43' 0
-
0 Z 30
%.0 N.)
0
r: CO
2 ‘051
m 53 0
"V
-‹ E
Cl)
<
\
- \\ Ik1
"e°
el •9At
-
TA Sr'
%o _
STATUS OF RESIDENTIAL LAND IN THE CITY OF EDMONTON DECEMBER 31, 1981
PREPARED BY: CITY OF EDMONTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT MARCH 1982
â&#x20AC;¢
6.
TABLE OF CONTENTS I.
INTRODUCTION
2.
SUMMARY
page I
page 3 Development Activity 2-1 page 4 2-2 Sales of City-Owned Lands Supply of Serviced Residential 2-3 page 5 Land Supply of Subdivided Residential 2-4 page 6 Land Supply of Unsubdivided Land in 2-5 page 7 Area Structure Plan Areas
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Residential Building Permits 6-1 6-2 Mix of New Development 6-3 Residential Construction Starts
7.
RESIDENTIAL LAND SUPPLY 7-1 7-2 7-3 7-4
3.
DATA SOURCES AND DEFINITIONS 7-5 3-1 Data, Sources and Definitions page 9 page 9 Definitions 3-2 3-3 Land Use Bylaw 1980 Data page 1. 0 Changes
POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLDS 8-2 4-1
Population and Households
page II 8-3
5.
HOUSING STOCK 8-4
5-1
Housing Stock in Edmonton page 13 5-2 Housing Stock in Area Structure Plan Areas page 15 5-3 Rental Accommodation Vacancy Rates page 17 5-4 Inventory of Newly Completed page 18 Unoccupied Dwelling Units
Supply of Serviced Residential Land Residential Land Servicing Activity Supply of Subdivided Residential Land Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity Supply of Unsubdivided Land in Area Structure Plan Areas
page 25 page 26 page 28 page 30 page 31
8.. CITY-OWNED RESIDENTIAL LAND 8-1
4.
page 19 page 21 page 22
8-5
9.
City-Owned Serviced Residential page 33 Land Servicing Program for City Owned page 34 Land City-Owned Subdivided Residential page 35 Land in A.S.P. Areas Sales of City Owned Residential page 36 . Land The Supply of City-Owned Raw page 37 Land
CASTLE DOWNS 9-1 9-2 9-3
Housing Stock Residential Building Permits Supply of Serviced Residential Land
page 41 page 42 page 43
1
9-4 9-5 9-6.
Residential Land Servicing page 44 Activity Supply of Subdivided Residential page 45 Land Residential Subdivision Plan page 46 Registration Activity
12. THE LAKE DISTRICT 12-1 Residential Building Permits 12-2 Supply of Serviced Residential Land 12-3 Residential Land Servicing Activity 12-4 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land 12-5 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity
10. CLARE VIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS AND CASSELMAN page 51 Housing Stock I 0-2 Residential Building Permits page 52 10-3 Supply of Serviced Residential page 54 Land 10-4 Residential Land Servicing page 56 Activity 10-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential page 58 Land 10-6 Residential Subdivision Plan page 60 Registration Activity page 10-7 Supply of Unsubdivided Land
10-1
.
11-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity
II
page 72
page 78 page 79 page 80 page 81
13. MILL WOODS 13-1 Housing Stock page 87 13-2 Residential Building Permits page 88 13-3 Supply of Serviced Residential page 89 Land 13-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity page 90 13-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land page 91 13-6 Residential Subdivision Plan page 92 Registration Activity
II. KASKITAYO AND TWIN BROOKS page 67 11-1 Housing Stock Residential Building Permits page 68 11-2 11 -3 Supply of Serviced Residential page 69 Land 11-4 Residential Land Servicing page 70 Activity 11 -5 Supply of Subdivided Residential page 71 Land
page 77
14.
PILOT SOUND 14-1 Residential Land Supply
15.
page 97
RIVERBEND 15-1 Housing Stock 15-2 Residential Building Permits
page 103 page 104
15-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land page 15-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity page 15-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land page 15-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity page
105 106 107
108
16. WEST JASPER PLACE 16-1 Housing Stock page 113 16-2 Residential Building Permits page 114 16-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land page 115 16-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity page 116 16-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land page 117 16-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity page 118
Ill
LIST OF TABLES 4-1
5-1
5-2
Population of the City of Edmonton by area structure plan areas and the built-up area of the City, 1976 - 1981. page!?
7-4 . 1 Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in area structure plan areas 1979 - 1981. page 30 7-5
Supply of raw land in area structure plan areas in December 1980 and 1981. page 31
Residential dwelling units in the City of Edmonton, December, 1981. page 14
8-1
Supply of City-owned vacant serviced residential land in area structure plan areas, 1979 - 1981. page 33
Residential dwelling units in area structure plan areas, December, 1981. page 16
8-2
Annual residential servicing activity for City-owned land, 1979 - 1981. page 34
6-1
6-2
7-1
7-2
7-3
IV
Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in the City of Edmonton, 1979 - 1981. page 19
8-3
Supply of City-owned vacant subdivided residential land in area structure plan areas, 1979 - 1981. page 35
Residential dwelling unit construction starts in the City of Edmonton, 1978- 1981. page 22
8-4
City-owned land sold for residential development, 1979- 1981. page 36
Year-end supply of vacant serviced residential land in area structure plan areas, 1979 - 1981. page 25
8-5
City-owned raw land in area structure plan areas, December, 1981. page 37
Annual residential land servicing activity in area structure plan . areas, 1979 - 1981. page 26
9-1
Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Castle Downs to December 31, 1981. page 41
Year-end supply of vacant subdivided residential land in area structure plan areas, 1979- 1981. page 28
9-2 â&#x20AC;˘
Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Castle Downs in each year, 1979 - 1981. page 42
9-3
Year end supply of serviced residential land in Castle Downs, 1979 - 1981.
10-5
page 43
Year end supply of vacant subdivided residential land in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselrnan, 1979- 1981.
page 59 9-4
Annual residential land servicing aCtivity in Castle Downs, 1979- 1981.
page 44 9-5
page 61
Year end supply of vacant subdivided residential land in Castle Downs, 1979 - 1981.
page 45 9-6
I 0-6 Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman, 1979 - 1981.
I I -1
Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in Castle Downs, 1979. 1981.
Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Kaskitayo and Twin Brooks to December 31, 1981. â&#x20AC;˘
page 67
page 46 1 1-2 Residential dwelling units approved by building 10-1 Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman to December 31, 1981.
permits in Kaskitayo and Twin Brooks in each year, 1979 - 1981.
page 68
page 51 1 1-3 Year end supply of serviced residential land in 10-2 Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman in each year, 1979 - 1981.
page 53 10-3 Year end supply of serviced residential land in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman, 1979 - 1981.
page 55
Kaskitayo and Twin Brooks, 1979 - 1981.
page 69 11-4
Annual residential land servicing activity in Koskitayo and Twin Brooks, 1979 - 1981.
page 70 1 I -5 Year end supply of vacant subdivided residential land in Kaskitayo and Twin Brooks, 1979 - 1981.
page 71 10-4 Annual residential land servicing activity in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman, 1979 - 1981.
page 57
11-6
Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in Kaskitayo and Twin Brooks, 1979 1981.
page 72
V
12-1 Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in the Lake District in 1981. page 77
13-5 Year end supply of vacant subdivided residential land in Mill Woods, 1 9 79 - 1981.
12-2 Year end supply of serviced residential land in the Lake District, 1981. page 78
13-6 Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in Mill Woods, 1979 - 1981.
12-3 Residential land servicing activity in the Lake District, 1981. page 79
15-1 Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Riverbend to December 31, 1981.
12-4 Year end supply of vacant subdivided residential land in the Lake District, 1980- 1981. page 80
15-2 Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Riverbend in each year, 1979 - 1981.
12-5 Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in the Lake District, 1980- 1981. page 81
15-3 Year end supply of serviced residential land in Riverbend, 1979 - 1981.
13-1 Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Mill Woods to December 31, 1981. page 87
15-4 , Annual residential land servicing activity in Riverbend, 1979- 1981.
13-2 Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Mill Woods in each year, 1979 - 1981. page 88
15-5 Year end supply of vacant subdivided residential land in Riverbend, 1979 - 1981.
13-3 Year end supply of serviced residential land in Mill Woods, 1979 - 1981. page 89
15-6 Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in Riverbend, 1979 - 1981.
13-4 Annual residential land servicing activity in Mill Woods, 1979- 1981.
16-1 Residential dwelling units approved by building â&#x20AC;˘ permits in 'Nest Jasper Place to December 31, 1981.
page
90
page
page
page
page
page
page
page
page
VI .
91
page
92
103
104
105
106
107
108
113
16-2 Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in West Jasper Place in each year, 1979 1981.
page 114 16-3
Year-end supply of serviced residential land in West Jasper Place, 1979 - 1981.
page 115 16-4 Annual residential land servicing activity in West Jasper Place, 1979 - 1981.
page 116 16-5 Year-end supply of vacant subdivided residential land in West Jasper Place, 1979 - 1981.
page 117 16-6 Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in West Jasper Place, 1979 - 1981.
page 118
VII
LIST OF FIGURES
Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in area structure plan areas and built-up areas of Edmonton, I 979 - 1981. page 20
6-2
Mix of residential dwelling units approved by build- . ing permits in area structure plan areas, built-up areas and the City as a whole, 1979 - 1981. page 21
2-1
Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in area structure plan areas, 1979 - 1981. page 3
2-2
City-owned land sold for residential use in area structure plan areas, 1979 - 1981. page 4
2-3
Year-end supply of serviced residential land in area structure plan areas, 1979 to 1981. page 5
6-3
Residential dwelling unit construction starts in Edmonton, 1978 - 1981. page 22
2-4
Year-end supply of subdivided residential land in area structure plan areas, 1979 - 1981. page 6
6-4
Dwelling unit starts in a selection of Canadian metropolitan areas, 1976 - 1981. page 23
2-5
Year-end supply of raw land in area structure plan areas, 1980- 1981. page 7
7-1
Supply of vacant serviced residential land in area structure plan areas, 1979 - 1981. page 25
4-1
City of Edmonton population change and distribution 1976 - 1981. page II
7-2
Annual residential land servicing activity in area structure plan areas, 1979 - 1981. page 26
5-1
The housing mix in area structure plan areas and in the built-up areas of the City, December 31, 1981. page 13
7-3
Supply of vacant subdivided residential land (serviced and unserviced) in area structure plan areas, 1979 1981. page 28
5-2
5-3
VIII
6-1
Edmonton inetropoli tan area rental apartment vacancy rates, 1976 - 1981. page 15 Inventory of newly completed and unoccupied dwelling units in the City of Edmonton, 1977 1981. page 17
â&#x20AC;˘
7-4
Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in area structure plan areas, 1979- 1981. page 30
9-1
Mix of residential dwelling units in Castle Downs, 1981.
page 41
10-4 Residential land servicing activity in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselrnan, 1979 1981.
page 56 9-2
Residential dwelling units approved each year in Castle Downs, 1979 - 1981.
I 0-5 Supply of vacant subdivided residential land in
page 42 9-3
page 58
Supply of serviced residential land in Castle Downs, 1979- 1981.
page 43 9-4
Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman, 1979 - 1981.
Residential land servicing activity in Castle Downs, 1979 - 1981.
10-6 Residential subdivision registration activity in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman, 1979 - 1981.
page 60
page 44 9-5
Supply of vacant subdivided residential land in Castle Downs, 1979 - 1981. page 45
11-1 Mix of residential dwelling units in Kaskitayo, 1981.
â&#x20AC;˘ I 1-2
9-6
Residential subdivision registration activity in Castle Downs, 1979 - 1981.
page 67
Residential dwelling units approved each year in Kaskitayo, 1979 - 1981.
page 68
page 46 I I -3 Supply of serviced residential land in Kaskitayo, 1979- 1981.
10-1 Mix of residential dwelling units in Clareview, Hermitage, Casselman and Steele Heights, 1981.
page 69
page 51 11-4 10-2 Residential dwelling units approved in Clareview, Hermitage, Casselman and Steele Heights, 1979,â&#x20AC;&#x201D; 1981. page 52
Residential land Servicing activity in Kaskitayo, 1979- 1981.
page 70 II -5 Supply of vacant subdivided residential land in Kaskitayo, 1979 - 1981.
10-3 Supply of serviced residential land in Clareview, Hermitage, Casselman and Steele Heights, 1979 1981. page 54
page 71
IX
11-6 Residential subdivision registration activity in Kaskitayo, 1979 - 1981.
13-4 Residential land servicing activity in Mill Woods, 1979- 1981.
page 72
page 90
12-1 Mix of residential dwelling units in the Lake District, 1981.
13-5 Supply of vacant subdivided land in Mill Woods, 1979 - 1981.
page 91
page 77 12-2 Year end supply of serviced residential land in the Lake District, 1981.
13-6 Residential subdivision registration activity in Mill Woods, 1979 - 1981.
page 92
page 78 12-3 Residential land servicing activity in the Lake District, 1981.
15-1
Mix of residential dwelling units in Riverbend, 1981.
page 103
page 79 12-4 Supply of vacant subdivided residential land in the Lake District, 1980 - 1981. page 80 12-5 Residential subdivision registration activity in the Lake District, 1980- 1981.
15-2 Residential dwelling units approved each year in Riverbend, 1979 - 1981.
page 104 15-3 Supply of serviced residential land in Riverbend, 1979- 1981.
page 105
page 81 13-1 Mix of residential dwelling units in Mill Woods, 1981. page 87 13-2 Residential dwelling units approved each year in Mill Woods, 1979- 1981. page 88 13-3 Supply of serviced residential land in Mill Woods, 1979 - 1981. page 89
X
15-4 Residential land servcing activity in Riverbend, 1979 - 1981.
page 106 15-5 Supply of vacant subdivided residential land in Riverbend, 1979 - 1981.
Page 107 15-6 Residential subdivision registration activity in Riverbend, 1979 - 1981.
page 108
16-1 Mix of residential dwelling units in West Jasper Place, 1981.
page 113 16-2 Residential dwelling units approved each year in West Jasper Place, 1979 - 1981.
page 114 16-3 Supply of serviced residential land in West Jasper Place, 1979 - 1981. page 115 16-4 Residential land servicing activity in West Jasper Place, 1979- 1981.
page 116 16-5 Supply of vacant subdivided residential land in West Jasper Place, 1979 - 1981.
page 117 16-6 Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in West Jasper Place, 1979 - 1981.
page 118
XI
LIST OF MAPS â&#x20AC;˘
13-2 Mill Woods Land Use Districts.
page 93 1-1
City of Edmonton Residential Area Structure Plan Areas (December 31,1981).
1
Pilot Sound Neighbourhoods.
page 96
page 2 9- I
Castle Downs Neighbourhoods.
14-2 Pilot Sound Land Use Districts.
page 40 9-2
page 98 15-1 Riverbend Neighbourhoods.
Castle Downs Land Use Districts.
page 47 10-1 Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman Neighbourhoods.
page 102 15-2 Riverbend Land Use Districts.
page 109
page 50 16-1 West Jasper Place Neighbourhoods.
page 112
10-2 Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman Land Use Districts.
page 62
16-2 West Jasper Place Land Use Districts.
page 119 II-I
Kaskitayo and Twin Brooks Neighbourhoods.
page 66 II -2 Kaskitayo and Twin Brooks Land Use Districts. page 73 12- I
Lake District Neighbourhoods.
page 76 12-2 Lake District Land Use Districts.
page 82 13-1 Mill Woods Neighbourhoods.
page 86
I. XII
1. INTRODUCTION This report presents information on land designated for residential use in Edmonton's Outline Plan and Area Structure Plan Area (Map I-I). The format of the 1981 edition of the report is designed to meet the information requirements of a variety of report users. Data measuring aspects of consumption and supply of vacant residential land are reported at three levels of aggregation: the City's combined plan areas; each plan area individually; and, each neighbourhood within plan areas. Most data are provided over the three year period from 1979 to 1981 to assist in identification of trends in consumption and supply of vacant residential land. Section 2, the summary section of the report, highlights key information on residential land consumption and supply. Information is reported on: (a) (b) (c) (d)
The amount of land used for new residential land development during the year; Year-end inventories of serviced and unserviced subdivided land; Annual rates of land servicing and subdivision; and, Remaining stocks of "raw" land in the plan areas.
This summary information is provided at a combined plan area level of aggregation. A detailed breakdown, at the plan area level, of the data contained in the summary is provided in sections 7 and 8. Additional information on Edmonton's population, housing stock and construction activity is presented in sections 5 and 6 as background information. Each plan area is described on a neighbourhood basis in the final eight sections of the report. The design of the 1981 Status of Residential Land report represents a substantial revision from the previous report format. These revisions have come as a result of cornments and suggestions made by report users. Further comment on content and presentation is welcomed by the General Research Services Section of the City of Edmonton Planning Department, 1 I th floor, Phipps McKinnon Building, 10020 - 101 A Avenue, Phone: 428-3407.
MAP I
CITY OF EDMONTON RESIDENTIAL AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS JANUARY I, 1982
r
r
error
— -
—
CASTLE
PILOT SOUND
10 OWNS
111
ciA. RvviEw
w • sTrEmsvisyytAt-r s1
/
imp Imos„,, twain pow ••=lmia c t lop MO 11191571•411
NIP
1 WEST JASP R PLACE
1
RIVERBEND EliONNA41111111
wisp
11,k,
KASKITAYO IN= mom
■I=1
110
miLLwooDs
-
FPR,
TWIN BROOK
1
2
N
MIPP.1111111
OS je". -
—
NOM
,,/ I AGE
1111
1111113
I
II
I
2. SUMMARY -
1
-
Development Activity
In Edmonton during 1981, approvals for construction of over twelve thousand dwelling units were granted by issuance of building permits. Of these, 7,146 or 59% were approvals for dwellings to be located in Edmonton's area structure plan areas. Approximately 84% of approvals for single family and semi-detached dwellings and 75% of approvals for row housing units were for dwellings in area structure plan areas (Map I 1). Only 26% of approvals for apartment units were for buildings in area structure plan areas. The remaining residential units were intended for the older built-up areas of the city. -
This distribution of development activity continues a trend towards concentration of high density apartment development in centrally located areas of the city while single family and row house development locates in the area structure plan areas. Of the 7.146 dwelling units approved by building permits in the area structure plan areas; 51% were single family and semi-detached units, 32% were row house units, and 17% were apartment units, (Figure 2-1). This mix of approved housing is similar to the existing mix of development in area structure plan areas with some increase in the row housing share for 1981 development. The number of dwelling units approved in area structure plan areas in 1981 was well above the numbers approved in 1979 and 1980. Higher numbers of approvals were given for single family, row housing and apartment units in 1981. Approvals for row house and apartment development were given a year-end boost as developers acted to qualify projects under the federal government's MURB program prior to the program closing date. There is speculation that construction of some of the MURB developments approved at year-end may be delayed well into 1982. In the three-year period from 1979 to 1981. construc'tion of almost eighteen thousand dwelling units in area structure plan areas was approved by building permits. The average annual number of approvals was 5,981 units. Of these approvals, 55% were for single family units, 29% were for row house units and 16% were for apartment units. This rate of consumption is used throughout the report as a
8000 =I apartment units
7000
DWELL ING UNI TS
2
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1919- 1981 •
FIGURE 2 1
6000
(7146)
row housing units
rz
single lorolip , seml-detached, duplex units
17% (5981)
(5961) 14% (4837)
5000
16%
.•.•.•.-.-.-. ..... .•.•.•.•.•.•:- 32% •: •
4000
16%
29%
3000 • 55%
2000 1000
/
1979
1980
1981
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS .APPIOVOD BY BUILDING PERMITS IN ASP AREAS 1979 - 1981
frame of reference against which supplies of serviced and subdivided land are compared,. Given uncertain levels of activity in the housing industry, the three-year rate of consumption is at one time both a very rough standard and the best available standard for comparison. Care should be used in interpreting the relationship between the threeyear average annual consumption rate and supplies of vacant residential land. It was noted during preparation of this report that land designated for apartment development was, in a few instances, used for row housing. The result of this is a large difference between expected development potential and the actual number of units developed. As an example, in West Jasper Place 16.67 hectares (41.19 acres) of land designated for apartment units will be developed at less than half the dwelling unit density permitted under the Land Use Bylaw. 3
-
Sales of City-Owned Land
In 1981, the Real Estate and Housing Department sold or optioned land with a residential development potential of 2,294 dwelling units, (Figure 2-2). This figure includes sales of 633 single family lots plus sales of multi-family lots with a development potential of 740 units. Option agreements involve an additional potential of 921 units of multi-family housing. Almost all land sold by the City was in Mill Woods. The development potential of land sold and optioned in 1981 was much higher than the potential of lands sold in 1979 or 1980. The change is due to a substantial increase in the disposition of land designated for multi-family row house and apartment development. Sales of single family lots in 1981 were lower than in 1979 but above the 1980 level of sales. Of the development potential of land sold and optioned by the City in 1981. 72% consisted of multi-family unit potential and 28% of single family unit potential. This split is a reversal from 1979 and 1980 residential land sales which involved much less multi-family development potential. Over the three-year period from 1979 to 1981, sales of City-owned land have involved an annual average of 1,328 units of development potential. Single family lots dominated sales in 1979 and 1980. Multi-family lots dominated in 1981. From 1979 to 1981, the total development potential was nearly evenly split between single family and multi-family development. There was a year-end surge in sales and option agreements involving City-owned land in 1981. As a consequence, the full impact of sales of City-owned land on building permit and construction start statistics will not be registered until 1982 figures are compiled.
