AGS Bitsize Guide: What aspects must we consider?
IMPLEMENTING SYSTEMIC SUSTAINABILITY
Fugro discuss reducing single use plastic with core liner recycling
THE IMPORTANCE OF EMPLOYEE NETWORKS
Empowering Diversity and Inclusion - Maximising benefits and innovation
Image credit: Tom Androsiuk
TASK-SPECIFIC ASBESTOS AWARENESS TRAINING
Equipe Group unveil new AAT that is free to BDA Members until 1st October
Welcome to the September issue of the AGS Magazine.
I hope you managed to take a break from work over the summer and have come back feeling refreshed.
In this edition, Fugro share with us how they are reducing single use plastic with core liner recycling, which brings a number of positive environmental benefits. Bradley Falcus from the Business Practice Working Group shares with us the importance of Employee Networks and how they are beneficial to both the company and employees.
We present our next EC7 Next Gen: Bitesize Guide – Georisk is intrinsic to reliability of structures – what aspects must we consider when determining the risk categorisation of a structure? The article reminds us that reference to BS EN 1991:2023 is mandatory and essential to understand how to use and apply FprEN 1997:2024.
Also in this edition, is an article on the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 and its possible implications for environmental law in the UK.
As always we provide details of our upcoming events. I hope some of you will be able to join us for these. Looking ahead,
we are holding an EDI themed webinar on 25th September discussing various initiatives and campaigns which have made a lasting impact for our workforce and consider what the next steps may look like for our industry. In November we have an in-person event in Manchester exploring a range of topics considering the impact and effect of groundwater during all stages of the design and construction process. Work has also started on planning our 2025 Annual Conference to be held at London’s One Great George Street. Please save the date of Thursday 1st May.
We are always on the lookout for additional, informative content for the magazine, so if you have an opinion piece, a case study, a technical article or a wider issue that you think the geotechnical and geoenvironmental public would find beneficial, please do get in touch.
We would be interested in your feedback on the magazine and our future plans. Please contact ags@ags.org.uk if you have any comments.
The Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists (AGS) is a not-for-profit trade association established to improve the profile and quality of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering. The membership comprises UK organisations and individuals having a common interest in the business of ground investigation, geotechnics, geoenvironmental engineering, engineering geology, geochemistry, hydrogeology, and other related disciplines.
EDITORIAL BOARD
Vivien Dent, AGS Chair
Sally Hudson, Coffey Geotechnics
Caroline Kratz, Forum Court Associates (FCA)
Katie Kennedy, FCA
Julian Lovell, Equipe Group
Calum Spires, Equipe Group
David Entwisle, BGS
Chris Vincett, Retired
Lauren Hunt, Arcadis
Adam Latimer, Ian Farmer Associates
Dimitris Xirouchakis, Structural Soils
Emma Anderson, HaskoningDHV UK
Daniele Fornelli, Geotechnical Observations
EDITORIAL STORY
To submit an article for inclusion in the AGS Magazine, please contact the AGS on 020 8658 8212 or ags@ags.org.uk. Please note that articles should act as opinion pieces and not directly advertise a company. The AGS is under no obligation to feature articles or events received.
CONTACT US AGS Forum Court, Office 2FF, Saphir House, 5 Jubilee Way, Faversham, Kent, ME13 8GD
ags@ags.org.uk
020 8658 8212
Vivien Dent AGS Chair
Association of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Specialists
@agsgeotech
www.ags.org.uk
FEATURE
PAGE 28
COVER STORY
PAGE 22
Georisk is intrinsic to reliability of structures – what aspects must we consider for a structure?
POST BREXIT CHANGES IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
PAGE 4
How it might affect AGS members?
The HSE guidance on AAT makes specific reference to the training being “appropriate for the work and the roles undertaken by each worker (and supervisor)”. In response, Equipe Group have created a specialist AAT online course, available for free to BDA Members until 1st October 2024.
IMPLEMENTING SYSTEMIC SUSTAINABILITY
PAGE 12
Fugro discuss reducing single use plastic with core liner recycling.
THE IMPORTANCE OF EMPLOYEE NETWORKS: EMPOWERING DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION
PAGE 18
Maximising benefits, innovation and improving culture.
MORE INSIDE
PAGE 4
News in Short: Incl. Publication Updates
PAGE 6
AGS Annual Conference
Sponsorship now open
PAGE 32
Standards Update July 2024
Breaking Ground, a podcast collaboration between Ground Engineering Magazine and the Ground Forum, have released a new episode which is available for free listening: Î The Institute of Materials, Minerals & Mining (IOM3)
Hosted by Steve Hadley, Breaking Ground covers a wide range of ground engineering related topics. Key themes include sustainability, design, commerce, diversity, health and safety, welfare, construction techniques, education, and industry challenges. Episodes also profile industry members' careers within the context of discussing industry issues, construction techniques and case studies.
Breaking Ground is available for free download on channels including Spotify, Apple Podcasts and Google Podcasts. To listen to the podcast, click HERE.
For further information on the podcast or for podcast sponsorship opportunities please email gforum@ground-forum.org.uk.
Article contributed by Murray Bateman, Director, Geo-Integrity Ltd
A recent presentation to the SiLC Annual Forum by environmental solicitor Emma Tattersdill (Bexley Beaumont) covered The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 (REUL Act), and in particular its possible implications for environmental law in the UK.
The REUL Act is a significant legislative measure in the United Kingdom, passed to address the complexities and legal frameworks inherited from European Union law post-Brexit. This Act is crucial for environmental law as it signifies a pivotal shift in how environmental regulations will be managed and implemented in the UK.
The REUL Act creates powers for government to review, amend, or repeal the vast body of EU-derived legislation retained in UK law after Brexit. Currently, the UK’s environmental law heavily relies on regulations directly imposed by the EU or influenced by EU directives. These laws covered various environmental protections, including air and water quality, waste management, biodiversity, and chemical safety.
The primary importance of the REUL Act in environmental law lies in its aim to streamline and adapt these inherited regulations to better fit the UK’s specific needs and priorities. By doing so, it provides an opportunity for the UK government to tailor its environmental policies more closely to national interests. However, this also poses significant challenges and uncertainties.
One of these challenges is the potential for a reduction in environmental standards. Critics argue that the process of reviewing and possibly revoking EU-derived laws could lead to the weakening of crucial environmental protections. For instance, there is apprehension that the government might prioritize economic and industrial interests over environmental sustainability, leading
to less stringent regulations on pollution and resource management, such as they did with neonicotinoids in 2023. This could undermine the progress made in areas such as climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and public health protection. Other concerns are that it may compromise the clarity, accessibility, and comprehensibility of “assimilated law”, thereby affecting the rule of law. In addition, previously litigated points may need to be revisited due to the changes in the status of REUL; i.e. points argued under direct effect of EU Directives. Also, to date the review process for which laws will be retained, amended, or repealed has been opaque and under resourced, to say the least, and with the recent change in government it is even less clear as to what will occur.
In conclusion, the REUL Act is a fundamental development in UK environmental law, representing both significant opportunities and potential risks. The implementation of the new Act has the ability to affect AGS members greatly. For further information on the Act and its ramifications, the UK Environmental Law Association has produced a fascinating briefing paper on their website (www.ukela.org).
