@itionton
DLETENIZM GAENNDT
Mature Neighbourhood Reinvestment (2009) and
Decade in Review (2000 to 2009)
Pianning
and CAvalopmont
LIBRARY 040 715 010
The City of Edmonton
eknonton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Mature Neighbourhood Reinvestment (2009) and Decade in Review (2000-2009) Introduction The mature neighbourhood reinvestment analysis is undertaken annually based on residential building permits granted within Edmonton's mature neighbourhoods (see Table 1). Residential building permits are broadly divided into two categories: single-family permits and multifamily permits; multi-family permits include semi-detached dwellings and duplexes, as well as low and high-rise apartments/condominiums. The permits are analysed by neighbourhood based on: D
the total number of residential permits granted;
D
the number of permits for interior/exterior alterations;
D
the number of net single family unit gain per neighbourhood (new units minus demolitions);
D
the number of multi-family unit gain per neighbourhood (new units minus demolitions);
D
and, the estimated construction value for all residential projects for each neighbourhood and the total overall value for all mature neighbourhoods.
Detailed tables on 2009 permit data for each neighbourhood are provided in Appendix 1 (Tables 2-4).
Mature Neighbourhoods, defined Mature neighbourhoods in Edmonton are generally those completed before 1970, the majority of which experienced their greatest growth in the post-WWII era. These neighbourhoods form a rough concentric oval around the city centre and are formally defined by the "Mature Neighbourhood Overlay" (MNO) (see Map 1). The Griesbach neighbourhood does not fall within the MNO but is considered a mature neighbourhood for the purpose of this analysis based on its central location and specific characteristics. Including Griesbach, there are 109 mature neighbourhoods in Edmonton out of a total of 255 residential neighbourhoods city-wide.
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal planner, at: 780-496-4524
@Minton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Map 1: Mature Neighbourhood Overlay, Edmonton Zoning Bylaw and List of Mature Neighbourhoods (A-Z) Abbottsfield
Alberta Avenue
Allendale
Argyll
Aspen Gardens
Athlone
Avonmore
Balwin
Beacon Heights
Belgravia
Bellevue
Belvedere
Bergman
Beverly Heights
Bonnie Doon
Boyle Street
Britannia Youngstown
Calder
Canora
Capilano
Central McDougall
Cloverdale
Crestwood
Cromdale
DeIton
Delwood
Dovercourt
Downtown
Duggan
Eastwood
Elmwood
Elmwood Park
Empire Park
Evansdale
Forest Heights
Fulton Place
Garneau
Glengarry
Glenora
Glenwood
Grandview Heights
Gold Bar
Greenfield
Griesbach
Grovenor
Haze!dean
High Park
Highlands
Holyrood
Idylwylde
Inglewood
Jasper Park
Kenilworth
Kensington
Kildare
Kilkenny
King Edward Park
Killarney
Landsdowne
Lauderdale
Laurier Heights
Lendrum Place
Lynnwood
Malmo Plains
Mayfield
McCauley
Mckernan
McQueen
Meadowlark Park
Montrose
Newton
North Glenora
Northmount
Oliver
Ottewell
ParkaIlen
Parkdale
Parkview
Patricia Heights
Pleasantview
Prince Charles
Prince Rupert
Queen Alexandra
Queen Mary Pk
Quesnell Heights
Rideau Park
Rio Terrace
Ritchie
Riverdale
Rossdale
Rosslyn
Royal Gardens
Rundle Heights
Sherbrooke
Sherwood
Spruce Avenue
Strathcona
Strathearn
Terrace Heights
Virginia Park
Wellington
West Jasper Place
West Meadowlark Pk
Westmount
Westbrook Estates
Westwood
Windsor Park
Woodcraft
Mature Neighbourhood Overlay
39
• Note: See numbered map pages for Overlay and land parcel detail.
40
952
949 38 -
38
Anerlal.
