Adrià Marco Bercero_Architecture Portfolio_2019-09 by adria_marco

ADRIÃ&#x20AC; MARCO BERCERO

ARCHITECTURE

PORTFOLIO

UNDERGRADUATE PROJECTS

MASTERâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;S RESEARCH & PROJECTS

RENDERING

MODELLING

VIMAC PROJECTS

CURRICULUM VITAE

EDUCATION

Elementary and secundary school: Teide Viladecans (Excellent) High School (technology): Sant Gabriel de Viladecans (9.2) Architectural degree (94 studies plan) at ETSAB (UPC) _2008-2015 Excellent Visual simulation _9 Subjects 3D Modeling applyed to design (grasshopper) _10 Graphic control of the natural and urban environment _9 Information and Comunication Technologies in Architecture (TIC) _10 Informatic in an architecture office_9 Math _9 Professional Master in UPC school: Parametric Design in Architecture_2016-2017 Cgmasteracademy workshop: Intro to digital matte painting_March-April 2018

Marco Bercero, AdriĂ

McNeal workshop: Karamba 3D Training Workshop_February-March 2018

Other PRL: Prevention of Working Risks _2016

PEMP: Human Mobile Lifting Platforms manipulator_2016

Software at VIMAC: :Pointtools, FaroScene, Lightroom, Polyworks, Acces, Excel, Revit, Meshlab, Cloudcomapre

Date and place of birth: 02/08/1990 Barcelona Address: C/ Troana, 21 Viladecans 08840

Expert: Autocad, Rhinoceros + Grasshopper, 3D Studio (Mental ray), Photoshop Middle-high level: Illustrator, Indesign, Premier, Karamba3D, Kangaroo Basic level: After Effects, SketchUp, V-ray, Artlantis, Ladybug + Honeybee, QGIS, Unreal, Unity3D Programming basics: web (html i javascript), Flash, drawing (LISP, script, Visual Basic, Phyton) Other: 123DCatch, iVisit, Krpano, Photoscan, reality capture, movie maker

COMPLEMENTARY EDUCATION

English (B2.2) _EOI Viladecans Swedish (A.1) _EOI Drassanes

Sport Swimming_1992-1998 / Taekwondo _1995-1997

Basketball and volleyball (player and manager of the university team) _ 2010-2016 Basketball_1999-2007 / 2016-Currently

Arts Piano and music theory _1995-2003

Phone number: 685467177

Painting, handcraft and scenography models lessons in Taller de les Arts Academy_1995-2003

Other

e-mail: adriamarco7@ gmail.com

Languages Catalan (C1) and Spanish _mother tongue

Driving license Height: 189cm Interests: Sports, scenography, science fiction, comedy, arts, programming

PROFESSIONAL EXPIERIENCE

Heritage Working at VIMAC lab (old LMVC) _2016-Currently documentation Architectural surveys with Laser scanner and photogrammetry for heritage buildings (Sagrada Familia) / Scan to BIM projects / Apps for heritage dissemination (barcino) / Editing the lab web vimac.upc.edu Assistant UPC - ETSAB in the Architectural Representation department 2018-Currently teacher Teaching at 4th grade parametric geometry: Grasshopper Articles / 5 indexed articles for congress 2017-2018-2019 WMCAUS and Le Vie Dei Mercanti Congress Congress WMCAUS2018 - 2 conferences / WMCAUS2019 - 1 conference Rendering For architectural offices and students’ final project Modelling Complex component for a façade for Pich-architects 2018-2019 Collaboration Geometrical assistance for architectural competitions 2017-2019 Private Elementary , secondary and high school teacher Univertisty (physics I, Structures, Autocad, Rhinoceros, 3D Max, Revit and Grasshopper) Intern university Architectural Representation IV _October-November 2015 teaching Architectural Representation II _October-November 2015

EDUCATION

ETSAB Sports Club member and president: organizing tournaments and activities _2012-2016 Collaborator in the organization of the ETSAB’s cultural week 2014, 2015 and 2016 Representative in the ETSAB students council and the Architectonical Representation department_2014-2015

CURRICULUM VITAE

UNIVERSITY COLLABORATION

*Classified project: images from publications and newspapers (images can’t be of high resolution)

Projects:

Sagrada Familia’s Naixement Façade (2mm resolution) Office: VIMAC (ETSAB/ UPC) vimac.upc.edu/en/

Article from the newspaper: LA VANGUARDIA

Year: 2016 - 2018 Description: Surveying + post-processing + raster blueprints Details of the final point cloud model (LA VANGUARDIA web report)

Point cloud raster section (web)

Pictures from the data taking (Le Vie Dei Mercanti congress)

VIMAC PROJECTS

Poster of the presentation of how it was done (web)

Projects:

Architectural Surveys (TLS + photogrammetry) Office: VIMAC (ETSAB/ UPC) vimac.upc.edu/en/

Architectural survey with a laser scanner Faro focus 330 in Casa Parés

Year: 2016 - 2019 Description: Surveying + post-processing + blueprints 3D views of the Mesh and Point cloud of Palau reial Major

Taking pictures with a 6m pole in Plaça Sant Iu

Point cloud Raster projections of a catalogued house

Point cloud Raster (depth and Intensity) and vector blueprints an old ruined church in Sant Miquel de Montmagastre

VIMAC PROJECTS

Point cloud Raster (rgb, depth and Intensity) and vector blueprints of the heritage building Palau Reial Major

Projects:

Scan to BIM Office: VIMAC (ETSAB/ UPC) vimac.upc.edu/en/

Year: 2018 - 2019 Description: Architectural Survey + basic BiM modeling from a point cloud

Architectural survey + BIM modeling of a catalogued house in Barcelona

VIMAC PROJECTS

As-built BIM modeling of an old militar hospital in Valencia from a point cloud

Projects:

heritage and VR apps

1st person walkthrough app inside the foundry Casa Pares and the Santa Agatha Chapel (Twinmotion)

Office: VIMAC (ETSAB/ UPC) vimac.upc.edu/en/

Year: 2017 - 2019 Description: Updating scripts + 3d survey + modeling + create the scene Orbit view of the app Foundry Casa Pares (unity)

Mesh and point cloud of Casa Pares. Isolating the architectural elements from the machines and furniture for the App

App Barcino 3D (Unity): Updating of the scripts and the menus to the new IOS

VIMAC PROJECTS

VR app for the exibition in Crostumat 2019, COAC stand

Modeling:

Prefabricated panel of concrete for a façade of a Pich-aguilera studio’s building Authors: Marco Bercero, Adrià Year: 2018-2019 Description: Modelling with grasshopper and Kangaroo to achieve a complex geometry that simulate dunes

Picture of the 1st build panel to test it: 1st parametric design (Pich-aguilera web)

MODELLING

Final blueprints and design are classified / There are the images of the concept design before being parametrized (IV Congreso EECN)

Renders:

Renders for architects + degree final projects

Utah State University Performance Hall (sasaki) - Render in 3d Max Mental Ray (with Atanas Rumenov)

Authors: Marco Bercero, AdriĂ Others Year: 2014-2018 Description: modeling in Rhino + renders in 3d Max with mental ray and Vray + photoshop Degree final project (Roger Marco) - Revit renders + photoshop

Concert hall (Map13 Barcelona) - Render in 3d Max Mental Ray + photoshop (with Atanas Rumenov)

Degree final project (Atanas Rumenov) - Render in 3d Max Mental Ray + photoshop (with Roger Marco)

RENDERING

Single family houses in Granada & Alincante (studio in Barcelona) - 3D max Vray renders + photoshop (with Atanas Rumenov + M. Angel Martinez)

Thesis:

Origami funicular shell: 01_funicular shell form finding Author: Marco Bercero, Adrià

Abstract

1. Introduction

This thesis is an exploration through how to design a funicular shell with an origami structure. It goes from the basic vault simulation to how an origami Miura Ori design is applied on it and its structural behavior. In every step of the process, a structural analysis is done to compare the results of every design, as the point of it, is to find the best design strategy and at the end, if having an origami design in a funicular shell is an optimal design: easier to build, less material, thinner materials. This exploration is divided in two steps: the form finding of a funicular shell design and the application of folded design strategies like origami.

This exploration tries to be the combination of some topics explored in class during the master through some case studies. These main topics would be Funicular Shells and Origami architecture. Both topics were studied in class, but they could have been explored more deeply and corrected to achieve some better goals. They were two topics that left some unanswered questions… So the purpose of this work is to get an efficient design combining these technics, and try to see how they combine together and if it’s a good idea to do so.

2. Background

Year: 2017 Description: How the initial mesh affect the form finding simulation of funicular shells

The architect Tal Friedman’s ‘fold finding’ pavilion is a self-supporting folded architectural work that utilizes traditional origami techniques (both aesthetic and structural) to avoid the need of any sub-structure. composed in its entirety using only eight 4mm thick alucobond panels, friedman

created algorithms necessary to take advantage of the material’s innate surface rigidity. the result is an ultra thin shell, from which nothing can be added or subtracted, that uses surface tension as its structural foundation.

Foster’s Pavilion in Venice. This Pavilion is a prototype though to be next to another in a chain, so it’s a form finding proces with the perimeter fixed. Moreover, as it is a moduled building, the formwork can be used again, for all the modules.

