Design portfolio, Amanda Bryant

Page 1

DESIGN PORTFOLIO AMANDA BRYANT

B.A. Arch, University of Kentucky; MSC Urbanism, TU Delft


2


CONTENTS OPERA NEBULA 4-17 Bachelor Thesis Project Professor Jason Scroggin UK COD - Fall 2013

FLIP-SCAPE REGIONAL PLANNING

18-31

Master Group Project Professor Remon Rooij and Els Bet TU Delft - Q3 2017

DELFT SCENARIO 32-39 Bachelor Study Abroad Project Professor Siebe Bakker UK COD - Summer 2013, Delft, Netherlands

PATTERN STUDY 40-45 Master Studio Exercise Professor Leo van den Berg TU Delft - Q2 2016/2017

WIRE MONSTER 46-53 Bachelor Studio Exercise Professor Rives Rash UK COD - Spring 2013

CUBE CITY 54-61 Master Project Professor Luisa Calabrese and PhD Jiaxiu Cai TU Delft - Q1 2016

RESEARCH CENTER

62-71

Bachelor Project Professor Anne Filson UK COD - Fall 2012

THE OPPORTUNITY IN THE VACANCY

72-107

Master Thesis Project Professor Rients Dijkstra and Vincent Nadin TU Delft 2017/2018

3


OPERA NEBULA The conceptual idea for a performance hall was derived from the formal analysis of the natural phenomenon of a nebula. Nebulae are part of the life cycle of a star. Through space matter and photon emission Nebulae are made up of interactive volumes of gas that emit different layers of colors and light. The formal characteristics of a nebula were translated into a series of formal and conceptual models that elaborated on the idea of colliding volumes and its relationship with color, frame and view orientation. The additive and subtractive values of a collision of volumes reminisce the interwoven layers of space matter and gas within a nebula. When applied to architecture, the defined program is located at an additive intersection of volumes. While, loosely defined program is oriented in interstitial spaces that result from volume subtraction. The exterior of the building reflects the form and program through different opacities and material while more directly referencing the natural inspiration through color with a juxtaposed transparent opaque atmosphere. Professor Jason Scroggin, Bachelor Thesis project UK COD - Fall 2013

4

Opera Nebula


PHYSICAL STUDY MODEL Volume Intersection

Bachelor Thesis Project

5


Exterior Rendering

6

Opera Nebula


Bachelor Thesis Project

7


8

Opera Nebula


SECTION 0 FT

20 FT

40 FT

80 FT

Bachelor Thesis Project

9


N

ST. GE O STA RGE TE TE N ISL RMIN A

Opera Nebula

SITE PLAN

10

E RICHMOND TERRAC


STA YA TEN N KEE ISLA ND S T A DIU M

Volume addition creates form and intersection defines formal program

North Elevation

Volume subtraction creates views and defines informal program

South Elevation Volume relationship defines facade devision and materiality

ELEVATIONS

PROGRAM DIAGRAM

Bachelor Thesis Project

11


NEBULA FORMATION

LIFE CYCLE OF A STAR Nebula

Dust Cloud

Interstellar space medium (ISM) gas and dust that make up space. Globule

Protostar

Brown Dwarf As ISM clumps together they pull in more matter. The gravitational pull is directly proportional to the mass.

Main Sequence Star

Red Giant

White Dwarf They form larger massive structures and the pressure becomes so high that nuclear fusion occurs.

Black Dwarf

Supernova

Neuron Star

This results in the emission of high-energy electromagnetic radiation which ionizes the outer layers of gas. This is an early stage of star formation.

Black Hole

PHOTON EMISSION ELECTRON

part of the process of electromagnetic radiation that produces light. when atoms absorb energy they become excited and move to a higher energy level. when the electrons move back down to a lower energy level the energy is re-emitted as a photon which is percieved as colored light. every element has a different emission spectrum.

LOW ENERGY PHOTON NUCLEUS HIGH ENERGY PHOTON LOWEST ENERGY LEVEL LOW ENERGY LEVEL EXCITED STATE

ABSORBTION

12

Opera Nebula

EMISSION


DIGITAL STUDY Color Frame Interaction

PHYSICAL STUDY MODELS Color Frame Interaction

DIGITAL STUDY Volume Intersection

CONCEPTUAL STUDIES Bachelor Thesis Project

13


PHYSICAL STUDY MODEL Volume Intersection

14

Opera Nebula


2

13 FT

60 FT

1 15 FT

4

13 FT

13 FT

3 5 36 FT

30 FT

58 FT 60 FT 60 FT

45 FT

30 FT 45 FT

30 FT

13 FT

13 FT

73 FT

6

8

7

FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 1. Theater Lobby 2. Restrooms 3. VIP Lounge and Bar 4. First Balcony Seating 5. VIP/Box Seating 6. Performers Lounge 7. Back of House Storage Area 8. Rehersal Space