37
946
La.1.1.J a
943
940
27
33
1/1 4 0111111111 25
937 20 934
,1 #411t 1 tk i it. 13
/*.931 18 a 928
925 12
--s
1
922
-v.
oten
6
2
919 916
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
York
tdairoiten
%Nam ••••••••••••• ••••••
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
41fflavlart
2
eliitonton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
2009 Highlights Measured in building permit values, residential reinvestment in Edmonton's mature neighbourhoods in 2009 was uncharacteristically low in terms of major multi-family construction projects. In contrast, individual investment by homeowners improving their properties was surprisingly high. The number of new homes added to the mature neighbourhoods in 2009 was very low (212 net units gained), and the percentage of all new units in Edmonton that went into mature neighbourhoods fell from an average 18% observed over the 2000-2008 period to a decade low of 5% (Figure 1).
capital-intensive multi-family developments. Over the late 2008 to 2009 period, for instance, lending institutions and underwriters were raising requirements on the percentage of pre-sales' required to qualify for project financing, which forced project proponents to secure a higher number of presales during a period of downward pressure on home prices and general market volatility. Further, many buyers were holding back on their commitment to purchase as they took a wait-and-see approach through the economic uncertainty that characterized the last year and a half. Notably, in 2009 there were no major residential building permits taken out in either the Downtown or Oliver neighbourhoods, both of which have typically received the lion's share of new housing units within the mature neighbourhoods in previous years.
Figure I: Percentage share of net housing units gained in MNO 2000-2009 35% 30%-
•
25% 20% El % share of net citywide unit gain in MNO
15% 10% 5%
cr% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Several key factors are likely responsible for these trends: •
The economic downturn of 2008-2009, and attendant credit tightening by major lending institutions, likely impacted the borrowing/financing capabilities of project proponents for
In the building boom that characterized Edmonton through the 2005 to 2007 period, the multi-family residential construction sector undertook a substantial number of new projects which added appreciably to the city's multi-unit housing inventory in both mature and developing neighbourhoods. Multi-unit supply ultimately outpaced demand as investors sought to capitalize on Edmonton's rapid growth through the boom, which fueled some speculative building. At the end of Q3 2009, the supply of complete and unabsorbed multi-family units peaked, and inventory started to turn the corner towards the end of the
1 "Pre-sales"
refers to homebuyers or investors purchasing new residential units from homebuilders prior to construction commencing. Pre-sales are often required for project financing as they provide a portion up-front capital required for development.
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
3
ehionton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
year as absorption began drawing down some of the excess supply (Figure 2). The high inventory of completed and unoccupied multi-family units available through 2009 did not create the conditions for continued investment in new capital intensive residential projects, and a pause in construction was clearly demonstrated by the conspicuous lack of building permits taken out for major infill development projects in the mature areas of the city over the last year. Figure 2: Complete and unabsorbed multiple units in Edmonton (2008 & 2009) 1400
marketplace by selling their existing homes and purchasing new ones if they desired a housing upgrade. 2009 key findings Overall, the total value of residential construction in mature neighbourhoods decreased 44% year-over-year (Figure 3). Citywide residential construction values, on the other hand, increased 42% year-over-year, which further emphasized the decline observed in mature neighbourhoods in 2009. Figure 3: Value of Residential Construction in MNO 2000-2009 (in millions) $350
1000 800
1E1 2008 • 2009
600 400 200 0
„,6 6 6c• 4‘ 4
Ns?
ec,
e
residential construction value
number of units
1200
$300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50
"zc , $0 000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 200
Source: CMHC Residential Construction Digest, December 2009 & 2008
•
Building permits for home alterations, repairs, additions, and other miscellaneous reinvestment opportunities were high in 2009. The federal home renovation tax credit may have had an impact on residential reinvestment decisions for individual homeowners. Additionally, the volatility observed in the housing market over 2009 may have encouraged many homeowners to invest money improving their existing properties rather than engaging directly in a turbulent
Despite falling construction values, the total number of residential building permits granted increased 5% year-over-year to 2,374, which is the second highest number of permits granted for residential projects in mature neighbourhoods on an annual basis observed over the last decade (Figure 4). The vast majority of building permits taken out within all mature neighbourhoods in 2009 consisted of interior and exterior renovations, additions and some demolitions of existing structures accompanied by one-toone replacements of single family homes.
