Inflection 4: Permanence by A A D R

Permanence

JOURNAL OF THE MELBOURNE SCHOOL OF DESIGN

Features: Elizabeth Diller Dan Hill Casey Mack Christof Mayer of raumlabor Tod Williams & Billie Tsien

Vol 04 November 2017

PERMANENCE

Inflection Journal Volume 04 - Permanence November 2017

Inflection is published annually by the Melbourne School of Design at the University of Melbourne and AADR: Art Architecture Design Research. Editors: Dominic On, Jessica Wood, Nina Tory-Henderson and Stephen Yuen Deputy Editors: Catherine Woo and Olivia Potter Academic Advisor: Dr. AnnMarie Brennan Academic Advisory Board: Dr. AnnMarie Brennan Prof. Alan Pert Prof. Gini Lee Acknowledgements: The editors would like to thank all those involved in the production of this journal for their generous assistance and support. For all enquiries please contact: editorial@inflectionjournal.com inflectionjournal.com facebook.com/inflectionjournal/ instagram.com/inflectionjournal/ © Copyright 2017 ISSN 2199-8094 ISBN 978-3-88778-520-8 AADR – Art, Architecture and Design Research publishes research with an emphasis on the relationship between critical theory and creative practice. AADR Curatorial Editor: Rochus Urban Hinkel, Stockholm Production: pth-mediaberatung GmbH, Würzburg Publication © by Spurbuchverlag 1. Print run 2017 Am Eichenhügel 4, 96148 Baunach, Germany. Graphic design in collaboration with Büro North Interdisciplinary Design No part of the work must in any mode (print, photocopy, microfilm, CD or any other process) be reproduced nor – by application of electronic systems – processed, manifolded nor broadcast without approval of the copyright holder. The opinions expressed in Inflection are those of the authors and are not endorsed by the University of Melbourne.

Cover Image:

Wrecking the Seat of Learning Argus Newspaper Collection of Photographs, State Library of Victoria

CONTRIBUTORS

Aki Ishida Aki Ishida is an Assistant Professor of Architecture at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She founded Aki Ishida Architect PLLC in ~ oly New York City, and prior to that, worked at the offices of Rafael Vin Architects, James Carpenter Design Associates and I.M. Pei Architect. In 2016, she was recognised nationally as one of the 25 Most Admired Educators by DesignIntelligence.

Christine Bjerke Christine Bjerke is an architect, designer and educator based in Copenhagen, Denmark. She holds a Diploma of Architecture from the Bartlett School of Architecture and a Bachelors of Architecture from the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts. In 2015 she co-founded the interdisciplinary collective In-Between Economies and she is the editor of the multifaceted website and publication project, www.thefxbeauties. club. She is currently teaching the Urbanism & Societal Change Masters Programme at the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts.

Amelyn Ng Amelyn is a recent graduate of the Melbourne School of Design. She is now a graduate architect at Fieldwork and an independent writer whose work has been published across a variety of digital and print Australian media. She recently presented papers on civic agency and socially responsive infrastructures at conferences in Philadelphia, USA and Nicosia, Cyprus. Amelyn will be moving to New York City later this year for further study in architectural criticism at Columbia University.

Christof Mayer Christof Mayer studied architecture in Berlin and London. He graduated in 1998 from the Technical University of Berlin. In 1999, he founded the architecture collective raumlaborberlin with Andrea Hofmann, Jan Liesegang and Markus Bader. In 2000, he became a member of the Chamber of Architects Berlin and started the Büro für Architektur und Städtebau. He has since taught in Germany, Switzerland, Norway, Greece and Australia. In 2014, he held a residency at Monash University in Melbourne. Since 2017, he has held a professorship at the Bergen Architecture School in Norway.

Barnaby Bennett Barnaby Bennett is a publisher and co-founder of Freerange Press. He is an award-winning designer, and is currently completing a PhD examining the political characteristics of temporary architecture in post-quake Christchurch. Barnaby has been widely published and teaches architectural theory and design at universities in Australia and New Zealand.

Dan Hill Dan Hill is an Associate Director at Arup, the global design and engineering firm. He is Head of Arup Digital Studio, a multidisciplinary strategic design, service design and interaction design team. Dan is uniquely positioned at the intersection of design, urbanism and technology, and is recognised globally as a key thinker, leader and practitioner in this field. Dan is an adjunct professor at RMIT University and UTS and a visiting professor at the Bartlett School of Architecture.

