PORTFOLIO
by Alexander H. Schober
With time and contribution people have the right to live in a great place. Involvement with improvement of employment, public space, and ethics will contribute to the health of the community. More people that are productively working will achieve a better paradise. Summary of Projects: Striving to embrace the project to invoke emotion with design and to design places that people can feel in their heart. Philosophy: Ethically we strive to do what is right for the long-term, add by value to client’s project and do what is best for them. Our firm works on the designs that would best benefit people. We work on high-profile projects around the globe that benefit the economy. Customer Service: Do What You Say You Are Going To Do! Do It When You Say You Are Going To! Do It Right The First Time! Get It Completed On Time! BE CREDIBLE, BE ATTRACTIVE, BE RESPONSIVE, BE EMPATHETIC, BE RELIABLE My Mission Statement: Positive Energy, Experience, Evoking Productive Emotion; these three terms are the core of the firm’s projects, customers, and employee relationships. Be diversified with architecture, urban planning, landscape architecture, urban design, and graphic design. The difference between mediocrity and greatness is the feeling people have for each other in a great team in a good work environment. Most people call it team spirit when the players are imbued with that special feeling you know you’ve got a winning team!!!
I started out my professional career working as a landscape construction foreman with the knowledge of drawing in CAD 13 and reading blue prints for construction sites in 1998. I was inspired by the landscape architecture team there to become an Architect. Every job that I have had during the last 16 years has been landscape or design oriented. Each of my dedicated careers was a stepping block for the next position. I work at designing places for people that they can feel in their heart. At Smallwood Design Group, I assisted the account manager on large residential projects with WCI Communities like Gulf Harbour Yacht & Country Club. I also managed additional properties like Hoffman Residence, Waterside Shops, Pelican Marsh, Tiburon, Bonita Bay and Grey Oaks. My main duties were assisting on landscape layouts, reading blueprints, also construction work and crew management. I was also responsible for conducting monthly safety meetings; upkeep of trucks, trailers, mowers, and small equipment for 30 crews; etc. This job was very rewarding because I was inspired to become a Landscape Architect, and definitely move forward on my career. I was mentored by Joanne Smallwood’s team to move to pursue my landscape architecture degree. I studied architecture at Miami-Dade College, Broward College, and Palm Beach State College. I was accepted into an accelerated Masters program with Florida International University from the landscape architecture department. My skills progressed with actives of design in a broad spectrum of architecture, landscape architecture, urban planning, and urban design. I continued my education at Florida Atlantic University and focused on urban design with urban planning. During my education, I worked for Valley crest for 7 years and Annco Services for 4 years. In both companies I gained more knowledge, experience, and clients. The clients I took care of they were form a wide range of professions and they had a variety of needs. Most of the properties were in the tri-county area. On occasion, I would have responsibilities or obligations to projects that were in wide spread geographically. During the years, I had the responsibility of up to 30 accounts and just one account had a responsibility of 1260 homes. I started to see my own niche with my career and academic growth. So, I developed my own company. I’ve managed Harrison Design Group since 2011 and strive for building a strong portfolio. I have mainly worked in the United States but have been fortunate to work in Costa Rica and Ontario Canada. I am a hard working, disciplined and extremely driven person. I am always seeking for more knowledge, keeping myself updated through courses and events related to Design. I hope this book shows the persistence I have for design. I continued my dream of a design and could not be around for my family. My father battled cancer recently and unfortunate was not able to be there. This book is dedicated to my father. Best Regards, Alexander H. Schober
Introduction Cover Quote, Summary, Mission Statement Dedication Letter
Peoples Places Jim & Steph Albright Residence Helen Aldersley Residence Brian Currie Residence Bridgit & Dylan Residence Lloyd & Elaine Burrow Residence Betty Diebold Residence Karen & John Kollias Residence Rick Duenn Residence Dave & Julie Farrell Residence Susan and John Goddard Residence Doug and Doris Price Residence Fran Hill Residence Sean & Cheryl Jones Residence Martin and Martina Kleinecke Residence Jim & Shelly Kocher Residence JD Lyons Residence Glenn Miller Residence Kyrene Minty Residence Hayley Murry Residence Parker Merv Residence Rosemarrie & Ken Residence Bill & Sonya Scriven Residence David & Jan Shaw, David & Jan Residence Edith Sittlinger Residence Al and Lynn Tomlison Residence Janet & Robert Wyatt Residence Neil Kirstine & Tracey Cassidy Residence Cathy Vanopstal Residence David and Daphnee Pfaff Residence Brown Residence 4
144
Table of Contents
1-3 1 2 3
6 - 87 8-13 14-16 17 18-19 20-21 22-24 25 26-27 28-31 32-34 35 36-37 38-39 40-42 43-52 53 54-55 56-59 60-61 62-63 64-66 67 68-69 70-71 72-73 74 77-81 82-83 84-85 86-87
Pubic Spaces
88 - 109
Place: Hanover Park 90-99 Project: Holiday Park Address: 273 10th St, Hanover ON N4N 3T1 Client: D.R.I.C. Downtown Revitalization Implementation Commitee Place: Bay Harbor Park 100-101 Project: Elderly Park Address: 98th St, Bay Harbor Islands, FL 33154 Client: Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. Place: Park Pod 102-103 Project: Water Filtration Address: 10251 W Flagler St, Miami, FL 33172 Client: Women’s Park Place: Engineering Campus Park 104-105 Project: Azul Profundo Address: 10555 W Flagler St, Miami, FL 33174 Client: Electrical and Computer Engineering Depart. Place: Las Olas Riverfront 106-107 Project: Urban Campus Address: 300 SW 1st Ave, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Client: Downtown Development Authority Place: Mac Arthur Terminal Isle 108-109 Project: Ripples Address: 140 MacArthur Causeway, Miami Beach, FL Client: City of Miami Beach
Community Place: Fort Lauderdale Project: New Eco-Studies School Address: GIS Location Client: CAIS Boarding Schools Place: Downtown Fort Lauderdalee Project: Location on Vacant Parcels of Land Address: NE 13th St, Fort Lauderdale, FL Client: Downtown Development Authority
110 - 123
112
113
Pubic Spaces
124 - 132
Place: Lake Okeechobee Project: Health of the Environment Address: Lake Okeechobee, Florida Client: South Florida Water Management District Place: Lake Okeechobee Project: Increasing Water Collection Address: Lake Okeechobee, Florida Client: South Florida Water Management District
126
127
Place: Weiner’s Mobile Park 114-115 Project: Camping by the Beach Address: 801 E Dania Beach Blvd, Dania Beach, FL Client: Dania Beach CRA Community Redevelopment Agency
Place: Andes Mountain Range; Boston, MA Aspen, CO; Existing Shopping Center in Miami 128-129 Project: Increasing Water Collection Address: Lake Okeechobee, Florida Client: South Florida Water Management District
Place: Deerfield Beach 116-117 Project: Site Location for a Linen Service Address: 1400 N.W. 3rd St. Deerfield Beach Fl. 33442 Address: 1219 W. Newport C Dr. Deerfield Beach Fl. Client: Advanced Linen Service
Place: Urban Cities 130-132 Project: Health of Humanity Address: Cities Core Client: World Health Organization THESIS QUESTION: What types of city designs in the
Place: Fat Village 118-119 Project: Green Building with Mixed Use Address: 542 NW 1st Ave, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Client: Catalyst Architecture Place: Fort Lauderdale Beach Project: Plan Making and Design Address: Fort Lauderdale Client: Downtown Development Authority
central core can become a catalyst for the city with facetious amusement?
120-121
Place: Boca Raton 122-123 Project: Car Condominium Address: 1501 Spanish River Blvd, Boca Raton, FL Client: Business Plan Competition
Table of Contents
5
144
IMPROVEMENT of
Peoples Places
Peoples Places
8
3D View Rendering for Proposed Landscaping | Page 1 of 6 Albright, Jim & Steph | 720 Mary St, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 144
October 2, 2013
Peoples Places
9 Plan View for Proposed Landscape Design | Page 2 of 6 144 Albright, Jim & Steph | 720 Mary St, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 October 2, 2013
Peoples Places
3D View of Front Yard Plan View of Front Yard
10
Plan View and 3D View of Front Yard | Page 3 of 6 Albright, Jim & Steph | 720 Mary St, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 144
October 2, 2013
Peoples Places
3D View of Side Yard
Plan View of Side Yard
11 Plan View and 3D View of Side Yard | Page 4 of 6 144 Albright, Jim & Steph | 720 Mary St, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 October 2, 2013
Peoples Places
Trafalgar
Trafalgar Walkway
Trafalgar Patio
Cobble Edge
12
Hardscape Materials Proposed | Page 5 of 6 Albright, Jim & Steph | 720 Mary St, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 144
October 2, 2013
Natural Stone Steps
2- 6� Riverstone
Peoples Places
Dwarf Hamlin Grass
Boxwood
Dianthus
Pyramidal Boxwood
Concorde Barberry
Stella De Oro Dayliy
Karl Forester Grass
Gracillimus Grass
Echinacea ‘Fatal Attraction’
13 Plant Materials Proposed | Page 6 of 6 144 Albright, Jim & Steph | 720 Mary St, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 October 2, 2013
Peoples Places
Daylily
14
Coral Bells Burgundy
Dakota Charm Spirea
Front Island Proposed and Plant Materials | Page 1 of 3 Aldersley, Helen | Aldersley Security | 555 10th St. Hanover, ON 144
June 24, 2013
Spiral Boxwoods
Hicks Yew
Peoples Places
Trafalgar Interlocking Pavers
(7)
Peoples Places
Hostas
Ivy
Var. Ajuga
Pyramidal Boxwoods Royalty Holly Combo
15 Proposed Back Yard Plans and Materials | Page 2 of 3 144 Aldersley, Helen | Aldersley Security | 555 10th St. Hanover, ON N4N 2Z4 June 24, 2013
Peoples Places P L A N T I N G NOTES: GENERAL: I. PROVINCE OF ONTARIO MANDATES CONTACTING /CALLING ONTERIO ONE BEFFORE YOU DIG 2. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE COUNTY, CITY AND/OR UTILITY COMPANIES TO LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES PRIOR TO DIGGING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, AND/OR CONSTRUCTION CAUSED BY UTILITY DAMAGE. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH A “UNIT PRICE BREAKDOWN” FOR ALL MATERIAL TO BE USED IN PROJECT: 3. I MULCH, TOPSOIL, FERTILIZER, STAKING, ETC. SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE “UNIT BREAKDOWN” COST PER PLANT. 3.2. REQUESTS FOR SUBSTITUTIONS AND CHANGES SHALL BE IN WRITING 3.3. OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE MAY IN HIS/ HER DISCRETION ADD OR DELETE UNINSTALLJED PLANT MATERIAL FROM PROJECT UTILIZING THE “UNIT BREAKDOWN” UNIT COSTS SUBMITTED. 4. CONTRACTOR(S) MUST OBTAIN SEPARATE LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION $ TREE RELOCATION/ REMOVAL PERMITS FROM THE GOVERNING AGENCIES PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE PROJECT 5. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR WITH THE GOVERNING AGENCY TO SCHEDULE A PRE CONSTRUCTION MEETING, ALONG WITH THE OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO ANY SITE PREPARATION: 6. XERISCAPE LANDSCAPE PRINCIPLES SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL SITES AS SPECIFIED IN THE ONTARIO WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS “WATERWISE ONTARIOLANDSCAPES” GUIDELINES: 7. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND GOVERNING AGENCIES OF ANY CHANGES IN MATERIAL FOR APPROVAL, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 8. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO LANDSCAPE DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL PLANTING REQUIREMENTS. 9. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL ESTIMATED QUANTITIES OF MATERIAL SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING HIS BID. PLANTING PLAN IS TO TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT LIST/SCHEDULE. 10. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN I 2 MONTHS AFTER DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE (SEE WATERING NOTE). 11. LANDSCAPE PROPOSAL GUIDES THE INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS BUT IS NOT PERFECT AND THERE MAY BE MINOR CHANGES I2. OWNER(S) OF THE IAND OR THEIR AGENTS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPE, AFTER INSTALLATION. SITE PREPARATION: I3. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CAUTION TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING SOD AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ANY DAMAGE TO THE SOD OR IRRIGATION SHALL BE REPLACED/ REPAIRED TO THE ORIGINAL STATE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR I4. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ALL EXISTING BRAZILIANPEPPER, FLORIDA HOLLY AND ALL EXOTIC NUISANCE MATERIAL ON SITE, AS REQUIRED AND/OR AS SPECIFIED ON EXISTING PRESERVATION/DISPOSITION PLANS. I5. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL ERADICATE ¢ REMOVE ALL WEEDS & GRASS, CLEAN-UP ANY DEAD MATERIAL, DEBRIS, AND RUBBISH PRIOR TO INSTALLING A NEW PLANT MATERIAL. I6. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPON-
PLANTING/TOP SOIL: I7. ALL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL AND FOREIGN MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PUXNTING AREAS AND REPLACED WITH 5O/5O MIX FILL SOIL OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. I7. I. ALL PARKING ISLANDS AND PLANTING BEDS AROUND BUILDINGS, SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO A DEPTH OF 36” MIN. AND REPLACED WITH 5O/5O PLANT MIX, OR AS PER SPECIFICATIONS. 17.2 TOPSOIL SHALL BE CLEAN AND FREE OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS, WEEDS, ROCKS, NOXIOUS PESTS AND DISEASES, AND EXHIBIT A PH OF 6.5 TO 7.0. THE TOPSOIL FOR PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE AMENDED WITH HORTICULTURAL ACCEPTABLE ORGANIC MATERIAL. ALL SOILS USED SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR THE INTENDED PLANT MATERIAL. THE SOURCE OF THE TOPSOIL SHALL BE KNOWN TO THE APPLICANT AND MUST BE ACCEPTABLE TO THE GOVERNING AGENCIES. 17.3 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO SUPPLY $ INSTALL 2” SOIL LAYER 50/50 MIX BLANKET FOR ALL NEW SOD AREAS. 17.4 THE MIN. PLANTING SOIL DEPTH SHALL BE SIX (6“) INCHES FOR GROUND COVERS, FLOWERS, SHRUBS AND HEDGES. I 7.5. TREES SHALL RECEIVE TWELVE (I 2”) INCHES OP PLANTING SOIL AROUND THE ROOT BALL. I7.5. 6” TOP SOIL REQUIRED AROUND ¢ BENEATH ALL PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL ROOT BALLS. (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) I7.6. CLEAN SAND SHALL BE USED TO BACKFILL ARID CLIMATE PALMS. NATIVE TOPSOIL ON THE SITE SHALL BE RETAINED ON-SITE AND USED WHEN THERE IS SUFFICIENT QUANTITY TO COVER AT LEAST SOME OF THE ON-SITE LANDSCAPED AREAS. PLANT MATERIAL: I8. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE MIN. GRADE OF ONTARIO NO. I & BE INSTALLED AS SPECIFIED IN “FLORIDA DEPT. OF AGRICULTURAL GRADES AND STANDARDS”, CURRENT EDITION RESPECTIVELY. I9. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ATTAINING PERMITS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF NEW PLANT MATERIAL. 20. NO TREES OR OTHER PLANT MATERIAL MAY BE PLANTED IN RIGHTS-OF—WAY (IE. SWALE AREAS) WITHOUT A PERMIT. NO SHRUB SPECIES WITH A MATURE HEIGHT THAT WILL BLOCK THE CLEAR SIGHT ZONE FROM 3O INCHES IN HEIGHT TO SIX FEET IN HEIGHT WILL BE APPROVED IN SAID SWALE AREAS. 21.1 ALL DUMPSTERS, TRANSFORMERS, UTILITY BOXES, IRRIGATION PUMP HOUSES $ MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. INCLUDING BACK FLOW PREVENTOR, A.C. UNITS, ETC., SHALL BE SCREENED WITH HEDGE MATERIAL TO THE HEIGHT OF EACH ABOVE GROUND ELEMENT FOR COMPLETE SCREENING ON THREE (3) SIDES MIN. 2 I .2. THE QUANTITY OF SCREENING SHRUBS IS IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF SHRUBS AS PROVIDED IN THE CODE CALCULATION TABLE. 2 I .3. ALL SCREENING SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED IN SUCH A WAY AS TO PROVIDE ACCESS FOR PROPER OPERATION OF EQUIPMENT BEING SCREENED AND/OR PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY AS NECESSARY. 2 I .4. ALL HEDGE MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR SCREENING PURPOSES SHALL BE PLANTED SO AS TO BE TIP TO TIP WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF PLANTING AND MAINTAINED SO AS TO FORM A CONTINUOUS VISUAL SCREEN. ADJUST SPACING AS NECESSARY AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PLANTS TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE SCREEN. 2 I .5. SHRUBS USED AS HEDGES SHALL BE ONTARIO NO. I OR BETTER 22. WITH A MIN. HT. OF 24” AND A MIN. SPREAD. OF I5”, WHEN MEASURED IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING ¢ SHALL BE A MIN. OF 3’ HT. WITHIN 2 YRS. FROM THE DATE OF PLANTING. ALL SIZES SHOWN FOR PLANT MATERIAL ON THE PLAN ARE TO BE CONSIDERED MINIMUM. ALL PLANT MATERIAL MUST MEET OR EXCEED THESE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR BOTH HEIGHT AND SPREAD. ANY OTHER REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC SHAPE OR EFFECT AS NOTED ON THE PLAN SHALL ALSO BE REQUIRED FOR ACCEPTANCE. ALL TREES ARE TO BE SINGLE TRUNK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. ALL SYNTHETIC BURLAP, SYNTHETIC STRING OR CORDS, OR WIRE BASKETS SHALL BE REMOVED BEFORE ANY TREES ARE PIANTED. ALL SYNTHETIC TAPE (I.E. TAGGING TAPE, NURSERY TAPE) SHALL BE REMOVED FROM TRUNKS, BRANCHES, ETC. BEFORE INSPECTION. THE TOP I/3 OF ANY NATURAL BURLAP SHALL BE REMOVED OR TUCKED INTO THE PLANTING HOLE BEFORE THE TREES ARE BACK FILLED SET TREES NO DEEPER THAN IT WAS IN ITS ORIGINAL GROWING WITH THE ROOT BALLS EVEN WITH, OR SLIGHTLY HIGHER (+/- I”) THAN THE FINISHED GRADE. ALL “GROUNDCOVER REQUIRES 75% COVERAGE AND I OO% WITHIN 3 MONTHS OF INSTALLATION”. PROPOSED UNDERSTORY PLANT MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE PLANTED ON TOP OF TREE OR PALM ROOT BALLS. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION, SEE SPECIFICATIONS.
