Bartlett Design Anthology | PG24

Design Anthology PG24

Architecture MArch (ARB/RIBA Part 2) Compiled from Bartlett Summer Show Books

Our Design DNA

At The Bartlett School of Architecture, we have been publishing annual exhibition catalogues for each of our design-based programmes for more than a decade. These catalogues, amounting to thousands of pages, illustrate the best of our students’ extraordinary work. Our Design Anthology series brings together the annual catalogue pages for each of our renowned units, clusters, and labs, to give an overview of how their practice and research has evolved.

Throughout this time some teaching partnerships have remained constant, others have changed. Students have also progressed from one programme to another. Nevertheless, the way in which design is taught and explored at The Bartlett School of Architecture is in our DNA. Now with almost 50 units, clusters and labs in the school across our programmes, the Design Anthology series shows how we define, progress and reinvent our agendas and themes from year to year.

2022 Vibrant Matter

Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

2021 Wanderlust

Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

2020 Guilt Free

Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

2019 Redrawing the Rural

Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

2018 Sculpting in Time

Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

2017 Make-Believe

Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

2016 Against the Flow

Penelope Haralambidou, Simon Kennedy, Michael Tite

2015 Forty Second Island

Penelope Haralambidou, Simon Kennedy, Michael Tite

2014 Remember the Future

Penelope Haralambidou, Simon Kennedy, Michael Tite 2013 Collisions

Michael Chadwick, Simon Kennedy 2010 Possibilities of Exchange: Poetic Transference

Uwe Schmidt-Hess, Michael Wihart 2009 Migrating Thresholds

Uwe Schmidt-Hess, Michael Wihart

2006 Phenomenal Noumena: extreme PHENOuMENA

Steve Hardy, Jonas Lundberg with Ken Faulkner 2005 Effectual Formalisms

Steve Hardy, Jonas Lundberg

2004 [Bosphorus] Drifts [Caspian] Shifts

Peter Hasdell, Patrick Weber

Vibrant Matter

Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

Vibrant Matter

Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

PG24 is a group of architectural storytellers who employ film, animation, VR/AR and physical modelling techniques to help make sense of the complexity of today’s world. Inspired by philosophy, this year we questioned our relationship with matter.

In Vibrant Matter, political philosopher Jane Bennett theorises a vital materiality that runs through and across human and non-human entities. Furthermore, thinkers such as Graham Harman and Timothy Morton propose an ‘object-oriented ontology’ that perceives material things as alive and multi-scaled, sentient even. They insist that we are made of, and are surrounded by, a vibrant world of correlated habitats and non-human conscience: a steel column, a hurricane, a cup of tea, a microbe – all belong to a universal material sameness that created us.

The climate emergency is seen as the result of human activity. Solutions often use the same technological thinking that has led to the crisis in the first place. But what if we firstly (and urgently) reconsider our understanding of the world of things? Instead of shaping matter, can we allow matter to shape our sensibility as designers?

We considered these ideas like sculptors obsessing over raw materials or philosophers engaging intellectually with the concept of matter itself. How is time embedded in matter? How do we define value in materials? What about edible matter and architecture’s relationship to food? When does material become waste?

In the process we invented new types of physical and digital hybrid matter, tethering ethereal new behaviours to tangible material. We reflected on how this new hybrid matter can influence not only our manufacturing, design and entertainment industries, but also our everyday, helping to form new local and global communities. To support this material awakening we explored the historical, social and industrial heritage of diverse sites, portraying the stories embedded in the life of their material resources and the communities that these create. In so doing we moved towards an architecture of vibrant matter.

Year 4 Loukis Menelaou, Cira Oller Tovar, Joshua Richardson, Matthew Semião Carmo Simpson, Chak (Anthony) Tai

Year 5

Vitika Agarwal, Jatiphak Boonmun, Kalliopi Bosini, Paris Gazzola, Gabriele Grassi, Holly Harbour, Daniel Johnston, Carlota Nuñez-Barranco Vallejo, Tom Ushakov, David Wood

Technical tutor and consultant: Matthew Lucraft

Thesis supervisors: Camilo Boano, Amica Dall, Oliver Domeisen, Claire McAndrew, Harry Parr, Tania Sengupta, Robin Wilson, Oliver Wilton, Fiona Zisch, Stamatis Zografos

Critics: Laura Allen, Mark Breeze, Rhys Cannon, Barbara-Ann Campbell-Lange, Marjan Colletti, John Cruwys, Claude Dutson, Pedro Gil, Matt Lucraft, Matei Mitrache, Caireen O’Hagan, George Proud, Javier Ruiz Rodriguez, Mark Smout, Jasper Stevens, Jonathan Tyrrell

24.1 Paris Gazzola, Y5 ‘My Land, Mine Land’. The project is an investigation into the gold-mining towns of Western Australia. It critiques imported colonial knowledge and imagines a new future for the settlement of Leonora. The settlement is composed of an archipelago of residential islands on the surface that extend into social, commercial and industrial spaces underground. A new kind of desert living is proposed that sits in contrast to the resource-hungry models of the recent past – one based on local resources and knowledge, remediation and the coexistence of different societies. The film explores this interconnected underground realm as a cinematic love letter playing backwards – a hopeful, resilient and optimistic future for a once-scorched Earth.

24.2 Kalliopi Bosini, Y5 ‘Mani Stone Kneaded’. The Greek peninsula of Mani is facing increasingly difficult environmental and social challenges as younger generations move to bigger cities. This internal migration is leading to the gradual abandonment of the region, resulting in the loss of equilibrium between heritage, identity and socio-economic growth. The new settlement in the village of Kardamyli traces the timeless reciprocal relationship between the land, extracted materials and the shaped architecture. A rebirth of the families’ domestic and labour needs is enabled through the exclusive production of olive oil and soap. A new socially, economically and environmentally sustainable Maniotian vernacular is imagined, matching the village’s origins and its true historic identity.

24.3–24.5 Carlota Nuñez-Barranco Vallejo, Y5 ‘Queens of the Desert Age’. Located in southern Spain at a point in the near future, a female-led settlement survives in an incredibly hostile environment. Three primary technological powers (wind, solar and organic matter) are harnessed and sit alongside residential dwellings. Research into the science-fiction genre generated a positive future vision, where climate change is a force for active development. Three mystical ‘queens’ emerge from the desert terrain, each responsible for controlling and channelling their regions’ power, each with an amorphous identity that translates into their respective architectures. Building on utopian visions of agrarian societies, the project comments on the uneven city-centric population distribution in Spanish society. 24.6 Gabriele Grassi, Y5 ‘Wast\ed’. The project explores food production, consumption and waste systems. An unconventional material palette is proposed, fusing traditional building materials with food: an architecture of chocolate, milk, vegetables, plastic, cardboard and wood. A storytelling dining table capable of blurring scales and material conditions, morphs between the fictional and the informational, the real and the virtual. The final film borrows narrative elements of Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland to tell a contemporary story of consumption and waste. The result is a surreal communal dining hall with a sobering wake-up call to our contemporary state of gluttony. 24.7–24.9 Tom Ushakov, Y5 ‘Gatekeepers of Memory’. The project translates idiosyncratic metaphysical concepts into space and takes the form of pavilions nestled in a speculative landscape. Readings of Pallasmaa, Yates and Plutchik’s ‘Wheel of Emotion’ underpin the layout of this imaginary realm, depicted in a large-scale model/table/mindscape masterplan. Each pavilion is assigned an emotion and a memory which, when combined, create a central edifice –the ‘House of Emotion’. A semi-autobiographical protagonist sets out on a hero’s journey to explore these internal monochromatic landscapes, reflecting on past experience and searching out new forms. Upon his return to reality, he builds the table as a cathartic act, to give an external grounding to his internal world.

24.10 Jatiphak Boonmun, Y5 ‘Performances of Authenticity’. A series of performative architectures reveal the indigenous truths of the Republic of Formosa. Reacting to the fictitious histories presented to the West by George Psalmanazar in the 1740s, the project foregrounds the islanders’ true heritage while also forging new spatial possibilities. Exploring how aboriginal performativity navigates architecture against the backdrop of nuclear waste storage, this filmic architecture exposes and critiques various forms of cadastral land interpretation. The proposal is a quasi-theatre nuclear waste facility that follows a crafted itinerary. It describes a surreal world that sits between performance, theatre and historical storytelling. 24.11–24.13 Holly Harbour, Y5 ‘The Beautiful and the Dammed’. In the mountains of Guatemala, megainfrastructure projects lead to the forced displacement of local Mayan farming communities, with protestations claiming the lives of indigenous activists. The project imagines a new future for a hydroelectric dam that is reclaimed by local people as a site of pilgrimage and a memorial to lives lost. The structure provides a stage for the performance of rituals and festivities whose degree of transience relates to the Mayan calendar, taking inspiration from ancient mythology and the magic realist writings of Miguel Ángel Asturias. The building is shaped by time, water and human activity in a manner that contrasts the traditionally immutable structure of a dam. 24.14 Daniel Johnston, Y5 ‘The Para-Nominal (e)State’. The project explores contemporary ideas of value, which have become eroded as technology has progressed. It asks whether an alternative digital valuation system can create new commodities, typologies and emergent programmes, and how it might alter everyday physical spaces. Responding to London’s housing crisis, a new kind of dwelling is prototyped within the Barking Riverside masterplan, including 19 residential units, a corner shop, bin store and courtyard. Unrestricted by screens, the form and content of the home become warped and twisted. A universal digital overlay is designed within the estate, offering residents the chance to customise their homes and link to the wider community. 24.15–24.17 David Wood, Y5 ‘Capturing the Arctic’. The project describes an expedition, a yearly ritual of capturing, transporting and reconfiguring Arctic ice. Arriving in London, an ice harvester is met by a small flotilla that journeys down the Thames, transforming the ice into a water fountain, an ice rink and an Arctic temple. Mirroring the otherworldliness of remote, extreme landscapes, the film explores the fragility between preservation and loss on a human scale through a part-drawn, part-digital architecture. The ceremonial proposal addresses the overwhelming enormity of shifts that are occurring in the Arctic and the memory of landscapes that are disappearing from sight. 24.18 Vitika Agarwal, Y5 ‘Inhabiting Hybridity’. The project responds to the postcolonial theory of cultural hybridity through a combination of British and Indian culture. The film depicts the migrant experience of being rooted in many places at once. Located at the prime meridian line in Greenwich Park, the proposal obscures the symbolic division between East and West, creating a fertile third space. Stone, a material used in both cultures as a signifier of permanence, is imagined as an amorphous, transcendental material. Through a digital time-based refiguring, it carries the potential to be constantly reshaped by addition and subtraction. The resulting architecture is a hybrid reforming of Britain and India, the past and present, the real and imagined.

Wanderlust Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

Wanderlust

Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

PG24 is a group of architectural storytellers employing film, animation, VR and XR and physical modelling techniques to explore architecture’s relationship with time.

This year we continued to address issues of climate change, by reconnecting the body with one of its most basic functions –walking. As the global pandemic upended our lives, we used walking as a primary method of engaging with and reclaiming the city and landscape.

Wanderlust has long been the source of inspiration of many writers and philosophers: Friedrich Nietzsche, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Virginia Woolf, W.G. Sebald and Rebecca Solnit, amongst others. But, beyond poetry, walking is also linked to abstract mathematical thought, intrinsically related with gauging distance – by measuring units based on the size of the human (male) foot – and the origin of arithmetic calculation itself. Recently, walking itself has become intensely quantified, in number of steps, as an indicator of wellbeing.

We asked, how does wanderlust inform architectural design but also film? Architecture is not experienced as a static contemplation from a single point of view but as a cinematic journey that unfolds in time. A well-designed amble, e.g. the Guggenheim Museum in New York, or the bridging of an impossible passage, e.g. Tintagel Castle Bridge in Cornwall, can be the sole purpose of architecture, which can fulfill dreams of walking on water, e.g. Christo and Jean-Claude’s Floating Piers (2016), or walking on air, e.g. Tomas Saraceno’s On Space Time Foam (2012). Architecture itself can be taken out for a walk. In traditional Japanese festivals, Mikoshi shrines are transported within a district, activating collective space. Archigram’s influential Walking City (c. 1960) can be seen in modern fables such as Howl’s Moving Castle (2004) and Mortal Engines (2018). Furthermore, the representation of walking in the built environment led to inventions such as the dolly system and the Steadicam, which were key to the development of cinema. Advancements in immersive film, VR and XR are allowing this to evolve further; we can now construct a digital spatial overlay around the moving body that can be inhabited in real time.

