_ .
.
a 00$
ok vP AO t 0,0
eklionton PLANNING LIBRARY
r.0
■a& A Nclig°
t
■0,6
'Oecev(‘
ARCHIVES 1983 - 3
DO NOT REMOVE FROM LIBRARY
Nt
•
Status of Residential Land
in ,the.C:ity.of Edmonton -
December 31, 1982
STATUS OF RESIDENTIAL LAND IN THE CITY OF EDMONTON DECEMBER 31,1982
R L71 he City of
Edmonton
PREPARED BY: CITY OF EDMONTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT MARCH 1983
TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION
6.
2. SUMMARY 2- I Development Activity 2-2 Sales of City-Owned Lands 2-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land 2-4 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land 2-5 Supply of Unsubdivided Land in Area Structure Plan Areas 2-6 Findings 3.
6- I Residential Building Permits 6-2 Mix of New Development 6-3 Residential Construction Starts
Page I page 2 7.
Supply of Serviced Residential Land 7-2 Residential Land Servicing Activity 7-3 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land 7-4 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity 7-5 Supply of Unsubdivided Land in Area Structure Plan Areas
Page 5 page 6
POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLDS
5.
Population and Households
RESIDENTIAL LAND SUPPLY 7- I
page 4
DATA SOURCES AND DEFINITIONS
4-I
page 18 page 20 page 21
Page 3
3-I Data, Sources and Definitions page 8 3-2 Definitions page 9 4.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
8. page 11
HOUSING STOCK 5-I Housing Stock in Edmonton page 12 5-2 Housing Stock in Area Structure Plan Areas page 14 5-3 Rental Accommodation Vacancy Rates page 16 5-4 Inventory of Newly Completed Unoccupied Dwelling Units page 17
page 22 page 23 page 24 page 25 page 26
CITY-OWNED RESIDENTIAL LAND City-Owned Serviced Residential page 27 Land 8-2 Servicing Program for City-Owned page 28 Land 8-3 City-Owned Subdivided Residential page 29 Land in A.S.P. Areas Sales of City-Owned Residential 8-4 page 30 Land 8-5 The Supply of City-Owned Raw page 31 Land 8- I
9. CASTLE DOWNS
12. THE LAKE DISTRICT
9-1 Housing Stock page 33 9-2 Residential Building Permits page 34 9-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land page 35 9-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity page 36 9-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land page 37 9-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity page 38 10. CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS AND CASSELMAN 10-1 Housing Stock page 42 10-2 Residential Building Permits page 43 10-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land page 45 10-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity page 47 10-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land page 49 10-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity page 51
12-1 Housing Stock 12-2 Residential Building Permits 12-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land 12-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity 12-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land 12-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity 13.
11-1 Housing Stock page 56 11-2 Residential Building Permits page 57 11-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land page 58 11-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity page 59 11-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land page 60 11-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity page 61
II
15.
page 68 page 69 page 70
page 73
MILL WOODS 14-1 Housing Stock 14-2 Residential Building Permits 14-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land 14-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity 14-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land 14-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity
II. KASKITAYO AND TWIN BROOKS
page 67
THE MEADOWS 13-1 Residential Land Supply
14.
page 65 page 66
page 75 page 76 page 77 page 78 page 79 page 80
PILOT SOUND 15-1 Residential Land Supply
page 84
16.
RIVERBEND 16-1 Housing Stock page 88 16-2 Residential Building Permits page 89 16-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land page 90 16-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity Page 91 16-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land page 92 16-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity Page 93
17.
WEST JASPER PLACE 17-1 Housing Stock Page 97 17-2 Residential Building Permits page 98 17-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land page 99 17-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity page 100 17-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential page 101 Land 17-6 Residential Subdivision Plan page 102 Registration Activity
III
LIST OF FIGURES 2-1
Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in area structure plan areas, 1980 - 1982. page 3
5-3
Inventory of newly completed and unoccupied dwelling units in the City of Edmonton, 1977 - 1982. Page 16
2-2
City-owned land sold for residential use in area structure plan areas, 1980- 1982. page 4
6-1
2-3
Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in area structure plan areas and built-up areas of Edmonton, 1980 - 1982. page 19
Year end supply of serviced residential land in area structure plan areas, 1980 to 1982. page 5
6-2
Mix of residential dwelling units approved by building permits in area structure plan areas, built-up areas and the City as a whole, 1980- 1982. page 20
6-3
Residential dwelling unit construction starts in Edmonton, 1979- 1982. page 20
6-4
Dwelling unit starts in a selection of Canadian metropolitan areas, 1977 - 1982. page 21
7-1
Supply of vacant serviced residential land in area structure plan areas, 1980 - 1982. page 22
7-2
Annual residential land servicing activity in area structure plan areas, 1980 - 1982. page 23
7-3
Supply of vacant subdivided residential land (serviced and unserviced) in area structure plan areas, 1980 1982. page 24
2-4
Year end supply of subdivided residential land in area structure plan areas, 1980 - 1982. page 6
2-5 Year end supply of raw land in area structure plan areas, 1981 - 1982. page 7 4-1
5-1
City of Edmonton population change and distribution 1977 - 1982. page 10 The housing mix in area structure plan areas and in the built-up areas of the City, December 31, 1982. page 12
5-2 Edmonton metropolitan area rental apartment vacancy rates, 1977- 1982. page 14
iv
7-4
Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in area structure plan areas, 1980 - 1982. page 25
10-3 Supply of serviced residential land in Clareview, Hermitage, Casselman and Steele Heights, 1980 1982. page 45
9-1
Mix of residential dwelling units in Castle Downs, 1981. page 33
10-4 Residential land servicing activity in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman, 1980 1982. page 47
9-2
Residential dwelling units approved each year in Castle Downs, 1980- 1982. page 34
9-3
Supply of serviced residential land in Castle Downs, 1980- 1982. page 35
9-4
Residential land servicing activity in Castle Downs, 1980- 1982. page 36
9-5
Supply of vacant subdivided residential land in Castle Downs, 1980- 1982. page 37
9-6
Residential subdivision registration activity in Castle Downs, 1980- 1982. page 38
10- I Mix of residential dwelling units in Clareview, Hermitage, Casselman and Steele Heights, 1982. page 42 10-2 Residential dwelling units approved in Clareview, Hermitage, Casselman and Steele Heights, 1980 1982. page 43
10-5 Supply of vacant subdivided residential land in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman, 1980- 1982. page 49 10-6 Residential subdivision registration activity in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman, 1980- 1982. page 52 11-1 Mix of residential dwelling units in Kaskitayo, 1982. page 56 11-2 Residential dwelling units approved each year in Kaskitayo, 1980 - 1982. page 57 11-3 Supply of serviced residential land in Kaskitayo, 1980- 1982. page 58 11-4 Residential land servicing activity in Kaskitayo, 1980- 1982. page 59
11-5 Supply of vacant subdivided residential land in Kaskitayo, 1980- 1982. page 60
11-6 Residential subdivision registration activity in Kaskitayo, 1980 - 1982. page 61 12-I Mix of residential dwelling units in the Lake District, 1982. page 65 12-2 Residential Building Permits
page 66
14-3 Supply of serviced residential land in Mill Woods, 1980- 1982. page 77 14-4 Residential land servicing activity in Mill Woods, 1980- 1982. page 78 14-5 Supply of vacant subdivided land in Mill Woods, 1980- 1982. page 79
12-3 Year end supply of serviced residential land in the Lake District, 1982. page 67
14-6 Residential subdivision registration activity in Mill Woods, 1981 - 1982. page 80
12-4 Residential land servicing activity in the Lake District, 1982. page 68
16- I Mix of residential dwelling units in Riverbend, 1982. page 88
12-5 Supply of vacant subdivided residential land in the Lake District, 1981 - 1982. page 69
16-2 Residential dwelling units approved each year in Riverbend, 1980- 1982. page 89
12-6 Residential subdivision registration activity in the Lake District, 1980- 1981. page 70
16-3 Supply of serviced residential land in Riverbend, 1980- 1982. page 90
14- I Mix of residential dwelling units in Mill Woods, 1982. page 75
vi
14-2 Residential dwelling units approved each year in Mill Woods, 1980- 1982. page 76
16-4 Residential land servcing activity in Riverbend, 1980- 1982. page 91 16-5 Supply of vacant subdivided residential land in Riverbend, 1980- 1982. page 92 16-6 Residential subdivision registration activity in Riverbend, 1980- 1982. Page 93 17-1 Mix of residential dwelling units in West Jasper Place, 1982. page 97 17-2 Residential dwelling units approved each year in West Jasper Place, 1980 - 1982. page 98 17-3 Supply of serviced residential land in West Jasper Place, 1980- 1982. page 99 17- 4 Residential land servicing activity in West Jasper Place, 1980- 1982. page 100 17-5 Supply of vacant subdivided residential land in West Jasper Place, 1980- 1982. page 101 17-6 Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in West Jasper Place, 1980 - 1982. page 102
vi i
LIST OF TABLES
viii
4- 1
Population of the City of Edmonton by area structure plan areas and the built-up area of the City, 1977- 1982. page 1 1
5- 1
Residential dwelling units in the City of Edmonton, December, 1982. page 13
5-2
Residential dwelling units in area structure plan areas, December, 1982. page I S
6-1
Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in the City of Edmonton, 1980 - 1982. page 18
6-2
Residential dwelling unit construction starts in the City of Edmonton, 1980 - 1982. page 20
7-1
Year-end supply of vacant serviced residential land in area structure plan areas, 1980- 1982. page 22
7-2
Annual residential land servicing activity in area structure plan areas, 1980- 1982. page 23
7-3
Year-end supply of vacant subdivided residential land in area structure plan areas, 1980 - 1982. page 24
7-4
Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in area structure plan areas 1980- 1982. page 25
7-5
Supply of raw land in area structure plan areas in December 1981 and 1982. page 26
8-I
Supply of City-owned vacant serviced residential land in area structure plan areas, 1980- 1982. page 27
8-2
Annual residential servicing activity for City-owned land, 1980- 1982. page 28
8-3
Supply of City-owned vacant subdivided residential land in area structure plan areas, 1980 - 1982. page 29
8-4
City-owned land sold for residential development, 1980- 1982. page 30
8-5 City-owned raw land in area structure plan areas, December, 1982. page 31 9-1
Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Castle Downs to December 31, 1982. page 33
9-2
Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Castle Downs in each year, 1980 - 1982. page 34
9-3
Year end supply of serviced residential land in Castle Downs, 1980 - 1982. page 35 .
9-4
9-5
9-6
Annual residential land servicing activity in Castle Downs, 1980 - 1982. page 36 Year end supply of vacant subdivided residential land in Castle Downs, 1980- 1982. page 37 Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in Castle Downs, 1980- 1982. page 38
10-1 Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman to December 31, 1982. page 42 10-2 Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman in each year, 1980- 1982. page 44 10-3 Year end supply of serviced residential land in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman, 1980- 1982. page 46 10-4 Annual residential land servicing activity in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman, 1980- 1982. page 48
10-5 Year end supply of vacant subdivided residential land in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman, 1980- 1982. page 50 10-6 Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman, 1980- 1982. page 51 11-1 Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Kaskitayo and Twin Brooks to December 31, 1981. page 56 11-2 Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Kaskitayo and Twin Brooks in each year, 1980- 1982. page 57 11-3 Year end supply of serviced residential land in Kaskitayo and Twin Brooks, 1980- 1982. page 58 11-4 Annual residential land servicing activity in Kaskitayo and Twin Brooks, 1980- 1982. page 59 11-5 Year end supply of vacant subdivided residential land in Kaskitayo and Twin Brooks, 1980- 1982. page 60 11-6 Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in Kaskitayo and Twin Brooks, 1980 1982. page 61
ix
12-I Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in the Lake District in 1981. page 65 12-2 Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Lake District in each year 1980- 1982. 12-3 Year end supply of serviced residential land in the Lake District, 1982. page 67 12-4 Residential land servicing activity in the Lake District, 1982. page 68 12-5 Year end supply of vacant subdivided residential land in the Lake District, 1980- 1981. page 69 12-6 Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in the Lake District, 1980 - 1981. page 70 14-1 Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Mill Woods to December 31, 1982. • page 75 14-2 Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Mill Woods in each year, 1980- 1982. page 76 14-3 Year end supply of serviced residential land in Mill Woods, 1980- 1982. page 77
14-4 Annual residential land servicing activity in Mill Woods, 1980 - 1982. page 78 14-5 Year end supply of vacant subdivided residential land in Mill Woods, 1980- 1982. page 79 14-6 Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in Mill Woods, 1980 - 1982. page 80 16- I Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Riverbend to December 31, 1982. page 88 16-2 Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in Riverbend in each year, 1980 - 1982. page 89 16-3 Year end supply of serviced residential land in Riverbend, 1980 - 1982. page 90 16-4 Annual residential land servicing activity in Riverbend, 1980- 1982. page 91 16-5 Year end supply of vacant subdivided residential land in Riverbend, 1980- 1982. page 92 16-6 Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in Riverbend, 1980 - 1982. page 93
17- I Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in West Jasper Place to December 31, 1982. page 97 17-2 Residential dwelling units approved by building permits in West Jasper Place in each year, 1980 1982. page 98 17-3 Year end supply of serviced residential land in West Jasper Place, 1980 - 1982. page 99 17-4 Annual residential land servicing activity in West Jasper Place, (980- 1982. Page 100 17-5 Year end supply of vacant subdivided residential land in West Jasper Place, 1980 - 1982. page 101 17-6 Annual residential subdivision plan registration activity in West Jasper Place, 1980 - 1982. page 102
xi
LIST OF MAPS City of Edmonton Residential Area Structure Plan Areas (December 31, 1981). INTRODUCTION
Mill Woods Land Use Districts. page 81 Pilot Sound Neighbourhoods.
Castle Downs Neighbourhoods.
page 83 page 32 Pilot Sound Land Use Districts.
Castle Downs Land Use Districts.
page 85 page 39 Riverbend Neighbourhoods.
Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman Nei ghbourhoods. page 41
Riverbend Land Use Districts. page 94
Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman Land Use Districts. page 53
West Jasper Place Neighbourhoods.
Kaskitayo and Twin Brooks Neighbourhoods.
West Jasper Place Land Use Districts. page 55
Kaskitayo and Twin Brooks Land Use Districts. page 62 Lake District Neighbourhoods. page 64 Lake District Land Use Districts. Page ii The Meadow Neighbourhoods Page 73 Mill Woods Neighbourhoods. Page 74
xii
page 87
page 96 page 103
I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to provide information on the location and development status of the land districted and registered for residential use in the "Area Structure Plan" areas of Edmonton. Twelve such areas are identified (Map 1-1). The format of the 1982 edition of the report is designed to meet the requirements of a variety of users. Data measuring aspects of consumption and supply of vacant residential land are reported at three levels of aggregation: the city's combined plan areas; each plan area individually; and each neighbourhood within plan areas. Most data are provided over the three year period from 1980 to 1982. This is to assist the user in identifying trends in the consumption and supply of vacant residential land. Section 2, the Summary, highlights key information on the consumption and supply of residential land. Information is provided on: a)
the amount of land used for new residential land development during the year;
b)
year-end inventories of serviced and unserviced subdivided land;
c)
annual rates of land servicing and subdivision; and
d)
remaining stocks of "raw" land in the plan areas.
A detailed breakdown, at the plan area level, of the data contained in the Summary is provided in sections 7 and 8. Additional information on Edmonton's population, housing stock and construction activity is presented in sections 5 and 6 as background. Each plan area is described on a neighbourhood basis in the final eight sections of the report.
Please note Section 3, Data Sources and Definitions, which is included to assist the reader in the use of this report. Comment on content and suggestions on presentation are welcomed by the General Research Section of the City of Edmonton Planning Department, 13th Floor, Phipps-McKinnon Building, 10020- 101 A Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, phone 428-3107.
MAP 1
CITY OF EDMONTON RESIDENTIAL AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS JANUARY!, 1983
O
En
,.. i. r O MI • OM
4/6 1 17-Kra
■••• 17
U ON
=I
0
1
'67AvF
ICastleDown
ri r 11/ o
• •"" i i Ali •• ■ Pilot Sauna 101110
1ri. , ■ 1 --it 1 1 _iv i ■41N .,. . . . t„,, , , . .111 -101 -111 1 41.1111 ■1:1 ...I.L.1-•-: , —grill 4 tam / *1= 4i ..
Steele Hei iht_4r, ' 137 AVE ‘' -iClareCle- :1 Casselman % %II . i 2 7 _AVE /i,,,,,. ...,... ermitage.
11
MIN
,m,04... _ . _ „An kassiam .NIIFISPlarluT ts
West Jasper Place
11..1
US
. ' .//
•
Lake istric District
.-r-
W
....--
aif
ra rovr. ME-.Arial . mow mr, w ). Kaskitayo 17r11• The Meadows M ___
111 Twin Brooks1`i
'm try
r* MI 4!
!
wilsmilmsme ■ imes
•
ip_. alla Il lip Mi I !woo 4 s
=Milli
• 11•• • SIM •
.-•
L
2. SUMMARY Findings are discussed in Section 2-6.
FIGURE 2-1 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING
PERMITS IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1980-1982
2 I Development Activity -
DY/EWNG UNITS 8000
At the end of 1982, in the Area Structure Plan areas there was vacant subdivided and serviced land with a capacity of 31,900 potential dwelling units, up 12% from 1981. Almost all of the vacant subdivided land in the Area Structure Plan areas is serviced. In 1982, 5719 potential dwelling units were serviced in Area Structure Plan areas, up 2% from 1981 (Table 2-1). Of this total, 1907 were single family lots, down almost 50% from 1981. Town, in Mill Woods, accounted for 90% of the multi-family servicing activity in the Area Structure Plan areas in 1982. This is discussed in Section 7-2 of this report.
(7146) 7000
6000
5000
(4837)
4000
3000
2000
1000
isso
There were 8142 dwelling units approved by building permits in Edmonton in 1982, down 32% from 1981 (Table 6-1). Of these, 3724 or 45%, were approvals for dwelling units to be located in Edmonton's Area Structure Plan areas (shown opposite on Map I -1), down 48% from 1981 (Figure 2-1).
1981
1982
1980-1982*
.AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN ASP AREAS.
1
1
Apartment Units Rai, Housing Units Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
CMHC residential construction starts data show that single family starts are down 55%, row housing starts down 44% but apartment starts are up 46% over the comparable 1981 figures. The apartment starts statistic probably should not be taken as a pure reflection of market forces at work because apartment construction was greatly influenced in 1982 by the government incentive programs, MURB and CHIP. The population of the city as a whole increased slightly (2.6%) in 1982 primarily because of annexation. The Area Structure Plan areas increased in population by 32% while the built-up areas of the city lost 1.6% of their population.
1
2-2 Sales of City-Owned Land In 1982, the Real Estate and Housing Department of the City of Edmonton sold land with a residential development potential of 1169 dwelling units (Figure 2-2). This number includes sales of 273 single family lots plus sales of multifamily lots with a development potential of 896 dwelling units. All but 9 units -- all single family -- were in Mill Woods. In 1979 (not shown) and 1980, single family lots dominated sales. In 1981 and 1982, by contrast, multi-family units dominated sales (Figure 2-2).
FIGURE 2-2 POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ON LAND SOLD BY THE CITY FOR RESIDENTIAL USE IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1980-1982
POTENTIAL OIVEWNG UNITS 3000
2500
2000
1500
(1373) (1169) //1e
(1043)
1000 .////// ////// //////
(588)
1980
1981
I//A
1/7/./ZA
1982
1980-1982*
•AvERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS ON LAND SOLD BY THE
Multi—Family Units
?ZZZA
2
Single Family Units
an, IN ASP AREAS.
FIGURE 2-3 YEAR—END SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1980-1982
POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS 35000 (31900) 30000
(29567)
(26374
2-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land The inventory of vacant serviced residential land in the Area Structure Plan areas had a development potential of 31,900 dwelling units at the end of 1982, up 12% from the 1981 figure (Figure 2-3). Of the total, 28% represents single family, 25% row housing and 47% apartment units. The distribution for 1982 was similar to the previous two years but there was a slight increase (2%) in the potential for apartment units.
25000
20000
15000
(9120)
10000 (74436) • (6400)
(5235) //Z.
TOTAL
CITY
1
TOTAL
CITY
1981
1980
I
1••••••• . 1
TOTAL
CITY
19130-92*
1982
Apartment Units Row Housing Units Single Family, Semi— Detached. Duplex Units
CITY OWNED - Multi—Family Units
1W
Single Family Units *Average annual dwelling units approved by building permits in ASP areas.
3
2-4
Supply of Subdivided Residential Land
At the end of 1982, there was vacant, subdivided residential land with a capacity of 32,185 additional dwelling units in the Area Structure Plan areas of the city, up 1088 units or 3% from 1981 (Figure 2-4).
FIGURE 2-4 YEAR--END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN .AREAS 1980-1982
POTENTIAL EAVELLJNG UNITS 35000
Since virtually all of this subdivided land has now been serviced, the supply figures for both the subdivided and the subdivided, serviced land are almost identical this year.
(34198)
(32185) (31097
25000
20000
15000
10000
(9234)
0
8332)
0
/ /
(8891
•
0235)
/ /
Nem
//
TOTAL
CITY
CITY
TOTAL
1981
1980
I
TOTAL
I
Pr • CITY 1980-824
1982
Apartment Units Row Housing Units Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
CITY OWNED Multi—Family Units
1771
FM Single Family Units • Average annual dwelling units approved by building permits in ASP Areas.
