu-

Bibliography

315

meration systems. Cognition, 57, 271–295.

Zhang, J., & Wang, H. (2005). The e↵ect of external representations on numeric tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 817–838.