Ofts

Page 1

2013-14


Villages: B.Hosur, Kempaihnapalya RNR Tq No. of Trials :5 Area : 2 ha

Suckers/ plant (at 90 DAP)

Leaf width (m)

Weed count/0.5 Sq m (at 90 DAP)

1.30

0.60

56

4.5

1.26

0.62

64

6

Plant height (m)

Stem girth (m)

Square Method (1.8X1.8 m)

2.54

0.64

18

Square Method (2.1X2.1 m) UAS’B

2.41

0.69

18

Paired row with zigzag planting (1.2X1.2X2 m) NRCB, Trichy

2.64

0.61

Rationale :Low yield of 3 16 1.35 0.58and non -utilisation 42 resources effectively

Options

No. of Leaf leaves/ length plant (m)


Plants in Paired row method are healthy, little taller, good stem girth with luster green and erect leaves

90 DAP, got very good weed control, Sucker production is comparatively less Nut. deficiency symptoms noticed


Villages:Hombalampet Magadi No. of Trials :5 Area : 1 ha

Options

I cut (t/ha)

NB-21 (FP)

-

Co-3 (24-4-14 1st cut

20

Rationale: Non-availability palatable green fodder through out season

II nd Leaf Leaf No. of Stem Cum Pl ht Tillers Cut length width leaves/ girth yield (cm) / pl (t/ha) (t/ha/yr) (cm) (cm) pl (cm) 18 -

Palata bility (%)

85

204

23

112.5

4.20

135

5.80

58

120

215

22

123.0

4.10

163

5.60

72

COFS 29 (18-4-14 1st cut)

34

-

160

221

13

80.30

4.50

95

2.80

93

(DHN-6)

40

38

220

252

25

96.50

5.30

190

7.20

92


Weight of the fresh fodder offered – Weight of the leftover fodder Palatability (%) = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Weight of the fresh fodder offered

Options

Growth

Pubescence

Palatability

Preference

Farmers PracticeNB-21

Vigorous

More

More fibrous

Low

Hybrid Bajra NapierCo-3

Vigorous

More

COFS 29

Moderate

Less so easy to harvest

High

High

Dharwad Hybrid Napier (DHN-6)

Vigorous

Less so easy to harvest

High

High

Moderately

X 100

Moderate

DHN-6

Farmers Practice


No. of Trials :5 Area : 1 ha

Technology Options 1. spraying of methomyl@ 2g/lt 2. Spraying of monocrotophos @ 1.5 ml/lt (IIHR) 3. Spraying of profenophos @ 2ml followed by (15 DA) spray of thiacloprid @ 1.5 ml/lt (TNAU)

Budworm Infested flower buds (%) Pre20 40 count days days

No. flower buds / 100 g

Yield (q/ha) for 30 days

Net Return (Rs.)

BC Ratio

20.8

789

12.15

59672

2.61

18.6

Village: Siddagangainapalya, 13.79Magadi72824 2.98 Tq

17.2

15.2

732

14.4

5.4

695 Rationale: 17.99Existing 92342 3.25 insecticides are not effective

30.4


T1 Farmers practice

IIHR / UAS-B

Conclusion: By spraying new combination of insecticides we are able to manage budworm effectively and minimize the damage Combination of profenophos followed thiacloprid is effective in reducing bud worm infestation than monocrotophos or methomyl This combination also gives protection from budworm for longer duration

TNAU


No. of Trials :5 500 DFLs Villages: Kamasagara, Tokinayakanadoddi, Hanumanahalli, Varagerahalli, Virupasandra, Kanakapura tq.

Options Farmers practice Bandh powder and lime Samraksha (A Powder) (CSR & TI Mysore) Rakshak (KSSR & DI, Bangalore) Vijetha Green, (CSB)

Net Rationale: LowYield yield & cocoon Disease Defective Cocoon Shell Pupal Return BC quality . Farmers apply only lime inciden cocoons (kg/100 weight weight wt in Rs. Ratio ce (%) (No./100) DFLs) /ha/year 7

12

0.80

0.30

0.50

73

127750

1.60

5

9

0.92

0.40

0.52

78

138840

1.74

4

7

1.01

0.45

0.56

82

148010

1.86

3

5

1.22

0.51

0.71

88

160600

2.02


Farmers Feedback: We got good quality cocoons & high price Rakshak bed disinfectant is pungent There was 6.80, 12.32 and 20.54% cocoon yield increase in T2, T3 and T4 respectively

Market Price T1: Rs.395/Kg cocoon T4: Rs.418/Kg cocoon


Villages: Biskur, Magadi

Options

Details of Technology

Name of SHG

T1

SHGs focusing on savings alone

Shri Laxmi Kalangium

T2

CBA focusing on Production Technology CBA focusing on production & marketing

Shri Vijayalakshmi Kalangium

T3

EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Off Campus Training Programs: 02 Group discussion Meeting: 02 On campus Training: 01 Demonstrations: 04 Training mannual:01 Telephonic guidence:08

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Shri Vigneswara Kalangium

Preparation of ragi products Hands on training and cost economics Establishment of units License and branding Production, packing, labeling & branding & market linkages


Parameters Type of Group

T1 Focusing on savings alone (Shri Laxmi Kalangium)

Income (% increase)

3 .00 Earning interest on their savings

Group feeling

Fair

Social change

-

T2

T3

Focusing on Production Group focusing on production & marketing Technology (Shri Vigneswara Klangium) (Shri Vijayalakshmi Kalangium) 10 .20 29.90 Selling ragi as such and also Selling ragi value added products preparing the product profit (Ragi malt, ragi papad and ragi is less due to lack of mixture) with proper branding branding and linkage and labeling with better market linkage Fair

good

-

• Due to outside contact developed better market linkage • More exposure to melas • Ready to accept Mechanization Eg: Cycle weeder • Serves as resource person • Identified as SAC member


Income generated from the unit (T-3) Products

Qty sold till date

Selling Price

Income

Cost of Production

BCR

Ragi Malt

20kgs

Rs. 150/Kg

3000

115

1.30

Ragi Papad

40kgs

Rs.150/Kg

6000

112

1.33

Ragi Mixture

15kg

Rs. 200/kg

3000

153

1.30

Feed Back: Branding, labeling and market linkage enhanced the profit, We-feeling and exposure to outside world

Value addition. Branding, labelling and marketing to the regional crops will enhance the profit and provides employment


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.