The top three downloaded AGS publications in last month:
1. AGS Guidance on Waste Classification for Soils - A Practitioners Guide
2. Safety Guidance - Classification of Potentially Contaminated Sites for Intrusive Investigation Activities
3. AGS Client Guide for Ground Investigation Activities – Trial Pitting Recent AGS publications available on the AGS website:
• Laboratory Proficiency Testing An Introduction to Geotechnical Laboratory Testing for Routine Construction Projects
• Bitesize Guide – EC7 Next Generation 06 – Ultimate Limit States Bitesize Guide – EC7 Next Generation 07 – Geotechnical Reporting
• Bitesize Guide – EC7 Next Generation 08 – Groundwater and Geohydraulic Properties
To download the publications for free; click here.
We are pleased to announce the AGS Annual Conference will return to London’s One Great George Street in spring 2025, and sponsorship for the event is now open.
Taking place on Thursday 1st May, the Annual Conference is the flagship event in the AGS’ calendar; the programme will feature a full-day CPD conference in the stunning Great Hall and soon to be refurbished Telford Theatre, followed by an evening Networking Drinks and Canapé Reception in the Smeaton Room.
We have a range of sponsorship opportunities available for both Members and non-Members of the Association who wish to have a presence during the event. A summary of each package is listed below but for full details on each offering please click HERE
CANAPE SPONSOR*
(AGS Member Rate: £1750 / Non-Member Rate: £2548)
Î Company logo on the drinks and canapé menu
Î Company logo on the canapé flags
Î Two/three page company/individual Q&A in AGS magazine (over 7450 subscribers)**
Î Full page advert in AGS Magazine (worth £400)**
Î Entry for three delegates into the Annual Conference
Î A designated area to exhibit company initiatives, research and software during the conference. This exhibition space can also be used to showcase marketing materials, company literature and banners
*one package available **terms and conditions apply
(AGS Member Rate: £1525/ Non-Member Rate: £2090)
Î A designated area to exhibit company initiatives, research and software during the conference. This exhibition space can also be used to showcase marketing materials, company literature and banners
Î Entry for three delegates into the Annual Conference
Î Full page advert in AGS Magazine (worth £400, over 7450 subscribers)**
(AGS Member Rate: £1400 / Non-Member Rate: £1975)
Î A designated area to exhibit company initiatives, research and software during the conference. This exhibition space can also be used to showcase marketing materials, company literature and banners
Î Entry for two delegates into the Annual Conference
Î 1/4 page advert in AGS magazine (worth £160, over 7450 subscribers)
(AGS Member Rate: £688 Non-Member Rate: £930)
Î Entry for one delegate into the Annual Conference
Î Company directory in AGS magazine (worth £50, over 7450 subscribers)
Î Company logo on the conference lectern
Î Company logo on the event presentation holding slide
All rates exclude VAT. If you’d like to confirm your support, please contact Caroline Kratz or Holly Blake on ags@ags.org.uk before Friday 28th March. Please note that packages are limited and are offered on a first come, first served basis.
The AGS are holding a one day CPD conference on the topic of groundwater on Wednesday 6th November at ETC Venues in Manchester.
The need to consider the impact and effect of groundwater during all stages of the design and construction process is of paramount importance for almost all construction and building projects. Whenever something goes wrong on a construction site in the ground, invariably groundwater is found to have had an impact and ground failures have the potential to cause major safety risks and cost implications. The cause is often blamed on 'unforeseen ground conditions'. However, the impact of groundwater is often poorly understood by many sectors of the construction industry, even those tasked with the design and construction of earth structures, basements, foundations, roads or pavements. The impact of groundwater can manifest in obvious ways as water inflow into excavations, leakage through retaining walls,
uplift buoyancy pressures, but in less obvious ways such as consolidation settlements or reduction in the strength of the ground, or as the medium for transportation of contaminants or adverse chemical elements.
We Need to Talk About Groundwater is a CPD conference aimed at attendees involved in construction projects from concept and planning through detailed design to construction and is not solely for geotechnical engineering specialists. The conference will be hosted by Vivien Dent (AGS Chair), and is proposed to raise awareness of how groundwater can impact construction. This will include presentations about how groundwater and geohydraulic parameters can be reliably determined during investigations and infiltration testing, how groundwater is covered by the new second-generation Eurocodes BS EN 1990:2023 and FprEN 1997-1:2024, measures for control of groundwater, how water pressures can impact cutting slopes or excavations, and a number of other topics.
Confirmed speakers and presentation titles include:
Î Groundwater Pressures in the SecondGeneration Eurocodes
Dr Andrew Bond, Director at Geocentrix
Î Eurocode, Groundwater and Geohydraulic Properties, The Next Generation
Will Capps, Technical Manager at Lucion Delta-Simons
Î Groundwater in Slopes and its Relationship to Stability
Len Threadgold, Geotechnical Adviser at Geotechnics
Î Stabilisation of Steep Slopes in Saturated Ground using Groundwater Control & Passive Drainage Anchors
Dr Stephen Thomas, Founder, Director and Chair of OGI Groundwater Specialists
Î Infiltration Tests – There are Better Options than BRE 365
Steve Wilson, Technical Director at EPG
Î Intriguing Observations and their Significance in Groundwater Management
Stephen Walthall BEM, Retired Engineering Geologist
Î Groundwater Extremes Under Climate Change
Dr Jon Mackay, Senior Hydrologist at the British Geological Survey
Î Whatdunnit? (basement failures)
Clive Everett, Technical Claims Surveying Manager at National House Building Council (NHBC)
Î Challenges of Permeability Assessment for Geotechnical Purposes
Dr Martin Preene, Technical Director at Coffey Geotechnics
Î Second-Generation Eurocodes – Dealing with the Chemical Effects of Common Groundwater Solutes on Structural Concrete
Chris Raison, Director at Raison Foster Associates
The event will also include two group Q&A segments; the first will be chaired by Claire Howarth (Senior Principal Engineering Hydrogeologist at Mott Macdonald) and the second will be chaired by Georgina Donbroski (Director – Technical and Quality at RSK Geoscience).
For full speaker biographies and presentation synopsis, please click HERE.
Tickets are priced at £150 for AGS Members and £210 for non-AGS Members. Prices exclude VAT. A limited number of student, local authority and Environmental Agency places are available for £95, ex VAT. To register please click HERE.
SPONSORED BY
DATE: Wednesday 25th September
TIME: 11:00 – 13:00
FEE: Free of charge to AGS Members. £50 plus VAT to non-Members.
The AGS is hosting a webinar this autumn entitled, How Can We Achieve an Equitable, Diverse, and Inclusive Industry? This virtual event will take place on Wednesday 25th September between 11:00-13.00, and will be free to attend for members of the Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists.
Unfortunately, it is often felt that the geotechnical and geoenvironmental Industry lags behind others in its efforts to be equitable, diverse, and inclusive (EDI); often focusing on
other aspects of our work as paramount and leaving EDI behind.
This virtual CPD event endeavours to shine a light on some of the amazing work that is already ongoing within the AGS Membership and in the wider geosciences community and continue the conversation for a more progressive future.
Join webinar Chair, Bradley Falcus (Central Alliance Pre Construction Services) and our four speakers Charity Rose (AtkinsRéalis), Martin Griffin (GHD), Hollie Taylor (Amey) and Ebenezer Adenmosun (Geofirma) as we discuss various initiatives and campaigns which have made a lasting impact for our workforce, highlight the importance of EDI and wellbeing within the geotechnical and geoenvironmental industry, and consider what the next steps might look like for our industry.