4
FIGURE 2-5 YEAR END SUPPLY OF RAW LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1981-1982
Supply of Unsubdivided (Raw) Land In Area Structure Plan Areas
At the end of 1982, there were 3567 hectares of raw land in the Area Structure Plan areas, up 821 hectares or 32% from 1981 (Table 2-5). Approval of The Meadows Area Structure Plan in 1982 added 1099 hectares to this total.
HECTARES 4000 3300
(3%7)
Approximately 278 hectares of raw land were subdivided in 1982 (Figure 2-5). Major subdivision registration activity took place in Lake District (123 hectares), Mill Woods (65 hectares), West Jasper Place (56 hectares), Clareview (27 hectares), and Kaskitayo (7 hectares).
(:2741)
2500 2000
2-5
L
City-owned raw land totals 475.8 ha up 18% from 1981. This represents 14% of the total supply in Area Structure Plan areas.
1500 1000 (475.8) (278)
1 1981
1982
I
1982
1982
Total
1. • •1
City Owned
1
Raw Land Subdivided in 1982
1
5
2-6 Findings 1.
Subdivision and servicing activity exceeded demand in 1982. This resulted in the supply of subdivided and serviced residential land increasing by 12% from 1981 to a total of 31,900 potential dwelling units (Figure 2-3). Over the period 1980-82, as measured by building permits approved (Figure 2-1) the average annual rate of consumption of residential land in Area Structure Plan areas has been: Single Family: 2738 potential dwelling units Row Housing: 1497 potential dwelling units Apartment units: 1000 potential dwelling units Using these numbers as a guide, the 31,900 potential dwelling units of subdivided and serviced residential land in the Area Structure Plan areas represents a supply of: -
Single Family 3 years (2.5) Row Housing 5 years (4) Apartment units 15 years (14)
The comparable 1981 figures are in parentheses. These units would potentially house 83,045 people (single family, 31,074; row housing, 23,621; apartment units, 28,350). 2.
3.
6
While the supply of subdivided and serviced land designated for apartment and row housing units not unexpectedly increased in 1982 due chiefly to the registration of the Tawa plan of subdivision, the supply of subdivided and serviced single family lots also increased (Figure 2-3) even though servicing activity in this category was down almost 50% (Table 7-2). Although single family subdivision activity was down nearly 50% in 1982 (Table 7-4) the supply of vacant subdivided land increased by about 10%. The supply of land in this category as well, then, exceeded the demand in 1982 (Figure 2-4).
â–
1
4.
Federal and financial incentive housing programs such as MURB and CHIP played an important role in accelerating the supply of apartment units in Edmonton during 1981 and 1982. The net effect of these programs, and that of the economic recession and a slower rate of population growth in the City of Edmonton was a steady increase in vacancy rates for apartment units (CMHC reported 5.9% in October 1982). Consequently, during 1982, as in 1981, there were instances where land designated for apartment development was used for lower density development such as row housing. The effect of this type of activity is actual unit densities well below permitted maximums. In view of the large supply of land for apartments and the more constrained supply for row housing, similar adjustments can be expected for the upcoming year.
5.
The tendency of apartment construction to locate in the built up areas and single family to locate in the Area Structure Plan areas of the city is continuing (Table 6-1). There are now 2.5 serviced multi-family units to every one single family unit in the Area Structure Plan areas, up from the 1981 ratio of 2.3 to I (Figure 2-3). The gap between the supply of multifamily units in the Area Structure Plan areas and the demand thus widened in 1982.
6.
The decrease in the absolute number of building permits issued in 1982 was considerably less dramatic in the built-up areas of the city than in the Area Structure Plan areas (9% vs. 50%) (Table 6-1).
7.
Adverse market conditions during much of 1982 resulted in many subdivisions not being registered even though third reading approval from Council !lad been received. It can he expected that the development industry will continue in 1983 to monitor the local market very carefully before committing the sums that registration of a subdivision entails.
7
3. DATA, SOURCES AND DEFINITIONS 3-1
Data and Data Sources
Data for this report were obtained from City departments and Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). City data are the products of administrative data collection procedures of municipal departments. CMHC data are produced as part of an ongoing housing research program. Data from different sources may not be entirely comparable. Report users should be aware of this fact when using and interpreting the data. Data and data sources are listed below. CMHC is the source of statistics on housing starts and completions, newly completed but unoccupied dwelling units and rental accommodation vacancy rates. The Assessment Department is the source of statistics used to produce estimates of the number of dwelling units by type of structure in the city. The civic census through the City Clerk's Office, is the source of statistics on population and numbers of households. The Bylaw Enforcement Department is the source of all statistics on building permits issued. The Real Estate and Housing Department is the source of statistics on all City-owned residential land. The Planning Department is the source of data on municipal servicing and raw land. Calculations, using data from other sources, have been made by the Planning Department. In 1981 there was a year-end surge in sales and option agreements involving City-owned land. The option agreements involving land with a capacity of 921 potential dwelling units did not close.
8
These units appear as sales in the previously published 1981 figures. The 1981 figures shown in Figure 2-2 and Tables 8-1 and 8-4 of this Report have been adjusted to reflect this. 3-2
Definitions
"Area Structure Plan areas" or "plan areas" include both designated outline plan areas and legally designated area structure plan areas in Edmonton. Some older outline plan areas that are fully or nearly fully developed (e.g. Petrolia) have not been included. All outline plan and area structure plan areas included in this report are listed on Table 4-1. "Built-up area" refers to the combined areas of Edmonton within the boundaries of the city, prior to annexation on 1982 01 01, that do not fall within an Area Structure Plan area as defined above. 'Dwelling units approved by building permits" refers to the number of dwelling units for which building permits have been issued by the Bylaw Enforcement Department. It is stressed that issuance of a building permit does not guarantee that the permit will be acted on. A small proportion of permits issued are allowed to lapse while others are superseded by new permits. In 1982, building permits involving 239 dwelling units expired or were superseded. "Potential Dwelling Units" refers to the maximum possible number of dwelling units that may be developed on residential land under the terms of the Land Use Bylaw. For single family dwellings, duplex and semi-detached dwellings in RF 1 , RF2, RF3, RF4 and RPL land use districts, this number is the same as the number of registered lots in a plan of subdivision. For row and apartment dwellings, an estimate is derived by multiplying the gross area of a parcel of land by the maximum number of dwelling units per hectare of land permitted in the appropriate land use district. (For example, land districted under the Land Use Bylaw as RFS has a maximum development potential of 42 dwelling units per hectare. Hence, a maximum of 84 dwelling units (2x42) may be built on a 2 hectare parcel. Normally, row housing is built on land with a land use district designation of RF5 or RF6 and
apartment housing is built on land with a land use district designation of RA7, RA8 or RA9. It should be noted too, that many new developments contain fewer dwelling units than the maximum permitted under the Land Use Bylaw. "Raw Land" refers to land within an area structure plan area that is designated for residential development but for which there is not yet a registered plan of subdivision. "Vacant Serviced Land" refers to vacant registered parcels of residential land which have or could have been released by the Land Development Coordination Branch for the issuance of building permits. This means complete underground servicing to all lots and, as a minimum, gravelled access roads. Note that this definition has slightly different implications for single family and multi family sites. In the case of multi-family sites, services need only be provided in the road passing by the site. "Vacant Subdivided Land" refers to vacant registered parcels of residential land. Registered land refers to land legally established within a plan of subdivision as recorded in the Alberta Land Titles Office. The figures reported include vacant serviced land, as described above, as well as vacant unserviced land.
9
4 • POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLDS
FIGURE 4-1 CITY OF EDMONTON POPULATION CHANGE AND DISTRIBUTION 1977-1982
4-I Population and Households
POPMATION 800000 (551,314)
500000
r (471.474)
478.088)
(491.359
400000
(505.773)
(521.205)
v r v
300000
200000
100000
A A A A
1977
souRce
1978
1979
1980
CITY OF EDMONTON CIVIC CENSUS 1977-1982.
Combined Area Structure Plan Areas
I
1981
I
Built—up Areas
Demand for new residential development in Edmonton appears to have been sustained by population growth and the related increase in the number of households in the city. Edmonton's population has been increasing at an average rate of 2.6% over the past five years (Table 4-1). Most of the apparent growth in 1982 was a result of annexation which added approximately 10,000 people to the city's population figure. Annexation would not have created any additional demand for housing. The number of households increased, at an annual rate of about 4 to 5%. The number of households represents the effective demand for housing. Therefore, the city's stock of residential dwelling units has increased at about the same rate as the increase in households, almost 5% per year.
1982
Most of Edmonton's new residential development has occurred in areas designated as Outline Plan areas or Area Structure Plan areas. The population in these areas has increased dramatically in the last 6 years. Between 1977 and 1982 the percentage of Edmonton's population living in new residential development in plan areas climbed from 11% to 30% (Figure 4-1). By the end of 1982, the plan areas accommodated well over 160,000 people. In contrast, the population of the built-up area of the city has declined during this six-year period at an annual rate of about 1.6%. This decline has occurred despite substantial redevelopment activity. During the period 1977 to 1982, Mill Woods attracted more new residents than any other plan area. Its population grew at an average annual compounded rate of 32%, representing an average annual increase of 7468 people. Rapid rates of population growth also occurred in most other established plan areas. Riverbend was an exception; it had a significant though more modest rate of increase. Population increase of the combined plan areas in the period 1977 to 1982 has been over 30% per year.
10
TABLE 4-1 POPULATION OF THE CITY OF EDMONTON BY AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS AND THE BUILT-UP AREA OF THE CITY 1977-1982
AVG. ANNUAL POPULATION CHANGE AND PERCENTAGE CHANGE COMPOUNDED ANNUALLY, 1977-1982
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
Castle Downs
7855
11707
15725
18644
22030
25152
3459 (+32%)
Clareview Cassel man
3570
5689
8926
11727
14623
16975
2681
Hermitage
3066
3394
4209
4589
5046
5997
Kaskitayo
(2000)*
5012
8416
11387
14642
16953
214
187
132
128
422
36 (+28%)
—
—
28872
37618
43999
53013
7468 (+32%)
—
141
134
131
–3
—
327
(+3%)
Area Structure Plan Areas
Lake District
242
—
Meadows Mill Woods
15675
Pilot Sound
—
21209
(+54%)
586 (+29%) 2991
(+16%)
Riverbend
5739
5793
5857
6068
6608
7373
Steele Heights (North Part)
4310
4894
5051
5115
5207
9911
14
9
11
24801
27027
31600
4250 (+31%)
119,954 139,453
167,538
22,746 (+31.5%)
Built-Up Area of City Population
417,668 403,233 392,624 385,819 381,752 383,776
–6,778 (-1.6%)
• City of Edmonton Total Population
471,474 478,066 491,359 505,773 521,205 551,314
15,968 (+2.6%)
Twin Brooks West Jasper Place
11349
16921
21492
Area Structure Plan Population
53,806
74,833
98,735
*(Estimated Population)
1120 (+29%) 2
SOURCE: City of Edmonton Civic Census 1977-1982
II
FIGURE 5-1 THE HOUSING MIX IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS AND IN THE BUILT—UP AREAS OF THE CITY, DECEMBER, 31 1982
5. HOUSING STOCK 5-I
Housing Stock in Edmonton
There were about 216,300 residential dwelling units in Edmonton in December 1982 (Table 5-1). Twenty nine • percent of these were located in Area Structure Plan areas while 71% were in the older built-up area of the city. This figure does not include institutional housing or housing associated with commercial or industrial structures.
BUILT—UP AREAS
More than half of all dwellings in Edmonton are single family detached, semi-detached or duplex units (Figure 5-1). This type of housing makes up a greater percentage of the housing stock in the built-up areas than in the plan areas. However, the difference is not large. In contrast, row housing is more common in plan areas while apartment dwelling units are most prevalent in the city's built-up areas. 5%
49%
AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS
Apartment Units Row Housing Units 20%
ITEIT
31%
12
Single Family, Semi—Detached Duplex Units
TABLE 5-1 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS* IN THE CITY-OF EDMONTON, DECEMBER 1982
Single, Semi & Duplex Units
Row Housing, Tri-Plex & Four-Plex Units
Apartment Units
Total Units
Areas Structure Plan Areas
Number %
30883 49%
19897 31%
12400 20%
63180 100%
Built-Up Area
Number %
84562 55%
7427 5%
61119 40%
153108 100%
City of Edmonton Total
Number %
115445 53%
27324 13%
73519 34%
216288 100%
*Figures are for residential dwelling unit types indicated in column headings, other types of residences are not included. All numbers are estimates. SOURCE: City of Edmonton Departments
'3
5-2
Housing Stock in Area Structure Plan Areas
The housing mix shows considerable variation between plan areas (Table 5-2). The Lake District has the highest concentration of single family, semi-detached and duplex units (8I%); approximately two thirds of the units in Mill Woods and Castle Downs are of this type. In no area does row housing comprise more than 35% of the total number of units approved. Apartment units represent less than 40% in all areas. The percentage of the total stock in Table 5-2 reflects the tendency in plan areas for single family lots to be developed before multi-family blocks. It does not necessarily represent the mix when the area becomes fully developed.
FIGURE 5-2 EDMONTON METROPOLITAN AREA* RENTAL APARTMENT VACANCY RATES 1977-1982 PERCENTAGE VACANCY RATE 6
*Data Reported for the Edmonton Census Metropolitan Area as defined in 1981 by Statistics Canada. SOURCE: CMHC Apartment Vacancy Survey. The survey covers all self— contained rental apartment units in building of six units or more. Private and public units six months and older. 0 APR OCT APR OCT APR OCT APR OCT APR OCT
1977
14
1978
1979
1980
1981
APR
OCT
1982
TABLE 5-2
ESTIMATED NUMBERS OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS TO DECEMBER 1982
Area Structure Plan Areas
Single Family and Semi-Detached Units
Row Housing Units
Apartment Units
Total Units
Castle Downs
No.
5264 (62%)
2043 (24%)
1136 (14%)
8443 100%
Clareview, Hermitage Casselman, Steele Hts.
No.
3861 (39%)
3081 (31%)
2899 (30%)
9841 (100%)
Kaskitayo
No. %
2478 (35%)
1870 (26%)
2773 (39%)
7121
Lake District
No. %
427 (81%)
101 (19%)
—
No. %
—
—
Mill Woods
No. %
12030 (64%)
4560 (24%)
Pilot Sound
No. %
42* (100%)
Riverhend
No. %
1353 (49%)
Twin Brooks
No. %
West Jasper Place
Area Structure Plan Area Total
Meadows
528 (100%) —
2151 (12%)
18741 (100%)
—
42* (100%)
481 (17%)
945 (34%)
2779 (100%)
3* (100%)
— —
—
3* (100%)
No. %
4178 (35%)
4101 (35%)
3534 (30%)
11813 (100%)
No.
29636
16237
13438
59311
*Residential units in place prior to approval of the area structure plans. SOURCE: City of Edmonton Planning Department.
15
5-3
Rental Accommodation Vacancy Rates
The Edmonton census metropolitan area overall rental accommodation vacancy rate was 4.3% in October 1982 (Figure 5-2). This represents a significant increase over the October 1981 rate (1.1%), and is substantially higher than rates from the past six years, which have averaged about 1.8%. For apartment units, the vacancy rate was even higher (5.9%). Under "normal" market conditions, a vacancy rate of 3.0% is considered by CMHC to represent an equilibrium. Renters have an adequate choice of accommodation while developers have incentive to build. A vacancy rate of 4.3% suggests an excess supply of rental accommodation in the City.
FIGURE 5 3 INVENTORY OF NEWLY COMPLETED AND UNOCCUPIED -
DWELLING UNITS IN THE CITY OF EDMONTON 1977-1982
3000
RESIDENTIAL DWELUNG UNITS
Single family, semidetached and duplex units
2500
_ Row housing and apartment units (this category was redefined in January 1981)
2000
1500
1000 S.
500
0
SOURCE: CMHC—Housing Statistics _ JUN E JUN DEC JUN DEC JUN DEC JUN DEC JUN DEC DEC
1977 16
Total of all residential dwelling units
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
5-4
Inventory of Newly Completed Unoccupied Dwelling
Units At the end of 1982 there were 2186 newly completed unoccupied dwelling units in the City of Edmonton (Figure 5-3). This represents a decline from the 2282 units unoccupied in December 1981. Only 727 of the total were single family, semi-detached or duplex units. The more rapid decrease in inventory in these dwelling types resulted from a decline in residential development activity during late 1981 and 1982 as the market became increasingly depressed. The number of newly completed and unoccupied row houses and apartment units has increased significantly (to 1459) since December 1981, when the stock was fewer than 1000 units. This increase may be attributed to the announced cancellation of the federal Multiple Unit Residential Building (MURB) Program which prompted an increase in multiple unit starts in late 1981.
)
17
6. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 6-1
in drawing inferences from the apparent trends that these figures indicate. Two major government incentive programs -- CHIP and MURB --strongly influenced the local market during the latter part of 1981 and the first three quarters of 1982. One should also expect this influence to carry over into 1983 and colour the building permit figures for that year as well.
Residential Building Permits
City wide, a total of 8142 residential dwelling units were approved by building permit in 1982, down 3879 units or 32% from 1981 (Table 6-1). Of the 1982 total, 4895 units or 60% were for apartments, 1066 or 13% for row housing, and 2181 or 27% for single family. The corresponding figures for 1981 are 4623 units or 38% for apartments, 3088 or 26% for row housing and 4310 units or 36% for single family.
About 80% of the apartment activity occurred in the built up areas of the city, less than 20% in the ASP areas. The comparable rate in 1981 was 75% in built-up areas to 25% in ASP areas.
Table 6-1 shows a very significant shift towards multifamily and away from single family in 1982 as compared with 1981 and 1980. Caution, however, should be exercised
A definite trend has been developing in the past 2-3 years towards apartments locating in the built-up areas of the city and single family in the ASP areas.
TABLE 6-1 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN THE CITY OF EDMONTON, 1980 TO 1982 19130 Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
CASTLE DOWNS CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN, STEELE FIEIGHTS KASKITAY0 LAKE DISTRICT MEADOWS MILL WOODS
Apart. lotal Units Units
1981 Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
1902 Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
No. Row % No. Row %
447 (70%) 494 (60%)
126 — 573 (22%) — (100%) 165 167 826 (20%) (20%) (100%)
236 (32%) 435 (30%)
414 (55%) 591 (42"k)
98 748 (13%) 1100%) 406 1432 (28%) (100%)
153 (34%) 96 (17%)
130 166 449 (34%) . 110(1%) (29%) 100 361 557 (18%) (65%) (100%)
No. Row No. Row No. Row No. Row
308 (39%)
215 259 782 (28%) (33%) (100%)
168 (28%) 188 (65%)
315 (53%) 101 (35%)
110 593 (19%) (100%) 289 (100%)
153 (61%) 239 (100%)
99 252 (39%) — (100%) 239 (100%)
1110 (62%)
437 (24%)
1799 1100%1
1886 (71"k)
521 (21%)
2613 (100%)
545 (40%)
-379 451 1375 (28%) (32%) (100%)
94 (100%)
217 (85%)
37 (15%)
254 (100%)
65 (62%)
% % % %
252 (14%)
206 (8%)
PILOT SOUND R1VERBEND TWIN BROOKS WEST 'ASPER PLACE
94 (10016)
%)
105 39 (37%) (100%)
_ 436 (57%)
233 (31%)
763 (100%)
488 (40%)
337 392 1217 (28%) (32%) (100%)
456 (6I%)
291 139%1
No. Row %
2889 (60%)
1176 772 4837 (24%) (16%) (100%)
3618 (51%)
2316 (32%)
1212 7146 117%) (100%)
1707 (46%)
1000 (27%)
1017 3724 (27%) (100"k)
No. Row %
457 (17%)
298 1872 2627 (12%) (71%) (100%)
692 (14%)
772 3411 41175 (16%) (70%) (100%)
474 (11%)
66 (2%)
3078 4418 (87%) (100%)
CITY OF EDMONTON No. TOTAL Row %
3346 (45%)
1474 2644 7464 (20%) (35%) (100%)
4310 (36%)
3088 4623 12021 126%) (38%) (100%)
2181 (27%)
AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREA TOTAL
BUILT-UP AREA OF CITY TOTAL
18
Row % No. Row % No. Row % No. Row %
Prepared by: Cily of Edmonton Planning Department
94 (12%)
—
747 (100%)
1066 4895 8142 (13%) (60%) 1100%1
FIGURE 6-1 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS AND BUILT UP AREAS OF EDMONTON 1980-1982
DWEWNG UNITS 6000
(4895)
5000
(4623)
4000 (3346) 3000 (218 ) 2000
(1066) 1000
A. A 123 1982
123 1980
Area Structure Plan Areas Built—up Areas of the City
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
2
Row Housing Units
3
Apartment Units
19
6-2
Mix of New Development
FIGURE 6-2
The 1982 proportions tend to reinforce the recent trend towards most new apartment construction locating in the built-up areas of the city and single family and row housing locating in the ASP areas (Figure 6-2). Apartment units gained 5% each from the 1981 row housing and single family units percentages (Figure 6-2). This probably was due in large part to Government incentive programs for multi-family development (MURB and CHIP). Over 47% of all building permits issued in 1982 were for apartment development in the built-up areas of the city. The impact of the high rental vacancy rates in the latter half of 1982 and 1983 should show up in the 1983 building permit figures.