Between wandering, marching and rambling we questioned issues of mobility, age, gender, race and disability, and studied architecture through the romantic exploratory hike, the habitual daily commute, the purposeful personal quest, the meandering flânerie, the protest, the adventurous expedition and the dedicated pilgrimage.

All of our projects built a new and dynamic design vocabulary, proposing new ecological modes of occupation that can foresee and withstand the needs of our dramatically changing world.

Year 4 Vitika Agarwal, Jatiphak Boonmun, Kalliopi Bosini, Paris Gazzola, Gabriele Grassi, Holly Harbour, Carlota Nuñez-Barranco Vallejo, Tom Ushakov

Year 5

Camille Dunlop, Viktoria Fenyes, Alexander Fox, Maxim Goldau, Yee (Enoch) Liang, Elissavet Manou, Lingyun Qian, Issui Shioura, Matthew Taylor

Thank you to our design realisation tutor Kairo Baden-Powell

Thank you to our consultants: Krina Christopoulou, John Cruwys, Matt Lucraft, Sonia Magdziarz, Jerome Ng, Kevin Pollard, George Proud

Thesis supervisors: Edward Denison, Stephen Gage, Elise Hunchuck, Richard Martin, Niall McLaughlin, Guang Yu Ren, Oliver Wilton

Thank you to our critics: Kairo Baden-Powell, Nat Chard, Krina Christopoulou, John Cruwys, Kate Davies, Pedro Gil-Quintero, Jessica In, Suzanne Isa, Chee-Kit Lai, Stefan Lengen, Matt Lucraft, Keiichi Matsuda, Kevin Pollard, Sophia Psarra, Nick Shackleton, Sayan Skandarajah, Jasper Stevens, Jerry Tate, Manuel Toledo, Stefania Tsigkouni, Tim Waterman, Fiona Zisch

24.1 Yee (Enoch) Liang, Y5 ‘A New New Town’.

The allegorical film narrates Hong Kong’s collective consciousness through the city’s New Town Plaza mall. The film follows a boy who enters a surreal parallel dimension of New Town Plaza and wanders through its three spaces. These spaces explore remembering the past, savouring the present and building towards the future. The three spaces act as architectural characters that spatially guide the boy to rediscover his lost childhood and innocence, as a kind of coming-of-age journey in reverse. Allegorically, the boy’s journey represents Hong Konger’s rediscovery of their love towards the city and their perishing dream to preserve an expiring identity and reclaim a right to the city. Universally, it is a story that encourages one to break free from worldly social expectations and forge a future according to your beliefs.

24.2 Lingyun Qian, Y5 ‘Hundred Year Forest Wall’. Addressing China’s commitment to be carbon neutral by 2060, the project is a radical proposal for Beijing –a slow transformation of the old, now lost, city wall site, from the current ring road into a vibrant ‘forest wall’. Conceived as an enormous piece of ecological infrastructure, the proposal reorders the city over a long time period, to send a message of how seriously China takes the environmental crisis. The project’s main theme is creating nature through human intervention within a multi-scale, cross-generational planning framework. Adaptable, mobile and elevated structures are designed to allow the forest and the road to morph, and to form a ceremonial architecture that resembles the old gates and city wall. As we stand at the precipice of environmental failure, the project is a call-to-arms that levers political power and the will of the collective, for the benefit of future generations.

24.3–24.5 Issui Shioura, Y5 ‘Ephemeral Preservation’. The film depicts the world of Sampo, a real-life mobile living unit collective that explores a method for disaster preparation in Japan. The project introduces a series of interconnected interventions that operate on a variety of scales: from the ‘Tact’ mobile expandable kit to the ‘MoC’ mobile cell, and the kura (storehouse) to the mikoshi (portable shrine), each one resists the idea of fixity, drawing on the idea of the void space and historic Japanese architectural modes. Influenced by slacker culture and Mike Figgis’ Timecode (2000), the film is realised as a lo-fi, countercultural rallying cry, where the collective acts of making, gathering, building, remembering (and partying) try to flow with the natural world, rather than create resistive structures. The film is part documentary, part music video; a freestyle rap drives the form of the film. It takes an optimistic attitude and approach to community, rather than built hardware, and offers a new kind of anticipatory, participatory, free-flowing architecture.

24.6 Matthew Taylor, Y5 ‘Bathhouse of Spiritual Purity’. Located in and around the Hie Shrine in the Chiyodo ward of Tokyo, the bathhouse is conceived as a bridge between the real and the divine – an ecological realm where time and gravity play to different rules. Influenced through a personal affiliation with Japan and Shintoism, the project seeks out a new eco-animistic inhabitation for the 21st century and beyond. The design lies between architecture and mythical storytelling, utilising the boundless potentials of animistic values to form an alternative architecture of co-existence. The project gives partial design control to procedural software, conceived as ‘digital spirits’ that guide us on a sacred design journey. From the animations of Studio Ghibli to the paintings of Hieronymus Bosch, and decay simulations to Kami iconography, the final film promotes messages of environmentalism and animistic co-existence.

24.7–24.9 Maxim Goldau, Y5 ‘Matryoshka Tempelhof’. By applying concepts of ‘Shearing Layers’ and ‘Support & Infills’ this housing project inhabits the hangars of the former Tempelhof Airport in Berlin, creating the necessary shelter for a participatory architecture. The project examines how better quality, low-tech, inclusive environments might benefit us all. By questioning the humble functions and elements in our homes, it explores to what extent services and furniture can take on architectural roles by activating a mobile form of construction. The design is realised through a series of inventive installation-like objects that are gradually adapted and changed until they become occupiable interiors. The film gives voice to the disembodied view of the articulated service infrastructure, which together with the occupant become collaborators in a reusable and adaptive architecture.

24.10 Alexander Fox, Y5 ‘Harbouring the Exoskeleton’. This science fiction allegory calls for the preservation of biodiversity, while challenging human interference. Learning from insect life cycles, the architecture takes three forms. In the first, a land train of experimental laboratories, resembling larva or a caterpillar, roams across terrains before decoupling and expanding into inflated biomes, similar to pupa, creating an idyllic habitat, safe from predators, for the reproduction of insects and providing opportunity for scientists to observe. Secondly, the building’s AI system, HIVE (Holistic Insect Vehicular Experiment), controls the architecture to create monolithic structures that house insects, while also tethering the inflatables in place. In the final phase, the building goes through a process of ecdysis – the shedding of old skin – and rebirth. The building rejects the human operators it houses and becomes sentient; a catalyst for environmental regeneration.

24.11–24.14 Camille Dunlop, Y5 ‘Arboreal’. The project operates at the intersection of body, forest and city. ‘Arboreal’ has two sites: the dance is digitally recorded in the Swedish Tyresta National Park forest and is then translated into a dedicated dance hall in Stockholm. The body-in-motion conducts an architectural act between the wilderness and the city, and the choreography becomes a constituent part of a performing architecture. The building also performs through an adaptable, dynamic and ever-shifting system controlled by the performers. Sited in the centre of the city, tree-like columns host swaying translucent fabrics that blend the building into the urban environment. Motion-capture technology is a key part of the research methodology and the programme. While mobility entangles all living beings within the Anthropocene, digital measures of movement create architectural dualities that challenge humancentric space.

24.15 Elissavet Manou, Y5 ‘Not Set in Stone’. The project imagines the establishment of a multi-generational settlement on the windy Greek island of Tinos. ‘Not Set in Stone’ explores the concept of a ‘palindromic’ construction process that results in a dual green marble architecture. One is a positive, additive construction that relates to the intimate and humdrum everyday life through the creation of a notional settlement, the other is a negative, subtractive carving-out of a rock temple in the quarry that reflects the ‘sublime’ essence of Tinos. The dialogue between the two programmes and sites explores an alternative way of living – one that harnesses the wind, and questions the nuclear family typology, the traditional role of women and ideas of the sublime. Exploring ideas of longevity, handcraft, technological advancements and the Tinian vernacular, the scheme creates a tension between the everyday and the extraordinary.

Guilt Free Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

Guilt Free

Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

PG24 employs film, animation, virtual and augmented reality, and physical modelling techniques to nurture free thinking and architectural storytelling, and to explore and expand architecture’s relationship with time. As we emerge from a recent ice age, Earth’s atmosphere continues to heat up. Scientists protest that mankind is directly responsible, but the word of climate change is still not accepted as gospel. We must reduce, give up, fast and exercise self-control. We are guilty and our guilt makes us fallible. In the grey areas of doubt, a new kind of faith has emerged, unchallenged by fanatics and dismissed by heretics. Has climate change become a new religion?

While the male-dominated, white, proto-religious debates swell, global inequality grows and the planet pays the price. Within this febrile territory, what is the role and responsibility of architecture? The built environment’s 40% contribution to our total carbon footprint is eye-watering, but it also presents a huge design opportunity. Can the looming catastrophe of climate change be switched into a positive creative force? Can technology really save us? Can we design guilt-free?

As a direct response to the Architecture Education Declares open letter, this year we engaged with a deep study of the cultural and geo-scientific parameters of climate change. We questioned identity: How do we situate ourselves when we design and for whose benefit? Can we think from a ‘post-human’ position, seeking radical new approaches that are more effective and inclusive, outside the guilty conscience of the ‘humanity’ that created the problem?

We redefined matter: Can we transform the current linear thinking of take/make/consume/discard, into a circular ecology of materials and building parts? Often in architecture we design perfect births, but this year we used long-term thinking to design perfect deaths and planned ahead for the end of life of buildings. We employed technology: While the atmosphere deteriorates, another digital atmosphere, a digital twin of the Earth, has emerged, able to computationally monitor, predict and address future change. How can we future-proof sustainable buildings by designing them in parallel to their intelligent and responsive digital twins?

We visited the swamps, cities and low-lying terrains of Florida, to explore a region that has both exacerbated the problems of, and is catastrophically threatened by, climate change. Here, retirement communities and ghettos coalesce where the flooded marshlands swell and huge metropolitan complexes sprawl; terrains of space exploration and luxury golf courses meet hurricane warnings, digital magic, fried food and voodoo. We explored this conflicted identity of culprit, victim and saviour to form our own design manifestos and propose new parables of evolving ecologies.

Year 4

Camille Dunlop, Viktoria Fenyes, Alexander Fox, Maxim Goldau, Yee (Enoch) Liang, Elissavet Manou, Lingyun Qian, Matthew Taylor, David Wood

Year 5

Krina Christopoulou, Lucca Ferrarese, Hanna Idziak, Maria Konstantopoulou, Afrodite Moustroufi, George Proud, James White

Thanks to our technical tutor Kairo Baden-Powell

Thank you to our thesis supervisors Alessandro Ayuso, Ben Campkin, Murray Fraser, Stephen Gage, Tasos Varoudis, Simon Withers, Stamatis Zografos

Thanks to our critics Ollie Alsop, Nat Chard, Kate Davies, Egmontas Geras, Alex Holloway, Jessica In, Greg Kythreotis, Sonia Magdziarz, Tim Norman, Nick Shackleton, Sayan Skandarajah, Jasper Stevens, Tasos Varoudis, Izabela Wieczorek, Simon Withers, Fiona Zisch

24.1 Maria Konstantopoulou, Y5 ‘The Spirit of the Liquid Marshes’. Sited in Bayou Tortillon, a vast swamp region in Southern Louisiana, the project imagines a partsubmerged world, inhabited by low-tech hydroengineered infrastructures and peculiar humanlike scavengers called ‘Lossans’. In response to the mythic power of this threatened landscape and inspired by Donna Harraway’s ‘Chthulucene’, JG Ballard’s ‘Drowned World’ and the writings of Jorge Luis Borges, Mary orchestrates an ambitious magical realist intervention, part poem, part architecture. A pair of ambiguous creatures emerge as cavernous inhabitable structures that relate to ancient mythological orders and straddle our middle world and the realm of the spirits. They are intended as pieces of infrastructure operating outside of human time perception, capable of healing, yet with unpredictable and potentially destructive behaviours. Slippery interior worlds of mysterious organ-like forms give way to large animalistic exteriors with plasto-reptilian skins that finally merge into the swamp itself.