3. Funicular Shell Form Finding (FSFF)

“01_Triangular Mesh”

“10_High resolution Quad Mesh”

“30_Perimerter XY fixed - Quad Mesh”

“33_UV-Length 0 - Quad Mesh”

“20_Random points Mesh”

“21_Catmull-Clark Mesh”

“31_Perimerter fixed - Quad Mesh”

“34_U-Length 0 - Quad Mesh”

3a. Different results when applying strategies to try fixing the creation of crease in the mesh. Applying a Minimal Surface Regularization during the FSFF. “22_Brep to Mesh (0.5m edge)”

“23_Radial Mesh”

“32_Perimerter fixed - Triangle

2. Different results when applying strategies to fix the perimeter

“24_Rotated triangle Mesh”

“25_Squares Quad Mesh”

1. Different Form results depending on the tessellation of the 2D mesh.

3b. Appying a Minimal Surface Regularization after the FSFF. First just fixing the perimeter, then fixing the perimeter and the highest point of the vault.

MASTER’S RESEARCH & PROJECTS

0. The form finding process of a funicular shell with grasshopper-Kangaroo2 seems pretty logical and easy. It is based on making a 2D mesh inside a desired perimeter and applying just vertical forces while fixing the support points and the lengths of the mesh’s edges.

4. Folded Structure Strategies

Thesis:

Origami funicular shell: 02_Folding a funicular shell Author: Marco Bercero, AdriĂ

0. As seen in â&#x20AC;&#x153;first hypothesis designâ&#x20AC;?, to apply an origami definition we need regular quad-mesh, therefore now that we have a funicular shell that works as it should, it is time to re-mesh it. Using this vault as a mesh to create the guide lines to create the quad-mesh or surface where the origami definition will be applied. 1. Comparing the Utilization results of the folded designs and the simple vault. a) Is the Quad-mesh Vault, remeshed. b) Is applying a folded desing where all edges have the same length. c-d) are origami patterns. e) Miura Pattern with fold that make all the U edges to have the same length. f) Miura pattern optimazed following structural necessities. 8%

Year: 2017 Description: How to make a folded structure for a funicular shell + comparing structural analysis results

a) Geodesic Mesh

b) Folded Mesh

c) Yoshimura Mesh

d) Basic Miura Ori Mesh

e) Regularized Miura Ori Mesh

f) Optimized Miura Ori Mesh

-8%

5. Analysis results

6. Conclusions

In conclusion, it has been proven that an origami Yoshimura design is a good solution to design a funicular shell, not only it stands against gravity, but it increases its resistance to wind too. The Origami design apart from being better structurally, the Yoshimura design, is based on thin flat triangular panels, so from wood or steel sheets, triangles can just be cut and assembled, easy and fast, without effort or wasting material, even as a base, then the panels can be re-used or cut again.

2. Analysis of the Yoshimura Mesh Displacement/Utilization/Forceflow/Principal stress lines/Thicknes

MASTERâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;S RESEARCH & PROJECTS

1. Analysis of the Geodesic Mesh Displacement/Utilization/Forceflow/Principal stress lines/Thicknes

computer wise, differences concerning the grid used appeared.

First experiments of Frei Otto and Heinz Isler consisted on the hanging of a cloth or chain system, getting a full tensile system, meaning that once turned upside down it turns into a full compression structure.

3. Form generation

More recently these experiments have been done digitally, with software such us Kangaroo, Catia or Karamba. In the drawings we can see the process from a bare mesh to a final optimised structure.

4. Tech implementation

Starting with a mesh, anchors or fixed points are applied together with the points that will move up.

We define several tensors which define the valleys and montains for the final shape.

Final shape, converged mesh in kangaroo.

Study:

Funicular Shell (study + Project) Author: Marco Bercero, AdriĂ Casanueva Ovies, Maria Edel

1 At this point we analysed how different mesh patterns produce different final shapes. For

2 this evaluation we used a simple form like a square in which we applied different patterns:

1.diagonal grid 2. quad grid

Year: 2017 Description: How to simulate a Funicular shell + Prjecting one with cuts

During the formfinding, with the purpose of creating some wrinkles on the surface we tried: 1.Putting a cable under the model while taking shape.

5. Performative analysis

2. Increasing the number of pickpoints, which resulted to be the smoothest. Also we jumped to the conclusion that crosswise lines collide with the grid resulting on an unoptimised shape.

To make the apertures on the vault, we followed the procedure below: 1. Split the mesh through the aperture planes and weld it with the aperture points separeted.

2. Assign different strenghts to the edges. In the graphics above, represent the interpretation of the forces given in the previous operations, in order to get a clearer or better ordered structure, and also an optimization of the material.

First representation, on the left represents the principal stresses. On the right secondary stresses.

6. Conclusions Based on the classical structure a funicular shell is (also very characteristic through Catalan architecture), the purpouse was to create a new modern structure out of the main characteristic of these buildings, the pure compression efforts. After our first approach with continuous meshes, we realised that we could add some new qualities to these kind of buildings as using a beam structure to get the same efforts also we found out that we could add apertures without getting important tensiles.

the material.