MIX OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS. BUILT UP AREAS AND THE CITY AS A WHOLE 1980-1982 DWELLING UNITS
14000 (12021
1
Apartment Units
I
1 Area Structure Plan
12000
Areas
Row Housing Units
2 Built—up Areas 10 . 000
(7464)
8000
6000
3 Total City
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
T
(8142)
(7146)
(4875)
(4837)
(4418) (3724) ,--,
4000
Comparing the 1982 figures with the 1981 indicates that the fall off in the absolute number of building permits issued was considerably less dramatic in the built up areas of the City than in the Area Structure Plan areas (9% vs. 50%).
TABLE 6-2 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT CONSTRUCTION STARTS IN THE CITY OF EDMONTON 1979-1982 1979
1980
1981
1982
Single, Semi-Det, and Duplex Units
4138 43%
3191 38%
4046 38%
1811 20%
Row Housing Units
1503 15%
2072 24%
2411 23%
1350 15%
(2627) 2000
A
VA /4 2 3 1980
1
1
2 3 1981
1
V2
FIGURE 6-3 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT CONSTRUCTION STARTS IN THE CITY OF,EDMONTON 1979-1982 SOURCE: CMHC - HOUSING STA EISTICS.
DWEWNG UNI I STARTS 16000
14000
•
12000 (10515) 10000
L
(9682)
(9111) (8446)
Apartment Units
4041 42%
3183 38%
4058 39%
5950 65%
Total Units
9682 100%
8446 100%
10515 100%
9111 100%
8000
6000
Apartment Units Row Housing Units
SOURCE: CMHC — Housing Statistics
20
A
2 3 1982
Single Family; Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
4000
2000
1979
1980
1981
1982
FIGURE 6-4
DWELLING UNIT STARTS IN A SELECTION OF CANADIAN METROPOLITAN AREAS 1977-1982 SOURCE: CMHC — Monthly Housing Stotis.
6-3
Residential Construction Starts
CM HC reported 9111 residential construction starts (measured in potential dwelling units) in the City of Edmonton in 1982 (Table 6-2), down 6% from 1981. Apartment construction starts in 1982 (as measured in potential dwelling units) were up 45% a - 85% respectively over the comparable 1981 and 1980 figures (Figure 6-3).
DWEWNG UNIT STARTS 18000 17000 /‘
16000 15000
•,
14000
VANCOUVER . . . .
A
13000
CALGARY -
12000
EDMONTON MIA
11000 \
• \
10000
\
/
.
EDMONTON CITY
In 1982, apartment unit starts represented 65% of all new residential construction activity in the City. In 1981, by comparison, they represented 39%. Several qualifications should be attached to the 1982 figures: -
approximately 20% of the 5950 apartment unit construction starts were for publicly-funded senior citizen units, up significantly from 1981 and 1980.
-
much of the apartment unit construction activity began in the first quarter of 1982 when the apartment vacancy rate was extremely low and there was a large inventory of unsold single family units.
-
a large proportion of the apartment construction activity in 1982 was in the built-up areas of the city.
-
to what extent the construction of housing for Universiade '83 affected the figures for apartment units construction activity is at present unknown.
-
the provision of government incentive programs CHIP and MURB was a contributing factor to the increase in apartment construction.
9000 8000 1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
YEAR
DWELLING UNIT STARTS 10000 SASKATOON
9000 8000
REGINA 7000 VICTORIA
6000 5000
• OTTAWA
4000 QUEBEC 3000 WINNIPEG
2000 1000 0 1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
_J 1982
Figure 6-4 compares construction starts in Edmonton and some other Canadian cities over the past 5 years. In spite of the sharp decline in activity in 1982, the number of construction starts in Edmonton continued to be greater than in many other Canadian cities, including Vancouver.
YEAR
21
7. RESIDENTIAL LAN) SUPPLY
FIGURE 7-1 YEAR—END SUPPLY OF VACANT SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS DECEMBER 1980-1982
7-1 Supply of Serviced Residential Land
POTENTIAL DWELUNG UNITS
A the end of 1982 there was vacant serviced residential land in the City's Area Structure Plan areas with a capacity of 31,900 potential dwelling units, up about 12% from the comparable 1981 figure (Table 7-1). In 1982 the apartment capacity increased by about 2300 potential dwelling units or 18%; the row housing capacity by about 900 potential dwelling units or 5% and single family capacity by about 345 units or 4%.
35000 (31900) (29567)
30000
(28374)
25000
20000
The proportion of land designated for apartment units, row housing and single family housing has however, remained substantially the same, though a slight increase (2%) in apartment units and a slight decrease in single family units (2%) is noted (Figure 7-1).
15000
10000
5000
1980
1981
1982
1980-1982*
*AVERAGE ANNUAL DWEWNG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN ASP AREAS.
1
1
Apartment Units
F-1 Row Housing Units 177274 Single Family, semi— Detached, Duplex Units
TABLE 7-1 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1980-1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
Duplex Units
1 9110 Row Apart. Total Units Units Units
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
19112 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Unils Unils
CASTLE DOWNS
1083
1085
5611
2736
9211
789
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN, STEELE HEIGH I'S KASKITAYO LAKE DISTRICT MEADOWS MILLWOODS l'ILOT SOUND RIVERBEND TWIN BROOKS WEST JASPER PLACE
575
2284
769
911
409
2 I 119
877 1109 3805 290 1396
2577 773 2542 147 1073
165.1 2298 5141 69 3081
5107 4180 11488 506 5550
513 1062 687 2997 1003 1479
1985 769 71 21114 326 887
1464 2554 5354 69 21.81.
:1962 4385 758 10535 13911 5052
648 1182 825 .._
2080 855 71 -21140 .1117 --
1 )04 2596
41142
-8202 2485
--
AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREA TOTAL
8560
8197
121110
29567
8661
7011
12702 211174
91107
Single, Semi
l'repared by: City of Edmonton Planning Depanntent
22
2601 940 -2042
813
7897
4613
1 16.1.1
-1247 -5340
149'16 31900
FIGURE 7-2 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTMTY IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1980-1982
7 2 -
Residential Land Servicing Activity
Table 7-2 shows that residential land with a development potential of 5719 units was serviced in 1982. This figure includes 3431 potential multi-family dwelling units in the Iowa neighbourhood of Mill Woods although servicing of this land was carried out in 1981. The figure appears in the 1982 total only because the plan of subdivision for Iowa was registered in 1982.
POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS 14000 (12094) 12000
10000
In drawing conclusions about the level of servicing activity in the City, it must be remembered that the total 1982 figure is inflated and conceals the more significant activity in servicing single family land which actually took place.
8000
(55136)
6000
(5719) (5235)
1
I
Apartment Units Row Housing Units
2000
=21 1980
1981
1982
1980-1982.
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
•AVERAGE ANNUAL OWELUNG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN ASP AREAS.
TABLE 7-2 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1980-1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1980 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Units Units Duplex Units Units
1981 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Units Units Duplex Units Units
57
—
— 75 — 321 658 217 172 — 1047 — — — 180 438 1691 — — — 216 — 1145 — — — 106 729 42
252 175 383 — — — — — 1040
633 169 212 175 — — — — 3113 — — -3431 2703 728 — — — — — — — — 71040 — — '
891
1907
897
72
64
327 719 1651 386 2379 3318 — — — — — — 500 2939 5315 — — — — 39 — — — — 234 207 1032
75 120 875 — 1073 — 929 — 581
6545
3725
CASTLE DOWNS CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN, STEELE HEIGHTS KASKITAYO LAKE DISTRICT MEADOWS MILLWOODS PILOT SOUND RIVERBEND TWIN BROOKS WEST JASPER PLACE
192
246
605 553 — — 1876 — 39 — 591
AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREA TOTAL
3856
1693
301
739
12094
1982 Row Apart. Total Single, Semi Units Units Duplex Units Units
105
970
241
5586
—
2915
57
5719
Prepared by: City of Edmonton Planning Department
23
7-3 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land
At the end of 1982, there was vacant subdivided residential land in the Area Structure Plan areas with a potential capacity of 32,185 dwelling units, up about 1100 units or 3.5% from 1981. Virtually all of this capacity is on serviced land. Implications are discussed in Section 2.
FIGURE 7-3 YEAR END SUPPLY OF VACANT RESIDENTIAL LAND• (SERVICED AND UNSERVICED) IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1980-1982 POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS 35000 (34198)
(32185) (31097)
.
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000 (5235) 5000
0 19130
1981
1982
1980-1982.
.AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELL/NG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERINI'S IN ASP AREAS.
Apartment Units
1* •••••••1
A Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
Row Housing Units •
TABLE 7-3 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1980-1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1980 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
1982 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units Units
955
864
804
931
CASTLE DOWNS CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN, STEELE HEIGHTS KASKITAYO LAKE DISTRICT MEADOWS MILLWOODS PILOT SOUND RIVERBEND TWIN BROOKS WEST lASPER PLACE
1190
1160
877 1151 385 — 4205 — 646 — 2068
2911. 2034 5822 968 '2696 4815 43 — 428 — — — 2729 6096 13030 — — — 248 69 963 — — — 1073 3081 6222
513 1062 687 — 3148 — 1003 — 2292
2319 1845 4677 769 2554 4385 71 — 758 — — — 2325 6147 11620 — — — 326 69 1398 — — — 887 2686 5865
648 1182 825 — 2601 — 940 — 2087
4032 2080 1304 855 2596 4633 — 896 71 — — — 13848 2840 8407 — — — 1247 307 — — — — 813 2485 5385
AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREA TOTAL
10522
9132
9660
7561
9087
7897
Prepared by: City of Edmonton Planning Department
24
568
2918
14544 34198
575
2394 •
13876 31097
409
2144
15201 32185
7-4 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity
FIGURE 7-4 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1980-1982
A subdivision is not included in this Report unless it has received approval after third reading by Council and has been registered under the Alberta Land Titles Act. A subdivision which had received approval in 1981 but was not registered until 1982 thus appears in the 1982 figures.
POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS
During 1982, land with a development potential of 5666 dwelling units was registered as having received subdivision approval in 1982, up 1520 units or 37% from 1981 (Table 7-4). Because of the registration in 1982 of the Tawa (Mill Woods) plan of subdivision (see Section 7-2) the 1982 figures for multi-family are higher than might be expected.
I 1980
1982
1981
I
Row Housing Units
Apartment Units
Single Family, Semi—
Detached, Duplex Units
1980-1982.
.'AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN ASP AREAS.
TABLE 7-4 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1980-1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1980 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
1981 Row Apart. Total Single, Semi Units Duplex Units Units Units
1982 Apart. Total Row Single, Semi Units Units Duplex Units Units
CA5 .11.1: DOWNS CLAM:VIEW, 1 IERMITAGE, CASSELMAN, STEELE IIIGI ITS KASKITAY0 [AKE DISTRICT INTEAI /OWS 11.411.1.W1 X /I )5 P11_01 S( )JND RIVERBEND [WIN 11R0( /KS WEST 'ASPER ['LACE
218
51
296
565
—
64
105
169
—
—
150
150
79 474 3115 — 331 — .161 — 596
190 298 43 — 342 — 101 — 169
764 962 — — 2284 — :14 — 2117
1033 17.1 ,1 428 — 2957 -498 — 11112
57 120 490 — 824 — 573 — 711
_ 141 129 — 1211 — 115 —
— 221 — — 1111 — — —
57 484 619 — 1270 — 688 —
42
106
859
252 138 376 — — — — — 118 I
169 — — — 7211 — — — 162
212 — — — 2703 — — — 95
633 138 376 — 3431 — — — 938
AREA St RUC:LURE PLAN AREA TOTAL
2651,
1114
4547
11.117
2775
619
752
4141,
3160
5666
1447
1059
Prepaied by: Cily ot Edmonton Planning Department
25
7 5 -
Supply of Unsubdivided (Raw) Land In Area Structure Plan Areas
For the purposes of this Report, "raw land" or "gross developable residential land" is defined as unsubdivided land which is designated residential in an approved Area Structure Plan area. Districting (zoning) need not be in place nor need there be an approved neighbourhood structure plan. Once, however, an approved plan of subdivision is registered in that plan area, the amount of land covered by that plan of subdivision is subtracted from the raw land total for that Area Structure Plan area.
TABLE 7-5 SUPPLY OF RAW LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS IN DECEMBER 1981 AND 1982
AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS
1982
1981 Hectares
RAW LAND SUBDIVIDED IN 19112
CASTLE DOWNS CLAREV1EW, HERMITAGE, CASSEL MAN , STEELE 11E10 ITS KASKTUAN'O
14 2
I 15
27
:10
23
7
LAKE DIS . FRILL
921
7911
1 2.1
MEAD( )WS
—
I 099
—
The definition also implies that these tracts be large and contiguous. Small parcels of unsubdivided land in relatively built up areas are not included in the raw land totals.
MILL W( K /DS
127
62
PILOT SOUND
550
550
—
RIVERBEND
458
458
—
1 WIN BROOKS
194
194
--
In 1982, there was a total of 3567 hectares of raw land in the Area Structure Plan areas, up 821 hectares or 32% from 1981 (Table 7-5). Approval of The Meadows in 1982 added 1099 hectares to this total. Approximately 278 hectares of raw land were subdivided in 1982 (Table 7-5). Two hundred and four (204) hectares were subdivided in 1981 (not shown).
WEST /ASPER PLACE
324
2611
56
2746
3567
2711
Using the average of these 2 years as a rough estimate of the current rate of consumption there was at the end of 1982 a IS-year supply of raw land developable as residential in approved ASP areas.
26
ASP AREAS TOI-Al.
65
8. CITY-OWNED RESIDENTIAL LAND 8-1 City-Owned Serviced Residential Land Through its Real Estate and Housing Department, the City of Edmonton owns vacant serviced residential land that had, at the end of 1982, a development potential of 9120 units (Table 8-1). Almost all of this land is in Mill Woods. This figure represents an increase of about 30% over the corresponding figure indicated in Table 8.1 for 1981. Tawa neighbourhood, which was actually serviced and subdivided in 1981 (see Section 7-2), appears in Table 8-1 for the first time.
TABLE 8-1 SUPPLY OF CITY-OWNED VACANT SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1980
TOTAL COMBINED PLAN AREAS
1981
Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Total Units
Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
2078
5408
7486
1603
4797
1982 . Total Units
6400
Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Total Units
1788
7332
9120
•
SOURCE: Real Estate and hlousing Department, City of Edmonton NOTE: Revisions to Figures Published in 1981
27
8-2
Servicing Program for City-Owned Land
Apart from the 3431 multi-family units in Tawa neighbourhood (see Section 7-2) there were 57 City-owned lots serviced in 1982. These lots -- all single family -located in the East Lorelei neighbourhood of Castle Downs, were serviced in accordance with the approved 1982 servicing program for City owned land.
TABLE 8-2 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SERVICING ACTIVITY FOR CITY-OWNED LAND, 1980-1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1980 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Units Duplex Units Units Units
MILL WOODS
1269
288
1366
2923
1269
288
1366
SOURCE: Real Estate and Housing Department, City of Edmonton
28
96
47
82
62
OTHER PLAN AREAS TOTAL COMBINED PLAN AREAS
1981 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Units Units Duplex Units Units
2923
158
47
82
1982 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Units Units Duplex Units Units
728
225 62
57
287
57
2703
3431 57
728
2703
3488
8-3
City-Owned Subdivided Residential Land
At the end of 1982, the inventory of City-owned subdivided residential land in Area Structure Plan areas, including serviced and unserviced lots, had a development potential of 9234 units. (Table 8-3) Comparing this figure with the corresponding figure in Table 8-1 indicates that almost all the City owned subdivided land is serviced. All but 281 of these units are in Mill Woods.
TABLE 8-3 SUPPLY OF CITY-OWNED VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND (SERVICED AND UNSERVICED) IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
TOTAL COMBINED PLAN AREAS
1982
1981
1980 Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Total Units
Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Total Units
Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Total Units
2078
4254
6332
1894
4797
6691
1902
7332
9234
SOURCE: Real Estate and Housing Department, City of Edmonton NOTE: Revisions to figures published in 1981
29
8-4
Sales of City-Owned Residential Land
In 1982, land with a development potential of 1169 units was sold by the City. All but 9 of these units were in Mill Woods. There were also 273 single family lots sold in 1982, down 63% from the corresponding 1981 sales figures.
TABLE 8-4 CITY-OWNED LAND SOLD FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT * 1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Total Units
Single Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Total Units
jingle Family Units
Multi-Family Units
Total Units
MILL WOODS
512
62
574
625
740
1365
264
896
1160
OTHER PLAN AREAS
14
—
14
a
—
8
9
526
62
588
637
740
1373
273
AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS
TOTAL COMBINED PLAN AREAS
'Sales of a City-owned lot carried the obligation to begin construction on a residential unit within four months. SOURCE: Real Estate and Housing Department, City of Edmonton NOTE: Revisions to figures published in 1981
30
1982
1981
1980
9
896
1169
8-5 The Supply of City-Owned Raw Land In 1982, the supply of City-owned raw land increased with the acquisition of 104.4 ha in The Meadows. An 11.9 ha parcel in Steele Heights and two parcels totalling 21.5 ha in West Jasper Place were redesignated from industrial to residential uses in 1982. These are included in this year's inventory for the first time. The registration of the plan of subdivision for Tawa in Mill Woods decreased the supply of raw land by 64.8 ha. The net increase in 1982 in the supply of City-owned raw land designated for residential uses was 65.0 ha or 16%. The total supply of city-owned raw land at the end of 1982 stood at 475.8 ha (Table 8-5).
TABLE 8-5 CITY-OWNED RAW LAND IN AREA STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS, DECEMBER 1982 HECTARES C:asselinan/SIcel
11.9
Lake Dis1ric1
119.4
h1eadows
104.4
Mill Woods mid)
95.4
Pilot Sound
90.0
Rivelbend
63.2
â– Vest lasncr Plat c
21.5
Ill (;j).( hvned Raw Land in AS. I'. Areas
475.11
S( )(1RCE: Real lislale and I lousing Iii:pailincrit. Cily of tdinonlon
31
1.6
(r)
• =t.
N.
cr,
• 11111111111111.111111111101111111111111 MO
S
MN
IS
cr) : 11601111 M11 11111111IMINICIIIIIIII
STIRLING Lorelei Dunluce
rr • •
. 61
WARWICK—
5ammeimmemessittim
II III III MIIMOIM MIII II IIIIIIN
E 167 AVE.
153 AVE.
a
\\ Caernarvon a
GRIESBACH
CASTLE DOWNS Castle Downs Plans Neighbourhoods
S a
137 AVE.
32
9. CASTLE DOWNS 9-1 Housing Stock At the end of 1982 there were 8443 dwelling units in Castle Downs (Table 9-1). 62% of this total are single family units, 24% are row housing units and 14% are apartment units (Figure 9-1).
FIGURE 9-1 MIX OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS IN CASTLE DOWNS. DECEMBER 31. 1982
TABLE 9-1 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN CASTLE DOWNS TO DECEMBER 31, 1982 DWELLING UNITS APPROVED CASTLE DOWNS NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
—
BARANOW 13ATURYN BEAUMARIS CAERNARVON CARLISLE DUNLUCE LORELEI
1252 576 886 688 ' 1135 727
281 256 437 267 412 390
246 206 137 469 78
— 1533 1078 1529 1092 2016 1195
CASTLE DOWNS TOTAL
5264
2043
1136
8443
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
33
9-2 Residential Building Permits
FIGURE 9-2 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED EACH YEAR IN CASTLE DOWNS 1980-1982
449 dwelling units were approved by building permit in Castle Downs in 1982, down 40% from 1981. (Table 9-2) Figure 9-2 (opposite) graphically illustrates the changing proportion of single family, row housing and apartment units in this Area Structure Plan area.
DWELLING UNITS APPROVED 1200
Apartment Units Row Housing Units
1003
?Z&Z (748)
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
(590)
(573)
e./././77
200
1
980
(449)
•
7
1982
1981
1980-1982*
•AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 9-2 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN CASTLE DOWNS IN EACH YEAR, 1980 - 1982 CASTLE DOWNS NEIGHBOURHOODS
34
1980 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
BARANOW BATURYN BEAUMARIS CAERNARVON CARLISLE DUN LUCE LORELEI
39 166 70
35
CASTLE DOWNS TOTAL
447
126
16 150
91
1981 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Units Units Duplex Units Units
16 241 6 39 201 70
3 73 16 14 82 48
135 53
573
236
414
98
44 182
98
1982 Apart. Total Row Single, Semi Units Units Duplex Units Units
138 224 16 58 264 48
1 31 1 16 65 39
— 47
— 88
1 166
39 — 44
___ — 78
55 65 161
748
153
130
166
449
FIGURE 9-3 SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN CASTLE DOWNS 1980-1982
9-3
At the end of 1982, Castle Downs contained serviced land with a capacity of 2109 dwelling units (Table 9-3). Of this potential capacity, 36% is represented by single family units, 44% by row housing units and 20% by apartment units (Figure 9-3). The supply of serviced land, as measured by potential dwelling units, dropped 8% compared with the 1981 figure. At land consumption rates over the period 1980 to 1982, there is a 2.7-year supply of land for single family units, a 4.1-year supply of land for row housing units and a 5-year supply of land for apartment units.
