2013-14
No. of Demos :12 Area : 5 ha Hombalmapet, Magadi Tq DOS: 15-25 July 2013 Soil test Results
To be applied over recomm
RF Kg/ha (POP)
N-Low (171:280)
+ 10 kg
50
69
60
P-Low (13.9:22.9)
+ 10 kg
40
40
50
K-Medium (200:141336)
--
25
30
25
Parameter
Farmers practice To be applied after (kg/ha) soil test kg/ha
Demo
Check
% change
99.8
127.3
Varietal feature
No. of tillers
7
5
+28.5
No. of fingers
7
8
-14
Plant height (cm)
Finger length (cm) Grain Yield (q/ha) Straw Yield (t/ha) Net income (Rs. /ha) B:C ratio
6.4
8.4 -31 Technologies Demonstrated 31.5 30 5 Improved var, Seed Treatments with 4.2 Azotobactor 5.1 25 of fertilizers based-3.64 on soil test 33625 Application 34850 results 2.18 INM along 2.24 with Micronut management
Yields better compared to MR-6 Very good for Ragi balls preparation Suitable for delayed monsoon. Prone for lodging Straw value is poor
Problem: Low yield due to Low fertility - Soil erosion Technologies Demonstrated : 1. Micro catchment techniques - V ditches, Saucer basins / semi circular bunds 2. Vegetative measures: Vetivera grass as a cover crop & strengthening of bunds Before (Jun 2013)
After (Jan 2014) Available nutrients (kg/ha) N P K
Name of the farmer
Nutrient status (kg/ha) N
P
K
Ashok
351.3
10.50
156.3
357.4
11.03
Shivalingiah
306.2
14.01
147.5
301.8
Mahesha
273.9
10.24
145.9
Narasimhiah 295.3 No. of Demos :5 Area : 1 ha Andaniah 301.2
10.09 14.14
% Change N
P
K
160.8
1.73
5.00
2.87
14.39
148.6
-1.43
2.71
0.74
276.6
10.57
156.7
0.98
3.22
7.40
120.6
298.6
10.30
126.8
113.2
309.9
15.30
1.11 2.08 5.1 Villages:Laxmipura, RNR tq 116.9 2.88 8.20 3.26
• Flower drop considerably reduced because of Moisture retention • Emergence of new shoots after the treatment • Laborious
Untreated Particulars
No. of Inflorescence / branch
Demo Demo
Check
% change over check
4.6
10.4
-55.7 Recording Observations
No. of flowers / Inflorescence
2980
1750
70.2
No. of fruit set/ inflorescence
4.6
2.2
109
65.82
44.56
47.7
Chlorophyll content (SPAD meter)
Laying Microcatchment
Yield & B:C Ratio to be recorded
Vetivera for bunds-demo
No. of Demos :15 Area : 6 ha DOS: 08.07.13 to 30.08.13 Soil test Results
To be applied over recomm
RF Kg/ha (POP)
N-Low (169.1:280)
+10
40
50
50
P-Medium (22.3:22.9-56.5)
---
40
30
40
K-Medium (162.8:141-336) Particulars
Not Recommended
Demo
Check
% increase
Plant height (cm)
93.4
92.3
1.2
No of productive tillers
4.3
3.6
16.27
No. of panicles /plant
3.4
3.0
11.8
Panicle Length (cm)
12
10
16.6
Seed Yield (q/ha)
13.72
12.7
7.86
Net income (Rs. /ha)
20700
16546
-
4.06
3.60
-
B:C ratio
Farmers practice To be applied after (kg/ha) soil test kg/ha
Villages:, Gangainadoddi, Hosadoddi – Kanakpura tq.