5. Performative analysis 1 1

Abstract

2. Background

The project consists on the research of Researching on different topics, like cable the behavior of forces on funicular 1shells. nets and fractals, we found that the 2research Starting with the use of a simple shape of new ways of designing funiculars was such a self loaded square and observing its inexistent. Thus we intended to get to somedeformation depending on the way its hung, thing new or different to those well known whether we use pickpoints or catenaries. examples, like Heinz Islerâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s. Furthermore, simulating the behaviour computer wise, differences concerning the grid used appeared. First experiments of Frei Otto and Heinz make the apertures on the vault, we foDuring the formfinding, with the purpose 2. Increasing the number of pickpoints, To Isler consisted on the hanging a cloth or To make apertures on the of vault, we foDuring the formfi nding, with the purpose 2. Increasing the number of pickpoints, llowed thethe procedure below: of creating some wrinkles on the surface we which resulted to be the smoothest. chain system, getting a full tensile system, llowed the mesh procedure below: of creating some wrinkles on the surface we Also whichwe resulted to betothethe smoothest. Split the through the aperture planes tried: jumped conclusion that 1. meaning once turned upside planes down 1. Split theitthat mesh through the aperture tried: Also we lines jumped to with the the conclusion that and weld with the aperture points separe1.Putting a cable under the model while tacrosswise collide grid resulting itand turns into a full compression structure. weld it with the aperture points separe1.Putting a cable under the model while tacrosswise lines collide with the grid resulting ted. king shape. on an unoptimised shape. ted.make the apertures on the vault, we foking shape. on Increasing an unoptimised During the formfinding, with the purpose 2. the shape. number of pickpoints, To 3.creating Formsome generation llowed the procedure below: of wrinkles on the surface we which resulted to be the smoothest. 5. Performative analysis tried: Also we jumped to the conclusion that 1. Split the mesh through the aperture planes 5. Performative analysis 1.Putting a cable under the model while tacrosswise lines collide with the grid resulting and weld it with the aperture points separeThe results of both the stresses Comparison uncontinuous ted. and the forceflow were used to place king shape. of the vaults with either continuous onand an unoptimised shape. the openings in the less harmful location. (with openings) structures. We compare how the edges of the mesh change, the forceflow, the In conclusion we observed that the openings do not affect the struc5. Performative analysis tural behaviour too aggressively. utilization, and also principal stresses.

Starting with a mesh, anchors or fixed points are applied together with the points that will move up.

We define several tensors which define the valleys and montains for the final shape.

More recently these experiments have 2. Assign different strenghts theware edges.such In been done digitally, withto 2. Assign diffabove, erent strenghts tosoft theinterpretaedges. In the graphics represent the us Kangaroo, Catia or Karamba. In the the graphics above, represent the interpretation of thewe forces in the previous ope-a drawings cangiven see the process from tion of the forces given in the previous operations, in order to get a clearer or better orbare mesh to a to final optimised rations, in order a clearer orstructure. better ordered structure, andget also an optimization of dered structure, also antooptimization of 2. Assign differentand strenghts the edges. In the material. 4. implementation theTech material. the graphics above, represent the interpretation of the forces given in the previous operations, in order to get a clearer or better orDoingstructure, the reinterpretation the stress gradered and also anofoptimization of phics , we reparametrized in order to get a the material. beam structure out of the original approach.

Final shape, converged mesh in kangaroo.

First representation, on the left represents Firstprincipal representation, represents the stresses.on Onthe theleft right seconthe principal dary stresses. stresses. On the right secondary stresses. First representation, on the left represents

7. the References principal stresses. On the right secon6. Conclusions 6. Conclusions dary stresses.

ThomasonHerzog, Julius Natterer, Based the classical structureRoland a funicuBased the classical structure athrough funicuSchweitzer,Michael Volz & Wolfgang Winlar shellon is (also very characteristic lar shell architecture), isConstruction (also very characteristic through ter.Timber Manual. Heinz Isler Catalan the purpouse was to Catalan architecture), purpouse to and Frei 6. Conclusions create a Otto new experiments. modern the structure out was of the createcharacteristic a new modern structure out of the the main of these buildings, maincompression characteristic of these buildings, the Based on the classical structure a funicupure efforts. pure compression eff orts. lar shell is (also very characteristic through After our first approach with continuous After our firealised rst approach with Catalan architecture), thewepurpouse to meshes, we that couldcontinuous addwas some meshes, thatstructure we could addofsome create a we newrealised modern out the new qualities to these kind of buildings as new qualities to these kind of buildings as main of tothese buildings, the using acharacteristic beam structure get the same efforts using a beam to get the add sameapertuefforts pure compression orts. also we foundstructure out eff that we could alsoer weour found that we could add apertuAft figetting rstout approach with continuous res without important tensiles. res without getting important tensiles. meshes, we realised that we could add some new qualities to these kind of buildings as using a beam structure to get the same efforts also we found out that we could add apertures without getting important tensiles.

7. References 7. References

resultsform of both and the ow were used to place Comparison of the vaultshow with either and uncontinuous At this point we erentcontinuous mesh this 1.diagonal gridforcefl evaluation we usedTh a esimple likethe a stresses Comparison of analysed the vaults withdiff either continuous and uncontinuous Th eopenings results ofinboth and the forceflow were used to place the the the lessstresses harmful location. (with openings) structures. patterns produce diff erent fi nal shapes. For square in which we applied diff erent patter2. quad grid (with openings) theconclusion openings in less harmful location. wethe observed that the openings do not affect the strucWe compare howstructures. the edges of the mesh change, forceflow, the In ns: the We compare edges of the mesh change, the forceflow, the tural In conclusion observed that the openings do not affect the strucbehaviourwetoo aggressively. utilization, andhow alsothe principal stresses. utilization, and also principal stresses. tural behaviour too aggressively. Comparison of the vaults with either continuous and uncontinuous The results of both the stresses and the forceflow were used to place the openings in the less harmful location. (with openings) structures. We compare how the edges of the mesh change, the forceflow, the In conclusion we observed that the openings do not affect the structural behaviour too aggressively. utilization, and also principal stresses.

Based on the classical structure a funicular shell is (also very characteristic through Catalan architecture), the purpouse was to create a new modern structure out of the main characteristic of these buildings, the pure compression efforts. After our first approach with continuous meshes, we realised that we could add some new qualities to these kind of buildings as using a beam structure to get the same efforts also we found out that we could add apertures without getting important tensiles.

2 2

1. Introduction

6. Conclusions

Doing the reinterpretation of the stress graDoing, the reinterpretation in of order the stress graphics we reparametrized to get a phics structure , we reparametrized in order to get a beam out of the original approach. beam structure out of the original approach. Doing the reinterpretation of the stress graphics , we reparametrized in order to get a beam structure out of the original approach.

Thomas Herzog, Julius Natterer, Roland Thomas Herzog, Julius Roland Schweitzer,Michael VolzNatterer, & Wolfgang WinSchweitzer,Michael VolzManual. & Wolfgang Winter.Timber Construction Heinz Isler 7. References ter.Timber Construction Manual. Heinz Isler and Frei Otto experiments. and Frei Otto experiments. Thomas Herzog, Julius Natterer, Roland Schweitzer,Michael Volz & Wolfgang Winter.Timber Construction Manual. Heinz Isler and Frei Otto experiments.

MASTERâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;S RESEARCH & PROJECTS

ns:

María Edel Casanueva Ovies, Adrià Marco Bercero MPDA BarcelonaTech Master s degree Parametric Design in Architecture

Funicular shell

School of Professional & Executive Development

María Edel Casanueva Ovies, Adrià Marco Bercero

1. Documentation

Project:

Funicular Shell (study + Project) Author: Marco Bercero, Adrià Casanueva Ovies, Maria Edel Year: 2017 Description: How to simulate a Funicular shell + Prjecting one with cuts

MPDA BarcelonaTech

Plan

Master s degree Parametric Design in Architecture

The project proposed consists on a wood work lab. For its construction we used a she1.ll Documentation composed by a wood structure, as a me- Plan taphore for the work which is going to be The project proposed consists on a wood developed also we used curtain walls work lab. Forinside, its construction we used a sheclose theby space without claiming attenll to composed a wood structure, as for a metion and nally a white skin, taphore for fithe work whichaluminum is going to be to 1. Documentation protect the structure as wellwalls as the Plan developed inside, also webehind, used curtain machinery inside. toTh close the space withoutconsists claiming e project proposed onfora attenwood Geometrically divided theweshell into three work lab.finally For itsawe construction used a shetion and white aluminum skin, to meaning has eight supports. In bellparts, composed by aitwood structure, as as a meprotect the structure behind, as well the tween the three different parts the enclosure taphore for the work which is going to be machinery inside. as well as spaces needed (like offi ce,storage). developed inside, also wethe used curtain walls Geometrically we divided shell into three to the space without forIn attenOnclose the other we claiming have a third of the parts, meaning ithand has eight supports. betion and fiunclosed, nallydiff a erent white aluminum skin, tocan structure so parts that the enclosure workers tween the three structure asce,storage). well asprotect well as spaces needed (like offi work onthe some piecesbehind, outside, or useasitthe as an machinery On the otherinside. hand we have a third of the exhibition area. Geometrically we divided the shell into three structure unclosed, so that the workers can parts, it hasoutside, eight supports. work onmeaning some pieces or use itIn as bean tween thearea. three different parts the enclosure exhibition as well as spaces needed (like office,storage). On the other hand we have a third of the structure unclosed, so that the workers can work on some pieces outside, or use it as an exhibition area.