FIGURE 2 2 -
POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ON LAND SOLD BY THE CITY FOR RESIDENTIAL USE IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1979- 1981
3000-
PO TE NTI AL D W EL L ING UNI TS
2 2
moitl-fomlly units IZZ2:1 single family units
2500
(2290
2000_ 72% 1500_
(1328) (1100)
1000_
14 9%
21% (588)
â&#x20AC;˘ 500â&#x20AC;&#x201D;
e',/////
2 79%
11
89% 1979
1 980
r7/4 1414;4 1981
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS ON LAW SOLD BY THE CITY IN ASP AREAS 1919- 1981
YEAR-El\ID SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1979- 1981
FIGURE 2 3 -
30000_
(29567)
(28374)
is) t—
oportment uni =I row housing units
43%
(20564)
45%
rZZA single toinily. sesni-detached. duplex wilts
Z 20000—J
CITY OWNED
29%
EJ
mulli-lomily units
.:.:.••••• =I single fondly units
.'."."."
.?0%.
_J p 10000. Lt.! 0 0_
2.5% .•...-.•
.•.•.•. .•.•.•.
(6332: /// (3997) 36% 67%
A
TOTAL
CITY OWNED
1979
9% //// TO
67%
// (4325) 30% 63%
: 14] CITY OWNE1
1980
TOTAL
CITY OWNED
1981
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPI t OYU) BY. BUILDING PERMITS IN ASP Al tEAS 1979 - 1981
2 3 -
Supply of Serviced Residential Land
The inventory of vacant serviced residential land in Edmonton's plan areas had a development potential of 28,374 dwelling units at the end of 1981. The inventory was down from 1980 levels but well above the 1979 inventory, (Figure 2-3). Of the total development potential; 30% consisted of potential units on land designated for single family development, 25% for row housing, and 45% for apartment development. This 1981 distribution was similar to that for 1980. Differences between 1979 and 1980 were due primarily to adoption of the 1980 Land Use Bylaw which increased permitted dwelling unit densities for apartment land use districts. The changes in permitted densities increased the development potential of vacant serviced land designated for apartments by 6,008 units in 1980. At the average annual rate of consumption of land measured by building permits issued between 1979 and 1981, there is a 2.5-year supply of serviced land for single family housing and a 4 year supply for row housing. Frpm 1979 to 1981 an average of only 940 apartment units per year were approved by building permits in the plan areas. At current rates of consumption there is a 14 year supply of land for apartment development. During 1981 there were instances where land designated for apartment development was used for row housing. The effect of this type of activity is actual unit densities well below permitted maximum densities. In view of the large supply of land for apartments and the more constrained and dwindling supply for row housing, repetitions of this situation can be expected. The 1981 year-end supply of vacant serviced City-owned land was 4,325 potential single family and multi-family units. This level of inventory represents a decline of 2,007 potential units from the 1980 inventory. While the supply of single family potential units declined by 475 units, there was a much larger drop of 1,532 potential units for land designated for multi-family housing. This decline is the result of unusually high sales of land designated for multifamily development combined with very little servicing activity in 1981. The inventory of serviced City-owned land will probably be replenished in 1982 when subdivision and final servicing of Tawa neighbourhood in Mill Woods is expected. 5
2-4
Supply of Subdivided Residential Land
The total supply of serviced and unserviced vacant subdivided residential land in Edmonton's area structure plan areas had a development potential of 31,097 dwelling units at the end of 1981, (Figure 2-4). More than 90% of this potential was on land that was both subdivided and serviced. The development potential of the 1981 inventory of subdivided land was 3,101 units below the 1980 supply. There was a 9% decrease in development potential of subdivided land designated for single family housing, a 17% decrease in row housing potential, and a 5% decrease for apartment housing potential. Of the total development potential of subdivided land in 1981, 31% was designated for single family development, 24% for row housing, and 44% for apartment development. The shares of development potential allocated to single family, row house and apartment development were similar in 1980 and 1981. Differences between 1979 and 1980 were due largely to adoption of the 1980 Land Use Bylaw. Increases in permitted dwelling unit densities on land designated for apartments added 6,419 units to the development potential of vacant subdivided land in 1980. Based on the average annual numbers of building permits issued each year from 1979 to 1981, there is a 3 year supply of vacant subdivided residential land for single family development, a 4.5 year supply for row housing, and, at current rates of consumption a 15 year supply for apartment development. During 1981, the development potential added to the inventory of residential land through plan registration was well below the rate at which land was developed. The effect was reduced inventories of subdivided land. The development potential of City-owned subdivided land was 4,616 dwelling units at the end of 1981. All but 291 potential units were on serviced land. The 1981 development potential of City-owned land was slightly above 1979 supplies, but was only 68% of 1980 supplies. The decrease in total development potential was due primarily to sales and option agreements that depleted the inventory of land for multi-family development. The possible registration of a plan of subdivision in Tawa neighbourhood in Mill Woods during 1982 should replenish the inventory of City-owned subdivided land. 6
YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1979 - 1981
FIGURE 2-4
(MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
(34198) 30000, t)
(31097) =1 apartment units
(27319)
42%
row housing units
EZ2:21 single
family, semi-detached, duplex units
11 11%
34%
CITY OWNED
=I 20000_ —J
I=1 multi-family units =I single family units
0 _J
MW3 .
w Z 0000_
.•.•... .•:••.•:•
0 0_
% C33% V/z/,
(3997) 67%
:6332
1979
(4616
'
MI
67%
A TOTAL CITY OWNED
(5981) 31%
TOTAL CITY OWNED
1980
4
29% 16%
TOTAL CITY AVERAGE ANNUAL OWNED DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN ASP AREAS • 979- 1981
1981
FIGURE 2-5 YEAR END SUPPLY OF RAW LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1980- 1981 3126 3000_ :
(2922)
2000.1
1000 cr) lii
(402.8) (204 ) uJ TOTAL
1980
TOTAL OWL 1981
HAW LAND SUBDIVIDED IN 1981
2-5 Supply of Unsubdivided Land In Area Structure Plan Areas At the end of 1981, Edmonton's area structure plan areas contained 2,922 hectares of raw land, (Figure 2-5). This land consists of large contiguous tracts not within the boundaries of a registered plan of subdivision consistent with a plan area. The entire area of three plan areas; Pilot Sound, Twin Brooks, and Casselman was raw land at yearend 1981, while no raw land was left in Castle Downs. The 1981 stock of raw land in the plan areas was 204 hectares less than the 1980 stock. This land was removed from the supply of raw land by major subdivision registration activity in Lake District (77 hectares), Mill Woods (45 hectares), Riverbend (42 hectares) and West Jasper Place (40 hectares). At the 1981 rate of consumption of raw land for residential subdivisions there was a 14 year supply of raw land in area structure plan areas at the end of 1981. This is in addition to residential land already subdivided. The City of Edmonton owned 402.8 hectares of raw land at the end of 1981. Large tracts of land, over 25 hectares in size, were held in Lake District, Pilot Sound, Riverbend, and Mill Woods. Smaller tracts were held in Pilot Sound and Mill Woods.
7
3. DATA SOURCES AND DEFINITIONS 3 1 -
Data and Data Sources
Data used to prepare this report were obtained from City departments and Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). City data are the products of administrative data collection procedures of municipal departments. CMHC data are produced as part of an ongoing housing research program. Data from different sources may not be entirely comparable. Report users should be aware of this fact when using and interpreting the data. Data and data sources are listed below: CMHC is the source of statistics on housing starts and completions, newly completed but unoccupied dwelling units and rental accommodation vacancy rates. The Assessment Department is the source of statistics used to produce estimates of the number of dwelling units by type of structure in the city. The City Clerk's Office, through the Civic Census, is the source of statistics on population and numbers of households. The Bylaw Enforcement Department is the source of all statistics on building permits issued. The Real Estate and Housing Department is the source of statistics on all City-owned residential land. The Planning Department is the source of data on municipal servicing and raw land. Calculations, using data from other sources, have been made by the Planning Der artment.
3 2 -
Definitions
"Area Structure Plan Areas" or "Plan Areas" include both designated outline plan areas and legally designated area structure plan areas in Edmonton. Some older outline plan areas that are fully or nearly fully developed (e.g. Petrolia) have not been included. All outline plan and area structure plan areas included in this report are listed on Table 4-1. "Built-up Area" refers to the combined areas of Edmonton within the boundaries of the city, prior to the inclusion of annexed land on 1982 01 01, that do not fall within an area structure plan area as defined above. "Dwelling Units Approved by Building Permits" refers to the number of dwelling units for which building permits have been issued by the Bylaw Enforcement Department. It is stressed that issuance of a building permit does not guarantee that the permit will be acted on. A small proportion of permits issued are allowed to lapse while others are superseded by new permits. In 1981, building permits involving 422 dwelling units expired or were superseded. "Potential Dwelling Units" refers to the maximum possible number of dwelling units that may be developed on residential land under the terms of the Land Use Bylaw. For single family dwellings and semi-detached dwellings in RF I , RF2, RF3. RF4 and RPL land use districts, this number is the same as the number of registered lots in a plan of subdivision. For row and apartment dwellings an estimate is derived by multiplying the gross area of a parcel of land by the maximum number of dwelling units per hectare of land permitted in the appropriate land use district. Normally, row housing is built on land with a land use district designation of RFS or RF6. Apartment housing is built on land with a land use district designation of RA7, RA8 or RA9. It is stressed that the potential dwelling unit (or PDU) count reported is the maximum number of units permitted under the Land Use Bylaw. Many new developments contain less units than the maximum number permitted. â&#x20AC;˘
9
"Raw Land" refers to land within an area structure plan area that is designated for residential development but which requires a registered plan of subdivision prior to development. Raw land does not include land designated for school sites or parks.
West Jasper Place - 1,314
"Vacant Serviced Land" refers to vacant registered parcels of residential land which have or could have been released by the Land Development Coordination Branch for the issuance of building permits. This reflects complete underground servicing to all lots and, as a minimum, gravelled access roads.
Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman - 826
"Vacant Subdivided Land" refers to vacant registered parcels of residential land. Registered land refers to land legally established within a plan of subdivision as recorded in the Alberta Land Titles Office. The figures reported include vacant serviced land, as described above, plus unserviced land
3-3
Land Use Bylaw 1980 Data Changes
The Land Use Bylaw adopted in 1980, increased the permitted housing densities on land designated for row housing and apartment housing. This increased the potential number of apartment units on vacant, serviced land. Therefore, much of the increase in the number of apartment units serviced and subdivided in 1980 does not indicate actual servicing and subdivision activity. The increase in development potential due to changes in permitted densities amounted to 6,419 potential apartment units on vacant subdivided land including 6,008 potential apartment units on vacant serviced land in 1980. This change was distributed among the area structure plan areas as follows:
Mill Woods - 2,910 potential units on vacant subdivided land including 2,570 potential units on vacant serviced land.
Kaskitayo - 1,051 potential units on vacant subdivided land including 980 potential units on serviced land.
Castle Downs - 284 potential units on vacant serviced and subdivided land. 10
potential units on vacant
serviced and subdivided land.
Riverbend -
34 potential units on vacant serviced and subdivided land.
units on vacant serviced and subdivided land.
4. POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLDS
developments in the plan areas climbed from 8.2% to 27.0% (Figure 4-1). By May of 1981, the plan areas accommodated well over one hundred thousand people.
4-1 Population and Households Demand for new residential development in Edmonton has been sustained by population growth and the related increase in the number of households in the city. Edmonton's population has increased at an average annual rate of 2.5% over the past five years (Table 4-1). The number of households increased even more cpickly at an annual rate of 4.7% from 1978 to 1981. The number of households represents the effective demand for housing. Therefore, the city's stock of residential dwelling units has increased at about the same rate as the increase in households, a rate of almost five percent per year.
In contrast, the population of the built-up area of the city has declined at an annual rate of 2.1%. This decline has occurred despite substantial redevelopment activity. During the period from 1976 to 1981, Mill Woods attracted more new residents than any other plan area. Its population grew at an average annual compounded rate of thirty percent, representing an average annual increase of 6406 people. Rapid rates of population growth also occurred in most other established plan areas. Riverbend and the northern part of Steele Heights were the exceptions with significant but more modest rates of population increase. The population increase of the combined plan areas in the period from 1976 to 1981, has been almost thirty percent per year.
Most of Edmonton's new residential development has occurred in areas designated as Outline Plan areas or Area Structure Plan areas. The population in these areas has increased dramatically. Between 1976 and 1981 the percentage of Edmonton's population living in new residential
FIGURE Li- I
CITY OF EDMONTON POPULATION CHANGE AND DISTRIBUTION 1976 - 1981
600,000
POPUL A TION
500,000 (461,559)
(471,474)
8%
(478,066) I6/
1=1 combined area structure plan areas
I
(491,359)
I
built-up areas
(505,773)
V7'
,20%
400,000
300,000
(521,205)
2
92%
89%
84%
80%
76%
73%
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
200,000
100,000
YEAR SOURCE: CITY OF EDMONTON CIVIC CENSUS 1976 TO 1981
11
TABLE 4-I
POPULATION OF THE CITY OF EDMONTON BY AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS AND THE Bl IILT-UP AREA OF THE CITY 1976 - 1981
AVG ANNUAL POPULATION CHANGE AND PERCENTAGE CHANGE COMPOUNDED ANNUALLY, 1976-1981
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
Castle Downs
4458
7855
11707
15725
18644
22030
3514
(+38%)
Clareview Casselman
1143
3570
5689
8926
11727
14623
2696
(+66%)
Hermitage
171,4
3066
3394
4209
4589
5046
666
(+24%)
Kaskitayo
(1000)*
(2000)*
5012
8416
11387
14642
2728
(+71%)
230
242
214
187
132
128
-20
(-11%)
Mill Woods
11967
15675
21209
28872
37618
43999
6406
(+30%)
Pilot Sound
-
-
-
-
141
134
Area Structure Plan Areas
Lake District
Riverbend
5782
5739
5793
5857
6068
6608
165
(+3%) .
Steele Heights (North Part)
3644
4310
4894
5051 .
5115
5207
313
(+7%)
-
-
14
9
8127
11349
16921
21492 â&#x20AC;¢ 24801
27027
3780
(+27%)
Area Structure Plan Population
38,065
53,806
74,833
98,735
119,954
139,453
20278
(+29.6%)
Built-Up Area of City Population
423,494
417,668
403,233
392,624
385,819
381,752
-8348
(-2.1%)
City of Edmonton Total Population
461,559
471,474
478,066
491,359
505,773
521,205
11929
(+2.5%)
Twin Brooks 'Nest Jasper Place
12
-
* (Estimated Population) SOURCE: City of Edmonton Civic Census 1976 to 1981
-
--
--
FIGURE 5-1
5. HOUSING STOCK 5-1
Housing Stock in Edmonton
THE HOUSING MIX IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS AND IN THE BUILT- UP AREAS OF THE CITY DECEMBER 31, 1981
There were about 202,900 residential dwelling units* in Edmonton in December, 1981 (Table 5-1). Twenty-seven percent of these were located in Area Structure Plan areas. Seventy-three percent were in the older built-up area of the city.
area structure plan areas
In Edmonton, more than half of all dwellings are single family detached, semi-detached or duplex units (Figure 5-1). This type of housing makes up a greater percentage of the housing stock of the built-up area than of the plan areas. However, the difference is not large. In contrast, row housing is more common in plan areas while apartment dwelling units are most prevalent in the city's built-up area. *This figure does not include institutional housing or housing associated with commercial or industrial structures.
= apartment units
l '• - •••1
row housing units
• built-60 area
.single family, semi-detached, duplex units
13
TABLE 5-1
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS* IN THE CITY OF EDMONTON, DECEMBER 1981
Area Structure Plan Number Areas
â&#x20AC;¢
Single, Semi & Duplex Units
Row Housing, Tri-Plex & Four-Plex Units
Apartment Units
Total Units
28,400 51%
14,700 26%
12,500 23%
55,600 100%
Built-Up Area
Number
84.800 57%
12,700 9%
49,800 34%
147,300 100%
City of Edmonton Total
Number
I I 3,200 56%
27,400 13%
62,300 31%
202,900 100%
*Figures are for residential dwelling unit types indicated in column headings, other types of residences are not included. All numbers are estimates. SOURCE: City of Edmonton Departments
114
5-2
Housing Stock in Area Structure Plan Areas
The housing mix shows considerable variation between plan areas (Table 5-2). Nearly two thirds of the units in Mill Woods, Castle Downs and the Lake District are single family detached, semi-detached or duplex units. In no other plan area does this type of low density housing constitute more than one half of the housing stock. The proportion of the housing stock made up of row housing units varies from one fifth to one third in different plan areas. The percentage of apartment units in the housing mix of established plan areas varies from ten percent in Mill Woods to forty-one percent in Kaskitayo while no apartment units have been approved in the Lake District.
EDMONTON METROPOLITAN AREA* RENTAL APARTMENT VACANCY RATES 1976- 1981
PERC ENTAGE VAC ANCY R ATE
FIGURE 5-2
(3.0) r
. pm
,% , ,
/
/‘
%
,
/%
,
%
I
%
/
2 0k_
%
/ I
I 1. I I
;
,,
1
I • II III
, (0.8) r---•'(0.8)
%
/
• I I
(1.9)
I , , • • (0.8)
/%
.
•
I
1%.
,
%
•
-
4
, %
, 1 % % % (1.1)j,
(1.0) .
--
,,
/
,,
(0.3) )1,.... (0.2) / , ---4, .... . , (3.0) -I
.
.
.
.APR OCT APR OCT APR 0& .APR OCT APR OCT APR OCT
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
=Data Reported for the Edmonton Census Metropolitan Area as defined in 1981 by Statistics Canada. SOURCE: CMHC Apartment Vacancy Survey. The survey covers all self-contained rental apartment units in building of six units or more.
15
TABLE 5-2
ESTIMATED NUMBERS OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS TO DECEMBER 1981
Area Structure Plan Areas
Single Family and Semi-Detached Units
Row Housing Units
Apartment Total Units Units
Castle Downs
No.
5113 63%
1910 24%
1055 14%
8078 100%
Clareview, Hermitage Casselrnan, Steele Hts.
No. %
3766 41%
2981 32%
2538 27%
9285 100%
Kaskitayo
No. %
2370 34%
1747 25%
2785 41%
6902 100%
Lake District
No. %
188 65%
101 35%
-
289 100%
Mill Woods
No. %
11478 66%
4181 24%
1700 10%
17359 100%
Pilot Sound
No. %
42* 100%
-
-
42 100%
Riverbend
No. %
1284 48%
480 18%
906 34%
2670 100%
Twin Brooks
No. %
3* 100%
_ -
-
3 100%
West Jasper Place
No. %
4160 38%
3322 30%
3566 32%
11048 100%
Area Structure Plan Area Total
No.
28,404 51%
14,722 26%
12,550 23%
55,676 100%
*Residential units in place prior to approval of the area structure plans. SOURCE: City of Edmonton Planning Department. 16
Rental Accommodation Vacancy Rates
5-3
The Edmonton metropolitan area rental accommodation vacancy rate was 1.1% in October 1981 (Figure 5.2). This figure is slightly higher than the vacancy rate of one year earlier but below the October 1979 rate. Vacancy rates measured in April over the period 1979 to 1981 have declined from 3.0% to 2.4%. Vacancy rates over the past three years have remained above the very low rates experienced during the period from 1976 to 1978 when rental accommodation was in very short supply. Under "normal" market conditions, a vacancy rate of 3.0% is considered by CMHC to represent an equilibrium. Renters have an adequate choice of accommodation while developers have incentive to build. However, during 1981, production of new rental apartrnents was constrained by high interest rates which reduced development incentive.
co 3000
FIGURE 5-3 INVENTORY OF NEWLY COMPLETED AND UNOCCUPIED DWELLING UNITS IN THE CITY OF EDMONTON 1977- 1981 single family, semi-detached and duplex units --- row housing and apartment units (this category was redefined in Jan 1981)
o
i 2000_1 - total of all residential dwelling units El
_J
•••••
••••
••••
••••
•••
•.. •
l000_ (7)
••••• •••••
''"•' ''"'• ..... ••••
•••••
•••,. #
# .. .
••"" el
#
.