Technologies Demonstrated HMT 100-1, POP Value added products preparation – payasam & puliyogare
Unprocessed Navane -Rs.20 Cost of processing, branding labeling-Rs.20 Processed navane ready to cook-Rs.45
Better market price (Rs.20/kg) compared to local grown ragi crop (Rs.14/kg) Easy to cultivate, no serious pest & disease attack. Preference/acceptability: Payasam-100%, Puliyogare-70 % De-husking is a problem
Soil test Results
N-Low 184:280
P-Low (14.1:22.9)
K-Medium (241.5:141336)
To be applied over recomm
+ 5 kg
+ 10 kg
--
RFKg/ha (POP)
38
38
25
FP (kg/ha)
30
25
20
To be applied after soil test kg/ha
43
48
25
Parameter Plant height up to primary raceme (cm)
Demo Check
% increase
93.1
Varietal feature
47
43.6
7.2
No. of capsules /spike
53.6
43.7
18.5
100 seed weight (g)
31.3
28.2
9.9
Seed Yield (q/ha)
20.89
17.51
19.3
Net income (Rs. /ha)
20700 16546
20.06
B:C ratio
4.06
3.6
Technologies Demonstrated : Improved Hybrid, Seed treatment, Bud nipping, INM & IPM, castor decortication
53.1
Primary Spike length (cm)
Problem: Low yield & drudgery in decortication
-
Check
No. of DemosDemo :10 Area : 4 ha DOS: 10.07.13 to 25.08.13 Villages: Gangainadoddi, Hosadoddi, Kanakapura, tq
Feed back: Yield is high BUT seeds are white in colour & hence low price
Decorticator Demonstration
Feed back: Castor decorticator Percent efficiency is high, Saves labour & drudgery, Percent damage to seeds is low Mechanical (kg) Per day 265
Manual (kg)
Man days 6 hrs
% damage
Per day
1
1.53
37
Efficiency (%)
Man days
% damage
3
3.55
86
No. of Demos : 10 Area : 2 ha Village: Neraluru CPT
Parameters
Demo
Check
% change
Plant height (mt)
5.8
6.5
-12.06
Stem thickness (cm)
2.9
5.4
-86.2
No. of tillers/plant
11
14
-27.27
Palatability (%)
98
80
18.36
Cumulative Yield (t/ha/year)
135
90
33.3
Pubescence
less
More
-
Preference
Most
Less
-
66000
36200
-
3.75
2.44
-
Net income (Rs. /ha) B:C ratio
Problem: Low yield & Non-av of green fodder throughout the year Technologies Demonstrated Cultivation of COFS-29 Multicut fodder
Feed back: Continuous supply of green fodder throughout the year Animals do not waste fodder & is more palatable
Check Plot
Demo Plot
No. of Demos :30 Area : 4 ha
Villages: : Hombalammanapete, Magadi Particulars
I Harvest Demo
II Harvest
Check
Demo
Average
III Harvest
% increase over Demo Problem: Demolow yielding Check local check
pulling type varieties Germination (%)
92
85
-
-
Plant height (cm)
29.50
28.50
26.60
20.40
No. of shoots
5.40
2.50
6.20
4.8
No. of leaves/plant
20.60
21.50
18.60
17.40
Stem girth (cm)
2.50
3.20
2.14
1.74
Yield (q/ha)
76.81
108.70
83.58
62.93
Net income (Rs. /ha)
-
-
-
-
B:C ratio
-
-
-
-
-
-
8.23
25.50
28.50
-10.52
Technologies Demonstrated :
2.50 variety 118.4 High 5.46 yielding multicut ‘Arka19.83 Suguna’ 21.50 -7.76 Application of pre emergent 2.14 (pretilachlor) 3.20 -33.12 herbicide Harvesting of foliage by 123.32 223.32 108.70 Pinching/cutting (Ratoon) 1,26,297 29125 333.63 Ratoon crop management 2.32
1.80
-
The stem is succulent & soft, foliage is shiny 3 harvests gave us more income Consumer preference is very good
While harvesting there is damage to stem since it is soft. Withers very fast after harvest- (shelf life) Ratoon crop management is little difficult (weeding, harvesting)
Villages:Gavinagamang ala, Magadi tq. Laxmipura, RNR
No. of Demos :10 Area : 2 ha Parameters
150 DAP (plantingNov end)
% change
Demo
Check
Plant height (m)
1.31
2.4
-45.41
No. of secondary branches
7
4.5
55.55
Days taken for flower initiation
116
Not yet
-
Flowering to fruit set
8
Not yet
-
No. of inflorescence/branch
7
Not yet
-
No. of flowers/inflorescence
50
Not yet
-
No of fruits/inflorescence
3
Not yet
-
39.2
46.5
-15.69
Leaf length (cm)
Problem: low yielding, long gestation period, tall growing, season specific local varieties with either short or too lengthy fruits & less market preference
Technologies Demonstrated High yielding, dwarf , nonseasonal var “Baghya� Raising seedlings , Planting, Pruning & training, Nutrient mgmt
Bhagya plants respond good for pruning & training More number of auxilary shoots on the main stem & appear at lower level. Flower initiation takes place with in 4 months (early bearing)
No. of Demos :10 Area : 2 ha Villages: Neralur, channapatana tq
Parameters (2nd
Problem: Low yield due to Pest & diseases & improper Nutrient mgmt 35 DAP
% change