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
4
@inonton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Figure 4: Annual number of residential construction permits granted in MNO
Neighbourhoods that experienced the highest and lowest net unit gain in 2009 (top 10 and bottom io) include:
Number of permits granted
3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Finally, absolute net unit gain in the mature neighbourhoods for 2009 was the lowest observed over the decade at just 212 units. At its peak, net unit growth in mature neighbourhoods reached 1,796 units in 2002, but the average over the last ten years has been approximately 1,170 net units gained per year (Figure 5). Figure 5: Net unit gain in MNO 2000-2009 2, ,800 400
NBHDs with highest net unit gain in 2009 Queen Mary Park 94 61 Griesbach 32 DeIton Boyle Street 22 19 Eastwood Alberta Avenue 18 15 Prince Rupert Rundle Heights 12 King Edward Park 9 Downtown 7 NBHDs with lowest net unit gain in 2009 Rideau Park -139 Central McDougall -5 McCauley -3 -2 Balwin Glenora -2 Queen Alexandra -2 -1 Bergman Beverly Heights -1 -1 Greenfield -1 Grovenor
400 ,200
In 2009, neighbourhoods with the highest number of building permits and a construction value of over $2 million for singlefamily dwellings include (in order of highest to lowest construction value):
,000 800 600 400 200 0
• Griesbach • Crestwood • Parkview • Glenora • Alberta Avenue 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
• McKernan • Windsor Park • Belgravia • Strathearn • Westmount • Forest Heights • Bonnie Doon • Laurier Heights
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal planner, at: 780-496-4524
5
@iiionton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Table 1: Summary of Mature Neighbourhood Reinvestment 2009
Mature Neighbourhood Reinvestment 2009 Total Residential Permits (Mature Neighbourhood Overlay plus Griesbach neighbourhood)
Construction Value TOTAL EXCLUDING DOWNTOWN
% Change in Value (2008 to 2009)
Number of New % Change (2008 Units
to 2009)
% Change Units Demolished
Net Unit Gain
Number of Permits
(2008 to 2009)
$166,836,708
-35%
535
-43%
330
205
2,358
4% 5%
TOTAL
$167,703,815
-44%
542
-50%
330
212
2,374
SINGLE
$91,930,032
28%
153
18%
188
-35
2,092
2%
MULTI
$75,773,783
-67%
389
-59%
142
247
282
32%
Construction
Percentage
Value
Share
Construction Value Summary ($) Residential permits in Mature Neighbourhoods as a % of City Wide res permits, excluding Downtown Downtown residential permits as a % of City Wide res permits
$166,836,708
13%
$867,107
0.1%
Residential permits in Developling and Established neighbourhoods (suburban) as a % of City Wide res permits
$1,146,153,405
87%
City Wide residential permit value
$1,312,990,113
100%
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
6
eiiiionton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Decade in Review (2000-2009) When a key set of residential reinvestment indicators are combined for the past ten years a clear picture emerges that shows uneven reinvestment across mature neighbourhoods in terms of population change, net unit gain (or loss), and level of commitment to reinvestment in terms of both construction values and the number of residential building permits acquired.
A key trend that emerges when combining ten year's worth of data is that a couple of neighbourhoods in Edmonton's central core received the greatest amount of reinvestment while many of the mature neighbourhoods built further out from the core actually suffered from net unit and population loss (see Maps 2 to
As discussed above, the decade-long trend for the share of units gained in mature neighbourhoods as a percentage of city-wide growth has been a downward one (Figure 1). The construction boom that took place through the middle of the decade was good to Edmonton's mature neighbourhoods, and the economic downturn that took place at the end of the decade was particularly hard on those same neighbourhoods. Taken together, however, the cumulative effect of residential reinvestment in mature neighbourhoods resulted in a net gain of 11,698 housing units over the decade, all of which were achieved in the form of multi-family development (Figure 6). The population growth in the M NO over the same time period was 3%, as compared to 21% population growth for the city as a whole.