•••,. • • • • •••• •••..
•
• • ••
•.
. • •■•••
•
.............. •
#
',, ......... • •
•
••
..••• .•'
DEC JUNE DEC JUNE DL 1976 1978 1977 SOURCE: CMHC - Housing Statistics
JUNE DEC JUNE DEC 1979 1980
JUNE DEC 1981 17
5-4
Inventory of Newly Completed Unoccupied Dwelling Units
At the end of 1981 there were 2282 newly completed unoccupied dwelling units in the City of Edmonton (Figure 5-3). Over thirteen hundred of these units were single family semi-detached or duplex structures. This number is slightly higher than 1980's year-end inventory but the same as the 1979 inventory. The number of vacant new dwellings is well above the stock available during the period 1976 to 1978, when the inventory was under five hundred units. The current inventory combined with high interest rates and slumping housing sales has discouraged new development in the short term. There has been a steady decline in the number of newly completed unoccupied row house and apartrnent dwelling units over the period 1979 to 1981. The 1981 year-end stock was under one thousand units, down from seventeen hundred in 1979 and eleven hundred in 1980. This decline, in combination with current low vacancy rates in rental accommodation, reflects constraints placed on new development by high financing costs. Generally, the current inventory level of newly completed unoccupied dwelling units, under current market conditions, is not sufficiently low to provide extraordinary impetus for new development.
18
6. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 6 1 -
Residential Building Permits
In 1981, a total of 12,021 residential dwelling units were approved by building permits in Edmonton (Table 6-1). This is substantially higher than the number of approvals recorded in 1979 and 1980 particularly as it applies to row housing and apartment units. In part, the increase is due to actions by developers to qualify projects under the federal government's MURB program prior to its closing date. This factor resulted in a year-end surge in row house and apartment unit building permit applications and subsequent approvals.
1 t
TABLE 6-1
Single family, semi-detached and duplex uni t permit approvals were not affected by curtailment of the MURB program. The number of approvals registered was slightly below the figure for 1979, but almost one thousand units above the 1980 figure.
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN THE CITY OF EDMONTON, 1979 TO 1981 1979 Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
â&#x2013;
Ci 5TLE DOWNS CLIAREV IEW, HERMITAGE, CASELMAN, STEELE HEIGHTS
No. Row % No. Row %
KA*ITAY0
No. Row % LAKE DISTRICT No. Row % , MLL WOODS No. Row % PILOT SOUND No. Row % RIVERBEND No. Row % 1 WIN bROOKS No. Row % WEST JASPER PLACE No. Row %
Total Units
1980 Row Apart. Single, Semi Units Duplex Units Units
Total Units
167 (20%)
236 (32%) 435 (30%)
414 98 748 (55%) (13%) (100%) 591 406 1432 (42%) (28%) (100%)
215 (28%)
259 (33%)
782 (100%)
1110 (62%)
437 (24%)
252 (14%) -
1799 (100%)
168 (28%) 188 (65%) 1886 (71%)
315 110 (53%) (19%) 101 (35%) 206 521 (21%) (8%)
593 (100%) 289 (100%) 2613 (100%)
160 (100%) -
94 (100%) -
-
-
254 (100%)
-
217 (85%) -
37 (15%)
-
94 (100%) -
54 157 (16%) (6%) 106 191 (35%). (15%)
949 (100%) 550 (100%)
447 (78%) 494 (60%)
126 (22%) 165 (20%)
327 (30%)
317 425 (30%) (40%) -
1069 (100%) -
308 (39%)
1691 (66%)
6131 178 (27%) (7%) -
2550 (100%) -
120 (75%)
40 (25%)
-
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
573 (100%) 826 (100%)
738 (71.1%) 253 (46%)
-
Total Units
-
313 (46%)
299 71 (44%) (10%)
683 (100%)
436 (57%)
233 ( 31 %)
94 (12%)
763 (100%)
488 (40%)
392 1217 337 (28%) (32%) (100%)
AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREA TOTAL No. Row %
3442 (56%)
1685 834 (28%) (14%)
5961 ( I 00%)
2889 (60%)
1176 (24%)
772 16%)
4837 (100%)
3618 (51%)
7146 2316 1212 (32%) (17%) (100%)
bULT-UP AREA OF No. CITY TOTAL Row %
989 (34%)
57 1864 (2%) (64%)
2910 (100%)
457 (17%)
298 (12%)
1872 (71%)
2627 (100%)
692 (14%)
4875 772 3411 (16%) (70%) (100%)
CITY OF EDMONTON No. TOTAL Row %
4431 (50%)
1742 2698 (19%) (31%)
8871 (100%)
3346 (45%)
1474 (20%)
2644 (35%)
7464 (100%)
4310 (36%)
12021 .3088 4623 (26%) (38%) (100%)
Prepared by: City of Edmonton Planning Department
19
Overall, 59% of 1981 building permit approvals were for dwelling units in area structure plan areas. Eighty-four percent of all single and semi-detached units and 75% of row house approvals were for dwelling units in plan areas (Figure 6-1). In contrast, only 26% of apartment units were to be located in plan areas. This is a continuation of a trend towards concentration of new low and medium density housing in plan areas while high-density apartment unit developments are drawn to more central areas of the city.
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN AREA STRUCTURE 1979 - 1981 PLAN AREAS AND BUILT UP AREAS OF EDMONTON
FIGURE 6-I 5000_
I (4431)
I
area structure plan areas (4623)
M1 built-up areas of the city
(4310)
4000.1
26%
(3346)
(r) 2 3000-1
78%
(3088) 3088)
-
0
(2698)
J
31%
W
(2644) 29%
75%
20001
74%
(1742)
0
(1474) I 474) 97%
I000
,220 /
3% single family, semi-detached, duplex units
20
71%
.A
.111 row housing units apartment units
1979
80% /
W
I
single family, semi-detached, duplex units
20% row housing units apartment units
1980
25°A: / 16%; / single family, semi-detached, duplex units
row housing units
1981
A apartment units
6 2 -
Mix of New Development
The dwelling units approved by building permits in 1981 consisted of: 38% apartment units, 26% row house units, and 36% single and semi-detached units (Figure 6-2). These figures reflect a trend towards increasing proportions of medium and high density residential development in the city's overall housing stock. The trend is due primarily to row house and apartment unit approvals for the built-up area of the city. Seventy percent of dwellings approved in built-up areas were apartment units. Fourteen percent were single, semidetached and duplex units and 16% were row house units. This mix of newly approved development is very different from the mix of existing housing stock in built-up areas which has been dominated by single-family dwellings.
FIGURE 6 2 -
12000-,
MIX OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS, BUILT UP AREAS AND THE CITY AS A WHOLE 1979 - 1981
apartment units row housing units
I 0000
EM single family, semi-detached duplex units
8000-
6000-,
4000-
. 2000_
Structure Built-Up Plan Areas Areas
1979
Total City
Area Structure Plan Areas
Built-Up Areas
1980
Total City
Area Structure Built-Up Pion Areas Areas
Total City
1981
21
6-3 In area structure plan areas, 51% of dwellings approved in 1981 were single and semi-detached units. Apartment units retained a consistent 17% share of approvals while the row house unit share rose to 32%. This mix of newly approved development is similar to the mix of the existing housing stock in the plan areas although row house development appears to be on the increase.
Residential Construction Starts
CMHC reported 10,515 residential unit construction starts in the City of Edmonton in 1 981 (Table 6-2). The year-end tally was boosted by a flurry of activity in anticipation of curtailment of the federal government's MURB program. The number of starts was above the level reported for 1979 and 1980 but well below the level attained during the 1978 "boom" year. Construction starts in 1981 were higher than those in 1980 for single and semi-detached units, row house units and apartment units. When 1981 figures are compared with those from 1979, only 1931 row housing starts have shown a notable increase. Single and semi-detached starts are down slightly while apartment unit starts are roughly the same in 1979 and 1981.
FIGURE 6-3
FABLE 6-2
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT CONSTRUCTION STARTS IN THE CITY OF EDMONTON 1978 1981 I5/3
Single, Semi-Det., and Duplex Units
5434 37%
19/5 4138 43%
1Y8U 3191 38%
1981 4046 38%
16000-1 (14668)
1 1.•.',1
14000v) IT 12000-
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT CONSTRUCTION STARTS IN THE CITY OF EDMONTON 1978- 1981 apartment units row housing units
EZ21 single family, semi-detached, duplex units
45% (10515)
(r)
WOW-
D
8000-
D-J
6000-
1—
(9 682) (8446)
Row Housing Units
2651 18%
1503 15%
2072 24%
2411 23%
Apartment Units
6583 45%
4041 42%
3183 38%
4058 39%
Total Units
14668 100%
9682 100%
8446 100%
10515 100%
SOURCE: CMHC - Housing Statistics
22
39%
42% 38%
g 4000, 2000-1
13/ p4Y4 11!:cy VA A :•:•4%;•:
1980 1979 1978 SOURCE: CMHC - Housing Statistics
.•.-...•.•.•
38%
1981
1
The share of housing starts accounted for by single and semi-detached units was 38% in 1981 (Figure 6-3). This percentage is about equal to the share of starts accounted for by apartment units. The balanced relationship has persisted over the past three years. Row housing units made up a little less than one quarter of all starts in both 1980 and 1981.
Generally, the Edmonton housing industry, along with that of other western cities, has not experienced the same degree of constraint as the housing industry in eastern Canadian cities.
18000_ l7000_
DWELLING UNIT STARTS IN A SELECTION OF CANADIAN METROPOLITAN AREAS 1976- 1981 •• • •
V.
/
16000... S.
•
s.
15000 _
• •
•
•
Vancouver
•
• (r"C
al gory
14000 _ 13000 _
DW EL L ING UNI TSTARTS
In Edmonton, 1981 was considered to be a slow year for the housing industry. However, when compared with other major Canadian metropolitan areas, Edmonton, along with Calgary, enjoyed a relatively high level of development activity (Figure 6-4). Other Canadian metropolitan areas, including Quebec, Winnipeg and Ottawa reported less than one third of the number of starts recorded in the Edmonton metropolitan area. This relationship is part of the dichotomy between Canadian metropolitan areas in Alberta, Saskatchewan and B.C. in the west, and the provinces to the east. The performance of the housing industry in Victoria, Saskatoon and Regina approached that of much larger eastern cities.
FIGURE 6-4
12000 _
E
jil
.••
I 1000 10000 _
•
EC
Edmonton .1(CMA)
..' ..,Edmonton /(City)
9000_ 8000 _ 7000_ 6000... 5000_
uebec
4000 _
Ottawa Victoria Winnipeg Saskatoon Regina
3000... 2000_
1000_1 1976
19177
19178
19179
1980
1981
YEAR SOURCE: CMHC - MONTHLY HOUSING STATISTICS
23
7. RESIDENTIAL LAND SUPPLY 7-1
FIGURE 7-1
Supply of Serviced Residential Land
YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS DECEMBER 1979 - 1981
At the end of 1981, the supply of vacant serviced residential land in the city's area structure plan areas had a development potential of 28,374 dwelling units, (Table 7-1). This development potential represents a small decrease from the potential at the end of 1980. From 1980 to 1981. there was a slight increase in the development potential for single family units. The potential for row housing units declined by 1,186 and the development potential for apartments was down by 108 units.
30000
(29567)
(28374 )
26000
-
2200
(20564)
45%
â&#x20AC;¢J
row housing units
EM single family. seini-detoched, duplex units
Ui
18000
apartment units
r.-
43%
29%
.1= 14000_ ,z
The development potential of vacant serviced land in area structure plan areas in 1979 was substantially below that for 1980 and 1981. Changes in single family and row housing unit potential reflect actual changes in the number of serviced lots. However, much of the increase in the potential number of apartment units was due to the adoption of the 1980 Land Use Bylaw. The Land Use Bylaw increased the permitted housing densities on land designated for apartment units. This change resulted in an increase in apartment development potential of 6008 units.
0.
I 0000.
2
6000A
CL
16%
30%
36A
2000
(5981)
Ui
1979
1980
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNIIS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN ASP AREAS 1979 - 19E11
1981
TABLE 7-1 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS
1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
1979 Apart. Single, Semi, Row Duplex Units Units Units
CAS1LE DOWNS CLAREV1EW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN, SlEELE HEIGHTS KASKITAY0 LAKE DISTRICT . MILL WOODS PILOT SOUND RIVEFtBEND TWIN BROOKS WEST JASPER PLACE
AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREA TOTAL
Total Units
Single, Semi, Duplex Units
1980 Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
1981 Single, Semi, Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
1381
544
809
2734
1083
1085
568
2736
920
789 575
2284
415 911
2451 618
1327 393
1653 2298
5107 . 4180
2467
2036
877 1109 3805
2577 773
3079
4193 1922 75132
2542
5141
11488
513 1062 687 2997
3962 4385 758 10535
45
147
35
527
290
147
69
506
1003
1226
1053
1327
3606
1396
1073
3081
5550
1479
1985 1464 769 2554 71 2184 5354 326 69 887 2686
7357
7280
5927
20564
8560
8197
12810
29567
8661
7011 12702
28374
1398 5052
Prepared by: City of Edmonton Planning Department
25
-
Of the total residential development potential of serviced land in area structure plans at the end of 1981, 30% was designated for single family units, 25% for row housing units and 45% for apartment units (Figure 7-1). The share of the development potential representing apartment units has increased by 17% between 1979 and 1981.
units resulting from adoption of the 1980 Land Use Bylaw. The Land Use Bylaw increased the number of dwelling units permitted on land designated for apartment development.
At residential land consumption rates over the period 1979 to 1981, there is a 2.5 year supply of serviced land designated for single family units and a 4 year supply for row housing units. The rate of apartment development in area structure plan areas during the period 1979 to 1981 was only 940 units per year. Relative to this rate of development there is a 14 year supply of serviced land designated for apartment development in plan areas.
14,000
(MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
(12094)
2- 12,000
0 op. tment units
z 10,000
7-2
Residential Lund Servicing Activity
During 1981, residential land with a development potential of 5,586 dwelling units was serviced in Edmonton's area structure plan areas (Table 7-2). This amount is well below the amount of servicing in 1979. Total servicing figures for 1980 cannot directly be compared with those for 1979 and 1981. The 1980 figures reflect an increase in development potential of land designated for apartment
TABLE 7-2
26
w
8000_1
—1
6000
ti 3
4000
F0
o_
WY
(9158) 20%
row housing units
1222] sing efon3iIy, serni-detoehed dupl ex units
54%
(5981) (5586) 17% :- 6
/A
2000
.
6"M
10. 1979
.'.•
1981
1980
,
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN ASP AREAS 1979 - 1981
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
CASTLE DOWNS CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN, STEELE HEIGHTS KASKITAY0 LAKE DISTRICT MLL WOODS PILOT SOUND RIVERbEND TWIN bROOKS WEST JASPER PLACE
AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREA TOTAL
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 19791981
FIGURE 7-2
1979 Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
1980 Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
11k9
221
505
1855
192 ,
246
301
739
72
64
105
241
441 1299
993 628
24 688
1458 2615
605 553
327 386
719 2379
1651 3318
739
257
89
1085
1876
500
2939
5315
75 120 875 1073
217 172 180
321 438
75 658 1047 1691
448
187
34
669
39
39
929
216
-
1145 729
5586
821
217
438
1476
591
234
207
1032
581
42
106
4877
2503
1778
9158
3856
1693
6545
12094
3725
891
970
Prepared by: City of Edmonton Planning Department
Servicing figures for single family and row housing development potential are directly comparable for 1979, 1980 and 1981. The amount of servicing activity for single family lots in 1981 was down slightly from 1980 but was only 76% of the amount serviced in 1979. A greater decline was recorded for land designated for row house and apartment development. Single family lots made up 67% of the total development potential of land serviced in 1981. The remaining capacity was nearly evenly split between row house and apartment unit potential (Figure 7-2). The share of servicing allocated to single family lots is notably higher in 1981 than in previous years. The share allocated to row housing declined. Overall, the amount of residential land serviced in 1981 was less than the average annual rate of consumption of land between 1979 and 1981. The amount of land serviced for apartment unit development was comparable to the three-year average annual consumption rate. The amount of servicing of land designated for row house development is only half of the three-year average rate of consumption. The development potential of land serviced for single family dwellings is above the three-year average rate of consumption but about equal to the actual development figures for 1981.
27
7-3
Supply of Subdivided Residential Land
FIGURE 7-3
At the end of 1981, Edmonton's area structure plan areas contained vacant subdivided residential land with a development potential of 31,097 dwelling units. This represents a decrease of 3101 units of potential from 1980 to 1981. While the development potential declined for all types of dwelling units, the most notable decline was a drop of 1671 units of row house potential.
(MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
POTENTIAL DW ELL ING UNI TS
3500 0-,
The development potential of subdivided land in the plan areas in 1981 was 3,698 units above the 1979 potential. Much of the change, 6419 potential dwelling units, was due to increases in permitted dwelling unit densities for apartment units under the 1980 Land Use Bylaw. The development potential of land for single family housing was 798 units above the 1979 supply. The development potential of land for row housing decreased by 1502 units between 1979 and 1981.
(34198) (31097)
30000 42%
25000
28
I:S= row housing units
35%
IZZA single family, seini-detached, duplex units
45%
20000 15000
.•.•.•.•.•.'
:-:.26%:•:
.•.•.•.•.•.•
10000 32% 5000
FA
A rr A
3",2",c)§%'' 1979
1 980
1981
(5981)(-1,6% ":•2996% - y-
/V)6/ AVE lAGE ANNT AL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN ASP AREAS 1979 - 1981
YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
CASTLE DOWNS CLAREV1EW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN, STEELE HEIGHTS KASKITAY0 LAKE DIS1RICT MILL WOODS PILO1 SOUND RIVE RBEND 'TWIN BROOKS VvES1 JASPER PLACE
AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREA TOTAL
apartment units
(27319)
Of the total development potential of subdivided land in the plan areas in December 1981, 31% was designated for single family housing, 24% for row housing and 45% for
TABLE 7-3
YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT RESIDENTIAL LAND (SERVICED AND UNSERV10ED) IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1979 - 1981
1979 Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
1980 Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
1455
1045
2808
1190
1160
568
2918
955
864
965 990
5196 3658 _ 8640
877 1151 385 4205
2911 968 43 2729
2034 2696
3454
2889 1342 932 1736 _ _ 2768 2418
6096
5822 4815 428 13030
513 1062 687 3148
2319 769 71 2325
377
147
35
559
646
248
69 '
963
1003
326
1621
1282
3555
6458
2068
1073
3081
6222
2292
887 2686
5865
8862
9063
9394
27319
10522
9132
14544
34198
9660
7561 13876
31097
Prepared by: City of Edmonton Planning Department
308
575
1845 2554. 6147 69
2394
4677 4385 758 11620 1398
apartment development (Figure 7-3). The share of development potential designated for row housing decreased by 9% between 1979 and 1981. At the average annual rate of residential land consumption over the period 1979 to 1981, there is a 3 year supply of subdivided land designated for single family unit development. For row housing there is a 4.5 year supply of land at the three-year rate of consumption. Relative to the rate at which land designated for apartment development has been consumed since 1979 there is a 15 year supply of vacant land for apartments.
29
Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity
During 1981, subdivision registration activity created residential lots with a development potential of 4,146 units in Edrnonton's area structure plan areas (Table 7-4). This potential was well below the 10,030 unit potential resulting from subdivision activity in 1979. Subdivision activity figures for 1980 reflect development potential added to apartment unit lots by adoption of the 1980 Land Use Bylaw. Figures for single family lots indicate similar levels of activity during 1980 and 1981. This represents a decline of about four hundred units from 1979. Subdivision of land for row housing and apartment units declined sharply between 1979 and 1981.
row housing was only one third of the three-year average rate of consumption of land for row housing. The development potential of land subdivided for single family and apartment development was also below the three-year average annual consumption rate.