Casey Mack Casey Mack is an architect and the director of Brooklyn-based Popular Architecture, an office devoted to combining simplicity with versatility in work across multiple scales. With the support of the Graham Foundation, Mack is currently writing Digesting Metabolism: Artificial Land in Japan 1954–2202, a forthcoming book from Princeton Architectural Press on built housing by the Metabolists and their associates inspired by Le Corbusier’s unbuilt designs for Algiers. Mack's work has been published in Domus China, CLOG, The Avery Review, Bracket and OASE.

Eleni Bastéa Eleni Baste´a was born and grew up in Thessaloniki, Greece. She holds a BA in art history from Bryn Mawr College, and a Master of Architecture and a PhD in architectural history, both from the University of California at Berkeley. At the University of New Mexico, where she has taught since 2001, she is Regents' Professor of Architecture and director of the International Studies Institute. The recipient of several grants and awards, she lectures internationally on memory and architecture, cities and literature, and on modern Greece and Turkey.

Elizabeth Diller Elizabeth Diller is a founding partner of Diller Scofidio + Renfro (DS+R), an interdisciplinary design studio that works at the intersection of architecture, the visual arts and the performing arts. DS+R focuses on projects of civic importance: rethinking the future of the city, the changing role of institutions and the increasing dominance of technology in society. She is also a Professor of Architecture at Princeton University.

Sean Anderson Sean Anderson is the Associate Curator for the Department of Architecture and Design at the Museum of Modern Art in New York. Prior to his work at MoMA, Anderson served as the undergraduate program director and senior lecturer of design and history at the University of Sydney from 2012. His research focused on Italian modernism and its effect upon colonial and post-colonial architecture across multiple geographical contexts.

Jessica Wood Jessica Wood is an editor of Inflection Journal and a Master of Architecture student at the Melbourne School of Design. She holds a Bachelor of Interior Design from RMIT University, where she also teaches Design Studio. In 2014 she was awarded the Australian German Associationâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Travel Fellowship.

Tanja Beer Dr. Tanja Beer is an award-winning ecoscenographer and an Academic Fellow in Performance Design and Sustainability at the Melbourne School of Design. She has more than 15 years professional experience, including creating ephemeral designs for projects in Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, New York, London, Cardiff, Glasgow, Vienna and Tokyo.

Kaylene Tan Kaylene is a PhD student at the Melbourne School of Design, focusing on food heritage interpretation. With a background in heritage engagement, Kaylene has worked as a writer and producer for film, audio, theatre and site-specific performances for cultural organisations and historical sites in Singapore and Malaysia.

Toby Dean Toby Dean graduated from the University of Melbourne in 2017 with a Master of Architecture and now teaches in the Bachelor of Environments. He is interested in the intersection of contemporary culture with tradition and in seeking alternative methods of architectural practice and exhibition for the future. He believes in design as a form of empowerment and hopes to continue the discourse on the implications of architecture upon complex environmental and social systems.

Morgan Hickinbotham Morgan graduated from the Victorian College of the Arts in 2012 with a Bachelor of Fine Arts, majoring in photography. His photography work spans the fashion, design, architecture and commercial spheres. Seeing and thinking in sound and vision, he also makes music and video art.

Tod Williams and Billie Tsien Tod Williams and Billie Tsien began working together in 1977 and co-founded their eponymous architectural practice in 1986. Located in Midtown Manhattan, their studio focuses on work for institutions including schools, museums and not-for-profitsâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;organisations and people that value issues of aspiration and meaning, timelessness and beauty.

003

CONTENTS

06 10

Editorial

Christine Bjerke Dual-Living: The Digitalisation of Domestic Space

Elizabeth Diller On Obsolescence

Tod Williams and Billie Tsien On Slowness

Aki Ishida Metabolic Impermanence: The Nakagin Capsule Tower

Eleni BastĂŠa The Memory of Loss

Kaylene Tan Unfinished: Brutalist Heritage in the Making

108

Tanja Beer* The Aesthetics of Impermanence

Casey Mack Future Stock

116

Toby Dean The Reassembled Town Hall

Dan Hill On Systems

126

Jessica Wood MPavilion: Catalyst or Cat's Paw?

