Short Essays on Design Michael Beirut
9 9 Preface 11 11 Warning: May Contain Non-Design Content 14 14 Why Designers Can’t Think 18 18 Waiting for Permission 23 23 How to Become Famous 28 28 In Search of the Perfect Client 32 32 Histories in the Making 35 35 Playing by Mr. Rand’s Rules 39 39 David Carson and the End of Print 42 42 Rob Roy Kelly’s Old, Weird America 44 44 My Phone Call to Arnold Newman 46 46 Howard Roark Lives 49 49 The Real and the Fake 52 52 Ten Footnotes to a Manifesto 61 61 The New York Times: Apocalypse Now, Page A1 63 63 Graphic Design and the New Certainties 65 65 Mark Lombardi and the Ecstasy of Conspiracy 67 67 George Kennan and the Cold War Between Form and Content 70 70 Errol Morris Blows Up Spreadsheet. Thousands Killed 72 72 Catharsis, Salesmanship, and the Limits of Empire 75 75 Better Nation-Building Through Design 77 77 The T-shirt Competition Republicans Fear Most 79 79 I Hate ITC Garamond 81 81 Graphic Designers, Flush Left? 84 84 Just Say Yes 87 87 Regrets Only 91 91 The Forgotten Design Legacy of the National Lampoon 93 93 McSweeney’s No. 13 and the Revenge of the Nerds 96 96 The Book (Cover) That Changed My Life
2
Michael Bierut
3
Michael Bierut
2
4
Michael Bierut
I Hate ITC Garamond
My daughter Liz called me from college to recommend a book she had been assigned for a political science class: Mr. Truman’s War by J. Robert Moskin, a non-fiction account of the end of World War II and the dawn of the Cold War. On Amazon, I learned it was out of print, but she was so enthusiastic about it that I tracked down a used copy. It arrived in the mail a few weeks later, and I opened it up only to receive a hellish, ghastly, devastating shock. The entire book, all 400-plus tightly-packed pages of it, is set in a typeface that I absolutely despise: ITC Garamond.
79
Sorry, Liz, I just don’t think I can do it. There are lots of typefaces I don’t like, but each of them usually has a saving grace. I’ve always had a distaste for Herman Zapf’s Optima, for instance, but I have to admit that there are occasions when it’s been used well. Maya Lin’s Vietnam Veterans Memorial is an example. But ungainly ITC Garamond repulses me in a visceral way that I have trouble explaining. ITC Garamond was designed in 1975 by Tony Stan for the International Typeface Corporation. Okay, let’s stop right there. I’ll admit it: the single phrase “designed in 1975 by Tony Stan” conjures up a entire world for me, a world of leisure suits, harvest gold refrigerators, and “Fly, Robin, Fly” by Silver Convention on the eight-track. A world where font designers were called “Tony”instead of “Tobias” or “Zuzuna.” Is that the trouble with ITC Garamond? That it’s dated?
Michael Beirut Bierut 680 Michael
“ Sorry Liz, I just don’t think I can do it. ”
7
Michael Bierut
Seventy-nine Short Essays on Design
81
“ The most distinctive element... is its enormous lower case x-height. �
82
Michael Beirut
Maybe. Typefaces seem to live in the world differently than other designed objects. Take architecture, for example. As Paul Goldberger writes in his new book on the rebuilding of lower Manhattan, Up From Zero, “There are many phases to the relationships we have with buildings, and almost invariably they come around to acceptance.” Typefaces, on the other hand, seem to work the other way: they are enthusiastically embraced on arrival, and then they wear out their welcome. Yet there are fonts from the disco era that have been successively revived by new generations. Think of Pump, Aachen, or evven Tony Stan’s own American Typewriter. But not ITC Garamond. The mostdistinctive element of the typeface is its enormous lower-case x-height. In theory this improves its legibility, but only in the same way that dog poop’s creamy consistency in theory should make it more edible. Some people dislike ITC Garamond
Seventy-nine Short Essays on Design
83
because it’s a desecration of the sacred memory of Claude Garamond. That part doesn’t bother me. For one thing, despite its name, Garamond as we know it appears to be based on typefaces developed by Jean Jannon, who lived about a century after Garamond, and Garamond based his designs on those of Aldus Manutius: it’s hard to say where you’d locate authenticity in this complicated history. And I’ve been stimulated by Emigre’s revivals like Mrs. Eaves and Filosofia, which take inspiration from — and bigger liberties with — the work of, respectively, John Baskerville and Giambattista Bodoni with great success. But there are good revivals and bad revivals, and ITC Garamond is one of the latter. There was a moment in time where it seemed that bad type would drive out good time. Reporting on a now-legendary 1987 debate where Paula Scher faced off against Roger Black and denounced ITC Garamond for the simple reason that “it’s called
84 Michael Beirut Michael Bierut 10
“ ...it’s called Garamond and it’s not Garamond. ”
11 Michael Bierut
Seventy-nine Short Essays on Design
85
“ And then, just like global communism, it just went away... � 86
Michael Beirut
Garamond and it’s not Garamond,” Karrie Jacobs pointed out what was then a cause for widespread alarm: “ITC faces have a way of muscling out the faces from which they were adapted...In the largest of cities, a designer has a great many type suppliers to choose from. If she doesn’t want an ITC Garamond Garamond, she can get a Berthold or a Linotype version. But in a one-typesetter town, the odds are that the local type shop will offer mainly ITC faces. The distinctions between Garamonds then become moot. ITC Garamond is Garamond.” Thanks to the internet and the digital typesetting revolution, there’s no such thing as a “one typesetter town” anymore. Too bad. It sounds nice and peaceful. ITC Garamond enjoyed its apotheosis when it was adapted as the official corporate typeface of Apple Computer in 1984; adding insult to injury, the font was condensed horizontally 80%. Associated with Apple’s brilliant packaging and advertising for the
Seventy-nine Short Essays on Design
87
next 20 years, the resulting mutation became a part of the global landscape, seeming no less impregnable and unchanging as the Soviet empire. And then, just like global communism, it just went away, replaced overnight with a sleek customized version of Myriad. Today, ITC Garamond is no longer ubiquitous, but it pops up in unlikely places and still gives me a nasty start, as in my daughter’s book recommendation.I’ve come to realize that I don’t hate it for anyrational reason; I hate it like I hate fingernails on a blackboard. I hate it because I hate it. Yet I do know one use of it that I would call an unqualified success: it’s the classic poster by Jack Summerford from way back when the typeface was shiny and new, where the nastiness of the typeface and the dissonance of the message combine in one deafening clang. To promote the ITC Garamond’s arrival in Texas, Summerford used it, in all its monstrous glory, to set a single giant word: Helvetica. It’s not a good font, but just this once, it made a great punch line.
88 Michael Michael Beirut Bierut 14
“ I hate it because I hate it. �
15 Michael Bierut
Seventy-nine Short Essays on Design 89
Designed by Abhi Alwar Spring 2014 Typography I