14000
(MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELUNG UNITS)
Single family lots represent 67% of the total development potential of land subdivided in 1981. Fifteen percent was designated for row housing and eighteen percent for apartment development (Figure 7-4). The share of new potential for single family units was higher in 1981 than in previous years. The share for apartment development declined. In 1981, residential land was used for development faster than it was replaced by subdivision registration activity. The replacement rate of subdivided land was also below the three-year average annual rate of consumption from 1979 to 1981. The development potential of land designated for TABLE 7-4
30
12000_
IJ
(10030)
8000
1=n single family, semi-detached, duplex units
(8397)
54%
55%
6000..
(5981) 16% (41 46) 18%
: • 1 5% : •
4000
apartment units
1= row housing units
10000_
29%-:• .•.•.•.•.-.• 15%
r&—
2000
r 30%
67%
1980
1981
A
A
1979
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVE') BY BUILDING PERMITS IN ASP AREAS 1979 - 1981
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
CASTLE DOWNS CLAREV1EW, HERMITAGE, CASSL- L MAN, STEELE HEIGHTS KASKITAYO LAKE DISTRICT MILLWOODS PILOT SOUND RIVERBEND 1WIN BROOKS WEST JASPER PLACE
AREA 51 RUCTURE PLAN AREA TOTAL
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1979- 1981
FIGURE 7-4
PO TEN TI ALD W ELL ING UNI TS
7-4
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
1979 Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
1980 Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
760
480
49
1289
218
51
296
565
214 806 834 26
110 668 92 -
369 1858 239 -
693 3332 1165 26
79 474 385 331 363
236
3525
806
596
1033 1734 428 2957 498 1182
57 120 490 824
514
190 764 298 962 43342 2284 34 101 169 207
3154
1586
5290
10030
2656
1194
8397
Prepared by: City of Edmonton Planning Deportment
4547
64
105
169
573 711
141 129 128 115 42
223 318 106
57 484 619 1270 688
2775
619
752
4146
859
7 5 -
Supply of Unsubdivided Land In Area Structure Plan Areas
There were 2,922 hectares of raw land in Edmonton's area structure plan areas at the end of 1981 (Table 7-5). This figure includes large contiguous tracts of land for which no plan of subdivision, consistent with an area structure plan, has been registered. Principally, these areas are complete "neighbourhood" components of plan areas. These areas represent most of the inventory of land readily available for subdivision for residential and other urban land uses. All of Pilot Sound and Twin Brooks are included in the inventory while no large tracts are left in Castle Downs. During 1981. 204 hectares of land in large tracts were removed from the inventory of raw land through subdivision registration. Additional subdivision activity in Castle Downs, Kaskitayo, Clareview and other plan areas dealt with smaller tracts of land associated with previous subdivision activity. This subsidiary subdivision activity is not reported as a debit drawn on the raw land inventory, as it was considered to be part of earlier subdivision activity. In each of Lake District, Mill Woods, Riverbend and West Jasper Place, substantial amounts of land were withdrawn from the raw land inventory by subdivision registration.
SUPPLY OF RAW LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS IN DECEMBER 1980 AND 1981
TABLE 7-5
1981
RAW LAND SUBDIVIDED IN 1981
-
-
-
CLARE VIEW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN, STEELE HEIGHTS
142
142
-
KASKITAY0
30
30
-
LAKE DISTRICT
998
921
77
MILL WOODS
172
127
45
PILOT SOUND
726
726
-
500
458
42
TWIN BROOKS
194
194
-
WEST JASPER PLACE
364
324
40
ASP AREAS TOTAL
3126
2922
204
1980
AREA STRUCTURE PLAN 'AREAS
Hectares
CASTLE DOWNS
R IVERBEND
â&#x20AC;¢
31
8. CITY-OWNED RESIDENTIAL LAND 8 1 -
City-Owned Serviced Residential Land
The City of Edmonton, through the Real Estate and Housing Department, owned vacant serviced residential land with a development potential of 4325 units at the end of 1981 (Table 8-1). Almost all of this land was in Mill Woods. The total development potential of serviced Cityowned land decreased by two thousand units from the 1980 figure but is above the figure reported at the end of 1979. A decline in the inventory of serviced City-owned residential land between 1980 and 1981 is recorded for the development potential of both single family and multifamily units. The decrease in the total development potential of Cityowned land is due to the combination of continued sales of land and a very low level of servicing activity.
TABLE 8 1 -
SUPPLY OF CITY-OWNED VACANT SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
TOTAL COMBINED PLAN AREAS
1981
1980
1979 Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Total Units
Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Total Units
Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Total Units
1335
2662
3997
2078
4254
6332
1603
2722
4325
SOURCE: Real Estate and Housing Department, City of Edmonton
33
8-2
Servicing Program for City-Owned Land
In 1981, the servicing program for City-owned land involved land with a development potential of 287 dwelling units (Table 8-2). Most lots, and all row housing and multifamily lots, were in Mill Woods. The level of servicing activity is very low when compared with 1979 and 1980 servicing programs. The effect of this low level of activity is to draw down the inventory of vacant serviced Cityowned residential land.
TABLE 8-2
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SERVICING ACTIVITY FOR CITY-OWNED LAND, 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
MLL WOODS
1038
324
1382
2744 .
1269
288
1366
2923
96
OTHER PLAN AREAS
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
62
1038
324
1382
2744
1269
288
1366
2923
158
TOTAL COMBINED PLAN AREAS
SOURCE: Real Estate and Housing Department, City of Edmonton
34
1981
1980
1979
47
47
82
225
-
62
82
287
8 3 -
City-Owned Subdivided Residential Land
At the end of 1981 the inventory of City-owned subdivided residential land, including serviced and unserviced lots, had a development potential of 4616 dwelling units (Table 8-3). This figure is. only slightly above the totals reported for serviced lots. Almost all lots are in Mill Woods. The total development potential of subdivided City-owned land decreased by over seventeen hundred dwellings between 1980 and 1981. The decline in development potential is reflected in figures for single and multi-family units but is far more pronounced for multi-family unit development potential. The decrease in the total development potential of Cityowned, subdivided land is due to continued sales of land coupled with very little replenishment of the inventory of subdivided land.
TABLE 8 3 -
SUPPLY OF CITY-OWNED VACANT SUI3D IVDED RESIDENTIAL LAND (SERVICED AND UNSERVICED) IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
TOTAL COMBINED PLAN AREAS
1981
1980
1979 Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Total Units
Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Total Units
.Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Total Units
1335
2662
3997
2078
4254
6332
1894
2722
4616
SOURCE: Real Estate and Housing Department, City of Edmonton
35
8-4
Sales of City-Owned Residential Lund
In 1981, land sold by the City for residential development, including completed land sales and land under option, had a development potential of 2294 units (Table 8-4). Almost all of the land sold was in Mill Woods. The multi-family development potential of 1661 indicated by 1981 figures was extremely high when compared with figures for 1979 and 1980 (235 units and 62 units respectively). Multifamily lot sales and options to buy received a year-end boost from increased MURB program activity. Sales of single family lots in 1981 were more in line with sales in previous years. The development potential on single family lots was 633, up from 526 in 1980 but down from 865 in 1979.
TABLE 8-4
CITY-OWNED LAND SOLD FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT* 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1979
AIREA STRUCTURE Single Family PLAN AREAS Units
MILL WOODS
805
OTHER PLAN AREAS
60
TOTAL COMBINED PLAN AREAS
865
1980
Multi-Family Units
Total Units
Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Total Units
Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Total Units
235
1040
512
62
574
625
1661+
2286
60
14
14
8
1100
526
588
633
235
62
â&#x20AC;˘Sales of a City-owned lot carried the obligation to begin construction on a residential unit within four months. SOURCE: Real Estate and Housing Department, City of Edmonton
36
1981
8
1661
2294
+1981 multi-family sales included lots sold and lots under option (sold = 740, under option = 921).
8 5 • The Supply of City-Owned Row Land -
In December 1981, the City of Edmonton, through the Real Estate and Housing Department, owned 402.8 hectares of raw unsubdivided land in area structure plan areas (Table 8-5). Large contiguous tracts of land, more than 25 hectares in size, were held in: Lake District (25.5 and 63.8 hectares); Pilot Sound (64.6 hectares); Burnewood in Mill Woods (28.0 and 62.1 hectares), and Riverbend (63.2 hectares). Additional, smaller tracts are held in Pilot Sound (4.0, 4.0, 4.9, 4.3 and 8.1 hectares) and Burnewood in Mill Woods (5.3 hectares). The Mill Woods neighbourhood of Tawa is a 64.8 hectare tract of land owned by the City of Edmonton. A plan of subdivision is being prepared for the area. Some work has been done to provide services to the neighbourhood, but servicing cannot be completed until a plan of subdivision has been approved. Tawa is expected to have a development- potential of over 3,000 dwellings in row house and apartment units.
TABLE 8 5 -
CITY-OWNED RAW LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS, DECEMBER 1981 HECTARES
ACRES
Lake District
89.4
216.0
Pilot Sound
90.0
217.5
Mill Woods (Burnewood) (Tawa)•
95.4 64.8
230.6 156.7
Riverbend
63.2
152.8
402.8
973.6
Total City-Owned Row Land in A.S.P. Areas (•A plan of subdivision for Iowa is being prepared).
SOURCE: Real Estate and Housing Department, City of Edmonton
37
9. CASTLEDOWN S
MO OP ISO SO NS OM OM NM MO NO Oil OM OD OW NUM
1
DUNLUCE
1
CASTLE DOWNS BEAUMARIS
1 1
CASTLE DOWNS PLAN NEIGHBOURHOODS
40
1 1 1
9. CASTLE DOWNS 9-1 Housing Stock At the end of 1981, Castle Downs contained 8,083 dwelling units, (Table 9-1). Of this total, 63% are single family units, 24% are row housing units, and 13% are apartment units (Figure 9-1).
FIGURE 9-1 TABLE 9-1 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN CASTLE DOWNS TO DECEMBER 31, 1981
Single, Semi Duplex Units
EJ
apartment units
L • ,• .•
row housing units
E:=3 single family, serni-detached,duplex units
DWELLING UNITS APPROVED
CASTLE DOWNS NEIGHBOURHOODS
MIX OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS IN CASTLE DOWNS DECEMBER 31 1981
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
BARANOW BATURYN BEAUMARI5 CAERNARVON CARLISLE DUNLUCE LORELEI
1251 545 885 672 1072 • 688
281 254 437 221 376 346
158 206 137 469 85
1532 957 1528 1030 1917 1119
CASTLE DOWNS TOTAL
5113
1915
1055
8083
41
9-2
Residential Building Permits FIGURE 9-2
Castle Downs had 748 dwelling units approved by building permit in 1981. (Table 9-2). Of this total, 32% were single family units, 55% were row housing units, and 13% were apartment units, (Figure 9-2). Development of single family units in 1981 was down considerably from development in 1980 and 1979, but development of row housing and apartment units was up substantially.
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED EACH YEAR IN CASTLE DOWNS 1979 - 1981
apartment units
1200.J
1=1 row housing units
> 1000_1 0
IZZ2 single family, semi-detached.
a- 800
duplex units
949
cC
•:16%:-:
6%
600.J
(756)
(748) 13%
(573)
.7% .
.
400.1 171 Lij
200_1
//. 1979
TABLE 9-2
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
1981
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN CASTLE DOWNS IN EACH YEAR, 1979 - 1981 1979
42
1980
1980
CASTLE DOWNS NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
BARANOW BATURYN BEAUMARIS CAERNARVON CARLISLE DUNLUCE LORELEI
169 204 13 126 224 2
42 4 III -
54 -
265 208 13 126 335 2
' 16 150 6 39 166 70
CASTLE DOWNS TOTAL
738
157
54
949
447
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
1981
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
91 35 -
- . -
16 241 6 39 201 70
3 73 16 14 82 48
135 53 44 182 -
126
-
573
236
414 98
98 -
138 224 16 58' ° 264 48
748
9-3 FIGURE 9-3
SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN CASTLE DOWNS 1979 - 1981
3000_
apartment units
(2734)
(2736)
r2 2500J
I= row housing units IZZa single family, selni-detoched, duplex units
u 2000_1 z .7J _J LtJ
2096:.
0 _J
5 .1000 fl
F-
(756)
Supply of Serviced Residential Land
At the end of 1981, Castle Downs contained serviced land with a capacity of 2,284 additional dwelling units, (Table 9-3). Of this potential capacity, 40% is designated for single family units, 35% is designated for row housing units, and 25% is designated for apartment units (Figure 9-3). The supply of serviced land, as measured by potential dwelling units, dropped 16% from the supply at the end of 1980. At land consumption rates over the period 1979 to 1981, there is a two-year supply of land for single family units, and a 2.5-year supply of land for row housing units. Given the slow rate of apartment development in Castle Downs over the period 1979 to 1981, there is a large supply of land for this type of development.
7%
0 500_1 0_
1979
TABLE 9-3
1980
AVERAGE ANNIIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PF.RMITS 1979 - 1981
1981
YEAR-END SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN CASTLE DOWNS, 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1981
1980
1979
CASTLE DOWNS NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
BARANOW BATURYN BEAUMARIS CAERNARVON CARLISLE DUNLUCE LORELEI
118 401 90 105 397 270
147 85 155 113 44
136 145 127 323 78
401 631 90 387 833 392
90 296 75 185 237 200
262 156 36 282 276 73
96 372 100
352 548 111 467 885 373
87 274 59 172 155 173
197 151 36 238 94 73
1381
544
809
2734
1083
1085
.568
2736
920
789 575
'CASTLE DOWNS TOTAL
103 372 100
284 528 95 410 621 346
2284
43
9-4
Residential Land Servicing Activity
FIGURE 9-4
During 1981, land with a capacity of 241 dwelling units was serviced in Castle Downs, (Table 9-4). Of this total, 30% is designated for single family units, 27% is designated for row housing units, and 43% is designated for apartment units, (Figure 9-4). Servicing during 1981 was considerably less than servicing in 1980 and 1979.
RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN CASTLE DOWNS 1979- 1981
2000
PO TEN TIAL DWELLI NG UNI TS
(1855) 1.= apartment uni.s 1=1 row housing ton; ts
1500,
(2M single family, sernl-detoched, duplex units
1 0 00_1 (756)
(739) .
.
7%
500(
241
63%
)
30% 1979
TABLE 9-4
44
1 981
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN CASTLE DOWNS, 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
1979
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
Row Single, Semi Duplex Units Units
bARANOW BATURYN BEAUMARIS CAERNARVON CARLISLE DUNI UCE LORELEI
30 384 37 32 258
110 50 79
271 185 49
30 667 37 112 623 386
74 112 6 -
1129
221
505
1855
192
3138
12
1981 '
1980
CASTLE DOWNS NEIGHBOURHOODS ,
CAS1 LE DOWNS TOTAL
1980
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
_ 162 84 -
46 36 168 51
282 36 112 258 51
51 -
16 48 -
105 -
16 204 -
21
-
-
21
246
301
739
72
64
105
241
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
9-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land FIGURE 9-5 SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED
At the end of 1981, Castle Downs contained vacant, subdivided land with a capacity of 2,394 dwelling units, (Table 9-5). Of this total, 39% is designated for single family units, 37% is designated for row housing units, and 24% is designated for apartment units, (Figure 9-5). Subdivided land with a capacity for 273 dwelling units remains to be serviced.
RESIDENTIAL LAND IN CASTLE DOWNS 1979- 1981 3000, I l/I
t 2500
(2918)
(2808)
qx;1ment units row housing units
19%
I I%
(2394) IZ2:23
.•..•..•..:.•..
single family, d semi-etached," duplex
24%
(23
2000_1
37% :•' • . :•:-:•:•:•'
Lu 3 1500_
• •. .••••... .•••........
17
.•••••••...•
1000.
•r
Lu
2
(756) 7%
z
500_1
9 9,60. 63%4
"i.e.°I 1980
1979
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
1981
YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN CASTLE DOWNS, 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
TABLE 9 5 -
Apart. Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units
CASTLE DOWNS NEIGHBOURHOODS
bARANOW bAT URYN BEAUMAR1S CAERNARVON CARLISLE DUNLUCE LORELE. I
CAS1 LE DOWNS TOTAL
.
1981
1980
1979
Total Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
118 401 83 160 397 296
283 180 282 227 73
50 209 49
401 631 83 442 833 418
90 347 75 185 237 256
262 231 36 282 276 73
96 372 100
352 674 III 467 885 429
87 274 59 172 155 208
197 226 36 238 94 73
103 372 100
284 603 95 410 621 381
1455
1045
308
2808
1190
1160
568
2918
955
864
575
2394
45
9-6
Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity
FIGURE 9-6
During 1981, land with a capacity for 169 units was subdivided in Castle Downs, (Table 9-6). Of this total, 38% is designated for row housing units, and 62% is designated for apartment units, (Figure 9-6). Baranow neighbourhood has not yet been subdivided For residential use.
1979
TABLE 9-6
1980
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979- 1981
1981
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN CASTLE DOWNS, 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1981
1980
1979
46
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN CASTLE DOWNS 1979 - 1981
CAS1 LE DOWNS NEIGHBOURHOODS
Apart. Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
BARANOW BATURYN BEAUMARIS CAERNARVON CARLISLE DUNLUCE • LORELEI
30 354 92 284
166 240 I 73
49
196 594 93 406
CASTLE DOWNS TOTAL
760
480
49
1289
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
125 57 6 . 30
51 -
46 36 163 51
171 36 57 220 81
• 218
51
296
565
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
16 148
-
105 -
105
16
153
169
MO MN NM ME OS dB MS Oa OM OM IS OM Oa UM NM
.
Land Use District Codes AG
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
t8
INDUSTRIAL
AOU
URBAN RESERVE DISTRICT
IM
MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
AGI
INDUSTRIAL RESERVE DISTRICT
WS
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
RFI
SINGLE DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
A
METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT
AP
PUBLIC PARKS DISTRICT
RF2
LOW
RPL
PLANNED LOT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
DENSITY
INFILL
DISTRICT
AFT
LOW DENSITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
FIFil RF5
SEMI-DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
DISTRICT
US
URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT
PU .
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
MA
MUNICIPAL AIRPORT DISTRICT
ROW HOUSING DISTRICT
SPO
STATUTORY PLAN OVERLAY
RF6
MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY DISTRICT
APO
AIRPORT PROTECTION OVERLAY
RA?
LOW RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
OCI
DIRECT DEVELOPMENT CONTROL DISTRICT (see below/
0C2
COMPREHENSIVELY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
DC2
TEMPORARY HOLDING DISTRICT
0C4
SPECIAL PUBLIC SERVICE
no
DeSignalion applied In Commun.iv Housing sites in accordance with Seclion 92 Land Use Bylaw
RAE
MEDIUM RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
RA9
HIGH RISE ' APARTMENT DISTRICT
RMX
RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE DISTRICT
RR
RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RMH
MOBILE
CNC
NEIGHBOURHOOD
CSC
SHOPPING CENTRE
CBI
LOW
CB2
GENERAL
CHY
HIGHWAY CORRIDOR DISTRICT
CO CMX
COMMERCIAL
OFFICE
COMMERCIAL
MIXED USE
HOME DISTRICT
INTENSITY
CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
•
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
Designation applied to some RAB sites In aecordance with Seclion 220.5.Land Use Bylaw
BUSINESS DISTRICT
BUSINESS
DISTRICT
..., .. : :=7 '.., ...