Amelyn Ng Illusions of Freedom

132

Sean Anderson On Imagined Placelessness

Barnaby Bennett Breaking and Making Temporality

Christof Mayer Cui Bono? The City as a Product of Societal Negotiation

*denotes articles that have been formally peer-reviewed

EDITORIAL Dominic On, Jessica Wood, Nina Tory-Henderson and Stephen Yuen Permanence has long been prescribed as an essential virtue of architecture, associated with the Vitruvian definition of firmitas: mass and solidity crafted to endure. Yet, to think about architectural permanence in the Vitruvian sense today produces a schism: absolutism in a culture of relativism. Speculative development, volatile real estate markets, international warfare, mass migration, a changing climate and throw-away attitudes prioritising quick and temporary fixes for ongoing problems have repositioned the value placed on the material durability of architecture. How do we focus our thoughts and efforts in a culture of obsolescence, when the very essence of architecture—to build—has endurance at the centre of its logic? This logic frames the architectural project as complete the moment it is built, but a building is an ongoing series of processes; it changes over time through occupation, inhabitation and developing technologies. From the enduringly incomplete Tower of Babel to the temporary urbanism of today, practitioners and theorists have been negotiating and reinterpreting the definition and value of architectural permanence, and it is in this milieu that this edition of Inflection is positioned. In opposition to the commonplace acceptance of architectural timelessness, this journal presents alternative practices that interrogate the relationships of architecture and design with solidity and time. Through examining a series of temporary architectural interventions in post-quake Christchurch, Barnaby Bennett proposes an ecological understanding of architectural timescales. He argues that buildings should not be understood as inert edifices, but as ‘living’ things that respond to flows, shifts, events and activities as they move through time. In rebuttal to the scrap-and-build culture in Japan, Casey Mack's study of 'artificial land' projects by structural engineer Toshihiko Kimura underscores the importance of cultivating new attitudes toward existing built stock in order to project them into the future, finding 06

Inflection

a middle ground between permanence and change. Christof Mayer of raumlaborberlin takes post-Wall Berlin as a case study to illustrate how temporary projects can democratise spaces, diversify a city and contribute to long-term urban developments. A thesis project by Toby Dean from the Melbourne School of Design explores the reclamation of public space through more permanent means. Dean proposes the Reassembled Town Hall as a tool with which to resist a culture where the worth of architecture is reduced to economic capital alone. Conversely, in the fields of scenography and performance design, the transience of the event typically takes precedence over the fixity and sustainability of the set and costumes. Tanja Beer’s research considers the social and environmental ripples that resound long after the curtain falls and the set is demolished. Our contemporary world is one in-flux; new technologies allow business models, governments and social structures to morph with unprecedented speed. How then, does the relatively slow and fixed practice of building position itself in this global condition of temporal, social and technological instability? Amelyn Ng responds to this question through a critique of the rise in freelance and precarious work, made possible by contemporary conditions of globalisation, digitalisation and fluctuating economies. In exploring the spatial implications of our changing work life, she puts forth a sharp commentary on the now ubiquitous hotdesk environment. In a hive of infinite connectivity and productivity, our work life is increasingly held in a state of temporality and placelessness, resulting in a nostalgia for permanence. Christine Bjerke examines the digitalisation of the home and the subsequent effects of destabilisation: breaking down perceived boundaries of domesticity and privacy. Whilst technologies have transformed the social space of the domestic, she posits that the physical space of the home remains largely unaffected, and subsequently questions how the materiality of the home might respond.

An enquiry into architectural permanence is not only an exploration of physical and material endurance, but also of cultural and symbolic persistence. It prompts an investigation into what our architecture says about our collective psychology across time and cultures. Never intended to be permanent, initially considered irreparably ugly and out of character in its romantic surroundings, the Eiffel Tower has since come to define the ‘concept’ of Paris. But of the 18,000 iron members which make up the tower, each has been replaced at least once. The Eiffel Tower as it stands today is a facsimile both of itself and of the culture it has come to represent. So when it comes to architectural heritage, do we seek to preserve the buildings themselves or rather the ideals, souls and epochs by whom they were conceived? As creatures with imperfect memories, perhaps the practice of designing, building and restoring enables us to convert urgent shortterm phenomena into physical recollections thereby cheating our fated collective anterograde amnesia. Taking Brutalism as a case study, Kaylene Tan uses a movement in a kind of architectural limbo, neither contemporary nor solidified in the past, to question the role of heritage protections. How do we decide what to preserve when our definition of ‘heritage’ changes from person to person, from age to age? Heritage should be considered a verb rather than a noun. If undertaken merely as a formal exercise concerned with hermetic histories and aesthetics, heritage fails to serve modernity. Rather a building’s ‘permanence must be earned rather than merely assumed’ through continual use and appreciation. In a close reading of the current situation surrounding Kisho Kurokawa’s Nakagin Capsule Tower, Aki Ishida delves into the broader cultural and historical beginnings of Metabolism to find answers to the Tower’s preservation conundrum as a building designed to evolve. In The Memory of Loss, Eleni Baste´a poetically explores the symbiotic relationship between buildings and memory. Physical reference points act as a backdrop for the recollection of one’s life, and so these buildings in Vol 04 Permanence