Transverse section Transverse section

Transverse section

Longitudinal section Longitudinal section

Longitudinal section R08

2. Elements

R09 R10

R08_vapor barrier 2.R01_ Elements Two layer aluminium with mineral R09_Skylight with profiles compressing the R01 glass vertically central nucleus, ALUCOBOND paralel toR08_vapor barrier while fixing it to the main A structure. with Horizontal between the direction the roof 7,6Kg/m²,blanco profilessealing compressing the glas- R01 R01_ Two layerofaluminium with mineral R09_Skylight R02 sesvertically to avoidwhile water to accumulate. EPDM metalizado. fixing it to the main central nucleus, ALUCOBOND paralel to glass 2. Elements A Horizontal glas- Brithe direction of theprofi roofle 7,6Kg/m²,blanco joints. 30mm PVCsealing profilesbetween for Thermal R02_ “U” section to support the finihstructure. R08_vapor barrier ses to avoid water to accumulate. EPDM metalizado. dge breaking of the roof. R09_Skylight with profi compressing the R01_ Two layerprofi aluminium mineral PVC profiles lesclimalit for Thermal BriR02_ “U” section finih joints. R1030mm Double glazing, (6+6/16/6+6). R03_ Polyamide cliple to support fix with the the aluminium R01 R02 glass vertically nucleus,KALZIP. ALUCOBOND paralel to dge breaking ofcentral the roof. Clear glass. while fixing it to the main panels, 65mm, A structure. Horizontal sealing between glasthe direction of the roof 7,6Kg/m²,blanco R10 Double glazing, climalit (6+6/16/6+6). R03_ Polyamide clip to fi x the aluminium R04_ Aluminum panels finish 1mm thick, ses toglass. avoid water to accumulate. EPDM metalizado. Clear panels, 65mm, KALZIP. with standing seam and clips. R02_Aluminum “U” sectionpanels profile fi tonish support thethick, finih joints. 30mm PVC profiles for Thermal BriR04_ 1mm R05_ Rigid insulation panels, 140mm thick. dge breaking of the roof. seam and clips. with Firestanding Protection EUROCLASE A1, noise αwR10 Double glazing, climalit (6+6/16/6+6). R03_ Polyamide clip panels, to fix the aluminium R05_ Rigid insulation 140mm thick. = 1. panels, 65mm, EUROCLASE KALZIP. Fire Protection A1, noise αw Clear glass. R06_Table boardspanels for roof supporting. Aluminum finish 1mm thick, = R04_ 1. R07_Wood profi les variable section Pynus with standing seam R06_Table boards forand roofclips. supporting. 2 sylvestris, E:1050KN/cm R05_ Rigid insulation panels, 140mm thick. R07_Wood profiles variable section Pynus Fire Protection EUROCLASE A1, noise αw sylvestris, E:1050KN/cm2 = 1. R06_Table boards for roof supporting. profiles variable section Pynus 3.R07_Wood Construction sequence sylvestris, E:1050KN/cm2

3. Construction sequence

4. View 4. View 4. View

R08

R02

R03

R04

R05

R03

R04

R05

R06

R07

R09 R10

R08

R07 R08 R08 R09 R10

R03

R04

R05

R06

R07

R08

B B

Transverse section

Longitudinal section

Fire Protection EUROCLASE A1, noise αw = 1. R06_Table boards for roof supporting. R07_Wood profiles variable section Pynus sylvestris, E:1050KN/cm2

3. Construction sequence R08

2. Elements

R08

2. Elements

R08_vapor barrier R01_ Two layer aluminium with mineral R08_vapor barrier R09_Skylight with profiles compressing the glass vertically it to the main central nucleus, ALUCOBOND paralel with to profi les compressing the whileR01fixing R01_ Two layer aluminium with mineral R09_Skylight R02 R03 R04 R05 R06 fixing it to theHorizontal main central nucleus, ALUCOBOND paralel7,6Kg/m²,blanco to glass vertically while structure. sealing between glasthe direction of the roof A sealingtobetween the direction of the roof 7,6Kg/m²,blanco structure. Horizontal ses avoidglas-water to accumulate. EPDM metalizado. ses to avoid water to accumulate. EPDM metalizado. PVC profiles for Thermal BriR02_ “U” section profile to support the finih joints. 30mm R02_ “U” section profile to support the finih joints. 30mm PVC profiles for Thermal Bridge breaking of the roof. dge breaking of the roof. R10 Double glazing, climalit (6+6/16/6+6). R03_Polyamide Polyamide fix theR10 aluminium Double glazing, climalit (6+6/16/6+6). R03_ clip to ficlip x the to aluminium Clear glass. panels, 65mm, KALZIP. Clear glass. panels, 65mm, KALZIP. R04_Aluminum Aluminum panels nish 1mm thick, R04_ panels finish 1mm fithick, with standing seam and clips. and clips. with standing seam R05_ Rigid insulation panels, 140mm thick. 140mm thick. R05_ Rigid insulation panels, Fire Protection EUROCLASE A1, noise αw Fire Protection EUROCLASE A1, noise αw = 1. = 1. boards for roof supporting. R06_Table R06_Table roofPynus supporting. R07_Wood profiboards les variablefor section R07_Wood profi2 les variable section Pynus sylvestris, E:1050KN/cm sylvestris, E:1050KN/cm2

3. Construction sequence

R09 R10

R01

R02

R03

R04

R05

R06

R07

R08

R07A R08

1.The main structure is composed of wooden beams, reinterpreted from the forceflow of a continuous mesh.