MULCH: 23. A THREE (3”) INCH MIN. DEPTH OF APPROVED ORGANIC MULCH MATERIAL (MEASURED AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION) SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS NOT COVERED BY PAVEMENT, SOD, DECORATIVE STONES, OR ANNUAL FLOWER BEDS. ADDITIONALLY, EACH TREE SHALL HAVE A RING OF ORGANIC MULCH AT THE PERIMETER OF THE ROOT BALL: 24. THE USE OF CYPRESS MULCH SHOULD BE RESTRICTED AND PROHIBITING ANY MULCH CONTAINING ARSENIC. A MIN. MULCH WIDTH OF I8” BEYOND THE TRUNK OF ALL TREES, PALMS, HEDGES AND SHRUBS. MULCH SHALL E BE PLACED CLOSER THAN 3” FROM THE TRUNK OF ALL TREES AND PALMS; THE MOUNDING OF MULCH IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. MULCH SHALL BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH GROUND COVER IN ALL PLANTING BEDS (UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE). DO NOT MULCH WITHIN DESIGNATED “PRESERVE AREAS” (UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE). LANDSCAPE/IAWN AREAS: 25. LANDSCAPE MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL AREAS NOT COVERED BY MAIN AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, WALKS AND VEHICULAR USE AREAS. LANDSCAPE MATERIAL SHALL EXTEND TO ANY ABUTTING STREET, PAVEMENT EDGE AND TO THE MEAN WATER LINE OF ANY ABUTTING CANAL, LAKE OR WATERWAY. CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE IN HIS BID SOD FOR ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS VOID OF ANY PLANT MATERIAL (GROUND COVER, SHRUBS, SOD). NOT SPECIFIED IN PLANS, WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BIDDING IN REFERENCE TO “PROJECT LIMITS”. IRRIGATION: 26. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AN AUTOMATIC LAWN IRRIGATION SYSTEM GUARANTEEING IOO% COVERAGE $ MAINTAIN A 5O% MIN. OVERLAP TO ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS. THERE SHALL BE NO OVER SPRAY ONTO SIDEWALKS. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL: I . HAVE A RAIN SENSOR DEVICE INSTALLED, AS REQUIRED. 2. USE PURPLE CODED PIPE, HEADS, VALVES ETC. FOR IDENTIFYING RECLAIM WATER COMPONENTS. AS REQUIRED. 3. IRRIGATION PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT. 27. ALL GUYING, STAKING & TREE BRACING SHALL BE THE WATERING NOTE DETAILS WITH CONTRACTOR. 28. ALL NEW PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD PLANTING DETAILS FOR APPROVED METHODS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETURN I 2 MONTHS AFTER COMPLETION OF JOB AND REMOVE ALL GUYS, STAKES $ TREE BRACES. 29. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SYMBOLS SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN(S) SHALL BE CONSIDERED DIAGRAMMATIC AND SHOULD BE ADJUSTED IN THE FIELD BY CONTRACTOR TO AVOID UTILITY CONFLICTS AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS. WHERE SAID ADJUSTMENT CANNOT BE DONE WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT CHANGE TO THE PLANTING DESIGN CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR CONTRACTOR AND/ OR OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE FOR APPROVAL, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 30. TREES SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 6 FT. FROM UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND ALL SHADE TREES INSTALLED WITHIN SIX FEET OF PUBLIC/PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE (INCLUDING CURBS, WALKS, PAVEMENT, ETC.) SHALL UTILIZE A ROOT BARRIER SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE GOVERNING AGENCY. 30. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE CLEAR (7- I/2 FT. IN FRONT & SIDES WITH 4 FT. IN REAR) AROUND ALL FIRE HYDRANTS. CHECK VALVES. FIRE DEFT. EQUIPMENT. ETC., OR AS REQUIRED. 31. SHADE TREES SHALL BE PLANTED MIN. OF I5 FT. FROM LIGHT POLES. ALL SMALL TREES AND PALMS TO BE PLANTED MIN. OF 7.5 FT. FROM LIGHT POLES, OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 32. ALL SHADE TREES SHALL HAVE A 4 I/2‘ MIN. CLEAR TRUNK HEIGHT (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) AND CALIPER SHALL BE MEASURED AT D.B.H. AT TIME OF PLANTING OF I2 MONTHS FROM THE TIME OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE. DURING THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: WATERING FER THE SCHEDULE ATTACHED, RE—SEITING OF PLANTS, REPLACEMENT OF SICK OR DEAD PLANTS, ALL OTHER CARE REQUIRED FOR PROPER GROWTH. ANY PLANT MATERIAL NOT IN HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CLIENT. 33. THE I2 MONTH WARRANTEE/ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD SHALL BE EXTENDED BY 45 DAYS FOR ALL REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL AT THE CLIENT’S EXPENSE, THE CONTRACTOR WILL REPLACE ANY PLANT MATERIAL DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS OR “ACTS OF GOD” LIMITED TO HAIL. FREEZE, LIGHTNING. AND WINDS EXCEEDING 75 MPH AS DEFINED BY THE ONTARIO HURRICANE CENTER. WATERING CONTRACT SHALL BE INCLUDED IN CONTRACTORS BID 34. FOR ANY PLANT MATERIAL THAT HAS BEEN ROOT PRUNED. INSTALLED, DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION, OR WHERE PROPOSED OR 35. EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ARE NOT FUNCTIONAL. ALL WARRANTIES SHALL BE IN PLACE BY CONTRACTOR REGARDLESS OF NONOPERATIONAL IRRIGATION SYSTEMS OR AREAS WHERE NO IRRIGATION IS PROPOSED. WATERING SCHEDULE (FIRST 6 MONTHS)‘: WEEK(S) FREQUENCY (WATERING DAYS) WEEKS I THRU 6 MON., WED., FRI., SAT. 7 THRU I2 MON., WED., FRI. I3 THRU 24 MON., FRI. 6 MONTH WATERING SCHEDULE IS A MINIMUM, CONTRACTOR IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERING PLANT MATERIAL FOR THE FULL I 2 MONTH ESTABLISHMENT/WARRANTY PERIOD.
Hard Scaping
Soft Scaping
Equipment
Labour
16
144
Site Detals and Estimate Materials and Labor | Page 3 of 3 Aldersley, Helen | Aldersley Security | 555 10th St. Hanover, ON N4N 2Z4 June 24, 2013
Description Armour Stone Wall 2' - 6" Tall Trafalgar Interlocking Pavers ‘A’ Gravel Stone Dust Parking Lot Repair w/ ‘A’ Gravel 4" Tile Coral Bells Burgundy Daylily Royalty Holly Combo Ivy Var. Ajuga Hostas (mixed) (Pine apple upside down) (20") Pyramidal Boxwoods Hicks Yew Spiral Boxwoods Dakota Charm Spirea Screened Topsoil Potting Soil (Triple Mix) Brown Mulch Dump Truck and Trailer Skid Steer Stone Saw Laser Level Plate Tamper Labour for Hardscapes Labour for Softscapes Spray for Grass/ Weeds
Quantity 30 210 3 4
18 20 7 10 15 10 4 2 3 14 2 2 5 na 4 1 1 1 32 24 1
Peoples Places
Existing Flower Bed
Existing Pool
Existing Patio
Existing Flower Bed
Stone (Tank)
Armour Stone (3) Shouldice Select (Color Cambria) Stella De Oro Daylily (7) Flag Stone Fire Pit Cobble Edge Charcoal Tall Grass (10)
Trafalgar Pavers (Color Penfield Brown)
17
144
Plan View for Proposed Landscape Design | Page 1 of 1 Currie, Brian | Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 July 25, 2013
Peoples Places Natural Stone Steps (2) Flagstone Steps (3) Annabelle Hydrangea (3) Global Boxwood (3)
Existing Cedar Hedge
Hakone Grass (7) Pyramidal Boxwood (2) Armour Stone (1) Hostas (5) Boxwood Hedge (6)
Stone Star Design
Trafalgar Pavers
Stella De Oro Daylily (5) Existing Tree (3) Armour Stone (3)
Obsidian Coral Bells (3)
Ornamental Grass (3) Dwarf Nest Spruce (3) Stella De Oro Daylily (5)
Hydrangea Limelight (5) Gracillimus Grass (4) Dwarf Nest Spruce (3) Obsidian Coral Bells (5) Cobble Edge
18
Plan View for Proposed Landscape Design and Interlocking Design | Page 1 of 2 Bridgit & Dylan | 42 Johnstone Blvd, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 144
July 26, 2013
Peoples Places
Flag Stone Steps
Gracillimus Grass
Boxwood Hedge
Armour Stone
Obsidian Coral Bells
Trafalgar Paver (Penfield Brown)
Cobble Edge
Natural Stone Steps
Pyrimidal Boxwoods Limelight Hydrangea Annabelle Hydrangea Global Boxwoods
Hakone Grass
Dwarf Nest Spruce
Stella d’oro Daylilly
Hostas
19 Hardscapes and Plant Materials Proposed for Site | Page 2 of 2 144 Bridgit & Dylan | 42 Johnstone Blvd, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 July 26, 2013
Peoples Places
Existing Lilac
Mixed Color Perennials Flowers
Rhododendrons (3)
Mixed Color Perennials Flowers
Existing Tree Rose of Sharon (5) Hostas (5) Rose of Sharon (3)
Pyramid Cedars (2)
Hydrangea Limelight (5)
Purple Coral Bells (6)
Rhododendrons (3)
Armour Stone (2)
Purple Coral Bells (6) Blue Muffin Viburnum (7) Pyramid Cedars (2) Magnolia (2) 12' Grass (5) Golden Cypress (5) Magnolia (2) Armour Stone (2)
20
Plan View for Proposed Landscape Design by Fence| Page 1 of 2 Burrow, Lloyd & Elaine | 547 10 Ave, Hanover, ON N4N 2P4 144
August 22, 2013
Hydro Pole
Peoples Places Dwarf Burning Bush (3) Armour Stone (2)
Pyramidal Boxwood (5)
Mixed Hostas (5)
Mixed Hostas (5)
21 Plan View for Proposed Landscape Design around Shed | Page 2 of 2 144 Burrow, Lloyd & Elaine | 547 10 Ave, Hanover, ON N4N 2P4 August 22, 2013
Peoples Places
Amour Stone (1) Riverstone 1- 2" Hick Yew (2) Service Berry Clump (1) Global Boxwood (3)
Deck
Driveway Driveway
Diathus (5) Existing Blue Spruce (1) Purple Coral Bells (5) Armour Stone (1) Diathus (5) Gracillimus Grass (1) Limelight Hydrangea (3) Concord Barberry (3) Cobble Edge Karl Forester Grass (5)
22
Plan View for Proposed Landscape Design 1 | Page 1 of 3 Diebold, Betty | Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 144
August 13, 2013
Peoples Places
Amour Stone (1) Riverstone 1- 2" Hick Yew (2) Service Berry Clump (1) Global Boxwood (3)
Deck
Driveway
Driveway
Diathus (5) Existing Blue Spruce (1) Purple Coral Bells (5) Armour Stone (1) Diathus (5) Gracillimus Grass (1)
Existing Hick Yew (2) Cobble Edge Karl Forester Grass (5)
23 Plan View for Proposed Landscape Design 2 | Page 2 of 3 144 Diebold, Betty | Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 August 13, 2013
Peoples Places
Armour Stone
Hicks Yew
Limelight Hydrangea
24
River Stone
Global Boxwoods
Concord Barberry
Plant Materials Proposed for Site | Page 3 of 3 Diebold, Betty | Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 144
August 13, 2013
Service Berry
Karl Foerster Grass
Purple Coral Bells
Blue Spruce Std.
Ornamental Grasses
Dianthus
Peoples Places
Trafalgar Paver (Penfield Brown)
Natural Stone Steps
25 Hardscapes Materials and Interlocking Proposed for Site | Page 1 of 1 144 Kollias, Karen & John, Fire# 283067; Durham, On. August 30, 2013
Peoples Places
Armour Stone Wall
Concrete Block Wall
26
Plan View for Proposed Retaining Wall | Page 1 of 2 Duenn, Rick | 341090 County Road 28, Hanover, ON N4N 3B9 144
October 2, 2013
Peoples Places
Armour Stone Wall
Precast Concrete Block Wall
27 3D View for Proposed Retaining Wall | Page 2 of 2 144 Duenn, Rick | 341090 County Road 28, Hanover, ON N4N 3B9
October 2, 2013
144
28
July 5, 2013 Extend Concrete
Hydrangea Limelight
Gate
Walkway
Paving Stone
Rocky Mountain Fir
Ornamental Grasses
Maple
Raised Deck
Hicks Yew
Plan View for Proposed Landscape Design and Interlocking Design | Page 1 of 4 Farrell, Dave & Julie | 305 Westwood Dr, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 2V0 Blue Spruce
Chanticlear Ornamental Pear
Boxwood Hedge
Hakone Grass
Japanese Maple
Bell Flowers White
Gold Mound Spirea
Mixed Perennials
Burning Bush
Landscape Stone
Pyramid Boxwood
Concord Barberry
Service Berry Clump
Ornamental Grasses
Existing Trees
Gate
Wood Fence
Shed
Pyramid Oaks
Peoples Places
Peoples Places Existing Trees
Ornamental Grasses Service Berry Clump
Concord Barberry
Pyramid Boxwood
Landscape Stone Burning Bush Hicks Yew Bell Flowers White
Mixed Perennials
Japanese Maple Gold Mound Spirea Hakone Grass
Boxwood Hedge
Chanticlear Ornamental Pear
Blue Spruce
29 Plan View of Front for Proposed Landscape | Page 2 of 4 144 Farrell, Dave & Julie | 305 Westwood Dr, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 2V0 July 5, 2013
Peoples Places
Maple
Ornamental Grasses Rocky Mountain Fir Paving Stone Walkway Gate Hydrangea Limelight
Pyramid Oaks Raised Deck
Shed Wood Fence Gate
Extend Concrete
Existing Trees
30
Plan View of Back for Proposed Landscape | Page 3 of 4 Farrell, Dave & Julie | 305 Westwood Dr, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 144
July 5, 2013
Ornamental Grasses
Peoples Places
Pyramidal Oak
Limelight Hydrangea
Burning Bush
Blue Spruce
Boxwood Hedge
Hicks Yew
Chanticleer Ornamental Pear
Hakone Grass
Service Berry
Bell Flowers White
Pyramidal Boxwoods Ornamental Grasses
Japanese Maple
Gold Mound Spirea
Concorde Barberry Landscape Stone
31 Plant Materials Proposed for Site | Page 4 of 4 144 Farrell, Dave & Julie | 305 Westwood Dr, Walkerton, ON N0G July 5, 2013
Peoples Places
Mixed Colored Hostas
Hick Yew (4)
Mixed Colored Hostas
Hick Yew (4)
Water Tap
Hostas (7) Annabelle Hydrangea (4) LimeLight Hydrangea (3) Arbel Pavers Walkway LimeLight Hydrangea (3) 1/ 2 Armour Stone (2 High) 40'
Grass Driveway with Diamond Hollow Pavers
Existing Tree (1)
Armour Stone (2 High) 35'
Karl Forester Grass (8)
Cedar (15)
32
Plan View for Proposed Landscape Design and Grass Driveway | Page 1 of 3 Goddard, Susan and John | 900 Saugeen St, Kincardine, ON N2Z 1A7 144
July 23, 2013
Karl Forester Grass (5)
Peoples Places
Periwinkle Ground Cover
Ivy
Existing Tree (1)
Retaining Wall (1)
Existing Tree (1)
Fire Pit
Gate
Annabelle Hydrangea (4) LimeLight Hydrangea (3) Arbel Pavers Walkway LimeLight Hydrangea (3) 1/ 2 Armour Stone (2 High) 40'
Karl Forester Grass (5) Hot Tub Natural Stone Steps
33 Plan View for Proposed Landscape Design by Water Front | Page 2 of 3 144 Goddard, Susan and John | 900 Saugeen St, Kincardine, ON N2Z 1A7 July 23, 2013
Peoples Places
Hallow Pavers for Grass Driveway
10� Armour Stone at 2 High
Lime Light Hydrangea
34
Annabelle Hydrangea
Mixed Hostas
Arbel Pavers Walkway
Natural Stone Steps
Hicks Yew
Fire Pit
Black Cedar
Hardscapes and Plant Materials Proposed for Site | Page 3 of 3 Goddard, Susan and John | 900 Saugeen St, Kincardine, ON N2Z 1A7 144
July 23, 2013
Karl Forester Grass
Periwinkle
Ivy
Peoples Places
Existing Steps Step Pyramidal Yew (2) Existing Flower Bed
Trafalgar Interlocking Pavers (grey)
Cob
Royalty Holly Combo ( 7)
ble
Edg
ing
Step
Transplant Hostas
Existing Birch Trafalgar Interlocking Pavers (grey)
Hollys Combo
Dwarf Hostas
Pyramidal Yews
Trafalgar Interlocking Pavers (grey)
35 Plan View for Proposed Landscape Design with Materia|s Page 1 of 1 144 Price, Doug and Doris | Elmwood July 2, 2013
Peoples Places
36
144
Plan View of Landscape Design | Page 1 of 2 Hill, Fran | 105 Colborne St, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 October 12, 2013
Peoples Places
Armour Stone
Purple Coral Bells
Grasillmous Grass
Stella d Oro Daylily
Cobble Edger
Pinky Winky Hydrangea
37 Hardscapes and Plant Materials Proposed for Site | Page 2 of 2 144 Hill, Fran | 105 Colborne St, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 October 12, 2013
Shouldice Steps
Peoples Places
Soldier Course Pavers Pattern- Town Hall (Red) Trafalgar Pavers Norvick Souldice Wall Silverado Armour Stone (2) Japanese Maple (1) Stella De Oro Daylily (3) Blue Oat Grass Chanticleer On. Pear (3)
Ornamental Grass (3) Spirea Magic Carpet (4) Service Berry (1) Armour Stone (2)
Stella De Oro Daylily (3) Hick Yew (6) Dianthus (3) Japanesse Maples Bloodgood (1)
Stella De Oro Daylily (7)
38
144
Plan View for Proposed Landscape Design and Interlocking Design | Page 1 of 2 Jones, Sean & Cheryl | 11 Otter Cases; Mildmay, ON July 10, 2013
Peoples Places
Trafalgar Pavers Patio (Norvick) Soldier Course
Shouldice Steps
Hicks Yew
Chanticleer Ornamental Pear
Shouldice Retaining Wall
Service Berry
Japanese Maple
Soldier Course Mat (TownHall)
Pyramidal Boxwoods Ornamental Grasses Blue Oat Grass Spirea Magic Carpet Stella Daylily
Armour Stone
Dianthus
39 Hardscapes and Plant Materials Proposed for Site | Page 2 of 2 144 Jones, Sean & Cheryl | 11 Otter Cases; Mildmay, ON July 10, 2013
Peoples Places
3D VIEW FRONT
DRIVE UP VIEW- FRONT
40
144
3D View of Proposed Putting Green | Page 1 of 3 Kleinecke, Martin and Martina | 521 Lake Rosalind Road 5, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 June 24, 2013
Peoples Places Chipping Area- Fringe Turf Landscape Stones Riverstone 1-2”
Aluminum golf pins with cup 2’ Rock Table
Play Sand (Polymeric Sand)
Pro Putt 2 Tone (Green and Lite Green) Stone Dust ‘A’ Gravel Straight Line Level Long Putt Flagstone Patio Snap Edge and Spikes Stone Dust / ‘A’ Gravel Brent Grass- Fringe Turf Ornamental Grasses Brown Mulch
41 Plan View of Proposed Putting Green | Page 2 of 3 144 Kleinecke, Martin and Martina | 521 Lake Rosalind Road 5, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 June 24, 2013
Peoples Places P L A N T I N G NOTES: GENERAL: I. PROVINCE OF ONTARIO MANDATES CONTACTING /CALLING ONTERIO ONE BEFFORE YOU DIG 2. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE COUNTY, CITY AND/OR UTILITY COMPANIES TO LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES PRIOR TO DIGGING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, AND/OR CONSTRUCTION CAUSED BY UTILITY DAMAGE. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH A “UNIT PRICE BREAKDOWN” FOR ALL MATERIAL TO BE USED IN PROJECT: 3. I MULCH, TOPSOIL, FERTILIZER, STAKING, ETC. SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE “UNIT BREAKDOWN” COST PER PLANT. 3.2. REQUESTS FOR SUBSTITUTIONS AND CHANGES SHALL BE IN WRITING 3.3. OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE MAY IN HIS/ HER DISCRETION ADD OR DELETE UNINSTALLJED PLANT MATERIAL FROM PROJECT UTILIZING THE “UNIT BREAKDOWN” UNIT COSTS SUBMITTED. 4. CONTRACTOR(S) MUST OBTAIN SEPARATE LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION $ TREE RELOCATION/ REMOVAL PERMITS FROM THE GOVERNING AGENCIES PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE PROJECT 5. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR WITH THE GOVERNING AGENCY TO SCHEDULE A PRE CONSTRUCTION MEETING, ALONG WITH THE OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO ANY SITE PREPARATION: 6. XERISCAPE LANDSCAPE PRINCIPLES SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL SITES AS SPECIFIED IN THE ONTARIO WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS “WATERWISE ONTARIOLANDSCAPES” GUIDELINES: 7. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND GOVERNING AGENCIES OF ANY CHANGES IN MATERIAL FOR APPROVAL, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 8. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO LANDSCAPE DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL PLANTING REQUIREMENTS. 9. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL ESTIMATED QUANTITIES OF MATERIAL SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING HIS BID. PLANTING PLAN IS TO TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT LIST/SCHEDULE. 10. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN I 2 MONTHS AFTER DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE (SEE WATERING NOTE). 11. LANDSCAPE PROPOSAL GUIDES THE INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS BUT IS NOT PERFECT AND THERE MAY BE MINOR CHANGES I2. OWNER(S) OF THE IAND OR THEIR AGENTS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPE, AFTER INSTALLATION. SITE PREPARATION: I3. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CAUTION TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING SOD AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ANY DAMAGE TO THE SOD OR IRRIGATION SHALL BE REPLACED/ REPAIRED TO THE ORIGINAL STATE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR I4. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ALL EXISTING BRAZILIANPEPPER, FLORIDA HOLLY AND ALL EXOTIC NUISANCE MATERIAL ON SITE, AS REQUIRED AND/OR AS SPECIFIED ON EXISTING PRESERVATION/DISPOSITION PLANS. I5. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL ERADICATE ¢ REMOVE ALL WEEDS & GRASS, CLEAN-UP ANY DEAD MATERIAL, DEBRIS, AND RUBBISH PRIOR TO INSTALLING A NEW PLANT MATERIAL. I6. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSI-
PLANTING/TOP SOIL: I7. ALL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL AND FOREIGN MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PUXNTING AREAS AND REPLACED WITH 5O/5O MIX FILL SOIL OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. I7. I. ALL PARKING ISLANDS AND PLANTING BEDS AROUND BUILDINGS, SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO A DEPTH OF 36” MIN. AND REPLACED WITH 5O/5O PLANT MIX, OR AS PER SPECIFICATIONS. 17.2 TOPSOIL SHALL BE CLEAN AND FREE OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS, WEEDS, ROCKS, NOXIOUS PESTS AND DISEASES, AND EXHIBIT A PH OF 6.5 TO 7.0. THE TOPSOIL FOR PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE AMENDED WITH HORTICULTURAL ACCEPTABLE ORGANIC MATERIAL. ALL SOILS USED SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR THE INTENDED PLANT MATERIAL. THE SOURCE OF THE TOPSOIL SHALL BE KNOWN TO THE APPLICANT AND MUST BE ACCEPTABLE TO THE GOVERNING AGENCIES. 17.3 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO SUPPLY $ INSTALL 2” SOIL LAYER 50/50 MIX BLANKET FOR ALL NEW SOD AREAS. 17.4 THE MIN. PLANTING SOIL DEPTH SHALL BE SIX (6“) INCHES FOR GROUND COVERS, FLOWERS, SHRUBS AND HEDGES. I 7.5. TREES SHALL RECEIVE TWELVE (I 2”) INCHES OP PLANTING SOIL AROUND THE ROOT BALL. I7.5. 6” TOP SOIL REQUIRED AROUND ¢ BENEATH ALL PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL ROOT BALLS. (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) I7.6. CLEAN SAND SHALL BE USED TO BACKFILL ARID CLIMATE PALMS. NATIVE TOPSOIL ON THE SITE SHALL BE RETAINED ON-SITE AND USED WHEN THERE IS SUFFICIENT QUANTITY TO COVER AT LEAST SOME OF THE ON-SITE LANDSCAPED AREAS. PLANT MATERIAL: I8. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE MIN. GRADE OF ONTARIO NO. I & BE INSTALLED AS SPECIFIED IN “FLORIDA DEPT. OF AGRICULTURAL GRADES AND STANDARDS”, CURRENT EDITION RESPECTIVELY. I9. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ATTAINING PERMITS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF NEW PLANT MATERIAL. 20. NO TREES OR OTHER PLANT MATERIAL MAY BE PLANTED IN RIGHTS-OF—WAY (IE. SWALE AREAS) WITHOUT A PERMIT. NO SHRUB SPECIES WITH A MATURE HEIGHT THAT WILL BLOCK THE CLEAR SIGHT ZONE FROM 3O INCHES IN HEIGHT TO SIX FEET IN HEIGHT WILL BE APPROVED IN SAID SWALE AREAS. 21.1 ALL DUMPSTERS, TRANSFORMERS, UTILITY BOXES, IRRIGATION PUMP HOUSES $ MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. INCLUDING BACK FLOW PREVENTOR, A.C. UNITS, ETC., SHALL BE SCREENED WITH HEDGE MATERIAL TO THE HEIGHT OF EACH ABOVE GROUND ELEMENT FOR COMPLETE SCREENING ON THREE (3) SIDES MIN. 2 I .2. THE QUANTITY OF SCREENING SHRUBS IS IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF SHRUBS AS PROVIDED IN THE CODE CALCULATION TABLE. 2 I .3. ALL SCREENING SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED IN SUCH A WAY AS TO PROVIDE ACCESS FOR PROPER OPERATION OF EQUIPMENT BEING SCREENED AND/OR PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY AS NECESSARY. 2 I .4. ALL HEDGE MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR SCREENING PURPOSES SHALL BE PLANTED SO AS TO BE TIP TO TIP WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF PLANTING AND MAINTAINED SO AS TO FORM A CONTINUOUS VISUAL SCREEN. ADJUST SPACING AS NECESSARY AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PLANTS TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE SCREEN. 2 I .5. SHRUBS USED AS HEDGES SHALL BE ONTARIO NO. I OR BETTER 22. WITH A MIN. HT. OF 24” AND A MIN. SPREAD. OF I5”, WHEN MEASURED IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING ¢ SHALL BE A MIN. OF 3’ HT. WITHIN 2 YRS. FROM THE DATE OF PLANTING. ALL SIZES SHOWN FOR PLANT MATERIAL ON THE PLAN ARE TO BE CONSIDERED MINIMUM. ALL PLANT MATERIAL MUST MEET OR EXCEED THESE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR BOTH HEIGHT AND SPREAD. ANY OTHER REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC SHAPE OR EFFECT AS NOTED ON THE PLAN SHALL ALSO BE REQUIRED FOR ACCEPTANCE. ALL TREES ARE TO BE SINGLE TRUNK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. ALL SYNTHETIC BURLAP, SYNTHETIC STRING OR CORDS, OR WIRE BASKETS SHALL BE REMOVED BEFORE ANY TREES ARE PIANTED. ALL SYNTHETIC TAPE (I.E. TAGGING TAPE, NURSERY TAPE) SHALL BE REMOVED FROM TRUNKS, BRANCHES, ETC. BEFORE INSPECTION. THE TOP I/3 OF ANY NATURAL BURLAP SHALL BE REMOVED OR TUCKED INTO THE PLANTING HOLE BEFORE THE TREES ARE BACK FILLED SET TREES NO DEEPER THAN IT WAS IN ITS ORIGINAL GROWING WITH THE ROOT BALLS EVEN WITH, OR SLIGHTLY HIGHER (+/- I”) THAN THE FINISHED GRADE. ALL “GROUNDCOVER REQUIRES 75% COVERAGE AND I OO% WITHIN 3 MONTHS OF INSTALLATION”. PROPOSED UNDERSTORY PLANT MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE PLANTED ON TOP OF TREE OR PALM ROOT BALLS. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION, SEE SPECIFICATIONS.
MULCH: 23. A THREE (3”) INCH MIN. DEPTH OF APPROVED ORGANIC MULCH MATERIAL (MEASURED AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION) SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS NOT COVERED BY PAVEMENT, SOD, DECORATIVE STONES, OR ANNUAL FLOWER BEDS. ADDITIONALLY, EACH TREE SHALL HAVE A RING OF ORGANIC MULCH AT THE PERIMETER OF THE ROOT BALL: 24. THE USE OF CYPRESS MULCH SHOULD BE RESTRICTED AND PROHIBITING ANY MULCH CONTAINING ARSENIC. A MIN. MULCH WIDTH OF I8” BEYOND THE TRUNK OF ALL TREES, PALMS, HEDGES AND SHRUBS. MULCH SHALL E BE PLACED CLOSER THAN 3” FROM THE TRUNK OF ALL TREES AND PALMS; THE MOUNDING OF MULCH IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. MULCH SHALL BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH GROUND COVER IN ALL PLANTING BEDS (UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE). DO NOT MULCH WITHIN DESIGNATED “PRESERVE AREAS” (UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE). LANDSCAPE/IAWN AREAS: 25. LANDSCAPE MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL AREAS NOT COVERED BY MAIN AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, WALKS AND VEHICULAR USE AREAS. LANDSCAPE MATERIAL SHALL EXTEND TO ANY ABUTTING STREET, PAVEMENT EDGE AND TO THE MEAN WATER LINE OF ANY ABUTTING CANAL, LAKE OR WATERWAY. CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE IN HIS BID SOD FOR ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS VOID OF ANY PLANT MATERIAL (GROUND COVER, SHRUBS, SOD). NOT SPECIFIED IN PLANS, WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BIDDING IN REFERENCE TO “PROJECT LIMITS”. IRRIGATION: 26. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AN AUTOMATIC LAWN IRRIGATION SYSTEM GUARANTEEING IOO% COVERAGE $ MAINTAIN A 5O% MIN. OVERLAP TO ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS. THERE SHALL BE NO OVER SPRAY ONTO SIDEWALKS. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL: I . HAVE A RAIN SENSOR DEVICE INSTALLED, AS REQUIRED. 2. USE PURPLE CODED PIPE, HEADS, VALVES ETC. FOR IDENTIFYING RECLAIM WATER COMPONENTS. AS REQUIRED. 3. IRRIGATION PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT. 27. ALL GUYING, STAKING & TREE BRACING SHALL BE THE WATERING NOTE DETAILS WITH CONTRACTOR. 28. ALL NEW PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD PLANTING DETAILS FOR APPROVED METHODS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETURN I 2 MONTHS AFTER COMPLETION OF JOB AND REMOVE ALL GUYS, STAKES $ TREE BRACES. 29. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SYMBOLS SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN(S) SHALL BE CONSIDERED DIAGRAMMATIC AND SHOULD BE ADJUSTED IN THE FIELD BY CONTRACTOR TO AVOID UTILITY CONFLICTS AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS. WHERE SAID ADJUSTMENT CANNOT BE DONE WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT CHANGE TO THE PLANTING DESIGN CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR CONTRACTOR AND/ OR OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE FOR APPROVAL, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 30. TREES SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 6 FT. FROM UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND ALL SHADE TREES INSTALLED WITHIN SIX FEET OF PUBLIC/PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE (INCLUDING CURBS, WALKS, PAVEMENT, ETC.) SHALL UTILIZE A ROOT BARRIER SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE GOVERNING AGENCY. 30. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE CLEAR (7- I/2 FT. IN FRONT & SIDES WITH 4 FT. IN REAR) AROUND ALL FIRE HYDRANTS. CHECK VALVES. FIRE DEFT. EQUIPMENT. ETC., OR AS REQUIRED. 31. SHADE TREES SHALL BE PLANTED MIN. OF I5 FT. FROM LIGHT POLES. ALL SMALL TREES AND PALMS TO BE PLANTED MIN. OF 7.5 FT. FROM LIGHT POLES, OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 32. ALL SHADE TREES SHALL HAVE A 4 I/2‘ MIN. CLEAR TRUNK HEIGHT (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) AND CALIPER SHALL BE MEASURED AT D.B.H. AT TIME OF PLANTING OF I2 MONTHS FROM THE TIME OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE. DURING THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: WATERING FER THE SCHEDULE ATTACHED, RE—SEITING OF PLANTS, REPLACEMENT OF SICK OR DEAD PLANTS, ALL OTHER CARE REQUIRED FOR PROPER GROWTH. ANY PLANT MATERIAL NOT IN HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CLIENT. 33. THE I2 MONTH WARRANTEE/ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD SHALL BE EXTENDED BY 45 DAYS FOR ALL REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL AT THE CLIENT’S EXPENSE, THE CONTRACTOR WILL REPLACE ANY PLANT MATERIAL DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS OR “ACTS OF GOD” LIMITED TO HAIL. FREEZE, LIGHTNING. AND WINDS EXCEEDING 75 MPH AS DEFINED BY THE ONTARIO HURRICANE CENTER. WATERING CONTRACT SHALL BE INCLUDED IN CONTRACTORS BID 34. FOR ANY PLANT MATERIAL THAT HAS BEEN ROOT PRUNED. INSTALLED, DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION, OR WHERE PROPOSED OR 35. EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ARE NOT FUNCTIONAL. ALL WARRANTIES SHALL BE IN PLACE BY CONTRACTOR REGARDLESS OF NONOPERATIONAL IRRIGATION SYSTEMS OR AREAS WHERE NO IRRIGATION IS PROPOSED. WATERING SCHEDULE (FIRST 6 MONTHS)‘: WEEK(S) FREQUENCY (WATERING DAYS) WEEKS I THRU 6 MON., WED., FRI., SAT. 7 THRU I2 MON., WED., FRI. I3 THRU 24 MON., FRI. 6 MONTH WATERING SCHEDULE IS A MINIMUM, CONTRACTOR IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERING PLANT MATERIAL FOR THE FULL I 2 MONTH ESTABLISHMENT/WARRANTY PERIOD.
Front Yard Putting Green Hard Scaping
Artificial Turf
Soft Scaping
Equipment
Labour
Description Flagstone Patio Snap Edge and Spikes Stone Dust ‘A’ Gravel Nylon Putting Green (15') (36 by 15) Fringe Turf (Roll 15') (27 by 15) Artificial Turf Seam Tape Stone Dust ‘A’ Gravel Aluminum golf pins with cup 2' Concrete Putting Infill Sand- Tan Color (Final Touch Up) Top Dressing (Final Touch Up) Play Sand (Brick Sand) Landscape Stones Ornamental Grasses Riverstone 1-2” Potting Soil (Triple Mix) Brown Mulch Dump Truck and Trailer Skid Steer/ Mini Excavator Plate Tamper Carpet Seamer Labour for Hardscapes Labour for Softscapes Putting Check and Putting Course Lay up
42
144
Site Details | Page 3 of 3 Kleinecke, Martin and Martina | 521 Lake Rosalind Road 5, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 June 24, 2013
Quantity 200 78 3 4 540 405 80 3 4 3 3 2 2 2 7 25 6 2 4 na 13 1 1 27 8 4
Unit/Size square foot per foot per yard per yard square foot square foot per foot per yard per yard per pin pin block bag bag per yard per stone 2 gallon per yard per yard per yard fixed per hour fixed fixed per hour per hour per hour
Price per Unit $12 $2.25 $30 $30 $18 $18 $4 $30 $30 $180 $21 $44 $64 $50 $75 $25 $30 $50 $50 $250 $75 $100 $115 $60 $40 $60 Subtotal Tax Total
Sub Total $2,400 $175.50 $90 $120 $9,720 $7,290 $320 $90 $120 $540 $63 $88 $128 $100 $525 $625 $180 $100 $200 $250 975.00 $100 $115 $1,620 $320 $240 26,494.50 $3,444.29 $29,938.79
Peoples Places
Preliminary Sketch of Design 1
Preliminary Sketch of Design 1
Preliminary Sketch of Design 2
Design 2- Armour Stone with Siena Stone
Design 2- All Walls with Armour Stone
43 Plan View of Proposed Landscape by Water Front | Page 1 of 10 144 Kocher, Jim & Shelly | 455 Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N 3B9 October 23, 2013
Peoples Places
44
144
3D View of Preliminary Sketch of Design 1 | Page 2 of 10 Kocher, Jim & Shelly | 455 Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N October 23, 2013
Peoples Places
45 Plan View of Preliminary Sketch of Design 1 | Page 3 of 10 144 Kocher, Jim & Shelly | 455 Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N October 23, 2013
Peoples Places
46
144
3D View of Preliminary Sketch of Design 2 | Page 4 of 10 Kocher, Jim & Shelly | 455 Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N October 23, 2013
Peoples Places
47 Plan View of Preliminary Sketch of Design 2 | Page 5 of 10 144 Kocher, Jim & Shelly | 455 Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N October 23, 2013
Peoples Places
48
144
3D View of Design 2 | Page 6 of 10 Kocher, Jim & Shelly | 455 Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N October 23, 2013
Peoples Places
49 Plan View of Design 2 | Page 7 of 10 144 Kocher, Jim & Shelly | 455 Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N October 23, 2013
Peoples Places
50
144
3D View of Design 2 with all Walls are Armour Stone | Page 8 of 10 Kocher, Jim & Shelly | 455 Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N October 23, 2013
Peoples Places
51 Plan View of Design 2 with all Walls are Armour Stone | Page 9 of 10 144 Kocher, Jim & Shelly | 455 Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N October 23, 2013
Peoples Places
Siena Stone
45 Degree Siena Stone
Siena Stone Steps
Flag Stone Mahogany Brown Natural Granite Nevada
Penfield Brown Trafalgar
6� Siena Stone Steps
52
144
Interlocking and Stone Proposed for Materials | Page 10 of 10 Kocher, Jim & Shelly | 455 Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N October 23, 2013
Siena Stone Colors
Peoples Places
Plan View
Trafalgar Interlocking
3D Rendering
Armour Stone
53 Plan View for Proposed Landscape Design and Interlocking Design | Page 1 of 1 144 Lyons, JD | Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N October 22, 2013
Peoples Places
Weeping Mulberry (1)
Peoples Places
Weigela Purple (2)
Cedar (1) Mixed Perennials Weigela Purple (2)
Cedar (1) Mixed Perennials Weeping Mulberry (1) Spirea (3) Spirea (3)
Ornamental Grass (3)
Purple Leaf Sandcherry (2) Mixed Perennials
Daylilies (5) Service Berry Clump (1)
54
144
Plan View of Landscape Proposal | Page 1 of 2 Miller, Glenn | 7 Huron St, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 August 13, 2013
Peoples Places
Weeping Mulberry
Peoples Places
Cedar
Purple Leaf Sand Cherry
Ornamental Grasses
Spirea
Daylilies
Service Berry Clump
Weigela Purple
Dianthus (Mixed Perennials)
55 Materials for Landscape Proposaed | Page 2 of 2 144 Miller, Glenn | 7 Huron St, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 August 13, 2013
Peoples Places Daylilies (5) Cobble Edge
Hydrangea (1)
Hydrangea (1)
Purple Coral Bells (3)
Purple Coral Bells (3)
Hydrangea (1)
Hostas (5) Hydrangea (2)
Var. Miscanthus Grass (3)
Daylilies (5)
Var. Miscanthus Grass (3)
Hostas (2)
Blue Arrow Skyrocket Juniper (2)
Blue Arrow Skyrocket Juniper (2)
Var. Miscanthus Grass (2)
Global Yew (4)
Global Yew (4)
Global Yew (4)
Pyramidal Boxwood (2)
Pyramidal Boxwood (2)
Pyramidal Boxwood (2)
Daylilies (5)
Daylilies (5)
Daylilies (5)
Blue Star Std. (1)
Blue Star Std. (1)
Blue Star Std. (1)
Magic Carpet Spirea (3)
Magic Carpet Spirea (3)
Magic Carpet Spirea (3)
Purple Coral Bells (6)
Purple Coral Bells (6)
Cobble Edge
Cobble Edge
Cobble Edge
56
Plan View of Complete Landscape Proposal | Page 1 of 4 Minty, Kyrene | 168 Victoria St S, Paisley, ON N0G 2N0 September 23, 2013
Hostas (5) Purple Coral Bells (3)
Hydrangea (1) Daylilies (5)
144
Cobble Edge
Daylilies (5) Purple Coral Bells (3)
Hydrangea (2)
Peoples Places
Global Yew (4) Pyramidal Boxwood (2) Daylilies (5) Blue Star Std. (1) Magic Carpet Spirea (3) Purple Coral Bells (6) Cobble Edge
Corner Unit
First 2 Units
Global Yew (4) Pyramidal Boxwood (2) Daylilies (5) Blue Star Std. (1) Magic Carpet Spirea (3) Cobble Edge
57 Plan View of Front Landscape Proposal | Page 2 of 4 144 Minty, Kyrene | 168 Victoria St S, Paisley, ON N0G 2N0 September 23, 2013
Peoples Places
Peoples Places Daylilies (5) Cobble Edge Hydrangea (1) Hostas (5) Purple Coral Bells (3) Hydrangea (2)
Purple Coral Bells (3)
Hydrangea (1) Daylilies (5)
Var. Miscanthus Grass (3)
Var. Miscanthus Grass (3) Blue Arrow Skyrocket Juniper (2)
Backyard Left
Hydrangea (1) Purple Coral Bells (3)
Cobble Edge
Daylilies (5) Hostas (5)
Hydrangea (1) Purple Coral Bells (3) Daylilies (5) Hostas (2) Blue Arrow Skyrocket Juniper (2)
Backyard Right
58
144
Plan View of Backyard Landscape Proposal | Page 3 of 4 Minty, Kyrene | 168 Victoria St S, Paisley, ON N0G 2N0 September 23, 2013
Var. Miscanthus Grass (2)
Hydrangea (2)
Peoples Places
Globe Yew
Invincibelle Hydrangea
Pyramidal Boxwood
Purple Coral Bells
Hostas
Blue Arrow Skyrocket Juniper
Variegated Miscanthus Grass
Magic Carpet Spirea
Daylilies
Blue Star Standard
59 Landscape Materials Proposed | Page 4 of 4 144 Minty, Kyrene | 168 Victoria St S, Paisley, ON N0G 2N0 September 23, 2013
Peoples Places
60
Plan View for Proposed Retaining Wall in Backyard | Page 1 of 2 Murry, Hayley | 24 Spitzig; Hanover, ON N0V 2V0 144
August 19, 2013
Peoples Places
Three High ARMOUR STONE
ARMOUR STONE Wall with Double Terraced Flower Bed
61 Hardscapes Materials Proposed for Site | Page 2 of 2 144 Murry, Hayley | 24 Spitzig; Hanover, ON N0V 2V0 August 19, 2013
Peoples Places
Riverstone 1"- 2"
Existing Hedge
Flagstone Steps Yellow Grass (7)
Yellow Grass (3) Armour Stone (3)
Stella De Oro Daylily (5) Bells Flowers (White) (7) Pyramid Boxwoods (4) Concorde Barberry (5) Dianthus (5)
Ornamental Grass (3) Yellow Grass (3)
Bells Flowers (White) (7) Dianthus (5) STD Blue Spruce (1)
Existing Hedge
62
Plan View for Proposed Landscape Design | Page 1 of 2 Parker, Merv 144
July 25, 2013
Purple Coral Bells (5)
Peoples Places
Cobble Edge
Riverstone 1�- 2�
Armour Stone
STD Blue Spruce
Concorde Barrbery
Dianthus
Hakone Grass
Stella Daylily
Pyramidal Boxwoods
Purple Coral Bells
White Bell Flowers
63 Hardscapes and Plant Materials Proposed for Site | Page 2 of 2 144 Parker, Merv
July 25, 2013
Peoples Places
Magnolia Tree Purple Coral Bells (5) Guacamole Hostas (4)
Center Island
Bell Flowers (5)
Magnolia Tree
Coppertina Ninebark (1) Burning Bush (2)
1st Island
Purple Coral Bells (5)
Site Plan
Guacamole Hostas (4)
Center Island
Hydrangea Limelight (3) Coral Bells (3)
2nd Island
3rd Island Splash Honeysuckles (2) Chanticleer On. Pear (1)
64
Tree
Ivory Silk Japanese Lilac Tree
Complete Plan View for Proposed Landscape Design | Page 1 of 3 Rosemarrie & Ken | 152 Kincardine St., Durham, On 144
August 14, 2013
Peoples Places
Splash Honeysuckles (2) Chanticleer On. Pear (1)
Bell Flowers (5)
Coppertina Ninebark (1) Burning Bush (2)
1st Island
3rd Island
Hydrangea Limelight (3) Coral Bells (3)
Ivory Silk Japanese Lilac Tree
2nd Island
Tree
65 Plan View Details for Proposed Landscape Design | Page 2 of 3 144 Rosemarrie & Ken | 152 Kincardine St., Durham, On August 14, 2013
Peoples Places
Magnolia Tree
Splash Honeysuckles
Coppertina Ninebark
Burning Bush
Chanticleer Pear Tree
Hydrangea Limelight
Ivory Silk Japanese Tree
Guacamole Hostas
66
Purple Coral Bells
Plant Materials Proposed for Site | Page 3 of 3 Rosemarrie & Ken | 152 Kincardine St., Durham, On 144
August 14, 2013
Bell Flowers
Peoples Places
3D View
Front View
Plan View
67 Sketches of Proposed Landscape Design | Page 2 of 2 144 Scriven, Bill & Sonya August 22, 2013
Peoples Places
Proposed Concrete
Transplant Existing Cedar
2 - 6" Rivertone
(3) Boston Ivy 1- 2" Rivertone
Shouldice Wall (Color Delight)
Cobbler Edger
Flag Stone Steps
Trafalgar Paving Stone
Cobble Edging
Shouldice Wall (1) Gracillimus Grass
Transplant Existing Cedar (1) Gracillimus Grass (5) Hameln Dwarf Grass
Steps
(10) Golden Yucca Pea Stone 2 - 6" Rivertone
Proposed Concrete
Snap Edge and Spikes
(6) Flat Stone Rocks Proposed Concrete
Armour stone wall (16) Daylilies
68
Plan View for Proposed Landscape, Concert Driveway, and Interlocking Design | Page 1 of 2 Shaw, David & Jan 144
July 10, 2013
Peoples Places
Example of Low Maintenance Landscape
Armour Stone Retaining Wall
Boston Ivy
Gracillimus Grass
Porch Steps and Small Patio
Armour Stone
Golden Yucca
Flag Stone Steps
1-2” River Stone
Hameln Dwarf Grass
2-6” Riverstone
Stella Daylily
69 Hardscapes and Plant Materials Proposed for Site | Page 2 of 2 144 Shaw, David & Jan July 10, 2013
Peoples Places
Steps
Hose Bibb
Flag Stone Hydrangea STD (1) Stella De Oro Daylily (7) Cedar (2) Dianthus (7) Concorde Barberry (4) Gracillimus Grass (3)
70
Purple Coral Bells (5) Blue Spruce Std. (1) Armour Stone (2) Spirea Magic Carpet (4) Trafalgar Paver (Grey) (4) Global Boxwoods (5)
Plan View for Proposed Landscape and Interlocking Design | Page 1 of 2 Sittlinger, Edith | 105 5 Ave, Hanover, ON N4N 144
October 25, 2013
Dwarf Variegated Dogwood (10) Cobble Edger
Peoples Places
Blue Spruce Standard
Cobble Edger
Grasillmous Grass
Dwarf Variegated Dogwood
Purple Coral Bells
Stella d Oro Daylily
Hydrangea Standard
Steps with Armour Stone Sides
Burgundy Barberry
Trafalger Walkway
Flagstone Walkway
71 Hardscapes and Plant Materials Proposed for Site | Page 2 of 2 144 Sittlinger, Edith | 105 5 Ave, Hanover, ON N4N October 25, 2013
Peoples Places Armour Stone (1)
Dwarf Ninebark (3)
Pyramidal Boxwood (2)
Hick Yew (4) House
Existing Flower
Steps
Shouldice Wall
Walkway
Service Berry (1)
Spirea Magic Carpet (5 Dianthus (11)
Daylily (5)
River Dwarf stone Ornamental Grasses (5)
Purple Coral Bells (5)
Blue Spruce Std. (1)
Global Boxwoods (3)
Armour Stone (1)
Karl Foerster Gats (3)
Driveway
Chanticleer On. Pear (3)
72
Plan View for Proposed Landscape and Interlocking Design | Page 1 of 2 Tomlison, Al and Lynn | 293 Westwood Dr, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 144
June 24, 2013
Peoples Places
Shouldice Wall
Hick Yew
Armour Stone
Pyramidal Boxwood
Spirea Magic Carpet
River Stone
Global Boxwoods
Daylily
Chanticleer On. Pear
Karl Foerster Gats
Service Berry
Ornamental Grasses
Purple Coral Bells
Blue Spruce Std.
Dwarf Ninebark
Dianthus
73 Hardscapes and Plant Materials Proposed for Site | Page 2 of 2 144 Tomlison, Al and Lynn | 293 Westwood Dr, Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 June 24, 2013
Peoples Places
74
3D View Sketch of proposed dock | Page 1 of 1 Wyatt, Janet & Robert | 123 Lake Rosalind Road 1, Hanover, ON N4N 3B9 144
October 22, 2013
Peoples Places
75 Plan View for Proposed Landscape and Interlocking Design 1 | Page 1 of 7 144 Kirstine, Neil & Cassidy, Tracey | 443 Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N 3B9 September 16, 2013
Peoples Places
76
3D View for Proposed Landscape and Interlocking Design 1 | Page 2 of 7 Kirstine, Neil & Cassidy, Tracey | 443 Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N 3B9 144
September 16, 2013
Peoples Places
77 3D View for Proposed Landscape and Interlocking Design 1 | Page 3 of 7 144 Kirstine, Neil & Cassidy, Tracey | 443 Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N 3B9 September 16, 2013
Peoples Places
78
3D View for Proposed Landscape Design 2 and Interlocking Design | Page 4 of 7 Kirstine, Neil & Cassidy, Tracey | 443 Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N 3B9 144
September 16, 2013
Peoples Places
Cascading Foutain with Meandering Water Path
Double Slate Rock Fountain Descending Staircase
Barbacue
Fire Pit
Stairs into Water
79 3D View for Proposed Landscape Design 1 and 2’s Details | Page 5 of 7 144 Kirstine, Neil & Cassidy, Tracey | 443 Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N September 16, 2013
Peoples Places
Armour Stone
FlagStone Stepping Stones
80
Arbel Pavers Walkway Natural Edge
Arbel Pavers
Hardscapes Materials Proposed for Site | Page 6 of 7 Kirstine, Neil & Cassidy, Tracey | 443 Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N 3B9 144
September 16, 2013
Stones Steps
Natural Stone Steps
Peoples Places
Fire Pit Lakeside at Night
Cascading Fountain
Stone Barbecue
Slate Rock Water Fall
Outdoor Blacksmith Tables
81 Additional Hardscapes Materials Proposed for Site | Page 7 of 7 144 Kirstine, Neil & Cassidy, Tracey | 443 Lake Rosalind Road 4, Hanover, ON N4N 3B9 September 16, 2013
Peoples Places
Existing Topiary Mixed Hostas (10)
Karl Forester Grass Existing Stone (1) Existing Topiary
Existing Hick Yew Transplant Hick Yew (1)
Golden Grass
Driveway
Dwarf False Spirea (2) Existing Hedge Dwarf False Spirea (2) Existing Stone (1)
Purple Coral Bells (3) Blue Spruce Std. (1)
Existing Blue Spruce (1) Purple Coral Bells (5)
82
Plan View for Proposed Landscape Design | Page 1 of 2 Vanopstal, Cathy | 859 Andrew Malcolm Dr, Kincardine, ON N2Z 1M9 144
August 14, 2013
Peoples Places
Mixed Hostas
Blue Spruce Std.
Hakone (Golden) Grass
Karl Foerster Grass
Dwarf False Spirea
Purple Coral Bells
Columnar Grabapple
83 Plant Materials Proposed for Site | Page 2 of 2 144 Vanopstal, Cathy | 859 Andrew Malcolm Dr, Kincardine, ON N2Z 1M9 August 14, 2013
Peoples Places
84
Landscape Design and Installed | Page 1 of 2 David and Daphnee Pfaff | 696 16th Ave S, Naples, FL 34102 144
May 12, 2013
Peoples Places
85 Landscape Design and Installed | Page 2 of 2 144 David and Daphnee Pfaff | 696 16th Ave S, Naples, FL 34102 May 12, 2013
Peoples Places House in Miami Shores | Upper Floor Addition
The conceptual idea for the addition to the house was to put the addition on top of the house because of multiple reasons like flood insurance, space saving efficiency. The addition was created to add more space to the house as library or a single bedroom apartment. The apartment space can be rented out to generate income for the house. The addition was created to sustainable environmental friendly. The design is based on using the energy from the sun light. The roof is put at the same pitch or angle as the original roof. The angle collects the best sun rays with the southern exposure of light. The sun is absorbed into two panels taking away the heat of Florida’s sun rays. The first panel heats and stores water for the house. Hot water will be available for the entire house without an electric cost. The second panel is used for solar energy and will provide at least energy for smaller electrical powered units around the house. These are two replenish able sources of energy. The design also had to take into consideration the roof beams and ventilation of the original building. The new building does not disturb the air flow and will help in capturing wind. It also will create a cooler original house with roof being removed a hole addition floor of insulation. The addition has its own ventilation that is similar to the original floor plan of more windows on the wind exposed side of the house capturing the wind. It has ventilation that enters in the same point as the first floor at the roof. The second floor has ventilation coming in through the floor. It enters on one side and exits through the other side creating a wind tunnel. The two floors create a wall that will help capture the wind. The entry point is in the middle of the two floors in the south east side and works into the design of the original plan of vaulted ceilings. The materials used to build the second floor will be out of recycled materials and energy cost efficient. One of the most important things is to keep the same colors with the materials as the original house. The walls can be made of a recycled brown material made up of plastic and cloth. It will be strong, light weight, similar in color, energy efficient, and very green in nature of recycled materials. The recycled material should last for a very long time. The addition will still have a look that will connect the architecture to the community. It will not have any new or modern architecture forms except the windows that will be more energy effective. The conceptual idea for the addition to the house has resolved a lot of conflicts that the home owner will be happy with. It will also increase the appeal to future people living at the house. The addition will help lower the foot print on the environment.
86
144
Final | Brown House Architecture Design 2 | Instructor: Jose Vaques Miami Dade College | ARC 1302 | Summer 2008
Architecture
Final | Brown House Architecture Design 2 | Instructor: Jose Vaques Miami Dade College | ARC 1302 | Summer 2008
REBUILDING cities
Public Space
PUBLIC SPACES
Peoples Places
Downtown Revitalization Parkette Reconstruction & Streetscape Demonstration PARK - GARDENS - EVENT PLANS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN PLANS
SHEET / TITLE PARKETTE SITE
L-100 L-200 L-300 L-400 L-500 L-600 L-700 L-800 L-900 L-1000
COVER SHEET PARK CONNECTIONS LOCATION / AREA / SIZE OF PARK LARGE PARCEL DIVIDED INTO PHASE 1 / 2 / 3 PHASE 1 PROPOSAL / SITE PLAN SCOPE OF WORK / DOLLARS FRONT AND REAR VIEW RENDERING / MATERIALS SITE DETAILS PLANTING DIAGRAMS COMPLETE DESIGN PHASE 1 / 2 / 3
HOLIDAY PARK PARKETTE SITE
Parkette Design Node Network Park 273 10th St, Hanover, ON N4N 3T1, Canada DRIC (Downtown Revitalization Implementation Committee) 341 St Hanover ON N4N 1P5 Office: (519) 364- 2780 Fax: (519) 364- 6456 Email: Civic@Hanover.ca
90
Cover Page for Proposed Landscape Design and Interlocking Design | Page 1 of 10 Downtown Revitalization Implementation Commitee | 273 10th St, Hanover ON N4N 3T1 144
June 14, 2013
GARDEN RETAIL LANDSCAPE DESIGNING SITE PLANNING CONSTRUCTION 939 Bruce County Rd 4 Walkerton, ON N0G 2V0 Office: (519) 364-7548 Fax: (519) 364- 0261 Email: RiversEdgeGarden@gmail.com
PUBLIC SPACES Heritage Square Park Address: 10th Street, Hanover Onterio (North of the Civic Centre)
“Heritage Square is the Town’s jewel in downtown Hanover. The Square provides a number of space options (Music Garden, Amphitheatre, Plaza area) for special events, wedding photos, concerts or your leisurely pleasure.
treet 13th S
The Heritage Square is also the home to the Labyrinth of Distinction. The Labyrinth of Distinction recognizes persons of Hanover heritage having earned distinction bestowing pride and honor on the Hanover Community. An engraved paver stone is positioned in the plaza area of the Heritage Square Labyrinth in honour of the inductee nominated and approved by Hanover Council. Policies, criteria and nomination forms are available from the Parks, Recreation & Culture Office.” http://www.hanover.ca/park
treet
treet
755’
11th S
Connection of Two Parks
The distance between Heritage Park and the new park is 755 feet/ 230 meters. Both parks need to have the same amenities.
nue
venue
enue
enue
8th Av
9th Av
10th A
ve 11th A
12th S
treet
10th S
Holiday Park
Address: 273 10th Street, Hanover Ontario This is a parkette design and can be replicated around the city. They would be connecting nodes to the network of the city. These would be parks that people could enjoy their lunch and relax for their busy day at the office. Small park spaces break up the density of the city and make the central city more enjoyable.
et 100 m
Node Network Park
re 9th St
500 ft
This park space can be maintained by the city of people and businesses surrounding the park space. The ownership would be maintained by the city but people could reserve a this smaller park as their space. This gives the town more ownership, responsibility and pride in Hanover.
91 Other Park Connections and Size | Page 2 of 10 144 Downtown Revitalization Implementation Commitee | 273 10th St, Hanover ON N4N 3T1 June 14, 2013
PUBLIC SPACES 10th
255
265 261
Peoples Places t
Stree
267
269
273
275
279
285
34’
32’ 28’
180’
180’
294
256
262
270
274
5760 sq. ft.
280
treet
9th S
40m
20’
100Ft
SIZE of Site with 2 Parcels
34’ 34’
5’
GIS Information: Parcel Number : 422902000101600 Address: 273 10th St. Hanover County: Grey Acreage: 0.139 Parcel Number: 422902000103701 Address: NA- Easement Acreage: 0.193
Natural Drainage Creek
81’ 6720 sq. ft. 70’
Total Acreage of 2 Parcels: 0.332 = 14462 sq. ft. Measured Site: 5760 sq. ft. = Value in Acres 0.13223140495 6720 sq. ft. = Value in Acres 0.15426997245
45’
Total sq. ft with both Parcels
12480 sq. ft. = Value in Acres 0.2867
92
Parcel Location, Area, and Size of Park | Page 3 of 10 Downtown Revitalization Implementation Commitee | 273 10th St, Hanover ON N4N 3T1 144
June 14, 2013
47’
PUBLIC SPACES SIZE of Site Very Large for Scope of Work and Dollars Broken into 3 Phases Phase 1 Entrance to the Park The entrance needs to attract people and bring them into the park. It needs to grab the attention of people walking or driving by. It needs to look inviting to people to enter and safe. The main space that will be used is the entrance for a majority of the time.
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 2 Walkway through Park along Buildings The walkway serves the purpose of transporting people from the inevitable entrance to the garden space in the back with tall landscaping to cover the walls. Also, the plant material needs to be slender on width because of the narrow area. And, it is not to look over grown like a jungle. The walkway can be narrow and will guide people to the back. Phase 3 Garden Space around Creek This park space can be very simple in landscaping but provide enjoyment to the user that would find the remote beautiful garden.
Phase 3
93 Break Landscape Design into Economic Affordable Phases | Page 4 of 10 144 Downtown Revitalization Implementation Commitee | 273 10th St, Hanover ON N4N 3T1 June 14, 2013
PUBLIC SPACES Trash Can 36” Global Planter w/ Round Lip Potting Soil (Triple Mix) Assorted flowers Recycle Bin Benches (4) Outline Circle of Pavers
Address: 939 Bruce Cou Walkerton, ON Office: (519) 36 Fax: (519) 364-
HOLIDAY
Parkette Des Node Netwo
Address: 273 10th St, Ha ON N4N 3T1, C
Trafalgar Interlocking Pavers 923 sq. ft. Stone Dust (4 yards) ‘A’ Gravel (3 yards) Blue Spruce (Exsiting) Coral Bells (Saxifragaceae, Heuchera ‘Fire Chief’) (18)
D.R.I.C.