Vol 03 New Order

our memory maintain a legacy and life form after their demolition. Only when physical heritage fails and buildings are wiped away is permanence ultimately achieved. Like our ancestors, buildings are untouchable in death. Preservation through memory is not confined to introspection. Often, the decision to demolish a building provokes a social and political commentary which can continue well after the dust settles. A tension exists between the need to develop and the need to value cultural history. The 2014 demolition of the 15-year-old American Folk Art Museum in New York is one such example which has sparked a polemical discourse amongst the architectural community and the greater public. To this day, the lingering effects of MoMA’s decision are still at work as the institution continues their plans for expansion. The journal presents a multivocal view on the situation. In an interview with the architects of the Folk Art Museum, Tod Williams and Billie Tsien, they expound upon their design approach which involves a deliberate slowing down in a world which prioritises speed and efficiency. Elizabeth Diller from interdisciplinary design studio Diller Scofidio + Renfro, chosen to lead the development and expansion of MoMA, provides an alternative perspective, acknowledging our contemporary culture of obsolescence. Through these voices, Inflection Vol. 4 extrapolates the permanent and the temporary as a spectrum to be navigated at each stage of architecture’s unfolding narrative. Through each of the responses presented in this year’s edition, Permanence provides a critical voice as architecture continually seeks an enduring foothold in an ever evolving landscape.

Cedric Price, Re:CP, ed. Hans-Ulrich Obrist (Basel: Birkhauser Verlag AG, 2003), 11.

Inflection

Photograph by Mark Strizik. Pictures Collection, State Library of Victoria

Vol 04 Permanence

BREAKING AND MAKING TEMPORALITY TIME AND TEMPORARY ARCHITECTURE IN POST-QUAKE CHRISTCHURCH Barnaby Bennett

What makes one thing permanent and another temporary? Can objects, buildings, or landscapes be understood through other forms of temporal status? And how might these different forms affect our experience of the objects? This essay seeks to answer these questions by complicating the normally tidy division between the permanent and the temporary by articulating an ecological understanding of time that encompasses a broader range of temporal conditions. The difference between temporary and permanent things appears self-evident: the former exists for a discrete and measurable amount of time, whilst the latter extends into the future. This is one of the binary divisions we use to understand the status of objects in the world, and we build relationships with things based on these assumptions. This essay is based on information gathered whilst living in Christchurch between 2012 and 2015. Assumptions of permanence and temporariness were particularly evident when dealing with the built environment after the earthquakes in 2010 and 2011. At 12:51 p.m. on 22 February 2011, a large earthquake shook Christchurch, New Zealand's second largest city.

Inflection

Between September 2010 and the end of 2012, over 13,000 earthquakes jolted the city of 342,000 people, but the February 2011 quake was different. The city was devastated— buildings and infrastructure were damaged and 185 people were killed.1 A national state of emergency was declared the following day: the core of the city was shut down and cordoned off as a public exclusion zone. It would be over two years before citizens could return freely to the shattered city centre. In this context, the temporary became necessary and the permanent visions of the city a topic of controversy and debate. In his 1997 essay ‘Trains of Thought’ Bruno Latour compares the experiences of two twins.2 The first is moving slowly through the jungle. Latour says ‘She will remember it because each centimetre has been won through a complicated negotiation with other entities, branches, snakes and sticks that were proceeding in other directions and had other ends and goals.’3 A second twin is travelling on a fast TGV train from Paris to Switzerland. ‘… he will remember little else except having travelled by train instead of plane. Only the articles he read in the newspaper might be briefly recalled … No negotiation along the way, no event, hence no memory of anything worth mentioning.’4 Latour uses these examples to contrast experiences—to show the sweat, exertion and Breaking & Making Temporality

Aerial photograph of Christchurch, 2013. Photograph by Becker Fraser Photography

suffering of establishing a new path through the jungle against the ease and relaxation of sitting on a train. The infrastructure of the train—the tracks, signals, workers, tunnels and so on—enables the second twin to focus and develop thoughts away from the work being done to carry him. Hers is an experience of effort and his, ease.

It follows from this that a multiplicity of temporalities can be created by different kinds of material assemblages. The two most common types of time in architecture are temporary and permanent, but a closer look at a project like Agropolis (discussed later in this essay) offers a range of other typologies.

