1 minute read
Table 36b: Constraints militating against the adoption of Good Agronomic Practices among sorghum farmers
from AN ASSESSMENT OF THE ADOPTION OF IMPROVED TECHNOLOGIES AMONGST ATASP-1 BENEFICIARIES IN NIGERIA
that farmers have less to worry about in deciding to adopt good agronomic practices introduced to them for sorghum production. This is also consistent with the nature of this crop that is considered to be very tolerant and can even survive in marginal land and under considerable low rainfall regime.
Table 36b: Constraints militating against the adoption of Good Agronomic Practices among sorghum farmers
Advertisement
Constraints Very severe Severe Mild severe Not severe Not a problem Weighted score
Insufficient awareness about safety Environmental and social problem Insufficient knowledge of impact of agricultural practices Lack of knowledge and low education 4(5) 13(16.25) 18(22.5) 25(31.25) 20(25) 2.45
6(7.5) 12(15) 10(12.5) 17(21.25) 34(42.5) 2.23
8(10) 7(8.75) 24(30) 12(15) 29(36.25) 2.4
8(10) 19(23.75) 20(25) 16(20) 13(16.25) 2.8
Poor understanding of technology (GAP) requirements 7(8.75) 14(17.5) 10(12.5) 21(26.25) 28(35) 2.37
Poor record keeping 13(16.25) 15(18.75) 17(21.25) 24(30) 11(13.75) 2.9 Low motivation and incentives to implement GAP 10(12.5) 9(11.25) 20(25) 22(27.5) 19(23.75) 2.5 Unhygienic practices in production and food processing 2(2.5) 12(15) 23(28.75) 22(27.5) 21(26.25) 2.47 No direct links with market 9(11.25) 13(16.25) 13(16.25) 20(25) 21(26.25) 2.62 Small number of large export companies 13(16.25) 16(20) 13(16.25) 15(18.75) 23(28.75) 2.75 Insufficient organization of small growers in producers association 12(15) 10(12.5 17(21.25) 25(31.25) 16(20) 2.7 Inappropriate use of pesticides 8(10) 18(22.5) 16(20) 14(17.5) 24(30) 2.625 Shortage of skill labour 8(10) 17(21.25) 9(11.25) 20(25) 26(32.5) 2.5 Poor understanding of the role of GAP 12(15) 12(15) 12(15) 19(23.75) 25(31.25) 2.55 Insufficient dialogue with stakeholders 6(7.5) 11(13.75) 19(23.75) 15(18.75) 29(36.25) 2.375 Insufficient outreach and lack of coordination in training - 16(20) 13(16.25) 9(11.25) 42(52.5) 2.025 Figures in parentheses are percentages Note: weighted score less than 3.0 indicates not severe