24.2 Afrodite Moustroufi, Y5 ‘Projections on Learning’. Through a series of playful and immersive investigations with projections, this project developed a vocabulary of tools that allow an occupancy of illusory stereoscopic space as a working extension to the physical space that frames it. Using stereoscopy both as a design method and as programmatic catalyst, the proposal for an experimental school in Silvertown is capable of recording and then three-dimensionally projecting parts of the building onto itself, allowing the school to expand virtually. The three-dimensional projective design method is coupled with precise physical modelling in coloured plaster inspired by Isamu Noguchi’s landscape models. As a ‘machine for learning’ that exists in both physical and projected form the school occupies a realm of extra dimensions, where moving elements rotate and redeploy to form different teaching environments. The film becomes a promotional video for the school, including first-person experiences and the voices of the children, conveying a childlike sense of wonder that challenges our embedded ideas of space and time. 24.3–24.7 Hanna Idziak, Y5 ‘Garden of (Im)permanence’. This project explores the past of Gdansk shipyard, as a tool for understanding the wider politics and history of Poland and imagines a redevelopment of the postindustrial site into a women’s centre. The architectural film acts as a protest against the patriarchal attitudes of the current conservative government, which uses architectural preservation and demolition to distort history. Drawing from UNESCO’s definitions of tangible and intangible heritage; the notion of Anti-Monument by architects Zofia and Oscar Hansen; and the undulating brickwork techniques of Eladio Dieste, the project commemorates the forgotten histories of the women working on the shipyard, which the heroine describes as a ‘mother’. Architecture becomes a collective act, where the women disassemble the brick warehouse onsite to create a new form, which is slowly taken over by nature, becoming a time-conscious monument to the past, present and future. 24.8–24.11 Lucca Ferrarese, Y5 ‘Vauxhall Pleasure Palace’. Set in Vauxhall in the near future, in a postCovid-19 world, where the virus has been completely eradicated and local lockdowns have ended, this film sees two lovers reunited for the first time since their government-imposed hiatus. The project investigates the links between social technology, gender identity, performance, public space and the state. The work extrapolates the consequences of the pandemic into the future, but also tunes into the wider undercurrents that are seeing disenfranchised sections of society seek out new modes of occupancy within the city. Ideas of

reclaiming public space through reclaiming the body and fusing fashion with architecture are imagined within a reinvigorated nocturnal realm for the city. The project draws on the rebellious art/performance/fashion practices of Lee Bowery, Oscar Schlemer and Issey Miyake. The carnivalesque neon-lit world, the nervous behaviours of its occupants and the semi-automated glossy movements of the machine-building, are depicted with a nudge, a wink and gentle tongue-in-cheek wit. 24.12–24.15 James White, Y5 ‘Guilt-Free Homes’. Guilt-Free Homes explores the increasingly intrusive role of Mega-Cap US technology companies in the domestic realm and speculates on the future commodifying effect they will have on housing. Located in Somers Town, the residential scheme encourages us to accept the experimental intertwining of virtual and physical realms, where we might be free from labour, engaged with local urban identity and where environmental responsibility is offset on our behalf. The work is grounded in a series of observations about our evolving relationship with consumption and technology and ‘feels for the beating pulse’ of what defines living in the 2020s. The project draws on a wide range of historical, theoretical and technical influences, including Harlow’s destroyed heroic modernism, Adrian Forty’s 1986 book Objects of Desire and contemporary object-oriented interior design. The film is an Orwellian ‘cat-and-mouse detective thriller’, immersing us in a disorientating and menacing 360° narrative. 24.16–24.19 George Proud, Y5 ‘The AR-k’. The AR-k is a long-term oral history archive located on the Somerset Levels, which is also composed as the architectural equivalent of a love letter to the author’s homeland. Rooted in the rich mythical history and contemporary local culture of Somerset and Glastonbury the proposal takes on a monastic/sound recording and producing arrangement that imagines an innovative use of augmented reality. Head archaeologist, Dr Fouracres, is our guide in the far future setting of 2442, describing the gradual discovery of a mixed physical/digital ruin. The project considers the material and immaterial aspects of architectural heritage, playing with scale and deep time to depict a warning for the future. Architecture becomes a reliquary, hosting the lost sounds of the past through audio as well as visual augmentation coded in matter. An ode to both the relationship between physical space and its digital extensions, but also to the design process itself, the film is a feat of architectural storytelling. 24.20 Krina Christopoulou, Y3 ‘The Third Space’. The Third Space investigates the evolution of the domestic realm, where 2D ‘point-and-click’ computer interfaces transition into intuitively operated 3D inhabitable digital environments. By designing both the physical home of the future and the virtual spaces it can host, this project speculates on a post-Covid-19 world where houses do not have computers in them, but are computers themselves. The home becomes responsively robotic and rearranges itself to accommodate the resident’s virtual inhabitation, but also becomes a realm for global exploration, entertainment and deep-thought. This haptic installation, where physical anchors tether us to the ‘real world’, acts in tandem with dream-like explorations into what might constitute ‘everyday living’. Architecture’s role in learning, working, socialising and living communally online is redefined and spatial distance collapses, forming new worlds within worlds. With ‘George XP’ as our sassy virtual companion, we dive headlong into an ever-expanding architectural universe, without ever having to open our front door.

Redrawing the Rural Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

Redrawing the Rural

Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

In PG24, we employ film, animation, virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR) and physical modelling techniques to explore architecture’s relationship with time. We nurture free thinkers and storytellers who find inspiration in both film and architecture, studying their intertwined histories and seeking the myriad possibilities arising from their merger. This year, we turned our attention to the fast-changing nature of architectural drawing. Time charges and enlivens space in drawing. It can reveal the process of assembly, predict responses to weather, calculate future patterns of occupation, connect with the past, imagine the future, unfold a narrative, build atmosphere, engage with sound and light, and relink architectural composition with the senses. Filmic drawings lead to empathetic design. At the same time, ubiquitous computer-aided design (CAD), building information modelling (BIM) and artificial intelligence (AI) have the potential to eradicate the need for drawing entirely. If a building can draw itself, what is the role of the architect? Has the digital mechanised the hand? Can we draw 1:1 and inhabit the drawing whilst it is being drawn? Can we close the loop between drawing, manufacture and inhabitation by allowing instantaneous feedback between the three? Can digitally disseminated drawings democratise architecture, expand the impact and reach of architectural ideas, and bring communities together?

According to Rem Koolhaas, 50% of the global population now lives in cities and, as a result, we tend to ignore 98% of land: the countryside. Economically and socially overlooked, the rural is the realm of the most rapid and radical change, and the testbed for the future of the world. A colossal ‘back-of-house’ that feeds, maintains and entertains ever-growing cities, the countryside has historically been the site of utopic visions, centres for study and contemplation, labs for testing new building paradigms, spiritual retreats, sanctuaries for healing and art collections. It can be dreamed up as paradise and idyll, but also demonised as the location of existential horror.

Inspired by our visit to Niall Hobhouse’s remarkable Drawing Matter archive at Shatwell Farm in Somerset and our road trip through Europe, we cast off our urban predilections and ventured into the rural. Beyond farmed land, we looked for sites in the wilderness – forests, mountains, oceans and even the atmosphere –and used digital drawing and cutting-edge technologies to narrate new architectural prototypes that change the way we conceive and inhabit space.

Year 4

Krina Christopoulou, Lucca Ferrarese, Alex Haines, Hanna Idziak, Maria Konstantopoulou, Maria Afrodite Moustroufi, George Proud, James White

Year 5

Alexander Ball, Flavian Berar, Uday Berry, Lee Kelemen, Pascal Loschetter, Jerome (Xin) Ng, Sylwia Poltorak, Marie Walker-Smith

Special thanks to Keiichi Matsuda. Thank you also to our Design Realisation tutor Matt Lucraft; our consultants Kevin Pollard, Ali Shaw and Ben Sheterline; workshop/ seminar leaders Finbar Fallon and Jack Holme; and Niall Hobhouse and Susie Dowding at Drawing Matter, Somerset

Thank you to our critics: Laura Allen, Ollie Alsop, Barbara-Ann CampbellLange, Rhys Cannon, Nat Chard, Nigel Coates, John Cruwys, Elizabeth Dow, Ava Fatah gen. Schieck, Maria Fedorchenko, Maria Fulford, Pedro Gil, Kate Goodwin, Stefania Gradinariu, Kevin Green, Sean Griffiths, Colin Herperger, Niall Hobhouse, Jack Holmes, Jessica In, Chee-Kit Lai, Matt Lucraft, Abel Maciel, Thomas Millar, Matei Mitrache, Caireen O’Hagan Houx, Sophia Psarra, Nick Shackleton, Jasper Stevens, Stefania Tsigkouni, Nimrod Vardi, Kevin Walker, Tim Waterman, Simon Withers

24.1 Flavian Berar, Y5 ‘Engines of Creation’. In response to existential threats posed by climate change, artificial intelligence and nanotechnology, ‘Engines of Creation’ explores potential new directions that architecture might take, reacting to and against these potent forces. Located in the heart of Europe, within the neutral, yet hostile, territories of the Swiss Alps, the project begins as an alternative Future of Humanity Institute. Conceived as a mythical research laboratory, where ‘Citizens of Nowhere’ gather to shape our Post-Anthropocentric interplanetary future, the building slowly evolves over a long time period in response. A radical landscape of the sublime, this is a visionary regenerative architecture born out of the merger of art, nature and technology.

24.2 Lee Chew Kelemen, Y5 ‘Proxima Estacion: Via (De)Colonial’. Over the last four decades, the Argentinean railway network has slowly fallen into ruin, leaving many rural communities disconnected and struggling for survival. The crumbling town of Mechita – once home to the largest railway workshop in South America – finds itself hollowed out: its citizens, having long since migrated away to urban areas, have left behind the carcasses of thousands of disused trains. A new ‘De-Colonial Line’ emerges from these ashes; a line that will awaken the spirit of the trains once more. Wearing ‘architectural masks’ given to them by the remaining community, the train carriages house new mutating programmes such as micro-banks, Pulperia, football pitches, protest walls and carnival floats. The trains act nomadically, not knowing when they will leave or return, bringing with them a dynamic exchange of civil disobedience as well as cultural, economic and social events according to the needs of the rural population.

24.3–24.5 Pascal Loschetter, Y5 ‘The Unnatural History Museum’. Emerging from a coastal landfill site on the Thames Estuary and telling the story of a landscape of waste, ‘The Unnatural History Museum’ is a new kind of building that is part-museum, part-monument, part-land art. The museum exhibits markers of our time which contribute to the geology of the future. The architecture itself acts as a monument to the current age of excess by displaying petrified ‘memories’ of landfill objects within the building’s skin. The process carried out to create the building – whereby material is excavated and transformed into plasma rock – remediates the entire landscape, recreating a habitat of salt marshes for the local fauna and flora. Gradually constructed as a remnant of the transformed landscape, the building draws value from the materials found on the site, whilst mitigating against the environmental damage associated with the archaic processing of landfill.

24.6 Marie Walker-Smith, Y5 ‘The Last Forest: Rothiemurchus 2098’. The year is 2098. The Rothiemurchus Project in the Scottish Cairngorms stands as the ‘Last Forest’, the final remnant of a doomed UN experiment to protect global biodiversity. A central ‘ark’ building, designed initially to protect plant life in perpetuity, has been left to ruin. Yet, against the odds and for better or worse, the intelligent robotic infrastructure, designed to maintain the forest, appears to have adapted and grown. As an inquisitive biologist infiltrates the Last Forest, we accompany him to discover how corruption and disorder might be forces for survival. The mysterious world we find there asks us to consider who its architecture is for, how custodianship might shape space and how the idea of ‘nature‘ itself might evolve in time.

24.7–24.9 Alexander Ball, Y5 ‘Dreaming in the Shadows’. Streaming services such as Netflix and Disney+ are not only transforming the way that films are produced and distributed, but are also threatening the film theatre as an urban artefact. Inspired by the horror genre, 1950s visions of domesticity and The Twilight Zone, a strange installation is imagined on the sacred ground of the recently demolished Marble Arch Odeon. Blurring the boundaries between the architectural home and architectural cinema, the film charts the slow disintegration of the central protagonist. Where is his identity centred? In the home or the cinema? Or an uncomfortable strange place belonging to neither?

24.10–24.12 Sylwia Poltorak, Y5 ‘The Independent State of Melanfolly’. What is architecture? How long can it last? Can it help us endure time itself? The answer is definitively, yes it can! The Independent State of Melanfolly is a secretive cultish island state, lying somewhere in the South Pacific. The rebellious insiders, who refer to themselves as ‘lobsters’ have developed a mysterious bio-scientific system to extend their existence through the cryogenic growth of artificial organs. Trees twitch with gossip, walls flow with mysterious red liquid and all is watched over by the mysterious ‘banner girl’. Give in to this wild, noxious, moonlit party-architecture; you cannot escape it.