The experience of each twin is defined by the length of their travel and the number of entities supporting them. The twin cutting her way through the jungle has few allies—she is part of a small gathering of objects. The twin on the train has a huge array of supporters and helpers that participate in an assemblage linking large parts of Europe together. Latour uses this story to argue that a different temporality, a different type of time is being brought into being in each case. For Latour, ‘time is not a general framework but a provisional result of the connection amongst entities.’5 In this way, time is produced or performed by different types of assemblages and networks. In relation to designed things, temporality is a consequence of the labour involved with coordinating objects into certain assemblages and arrangements.

Performing Permanence It is almost a cliche´ to state that one of the dominant characteristics of architecture is the quest for permanence. Architecture is meant to persist, to be durable. The term ‘permanent architecture’ does not exist because the idea of permanence is central to its logic.

Vol 04 Permanence

Various authors have pointed out problems with the assumption of permanence. Mohsen Mostafavi and David Leatherbarrow state the obvious but often overlooked fact that ‘No building stands forever.’6 Even the greatest buildings and cities will one day fall into ruin, become redundant or be replaced. Mostafavi and Leatherbarrow identify a contradiction in which ‘buildings persist in time. Yet they do not.’7 The language we use to describe architecture often conceals the fact that nothing, in the end, lasts forever. In this sense, permanence is an imagined ideal that we collectively sustain. 11

Long lifespans are only achieved through the procedures of maintenance and care. Nigel Thrift writes that repair and maintenance are the ‘means by which the constant decay of the world is held off.’8 The deserted and vegetative town of Varosha on the island of Cyprus and the Demilitarised Zone between North and South Korea illustrate how so-called permanent objects quickly fail when no one is present to maintain them.9 The famous image of a decaying Villa Savoye evidences the tension between the essence of a finished work and the deleterious effects of time and weathering. Stewart Brand writes that ‘Architecture, we imagine, is permanent. And so our buildings thwart us.’10 The status of buildings as durable objects, like the twin’s travel on the train to Switzerland, is only sustained by an array of other devices and labour that continuously care and protect. The often overlooked labour of cleaning, repair and maintenance is the invisible work that creates the effect of permanence. Permanent buildings are a result of large assemblages of different things working together to keep them standing: foundations, windows and ceilings make buildings stable and keep the weather outside; various institutions and organisations pay cleaners, caretakers and maintenance crews to maintain and repair its different parts; financial institutions such as banks and insurance companies provide capital to upgrade, rebuild and repair as time goes by. This creates a particular experience of use, and like the twin on the train, this enables other kinds of behaviour and activity to be focused on. Permanence is a kind of performance, but it is one we benefit from participating in. The permanence of architecture is a beneficial illusion that helps to sustain the institutions and organisations we want to have as stable markers of our society—courts, houses, great landmarks, universities, commercial centres, parliaments and civic spaces. Performing Temporariness What then of the temporary? Temporary architecture is a minor tradition that requires naming in a way that permanent architecture does not. Temporary projects have a beginning and an end. Permanent architecture is finished when it opens—this is its final state. A temporary project is finished when it disappears and ceases to be.

Inflection

After the earthquakes in Christchurch, temporary projects proliferated with hundreds spreading across the damaged city. Agropolis was one such project initiated by Jessica Halliday, director of the Festival of Transitional Architecture (FESTA) and Bailey Perryman, a local food activist. It was developed as part of a larger collaboration that included local residents, businesses, chefs and artists. Launched at FESTA in 2013, the project was located on a vacant central site, one of thousands in the central city in which 80 percent of the area was demolished. Agropolis consisted of around 12 large planter boxes, many of which were constructed from demolished houses, a large four-part composting facility and a tool shed made of earth. The project worked with local cafés to gather their green waste for composting and growing vegetables to sell back to the shops. Agropolis was temporary, it evolved at its first site over two years and then moved to another in 2015 before integrating with a larger urban farm project in 2016. Authors of the 2012 book The Temporary City, Peter Bishop and Lesley Williams, define temporary projects in relation to intention.11 For them a project is temporary when the people that make and use it understand that it will not last. This kind of temporary use can be liberating: experiments and investigations can be made without the risk of permanent and expensive failure; different materials can be introduced and arranged into dynamic forms; members of the public and students can participate in the design and making of places with little fear of consequence; a larger and more radical variety of activities can be performed in public such as film screenings, bathing, dancing, shopping, eating and the growing of food. Examples of temporary projects internationally range from protests such as Occupy to community gardens and commercial pop-up spaces and are produced by a variety of designers, architects, retailers, activists, artists and community groups. Agropolis was an experiment in building systems of exchange and an alternative economy of food and waste based on freely given expertise and hundreds of volunteer hours. Bringing things together—materials, organisations, people, practices—for a temporary period of time changes the relationship people have with the project or place. Experiences of provisionality, experimentation and uncertainty characterise temporary projects. Agropolis’ temporary condition produced a heightened sense of commitment and engagement. Bailey Perryman comments “You know every day of these projects is unique.”12