Neighbourhoods that received the highest and lowest number of new units, and population gain, between 2000 and 2009 include:
Figure 6: Net unit gain in mature neighbourhoods for single and multi-family
—
NBHDs with highest net unit gain in 2000-2009 3,469
89%
Oliver
15%
Westmount
1,404 556
Griesbach
460
32%
Garneau
451
13% 17%
1500
D net unit change (single family units)
1000
• net unit change (multi family units)
500
0 III 2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
14%
Boyle Street
440
Queen Mary Park
436
1%
Riverdale
420
61%
Glenwood
344 327
9%
Belvedere
_
7% % Population change 13%
Virginia Park
-139 -16
Gold Bar
-6
-5%
Highlands
-5
-10%
Rosslyn
-5
2%
Bellvue
-4
o% -1%
Rideau Park 2000
% Population change
Downtown
NBHDs with lowest net unit gain in 2000-2009
homes (2000-2009) net unit change (all mature neighbourhoods)
5).
o%
Parkview
-4
Fulton Place
-3
o%
High Park
-3
-14%
Glenora
-2
0%
-500
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
7
@iironton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Map 2: Cumulative net unit change 2000-2009
Map 3: Percent population change 1999-2009
/7-
air,"
kik veil II TAP!! ! PE
WI°rittior-\ ,ut,
itok.
11."Itr.
IL Difference of Net Residential Units + 1000 101 to 1000 21 to 100
t di
ha rb.
i
Neighbourhood Population Change, 1999-2009 (%) + 40 21 to 40
0 to 20
0 to 20
-21 tO 0
<0
11111 <-20
Source: 1999 and 2009 Edmonton Municipal Census
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
8
einionton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Map 4: Cumulative residential construction costs based on building permits 2000-2009
Map 5: Cumulative number of residential building permits granted 2000-2009
Neighbourhood Renovation & Construction Costs (in millions) $100 to 400
401 to soo
$50 to 100 $10 to 50
201 to 400
11
101 to 200
$5 to 10 0 to 100
<$5 1
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
9
@itionton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Appendix 1: Detailed Neighbourhood Permit Data
Table 2 - 2009 Single-Family Building Permits and Construction by Neighbourhood Table 3 - 2009 Multi-Family Building Permits and Construction by Neighbourhood Table 4 - 2009 Total Construction Value and Net Unit Gain by Neighbourhood
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
10
aiitionton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Table 2: 2009 Single-Family Building Permits and Construction by Neighbourhood (A-D)
Neighbourhood
Abbottsfield Alberta Avenue Allendale Argyll Aspen Gardens Athlone Avonmore Balwin Beacon Heights Belgravia Bellevue Belvedere Bergman Beverly Heights Bonnie Doon Boyle Street Britannia Youngstown Calder Canora Capilano Central McDougall Cloverdale Crestwood Cromdale Delton Delwood Dovercourt Downtown Duggan
Total Construction Value ($) 4,122,057 762,710 522,586 522,766 96,751 378,832 384,676 438,918 3,387,549 46,476 175,994 42,937 188,227 2,487,863 30,060 84,946 157,611 102,045 827,616 211,935 22,162 6,124,339 638,150 134,536 381,428 346,257 0 837,461
Number of Interior/ Exterior Alterations 15 4 1 8 2 2 3 5 1 2 1 5 2 2 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 3 3 5
Number of New Units
15 2 1
1 1 1 5 4 1 7 1 -
Number of Additions 2 2 2 6 1 2 4 6 1 2 6 1 3 1 5 1 9 1 2 3 1
Number of Units Demolished
9 2 1
4 2 4 1 1 6 1 1 2 2 1 5 6 1 2 -
Net SF Units: Number of new minus Permits demolished 6 0 0 1 -3 -1 1 -1 -1 -2 -1 -1 -2 -2 0 -5 1 0 -2 -
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
0 81 19 18 15 14 14 15 24 45 9 14 7 12 57 6 18 28 14 23 12 4 57 5 13 9 17 11
11
AND DEVELOPMENT JrnOriton PLANNING
...cont, Table 2: 2009 Single-Family Building Permits and Construction by Neighbourhood (E-K) Neighbourhood
