Resumé and reflection
Undoing while Doing! Michaela Glanz
Undoing Supervision
A Compendium of Key Issues in Supervising Artistic Research Doctorates
64/76
What can we draw as a final conclusion at the end of a project like Advancing Supervision for Artistic Research Doctorates that has lasted over three years? What are the most important learnings and outcomes we should particularly highlight? Referring back to the project application and arguing for what the project has achieved in terms of formulated aims and proposed outputs would be a common approach to it. Of course, we are expected to underline that the project has made a decisive contribution to the discussion around the question of supervision in artistic doctorates and that a number of tools and resources have been developed and made available to the community. The specific focus of the project has been met with great interest within the community and beyond. The fact that the project was able to respond to the also formulated need and expectation for clear recommendations and best practices with a non-normative but critical stance of the project is certainly to be considered a merit of a strategic partnership project like this.