24.13–24.16 Uday Berry, Y5 ‘The Tower of a Forgotten India’. Exploring the politics, cultural forces and power struggles underlying architectural heritage and conservation in India, this project proposes an extraordinary tower that acts as a living museum, protecting the nation’s threatened and under-valued buildings. Threats come from every direction: religious fundamentalism, rampant modernisation, the culture of collectability and political corruption. In a rapidly developing and ever-changing nation, heritage is seen here as a living part of the city, rather than a site for displaying museum pieces. The tower breathes life back into these forgotten building fragments, reintegrating them into the city’s urban fabric. Firing us into the heart of the sprawling chaos of Delhi, ‘The Tower of a Forgotten India’ is a modern parable spanning decades that seems to suggest that taking control of a city’s past is, in the end, a fool’s paradise. 24.17 Jerome Ng Xin Hao, Y5 ‘Metabolist Regeneration of a Dementia Nation’. Singapore’s Golden Mile Complex is celebrated in many countries as an important icon of 1970’s Metabolist urbanism, yet, in its home city, it faces imminent demolition. More than 80 similar sites have already been destroyed, as part of a progressive nation-building programme. More will follow. This project speculates on an alternative vision for this huge residential block, that not only saves the building, but allows it to absorb physical artefacts from Singapore’s threatened urban infrastructure. It acts as a prototype for an alternative pattern for future development, allowing residents to forge new memories, whilst giving space for the past to breathe. The animated film documents the lives of a series of Golden Mile residents, urging us all to resist the power structures that see our urban memories so readily erased.

Sculpting in Time

Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

Year 4

Alexander Ball, Flavian Berar, Uday Berry, Thomas Cubitt, Lee Kelemen, Pascal Loschetter, Jerome (Xin) Ng, Sylwia Poltorak, Marie Walker-Smith

Year 5

John Cruwys, Tom James, Sonia Magdziarz, Matei Mitrache, Masahiro Nakamura, Rosemary Shaw, Paula Strunden, Stefania Tsigkouni

Special thanks to Keiichi Matsuda, Leap Motion, for digital film, animation and interactive media teaching

Workshops/seminars: Grand Gee, Jack Holmes, Shedworks, Jasper Stevens

Thank you to our consultants: Kevin Pollard, Ali Shaw, Ben Sheterline

Thank you to Carl-Dag Lige, Sille Pihlak and Harri Taskinen for their help during our fieldtrip to Estonia and Finland.

Thank you to our critics: Ollie Alsop, Anna Ulrikke Andersen, Ruth Bernatek, Tom Brown, Nat Chard, Nigel Coates, James Craig, Elizabeth Dow, Grant Gee, Christophe Gérard, Pedro Gil, Kevin Green, Gonzalo Herrero Delicado, Joanna Karatzas, Chee-Kit Lai, Ifigeneia Liangi, Matt Lucraft, Martyna Marciniak, Tomas Millar, Phuong-Trâm Nguyen, Caireen O’Hagan Houx, Luke Pearson, Sille Pihlak, Fleur Praetorius , Sophia Psarra, Nick Shackleton, Sayan Skandarajah, Amalia Skoufoglou, Jasper Stevens, Kevin Walker, Fiona Zisch

Sculpting in Time

Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

Unit 24 is a group of architectural storytellers employing design, film, animation, drawing, virtual and augmented reality and physical modelling to explore architecture’s relationship with time. We nurture free thinkers, who are prepared to explore novel ideas and techniques. We find inspiration in the dialogue between film and architecture, study their intertwined histories and seek the magical possibilities arising from their merger.

This year we turned our attention to the evolving notion of craft. A renewed attention to craft – and its related values of authenticity, engagement with materials, personalisation, skill, care, time and provenance – has recently emerged. The popularity of Etsy, Minecraft, BrewDog and The Great British Bake-Off attest to craft’s resurrection in unexpected forms that respond to, and harness, the post-digital economy.

Today, when new digital technologies are rendering the nineteenthcentury dichotomy between the hand and the machine obsolete, where does craft lie in architecture and film? How does it manifest itself in brick, stone and celluloid, or in drawing, editing and cinematography?

To find out, in November we headed north on a road trip to the lands that shaped the work of two modern master craftsmen: an architect and a filmmaker. In Helsinki, we visited celebrated buildings by Finnish architect Alvar Aalto. He pioneered a design ideology rooted in craft, nature and technology and forged a productive relationship with industry, which allowed the hand of the studio to remain close to built artefacts: from vases to staircases and chairs to roofscapes. We then took the boat across the Gulf of Finland to Tallinn, the city whose fringes acted as the backdrop for the film Stalker by Russian director Andrei Tarkovsky. Obsessed with craft, Tarkovsky saw film as a poetic act of making: a sculpting in time. One of the best-preserved, UNESCO-listed, medieval cities, Tallinn is also dubbed ‘the Silicon Valley of Europe’, with the highest number of start-ups, a digital economy driven by blockchain and e-residency.

Our projects searched for a redefinition of craft beyond digital form-finding, using narrative and storytelling to address place, memory and performance. We defined hybrid practices between architecture and filmmaking that also blur the boundaries between design and experience. And we asked: What is the relationship between materiality and craft? Or craft and ethics? Is craft still grounded in local, individual skill, or can it be dispersed between many in the cloud, crowd-sourced and spread globally? And how can we overcome ‘the handmade versus the machine’ in an era when the human hand has been softly mechanised by immersive digital technologies?

Year 4 students proposed time-crafted architectures within the modern economies of Finland and Estonia and Year 5 students created architectural ‘essay-films’ that sculpt time. A series of specialist workshops with filmmakers, videogame designers, visualisers, Virtual Reality developers, musicians and sound technologists supported our work.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2018

Fig. 24.1 John Cruwys Y5, ‘Festival of Fulfilment’. The project explores how contemporary ideas of work, craft and ritual can shape perceptions of value in the built environment. The tripartite essay film follows the delivery of twin public buildings – a Town Hall and a Festival Hall – as part of an indefinitely prolonged Festival of Fulfilment in the town of Rugeley, Staffordshire. Incorporating the skills and techniques of the post-digital workforce, the festival is ambivalent to form, material, tradition, and scale. It seeks to embed a meaningful practice of building for the sake of building, to create a lasting civic presence and ultimately appease the mind and soul. Fig. 24.2 Matei Mitrache Y5, ‘Edenic Polyphony’. The project brings together historical research into Dante’s Divina Commedia with acoustic design to form a new kind of

operatic landscape within a charged site in Tartu, Estonia. Preserving the imposing presence of the ruined manor, yet revitalising the site, it proposes an episodic journey through a sonic terrain. The film explores the architecture of hell, purgatory and paradise through the eyes of its subjective protagonist and its omniscient narrator. Fig. 24.3 Masahiro Nakamura Y5, ‘Imaginarium of a Legacy’. The film is an architectural polemic exploring the implications of the physical annexing of Hong Kong into a new Chinese-funded sovereign city state. It follows the journey of a young protagonist through ‘The Emancipated State of Hong Kong’ an island suspended above the ocean, as a perfect utopian version of the original city. Inspired by the role of identity in Anime, a series of dream-sequences help re-awaken the subdued democratic spirit.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2018

24.4

24.5

Figs. 24.4 – 24.5 Tom James Y5, ‘(Re)Creation: Constructing the Zone’. Influenced by the central thematic device of Andrey Tarkovsky’s Stalker (1979), the Zone is a proposal for a sculpture park containing recovered digital fragments of Manchester’s lost built heritage. Captured from film, using slit-scanning and photogrammetry techniques, the fragments are overlaid into the parklands of Nutsford Vale in East Manchester. The project explores themes of preservation and memorialisation and provides a platform of resistance for a city undergoing transformative waves of speculative development. Fig. 24.6 Stefania Tsigkouni Y5, ‘Silk Tales’. An architectural fable studies the complex dynamics of Athens, focusing on the interweaving lives of a community within the working-class neighbourhood of Metaxourgeio. The project

plays with cyclical time as a way of drawing out relationships between humans and the forgotten natural world within the city. Magical elements nurture the themes of displacement, labour, craftsmanship and explore mobility within the social ecology. Reality acts as a trickster and consequently, causality as an illusion. The buildings become characters in themselves, engrained with the city’s mythology, and its ongoing history.

Figs. 24.7 – 24.8 Rose Shaw Y5, ‘Ebbsfleet Town Square’. If urban space is played rather than planned can it give rise to more creative uses? Located at the epicentre of a planned Garden City at Ebbsfleet, the proposal is a speculative framework for public space ownership, re-inventing the town square for post-Brexit Britain. An illuminated game-board is placed at the centre of the process, which links to a full-scale

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2018

immersive projection environment. Within a structured system of rules, the kit of parts can be re-configured by different stakeholder groups. A world where lateral thinking, negotiation skills and even a little gamesmanship are the highest forms of influence. Fig. 24.9 Paula Strunden Y5, ‘Micro-Utopia’. The project proposes an immersive and interactive version of the home, where space is born from the finely-tuned sensorial interplay between the body and the physical/virtual objects connected to the Internet of Things. A chair invites us to stay with it for a moment; we crawl through a demanding fireplace; our hands are washed in a bowl of digital liquid. Drawing on radical art practice, interiors in historical painting and contemporary product design, Micro-Utopia is the dream of a house that is nothing but the parameters of our perception,

triggered by the metaphorical dimension of the objects we interact with on a daily basis. Fig. 24.10 Sonia Magdziarz Y5, ‘How to Carve a Giant’. Inspired by the mystical Finnish poem ‘Kalevala’ the project proposes an architecture capable of keeping knowledge safe for millennia. Building on the granite boom of the Romantic era, it carves a folk story directly into the solid rock outcrops of the Pasila region in Helsinki over a very long period of time. A mysterious giant emerges sitting under an earthly blanket, protecting the knowledge of Finland and setting in motion the future stories of stone-crafted guardians: the blacksmith, the bear and the fox. This epic folk tale brings together a range of cosmic forces into a fabricated urban topography – from the mineral to the mythical and the mortal to the timeless.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2018

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2018

MArch Unit

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2018

Make-Believe Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

Make-Believe

Penelope Haralambidou, Michael Tite

Year 4

John Cruwys, Tom James, Matei Mitrache, Masahiro Nakamura, Rose Shaw, Paula Strunden, Stefania Tsigkouni

Year 5

Sabina Berariu, Thomas Brown, Clare Dallimore, Matthew Lucraft, Martyna Marciniak, Gergana Popova, Nick Shackleton, Jasper Stevens

Special thanks for digital film, animation and interactive media teaching to Keiichi Matsuda

Workshops: Angeliki Vasileiou, Kevin Pollard, Neutral Digital, Shed-Works, Studio Archetype

Thank you to: Jack Holmes, Sergio Irigoyen, Rashed Khandker, Greg Kythreotis, Brook Lin, Sam McGill, Dan Scoulding, Ben Sheterline

Thank you to our critics: Ollie Alsop, Anna Ulrikke Andersen, Nat Chard, Patrick Chen, Daniel Cotton, Nico Czyz, Max Dewdney, Stephen Gage, Tamsin Hanke, Colin Herperger, Ifigeneia Liangi, Chris Pierce, Merijn Royaards, Sayan Skandarajah, Henrietta Williams

Unit 24 is a group of architectural storytellers employing film, animation, drawing, VR/AR and physical modelling in pursuit of spatial propositions that harness the potential of time-based media. We nurture freethinkers who investigate ideas and techniques in collaboration with other likeminded experts. We find inspiration in the dialogue between film and architecture and their intertwined histories; film has the power to construct the psyche of a city while architectural ideas are changing the way that film is generated and understood.

This year we turned our attention to the growing frictions between urban bubbles of overabundance and post-urban pockets of debilitating scarcity. We asked whether a cinematic architecture of ‘make-believe’ can address this dichotomy with proposals that marry fact and fiction.

In November, in the immediate aftermath of the US Presidential Election, we explored the contrasting territories of LA and Arizona, tracing a path across the underlying geographic, social and fictional fault lines that separate these neighbouring, yet deeply diverse regions. Since it first swelled out of the Californian desert in the late 1800s, the growth of LA has been inextricably linked to the business of making moving images and storytelling. Conversely, the cinematic landscapes of Arizona have provided the outward gaze for America to reflect upon its history. This sense of emptiness breeds the mythical and surreal, triggering sightings of unexpected objects and the birth of conspiracy theories.