Î To Affinity and Beyond – The Power Of Affinity Networks
Hollie Taylor, GeoEnvironmental Engineer and Co-Chair Women@Amey at Amey
The talk will include an overview of the Women@Amey Network’s achievements to date, highlighting their commitment to continuous improvement and empowerment and showcasing the significant positive impact on women throughout the Amey business. Attendees will learn about various successful initiatives that have been implemented, which have fostered a more inclusive and supportive work environment. Additionally, the talk will
delve into the ongoing projects and future goals of the Women@Amey Network, highlighting their commitment to continuous improvement and empowerment.
Hollie’s presentation will also outline the collaborative efforts with our other affinity groups emphasizing the importance of unity and collective action in driving meaningful change.
Î Be Boulder; Ready to Rock N’Roll
Martin Griffin, Principal Geotechnical Engineer and EDI Advisor with GHD
The talk will be an awareness session focussing on allyship towards diverse underrepresented groups. Allyship is a much-misunderstood term and describes the actions, behaviours, and practices we can all do in ground engineering to make our employment sector more welcoming, and inclusive for one and all. By understanding our role, what allyship is, and why it is needed as an essential soft skill. By also providing some practical tips, together we will learn how to move the Equity Diversity Inclusion (EDI) dial a bit further on. Finally, it will comprise my ongoing learning/research on EDI in engineering and some of my and others’ lived experiences while working in ground engineering.
Î Geologists are Rockstars – How to Make Noise and Take Control!
Charity
Rose, Engineering Geologist at AtkinsRéalis
The talk will include a high-level overview of the work Charity has undertaken and explore practical strategies on how to make positive
change within your own organisation. Being a voice for change (and professionally persistent) can come with challenges. The talk will discuss how we can empower ourselves, the people around us and how to tackle the fear of rejection.
Î Diversity and Inclusion. Do we really still have a problem in our Industry?
Ebenezer Adenmosun, Director at Geofirma and Co-Founder of the Ground Forum Undergraduate Mentoring Scheme
Ebenezer Adenmosun openly discusses his views on whether diversity and inclusion is still a real issue within the ground engineering industry from his personal standpoint. He takes us through some of his experiences gleaned from his 30 plus years in the industry from being an undergraduate in the early 1990’s to now running his own geotechnical consultancy, and how these important experiences led to him to co-founding the Ground Forum Undergraduate Mentoring Scheme (GFUMP) and being involved in other initiatives. Ebenezer discusses the important lessons he has learnt during his career journey, and how we can all do something towards helping to improve the reputation our industry has, if indeed we really still have a problem.
The webinar is free to attend for AGS Members and £50 (ex VAT) for Non-Members. To register for this event and for further information, please click HERE
Sustainability has become one of the most important factors to consider in any construction project, both within and outside of the ground engineering sector. The past few years have seen environmental and sustainability issues thrust into the spotlight on a global scale, including a more widespread understanding of governing bodies such as the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (the UNFCCC COP), and large-scale adoption of initiatives such as the science based targets initiative (SBTi) and the
However, focus on improving sustainability in construction is largely focussed on the introduction of practices that include ‘easy wins’ such as electric or alternatively fuelled equipment and fleet vehicles, the use of lowerimpact materials, and an increased focus on renewable energy procurement. But what about everything else? While these aspects are undoubtedly hugely important in achieving sustainability goals, there are so many other ways in which sustainability can be achieved across the entire lifecycle of a project.
At Fugro, we continuously rethink what we do and how we do it to ensure we are key contributors to the development of a safe and sustainable world. We conduct our operations in many different sectors and such
a broad scope of works has lent itself to the development of a number of innovative ways to increase sustainability in these areas.
Post-Covid, Fugro decided to analyse how we could be more sustainable in lesser considered areas, and we began this process by analysing consumption across the business. We soon realised that we consume a large amount of single use plastic, and it was here that we decided to introduce our Zero Plastic Initiative, aiming to completely eliminate Fugrodeployed single use plastics and to reduce supply chain plastics by 50%.The single use plastic dilemma has become one of the most prominent environmental crises in recent times and the impact of single use plastics on our planet is devastating. Microplastics from waste that has been carelessly disposed of are everywhere, having been found in human blood, in clouds, and even at the bottom of the Mariana Trench, one of the deepest oceanic trenches on earth that stretches further below the surface of the sea than Everest does above land. Chemicals from plastics pollute soils and waterways. The production of virgin plastics includes the use of fossil fuels such as oil and natural gas and is incredibly energy intensive, with a white paper by The Association of Plastic Recyclers estimating that virgin plastic production can consume an estimated 70.4 MJ per kg of energy.
11 – sustainable cities and communities
14 – life below water
• 15 – life on land
“ The single use plastic dilemma has become one of the most prominent environmental crises in recent times and the impact of single use plastics on our planet is devastating.
The manner in which Fugro was consuming plastics did not correspond with the objectives we believed we could best contribute to, nor did it resonate with the operational standards to which we aspire. With a strong determination to make the most substantial impact from the very beginning, we made the decision to tackle the most significant source of singleuse plastic identified within our business operations first – the core liners.
The proper handling of waste stands as one of our most significant environmental responsibilities. PVC core liners are the most appropriate type of liner for carrying out our specific sample collection activities. Many of the projects in which we are involved present constraints related to space or weight. This is true whether we are drilling for core samples from a vessel situated in the middle of the North Sea or operating halfway up a mountain in the Scottish Highlands, as we did in 2023 as part of the SSE Renewables Coire Glas hydro pumped storage project.
Whilst Fugro endeavours to encompass all 17 sustainable development goals wherever possible, we most closely align ourselves with:
• 7 – affordable and clean energy
• 9 – industry, innovation and infrastructure
There are numerous benefits to using PVC core liners, which play a crucial role in our geotechnical investigation works. Although they may seem like just simple plastic tubes, they offer significant cost savings and reduced weight compared to other options, they are durable, and because they are made from PVC rather than uPVC, they have the added advantage of flexibility. Their use helps reduce
the risk of contamination, their transparency allows for easy observation, and they facilitate successful sample retrieval.
Whilst alternatives such as steel Shelby liners exist, they are significantly heavier and more expensive, and pose additional extraction risks when the sample is analysed in the laboratory. It is important to note that plastic itself is not inherently a bad choice – when used appropriately and handled correctly, plastic-based tools and parts can be invaluable in any geotechnical project. Therefore, completely phasing out the use of PVC core liners in favour of nonplastic alternatives was deemed unfeasible.
“ Therefore, completely phasing out the use of PVC core liners in favour of nonplastic alternatives was deemed unfeasible.
However, there is a notable downside to employing plastic core liners. Reuse, the subsequent tier in the waste management hierarchy, is unfeasible in this scenario. Upon arrival at our laboratories, the sample retrieval process necessitates the splitting of the liner, either partially or entirely, to extract the sample intact. Consequently, the liner cannot be reused and must be discarded. Our analysis of single-use plastic usage revealed that we were not handling this waste in the most environmentally responsible manner. Instead of implementing the recycle tier of the waste management hierarchy, we were resorting to the final tier, disposal/ recovery.
Searching for a solution to recycle responsibly
We realised that it was imperative to instigate positive change, aligning with our commitment to support the SDGs and our sustainability objectives. However, we soon realised that finding a solution for PVC core liner disposal would prove to be a challenge.
The plastic recycling market predominantly
favours easier to recycle plastics with higher rebate potential. uPVC (unplasticised polyvinyl chloride), commonly used in windows and doors, exemplifies this trend. In contrast, PVC (polyvinyl chloride) contains plasticising additives, rendering it somewhat malleable and structurally flexible, which is advantageous in certain applications but also presents challenges. These additives, such as phthalates, pose health hazards and contamination risks during recycling processes. Moreover, the high heat treatment typically involved in plastic recycling can release hydrochloric acid, posing corrosion risks to both equipment and workers. Many recycling companies are reluctant to bear the safety burden and associated costs relating to this.
In 2023, Simplas PVC Recycling embraced collaboration with us to realise our objectives. Aligned with Fugro's values and vision, Simplas is committed to fostering more sustainable practices and reducing reliance on single-use plastics. Their dedication led to the attainment of Recovinyl® certification, European certification scheme which verifies the process, quantity and quality of recycling PVC waste.
A secondary challenge lay in the requirement for cleaning prior to recycling, presenting another substantial obstacle due to the various mud and silt residues often stuck to the liners, as well as tapes and labels. Despite recognising the impracticality of cleaning them solely through manual labour, we remained determined to succeed. Through collaborative efforts among our internal departments, we pinpointed ultrasonic cleaning as the solution to achieve the cleanliness necessary to meet our objectives. Subsequently, we invested in two ultrasonic baths and designed a tailored
operating procedure, seamlessly integrating routine core liner cleaning into our daily operations.
PVC undergoes recycling via a mechanical process involving rigid plastic granulation. Initially, the core liners are shredded into pieces roughly a few inches in size. Subsequently, these pieces undergo a secondary processing phase, granulating them into even smaller fragments, typically just a few millimetres in size. Known as plastic pellets or 'regrinds' within the plastic recycling sector, these granules are ideally sized for sale to manufacturers of plastic goods. Manufacturers go on to melt the regrind to create new plastic items, avoiding the use of virgin PVC in manufacturing processes. While regrinds are often utilised in producing similar items, lower quality regrinds may also find applications in alternative products such as mats and traffic cones.
All this effort brings considerable positive environmental benefit. Recycling PVC reduces primary energy demand by between 45% and 90% compared to virgin PVC production, resulting in approximately 2 kg of CO2 saved per kg of recycled materialii. Further carbon savings can be achieved by diverting this waste from incineration – the combustion of PVC in energy from waste facilities emits around 21.28 kg CO2 per tonneiii.
To put this into perspective, Fugro disposes of around 4 tonnes of spent core liners annually, meaning that by simply working to ensure we recycle this waste stream we can save an additional 8.09 tonnes of CO2 from being emitted each year – it would take approximately 400 trees twelve months of growth to sequester the same amount of carbon dioxide from the atmosphereiii. There are other notable benefits in addition to the obvious carbon savings. Recycling core liners
diminishes the demand for natural resources, with the makeup of PVC comprising of 57% chlorine extracted from common salt and 43% ethylene sourced from fossil fuels or byproducts from sugar cropsiv.
Although various factors can make systemic sustainability challenging, Fugro’s core liner recycling project serves as compelling evidence that with steadfast willpower and determination, these challenges can be realistically and effectively addressed.
We are committed to going beyond the initial success of our core sample recycling initiative – our next objective is to initiate the recycling of the poly bags and tubs used to store samples in our laboratories: we go through approximately 20,000 of these items annually. Our efforts will continue to extend further down the single-use plastic chain, encompassing every item, right down to the very last sample tag and zip tie.
Finally, we must ensure that we share best practice and lessons learned with those around us. Fugro operates in 57 countries across the world and our international colleagues often encounter similar issues around plastic recycling. By delivering tangible benefits and laying the foundation for enduring change, we can amplify and maximise the environmental benefits of such approaches across our global portfolio.
But why stop there? Engagement with clients, geotechnical specialists, and other stakeholders around the single use plastic crisis is critical to ensuring the ground engineering sector can fully realise the benefits of adopting a circular economy approach. The industry as a whole need to make sure that we continue on a path of true sustainability, using open communication and knowledge sharing to ensure that a combination of effective techniques are used. This allows the industry to achieve the best environmental outcomes operationally, benefitting not only ourselves but the planet too, and most importantly, ensuring a safe and sustainable environment for future generations.
i. Source: https://plasticsrecycling.org/ images/library/APR-Recycled-vs-VirginMay2020.pdf
ii. Source: https://www.vinylplus.eu/news/ moving-the-pvc-industry-to-a-low-carboncircular-economy/#:~:text=It%20has%20 been%20calculated%20that,PVC%20and%20 the%20recycling%20process
iii. Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/ collections/government-conversion-factorsfor-company-reporting
iv. Source: https://www.bpf.co.uk/ plastipedia/polymers/PVC.aspx#Raw%20 Materials
Article contributed by Bradley Falcus, Senior Administrator, Central Alliance
Employee Networks, are voluntary, employee-led groups formed around shared characteristics or experiences, such as race, gender, sexual orientation, or veteran status. These networks have become essential in fostering diversity, inclusion, and a positive organizational culture. As businesses increasingly prioritize diversity and inclusion (D&I), the role of Employee Networks has grown in significance, offering numerous benefits for both employees and organizations.
Employee Networks are beneficial not only to the members but also to the organization as a whole. They offer a channel through which employees can voice their concerns, provide feedback on company policies, and contribute
to a more inclusive workplace culture. Additionally, they serve as a resource for organizations to tap into diverse perspectives, which can drive innovation and improve decision-making.
Employee Networks are vital for promoting a sense of belonging among employees, especially those from underrepresented groups. These networks help foster a supportive community by connecting individuals with similar backgrounds or interests. A 2019 study by Harvard Business Review found that companies with active Employee Networks are 70% more likely to have a positive organizational culture that promotes diversity and inclusion. These networks also play a crucial role in enhancing employee engagement, a key driver of productivity and retention.
Studies show that companies who embed Employee Networks within their EDI strategy have a higher level of engagement in employees who participate in the groups. This demonstrates the significant role these networks play in retaining diverse talent, particularly in a competitive job market. Employees who feel connected and valued are more likely to stay with the company and contribute to its success.
Employee Networks also contribute to innovation by bringing diverse perspectives into the organization's decisionmaking processes. Diverse teams are more likely to generate creative solutions and better understand the needs of a diverse customer base.
“ This demonstrates the significant role these networks play in retaining talent, particularly in a competitive job market. Employees who feel connected and valued are more likely to stay with the company and contribute to its success.
This connection between diversity and innovation is vital in industries where creativity is key. By leveraging the insights of a diverse workforce through Employee Networks, companies can stay ahead of the competition and drive continuous innovation.
Employee Networks are instrumental in fostering a culture of inclusion, where all employees feel valued and respected. Inclusion is more than just diversity; it involves creating an environment where diverse voices are heard, considered, and integrated into the decisionmaking process. Employee Networks play a crucial role in advocating for inclusive policies
and practices within the organization.