Eastwood Elmwood Elmwood Park Empire Park Evansda le Forest Heights Fulton Place Garneau Glengarry Glenora Glenwood Gold Bar Grandview Heights Greenfield Griesbach Grovenor Hazeldean High Park Highlands Holyrood Idylwylde Inglewood Jasper Park Kenilworth Kensington Kildare Kilkenny Killarney King Edward Park
Total Construction Value ($) 634,276 69,490 42,176 7,000 225,000 2,516,104 126,862 169,957 35,987 4,382,480 462,932 163,202 172,032 439,797 10,547,926 1,080,860 126,561 96,857 1,534,621 1,461,069 114,432 829,134 8,826 56,266 169,634 32,309 287,474 136,802 1,855,786
Number of Interior/ Exterior Alterations 4
Number of New Units
Number of Additions
2 -
1 1 1 1 9 3 -
4 6 4 3 6 2 1 3 9 8 4 1 1 6 7 2 3 1 3 3 2 3
3 -
7 1
24 2
4 1 2
4
11 2 2 2 4 5 4 1 6 6 1 3 2 3 1 1 1
Number of Units Demolished 4 1
Net SF Units: Number of new minus Permits demolished -2 -1 -
3 4 9 1 1 1 3 4 3 3 2 5 -
0 -4 -2 0 -1 -1 24 -1 -4 -3 1 -1 -3
1
-1
4
0
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Ka len Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
22 6 3 1 6 43 17 16 5 62 23 18 11 21 63 29 23 20 41 36 6 33 2 11 15 5 12 5 37
12
elitionton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
...cont, Table 2: 2009 Single-Family Building Permits and Construction by Neighbourhood (L-Q)
Neighbourhood
Landsdowne Lauderdale Laurier Heights Lendrum Place Lynnwood Malmo Plains Mayfield McCauley Mckernan McQueen Meadowlark Park Montrose Newton North Glenora Northmount Oliver Ottewell Parkallen Parkdale Parkview Patricia Heights Pleasantview Prince Charles Prince Rupert Queen Alexandra Queen Mary Park Quesnell Heights
Total Construction Value ($) 1,000 1,064,678 2,131,853 72,061 44,360 86,252 92,373 492,508 3,717,754 329,514 198,041 240,754 466,062 236,487 43,318 21,006 1,680,557 772,969 1,097,857 5,092,724 288,610 1,195,318 95,464 51,286 583,709 61,932 17,500
Number of Interior/ Exterior Alterations 2 5 1
Number of New Units
Number of Additions
2
1 2 5
3 -
4 2 2 1 2 4 1 4 1 9 5 5 10 2 1 1 5 2
1 8 1 1 1
1 1 3 6 2 1 -
Number of Units Demolished
1 4
1 2 2
-
1 1 4 4
4 14
1 1 6 1 5 3 12 1 7
4 1
2 2 1
Net SF Units: Number of new minus Permits demolished 1 -1 -
-3
1 11 37 14 5 15 13 14
-6 -3 0 1 -
53 16 11 23 16 18 6 4
1 1 1 6
0 0 2 0 -
1 5
1 -
40 26 25 70 3 23 15 6 23 9 2
-
-4 -
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
13
i
eilliOnton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
...cont, Table 2: 2009 Single-Family Building Permits and Construction by Neighbourhood
Neighbourhood Rideau Park Rio Terrace Ritchie Riverdale Rossdale Rosslyn Royal Gardens Rundle Heights Sherbrooke Sherwood Spruce Avenue Strathcona Strathearn Terrace Heights Virginia Park Wellington West Jasper Place West Meadowlark Park Westbrook Estates Westmount Westwood Windsor Park Woodcroft York
TOTAL
Total Construction Value ($) 141,300 435,184 1,427,163 1,857,524 95,600 716,710 97,440 18,860 706,929 932,267 38,634 1,651,937 3,223,096 21,802 422,860
Number of Interior/ Exterior Alterations
3,644,211 307,626 149,915
1 2 3 3 1 5 1 1 1 4 2 7 3 2 1 2 1 2 15 2 1 1
91,894,036
293
155,319 872,606 18,400 149,600 3,216,899 173,470
Number of New Units
3 4 1
1 2 3 6 1 2
Number of Additions 2 5 6 5 3 4 2 1 2 1 1 7 5 1 2 4 1 1 7
Number of Units Demolished
Net SF Units: Number of new minus Permits demolished 3
10 7 2
-4 2
1
0
2 2 1 6 7
5
1 2 3
1 4 1 5 2 4 -
153
263
188
5
(R-Z)
-1 0 -1 -3 -1 0 -2 -1 0 -2 1
48 27 6 18 5 6 20 20 12 53 32 6 5 14 21 4 4 73 14
-
23 11 5
-35
2,092
Total construction value and number of include all single family residential related activity including new garages and decks Number of additions refer to additions to residential buildings and do not include additions to accessory buildings (i.e. garages, greehouses, etc.) Number of interior/exterior alterations refer to residential buildings and do not include alterations to accessory buildings (i.e. garages, greehouses, etc.)