2.Over the main structure we have a proper aluminium shell, with its own supports and insulation, which conforms a proper shell.

4. View

2.Over the main structure we have a proper aluminium shell, with its own supports and insulation, which conforms a proper shell.

1.The main structure is composed of wooden beams, reinterpreted from the forceflow of a continuous mesh.

2.Over the main structure we have a proper aluminium shell, with its own supports and insulation, which conforms a proper shell.

3.The carpentry is the last thing added (both skylights and curtain walls).

Exploded axonometric view of the construction sequence.

MASTER’S RESEARCH & PROJECTS

3. Construction sequence

1.The main structure is composed of wooden beams, reinterpreted from the forceflow of a continuous mesh.

4. View

Project:

Parametric landscape design Author: Marco Bercero, AdriĂ Casanueva Ovies, Maria Edel Year: 2017 Description: definition of new topography for a landscape with different zones and characteristics

Terrain Topography

Final Landscape Topography

MASTERâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;S RESEARCH & PROJECTS

Vegetation Topography

Atsushi Imai Memorial Gymnasium, Japan, 2002 Adria Marco ; Kritika Saini

Study:

Design based on geodesic curves (Atsushi Imai Memorial Gymnasium by Shigeru Ban) Author: Marco Bercero, Adrià Saini, Kritica Year: 2017 Description: Study of a design based on geodesic curves + implementing it in a doble curvature surface

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Background

The Aim is to analyse the principles and ideology behind geodesic forms, hence bringing out its importance and see how it can be used to design a building efficiently. The Scope Of Study is to understand and parametrise the design systems of the given case study building and then adapt it to an arbitrary toroidal surface. The Hypothesis states that “By achieving single panel curvature placed parallelly at equal distance to each other, the principles of geodesics can be adapted to any arbitrary shape”. But in case of toroidal surface, the hypothesis turns out to be false, therefore modifications are made to achieve to the nearest result.

The ellipsoid is formed of geodesics with single curvature and is a part of spindle torus section. The Building is a Space frame structure of multi skinned elliptical Grid Dome (20X28M) (6M high) made using LSL (laminated strand member), supported by 25 truss arches along minor axis (which forms the dome) & virendeel arches along major axis (which acts as lattice members). LSL act as primary structural material with only a minimal use of steel structure for piping. Translucent polycarbonate roof panels used to admit natural light.

Geodesics On Triaxial Ellipsoid : Geodesic Dome with maximal symmetry & constant curvature

Spindle Torus : generated by rotating a circle c about an arbitrary lines, where s < r (self intersecting torus). cutting section to generate isocurves and create perfect equidistant arches.

Wallon of forest reproduction industry, at Marche-en-Famenne, Belgium by Samym and partners. Structure is made up of composed arcs (rectangular pieces of wood) which approximates a funicular curve. Their axes are all implanted in radian plans forming a torus section.

3. Casestudy Y

g d

c a

d c a

Building: Atsushi Imai Memorial Architect: Shigeru Ban Picture by XXX

4. Adaptation strategy

1. Form Evolution : geometry evolved from an ellipse, formed by intersecting 2 circles. The minor arcs intersect at the centre of great circle.

2. Design Evolution : Minor Arcs as 600mm wide wood panels. a. minor arcs b. vectors c. wood panels d. glass

Step 3 – Fabrication of complete dome structure a. Arc divisions b. pentagon and virendheel arch in upper and lower chords respectively c. perpendicularly Y-varying systems in dome structures d. field joints and lattice members e. wood panels f. piping g. wood

Architect: Shigeru Ban Picture by XXX

an ellipse, formed by intersecting 2 circles. The minor arcs intersect at the centre of great circle.

600mm wide wood panels. a. minor arcs b. vectors c. wood panels d. glass

a. Arc divisions b. pentagon and virendheel arch in upper and lower chords respectively c. perpendicularly Y-varying systems in dome structures d. field joints and lattice members e. wood panels f. piping g. wood

4. Adaptation strategy A Base divided in equal lengths and join the points with geodesics

B vertical curves C Double Geodesics D Geodesics with angle 0 E final geodesic

5. Results

6. Conclusions

the same strategy cannot be applied in any arbitrary surface because geodesics wont behave in the similar way and construction techniques needs modifications and geodesics have to be regular.