It's noted that organizations with active Employee Networks are much more likely to have inclusive workplace policies, such as flexible work arrangements, diversity training, and equitable pay practices. These policies directly contribute to a more inclusive workplace, which in turn leads to higher levels of satisfaction and retention.
their skills and advance their careers. This is particularly beneficial for employees from underrepresented groups, who may face additional challenges in navigating their career paths.
“ Many networks offer mentorship programs, leadership development workshops, and networking events that help members build their skills and advance their careers.
Employee Networks also provide valuable opportunities for professional development and career advancement. Many networks offer mentorship programs,
No matter the business size, Employee Networks can be set up and run by dedicated and passionate staff members. Some examples of Employee Networks are listed: Women's Networks, Black Employee Networks, Disability Networks, LGBTQ+ Networks, Asian Affinity Networks, Family Networks, and Volunteer Activity Networks.
practice to confirm the general demographic of the workforce or if there is an appetite for a Network – this is where HR representative(s) should be involved to help shape the look of any future Network. It's also important to seek the support of a Champion or Executive Sponsor who is part of the company's Senior Leadership Team, these will help open doors when you first start the Network. It's essential to ensure that you engage volunteers to lead and participate in the Employee Network. You can attract volunteers by using the Network as a development opportunity and adding it to annual objectives and development plans.
“ It's also important to seek the support of a Champion or Executive Sponsor who is part of the company's Senior Leadership Team, these will help open doors when you first start the Network. It's essential to ensure that you engage volunteers to lead and participate in the Employee Network.
The first step of any Employee Network should be to create an action plan with three main goals, prove the Network's worth with these goals before expanding the remit, and reach – and manage expectations appropriately. Research similar employee networks within your own business or externally. Establish a dedicated committee of volunteers to help with initiatives and events. Use internal and external communication channels to cascade information through the company so employees feel part of a community year-round.
In today's increasingly diverse and globalized workforce, the importance of Employee Networks cannot be overstated. These networks are not just a "nice-tohave" but a strategic asset that can drive organizational success. From enhancing employee engagement and retention to fostering innovation and inclusion, Employee Networks offer tangible benefits that contribute to a more vibrant, equitable, and productive workplace.
Organizations that invest in supporting and expanding their Employee Networks are not only supporting their employees but are also positioning themselves for longterm success in a competitive and rapidly changing environment. By recognizing and harnessing the power of Networks, companies create a workplace where diversity is celebrated, inclusion is the norm, and every employee has the opportunity to thrive.
Photo credit: Debbie Darling
Article contributed by Dr Vincent Nyambayo, AtkinsRéalis
The success in delivery of geotechnical projects pivots on practitioners being able to develop reliable and robust solutions. This process is underpinned by complying with the relevant codes and it’s notable that it is mandatory to reference BS EN 1990:2023 in order to comply with the requirements of FprEN 1997:2024. BS EN 1990:2023 contains most of the definitions and procedures for structural and geotechnical design.
The second-generation draft FprEN 1997:2024 suite of documents is improved and contains additional advice and recommendations regarding georisk plus expanded guidance in the determination of the Geotechnical Category. This should result in increased reliability and robustness of structures. There is need to consider the interaction of a structure with the ground and assess how much of that ground will interact with the structure for all relevant limit states and design cases i.e. the zone of influence. This helps to inform the scope of Ground Investigation required to develop an appropriate Ground Model.
Another aspect to consider is the complexity of the ground. Factors such as uncertainty, variability, complexity of the ground, etc. need to be considered in order to determine whether the Geotechnical Complexity Class (GCC) is high, normal or low.
A new concept is the requirement for practitioners to also consider health and safety, as well as socio-economic and environmental impact should failure occur i.e. Consequence Class (CC). Detailed guidance is provided in the second-generation BS EN 1990:2023 regarding the requirements for design quality, checking and inspection for different CC. The practitioner is, therefore, now required to consider the zone of influence, as well as linking the GCC to the CC in order to derive the Geotechnical Category (GC). Finally, although the secondgeneration FprEN 1997:2024 alludes to the fact that in general structures designed in accordance with Eurocodes have sufficient robustness, nonetheless additional guidance is now also included which recommends a checklist of design and operational scenarios to be considered, including recommended possible strategies that can be taken when designing for robustness.
“ The practitioner is therefore now required to consider the zone of influence, as well as link the GCC to the CC in order to derive the Geotechnical Category (GC).
current BS EN 1997:2004+A1:2013 are given in Part 1 (2.1) (8)P where it states that “In order to establish minimum requirements for the extent and content of geotechnical investigations, calculations and construction control checks, the complexity of each geotechnical design shall be identified together with the associated risks”. It recommends 3 geotechnical categories based on the perceived risk and recommends that the category be reviewed at each stage as the project evolves. Overall, the determination of risk in the current BS EN 1997:2004+A1:2013 largely focuses on structural aspects of the structure, with very little reference to consequences of a civil, economic or environmental nature.
The second-generation FprEN 1997:2024 suite of documents contain significant improvements and provides more detailed guidance on assessing the level of risk, in order to inform the Geotechnical reliability. The new procedures require determination of the zone of influence, Geotechnical Complexity Class (GCC) and Consequence Class (CC); in order to determine the Geotechnical Category (GC). These various elements are discussed in more detail below.
The reliability of a structure is its ability to fulfil the specified requirements, including the design working life for which it has been designed – this includes its safety, serviceability and durability.
This subject is introduced in general terms in BS EN 1990:2023 4.1 and expanded in FprEN 1997:2024 for geotechnical design. The requirements of the basis of design in the
This new approach in the second-generation FprEN 1997:2024 will enable better assessment of the Geotechnical Category and the corresponding scope of Ground Investigation and design methods required and allied with this, information from the desk studies and comparative experience is also pertinent.
The zone of influence is defined in secondgeneration FprEN 1997-1:2024, 3.1.6.1 as the “zone where construction works or the
geotechnical structure can induce adverse effects in terms of safety, serviceability, robustness, durability or sustainability on the geotechnical structure itself, other structures, utilities, ground, or groundwater”. More detail is given in clause 4.1.2.1 of Part 1, with detailed advice given in Part 2 with regard to ground properties, and Part 3 for specific geotechnical structures.
The primary demarcation of the zone of influence shall include but not be limited to the extent of potential failure surfaces, potential occurrence of significant ground displacements and extents of any transient or persistent changes in ground water or piezometric levels. It is important to understand that the zone of influence is directly linked to the type of geotechnical structure and the relevant limit states under consideration.
In order to inform the scope of Ground Investigation the zone of influence has to be defined first. During the Ground Investigation and design phase the zone of influence is
updated as part of georisk management. This might involve requirements for supplementary Ground Investigation or more advanced design methodologies in order to mitigate the georisk.
The GCC is defined in FprEN 1997-1:2024, 3.1.2.2. as “classification of a geotechnical structure on the basis of the complexity of the ground and ground structure interaction, taking account of prior knowledge”, and is expanded in 4.1.2.2. This is a new concept in the second-generation FprEN 1997:2024.
Guidance on selection of the GCC is provided in Annex C of FprEN 1997-1:2024. The process requires an evaluation of the degree of severity for the design situation by considering various influencing factors which fall under four categories (C.3):
Î uncertainty of the ground conditions; Î variability and difficulty of the ground; Î sensitivity of the geotechnical structure to groundwater and surface water conditions;
and Î complexity of the ground-structure interaction.
Through application of engineering judgement and systematic evaluation, the severity is established based on a classification system, which ranges from high complexity to low complexity, relative to any comparable experience that exists for the particular geotechnical structure, design situation, and ground conditions.
A structure is classified into one of 3 categories: GCC3, GCC2 and GCC1 corresponding to higher, normal and lower complexity respectively.
A preliminary GCC shall be selected at desk study phase or alternatively based on site inspection and shall be reviewed and updated as necessary during design and execution phases.
Furthermore, it gives examples of geotechnical structures in Consequence Classes CC0 to CC4 in Table 4.3 (NDP), unless the National Annex gives other examples.
This approach enables more detailed assessment to be made for evaluation of the georisk and better informs the scope of Ground Investigation, the degree of complexity of the design approach required and scale of risk mitigation measures needed during execution of the works.
“ A preliminary GCC shall be selected at desk study phase or alternatively based on site inspection and shall be reviewed and updated as necessary during design and execution phases.
As aforementioned, this is a new concept in the second-generation Eurocodes. The consequences of failure of the structure or a structural member shall be classified into one of five possible consequence classes (CC4 to CC0 equating to highest and lowest consequence class, respectively). BS EN 1990:2023 includes Annexes A to E, which provide much more detail about CC e.g. Table B.4 gives requirements for design quality, checking and inspection for different CC.
FprEN 1997:2024 4.1.3 (1) expands on BS EN 1990:2023 (4.3) and emphasises that “the classification of the consequences of failure of a geotechnical structure should account for the potential effects on structures, utilities, and ground within the zone of influence”.
The concept of a GC already exists in the current BS EN 1997:2004+A1:2013 Part 1(2.4) and underpins the assessment of georisk. The complexity of the design and associated risks are assessed to inform the Ground Investigation and analytical methods to be used in design. Small simple structures of low risk fall into GC1 and high risk very complex structures or unusual ground conditions fall into GC3, whilst the majority of structures fall into GC2.
GC2 should include conventional types of structures and foundations with no exceptional risk nor difficult ground nor loading conditions.
In the FprEN 1997:2024 suite of documents the concept of risk is significantly expanded and now requires the GC to be linked to the GCC and CC i.e. the Geotechnical Category (GC) should be determined from a combination of the Consequence Class of the structure (CC) and Geotechnical Complexity Class (GCC). It is noteworthy that the structure defines the Consequence Class CC. The ground defines the Geotechnical Complexity Class GCC. These are then combined in FprEN 1997-1:2024, Table 4.2
to give the Geotechnical Category GC. This in turn defines the requirements for GI, design, quality management, reporting, checking, supervision, inspection etc.
This new approach significantly elevates the importance of civil and economic factors that must also be considered by geotechnical engineers when assessing the GC. Under the FprEN 1997:2024 approach, this will result in structures with a high CC being classified with a higher GC than is currently, and rightly so, as this will result in improved reliability. Logically, structures of high GC will require greater scope of Ground Investigation and increased complexity in analytical methods to mitigate the georisk.
As expanded in the secondgeneration FprEN 19971:2024, in addition to BS EN 1990:2023 , (4.2), the GC shall also specify the extent and amount of the following:
Î measures to achieve appropriate representation of parameters for design;
this shortcoming is now addressed in FprEN 1997:2024 in conjunction with BS EN 1990:2023. BS EN 1990:2023 (3.1.6.9) describes robustness as “The ability of a structure to withstand unforeseen adverse events without being damaged to an extent disproportionate to the original cause”. The aim of designing for robustness is either to prevent disproportionate consequences as a result of an adverse or unforeseen event or to provide some additional resistance to reduce the likelihood and extent of such an event.
“ It is notable that for most structures, design in accordance with the Eurocodes provides an adequate level of robustness without the need for any additional design measures to enhance structural robustness.
Î measures to achieve accuracy of the calculation models used and the interpretation of their result;
Î measures to prevent errors in design and execution, and the occurrence of gross human errors; and
Î measures to ensure appropriate implementation of design according to procedures specified in the project documentation.
Although there is a cursory reference to robustness in the current BS EN 1997:2004+A1:2013, 2.2 (5)(e), there are no principles or requirements stated in it and
It is notable that for most structures, design in accordance with the Eurocodes provides an adequate level of robustness without the need for any additional design measures to enhance structural robustness. Nonetheless in order to enhance the robustness of geotechnical designs, the new Eurocodes go much further. FprEN 1997-1:2024 (4.1.4) provides a checklist of design and operational scenarios that it recommends need to be considered, as well as possible strategies for designing for robustness that should be considered where relevant.
Ground practitioners are reminded that reference to BS EN 1990:2023 is mandatory and essential to understand how to use and apply FprEN 1997:2024. One cannot just pick up FprEN 1997:2024 and expect to be able to design a Ground Investigation or a geotechnical structure.
Georisk mitigation plays a key part in improving the reliability of structures. The new generation of Eurocodes addresses this topic in greater detail, thereby providing much
needed guidance to practitioners. Overall, in order to improve reliability of geotechnical structures, the new Eurocodes require an in-depth assessment of georisk that involves establishing a linkage between the GCC, CC and GC, unlike the current EC7, which considers the risk aspects on the basis of the GC alone. Under the second generation EC7 approach, this will result in structures with a high CC being classified with a higher GC than is currently, and rightly so as this will result in improved reliability.
Key considerations during the ground investigation for high-risk projects will require due consideration of the zone of influence and GC to identify the appropriate number and location of exploratory holes, and associated testing regimes, in order to adequately characterise the ground. Furthermore, for the complex structures advanced testing may also be required in order to provide input data for advanced analytical models. As the overall risk reduces, the scope and scale of Ground Investigation may correspondingly be reduced. Similarly, during the design process high risk structures will require complex modelling and analyses for effective georisk mitigation
whereas structures of negligible risk can be analysed using simplified or routine methods of analysis.
Whilst the majority of structures designed in accordance with Eurocodes have adequate level of robustness, the second-generation Eurocodes improve this design aspect by providing a recommended checklist of design and operational scenarios to be considered, as well as possible strategies for designing for robustness.
This document is, of necessity, generic and is not intended to be a complete or comprehensive statement of the law, nor does it constitute legal or specialist advice. It is intended only to highlight issues that may be of interest to AGS members. Neither the writer, nor AGS, assumes any responsibility for any loss which may arise from accessing, or reliance on the material and all liability is disclaimed accordingly. Professional advice should be taken before applying the content of the document to particular circumstances. The bitesize guide, along with the other AGS bitesize guides can be downloaded from the AGS website here
Article contributed by Calum Spires, Operations Director & Julian Lovell, Managing Director, Equipe Group
In the specialized field of ground engineering, where workers frequently interact with made ground and disturb soils, the likelihood of encountering asbestos and the associated exposure risksare well documented. Whilst dangerous levels of exposure to asbestos are infrequent in ground engineering, knowledge of what form that asbestos could take and what that actually looks like in the ground could be the difference
between a legal or illegal activity or creation of a significant risk.
Hopefully, Asbestos Awareness Training (AAT) forms a part of most companies' training programmes, however, this training is often failing to fulfil the requirements of the Health and Safety Executive’s provided expectations, as it is often not relevant to the work activity or workplace. This means that many in the industry receive only generic asbestos training, which often fails to address the specific hazards faced by ground engineering workers and the risk posed by asbestos in soils.