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
14
TF,11 OF don
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Table 3: 2009 Multi-Family Building Permits and Construction by Neighbourhood (A-D) Number of
Total Neighbourhood
Interior/ Exterior
Construction Value
Abbottsfield
Alterations
Number of New Units (includes secondary
Number of Additions
Number of Units
Net MF Units: Number of new minus Permits Demolished demolished
suites)
-
-
1,291,800
-
12
12
0 3
Allendale
299,187
2
3
3
6
Argyll Aspen Gardens
114,000
1
1
1
-
0
Alberta Avenue
Athlone Avonmore
0 0
-
40,000
2
16,000
1
-
-
-
2
-
-
2
0 2
1
-
4
-
-
1 4
1 1
-
-
2
-
1
1
Balwin Beacon Heights
600,000
Belgravia
422,488
Bellevue
40,000
2 1
1 1
0 0
-
-
0 122,651
7
3
3,639,500 3,548,500
5 1
23
Calder
515,200
3
6
1
Canora Capilano
384,060 50,000
4 2
2 2
-
Central McDougall Cloverdale
250,000 10,000
1 1
20,000 5,000
1 1
1
3,943,180 0
1
35
50,000
1
-
15
7 1
Belvedere Bergman Beverly Heights Bonnie Doon Boyle Street Britannia Youngstown
Crestwood Cromdale Delton Delwood Dovercourt Downtown Duggan
867,107 27,000
-
-
6
3
9
23
6
1
5 6
6 6
-
2
5
-
2
2
-
2 1 -
-
1
1
34
6
1
1
1
-
1
-
-
7 1
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
16 1
15
i
I
i
i
@iiiOnton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
...cont, Table 3: 2009 Multi-Family Building Permits and Construction by Neighbourhood (E-K)
Neighbourhood
Total Construction Value
Number of Interior/ Exterior Alterations
Number of New Units (includes secondary
Number of Additions
Number of Units
Net MF Units: new minus
Demolished
demolished
Number of Permits
Eastwood
2,305,200
3
suites) 21
21
8
Elmwood
0 40,000
1
1
1
1
Elmwood Park Empire Park
312,000 3,500
1
130,000 0
5
4
4 -
1,238,230
5
5
5
Glenora
39,000 130,000
2 1
Glenwood
30,000
Gold Bar Grandview Heights
32,000
2 1
1
Evansdale Forest Heights Fulton Place Garneau Glengarry
1 1
1
7,685,468
18
37
15,300
1
-
Hazeldean
514,000
1
5
High Park
400,000 40,000
1
4 1
0 32,000
1
1
Jasper Park
7,451,051 90,000
2 1
6 1
Kenilworth
20,000
1
1
Kensington Kildare
0
Idylwylde Inglewood
Kilkenny
2 2 1
0 0
Grovenor
Holyrood
6 2
Greenfield Griesbach
Highlands
5
10,000
Killarney
360,000 823,162
31 2
5
3 1
1
1
6 1
6 1
-
1
1 1
1
0
King Edward Park
-
36
1 -
2 4
9
1 9
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
7
16
@rnonton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
...cont, Table 3: 2009 Multi-Family Building Permits and Construction by Neighbourhood (L-Q)
Neighbourhood
Total Construction Value
Landsdowne
Number of Interior/ Exterior Alterations
Number of New Units (includes secondary suites)
1
0
-
Lendrum Place
502,500
1
Lynnwood
107,000
2 2
Malmo Plains
10,000 41,900
1 2
1 2
McCauley Mckernan
6,424,000 1,293,000
4 4
11
McQueen
0 0
-
Mayfield
Meadowlark Park Montrose Newton North Glenora
1
Demolished
Net MF Units: new minus demolished
-
-
-
-
Number of Permits
-
-
-
0
2
1
1
-
2
2
11
5 9
2
1
-
-
0
-
-
-
2
1 2
-
250,000
-
-
-
-
Northmount Oliver
769,060
13
1
Ottewell Parka]len
10,000 130,000
1 2
1 1
-
-
2
Parkdale
190,000
1
2
-
1 2
Parkview
43,808
1
1
-
-
1
1
-
1 15
8 3
-
2 94
3 6
-
-
Patricia Heights Pleasantview Prince Charles