POTENTIAL DWELUNG UNITS 3000
1 1 •
(2734) 2500
(2109)
(2284)
2000 .
.
.
.
.
.
.• .
-:-:•:-:•:
1500
Supply of Serviced Residential Land
:•:•:•:•:•:
• .•.•.•.•.
:-:-:•:•:•:
1000
.".".• . • .
VA
500
(sso)
/
1 1980
I
I.•-•
Apartment Units
Row Housing Units
1982
A Single Family, SemiDetached, Duplex Units
•AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELIJNG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 9-3 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN CASTLE DOWNS, 1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) CASTLE DOWNS NEIGHBOURHOODS
BARAN( MA/ ISA EURYN 111:AUMARIS CALKNARV( IN CARLISLE 1 MJNI.LICE LORI:Ill CAS11.F. 1OTA1.
19110 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
'— 90 296 75 1115 2.17 200
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
1982 Apart. Total Row Single, Semi Units Units Duplex Units Units
-262 156 36 2112 276 73
— — 96 — — 372 1011
— 352 5411 III 467 31115 373
— 117 274 59 172 155 173
— 197 151 36 2.111 94 73
— — 103 — — 372 10(1
— 2114 5211 95 .110 62 1 346
— 116 243 511 156 92 1:14
— 197 :176 36 199 94 29
— — 15 — — :172 22
— 2133 6:14 94 355 5511 1115
10115
5611
2736
920
7119
575
22114
769
931
409
2109
MNNS 10113
35
9-4
Residential Land Servicing Activity
FIGURE 9-4 RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN CASTLE DOWNS 1980-1982
During 1982, land with a potential of 57 single family units was serviced in Castle Downs by the Real Estate and Housing Department of the City of Edmonton. There was no other servicing activity in Castle Downs during 1982.
POTENTIAL DWELUNG UNITS 2000 1800
I
I
Apartment Units
1800
••
1400
Row Housing Units Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
1200 1000 800
L
( 739)
(590)
BOO 400
•. • ."
(241)
0
200 57 1980
17=1
17=721
1901
1982
980-1982.
.AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 9-4 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN CASTLE DOWNS, 1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1')I10 CASTLE DOWNS NEIGHOURDOODS
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
Apart. Total Units Units
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
1982 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
BARANOW BATURYN BEAUMARIS CAERNARVON CARLISLE DUNLUCE LORELEI
— — 74 — 112 6 —
— — 16'2 — — 114 —
— -46 16 — 161) 51
-— 2112 36 112 258 51
— -51 — -— 21
192
246
301
7.1')
72
CASTLE DOWNS tOrAt.
36
— 16 411 — — — —
— — 105 — --— —
— 16 204 — — — 21
57
57
1115
241
57
57
FIGURE 9-5 SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN CASTLE DOWNS 1980-1982
At the end of 1982, Castle Downs contained vacant subdivided land with a capacity of 2144 dwelling units (Table 9-5). Comparing this figure with that in Table 9-3 indicates that virtually all of this land is serviced. Of this total, 19% is designated for apartment development, 43% for row housing and 38% for single family development.
PO1Erf0AL DWELLING UNITS (2918) 2500
Supply of Subdivided Residential Land
9-5
(2144)
(239 4)
2000 .•.• .• .• .•
1500 .'
.
.
.
.
.
.•:•:•:•".•: .•.
.
.
.
1000 (590) ./•
I
Adt 980
198
1982
I
Apartment Units
•
Row Housing Units
1980-1982*
4
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
*AVERAGE ANNUAL DVIELUNG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 9-5 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN CASTLE DOWNS, 1980-1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) CASTLE DOWNS NEICIIIIOURTIOODS
1980 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
BARANOW BA EURYN BEAUN1ARIS CAERNARV( )N CARLISLE 1)UNLUCE 1.1)R1:1.13
— 90 :147 75 185 237 256
— — — 262 — 352 '16 231 674 36 — III 282 — 467 276 372 11115 73 1110 429
— 117 274 59 172 155 208
— — — __ 197 2114 226 I03 603 — 95 36 _ 41(1 238 94 372 (,21 73 MO 381
— 86 243 511 156 92 169
— — — 197 — 2113 376 15 634 — '14 36 _ 19') 355 558 372 94 220 29 22
(AS III: DOWNS . 1 .01A1.
1190
111,11
955
1164
804
93 I
5611
29131
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total . Duplex Units Units Units Units
575
2.194
1982 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
409
2144
37
9-6
Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity
FIGURE 9-6 RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN CASTLE DOWNS 1980-1982
No new subdivisions were registered during the past year (Figure 9-6). There was, however, a redistricting in Beaumaris which yielded I 50 additional apartment units.
POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS 1200
I
I
Apartment Units
1000
Row Housing Units Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units (585)
(590)
(189)
200
NO PGRVITY .•.•.'.'.•.
1980
1981
1982
1980-1982*
*AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY EiLIILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 9-6 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN CASTLE DOWNS, 1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) CASTLE DOWNS NEIGHBOURHOODS
1980 Row Apart. Total Single, Semi Duplex Units Units Units Units
1981 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units Units
BARANOW BATURYN I3EAUMARIS CAERNARVON CARLISLE DUNLUCE LORELEI
— — 125 — 57 6 30
— — — — — — .16 171 — — 36 36 — — 57 163 220 51 — 81 51
— — — —
CASTLE DOWNS TOTAL
218
51
• Result ol redistricting
38
2%
565
— — — 16 16 — 48 1115 15.1 — — —
6-1
105
169
1982 Row Apart. Total Single, Semi Units Units Duplex Units Units
150
150•
150
150
1•111
=a Ma
=111 MN 110 011 a= MI I= Ma SW =I
Land Use District Codes AG
AGRICUI [URAL DIST RIC1
113
ININ1S I RI AL
AGU
URBAN RESERVE DIS IRIC 1
OA
MEDIUM INDUS1R1AL
AGI
INDUSIRIAL RESERVE
IN
HEAVY
A
ME I ROPOL 11AN RECREATION DISTRICT
DISTRICT
API
SINGLE
RF2
LOW
APT
Pt •104TO LWRE SIDENI IAL DISIRICT
REP
UE I AC HED RE SIDENNAL DISTRICT
DENSITY
INFILL
DISTRICT
TOW DENSII Y REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
flf4
SEMI-DE TACHED RESIDENTIAL DISIIIICT
BPS
AP
INDUSTRIAL
DISIRICT DISIRICT
PUBLIC
PARKS DISTRICT
US
URBAN
SERVICE
PU
PIA11.1C
UTILITY DISTRICT
MA
MUNICIPAL
SlATUIOPY PL AN OVERLAY
DISIRIC I
AIRPORT DISIRICT
ROW HOUSING DIST AIC I
SP°
PPE
MEDIUM DENSITY MUL I IP, 1 (AMITY DISTRIC I
APO
AIRPORT PROTECTION OVERLAY
RAT
TOW RISE
RAS
MEDIUM RISE
DC1
DIREC I
11A9
HIGH RISE
DC?
COMPREHENSIVELY
RANI
RESIDENIIAL
RR
RURAL
ROAN
MOBILE NOME DISTRICT
CNC
NEIGHBOURHOOD
APARTMENI DISTRICT APARIMENT DISIRIC 1
APARTMENT DISTRIC I MIXED USE
RESIDENTIAL
DISIRICT
DISTRICT
CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL INS I RIC l
CENTRE
I IMPORART
OCI
SPECIAL PUBLIC
see
PLANNED DEVELOPMENI
bem e,1
DISIRIC I
HOLDING DISTRICT SERVICE
(NSIRIC I
Deonnetno APPKed IA Com...W, timssmq ides 0. tri •co.o.d..n ant.e .... .r.. tho S .oecsonw hon R 9A 2 81 zInt ..Use Run.
CSC
SHOPPING
CBI
LOW
COP
GENERAL
CNY
HIGHWAY CORRIDOR DISIRICT
CO
COMMERCIAL
OFFICE
CMX
COMMERCIAL
MIXED USE
INTENSITY
DIVE. OPMEN I CONTROL DISTRICT I
OCT
.
DISTRICT
el a&osdanee eallh Seclann 220 S. (And Use 13111A.
BUSINESS DISTRICT
BUSINESS
. Linul ol Edmonton 111soroctpal A•pott Ploleotton Owes Iay
DISTRICT
DISTRICT DISIRIC 1
-...';'7
s"— ' ' 1 ReLlItcleo Deyelopmen. Am. 18.0 A.I .1 ......Ze. ,.. Immonelon autemd 10 %nes 10111 alined no specohed development •emAalems tn accondenre with . Serten 820. l.ind Use Dela* DC I
40
BUSINESS DISIRICI
1 m me ose ............. .1.01 de•mopmeni • ono... I,.. In:; 11. .... 15. 1....,........ I., II.. applo .dne • ■ •• RedeveKonnent In toe.. Snot lo.• Plan
Clareview, Hermitage, Casselman and Steele Heights Plan Neighbourhoods
PILOT SOUND
ln
1`
I
_1.• ‘.
'
l
153 AVE.
evolssommem,
iimmiummumuummosoma
a
Miller
.11 1
•
McLeod
a a a a a a
2
CASS
/111111BOOMM
ismose ll II
V Ebbers
r
STEELEE • ORM HEIGL -.;
Kirkness
Fra ser
at• vr‘ MIL
uuuuluuuuu
Hairsine Clareview Town Centre
137 AVE.
'
:B
MAN/
•
E
IINIIIIIIIO111111
•
Bannerman
CLAREVIEW
(1) ,
c)
se
Sifton Park 11111 1111111
Kernohan
• al/me
KEN N EDALE
.
Homesteader
HERMITAGE Canon Ridge
CITY OWNED Overlanders 5.
Portion SE 1/4 35-53-24-W4
AG
5.12 Hectares I—; c.r)
6.
/13 Lot I R, 2R, 3R Block 20 Plan 2572R - S Block 17 Plan 3551 AD Parcel A, B Plan 3033 HW
AG
6.8 Hectares
In
41
10.
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS AND CASSELM AN
10-I Housing Stock At the end of 1982, Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman contained 9841 dwelling units, (Table 10-1). Of this total, 39% are single family units, 31% are row housing units, and 30% are apartment units, (Figure 10-1).
TABLE 10-1 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS AND CASSELMAN TO DECEMBER 31, 1982
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN NEIGI IBOURHOODS
DWELLING UNITS APPROVED Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
CLAREVIEW BANNERMAN BELMONT . ERAZER 1 - IA1RSINE KERNOHAN KIRKNESS SIFTON PARK 11 ANN CENTRE
503 575 510 254 518 327 278 —
231 3:44 223 436 316 27 148 —
330 381 124 1211 — 201 483 —
1064 1290 857 818 044 555 909 —
CIAREVIEW TOTAL
2965
1715
1647
1,327
1 II RMITAGE CANNON RIDGE 110MESTEADER OVERLANDERS
42 509 196
58 652 111)
— 333 457
100 1494 733
HERtvIIIAGE TOTAL
747
790
7911
2327
sir-ill. HEIGIf ES mcaor) NEIGHBOURHOOD 2 NEIGHBOURHOOD 3 NEIGHBOURHOOD 5
149 — — —
576 — — —
462 — — —
1187 — — —
STEELE HEIGH ES TOTAL
149
576
462
1187
386 I
308 I
2899
9144 I
CASSELMAN .1-0TAL
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN TOTAL
42
FIGURE 10-1 MIX OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN AND STEELE HEIGHTS, DECEMBER 31, 1982
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
10-2 Residential Building Permits
*AWE ANNUAL DAVELUNG
utals
APPROVED BY SODOM PERMITS.
During 1982, 557 dwelling units were approved by building permit in this Area Structure Plan area, down 61% from the comparable 1981 figure (Table 10-2). Of the 1982 total, 17% were single family units, 18% were row housing units, and 65% were apartment units (Figure 10-2). As a proportion of the total, apartment development, as measured by building permits issued, is up almost 50% from the comparable 1981 figure while row housing and single family are both down by almost the same proportion.
FIGURE 10-2 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN AND STEELE HEIGHTS, 1980-1982 POTENTIAL DWELUNG UNITS 1600 (1432) 1400
1200
1000
03/9 (826)
(551)
200
980
982
980-1982*
*AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
I Apartment Units
Row Housing Units y
Single Family. Semi— Detached. Duplex Units
43
TABLE 10-2 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS AND CASSELMAN IN EACH YEAR, 1980 - 1982 CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN NEIGHBOURHOODS
1980 Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
CASSELMAN TOTAL
1981 Apart. Total Units Units
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
NO 1110,111 S ISSUED
Apart. Total Units Units
111 — 380 32 23 35 — —
I-I — -97 — — — —
.19 — — 128 — — — —
63 -380 257 2 3. 35 — —
1 -112 12 III 251 — —
63 -195 112 — 27 — —
— — 124 .— — 7/1 — ---
CLAREVIEW TOTAL
480
III
1147
758
394
397
I IERMFIAGE CANNON RIDGE HOMESTEADER OVERLANDERS
1
— 54 —
— (44 1
1 4)1 ---
HERMITAGE 'TOTAL
II
54
145
41
_ —
.1
STEELE I IEIGHTS rI )TAL CLAREVIEW, IIERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGI ITS, CASSELMAN TO? A1.
494
1135
1147
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
N(.1 VERMITS I55011.1)
CLAREV1EW BANNERMAN BELMONT FRAZER HAIRSINE KERNOHAN K1RKNESS SIFT( )N PARK TOWN CENTRE
STEELE HEIGHTS MCLH ID NEIGHBOUR11001) 2 NIEGE111011181()( )D NEIGI111( )1,JR1 R 8 11..) 5
411
19112
821,
435
NI / VERMIES ISS111.1)
64 ._ 431 12.1 18 3514 — —
--18 7 •1,2 — --
202
'193
117
._ — 13
— — 204
1 40 247
8 1
.13
2114
278
.1)
11,1
161
161
161
591
4116
Apart. Total Units Units
1.112
4144
211
I ll
185
28
124
218
58 I-1
411 1-17
66 92 1141
'
238
419
100
461
557
10-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land At the end of 1982, Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman contained serviced land with a capacity of 4032 additional dwelling units (Table 10-3). This figure is virtually unchanged from the comparable 1981 figure indicating that servicing activity just kept pace with sales. Casselman was redesignated to industrial uses in 1982.
FIGURE 10-3 SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN, STEELE HEIGHTS, 1980-1982 POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS 6000
(5107) 5000
(3962)
4000
(4032)
3000
2000
(938)
1000
1980
1981
A
1982
1980 - 1982•
*AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
1
I
Apartment Units Row Housing Units Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
45
TABLE 10-3 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS AND CASSELMAN IN EACH YEAR,1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
CASSELMAN TOTAL
19112
1981
1980 Apart. Total Units Units
•
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
Row _ Apart. Total Single, Semi Units Units Duplex Units Units
Apart. Total • Units Units
1\1( ) SI:RVICISI / I.1 /TS
NO SERVICED LOTS
NC) SERVICED LOTS
I
i
•
CLAREVIEW liANNERMAN BELMONT FRAZER HAIRSINE KERNOHAN KIRKNESS S1FTON PARK TOWN CENTRE
32 1 175 56 61 291 7 —
:126 — 304 212 110 83 — —
235 — 126 173 — 95 — —
593 I 605 4•11 171 469 7 —
:12 I 118 44 43 86 7 —
26:1 — 108 100 110 56
CLAREV1EW :FOTAL
623
1035
629
2287
HERMITAGE CANNON RIDGE HOMESTEADER OVERLANDERS
12.1 72 4
1,1,7 39 659
504 100 420
1294 211 1083
-7—
498 — — 173 — — .— —
793 I 196 317 153 142 7 —
:12 1 70 37 43 255 7 —
263 — Mb 1101 1 III 225 — --
498 -— 173 — 78 .— —
793 1 176 310 15:1 55/1 7 —
301
637
671
1609
445
004
749
1990
122 32 4
667 .19 626
504 100 109
1293 171 819
114 .11 4
609 39 612
504 9 42
1127 79 658
•
'
i
I
1
.
1•IERMITAGE TOTAL
199
1365
1024
2588
158
3.132
793
2283
149
1260
555
1964
STEELE HEIGHTS MCLEOD NEIGHBOURHOOD 2 NIEGI - 113OUREIOOD 3 NEIGHBOURHOOD 5
55 — — —
177 — — —
— — — —
2:12 — — —
54 — — —
16 — — —
— — — —
70 — — —
54 — — —
16 — — —
— — — —
70 — — --
STEELE HEIGHTS TOTAL
55
177
—
232
54
It.
—
711
54
16
—
70
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN TOTAL
877
2577 '1653
513
1985
1464
3962
648
2080
1.104
40:12
i
• 111
• 5107
i
I
I
1 16
10-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity During 1982, land with a capacity of 633 dwelling units was serviced (Table 10-4). This compares with the 3-year average of 938 dwelling units. It is noted from Figure 10-4 that there was virtually no servicing activity in 1981. Table 10-4 also indicates that all of the servicing activity in 1982 was in the Kirkness neighbourhood of Clareview.
FIGURE 10-4 RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN AND STEELE HEIGHTS, 1980-1982 POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS 1800 (1815)
Apartment Units
1800
Row Housing Units 1400
Single Family, SemiDetached, Duplex Units
1200 1000
(938)
800 (833) 800 400 200 (75) 1980
1981
1982
1980-1982.
•AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
47
1 TABLE 10-4 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS AND CASSELMAN IN EACH YEAR, 1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) CLARE VIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN NEIGHBOURHOODS
Row Single, Semi Duplex Units Units
CASSELMAN TOTAL CLAREV1EW BANNERMAN BELMONT FRAZER 1 - 1AIRSINE KERNOFIAN KIRKNESS SIFION l'ARK TOWN CENTRE
Apart. Total Units Units
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
Apart. Total Units Units
Row Single, Semi Duplex Units Units
273 -
119 62 19 -
I I') 8811 19 -
-
CLAREVIEW TOTAL
531
273
200
100-1
HERMITAGE CANNON RIDGE H OMESTEADER OVERLANDERS
7-1 --
54 -
255 51 213
I•1ERMITAGE .10TAL
74
54
51')
Apart. Total Units Units
NO SERVIC1.1) I.( ) US
NO) SERVICED I.( (IS
N() SERVICED LOTS
531 . ---
SI E E LE HEICI•ITS MCLEOD NEIGHBOURHOOD 2 NIEGHBOURI - 1000 3 NEIGI•IBOURHOOD 5
19112
1981
1980
11.
4') 19( --
-252 -. -
-169 ._ -
212
-
--
-
633 .-
75
--
-
75
252
110)
212
633
255 179 213
--
-
---
-
-
-•-
..,
--•
647
-
--
-
-
-
-
49 -
-
-i
-•
i
I
--
•
I
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-•
--
6115
327
719
1651
75
-
-
75
252
169
212
I
STEELE HEIGHTS TOTAI. CAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGEFES, CASSELMAN TOTAL
I
633
i
I
I
48
10-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land At the end of 1982, Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman contained vacant, subdivided land with a development potential of 4032 dwelling units (Table 10-5). This figure is down about 13% from the comparable 1981 figure (Figure 10-5). The supply of land designated for single family development is up somewhat over the comparable 1981 figure while the supply of land designated for apartment development is down approximately 7% from the 1981 figure.
FIGURE 10-5 SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN AND STEELE HEIGHTS, 1980-1982 POTENTIAL DWEWNG UNITS 8000 (5822) 5000
(4877) (4032)
4000
3000
2000
(938)
1000
1980
1981
1982
1980-1982*
• AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELUNG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
I
1 • ..1
Apartment Units Row Housing Units Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
49
TABLE 10-5 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS AND CASSELMAN IN EACH YEAR, 1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN NEIGHBOURHOODS
1980
1982
19111
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
Apart. Total Units Units
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
Apart Total Units Units
Single, Semi Row - Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
(LAKEVIEW l)ANNERMAN 13ELMONT FRAZER HAIRSINE KERN( :NAN KIRKNESS S1FTON l'ARK TOWN CENTRE
32 1 175 56 61 291 7 —
321, — 304 212 110 8.4 — .—
235 — 121, 173 — 95 — —
593 1 605 441 171 469 7 —
.12
263
498
79.1
.12
21,3
I
_
__
I
I
• ••
I
88 44 43 116 7 --
108 1110 110 56 — —
— 17:1 — -— --
196 317 153 142 7 —
70 .17 43 255 — —
106 100 17.1 11078 225 -• ---
171, 110 IS) 558
CLAREVIEW TOTAL
623
1369
1010
31102
301
971
1052
2324
445
11114
7-19
1998
HERMEEAGE CANNON RIDGE HOMESTEADER OVERLANDERS
123 72 4
14,7 39 659
504 100 420
1294 20 10113
122 32 4
1,67 39 626
504 1110 189
129.1 171 1119
114 31 4
61 PI 39 1,12
504 42
1227 79 1,511
HERMITAGE .[OTAI.