N 0 FT

20 FT

40 FT

80 FT

Bachelor Thesis Project

15


interior Rendering

16

Opera Nebula


Bachelor Thesis Project

17


FLIP-SCAPE The focus for this studio was, as a group, to create a regional vision and strategy for The Amsterdam Metropolitan Area (AMA). As part of this proposal we also had to implement the goals of the municipalities in the region and consider the goals of the circular economy. For this vision, named Flipscape, the proposal focused on the direct relationship between landscape, density, and the knowledge economy. As cities such as the AMA continue to expand, over time large amounts of landscape are consumed for urban use. In order to protect the landscape cities need to redirect development to increasing the density of existing urban areas. In order to keep these areas attractive, landscape has to be considered and included as a crucial element for design. The statistics and research on the workers of the knowledge economy also supports this argument for landscape as essential element for design. Highly educated workers are more mobile, and have a wide choice of where they would like to live and work. Providing landscape can be a deciding factor in where these knowledge workers choose to live. This will directly affect the future of the region of the AMA and its economy. Flipscape looks to alter the current relationship of the AMA and these three themes, and propose alternative spatial typologies for the future. Lastly the goals of Flipscape align with the goals of the circular economy by emphasizing the re-use of land and the opportunity to create better efficiency and use of the other urban metabolisms within a building, city block and region. Professors Remon Rooij and Els Bet, Master Group Project TU Delft - Q3 2017 Group Members: Cateau Albers, Donald Boing, Amanda Bryant, and Jingsi Li

18

Flip-Scape


lake canal

river

coast

path

dunes view

waterfront

protected areas

forest

interaction

historic area

proposed islands

Landscape park

agriculture

farm co opp

natural park

urban park

urban farm

public initiatives

digital infrastructure

private co.

green roof

solar panels

water collection

public spaces

collaborative space

research institutes

use of roof

FLIPSCAPE

new plots

library

amenities

class rooms

suburb densification

campus

projects

knowledge

density business park

unique space

cafe

collaboration hubs

collabora tion

creative startups

re-use developments

tram public transit

metro walk ways

mixed use areas

high rise housing

trends large scale conventions reused areas

active

new forms shared areas

SPATIAL POSSIBILITIES DIAGRAM LEGEND Landscape Density Knowledge Connection

Master Group Project

19


1600

1900

URBAN GROWTH

Timeline

Industrial expansion

Closed Door

Water Front Door

Wild landscape

Tamed landscape

LANDSCAPE

ECONOMY

Origin

LEGEND COMBINED

Dikes Water body High ground New land Railway Tram Highway Urban area Heavy industrial area Knowledge-intensive area Wild Landscape, Origin, Closed Door

20

Flip-Scape

Tamed Landscape, Industrial Expansion, Water Front Door


1980

2017

Post War Expansion

Suburban Expansion

New Doors

Where is the Front Door?

Manipulated landscape

Overgrown

Manipulated Landscape, Post War Expension, New Doors,

Overgrown Landscape, Subrban Expansion, Where is the Front Door?

Master Group Project

21


N 0 km

5 km

10 km

20 km

THREE THEMES FLIPSCAPE MAP LEGEND Railway Highway Airport Industrial Area Knowledge-intensive Area Multi-functional Area Urban Area Permeable City Edges Dikes Bodies of Water High Ground New Land/Polder

22

Flip-Scape


FLIP-s LEGEND

G

P

P

P

P

S

W

N

S

N 0 km

5 km

10 km

20 km

FLIPSCAPE VISION MAP LEGEND Green Corridors Phase 1 Phase 1 - Circular Economy Phase 2 Phase 3 Stelling Van Amsterdam Start Up Circle Westas Network Connections Secondary Network Connections

Master Group Project

23


EXISTING URBAN EXPANSION LEGEND Urban Expansion Heavy Industry Knowledge Economy Transportation Hub

FLIPSCAPE SPATIAL PRINCIPLES LEGEND Re-use of Land City Border Landscape Permeation Knowledge Economy Transportation Hub

24

Flip-Scape


Multifunctionality

Re-use of Land

Complete Triangle

Compact City

Biological Consultation

Flexibility and Resilience

No Urban Expansion

Sustainable Transport

Landscape Protection

SPATIAL REQUIREMENTS

Master Group Project

25


lake canal

river

coast

path

dunes view

waterfront

protected areas

forest

interaction

historic area

proposed islands

Landscape park

agriculture

farm co opp

natural park

urban park

urban farm

public initiatives

digital infrastructure

private co.

green roof

solar panels

water collection

public spaces

collaborative space

research institutes

use of roof

FLIPSCAPE

new plots

library

amenities

class rooms

suburb densification

campus

projects

knowledge

density business park

unique space

cafe

collaboration hubs

collabora tion

creative startups

re-use developments

tram public transit

metro walk ways

mixed use areas

high rise housing

trends large scale conventions reused areas

active

new forms shared areas

SPATIAL POSSIBILITIES DIAGRAM LEGEND Landscape Density Knowledge Connection

26

Flip-Scape


icy dor gre e

nc orr i

enviro

g ita

ge ea

ie nc

s

licy n po

er +h

va n

nmenta

io ect rot pe p

li

ng

pol

sca

el

Rijkswater staat

s cie l agen

d lan

St

Am

Un

ol ph

t

hi

re ch

et ci

so il

d

er s

en

ut

ies

er v ci

ut

sc

mm

rm

co

es

rd am

pu

co

st e

nts

bita

k sp ar es

er

us in

ld

lb

po

st e

er

am

rd wa a

m

er

u rs

me

e lv

ls

ces

hi

aa

provin

inha

FLIPSCAPE

developers

city bord

er ho using densif icatio n

ive

eat

sin g

ph

M

rt sta

2

Am

3

st e

rd am

n o ti

ti

pe

m

o

c

municipalities

ic y po l

ve

s

as e

ve

in

ion

ph

ti ra

st or s

ci ty ri c

eg io

bo

nt

a ll

ly ce

o

po

rat

rr

c

am a

as e

rv oe

cy li

IJmuiden

rpo

ph

Ve

po

co

almere

co

1

s si

i

o bi m sy

es

as e

A

zuidas

westpoort

an mp

polic y

hou

in

A

cr ups

try dus

+

NS

+

tr

an

si t

STRATEGY TIMELINE DIAGRAM LEGEND Landscape Density Knowledge Intervention Policy Stakeholder Phase Connection

Master Group Project

27


N 0 km

5 km

10 km

20 km

ALMERE EXISTING CONDITION ANALYSIS LEGEND Existing Railway Existing Railway Station Highway Urban Area Outside of Almere Suburban Areas in Almere Public Areas in Almere Parks in Almere Landscape Development Urban Development New Railway New Railway Station New Island for Train Support

28

Flip-Scape


N 0 km

1 km

1.5 km

3 km

ALMERE FLIPSCAPE INTERVENTION PROPOSAL LEGEND Existing Railway Existing Railway Station Highway Suburban Areas in Almere Public Areas in Almere Parks in Almere Landscape Development Urban Development New Railway New Railway Station Urban Intervention Suburb Densification Park Development New Attraction New Network

Master Group Project

29


Almere Flip-scape Rendering

30

Flip-Scape


Master Group Project

31


Urban Studio This studio was focused on a scenario based urban analysis of the Dutch city Delft. Initially we began with an analysis based on strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) of the city and based on the analysis five scenarios were derived as possible futures for the city of Delft. Each member of our group then became responsible for graphically explaining one of five scenarios that was ultimately published in a newspaper format. Along with maps, diagrams and info-graphics, each scenario utilized a comic strip to demonstrate its characteristics. The newspapers were distributed to local municipality along with a verbal presentation. I was responsible for the Delft UniverCity Scenario which focused on how to utilize shared space to encourage interaction between citizens and students in which the shared space creates a collaborative community identity. Through analyzing the existing needs of students, citizens, and existing campus precedents three types of programmatic spaces were chosen as necessary to create this type of scenario. The location relationship between the programs, city and campus creates a variety of opportunities for students and citizens to interact creating a collaborative community. Professor Siebe Bakker, Bachelor Study Abroad Project UK COD - Summer 2013, Delft, Netherlands

32

Urban Studio


student space

the city

the campus

citizen space

TU CENTER

cafe

market

Bachelor Study Abroad Project

33


? Whats going to happen to the city of Delft in the future?

?

?

DF & CU

SWOT

A B C D

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

+ + -

+ +

+ + -

+ + +

+ +

+ + -

+ -

Lets look at Delfts strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats, driving forces, and critical uncertainties.

?

DELFT

?

? There are several different scenarios for the future of Delft based on this analysis.

DELFT

+

Lets elaborate on these scenarios by continuing research, collaborating with policy students from Liden, and meeting with stakeholders.

TWO FACED DELFT

DELFT UNIVERCITY

DESTINATION DELFT

IN DELFT

REGIONOVATION

The main five scenarios.

TWO FACED DELFT

DELFT UNIVER-CITY

DESTINATION DELFT

IN DELFT

REGIONOVATION

A new housing proposal that will work with all scenarios and therefore the future of Delft.

A final graphic presentation is given to stakeholders and municipality of Delft.

Using info-graphics, we can present this information in a newspaper. (via www.newspaperclub.com)

Newspapers are distributed to share the information.

PROJECT PROCESS 34

Urban Studio


DELFT UNIVERCITY

WEAKNESSES - disparity: students - citizens - housing gap: lack middle and high - limited space - no regional attraction - career opportunities (tech workers) - communication: TU - companies municipality - marketing

OPPORTUNITIES - collaboration - tech parks - marketing - incubators - region - creative industries

THREATS - culture of short term strategies - regional competition - limited budget - lack of amenities - departure of tech companies - connection: city and campus

DRIVING FORCES - tourism - improving public transport - improving infrastructure - need for new economy models - need for tech workers - limited space - government reorganization

CRITICAL UNCERTAINTIES - number of international students - study finance system - merger of Dutch technical universities - regional competition - new economic models - 100.000+ municipalities - attracting tech companies

WEAKNESSES - disparity: students - citizens - housing gap: lack middle and high - limited space - no regional attraction - career opportunities (tech workers) - communication: TU - companies municipality - marketing

STRENGTHS - educational institutes TU/ HBO/MBO - student population - social housing - geography and region - history and city center

WEAKNESSES - disparity: students - citizens - housing gap: lack middle and high - limited space - no regional attraction - career opportunities (tech workers) - communication: TU - companies municipality - marketing

OPPORTUNITIES - collaboration - tech parks - marketing - incubators - region - creative industries

THREATS - culture of short term strategies - regional competition - limited budget - lack of amenities - departure of tech companies - connection: city and campus

OPPORTUNITIES - collaboration - tech parks - marketing - incubators - region - creative industries

THREATS - culture of short term strategies - regional competition - limited budget - lack of amenities - departure of tech companies - connection: city and campus

DRIVING FORCES - tourism - improving public transport - improving infrastructure - need for new economy models - need for tech workers - limited space - government reorganization

CRITICAL UNCERTAINTIES - number of international students - study finance system - merger of Dutch technical universities - regional competition - new economic models - 100.000+ municipalities - attracting tech companies

DRIVING FORCES - tourism - improving public transport - improving infrastructure - need for new economy models - need for tech workers - limited space - government reorganization

CRITICAL UNCERTAINTIES - number of international students - study finance system - merger of Dutch technical universities - regional competition - new economic models - 100.000+ municipalities - attracting tech companies

STRENGTHS - educational institutes TU/ HBO/MBO - student population - social housing - geography and region - history and city center

WEAKNESSES - disparity: students - citizens - housing gap: lack middle and high - limited space - no regional attraction - career opportunities (tech workers) - communication: TU - companies municipality - marketing

STRENGTHS - educational institutes TU/ HBO/MBO - student population - social housing - geography and region - history and city center

WEAKNESSES - disparity: students - citizens - housing gap: lack middle and high - limited space - no regional attraction - career opportunities (tech workers) - communication: TU - companies municipality - marketing

OPPORTUNITIES - collaboration - tech parks - marketing - incubators - region - creative industries

THREATS - culture of short term strategies - regional competition - limited budget - lack of amenities - departure of tech companies - connection: city and campus

OPPORTUNITIES - collaboration - tech parks - marketing - incubators - region - creative industries

THREATS - culture of short term strategies - regional competition - limited budget - lack of amenities - departure of tech companies - connection: city and campus

DRIVING FORCES - tourism - improving public transport - improving infrastructure - need for new economy models - need for tech workers - limited space - government reorganization

CRITICAL UNCERTAINTIES - number of international students - study finance system - merger of Dutch technical universities - regional competition - new economic models - 100.000+ municipalities - attracting tech companies

DRIVING FORCES - tourism - improving public transport - improving infrastructure - need for new economy models - need for tech workers - limited space - government reorganization

CRITICAL UNCERTAINTIES - number of international students - study finance system - merger of Dutch technical universities - regional competition - new economic models - 100.000+ municipalities - attracting tech companies

IN DELFT

STRENGTHS - educational institutes TU/ HBO/MBO - student population - social housing - geography and region - history and city center

REGIONOVATION

DESTINATION DELFT TWO FACED DELFT

STRENGTHS - educational institutes TU/ HBO/MBO - student population - social housing - geography and region - history and city center

SCENARIO SWOT ANALYSIS Bachelor Study Abroad Project

35


FRONT COVER designed and drawn by: Amanda Bryant, Laurel Christensen

DESTINATION DELFT designed and drawn by: Liz Feldman

01

02/03

04/05 REGIONOVATION designed and drawn by: Jennifer Seymour-McCrystal

NEWSPAPER LAYOUT

36

Urban Studio

TWO FACED DELFT designed and drawn by: Zach Allen

SWOT ANALYSIS collaboration by: entire group, final text written by: Professor Siebe Bakker

DELFT UNIVERCITY designed and drawn by: Amanda Bryant

06/07

INDELFT designed and drawn by: Laurel Christensen

12/13

08/09

HYBRID DWELLING PROPOSAL designed and drawn by: Katie Gray

14/15

10/11

BACK COVER - PROCESS DOCUMENTATION photographs by: entire group

16


Newspaper Photos

Bachelor Study Abroad Project

37


DELFTUNIVERCITY delft university of technology

opportunity analysis of current students and amenities.

departments

student population total: 19.500 undergraduate: 10.900 graduate: 6.300 Doctoral: 2.300

eems

ae

arch

ceg

as

tpm

ide

3me

tu delft is made up of 8 departments. each of which have separate facilities and student societies. students are isolated to their designated department as early as welcome week. each student organization has its own location for events as well. this severely limits interaction and collaboration between faculties and ultimately the university’s sense of community.

over half of the student population is in a student society

student societies* total:74 sport student societies-34 professional student societies-22 social student societies-18

*tu delft has the most student societies of any university in the netherlands

science center delft cultural and sports center library Aula technopolis

Housing is largely decentralized and the majority of students live off campus in residential areas. apart from international students, who recieve assistance, tu students are responsible for finding their own accommodation. this limits the student community.

student space

the city

campus map

student housing

buildings or spaces not related to a specific faculty

shared spaces and events pull students and residents across the city and campus

the campus

citizen space

campus relationship PRECEDENTS

UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI

ILLINOiS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

lexington KY

cincinnati oh

chicago il

key student housing student center multipurpose event space

Delft Univercity Scenario Layout 38

social and spatial interactions between existing campuses and cities.

UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY

Urban Studio


campus and city have a collaborative identity through shared use of spaces. transition program CAMPUS

shared spaces

spaces that allow for a variety of events used by both students and citizens.

STUDENT HOUSING

STUDENT CENTER

MULTIPURPOSE EVENT SPACE

provides living amenities for students

campus building used for student recreation

accommodates a large variety of events

clearly defined function

semi-defined function

completely open function

promotes student interaction outside of class

promotes student interaction and used by citizens

promotes student and citizen interaction space is used equally by both

CITY

the division between campus and city

event space

we are a community!

TU CENTER

cafe

market

becomes less defined as space is shared.

location relationships 01

student housing in the middle of campus allows for a central destination for all students. the student center within the city draws students off campus. the multipurpose space within the city is close to both students and residents.

strategic placement that influences interaction.

02

student housing at the bottom of campus gives students close proximity to existing academic buildings. the student center on the opposite side of campus draws students across campus and is located near the city center, the multipurpose event space in the city pulls students off campus and creates a path through the student center for residents.

03

student housing at the top of campus gives students close proximity to the city center. the student center in the city draws students off of campus and creates intersections with other paths. the multipurpose space on the opposite end of campus causes residents to travel across campus.

04

student housing at the bottom of campus isolates student living from existing residential areas. the student center on the opposite side of campus creates a path through campus and becomes the mediation between the city and the campus. the multipurpose event space is located above the student center in the city and emphasizes the path to and from housing.

Bachelor Study Abroad Project

39


Pattern Study This study exercise explored the concept of Patterns and a Pattern Language in the context of an urban design. The focus was on how the design of public space can improve the lives of people using the categories of Health, Control, Legibility and Safety. Each of the four categories is broken down again into physical, mental and social components. To complete this study, each of those components is explained through four patterns. Each pattern is demonstrated through an icon with a name and key words. This collection of patterns is meant to represent concepts of urban design and human interaction rather than specific design moves. In addition to the patterns part of the assignment was to explore the integration of engineering systems into these patterns. As a result, examples of possible engineering systems are annotated in each pattern icon. Each of the patterns could include multiple engineering systems that focus on water, subsurface, energy collection or climate. The implementation of engineering systems into patterns depends on the final form of the design. Because these patterns are only defined by a list of variables and not strict dimensions, it is important to show the use of engineering systems, but keep the options open for more possibilities. Patterns, although an interesting way to analyze complex systems, ultimately are not a way to determine form. Forms of patterns should be malleable and interchangeable, but ultimately need a formal goal. Settling on a pattern as the end result can ultimately create a lack of innovation. As a designer it is our job to challenge the forms that create patterns. In questioning form innovations can be created and discovered. Through including context and multiple scales determines formal success and guides use and patterns. Professor Leo van den Berg, Master Studio Exercise TU Delft - Q2 2016/2017

40

Pattern Study


LEDGE

SEAT

VIEW

KNOW YOUR NEIGHBOR

VIEW

INTERSECT

SHARE

OPEN SIGN

PERSONAL

ACTIVE

PARTICIPATION Social

IDENTITY

DECORATION

A STORAGE SPOT

SECURE

CLOSE

ACCESSIBLE

A SMALL GARDEN

INVITING

A TRADITION

EVENT

COLOR

TACIT

MAINTAIN

VARIETY

INTERACT

PERSONAL space

VISIBLE

OPEN

CHOICE

Mental

CONTROL PATTERNS

Master Studio Exercise

41


THE MAIN ENTRY

VISIBLE

OPEN

ACCESSIBLE

PROTECTIVE SHELTER

SHIELD

VISIBLE

OPTIONS

ABILITY TO PAUSE

LEDGE

PERMEABLE

HIERARCHY

VIEW

SECLUDED Physical

CONNECTIVE

INTERSECT

SHARE

OPEN SIGN

PERSONAL

A SHORT CUT

CHOICE

VIEW

KNOW YOUR NEIGHBOR

THE DEFINED EDGE

MATERIAL

SEAT

ACTIVE

PARTICIPATION Social

COLOR

IDENTITY

DECORATION

A STORAGE SPOT

SECURE

CLOSE

ACCESSIBLE

A SMALL GARDEN

INVITING

A TRADITION

EVENT

A PAINTED DOOR

TACIT

MAINTAIN

VARIETY

INTERACT

PERSONAL space

VISIBLE

OPEN

CHOICE

Mental

CONTROL PATTERNS 42

Pattern Study


PLACE OF REST

Variety

View

Shade

A quiet corner

Planned

Spontaneous

Inclusive

PATH OF TRAVEL

Visible

A NIGHT out

PROMOTION OF PLAY

Organized

Intimate

INFORMAL

ENTERTAINMENT

Exchange

A gathering spot

NATURAL EXPERIENCE

GREEN

LIGHT

PEACEFUL

CREATIVE mark

TANGIBLE

COLOR

PERSONALIZE

COGNITIVE SPARK LETS PLAY!

Ease

Function

Choice

CLEAN area

Senses

Facilities Physical

Access

ALL-AGES

Welcoming

Open

ENGAGE

ORGANIZED EVENTS

INFLUX

Local Social

Brand

INTERACT

CHALLENGE

SELF STUDY

DESK

CONNECTION

Purchase

Mental

HEALTH PATTERNS Master Studio Exercise

43


RESIDENCE

A NIGHT LIGHT

Visible

Consistent

Bright

A STORE LOGO

Brand

Identity

Exchange

DWELL

INTIMATE

Choice

Play

Events

EXCHANGE

A STOP sign

Direction

Clarity Physical

Bold

Nature

Extra

Structure

Unique

Historic

Formal

A STATUE

STORE

NECESSITIES

Service

Creative

Events

Temporary

Visible

ARCHITECTURAL ICON

Amenities ER CORN

Changing

PRIVATE

Recreation

A POSTER WALL

Local

Natural element

Commercial Social

Material

Small

A SQUARE

Influx

Open

Active

Connected

Mental

LEGIBILITY PATTERNS 44

Pattern Study


A BENCH

THE divider

Visible

Permeable

Short

Relax

Discuss

Human measure

CLEAN FACADE

Watch

Maintenance

Identity

Material

Entrance

A view

NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE

SCHOOL

Height

Obstacle

Noise

The path

Visible

Open

Goal

Appearance

Task

Variety

Inviting

CIRCULATION

Function

Sign-age

Intersect

Implicit Physical

Leisure

Observe

Monitor Social

Ease

Pedestrian

A function

A window

CAFE

Organized

Scale

A CROSSWALK

A entrance

Permeable

Horizontal

Hints

OFFICE

OFFICE

Necessary

Clear

APARTMENTS

Active

Mental

SAFETY PATTERNS Master Studio Exercise

45


Wire Monster Analyzing the structural repetition of space and form, the goal of this project was to create an aggregation that challenges structure connection logic and the resulting form using only piano wire and soldering as materials. The final model consists of a bloom shaped unit, composed of four diamonds, with three different rules of connection logic; one for each axis of direction. One connected at the same edge, one connected at the opposite edge, and one face to face. The orientation of the axis is tied to the individual unit, not the entire structure, so the axis rotates each time a unit is added. The result is a form that can expand infinitely in all directions, and maintain structural support. The form creates moments of density and moments of alignment that create a wide variation of formal results. Digital modeling, drawing and rendering were used to analyze formal results, explain connection, and explore scale and installation possibilities. Professor Rives Rash, Bachelor Studio Exercise UK COD - Spring 2013

46

Wire Monster


ion

Plan

Elevation

Axon

Bachelor Studio Exercise

47


UNIT DIAGRAM 74

2”

106 1.25”

1.5”

Axon

Elevation

Plan

ATTACHMENT DIAGRAM X-AXIS ATTACHMENT

48

Y-AXIS ATTACHMENT

Z-AXIS ATTACHMENT

Plan

Plan

Plan

Elevation

Elevation

Elevation

Axon

Axon

Axon

Wire Monster


PLAN

ELEVATION Unit aggregation allows expansion infinitly in all directions.

Unit aggregation creates moments of overlapping that creates a sense of depth and density.

Unit aggregation creates moments of alignment that creates the illusion of flatness.

VARIATION DIAGRAM Bachelor Studio Exercise

49


Installation Perspective 1

Installation Perspective 2

50

Wire Monster


Installation Perspective 3

Installation Perspective 4

Bachelor Studio Exercise

51


Solder Model Photo

52

Wire Monster


Solder Model Photo

Bachelor Studio Exercise

53


Cube City The portrait of the city of Haarlem is an analysis through movement, interaction and isolation using the theories of typomorphology, urban landscape, open city, and complex system. Each theory is analyzed, diagrammed, and realized through a conceptual mapping. The conceptual map is then translated to an interactive model inspired by Buckminster Fuller’s Dymaxion Map. For the portrait of Haarlem, the geometry will be simplified and the conceptual map will be manipulated and projected onto faces of a cube. Different areas are isolated onto different faces of the cube, while also promoting interaction and challenging the perspective of the viewer. This analysis will bring about alternative perspectives and distinguish new ways of determining opportunities for different areas of the city. Professor Luisa Calabrese, and PhD Jiaxiu Cai, Master Project TU Delft - Q1 2016

54

Cube City


Complex System Cube Layout

Master Project

55


Typomorphology Drawing

Urban Landscape Drawing

Open City Drawing

Complex System Drawing

THEORY DRAWINGS 56

Cube City


Urban Morphology Axon Drawing

Master Project

57


Open City Downtown Plan View Sketch

COMPLEX SYSTEM ANALYSIS TIMELINE

1800

58

Cube City

1900

1930


Analytical Mapping

N 50 M

500 M

1 Km

Typomorphology Analysis

N 50 M

500 M

1 Km

Urban Landscape Analysis

N

50 M

500 M

1 Km

Open City Analysis

Open City Downtown Perspective Sketch

1960

1990

Present

Master Project

59


Typomorphology Cube Layout

Urban Landscape Cube Layout

Typomorphology Cube

Urban Landscape Cube

Cube Portrait Drawing and Model Photos 60

Cube City


Open City Cube Layout

Complex System Cube Layout

Open City Cube

Complex System Cube

Master Project

61


Research Center A Transdiciplinary Research Center requires space for different fields of a similar topic can collaborate and compare in an effort to make advancements. Natural resources and living locally focuses on a communities use and effect on a natural environment as well as unique environmental factors that can be utilized to maximize sustainability and community life. The natural give and take from the environment influenced the formal concept of a cycle, partially submerged, representing humans’ relationship with the earth and the resources taken from it. The form allowed for continuous circulation on both the interior an exterior to emphasize the idea of a cycle and allow visitors to symbolically become a part of it as they travel below ground for an auditorium, above ground for offices, and pass through the buildings public plaza and green space. Professor Anne Filson, Bachelor Project UK COD - Fall 2012

62

Research Center


Below Ground

First Floor

Second Floor Auditorium Lobby Space Circulation and Mechanical Cafe Office Space Outdoor Terrace Third Floor

PROGRAM AND CONCEPT DIAGRAM

Bachelor Project

63


Exterior Rendering

64

Research Center


Bachelor Project

65


10

1 19 FT

5

5

14 FT 3

14 FT

10 FT

4

6

8

10 FT

2

9 FT

9 10 FT

22 FT 7

5

10

BELOW GROUND FLOOR PLAN

LEGEND 1. Auditorium Stage 2. Above Ground Entrance 3. Below Ground Reception Area 4. Restrooms 5. Exit Stair 6. Entrance Lobby 7. Entrance Lobby 8. Green Roof Above Auditorium 9. Covered Exterior Space 10. Exterior Green Space

66

Research Center

GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN

11. Exit Stair 12. Cafe 13. Cconnection Walkway 14. Restrooms 15. Storage Closet 16. Small Meeting Room 17. Corner Conference Room 18. Office 19. Outdoor Patio


11 11

14

10 FT 14

10 FT

13

15

16

12

19 10 FT

16

10 FT

11

11

18

SECOND FLOOR PLAN

18

18

17

THIRD FLOOR PLAN

FLOOR PLANS N 0FT

20FT

40FT

80FT

Bachelor Project

67


ROOF GARDEN - Growth Medium - Plantar Tray - Precast Concrete -Steel I Beam

CONCRETE FLOORING - Metal Decking - Sub Floor - Steel I Beam DOUBLE PANED GLASS WINDOW MULLION

INTENSIVE GREEN ROOF - Growth Medium - Drainage Fabric - Retention Layer - Root Barrier - Waterproof Membraine -Precast Concrete -Steel I Beam

CONCRETE LOAD BEARING WALL

CONCRETE FOOTER

SECTION DETAIL 1

SECTION DETAIL 2

1

68

Research Center


Below Ground

First Floor

Second Floor Auditorium Lobby Space Circulation and Mechanical Cafe Office Space Outdoor Terrace Third Floor

SECTION DETAIL 3

PROGRAM AND CONCEPT DIAGRAM

2

3

SECTION 0 FT

20 FT

40 FT

80 FT

Bachelor Project

69


Interior Rendering

70

Research Center


Bachelor Project

71


The Opportunity In The Vacancy For this thesis I explored the topic of automobile dependence and its spatial relationships and effects. Automobile dependence and suburban sprawl have a cyclical compounding relationship. Automobiles require a large amount of space and infrastructure in order to be an effective means of transit. This prompts constructing the urban environment at a lower density, which generates suburban sprawl. The low-density development then requires an automobile for ease of access, which generates dependence. In this way automobile dependence and suburban sprawl build upon each other. This relationship has a series of primary spatial effects and secondary socioeconomic effects on the urban environment. The United States is currently stuck in a system of automobile dependence that perpetuates nearly all cities across the country. But, automobile dependence is more severe than the mere use of a car. It instead, refers to the necessity of an automobile for accessibility within nearly all aspects of daily life. Todd Litman defines automobile dependence in terms of three criteria: 1) reduced transport alternatives, 2) automobile oriented land use patterns, and 3) high levels per capita automobile travel. The three definition criteria were used as the main methodology by dictating the spatial analysis, key goals, and strategy themes. The key design goals of the thesis were 1) to consider destination as well as transportation 2) work to attract suburban inhabitants back into the city and 3) focus on pedestrianizing public space. The themes of this thesis are transit, development, and culture. It is crucial that these three themes work together in a cohesive strategy in order to alleviate the effects of automobile dependence. The design of this thesis concluded with proposals at the city, district, and neighborhood level, with the design at the neighborhood level being the focus. Professors Rients Dijkstra and Vincent Nadin, Master Thesis Project TU Delft - 2017/2018

72

The Opportunity in the Vacancy


Master Thesis Project

73


Isol atio n or A

cces Red sibi Low lity u ce Alt d Tr ern ans ativ por es t

Iso latio no A

The Lack of empathy The mental disassociation with the city

Automobile Dependence

of eve a h L apit el Hig er C eTrav P bil omo Aut

The overwhelming majority

of ount Am icle ve a Veh essi Exc ime in T ls

t of oun Am ehicle V

cce ssib r Low Red ility uce Alt d Tr ern ans ati por ves t

The false understanding of accessibility

The support of the system

sive

o Aut

Automobile Dependence

The Level of Implementation

a ces of Ex ime in T ls eve ta h L api vel Hig er C Tra P ile mob

Automobile Dependence

Automobile Oriented Land Use Patterns Uncomfortable or Useless Public Space

Suburban Sprawl Cycle Diagram

Scale - distance

Uncomfortable or Useless Public Space

The market control

Three Criteria Diagram

Wicked System Diagram

Scale - distance

possible to travel

develop - amount

develop - amount

of infrastructure

of infrastructure

Automobile Automobile Automobile Automobile Automobile Automobile Automobile Automobile