fortnight of MarchMarch-planting)
Demo
Check
Plant height (m)
17.6
13.5
30.37
No. of shoots
5.2
2.5
108
6
6
0
31
28
10.71
22.8
18.8
21.27
10.35
8.4
23.21
98.40
85.0
15.76
0
15
-
No. of leaves/ shoot
Technologies Demonstrated: Disease res Hybrid ‘Arka Anand’ , LeafVegetable length (cm) Special LeafFYM width (cm) enrichment-trichoderma Neem Soap-Jassids Crop establishment (%) of pheromone traps-fr borer WiltUse incidence (%) Days taken for flower initiation
Seedlings establishment is good. No wilt incidence More branches But late flowering compared to check (MH-14)
No. of Demos :10 Area : 2 ha Villages: Hosahalli, Basavenahalli, Magadi tq
Parameters
Demo
Check
% change over check
Mean no. of thrips/leaf
0.6
2.0
- 70.00
Leaf miner incidence (Scoring 0-4 scale)
0.4
1.7
- 76.00
Rust (Scoring 0-5 scale)
0.7
Average Pod length (cm)
18.20
Yield (q/ha)
175.2
Net income (Rs.) B:C ratio
245460 3.51
Technologies Demonstrated : 1.8 - 61.10 FYM enriched with Trichoderma 15.5 (wilt), 17.76 Management of insects pests 139.9 25.23 Thrips-Acephate 180320 36.12 Rust-Propiconozole 2.52 - soap Leaf miner-Acephate + neem
Reduced the incidence and spread of leaf miner, effectively managed rust by timely spray Quality of pods is very good Would follow the schedule of chemicals when P&D occurs
No. of Demos :10 Area : 4 ha Villages: Gavinagamangala, Magadi tq. Kempavadarahalli, RNR tq.
Technologies Demonstrated - Stem borer mgmt : sealer-healer technology - Powdery mildew (Hexaconazole) and leaf hopper (Imidacloprid & Lamda cyhalothrin) management - Mango special + major nutrients - NAA spray to prevent fruit drop - Fruit fly mgmt: pheromone traps + soil racking - Anthracnose mgmt (Thiophanate methyl)
Fruit drop in check
Check
Parameter Plants rejuvenated after treatment for stem borer (%)
Demo 60 (22 of 28)
Check
% change
-
Powdery mildew (0-9 scale) ( Mean of 10 infloresence panicles)
1.1
2.3
- 52.10
Jassids (Mean of 10 panicles)
0.8
13
- 93.84
Fruit set (Mean 10 panicles)
1.0
0.2
80.00
32.30
47.23
Fruit drop (%) (mean of 10 panicles) Yield
To be recorded
- 46.22
No. of Demos :10 Area : 2 ha Problem: Low yield - DM, PM, Leaf miner & Fruit fly
Technologies Demonstrated : -Mgmt of PM : Hexaconazole , -Mgmt of DM : Redomil Gold -Mgmt of Leaf miner : Acephate + Neem soap Mgmt of Fruit fly : DDVP + Fruit fly traps
Villages: Basavenahalli, Hosapalya Magadi tq
Particulars
Demo
Check
% change over check
Leaf miner incidence (Scoring 0-4) (mean of 10 leaves)
0.4
1.5
- 73.3
Downy mildew (Scoring 0-5) (Mean of 10 leaves)
0.4
1.0
- 60.00
Powdery mildew (Scoring 0-9) (mean of 10 leaves)
0.5
2.6
-80.76
Fruit fly incidence (%) (mean of 10 plants fruits)
2.2
6.5
-66.15
Fruit length (in cm) (mean of 10 fruits)
32
25
21.87
Yield & B:C ratio: To be Recorded
DOP: 18.01.2014
Technologies Demonstrated : 1.Method demonstration on preparation of Jack products 2.Hands on training and cost economics 3.Establishment of units 4.License and branding 5.Production, packing, labeling of branded products 6.Facilitate market linkages
Educational activities conducted Group discussion meetings Training on Campus Training Off campus Training Manual Trg for extn func
Stage of the crop/ technology Initial Before Implementation During Implementation At the time of Training During implementation
Villages: : Narasahanumayyanapalya, Channohalli, Magadi Tq No. of Demos :2 SHGs Problem: 40% post harvest losses & low income Participants Extn women funcs 26 6 16 24 24 -
4 3 31
Jack Value Added products (Demo) JACK JAM
JACK RTS
Jack bulbs (Check)
Total cost of Production (Rs/ Kg)
116
77
70
Gross returns (Rs/kg)
200
100
90
Net returns of Demo plot (Rs/kg)
84
23
20
122.22
11.11
-
1.72
1.30
1.29
Parameters
% Increase over check B:C ratio
Para meters
JACK JAM
Consumer acceptability (%) A-1-100% – [1-highly acceptable, 2-Acceptable, 3-Not acceptable] Profit (%) Marketability(Excellent, Very good, Good, Fair, Poor) Impact on social status Market linkage
JACK RTS A-1-75%, 2-25%,
62 Very good
40 Fair
Own production unit started Local contact, KVK , Exhibitions
Technologies Demonstrated • • • • • •
Method demonstration on preparation of ragi products Hands on training and cost economics Establishment of units License and branding Production, packing, labeling of branded products Facilitate market linkages
Groups: 02 Villages: Chikkabballi, Kachuvinahalli. Kankapur Tal.