Asbestos awareness training, which is stipulated for “anyone who is liable to
disturb asbestos during their normal work, or who supervises those employees” under the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012, is designed to cover the basics: types of asbestos, health risks, legal responsibilities, and general procedures for avoiding exposure. While crucial for a broad audience across the construction industry, this training often falls short for those in ground engineering, a sector that involves complex interactions with potentially contaminated soils, made ground, imported materials and buried infrastructure. Even despite the HSE’s guidance on who should undertake AAT, statistics from the last 12 months of the British Drilling Association’s annual driller’s audit show that 12% of their participants hold no asbestos training whatsoever.
Ground engineering frequently takes place on brownfield sites where asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) might be present on or beneath the surface. Generic training often focusses on asbestos in buildings and what it looks like within buildings, like pipe lagging or ceiling tiles, which does not adequately prepare workers for the challenges posed by asbestos risks associated with demolition, weathering, crushing etc. The skills required to identify potential asbestoscontaminated soil during excavation, for example, are vastly different from those used in dealing with asbestos insulation in buildings. This gap in training can lead to dangerous lapses in safety protocols, as workers may be unaware of how to recognize and handle asbestos risks unique to their work environments.
reference to the training being “appropriate for the work and the roles undertaken by each worker (and supervisor)”. This means task-specific asbestos awareness training for ground engineering workers should be undertaken to address the unique risks and challenges faced on ground engineering sites. By offering in-depth knowledge and practical guidance tailored to the specific activities and environments they encounter, learners can be better equipped in how to identify potential asbestos and know what the immediate next steps are.
A key focus of task-specific training is the identification and assessment of asbestos hazards. Ground engineering workers must be able to recognize potential ACMs not just in buildings, but in soil and other subsurface conditions, as well as its potential presence on the surface. This requires an understanding of how asbestos was historically used, disposed of, and how it might have spread over time.
“ Ground engineering frequently takes place on brownfield sites where asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) may be present on or beneath the surface.
For instance, asbestos was commonly used in products like cement pipes and drainage systems. When these materials are buried or broken up, they can pose significant risks to workers who may unknowingly disturb them as part of a ground investigation, or wider earthworks projects. Task-specific training equips workers with the knowledge to identify these risks and raise the alarm.
Why does AAT
The HSE guidance on AAT makes specific
Task-specific asbestos awareness training offers several key benefits. First and foremost, it enhances worker safety by providing the knowledge and skills necessary to identify and avoid potential asbestos exposure in specific ground engineering environments such as
ground investigations, earthworks, piling, land drilling, remediation etc. This not only protects individual workers but also contributes to a safer workplace culture, where everyone is aware of the risks and takes proactive steps to mitigate them.
“ When workers are confident in their ability to identify asbestos risks in soils, this allows the project to pro-actively develop a suitable and sufficient work plan...
Secondly, it helps employers comply with their legal obligations under the Control of Asbestos Regulations, 2012. By providing training that reflects the specific risks of their work and their working environments, employers can demonstrate due diligence and eliminate the risk of fines or legal action in the event of an asbestos-related incident.
Finally, task-specific training can lead to
improved project outcomes. When workers are confident in their ability to identify asbestos risks in soils, this allows the project to proactively develop a suitable and sufficient work plan and control measures to allow it to proceed more smoothly. This results in fewer delays or disruptions caused by unexpected or unnoticed asbestos discoveries later on in the project.
The British Drilling Association have identified the importance of AAT by making evidence of it a mandatory requirement for all drillers undertaking the BDA Audit from 1st October
free access to the course to all BDA member companies until the audit requirement comes into force on 1st October. The course is taken online and is available on-demand via their GEO Academy e-learning platform.
Equipe have established themselves as specialist providers of task-specific and industry focussed training courses. Whether that is site supervisory training or CAT & Genny training, Equipe always believe that when it comes to health and safety, it should be task-specific and industry related. Equipe already delivers a ground engineering-focussed non-licensed asbestos in soils course. However, it is recognised that not all ground engineering companies choose to work with asbestos obligations.
“ The need for taskspecific asbestos awareness training in the ground engineering sector cannot be overstated and as discussed above is an integral part of HSE guidance.
The need for task-specific asbestos awareness training in the ground engineering sector cannot be overstated and as discussed above is an integral part of HSE guidance. While generic construction-related training provides a valuable foundation, it is insufficient to address the uspecific risks faced by ground engineering workers. By investing in tailored training programs that reflect the realities of their work and workplace, companies can better protect their workers, ensure compliance with legal requirements, and improve project outcomes. In an industry where the stakes are high, there is no substitute for task-specific knowledge and preparedness.
BS ISO 11277:2020+A1:2024
Soil quality – Determination of particle size distribution in mineral soil material – Method by sieving and sedimentation Replaces
BS EN ISO 18187:2024 Soil quality – Contact test for solid samples using the dehydrogenase activity of Arthrobacter globiformis Replaces
BS EN ISO 23611-2:2024 Soil quality – Sampling soil invertebrates – Part 2: Sampling and extraction of micro-arthropods (Collembola and Acarina) New
(a) This table is derived from the work programmes of BSI Technical Committees EH/4-Soil quality and B/526/3-Ground investigation
CEN EN 1997-1 Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design – General Rules Will A1:
CEN EN 1997-2 Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design – Ground properties Will
CEN EN 1997-3 Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design – Geotechnical structures Will
ISO/WD 18674-6 (for CD consultation)
CEN prEN, ISO DIS 18674-7
CEN FprEN, ISO FDIS 22476-16
Geotechnical investigation and testing -Geotechnical monitoring by field instrumentation — Part 6: Measurement of settlement: Hydraulic settlement systems New
Geotechnical investigation and testing – Geotechnical monitoring by field instrumentation – Part 7: Measurement of strains: Strain gauges New
Geotechnical investigation and testing – Field testing –Part 16: Borehole shear test -
BS 10175 (revision) Investigation of potentially contaminated sites – Code of practice
ISO CD 7303
ISO DIS 8259
ISO DIS 11074
Soil quality - Simplified method for oral bioaccessability of metal(oids) in soils
Soil quality – Bioaccessibility of organic and inorganic pollutants from contaminated soil and soil-like material
Soil quality - Vocabulary EN
ISO CD 18718 Assessment of soil functions and related ecosystem services: definitions, descriptions and conceptual framework New
ISO CD18721 Assessment of soil functions: indicators and methods New
ISO DIS 24212
Soil quality - Remediation techniques applied at contaminated sites New
PUBLISHED STANDARDS (a)
Replaces BS ISO 11277:2020
Replaces BS EN ISO 18187:2018
Published July 2024
Published June 2024
New standard Published May 2024
investigation and ground testing. Copies of draft standards (e.g. CD, DIS, prEN) are usually available for review and comment via AGS. “GEOTECHNICAL” STANDARDS – In preparation
Will partially replace BS EN 1997-1: 2004 + A1: 2013
Will replace BS EN 1997-2: 2007
Will partially replace BS EN 1997-3: 2004
New standard
Progressing to FprEN
Progressing to FprEN
Progressing to FprEN
Comment period ended 8 April 2024
New standard ISO comment period ended 15 March 2024
Comment period ended 19 November 2023
BS EN 1990:2023 Basis of structural and geotechnical design was published in April 2023. Publication of EN1997-1 and EN 1997-2 is expected by about July 2024. Publication of EN 1997-3 is likely about January 2025. For more information see: Bond A, Ground Engineering, 2023 (November) 30-32.
