2 minute read

Editorial

Asian countries have different cultures, with various religions, traditions, and perceptions. Cultural identity is particularly important for regions and cities, where different groups of people live. Sense of identity is often related to nationality, ethnicity, religion, social class, generation, place of settlement, or even a social group with its unique culture. At the same time, whether based on homogeneous or heterogeneous cultures, social responsibility and social care are indispensable to maintain the balance between economic development and social welfare, and to remove barriers between people imposed by region, distance, economic conditions, and so on. The three articles in this issue take these points as a starting point for discussion.

Chinatown in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, carries the collective memory of the Chinese diaspora, which is always ignored in development and regeneration. Through examining past images and official blueprints of the area’s layout, evaluating the spatial configuration in Chinatown, and reviewing the literature, Ng Shi Qi and Gong Xiao Lei’s article analyzes and evaluates the conceptual structural framework of the connections among the communities, place, and time that sustain the collective memory of a place and their influence. Rozanne Jojo Vallivattam and Ramneet Kaur’s article examines how street art can affect a city’s social identity, in terms of the parameters of location, physical attributes (color, design, and scale), user activities, and conception. To deal with the global issue of youth homelessness through social care, Kai Zhou and Greg Missingham’s article identifies the principles of transitional space design by redefining how a shelter functions, and by considering how humanizing spatial design characteristics could create a more holistic solution.

Asian architectural practice started to explore cultural identity from a rising of national consciousness in the early twentieth century. With the modernization of social civilization, the responsibility of building Asian societies has been increasingly reflected in the development of architecture and cities; architecture plays an important role in cultural cohesion and transmission. From a nursery to school, the projects in this issue explore enlightenment of the new generation, from discipline to personality cultivation. From a museum to community center, they reflect various forms of cultural communication, from elite output to grassroots interaction. From a service facility to landscape architecture, they demonstrate the form transformation of urban spectacle in public space. Architects from Japan, China, India, Thailand, and Sri Lanka keep on experimenting with space, structure, and materials, which show an infinite imagination of Asian wisdom in expressing the theme.

This article is from: