Russia-Ukranian war crosses boundaries
On 21 November 2024, the Russian military deployed intermediate-range ballistic missiles (IRBMs), an unstoppable force of mass destruction, against Ukraine.
While we slept in oblivion, a line was crossed that had not been crossed before. Though even if we had known, there would have been no way to stop it.
This event illustrated just how easy it is to end the world and how fragile peace truly is. No historian will be able to write about World War III without mentioning this day – when the world came terribly close to ending.
Weapons of mass destruction
Decades-old predictions from World War II were materialised in the form of ballistic missiles, commonly referred to as BMs. A ballistic missile is a type of missile that utilises projectile motion to deliver warheads to a target.
The advanced qualities of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and intermediate-range ballistic missiles (IRBMs) make them commonly used for delivering thermonuclear weapons. A thermonuclear weapon, also known as a fusion weapon or hydrogen bomb, is classified as a second-generation nuclear weapon.
Unlike the bulky and cumbersome
nuclear weapons often portrayed in popular movies and series, modern secondgeneration weapons are much more compact. Some ICBMs can even carry multiple warheads, allowing each one to strike a different target.
If you’re counting the number of countries that possess nuclear weapons, you may want to recount. The current focus should be on countries with operational ICBMs, as a weapon that cannot reach its intended enemy is of no use.
For the reader’s convenience, some basic information is provided below. Generally, the greater the missile’s range, the more
challenging it is to intercept. After reaching a certain range, the ballistic missile enters a new category:
• Tactical ballistic missile (TBM): Range less than 300 kilometres
• Short-range ballistic missile (SRBM): Range from 300 to 1,000 km
• Medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM): Range from 1,000 to 3,500 km
• Intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM): Range from 3,500 to 5,500 km
• Intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM): Range greater than 5,500 km
– Sayings of the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa
Allah’s mercy prevails over His wrath
Hazrat Abu Hurairahra narrated, that the Holy Prophetsa said, “When Allah created the creation, He inscribed in His Book, making it binding upon Himself – and this record is kept with Him upon the Throne – ‘Indeed, My Mercy prevails over My Wrath.’” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab at-tawhid, Bab qawlillahi ta‘ala ‘wa yuhazzirukumullahu nafsah’, Hadith 7405)
“The Holy Quran states regarding the one who backbites that he eats the flesh of his dead brother. This disease is widespread among women. They sit and gossip till midnight and then wake up in the morning and start doing the same thing, but this should be avoided. There is a particular Surah for women in the Holy Quran. It has been mentioned in the hadith that the Holy Prophet, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said that I saw mostly poor people in Paradise and saw many women in Hell.” (Malfuzat [English], Vol. 8, p. 386)
Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas, In His Own Words
<< Continued from previous page
A world war in the making
What key ingredients are necessary for a world war? The short answer is involvement. It starts as a conflict, escalates into a regional war, and with enough countries participating, it can develop into a world war. This reflects the current situation of the Russo-Ukrainian conflict.
Ukraine
Last year, Germany provided Ukraine with the first shipment of its Leopard 2 tanks.
“Eighteen cutting-edge main battle tanks were delivered after Ukrainian crews were trained to use them.
“Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said he was sure the tanks could ‘make a decisive contribution’ on the frontlines of the war.” (Ukraine war: Germany sends muchawaited Leopard tanks, bbc.com, 28 March 2023)
A few months ago, Ukraine received F-16 Fighter Jets from the US. This was again an alarming escalation to the war, allowing more casualties and blood to be spilt.
“Ukraine’s leader thanked allies for what they were once very hesitant to provide – though he added that many more were needed.
“The arrival of the jets marks a crucial milestone in boosting the capabilities of Ukraine’s air force, which largely relies on old Soviet-era jets.” (Ukraine receives first F-16 fighter jets – Zelensky, bbc.com, 4 August 2024)
Western support for Ukraine is widely known. The Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IFW) has established the Ukraine Support Tracker, which is a database that records military, financial, and humanitarian aid provided to Ukraine. This tracker includes detailed information about each country’s contributions. (Ukraine Support Tracker, www.ifw-kiel.de)
Russia
On the day Donald Trump was re-elected as President of the United States, news emerged that North Korean troops had reportedly clashed with Ukrainian forces for the first time. (North Korean troops ‘enter’ battle; Trump win throws Ukraine aid in doubt, aljazeera.com, 8 November 2024)
Foreign mercenaries and soldiers have been involved in the war for quite some time. A recent documentary produced by the Russian news network, RT (Russia Today), titled Soldiers of Misfortune has highlighted this issue. However, the involvement of the North Korean army marks the first instance of another nation being fully engaged in the conflict.
Similarly, Iran has not ceased to get involved: “Ukraine’s foreign ministry said on Friday that Russia had launched 8,060 Iran-developed Shahed drones at Ukraine since it began its full-scale invasion 2-1/2 years ago.” (Ukraine says Russia launched 8,060 Iran-developed drones during war, reuters.com, 13 September 2024)
Every part of the world is involved, whether it be India, which is heavily purchasing Russian oil and gas, or China,
which has been accused of sabotaging undersea cables in Europe (akin to what the US is being accused of by Russia).
The escalation(s)
A few days ago, on 19 November 2024, President Biden approved Ukraine’s use of US-made ATACMS missiles to target Russian territory. The Army Tactical Missile System, known as ATACMS (pronounced “attack ‘ems”), has a range of up to 300 kilometres, allowing it to strike deep into Russian territory. A clear sign of escalation. (Atacms: what are the missiles Ukraine has fired into Russia for first time?, theguardian. com, 19 November 2024)
The following day, on 20 November 2024, Ukraine fired UK-made Storm Shadow missiles into Russia. These ongoing escalations of the war prompted Russia to give a response.
On 21 November 2024, President Putin confirmed that Russia has used its latest Hypersonic Missile System, Oreshnik on a Ukrainian defence industry facility. A weapon that travels up to 10 Mach (3 km per second) and was built to deliver thermonuclear weapons.
In a broadcast from the Kremlin, President Putin states: “There are no means of countering such weapons today” (A new hypersonic missile, conflict escalation and a warning for NATO: what you need to know from Putin’s latest address, www.swentr. site, 21 November 2024)
Winter is coming
Although Europe is not openly admitting it, there are signs that war is approaching. This year, many European countries have urged their citizens to stockpile emergency supplies and food.
“The report on Europe’s civilian and military preparedness, published on Wednesday, was written by former Finnish President Sauli Niinistö in his capacity as Special Adviser to the President of the European Commission.
“The report notes that the EU was not prepared for either the COVID-19 pandemic or Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, and that it needs to move ‘from reaction to proactive preparedness.’
“As part of this strategy, the EU should advise households to be prepared to be selfsufficient for a minimum of 72 hours in the event of an emergency, the report says.” (Europeans Told to Stockpile Food in Case of War With Russia, www.newsweek.com, 31 October 2024)
The UK launched an entire website earlier this year dedicated to helping people prepare for unforeseen emergencies: prepare.campaign.gov.uk asks its visitors the following question: “How would you prepare for an emergency?”
Scandinavia too has taken similar steps.
In the wake of recent escalations, Sweden has issued 5 million pamphlets instructing its people to stockpile for the war. (Sweden tells citizens to prepare for WAR: Five million households get pamphlets on how to get their home ready for nuclear armageddon... as Biden is accused of trying to start World War Three, dailymail.co.uk, 18 November 2024)
Norway has also instructed its citizens to prepare a week’s worth of supplies.“We have sent out 2.2 million paper copies, one for each household in Norway,” said Tore Kamfjord, who is responsible for the campaign. (Norway issues stockpile warning to citizens amid rising RussiaUS tensions, www.joe.co.uk, 18 November 2024)
Khalifatul Masih Vaa has been providing guidance on this subject for nearly two decades. In his recent Friday sermon, he reminded Ahmadis once again to keep two to three months’ worth of provisions at home.
Noah’s ark
For over 20 years, a dedicated leader has championed the cause of peace, tirelessly reaching out to the world. He has left no stone unturned in reaching out to the most influential leaders of the world to bring about change.
The current worldwide head of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmadaa has been calling on humanity to heed his warnings, unite, and work collectively to prevent the outbreak of another world war.
That we stand at the precipice of disaster is indicative of the profundity of his warning. We must learn from the example of the people of Noahas, who preferred to seek refuge in the mountains than to embark the vessel captained by a man of God.
The time for action is now! Will we join
him in the quest for peace, or will we turn away? Let us rise together and safeguard our future. There is still time.
In his Friday Sermon, delivered on 22 November 2024, Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, said:
“As everyone knows, the situation in Europe is rapidly moving towards war; the danger of the conflict between Ukraine and Russia escalating is increasing, and threats are being made to European and other countries as well.
“In any case, pray that Allah the Almighty keeps Ahmadis and other peaceloving people safe from the adverse effects of war, and that people do not use such weapons in warfare whose use would affect future generations.” (Friday Sermon, alhakam.org, 22 November 2024)
Let us pray and not forget the warnings of the past. To act on the above is protect ourselves from the travesty described below:
“Someday, not too distant, there can come streaking out of somewhere – we won’t be able to hear it, it will come so fast – some kind of gadget with an explosive so powerful that one projectile will be able to wipe out completely this city of Washington.” (US General of the Army Hap Arnold, 1943; Toward a Theory of Spacepower: Selected Essays, Chapter 19, p. 373)
Wake up! We are past midnight, and no one is turning back the clock.
(Tahmeed Ahmad, Al Hakam)
Interfaith symposium held by Lajna Imaillah Quebec, Canada
Syed Mukarram Nazeer Canada Correspondent
Lajna Imaillah Quebec, Canada, held an interfaith symposium on 27 October 2024. The opening session started with the recitation from the Holy Quran with its French translation and was presided over by Regional Sadr Lajna Imaillah Quebec, Aneela Omer Sahiba. An introduction to the Jamaat was presented by the moderator, Salmana Janjua Sahiba. The speakers included Dieneba Drame Sahiba from Islam Ahmadiyyat, Bavneet Kaur from Sikhism, Isabelle Laurin from Universal Peace, and Adriana Roledo from Christianity. The concluding remarks were given by Sadr
Lajna Imaillah Quebec. An exhibition was also set up where copies of the Holy Quran with translations in various languages, and various books of the Jamaat were on display. “Hijabi Corner” and “Tabligh Booth” proved popular destinations for attendees. The total attendance was 107, with 30 non-Ahmadi guests. The programme received positive feedback; examples are given below:
Isabelle Laurin said, “Thank you so much for organizing these interreligious meetings. I really like these times of sharing and mutual understanding.”
Bavneet Kaur said, “It’s an honour for me. Loved the event.”
Prayers and preparedness amid global turmoil
During his Friday Sermon, delivered on 22 November 2024, Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, said:
“The situation in Europe is rapidly moving towards war; the danger of the conflict between Ukraine and Russia escalating is increasing, and Europe as well as other nations are being warned. Many wise and peace-loving leaders are also concerned about this.
“In any case, pray that Allah the Almighty keeps Ahmadis and other peace-loving people safe from the adverse effects of war, and that people do not use such weapons in warfare whose use would affect future generations.
“Pray for the Muslim countries as
well. May Allah the Almighty grant them wisdom and understanding and enable them to recognise the truth.
“Secondly, I wish to draw your attention to the fact that these circumstances have deteriorated rapidly and continue to worsen. Due to these conditions, people are already alert, but I wish to remind you once again to endeavour to keep two to three months’ worth of provisions at home. However, the most important point is that you should strive to attain nearness to Allah the Almighty, strive to attain His pleasure, strive to establish a relationship with Him, and strive to strengthen this relationship. May Allah the Almighty enable us to do so.
[Amin.]”
Visit by King of the Ga State, Ghana and fifth Pan-African Peace Symposium
Tommy Kallon
President Pan-African Ahmadiyya Muslim Association, UK
On 7 November 2024, His Royal Majesty King Tackie Teiko II, King of the Ga State, Ghana, visited the Baitul Futuh Mosque in London, UK. His Majesty extended his gratitude to Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa and the Jamaat for the warm hospitality. He expressed a desire for MTA Africa to also be broadcast in the Kadambe language to enable the message of Ahmadiyyat to reach his community in Ghana. He highlighted his ongoing efforts with local charities to combat hunger in Ghana. He acknowledged the collaboration with the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat in these efforts, recognising the Jamaat’s commitment to humanitarian work and the alleviation of poverty. His Majesty expressed a keen interest in attending the Jalsa Salana UK 2025. During the dinner, he informed Amir Jamaat UK of his willingness to grant land to the Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Ghana to work in partnership with the Jamaat in various initiatives – especially agricultural projects to grow food to feed the hungry.
Rafiq Ahmad Hayat Sahib, Amir Jamaat UK, in his closing remarks, expressed profound appreciation for His Royal Majesty’s visit and generosity. He highlighted that the Baitul Futuh Mosque symbolises the Jamaat’s dedication to peace and serves as a platform to foster harmony globally. He also referenced the National Peace Symposium UK, where Huzooraa
has repeatedly cautioned world leaders about the risks of escalating conflicts, particularly in the Middle East and Ukraine. He reiterated that Islam embodies peace and submission, advocating for a spiritual connection to God as the foundation of true peace.
A video was played about the work of the Jamaat in Ghana and across Africa. Another video was played at the request of the King about his humanitarian work through his Ga Mantse Foundation.
At the request of the King, a special silent prayer was led by Ataul Mujeeb Rashed Sahib to pray for Ghana and for the King.
5th Pan-African Peace Symposium
The 5th Pan-African Peace Symposium took place on 16 November 2024, at the Baitul Futuh Mosque complex in London, with the theme “Recognition of the Creator –The Pathway to Peace” and was attended by nearly 700 people, with thousands more joining via YouTube. The gathering included distinguished speakers and guests from across the UK, USA, Africa, and beyond, including parliamentarians, diplomats, religious leaders, professionals, and many peace-loving people who recognised the urgent need for conversations around peace, justice, and equality.
The formal proceedings started with a recitation from the Holy Quran with English translation, followed by a welcome address by my humble self.
Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa graciously
sent a message to the gathering, read by Rafiq Ahmad Hayat Sahib, Amir Jamaate-Ahmadiyya UK. Huzooraa expressed in his message that the Jamaat dedicates every opportunity and platform to promoting peace and bringing people from all walks of life together to foster unity and understanding. Huzooraa also addressed the people of Africa, urging them to free themselves from all forms of deception, corruption, and dishonesty and to be prepared to work hard and make sacrifices for the betterment of their nations.
Among the speakers were Vice President PAAMA USA, Founder-Director of the School of Pan African Thought, Queen Mother from the Ga State of Ghana, and The
Gambia High Commissioner to the UK. A goodwill video message from the Minister of Education, Science, and Technology in Tanzania was also played. Amir Jamaat UK, in his speech, reflected on the significance of the event’s theme, emphasising the teachings of Islam as a means for global peace. The formal session of the event concluded with a silent prayer, followed by dinner. In a series of short interviews, several guests and participants shared their admiration for the smooth and successful organisation of the event. Many first-time attendees expressed their enthusiasm and anticipation for the next edition of the Pan-African Peace Symposium.
This Week in History
A glimpse into the rich history of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat
29 Nov - 5 Dec
29 November 1940: On this day, the Lahore chapter of Sanatan Dharam, an orthodox Hindu organisation, convened a religious conference on the theme of worship. Representing the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, Malik Abdur Rahman Khadim Sahib delivered a lecture in which he demonstrated that the most exalted form of worship is salat (Islamic prayer). (Tarikh-eAhmadiyyat, Vol. 8, p. 206)
29 November 1996: On this day, during his tour of Europe, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh delivered a Friday sermon from Baitul Hamd, Malmö, Sweden. The sermon was broadcast live on MTA in collaboration with the national television. Huzoorrh emphasised that true transformation in this era could only be achieved through the highest standards of moral conduct and urged every Ahmadi to strive for moral excellence.. (Khutbat-eTahir, Vol. 15, pp. 913-932)
30 November 1901: On this day, an Amin ceremony was held in Qadian to mark the completion of the first recitation of the Holy Quran by three children of the Promised Messiahas: Hazrat Sahibzada Mirza Bashir Ahmad, Hazrat Sahibzada Mirza Sharif Ahmad, and Hazrat Sahibzadi Nawab Mubaraka Begum, may Allah be pleased with them all. (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 2, p. 194)
30 November 2008: On this day, during his tour of South India, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa inaugurated the Umar Mosque in Ernakulam, a famous business city in Kerala state. (“Establishing Peace, Love and Harmony in the Society”, alislam.org)
1 December 1888: On this day, the Promised Messiahas published
an ishtihar on the demise of Bashir Awwal, titled “Haqqani Taqrir bar Wafaat-e-Bashir” – A Discourse upon the Demise of Bashir. Since it was published on a green paper, it is known as the “Sabz Ishtihar”, i.e. The Green Announcement. (Tarikh-eAhmadiyyat, Vol. 1, p. 282)
1 December 1952: Dr Curt Tiltack, a German orientalist, sought to write a book about the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat. To aid his research, a German missionary provided him with the book Ahmadiyyat or the True Islam, authored by Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra. Using this book as a resource, Dr Tiltack compiled material and later sent four questions in a letter to Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra for further clarification on this day. Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra responded to these questions, and his answers are documented in Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat (Vol. 12, pp. 138-145).
1 December 1989: On this day, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh instructed parents and office-bearers of the Jamaat that every child who has devoted his or her life under the Waqf-e-Nau scheme must learn at least three languages. (Khutbat-eTahir, Vol. 8, pp. 771-783)
1 December 2008: During his tour of India, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa was interviewed on this day by a correspondent of the Indian Express, a well-known newspaper in India. Huzooraa was also interviewed by reporters of The Hindu and a Malayalam newspaper, the Janam Bhumi. (Al Fazl International, 23 January 2009, pp. 11-12)
2 December 1912: On this day, at the request of Sir Muhammad Iqbal, the national poet of Pakistan, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira sent him a list of recommended Arabic literature. Huzoorra highlighted that renowned
scholars, including German experts in the Arabic language, regarded the Holy Quran as the greatest book in Arabic. (Tarikhe-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 3, p. 429)
2 December 1982: On this day, a special reception was held in Rabwah in honour of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh. Huzoorrh, while addressing the attendees, underscored the significance of developing and disseminating scholarly responses to the allegations made by prominent orientalists worldwide. (Silsila Ahamdiyya, Vol. 4, p. 819)
2 December 2005: On this day, during his tour of Mauritius, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa inaugurated the 44th Jalsa Salana Mauritius with his Friday sermon. It was the first time that a Khalifatul Masih had graced the Jalsa Salana of Mauritius. (Khutbat-e-Masroor, Vol. 3, p. 701)
2 December 1988: On this day, during his Friday Sermon at the
Fazl Mosque in London, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh congratulated the people of Pakistan on the establishment of a democratic government following 11 years of martial law. Huzoorrh also encouraged the Jamaat to engage in the remembrance and praise of Allah. (Khutbat-e-Tahir, Vol. 7, pp. 809-823)
3 December 1905: On this day, Hazrat Maulvi Burhan-ud-Din Jhelumira, a distinguished scholar of the Jamaat, passed away. Earlier that year, the passing of Hazrat Maulvi Abdul Karim Sialkotira had deeply saddened the Promised Messiahas. Reflecting on these losses, he emphasised the need for advancing the Community’s standard of knowledge and scholarship. This concern ultimately led to the inception of Jamia Ahmadiyya. (Tarikh-eAhmadiyyat, Vol. 2, p. 399)
4 December 1992: On this day, during his Friday Sermon, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh shared the distressing news of a newly
Press interviewing Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa in Cochin, Kerala, India, 2008
constructed Ahmadiyya mosque in Rajshahi, Bangladesh, being attacked and demolished by opponents. The attackers even removed every single brick, digging out the mosque’s very foundations. (Khutbat-e-Tahir, Vol. 11, p. 867)
4 December 2012: On this day, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa answered questions from a range of media outlets during a 40-minute press conference in the Press Room of the European Parliament in Brussels.
A number of global media organisations from the UK, Spain, France, Belgium, Pakistan, and other countries attended. After this, Huzooraa delivered the keynote address at the European Parliament to an audience of more than 350, representing 30 countries. The event was hosted by the European Parliament Friends of Ahmadiyya Muslims Group, whose chair and vice chairs all took to the stage to welcome Huzooraa. Martin Schulz, MEP and then President of the European Parliament, also came to greet Huzooraa. (“Head of Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat calls for peace during Press Conference at European Parliament”, and “Head of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community makes historic address at European Parliament”, www. pressahmadiyya.com)
5 December 1953: On this day, the fifth Jalsa Salana of Jamaate-Ahmadiyya Sierra Leone commenced, lasting for three days. It was attended by 500 delegates from 41 regions. Hazrat Muslehe-Maudra sent a special message encouraging members to work with unity and prayed for God’s blessings upon them. (Tarikh-eAhmadiyyat, Vol. 16, p. 209)
Khuddam from USA’s Gulf Region blessed with an in-person mulaqat with Huzoor
Islamabad, Tilford, UK, 17 November 2024: A group of khuddam from the Gulf Region of Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya USA were blessed with an in-person mulaqat with Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, at Islamabad, UK.
Introductions
Hazrat Amirul Momineenaa arrived for the mulaqat and greeted the khuddam He first addressed Sohaib Awwan Sahib, Regional Qaid of MKA Gulf Region, enquiring about his work, studies, and family background. Huzooraa then spoke to each of the 21 khuddam individually, taking their introductions and learning about their personal and professional lives.
During the introductions, the khuddam informed Huzooraa about a fellow khadim who had tragically passed away a few days earlier. Huzooraa expressed sorrow, asked about the deceased’s family, and prayed for him.
Huzooraa also enquired about the group’s accommodation, to which they responded that they were staying at Baitul Ehsan in London and were very satisfied with the arrangements.
When a khadim mentioned he was from The Gambia, Huzooraa enquired about the number of Gambians residing in that part of the USA.
Another khadim, a radiologist, shared how he remotely volunteers for the Fazl-e-
Umar Hospital. Huzooraa remarked, “There will be more blessings if you [physically] go there yourself.”
One khadim shared that he had recently married in Pakistan and his wife was on a flight to the USA at that moment. Huzooraa commented with a smile, “So, you won’t be able to receive her then.” The khadim replied that his wife had encouraged him to prioritise this mulaqat with Huzooraa
Huzooraa also spoke to Ali ibn Ali Sahib, a new convert to Ahmadiyyat. When asked why he accepted Ahmadiyyat, Ali Sahib said it was a blessing of Allah and added, “It was also due to the brotherhood and love I received from all of my brothers.” Huzooraa encouraged him to further study Islam Ahmadiyyat and the claims of the Promised Messiahas
The introductions concluded with the Regional Qaid expressing gratitude to Huzooraa on behalf of the group and presenting a gift.
Questions and answers
The khuddam had the opportunity to ask several questions during the mulaqat, which Huzooraa graciously answered.
One khadim asked whether hell has levels like Heaven. Huzooraa explained that, similar to Heaven, hell has different stages. He elaborated that some people would face less severe punishment, while others would endure greater torment depending
on their sins. He said, “Allah the Almighty will not treat everybody in the same way. So, everybody will get his or her punishment according to their deeds and sins, just as they will get the reward in Heaven.”
Another khadim, a waqif-e-nau, sought advice on which books of the Promised Messiahas to read. Huzooraa recommended
The Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam, Kashti-e-Nuh, and Al-Wasiyyat. About the latter, Huzooraa said, “This will also [teach] you the importance of Khilafat and the claims of the Promised Messiahas and how we should increase our faith in Ahmadiyyat and Islam.”
A question was raised about why Prophets are not associated with certain ancient civilisations such as the Aztecs or the Aborigines. Huzooraa explained that the Holy Quran states that Allah sent Prophets to every nation at different times. He added that while only 25 Prophets are mentioned in the Holy Quran, Prophets were sent to all nations, including Aborigines and others, who taught them to worship Allah and fulfil their duties to one another. Huzooraa said:
“So, what we believe is that they all believed [in the One God], even the Aborigines in Australia or Canada, they all say that our Prophet gave us these teachings. And the basic teaching of every Prophet, whether they were in Australia or Canada or America or Asia or elsewhere, or China
100 Years Ago...
Accounts of 1924: Visit to the House of Lords and House of Commons
House of Lords and House of Commons
The health of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih II[ra] remains the same, [i.e., there is no improvement]. The doctor has recommended complete rest, which is unfortunately not readily available here. On 7 and 8 October 1924, Huzoor[ra] went for medical consultations.
On 7 October, Hazrat Musleh-eMaud[ra] attended a session of the House of Lords to observe its proceedings, and on 8 October at 12:30 pm, he visited the House of Commons. For this visit, Sir Frederick Hall, Member of Parliament for East Dulwich, had invited him and gave a [guided] tour of the entire House.
East Dulwich is divided into two parts, and Hazrat Khalifatul Masih[ra] had delivered a lecture on politics there at the invitation of the Conservative Party. After the lecture, Sir Frederick Hall wrote a letter to Huzoor[ra] expressing his gratitude. The structure and internal arrangements of the House are quite astonishing. Sir Frederick showed us the meeting rooms, various committee rooms, and the workspaces for members.
On 8 October, a significant and highly anticipated debate was scheduled at the House of Commons, which drew a large crowd to gather below. We had arrived before the session, which was set to begin at 2:40 pm. There were speculations about the possibility of a ministerial defeat. While we were touring the buildings and rooms, a group of boys, girls, and teachers from a school in Wales also arrived to observe the House of Commons. It was an excellent example of national education and training. When a nation instils such a spirit in its children from the beginning, there is no limit to what they can achieve.
On 9 October, Huzoor[ra] is going to attend the debate at the House of Commons. On 1 and 9 October, he remained occupied with writing letters to India. On the evening of 8 October, Huzoor[ra] held another consultative meeting regarding the London Mission, and the immediate decision was that Chaudhry Fateh Muhammad Sayal[ra] would stay here for some time. Malik Ghulam Fareed[ra] will travel to India to settle his wife and children and has made arrangements for his ship.
London
Regarding the construction of the London Mosque, it has been decided that Huzoor[ra]
will personally lay its foundation stone under his supervision. Discussions with engineers have already taken place.
On 7 October, Maulvi Abdul Rahim Dard[ra] delivered a lecture at a society on the topic of women in Islam. However, due to the rain, the attendance was very low. The said society had requested him [to deliver the lecture].
Qadian
The long-awaited day, as expressed by Hazrat Musleh-e-Maud[ra], has arrived by the grace and blessings of God:
“Ah! What a joyful moment it will be, when we, having fulfilled our mission, prepare to journey towards Qadian.”
Preparations for the journey are underway, and hearts are filled with fervour and longing for Qadian. May Allah safely bring everyone to their destination.
Engagements
The week from 8 to 16 October was marked by Huzoor’s[ra] multiple responsibilities: preparing for the journey back to India and propagating the message of Islam Ahmadiyyat to new Muslims in London. Additionally, a consultation with a throat specialist was scheduled. His health condition remains unchanged, and it was evident that consistent rest was now essential.
On 9 October, Huzoor[ra] spent time writing letters to India. On 10 October, he had an appointment with a throat specialist in the morning. He visited the doctor accompanied by his physician. The specialist began by asking general questions and then met with Hazrat Khalifatul Masih[ra]:
Doctor: “Do you understand English?”
Khalifa: “Yes, I know some English.”
Doctor: “Your physician speaks good English.”
Khalifa: “I can also speak in the same way.”
The specialist examined Huzoor’s[ra] throat and remarked that there was no significant issue. He inquired further, and Huzoor[ra] explained, “I can speak continuously for six hours, but after that, I experience discomfort.” The doctor then examined his gums and found the issue. […]
The doctor concluded, “This is the only issue. Ensure you eat well; consume milk and butter.” […] He also recommended a general-use medicine.
A notable characteristic of this doctor was his practical approach; he explained
everything by demonstrating it. […] In conclusion, there was no issue with Huzoor’s[ra] throat.
Hazrat Khalifatul Masih[ra] led the Friday prayer in Putney, as it was necessary to consult with engineers about the mosque. During these discussions, it was proposed that the foundation stone of the mosque be laid.
After Jumuah prayer, Huzoor[ra] went out for a short while, and upon his return, he received a telegram conveying the joyful news that on Thursday, 9 October [1924], a son was born to his first wife. Alhamdulillah for this blessing. Friends were overjoyed at this delightful news and exchanged congratulations among themselves. Later that night, after prayers, Chaudhry Ali Muhammad Sahib[ra] hosted friends with sweets to celebrate the occasion. May Allah reward him abundantly.
On 11 October, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih[ra] went out to purchase some essential items. On 12 October, he had invited new converts, and spent nearly five hours in preaching and guidance. On 13 October, preparations for the journey were underway, as the luggage was to be handed over to Thomas Cook on the morning of 14 October. On the same evening, Malik Ghulam Fareed[ra] MA, the missionary to England, was departing for India with his wife and children. Huzoor[ra] personally accompanied him and a group of friends to Victoria Station, where a long silent prayer was carried out before seeing them off to India.
That same evening at 8 pm, Abdur Rahim Nayyar Sahib[ra] delivered a lecture on the life and teachings of the Holy Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, at the Theosophical Lodge in Brixton.
On 15 October, Huzoor[ra] visited the
Oriental School of Study with Hafiz Roshan Ali Sahib[ra] and Abdul Rahman Sahib. This institution specialises in teaching Eastern languages. Sir ED Ross conducted the tour and showed the library as well.
16 October was dedicated to Indian correspondence, and Huzoor[ra] remained occupied with this task. Later, there was another scheduled medical consultation with the doctor. At 7 pm, Huzoor[ra], accompanied by his companions, was invited for tea at the residence of Mrs Pearl, a new convert. In addition to these engagements, Huzoor[ra] appointed certain companions to meet prominent figures.
Meeting with ambassadors
I, along with Chaudhry Muhammad Sharif Sahib BA, was instructed to visit various ambassadors. On 13 October, we met with the Chinese Ambassador to London; on 14 October, we met with the Estonian Government Ambassador; and on 15 October, we met with the Japanese Ambassador.
In general political views, we expressed that the Ahmadiyya Community has come into the world to foster a spirit of universal peace. For this purpose, God referred to its founder, Hazrat Ahmadas, as the “Prince of Peace.” By adhering to his teachings and principles, universal peace and harmony can prevail in the world.
The Founder of the Ahmadiyya Community instructed his followers to refrain from all forms of rebellion and unrest, and this directive is included in the conditions of initiation into the community. He taught, based on the guidance of the Holy Quran, that one should always respect
Hazrat Sheikh Yaqub Ali Irfanira (1875-1957)
What Trump’s 2024 victory means for Muslims in America and abroad
Fayzaan Virk
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
On 5 November 2024, Donald Trump won back the presidency in a historic comeback victory. He dealt a blow to the opposing Democratic party, winning several swing states, including Michigan and my home state of Wisconsin. One of the key issues for the Democrats in these states was convincing Muslim and Arab Americans to vote for them given Kamala’s stance on the war in Gaza. Trump even won the Arabmajority city of Dearborn, Michigan, which was decisive in his win over Michigan as a whole.
This begs the question: now that Trump will be president again, what does that mean for Muslims, both in America and around the world? How can President-Elect Trump and the world ensure peace in rising threats in the Middle East in which all involved parties claim to be victims or claim to be oppressed by the other?
Islamophobic tendencies
Donald Trump has a long history of being criticised for his Islamophobic comments. He has appointed men with ties to antiMuslim groups to his cabinet, such as Sebastian Gorka, John Bolton, and Mike Pompeo. In the past, he has tweeted and retweeted claims about Muslims being terrorists, a problem for the USA and UK, and an existential threat to democracy at large. Trump has often used “Muslims” and “radical terrorists” as if they are synonymous. (“86 Times Donald Trump or Promoted Islamophobia”, www.medium. com)
Most notably, Trump was criticised for his immigration ban. It was an executive order that banned all immigration from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and
<< Continued from previous page
the laws of the government under which they live and demonstrate loyalty and obedience through their actions. If the government commits an error, one should inform it respectfully and rationally.
This has always been the approach of our community, and under the leadership of Huzoor[ra] and the successors of the Promised Messiahas, this is how the community is being guided. We have consistently provided governments with sound advice courageously and sincerely, and senior officials of the government have always respected and valued these constructive suggestions.
It was further conveyed to these ambassadors that our leader strongly disapproves that a person serves the government in upholding public peace and then expect any compensation in return, be it in the form of rewards, titles, or estates.
Yemen for 90 days and immigration from Syria permanently. The ban was criticised as a “license to discriminate” since it completely banned immigration from seven Muslim-majority countries. (“A License to Discriminate: Trump’s Muslim & Refugee Ban”, www.amnesty.org.uk)
While it was pushed as a national security issue, many of the people banned from entering were asylum-seeking refugees who were fleeing war and violence and simply couldn’t return home. Given how much of Trump’s campaign focused on curtailing immigration and putting America first, he could reintroduce or expand this policy.
Ties with Muslim countries and stance on Palestine
During his first term, for foreign policy, Trump strengthened ties with some Muslim countries. He strengthened alliances with the UAE and Saudi Arabia. He brokered deals like the Abraham Accords, which normalised relations between Israel and several Arab countries in an attempt to stabilise the region. He also drastically
This is because whatever we do is done in obedience to the commands of God Almighty, not as a transaction or trade.
The Ahmadiyya Community, while instructing its followers to show loyalty to a lawful and legally established government and obey its laws, also fosters a sense of sincerity that elevates such actions beyond personal interests or motives. For this reason, wherever such a community exists, it proves to be a blessing for the governments there.
Thus far, the ambassadors we have met have expressed great happiness and satisfaction during our discussions. They have shown readiness to offer moral support when our missions are established in their countries. Some have even suggested that we deliver lectures there. These aspirations and objectives are of the highest order. They have also provided contact details of some of their prominent thinkers and scholars who may assist in this work. Allah the Almighty
reduced the number of US troops in Afghanistan, helping to end that war. However, the geopolitical scene in the Middle East is dramatically different now than it was four years ago when Trump left office. The ongoing war and humanitarian crisis in Gaza has caused heightened tensions. The crises have further escalated with Israel invading Lebanon. The entire region seems to be on the brink of war, and the USA as one of Israel’s key allies has the greatest power to promote peace and justice.
While Trump has been unwavering in his support of Israel, he has also promised to end the war. (“Trump Demonized Muslims. He’s Winning Some of Them Over”, www. rollingstone.com) I hope whatever end he brings about is just for the Palestinians and creates a long-lasting peace, but it should be noted that Trump rarely considered Palestinian interests during his first term. He abandoned them by rejecting their claim to Jerusalem when he recognised it as the capital of Israel by moving the
Continued on page 9 >>
will surely open further avenues as He wills.
The Netherlands
On 13 October, Chaudhry Zafarulla Khan[ra] Sahib departed for The Netherlands via aeroplane, where he is staying for a few days at a place owned by a newly converted lady. This sister is a highly active and devoted Ahmadi who is engaged in extensive preaching efforts.
In his letter, Chaudhry Sahib[ra] wrote that the English Channel was crossed in just 15 minutes, and he reached his destination very comfortably. The view of the earth from the sky is indeed extraordinary and wonderful.
(Translated by Al Hakam from the original Urdu, published in the 11 November 1924 issue of Al Fazl)
or India, they all gave the same teaching that [you should] bow before Allah and discharge your duties towards each other.”
When a waqif-e-nau expressed interest in joining the police force, Huzooraa permitted him to pursue the career and said:
“I even asked Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya and young people that they should join the public service and the police force. That is how you can improve and better the quality and behaviour of the police department and the police people. Nowadays, it is [often] said that [...], especially American police, are quite irrational. They don’t care about the people. Sometimes they become very cruel. So, if you join the police force, I hope you will try to improve the behaviour of those people or if you get a higher status in the police department, then you can reform the police department.
“And as for how you can serve the Jamaat, when you show your example, you will set your example, while people will know that you are an Ahmadi Muslim, then they will know that this is the true teaching of Islam. This is how police personnel should behave and this is how they can improve the moral values of society. When you do this, that will definitely give a good impression and better impact of the Jamaat on the people.”
Regarding the election of Donald Trump as President of the United States, Huzooraa commented:
“Let us see when it takes over! I don’t know what he will do for the United States, but I think the world’s condition will get better; at least he will try to avoid wars. But some people are quite pessimistic about him. They say he will spoil the American economy and American people and he will take some cruel actions against immigrants and migrants and refugees, especially illegal refugees.”
Huzooraa added:
“If there is going to be any immigration, it should be legal immigration. But on humanitarian grounds, he should [...] deal with the people in a sympathetic way.
“Anyway, nowadays people are giving different opinions. Some international leaders are saying that the present-day condition of the world will get better. Some say he will just ruin the peace of the world. Let us see what happens! Anyway, the members of the cabinet or the cabinet he is forming seem to be comprised of those people who are hard-headed and they are against Muslims. So in this way, I don’t know what is going to happen with Muslim countries. But Trump himself says that he has good relations with the Prince of Saudi Arabia and some other Muslim leaders. And even the Chinese President says that he has good relations or he hopes that he will have better relations with China and with America. We cannot predict at this time. Let us see what happens. And Trump himself is such a person that one cannot predict about him.”
Conclusion
The mulaqat concluded with Huzooraa distributing pens among the khuddam and allowing them the honour of taking a group photo with him. Huzooraa then took leave, bringing the mulaqat to an end.
(Report prepared by Al Hakam) << Continued from page 5
The True Revolution – Part VII
English translation of Inqilab-e-Haqiqi
An address by Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmadra, Khalifatul Masih II, al-Musleh al-Maud
Delivered at Jalsa Salana Qadian on 28 December 1937
Great Religious Movements in History
Moving on from this preliminary discussion, I will now look at the [great] religious movements and how they correspond with the [most celebrated] cultures and civilisations of the world.
The Message of Adamas
One should keep in mind that according to the Holy Qur’an the first [great religious] age witnessed by the current order of humanity was that of Adamas. As for Adamas, The Holy Qur’an says:
“And when thy Lord said to the angels, ‘I am about to place a vicegerent in the earth,’ they said, ‘Wilt Thou place therein such as will cause disorder in it, and shed blood?’”
(Surah al-Baqarah, Ch.2: V.31) [Publishers]
This passage makes it clear that Adamas was the first prophet who laid the foundation of civilisation and society. However, the Adamas mentioned in this verse is not the progenitor of the human race, but rather the person who heralded the period of humanity’s move towards civilisation. Before his advent, the human race had not yet reached that point of civilisation where it could bear the burden of a religious law. They were [but savages], uncivilised and unworthy of being called human beings. At best, they could be described as magnificent beasts. [Here let me say] that I do not subscribe to the view that human beings evolved from primates and, by the grace of Allah the Exalted, I can prove this to be false.
The Progress of Humanity Occurred Through Constant Evolution
Nevertheless, it is true that humanity progressed through an evolutionary cycle. In the beginning, the condition of human beings was like that of a child; they had yet to arrive at a level whereby they could bear the responsibilities of religious law. [To impart on them a spiritual teaching] would have been as foolish as instructing a fouryear-old child to observe the fasts.
The Reality of the Initial Period
Thus there was a period where though our species was referred to as human, they were not ready for the attainment of eternal life. Once they crossed this stage and their minds were able to receive a religious teaching, the first law that Allah the Exalted initially commanded them [to follow] was to live together as a society under the authority of a ruler. The first messenger of Allah the Exalted brought with him the simple message—outside of the instruction to worship God—that human beings ought to establish a familial and civilised way of life under a leader who should judge [between them in] their trials and affairs under the law, and whom they should be obligated to obey. The first human being who established this law was Adamas
When Adamas is perceived in this way, many of the objections made against the [historical account of his life] are refuted. For example, the Holy Qur’an reports that the angels asked God:
“Wilt Thou place therein such as will cause disorder in it, and shed blood?” (Surah alBaqarah, Ch.2: V.31) [Publishers]
That is, are you about to place in the world someone who will create disorder and bloodshed?’ People question how it was possible for the angels to know that Adamas would come to shed blood even before he was born.
Various explanations have been offered for this. For example, because one of the tasks of a ruler is to quell disorder and unrest, the angels may have assumed that (the appointment of a leader) necessitated the presence of a rebellious group. Therefore, they inquired from Allah the Exalted whether a mischievous faction would appear in the world, which would require the birth of Adamas to keep them within the limits.
The word khalifa alludes to the presence of a rebellious element [at the time of Adamas]. However, even if it is accepted that the Adam mentioned in this verse is also the Adam who is the father of humanity, surely then, the referred chaos and disorder would occur at a future time at the hands of his progeny. If this were true, what need would there be to appoint Adamas as the khalifa? And if a khalifa can be appointed
when there is no anarchy, what was the basis of the question of the angels? Thus, this explanation, while not entirely amiss is not sufficient either. It is one interpretation of the verse, albeit not entirely adequate.
A number of commentators have suggested that on the basis of the qualities God had invested in Adamas, the angels assumed that he himself would create disorder and bloodshed. However, if Adamas was a prophet of God Almighty, he would only have acted in accordance with the divine commandment of God Almighty. It was impossible for him to do otherwise. Therefore, when explaining the actual
essence of the verse, it must be kept in mind that apparently the angels were expressing surprise at the acts to be committed by Adamas himself and not anyone else. They asked God whether he was about to give life to a person who would cause disorder and bloodshed. The question of the angels also suggested that chaos arises from the establishment of khilafat. The disorder they alluded to is closely associated with the appointment of a khalifa. It appeared to them that God Almighty would assign Adamas a task that would result in violence
and turmoil; therefore, they wondered how the khalifa of God could be responsible for such atrocities. The prospect of this confused them.
Keeping in mind all these numerous intricacies, the explanation I have proposed is the only one that corresponds to and is consistent with the question asked by the angels. As I have already mentioned, the Adamas of Surah al-Baqarah is not the progenitor of the human race, but the patron of the first divine law, and as inferred from the Holy Qur’an, the time in which he lived was an age when the civilisation [was progressing]. Through Adamas, humanity was first enlightened by [the principles of] civilisation. Previously, human beings had been incapable of assuming the responsibilities of civilisation and culture. But by the time of Adamas they were ready for this, therefore, Allah the Exalted appointed the best among them as his prophet, made him the founder of the age of civilisation and commanded him into being. Among his early initiatives was the establishment of the institution of marriage. Until his advent, human beings did not adhere to the principles of civilisation wherein the idea of a union between a man and woman held no meaning.
The Creation of Adamas and the Question of the Angels
When the circumstances of Adam’sas life are understood within this frame of reference, the question of the angels makes perfect sense.
Prior to the establishment of a civilised order, acts of killing and bloodshed are considered iniquitous and sinful. However, with the commencement of government and the rule of law, certain forms of conflict and the taking of life are made permissible. For example, it is considered legitimate for governments to take action against seditious elements in a society. Again, the execution of those who defy the law is considered just [by certain societies]. Many of the world’s governments rule like this; indeed they are compelled to. Hence, when Allah the Exalted decided to appoint Adamas the khalifa of the earth, the Angels pondered the various functions of government and were astonished to learn of the existence of legitimate forms of killing, bloodshed and warfare.
Furthermore, because no system of government had existed prior to this, the angels were alarmed that Adamas would commit these acts and that God Almighty would approve of the course of action he pursued rather than condemning it.
In a similar way to those people who, in their ignorance of the facts, criticise the wars waged by the Holy Prophetsa or the capital punishments issued by him, the angels questioned the actions Adamas would undertake in his capacity as the ruler of the age. They were astonished to learn that war and killing, which had previously been considered sins, were in some circumstances lawful. Therefore, they asked Allah: ‘Will you appoint a khalifa upon whom you enjoin that which was once considered unlawful?’ To which He replied:
<< Continued from page 7
American embassy there from Tel-Aviv. He abandoned the two-state solution by not making it a part of the Abraham Accords. (“What Trump’s Win Means for the Middle East, Ukraine, and China”, www.bbc.co.uk) Trump has promised to end the war and bring peace, but it’s difficult to say if the peace will truly solve the underlying root cause of the conflict: the lack of a homeland for the Palestinians.
Promises made about immigration
Aside from ending the war, Trump has promised many other things on the campaign trail. The 2024 Republican Party Platform promises to deport every illegal alien, and names “Hamas terrorists” as one group of immigrants destroying our country (“2024 Republican Party Platform”, www. presidency.ucsb.edu). While national defense should be a priority, it is dangerous to use this type of language when talking about refugees and asylum seekers. Trump also promised in a campaign rally in Iowa last year that he would ban all migrants from Gaza to prevent terrorists from infiltrating our country. (“Trump vows to expand Muslim ban and bar Gaza refugees if he wins presidency”, www.theguardian.com) His ban would also prevent those fleeing the war from finding shelter in the USA.
to unite all Americans. There appear to be two different versions of Trump, one who wants to unite Americans, including Muslims, and one who demonises Muslims and their interest to satisfy his core voters. I sincerely hope that we have just elected the former.
So, with this uncertainty about what the future holds, what should we do? A hadith best answers this question: Hazrat Anasra narrated “Allah’s Messengersa said ‘Help your brother, whether he is an oppressor or he is oppressed.’ People asked ‘O Allah’s Messengersa! It is alright to help him if he is oppressed, but how do we help him if he is an oppressor?’ The Prophetsa said ‘By preventing him from oppressing others.’” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith 2444)
What does it mean to help the oppressor? Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa said in his Friday Sermon on 13 October 2023:
“I know what you know not.” (Surah alBaqarah, Ch.2: V.31) [Publishers] [Meaning to say that] the angels failed to understand the many outstanding features of this form of rule.
With the establishment of a rule of law, some constraints and compulsions are made permissible and certain individual freedoms are diminished. Despite this, such laws are better for the individual and society as a whole. Under the interpretation I have accorded this verse, the words اِنَی
make perfect sense, otherwise, they suffer from laboured interpretations or at the very least depend on other explanations and exegesis.
The Truth about Civilisation
Thus it is clear that in the world, the term civilisation infers to the creation of lawful means that allow certain forms of discord and taking [and interfering with a person’s] life. When a member of the public kills someone, the world views them as a murderer. But if the ruling government hangs that killer by the neck, the government is not branded as murderous, rather their act is considered commendable and appropriate. Likewise, if a group of people appropriate a piece of property or land, they will be seen as rebellious [and acting in defiance of the law]. However, if for reasons of the national interest the government were to do the same, society would consider this a legitimate intervention. Again, if an individual forcefully detains another person, their actions are seen as cruel, yet if a ruling power imprisons a person for example, or interferes in their personal freedoms these measures are considered necessary.
When God revealed that He would establish civilisation in the world and appoint a khalifa who would initiate a rule of law, through which he would enforce executions, take possession of property and interfere in the personal freedom of <<
What does all this mean for Muslims?
So what does a second Trump term mean for Muslims? It is hard to say. He has promised to end the war in Gaza. He has built relationships with Muslims throughout the campaign. And he has also softened his rhetoric as the election drew closer. But his actions are also cause for concern. His immigration policies seem to be targeted against Muslims. He has a history of siding with Israel and ignoring Palestinians. During his victory speech, Trump promised
individuals, the angels greeted the news with surprise because they had never before encountered such an approach. Whereas all forms of killing had once been seen as wrong, certain types of killing were now considered lawful. And this was also true of [other acts such as creating a state of] discord which had previously been regarded as unjust.
By primitive standards, this was a momentous way of thought. Even today (aspects of this form of government) are heavily debated. Many people across Europe still oppose capital punishment on the basis that if killing is intrinsically wrong, what right do governments have of implementing it as a means of punishment? And yet the role of government is far broader than just the issuance of death sentences and comprises many other functions and policies which on the surface bear a resemblance to other fundamental wrongs. There is, for example, taxation. If the premise (of the aforementioned) argument is correct, one would have to concede that it is also wrong to tax, for it bears a likeness to larceny. Therefore, it should also be abolished. Yet, no one raised their voice against tax collection. Hence, criticisms of capital punishment are based on erroneous
“If the Muslims unite and are one, they will have a strong and impactful voice. Otherwise, the Muslim governments would be responsible for the deaths of innocent Muslims. Always keep the saying of the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa in mind –and this should be borne in mind by the major powers as well – that we must help both the oppressor and the oppressed. We must understand the importance of this injunction […] May Allah guide the Muslim powers so that they may unite in order to establish true justice. May the major world powers of the world also be granted rightmindedness so that instead of taking the world towards destruction, they try to save it. They should not make it their objective to simply fulfill their Selfish desires. They should always remember that if and when there is destruction, the major powers too will not be safe from it.” (Friday Sermon, 13 October 2023, “Muhammadsa: The Great Exemplar”, www.alhakam.org)
Let all world governments take heed of this advice to establish peace and justice throughout the world.
misgivings and a lack of serious thought on the subject.
Because there was no concept of kingship among the early humans, society was a long way away from becoming civilised. Acts of killing or appropriation were seen as deplorable. Therefore, God Almighty’s appointment of a ruler and the establishment of laws such as the right [of government] to execute people found guilty of murder, astonished the people [of Adamas] and left them wondering as to what had befallen them. They questioned how it could be lawful to kill in a particular set of circumstances and not in others, or why only in certain conditions the seizure of property was permissible in accordance with the law but not in any other situations. The government, for example, was permitted to tax the people, but common citizens were prohibited from appropriating the wealth of others. All that had once been considered wicked was when conducted by the government seen as civilising, and when committed by the individual considered as wrong.
(Translation by Fazl-e-Umar Foundation, English Section)
Friday Sermon
Mubarak Mosque, Islamabad, Tilford, UK
1 November 2024
Muhammadsa: The Great Exemplar
After reciting the tashahhud, ta‘awwuz, and Surah al-Fatihah, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa stated:
Details relating to the Battle of Banu Quraizah were being mentioned. Further details in relation to this are as follows:
It is mentioned that two Muslims were martyred during this battle, Khallad bin Suwaidra and Hazrat Mundhir bin Muhammadra. Regarding the Jews of Banu Quraizah who were killed, there are various narrations with regards to their numbers.
Ibn Ishaq has stated the number as 600, while according to another narration it is stated as 700. Suhaili mentions it being between 800 to 900. While Imam Tirmidhi and Imam Nasa‘i have recorded it as 400 combatants. Ibn Sa‘d also mentions it between 600 to 700. (Subul al-Huda Wa al-Rishad, Vol. 5, 20, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 1993, p. 16)
Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmad Sahibra, based on his research through various historical sources, concludes that “More or less 400 men were executed that day as per the judgement of Sa‘dra. The Holy Prophetsa ordered the Companions to arrange for the burial of these people.” (Sirat Khatam-unNabiyyeen, p. 603)
The opponents of Islam often exaggerate these numbers to try and portray Islam as a cruel religion. However, upon assessing the facts and evidence, based on authentic historical sources, the figure is close to 400 and only limited to those who were combatants. It is for this reason that they were all buried in a single trench in one home.
An Ahmadi scholar of the time, Syed Waqas Sahib, has also carried out extensive research on this and provided valuable insights on this topic. In his book Rasoole-Akram Aur Yahud-e-Hijaz, he discusses the debate over the number of people killed from among the Banu Quraizah, and raises certain questions regarding it, some of which carry a degree of rationality. He outlines a fundamental principle which is extremely significant: Whether a narration is taken from a hadith or a book of history, it cannot be exempt from being scrutinised in terms of how strong the narration is and potential fabrications, and to blindly accept all narrations is unwise.
Furthermore, the notion that 600 to 900 men were killed alongside their women and children, which even by a conservative estimate is said to be no less than 5,000 or 6,000 in total, and then to claim that such a large number of people were tied with ropes and brought to Medina, housed in two homes, and provided for with food and water, whilst the Muslims themselves remained without food and water [appears implausible]. Additionally, making arrangements for such a large number of people to answer the call of nature as well as to fulfil any other needs of theirs, without any attempts of them trying to escape or resist, and preparing graves for 600 individuals overnight whilst a trench had just freshly been dug, and the idea that only two or three companions, namely Hazrat Alira and Hazrat Zubairra were tasked with executing all of them, yet neither ever mentioned the incident, and Bukhari and Muslim also do not record the number of people executed, further suggests that these narrations should be critically re-examined and assessed whether these narrations have been greatly exaggerated.
He further writes that the fact is that later on people have added details from themselves in order to portray the Holy Prophetsa and the Muslims as hostile toward Jews. The word recorded in Bukhari with regards to Hazrat Sa‘d’sra decision is لٌتَقْتَ
, meaning “their combatants are to be killed.” Many historians and biographers interpreted this to mean that all men capable of fighting were to be killed. In fact, they expanded the term “combatants” to such an extent that they considered it to be every adult man and claimed, on their own accord, that people were in fact appointed to determine whether they had reached the age of maturity, thus further inflating the numbers. This is the extent to which they have exaggerated.
In contrast, those who have suggested a relatively smaller figure maintained a limited interpretation of the word “combatants”, meaning only the men who actively participated in the battle. And
according to their research, this is estimated to be no more than twenty, thus even further reducing the actual number and this conclusion of theirs possesses a degree of rationality. In any case, this is his personal research; however, some aspects of this are indeed reasonable and could serve as a basis for further research. (Rasool-e-Akram Aur Yahud-e-Hijaz, Maktaba Jamia Nai Dehli Ltd., pp. 132-148)
Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmad Sahibra has stated in response to the allegations raised by non-Muslim historians on the number of Jews killed from among the Banu Quraizah:
“With relation to the account of the Banu Quraizah, various non-Muslim historians have levelled allegations against the Holy Prophetsa in a very unpleasant manner. Due to the death penalty, which was administered to more or less 400 Jews, they have presented the Holy Prophetsa, God forbid, as being a cruel and bloodthirsty ruler. However, this allegation is based purely on religious prejudice. In the least, as far as an allegation upon Islam and the Founder of Islam is concerned, even those historians who have been trained in light of Western thought have not been able to
absolve themselves, (i.e. certain Muslims have also become influenced by this.)
“In response to this allegation, firstly, it should be remembered that the verdict regarding the Banu Quraizah, which is deemed to be a cruel verdict, was that of Hazrat Sa‘dra, not the Holy Prophetsa. When it is proven that the verdict was not issued by the Holy Prophetsa in the first place, no objection can be raised against him on this account. Secondly, this verdict was not faulty and barbaric at all. (The details of this incident have already been mentioned.) Thirdly, due to the covenant that Sa‘dra took prior to announcing his verdict, the Holy Prophetsa was in any case, bound to act upon it. Fourthly, when this verdict was accepted by the criminals themselves and they did not object, considering this to be a divine decree, as is evident from the words uttered by Huyayy bin Akhtab just as he was about to be executed, it was not the task of the Holy Prophetsa to unnecessarily interfere in such a case.
“After the verdict of Sa‘dra had been announced, the only relation of the Holy Prophetsa in this respect was to put into effect this verdict in the best possible
manner under the supervision of his administration. Thus, it has already been mentioned that the manner in which the Holy Prophetsa instituted this decision may be deemed the highest possible example of mercy and compassion. To be specific, whilst these people remained in captivity before the verdict was put into effect, the Holy Prophetsa arranged for their lodging and food in the best possible manner. When the verdict of Sa‘dra was to be implemented upon them, the Holy Prophetsa instituted the verdict in a manner that would prove to be least painful for the criminals. Firstly, taking their emotions into consideration, the Holy Prophetsa ordered that when one criminal was to be executed, the next should not be made to witness it. As a matter of fact, history tells us that when individuals would be brought to the place of execution, they would have no idea as to where they were being taken until they reached the actual spot. In addition to this, the Holy Prophetsa immediately accepted each and every appeal for mercy, which was lodged before him with respect to an individual. Not only did the Holy Prophetsa spare the lives of such people, rather, he even ordered the release of their wives and children, and for their wealth, etc., to be returned. What greater example of mercy and compassion towards a criminal can there be? Hence, not only is it true that absolutely no allegation can be levelled against the Holy Prophetsa due to the account of Banu Quraizah, rather, the fact of the matter is that this incident is an immensely clear proof of the high morals, remarkable administration and innate mercy and tenderness of the Holy Prophetsa
“Now remains the question of the actual verdict. In this regard, we have no hesitation in stating that there was absolutely no cruelty and barbarity in this at all. In fact, it was precisely based on justice and equity. In this respect, the first thing which must be taken into account is the actual crime of the Banu Quraizah and the circumstances in which it was committed. Thus, it is ascertained from history that when the Holy Prophetsa initially arrived in Medina, three Jewish tribes resided in Medina; namely, the Banu Qainuqa‘, Banu Nadir and Banu Quraizah. The first political measure, which was undertaken by the Holy Prophetsa following the migration was to call upon the chieftains of all three tribes and settle a treaty of peace and harmony. The conditions of this treaty were that the Muslims and Jews would live together in Medina with peace and harmony, would foster friendly relations with one another, would not aid or hold any relations with the enemies of one another; and if an attack was waged against Medina by a foreign tribe or tribes, everyone would stand up in collective defence; and if any person or group from among those who had agreed to the terms was guilty of a breach of treaty, the others would have a right to undertake stern measures; and all disputes would be presented before Muhammadsa, whose verdict would be contractually binding upon the related parties; however, it would be necessary for every individual or nation to be judged according to his own religion or shari‘ah. (This is a very significant aspect of the treaty in that the decisions will be made in accordance with their religious law despite the fact that a Muslim government had been established.)
“How did the Jews act upon this treaty? The answer to this is that firstly, the Banu Qainuqa’ committed a breach of treaty, and sparked war with the Muslims whilst severing friendly relations. They harassed Muslim women in a crude manner and arrogantly rejected the presidential position of the Holy Prophetsa which he possessed by virtue of the international treaty in Medina. However, when they were defeated by the Muslims, the Holy Prophetsa forgave them and sufficed on the mere precautionary measure that the Banu Qainuqa‘ should leave Medina and take up residence somewhere else, so that the peace of the city was not further disturbed, and the Muslims may be protected from a snake in the grass. Therefore, the people of Banu Qainuqa‘ left Medina along with their wealth, wives, and children with great peace and security and settled somewhere else.
“However, the remaining two Jewish tribes did not learn a lesson as a result of this event. As a matter of fact, the mercy of the Holy Prophetsa fuelled them with greater audacity, and much time had not elapsed when the Banu Nadir, which was the second tribe of the Jews, also raised its head. To begin with, Ka‘b bin Ashraf, one of their chiefs, broke the treaty and began to conspire with the Quraish and other Arab tribes in opposition to the Muslims. He incited the wild beasts of Arabia to stand up against the Holy Prophetsa and his Companions in a dangerous manner, and composed such provocative couplets against the Muslims, which created an immensely threatening state for them in the land. Moreover, this evil man referred to honourable Muslim women by name and mocked them in his couplets, after which he finally conspired to assassinate the Holy Prophetsa. When this individual reached his rightful end by the command of the Holy Prophetsa, his tribe stood up together in opposition to the Muslims. From that day on, the Banu Nadir completely ignored their agreement and began to conspire against the Muslims. Ultimately, the entire tribe devised a plan to assassinate the Holy Prophetsa and decided that, however possible, the Holy Prophetsa should not be spared. (Even though they had all entered into a treaty that if anyone was guilty of breaching the treaty, they would all punish him and they agreed upon this.) When the Holy Prophetsa received news of their deadly intentions, he warned them and was then required to call them to account, in response to which they became prepared for war against the Muslims in an extremely insolent manner. In this war, the Banu Quraizah aided the Banu Nadir. However, when the Banu Nadir were defeated, (and one has to remember that even in this instance the Banu Quraizah aided the Banu Nadir and they also they broke the term of their treaty), the Holy Prophetsa pardoned the Banu Quraizah altogether (even though they had joined with the Banu Nadir), and even the Banu Nadir were permitted to leave Medina in peace and security, albeit, they were not permitted to take along their arms. However, the manner in which the Banu Nadir repaid this benevolence was that their chieftains toured the whole of Arabia and brought a swarm of an army to fall upon Medina by inciting the various tribes of Arabia in a very dangerous manner. They called upon everyone to take an oath that,
this time, until Islam had been wiped out completely, they would not turn back.
“At this perilous time, a brief description of which has been presented above, how did the third Jewish tribe known as the Banu Quraizah act? This was the tribe that the Holy Prophetsa had forgiven and treated with immense generosity despite their treachery on the occasion of the Ghazwah of Banu Nadir. (The Holy Prophetsa had in fact treated them with mercy.) Furthermore, a second favour of the Holy Prophetsa upon the Banu Quraizah was that prior to the migration of the Muslims to Medina, the Banu Quraizah were considered inferior to the Banu Nadir in their status and rights. (There was a difference in status between these two tribes as well, the Banu Quraizah were considered inferior to the Banu Nadir.) If a person belonging to the Banu Nadir was killed by someone from the Banu Quraizah, such a person would be executed in retribution. On the other hand, if an individual from the Banu Quraizah was killed at the hands of the Banu Nadir, the mere payment of blood money would be considered sufficient. However, the Holy Prophetsa gave the Banu Quraizah equal rights in line with other citizens. However, despite these magnificent favours, the Banu Quraizah still committed treachery, and all this was at such a sensitive time when the Muslims were not confronted with a more difficult time in their lives. The example of the Banu Qainuqa‘ was before them, yet they did not derive benefit from it. The account of the Banu Nadir had taken place right before their eyes, but they did not take a lesson from it. When the time came, what did they do? What they did was to ignore their treaty completely and forget the favours of the Holy Prophetsa altogether. They emerged from their fortresses and attacked the Muslim women and children from the rear exactly at such a time when 3,000 Muslims were surrounded by a fierce and bloodthirsty army of 10,000 to 15,000 disbelievers in an immensely vulnerable and helpless state, and in the face of their incapability, their hearts were coming to their throats (i.e., during the Battle of Ahzab), and death stared them in the eye. They turned from their pact with the Muslims and partook in a deadly coalition which was solely aimed at utterly destroying Islam and the Founder of Islam. Indeed!
The very same Founder of Islam, whose first task after his arrival to Medina was to make the Jews his friend and ally. (One should ponder over this fact that the Holy Prophetsa first established friendly ties between them.)
In response to this, the Jews also accepted him as their friend, ally and Democratic Head. In these circumstances, this action of the Banu Quraizah was not only a breach of agreement and treason, but was also a dangerous act of rebellion, and rebellion of such magnitude, that if their plan had succeeded, this definitely would have brought an end to the lives, honour, dignity, faith, and religion of the Muslims. Thus, the Banu Quraizah were not guilty of one crime alone, rather, they were guilty of disloyalty, ungratefulness, breach of agreement, treason, rebellion, and attempted murder. Furthermore, these crimes were committed in such circumstances as could have taken on the most atrocious possible form, and no unbiased court of law could find factors for which they would be inclined
to deal leniently in their case. (In such circumstances, no court of law would show leniency.)
“In such circumstances, what other punishment, except for the one that was given to them, did they deserve? Obviously, there were only three possible punishments, that could have been given to them. Firstly, imprisonment or house arrest; secondly, exile, as was the case with the Banu Qainuqa‘ and Banu Nadir; thirdly, the execution of combatant men and imprisonment or house arrest for the rest. Now, one should contemplate with justice, which option was available to the Muslims in light of the circumstances of that era. According to the circumstances of that era, to keep an enemy nation imprisoned in the same city was absolutely out of the question. The reason was that in the case of imprisonment, the responsibility of providing for the food and lodging of the prisoners would fall upon the Muslims, and this was a burden they could not bear at all. Secondly, in those times, there was no formal system of jails, etc., and it was a custom that prisoners would be distributed amongst the various men belonging to the nation that was victorious. Practically, the prisoners would live and move about freely. In these circumstances, to permit an enemy and conspiring group of the highest degree to remain in Medina was not without its dangers. If this judgement had been administered to the Banu Quraizah, this would mean that they would continue to enjoy the same freedom to create unrest, disorder, mischief, and scheme secret plots, all at the expense of the Muslims. In other words, if before they would provide for themselves and slaughter the Muslims, from then on (i.e., upon being given freedom), they would be provided for by the Muslims (who at the time did not even have enough to feed themselves) and slaughter the Muslims even still. Furthermore, due to their living with the Muslims together in their homes, the other dangers which could have arisen were in addition to all this.”
Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmad Sahibra further writes:
“In these circumstances, I do not believe that any sensible individual would hold the view that this punishment could be given to them. (I.e., for them to be kept there.)
“Now remains the second punishment, i.e., exile. Undoubtedly, according to that era, this punishment was indeed looked upon as a very effective method by which to protect oneself from the mischief of an enemy. However, the experience of exiling the Banu Nadir demonstrated that as far as the Jews were concerned, this option was no less dangerous than the first in any way. In other words, if the Jews had been permitted to leave Medina this would have added to the multitude of such anti-Islam proponents who were actively engaged in war. Furthermore, these people would have joined the ranks of such enemies of Islam, who were restless in leading a movement of sedition, hostile propaganda, as well as secret and cunning schemes against Islam. History proves that from among all the Jewish tribes, the Banu Quraizah were most vehement in their enmity. Invariably, therefore, the exile of the Banu Quraizah posed even greater threats than what the Banu Nadir had created for the Muslims by instigating the Ghazwah of the
Confederates. If the Muslims had done this, in light of the circumstances of that era, their action would have been no less than suicide. However, is there any nation in the world that becomes prepared to commit suicide in order to keep an enemy alive? If not, then surely the Muslims cannot be considered guilty either for not deciding to commit suicide themselves so that their enemy could be kept alive.
“Therefore, both these punishments were not an option, and if either one of these routes had been taken, this definitely would have spelt ruin. Putting these two options aside, the only other course of action was the one that was actually employed. Although the verdict of Sa‘dra was a stern measure in itself, and a person’s nature apparently feels grief as a result of it, the question is: was any other option available? When a surgeon deems it necessary to amputate the hand or leg of a patient’s body, or becomes compelled to sever another part of the body, every noble individual feels a shock, that if this had not occurred, i.e., if the circumstances did not require, it would have been better. However, one is forced to submit in the face of compelling circumstances. As a matter of fact, in such circumstances, the action of the surgeon is considered to be worthy of praise, inasmuch that with the sacrifice of a smaller part of the body, a thing of greater value is saved. Similarly, although the verdict of Sa‘d was a strict one in itself, it was a necessary outcome brought about by compelling circumstances, without which there was no other option. It is for this reason that even a historian like Margoliouth, who is not at all from among the friends of Islam, is compelled to admit on this occasion that the decision of Sa‘dra was based on compelling circumstances, without which there was no other option. Hence, Mr. Margoliouth writes:
“‘The great invasion, which Mohammed [sa] declared to have been miraculously frustrated, was due or believed to be due, to the propaganda of members of the Banu Nadir, whom the Prophet had been satisfied with banishing. Should he banish the Kuraizah, he would thereby be setting free a fresh set of propagandists. On the other hand, those who had taken part openly with the invaders of Medinah could not very well be permitted to remain there. To banish them was unsafe; to permit them to remain was yet more dangerous. Hence they must die.’
“(This was the statement of Mr Margoliouth.)
“It should also be taken into consideration that the Banu Quraizah were not only allies and confederates of the Holy Prophetsa, but rather, by virtue of their initial treaty, had already accepted the government of the Holy Prophetsa in Medina, or in the least, they had accepted his sovereignty. Hence, they were not merely a treacherous ally or ordinary enemy, rather, they were also rebellious and extremely dangerous ones at that. The penalty for rebellion, especially at a time of war, has always been execution. If a rebel is not given a strict punishment, the system of government crumbles completely; and mischievous and rebellious people develop such courage, which proves to be immensely destructive to the peace and
Qaasid
comfort of society. Undoubtedly, showing mercy to a rebel in such circumstances is actually equivalent to committing an injustice against the country and its peaceabiding citizens. Therefore, until now, all civilised governments have always punished such rebels, be they men or women, with the death penalty, and no sensible individual has ever raised an objection against them. Hence, the verdict of Sa‘dra was absolutely fair, and was completely in accordance with principles of justice and equity. Moreover, due to the covenant of the Holy Prophetsa, he was not in a position to demonstrate mercy, except in the case of individuals, and as far as individuals were concerned, the Holy Prophetsa made every possible attempt. (He could grant pardon to individuals who sought forgiveness but he could not forgive the entire tribe as he had already given his word to abide by the decision of Hazrat Sa’dra.) However, it seems that in the embarrassment that they had refused to accept the Holy Prophetsa as a judge, they were not too inclined to make an appeal for clemency to the Holy Prophetsa. Obviously, without an appeal, the Holy Prophetsa could not show mercy, because the release of a rebel who does not even express remorse for his crime, can pose extremely dangerous ramifications.
“Another point to remember is that by virtue of the treaty which had been settled between the Holy Prophetsa and the Jews, one condition stated that if any matter regarding the Jews required a verdict, a decision would be made according to their own shari‘ah. Therefore, history proves that in accordance with this treaty, the Holy Prophetsa would always issue a verdict to the Jews in accordance with the Mosaic law. Now, when we cast a glance upon the Torah, the exact same punishment for a crime as the Jews were guilty of committing has been prescribed therein, as Sa‘d bin Mu‘adh issued to the Banu Quraizah.
“Hence, the following divine commandment has been stipulated in the Bible:
“‘When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it. And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then it shall be, that all the people that is found therein shall be tributaries unto thee, and they shall serve thee. And if it will make no peace with thee, but will make war against thee, then thou shalt besiege it: And when the Lord thy God hath delivered it into thine hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword: But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself.” (Deuteronomy, Ch. 20, V. 10-15)
“This commandment of the Jewish law was not only a commandment on paper, rather, the children of Israel always acted upon this teaching, and Jewish cases were always decided according to this very principle. Therefore, let us witness an example:
“‘And they warred against the Midianites, as the Lord commanded Moses; and they slew all the males. And they slew the kings of Midian, beside the rest of them that were slain; namely, Evi, and Rekem,
and Zur, and Hur, and Reba, five kings of Midian: Balaam also the son of Beor, they slew with the sword. And the children of Israel took all the women of Midian captives, and their little ones, and took the spoil of all their cattle, and all their flocks, and all their goods […] And they took all the spoil, and all the prey, both of men and of beasts. And they brought the captives, and the prey, and the spoil, unto Moses, and Eleazar the priest, and unto the congregation of the children of Israel, unto the camp at the plains of Moab, which are by Jordan near Jericho.’ (Numbers, 31, V. 7-12)
“Although the Messiah of Nazareth (who was also from the children of Israel) never received the opportunity to govern, nor was he ever faced with instances of war and conflict, whereby his method of practice could be witnessed, yet there are certain statements made by him, which shed light on his views regarding the judgement of mischievous and evil enemies. As such, addressing his enemies, Jesusas states:
“‘Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?’
“In other words, O people! You are worthy of being destroyed like poisonous snakes, but I do not have the power to punish you. However, fear God, and if nothing else, abstain from your immoral and mischievous deeds for fear of the punishment of hell. It is perhaps due to this very reason that when the followers of Jesusas attained power in the world, in accordance with the teaching of Jesusas that evil and mischievous enemies are worthy of being destroyed like snakes and scorpions, they did not feel the least hesitation in destroying anyone who they felt to be immoral, mischievous or a hindrance in their objectives. (We can see this even today.) Thus, the history of Christian nations is full of such examples.
“In summary, although the verdict of Sa‘dra may be considered strict in itself, it was not at all contrary to justice and equity. Furthermore, invariably, the nature of
the crime committed by the Jews, as well as the safety of the Muslims, demanded that such a verdict be issued. Moreover, this verdict was in complete accordance with the Jewish law, rather, in light of the initial treaty, it was necessary because by virtue of that treaty, the Muslims were obliged to judge the Jews according to their own Shari‘at. However, whatever the case may be, this verdict was that of Sa‘d bin Mu‘adhra, not the Holy Prophetsa, and the first and last responsibility of this decision falls upon Sa‘dra. In his capacity as the Head of Government, the only relation which the Holy Prophetsa had with this verdict was to put it into effect under his administration. It has already been mentioned that the Holy Prophetsa implemented this verdict in such a manner as can be considered the best possible example for even the most civilised and merciful of governments.”
(Sirat Khatam-un-Nabiyyeen, pp. 605-613)
Thus, this serves as a response to today’s critics who raise objections against Islam, and as a result, some Muslims also become influenced by these allegations, including our youth as well, who sometimes question why the Banu Quraizah were killed.
In fact, some people even cite this example of the Banu Quraizah and venture to say that whatever is happening to the Palestinians today is justified. However, the circumstances they are facing today cannot be likened in any way to previous circumstances and the manner in which they are exacting revenge, and they are even killing women and children.
In any case, it is the Muslims alone who are responsible [for these misconceptions]; they have ruined the image of Islam for the sake of their personal gains. May Allah the Almighty grant them understanding.
(Official Urdu transcript published in the Daily Al Fazl International, 22 November 2024, pp. 2-6. Translated by The Review of Religions.)
Editor-in-Chief:
Muin Ahmad | Executive Editors: Ataul Fatir Tahir, Aqeel Ahmed Kang | Research: Awwab Saad Hayat, Iftekhar Ahmed | Associate Editors: Jalees Ahmad, Ata-ul-Haye Nasir Translations: M Adam Ahmad
Design: Tahmeed Ahmad