Within these febrile territories, we searched for new kinds of makebelieve that blur the boundaries between truth and reality. We explored the fictionalised urban landscapes of LA, the sun-baked world in and around the Salk Institute and discovered the desert-inspired utopias of Taliesin West, Arcosanti and Biosphere 2, where architecture playfully imagines an alternative make-believe future.

Upon our return, we interpreted our findings into the local climate of the post-Brexit maelstrom. We conjured new visions for these towns with proud, yet long-lost pasts: from Great Yarmouth to Rugeley, from Stratford to Port Stanley. Our students propose speculative new narratives for half-forgotten towns like these, creating stories that might beggar belief, but which are so hair-brained that they might just work.

Year 5 projects build on last year’s investigations, creating architectural ‘essay films’ that explore wild new frontiers and states of speculative magic. A series of workshops with games designers, visualisers, VR developers and sound technologists supported the work along with access to Oculus Rift and HTC Vive Developer Kits.

Throughout the year, Unit 24 has evolved into a band of virtual storytellers, snaggletoothed mythmakers, digital hoaxers and political yarn-spinners, who aim to make believers out of anyone who might care to listen.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2017

Fig. 24.1 Nick Shackleton Y5, ‘Let’s Live’. ‘Let’s Live!’ is not a utopia, but a community of online gaming performers, where work has been substituted by a desire to play. Players/ performers lay bare their everyday lives to the millions of online spectators that consume content. The architecture derives directly from the game-space, where brick and mortar merge with the digital world of gaming. A highly choreographed sequence of rituals merge play with everyday life, and the settlement provides a backdrop for the broadcasting that blurs the physical with the digital. Fig. 24.2 Clare Dallimore Y5, ‘Drawing in Time: Desert Filmscape’. Set in Arizona’s interior upland, the project acts as a rebellion against Hollywood cinema. Exploring themes of frontier, utopian living and cinema, the project proposes a new environment for

independent filmmakers working and living outside of the urban sprawl of nearby Phoenix, which culminates in an annual Independent Film Festival. Two-dimensional drawings are transformed into the three-dimensional filmic space, grafting the crafted nature of the hand-drawn elements into a digital form, set in space and time. Fig. 24.3 Gergana Popova Y5, ‘City as Stage’. The project revisits a period in the history of London, where theatre and city were constructing each other. Sited in Smithfield Market, the New Museum of London opposes the contemporary desire for the object, explores the intangible part of our heritage and celebrates traces of forgotten history. Inspired by the site’s long history of co-existence between a market and a funfair, ‘City as Stage’ merges theatre, market and museum.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2017

Fig. 24.4 Sabina Berariu Y5, ‘LOG | Deconstructed domesticity’. We are witnessing a spilling of the home at urban scale, where old bonds break, spatial linkages dissolve and new types of domestic urban composition emerge. This project is grounded in the digital nomadic movement, paired with the shifting nature of domestic environments and the possibility of integrating technology into everyday objects which respond to the biochemical composition of the human body. On a micro-level, the project addresses the fundamental biochemical composition of the nomad, while on a macro-level, the design assumes that old paradigms of property ownership and social status are superseded. LOG, ‘Life on the Go’, a high-end branded line of home-mobile products, controlled through wearable technology, is proposed as an alternative to

current domestic architectures. Fig. 24.5 Thomas Brown Y5, ‘Resorting to Canvey’. Resorting To Canvey is a speculative framework for a new environmentally responsible holiday resort. The project addresses one of the most pressing challenges facing not only Canvey’s tourism industry, but much of the built environment situated along the Thames Estuary including London: vulnerability to severe flooding due to sea-level rise. The film presents a case of positive flooding of the future holiday resort through the narrative of an unassuming protagonist, Bert Vandewiele. Bert is the caretaker at Thorney Bay Village, and is faced with many challenges whilst keeping the environmental flooding station-cum-holiday resort running smoothly for the holidaymakers.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2017

Fig. 24.6 Martyna Marciniak Y5, ‘Paul E. Phylo’s Palace’. A revival of the Enlightenment idea of architecture that has the potential to inspire desire and love. The Palace is a character that leads its visitors on a courtship journey from the lounge of anticipation, through the hall of indifference, the dining-room of awakening, to the boudoir of ultimate excitement. Similar to a living organism, the building reacts to the visitor’s presence – it uncovers its secret passages, blushes, grows and decomposes. Fig. 24.7 Jasper Stevens Y5, ‘The London NOTEL’. Part cinema, part immersive theatre, part hotel, the London NOTEL is a hybrid that merges VR with physical architecture. The building is only there to be touched, existing as haptic infrastructure designed to guide visitors through immersive cinematic narratives. But, there are rumours that

some guests have never returned, lost inside the building’s multiple realities. A Private Investigator has been hired to investigate. Provided with only a map of the building, he arrives on a rainy Saturday night... Fig. 24.8 Matthew Lucraft Y5, ‘A Monument to Outlast Humanity’. Emerging from the abandoned suburbs of the Sonoran Desert, the North Surprise Community Settlement is an experiment in idealised future living without paid labour. A group of ageing RVers pioneer an earthen, handmade architecture, an embodiment of a community voice and a lasting relic of their existence. Over time, a network of radially planned micro-communities spreads across the desert; the ‘streets’ undulate above and below the ground, forming an evolving artificial landscape intimately connected with the site’s fascinating past.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2017

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2017

Against the Flow

Penelope Haralambidou, Simon Kennedy, Michael Tite

Against the Flow

Penelope Haralambidou, Simon Kennedy, Michael Tite

Year 4

Sabina Berariu, Thomas Brown, Clare Dallimore, Matthew Lucraft, Martyna Marciniak, Gergana Popova, Nick Shackleton, Jasper Stevens

Year 5

Haesung Choi, Nichola Czyz, Finbarr Fallon, Stefana Gradinariu, Azizul Hoque Mariya Krasteva, Stefanos Levidis, Ting-Jui (Brook) Lin, Ziyi (Bill) Liu, Antonio Zhivkov

Workshops: Factory Fifteen, Tomas Millar, Kevin Pollard, ScanLAB Projects

Special thanks to: Kairo Baden-Powell, Alastair Browning, Ben Sheterline, Emir Tigrel, Angeliki Vasileiou

Critics: Ollie Alsop, Anna Ulrikke Andersen, Alessandro Ayuso, Paul Bavister, Matthew Butcher, Luke Chandresinghe, Peter Cook, James Craig, Hal Currey, Kate Davies, Elizabeth Dow, Max Dewdney, Marcela Araguez Escobar, Murray Fraser, Ruairi Glynn, Colin Herperger, Jonathan Hill, Alex Holloway, Kelvin Ip, Platon Issaias, Jan Kattein, Chee-Kit Lai, Ifi Liangi, Keiichi Matsuda, Sam Storr McGill, Tim Norman, James O’Leary, Manuel Toledo Otaegui, Luke Pearson, Dan Scoulding, Renée Searle, Catrina Stewart, Henri Williams

Unit 24 employs film, video, animation, drawing and modelling techniques to generate architectural propositions, harnessing the potential of timebased media in the production of space.

We nurture freethinkers who investigate ideas and techniques in collaboration with other like-minded experts. This year, after securing funding for workshops and new equipment, students benefitted from our expanded network of associated specialists, architects, animators, virtual reality tinkerers, filmmakers and musicians in a series of bespoke master classes.

This year’s theme focused on shifting notions of the ‘local’ and the ‘global’, reading both not as spaces, but as flows. The world has imploded. Instantaneous information flow rules all – the new ‘digital local’ makes the Global Village into the Google Earth. Location is irrelevant... or is it? Local news. Local weather. The local pub. Local architects. What do we mean when we talk about the local? Is it a place? Is it part of the psyche? Can its value be measured? Who can be a local? Can technology ever be local? And what about architecture?

Challenging the forces of universalising technological progress, we invited students to find a ‘critical regionalism’ for the information age, interrogating globally available open-source technologies in search of the particular and the local. We questioned the tendency to retreat into the home-grown, the tribal and the regional and asked whether the local simply inflects the global condition or whether it can be a driver for change.

The Thames, then. Our local river. A shimmering causeway flowing to the centre of the universe, or the disgusting urinal of a washed-up, morally bankrupt city? Defining the Thames in the singular is facile. At once staggeringly ugly and magnificently sublime, its length spans innumerable conditions: cupping the sweetbreads of international corporate investment but also cultivating new ecosystems. It has witnessed the emergence and growth of London and will outlive it.

In November, we travelled to and dispersed ourselves throughout Japan; walking the river route against the flow from Osaka to Kyoto; exploring backstreets in Tokyo; visiting Hiroshima; sailing to Naoshima, hoping to learn from what Arata Isozaki termed ‘Japan-ness’: a local architecture that can harness the forces of globalisation.

Year 4 students proposed filmic architectures that utilised the estuarine zones in and around the Thames, searching for an alternative future of the local, while Year 5 students developed their own personal agendas locally and globally.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2016

Fig. 24.1 Finbarr Fallon Y5, ‘SG100’. Fin imagines a future subterranean expansion of Singapore, where inflatable structures breathe naturally cooled cave air, supported by modular super-frame structures. The film portrays the 2065 centennial of independence celebrations, when the traditional military parade is reconfigured to a choreographed march of robotic construction technology. This ‘Metropolis’-inspired vision is a Technicolor polemic that challenges the ethics of large-scale infrastructural projects and their dark consequences, such as the exploitation of foreign workers.

Fig. 24.2 Haesung Choi Y5, ‘Holographic Theatre’. In science fiction cinema, the hologram has become ubiquitous shorthand for the futuristic and the intangible. Located on an old battery in Tokyo Bay, Hae explores the theatrical qualities of this

‘mythical hologram’ and overlays it onto a physical structure to propose a hybrid inhabitable and tectonic holographic experience. Seen as a fabric that can shroud and conceal, Hae’s hologram can also reveal a visceral ‘brighter real’.

Fig. 24.3 Azizul Hoque Y5, ‘Whalemart’. Aziz’s re-imagining of Tokyo as a city of hyper-convenience plunges us headlong into the shemozzle of an artificially intelligent drone service industry that swarms above and around us, eager to cater to our every need. Acting like an urban reef, the city hosts an aquatic caste system of robotic crustaceans; from delivery shrimps to whale-like storage zeppelins, rubbish collecting crabs and mobile sushi kiosks. In this pumped-up animeinspired city, the rules of transaction have been re-written and the bass has permanently been turned up to ten.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2016

Fig. 24.4 Stefana Gradinariu Y5, ‘The Fourth Nature’. The project deploys a ‘critical realist’ reading of mutant landscapes resulting from long-term and large-scale mining activities in the Apuseni Western Mountains of Romania. Three host sites in the area are key locations: the Rosia Montana gold mining community; the Roșia Poieni copper quarry and the Sesei Valley sludge bed. Stefana’s Hydrological Institute aims to heal the damaged, contaminated land and protect it from future exploitation. A series of tower-like structures scatter the quarry bed, echoing the haunting imagery of the flooded dwellings of the valley and acting as a warning flare to future generations. The project seeks to atone for the natural, cultural and historical vandalism played out in the region, by giving voice to the traumatised landscape.