Breaking & Making Temporality

Agropolis during FESTA 2014 Photograph by Annelies Zwaan

An important aspect of temporary projects is that the systems and assemblages required to bring them into being are often not as well integrated into the fabric of a place. Formal organisations such as councils and contractors, and integration with complex infrastructures of power, phone and water are frequently avoided by temporary projects, and instead ad hoc, improvised solutions are preferred. Often this means a more public display of making and developing projects and systems. In this way, the things involved with making, maintaining and unmaking of the projects are foregrounded. In contrast to more permanent architectures, in temporary projects such as Agropolis, maintenance and repair were public and visible activities, and through these different practices were brought to public view. In October 2013, Agropolis was launched with an event in the garden and the public was invited to help mix the mud for the earth shed with their feet. Many events, meetings, tours, festivals and working bees took place over its lifetime to sustain the farm and to offer people experiences and new knowledge about building and planting. These were experiences of a temporary project, but other forms of temporality were also being created and experienced at the same time.

Vol 04 Permanence

Both permanent and temporary architecture can be framed as a performance of invisible and public entities working together to produce effects that are experienced by people. This framing suggests that different types of assembling and gathering may create other types of temporal experience. Event Times Event time is a sharp and focused form of temporality characterised by festivals and carnivals. In the 1970s and â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;80s, Bernard Tschumi argued that architecture can only be understood through the event, that space makes no sense without considering the things that happen within it.13 At its broadest, this argument arranges the programme and intent of the space as being a critical part of its imagining. In relation to the Agropolis project, festivals and events brought into the site include temporary restaurants, tours, talks, construction processes and installations.

Events often produce vibrant and surprising atmospheres and because each involves a unique gathering of people, weather and materials, the atmosphere cannot be repeated—they are experienced as unique and important. Projects become platforms for events that then offer one-off experiences, but the variability of the project’s parts—weather, furniture, different audiences—affects the degree to which the event is experienced as unique or one of a series. Rhythms and Repetitions Regular repeating events occur in both temporary and permanent projects. This is a kind of experience created by periodic events. These are created by bringing together certain objects and people at regular intervals. Entities might include people, tools, building parts, plants, planets and tides. These different entities are often hidden in permanent projects and revealed in temporary ones. Agropolis had one part-time employee, Annelies Zwaan, who managed the project. Site maintenance was carried out by volunteers who regularly visited to water plants and weed the planter boxes. The farm was also involved with a network of local cafés that provided green waste for composting. This material was moved by a cargo bike built by another project called RAD Bikes, which shared the site for a year in 2014–15. These kinds of daily rhythms and routines were part of its critical maintenance and ongoing activities, and had a sustaining and connecting experience that mixed human and non-human actors. The growing of food introduced a range of entities that attended to particular rhythms. The relationship between the earth and sun gives rise to seasonal variation. Certain plants were grown at particular times of the year and this required organisation and communication. It brought seasonal changes such as day length, angle of light and temperature into the experience of the projects. Similarly, the taste and colour of food at different moments in the year helped articulate and differentiate the seasonal rhythms of time. A project like Agropolis introduced a more traditional set of entities into urban life. The rhythms of watering, planting and seasons are circular—they leave and return with a predictable rhythm, and because of this, knowledge and practices can be built from them.

Inflection

Periodic time is the temporality of repetition, of habits turning into routine. Many of the temporary post-quake projects in Christchurch had repeating or periodic events. Saturday markets, rosters for watering the Agropolis urban farm, Tuesday night board games at a temporary venue called the Pallet Pavilion, open bike nights at RAD Bikes and motorbike Thursdays at a bar called Smash Palace. These became habitual and enabled the development of lifestyles and the formation of new habits. Agropolis was located in a visible central city location and these routines were experienced and witnessed not only by the groups of people that were attached to them, but also by users from the city’s surrounds. In this way, the daily rhythms of Agropolis created different kinds of syncopated, staccato and punctuated experiences of time in the city. These rhythms and patterns were created by particular relationships with other entities (plants, compost, seasons, calendars, events) and are not accounted for in the conventional temporal descriptors of permanent and temporary architectures. Combining times - Spiral time, Percolation and Turbulence. The final three temporalities describe how these kinds of rhythms and temporalities co-exist. They tend to describe the broader urban experiences of the city instead of individual projects. Latour talks about the experience of time as being the consequence of gathered entities. The post-quake city was awash with new kinds of assemblages, revealed networks and broken fragments of previously functioning systems and infrastructures. If we accept the notion that different configurations of actors produce different experiences of temporality, and different types of time, then it makes sense that the complexity of new broken and old post-quake systems and networks, would produce an unusual and often surprising set of temporal experiences—a clashing of different temporalities.