199
131,5
1024
25118
158
1332
793
22113
149
1260
555
1964
STEELE HEIGHTS MCLEOD NEIGHBOURFI000 2
55 —
177 —
— —
2.12 —
54 —
16 —
— —
70 •-
54 —
I), •
-
-
711
5-1
111
4677
4.411
2111)0
CASSELMAN TOTAL
50
•
NiamisouRiloco 3 NEIGHBouRHooD 5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
--
—
—
—
--
—
STEEL[ HEIGHTS TOTAL
55
177
—
212
54
16
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HUGH (S. CASSELMAN TOTAL
1177
291 I
2034
51122
51.1
2119
1845
•198
'I
793
•
711 -
70
I 10 - 1
-1032
10-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity During 1982, land with a capacity of 633 dwelling units was subdivided and registered in Clareview, Hermitage, Steele Heights and Casselman (Table 10-6). In 1981, only 57 units -- all single family -- were subdivided and registered. Of the 1982 total, 40% were for single family, 27% for row housing and 33% for apartment units.
FIGURE 10-6 RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, CASSELMAN AND STEELE HEIGHTS, 1980-1982 DWELUNG UNITS APPROVED 1200 (1033)
1
I
Apartment Units
1000 1•• •• • 1
lYZZZI
800
Row Housing Units
(938)
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units (833)
800 .•. .•. .•.•.•. .'.• . • .' . . . . . . .• .'.•
400
. '
...........
200 (57)
1980
1981
A
1982
1980-1982.
•AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
51
TABLE 10-6 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS AND CASSELMAN IN EACH YEAR, 1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, CASSELMAN NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
CASSEEMAN TOTAL
19112
1981
1980 Apart. Total Units Units
-
-
--
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
Apart. Total Units Units
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
-
--
Apart. Total Units Units
-I
CLAREVIEW BANNERMAN BELMONT FRAZER H AIRSINE KERNOVIAN KIRKNESS SIETON l'ARK TOWN CENTRE
79 -
!WI 27 -
126 64 55 -
126 306 55 27 -
.11 26 -
._ . . .. _ CLAREVIEW .10TAL
79
1911
245
514
57
255 51 213
255 51 213
HERMITAGE CANNON RIDGE HOMESTEADER WERLANDERS H HERMITAGE TTAL O
-
-
S I!)
519
STEELE HE IGI•1TS MCLEOD NEIGHBOURHOOD 2 NIEGE113OUR1•100D 3 NEIGHBOURHOOD 5
- • -
--
-
-
-
---
_1 1 26 -
--252 _,
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
.
-
•
-169 . -
-212 -- --
169
212
--
-
.
I
633
•
-i
-
-
-
-
•---
I
STEELE HEIGHTS TOTAL
52
I
633 --
. _
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEEI.E 11EIGHTS, CASSE LMAN TOTAL
I
79
190
764
1033
57
57
252
16')
212
6.13
CLAREVIEW, HERMITAGE, STEELE HEIGHTS, & CASSELMAN
53
1
Land Use District Codes AG
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
AOU
URBAN RESERVE DISTRICT
IR IM
AI31
INDUSTRIAL RESERVE
in
MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
A
METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT
AP
PUBLIC PARKS DISTRICT
US
URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT
PU
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
MA
MUNICIPAL AIRPORT DISIRICT STATUTORY PLAN OVERLAY
DISTRICT
INDUSTRIAL
BUSINESS DISTRICT
AFT
SINGLE DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RF2 RPL
LOW
PLANNED LOT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RF3
LOW DENSITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
REV
SEMI-DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RFS
ROW HOI/SING DISTRICT
SPO
Fif6
MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY DISIFBC 1
APO
AIRPORT PROTECTION ' OVERLAY
RAP
LOW RISE
REV
DIRECT DEVELOPMENT CONTROL DISTRICT Ise* bestml
RAT
MEDIUM RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT HIGH RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
DCI OCT
MAX
RESIDENTIAL
COMPREHENSIVELY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IC TEMPORARY HOLDING DISTRICT
DENSITY
INFILL
DISTRICT
APARTMENT DISTRICT
MIRED USE
DC3 DC4
DISTRICT
RR
RURAL RESIDENTIAL
RMII
MOBILE
CNC CSC
ISEIGHPOUR14001)
COI
LOW
CB2
GENERAL
CHY
HIGHWAY
CO CMX
COMMERCIAL OFFICE DISTRICT COMMERCIAL MIXED USE DISTRICT
DISTRICT
,,,.
HONE DISTRICT CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
SPECIAL PUBLIC SERVICE
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
0.1,9nehon embed lo Convnuufill D.Deuil 5.1. 5 o in. t am..... ccotid.n am .....d • wt19 Sbe , c..... Iton R 9A 28 1:71 ..Use EtrIat.
•
SHOPPING CENTRE DISTRICT
in acotdance yeah Section 220 S.Lend Use flitlam
INTENSITY BUSINESS DISTRICT BUSINESS
ifie
DISTRICT
Lend of Edmonton Municapet Artitool Ptolection °revise
.7, , y•
CORRIDOR DISTRICT
ResIncled Demedopmen1 t.-7,,,-,..: _
Area
'FLO. A.I
Demyna•on applied to sees men aMmed a .
development
speDised segulaDons Si accordance with
Sock,. 820. Land Use Dela. DC I
54
Fp, one use conveutem and de.eluirnten1 cntea IA Soo DC I thsintlf. glee. e•le. 10 the aygoec.aue ghee. Rede•einomeno . Lisa Situcouo• Plan
I
KASKITAYO & TWIN BROOKS Kaskitayo and Twin Brooks Plan Neighbourhoods
DUGGAN
PETROLIA 34 AVE.
$1111111111111111111111311111111111111
pousemsmou t. 141 /14. 88
F-4
jr
inni c,
Naas
Sweet Grass a
111111111111111111111111111 1
• se IN 11111121111.
BLUE QUILL South .West Blue Quill
y---■ ## 4
ERIVIINESKIN
Blue Quill East
Ermineskin N
23 AVE.
N
-1. - -,• ■ s. ........„\v oms. . m .
.
—,
:1
Skyrattler
' . .. • m . -. . • ' • : 'Hidden . ■ Brook • .
.4•i.
11
YELLOWBIRD #*•\ * „Ls • CKmuo 1
. .
.• :• \
Keheewin
TWIN BROOKS j k Running Creek
Or) (6
VOOOVISSOMOMOVOIll OOOOO MI OOOOO limmoommumussms.............. ■ ....!.... .. ,,‘,-,- ,,,,-;,,......, -;-._:-,•„.--;,----,;.,, ..,,, ,_,,,,,, ,„,_ -_ , %, .../_%,_,„ -, ...,_1 ,,...--... :\-...--,...-•-; ,_,...-,c,%„ :■:•_.11 7,‘ , , , LI ,‘ ,--;.,,-; :_o .:..... ,_ .,,-, 1; 1.— z; /,`, ,6_,, -.1 -4 s.,-;-;-( s-.I -; -;f: %.-,'%- \--`,‘'-`, /_1;,,;‘,..1 --
*-_, ,_,-.1,--, , ---
-
_. ,„•‘-s--,
_I , ,;,-,,,), „ ,.....,„, - ,/,--,, ,,...\/.._„,,,,
',....---..f.'? , `,1 -;1=...‘;‘,`..1 --",:= ',"--..- D '''' `,-- Si , • %• n
li 'A... /.":C s." ‘....; •-• 1- ...i • s '.. '" ', J ...,.. -- ' , :: - f 7,'" , ;-' , 1-..., i1 ..c„, ■ ' "-!...\ -‘,::., / • ,,-,.., -•• . ‘,"•/-1 ,/ - s . , / i 0 -- , -.., e , , - •..... f... Vs....-1 ‘....., /1 ‘ ,,, • , _,,,, , ,,,.....-„ ' *,■:% 1-S-; \ (. ...\• 1,‘,.:/s '`..1.....; -..... .,t , % .- ,;: f ' , 1 ' , , > I .A '''. 1. "1 .-1 ' • i 1 ‘-.....--" ' ... 1 /.. ■ '-‘ ... • S r \.•.--• ' \ /c.-. 1 \-ti" , ...•‘, ' .1 .e sV,, , ••••••‘• 1 -..tZ' i;s, ,1 1 %,'--;•0 - , 1 ;:.. -. 1 .."1 ,f,,, , , r,-... ■ 0
• ,„_,_....,,,„., ,-,- , -s ■ '---, • iss,• , - , ,,•% -• -00 ,os -, , ......., , ,, ,,,-,-,..•...--., - ,- ,--/..,,,-, --1-sz, ...,‘,,.....\ ■ 1,• -,‘ \-%-‘,/ •,,-,‘,.. --■ ,,„, ,..., 0- 7, ;-„,,,,04 0•,,, ,, / ...,,,,-
•
.1_". !,;:e. '■ / , .1.,/, , .':,
-- /
...,'... I.. • ,I\„.../,„_\„
_,
■■ -•-,-'
s .. .,..... s, , ..
55
II. KASKITAYO MAD TWIN BROOKS I I -I Housing Stock By the end of 1982, using building permits issued as the measure, there were 7083 dwelling units in Kaskitayo (Table 11-1). This compares with the 1981 figure of 6902. Of this total, 35% are single family units, 26% are row housing units and 39% are apartment units (Figure 1I-I). Kaskitayo contains the highest proportion of apartment units of any of the Area Structure Plan areas. Twin Brooks has not yet been subdivided for residential use.
FIGURE 11-1 MIX OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS IN KASKITAYO DECEMBER 31, 1982 TABLE 11-1 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN KASKITAYO AND TWIN BROOKS TO DECEMBER 31, 1982
KASKITAY0TWIN BROOKS NEIGHBOURHOODS
DWELLING UNITS APPROVE!) Single, Semi Duplex UniIs
Row Units
Aparl. Units
KASKIIMI) BEARSRA• BLUE QUILL ERMINESKIN Kit ILIAVIN SKYRATFLI.R Si EINHAUER SW1ET GRASS
145 655 330 219 144 5414 4.47
-16 Min 2 i7 12/1 •I141 211 .171
1297 TO 110 1/16 -2.17
24S4
KASKITAY(4 11.4TAL
24711
111711
2771
71110
• Building permits issued in HBO expired. Site rkimizoned TWIN BR( RAS TOTAL
56
NO IIRMI IS ISSUED
..
Total Units
VII I I Hi 457 'Pm 75'1 11415
I I -2 Residential Building Permits
FIGURE 11-2 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED EACH YEAR IN KASKITAY0 1980-1982
There were 252 dwelling units approved by building permit in 1982 in Kaskitayo, down 57% from the comparable 1981 figure (Table 11-2). Of this total, 60% were single family units, and 40% were row housing units (Figure 11-2). Figure 11-2 also illustrates the continuing decline in development activity in this plan area.
POTENTIAL DWEUJNG UNITS
1000
Apartment Units
900 800
Row Housing Units
(782)
?7,(ZZI
700 (593)
BOO
Building permits for 12 potential dwelling units in an apartment were issued in 1980. These building permits expired in 1981 without being exercised. The site was downzoned from RA7 (apartments) to RF5 (row housing) in 1982. The 12 potential apartment units thus disappears (Table 11-2).
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
500
(542)
400 300
(252)
200
1980
1981
y/a
A
100
•
1982
980-1982*
•AVERAGE ANNUAL DWEUJNG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 11-2 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN KASKITAYO AND TWIN BROOKS IN EACH YEAR, 1980 - 1982
KASKITAY0TWIN BROOKS NEIGHBOURHOODS
KASKITAY() IIEARSPAW • BLUE QUILL ERMINI1SKIN Kit IEEWIN . SKYRATTLER STEINVIALIE R SWEET GRASS KASKI [AYE) TOTAE
TWIN BROOKS TOTAL
1980 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
1901 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Duplex Units Units Units
1902 Row Apart. Total Single, Semi Duplex Units Units Units Unils
. . 61 116 14 73 :18 4 2
14 39 29 115 — — 18
12 -247 — — — —
87 155 290 188 38 4 20
30 24 2 75 32 2 3
3 011
215
259
7112
168
NO PERMITS ISSUED
-
20 70 — — 77 — 148
— 7 — 110 — _ — —
• 50 94 2 185 109 2 151
315
110
593
NO PERMITS ISSUED
.. 54 10 II 65 12 — I
15:4
— — 52 — 47 — —
— — — — — — —
99
NO PERMITS ISSUED
54 10 63 65 59 — 1
252
57
I I 3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land
FIGURE 11-3 SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN KASKITAYO 1980— 1982
-
By the end of 1982, Kaskitayo contained serviced land with a capacity of 4633 additional dwelling units, up about 6% from the comparable 1981 figure. Of this potential capacity, about 26% are single family units, 18% for row housing units, and 56% apartment units, virtually unchanged from the comparable 1981 figures (Figure 11-4).
POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS 5000 (48 3 3)
(4385)
4500 (4180) 4000
At land consumption rates over the period 1980-82, there is a 5.6 year supply of land for single family units and 5.5 year supply of row house units. (The comparable 1981 figures are 4 years for single family units and 3 years for row housing.) At the average rate of consumption for the past 3 years, there is a greater than 20 year supply of serviced land developable with apartment units in this plan area.
3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 (542) 500
1
Apartment Units
F7.7/A Single Family, Semi—
Row Housing Units
.40
Detached, Duplex Units
980
1981
1982
1980-1982*
*AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 11-3 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN KASKITAYO AND TWIN BROOKS, 1980 - 1982, (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
58
KASKITAY0TWIN BROOKS NEIGIIBOURHOODS
1980 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
Single, Semi Duplex Units
1982 Row Apart. Total Units Units Units
KASKITAYO liEARSPAW BLUE QUILL [WINESKIN KEHEEWIN SKYRATTLER STEINHAUER SWEET GRASS
479 170 72 223 127 24 14
255 113 191 44 170 — —
167 — 1765 114 282 — —
901 283 2028 351 579 24 14
467 163 70 2611 61 22 II
236 75 190 74 194 — —
167 — 1765 340 282 — —
870 238 2025 682 537 22 II
413 153 59 249 49 22 1(1
246 47 140 137 147 — —
146 — 1765 293 282 — —
805 200 1964 679 478 22
KASKITAYO TOTAL
1109
773
22911
4180
1062
7(0
2554
4.385
11)12
855
25%
4633
TWIN BROOKS 10 [AL
NO SERVICED LOTS
NO SERVICED LOTS
NB) SERVICED I.( )1-S
II)
FIGURE 11-4 RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN KASKITAYO. 1980-1982
11-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity In 1982, land with a capacity of 175 dwelling units was serviced in Kaskitayo, down more than 70% from the comparable 1981 figure (Table 11-4) All of this land is designated for single family development. In 1980 and 1981, by contrast, much of the servicing activity was of land designated for apartment development.
POTENTIAL DWELUNG UNITS 3500 (3318)
I
1
Apartment Units Row Housing Units
2500
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
2000
1500
1000 (858) (542) (175) 1980
1981
.• . •. . •. . •. . •. . •.
1982
1980-1982*
*AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 11-4 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN KASKITAYO AND TWIN BROOKS, 1980 - 1982, (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) KASKITAY0TWIN BROOKS NEIGHBOURHOODS
1980 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Unils Unils Units Units
1901 Single, Semi Row Aparl. Tolal Duplex Units Unils Units Units
1982 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Units Units Duplex Units Units
KASKI FAY() BEARSVAW BLUE QUILL ERN1INESKIN KEHEEWIN SKYRATTLER ST LINHAUER SWEET GRASS
3.18 169 46 — — — —
170 — 185 — 31 — —
74 — 1856 193 256 — —
582 169 2087 193 207 — —
— — — 120 — — —
. — 39 — 30 — — 148
— — — 321 — _ _
— 39 — 471 — — 148
175
175
KASKI TAY() IL I
55:1
386
2379
3318
120
217
:121
658
175
175
'TWIN )IROOKS TL HAl .
..
NO SERVICED LOTS
NO SERVICED LOTS
NO SERVICED LOTS
59
11-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land
FIGURE 11-5 SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN KASKITAYO, 1980-1982
By the end of 1982, there was, in Kaskitayo, vacant, subdivided land with a capacity of 4633 potential dwelling units, up about 5% from the comparable 1981 figure (Table 11-5). All of this subdivided land in Kaskitayo is fully serviced.
POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS 5000 ( 4633 )
(4815)
4500
(4385)
4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 10 00
I Apartment Units
I'• • • I Row Housing Units
FZZ Single Family, Semi—
(542)
500
Detached, Duplex Units
A
1980
1981
177777A
1980-1982.
1982
*AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 11-5 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN KASKITAYO AND TWIN BROOKS, 1980 - 1982, (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) KASKITAY0TWIN BROOKS NEIGHBOURHOODS
19110 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
KASKITAYO BEARSI'AW BLUE QUILL ERMINESKIN KEHEEWIN
491 190 72 22:1
SKYRATTLER
137
STEINHAUER SWEET GRASS
24 14
255 113 191 92 I 70 — 147
1151
968
KASKITAYO TOTAL
60
TWIN BROOKS TOTAL
1981 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units Units
1982 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Units Units Duplex Units Units
167 — 1765 227 282 — —
913 303 2028 542 5119 24 161
467 163 70 2611 61 22 11
236 75 190 74 194 — —
167 — 1765 340 282 — —
870 2311 2025 682 537 22 II
41.1 15:1 59 476 49 22 I1/
246 47 1411 275 147 — --
146 -1765 403 282 — —
1105 200 1964 1154 478 22 10
2696
41115
1062
769
2554
4385
1182
855
2596
4633
NO VACANT SUBDIVIDED 0)15
NO VACANT
sunDmoLD Lois
NO VACANT SUBDIVIDED LOTS
11-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity
FIGURE 11-6 RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN KASKITAYO 1980-1982
During 1982, land with a capacity of 138 potential dwelling units was subdivided in Kaskitayo, down 71% from the comparable 1981 figure (Table 11-6). All of this land is in the Keheewin neighbourhood. It is all designated for single family development (Figure 11-6).
POTENTIAL DWELUNG UNITS 2000 1800
(1734)
Apartment Units
1600
Twin Brooks has, as yet, not been subdivided for residential use.
Row Housing Units
1400
V 4 1200
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
1000 800 600
(542)
(484)
400 .'.• .•
200
.•
(138)
1980
1981
1982
1980-1982*
• AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 11-6 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN KASKITAYO AND TWIN BROOKS, 1980- 1982, (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) KASKITAY0TWIN BROOKS NEIGHBOURHOODS
1980
Single, Semi Row
1981
1902 Row Apart. Total
Apart. Total Units Units
Row Single, Semi Duplex Units Units
Apart. Total
Single, Semi
Units
Units
Duplex Units Units
151 — — — — — 147
74 — 614 144 130 — —
551 148 614 144 130 — 147
— — — 120 — —
— 40 —
— —
— 40
223 — —
343 101 —
298
962
1734
120
141
223
484
Duplex Units Units
Units
Units
— —
— — — 138
KASKEUAY0 BEARSPAW BLUE QUILL ERMINESKIN KDIEEWIN SKYRAT ITER STEINHAUER SWEET (;RASS
326 148 — —
101
— — 138 —
— — — — —
—
KASKI riwo 474
138
138
• Rc(lislricling: RA7 10 RE5 (I31(ock 22)
IWIN BRO( )KS
1 ( ) FAI.
No LorS SUBDIVIDED
NO LOTS SUBDIVIDED
NO LUIS SUBDIVIDED
; 61
KASKITAYO & TWIN BROOKS
0 100 ZOO 100 111011101
62
.073— sea—
o---i—
Land Use District Codes AG
AGRICUI TUE'. DISTRICT
is
LOU
LIRRAN RESERVE
IM
MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL
IN
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
A
METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT
AP
PUBLIC
US
URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT
PU
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
MA
MUNICIPAL
SPO
STATUTORY PI AN OVERLAY
A01
DISTRICT DISTRICT
INDUSIPIAl RESERVE
DETACHED RESIDENTIAL
DIRI STCT
API
SINGLE
RE2
LOW
11.
PL•NNED LOT RESIDENTIAL
APT
LOW DENSITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
DENSITY
UNPILE
DISTRICT DISTRICT
FIFA
SEMI-DETACHED RESIDENTIAL
RFS
ROW HOUSING DISI RIC I
REA
1. DOM DENSITY MIsl I Ostt
RAT
LOW RISE
RAE
MI DIUM RISE HIGH RISE
RIOT
RESIDENTS.
APARTMENT
FAMILY DISTRICT
DISTRICT
APARTMENT DISTRICT MIXED USE
DISTRICT
RR
RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RMH
MOBILE
CNC
PARES DISTRICT
AIRPORT DISTRICT
NEIGHPOSIFINOOU ' CONVENIENCE
AIRPORT PROTECTION OVERLAY
OCI
DIRECT DEM OPMENI CONTROL DISTRICT I see beI”.1
1)C7
COMPREHENSIVELY
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT
HOLDING DISTRICT
DC7
TEMPORARY
OCE
SPECIAL PUBLIC
SERVICE
DISTRICT
D•Honaltno •pgalsod To Coo.... lloo.. •Oss• :. a..... • vs::: Swec.n.„. cco.ln onc .pp Ison 0 9: 81 .. ..sis. d .Use flys.
CSC
SHOPPING CENTRE
CBI
LOW
CB7
GE NEPAL
CHY
HIGHWAY
CO
COMMERCIAI
OFFICE DISTRICT
COAX
COMMERCIAL
MIXED USE
COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT
•
DISTRICT
.