Downtown Re Implementati
Brown Mulch Potting Soil (Triple Mix) Screened Topsoil
Address: 341 St Hanove Office: (519) 36 Fax: (519) 364 Email: Civic@H
Electrical Junction Box w/ Surge Protector 24” Global Planter w/ Round Lip Potting Soil (Triple Mix) Assorted flowers
PHASE 1 PROPOS SITE PLA
Stella d’oro Daylily (Hemerocallis ‘Ruby Stella’) (4) Dwf Blue Spruce Tree Form (Picea pun. ‘Glauca Globosa’) (4) Royalty Holly Combo (Ilex x meserveae) (10)
June 14
June 20
Brown Mulch Screened Topsoil Potting Soil (Triple Mix) Natural Stone Retaining Wall (28’) Screened Topsoil
June 24
5
L-50
94
Plan View for Proposed Landscape and Interlocking Design for Phase 1 | Page 5 of 10 Downtown Revitalization Implementation Commitee | 273 10th St, Hanover ON N4N 3T1 144
June 14, 2013
PUBLIC SPACES Phase 1 Hard Scaping
Soft Scaping
Equipment
Labour
Electrical
Entrance of Park Description Hemming Ford Steps Trafalgar Interlocking Pavers ‘A’ Gravel Stone Dust Natural Stone Retaining Wall Coral Bells (Saxifragaceae, Heuchera 'Fire Chief') Stella d'oro Daylily (Hemerocallis ‘Ruby Stella’) Dwf Blue Spruce Tree Form (Picea pungens 'Glauca Globosa') Royalty Holly Combo (Ilex x meserveae) Screened Topsoil Potting Soil (Triple Mix) Brown Mulch Dump Truck and Trailer Skid Steer Mini Excavator Stone Saw Laser Level Plate Tamper Labour for Hardscapes Labour for Softscapes Spray for Grass/ Weeds
Quantity 6 923.317 3 4 28' 18 4 4 10 8 3 4 na 10 4 1 1 1 32 8 1
Unit/Size per step per foot per yard per yard 1 gallon 1 gallon 5 gallon 2 gallon per yard per yard per yard per hour per hour fixed fixed fixed per hour per hour per hour
Price per Unit $ 200 $ 12 $ 30 $ 30 $ 2,000 $ 19.95 $ 12.95 $ 99.95 $ 29.95 $ 20 50 $ 50 $ 250 $ 75 $ 75 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 60 $ 40 $ 50 Subtotal Tax Total
Sub Total $ 1,200 $ 11,080 $ 90 $ 120 $ 2,000 $ 359.10 $ 51.80 $ 399.80 $ 299.50 $ 160 $ 150 $ 200 $ 250 $ 750 $ 300 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 1,920 $ 320 $ 50 20,000.00 $2,600.00 $22,600.00
$1,000
$1,000 $130 $1,130
$325 $399
$650 $399 $240 $50 $1,339 $174.07 $1,513.07
Underground Electrical Conduit Pipe Push Under Concrete Electrical Electrical Junction Box w/ Surge Protector Tax Total
Potted planters
Light Tan Pots Matching Heritage Square Park 24" Global Planter w/ Round Lip 36" Global Planter w/ Round Lip Assorted flowers Potting Soil (Triple Mix)
2 1 na 1
per planter per planter mixed var. per yard
$50 Tax Total
Separated by Line Items Electrical
The city has electricians on hand and can use for one part of this project. Or, the electrical can be included in the scoop of work.
Potted Planter
The city may have planters and flower on hand to fill the park. The cities planters should be identical matches to the parks in the city. Or, the planters can be in the scoop of work with the project.
95 Hardscapes Materials and Proposal for Site | Page 6 of 10 144 Downtown Revitalization Implementation Commitee | 273 10th St, Hanover ON N4N 3T1 June 14, 2013
PUBLIC SPACES
Coral Bells (Saxifragaceae, Heuchera ‘Fire Chief’)
Peoples Places
Stella d’oro Daylily (Hemerocallis ‘Ruby Stella’)
Royalty Holly Combo (Ilex x meserveae)
Dwf Blue Spruce Tree Form (Picea pungens ‘Glauca Globosa’)
PHASE 1- 3D VIEW FRONT
PHASE 1- 3D VIEW BACK
Trafalgar Interlocking Pavers
96
Elevation Views for Proposed Landscape Design and Materials for Site | Page 7 of 10 Downtown Revitalization Implementation Commitee | 273 10th St, Hanover ON N4N 3T1 144
June 14, 2013
PUBLIC SPACES P L A N T I N G NOTES: GENERAL: I. PROVINCE OF ONTARIO MANDATES CONTACTING /CALLING ONTERIO ONE BEFFORE YOU DIG 2. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE COUNTY, CITY AND/OR UTILITY COMPANIES TO LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES PRIOR TO DIGGING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, AND/OR CONSTRUCTION CAUSED BY UTILITY DAMAGE. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH A “UNIT PRICE BREAKDOWN” FOR ALL MATERIAL TO BE USED IN PROJECT: 3. I MULCH, TOPSOIL, FERTILIZER, STAKING, ETC. SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE “UNIT BREAKDOWN” COST PER PLANT. 3.2. REQUESTS FOR SUBSTITUTIONS AND CHANGES SHALL BE IN WRITING 3.3. OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE MAY IN HIS/ HER DISCRETION ADD OR DELETE UNINSTALLJED PLANT MATERIAL FROM PROJECT UTILIZING THE “UNIT BREAKDOWN” UNIT COSTS SUBMITTED. 4. CONTRACTOR(S) MUST OBTAIN SEPARATE LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION $ TREE RELOCATION/ REMOVAL PERMITS FROM THE GOVERNING AGENCIES PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE PROJECT 5. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR WITH THE GOVERNING AGENCY TO SCHEDULE A PRE CONSTRUCTION MEETING, ALONG WITH THE OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO ANY SITE PREPARATION: 6. XERISCAPE LANDSCAPE PRINCIPLES SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL SITES AS SPECIFIED IN THE ONTARIO WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS “WATERWISE ONTARIOLANDSCAPES” GUIDELINES: 7. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND GOVERNING AGENCIES OF ANY CHANGES IN MATERIAL FOR APPROVAL, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 8. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO LANDSCAPE DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL PLANTING REQUIREMENTS. 9. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL ESTIMATED QUANTITIES OF MATERIAL SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING HIS BID. PLANTING PLAN IS TO TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT LIST/SCHEDULE. 10. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN I 2 MONTHS AFTER DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE (SEE WATERING NOTE). 11. LANDSCAPE PROPOSAL GUIDES THE INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS BUT IS NOT PERFECT AND THERE MAY BE MINOR CHANGES I2. OWNER(S) OF THE IAND OR THEIR AGENTS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPE, AFTER INSTALLATION. SITE PREPARATION: I3. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CAUTION TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING SOD AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ANY DAMAGE TO THE SOD OR IRRIGATION SHALL BE REPLACED/ REPAIRED TO THE ORIGINAL STATE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR I4. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ALL EXISTING BRAZILIANPEPPER, FLORIDA HOLLY AND ALL EXOTIC NUISANCE MATERIAL ON SITE, AS REQUIRED AND/OR AS SPECIFIED ON EXISTING PRESERVATION/DISPOSITION PLANS. I5. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL ERADICATE ¢ REMOVE ALL WEEDS & GRASS, CLEAN-UP ANY DEAD MATERIAL, DEBRIS, AND RUBBISH PRIOR TO INSTALLING A NEW PLANT MATERIAL. I6. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPON-
PLANTING/TOP SOIL: I7. ALL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL AND FOREIGN MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PUXNTING AREAS AND REPLACED WITH 5O/5O MIX FILL SOIL OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. I7. I. ALL PARKING ISLANDS AND PLANTING BEDS AROUND BUILDINGS, SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO A DEPTH OF 36” MIN. AND REPLACED WITH 5O/5O PLANT MIX, OR AS PER SPECIFICATIONS. 17.2 TOPSOIL SHALL BE CLEAN AND FREE OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS, WEEDS, ROCKS, NOXIOUS PESTS AND DISEASES, AND EXHIBIT A PH OF 6.5 TO 7.0. THE TOPSOIL FOR PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE AMENDED WITH HORTICULTURAL ACCEPTABLE ORGANIC MATERIAL. ALL SOILS USED SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR THE INTENDED PLANT MATERIAL. THE SOURCE OF THE TOPSOIL SHALL BE KNOWN TO THE APPLICANT AND MUST BE ACCEPTABLE TO THE GOVERNING AGENCIES. 17.3 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO SUPPLY $ INSTALL 2” SOIL LAYER 50/50 MIX BLANKET FOR ALL NEW SOD AREAS. 17.4 THE MIN. PLANTING SOIL DEPTH SHALL BE SIX (6“) INCHES FOR GROUND COVERS, FLOWERS, SHRUBS AND HEDGES. I 7.5. TREES SHALL RECEIVE TWELVE (I 2”) INCHES OP PLANTING SOIL AROUND THE ROOT BALL. I7.5. 6” TOP SOIL REQUIRED AROUND ¢ BENEATH ALL PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL ROOT BALLS. (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) I7.6. CLEAN SAND SHALL BE USED TO BACKFILL ARID CLIMATE PALMS. NATIVE TOPSOIL ON THE SITE SHALL BE RETAINED ON-SITE AND USED WHEN THERE IS SUFFICIENT QUANTITY TO COVER AT LEAST SOME OF THE ON-SITE LANDSCAPED AREAS. PLANT MATERIAL: I8. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE MIN. GRADE OF ONTARIO NO. I & BE INSTALLED AS SPECIFIED IN “FLORIDA DEPT. OF AGRICULTURAL GRADES AND STANDARDS”, CURRENT EDITION RESPECTIVELY. I9. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ATTAINING PERMITS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF NEW PLANT MATERIAL. 20. NO TREES OR OTHER PLANT MATERIAL MAY BE PLANTED IN RIGHTS-OF—WAY (IE. SWALE AREAS) WITHOUT A PERMIT. NO SHRUB SPECIES WITH A MATURE HEIGHT THAT WILL BLOCK THE CLEAR SIGHT ZONE FROM 3O INCHES IN HEIGHT TO SIX FEET IN HEIGHT WILL BE APPROVED IN SAID SWALE AREAS. 21.1 ALL DUMPSTERS, TRANSFORMERS, UTILITY BOXES, IRRIGATION PUMP HOUSES $ MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. INCLUDING BACK FLOW PREVENTOR, A.C. UNITS, ETC., SHALL BE SCREENED WITH HEDGE MATERIAL TO THE HEIGHT OF EACH ABOVE GROUND ELEMENT FOR COMPLETE SCREENING ON THREE (3) SIDES MIN. 2 I .2. THE QUANTITY OF SCREENING SHRUBS IS IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF SHRUBS AS PROVIDED IN THE CODE CALCULATION TABLE. 2 I .3. ALL SCREENING SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED IN SUCH A WAY AS TO PROVIDE ACCESS FOR PROPER OPERATION OF EQUIPMENT BEING SCREENED AND/OR PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY AS NECESSARY. 2 I .4. ALL HEDGE MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR SCREENING PURPOSES SHALL BE PLANTED SO AS TO BE TIP TO TIP WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF PLANTING AND MAINTAINED SO AS TO FORM A CONTINUOUS VISUAL SCREEN. ADJUST SPACING AS NECESSARY AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PLANTS TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE SCREEN. 2 I .5. SHRUBS USED AS HEDGES SHALL BE ONTARIO NO. I OR BETTER 22. WITH A MIN. HT. OF 24” AND A MIN. SPREAD. OF I5”, WHEN MEASURED IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING ¢ SHALL BE A MIN. OF 3’ HT. WITHIN 2 YRS. FROM THE DATE OF PLANTING. ALL SIZES SHOWN FOR PLANT MATERIAL ON THE PLAN ARE TO BE CONSIDERED MINIMUM. ALL PLANT MATERIAL MUST MEET OR EXCEED THESE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR BOTH HEIGHT AND SPREAD. ANY OTHER REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC SHAPE OR EFFECT AS NOTED ON THE PLAN SHALL ALSO BE REQUIRED FOR ACCEPTANCE. ALL TREES ARE TO BE SINGLE TRUNK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. ALL SYNTHETIC BURLAP, SYNTHETIC STRING OR CORDS, OR WIRE BASKETS SHALL BE REMOVED BEFORE ANY TREES ARE PIANTED. ALL SYNTHETIC TAPE (I.E. TAGGING TAPE, NURSERY TAPE) SHALL BE REMOVED FROM TRUNKS, BRANCHES, ETC. BEFORE INSPECTION. THE TOP I/3 OF ANY NATURAL BURLAP SHALL BE REMOVED OR TUCKED INTO THE PLANTING HOLE BEFORE THE TREES ARE BACK FILLED SET TREES NO DEEPER THAN IT WAS IN ITS ORIGINAL GROWING WITH THE ROOT BALLS EVEN WITH, OR SLIGHTLY HIGHER (+/- I”) THAN THE FINISHED GRADE. ALL “GROUNDCOVER REQUIRES 75% COVERAGE AND I OO% WITHIN 3 MONTHS OF INSTALLATION”. PROPOSED UNDERSTORY PLANT MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE PLANTED ON TOP OF TREE OR PALM ROOT BALLS. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION, SEE SPECIFICATIONS.
MULCH: 23. A THREE (3”) INCH MIN. DEPTH OF APPROVED ORGANIC MULCH MATERIAL (MEASURED AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION) SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS NOT COVERED BY PAVEMENT, SOD, DECORATIVE STONES, OR ANNUAL FLOWER BEDS. ADDITIONALLY, EACH TREE SHALL HAVE A RING OF ORGANIC MULCH AT THE PERIMETER OF THE ROOT BALL: 24. THE USE OF CYPRESS MULCH SHOULD BE RESTRICTED AND PROHIBITING ANY MULCH CONTAINING ARSENIC. A MIN. MULCH WIDTH OF I8” BEYOND THE TRUNK OF ALL TREES, PALMS, HEDGES AND SHRUBS. MULCH SHALL E BE PLACED CLOSER THAN 3” FROM THE TRUNK OF ALL TREES AND PALMS; THE MOUNDING OF MULCH IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. MULCH SHALL BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH GROUND COVER IN ALL PLANTING BEDS (UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE). DO NOT MULCH WITHIN DESIGNATED “PRESERVE AREAS” (UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE). LANDSCAPE/IAWN AREAS: 25. LANDSCAPE MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL AREAS NOT COVERED BY MAIN AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, WALKS AND VEHICULAR USE AREAS. LANDSCAPE MATERIAL SHALL EXTEND TO ANY ABUTTING STREET, PAVEMENT EDGE AND TO THE MEAN WATER LINE OF ANY ABUTTING CANAL, LAKE OR WATERWAY. CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE IN HIS BID SOD FOR ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS VOID OF ANY PLANT MATERIAL (GROUND COVER, SHRUBS, SOD). NOT SPECIFIED IN PLANS, WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BIDDING IN REFERENCE TO “PROJECT LIMITS”. IRRIGATION: 26. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AN AUTOMATIC LAWN IRRIGATION SYSTEM GUARANTEEING IOO% COVERAGE $ MAINTAIN A 5O% MIN. OVERLAP TO ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS. THERE SHALL BE NO OVER SPRAY ONTO SIDEWALKS. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL: I . HAVE A RAIN SENSOR DEVICE INSTALLED, AS REQUIRED. 2. USE PURPLE CODED PIPE, HEADS, VALVES ETC. FOR IDENTIFYING RECLAIM WATER COMPONENTS. AS REQUIRED. 3. IRRIGATION PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT. 27. ALL GUYING, STAKING & TREE BRACING SHALL BE THE WATERING NOTE DETAILS WITH CONTRACTOR. 28. ALL NEW PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD PLANTING DETAILS FOR APPROVED METHODS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETURN I 2 MONTHS AFTER COMPLETION OF JOB AND REMOVE ALL GUYS, STAKES $ TREE BRACES. 29. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SYMBOLS SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN(S) SHALL BE CONSIDERED DIAGRAMMATIC AND SHOULD BE ADJUSTED IN THE FIELD BY CONTRACTOR TO AVOID UTILITY CONFLICTS AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS. WHERE SAID ADJUSTMENT CANNOT BE DONE WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT CHANGE TO THE PLANTING DESIGN CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR CONTRACTOR AND/ OR OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE FOR APPROVAL, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 30. TREES SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 6 FT. FROM UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND ALL SHADE TREES INSTALLED WITHIN SIX FEET OF PUBLIC/PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE (INCLUDING CURBS, WALKS, PAVEMENT, ETC.) SHALL UTILIZE A ROOT BARRIER SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE GOVERNING AGENCY. 30. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE CLEAR (7- I/2 FT. IN FRONT & SIDES WITH 4 FT. IN REAR) AROUND ALL FIRE HYDRANTS. CHECK VALVES. FIRE DEFT. EQUIPMENT. ETC., OR AS REQUIRED. 31. SHADE TREES SHALL BE PLANTED MIN. OF I5 FT. FROM LIGHT POLES. ALL SMALL TREES AND PALMS TO BE PLANTED MIN. OF 7.5 FT. FROM LIGHT POLES, OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 32. ALL SHADE TREES SHALL HAVE A 4 I/2‘ MIN. CLEAR TRUNK HEIGHT (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) AND CALIPER SHALL BE MEASURED AT D.B.H. AT TIME OF PLANTING OF I2 MONTHS FROM THE TIME OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE. DURING THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: WATERING FER THE SCHEDULE ATTACHED, RE—SEITING OF PLANTS, REPLACEMENT OF SICK OR DEAD PLANTS, ALL OTHER CARE REQUIRED FOR PROPER GROWTH. ANY PLANT MATERIAL NOT IN HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CLIENT. 33. THE I2 MONTH WARRANTEE/ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD SHALL BE EXTENDED BY 45 DAYS FOR ALL REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL AT THE CLIENT’S EXPENSE, THE CONTRACTOR WILL REPLACE ANY PLANT MATERIAL DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS OR “ACTS OF GOD” LIMITED TO HAIL. FREEZE, LIGHTNING. AND WINDS EXCEEDING 75 MPH AS DEFINED BY THE ONTARIO HURRICANE CENTER. WATERING CONTRACT SHALL BE INCLUDED IN CONTRACTORS BID 34. FOR ANY PLANT MATERIAL THAT HAS BEEN ROOT PRUNED. INSTALLED, DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION, OR WHERE PROPOSED OR 35. EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ARE NOT FUNCTIONAL. ALL WARRANTIES SHALL BE IN PLACE BY CONTRACTOR REGARDLESS OF NONOPERATIONAL IRRIGATION SYSTEMS OR AREAS WHERE NO IRRIGATION IS PROPOSED. WATERING SCHEDULE (FIRST 6 MONTHS)‘: WEEK(S) FREQUENCY (WATERING DAYS) WEEKS I THRU 6 MON., WED., FRI., SAT. 7 THRU I2 MON., WED., FRI. I3 THRU 24 MON., FRI. 6 MONTH WATERING SCHEDULE IS A MINIMUM, CONTRACTOR IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERING PLANT MATERIAL FOR THE FULL I 2 MONTH ESTABLISHMENT/WARRANTY PERIOD.
Items that need to be provided by separate contracts or sources
These materials will not be provided by River’s Edge Garden Centre by Paul Berberich. They are not in the scope of work and dollars. A quote/ proposal can be provided for extra additional needs of the park from the contractor. The items below need to be included in the park design for the longevity health of the park and security. Signage in Park
Prohibit Sign with Law Stated
WIFI sign at Heritage Square
Modern Electronic Gadgets
WIFI Station
Security Cameras
Irrigation
Irrigation Clock
Irrigation System
97 Hardscapes and Planing Note of Details for Site | Page 8 of 10 144 Downtown Revitalization Implementation Commitee | 273 10th St, Hanover ON N4N 3T1 June 14, 2013
PUBLIC SPACES
98
Planting Details | Page 9 of 10 Downtown Revitalization Implementation Commitee | 273 10th St, Hanover ON N4N 3T1 144
June 14, 2013
Peoples Places
PUBLIC SPACES Phase 1 Entrance to the park
3D COMPLETE SITE VIEW
COMPLETE PLAN VIEW
99 Complete Landscape Design Proposed for Site | Page 10 of 10 144 Downtown Revitalization Implementation Commitee | 273 10th St, Hanover ON N4N 3T1 June 14, 2013
PUBLIC SPACES | Landscape Architecture
Work Task 9
The purpose for developing the project was to create file is to facilitate consistency among all students’ work produced in this class, as well as to facilitate continuity in all projects developed by each student. This type of file documenting and final printing is consistent with architecture firms.