Breaking & Making Temporality

Clockwise from top left: Pallet Pavilion by Gap Filler, Christchurch, 2013. Photograph by author RAD Bikes by Gap Filler, Christchurch, 2013. Photograph by Erica Austin Launch of Tunnel House Supper Club at FESTA 2014, Agropolis site. Photograph by Chloe Waretini Installation Influx by architecture students from Unitec at FESTA 2014, Agropolis site. Photograph by Erica Austin

Vol 04 Permanence

In 2014, Ryan Reynolds articulated this complexity and described living in a ‘post-city, the remains of a complicated, contradictory and post-colonial place’ and ‘a pre-city with three years worth of plans, consultations, ideas and designs that exist mainly as a massive set of aspirations to be enacted’.14 The time after the quakes was characterised by a range of incongruous mixtures of old and new, leading to a melding of: – Broken things—80% of the central city was demolished over 4 years,15 – New things—this led to the design and planning of thousands of new buildings,16 – Normal things—that suddenly seemed older and more precious,17 – Provision solutions— such as the 180 temporary projects between 2010 and 2013,18 – Repaired old things—such as the city’s arts centre,19 – Demolitions of old things—such as heritage buildings,20 – Demolitions of new things—including buildings designed and finished after the quakes,21 – The competition between new plans22 and outdated plans.23 All these things co-existed, resulting in the mixing of objects and their temporalities. This particular urban setting is unique, but evidences the range of different types of temporal conditions that exist in any complex urban environment in which different projects, events and experiences are brought into being. Spiral Time As the city recovered, some of these rhythms were circular but formed as spirals. Spiral time is a circular time but with the perspective of change added to it. Political ecologist Jane Bennett writes that spiral repetition ‘is that sometimes that-which-repeats-itself also transforms itself. Because each iteration occurs in an absolutely unique context, each turn of the spiral enters into a new and distinctive assemblage— with absolutely local chirps, odours, herbs, thoughts, whirs, images, breezes, light waves, viruses, animals, machines, and minerals in its milieu.’24 The change can be personal, contextual or environmental. For example, climate change has shifted the seasons from a circular predictable mode to a spiral one, in which we do not know what will come next.

Inflection

Each season in Christchurch would be greeted by a different city—a place with more demolitions, new buildings and shifting temporary structures, fitting Bennett’s description of spiral time in which ‘each iteration occurs in an absolutely unique context.’25 Percolation Percolation is the combination of many times together, of the experiences of linear, circular, archaic and future all bubbling and shifting around. In a 1995 interview, Latour asked philosopher Michel Serres if he thought time passed and he responded, “Yes, it passes, and also it doesn't pass. We must bring the word pass closer to passoir—sieve. Time doesn't flow; it percolates.”26 The aforementioned description of overlapping and multiple times invokes Serres’ notions of a world in which time is not linear and instead people are understood to move through different bubbles, rips and percolations. The presence of Agropolis in the city for three years and its eventual removal contributed to this sense of seasonal and repeating return but with change, and eventually this change became a bubble. For a time, it was one of the few stable things prior to becoming a remembered part of the city's history in 2015. The planter boxes were given to another project and the earth shed was flatted back into the soil. Turbulence Turbulence is the temporality of apparent chaos. There may be order but it is either impossible to see or too complex to map. The fields of earthquakes are turbulent, there are statistical odds and geological patterns, but on the local level the impacts are sudden, often violent and entirely unpredictable. The turbulent is produced by the sudden presences and absences of forgotten patterns and quick returns. Designing with Different Times Agropolis shows how even the simplest of projects—a small urban farm—is part of a range of relationships, movements and events. Agropolis illustrated the joys of working with earth, soil, plants, waste, food, sunlight, seasons and the connections and movements shared by them and larger urban systems. This is a powerful contrast with the kinds of timeless or anti-temporal design that characterise many contemporary generic spaces such as malls, shopping centres and supermarkets, frequently designed with the intent to erase the passing of time by removing entities such as the sun, sky, shadows or time of day.