Limit of Edmonton Municipal Airport Protection Overlay Restricted Development Area IR.°. A.I
DISTRICT DISTRICT
• DC I
148
BUSINESS DISTRICT
Designation applied to sites 'nth altered or specified development regulations in accordance with Section 820. Land Use Bylaw For the use movisions and development criteim lo. oCI [mines. Please mtei In Itte applicable Afea RedClleilnlellelli or Area Sliuclure Plan
d
1101 NM NM MB EN MN
ell
OM MB
ell
MIN
ell
MN 11111
CLA R EV I EW, H ERM ITAGE, CASSELMAN, AND STEELEH EI GH TS
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN AND STEELE HEIGHTS PLAN NEIGHBOURHOODS
McLEOD
CASSELMAN
•STEELE HEIGHTS -
'
I I YORK
CLAREVIEW • TOWN CENTRE
HAIRSINE
CLAREVIEW
HOMESTEADER
HERMITAGE OVERLANDERS
50
10. CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS,
1 1 1 1 1 1
AND CASSELMAN 10- I Housing Stock At the end of 1981, Clareview, Herrnitage, Steele Heights, and Casselman contained 9,285 dwelling units, (Table 10-1). Of this total, 41% are single family uniFs, 32% are row housing units, and 27% are apartment units, (Figure 10-1). TABLE 10-1
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS AND CASSELMAN TO DECEMBER 31, 1981 DWELLING UNITS APPROVED
FIGURE 10- 1 MIX OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN AND STEELE HEIGHTS DECEMBER 31. 1981
CLAREV1EW, HERMITAGE STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN NEIGHBOURHOCOS
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
CLAREVIEW BANNERMAN BELMONT FRAZER HAIRSINE KERNOHAN KIRKNESS SIFTON PARK TOWN CENTRE
503 575 492 247 518 266 278
231 .334 195 436 316 27 148
330 381 124 128 78 483
1064 1290 811 811 834 371 909
CLAREVIEW TOTAL
2879
1687
1524
6090
HERMITAGE CANNON RIDGE HOMESTEADER OVERLANDERS
34 508 196
652 66
242 310
34 1402 572
HERMITAGE TOTAL
738
718
552
2008
149
576
462
1187
149
576
462
1187
3766
2981
2538
9285
CASSELMAN TOTAL apartment units
l••'••1
row housing unit s
2223 single f amily, semi-detached, duplex units
1 1
1 3 1
STEELE HEIGHTS MCLEOD NE IGHBOURHOCO 2 NEIGHBOURHOOD 3 NEIGHBOURHOCO 5 STEELE HEIGHTS TOTAL CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN TOTAL
51
10-2 Residential Building Permits During 1981, 1,432 dwelling units were approved by building permit in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights, and Casselman, (Table 10-2). Of this total, 30% were single family units, 42% were row housing units, and 28% were apartment units, (Figure 10-2). Much of this development occurred in Frazer, Kirkness, and Overlander neighbourhoods.
FIGURE 10-2
1400, 1200 0
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN Al\JD STEELE HEIGHTS 1979 - 1981 (1432)
apartment units row ha,sing units
28%
single family, semi-detoched, duplex units
•a_ 1000.
(936) (826)
in 800 1—
2 O
600
(550) 19%
*
24%
20% 20%
.....•.•...• -.
1-1.1 400_ _ O
52
-.• .•. •.- .
r am
20046%
/ A
1979
1980
1981
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY • BUILDING PERMITS 1979- 1981
TABLE 10-2
RESDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS AND CASSELMAN IN EACH YEAR, 1979 - 1981
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN NEIGHBOURHOODS
) Apart. Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units NO PERMITS ISSUED
NO PERMITS ISSUED
NO PERMITS ISSUED
CASSELMAN TOTAL
1981
1980
1979
CLAREV1EW BANNERMAN BELMONT FRAZER HAIRSINE KERNOHAN KIRKNESS S1FTON PARK TOWN CENTRE
81 91 36 -
48 61 49 -
-
129 152 85 -
10 380 32 23 35
CLARE VIEW TOTAL
208
158
-
HERMITAGE CANNON RIDGE HOMESTEADER OVERLAI\DERS
33 . . 3
33
HERMITAGE TOTAL
36
33
-
14 97 -
39 128 -
63 380 257 23 35 -
1 112 12 18 251 -
63 195 112 27 -
124 78 -
64 431 124 18 356 -
366
480
III
167
758
394
397 202
993
106
33 142
10
_ 54 -
-
64 1
1 40 -
33
204
1 40 237
106
175
II
54
65
41
33
204
278
9
9
3
3
161
-
161
STEELE HEIGHTS TOTAL
9
9
3
3
161
-
161
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN TOTAL
253
550
494
591
406
1432
STEELE HEIGHTS MCLEOD NEIGHBOURHOCO 2 NEIGHBOURHOCO 3 NEIGHBOURHOOD 5
191
106
165
" 167
826
435
53
10-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land At the end of 1981, Clareview, Hermitage; Steele Heights, and Casselrnan contained serviced land with a capacity of 3,962 additional dwelling units, (Table 10-3). Of this potential capacity, 13% is designated for single family units, 50% is designated For row housing units, and 37% is designated for apartment units, (Figure 10-3). The supply of serviced land, as measured by potential dwelling units, decreased 22% from the supply at the end of 1980. At land consumption rates over the period 1979 to 1981, there is just over a year's supply of land for single family units, a six-year supply of land for row housing units, and a six-year supply of land for apartment units.
FIGURE 10-3
SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN AND STEELE HEIGHTS 1979- 1981 -
PO TE NTIAL D W ELL ING UNI TS
4500_1 ( 419 3 )
33%
L= apartment units
(3962)
=j1 row housing units
'222 32%
single family. semi-detached duplex units
37%
3 0 00_1
•. 50% .•••• •.• :-:••.-
1500-
10,M 1979
54
7 (5107)
rh
17%
ffe
1980
1981
(936) 24% 4% r4 %, AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979- 1981
TABLE 10-3
YEAR-END SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS AND CASSELM AN IN EACH YEAR, 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) • 1981 1980 1979
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN NEIGHBOURHOODS
Apart. Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
.
42 I 88 84 7 -
.
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
NO SERVICED LOTS
NO SERVICED LOTS
NO SERVICED LOTS
CASSELM AN TOTAL
CLARE VIEW BANNERMAN BELMONT FRAZER HAIRSINE KERNOHAN KIRKNESS SIFTON PARK TOWN CENTRE
Total Units
590 194 638 -
32 I 175 56 61 291 7 -
326 304 212 110 83 -
235 126 173 95 -
593 I 605 441 171 469 7 -
32 I 88 44 43 86 7 -
263 498 108 173 100 110 56 -
793 1 196 317 153 142 7 -
1953
623
1035
629
2287
301
637 671
1609
340 311 110 148 -
148 191 483 -
530
909
822
I
CLAREVIEW TOTAL
222
HERMITAGE CANNON RIDGE HOMESTEADER OVERLANDERS
123 8 4
667 39 659)
249 • 1039 49 96 207 870
123 72 4
667 39 659
504 100 420
1294 211 1083
122 32 4
667 504 100 39 626 189
1293 • 171 819
HERMITAGE TOTAL
135
1365
505
2005
199
1365
1024
2588
158
1332 793
2283
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN NEIGHBOURHOCOS
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
STEELE HEIGHTS MCLECO NEIGHBOURHOOD 2 NEIGHBOURHOOD 3 NEIGHBOURHOCO 5
58 -
177 -
-
235 -
55 -
177 -
-
232
54
16
-
70
STEELE HEIGHTS TOTAL
58
177
-
235
55
177
-
232
54
16
-
70
CLARE VIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELM AN TOTAL
415
2451
1327
4193
877
2577
1653
5107
513
1985 1464
'
3962
55
10-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity During 1981, 75 single family lots were serviced in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Cassselman, (Table 10-4). Servicing activity in 1981 was down considerably from servicing in 1980 and 1979.
FIGURE 10-4
RESIDENTIAL LAN) SERVICING ACTIVITY IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE; CASSELMAN AND STEELE HEIGHTS 1979- 1981 (1651)
PO TENTIAL D W ELL INGUNI TS
1600, (1458)
1
2%
1400
1
apartment units row housing units single family, semi-detached, duplex units
1200-1
1 000 .J
(936)
800-1 .•.•.•.•.'.•
600-1
.:..••._:.: 400-,
Pip 200-i
07 05)cx,, 1979
56
1980
1981
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1919 • 1981
TABLE 10-4
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN CLARE VIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS AND CASSELMAN IN EACH YEAR, 1979- 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total tio:::,
75 39 321 -
63 118 177 -
7 2 -
7 140 157 504 -
CLAREVIEW TOTAL
441
358
9
808
HERMITAGE CANNON RIDGE HOMESTEADER OVERLANDERS
-
97 538
15
635
IS
HERMITAGE TOTAL
Apart. Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
NO LOTS SERVICED
NO LOTS SERVICED
CL AREVIEW BANNERMAN BELMONT FRAZER HAIRSINE KERNOHAN KIRKNESS SIFTON PARK TOWN CENTRE
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN NEIGHBOURHOCOS
Single, Semi Duplex Units
NO LOTS SERVICED
CASSELMAN TOTAL
1981
1980
1979
119
119
273 -
62 19 -
866 19 -
49 26
531
273
200
1004
75
97 553
74
54
255 51 213
255 179 213
650
74
54
519
647
Total Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
1458
605
327
719
1651
75
531
49
26
-
-
75
STEELE HEIGHTS MCLEOD NEIGHBOURHOCO 2 NE IGHBOURHOCO 3 NEIGHBOUR HOCO 5
STEELE HEIGHTS TOTAL
7 CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN TOTAL
441
993
24
75
57
-
10-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land At the end of 1981, Clareview, Hermitage, Casselman and Steele Heights contained vacant, subdivided land with a capacity of 4,677 dwelling units, (Table 10-5). Of this total, 11% is designated for single family units, 50% is designated for row housing units, and 39% is designated for apartment units, (Figure 10-5). Subdivided land with a capacity of 715 remains to be serviced.
FIGURE 10-5
V) 600
(5822)
1--
2
SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN AND STEELE HEIGHTS 1979 - 1981
1 50
EJ
(5196)
apartment units row housing units
(4677) 2221
400
'Ingle family, semi-detached, duple. units
iJJ
g 300 . . . . . .
-
200
Lu 1- 100 0 1979
1980
.".•.•.'.•. .'.•.•.'.".
(936)
1981
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS
24% 34%
APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1919- 1981
58
TABLE 10-5
YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESDENTIAL LAND IN CLARE VIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS AND CASSELMAN IN EACH YEAR, 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN NEIGHBOURHOCOS
1981
1980
1979
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
CLAREVIEW BANNERMAN BELMONT FRAZER HAIRS1NE KERNOHAN KIRKNESS SIFTON PARK TOWN CENTRE
42 1 476 88 84 7 -
340 141 311 110 56 -
530 I 679 645 194 56 7 -
32 I 175 56 61 291 7 -
326 304 212 110 83 -
235 126 173 95 -
593 1 605 441 171 469 7-
32 I 88 44 43 86 7 -
263 498 108 100 173 110 56 -
793 1 196 317 153 142 7 -
CLAREVIEW TOTAL
698
1292 837
2827
623
1369
1010
3002
301
971
2324
HERMITAGE CANNON RIDGE HOMESTEADER OVERL ANDERS
123 82 4
667 94 659
249 49 207
1039 225 870
123 72 4
667 39 659
504 100 420
1294 211 1083
122 32 4
667 504 100 39 626 189
1293 171 819
HERMITAGE TOTAL
209
1420
505
2134
199
1365
1024
2588
158
1332 793
2283
CLARE VIEW. HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
58
177
-
235
55
177
-
232
54
16
-
70
-
-
-
-
STEELE HEIGHTS TOTAL
58
177
-
235
55
177
-
232
54
16
-
70
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN TOTAL
965
2889
1342
5196
877
2911
2034
5822
513
2319 1845
CASSELMAN TOTAL
STEELE HEIGHTS MCLEOD NEIGHBOURHOOD 2 NEIGHBOURHOOD 3 NEIGHBOURHOOD 5
148 62 246 -
1052
4677
59
-
•
C'
C:)
3
ON
0
0
.02••:: • aQ Vae.:
CN
■0
00 0
(.4
so
co
g15.
0 crl
3 8
0, •■1
•
P
.•.
z:
cr) 3 (1
7,=›0›
. • ." • . • . • . • . •
— M Cf) r— M M • < Z > i59>
5. 0 co 5%7 CD
m
e
c _ 0_
>
L.J
D0 I ON —1 0 • :7 (7,* CD C 0
O 1"; (1:11
r
m c >
Z. a, 3g 5-j igT.77 s
NJ
nnxx D. M M
I Z cn
w?•EL
— ae
-
F
CD • < —•
•
1861-6L6I
•
NJ
3
8
0
901 3 U1D1 A
POTENTIA L DWELLING UNITS NJ
I cn "
urzi
—•
-"-
> <
(7)
n ST1 z rT,
(i)
CA (01 CA
LCI D
CL
O 3 (1) • Fps.777 7
O
C
5' in a) A ru CD
Eli
all NIB SIN IMO IIIIIII
0_
10 -6 Residenti al Subdi vi si on Pl an R egi st rati on Acti vi ty
—I..
=II MO IN
TABLE 10-6
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS AND CASSELMAN IN EACH YEAR, 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELF HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN NEIGHBOURHOODS
1981
1980
1979
Apart. Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
-
163 27 -
126 64 55 -
126 306 55 27 -
31 26 -
-
-
31 26 -
79
190
245
514
57
-
-
57
-
-
255 51 213
255 51 213
519
519
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Total Units
CASSELMAN TOTAL
CLAREVIEW BANNERMAN BELMONT FRAZER HA1RSINE KERNOHAN KIRKNESS SIFTON PARK TOWN CENTRE
75 39 -
53 57 -
246 108 -
374 204 -
CLAREVIEW TOTAL
114
110
354
578
-
15
100 15
15
115
HERMITAGE CANNON RIDGE HOMESTEADER OVERLANDERS
HERMITAGE TOTAL
79 -
.
' . 100 -
100
,
-
■•■..
CLAREV1EW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELM AN NEIGHBOURHOCOS
Apart. Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
190
764
1033
57
STEELE HEIGHTS MCLEOD NEIGHBOURHOOD 2 NEIGHBOURHOOD 3 NEIGHBOURHOCO 5
STEELE HEIGHTS TOTAL
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN TOTAL
214
110
369
693
79
-
-
57
61
P 'r -
:
,
all MI MS SE NW 1111
INNI NM IN
CLAREVI EW, HERM ITAGE, STEELE H EI G HTS, AN D CASS ELMA N
r'-' -' r "‘' \ ' r.• r:r--, r:11 'Pr-176 • Tm'c :::L.:::-5--"', C6:--= ''--=--:tn H 1 ' •{,s', ' A,r 't' ,,. \`,"• ' 1 -. • :-_____.: • 1 - .1, : 1
NO 11111 ANIN GM
, .
_
Land Use District Codes
,
BUSINESS DISTRICT
AG
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
IB
INDUSTRIAL
AGU
URBAN RESERVE DISTRICT
IM
MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL
AGI
INDUSTRIAL RESERVE
111
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
A
METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT
AP
PUBLIC PARKS DISTRICT
US PU
URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT
MA
MUNICIPAL AIRPORT DISTRICT STATUTORY PLAN OVERLAY
DISTRICT
DISTRICT DISTRICT
RFI
SINGLE DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RF2
LOW
RPL
PLANNED LOT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RF3
LOW DENSITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
RF4
SEMI-DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RFS
ROW HOUSING DISTRICT
SPO
PRI
MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY DISTRICT
APO
AIRPORT PROTECTION OVERLAY
RAT
LOW RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
OCI
DIRECT DEVELOPMENT CONTROL DISTRICT I see beiowl
RAII
MEDIUM RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
DC?
COMPREHENSIVELY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TEMPORARY HOLDING DISTRICT
RMX
HIGH RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE DISTRICT
DC?
RAT
DC4
SPECIAL PUBLIC
.0.
Designalion applied to Corlininody rtousing sdos in accordance wilh Section 92 Land Use ark..
DENSITY
RR
RURAL
RYAN
MOBILE
INFILL
DISTRICT
'
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
SERVICE
•
DISTRICT
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT HOME
DISTRICT CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
CNC
NEIGHBOURHOOD
CSC
SHOPPING
CBI
LOW
CI32
GENERAL
CHY
HIGHWAY CORRIDOR DISTRICT
CO
COMMERCIAL
CMX
COMMERCIAL
CENTRE
INTENSITY
Designation applied to some RAT Weir . Land Use Bylaw in aecoidance with Section 2205.
•
DISTRICT
BUSINESS DISTRICT
BUSINESS
..
DISTRICT
OFFICE DISTRICT MIXED USE DISTRICT
;:: •
Limit ol Edmonton Municipal Airport ProteCtion Overlay Restricted Development Area IR.D. A.1 Desaynallon apphed to silos WW1 ailte ■ Od or speCilied with development tegulattons in accordance
Sechon 820. Land Use Bylaw DC1
Fu.
Inn uae pooviatuns ancl development coletla
lot DCI Dsaincls. please telet lu the Plan applicatne M. Retleretopment ot Aced SlluCtule
63
KASKITAYO AN D TWIN BROOKS
MI MN Ell IIIII Ell MIMI NM
NM
On NIB MI IIIII NM MI all
KASKITAYO AND TWIN BROOKS PLAN NEIGHBOURHOODS
A N
HIDDEN BROOK
66
11. KASKITAYO AND TWIN BROOKS 11 -1 Housing Stock At the end of 1981, Kaskitayo contained 6,902 dwelling units, (Table 11 -1). Of this total, 34% are single family units, 25% are row housing units, and 41% are apartment units, (Figure 11-1). Of the plan areas, Kaskitayo contains the highest proportion of apartment units. Twin Brooks has not yet been subdivided for residential use.
FIGURE II -I
TABLE 11-1
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS , IN KASKITAYO AND TWIN BROOKS TO DECEMBER 31, 1981
MIX OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS IN KASKITAYO DECEMBER 31, 1981
apartment units
NW
row housing units single family, semi-detached, duplex units
DWELLING UNITS APPROVED
KASKITAY0TWIN BROOKS NEIGHBOURHOCOS
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
KASKITAY0 BEARSPAW BLUE QUILL ERM1NESKIN KEHEEWIN SKYRATTLER STEINHAUER SWEET GRASS
95 645 319 195 132 548 436
34 381 185 144 421 211 371
12 1297 743 110 386 237
141 2323 1247 449 939 759 1044
KASKITAYO TOTAL
2370
1747
2785
TWIN BROOKS TOTAL
.
6902
NO PERMITS ISSUED
67
11 -2 Residential Building Permits
FIGURE 11-2
Kaskitayo had 593 dwelling units approved by building permit in 1981, (Table 11-2). Of this total, 28% were single family units, 53% were row housing units, and 19% were apartment units, (Figure 11-2). The amount of development in 1981 was less than development in 1980 and 1979.
(1069)
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED EACH YEAR IN KASKITAYO 1979 - 1981 =I apartment units
1000_
row housing units EMI single family, semi-detached, duplex units
DWELLING U NI TS A PPRO VED
39%
600_
(593)
. . . . . .
19% 400_
:••-• 27% • . . . . . .
200_ 41%,
68
1980
1981
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN KASKITAYO AND TWIN BROOKS IN EACH YEAR, 1979 - 1981 1979
1981
1980
KASKITAY0TWIN BROOKS NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
KASKITAYO EEARSPAW BLUE QUILL ERMINESKIN KEHEL WIN SKYRAT 1 LER STEINHAUER SWEE1 GRASS
4 168 26 47 53 25 4
100 13 204 -
269 156 -
4 268 295 60 413 25 4
61 116 14 73 38
KASKITAYO TOTAL
327
317
425
1069
TWIN BROOKS 10TAL
33%
33%
.•. • .'.•.• .•.• . •.• .• .•.• .•
1979.
TABLE II-2
(814)
(782)
800_
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
2
14 39 29 115 18
12 247 -
87 155 290 188 38 4 20
30 24 2 75 32 2 3
20 70 77 148
110 -
50 94 2 185 109 2 151
308
215
259
782
168
315
110
593
,
NO PERMITS ISSUED
.
Lk
NO PERMITS ISSUED
NO PERMITS ISSUED
FIGURE 11-3 SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAI LAND IN KASKITAYO 1979 - 1981 4500 1
11-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land At the end of 1981, Kaskitayo contained serviced land with a capacity of 4,385 additional dwelling units, (Table 11-3). Of this potential capacity, 24% is designated for single farnily units, 18% is designated for row housing units, and 58% is designated for apartrnent units, (Figure 11-3). The supply of serviced land, as measured by potential dwelling units, increased by 5% from the supply at the end of 1980. At land consumption rates over the period 1979 to 1981, there is a four-year supply of land for single family units, a three-year supply of land for row housing units, and a large supply of land for apartment units.