0
Additions
Number of Units
-
0 38,000
Lauderdale Laurier Heights
Number of
-
1
17 1 2
-
0 0 48,000
1
1
1
Prince Rupert Queen Alexandra
2,030,000 30,000
1 2
15 2
-
Queen Mary Park Quesnell Heights
15,954,250 0
1
94 -
-
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
17
elilionton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
...cont, Table 3: 2009 Multi-Family Building Permits and Construction by Neighbourhood
Neighbourhood
Rideau Park Rio Terrace Ritchie Riverdale Rossdale Rosslyn Royal Gardens Rundle Heights Sherbrooke Sherwood Spruce Avenue Strathcona Strathearn Terrace Heights Virginia Park Wellington West Jasper Place West Meadowlark Park Westbrook Estates Westmount
Total Construction Value 254,000
Number of Interior/ Exterior Alterations
Number of New Units (includes secondary suites)
Number of Additions
1
1
-
140
-139
2
8
2
-
8 -
7 2
1
1
-
1
3
12
1
-
12 2
1 1
0 1,517,500
2
148,500
2
30,000
1
0 285,500 1,701,000
2
20,000
1
2
0 8,000
1
541,000
8
1 4
Number of Net MF Units: Number of Units new minus Permits Demolished demolished
-
1
-
0
1
20,000 0
1
62,500
2
2
-
599,800
2
1
1
4,032,000
2
1
1 -
4
8
-
1 -
1
2
2
-
1 1
5 2
-
2
6
6 1
5 1
-
-
0
5 3
2
9,910
1
1
Woodcroft
36,000
1
-
York
20,000
1
-
-
10
142
TOTAL
75,773,783
-
-
168,571 491,400
Westwood Windsor Park
(R-Z)
178
-
-
6
389
-
2 1
247
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
282
18
@itionton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Table 4: 2009 Total Construction Value and Net Unit Gain by Neighbourhood (A-D) Neighbourhood Abbottsfield Alberta Avenue Allendale Argyll Aspen Gardens Athlone Avonmore Balwin Beacon Heights Belgravia Bellevue Belvedere Bergman Beverly Heights Bonnie Doon Boyle Street Britannia Youngstown Calder Canora Capilano Central McDougall Cloverdale Crestwood Cromdale Delton Delwood Dovercourt Downtown Duggan
New Units
Units Demolished
-
-
5,413,857 1,061,897 636,586 522,766 96,751 418,832 400,676 1,038,918 3,810,037 86,476 175,994 42,937 188,227 2,610,514 3,669,560 3,633,446 672,811 486,105 877,616 461,935 32,162 6,144,339 643,150 4,077,716 381,428 396,257 867,107 864,461
27 5 2 3 2
9 2 1
Construction Value ($)
5 6 1 7 23 6 6 2 3 8 1 35 7 1
4 2 4 1 1 6 1 2 2 2 1 5 -
Net Units (new minus demos) 18 3 1 3 -2 3 2 1 -1 -1 1 22 4 4 0 2 -5
6 1 3 -
2 0 32 -
-
7 1
Number of Permits 0 84 25 19 15 14 16 16 25 47 10 14 7 12 66 12 24 34 19 25 14 5 58 6 19 9 18 16 12
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
19
@Menton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
...cont, Table 4: 2009 Total Construction Value and Net Unit Gain by Neighbourhood (E-K) Neighbourhood Eastwood Elmwood Elmwood Park Empire Park Evansdale Forest Heights Fulton Place Garneau Glengarry Glenora Glenwood Gold Bar Grandview Heights Greenfield Griesbach Grovenor Hazeldean High Park Highlands Holyrood Idylwylde Inglewood Jasper Park Kenilworth Kensington Kildare Kilkenny Killarney King Edward Park
Construction Value ($) 2,939,476 69,490 82,176 319,000 228,500 2,646,104 126,862 1,408,187 74,987 4,512,480 492,932 195,202 172,032 439,797 18,233,394 1,096,160 640,561 496,857 1,574,621 1,461,069 146,432 8,280,185 98,826 76,266 169,634 42,309 287,474 496,802 2,678,948