Breaking & Making Temporality

Earlier discussions explored viewing temporality as an ecology, as being constituted by experiences of permanence, temporariness, circular and repeating habits, the spirals of slow change and turbulences of uncertainty. Perhaps architecture might benefit if we gave more presence and better vocabulary to the actors—devices and humans—that do the work to sustain the things we often take for granted. In doing so, we might break away from understanding buildings as finished when constructed and towards a view of things that are both never quite finished and always being finished. An ecological approach suggests the boundaries of a project are of less importance that the movements through and over the border crossings along it. Ecologies have no final state; they exist as flows and movements and patterns of energy, nutrients and transformations. Perhaps our understanding of buildings as complex and living things increases when we give more presence to the flows, shifts, events and activities of buildings as they move through time.

This essay is a selected range of different typologies of time and described how they might mingle, overlap and interfere with one another. The usual classifications of objects as being either permanent or temporary are not false, but they do not describe the full range of experiences and activities that register within and around projects and buildings. In doing so, the tidy binary between temporary and permanent objects has been both challenged and expanded.

Barnaby Bennett et al., eds., Once in a Lifetime:

17 18

(Christchurch: Freerange Press, 2014), 67. Ibid., 42. Barnaby Bennett, Eugenio Boidi and Irene Boles,

03 04 05 06 07 08

09 10 11 12 13 14

Timothy Moore and Barnaby Bennett, “The Transitional City,” Volume #43 Self-Building City, (2015): 56-61. Bruno Latour, “Trains of Thought: Piaget, Formalism, and The Fifth Dimension,” Common Knowledge 6 (1997): 170–91. Ibid., 173. Ibid. Bruno Latour, We Have Never Been Modern (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993), 74. Mohsen Mostafavi and David Leatherbarrow, On Weathering (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993), 5. Ibid. Stephen Graham and Nigel Thrift, “Out of Order: Understanding Repair and Maintenance,” Theory, Culture & Society 24, no. 3 (2007): 1-25. Alan Weisman, The World Without Us (Picador, 2008). Stewart Brand, How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They’re Built (Viking, 1994), 2. Peter Bishop and Lesley Williams, The Temporary City (Abingdon: Routledge, 2012), 5. Author interview with Bailey Perryman, 2015. Bernard Tschumi, Event-Cities (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1994). Ryan Reynolds, "Desire for the Gap,” in Once

in a Lifetime: City-building after disaster in Christchurch, ed. Barnaby Bennett et al. 15

(Christchurch: Freerange Press, 2014), 167. Georgina Stylianou, “Christchurch red zone curtain set to fall,” The Press, 27 March 2013, accessed January 24, 2017, http://www.stuff. co.nz/national/8478832/Christchurch-red-zonecurtain-set-to-fall

Vol 04 Permanence

City-building after disaster in Christchurch

Christchurch: the transitional city Pt IV 19

(Christchurch: Freerange Press, 2013), 176. Georgina Stylianou, “Arts Centre bouncing back in 2016,” The Press, 19 Jan 2016, accessed Jan 24 2017, http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/business/ the-rebuild/75995949/Arts-Centre-bouncing-backin-2016 Barnaby Bennett, Eugenio Boidi and Irene Boles,

Christchurch: the transitional city Pt IV 21

(Christchurch: Freerange Press, 2013), 176. Georgina Stylianou, “New CBD building to be demolished,” The Press, 30 March 2013, accessed Jan 24 2017, http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/ rebuilding-christchurch/8488917/New-CBD-buildingto-be-demolished Barnaby Bennett et al., eds., Once in a Lifetime:

City-building after disaster in Christchurch 23 24

25 26

(Christchurch: Freerange Press, 2014), 34. Ibid., 32. Jane Bennett, The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics (Princeton University Press: 2001), 40. Ibid. Michel Serres and Bruno Latour, Conversations on Science, Culture and Time (New York: 1995), 59.

Permanence as an architectural concept is no longer restricted to the Vitruvian virtue of firmitas. To think about it in this sense today produces a schism: absolutism in a world of relativism. The fourth volume of Inflection extrapolates the permanent and the temporary not as opposing forces, but as a spectrum to be navigated at each stage of architectureâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s unfolding narrative. Through each of the responses presented in this yearâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s edition, Permanence provides a critical voice as architecture and design continually seek an enduring foothold in an inherently evolving landscape, physical or otherwise. Inflection is a student-run design journal based at the Melbourne School of Design, University of Melbourne. Born from a desire to stimulate debate and generate ideas, it advocates the discursive voice of students, academics and practitioners. Founded in 2013, Inflection is a home for provocative writingâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;a place to share ideas and engage with contemporary discourse.

ISSN 2199-8094 ISBN 978-3-88778-520-8 AADR publishes innovative artistic, creative and historical research in art, architecture, design and related fields. www.aadr.info

www.spurbuch.de

9 783887 785208