Parameters
Ragi Value Added products( Demo) Ragi Malt
Ragi papad
Total production(kg)
40
40
20
-
Total cost of Production (Rs/ Kg)
115
112
153
15
Gross returns (Rs/ha)
150
150
200
18
Net returns (Rs/kg)
35
37
48
3
1.30
1.33
1.30
1.20
B:C ratio Para meters
Ragi Malt
Consumer acceptability(%) –[1-highly acceptable, 2-Acceptable, 3-Not acceptable] Profit (%) Marketability (Excellent, Very good, Good, Fair, Poor) Impact on social status Market linkage
Ragi Mixture
Ragi flour (Check)
Ragi Mixture
1 -100%
Ragi Papad 1-100%,
42
46
56
Good
Good
Fair
1 -60%, 2-40%
Own production unit started Local contact, KVK , Exhibitions Technology demonstrated for regional crop is remunerative. Employment opportunity created during lean season
Parameters
Demo
Check
% Change
210
630
- 66.67%
Daily Consumption of Fresh vegetables (Days in week)
6
2
-
Access to preferred vegetable (%)
40
Monthly expenditure on Vegetable purchase
20
-
No of Demo: 10 Villages: Maregoudanadoddi, Tungani of Kanakapur
Technologies demonstrated Establishment of Nutrition Garden with IIHR Nut kit: Brinjal, onion, cowpea, chilly, tomato, coriander, palak, radish, carrot & amaranthus, Beans, ridge gouard Drumstick, Amla, papaya, lime
Prod cost:Rs.2750/Gunta GR:Rs.7615/gunta Net:Rs.4865/gunta/year BCR:2.76
The cost of purchase of vegetable reduces. Effective utilization of Space, time Per capita consumption of Vegetable increased We can grow and consume preferred vegetable Exchange of vegetables among the neigbourer
Fruits from perennials yet to be harvested - nutrition security
No. of Demos :18 Area : 1000 DFLs0 Problem: High incidence of silkworm diseases & low yld
Villages: Kamasagara, Tokinayakanadoddi, Hanumanahalli, Voragerahalli, Virupasandra, Kanakapura tq.
Parameters
Demo
Check
% change over check
Disease incidence (flacherie, muscardine, grassarie (%)
3.00
6.00
- 50.00
Defective cocoons (no./100)
6.00
11.00
- 45.00
Cocoon weight (gm)
1.33
1.25
6.40
Shell weight (gm)
0.78
0.56
39.20
Pupal weight (gm)
0.55
0.69
- 20.20
Yield (q/ha/yr)
1062. 5
950
11.84
Net income (Rs./ha/yr)
62025
26475
134.00
1.72
1.30
-
Technologies Demonstrated 3 stage disinfectant- Blch powder, Seri swatch, Super sanitech (CSR&TI)
B:C ratio
Three stage disinfection decreased the disease incidence Increased yield quality and income WOULD CONTINUEE TO USE
No. of Demos :15 Area : 3 ha Parameter
Demo
Check
% change
No. of shoots/ plant
28
29
-3.44
No. of leaves / shoot
29
24
20.83
Shoot height (mt)
1.41
1.20
17.5
Weight of 10 leaves (g)
5.89
5.20
13.26
No. of larvae/ shoot
-
1
-
No. of larvae/ plant
-
11
-
Extent of leaf damage (%)
-
43
-
No. of shoot damage/ plant
-
14
-
Leaf Yield (t/ha/yr)
46.49
42.51
9.23
Net income (Rs. /ha)
752575
636000
-
5.32
3.70
-
B:C ratio
Technologies Demonstrated: T. Chilonis, Mechanical destruction (NBAII, B’lore)
Villages: Panakanakallu, Magadi Taluk
Got to know about T. Chilonis Increased mulberry leaf yield and quality & cocoon yield. No side effects since it is not a chemical