(4385)
POTENTI ALDW EL L INGUNI TS
(1,180) 58% 52%
3000
1500
-
apartment units
-
row housing units
Ezzi
single family. serni-detached. duplex units
(1922) 20% :::19%::
â&#x20AC;¢
(814)
, 48% 1979
TABLE 11 3 -
wrA 1980
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
1981
YEAR-END SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN KASKITAYO AND TWIN BROOKS, 1979 - 1981, (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1981
1980
I 979 KASKITAY0TWIN BROOKS NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
KASKITA YO bEARSPAW BLUE QUILL ERMINESKIN KEHEE W IN SKYRAT1 LER STEINHAUER SWEET GRASS
220 137 40 296 175 28 15
99 235 34 140 92 lb
105 156 59 73 -
424 372 230 495 340 28 33
479 170 72 223 127 24 14
255 113 191 44 170 -
167 1765 84 282 -
901 283 2028 351 579 24 14
467 163 70 268 61 22 11
236 75 190 74 194 -
167 1765 340 282 -
870 238 2025 682 537 22 11
KASKITAYO TOTAL
911
618
393
1922
1109
773
2298
4180
1062
769
2554
4385
TWIN BROOKS TOTAL
NO SERVICED LOTS
NO SERVICED LOTS
NO SERVICED LOTS
69
1 I -4 Residential Land Servicing Activity
FIGURE 11-4,
In Kaskitayo during 1981, land with a capacity of 658 dwelling units was serviced, (Table 11-4). Of this total, 19% is designated for single family units, 33% is designated for row housing units, and 48% is designated for apartrnent units, (Figure I 1-4).
RESIDENTIAL LAW SERVICING \ ACTIVITY IN KASKITAYO 1979 - 1981 (3318)
3000.
nPartment c=
(2615)
"2
2500..
units
row housing units
1Z2Z4 single family, semi-detached, duplex units
71%
26%
D "-- 2000 ......:•:•::
3
0 1500, _J 1.1z
1000 (814)
uJ
0 o_ 500_1
(658) 5
33%..
48%
'0;513"
TABLE 11-4
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN KASKITAYO AND TWIN BROOKS, 1979 - 1981, (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) •
1979 KASK ITAY0TWIN BROOKS
70
Apco- t. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
170 185 31 -
74 1856 193 256 -
582 169 2087 193 287 -
120 -
39 30 148
321 -
39 471 148
386
2379
3318
120
217
321
658
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
Row Single, Semi Duplex Units Units
KASKITAYO / BEARSPAW BLUE QUILL ERM1NESKIN KEHELWIN SKYRATTLER S1L_INHAUER SWEET GRASS
224 574 343 158 -
99 130 187 212 .
105 386 41 156 -
428 704 386 571 526 -
338 169 46 -
KASKITAYO 1 OTAL
1299
628
688
2615
553
NO SERVICED LOTS
1981
1980
KIGHBOURHOODS
TWIN BROOKS TOTAL
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - I 984
1981
1 980
1979
NO SERVICED LOTS
NO SERVICED LOTS
FIGURE 11 5 -
SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN KASKITAYO 1979- 1981
(4815)
5000 1..r)
apartment urn tz 1:::3 row housing units
(4385)
2 4000
(3658)
IZZ2] single family, semi-cktothed, duplex units
11-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land At the end of 1981, Kaskitayo contained vacant, subdivided land with a capacity of 4,385 dwelling units, (Table 11-5). Of this total, 24% is designated for single family units, 18% is designated for row housing units, and 58% is designated for apartment units, (Figure 11-5). This subdivided land is fully serviced.
3000 LU °
200
1 -* 7 Z 1000
(814) 133% 4% 1979
TABLE 11 5 -
1980
1981
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN KASKITAYO AND TWIN BROOKS, 1979 - 1981, (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1981
1980
1979 KASKITAY0TWIN BROOKS NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Duplex Uni ts
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
KASKITAYO BEARSPAW BLUE QUILL ERMINESKIN KEHEEWIN SKYRATTLER STEINHAUER SWEET GRASS
232 158 86 296 175 28 15
118 235 185 206 170 18
105 1396 83 152 -
455 393 1667 585 497 28 33
491 190 72 223 137 24 14
255 113 191 92 170 147
167 1765 227 282 -
913 303 2028 542 589 24 161
467 163 70 268 61 22 11
236 75 190 74 194 -
167 1765 340 282 -
870 238 2025 682 537 22 11
KASKITAYO TOTAL
990
932
1736
3658
1151
968
2696
4815
1062
769
2554
4385
TWIN BROOKS TOTAL
NO VACANT SUBDIVIDED LOTS
NO VACANT SUBDIVIDED LOTS
NO VACANT SUBDIVIDED LOTS
7
11-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity
FIGURE 11-6
During 1981, land with a capacity for 484 dwelling units was subdivided in Kaskitayo, (Table 11-6). Of this total, 120 or 25% are single family lots, 29% are designated for row housing units, and 46% for apartment units, (Figure 11-6); Most of the subdivision activity was located in the Keheewin neighbourhood. Subdivision of single family lots was down considerably from subdivision in 1980 and 1979. Twin Brooks has not yet been subdivided for residential use.
(3332)
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN KASKITAYO 1979- 1981
3000 apartment units Lr,
=I row havsing units EZZ:1 single family, semi-detactsed,ctuples units
z 2000 7.;
(1 734)
uj
I
D 1000
;
(814) ;:; / 2470 p 4 .
0
a_
(484) 46% 25%
1979
TABLE 11-6
72
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
1981
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN KASKITAYO AND TWIN BROOKS, 1979 - 1981, (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1981
1980
1979 KASKITAY0TWIN BROOKS NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
KASKITAY0 / BEARSPAW BLUE QUILL ERMINESKIN KEHEEWIN SKYRATTLER STEINHAUER SWEET GRASS
236 181 46 343 -
118 130 185 235 -
105 1628 83 42 -
KASKITAYO TOTAL
806
668
1858
TWIN BROOKS TOTAL
1 980
NO LOTS SUBDIVIDED
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
459 311 1859 661 42 .-
326 148 -
151 â&#x20AC;¢ 147
74 614 144 130 -
551 148 614 144 130 147
120 -
40 101 -
223 -. -
40 343 101 -
3332
474
298
962
1734
120
141
223
484
Total Units
NO LOTS SUEiDIVDED
NO LOTS SUBDIVIDED
KASKI TAYOAN DTWI NBROOKS
13
I
Z
MI IMO
IIIMI NMI INN
IIâ&#x20AC;¢11 INN IIIII MN MI NMI
g
Land Use District Codes BUSINESS DISTRICT
AG AOU
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
ID
INDUSTRIAL
MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL
AGI
URBAN RESERVE DISTRICT DISTRICT
IM
INDUSTRIAL RESERVE
IN
HEAVY
A
METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT
AP
PUBLIC PARKS DISTRICT
US PU
URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
11F1
SINGLE DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RF2
LOW
API
PLANNED LOT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RF3
LOW DENSITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
DENSITY
'WILL
DISTRICT
INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT DISTRICT
MUNICIPAL AIRPORT DISTRICT
SEMI-DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
MA
RF4 RFS
ROW HOUSING DISTRICT
SPO
STATUTORY PLAN OVERLAY
RF6
MEDIUM DENSITY MULT IPLE FAMILY DISTRICT
APO
AIRPORT PROTECTION OVERLAY
RAT
LOW RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
DIRECT DEVELOPMENT CONTROL DISTRICT Isee below/
RAIS
MEDIUM RISE . APARTMENT DISTRICT HIGH RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
DC1 0C2
COMPREHENSIVELY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
DC3 DC4
TEMPORARY HOLDING DISTRICT SPECIAL PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT
pp
Deeignelion soodied to
RA9 MAX
RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE DISTRICT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RR
RURAL
RMH
MOBILE
CNC CBI
NEIGHBOURHOOD CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT SHOPPING CENTRE DISTRICT LOW INTENSITY BUSINESS DISTRICT
CU
GENERAL
CHY
HIGHWAY CORRIDOR DISTRICT COMMERCIAL OFFICE DISTRICT COMMERCIAL MIXED USE DISTRICT
CSC
CO CMX
HOME DISTRICT
f
.1
BUSINESS
DISTRICT
4
;.;:`....,. . ' ;,,:' i r: •
DCI
Com...loony Housing sdes
•ccotdance with Seclion 92 Land Use Bylaw
Designalkm applied to some PAR sites in eecordence with Seclion 220.5. Land Use Bylaw Limit
1 1
of Edmonton Municipal Airport Protection Overlay
Restricted Development
Area I R. D. A. I
Designation applied lo sites with altered or specilied de-veloornent regulations M accordance with Secliow B20. Land Use Bylaw FOI
the use prowpons
and develonmen1 cote..
the Redevelopment m Alea
lot DC1 DmIncls. please Inlet to
aPohcable
AFea
SPuchne Plan.
1
12. TH E LA KEDISTRI CT
INN
um so ow r â&#x20AC;¢ In am am ow r mo =I we r
LAKE DISTRICT PLAN NEIGHBOURHOODS (Including the Dickinsfield - Londonderry Annex)
A N
76
12. THE LAKE DISTRICT 12-1 Residential Building Permits Only Logo Lindo neighbourhood has been subdivided and serviced. In this neighbourhood 289 dwelling units were approved by building permit, (Table 12-1). Of this total, 65% were single family units, and 35% were row housing units, (Figure 12-1).
FIGURE 12 1 -
TABLE 12-1 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN THE LAKE DISTRICT IN 1981
MIX OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS IN THE LAKE DISTRICT DECEMBER 31, 1981
I= apartment units VIM
row housing units
DWELLING UNITS APPROVED E=1 single family, semi-detached, duplex units
LAKE DISTRICT NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
289
BELLE RIVE CRYSTALLINA NERA EAUX CLAIRES JOVIZ KLARVATTEN LAGO LINDO MAYLIEWAN OZERNA SCHONSEE TOWN CENTRE
188 -
101
-
-
-
LAKE DISTRICT TOTAL
188
101
-
289
77
12-2 Supply of Serviced Residential Land At the end of 1981, Logo Lindo neighbourhood contained serviced land with a capacity of 758 dwelling units (Table 12-2). Of this total 91% is designated for single family units, and 9% for row housing units, (Figure 12-1).
SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN THE LAKE DISTRICT 1981
FIGURE 12-2
PO TENTI AL D W EL L ING UN I TS
800_,
(758) nonrtrnont units
700
r i• • • . • 1 row houtino units
czz
600
single lomily, sorni-rIntoched, duple, units
500 400 (289)
300 200 100
1981
TABLE 12-2
YEAR-END SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN THE LAKE DISTRICT, 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1981 Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
BELLE RIVE CRYSTALLINA NERA EAUX CLA1RES JO VIZ KLARVATTEN LAGO UNDO M AYLIEWAN OZERNA SCHONSEE TOWN CENTRE
687 -
_ 71 _
LAKE DISTRICT TOTAL
687
71
LAKE DISTRICT NEIGHBOURHOODS
78
DWELLING 1.11•1115 Al P1209111 IlY BUIL1f1141 -.1'ERMITS I 951
Apart. Units
Total Units
_ _
_ 758 _
758
12-3 Residential Land Servicing Activity Logo Lindo is the first neighbourFfood to be serviced in the Lake District. During 1981, land with a capacity of 1,047 units was serviced in Lago Lindo, (Table 12-3). Of this total, 84% is designated for single family units, and 16% is designated for row housing units, (Figure 12-3). FIGURE 12 3 -
RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN THE LAKE DISTRICT 1981 (1047)
1000 PO TENTIAL DWELL ING UNITS
â&#x20AC;¢
800
600
400
200
1981
TABLE 12 3 -
DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1981
RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN THE LAKE DISTRICT IN 1981 1981
LAKE DISTRICT NEIGHBOURHOODS BELLE RIVE CRYSTALLINA NERA EAUX CLAIRES JO VIZ KLARVATTEN LAGO UNDO MAYLIEWAN OZERNA SCHONSEE TOWN CENTRE LAKE DISTRICT TOTAL
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
875
172
1047
875
172
1047
12-4 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land At the end of 1981, Logo Lindo neighbourhood contained vacant, subdivided land with a capacity of 758 dwelling units, (Table 12-4). Of this total 91% is designated for single family units, and 9% is designated for row housing units, (Figure 12-4). This subdivided land is fully serviced. FIGURE 12-4
PO TENTI ALD WELL ING U NITS
800.
SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN THE LAKE DISTRICT 1980 - 1981 9%
(758) =I apartment units
600_i
row housing units I= single family. semi-detached. duplex units
(428) 400_, (289) 35%:•
200_1
1981
1980
TABLE 12-4
DWF.LLING UNITS APPROVED BY FitilLDING PERMITS 1981
YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN THE LAKE DISTRICT, 1980-1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1980 1981
LAKE DISTRICT Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Apart. Total NEIGHBOUR- Duplex Units Units Units Units Duplex Units Units Units Units HOCOS
80
BELLE RIVE CRYSTALLINA NERA EAUX CLAIRES JOVIZ KLARVATTEN L AGO LINDO MAYLIEWAN OZERNA SCHONSEE TOWN CENTRE
_ 385 _
.._.AKE DISTRICT iOTAL
385
43 -
_ _ 428 --_ _
687 -
43
-
428
687
.71
- . _ _ - • 758
71
-
758
12-5 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity Only Logo Lindo neighbourhood has been subdivided for residential use. During 1981, land with a capacity for 619 dwelling units was subdivided in this neighbourhood (Table 12-5). Of this total, 79% is designated for single family units, and 21% is designated for row housing units (Figure 12-5). The following is a list of neighbourhoods which have not yet been subdivided for residential use. Gross Hectares
Neighbourhood Name
305 180 170 257 370 252 272 310
Klarvatten Crystallina Nero Joviz Schonsee Ozerna Mayliewan Belle Rive Eaux Claires
FIGURE 12-5
PO TENTIAL DWELL ING UNITS
700_
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN THE LAKE DISTRICT 1980 - 1981 (619) :•:•
600_
400_
(428) 0 0%
Fri
300_
single family, semi-detached duplex units
200,
iocL 1981
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN THE LAKE DISTRICT, 1980-1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1981
1980
(289)
1980
-
apartment units row housing uni Is
500,
TABLE 12 5
DWELLING UNITS Al 'PROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1991
LAKE DISTRICT Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Apart. Total NEIGHBOUR- Duplex Units Units Units Units Duplex Units Units Units Units HOODS
BELLE RIVE CRYSTALLINA NERA EAUX CLAIRES J OVIZ KLARVATTEN LAGO UNDO .M AYLIEWAN OZERNA SCHONSEE TOWN CENTRE
LAKE DISTRICT TOTAL
-
-
-
-
490
-
428 -
129 -
-
619 -
-
428
490
129
-
619
-
-
-.
385 -
43 -
-
385
43
. -
-
81
JDINISICI 3NV1 5:
2
Z OAg
â&#x20AC;¢1
g
I
No
!
r
so no se no se
as sr se am
Land Use District Codes AG AOU
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
IS
INDUSTRIAL
URBAN RESERVE DISTRICT
IM
MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL
AGI
INDUSTRIAL RESERVE
IH
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
SINGLE DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
A
METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT
11F1
LOW
AP
PUBLIC PARKS DISTRICT
RF2 FIPL
PLANNED LOT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOW DENSITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
RF3
DENSITY
INFILL
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
BUSINESS DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT
DISTRICT
US
URBAN SERVICE
PU
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
SEMI-DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
MA
MUNICIPAL AIRPORT DISTRICT
RF4 RFS
ROW HOUSING DISTRICT
SPO
S1ATU TORy PLAN OVERLAY
RF6
mEDium DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY DISTRICT
APO
AIRPORT PROTECTION OVERLAY
RAT
LOW RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
11A8
MEDIUM RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
OCI
Rag
HIGH RISE
RU
RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE
RR
RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
ROAN
MOBILE
CNC
NEIGHBOURHOOD
CSC
SHOPPING
CBI
LOW
APARTMENT DISTRICT
HOME
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
INTENSITY
TEMPORARY
DC4
SPECIAL PUBLIC SERVICE
,,,.
Designclion applied lo Continciete monseig saes
GENERAL HIGHWAY
CMX
COMMERCIAL MIXED USE
BUSINESS
DISTRICT
. in c1cordance with Section 2205. Land Use BYlior
BUSINESS DISTRICT
CHY CO
HOLDING DISTRICT
Designation applied to some HAS ait•s
.
DISTRICT
CO2
DISTRICT
CORRIDOR DISTRICT
COMMERCIAL
OCT
in accoolanc• with S•Cli011 92 Land Use BO:.
CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
CENTRE
DC2
DIRECT DEVELOPMENT CONTROL DISTRICT (see below) COMPREHENSIVELY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
OFFICE DISTRICT DISTRICT
. Limit oil Edmonton Municipal Airport Protection Overlay
, :::-•2: •
DC.
Restlicted Development
Mee IS . O. A.1
Designation applied lo saes with alleted Le specilied development tegolotions el accoolance with Section 820. Land Use Bylaw fo• the use poo•...ons and dewerepreeni cpleps ler DCI Dosteel.. Plea , e lele.. 0 1110 applicable Area Rederelopmeni ui Aiec Sliectuie Pion.
83
M ILLWOO DS
MI MO IIIII OW MO Ile IIIIII OM ME OM all
NM
MN Mill ON
MILLWOODS PLAN NEIGHBOURHOODS
JACKSON HEIGHTS TWEEDLE PLACE
KINISKI GARDENS
GREENVIEW
MICHAELS PARK
FLYNN DELL RICHFIELD
LEE RIDGE
HILLVIEW MINCHAU
TIPASKAN
NAMEYOSEK
MILLWOOD,5 WEINLOS MEYONOHK
MILLWOODS PARK
DALY GROVE
MEYOKUMIN
MENISA
86
TOWN CENTRE
POLLARD MEADOWS
SATOO
BISSET
SAKAW
CRAWFORD PLAINS
13. MILL WOODS 13-I Housing Stock At the end of 1981, Mill Woods contained nearly 17,500 dwelling units, (Table 13-1). Of this total, 66% are single family units, 24% are row housing units, and 10% are apartment units, (Figure 13-1). Of the plan areas, Mill Woods has the largest number of dwelling units, and contains the highest proportion of single family units.
FIGURE 13-1 TABLE 13-1
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN MILL WOODS TO DECEMBER 31, 1981
apartment units
DWELLING UNITS APPROVED MCI
MILL WOODS NE IGHBOURHOCO S BISSET CRAWFORD PLAINS DALY GROVE EKOTA FLYNN DELL GREENVIEW H1LLVIEW JACKSON HEIGHTS KAMEYOSEK KINISKI GARDENS LEE FUDGE MENISA MEYOKUM IN MEYONOHK MICHAELS PARK MINCHAU POLLARD MEADOWS RICHFIELD SAKAW SATOO TAWA TIPISKAN TOWN CENTRE TWEEDLE PLACE W1ENLOS MILL WOODS TOTAL
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
1-3 1.1 557 552 560 662 703 277 594 508 699 543 506 450 552 622 597 639 781
561 420
90 123 141 262 124 246 379 405 76 224 525 170 61 106 411 226 212 201 199 -
11478
4181
411
Apart. Units
Total Units
153 157
374 823 755 927 878 1055 675 594 1036 789 779 1040 770 661 728 1142 883 1006 954 913 577
1700
17359
143 62 105 92 106 19 123 14 12 9 150 48 134 18 13 342
MIX OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS IN MILL WOODS DECEMBER 31, 1981
row housing units
1=3 single farnilh semi-detached, duplex units
87
13-2 Residential Building Permits
FIGURE 13-2
Mill Woods had 2,613 dwelling units approved by building permits in 1981, ,(Table 13-2). Of this total 71% were single family units, 20% were row housing units, and 9% were apartment units, (Figure 13-2). This proportion of housing types maintains the high proportion of single family dwelling units in Mill Woods. The amount of development in 1981 was considerably greater than development in 1980. and was similar to the level of development in 1979.
3000_
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED EACH YEAR IN MILL WOODS 1979 - 1981 apartment units
IZJ
G
2500.
row housing units
1220sinik family. Senn i-detoched, duplex units
0 cr
(26 13) 9%
(2320)
2000. 1—
Z
(I 7 99)
.•.•.•.•.•.
