Mervinskiy 437

Page 100

341. WhatsApp also submitted that the proposed finding “conflicts with suggestions given by the Commission as part of its pre-GDPR engagement with WhatsApp, as evidenced in an email dated 11 April 2018, in which the Commission confirmed that the use of “technological design” and “hyperlinks to specific portions of the Terms/Privacy Policy” in the Legal Basis Notice was recommended139.” 342. It is clear that WhatsApp and I fundamentally disagree as to my assessment of the information provided by WhatsApp to users under this heading. I have already set out above the reasons why I consider the information provided to be insufficient, in terms of quality and the manner of delivery. My assessment, in this regard, already takes account of the matters raised by WhatsApp in the Preliminary Draft Submissions and my concerns remain, notwithstanding WhatsApp’s perspective on matters. Further, I do not agree with WhatsApp’s submission concerning “the benefit to users of more generally providing a range of easily accessible tools, settings and measures” or “the ease with which the user can navigate from the Privacy Policy to the linked Legal Basis Notice and to the Terms of Service (and back) …”. Such matters are only beneficial to the user if the user has been provided with the information that he/she is entitled to receive (which I do not consider to be the case here). Finally, my assessment of WhatsApp’s submissions concerning its pre-GDPR engagement with the Commission’s Consultation Unit has already been considered as part of my assessment of WhatsApp’s Submissions of General Application, above.

Identified Legal Basis 2: Consent What information has been provided? 343. In this section, I examine whether there has been compliance with Article 13(1)(c), insofar as WhatsApp refers to reliance on the legal basis set out in Article 6(1)(a) (consent). With regard to WhatsApp’s reliance on consent, the Legal Basis Notice provides that: “The other legal bases we rely on in certain instances when processing your data are: … Your Consent For collecting and using information you allow us to receive through the device-based settings when you enable them (such as access to your GPS location, camera, or photos), so we can provide the features and services described when you enable the settings.”

How has the information been provided? 344. The information set out above has been provided in a clear and concise manner.

Assessment of Decision-Maker 345. While the manner in which the information has been made available to the user is clear and concise, the quality of the information provided is insufficient in that it fails to identify the processing operations that will be grounded upon the user’s consent. It further fails to identify the categories of data that will be processed for the processing operations that will be grounded upon the user’s consent. I note, in this regard, that the information provided specifically references the “collection” and “use” of information that the user “allows” WhatsApp to receive through the device-based settings, such as access to the user’s GPS location, camera or photos.

139

The Preliminary Draft Submissions, paragraph 7.4

100


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

The Decision-Making Stage

2hr
pages 143-220

Article 83(5) and the applicable fining “cap”

14min
pages 248-256

Decision: Whether to impose an administrative fine and, if so, the amount of the fine

18min
pages 225-237

Appendix C – Terms of Order to bring processing operations into compliance, made pursuant to Article 58(2)(d

3min
pages 264-265

Summary of Corrective Powers to be Exercised

0
pages 257-258

Article 83(2)(k): any other aggravating or mitigating factor applicable to the circumstances of the case, such as financial benefits gained, or losses avoided, directly or indirectly, from the infringement

10min
pages 221-224

Assessment: Article 13(2)(a) – Retention Criteria/Retention Periods

2min
page 128

Assessment: Article 13(2)(b) – the existence of the data subject rights

2min
page 132

Assessment of Decision-Maker: What information has been provided?

2min
page 129

Identified Legal Basis 5: The vital interests of the data subject or those of another person

2min
page 110

Assessment of Decision-Maker: What information has been provided?

2min
page 124

Assessment: Article 13(1)(f) – Transfers of personal data to a third country

2min
page 123

Assessment of Decision-Maker: What information has been provided?

1min
page 120

Identified Legal Basis 6: Tasks carried out in the public interest

8min
pages 111-113

Identified Legal Basis 1: Contractual Necessity

17min
pages 94-99

Identified Legal Basis 2: Consent

5min
pages 100-101

Identified Legal Basis 4: Compliance with a Legal Obligation

11min
pages 106-109

Identified Legal Basis 3: Legitimate Interests

10min
pages 102-105

Preliminary Issue: What information must be provided pursuant to Article 13(1)(c)?

26min
pages 82-92

Assessment: Application of the Proposed Approach to Article 13(1)(c

2min
page 93

Review of the Materials being relied upon by WhatsApp

10min
pages 64-67

Assessment: Article 13(1)(c) – the purposes of the processing for which the personal data are intended as well as the legal basis for the processing

7min
pages 79-81

Assessment of Decision-Maker: What information has been provided?

1min
page 76

Methodology for Part 2: Assessment and Questions for Determination

19min
pages 68-74

Relevant Provisions

4min
pages 62-63

Assessment: Article 13(1)(a) – the identity and contact details of the controller

2min
page 75
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.