New standard
Will complement BS ISO 17924 – see also
ISO CD 8529
New Standard
Will complement BS ISO 17924 – see also
ISO CD 7303
EN ISO 11074:2015+A1:2020
New standard
New standard
Draft for Public Comment (DPC) expected in September 2024
DIS expected August 2024
Comment period ended 18 June 2024
Proceeding to FDIS
Proceeding to DIS Will be Technical Specification (TS)
Proceeding to DIS Will be Technical Specification (TS)
New standard Comment period ends 1 August 2024
Equipe Training's specialist geotechnical training courses are delivered both in person at our dedicated training facility just outside of Banbury, Oxfordshire, and also online via Zoom!
Available upcoming dates are provided below:
Î 19th September 2024 - Professor David Norbury’s Rock Description Workshop
Î 25th September 2024 - Basic Foundation Design
Î 26th September 2024 - Further Foundation Design
Î 2nd October 2024 - Mastering the AGS Data Format
Î 15th October 2024 - Understanding and Scheduling Geotechnical Laboratory Tests
Î 17th October 2024 - Professor David Norbury’s Chalk Description Workshop
Î 23rd October 2024 - Professor David Norbury’s Soil Description Workshop
Places on these courses can be booked online here, or via contacting Equipe on +44 (0)1295 670990 or info@equipegroup.com
Equipe Training and their health and safety training partners RPA Safety Services and EB Safety Solutions are delighted to announce their collection of specialist health and safety courses for the geotechnical market have resumed being delivered in person, as well as being delivered online where required.
These courses are approved and certified by the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH) and meet the requirements of UK Health and Safety regulations for working on geotechnical and land drilling sites. Upcoming courses have limited numbers of places available in order to maintain social distancing within the classroom environment. Upcoming dates include:
Î 17th September 2024 - Managing and working with Asbestos Risk in GI (MARGI)
Î 5th – 7th November 2024 - IOSH Safe Supervision of Geotechnical Sites
Î 5th December 2024 - IOSH Avoiding Danger from Underground Services
Places on these courses can be booked online here, or via contacting Equipe on +44 (0)1295 670990 or info@equipegroup.com
Delivered in partnership with RPA Safety Services
IOSH Safe Supervision of Geotechnical Sites (3 Days) - £495 + VAT
Learn in detail how to keep yourself and your on-site operatives safe in the field - industry SSSTS equivalent
IOSH Avoiding Danger from Underground Services - £175 + VAT
In accordance with the requirements and guidance set out within HSG47
Delivered in partnership with EB Safety Solutions & RPA Safety Services
MARGI - Managing & working with Asbestos Risk in Ground Investigation - £225 + VAT
Comprehensive guidance to deal with asbestos in a GI environment, including CAR 2012
Geotechnical Courses
Prof. David Norbury’s Soil Description Workshop - £295 + VAT
Providing a detailed approach to soil description practices and techniques
Prof. David Norbury’s Rock Description Workshop - £295 + VAT
Providing a detailed approach to rock description practices and techniques
Understanding and Scheduling Geotechnical Laboratory Tests - £250 + VAT
Detailed overview of processes involved in efficiently scheduling Geotechnical Laboratory Testing
Delivered in partnership with Plough Geotechnical
Basic Foundation Design - £250 + VAT
Shallow foundation overview for geotechnical practitioners and engineers
Further Foundation Design - £250 + VAT
Complex & deep pile foundations for geotechnical practitioners and engineers
Earthworks Design and Construction - £250 + VAT
A general overview of materials sourcing / selection for design & construction
Slope Stability Design - £250 + VAT
Comprehensive overview for geotechnical practitioners and engineers
An online advertising campaign within the AGS Magazine will help to build and increase industry awareness of your company’s profile, initiatives and offerings.
The AGS can help build a package to suit your needs and budget; whether it’s a series of adverts across multiple issues, a combination of event sponsorship and advertising, or a single advertorial.
The AGS Magazine is a free email publication that looks at a range of topical issues, insights and concerns, whilst publishing new guidance notes, working group activities and information on upcoming industry seminars.
With 6 issues each year, our subscribers include industry professionals such as practitioners, chartered specialists, senior decision makers and managing directors
To receive a media pack or to discuss advertising rates, please contact Caroline Kratz on 0208 658 8212 or email ags@ags.org.uk
H: 297mm
RATE: £400
W: 105mm
H: 145mm
RATE: £160
Company name, address, contact number, email and one logo.
RATE: £50
All adverts should be sent in a PDF, PNG, JPEG, TIFF, PSD (Photoshop) or EPS (Illustrator) format.
All advertising artwork must be supplied in 114 dpi resolution.
Artwork must be delivered to the AGS using the agreed artwork specification size listed left.
Artwork should be emailed to ags@ags.org. uk no later than 10 days prior to publication.
AGS Members all share a commitment to quality in the geotechnical and geoenvironmental industry. This has become widely recognised by clients, governmental bodies and other associations that touch issues to do with the ground.
We welcome both companies and individuals who want to be recognised for their quality of practice to join our growing membership of over 130 Members. We shape our industry, continually improve practice and collaborate on issues that affect us all; from clients, all the way through to the people who use the land and the buildings we help develop.
To become a Member of the AGS, please visit http://www.ags.org.uk/about/become-a-member and submit your application online. Please note that all membership applications are reviewed by the Membership Committee 6 weeks in advance of each quarterly Executive meeting. The deadline for the next round of completed applications is 8th October 2024.
All Members of the AGS are entitled to free introductory advice on chemical and legal/contractual matters from AGS Loss Prevention Group members, Marquis & Lord and Beale & Co.
For advice on chemical safety and best practice, Marquis & Lord will provide up to 30 minutes of free advice, for one issue, to any AGS Members.
Additionally, if you’re an AGS Member and are looking for legal advice, please contact Beale & Co and quote ‘AGS Helpline’ where the first 15 minutes of legal advice will be free of charge.
CHEMICAL SAFETY HELPLINE
Marquis & Lord
Tel: +44 (0) 121 288 2386
www.marquisandlord.com
(Please quote ‘AGS Helpline’)
LEGAL HELPLINE
Beale & Co
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7469 0400 www.beale-law.com
If you have any queries regarding AGS Data Format, there is a discussion forum on the AGS Data Format website, where queries can be posted and answered by the Data Format team.
If a Member has any issues with regard to Safety, Contaminated Land, Geotechnical, Instrumentation & Monitoring or Laboratories which you think the industry should be aware of please email ags@ags.org.uk, we will then forward your email to the relevant AGS Working Group.
All articles in the AGS Magazine are the opinions of the authors and are not intended to be a complete or comprehensive statement of the law, nor do they constitute legal or specialist advice. They are intended only to highlight current issues from date of publication that may be of interest. Neither the writer(s), nor the AGS, assumes any responsibility for any loss that may arise from accessing, or reliance on the material and all liability is disclaimed accordingly. Professional advice should be taken before applying the content of the articles to particular circumstances.