1 980
1981
DUI/ 1500
1000
—1 uJ
0
500
1979
TABLE 13-2
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN MILL WOODS IN EACH YEAR, 1979 - 1981 1979
88
1980
MILL WOODS NEIGHbOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
bISSE T CRAWFORD PLAINS DALY GROVE EKOTA FLYNN DELL GREENVIEW HILLVIEW JACKSON HEIGHTS KAMEYOSEK KINISKI GARDENS LEE RIDGE MENISA MEYOKUMIN MEYONOHK MICHAELS PARK MINCHAU POLLARD MEADOWS RIO-FIELD SAKAW SAT 00 TAWA TIPISKAN TOWN CENTRE TWEEDLE. PLACE W1ENLOS
242 261 -
74
132 118
64 66 75
316 261 248 184 93 190 6 158 248 45 493
MILL WOODS TOTAL
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVE) BY BUIUDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
18 6 53 69 45 493 1 224 5 23 1
1691
-
-
52 117 9 -
6131
178
73 105 170 -. 54 •
'
1981
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
• 28 156 202
141
142 62
28 298 405
256 149 89
5 12
67
5 79
28 22
_ _ 25 31 25 I 364 101
48 55
224 5 77 1 -
103 7 49
126
2550
1110
437
48
25 31 73 1 467 101
1
45
44
1 596 1 6 102 19
94
142 30
6 106
69
48
346 199 89
28 111 95 596 1 6 173 31
71 12
1
148 136 1 121 1
7
3
3
69
371
1799
1886
229
252
90 49
521
4
157
528
206
2613
FIGURE 13-3 SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN MILL WOODS 1979 - 1981 12000,
u.)
At the end of 1981, Mill Woods contained serviced land with a capacity of 10,535 additional dwelling units, (Table 13-3). Of this potential dwelling unit capacity, 29% is designated for single family units, 21% is designated for row housing units, and 50% is designated for apartment units, (Figure 13-3). The supply of serviced land, as measured by potential dwelling units, dropped 8% from the supply at the end of 1980. Of the plan areas, Mill Woods contains the largest supply of service0 land. At land consumption rates over the period 1979 to 1981, there is a two-year supply of land for single family units and a fouryear supply of land for row housing units. The supply of serviced land designated for apartment units in Mill Woods is considerable. This reflects the low level of apartment development in Mill Woods.
(11488) (10535)
10000
ap•Ornent units
45% D 8000_
I 3-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land
row housing units
I=1
50%
(7582)
r:=1 single family. duplex un i iIs
'Z 27%
-.I 6000 O --I 4000
•
•:
••
•
.1.. ...........1. : : .. .. : : :• •- • •
•
/.i ,.
1980
1981
-•
17-Z Lu 2000, 0 a_ 1979
TABLE 13-3
(2320)i 9%
m
24%. r67% AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
YEAR-END SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN MILL WOODS, 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
MILL WOODS NEIGHBOURHOODS BISSET CRAWFORD PLAINS DALY GROVE EKOTA FL YNN DELL GREENVIEW HILLVIEW JACKSON HEIGHTS KAMEYOSEK KINISKI GARDENS LEE RIDGE MENISA ME YOKUMIN ME YONOHK MICHAELS PARK MINCHAU POLLARD MEADOWS RICHFIELD SAKAW SAT 00 TAVVA TIPISKAN 1 OWN CENTRE ' TWEEDLE PLACE WIENLOS MILL WOODS TOTAL
Apart. Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units ' 680 481 12 120 KM 31 20 92 134 III 10 408 279 4 500 29 50 10 . , -
3019,
731 1 14 316 255 9 27 25 26 150 127 510 167 75 11 102 105 84 382 429 448 79 2 2 95159 73 _ -
2467
1981
1980
1979
2036
.
Total Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
1525 1052 ' 12 _ 156 159 _ 181 _ 20 219 811 197 112 597 1090 4 1027 33 145 _ 242 -
683 524 287 12 _ 115 96 35 20 67 103 86 10 349 178 3 397 29 43 10 758
268 115 251 27 24 _ 150 127 507 12 102 56 302 328 95 73 - 105
7582
3805
2542
—
Apart. Units 856 1175 387 18 - 51 _ 334 151 372 872 154 2 321 448
5141
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
1807 1814 925 12 160 171 _ 185 20 194 944 249 112 777 1352 3 879 31 138 404 1311
459 375 198 12 _ 87 76 _ 34 350 19 61 98 67 10 206 150 2 328 28 40 10 387
11488
2997
. ' .
856 178 115 1174 387 251 _ 27 • 18 261 24 _ _ 37 8 184 127 437 334 151 i 102 372 50 274 872 150 280 2 95 321 73 272 105
2184 5354
1493 1664 836 12 _ 132 361 _ 71 542 19 108 869 219 112 628 1296 2 758 30 135 404 764
10535
89
13-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity
RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN MILL WOODS 1979- 1981
FIGURE 13-4
In Mill Woods during 1981, land with a capacity of 1,691 dwelling units was serviced, (Table 13-4). Of this total, 63% is designated for single family units, 11% is designated for row housing units, and 26% is designated for apartment units, (Figure 13-4). Most of the servicing activity was located in Kiniski Gardens neighbourhood.
(5315)
PO TE NTI AL D W EL L I NG UNI TS
4500_ ED apartment units row housing units
1Z221
single family, seml-detached, duplex unite
3000 _ (2320) 9% (1691)
24%•:•
1500-. (
1085) 8%
■
767%7 /
( „, ,'„(„/ 68%/ / 1979
TABLE 13-4
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN MILL WOODS, 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1979
90
A
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979- 1981
1980
1980
MILL WOODS NE IGHESOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
BISSET CRAWFORD PLAINS DALY GROVE EK01 A FLYNN DELL GREENVIEW HILLVIEW JACKSON HEIGHTS KAMEYOSEK KINISK1 GARDENS LEE RIDGE MENISA MEYOKUMIN MEYONOHK MICHAELS PARK MINCHAU POLLARD MEADOWS RICHFIELD SAKAW SATO° TAWA T IP ISKAN TOWN CENTRE T WEEDLE PLACE
415 322 2 _ _
W1ENLOS
-
- . 66 8 2 181 _ -
34 26 20 9 _ -
415 356 26 66 8 22 2 190 _ -
MLL WOODS TOTAL
739
257
89
1085
.
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
711 . 4 305 49 807
1876
1981
Apart. ,Units
Total Units
-
856 586 224 9 26 167 76 315 443 75 162 _
1835 586 300 9 92 4 167 124 647 443 63 76 _ _ 162 807
500
2939
5315
268 76 66 48 27 14
1 _
-
,
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
32 • 944 97 -
1073
49 -
78
254 184 _ -
32 49 299 1136 97 78
180
438
1691
45 8 -
FIGURE 13-5
3-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land
SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN MILL WOODS 1979 - 1981
At the end of 1981, Mill Woods contained vacant, subdivided land with a capacity of 11,620 dwelling units, (Table 13-5). This was the largest supply of any plan area. Of this supply of subdivided land, 27% is designated for single family units, 20% is designated for row housing units, and 53% is designated for apartment units, (Figure 13-5). Subdivided land with a capacity of 1,085 dwelling units remains to be serviced.
I= apartment units
14000_
row housing units
(13030)
single family, semi.ktached, duplex wits
12000_
(11620)
2 10000_ 47%
(8640)
_J
8000_I
53%
28%
Iii
§ 6000J
-J
4000_
. ......... -.•.•32%•.' %. •..•..:.:.:.•..• /
..-.-.•.-.-. . . ....... -••••• ---••-.-.-...•.•.•. //A
.-.-.-.•.•:•:
■ ••••/ ,/ •
(2320),6%
w 2000 0 o_
/4fiX/x) .
1979
TABLE 13-5
1980
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
1 981
YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN MILL WOODS, 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1979
1981
1980
MILL WOODS NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Unils
Total Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
BISSLT CRAWFORD PLAINS DALY GROVE EKOTA FLYNN DELL GREENV1EW HILLVIEW JACKSON HEIGHTS KAMEYOSEK KINISKI GARDENS LEE RIDGE MENISA MEYOKUM IN MEYONOHK MICHAELS PARK MI1NCHAU POLLARD MEADOWS RICHFIELD SAKAW SATOO TAWA TIPISKAN
683 524 287 12 115 105 35 249 20 67 103
268
73 105
856 ' 1175 387 18 724 113 334 249 443 872 154 2 321 448
1807 1814 925 12
TWEEDLE PLACE WIENLOS
61:10 489 lk I20 117 31 92 134 111 787 279 4 500 29 59 10 -
234 965 185 362 20 194 945 347 112 951 1352 3 879 31 138 404 1350
459 375 198 12 87 85 34 350 19 61 98 67 10 309 150 2 328 28 40 10 426
MILL WOODS TOTAL
3454
2729
6096
13030
3148
,
191 316 27 204 150 127 510 59 102 84 382 448 95 73 -
731 255 9 358 167 114 105 429 79 2 159 -
1602 1060 12 156 679 181 -, 219 811 294 102 976 1090 4 1027 31 154 242 -
2768
2418
8640
86
'TOWNCER
10 452 178 3 397 29 43 10 797
4205
115 251 101 136 150 127 508 12 102 56 302 328 95
.
.
178 856 1174 115 251 387 101 18 91 680 37 184 8 127 437 334 249 1 102 443 50 1077 274 280 150 2 95 321 73 272 105
1493 1664 836 12
2325 6147
11620
206 856 71 542 19 188 869 317 112 802 1501 2 758 30 135 404 803
91
13-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity
FIGURE 13-6
During 1981, land with a capacity for 1,270 dwelling units was subdivided in Mill Woods, (Table 13-6). Of this total, 824, or 66% are single family lots, 10% are designated for row housing units, and 24% for apartment units, (Figure 13-6). Most of the subdivision activity was located in Kiniski Gardens neighbourhood. Subdivision of single family lots was up considerably from subdivision in 1980. The following neighbourhoods have not yet been subdivided for residential use: Jackson Heights, Flynn Dell, Minchau and Tawa.
RESIDENTIAL SUeDIVISION REGISTRATION' ACTIVITY IN MILL WOODS 1979 -1981 (2957)
3000_
POTENTIAL D W ELL INGUN I TS
row housing units single family, serni-cieloched, duplex units
2500_
BISSET CRAWFORD PLAINS DALY GROVE EKOTA FLYNN DELL GREENVIEW H1LLVIEW JACKSON HEIGHTS KAMEYOSEK KINISKI GARDENS LEE RIDGE MENISA MEYOKUMIN MEYONOHK MICHAELS PARK MINCHAU POLLARD MEADOWS RICHFIELD SAKAW SATOO TAWA TIPISKAN TOWN CENTRE TWEEDLE PLACE WIENLOS
MILL WOODS TOTAL
92
.•.•.•.•.•.
24%•: 1500_ (1270) 24% .:10%:.
(1165) 21( 101
1000
7%
,
619-6/
Ltm/A
V A AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
1981
1 980
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN MILL WOODS, 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
-
2
832
1981
1980
1979
MILL WOODS NEIGHBOURHOODS
(2320) 9%
77%
2000.
1979
TABLE 13-6
ma. tment uni t.
-
4 _ -
_ _ 84 -
235 -
Total Units
4 -
2 1151 -
Apart. Units
Totol Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
76
586 194
586 270
32 -
49 -
-
32 49 -
-
9 366
9 366 _
_ _ -
113
808
Row Single, Semi Duplex Units Units
-
249 29 49 -
8 _ 27 69 -
71 167 125 248 443 75 -
162
834
92
239
1165
331
342
328 167 125 304 443 49 144 -
695
97
_ 1
-
_ -
78
_ _ 205
824
128
318
97 1
283
1270
162
2284
2957
_Jo _Jo
MN WIN MB NM WI 1111 11111 INN NM UN NM INS NM IN INN
Land Use District Codes AG
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT .
18
INDUSTRIAL
AOU
URBAN RESERVE DISTRICT
IM
MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL
AGI
INDUSTRIAL RESERVE
IN
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
A
METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT
AP
PUBLIC PARKS DISTRICT
US PU
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
MA
MUNICIPAL AIRPORT DISTRICT
SPO
STATUTORY PLAN OVERLAY
APO
AIRPORT PROTECTION OVERLAY
DISTRICT
RFI
SINGLE DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RF2 RPL
LOW DENSITY INFILL DISTRICT PLANNED LOT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RF3
LOW DENSITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
RF4
SEMI-DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RFS RFT{
ROW HOUSING DISTRICT MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY DISTRICT
RAT
LOW RISE
RAll
MEDIUM RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
RAN
HIGH RISE
BMX
RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE
RR
RURAL
R4114
MOBILE
CNC CSC C8I CB2 CHY CO CMX
APARTMENT DISTRICT APARTMENT DISTRICT
RESIDENTIAL HOME
DISTRICT
URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT
•
DCI
DIRECT DEVELOPMENT CONTROL DISTRICT (see beim./
EIC2
COMPREHENSIVELY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
0C3
TEMPORARY HOLDING DISTRICT SPECIAL PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT
DC4
CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
DISTRICT
Designalion appli•d ID Conuntnelv 140nSulg SIMS in accordance with Section 92 Land Usc Rylaw
ty.
A
Designation applied lo some NAB sites In Trecordance with Section 2205. . Land Use BYlavr
DISTRICT
LOW INTENSITY BUSINESS DISTRICT DISTRICT GENERAL BUSINESS HIGHWAY CORRIDOR DISTRICT COMMERCIAL OFFICE DISTRICT COMMERCIAL MIXED USE DISTRICT
Limit ol Edmonton Municipal Aeport Protection Overlay Restricted Developmenl
:- :ii •
Area I R.D. At
Designation applied to sites 0,11., Mimed or specified wall del,Ipprnen1 regulations in accordance Seclion 020. Land Use Bylaw
OCI
For
Ihe use plovisodns and develo,nen1 cIder.a One IP. DCI Dysl"cls. please ,elet lo aPramable
91
DISTRICT DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
NEIGHBOURHOOD SHOPPING CENTRE
BUSINESS DISTRICT
Area Redevelopmenr m Aiev Suuclure
Plan
PI LOTSOU N D
MN NIP NM ON 11.11 MN ON MN NM NMI NM MI MN IN IN
S0001-11:1110EIHD13N NV1dcNnos 1011 d
Ile 1111 NM ON UM
le ille
NS Ile Se MN MI MS Se
ell
14. PILOT SOUND 14-1 Residential Land Supply At the end of 1981, no residential plans of subdivision had been approved for the Pilot Sound area structure plan area. Under the plan, two Pilot Sound neighbourhoods, Cy Becker and Gorman are designated for light industrial use. The other five neighbourhoods are to be residential. The following is a list of residential neighbourhoods indicating the number of gross hectares in each. Neighbourhood Name
Brintnell Hollick-Kenyon Matt Berry McConachie North Saw le
â&#x20AC;˘
Gross Hectares
122 95 110 103 120
97
PILOT SOUND
I. 1 1
AC.
lest
moires
98
I..
-72=1-416-
N
•1
Land Use District Codes AG AOU AGI
BUSINESS DISTRICT
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
IB
INDUSTRIAL
URBAN RESERVE DISTRICT INDUSTRIAL RESERVE DISTRICT
IM
MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL
Ili
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
A
METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT
AP
PUBLIC PARKS DISTRICT
RF1
SINGLE DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RF2
LOW
RPL RF3
PLANNED LOT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
DENSITY
INFILL
DISTRICT
LOW DENSITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
DISTRICT DISTRICT
US
URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT
PU
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT AIRPORT DISTRICT
MA
MUNICIPAL
RF4
SEMI-DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RFS
ROW HOUSING DISTRICT
SPO
STATUTORY PLAN OVERLAY
RFT/
MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY DISTRICT
APO
AIRPORT PROTECTION OVERLAY
RAT
LOW RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
OCT
DIRECT DEVELOPMENT CONTROL DISTRICT Ise. oalowl
RAll
MEDIUM RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT HIGH RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
0C2
RA9
0C3
COMPREHENSIVELY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TEMPORARY HOLDING DISTRICT
RMX
RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE
DC4
SPECIAL PUBLIC SERVICE
RR
RURAL RESIDENTIAL
RIAH
MOBILE
.u.
Designation applied to Commundy Housing sites in acconlance with Section 97 Land Usu BY. ,
CRC
NEIGHBOURHOOD
CSC
SHOPPING
C81
LOW
CL32
GENERAL
. CHY
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
•
HOME DISTRICT CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
*
CENTRE DISTRICT INTENSITY BUSINESS DISTRICT
HIGHWAY
BUSINESS CORRIDOR
CO
COMMERCIAL
OFFICE
C61/I
COMMERCIAL
MIXED
DISTRICT USE
DISTRICT
Designalion applied to some RA8 sites in aecordance with Section 2205. . Land Use BYlaw Lirnit ol Echnonlcm Municipal Aupoil ProteCtion Ovetlay
DISTRICT DISTRICT
DISTRICT
•. •
•• •-
Restricted Development Area IR.D. Al applied to sites with altered 0, specified development regulahons in accordance with Seclion 820. Land Use Bylaw
OeSig.1.11
• DC I
Fa/ the Lae 'Novae.. and devetoPmen , for DCI OISIUCIS. please ielei tu he applicable AI ea Redevelopment m AM,.
m. 505 5 4 St ioctuse Pt...
99
15. RIVERBEN D
MN SO MO MI IMP MN OW NMI MINI INN NM MN IIIII all MIN
RIVERBEND PLAN NEIGHBOURHOODS FORT EDMONTON PARK
BRANDER GARDENS ,,
BROOKSIDE
TERWILLEGAR PARK
RAMSAY HEIGHTS
RIVERBEND BULYEA HEIGHTS RHATIGAN RIDGE HENDERSON , ESTATE
FALCONER HEIGHTS
CARTER CREST
102
OGILVIE RIDGE
15. RIVERBEND 15-1 Housing Stock At the end of 1981, Riverbend contained 2,670 dwelling units, (Table I5-1). Of this total, 48% are single family units, 18% are row housing units, and 34% are apartment units, (Figure 15-1). â&#x20AC;¢
FIGURE 15 - 1
MIX OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS IN RIVERBEND DECEMBER 31. 1981
I= apartment units
MR
row housing units
EZZI single family, semi-detached duplex units
TABLE 15-1
RIVERBEND NEIGHBOURHOODS
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN RIVERBEND TO DECEMBER 31, 1981 Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
BRANDER GARDENS
277
319
781
1377
BROOKSIDE
577
84
45
706
I
-
-
1
BULYEA HEIGHTS FALCONER HEIGHTS HENDERSON ESTATE NEIGHBOURHOOD 9 OGILVIE RIDGE
-.
-
-
-
RAM SAY HEIGHTS
268
77
80
425
RHATIGAN RIDGE
161
-
-
161
RIVERBEND TOTAL
1284
480
906
2670
103
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED EACH YEAR IN RIVERBEND 1979- 1981 (251;) apartment units
FIGURE 15-2
15-2 Residential Building Permits Riverbend had 254 dwelling units approved by building permit in 1981, (Table 15-2). Of this total, 85% were single family units, and 15% were row housing units, (Figure 15-2). Nearly all of this development occurred in Ramsay Heights and Rhatigan Ridge neighbourhoods.
=I row housing units
1:Z221
single family, semi-detoched, duplex units
1 980
1979
TABLE 15-2
Apart. Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units
1981
1980
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
BRANDER GARDENS BROOKSIDE
-
-
BULYEA HEIGHTS
-
-
FALCONER HEIGHTS
1
-
HENDERSON ESTATE
-
NEIGHBOURHOOD 9
-
OGIL VIE RIDGE
-
-
RAMSAY HEIGHTS
120
40
160
94
94
RHATIGAN RIDGE
RIVERBEND TOTAL
104
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN RIVERBEND IN EACH YEAR, 1979- 1981 1979
RIVERBEND NEIGHBOURHOODS
1981
55
92
37
161
161
120
40
160
94
94
!l7
37
-
254
FIGURE 15-3 SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN RIVERBEND 1979 - 1981
15-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land At the end of 1981, Riverbend contained serviced land with a capacity of 1,398 additional dwelling units, (Table 15-3). Of this potential capacity, 72% is designated . for single family units, 23% is designated for row housing units, and 5% is designated for apartment units, (Figure 15-3). The supply of serviced land, as measured by potential dwelling units, increased nearly threefold from the supply at the end of 1980. At land consumption rates over the period 1979 to 1981, there is a seven-year supply of serviced land for single family units.
( I 398)
apartment units t.f) E:=) row hawing unit.
Z; 1200H 022
-J
single family, semi-detached, duplex units
1000.1 800,
-J
< 600J RZ tu 400]
(527)
(506) 7%
0
(169)
200]
15% Z9 / CX)
1979
1980
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
1981
TABLE 15-3 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN RIVERBEND 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1979
IVERBEND NEIGHBOURHOODS ' BF ANDER GARDENS
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units •
1981
1980
Total Units
.