Fig. 24.5 Nichola Czyz Y5, ‘The Long Now Foundation’. Named after the institute established by Stewart Brand and Brian Eno, Nico’s project is guided by an interest in instilling long-term thinking. It is the result of a pilgrimage route along the River Thames from the sea to the source, during which a brick is made from the river’s clay. Once fired, and on the ninth day of walking, the brick is placed at the source as the seed of a temple projected to grow over the next 10,000 years. Rules derived from the structure of bismuth crystals guide the placement of the bricks and the labyrinthine architecture that emerges over time is the result of the pilgrims’ interpretation, forming a ‘ruin in reverse’. The project is situated between land art and essay film, questioning the role of time in architecture, as well as the role of the architect as author.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2016

Fig. 24.6 Antonio Zhivkov Y5, ‘Palace of Motion’. Acting as a futuristic reincarnation of the original Crystal Palace, this project explores the possibilities of interaction between the human body and new technologies. The building is designed as a constantly changing entity; a dancing partner to human movement. Through an iterative process of motion capture and modelling, bodies and the corresponding building elements become gradually abstracted until the boundaries between the different joints and limbs vanish, creating a spectacular architecture that feels alive. Fig. 24.7 Mariya Krasteva Y5, ‘Reading between the Shadows: Mukaejima Film Island’. An exploration of the themes of identity, architecture and light through a study of early Japanese cinema. This posits a new typology, an immersive film museum inspired by the legends of

the ‘Golden Age’: Tanizaki, Ozu and Mizoguchi. Through the manipulation of daylight and projected light, aspects of three key films become embedded within the architecture. The building carries material and intangible traces of Japanese history, perpetually played out in time. 24.8 Stefanos Levidis Y5, ‘Embassy of the Displaced’. Established between London, Athens and Lesvos in December 2015, this is a design-based collective that operates both in-the-field and remotely, providing spontaneous responses to the refugee crisis. The ‘Embassy’ serves as a design-for-survival laboratory, a visual archive of the refugees’ journey and an institution on the side of the displaced, aiming to symbolically frame the plight of displacement through scanning technology and architectural design; ultimately suggesting a land for the landless.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2016

Fig. 24.9 Ziyi (Bill) Liu Y5, ‘Osaka Expo 2020: Mikoshis of Surveillance and Spectacle’. Based on traditional Japanese concepts of public space, the project proposes a new typology for the world exposition through the reconstruction of the processional and temporary qualities of the Japanese Matsuri (festival). Conceived as an extension of Arata Isozaki’s rebellion against the government’s top-down control, this project serves as a commentary on the act of surveillance both as a covert strategy used during Expo’70 and as a novelty of increasing fascination within contemporary society.

Fig. 24.10 Ting-Jui (Brook) Lin Y5, ‘An Anatomical Embassy’. This project is conceived as a refurbishment of the current home for the Embassy of Japan in Piccadilly, imagining its temporary relocation to the north edge of the adjacent Green

Park. The procedural, operational and diplomatic organs of the embassy become ceremonially eviscerated from the Victorian body and spill out into the park, like scattered ‘seeds’, which grow into small pavilion-like interventions. These vessels become re-inserted into the original building after a period of open use within the park: the two identities and two sets of vocabularies – architecture and garden design – eventually grafting and budding together. This ‘dual’ embassy (that of Green Park and that of 101-104 Piccadilly), embodies Venturi’s ideas of ‘duality’, ‘fragments’, ‘individuals’, and ‘the whole’ and becomes a carefully considered diplomatic architecture of formality, inflection and negotiation.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2016

Forty Second Island Penelope Haralambidou, Simon Kennedy, Michael Tite

Year 4

Haeseung Choi, Nichola Czyz, Finbarr Fallon, Stefana Gradinariu, Azizul Hoque, Mariya Krasteva, Stefanos Levidis, Ting-Jui (Brook) Lin, Ziyi Liu, Antonio Zhivkov

Year 5

Deng (Aiden) Ai, Joel Cullum, Jiang Dong, Ka Tsun Kelvin Ip, Emir Tigrel, Angeliki Vasileiou, Kai Yu, Caiwei (Amy) Zhao

Special thanks to Paul Bavister, Douglas Fenton, Johnny Kelly, Kevin Pollard

We would like to thank our critics: Nat Chard, Dan Cotton, Hal Currey, Liam Davis, Murray Fraser, Alexis Germanos, Christine Hawley, David Hemingway, Colin Herperger, Jack Holmes, Steven Howson, Platon Issaias, Kei Iwamoto, Chee-Kit Lai, Tim Norman, Caireen O’Hagan-Houx, Leonard O’Hagan-Houx, Ollie Palmer, Luke Pearson, Alan Penn, Kevin Pollard, Sophia Psarra, Merijn Royaards, Camila Sotomayor, Reza Schuster, Matthew Shaw, Matthias Suchert

unittwentyfour.wordpress. com www.unittwentyfour.com

Forty Second Island

Penelope Haralambidou, Simon Kennedy, Michael Tite

Unit 24 employs film, video, animation, drawing and modelling techniques to generate architectural propositions, harnessing the potential of timebased media in the production of space. This year, we studied a city to which we have all been … at least, in our imagination. This city has created its own mythology through film, and an identity so distinctive, that it is simulated throughout the world. Deeply embedded in our collective subconscious, this place can be reconstructed remotely, travelled to in dreams, and experienced through purely fictional constructs.

New York City is an archipelago of 42 islands; some are prominent and densely populated, others are deserted and effectively invisible. The island nature of the city has impacted on how it has grown and the way it sees itself. Its hydrogeographic position enabled it to harbour storytelling immigrants from all over the world, the pressure on land created the skyscraper, and the city’s topography has allowed it to gaze at its own mythical reflected skyline.

The spirit of Manhattan, the most prominent island, is distilled in 42nd Street. Linking the iconic sites of Grand Central Station, Chrysler building, the UN Headquarters and Times Square, it was once known as ‘Dream Street’. It has a sordid history of harboring criminal activity – an old joke goes that ‘they call it 42nd Street because you’re not safe if you spend more than forty seconds on it’.

By contrasting the urban density and energy of 42nd Street to the unexploited potential of the rest of the 42 islands we searched for new paradigms of urban occupation. We began by studying New York from afar, constructing filmic responses via research and editing techniques. We then proposed architectural interventions into these filmic sites. Our field trip to New York gave students the opportunity to compare their constructions to the throbbing reality of the city. Each student was invited to propose their own Forty Second Island through an architecture of narrative and film: a structure that established its own fictions and rules and allowed them to play out in time. Year 4 students resolved early speculations into a cinematic building proposition sited in New York. Year 5 students proposed a speculative thesis project, maintaining film as a key concern.

Unit 24 is supported by a broad network of associated professionals working in sectors ranging from architecture to film, animation, sound design, motion graphics, urban design and contemporary art. Contributions from these professionals serve as a counterpoint to the theoretical discourse within the unit. This year students benefited from animation masterclasses with Johnny Kelly and Douglas Fenton, sound workshops with Paul Bavister, collaborations with film sound composer Kevin Pollard, and scanning workshops with ScanLAB.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2015

Fig. 24.1 Kelvin Ip Y5, ‘Hong Kong Last Resort’. Entombed within a citadel at the fringes of the container port, Hong Kong Last Resort houses the deposed rebels of the crushed city. Through the deployment of strategic urban planning, emboldened civic architecture and symbolic sculptural motifs the citadel acts as a fatalistic double critique against both the British colonial rule and the credibility of the ‘One Country, Two Systems’ policy introduced by China. A warning from the future, the project maps out an imaginary end-game and an audacious critique of the smothering of a proud culture.

Figs. 24.2 – 24.3 Kai Yu Y5, ‘Submerged Silence’. In response to a growing interest in Taoist philosophy in China, a floating temple/diving centre provides a mirrored counter-body to the lost sacred site of the Jing Le palace. The palace embodies the

symbolic birth of the diety Xuanwu, but today lies at the bottom of a reservoir constructed by the Communist Party in 1967. Reaching the island by boat the visitor passes through a series of charged thresholds and physically completes the destroyed Xuanwu narrative, the lost faith, by accessing the submerged ruin undewater. Fig. 24.4 Deng (Aiden) Ai Y5, ‘New York Automobile Museum’. Acting as a monument to the car and its impact on the 20 th century American city, the New York Automobile Museum celebrates and mournfully reflects upon the doomed and intoxicating love affair between American culture and the image of the car. The automobile industry is at once glorified and also vilified through the symbolic destruction and explosion of components on a daily cycle. A blown-out hurricane.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2015

24.5

Fig. 24.5 Jiang Dong Y5, ‘The Autonomous Threshold’. Conceived as an experimental commuter island, the project explores new emerging domestic territories created by recent developments in self-driving vehicle technologies. Located within Parkland Walk in north London, a series of carousel-like house units provide the necessary hardware for daily life, while mobile vehicle units, or ‘autonomous thresholds’, can be programmed to receive parts of the house and travel away with them. Daily life becomes de-coupled from the drudgery of commuting, allowing the occupant/traveller to watch a film on the way home from work, to eat a bowl of cereal whilst on the school run or to take a long shower while on the M25.

Fig. 24.6 Joel Cullum Y5, ‘Remember the Future’. Imagining an alternative reality for the Heygate Estate in Elephant and

Castle, the film gives life to the sketches of visionary post-war architects who fought – and failed – for its regeneration.

Fig. 24.7 Caiwei (Amy) Zhao Y5, ‘The Institute of American Cuisine’. A moored aircraft carrier, harmoniously aligned to New York’s 42 nd Street, is the unlikely site for an experimental and cultish molecular gastronomy institute, orchestrating a covert operation against obesity. Innovating and specialising in agar-agar heavy cuisine, foodstuffs are manipulated and sculpted into ‘plates’ that are sometimes small as a thimble and at other times as large as a room. Channeling Grimm, Ledoux and Lewis Carroll, this edible terrain is a playground, an enchanting dietary experiment and an outrageous culinary warship.

The Bartlett School of Architecture

Figs. 24.8 – 24.9 Angeliki Vasileiou Y5, ‘Weaving the Ineffable’. Located within the industrial hinterlands of Leicester, a library is embedded within the enigmatic micro-cosmos of Soar Island. Bridging the physical with the immaterial the library becomes a model of different individual paths to knowledge. This shifting, labyrinthine terrain guided by the writings of Jorge Luis Borges, Umberto Eco and Gilles Deleuze, is loosely traced out across the island’s body. Complex interconnecting networks of rooms lure the visitor to endlessly explore the depths of the apparently boundary-less interior. Weaving the Ineffable seeks to construct an architecture informed by literature, where non-linear structures of space can echo the mysterious structures of the mind. Fig. 24.10 Emir Tigrel Y5, ‘Vestigial Landscapes’.

Within the once-sooty, blue-collar industrial zones of the Brooklyn Naval Yard – and acting as a counterpoint to the burgeoning ’Silicon Alley’ of Manhattan – the project examines architecture’s ability to convey historic continuity into the present. Drawing on the rich symbolism of the industrial ruins that scatter the existing site and by using advanced imaging technologies, the new building seeks to ‘complete’ lost artefacts and spaces, giving a tectonic presence to the fading memories of this original US Industrial Powerhouse. In this instance, the design reinterprets the embodied experience of scale by animating a naval vessel’s rudder thus turning it into a dynamic piece of history, rather than a frozen relic.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2015

The Bartlett School of Architecture

Remember the Future

Penelope Haralambidou, Simon Kennedy, Michael Tite

Remember the Future

Penelope Haralambidou, Simon Kennedy, Michael Tite

Year 4

Behnaz Berengi, Ka Tsun Kelvin Ip, Emir Tigrel, Angeliki Vasileiou, Kai Yu, Cai Wei (Amy) Zhao

Year 5

Kairo Baden-Powell, Daniel Cotton, Liam Davis, Jonathan Holmes, Steven Howson, Keiichi Iwamoto, Edward Mascarenhas, Rintaro Yoshida

Thanks to our partners: Factory Fifteen, Hal Currey of Arup Associates, Kevin Pollard, Andrew Gow of Raindog Films, Ali Carter of Max Fordham and Ben Sheterline of Price & Myers

Thanks to our critics: Dimitris Argyros, Julia Backhaus, Greg Blee, Kyle Buchanan, Luke Chandresinghe, Nat Chard, Hal Currey, Jo Dejardin, Richard Difford, Daniel Dale, Tom Ebdon, Douglas Fenton, Andrew Gancikov, Christophe Gerard, Tilo Gunther, Christine Hawley, Timo Haedrich, Colin Heperger, Jonathan Hill, Chee-Kit Lai, Sean Macintosh, Tim Norman, James O’Leary, Pravin Muthiah, Luke Pearson, Sophia Psarra, Kim Quazi, Merjin Royards, Matt Shaw, Gabby Shawcross, Bob Sheil, Mark Smout

Unit 24 employs film, video, animation, drawing and virtual/physical modelling techniques to generate architectural propositions. Acknowledging the continuing absence of a dominant socio-political design regime, and inspired by cinema, television, photography, literature and computer games, the Unit seeks to challenge the empty formalist pursuit currently prevalent in the production of built form in search of a critical and politically engaged role for the architect.

Inspired by historical cinematic visions of the future (Fritz Lang’s Metropolis), contemporary urban fantasies (Wim Wenders’ Wings of Desire), and past versions of the present (Walter Ruttman’s Berlin: Die Sinfonie der Großstadt), this year the Unit’s studies were focused on Berlin.