The instructor wanted a guarantee that all drawings are consistently printed, for all assignments students will print their drawings in full scale to PDF on standard sheet size Arch D (24x36 inches). The PDFs will then be printed into hardcopy deliverables fit‐to‐sheet on a standard Ledger (11x17 inches) page. By doing this, all students are guaranteed that the scalar differences between line‐weights printed at full scale are maintained when reduced to the Ledger size. 100
Final | WT 9 | Elderly Park | Page 1 of 2 Landscape Documentation | Instuctor: Gianno A. Feoli 144
Florida International University | SOA | LAA 5425 | Spring 2012
Document Trees and Proposal Trees for Replacements Individual Tasks on Group Assignment
PUBLIC SPACES | Landscape Architecture Details Sections of the Proposed Park
Individual Tasks on Group Assignment
101 Final | WT 9 | Elderly Park Page 2 of 2 144 Landscape Documentation | Instuctor: Gianno A. Feoli
Florida International University | SOA | LAA 5425 | Spring 2012
PUBLIC SPACES | Landscape Architecture STERI-WATER FILTRATION SITE WATER AND LIGHT FILTRATION
The project idea started with a modular fish tank. The fish tank had four pod units connected with tubes. The evolved to each pod could have something separate and different in the unit. I started drawing the units and realized there should be a direction for the pods of water current and filtration. All fish tanks have a median bases filtration. The best tanks use plant live to filter the bad chemicals like phosphorus and nitrogen. I looked at water treatment plants and how they filter water. The two functional systems were used in the project with water treatment plants and plant filtration. The system was planned out in the space provided in the program. It needed to have the ideal circulation of water and people visiting the location. The project needed one more concept to add a zing. I looked at filtration and came up with the idea for light filtration. The project had light filtration added by trees and a roof structure. It is a canopy multi colored structure that filters light with different colors onto the landscape of the project. The project two main concepts are water filtration and light filtration. Both concepts have had more development into materials, plant selection, space in project, circulation of water, and circulation of people. The section of building materials is all based on water and light filtration.
102
H4 | POD Design | Water Filtration Design 8 | LA Graduate Design 4 | Instructor: Roberto Rovira 144
Florida International University | SOA | LAA 6656 | Spring 2011
PUBLIC SPACES | Landscape Architecture FORMING A CONCEPT
The start of the filtration is with a trickle down water fountain dropping all of the sediment at bottom. The second stage is with air pumped into the water with aerators. The third system is allege and koi with a reticulating balanced water system. The forth path of the water is to go thru aquatic plants that have their root wet part or all of the time. The fifth and final system pumps needed chemicals into the water to kill bacteria with keeping the water quality. The fist, third, and final stages are large parts that were made for people to enjoy. They are intended to have a relaxing quality. The second and fourth section of water filtration has movement to the water to the next part.
Midterm Collage
I collected all the midterms posted by each individual student and I made a collage of all the good parts. It was called the Frank Einstein of creations of Landscape Architecture. It combined all the concepts to form a collective picture. The two pictures below show the collection of first site collage and then idea collage.
103
H4 | POD Design | Water Filtration 144 Design 8 | LA Graduate Design 4 | Instructor: Roberto Rovira Florida International University | SOA | LAA 6656 | Spring 2011
PUBLIC SPACES | Landscape Architecture FINAL CONCEPT
The major design ideas that will be implemented are creating a FIU Engineering Campus Central Park that will be a lively hub of activity. This central hub will be a gathering spot for FIU students and faculty, and a place for local residents to gather. The hub will be covered with a permeable overhead structure to help define a sense of place; large shade trees will provide ample shade to cool the microclimate. This central lawn will provide ample seating and Wi-Fi access. This central lawn will also showcase engineering technologies that are being tested by the university. Opportunities 1) Location/ Accessibility 2) Public transportation 3) Water body/ Quarry 4) Proximity to major highways 5) Commerce 6) Berms 7) Potential axis from edge building to park 8) Potential community involvement 9) Wall of Wind 10) Open space
DESIGN PROPOSAL POD INTEGRATION
We had to incorporate the pods into the site. We were unbiased about the designer and selected the pods based on concept. Then we took all six of the best pods and places them into the site. We undraped the pods, extended them, and copied parts of them. We worked on overlapping all of the parts to make one homogenous pre site plan.
Constraints 1) Heavy traffic flow impedes pedestrian acc. 2) Disconnection between park and campus 3) Disconnected park experience 4) Lack of facilities 5) Safety concerns 6) County imposed regulations/ Restrictions 7) Community perception/ Image ability 8) Lack of infrastructure/ Utilities
104
Final | Engineering Campus Park | Azul Profundo Design 8 | LA Graduate Design 4 | Instructor: Roberto Rovira 144
Florida International University | SOA | LAA 6656 | Spring 2011
PUBLIC SPACES | Landscape Architecture
Laser cut Model
The cross sections show the topography of four different parts of the site. There are raises and depressions in the elevation of the land. With water collecting in the depressions.
L A K E
WT I U NN DN E L
V I E W
V I E W
105 Final | Engineering Campus Park | Azul Profundo 144 Design 8 | LA Graduate Design 4 | Instructor: Roberto Rovira Florida International University | SOA | LAA 6656 | Spring 2011
PUBLIC SPACES | Urban Design Downtown Fort Lauderdale- Urban Campus
The project was to observe River Front’s failing problem and propose a plan to energize the site. This was a group project and we decided to propose a college campus. This campus would reuse some of the pre-existing buildings in River Front. The pictures on this page are my work on the group project. These are photo collages I made to graphically show our idea.
A C T I V I T Y 106
Final | Activating River Front | Urban Campus Site Planning | Instructor: Eric Dumbaugh 144
Florida Atlantic University | SURP | URP 6873 | Summer 2012
C O N N E C T I V I T Y
This images show how portions of the site that we are intending to preserve and/or retrofit. The focus for this campus project will be transit and pedestrian accessibility. It will incorporate the bus station on Broward, the upcoming Wave stop, FEC commuter line as well as place bike sharing stands along the campus. The FEC rail station will be located next to the existing parking garage, just south of Broward Blvd.
A D A P T A B I L I T Y 107
Final | Activating River Front | Urban Campus 144 Site Planning | Instructor: Eric Dumbaugh
Florida Atlantic University | SURP | URP 6873 | Summer 2012
PUBLIC SPACES | Urban Design Final Design Concept- Ripples
The concept started as above and below. The reason is because the residential portion of the project was on the north side of the site while the commercial side was on the south side of the site. The islands are raised above the water so there is an elevated view that gives an above and below effect. The concept evolved into interior and exterior space involving the residential northern side and the southern commercial side. The two islands also took interior and exterior space. Watson and Terminal Island also had interior and exterior space. The concept continued to evolve into ripples that satisfy both above and below interior and exterior space. The ripples were to involve the two islands and every part of the site that would be modified. The ripples gave a horizontal access point and gave the site elevation. This would give a “x” and a “y” coordinate, but the “z” axis was to be taken to an artistic will. The profile view of Terminal Island and colored in the ripples on the way that they worked themselves out. Then I looked at the overlap of each of the colors. This formed the shapes of the two islands.
Concept Sketch
Concept Glass Model
Scale: 1” = 40’
108 144
Module 5 | Final | Ripples Design 6 | LA Graduate Design 2 | Instructor: Marsh Kriplen Florida International University | SOA | LAA 6655 | Spring
PUBLIC SPACES | Urban Design ROADWAY CIRCULATION
I started with the roadways, pathways, and buildings in design and worked my way out to topography, the elevated and built up land masses. All three of these items had to work together to make the ripples form properly. After this the landscape formed the outer shells of the ripples to provide coverage and shade. The trees provide shade and coverage. There are even walls inserted to baffle the noise of McArthur Causeway. This also helped to create an interior space for the
Scale: 1” = 40’
CONCEPTUAL SPACE
Scale: 1” = 40’
The amphitheater and the parking lot and the golf driving range and the preexisting buildings were incorporated into this concept. The walkways and roadways were also incorporated into this idea. The landscape beds had the same concept of the curvilinear path. They formed the same ripple patterns. The grass was to provide open space on the interior. The hostile and the topography are supposed to provide elevated seating and viewing for the amphitheater in the center.
109 Module 5 | Final | Ripples 144 Design 6 | LA Graduate Design 2 | Instructor: Marsh Kriplen Florida International University | SOA | LAA 6655 | Spring
CONTRIBUTION to the
Community
COMMUNITY | Urban Planning 5 things to Map layouts with GIS 1) Intended Audience- The design of the map should have qualities for intended audience and can be understood by that frame of people viewing 2) Tell a Story- The map needs to be able to explain from start to finish a nice cohesive project with story, so the audience can understand what the map is showing. The story needs to be concise and not intentionally or unintentionally mislead people. 3) Included Information- Making sure that the precise information is included in the map. You need to include enough information for the map to be understood by the audience but not too much information to overwhelm or confuse the audience. 4) Number of Maps- The idea can be conveyed in one map or multiple map layouts may be needed to convey the point. This can be done in different ways like the same scale map but different data information or different scale maps conveying the same point. 5) Graphics and Colors- The map has to have graphics that are compatible with the data and that are understandable by the audience. Graphics should not be abstract. The color should stick to a theme and be compatible with the data. The colors should not be too wild and most the time be representative of the data colors. Example, water is typically blue and residential housing is yellow. Straying from the colors can confuse the audience like making the water red. The audience may think there was intentional reason for the red water like danger.
112
Assignment 10 | Location for a New Eco-Studies School Intro to GIS | Insructor: Ann-Margaret Esnard 144
Florida Atlantic University | SURP | URP 6270 | Fall 2012
COMMUNITY | Urban Planning
113
Assignment 5 | Location for Vacant Parcels that are Suitable 144 Intro to GIS | Insructor: Ann-Margaret Esnard
Florida Atlantic University | SURP | URP 6270 | Fall 2012
COMMUNITY | Urban Design
SITE PLAN ANALYSIS
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
P ROADWAY CIRCULATION- The new roadways are proposed to go an S shape around the site to connect East Dania Beach Boulevard R in and Gulfstream road. This circulation brings the visitors though the site. O There is still a road to connect visitors to check in at the front building. P O S SITE PARKING- The main site parking it on the East of the property. It is surrounding the preexisting buildA part ing and is already there. The proposal is to share parking beL tween the two properties and reduce parking on the West part of the site. There are some high end cabin homes with parking.
WALKING TRAILS- The main trails connect the main building and
parking to the secluded cabins. This gives connection to the cabins without parking. These trails are people that like walking and like to experience the natural environment. The secondary paths take you threw the salt water mash.
VACATION RETREAT BUILDINGS- The primary building is the guest checking on the South West of the site. The second structure is large building that is proposed to become more natural. Third proposal is the cabins to be in the natural environment. There are three different types of sleeping areas.
Preserve Inventory
114
Weiner’s Mobile Park Site Planning | Instructor: Kasama Polakit 144
Florida Atlantic University | URP 4870/ 6873 | Fall 2012
COMMUNITY | Urban Design CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
Preserving the Green Space
PROJECT CONCEPT- The main idea of this project is to bring the Motel D E S I G N
6 and the Weiner’s Mobile Trailer park back to the natural environment. This site can be made to conserving the preserve parks and wet land areas. The visitors can observe and enjoy the natural peaceful environment. This space can be enjoyed with log cabin, canoeing, and preserved walking paths. These visitors will respect nature and have a relaxing time with their visit. The urban city is close to the site and this is to try to separate from the large scale buildings. This proposal will maintain the unique salt water mash preserves.
S I T E P L A N 115 Weiner’s Mobile Park 144 Site Planning | Instructor: Kasama Polakit
Florida Atlantic University | URP 4870/ 6873 | Fall 2012
COMMUNITY | Architecture
Objectives of the study- Objectives of the study are to make sure the
sites would be suitable for Advanced Linen Services. This is a report goes through the programming and a site analysis study. It goes over the two pre selected sites and if the program will be compatible with the sites. Also, to determine what Advanced Linen Services needs in a site and what they would require if selecting a different site. The report goes over space requirements for the linen service systems and equipment needs. This study makes sure the zoning and codes of the sites are correct for the linen service. This is a complete analysis to insure Advanced Linen Service to open a new location that complies with standards above most facilities.
Site 1
ACTUAL REQUIRED Required Actual Zoning I- Industrial I- Industrial Zoning I Industrial Permitted Uses Dry Cleaning and Laudries Permited Uses Laundry Allowed Min. lot size 34500 SF 10000 SF Min. Lot Area 10000 sq ft Exceeded SetBacks Min. Lot Width 100 ft Exceeded Front 25 25 Site Area 300 by 115 34500 sq ft Back 10 10 FAR 100 by 34500 sq ft 34500 sq ft Sides 5 5 Max Footprint .5by34500 sq ft 17250 sq ft Max height NA 75 FT Max Landscape .15by34500sq ft 5175sq ft FAR 34500 SF 1 Off-Street Parking 10000/500 + Building Max Footprint 17250 SF 50% 7250/1000=3115 28 Spaces Green Space 5175 SF 15% Min. lot width 115 Ft 100 FT
Site 2
ACTUAL REQUIRED Required Actual Zoning I- Industrial I- Industrial Zoning I Industrial Permitted Uses Dry Cleaning and Laudries Permited Uses Laundry Allowed Min. lot size 42300 SF 10000 SF Min. Lot Area 10000 sq ft Exceeded SetBacks Min. Lot Width 100 ft Exceeded Front 25 25 Site Area 235 by 180 42300 sq ft Back 10 10 FAR 100 by 42300 sq ft 42300 sq ft Sides 5 5 Max Footprint .5by42300 sq ft 21150 sq ft Max height NA 75 FT Max Landscape .15by42300sq ft 6345 sq ft FAR 42300 SF 1 Off-Street Parking 10000/500 + Building Max Footprint 21150 SF 50% 11150/1000=3115 32 Spaces Green Space 6345 SF 15% Min. lot width 235 FT 100 FT
116
Advanced Linen Service | Deerfield Beach Professional Practices 3 | Insrtuctor: Ed O’Donnell 144
Florida Atlantic University | SOA | ARC 5272 | Fall 2012
COMMUNITY | Architecture Required Floor Space THE PLANT AREA
Quanity Clearance Width Length Area Total Square Feet Soiled Linen Receiving Area Bins/ Carts 30 NA 3’ 5’ 15 600 Soiled Linen Staging Area Bins/ Carts 110 NA 3’ 5’ 15 1650 Cart Dump Station 1 NA 5’ 6’ 30 30 Break-up Table 1 All sides 2’ 6’ 10’ 140 140 Sorting Platform 1 All sides 2’ 4’ 60’ 512 512 Soiled Linen Sling Bag Rails 12 5’ b. rails 40’ Average 5’ *13= 65’ 200 2600 Washer Extractors 165 lbs 1 All sides 2’ 6’ 8’ 120 120 95 lbs 1 All sides 2’ 4’ 7’ 88 88 95 lbs 1 All sides 2’ 4’ 7’ 88 88 Module Continuous Batch Washer 1 (12) All sides 8’ 9’ 60’ 1900 1900 Liquid Supply Delivery System 1 All sides 2’ 4’ 15’ 152 152 Shuttle Rack 1 All sides 2’ 9’ 78’ 1066 1066 Large Dryers 200 to 300 lbs 10 All sides 2’ 8’ 11’ 180 1800 Small Dryers 190 lbs 2 All sides 2’ 5’ 7’ 99 198 120 lbs 2 All sides 2’ 5’ 6’ 90 180 Folding Stage Bins/ Carts 30 NA 3’ 5’ 15 450 Small Piece Folders 4 All sides 4’ 5’ 12’ 260 1040 Sheet Separator 2 All sides 2’ 5’ 17’ 189 378 Flatwork Irons Spreader Feeder, 2 Roll Irons, 4 Lane Folder/ Cross Folder 2 All sides 8’ 18’ 34’ 1700 3400 Clean Linen Staging Bin/ Cart 270 NA 3’ 5’ 15 4050 20442 Sub-Total Circulation 15% to the total required Plant Area 15% 3066.3 Plant Area Total 23508.3 Total
Ancillary Area
Description of the programming objectives-
Programming objectives where to plan out the exterior space and interior space to make sure the entire component would fit in the square feet given in the site. Also, to go through zoning and code to make sure that the Advanced Linen Services is able to operate at the two different pre selected site locations. Then, objectively select a site or determine if both sites are not suitable of Advanced Linen Services. Finally, diagrammatically determine the needs of the linen service.
Description of the potential sites-
Site 1 is located at 1400 N.W. 3rd Street Deerfield Beach Florida 33442 It is a very sender rectangular site and located around a lot of other commercial businesses. The site would work well with all the other commercial businesses surrounding the site. It is very close to I95 and Hillsboro and has an ideal location to the interstate. This would make travel times for pickup and delivery shorter. The site 2 is at 1219 W. Newport Center Dr. Deerfield Beach Florida 33442 It is a rectangular site and located around a lot of other commercial businesses. The site would work well with all the other commercial businesses surrounding the site. It is very close to I95 and Hillsboro and has an ideal location to the interstate. This would make travel times for pickup and delivery shorter.
Brief Statement of Recommendations- The building has to be
Quanity Clearance Width Length Area Total Square Feet able to hold all the equipment, equipment clearance, circulation, bathrooms, offices, Boiler Room and Compressor Plant 1 1500 1500 break rooms, storage, and delivery bays. It needs to meet the requirements eight 35’ Loading Dock / Staging 8 12’ 15’ 180 1440 trucks delivering or receiving at the same time. Also, it needs to comply with code Office Loading Dock Office 1 10’ 10’ 100 100 Desks 3 3’ 6’ 18 54 and zoning for the locations with parking, handicapped parking, and landscaped Plant Area Restroom Based on plant floor population of 20 people 50% 816 area, setbacks, permitted use, maximum foot print, and maximum height. This report Locker Rooms Soiled Linen Disposal 1 6’ 10’ 60 60 covers the requirements and the recommendation to comply with the requirements. 1/2 Height Lockers for each employee 235 (1/2) 2’ 2’ 4 472 Showers per shift population 30 people 30 4’ 4’ 20 600 Toilets per shift population 30 people reg. 24 8’ 3’ 24 576 Required Size Hadicabbed 6 8’ 5’ 40 240 Set Backs Front 25’ 5858 Sub-Total Side 5’ Storage 10% of Plant Area 10% 585.8 Back 10’ 6443.8 Sub-Total Min Floor Area 1000 SF Circulation 15% to the total required Plant Area 15% 966.57 Max Floor Area 1.00 7410.37 Total- REQUIRED SPACE Max Building Foot Print 50% 32075.57Total- INTERIOR SPACE Maximum Height 75’
Zoning Requirements
Administrative Area
Quanity Clearance Width Length Area Total Square Feet Entry Lobby 1 15’ 20’ 300 300 Plant Floor Supervisors- Office w/ 3 desks 1 10’ 10’ 100 100 Executive Offices 3 3’ 6’ 18 54 Exec. Admin Desks 2 3’ 6’ 18 36 Sales Desks 3 3’ 6’ 18 54 Account Managers- Desks 4 3’ 6’ 18 72 Showroom 15’ 20’ 300 300 Accounting Desks 5 3’ 6’ 18 90 1006 Sub Total Circulation and Restrooms 15% to the total required Administration Area 150.9 Administrative Areas Total 1156.9 Total
Recommendation and the reasons / information that your recom-
mendations are based on the conclusions that may or may not be drawn from the studies Both sites are way too small but in great industrial parks. Site one is less than half of the size needed. I would recommend checking if adjacent parcels are available to both of the sites. With more space the program would work with zoning of the location. They both have quick access to the interstate and have good commercial industry neighbors. Site 1 is way too small with different innovative ideas with elevators for the linen and would cost a great deal more with multiple floors. Site Required Exterior Space- Exterior Areas 2 has enough space for the building but not for 8 trucks and parking. I would not Truck Court Exterior-Drive Court/ Apron 8 recommend Site 2 but if needed it could work if there was a second floor cre Turning Raduis 8 40’ 12’ 480 3840 ated for administration and some ancillary floor space. The truck courtyard and Truck 35’ 8 35’ 12’ 420 3360 Parking as Required by Zoning Code 41 22’ 9’ 108 4428 landscaped area would be would be at the minimum. Also, an adjacent lot would 32076; 1000/500= 20+ (22076/100) = 43 have to be found for parking for this building. The building would need to include Hadicabbed 2 22’ 13’ 286 572 handicapped parking close to the building. 12200 Total
117 Advanced Linen Service | Deerfield Beach 144 Professional Practices 3 | Insrtuctor: Ed O’Donnell Florida Atlantic University | SOA | ARC 5272 | Fall 2012
COMMUNITY | Urban Design
Program Analysis
Design Philosophy
To remain stable in the face of change and, more importantly, to be able to initiate necessary changes, that is a Catalyst. Catalyst Architecture endeavors to be a firm that will precipitate changes for the better. Our goal is to design aesthetically pleasing and efficient design for the community; affordable housing that is to incorporate not only the basic human need of shelter but also food. This entails the inclusion of green walls, courtyard gardens and roof gardens that will serve to provide food to the residents. This is in addition to the several known benefits of such gardens, such as serving to reduce the building’s footprint, reducing the building’s heat exposure, reducing carbon dioxide and beautifying the surroundings. This results in design that is beneficial for the community as well as the environment. Designing sustainable, affordable housing that also contributes to the residents’ wellbeing is our main objective. This catalyst architecture, we hope, will cause a chain reaction in the community, serving as inspiration for the community to continue changing in a similar model.
Floor Break Down on Quantity and Size
The encouraged programs for the site at the different levels of the buildings. The diagrams cover the basics of the ground floor with retail and park. The next level has office space and third level is usually designated for residential.
FAT Village is located in one of the nation’s fastest-growing regions, Fort Lauderdale has lagged dramatically behind neighboring civic centers in population growth. As national trends indicate a rebirth of city living, Downtown Fort Lauderdale is poised to support a significant increase in its residential population which, in turn, will support and sustain future economic development and urban vitality. FAT Village can be redevelopment can be managed in a responsible, sustainable way that can create a vibrant, mixed-use city center.
Principle 2
Program Space Breakdown
Principle 1
Housing opportunities should exist for a variety of income levels and family types. Workforce housing, live-work units, family-oriented housing, and luxury condominiums are just a few of the residential types that should co-exist to encourage a diverse.
Principle 3
Building on the unique characteristics of each area, these distinct identities should be strengthened and encouraged, avoiding approaches that are either too homogeneous or too sporadic to create a sense of place.
CATALYST R C
1st Level
Square Feet Quanity 1st Floor- Retail and Restaurant Retail Restaurant Parking \ Tare Space Total Square Feet 2nd Floor- Office Space Small Office Medium Office Large Office Total Square Feet 3rd Floor- Gallery Space Total Square Feet 4th Floor- Residental Sudio Apartments Total Square Feet 5th Floor- Medium Residental 6th Floor- High End Residental Total Square Feet
650 2000 5000 8950
3 1 1
500 750 1000 9000
6 4 3 1
8000 600 7200 1000 1500 6000
Costs
200 150 100 50 0
Company Logo
3 Retail Shops Tare Space
Small Office
12
Medium Office Large Office
6 4
The 4th, 5th, and 6th floor has a taper for green space. This space starts with the 3rd floor roof and increases in size up to the 6th floor. This is the break down of the decreasing size of units to the top floor and also the increasing size of units . The 4th floor units start as studio base with 500 square feet and then increase at 6 th floor to 1500 square units.
Restaurant
Studios Apartments 5th Floor- Residental Medium 6th Floor- Residental High End
1500 1000 500 0 4th FloorResidental Low End
5th FloorResidental Medium
6th FloorResidental High End
Cost of Building each part of mixed use
Each component of the project has a different estimated cost based on the level of detail and materials for the component.
The company logo was created to display all the ideals of the a company in a logo. It took many different ideas and thoughts to come up with a logo that was suitable for the project. This project developed the processes of starting a company in the future or the type of company that we may want to work for in the future.
118
Company Ideals | Catalyst Architecture Research Methods | Instructor: Francis Lyn 144
Florida Atlantic University | SOA | ARC 5910 | Summer 2012
COMMUNITY | Urban Design
Program Statement
Squa re Fo o t Co st Est ima t e R e po rt Estimate Name: FAT Villa g e Sho ps a nd R e side nc e s Mixe d Use w it h St uc c o o n Co nc re t e B lo c k / St e e l Building Type: Jo ist s Location: FO R T L AUD ER D AL E, FL Story Count: 6 Story Height (L.F.): 10 t o 14 Data Release: Ye a r 2012 Q ua rt e r 2 R e st a ura nt w it h St uc c o o n Co nc re t e B lo c k / St e e l Jo ist s (3000 s. f . ) First L e ve l S ubst ruc t ure A S he ll B I nt e rio rs C S e rvic e s D S pe c ia l Co nst ruc t io n F SubTo t a l Co nt ra c t o r Fe e s (G e ne ra l Co ndit io ns, O ve rhe a d, Pro f it ) Arc hit e c t ura l Fe e s Use r Fe e s To t a l B uilding Co st St o re , R e t a il w it h Pa int e d R e inf o rc e d Co nc re t e / St e e l First L e ve l Jo ist s (3400 s. f . ) S ubst ruc t ure A S he ll B I nt e rio rs C S e rvic e s D S pe c ia l Co nst ruc t io n F SubTo t a l Co nt ra c t o r Fe e s (G e ne ra l Co ndit io ns, O ve rhe a d, Pro f it ) Arc hit e c t ura l Fe e s Use r Fe e s To t a l B uilding Co st Se c o nd L e ve l O f f ic e 1 St o ry w it h EI FS o n Me t a l St uds / St e e l R o o f S ubst ruc t ure A S he ll B I nt e rio rs C S e rvic e s D S pe c ia l Co nst ruc t io n F SubTo t a l Co nt ra c t o r Fe e s (G e ne ra l Co ndit io ns, O ve rhe a d, Pro f it ) Arc hit e c t ura l Fe e s Use r Fe e s To t a l B uilding Co st G a lle ry, 1 St o ry w it h Co nc re t e B lo c k / St e e l Fra me Third L e ve l (8000 s. f . ) S ubst ruc t ure A S he ll B I nt e rio rs C S e rvic e s D S pe c ia l Co nst ruc t io n F SubTo t a l Co nt ra c t o r Fe e s (G e ne ra l Co ndit io ns, O ve rhe a d, Pro f it ) Arc hit e c t ura l Fe e s To t a l B uilding Co st Fo urt h-Six Apa rt me nt , 3 St o ry w it h St uc c o o n Co nc re t e B lo c k / L e ve ls St e e l Jo ist s (21000 s. f . ) S ubst ruc t ure A S he ll B I nt e rio rs C S e rvic e s D S pe c ia l Co nst ruc t io n F SubTo t a l Co nt ra c t o r Fe e s (G e ne ra l Co ndit io ns, O ve rhe a d, Pro f it ) Arc hit e c t ura l Fe e s To t a l B uilding Co st Full B uilding Co st L a nd Pro pe rt y Co st B uilding Sit e Wo rk
Background % o f To t a l 8. 80% 23. 40% 14. 70% 53. 20% 0. 00%
Co st Pe r S. F. $12. 83 $34. 33 $21. 50 $78. 00 $0. 00
Co st $38, 500 $103, 000 $64, 500 $234, 000 $0
100% 25. 00% 10. 00% 0. 00%
$146. 67 $36. 67 $18. 33 $0. 00 $201. 67
$440, 000 $110, 000 $55, 000 $0 $605, 000
% o f To t a l 11. 90% 34. 40% 12. 70% 41. 00% 0. 00%
Co st Pe r S. F. $12. 50 $36. 18 $13. 38 $43. 09 $0. 00
Co st $42, 500 $123, 000 $45, 500 $146, 500 $0
100% 25. 00% 10. 00% 0. 00%
$105. 15 $26. 32 $13. 09 $0. 00 $144. 56 Co st Pe r S. F. $10. 06 $29. 00 $24. 61 $50. 72 $0. 00
$357, 500 $89, 500 $44, 500 $0 $491, 500 Co st $90, 500 $261, 000 $221, 500 $456, 500 $0
100% 25. 00% 10. 00% 0. 00%
$114. 39 $28. 61 $14. 28 $0. 00 $157. 28
$1, 029, 500 $257, 500 $128, 500 $0 $1, 415, 500
% o f To t a l 13. 40% 25. 80% 7. 10% 53. 70% 0. 00%
Co st Pe r S. F. $13. 19 $25. 31 $7. 00 $52. 81 $0. 00
Co st $105, 500 $202, 500 $56, 000 $422, 500 $0
100% 25. 00% 10. 00%
$98. 31 $24. 56 $12. 31 $135. 18
$786, 500 $196, 500 $98, 500 $1, 081, 500
% o f To t a l 4. 40% 20. 90% 25. 50% 49. 10% 0. 00% 100% 25. 00% 10. 00%
Co st Pe r S. F. $4. 76 $22. 50 $27. 43 $52. 81 $0. 00 $107. 50 $26. 88 $13. 43 $147. 81
Co st $100, 000 $472, 500 $576, 000 $1, 109, 000 $0 $2, 257, 500 $564, 500 $282, 000 $3, 104, 000 $6, 697, 500 $328, 789
% o f To t a l 8. 80% 25. 40% 21. 50% 44. 30% 0. 00%
Our mission is to incorporate an ecological approach to design. To create an aesthetically pleasing environment. Community is a struggling art’s district. Changes needed for it to be an urban village. Addition of more mixed-use buildings could facilitate the integration of work-play environments
Purpose + Scope of Project
To encourage a thriving urban village environment in this art’s district. Integration of retail shops, offices and art galleries with affordable housing. 4 or 5 story mixed-use building, including affordable housing with garden spaces.
Occupants + Activities
1) People in need of affordable housing 2) Artists, shop owners, entrepreneurs, restaurateurs, business people, etc. 3) A wide range of activities would be encouraged – living, working, community activities, art walks, gallery exhibitions, street performers, etc..
Special Considerations
1) Green roofs, green walls and gardens and sustainable architecture strategies will be implemented 2)Affordability considerations, i.e. expensive design choices which aid in sustainability but which will create a return on investment in the future.
Design in Site
This is a rough sketch that gives an idea of the project installed into the site. The building uses up a majority of the property space but loses with green space courtyard for cooling the building. The volume of the building matches the context and connects future plans of projects coming to the neighborhood. Also, matches the residential area to the South.
$1, 004, 625
119 Catalyst Architecture | Sustainable Building 144 Research Methods | Instructor: Francis Lyn
Florida Atlantic University | SOA | ARC 5910 | Summer 2012
COMMUNITY | Urban Planning
Book: Fort Lauderdale BeachInventory, Research, Analysis, Problem Statement and Design
This book illustrates and explains a study analysis for a section of Fort Lauderdale. Located by the beach the site is able to provide great commercial, residential and entertainment area. To finalize, the project will include recommendations and problem solving strategies in order to make it a better place. Therefore providing a better traffic flow and use of space on an area that stretches about 1.30 miles long. Five steps were taken with the collaboration Florida Atlantic University students, Alexander H. Schober, Angel Hamilton, Diego Ruiz, Karina da Luz and Carlos Espejo for the final recommendations of this project. First a better background check will be taken for the area of research. This will give a further understanding of the study area and its issues. Second, research is made in order to learn about present concerns. The utilization of maps and statistics is seen in this step as well. Third an analysis is made with the help of the SWOT analysis. Finally, a final design and recommendations for the area are accomplished with the help of visual computer software.
Road Network
The GIS shape of Fort Lauderdale main road network connecting the city to the beach. The shape of Fort Lauderdale is irregular because of other cities adjacent to city. These main networks can use development in the sparse areas.
GIS Road Network
The road network was constructed as a basic grid system and is broken up by recessed topography of water. The grid system gives a good connection threw the main parts the city and a good flow.
GIS Population
Looking at the a population map gives us a better understanding of the area. The density being in the center of Fort Lauderdale. Lower density is located on peninsula islands and no population in the preserve area.
120
Final- Objective 2 | Book on Fort Lauderdale Beach Plan Making and Design | Instructor: Sherryl Muriente 144
Florida Atlantic University | SURP | URP 4343 | Fall 2012
COMMUNITY | Urban Planning Video: Fort Lauderdale Beach Site Documentary
This video illustrates and explains a study analysis for a section of Fort Lauderdale. Located by the beach the site is able to provide great commercial, residential and entertainment area. The video includes an inventory of the site. It has been uploaded to YouTube. Florida Fort Lauderdale Beach Site Documentary from FAU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKx2LlxObkg
Barriers
The residential peninsula islands with water breaks up the street disconnection traveling to the beach. This barrier is a large area causing a lot of disconnection for the area. People can use cars or walk over these barriers. The residents have water front access for their boats.
Green Space
The green space is sporadic for the site and has space by the water but is not used enough by the water. There is a lot of preexisting landscape by the East side of the core of the city before it become water canals.
Activity in the Site
The site is activated by may different places. There is a mixed variety of places through the site. There is the beautiful beach, entertainment, night life, vacation locations, and fun for the family.
Residential and Industrial
The main commercial spaces are located by AIA, US1, and Las Olas Blvd. The residential space sprawls out as infill through the peninsulas and East of US1.
121 Midterm | Video on Fort Lauderdale Beach 144 Plan Making and Design | Instructor: Sherryl Muriente
Florida Atlantic University | SURP | URP 4343 | Fall 2012
COMMUNITY | Architecture Alexander H. Schober MDC Architecture 3DMax Final Video Total Car Condo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McUJh5josjE
122
Final | 3D Building | Car Condo Computer Aided Drafting 2 | Instructor: Alex Perez 144
Miami Dade College | ARC 2172 | Summer 2009
COMMUNITY | Architecture
123 Final | 3D Building | Car Condo 144 Computer Aided Drafting 2 | Instructor: Alex Perez
Miami Dade College | ARC 2172 | Summer 2009
DESIGNING a great place for
Humanity
Humanity | Landscape Architecture and Water Flow Inventory and Analysis Traffic It is of Florida traffic flow visiting Lake Okeechobee. This is showing the direct point that most of the people visit at Lake Okeechobee. It shows were the central focus of the place that visitors see visiting Florida.
The first diagram (1) is showing the topography difference more on the North West and elevation on the North West does not have much change. This also were the water is coming from in direction or collected. The second diagram (2) shows how a good site The first diagram (3) is showing the visiting traffic to the area. This shows the first point that everyone sees of Lake Okeechobee. This is the introduction and is very import to the experience of the lake. The second diagram (4) is showing the were Lake Okeechobee needs to focus their efforts to restore and become more inviting. The first diagram (5) is showing the water flow into Lake Okeechobee and the directional flow out. The second diagram (6) shows the needed directional collection of water from all three sides of the lake. This collection starts West, North, and East of the lake with flow toward the lake. The first diagram (7) is showing the combined path into Lake Okeechobee with elevation, water, and vehicular travel. The second diagram (8) shows parts combined and that both vertically should be created equal. The combined parts need equal introduction into Lake Okeechobee.
126
Elevation Map and Sites around Lake Okeechobee This shows places visited and the conditions of topography with the elevations below. The elevations show the height of the Lake in comparison to the land surrounding the lake, rim canal, and retaining mound to keep water in the lake. It shows the vegetation around the lake and parts that have more plants. This shows the flat elevation of the site of the project.
Project 1 | Lake Okeechobee | Site Analysis Design 7 | LA Graduate Design 3 | | Instructor: Ebru Ozer 144
Florida International University | SOA | LAA 6655 | Fall 2010
Florida Water Flow Diagram 1 The diagram is showing todays water flow. It shows the water going outward and filteration of the water after going outward. Florida Water Flow Diagram 2 The diagram is showing ideal water flow. It shows the water going outward and filteration of the water after going outward. Florida Water Flow Diagram 3 The diagram is showing the future water flow with more canals being built in the future. It shows the water going outward and shows how there is more needed water collection to fill Lake Okeechobee.
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
The intent or objective to Lake Okeechobee is having a good introduction. It would start the connection to the other parts of the lake. The diagramming in this book provides a regional site scale of Lake Okeechobee and a smaller site scale of the City of Okeechobee. The lake has to have a good connection with all of its parts. The diagrams show the water coming in from canal and the canals that let the water leave. The smaller site is just on port were water comes in and goes out. The introduction is important to visitors and the connections to the other part.
Abstract Design
Humanity | Landscape Architecture
PROJECT CONCEPT
Design Diagram | Showing a Design in Creating Channels - The diagram shows were water can be directionally caught and run into an area of retention. This would help plant life and animal life in this area. The idea is to have an even distribution of water in the site with equal canals covering the area. Analysis Diagram | Showing Water PocketsThe diagram shows water pockets that go no direction and water just sits in one place. This causes plants and animals to go thru extreme conditions during wet and dry seasons. Very little plants could live thru the extreme of wet conditions and then really dry with no rain. The problem has a resolution with canal to drain the excess of water during rainy season.
Three Sister Nodes
Alnitak
Mintaka
Alnilam
The design is in the north part of Lake Okeechobee. Its purpose is creating a natural preserve area with parks, recreations, and wildlife. It has three retention ponds collecting the water from the new canals and used to maintain the plant and animal life to the pineland area of the site. It will add water flow and a filtration system to the area.
Design Diagram | Showing a Three Retention Ponds | Collecting Water- This is a diagram of three retention ponds collecting water and covering the site. It still needs a more elaborate canal system but this is the basics. It may look a little like crop circles but this is the beginning of the design.
127 Project 3 | Lake Okeechobee | Detailed Design & Defense | Three Nodes 144 Design 7 | LA Graduate Design 3 | | Instructor: Ebru Ozer Florida International University | SOA | LAA 6655 | Fall 2010
Humanity | Urban Design
REGION
CITY
128 144
WT5 | Analysis Book Analysis Methods | Insructor: Gianno A. Feoli
Florida International University | SOA | LAA 6382 | Summer 2010
Humanity | Urban Design
SITE
Assignment was to complete an Analysis Book with 88 pages in 22 DAYS
COMMUNITY
129 WT5 | Analysis Book 144 Analysis Methods | Insructor: Gianno A. Feoli
Florida International University | SOA | LAA 6382 | Summer 2010
Humanity | Landscape Architecture THESIS QUESTION: What types of city designs in the central core can become a catalyst for the city with facetious amusement?