7. References anaylse and compare the distance between LSL wood panels in all cases

analyse the curvature of the laterals of wood panels to see how the curvature works

1.H. Pottmann, A.Andreas, M.Hofer, A. Kilian, Architectural Geometry, bentley institute press, 2007, Rotational surfaces, chapter 9,pg. 294. 2. https://samynandpartners.com/ fr/portfolio/walloon-branch-of-reproduction-forestry-material 3.

MASTERâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;S RESEARCH & PROJECTS

it has to be a regular surface for geodesics to work. with regular surface, construction strategy works perfectly.

Study:

Design based on origami structures Author: Marco Bercero, AdriĂ Rizou, Anna Year: 2017 Description: Study of a design based origami + implementing it in a doble curvature surface

MASTERâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;S RESEARCH & PROJECTS

Project:

Torre Baro Sports Center Author: Marco Bercero, AdriĂ Location: Barcelona Year: 2015 Description: Gym + swimming pool + basketball court + bar + multiple sports

VOLUM B:

- Bar - Restaurant - Sala activitats dirigides (gimnàs) - Sala de màquines (gimnàs) - Despatxos i administració (Poliesportiu) - Hall i recepció principal (Centre esportiu) - Administració (centre esportiu i club natació) - Vestuaris (piscina) - Recepció (piscina) - Petita botiga esportvia

VOLUM A:

VOLUM C:

- Mirador - Pista poliesportiva - PAV2 (poliesportiu) - Pista de Bàsquet exterior amb Vestuaris - Piscina amb zona spa

Exteriors:

- Pista de petanca - Rocòdrom - Zona Ping-pong

Exteriors:

- Parc infantil

VOLUM articulador:

- Terrassa exterior de descans amb Zona de picnic i barbacoa - PUNT de TROBADA - Nau polivalent de doble altura (Gimnàs de Crossﬁt, espai per events, magatzem del casal, acivitats culturals de gran format...)

UNDERGRADUATE PROJECTS

- Terrassa del bar - Sala activitats dirigides (gimnàs) - Sala de peses (gimnàs) - Vestuari (Poliesportiu) - Vestuari (Poliesportiu)

Project:

Torre Baro Sports Center Author: Marco Bercero, AdriĂ Location: Barcelona Year: 2015 Description: Gym + swimming pool + basketball court + bar + multiple sports

UNDERGRADUATE PROJECTS

Project:

Cova Baro Authors: Marco Bercero, AdriĂ Oncins Antunez, Daniel Location: Barcelona Year: 2015 Description: 180m2 urban research center + residance

UNDERGRADUATE PROJECTS

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

28.3 28.6 28.4

11 14

19 18 24

28.6 28.4 18 19 24

28.6 28.4 19 18

Year: 2014 Description: 5739,42m2 daycare denter + offices + Restaurants + shops + parking

20.6 22

20.5

20.3 20.4

20.2

20.1

31 32 04

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

Location: Barcelona

25 28.3

BAF buiding Author: Marco Bercero, AdriÃ

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

Project:

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

28.3

11 13

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

17 09

25 28.3

28.6

28.3

11 14

28.6

25 28.3

28.1 15

21.2 21.1 21.3

16 23

19 08

28.3

28.2

28.6

24 24

11 13

28.6

28.5 28.3

24 24

15 16

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

28.3

07 27

20.6

20.5

20.4

20.3

20.2

20.1

20.6

20.5

20.4

20.3

20.2

20.1

UNDERGRADUATE PROJECTS

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

Project:

Research Center Author: Marco Bercero, AdriĂ Location: Barcelona Year: 2013 Description: 900m2 research rooms + classrooms + auditorium + library

UNDERGRADUATE PROJECTS

Project:

Music Academy Author: Marco Bercero, AdriĂ Location: Barcelona Year: 2013 Description: 1525m2 administration + dance and music classrooms + public spaces + concert hall

UNDERGRADUATE PROJECTS

Project:

Music Academy Author: Marco Bercero, AdriĂ Location: Barcelona Year: 2013 Description: 1525m2 administration + dance and music classrooms + public spaces + concert hall

UNDERGRADUATE PROJECTS

Project:

Research Center Author: Marco Bercero, AdriĂ Location: Barcelona Year: 2012 Description: 900m2 research rooms + classrooms + auditorium + library

UNDERGRADUATE PROJECTS

Project:

S[i]mon Towers Author: Marco Bercero, AdriĂ 1. Old people housing

Location: Barcelona Year: 2012 Description: Familly housing + student residence + old people apartments

Rigid nucleus

Exterior vertical columns

Exterior structure

2. Students residence 3 2

1 1. Old people housing

UNDERGRADUATE PROJECTS

3. Family housing

ADRIÃ&#x20AC; MARCO BERCERO

ARCHITECTURE

PORTFOLIO