BUSINESS DISTRICT
BUSINESS
DISTRICT DISTRICT
APO
' I 'rn
HOME DISTRICT
INTENSITY
BUSINESS DISTRICT
DISTRICT
APARIPANT DISTRICT
PA9
INDUSTRIAL
CORRIDOR DISTRICT
DISTRICT
in seccodanco so" Soc.. 720 5. Los. U. Bylaw LsooI ol Edrnonlon tsIonscspAI A•potl IssotmIson 0.11.
DISTRICT
.• • R.Incted D.olopmen1 A.• IR. D Al
• .' ,I ,..
lAss.s...• arosrd •
In sete• ynth alle.0 o. specelsed d..,,,,,..n.nt 1.pyla.nn1 . actoodance math
5e01.1 RID. I.E. U. PO.. DC1
•••■■ 1..ch.ns.nt .......D .Ilev to 11.• I .11111.1....b. •re• Il•de ■■•1,1•11001 In ll.fa SIllICIWO Plan
so. so. us. N toe 111 0 0 NN
(including
PILOTSOUND
"Z1
the
114
cr)
aaaa aaaaaa
ln
Un CIO
Cr,
CITY OWNED
64
LAND USE
I.
Portion of Block C, Plan 2887 A.Q. part of El /2 3-54-24-W4
AG
25.528 Hectares
2.
NE 1/4 33-53-24-W4
AG
63.84 Hectares
12. LAKE DISTRICT I 2-1 Housing Stock At the end of 1982, as measured by building permits issued, there were in Lake District 528 dwelling units, up 83% over the comparable 1981 figure (Table 12-1). Of this total, 81% are single family units and 19% are row housing units (Figure 12-1). The 1981 proportion, by contrast, was 65% single family and 35% row housing (not shown) indicating a high proportion of single family development measured by building permits issued.
FIGURE 12-1 MIX OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS IN THE LAKE DISTRICT, DECEMBER 31, 1982
TABLE 12-1 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN THE LAKE DISTRICT TO 1982
DWELLING UNITS APPROVED LAKE DISTRICT NEIGHBOURHOODS BUIE RIVE ( - RN'S I AI.I.INA NERA EAUX CLAIRES WIZ KI.ARVA I I I:N I.AG( 1.1NI MAY1.11:WAN ( V.ERNA SCI I( )NSI.I: I ( )WN ( IN I RE
Singre, Semi Duplex Units
Row Unils
•
Apart. Units
Total Units 68
('11
.159
101
460
427
10 I
528.
Single Family. Semi— Detached. Duplex Units
LAKE I )IS . FRICT
65
12.2 Residential Building Permits Only the Belle Rive and Logo Lindo neighbourhoods have experienced any significant servicing and subdivision activity. Two hundred and thirty-nine dwelling units were approved by building permit in these neighbourhoods during 1982, (Table 12-2). All permits were for single family units (Figure 12-2).
FIGURE 12-2 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS 1
1
Apartment Units Row Housing Units
12=1 Single 'Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units POTEN11AL DWELLING UNITS
TABLE 12-2 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN LAKE DISTRICT IN EACH YEAR, 1980, 1981
300
250 1982
1981 LAKE DISTRICT NEIGHBOURHOODS
200
BELLE RIVE CRYSTALLINA NERA EALIX CLAIRES IOVIZ KI.ARVATTEN I.AGO UNDO MAY I. (VERNA SCTIONSEE TOWN CENTRE
150
100
50
LAKE DISTRICT TOTAL
1980
1981
1982
1980-19820
'AVERAGE ANNUAL DWEWNG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
66
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units Duplex Units Units Unils Units 68
— 188
— — — — 289 101
— 171
— _ — — 171 —
188
101
289
239
239
—
12-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land At the end of 1982 Lake District contained serviced land with a capacity of 896 dwelling units, up 18% from the comparable 1981 figure (Table 12-3). Of this total, 92% is represented by single family units and 8% by row housing units, (Figure 12-3). This proportion is similar to that for 1981.
FIGURE 12-3 SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN THE LAKE DISTRICT, 1982
I
1
Apartment Units Row Housing Units Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
TABLE 12-3 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN THE LAKE DISTRICT, 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1981
1982
POTENTIAL DWELUNG UNITS 1000 (896)
900 800
(758)
\ LAKE DISTRICT 11001)5
Single, Semi Row Apart. Tolal Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units Duplex Units Units Units Units
700 600
MIL RIVL CRYS FAWNA N1.IZA 1,Al /X CLAIRI:ti 1( /VIZ MARVA FI1SN [AO I 1.1N1 )( 1 MAY1.11:WAN 0/_1:KNA S(:1•1( NSF!: II ANN (EN [RE
—
—
—
—
— — — — 1,117 — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — 71 7511 — — — — — —• — — —
1,117
71
131 — — -— 694 — — —
—
—
131
— — — — — — — — — — — — 71 765 — — -._
—
—
500 400 300
(264)
200 100
LAM: 1)151 RIO —
7511
1125
71
--
1146
1981
1982
1982.
•AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
67
12-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity
111
Servicing activity occurred in both the Belle Rive and Logo Lindo neighbourhoods. During 1982, land with a capacity of 383 units was serviced, down 63% from the comparable 1981 figure (Table 12-4). In 1982, all servicing activity occurred on land designated for single family units (Figure 12-4). In 1981, the comparable figure was 84% single family.
FIGURE 12-4 RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN THE LAKE DISTRICT, 1982 I 1 Apartment Units Row Housing Units
i3=
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
POTENTIAL DWELUNG UNITS 1200
TABLE 12-4 RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN THE LAKE DISTRICT IN 1982
(1047) 1000
1982
1901 LAKE DISTRICT NEIGHBOURHOODS
800
111
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units Duplex Units Units Units Units
— II
600
(383)
400
(284) 200
1981
1982
•DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
68
1982*
•— 177
—
-177 --
— — — — — — — — — 172 -— — -— — — —
— — — — 1847 — --—
— — — -19./ — — — —
---. — — — --• — — --— — _ _
199
—
1047
3I11
—
184 18
BELLE RIVE CRYS1ALLINA NI:RA EAUX CLAIRES ((VIZ KIARVATFEN LAG( ./ UNDO MAYLIFWAN OZERNA SCI IF 89S1:1: 1( 8AN CENTRE
—
—
— — — — 1175 — — — —
LAKE 13IS fRICT II EFAI.
875
172
—
-
I
11 -
12-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land At the end of 1982 Lake District contained vacant subdivided land with a capacity of 896 dwelling units, up 18% from the comparable 1981 figure (Table 12-5). Of this total, 92% is represented by single family units and 8% by row housing units, about the same proportions as in 1981 (Figure 12-5). All of this subdivided land is fully serviced.
FIGURE 12-5 SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN THE LAKE DISTRICT, 1980-1982 1
1
l••••.1 •
Apartment Units Row Housing Units Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
TABLE 12-5 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN THE LAKE DISTRICT, 1981 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1901 • LAKE DISTRICT NEIGIIIIOUR11000S
1982
1000
POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS (896)
900 800
Row Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Single, Semi Duplex Units Units Units Units Duplex Units Units Units Units
(758)
700
600 isiii I. RIVI. (NN'S! Al.I.INA NI. RA At IN (1.AIRI.ti It )\'I/ MARVA 11 I:N I.A( ;( ) 1.1NI It ) MAY1 II.WAN ( )/.I.RNA SCI I( )NSI.I. It )WN (1.N I 1.R
—
—
131
—
—
lit
500 -1,117
—
— 71
—
-—
_
7511
_
--
— 1,9 ,1
—
_ 71
—
—
—
_ 71,5
—
T
(428)
400 300
(264)
200 100
I AKI. I )IS I RIC 1 11 11/51.
1,117
71
—
7511
112 5
7t
—
7
11'16
0 1980
1981
1982
1982.
• DWELUNG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
69
12-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity Some subdivision activity occurred in both the Belle Rive and Lago Lindo neighbourhoods during 1982. Land with a capacity of 376 dwelling units, down 39% from 1981, was subdivided in these neighbourhoods (Table 12-6), all for single family units.
FIGURE 12-6 RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN THE LAKE DISTRICT, 1980-1982 POTENTIAL DWEWNG UNITS 700 (619)
1
1
Apartment Units
TABLE 12-6 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN THE LAKE DISTRICT, 1981 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
I
I
600 Row Housing Units Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
(428)
400
300
(264)
200
100
1981 LAKE DISTRICT NEIGHBOURHOODS
1980
1981
1982
Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Unils Units Units Units Duplex Units UMIs Units Unils
BULL RIVE
—
—
TALLINA NERA FAUX CLAIRES IOVIZ KLARVATTEN LAGO UNDO MAYLIEWAN OZERNA SCHONSEL TOWN (:EN FIR
— — — — 490 — — —
— — — — 129 — — —
LAKE DISTRICT TOTAL
1982
—
—
490
129
—
—
— — — — — — — — 619 — — — — — — --
—
619
177
—
—
177
— • — — -— — — — — — - -— — ---199 — — 199 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
.176
—
—
i
376
I
I
I
19820
*DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS. 1
70 I
LAKE DISTRICT
1
bet .00
SOO _1000 0-700" 70-17— see
metres
.00
5000
•■•••
550:0
-
:07-706
1500 • 01
ii
1
1 Land Use District Codes AG
AGRICUI IIIHAI
DISIRIC1
AGU
URBAN 1415111V"
AGI
INDUST Alia
RE I
SING1 IF
Al]
LOW
RP( RE]
DIS I RIC I
RESERVE
DISIRICT
IN IACIIED RISIDENIIAL
DENSIT V
DISI RIC 1
Pt 111N10 i 01 RESIDER I I•1
DIS I RIC I
ussunci
LOW (*HSI VI RI DEVELOPMENT
Al IF
SE MI- OE IACHED RESIDER 1 I•L
MIS
HOW HOUSING DISI RIC I
Rf 6
Mt OluM Di NSI I V NM I IN IL /MAR V LAS I RIC I
RAE
LOW RISE
RAO
MI num
11A9
HIGH RISE
RUT
APARIM., NI
DISIRIC 1
O ISIRIC I
•PAR MAE IL I DISTRICT
RESIDENHAI
MIRED USE
RR
RURAL
RAM
MOBILE
CNC
NIFIGNINIIIRHOOLL
CSC
SHOPPING
COI
LOW
CB]
GINE RAL
RESIDENTIAL HOME
ME DIIIM HIDUSIRIAI III AT/
•
ME IHUPOI I IAN RECRE•11001 DISTRIC I
BUSINESS DISIRICT
INDUS I HIM
DISIRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
Podia IC
PARRS THST RIC I
US
MILIAN
SERVICE
PU
PURI IC
U111.111, DOS ERIC I
MA
MUNICIPAL
590
51411110W PI AN OVE RI /W
INIEN5110
DISIRICT
AIRPORT
DISIRIC1
APO
*11111)111 KMIEC IION OVERLAY
MI
OUR CI
DC]
COM IARI HI NSIVII I'
DC]
11 EAPORAM
MI
SPECIAL
DE VII OPMEN 1 CONTROL DISIIIIC I Isee 6.......1
DISIRIC I
91 *111110 DE VII OPAM N I SERVICE
0151141C I
1,
11e10,nahon apploed 10 1 ,11•0.01••• • . 0, ..‘••) ,.....,
I
Do mynal.or. ••d lo Arm RAO Ma
DISTRICT
OsS I RIC I
HOI DINGIASI RIC 1
PURI IC
in .64 I" CO dabil■ •
CONVENIENCE COMMERCIA1
CENTRE
DISTRICT DIS1HIC 1
°MIMIC 1
•PAR IMF NI
RISE
INOUSI MAI
IN
Ar
DISIRIC1
'NEILL
al IN
ot aerocclance
goslh Svc lean 9? I and LILI: 11.1....
.
Ms St.:Hon 770 S.1.6.0 IPAy BHA.
BUSINESS DISIRICT
BUSINESS
DISTRICT
CORRIDOR DISIHIC 1
CIO
HILAIWAY
CO
COMMERCIAL
Of f ICE
CAM
COMMERCIAL
MIRED USE
OISIRIC I OISIHIC I
...::
Lona of id
'
...,• • • .... I —•", • • t .'. '' •
onion Mon.c.pat Appwl Pootochon On. I
lio•le.cloo Dowlopmor6 Am• 111.0 • I Mr,qn.m.. AgLoa. m ,le, .nIA Allowed m wec.lamt aP....m.6 impAal.Lo. Ln mccomkoAe molls Serle. KM . I end Use Uylem
UK. I
I... 181. use g............, mei ...ru.....e........".• 101
01 I 111
.Is
..y.A....1,16. •••• II
72
, ,,,,, orb., 1•D Ow
...n...8 e. M•.. SP.. 1Y10 91.1.1
13.
THE MEADOWS
THE MEADOWS
13-1 Residential Land Supply There are 1099 gross developable hectares designated for residential use in this newly approved Area Structure Plan area. One residential subdivision was approved by Council in 1982 but since it has not yet been registered under the Alberta Land Titles Act it is not included in this report. Registration is expected some time in 1983.
In
Also in 1982, Council approved 2 neighbourhood structure plans for The Meadows area structure plan area: Larkspur with 106.8 gross developable hectares and Wild Rose with 103.6 gross developable hectares.
CITY OWNED
-,-•
10.
Part of SW 7-52-23-W4
AG
55.88 Hectares
1 I.
NE 31-51-23-W4
AG
48.56 Hectares
73
1-: 'A
1-■ I-
tl.
MILL WOODS
IP lil
SOUTHEAST INDUSTRIAL
I
arcil I
WI i ITE MUD) FREEWAY
Mill Woods Plan Neighbourhoods
I_ 1111 .--1
ssss
Mill Woods Golf Course
Tweddle Place
Mill Wc)( 43,
fl
M1LLBOURNE
Richfield
Lee Ridge
-14 AVE.
Tipaskan
Kameyosek
LAKEWOOD Mill Woods Park
JOHN Town Centr
0 23 AVE.
KNOTT WOOD Menisa
CITY OWNED 9.
7
Part of NW 12-52-24-W4 AGU
Part of SW I 2-52-24-W4 AGU 27.985 Hectares Part of NE l-52-2 1i-W4
•.
74
62.137 Hectares
AGU
13.03 Acres 5.273 Hectares
14. MILL WOODS 14-1 Housing Stock At the end of 1982, there were nearly 18,800 dwelling units in Mill Woods (Table 14-1). As measured by building permits issued, this number represents an increase of nearly 1400 dwelling units or more than 7% over the corresponding figure for 1981. The proportion of single family, row housing and apartment units remains the same. (Figure 14-1)
TABLE 14-1 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN MILL WOODS TO DECEMBER 31, 1982
FIGURE 14-1 MIX OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS IN MILLWOODS, DECEMBER 31, 1982
DWELLING UNITS APPROVED MILL WOODS NEIGHROURIIOODS
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
ItISSET CRAM( /RD l'I.AINS 1/ALY ( ;12( )V1: UK( ))A FLYNN! /111. f NIENVILW 1111.1A/11W IA( 'KS( IN HEIGHTS KAIN.11A( )SEK KINISKI GARDENS LIT RI) )GI: NAISNISA ts.41:11 /KUN1IN M1:1( )1,11 111K K.181•IALLS l'ARK MINCI !AU I'( )1.1.ARI ) N11:Al /( )WS R103111:31) SAKAW SA . 1( 81 I-AWA 1 IVISKAN 11 ANN UN ME 1W1.1:DI.F. PIACI: WII.NI3 IS
339 592 5711 560 — 1,61, 706 — 277 7. 19 508 704 554 51.1 450 627 634 597 723 781 — .115 — 561 526
'HI
123 201 262 — 150 272 — 379 — 405 101 2511 525 211 108 170 411 226 212 — 257 — 199 —
20 143 123 105 — 92 118 — II) 011 123 14 12 19 150 66 220 134 18 13 — :142 — 153 179
449 85)) 902 927 — 908 1096 — 675 807 1036 819 824 1057 811 801 1024 1142 967 1006 — 1014 — 91.1 705
4560
2151
11174 I
N111.1. W( 1( /UAL
•
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
)1/S 12030
75
14-2 Residential Building Permits
FIGURE 14-2 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED EACH YEAR IN MILLWOODS 1980-1982
There were 1375 dwelling units approved by building permits in Mill Woods in 1982, (Table 14-2). This represents a decline of about 50% from the corresponding figure for 1981 (Figure 14-2) and a decline of almost 30% from the average number of approvals for the period 198082 (Figure 14-2).
1
1
Apartment Units
MELLING UNITS APPROVED
17=1 Single Family, SemiDetached, Duplex Units
Row Housing Units
*AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 14-2 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN MILL WOODS IN EACH YEAR, 1980 - 1982 MILL WOODS NEIGHBOURHOODS
13ISSET CRAWFORD PLAINS DALY GROVE EKOTA FLYNN DELL GREENVIEW HILLVIEW IACKSON HEIGHTS KAMEYOSEK KINISKI GARDENS LEE RIDGE MEN ISA MEYOKUMIN MEYONOEIK MICHAELS PARK MINCHAU POLLARD MEADOWS RICHFIELD SAKAW SATO° TAWA Tll'ISKAN TOWN CENTRE TWEEDLE PLACE WIENLOS
76
MILL VVOODS TOTAL
1980 Single, Semi Row Apart. ToIal Duplex Units Units Units Units
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Unils Units Units Units
28 156 202
5 12
141
67
-
211
256
142
2911
149
62
405
89
-
-
-
-
5
45 94
-
79
--
-
28 22 1
-
—
596
-
25 31 25 1 364 101 1 103
48 55
126
7
49
1110
437
911 49
1
346 1'1'1
-
11,1
28 44 III _ 95
-
_
596
125
-
1
6
-
17:1 .11 1411 1.16 I 121 I .1 -
157
528
-5 8 5 73 12 84 4 106
2116
2613
545
25
6
-
-
31 7:1 1 41,7 101 1
102 19 142 30 1 ' 69 I 3 .171
71 12 6 106 48 -
_
1886
521
229 7 49
252
17'19
26 4 .1 -
-
48 -
55 .15
1
-
-
1982 Row Apart. Total Single, Semi Units Units Duplex Units Units
_ _ 4 -
75 20 .15 60 61 147 -.10 -26 41 26 12 --211 101 _ -• -.01 25 .1-1 42 10 IS 41 -41 1.01 47 18 2'11, 64 2211 . 84 --• --• -60 56 •--
379
22
451
I 28
1.175
14-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land
FIGURE 14-3 SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN MILLWOODS, 1980-1982
At the end of 1982, approximately 13,700 additional dwelling units could be accommodated in Mill Woods, (Table 14-3). This represents a net increase of about 3100 potential dwelling units or approximately 30%. The bulk of this increase can be accounted for by the registration of the Tawa plan of subdiv s on. This provided serviced land which can accommodate 3431 multi family dwelling units.
POWOMAL DWELLING UNITS 18000 (13850)
14000 12000
(11488) (10535)
10000
I
1
Row Housing Units
(1929)
2000
A
1980
A.
??WA
1981
1980-1982.
1982
Apartment Units
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
.AVERAGE ANNUAL OWELUNG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 14-3 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN MILL WOODS, 1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1980 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Units Duplex Units Units
MILL WOODS NEIGHBOURHOODS
BISSET CRAWFORD PLAINS DALY GROVE EKOTA FLYNN DELL GREENVIEW HILL VIEW IACKSON HEIGHTS KAMEYOSEK KINISKI GARDENS LEE RIDGE MENISA MEYOKUMIN MEYONOHK MICHAELS PARK M1NCHAU POLLARD MEADOWS . RICHFIELD SAKAW SATOO TAWA TIPISKAN TOWN CENTRE TWEEDLE PLACE WIENLOS MILL WOODS TOTAL
683 524 287 12
35 — 20 67 103 86 10 349 178 3 397 29 — 43 — 10 758
856 1807 268 115 1175 1814 251 387 925 — — 12 — — — 27 160 18 24 51 171 — — — 150 — 185 — — — — — 20 127 — 194 507 334 944 249 12 151 102 — 112 777 56 372 302 872 1352 — — 3 154 879 328 — 2 31 — — 95 — 138 — — — 73 321 404 105 448 1311
3805
2542
115 96
.
5141
11488
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
459 375 198 12 — 87 76 — . 34 350 19 61 98 67 10 206 150 2 328 28 — 40 — 10 387
2997
.
1982 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units Units
178 115 251 — — 27 24 — 37 8
856 1174 387 —
1493 1664 836 12 — 18 132 261 361 — — — 71 184 542 — 19 7— 127 — 188 437 334 869 219 1 151 — 102 112 . 50 1172 628 . 274 872 1296 — — 2 280 150 758 — 2 30 — — — 95 — 135 — — — 404 73 321 105 272 764
406 340 172 12 — 83. 82 — 34 225 19 56 90 60 10 234 138 2 244 28 — 36 — 10 320
2184
5354
2601
10535
1420 836 178 1629 115 1174 334 698 192 — — 12 — — 176 75 18 668 815 65 — — 37 71 — 8 329 96 — — 19 — 158 102 334 827 - 403 465 166 239 61 — 71 662 425 3 1000 210 652 — 2 — 280 150 674 — 2 30 2707 3431 7211 39 — 75 — — — 321 404 73 250 675 105
21140
8202
13643
.77
I4-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity
FIGURE 14-4 RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN MILLWOODS, 1980-1982
The process by which City-owned land is registered as serviced was completed in January 1982 for 3431 multi family units in Tawa neighbourhood. It should be noted that these lots were serviced in 1981 but registration of the plan of subdivision releasing them to the serviced land inventory was not completed until January 1982. This was primarily because of delay resulting from accommodating the proposed hospital to be located in Tawa neighbourhood. They thus appear for the first time in the 1982 inventory for land 'servicing activity. No other residential units were serviced in Mill Woods in 1982.