Beginning by studying Berlin from afar, the first phase of the year, ‘Berlin Dream’, saw students use a number of short, time-based projects to develop an informed visual and cultural attitude to Berlin. A site was identified, an intervention proposed, and new techniques of spatio-temporal design and representation were explored.

The field trip to Berlin, ‘Berlin Travelogue’, took the form of an intense study of both the site chosen in the first phase of the year, and of Berlin as a whole. The students collaborated with ScanLAB to create highly detailed 3D scans of extraordinary spaces, and produced experimental film work to further refine their design ambitions and their approach to an individual spatial practice.

For the main project of the year, which we called ‘Berlin Symphony’, Year 4 students designed a detailed, ‘filmic’ building which sought to draw on cultural, physical, economic and historical peculiarities, resolving an architecture that sought to challenge and subvert the fabric of Berlin. This design then became the protagonist in a final, time-based exploration. Year 5 students refined their explorations into speculative cinematic architectural projects, generating architectural films and filmic architectures, spatio-temporal graphics and cinematic architectural drawings, all supported and enriched by the written thesis document. The completion of Year 5 enables students to develop particular personal design methodologies with the moving image as a key parameter.

Creative Practice

Unit 24 benefits from a broad network of associated professionals working across the creative sectors. This year students benefited from frequent masterclasses from architectural filmmakers Factory Fifteen, from sound workshops with film composer Kevin Pollard, from scriptwriting and narrative direction from Andrew Gow of Raindog Films, from scanning workshops by Matt Shaw of ScanLAB, and from inspirational lectures from digital design agency Studio Output, dynamic young practices Patrick Lewis Architects and Haptic Architects, and architectural visionary and practitioner Felix Robbins.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2014

Fig. 24.1 Liam Davis Y5, ‘Agitprop (agitation propaganda)’. The film represents the dissemination of social and political conflict in public space through architectural and cinematic montage. It traces the design and production of a dialectic structure, constructed from culturally significant icons to incite emotional associations through a process of superimposition and superadjacency. Fig. 24.2 Steven Howson Y5, ‘Accelerated Serendipity’. The project proposes a speculative work space for the creative digital technology industry in East London’s Tech City. The film is an ironic take on corporate promotional shorts satirically proposing an architectural iconography inspired by electronic devices. Fig. 24.3 Aggeliki Vasileiou Y4, ‘Staging Weather’. Oscillating between reality and dream, the theatre sited on the bank of the river Spree in Berlin entraps the

indeterminacy of the weather by simulating different environmental conditions within the interior of three auditoria. Fig. 24.4 Emir Tigrel Y4, ‘New Bank and School of Economics’. The building is sited within a redundant ice factory, featuring a dynamic roof ‘vault’ system that stores digital and physical currency, harnessing socio-economic nuances to trigger an architectural response that encourages entrepreneurialism and change. Fig. 24.5 Jonathan Holmes Y5, ‘Tempelhofer Lu(f/s)twerk’. A wind and hydro-powered recreational wetland transforms Tempelhof Airport into a landscape of the sublime. The physical processes on site spawn programmatic opportunities and cause natural phenomena. The film uses the motion-picturesque architectural framework to cast the site in parallel cinematic universe.

Fig. 24.6 Rintaro Yoshida Y5, ‘The Parasphere Architect’. The film proposes an archaeological museum/garden of cyberspace grafted on physical uncanny urban structures that resemble ‘Tomason’ which suddenly appear in the city. The design explores the early iconography of cyberspace before digital media became all-pervasive, in a series of brightly coloured toy-like digital follies, each representing a seminal cyberspace novel. Fig. 24.7 Cai Wei (Amy) Zhao Y4, ‘Cross-Media Centre: A Light Device’. Sited in the Media Spree Development Corridor in Berlin, the building features a dynamic glass façade that filters natural light as well as being self-illuminating at night. Using the music video genre and featuring Kraftwerk’s classic piece, HomeComputer , the film recasts the building in a humorous alien invasion narrative.

Fig. 24.8 Kelvin Ip Y4, ‘Blossoming Bridge’. The project proposes an ornamental movable bridge housing a hybrid programme of a post office/shopping arcade. Soft ornaments grow and expand in response to both environmental and functional cycles mimicking the blossoming of flowers creating a decorative choreography. Fig. 24.9 Keiichi Iwamoto Y5, ‘Berlin Estrangement’. Exploring Berlin’s underground, a space that has strong associations with both fear (bunkers and wartime bombing) and freedom (tunnelling under the Berlin Wall to escape), the project imagines an allegorical ‘deep underground’ and constructs a utopian future that challenges, inverts and expands the current urban reality of the city.

24.10

Fig. 24.10 Edward Mascarenhas Y5, ‘Barbecana’. Inspired by Constant’s New Babylon and re-appropriating the spaces of The Barbican Estate, the project proposes a game that reflects on architecture’s relationship to play. This new pervasive game creates a space that mediates between real and simulated urban experience. Through immersive gameplay Barbecana destabilises and blurs the spatial temporal nature of the site.

Fig. 24.11 Dan Cotton Y5, ‘Wates House’. A building narrates its own life story in a short film that explores the multifarious nature of our lived-in spaces and comments on the role of memory in our experience of space. Projection-mapped animations uncover hidden narratives – drawn from material collected through interviews with its inhabitants – and replayed on the walls of the soon to be demolished Wates House.

Fig. 24.12 Kairo Baden-Powell Y5, ‘Fictional Constructs’. Set in Kraftwerk, Berlin, the film constructs a fictional image of the site where hyper-real design interventions conceal various levels of deception of scale, time and place. The design proposes a new open film studio/public space that constantly evolves, grows and performs, acts and expands, merging the boundaries between the everyday and the iconic, the real city and its representation in film.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2014

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2014

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2014

Collisions

Michael Chadwick, Simon Kennedy

Collisions

Simon Kennedy, Michael Chadwick

Unit 24 employs film, video and animation techniques to generate architectural propositions, operating consciously and conscientiously within the globalised, decentralised, desensitised territories of media.

The Unit recognises the current absence of a dominant socio-political architectural and design regime. We aim to celebrate this freedom and draw from popular artforms: cinema, television, photography, literature and computer games can be analysed and utilised to form hybrid and synthetic spatial propositions.

Collisions

We inhabit unique times of tumultuous transition. Encroaching digital technologies collide with analogue and chemical technologies (nowhere more strikingly than in the construction industry). Cyberspace collides with and infiltrates built fabric. Iconic images collide with their own dissemination. Globalisation collides with everything. The Unit attempted to interpret the collision as a force of positive change, and sought to experiment with its potential use as an instrument of architectural investigation.

Beginning the year with a series of short, moving-image-based projects, students outlined a conceptual position while refining the skills required to examine their own architectural collisions. Intensive workshops were held during this phase of the year in key techniques for digital animation, editing, production and compositing.

We then travelled to the source of the spread of globalisation, armed with iconic images and film, with the intention of testing the power of such iconography against its origins. As part of a field trip to California, the Unit studied the Case Study Houses and works by Frank Gehry, Eric Owen Moss,

Morphosis and Coop Himmelb(l)au, the LACMA Stanley Kubrick exhibition, and Hollywood. Visiting the Sony Animation Studios, students were treated to a 3D and compositing workshop where they recreated a scene from The Amazing Spiderman. A visit to SCI-Arc also enabled students to experience SCI-Arc’s cutting edge Robotics & Simulation Lab.

Fourth year students then resolved their early speculations into a cinematic building proposition informed by filmic-spatial investigations, translations and notions of genre. Fifth year students defined a personal spatial and artistic practice, while constructing a speculative architectural thesis proposition, also with the moving image as a key parameter.

Creative Practice Unit 24 benefits from a broad network of associated professionals working in sectors ranging from architecture to film, animation, sound design, motion graphics, urban design and contemporary art. Contributions from these professionals serve as a critical pedagogic counterpoint to the conceptual and theoretical discourse within the Unit, as well as providing inspiration and practical guidance –students are encouraged to consider their potential as practitioners while still studying at the Bartlett.

Unit 24 arranged a series of lectures covering all aspects of setting up a creative and commercial practice in today’s economy and, importantly, maintaining creativity and conceptual development throughout the process. The Unit welcomed speakers such as David Chambers and Kevin Haley of Aberrant Architecture, Zoe Chan and Joao Gameiro Neves from Atelier ChanChan, Alex Scott-Whitby at Studio AR, George Thompson of Visitor Studio, Pedro Gil of Studio Gil, Jenny Fleming and Alessio Cuozzo of JAA, Rob Small of Lotsmorehere and Ed Soden.

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2013

‘Americans may have no identity, but they do have wonderful teeth.’ Jean Baudrillard

Many thanks to our critics: Diana Cochrane, Hal Currey, Andrew Gancikov, Alexis Germanos, Christine Hawley, Ephraim Joris, Jerome Keam, Patrick Lewis, Kim Quazi, Reza Schuster, George Thompson. Unit 24 has benefited from its relationships with a network of practising architects and construction industry consultants, and so would like to thank practice tutors Kim Quazi and Hal Currey of Arup Associates, Structural Engineers Michael Thomson and Timothy Snelson, also of Arup Associates and Environmental Engineer Ali Shaw of Max Fordham.

Year 4

Ai Deng, Daniel Cotton, Liam Davis, Khadija Durbar, Muhammad Zhlfiker Enayet, Jonathan Holmes, Steven Howson, Keiichi Iwamoto, Edward Mascarenhas

Year 5

Ruben Alonso, Isaac Eluwole, Douglas Fenton, Sasha Smolin

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2013

Fig. 24.1 Douglas Fenton, Y5, The Post-Human Experiment. Based on a theoretical view of the consciousness as a pattern of information which might be held within a digital substrate, the project explores the relationship between architectural environments and the duality of the mind/body that experiences them. The image describes a sequence within the film, ThePost-HumanExperiment , where the protagonist enters geometries and abstracted spaces generated by a digital version of consciousness. By representing this ‘mindscape’, the project speculates on the perception of 3D space and juxtaposes this against the abstracted spatiality held within the subconscious and in dreams, where time, space, place and event merge into one another, shifting and changing.

24.2 24.4

Fig. 24.2 Jonathan Holmes, Y4, Super Supper, film still. Normative shop-based activities are gamified with hilarious results, subsequently enabling new commercial potentialities.

Fig. 24.3 Ruben Alonso, Y5, Southbank, photo-collage: ‘The production of reality no longer depends on the direct relationship with reality, but with a represented reality.’

Fig. 24.4 Douglas Fenton, Y5, The Post-Human Experiment, spatio-temporal graphic depicting the procession through the Post-Human Experiment Tower. Fig. 24.5 Douglas Fenton, Y5, The Post-Human Experiment, spatio-temporal graphic showing the filmic journey from entering the Tower to emerging into mental geometric constructions.

24.3 24.5

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2013

24.6 24.8

24.7 24.9

Fig. 24.6 Ai Deng, Y4, Bricolage, A Three-Dimensional Collision, film still. Fig. 24.7 Edward Mascarenhas, Y4, Colliding Chairs, graphic storyboard. Set in the City of London, the film speculates on an infestation of banal office-derived objects and examines the surreal results. Fig. 24.8 Sasha Smolin, Y5, Market Stall Typologies, film still. Beginning with a process of intensive data gathering, the project generates a series of opportunistic typological interventions derived from the multiple cultures inhabiting Caledonian Road, London. These are combined to form dynamic and sympathetic new urban spaces. Fig. 24.9 Sasha Smolin, Y5, Market Stall Typologies, Eritrean typology. The Nda Mariam temple is Asmara is transformed via projection, drawing and modelling.

Bartlett School of

The Bartlett School of Architecture 2013

24.12

24.11 24.13

Fig. 24.10 Liam Davis, Y4, Collage: Film to Form, spatiotemporal graphic. The project seeks to generate architectural space via the analysis of filmic montage techniques. Here, Sergei Eisenstein’s BattleshipPotemkin is analysed graphically, sonically and temporally, giving rise to a system of notation, which is then used to drive software-based parameters, allowing the construction of new spaces and filmic architectures. Fig. 24.11 Daniel Cotton, Y4, Transitions: The Marlowe House, Hollywood, California. The project seeks to derive architectural space from filmic transitions between virtual and cinematic space, and footage filmed with a custom-designed steadycam. Transitions are mapped into three-dimensional habitable spaces which form a residence for the fictional detective, Phillip Marlowe. Fig. 24.12 Steven

Howson, Y4, The Thirty Second City, film still. The project describes the near-instant formation of a hyper-dense fictional urban amalgamation. Fig. 24.13 Keichi Iwamoto, Y4, The Restoration of the London Baths – conceptual graphic. Following an investigation into London’s historic red-light districts, the project suggests a controlled collision between eastern and western cultural modes.