Net Units (new minus
New Units
Units Demolished
23 1
4
demos) 19
1
0
7
3
4
5 7 1 1 -
4
1
9 1 1 -
-2 0 0
1 61 2 5 4 5 1 1 8 1 1 -
2 13
3 4 3 3 2 5
1
4
-1
Number of Permits 30 6 4 2 7 48 17 22 7 64 25 19 11 21 94
61 -1 1 1 2 -1
31 26 21 42 36
1 3 1 1 -1
7 39 3 12 15
2 9
6 12 6 44
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2010 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
20
elitionton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
...cont, Table 4: 2009 Total Construction Value and Net Unit Gain by Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Landsdowne Lauderdale Laurier Heights Lendrum Place Lynnwood Malmo Plains Mayfield McCauley Mckernan McQueen Meadowlark Park Montrose Newton North Glenora Northmount Oliver Ottewell Parkallen Parkdale Parkview Patricia Heights Pleasantview Prince Charles Prince Rupert Queen Alexandra Queen Mary Park Quesnell Heights
Construction Value ($) 1,000 1,102,678 2,131,853 574,561 151,360 96,252 134,273 6,916,508 5,010,754 329,514 198,041 490,754 466,062 236,487 43,318 790,066 1,690,557 902,969 1,287,857 5,136,532 288,610 1,195,318 143,464 2,081,286 613,709 16,016,182 17,500
New Units
Units Demolished
3 3 1
1 4 -
1
-
2 1 19
4 14 -
-
3 1 1 1 2 2 5 7 2 1 15 3 94
4 1 1 1 1 6 1 5
Net Units (new minus demos) 2 -1 1 1 2 -3 5 -1 0 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 15 -2 94
-
Number of Permits 1 12 37 16 7 16 15 19 62 16 11 24 16 18 6 21 41 28 27 71 3 23 23 9 26 15 2
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 21310 For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
(L-Q)
21
eiiiionton
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
...cont, Table 4: 2009 Total Construction Value and Net Unit Gain by Neighbourhood (R-Z) Neighbourhood Rideau Park Rio Terrace Ritchie Riverdale Rossdale Rosslyn Royal Gardens Rundle Heights Sherbrooke Sherwood Spruce Avenue Strathcona Strathearn Terrace Heights Virginia Park Wellington West Jasper Place West Meadowlark Park Westbrook Estates Westmount Westwood Windsor Park Woodcroft York
TOTAL
Construction Value ($) 395,300 435,184 2,944,663 2,006,024 125,600 716,710 382,940 1,719,860 726,929 932,267 46,634 2,192,937 3,223,096 41,802 422,860 217,819 1,472,406 4,050,400 149,600 3,385,470 664,870 3,654,121 343,626 169,915
167,667,819
New Units
Units Demolished
Net Units (new minus demos)
1
140
-139
11 4
7 2
4 2
1 1 12 3 2 1 7 7 1 2 3 1
1 2 2 1 6 7 1
0 1 12 1 0 0 1 0
Number of Permits 5 10 55 29 7 18 8 7 21 20 13 61 32 7 5
4
0 2 -1
7 6 6 -
1 5 2 4
1 -1 2 4 2
16 26 6 4 79 19 24 13 6
542
330
212
2,374
Mature Neighbourhoods Residential as a Percent of City Wide Residential Permits (Excluding Downtown) Downtown Residential as a Percent of City Wide Residential Permits Suburban Residential areas as a Percent of City Wide Residential Permits Total Value of Residential Permits City Wide
Prepared by the Growth Analysis Unit, Planning & Development Department, February 2o-io For more information contact Kalen Anderson, Principal Planner, at: 780-496-4524
12.7% 0 87 .1.2 %% $1,312,990,113
22