What types of city designs can develop and raise people to have a better culture? There are things that make a great city. But you have to think, “What types of city designs in the central core can becomes a catalyst for the city with facetious amusement? Also; when, why, and what activities do people engage in with the site? Third, How does the site connect with the city? What are the percentage of retail stores, art, bars, dinning, and cinema; which ones play an active role in the site? Fourth, How will the site affect surrounding areas? Fifth, What could make the site renowned? Advertising? People? Culture? Sixth, What element takes the site to a higher level of design? This paper will take a look at the lifestyle malls from the beginning in 1600’s. They started out as town market squares were people would buy and trade goods. They evolved to closed in and confined malls. They have even developed into a Wal-marts and cookie cutter shopping plazas that have destroyed some of our nation. They shopping areas have evolved and changed in sometimes a bad direction. But, landscape architects are getting a hold of ideas and changes to make shopping more enjoyable. There can be great changes made to the malls we have today to be better on our lifestyle. Lifestyle malls are the best described to help the people in a location and main design focus is to incorporate landscaping into the design. The idea with the times square has been around for a thousand years and evolves vendors to bring there things together for sale. It also involves people coming together for enjoyment, entertainment, and amusement. We start by looking at a city and the core that completes the city. It makes the biggest difference on the market or mall construction. There has to be parts to the systems that guides the system and will affect the influence of the culture in an area. Major systems that will affect the city are school, parks, roadways (pedestrian and vehicular traffic), housing (apartments, HOA communities, neighborhoods), shopping (confined to an area or evenly spaced), and individual owned of stores. Top six places to live that are great cities are Vienna, Zurich, Geneva, Switzerland, Austria, and European Cities. To look at a city close to Florida we can look at Atlanta George. In the last ten years Atlanta has had some major changes to become a great place to live based on its statistics. The statistics below are above average but not to extreme. Looking at the statistics you can from a judgment of how well the town is doing. These statistics could help us look at where another city needs help. This could help in the design of the city or change of the core parts to influence the city in the correct direction. Baseline information: Architecture design in Atlanta Atlanta stats City stat Best places avg. Median family income (per year) $50,06 $90,957 Job growth % (2000-2009)* 24.00% 15.71% Median home price $149,900 $239,391 Test scores reading (% above/below state average ) 1.6% 22.9% Test scores math (% above/below average) 3.2% 22.9% Personal crime incidents (per 1,000) 14 2 Property crime incidents (per 1,000) 72 24 Restaurants (within 15 miles) 9,25 2,967 High temp in July ° F 88.5° 86.2° Low temp in Jan ° F 31.1° 21.3° Median age 34.9 35.3 Everything on the statics is above average and were a city should be at in the United States in comparison. The temperature is perfect and sometimes can not be controlled in our design. But, everything else can be redesigned even the age group living in the area. Atlanta George has had many changes in the correct direction. There have been many different designs in the years to make it a great city. The greatest changes have been in the last ten years. There are numerous different different varieties of architects firm constructing all different building in Atlanta and as a collective group them from the city of Atlanta. There are a bunch of designer that collective form all different great pieces of architecture in the city. The users are the people living and visiting the city. The financials come from investors on a project. The main project that changed Atlanta Georgia Centennial Olympic Park, Plaza Park at Underground Atlanta, Sweetwater Creek State Park (Visitor Center), Master Planning for Atlanta. The town can be used as a model example to construct other towns that need help. The connection in the town to other cities is also very important. We find looking at the malls in Atlanta that they are more conforming to the environment. They have a good connection and design. We have to focus on one project that really changed the city. There have been many mall projects and city projects. The biggest with the most change, if there were on project to pick in Atlanta it would be Centennial Olympic Park but Master Planning for Atlanta has to look at also connecting the park to the city. The Master planning was to engage the community and started because of the 1996 Olympics. The two companies taking care of the majority of the design for the Centennial Olympic Park was Turner Associates Architects & Planners, Inc and Cooper Carry did the master planning. There were a lot of parts to the change in city with the project. The complete city looked like a construction site before the Olympics. They changed the mast planning for the city. They changed street, parks, buildings, and landscaping across the city. All the changes simulated the economy for the city, created work, and reform for the city. The changes helped the city be more efficient in the work the traffic, work, season vacationer, and selling goods to surrounding cities. The final product was to connect the two projects for the Olympics and have a good connection in the city with urban condos, government, corporate, hospitality workers riding the MARTA every day, convention visitors, and tourists engaging them in activates. The main process of designed was for the 1996 Olympic Game. There is an estimated 3 million visitors per year. Its main designs in the park and the parts where around the Olympics like light towers after the Greek mythological messenger god (Hermes). Oscar L. Harris influenced the project. The project was integrated into the context of the city. There were significant problems was the flux of people for the summer games. The design compensated for the flux but with the large amounts of people there is some that can not be controlled. They project was a massive under taking for the city. It was one of the largest renovations for a city to take on. The vendor that sold produces changed for the Olympic games and took on a large amount of sales to help the city. There are 12 things to look at in a core to center city to modify and change to make the city more profitable. These 12 things are very important to the city and infrastructure. Each of these 12 parts have smaller sub groups that can be stringed off. Types of city designs in the central core can become a catalyst for the city with facetious amusement. There are eight major parts as in sustainable, energy, economical, efficiency, comfort, flexibility, security, and safety. The location of the site has external influences on site this is a connection between site and external environments This is a dialog between sites around like talking and listening. Three major parts of external control are first public builds (government, schools, police, court house, college) , second stores (bar, restaurants, bakeries, coffee shops), and third is parks. There is a demand for a needed venue at the center core to the city. Intelligent site and interactive with the community. This demand is from Consumers or People frequenting the area vocational or permanent this is based on the location and Dialog between sites around like talking and listening. If there is not a provided place by other within a 5 to 10 mile radius and there is a demand for that site. Larger scale site design that the demand is only one for a country or county and the demand is needed in the county or country.
130 144
Continued after Assignment P5 | Master Thesis | Catalyst Design LA Masters Project | Instuctor: Gianno A. Feoli Florida International University | SOA | LAA 6970
Humanity | Landscape Architecture The center part of the city could be a point of interest and have that WOW factor. Intelligent sites attract the community. They host great works of Art, Theater, Movies. They can host unforgettable events with creating ever lasting memories. The site can be the work of Art with design shape. The site can include simple things like bar, restaurants, bakeries, and coffee shops. Parks and landscaping is important to incorporate into site with a same portion or can be a large part. The center of the city can change health, life, and prolongs life. It can be from the products or the place that influence our health and life. The site can influence our health here or at other locations at any time. The size and shape of the city can be important. How it is division and its creation of multicultural with connection. Size of site can be changed by splitting or dividing the property into different areas. The best example is South China Mall in Dongguan, it could be changed split into a 1/3 College Campus, 1/3 Medical Facility, Some times the size is influences by external stores. For example the retail should decrease if there already close retail store outside of the site. The can be problems with original part of the core of the city. Then you have to study of problems with site in the past to current. You look at why did the site fail. And, what part of the site needs to change and the direction that in could change? Also, change or flexibility with the site to incorporate the current times and future prospects. The conscious to the space is subjective to the experience. The feeling and relationship between the user of the space. There can be comfort in the site. There is convenience in visiting the site. You have to look at safety during the night time and day time. Also security, Does the site need a form of security if safety is not met? A center of a city or core can have people that are famous, historical, and celebrities. The site can be based on the people that could visit the site. It could also be known for the people that could own the site. The site could have historical ties to the past. For example naming the site after dead people or influences in the design from past. After looking at the large scale of a site we should look at the smaller scale of the core can be considered. A example of a contained site with good core city qualities are malls. There are nine desing needs of restricting a mall or dead site. We need to ask yourself, “What will change the site size, shape, allure more people, attract vendors and people to own the site? The site can be turned into a center of town or smaller scale involving a mall make a direct core or center axis. Using vehicular and pedestrian direct paths is important into the design. Parking and comfort is important in the site. The safety and security is always important in a mall. The removal of confining buildings or roofs can be very important into changing how the space is used. The open space should have up to a 2:1 ratio or more. The main space should involve the landscape design and building close but not to close. This adds a comfort level with the people visiting the space. Some buildings it is important to converted concrete area to green space. There can be a change to the financial stability with a mall site. The mall that uses the least amount of money can bring in the most money. This can be causes by the site or location. It is improve the financial stability of the dead site and places around the site. We can look at sustainable like using concrete (materials) and landscape (perennials and wind resistant trees). The energy use of a site can be cause by the sun and shaded areas. Using economical coast effective materials is important in the construction of a site. What is the efficiency of the site and what it uses of the in most effective way. The locations around a site are important to help the site. The external influences have a great involvement on site on how they will affect the site. The connection between site with external environments needs to be looked at. This is a dialog between sites around like talking and listening. This mainly involved external forces like government (schools, police, court house, college), food venues (bar, restaurants, bakeries, coffee shops) and parks (landscape designs). The demand that the site could supply for needed venues at mall location. An intelligent mall can be interactive with the community. This demand is from consumers or people frequenting the area vocational or permanent this is based on the location and dialog between sites around like talking and listening. This is the listening part of the dialog and response to surround sites.The mall has to look at other places within a 5 to 10 mile radius and there is a demand for that site. Larger scale site design that the demand is only one for a country or county and the demand is needed in the county or country. Large malls can fill that demand for that larger scale site. The mall can be a point of interest. The mall would have things that would draw in people constantan. This is the WOW factor. It attracts the community. The mall can host great works of art, theater, and movies. It can host unforgettable events. It can create ever lasting memories. The mall can be the work of Art with design shape. It can have small venues like bars, restaurants, bakeries, and coffee shops. Very important to have plants or landscape incorporated into the mall. It is important to change the mall and adapting to current time. It may have to changed for things to come in the future. An intelligent mall that can adapt to future needs of the people to visit. Malls can have added health and life integrated into them. Changes health and prolongs life are important to people and are an added attraction. It can be the products sold at the mall. The mall can influence our health and life depending how engaging it is to the outdoors. It can influence our health there or after leaving the location at any time. Size or division of a mall can be very important. You can creation a multicultural mall with connections to the space. It can be lost because the space is too large. Size with a mall can be changed by splitting or dividing the property into different areas. For example the South China Mall in Dongguan is a perfect example of a mall that needed a division. There can be problem with original site and the direction to change. To fix the mall a study of problems with site in the past up too current. We have to ask, “Why did the site fail?” And, “What part of the site needs to change and the direction that in could change?” The best thing for a mall is change or flexibility with the site to incorporate the current times and future prospects. How can you correct a mall to the subjective experience to the site? This would include feeling and relationship between the users of the space. The mall needs to include comfort in the site, convenience in visiting the site, safety during the night / day time and security. Does the mall have a form of security if safety that needs to be changed? This may sound strange but people could influence the mall. The could be a go a better direction if there is an influence of famous people, historical, or celebrities. The people that could visit the site could drive the vendors in the stores. It also could be because of the people that own the parts of the mall. It could have historical ties to the past. Now we come to the creation of malls or town square. These were the city cores when they created. Malls started out in the 1600’s as shaded avenues, open to the public, and the center of town. These are three core foundations to a mall and it acting as the center of the city. They have tried to evolve the mall idea but sadly failed in the evolution. Developer have made extremely large malls, added a ceiling, water parks, and redeveloped the mall idea. These extras sometimes never help the mall but hurt it; because, the new ideas break away from the cohesion to the city. The mall must be linked to the city by size, consumer, and location. Dead malls have grown in the years and have no determined destiny. If they did work in the first place or they failed threw time there was a good reason. The place needed to look at the public demands and meet those with size and consumer. They also need to act like a center hub of public space with core ties to the city. Wal-Mart and Target try to fulfill the needs of the general population and place themselves in locations with mass populations. This has created a hindrance on malls and a false core to the cities across North America. A good example of a dead mall that was reclaimed is the Boca Mall finished construction in 1974 and died in 1986. This was built as a enclosed mall and the enclose mall idea was started in the 1960’s. The enclosed malls were devolved because other weather and temperature. One major problem with the mall is people like the Well connected core to Delray Wal-mart spreading and disconnecting Cores to Cities weather in Florida and people like to outdoors. The Mall at 163rd St: North Miami Beach, FL Omni International Mall of Miami: Miami, FL After the Boca Mall failed, the owners/ investors decided to renovate. It has a great location but did not appeal to the city surround the mall. The major design change was removing the roof. Sometimes less is better. The mall was named Mizner Park after Addison Mizner the architect in Boca around the 1930’s. Mizner Park has been redefined for urbanism and can be called a lifestyle center. It takes on the qualities of being a lifestyle center with the mix uses.
Palm Beach Mall: West Palm Beach, FL
South China Mall in Dongguan, China
131 Continued after Assignment P5 | Master Thesis | Catalyst Design 144 LA Masters Project | Instuctor: Gianno A. Feoli Florida International University | SOA | LAA 6970
Humanity | Landscape Architecture
Mizner Park- Boca Raton FL
A lifestyle center is a shopping center or mixed-used commercial development that combines the traditional retail functions of a shopping mall. It has the leisure amenities oriented towards upscale consumers. They are sometimes labeled “boutique malls”. They are often located in affluent suburban areas. Lifestyle centers have different varieties. They sometimes depicted as occupying the upscale end of the spectrum of commercial development and one other end of the spectrum is the outlet mall with a wider range of income with bargain prices. Lifestyle centers usually require less land and generate higher revenue margins than closed in malls. They often generating close to $500 per square foot and the closed in mall average is $330 per square foot. Lifestyles centers have savings on heating and cooling. They are also quicker access for busy customers. Typical amenities at lifestyle centers include plush chairs. Lifestyle centers have a great advantage over closed in Malls. The consumer tends to favor the outdoors instead of the confined space. Some malls do work that are covered over with a roof. But, they still have a form of landscaping in them. They will have trees (live or fake), water fountains, sky lights ( to create the illusion that you are out doors), plants, and large form sculptures, Theses are create an effect that the place has a softer edge and invites people to spend more. The soft interior is more welcoming and inviting. But, it has a higher price this interior landscape inside an air conditioned place. A mall that is closed in needs some strong sources of income. This diagrams below show the differences between the closed in malls and open malls. The two on the right are closed in malls with the circulation on the outside. The two on the left are open air malls with landscape in the center. All four are examples of malls that are well run, generate income, have constant vendors, and produce a lot of sales. In the pictures to the right the landscaping is highlighted in yellow.
There is one thing that all the malls share is that they are the core to the city. They bring in people and make that part of town an attraction where people visit the mall and not the city. There is also one big similarity to the site is that there is great vehicular traffic thru these areas. Everyone converges to this point and has the attraction to stay. It is never dull time until late in the night. The malls also have connecting parts around them like legs. These other parts bring in a circulation of many other people. After, seeing the pictures of the lifestyle centers and the traditional malls you can start to have an idea that both of the styles of malls will work but there are major differences. There is a better connection to the city with life style center. The traditional mall has an earlier time they close. There is a lot of advantages and disadvantages to both kinds of malls. The percentage of life style malls is increase and is greater than the traditional mall. This shows factually that the life style mall has greater benefits and greater success. We need to look back at the parts read about before. If you look at the life style centers and European cities there is some major designs parts that are the same. The two story building with a 2 to 1 ratio. The central core to the town square of a European city. So what went wrong did the United States screw up the design with closed in malls and commercial shopping. These choices have affected our economy for the United States and surrounding parts. People in the US want cheap shopping that is economical by places that have industrial shopping. But, the commercial large businesses are driving the price for the market. They make it impossible for small businesses to survive. So, do we continue shopping at Wal-Mart that stripped out the family owned stores and redefined the core to our cities? Some people go three place work, home, and Wal-mart. This gives the three needs to live. What designs can we do to change this behavior? Also looking back, Mizner Park has qualities of a Eurpean city were everything needed is within walking distance. The idea of a place that has residential, mixed with commercial, and shopping is to keep everything in one area. This would cut down on vehicular traffic. The people that lived in the area, could work, and go shopping. This is a great idea economically but always puts a higher price on the housing in that area. So, if the price of housing was more economical there would be more of a demand for center housing instead of people commuting. There some times is a space problem when the price is cut lower. There seems to be less parking for people that live at the site. After all the research, we start to figure out that the architects have made a bigger impact on our life. This impact has be in bad direction were they have created a large structures that have taken over areas creating a real mono toned area. Landscape architects are needed more to separate out the spaces and make them more diverse. Also, landscape architects are used give a better connection to area. Architects have missed the point in the construction of the mega malls. Landscape architects view people and society to make differences in peoples’ lives. Their changes control our lifestyle, economy, and peace. The landscape design has a real effect on our lives and architects control the building design that has less of an effect on our lives. We need to work together on making a difference with design coast cutting, producing more, driving less, and using less energy. There are many different smaller parts of designs that could make a larger site that could make a big difference. Working together as group we can start to change a city. People have to make change, grow, and adapt to the site with the changing future. The site has to do the same change, grow, and adapt to the people of the future. Intelligent sites can help to conform to our future. In conclusion, the town square, town markets, malls, lifestyle center and core to a city idea have been around for a thousand years. It has evolved thru the years and had problems with the evolution. We can only hope that the designer have learned from their problems with the construction. Things take time to change in the correct direction. At least we can learn from our design mistakes. The main thing is to research a site and how the people that will visit the site. Landscape Architects have more research to know the clients that will visit the site. It is important to have knowledge of the site because deciding on life altering changes to a city. The hardest part is to predict the way the city will fluctuate with the design and the needs of the design will fill. We need facetious amusement to drive the new designs and attack the people into a venue. The center core market to the city can become a large catalysis for the city to become a better place.
132 144
Continued after Assignment P5 | Master Thesis | Catalyst Design LA Masters Project | Instuctor: Gianno A. Feoli Florida International University | SOA | LAA 6970
Traditional malls vs. Lifestyle centers
Traditional malls: Millenia Mall- Orlando, FL
Traditional malls: Great Mall- Milpitas, CA
Lifestyle Center: Waterside Shops- Naples, FL
Lifestyle Center: Bayside- Miami, FL
Work Cited: Books: CITY BY DESIGN an architectural perspective of Atlanta; Brain G. Carabet and John A. Shand © 2008 INFRASTRUCTURE a field guide to industrial landscape; Brain Hayes © 2005 1001 GARDENS you must see before you die; Rae Spencer-Jones © 2007 Magazines: CNN Money Magazine; Best Places to Live Boating Magazine; 10 Best Places to Live and Boat Kiplinger Magazine; 10 Best Cities for the Next Decade Books: Best Places to Raise Your Family; Peter Sander Cities Ranked and Rated; Bert Sperling and Peter Sander Amazing Places to Live the Rest of Your Life; Barbara Corcoran Places Rated Almanac; The Classic Guide for Finding Your Best Places to Live in America; David Savageau Websites: http://www.google.com/earth/index.html http://www. bestplaces.net.html http://www. relocateamerica.com.html http://www. moviemaker.com.html http://www.forbes.com/2010/05/25/worlds-best-cities-lifestyle-real-estate-mercer-vienna-geneva.html
us olo etts ra ng Cen do B ter
se lf Cour
ing nd a sL
wk Ha
G
Beaco
nwood
Go acuna rand L
Mutu a
ngto n
Pelican Marsh
ppi
Sho
l an k
ch
nC
sa
pe
as
Was hi
an lic
Br
ok
l
Pe
As
M
n
to Bo s
So un d
s
ub
ite
Cl
Su
lf
&
Go
In n
ón
arina
Poi
nte
ida
oo
Qu in ta
ur
dale M
Hol
ch
La
Tib
CV S Ph a
auder
cia
sS
M
Fort L
Val en
ie ud
Pe
lic
an
Hilton
St
h
s ar
s
o-
Ma
The Palms Hotel & Spa
Ec
rri
by Alexander H. Schober
w
ott
Humanity
Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Ne
l
te Ho
Bal Harbour Towers
ra
A
y
nd
M es
e
rgre
Eve
fo
Gu
r
n
a lf H
almturalists A P l e y Inn Hote Wellesle en n Na
n ai
nt
ou
ns
io
r Ya rbo
tr
n Cou
Ha
t ca Lo
cht
and
ub y Cl
rm ac
ouse
ts Wareh
permarke
Publix Su
B o ca W e s tC o u ntr
Sea Ranch Club of Boca
Be
de Gar
rg Eve
IMPROVEMENT of
Waterside Shops
rk
Pa
h ac
y ch bon Societ a e B udu
Club
Weiner’s M obile Park
er
v ulo
y C lub
ntry
n
Po l i c e De part m
Cou
io
ent of C i t y of Coral Sprin
Cam brid ge Ken sing ton
at
gs C Fire o r a Depa l Sp rtm e n t of C rings ora l S p rings
liffe
ci
ach
Wyc
so
Victoria Park
on
As
Hamptons
rlt
Woodfield Country Club
do
Princeton Estates Enclave
Ca
le Be
tz-
erda
IC
Laud
a
ton es fW yo
ni
on
Ri
Fort
C it
ea
n sto We in res su Clo ld Fie rk/ on Pa ati cre Re nd sa ton ark es nP tW sto ka We ar lP na gio Re
Oc
en
So
y In
un
n
d