POlENDAL DWELLING UNITS (5315)
(3454)
(1929)
(1891)
1
1
Apartment Units 1000
Row Housing Units Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
1980
1981
1982
1980-1982.
.AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 14-4
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN MILL WOODS 1980 -1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
MILL WOODS NEIGHBOURHOODS
BISSET CRAWFORD PLAINS DALY GROVE EKOTA FLYNN DELL GREENVIEW HILLVIEW JACKSON HEIGHTS KAMEYOSEK KINISKI GARDENS LEE RIDGE MEN ISA MEYOKUMIN MEYONOHK MICHAELS PARK MINCHAU POLLARD MEADOWS RICHFIELD SAKAW SATOO TAWA TIPISKAN TOWN CENTRE TWEEDLE PLACE WIEN LOS MILL WOODS TOTAL
78
19E10 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
711
32
268 76
856 586 224
1835 586 300
66
9 26
9 92
944
7
48
305
27
49
14 1
167 76
167 124
315 443
647 443 63 76
75
162
162 807
2939
5315
807
1876
32 49
49
45
254
299
8
184
— 1136
4
4
500
97
97
78
78
1073
1982 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units Units
180
438
1691
728
2703
3431
728
2703
3431
FIGURE 14-5 SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN MILLWOODS 1980-1982 18000 14000
14-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land At the end of 1982, Mill Woods contained privately owned and City owned vacant subdivided land with a capacity of about 13850 potential dwelling units, (Table 14-5). Of these, about 20% are designated single family, 20% row housing, and about 60% apartments. Virtually all of this land is classified serviced (Table 14-3).
POTENTIAL OVIEWNG UNITS
(13871)
(13030)
12000
(11820)
10000
I
.•.•.•.•
I
4000
Apartment Units Row Housing Units
(1929)
2000
1980
A
1981
A 1982
Single Family. Semi— Detached, Duplex Units 1980-1982.
.AVER40E ANNUAL OWELUNG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PEEWITS_
TABLE 14-5 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN MILL WOODS, 1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) 1900 MILL WOODS NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
BISSET CRAWFORD PLAINS DALY GROVE EKOTA FLYNN DELL GREENVIEW H1LLVIEW 1ACKSON HEIGHTS KAME YOSEK KINISKI GARDENS LEE RIDGE MENISA MEYOKUMIN MEYONOHK MICHAELS PARK MINCHAU POLLARD MEADOWS RICHFIELD SAKAW SATOO TAWA TIPISKAN TOWN CENTRE TWEEDLE PLACE W1ENLOS
683 524 287 12 — 115 105
MILL WOODS TOTAL
1982
1981
Row Duplex Units Units
Units
1807 1814 925 12 — 234 965 — 185 362 ' 20 194 945 347 112 951 1352 3 879 31 — 138 — 404 135(1
459 375 198 12 — 07 85 — 34 350 19 61 98 67 10 309 150 2 328 28 — 40 — 10 426
178 856 1493 115 1174 .1664 251 387 836 — — 12 — — — 101 18 206 91 680 856 — 37 — 71 184 8 542 — — 19 127 — 188 437 334 869 317 1 249 — 102 112 50 443 802 274 1077 1501 — 2 280 150 758 30 — 2 — — — 95 — 135 — — — 73 321 404 105 272 803
4116 340 172 12
35 249 20 67 103 86 10 452 178 3 :197 29 — 43 — 10 797
268 856 115 1175 251 387 — — — — 101 18 136 724 — — — 150 — 113 — — 127 — 508 334 12 249 102 — 56 443 302 . 872 — — 328 154 — 2 — — 95 — — 73 321 105 448
4205
2729
13030
3148
2325
2601
-
Units
6096
Single, Semi
Single, Semi
Row Duplex Units Units
Apart. Total
Apart. Total
Units
6147
Units
11620
83 82 — 34 225 19 56 90 60 10 234 13/1 2 244 28 36 — 10 320
Apart. Total Units Units
836 1420 1629 1174 698 334 12 — — — 176 75 18 668 815 65 .— — 71 37 — 329 8 96 — — 19 • 1112 — 158 403 334 827 166 239 465 61 — 71 662 3 425 210 857 1205 — — 2 280 150 674 30 — 2 728 2703 3431 39 — 75 — — — 73 321 404 105 250 675 178 115 192
2840
8407
13848
79
FIGURE 14-6 RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN MILLWOODS 1980-1982
14-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity All of the subdivision activity in Mill Woods in 1982 VIQS in the Tawa neighbourhood. A plan of subdivision for land with a capacity of 3431 potential dwelling units was registered in January 1982 (Section 14-4). All of the units are designated multi-family.
POlENDAL DWELLING UNITS 4000 (3454)
(2957)
(1929)
2000
I
?Z222]
Apartment Units
1500
Row Housing Units
1000
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
(1270)
vA 1980
1981
1=1 1982
•AVERAGE ANNUAL OWELUNG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PER11115.
TABLE 14-6 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN MILL WOODS, 1980. 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) MILL WOODS NEIGHBOURHOODS
BISSET CRAWFORD PLAINS DALY GROVE EKOTA FLYNN DELL GREENVIEW HILIVIEW IACKSON HEIGHTS KAN1EYOSEK KINISK1 GARDENS LEE RIDGE MENISA MEYOKUM1N MEYONOHK MICHAELS PARK M1NCHAU POLLARD MEADOWS RICHFIELD SAKAW SATOO TAWA TIP1SKAN TOWN CENTRE TVVEEDLE PLACE WIENLOS
80
MILL WOODS TOTAL
1980 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
.— — —
32
— — 4 249 — — 29 49 — —
331
— — 586 586 76 194 270 — — — — — -— 9 9 — 366 366 — — — — 4 8 71 328 — — — — — 167 167 — 125 125 — 27 248 304 — 443 443 — 49 69 75 144 — — — — — — — — — 162 — 162 — —
342
2284
2957
— — — — — — 695 — — 97 — — — —
— — —
824
— — 32 49 — 49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 113 808 — — — — — — 97 1 — I — — — — — 78 205 283 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
128
318
1270
1982 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units Units
— — — — — — —
— — — — — — 728 2703 3431 — — — — — — — — — — —
728
2703
3431
„,„„„„ „ . ,;e. r: , , „ „ „ iti,,,,-, i_ ._ VW: Will .: "..4. ' MILL Ui .n A 1 - , .v fl iW ivI , . ., ,.1 WOODS 1 fi 11 ,0 0;1 . , • i s o V i n vt i4 , ; Al ipkoto i-, um, II , , lffir iis . 's. ... s
alio go gm.
.0,0,„,m,,i.,„ •stio ,,u, : qi-7. 1 mu
1,;,
.,.:.,,,, ,,V
6.7z, •., '.
:16 ,,
ffinilln
Irk), 40411 1"" irle . (ffi •, i :', / / 111 - ..f . ".. I . f IR!1 i kb''r • "'Iism' 11111111ffryilfil .... Ul 1.r.F.74. . ki...71;1,07 i:i. lii! lir.lift • •.11-1, P..titito :‘, .
u
1-1...
' ..
A
'
, tri 04'
0 tid4116 a#141 , Aar / V.' i ,...',.;,..,<N ..rnilt3
ms
,.‘,„,-A
,
2 qr M. . 1 ,al ., rOT 1 1111 3i /1'111'1( '2 _ 1 -'01
'
Vennfill 14 j •---
- .411 aw a .11-14.111111lifinak,_
Ve " .::j_::._ 1 tj 1 i I ri1i: If -11-7 5 I"flnit
-7_ ,-: -,---,--,
,,iiiiiriv.. 741117 4,44,,--,noi I..411..p" fi, Mu
" . I Vligtrilahi ..k.
itt!k1MTI I T ,:. Itom. 11111i/V
to.
Jr: 10 mil." Riff
, ,104ffirifi iLphefte • 'mat 'At #•%. 01 Liu " 1 IIIIIIIIh• -1 •
—,1 1
fin __ II 1111111INAR11111111H1110.
.0%."
l eg!
-411111111I1111111111 41111111111M AL
ALIO II 0.1.10
teal 0
Takes
We
MOO
ima
81
1
—
. Land Use District Codes AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
IB
INDUSTRIAL
URBAN RESERVE DISTRICT
IM
AGI
INDUSTRIAL RESERVE
111
MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
A
METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT
AP
PUBLIC PARKS DISTRICT
DISTRICT
RFI
SINGLE DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RF2
LOW
RPL RF3
PLANNED LOT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RF4
SEMI-DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RF5
ROW HOUSING DISTRICT
RF6
MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY DISTRICT
APO
AIRPORT PROTECTION OVERLAY
RAT
LOW RISE
DIRECT DEVELOPMENT CONTROL DISTRICT (see below)
RAB
MEDIUM RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
DC1
COMPREHENSIVELY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DC3
TEMPORARY
BMX
HIGH RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE DISTRICT
DC2
RA9
SPECIAL PUBLIC
RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
DC4
RR MAN
MOBILE
•ci
Designalton applred to ConintouilY Housing siltos m accordance with Section 92 Land Use Bylaw
CNC
NEIGHBOURHOOD
CSC CBI
SHOPPING CENTRE DISTRICT LOW INTENSITY BUSINESS DISTRICT
CB2
GENERAL
CHY
HIGHWAY CORRIDOR DISTRICT COMMERCIAL OFFICE DISTRICT COMMERCIAL MIXED USE DISTRICT
CO CMX
DENSITY
INFILL
DISTRICT
LOW DENSITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
APARTMENT DISTRICT
HOME DISTRICT CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
BUSINESS
US
URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT
PU
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
MA
MUNICIPAL AIRPORT DISTRICT
SPO
STATUTORY PLAN OVERLAY
A
DISTRICT
HOLDING DISTRICT SERVICE
DISTRICT
Designation ePPlied to soma RAIT silos in accordance wilh Section 220.5. Land Use &Slaw ...; Lirnit of Edmonton Municipal Airport Protection Ovetlay
DISTRICT •
...-., i t .... i1--" r. , Restricted Devalopmenl a
OCI
82
BUSINESS DISTRICT
AG AGU
Area I R.D. A.1
Designation applied to saes with alloyed ON specrlied development regulations in accordance with Section 920 . Land Use Bylaw For tho use provisions and development oiler la lot DCI Distucts. Please reter In the applicable Area Redevelopment or Area SIILICIwe Plan.
-
CITY OWNED
3.
A ,
4•
; •
Lot I, Plan 2736 E.T.
AG
Lot 2, Plan 2736 E.T.
AG
Lot 3, Plan 2736 E.T.
AG
Block Z, Plan 8474 A.H.
AG
Portion of Plan 8474 A.H. Part of SE 35-53-24-W4
AG
444 009 44276 H HH ee cc tt aaa rree sss
4.33 Hectares 8.053 Hectares
64.566 Hectares
AG
SW 36-53-24-W4 I
7 1;_, --,1-=%1-%%:'"'<,/y‘-' • -
;
_
r)CrtpR R/VG -PO
• ,-
6
PILOT SOUND
cc
Pilot Sound Plan Neighbourhoods
..,
-. 0
■ :-
S
167 AV Ii
NN a NN
II
i /
••••
• /
um
153 Ay E... — F-:
IIUIUIIIIIUIIIIUIUIIISIIIUIIUI
cr) sr)
IIIIM111111111111101111111
3111116
•
IS
ssa
mali ss Y .:'
I IP
IJ
83
15. PILOT SOUND 15-1 Residential Land Supply Gross developable residential land in Pilot Sound totals 550 hectares. By the end of 1982, however, no residential plans of subdivision had yet been approved for Pilot Sound. All land is therefore raw land. The approved Area Structure Plan for Pilot Sound designates 2 neighbourhoods, Cy Becker and Gorman, for light industrial development and 5 other neighbourhoods for residential development. Neighbourhood structure plans (N.S.P.) for all 7 of these neighbourhoods have been approved by Council. Listed below are those neighbourhoods designated for residential development. Neighbourhood Name Brintnell Hollick-Kenyan Matt Beng McConachie North Sawle
Gross Developable Hectares 122 95 110 103 120
PILOT SOUND
We l
I NM. NW
IONI
.00
21000
..... 1600
1
mollail
II A
' 85
Land Use District Codes AG
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
IB
AGU
URBAN RESERVE DISTRICT
IM
MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL
AGI
INDUSTRIAL RESERVE
III
HEAVY
A
METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT
AP
PUBLIC PARKS DISTRICT
DISTRICT
FIFI
SINGLE
RF2
LOW
DETACHED RESIDENTIAL
RPL
PLANNED LOT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOW DENSITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
DENSITY
INFILL
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
BUSINESS DISTRICT
INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT DISTRICT
US
URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT
PU
PUBLIC
MA
MUNICIPAL
ROW HOUSING DISTRICT
SPO
STATUTORY PLAN OVERLAY
RF6
MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY DISTRICT
APO
AIRPORT PROTECTION
RAT
LOW RISE
RAII
MEDIUM RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
OCI
DIRECT DEVELOPMENT CONTROL DISTRICT (see below)
RA9
HIGH RISE
DC2
RMX
RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE
DC3
COMPREHENSIVELY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TEMPORARY HOLDING DISTRICT
DC4
SPECIAL PUBLIC
RF3 6F4 BPS
SEMI-DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
APARTMENT DISTRICT APARTMENT DISTRICT DISTRICT
RR
RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RMH
MOBILE
CNC
NEIGHBOURHOOD
CSC
SHOPPING
CBI
LOW
CB2
GENERAL
CHY
HIGHWAY
CO
COMMERCIAL OFFICE DISTRICT
CMX
COMMERCIAL
I.•
HOME DISTRICT CONVENIENCE
CENTRE
UTILITY DISTRICT AIRPORT DISTRICT
OVERLAY
SERVICE
DISTRICT
Designation applied to Conn-num b, H ousing silos in accordance with Section 92 Land Use Bylaw
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Designation applied to some RAO sites in accordance with Section 220.5.Land Use Bylaw
DISTRICT
INTENSITY BUSINESS DISTRICT BUSINESS CORRIDOR MIXED
v
DISTRICT DISTRICT USE
'
DISTRICT
Iii;:
Limil of Edmonton Municipal AiIport Protection Overlay
-... I ,•." Restricted Development . I ,,i I.,. / '_ Area IR.D. Al st Designatnn applied to sales with altered or specified * development mutilations in accordance with Section 620. Land Use Bylaw DC t
•
86
INDUSTRIAL
For the use provisions and development criteria tor DC! Districts. taloass ruler to the applicable Area Redevelopment or Area Structure Plan.
RIVERBEND uesnellliBridge
Riverbend Plan Neighbourhoods
Fox Drive
Fort Edmontorisso Park reseselm -
CITY OWNED 8.
SW I I-52-25-W4;
,4,
AGU & Proposed mixed RF 1, RF4, RA7, RF5p & US.
63.205 Hectares
WEST JASPER PLACE
• •• •• •• •
Brander Gardens 1
•
1\ 18.
115:
fl 2
Brookside
14).1.
Terwillegar Park
WH I TEMUD
Ramsay Heights
FREEWAY
3
6
Henderso Estate
oner
IF/ Carter Crest 9
8 \ -I
Ogilvie" Ridge
"*.•
sommessessommissesamIIIIIIIIII
87
16. RIVERBEND 16-1 Riverbend Housing Stock At the end of 1982, ns measured by building permits issued, there were 2779 dwelling units in Riverbend, up 3.5 percent from the corresponding 1981 figure (Table 16-1). Of the total, 49 percent are single family units, 17 percent row housing units and 34 percent apartment units , virtually unchanged from 1981 (Figure 16-1).
FIGURE 16-1 MIX OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS IN RIVERBEND, DECEMBER 31, 1982
17%
1
Apartment Units
2
Row Housing Units
3
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
TABLE 16-1 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN RIVERBEND TO DECEMBER 31, 1982 RIVERBEND NEIGHBOURHOODS
49%
34%
BRANDER GARI)ENS BR( )( )KSII 111/LYILA I ILIGI ITS I- ALC( MLR HEIGHTS 1 - 11:NDISKS( )N i:5TA1 ii NEIGIAISDURI - 1( )01) .) ( ;ILVIL ;L • RAMSAY I 11:1GlIrs RLIA -11GAN RID( ;F: R1VI:Rilf. NI) II ) VAL
88
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
277 577
119 114
7111 45
I 177 7111,
—
-504 1111
.113 1111
77 —
111 --
1353
4111
'145
16-2 Residential Building Permits
FIGURE 16-2 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED EACH YEAR IN RIVERBEND, 1980-1982
There were 105 new dwelling units approved by building permit in 1982 in Riverbend, down about 58% from the comparable 1981 figure (Table 16-2). Of these, 62% were for single family, one percent for row housing and 37% for apartment units (Figure 16-2). There has been no apartment development in Riverbend for several years. As in 1980 and 1981, nearly all of the new development activity occurred in the Ramsay Heights and Rhatigan Ridge neighbourhoods (Table 16-2).
DWEll.ING UNITS APPROVED 300
(254) 250
200
150
Apartment Units
100
Row Housing Units
50
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units 1980
1981
1982
1980-1982.
•AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 16-2 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN RIVERBEND IN EACH YEAR, 1980- 1982 RIVERBEND NEIGHBOURHOODS
BRANDER GARDENS I3R( )0KSIDE BULYI:A 1-11:IGI ITS FLACONIR 1 II:IGI I US I !ENDERS( )N IS! A II: NEIG11130LIRI - 100D 9 OGILVIE RIDGE RAMSAY 1- 11RAITS RI-IATR ;AN RIDGE
1980 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Unils
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
1982 Row Apart. Total Single, Semi Duplex Units Units Units Units
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — 1 — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — 1 — —
— — 2 — —
— — 1 — —
— — — — —
— — 3 — — 80
94
—
—
94
55
:17
—
92
—
—
—
—
161
—
—
161
41 22
— —
39 —
217
37
254
1,5
1
3')
22
RIVI.RBEND
TOTAL
94
105
89
16-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land
FIGURE 16-3 SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN RIVERBEND, 1980-1982
At the end of 1982, there was serviced land with a capacity of 1,247 additional dwelling units in Riverbend, down 10 percent from the corresponding 1981 figure (Table 16-3). Of this potential capacity, 75 percent is represented by single family and 25 percent by row housing units (Figure 16-3). All serviced land in Riverbend designated for apartment units has been used up at this point.
POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS 1600 (1398)
1400
1200
1000
BOO
I
I
600
Apartment Units Row Housing Units
?:=
200
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
'AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELUNG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 16-3 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN RIVERBEND 1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
90
RIVERBEND NEIGHBOURHOODS
1980 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
1982 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Units Units Duplex Units Units
13RANDER GARENS BROOKSIDE BULYEA HEIGHTS FALCONER HEIGHTS F1ENDIRSON ESTATE NEIGHBOURFIOOD 9 0 G I L V I E RIDGE RAMSAY HEIGHTS RHATIGAN RIDGE
13 4 — — — — — 273 —
— — — — — — — 147 —
— — — — — — — 69 —
13 4 — — — — —
13 4 — — 363 — —
469
401
110
—
222
101
— — — — — — — 69 —
13 4 — — 316 — — 407 200
RIVERBEND TOTAL
290
147
69
506
1003
326
69
-— — — 115 — —
13 4 — — 478 — — 5110 323
1398
— — — — 96 — — . 110 101
307
— — — — — — — — —
13 4 -— 412 — — 517 301
1247
FIGURE 16-4 RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN RIVERBEND, 1980-1982
16-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity No servicing activity occurred in Riverbend during 1982. In 1981 1,145 potential dwelling units were serviced in this area, 81 percent of which were for single family lots. Only about 105 potential dwelling units were absorbed by the market in 1982.
POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS 1200 (1145) 1000
800
800
I
0
I 200
•
•I
Apartment Units Row Housing Units
(192) NO
122= 1980
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
ACTIVITY
(39) 1981
1980-1982"
1982
'AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 16-4 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN RIVERBEND 1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) RIVERBEND NEIGHBOURHOODS
13RANDER GARDENS BROOKSIDE 13111.YEA 1 IEIGI Irs
1980 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
1981 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units Units
1982 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Units Units Duplex Units Units
—
RAcoNuR riuG; 1 IS I IIN DE RSON ES1A ri:
— — —
— _ —
— _ —
_ _ —
_ _
_ —
— —
_ —
NEIGI IBOURI 100D 9 OGILVIE RIDGE RAMSAY I ILIGFITS RI IATIGAN RIDGE
— — 39 —
— — — —
— — — —
— — 39 —
364 — — 1112 3113
115 — —• — 101
— — — — —
479 — — 1132
RIVERBEND 101 AL
39
39
929
216
—
1145
4114
91
FIGURE 16-5 SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN RIVERBEND, 1980-1982
16-5 The Supply of Subdivided Residential Land At the end of 1982, Riverbend contained vacant subdivided land with a capacity of 1,247 dwelling units all fully serviced (Table 16-5). At current average absorption rates there is probably a 6 to 8 year supply of subdivided serviced residential land in Riverbend. Seventy-five percent of this is designated for single family, 25% for row housing. There is no more land designated for apartment development in Riverbend (Figure 16-5).