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Single, Serni Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
13
-
-
13
13
-
-
13
13
-
-
13
BROOKSIDE
4
-
-
4
4
-
-
4
4
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
363
115
BULYEA HEIGHTS
-
-
-
-
FALCONER HEIGHTS
-
-
-
-
HENDERSON ESTATE,
-
-
-
-
NEIGHBOURHOOD 9
-
-
-
•
-
-
OGILVIE RIDGE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
RAMSAY HEIGHTS
328
147
35
510
273
147
69
489
RHATIGAN RIDGE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
RIVERBEND TOTAL
345
147
35
527
290
147
69
478
-
-
401
110 69
580
-
222
101
-
323
506
1003
326
69
1398
•
-
- .
105
15-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity
FIGURE 15-4
In Riverbend during 1981, land with a capacity of 1,145 dwelling units was serviced, (Table 15-4). Of this total, 81% is designated for single family units, and 19% is designated for row housing units, (Figure 15-4). Servicing activity in 1981 was considerably higher than servicing levels for 1980 and 1979.
RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN RIVERBEND 1979 - 1981
1979
TABLE 15-4
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN RIVERBEN) 1979- 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1979
R1VERBEND NE IGHBOURHOCO S
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979- 1981
1981
1980
1980
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
1981
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single. Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
BRANDER GARDENS BROOKSIDE BULYEA HEIGHTS FALCONER HEIGHTS HE143ERSON ESTATE
364
115
-
479
182
-
-
1 82
383
101
-
484
929
216
-
1145
NEIGHBOURHOCO 9 OGILVIE RIDGE RAMSAY HEIGHTS
448
187
34
669
39
RHATIGAN RIDGE
RIVERBEN:3 TOTAL
106
448
187
34
669
39
39
FIGURE 15-5
1979
TABLE 15-5
SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAI\D IN RIVERBEND 1979- 1981
At the end of 1981, Riverbend contained vacant, subdivided land with a capacity of 1,398 dwelling units, (Table 15-5). Of this total, 72% is designated for single family units, 23% is designated for row housing units, and 5% is designated for apartment units, (Figure 15-5). This subdivided land is fully serviced.
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1919- 1981
1981
1980
15-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land
YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN RIVERBEND, 1979- 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1981
1980
1979
RIVERBEND NEIGHBOURHOCOS
Apart. Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units
BRANDER GARDENS
13
Total Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
-
-
13
13
-
-
13
13
-
-
13
4
-
-
4
4
-
-
4
4
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
FALCONER HEIGHTS
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
HENDERSON ESTATE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
363
115 -
478
NEIGHBOURHOOD 9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
OGIL VIE RIDGE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
RAMSAY HEIGHTS
360
147
35
542
273
147
69
489
401
110 69
580
RHATIGAN RIDGE
-
-
-
-
356
101
-
457
222
101
323
R1VERBEND TOTAL
377
147
35
559
646
248
69
963
1003
326 69
BROOKSIDE BULYEA HEIGHTS
-
-
-
1398
107
15-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity
FIGURE 15-6
In Riverbend during 1981, an amount of land with a capacity for 688 dwelling units was subdivided (Table 15-6). Of this total, 573, or 83% are single family lots (Figure 15-6). Most of the subdivision activity was located in Henderson Estate neighbourhood. Subdivision activity in 1981 was considerably higher than subdivision in 1980 and 1979. The following neighbourhoods have not yet been subdivided for residential use: Bulyea Heights, Falconer Heights and Neighbourhood 9.
tr)
700 600_1
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN R1VERBEND 1979- 1981
-
aperrtment units
-
row housing units
(688)
IZZ2I single family, semi-detached, duplex units
0 • 500_
(498)
_J
•
400_
.J
•
300_
iu 200_1 -a
(169)
nnnnn
V 85`,6
100-1
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING WITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
1981
TABLE 15-6 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN RIVERBEND,
1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
1 R IVERBEND NEIGHBOURHOODS
1981
1980
1979
Total Units
Row Single, Semi Duplex Units Units
-
-
-
-
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
Apart. Units
Total lkiits
_
_
-
-
-
-
364
115 -
479
BRANDER GARDENS BROOKSIDE BULYEA HEIGHTS FALCONER HEIGHTS
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
-
NEIGHBOURHOOD 9
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
-
-
_
-
-
OGILVIE RIDGE
-
-
-
-
-
_
_
-
-
-
_
-
RAMSAY HEIGHTS
26
-
-
26
7
-
34
41
182
-
-
182
RHATIGAN RIDGE
-
-
-
-
356
101
-
457
27
-
-
27
RIVERBEIND TOTAL
26
26
363
101
34
498
573
115
-
688
HENDERSON ESTATE
108
-
MINI MI Mil SIM 111111 INN NM NIP OM MN ME Ell INN all IIIIII
Land Use District Codes AG
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
IB
INDUSTRIAL
ADU
URBAN RESERVE DISTRICT
IM
MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL RESERVE DISTRICT
IH
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
A
METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT
AGI
BUSINESS DISTRICT DISTRICT
RF1
SINGLE DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RF2
LOW
RPL
PLANNED LOT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RF3
LOW DENSITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
RF4
SEMI-DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RF5
ROW HOUSING DISTRICT
RFI3
MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY DISTRICT
APO
AIRPORT PROTECTION OVERLAY
RAY
LOW RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
DC1
DIRECT DEVELOPMENT CONTROL DISTRICT (see beim,'
RAII
MEDIUM RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
OCT
COMPREHENSIVELY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
RA9
HIGH RISE
TEMPORARY
RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE
OCT
WA% RR
RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RMH
MOBILE
CNC
NEIGHBOURHOOD
CSC
SHOPPING CENTRE
DENSITY
!WILL
DISTRICT
APARTMENT DISTRICT DISTRICT
AP
PUBLIC PARKS DISTRICT
US
URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT
PU
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
MA
MUNICIPAL AIRPORT DISTRICT
SPO
STATUTORY PLAN OVERLAY
SPECIAL PUBLIC SERVICE
DC4
DISTRICT
Designalion applied to Community Housing sites
or
HOME DISTRICT
DISTRICT
HOLDING DISTRICT
in accordance with Section 92 Land Use Bylaw
INTENSITY
CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
*
CBI
LOW
CB2
GENERAL
CHV
HIGHWAY
CO -
COMMERCIAL
OFFICE DISTRICT
CMX
COMMERCIAL
MIXED USE
BUSINESS
in oeciudance with Section 220-5, Land Use Bylaw . , Limit ol Edmonton Municipal Airport Protection Overlay
DISTRICT
CORRIDOR DISTRICT
DISTRICT
:-,: i','
•
DC1
HO
D•signalion applied lo sorne BAR sites
DISTRICT
BUSINESS DISTRICT
Restricted Development Area I R. D. A. I Designation applied to sites with altered or specilied development regulations an accordance with Section 820. Land Use Bylaw For the use movisions and development cuire((a to. DCI Disoicls. Pease ielei to the apphcable Area Redevetopment or Area Structure Plan
WEST JASPERPLAC E
OM =I SW INN NM NM OM OW OM
1E11 IIIII
IIIII MN
-
NJ
WEDGEWOOD HEIGHTS_...---- ■
ii JAMIESON / I PLACE
m gThw 0 —I Z
c_
i m
%1
ri
>
OP-
-
0
---C(j
g
M SI 17 DO i F--)
A 8 *
!›.
0
0 r-
m
cn
m
Z0 0 1> 1' -1 IIZ LD *
80
16. WEST JASPER PLACE 16- I Housing Stock At the end of 1981, West Jasper Place contained 11,048 dwelling units, (Table 16-1). Of this total, 38% are single family units, 30% are row housing units, and 32% are apartment units, (Figure 16-1).
FIGURE 16-1
MIX OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS IN WEST JASPER PLACE DECEMBER 31, 1981
apartment units
rem TABLE 16-1
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN WEST JASPER PLACE TO DECEMBER 31, 1981
row housing units
12= single family, semi-detached duplex units
DWELLING UNITS APPROVED WEST JASPER PLACE NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Duplex Units
ALDERGROVE BELMEAD CALLINGWOOD DECHENE . DONSDALE GARIEPY JAMIESON PLACE LA PERLE LYMBURN OLESKIW ORMSBY PLACE SUMMERLEA TERRA LOSA THORNCLIFF WEDGE WOO HEIGHTS WESTRIDGE
535 533 128 14 411 44 452 450 165 415 206 413 394
440 330
4160
WEST JASPER PLACE TOTAL
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
18
383 233 1580 32 412 152 321 438 15
1286 1336 1854 14 622 44 1304 932 165 1312 415 1337 427
3322
3566
11048
368 . 570 146 179
576 209 486
113
-
-
16-2 Residential Building Permits
FIGURE 16-2
'Nest Jasper Place had 1,217 dwelling units approved by building permit in 1981, (Table 16-2). Of this total, 40% were single family units, 28% were row housing units and 32% were apartment units, (Figure 16-2). Most of the development in 1981 occurred in Callingwood and La Perle neighbourhoods. Residential development in 1981, particularly of apartment units, was considerably greater than development in 1980 and 1979.
1400
9> 1200 0 cc 0- 1000
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED EACH YEAR IN WEST JASPER PLACE 1979 - 1981
-
apartment units
-
single family, semi-detached, duplex units
(121 7 )
row housing units
32% (8 8 8)
800 600
(76 3) 1 2%
(683) 10%
.... . . ..
.:.:.:
,
r
.0
uJ
.rA /17169
7y;
0 200 (4696
.4 1980
1979
114
1981
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN WEST JASPER PLACE IN EACH YEAR, 1979 - 1981 1979
1980
WEST JASPER PLACE NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
ALDERGROVE BEL MEAD CALL INGWOOD DECHENE DONSDALE GARIEPY JAMIESON PLACE LA PERLE LYMbURN OLESKIW ORMSBY PLACE SUMMERLEA TERRA LOSA 1 HOliNCLIFF WEDGE WOOD HEIGHTS WEST RIDGE
10 -
WES1 JASPER PLACE TOTAL
.:.:.:
..*: " ..". " .'...*
:5 _j 400
TABLE 16-2
21%
.
_ 49
108 12 42 92 22 24
17
1 15 36 12
54
87
-
299
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
10
2
Apart. Units
71
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
2 18
18
3
313
Total Units
1981
66 14
501 14
15 241
10 44 340 17 9 9 42
10 44 456 73 9 42 65
5
3
763
488
109
223
140
14
102 54 92 22 111
88 29 15 15 142
102
3
5
683
436
154 94
99
233
94
284 29 15
392
116 56 33 23
3
337
392
1217
SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN WEST JASPER PLACE'S 1979 - 1981
FIGURE 16 - 3
(55 50) (5052) 4500 56%
apartment mita
PO TENTI AL D WELL ING U N ITS
54%
row housing units
(36 06)
single family. semi-detached. duplex units
37%
3000
16 - 3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land
At the end of 1981, West Jasper Place contained serviced land with a capacity of 5,052 additional dwelling units, (Table 16-3). Of this potential capacity, 29% is designated for single family units, 17% is designated for row housing units and 54% is designated for apartment units, (Figure 16-3). The supply of serviced land, as measured by potential dwelling units decreased 9% from the supply at the end of 1980. At land consumption rates over the period 1979 to 1981, there is a 3.5-year supply of land for single family units, and a three-year supply of land for row housing units. There is a considerable supply of land for apartment units.
• 17% .•. . . . •.•' 1500 ••••••••••••
rr/O
29%
(888)
A 1979
1980
21%
•: 33%:. r 46% AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
1981
TABLE 16 - 3 YEAR - END SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN WEST JASPER PLACE, 1979 - 1981,
(MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1981
1980
1979 Total Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
80 636 77 325 23 186 -
148 9 782 283 570 200 945 130 449 18 72
77 9 129 111 66 506 82 188 59 114 18
39 - . 146 60 236 89 417 33 23 ...
37
30
163 2277 325 23 293 -
279 9 2423 129 171 66 742 171 930 115 430 18 67
77 9 195 101 86 543 65 179 50 96 18 60
39 18 146 60 120 33 417 24 30
163 1776 325 23 399 -
279 27 1922 195 161 86 663 98 921 73 519 18 90
1327
3606
1396
1073
3081
5550
1479
887 2686
5052
WEST JASPER PLACE NEIGHBOURHOODS
Apart. Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units
ALDERGROVE bELMEAD CALL INGWOOD DECHENE DONSDALE GARIEPY JAMIESON PLACE LA PERLE L V MBURN OLESKIW ORMSbY PLACE SUMMERLEA TERRA LUSA THORNCLIFF WEDGEWOOD HEIGHTS WESTRIDGE
55 9 251 223 111 203 74 240 18 42
13 146 32 270 89 417 33 23 30
WEST JASPER PLACE TOTAL
1226
1053
115
16- 1i Residential Land Servicing Activity
FIGURE 16-4
During 1981, land with a capacity of 729 dwelling units was serviced in West Jasper Place, (Table 16-4). Of this total, 80% is designated for single family units, 6% is designated for row housing units, and 14% is designated for apartment units, (Figure 16-4).
RESIDENTIAL LAD SERVICING ACTIVITY IN WEST JASPER PLACE 1979 - 1981
(1476) 1400 lc_r> 1200.1
apartment units
30%
=I row housing units EZZI single family, semi-detached, duplex units
(1032)
D 1000
(888) -71 800
.•.•.-.-...• .•.-.•
—J
(729) ,4‘,0
0 600
1110CNXI 6%
—J 1--
400
LL1
80%
1— 200 0
a_
1979
1980
1 981
AVERAGE ANNI AL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED RY BUILDING PERMITS
1979 - 1981
TABLE 16-4
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN WEST JASPER PLACE, 1979 - 1981, (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1979
116
1980
1981
WEST JASPER PLACE NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apcn- t. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
ALDERGROVE LEL MLAD CALLINGWOOD DECHENE UONSDALE GARIEPY JAMIESON PLACE LA PERLE LYMBURN OLESKIW ORMSBY PLACE SUMMERLEA TEI (RA LOSA THOF2NCLIFF WEDGEWOOD HEIGHTS WESTR1DGE
-
110 -
302 424 190 560 -
26 129 49 371 16 -
25 42 68 99 -
83 17 107 -
134 129 42 49 456 222 -
-
253 235 69 264 -
131 121 186 -
WEST JASPER PLACE TOTAL
821
217
438
1476
591
234
207
1032
49 -
se
24 -
106 -
18 80 64 389 152 26
42
106
729
18
oo 64 389 22 26
581
-
-
-
FIGURE 16 - 5
SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN WEST JASPER PLACE 1979 - 1981
PO TENTIALD W ELL I NGUNI TS
(6458) (6222
6000
(5865) 5000
= want-nes-It units
55%
51%
row housing units
12r22 46%
4000 3000
single family, semi-detached, duplex units
16-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land At the end of 1981, 'Nest Jasper Place contained vacant, subdivided land with a capacity of 5,865 dwelling units (Table 16-5). Of this total, 39% is designated for single family units, 15% is designated for' row housing units, and 46% is designated for apartment units, (Figure 16-5). Subdivided land with a capacity of 813 dwelling units remains to be serviced.
.•.•.•.•.•.• .•.•.•.•.'.•
2000 1000
A‘
1979
TABLE 16 - 5
1980
(888)
?' z
21%
F9 /1.16%
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED I3Y BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
1981
YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN WEST JASPER PLACE, 1979 - 1981, (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1979
1980
1981
WEST JASPER PLACE NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units •
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
ALDERGROVE BELMEAD CALL INGWOOD DECHENE DONSDALE GAR1EPY JAMIESON PLACE LA PERLE LYMBURN OLESKIW ORMSBY PLACE SUMMERLEA TERRA LOSA THORNCLIFF WEDGEWOOD HEIGHTS TS WESTRIDGE
55 9 251 549 111 203 74 309 18 42
148 9 3173 283 962 200 945 130 518 18
77 9
72
210 III 235 866 82 188 68 167 18 37
39 146 60 236 89 417 33 23 30
163 2277 325 23 293 --
279 9 2423 210 171 235 1102 171 930 124 483 18 67
77 9 195 101 191 960 313 179 59 130 18 60
WEST JASPER PLACE TOTAL
1621
6458
2068
1073
3081
6222
13 146 32 336
80 3027 77
89
-
417 33 186 30
325 23 23 -
1282 3555
•
2292
.
163 1776 325 23 399 -
279 27 1922 195 161 191 1080 346 921 82 553 18 90
887 2686
5865
39 18 146 60 120 33 417 24 30
117
16-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity
FIGURE 16-6
During 1981, land with a capacity of 859 dwelling units was subdivided in West Jasper Place, (Table 16-6). Of this total, 711, or 82% were single family lots, 6% were designated for row housing units, and 12% for apartment units, (Figure 16-6). Most of the subdivision activity was located in La Perle and Lymburn neighbourhoods. Wedgewood Heights, Donsdale and Terra Losa neighbourhoods have not yet been subdivided for residential use.
v)
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN WEST JASPER PLACE 1979- 1981
400 apartment units
3500
1.... • 1 row housing unit.
(3525)
EZZ2I single lordl y, (-7
Z
sernl-detaehed, duplee .unIts
3000 -
_j 2500 0
2000 1500
(1
182)
w 1000-1 0 a_ 500
•
1979
TABLE 16-6
ALDERGROVE BELMEAD CALLINGWOOD DECHENE DONSDALE GARIEPY JA M IES ON PLACE LA PERLE LYMBURN OLESKIW ORMSBY PLACE SUMMERLEA TERRA LOSA THORNCLIFF WEDGE WOOD HEIGHTS WEST RIDGE
WEST JASPER PLACE TOTAL
118
1980
AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING WITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS 1979 - 1981
1 981
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN WEST JASPER PLACE, 1979 - 1981 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1979
WEST JASPER PLACE NEIGHBOURHOODS
(_859)_4,fk,
'118% i__ .-n-v .-•
1980
Single, Semi Row Apart. Duplex Units Units Units
1981
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
69 281 -
126 110 -
2391 77 121 186 -
,2519 36 203 190 577 -
26 210 561 9 -
26 42 2 99 - •
83 _ 17 107 -
135 210 42 580 9 206 ' -
434 248 3 26
514
236
2775
3525
806
169
207
1182
711
128 36 -
18
-
18
434 248
24
106
133
26
42
106
859
W EST JAS PE RP LAC E
1): 4 _ I
1
: 1
z V
Mil MI MI NM • MI • IIIII1 MI • MI MO NM OM NM
1
Land Use District Codes AG
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
ID
INDUSTRIAL
AGU
URBAN RESERVE DISTRICT
IM
MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL
AGI
INDUSTRIAL RESERVE
IH
HEAVY
RF1
SINGLE
A
METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT
RF2
LOW
AP
PUBLIC PARKS DISTRICT
RPL
PLANNED LOT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOW DENSITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
RF3
DISTRICT
DETACHED RESIDENTIAL
DENSITY
'NEILL
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
US
BUSINESS DISTRICT
INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT DISTRICT
URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
PU MA
.
MUNICIPAL AIRPORT DISTRICT
RF4
SEMI-DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RFS
ROW HOUSING DISTRICT
SPO
RF6
MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY DISTRICT
APO
AIRPORT PROTECTION OVERLAY
RAT
LOW RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT MEDIUM RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
OCI
DIRECT DEVELOPMENT CONTROL DISTRICT 'see belovii
RA8 RAT
HIGH RISE
OCT
COMPREHENSIVELY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
RMX
RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE
DC3
TEMPORARY
Rn
RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
DC4
SPECIAL PUBLIC SERVICE
TIMM
MOBILE
CRC
NEIGHBOURHOOD CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT SHOPPING CENTRE DISTRICT
CSC
APARTMENT DISTRICT DISTRICT
CHY CO CMX
COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL
CO2
OFFICE DISTRICT MIXED
USE
DISTRICT
*
... -,
HOLDING DISTRICT DISTRICT
Designalion applied to Comro...Iv Ho.s.g Tiles en accordance with Section 92 Land Use Bylaw
.13 ,
HOME DISTRICT
LOW INTENSITY BUSINESS DISTRICT DISTRICT GENERAL BUSINESS HIGHWAY CORRIDOR DISTRICT
CBI
STATUTORY PLAN OVERLAY
Designation applied to sane RAO sileS in aCcoldance with Section 220.5. Land Use Bylaw ; ...1,1111 . of Edmonton Municipal Airpoil Protection Overlay
.. -â&#x20AC;¢ :::::?::: . .. . DC1
Reslricled Devakmment Area M.D. A.I Designation applied to sites with alined orspecified development tegulations in accordance with Section 620. Land Use Bylaw For
Ihe use prowrsrons and de.eiuunreni
ciiteria
DC1 Chstricis. Please role , in I 7n, apphcalale Area Redevelopmen1 or Area Struclure Plan
log
120
1