24.14 24.15 24.16

Fig. 24.14 Isaac Eluwole, Y5, The Quotidian Utopia, Aaron’s Undercroft, film still. The project seeks to reappraise forgotten and maligned Modernist spaces, countering preconceptions then inverting them with counter-cultural augmentations and interventions. Beginning by photographing and modelling each site in meticulous detail, the spaces undergo softwarebased transformations, from which each intervention is generated. A study of the prejudices surrounding the site, actual and perceived uses, and historical occurences gives rise to the intervention’s programme. Fig. 24.15 Isaac Eluwole, Y5, The Quotidian Utopia, The Memorial spatial construct, film still. Fig. 24.16 Isaac Eluwole, Y5, The Quotidian Utopia, The Memorial in construction, film still. Fig. 24.17 Jonathan Holmes, Y5, The Stahl House,

a constructed image of a mythological artefact at the boundary between reality and fiction.

The Bartlett School of Architecture

Possibilities of Exchange: Poetic Transference

Uwe Schmidt-Hess, Michael Wihart

Yr 4: Sung-Hwa Cha, Mo Huen Chong, Christopher Cox, Michail Floros, Yi-Tung Su, Qidi Hu, Nobuhiko Maeda

Yr 5: Ronald Cheape, Maya Cochrane, Thomas Ibbitson, Kevin Kelly, Asako Sengoku, Chun-Tai Tsai

Possibilities of Exchange: Poetic Transference

Unit 24 studies space beyond the confines of operational thought where architecture can become a dynamic interface between the body and the landscape.

Today’s innovations in technology, science and media are not only pushing the limits of what is feasible, but also the boundaries of our imagination. In this world thought is freed from pure rationales uniting opposites such as the natural and man-made, the biological and technological, the analytical and intuitive. Events emerge between users and their architectural surroundings; a hitherto unknown poetic transference unfolds new possibilities of exchange between man, architecture and landscape. This year’s projects have proposed hybrid interventions that migrate between the common strictures and nomenclatures of digital, mechanical, biological etc., becoming models of innovation as well as imaginative devices that investigate alternative spatial realities.

Unit 24 would like to thank Geoff Whittaker from KPF Architects for his continued assistance with Design Realization as well as our critics:

Tilo Amhoff, Christopher Bryant, Nic Clear, Marjan Colletti, Ines Dantas, Ranulph Glanville, Ruairi Glynn, Robert Greer, Christoph Hadrys, Jon Harvey, Chris Hildrey, Tobias Klein, Ben Luk, Geoff Morrow, Markus Seifermann, Bob Sheil, Ben Sweeting, Phil Watson, Mark West and Emmanuel Vercruysse.

Michael Wihart & Uwe Schmidt-Hess

Top: Michail Floros, Wet Elevator for Nautical Passenger Middle: Chun-Tai Tsai, Tidal Architecture – Sea Food Market in Mousehole Harbour Bottom: Maya Cochrane, Training Centre for Ice Road Truckers Opposite page clockwise from top left: Maya Cochrane, Feather and Lung Model; Michail Floros, Wet Elevator Models; Asaco Sengoku, Muscle Wire Actuation Model; Michail Floros, Wet Elevator Models; Sung-Hwa Cha: Soft Envelope Study

Top: Asaco Sengoku, Lace Space: a Workshop for Lacing Bottom from left: Ronald Cheape, Terra-forming Intervention in Glenaladale; Christopher Cox, The Biological Rocking Chair; Mo Huen Chong, Elastic Space

Kevin Kelly, Temples of Hermitic Virtues.

Tom Ibbitson, The Still Vessel: Timber Experts Stranded on an Island made of Stone are Forced to Rebuild Their Ship Using Stone, the Result is an Architecture of Inheritance and Inversion. Opposite page: Hull and Formwork Construction. Top: Sail detail. Bottom: The Becoming of the Window.

Migrating Thresholds

Uwe Schmidt-Hess, Michael Wihart

Dip/MArch Unit 24

Y4: Maya Cochrane, Nicole Dixon, Thomas Ibbitson, Kevin Kelly, Tomonori Ogata, Asako Sengoku, Chun-Tai Tsai, Andrea Wong. Y5: Jonathan P Harvey, Christopher Hildrey, Milad Hossainzadeh, Gerald Huber, Bleddyn R Jones, Fei Meng, Thomas J Rigley

Migrating Thresholds

Art protects us from the desert of reality, its one-dimensionality and the complete usefulness and banality of our existence. She achieves that by luring us into new and extraordinary emotional, experiential and intellectual states. In search of original pleasure, architectural designers often endeavour to challenge the unknown but feel restrained by the consequences of the known. We couldn’t care less.

There are spaces where duration and memory are compressed. Thresholds can be spatial, chemical, social, etc. They always have potential and they are the sites of change. The term ‘threshold’ describes moments of transitions. How do we record it? How do we, as architectural designers, imbue thresholds with meaning?

In its first year the unit has zoomed into transitional practices and observed rites of passage and their relevance to our coexistence and in turn invented new passage tactics and rites and responded with articulate architectural observations, experiments and propositions. We have explored thresholds between craftmanship and experimentation; between the excellence of the expectable and the failure of the experiment. We understand thresholds as sites of potential beginning, contact connection, immersion and their antagonists at the same time.

Michael Wihart and Uwe Schmidt-Hess

Top: Thomas Ibbitson, The beginning of architecture in the Garden of Eden Bottom: Asako Sengoku, Inflatable dress.

Clockwise from top left: Bleddyn R Jones, Geo-mechanical bridge at the Dripping Well in Knaresborough, North Yorkshire; Andrea Wong, Transfigured anatomies of a shopping bag; Fei Meng, Archaeological prosthetics for the Schliemann excavations of Troy, Turkey; Kevin Kelly, Lunatic Window; Chun-Tai Tsai, Moments of transformation; Tomonori Ogata, The visio-computational space of Anatoli Karpov; Thomas J Rigley, Aqueous transmission.

Milad Hossainzadeh, The Library of Bioinformatics Exchange, Sarajevo.

Maya Cochrane, Pores for a Hamam hydraulique.

Christopher Hildrey, Hybrid Gardens of the Circle Line, London.

Jonathan P Harvey, Mistral Festival in Orange, France.

Phenomenal Noumena: extreme PHENOuMENA

Steve Hardy, Jonas Lundberg with Ken Faulkner

Yr 4: Alan Pottinger, Charlie Coates, Dominque Laurence, Gayle Chan, Hannes Mayer, Huali Zhang, Ian Law, Justin Goodyear, Richard Roberts, Kwan Pik (Sonia) Chiu Yr 5: Chris Jones, Poyuan Huang, Takehiko Iseki, Tuomas Pirinen, ViJay Patel, Wei-Haw Wang

Phenomenal Noumena: extreme PHENOuMENA

Noumena exist in themselves as independent from experience in contrast to phenomena which exist within the experienced world, as 'objects' perceived by the senses Many contemporary design techniques continually decontextualise the experience of architecture and replace the experiencing subject with the notation of the statistical, the representational or the programmatic subject In parallel, the semi-autonomous emergence of architecture from systemic and algorithmic methods places the practice of architecture closer to that of the pseudo-noumenal

The unit aims to reintroduce qualitative experience to the otherwise typically quantitative practice of architecture Rather than work towards the understanding of a neo-cognitive experience, the charge is to work by interlacing the qualitative with the quantitative Working within instrumental simulations it is possible to provide qualitative feedback of phenomenal effects for the quantitative manipulation of systemic or material conditions which create the effects In altering the porosity of a wall through which light passes, for example, one increases the potential sensation of a brightening/darkening space

The design research is situated between the noumenal and the phenomenal, between the systemic algorithm and the sensed, in what we will call the phenoumenal Focusing on the phenbionics of the sensed, natural and mechanical phenomenon, students avoid complacent effects and instead seek out extremes

The unit continues to design effectual and experiential phenomena within pseudonoumenal structures

Steve Hardy, Jonas Lundberg with Ken Faulkner

Top to bottom: Tuomas Pirinen, Chainsaw Animation; Huali Zhang, Shark Research Centre, Florida; Vijay Patel, Mangrove Growth Mesh, Cuba; Wei-Haw Wang, Hanging Gardens of Babylon, Greece

This page: Takehiko Iseki, Salt Farms, Jordan

This page: Justin Goodyer, Fluid Dynamics, New York Facing page: Tuomas Pirinenm, Xylitol/Birch Milling, Finland

This page: Poyuan Huang, Condensation Chambers, Morocco Facing page: Chris Jones, Sequestration Coal Mining, Pennsylvania

Effectual Formalisms

Steve Hardy, Jonas Lundberg

Yr 4: Julian Busch, Stephen Clarke, Poyuan Huang, Takehiko Iseki, Christopher Jones, Sun Eoi Lee, Vijay Patel, Tuomas Pirinen, Wei-Haw Wang

Yr 5: Mark Andrews, Raymond Chan, James Ewen, Peter Moerland, Ka Chun Pun, Benjamin Guy Thomas, Charis Tsang, Vincent Young

Effectual Formalisms

The unit works within a ‘blind’ formalism; challenging the ocular preference for form with the performative aspects of the form in relation to the other senses For example, forms that are seen as different will usually ‘sound’ different as well If sound (or other sensual effects) becomes a determining factor, then designers can work on the form of a project to produce the desired effect If the effect is carefully constructed, one may even achieve certain emotive qualities

Working with spatial effects has become increasingly possible with our ability to simulate phenomena of space, material, light and sound A ray-traced image demonstrating the actual radiosity and colour bleed of light in fact becomes more of a simulation than a representation It is now also possible to ray-trace the actual sound of a space and create an exact, predictive simulation of the effect within the space

The unit works on locating, customising, mastering and creating simulation techniques, and experiments with these simulations to design emotive phenomena within a formal structure The intention is for the student to unleash the simulation as a powerful design tool for understanding complex relationships

Steve Hardy and Jonas Lundberg

Top: Benjamin Guy Thomas, middle: Charis Tsang, bottom: Wei-Haw Wang

Clockwise from top left: Poyuan Huang, Takehiko Iseki, James Ewen, Julian Busch, Ka Chun Pun, Raymond Chan, Vijay Patel, Tuomas Pirinen, Christopher Jones, Mark Andrews Overleaf, left: Vincent Young, right: Stephen Clarke

[Bosphorus] Drifts [Caspian] Shifts

Peter Hasdell, Patrick Weber

[Bosphorus] Drifts [Caspian] Shifts

Unit 24 investigated conditions of flux, places of exchange, transformation and information Focusing our investigations on a part of the Silk Road between Istanbul and Baku, an area defined by flows between the east and west, we consider a range of shifting conditions and continually changing environments

The unit explores an architecture that is part caravan (moving object) and part building or caravanserei (fixed place) We propose architectures of interferences, interruptions and obstacles to the flow of things in motion Projects are sited in Istanbul or Baku

The year ’ s programme comprises three interrelated parts Rift: a project defining two points of reference and the space in between Drift: an assemblage/construct of moments of drifting, derive, currents, turbulence, vortices and eddies Shift: proposals developed from individuals concerns ranged from markets of various types, hotels, taxi stations, bird sanctuary, apiary radio stations, weather register, sanatoriums and dog racing tracks

Peter Hasdell and Patrick Weber

Yr 4: Johan Berglund, Eleanor Brough, Katherine Davies, James Ewen, Kirsten Holland, David Roy, Kristina Schinegger, Jason Spiliotakos, Niek Turner, Emmanuel Vercruysse Yr 5: Joveria Baig, Sarah Burton, Rhys Cannon, Ka Man Cheung, Dimitris Karampatakis, Jonas Love Norlin, Chryssanthi Perpatidou, Ylva Reddy MArch Architecture: Timo Haedrich

Opposite, top: Dimitris Karampatakis, middle: Emmanuel Vercruysse, lower: Jason Spiliotakos This page, top: Rhys Cannon Bottom row: Kirsten Holland, Sarah Burton, Niek Turner, Johan Berglund, Joveria Baig, Chryssanthi Perpatidou, Niek Turner, Rhys Cannon, David Roy, Ylva Reddy