1
1
POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS 1800 (1398)
1400
(1247) 1200
1000
.
(983)
.
.
.
.'.'.'.'
Apartment Units 480
Row Housing Units
200
(192)
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units 1980
1981
1982
1980-1982*
•AVERAGE ANNUAL DWEWNG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 16-5 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN RIVERBEND, 1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
92
RIVERBEND NEIGHBOURHOODS
1980 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units UniIs Unils Units
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Unils
' 1982 Row Apart. Tula! Single, Semi Duplex Units UniIs Units Units
BRANDER GARDENS BROOKSIDE BULYEA HEIGHTS FALCONER HEIGHTS HENDERSON ESTATE NEIGHBOURHOOD 9 OGILVIE RIDGE RAMSAY HEIGHTS RHATIGAN RIDGE
13 4 — — — — — 273 356
— — — — — — — 147 101
— — — — — — — 69 —
13 4 — — — — — 4119 457
13 4 — — 363 — — 401 222
— — — -115 — —
RIVER BEND TOTAL
(,4),
248
69
963
1003
13 4 -— 412
101
— — — — — — — 69 --
13 4 — — 478 — — 580 12:1
IS 4 — — .116 -— 407 200
110 101
517 301
:126
69
1398
940
307
1247
110
-
FIGURE 16-6 RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION REGISTRATION
16-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity
ACTIVITY IN RIVERBEND, 1980-1982 No new land was subdivided in Riverbend during 1982. There was however, some re-subdivision of previously subdivided land and some redistricting (rezoning) activity. As a result of re-subdivision in the Henderson Estate neighbourhood, the number of potential dwelling units was reduced by 63. In the Rhatigan Ridge neighbourhood, a small residential parcel was redistricted to commercial. This resulted in the loss of approximately 30 potential dwelling units (Table 16-6).
POTENTIAL DWEWNG UNITS 700 (588)
(498)
I
I
200
Apartment Units
(192) 100
r.
NO
Row Housing Units
ACTIVITY 1980
1981
1982
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
1980-1982*
*AVERAGE ANNUAL DMELUNG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 16-6 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN RIVERBEND, 1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) RIVERBEND NEIGHBOURHOODS
1980 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units Units
BRANDER GARDENS BROOKSIDE BULYEA HEIGHTS FALCONER HEIGHTS HENDERSON ESTATE NEIGHBOURHOOD 9 OGIL VIE RIDGE RAMSAY HEIGHTS RHATIGAN RIDGE
— 7 356
101
RIVERBEND TOTAL
363
101
1981 Row Apart. Total Single, Semi Units Units Duplex Units Units
1982 Row Apart. Total Single, Semi Units Units Duplex Units Units
-
364
34
34
457
182 27
498
573
41
47 9
115
(45)
18 2 27
115
—
688
(45)
1 63 1'
(18)
(18)
(30)
(301' •
(3(1)
(93)"
• Resubdivision resulted in a loss of potential dwelling units • Redistricting for a portion of RA7 to CSC resulted in a loss of 30 potential dwelling units
93
Nor LI1 5a zik al arrozon R(
:1
RIVERBEND
te
zoo 0 100 ZOO
woo
ma
re00 oda
rzOrz
ooze
z000 zo6 -
1.00o .100
metro,
it
94
â&#x2013;
fiThi iiin
Land Use District Codes AG
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
ID
INDUSTRIAL
AGU
URBAN RESERVE
IM
MEDIUM
AGI
INDUSTRIAL
IN
HEAVY
DISTRICT RESERVE DISTRICT
BUSINESS DISTRICT
INDUSTRIAL INDUSIRIAL
DISTRICT DISTRICT
A
METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT
AP
PUBLIC
US
URBAN
PU MA
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT MUNICIPAL AIRPORT DISTRICT
SPO
STATUTORY PL AN OVERLAY
RE I
SINGLE
RE?
LOW
NFL
PLANNED LOT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RF3
LOW DENSITY REDEVELOPMENT
RF4 RF5
ROW HOUSING DISTRICT
RF6
MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY DISIFIIC I
APO
AIRPORT PROTECTION
RA/
LOW RISE
DCI
DIRECT DEVELOPMENT CONTROL DISTRICT
DC?
COMPREHENSIVELY
DC?
TEMPORARY
DC4
SPECIAL
DETACHED RESIDENTIAL
DENSITY
INFILL
DISTRICT
DISTRICT DISTRICT
SEMI-DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
APARTMENT
RAT
MEDIUM RISE
BAR
HIGH RISE
RMX
RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT
APARTMENT DISTRICT
APARTMENT DISTRICT MIXED USE
RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT
RR
RURAL
RMH
MOBILE
CNC CSC
NEIGHBOURHOOD CONVENIENCE SHOPPING CENTRE DISTRICT
CO I
LOW
CO2
GENERAL
CHY
HIGHWAY
CO CMX
COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL
HOME
DISTRICT
o
DISTRICT
INTENSITY
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
BUSINESS DISTRICT
BUSINESS OFFICE MIXED
DISTRICT USE
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
OVERLAY
PUBI.IC
SERVICE
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
Destgoation applied to Co ,,,,,, ugl y Huns, si n, in acconiance wall Section 92 I aorl Ilso livims Dem:matron applied to some RAT sdes in accts.:lance will, Seclion 220 5.Land Use Belaw
.
Linvf of Edmonton Municipal Airpotl Ptoleclion Overlay s
,,, *
...: Resift:fed Development Area IR.D.A.1 Desronatron appked to saes wilt. altered of specified development segolations in accordance with Seclinn 1120 . Land Me Bylaw
'
(see below)
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT HOLDING DISTRICT
:::
DISTRICT
CORRIDOR DISTRICT
PARKS DISTRICT SERVICE
DC I
â&#x20AC;¢
For tboo'... porostons and deyelnninerd colerra In, DCI Boar rcl s. please relic. In Ike applicalde Area Redevelomneid or Area Structure Plan.
95
•
•
(.11
1—•
co
• 1%2' •
s_
U")
t".
Fs- Stony Plain Road
MUE PLACE
.'" / Is t ; I
imassmossmassessamma•es IN
•
WEST JASPER PLACE
•
West Jasper Place Plan Neighbourhood 95 AVE.
.0 is
—I)
/
Belmead
•
Cr)
CITY OWNED
0
C4,
7.
l .
: 87 AVE.
RDA.;;z•
0
•-
a:
Aldergrove WHITEMUD FREEWAY 79 AVE.
•
*MI 11 1111 11 11 1.
Lymburn W Willow Rd.
s';%, -l; I
1•1
\--—
%7
Ormsby Place
)s,"67 •,
•
-. Oles11.\i: 5 North
. •07-el'ica.)OLESK1W ii. •, Gariepy
si,
- / VSION
7 -a • , sm — im
Oleslciw South
LESSARD
• s\ - 1. , •••• "4It
Donsdale
"
.
s
AS= •
o'
••• • • •
••
1, 4 h(v.
96
R1VERBEND
E 1/2 11-52-25-4 Portion SW 1/4 33-52-25-W4
AG AGU
17.82 Hectares 3.75 Hectares
17. WEST JASPER PLACE 17- I Housing Stock At the end of 1982, as measured by building permits issued, there were approximately 11,800 dwelling units in West Jasper Place (Table 17-1), up approximately 800 dwelling units or 7 percent from the corresponding 1981 figure. A slight increase in the proportion of row housing to apartment and single family units is noted compared to the corresponding 1981 figure (35 percent vs. 30 percent).
FIGURE 17-1 MIX OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS IN WEST JASPER PLACE, DECEMBER 31, 1982 TABLE 17-1 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN WEST JASPER PLACE TO DECEMBER 31, 1982 DWELLING UNITS APPROVED WEST JASPER PLACE NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Duplex Units
Row Units
Apart. Units
Total Units
585 533 128 20
368 570 11165
383 233 1580 — — —
1336 1336 2773 20
ALDERGROVE BELMEAD CALLINGWOOD DECHENE DONSDALE GARIEPY IAMIESON PLACE LA PULE LYMBURN OLESK1W ORMSBY PLACE SIJMMERI.EA TERRA LOSA THORNCLIFF WEDGE WOOD HEIGHTS WESTRIDGE
— 160 401 643 169 426 223 — 413 — 397
— — — 440 330 39 576 209 — 486 — 18
WEST 'ASPER l'I.ACE TOTAL
4178
4101
412 152 — 321 — — 438 — 15
— 160 1333 1125 208 1323 432 — 1337 — 430
3534
11813
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
97
17-2 Residential Building Permits
FIGURE 17-2 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED EACH YEAR IN WEST JASPER PLACE 1980-1982
There were 747 dwelling units approved by building permits in West Jasper Place in 1982 (Table 17-2). This is down approximately 18 percent from the three year average 1980-82 and approximately 38 percent from the corresponding 1981 figure. Single family units as a proportion of the total were up about 21 percent and row housing up about 11 percent. No building permits for apartment units were approved in 1982. In 1981, however, 32% of the building permits issued were for apartment units (Figure 17-2). 1
I
DAWNG UNITS APPROVED 1400 (1217) 1200
1000 (909) (793)
(747)
.:..•.:.•..•..
Apartment Units 400
Row Housing Units 200
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units 1980
1981
1982
1980-1982*
•AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 17-2 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS IN WEST JASPER PLACE IN EACH YEAR, 1980- 1982 1980 WEST 'ASPER PLACE NEIGHBOURHOODS
Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units
ALDERGROVE BELMEAD CALLING WOOD DECHENE DONS DALE GARIEPY IAMIESON PLACE LA PERLE LYMBURN OLESKIW ORMSBY PLACE SUMMERLEA TERRA LOSA THORNCLIFF WEDGEWOOD HEIGHTS WESTRIDGE
2
WEST 'ASPER PLACE TOTAL
98
Apart. Total Units Units
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Unils Units Units Units
2 18
18
50 109
392
14 140
14
88 29 15 15 142
102
154 94
99
233
94
10 44 340
116
17 9
56
241
9 42
33 23
5
3
763
488
15 15
5
436
284 29
1982 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
337
392
501 14
6
10 44 456 73 9 42 65
47 193 4 10 27 '
3
3
1217
456
50 252
116
39
252 6
116 47 193 43 10 27
3
291
747
FIGURE 17-3 SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN WEST JASPER PLACE, 1980-1982
13-3 Supply of Serviced Residential Land At the end of 1982, there was enough serviced land in West Jasper Place to accommodate 5340 additional dwelling units (Table 17-3), up about 6% from the comparable 1981 figure. Of this potential capacity, 38% is designated for single family units, 15% for row housing units and 47% for apartment units (Figure 17-3). At the average rate of consumption over the period 1980-82, there is a 5.4-year supply of single family lots, a 2.7-year supply for row housing lots and a 13-year supply of land for apartment units.
OOTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS 6000 (5550)
(5340) (5052)
5000
4000
3000
1
2000
1980
z
1981
Apartment Units Row Housing Units
(909)
1000
I
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
.101 1982
1980-1982*
•AVERAGE ANNUAL DWELLING UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 17-3 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF SERVICED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN WEST JASPER PLACE, 1980- 1982, (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) WEST JASPER PLACE NEIGHBOURHOODS
ALDER(;ROVE
BELMEAD CALLINGWOOD DECTIENE ER./NSDALE ( ;ARIERY IAMII SON PEACE LA PERU IYMBURN ( )I.LSK1W ( /RMSBY P(ACI: SUMMLR1.LA . IERRA LUSA THORNCLIF I: WEDGEW( )01) LILIGI ITS WESTRIDGE WEST 'ASPER PLACE TOTAL
1980 Row Apart. Total Single, Semi Duplex Units Units Units Units
1901 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Units Units Duplex Units Units
77 9 — 129 — I 11
3') — 146 — — 6)1
163 — 2277 — —
66
—
—
506 82 I 88 5') 114 — 18 — 37
_ 236 89 — 417 325 :13 23 23 293 — — — • — — — — 30
2423 129 — 171 66 742 171 930 115 430 — 18 — 67
77 9 — 195 — 101 86 543
I 391,
1073
555(1
—
.1081
279 9
39 18 146 — —
163 — 1776 — —
141
—
179 5(1 96 — 111 — 60
— 120 33 417 — 24 — — — 311
— — — .125 23 399 — — — —
147')
1187
26116
(,5
1902 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Units Units Duplex Units Units
— 90
— 189 — — 269 493 :472 175 41 98 — 18 — 57
163 39 — — 95 1575 — — — — — — — — — 243 — 65 325 1117 — 23 399 154 — — — — — — — 30
523 9 1670 1119 — — 261) 736 437 1,117 64 651 — 18 — 117
5052
21142
1113
5340
279 27 1922 195 — 161 (16 663 914 921 73 519 — 18
321 9
2485
99
17-4 Residential Land Servicing Activity
FIGURE 17-4 RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN WEST JASPER PLACE, 1980-1982
During 1982, land with a capacity of 1040 dwelling units was serviced in West Jasper Place (Table 17-4). All of this land is designated for single family units. In 1981 80% of the land serviced was also for single units (Figure 17-4).
POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS 1200
(1040)
(1032) 1000
800
800
I
I •
I •I
Apartment Units Row Housing Units 200
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units 1980
1981
1982
1980-1982.
•AVERAGE ANNUAL DWEUJNG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 17-4 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICING ACTIVITY IN WEST JASPER PLACE, 1980 - 1982, (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS)
100
WEST JASPER PLACE NEIGHBOURHOODS
1980 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
1981 Single, Semi Row Apart. Total Duplex Units Units Units Units
1982 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Units Units Duplex Units Units
ALDERGROVE BE LMEAD CALLINGWOOD DECF1ENE DONSDALE GARIEVY JAMIESON PLACE LA PERIL LYMBURN OLESKIW ORMSBY PLACE SUMMERLEA TERRA LOSA THORNCLIFF WEDGE WOOD HEIGHTS WESTRIDGE
26 — — 129 — — 49 371 — — — 16 — — — —
25 — — — — 42 — 613 — — — 99 — — — —
113 — — — — — — 17 — — — 107 — — — —
— — — 110 — — 64 389 — — — 22 — — — 26
— I li — — — — — — — — — 24 — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — 106 — — — —
— I IS — BSI — — 64 389 — — — 152 — — — 26
294
294
31 I
II I
417
417
I ll
Ill
WEST JASPER I'LACE TOTAL
591
234
207
5111
42
106
729
1040
1040
134 — — 129 — 42 49 456 — — — 222 — — — —
10.12
17-5 Supply of Subdivided Residential Land
FIGURE 17-5 SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN WEST JASPER PLACE 1980-1982
At the end of 1982, there was sufficient subdivided • residential land in West Jasper Place to accommodate 5385 additional dwelling units (Table 17-5), down about 9% from the comparable 1981 figure. Virtually all of this land has been serviced (Table 17-3)-
PMENT1AL DWELLING UNITS 7000 (6222) (5865)
6000
(5383)
1000
3000 : •:
I
.•.•
2000
I
Apartment Units
• :•
Row Housing Units 1000
?222Z 0 1980
98
Single Family, Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
1980-1982.
1982
...AVERAGE ANNUAL OWELUNG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 17-5 YEAR-END SUPPLY OF VACANT SUBDIVIDED RESIDENTIAL LAND IN WEST JASPER PLACE, 1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) WEST JASPER PLACE NEIGHBOURHOODS
ALDERGROVE BELMEAD CALLINGWOOD DECHENE DONSDALE GARIEPY JAMIESON PLACE LA PERLE LYMBURN OLESKIW ORMSBY PLACE SUMMERLEA TERRA LOSA THORNCLIFF WEDGE WOOD HEIGHTS WESTRIDGE WEST JASPER PLACE TOTAL
1980 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Duplex Units Units Units Units
77 9 — 210 — 'Ill 235 866 82 188 68 167 — 18 — 37
2068
1981 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Units Duplex Units Units Units
1982 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Units Units Duplex Units Units
39 163 279 — — 9 146 2277 2423 — — 210 — — — 60 — 171 — 235 — 236 — 1102 89 — 171 417 325 930 33 23 124 23 293 483 — — — — 18 — — — 30 — 67
77 9 — 195 — 101 191 960 313 179 59 130 — 18 — 60
279 39 163 18 — 27 1776 1922 146 — 195 — — — — 161 60 — 191 — 1080 120 — 33 — 346 417 325 921 — 23 82 24 399 553 — — — — 18 — — — 90 30
321 9 — 189 — — 269 493 372 175 50 134 — . 18 — 57
163 523 39 — — 9 95 1575 1670 189 — — — — — — — — 269 736 243 — 65 — 437 687 187 325 — 23 73 687 154 399 — — — — — 18 — — — 87 30
1073
2292
887
2686
2087
813
3081
6222
5865
2485
5385
101
-
-
FIGURE 17-6 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN WEST JASPER PLACE 1980-1982
17-6 Residential Subdivision Plan Registration Activity During 1982, land with a capacity of 809 dwelling units was subdivided and registered in West Jasper Place (Table 17-6), down about 6% from the comparable 1981 total. Of these, 14% represent single family lots, 3% row housing lots and 13% apartment units (Figure 17-6). Single family subdivision activity has constituted a very significant proportion of the total subdivision activity in West Jasper Place for the three years since West Edmonton Village came on stream.
FtnErfnAL DWELLING UNITS
A redistricting in Summerlea increased the capacity for row housing by 130 potential dwelling units. Apartment Units Row Housing Units Single Family; Semi— Detached, Duplex Units
•AVERAGE ANNUAL OWELUNG UNITS APPROVED BY BUILDING PERMITS.
TABLE 17-6 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN REGISTRATION ACTIVITY IN WEST JASPER PLACE 1980 - 1982 (MEASURED BY POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS) WEST JASPER PLACE NEIGHBOURHOODS
ALDERG ROVE BELMEAD CALLINGWOOD DECHENE DONSDALE GARIEPY JAMIESON PLACE LA PERLE LYMBURN OLESK1W ORMSI3Y PLACE SUMMERLEA TERRA LOSA TERRA LOSA THORNCLIFF WEDGEWOOD HEIGHTS WESTRIDGE WEST JASPER PLACE TOTAL • Increase due to redistricting.
102
1980 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Units Duplex Units Units Units
26
26
83
1981 Apart. Total Single, Semi Row Units Duplex Units Units Units
135 18
294
19 4
19 4
42
42 2
17
9 99
107
580
9 206
434 248
3
24
106
169
207
1182
711
434 248
17 5
32
133
18
130'
681
162
95
302
14 8
26
26
806
294 18
210
210
561
1982 Apart. Total Row Single, Semi Units Units Duplex Units Units
42
106
859
95
920
WEST JASPER PLACE
-.IIII(N
1... ...Ives
'.:,
1 nOSD
0 SOO MOO
2000
20S0
2000
S000 ,
TOO 200 WO 200 SOO
woo Om
Imo
103
Land Use District Codes AG
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
IIT
INDUSTRIAL
AGU
URBAN RESERVE DISTRICT
IM
MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL
AGI
INDUSTRIAL RESERVE
Ili
HEAVY INDUSTRIAL
A
METROPOLITAN RECREATION DISTRICT
AP.
PUBLIC PARKS DISTRICT
US PU
URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
MA
MUNICIPAL AIRPORT DISTRICT
SPO
STATUTORY PLAN OVERLAY
DISTRICT
RFI
SINGLE DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RF2
LOW
RPL RF3
PLANNED LOT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
DENSITY
INFILL
DISTRICT
LOW DENSITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
RF4
SEMI-DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RFS
ROW HOUSING DISTRICT
RF6
MEDIUM DENSITY
RA7
LOW RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
RALI
MEDIUM RISE APARTMENT DISTRICT
HAS
HIGH RISE
RMX
RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE
MULTIPLE FAMIIY DISTRICT
APARTMENT DISTRICT DISTRICT
APO
AIRPORT PROTECTION OVERLAY
DC1
DIRECT DEVELOPMENT CONTROL DISTRICT Ise. below)
TICS DC3
COMPREHENSIVELY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TEMPORARY HOLDING DISTRICT
DC4
SPECIAL PUBLIC
SERVICE
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
RR
RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT MOBILE
CNC
NEIGHBOURHOOD
CSC
SHOPPING CENTRE DISTRICT LOW INTENSITY BUSINESS DISTRICT
in accoldance with Section 220-5. Land Use BYlate
CBI CB2
GENERAL
Lim' 01 Edmonton Municipal Kapott Plotection Clyeslay
CHY
HIGHWAY CORRIDOR DISTRICT
CO
COMMERCIAL OFFICE DISTRICT COMMERCIAL MIXED USE DISTRICT
Des.analton applied to Com lllll nay Noosing
HOME DISTRICT CONVENIENCE
BUSINESS
silos
Dillesacion coarldion anc appi e wlilehd S toec..... tion 9 RA 2 81.1.11. d .Usu Bylaw COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT
â&#x20AC;¢
DISTRICT
Restricted Developmen1 Awe IR. :so *
DC I
104.
DISTRICT DISTRICT
RMH
CMX
,
BUSINESS DISTRICT
a A.I
Designation applied to sites with Meted or specified development regulatures in Nxordance with Section 820 . Land Use Bylaw FIN the use piovisions and development ceiteria tor OCI DISMCIS. please eater to the applicable Plea Redevelopment or Meta Sirucluie Ran.