Pedestrian cycling bus

Plane

tram / streetcar

Metro Regional Train Automobile

Transit Multiplicity

SUBURBAN SPRAWL

Smart Growth / Balanced development

Economic / Racial / Functional

City

SUBURB

Economics

Maximizes accessibility

Economic / Racial / Functional Integration

Segregation

Excessive time spent in vehicle

Health

possible to travel

AUTOMOBILE DEPENDENCE

Limits accessibility

Community Environment

Minimizes importance / use of public space

Market driven development and private interest

The emphasis on ownership

Automobile Oriented Land Use Patterns

Less time spent in vehicle

City

Health

SUBURB

Economics

Community Environment

Maximizes importance / use of public space

Problem Field Diagram

Automobile Dependence Diagrams 74

The Opportunity in the Vacancy


Changes in Summary Statistics on Demographics and Total Travel 1969, 1977, 1983, 1990, and 1995 NPTS, and 2001 and 2009 NHTS 3.5

Indexed (1969=1.0)

3.0

2.5

2.0

Legend Vehicles Drivers Workers Households Persons

1.5

1.0 1969

1977

1983

1990

1995

2001

2009

Percent of Person Trips by Mode of Transportation and Trip Purpose 1990, and 1995 NPTS, and 2001 and 2009 NHTS Total

83.4% Family/Personal Errands

to/from Work

Work related business

91.4%

88%

School or Church

87.8%

Social and Recreational

70.7%

Legend Vehicles Transit Walk Other

76.9%

Trend in Household Distribution by Number of Household Vehicles 1969, 1977, 1983, 1990, and 1995 NPTS, and 2001 and 2009 NHTS

4.6%

15.7%

22.7%

23.2%

19.1%

19.6%

80,000

19.2%

100,000

1990

96% percent of americans living in low density

9.2%

36.3%

37.2%

32.3%

1983

31.4%

1977

Legend

32.4%

1969

40.4%

38.4%

33.5%

32.8%

0

13.5% 33.7%

20,000

15.3% 34.6%

40,000

34.4%

26.4%

60,000

20.6% 48.4%

Number of Households (thousands)

120,000

8.1% 1995

8.1% 2001

8.7%

No Vehicle One Vehicle Two Vehicles Three or More

2009

61% percent of americans living in single detached home

american average: Drive 55 minutes per day Make 4 trips per day Drive 40 miles per day

National Statistics of Automobile Dependence Master Thesis Project

75


Natural Environment

Public space and architecture Infrastructure and Traffic

0M

20

0M

10

M

50 M

25

Parking Property Value and Vacancy

Separation of Functions

Low Density and Sprawl

Spatial Effects of Automobile Dependence-City

Lack of living opportunities

minimized tax revenue lack of diverse job opportunities

highly gentrified public space

Empty evenings and weeknights air pollution

Community

urban noise

no community

Health

Street Pollution

Economics large scale special events

0M

20

0M

10

M

50 M

25

Unsafe Feeling

Risk of being hit as pedestrian

Economics Health secondary expenses of automobile ownership

reduced walkability

Community not family friendly

economic trap

Socioeconomic Effects of Automobile Dependence-City

76

The Opportunity in the Vacancy

lack of proximity to amenities

minimal access without the car interstate barriers

low residential property value


Natural Environment

Infrastructure and Traffic

Low Density and Sprawl

0M

20

0M

10

M

50

M

25

Separation of Functions

Parking

Property Value and Vacancy

Public space and architecture

Spatial Effects of Automobile Dependence-Suburb

exclusivity becomes competition

extra expenses of owning a larger home owning multiple cars

minimal time with family

lack of interaction

Risk of an accident

constant car usage

Community

sedentary lifestyle

Health Economics

stress of vehicle operation

secondary expenses of automobile ownership

0M

20

0M

10

M

50

M

25

Economics Health minimal to no pedestrian options

cater to big brand stores branded architecture

Risk of being hit as pedestrian

consumer driven culture

Community

rarely going downtown

minimized tax revenue

mental disassociation with the city

Socioeconomic Effects of Automobile Dependence-Suburb

Master Thesis Project

77


(Louisville Population is 256,000)

(Louisville Density is 903/km2)

U.S. Cities By Population > 1,000,000 300,000 - 1,000,000 200,000 - 300,000 < 200,000

Average Commute in Louisville

U.S. Cities By Density

22 Min

> 5000/km2 3000/km2 - 4000/km2 2000/km2 - 3000/km2 1000/km2 - 2000/km2 < 1000/km2

(Average Commute in the U.S. 25.4 min)

Louisville Comparison to U.S. Cities

N

Urban Grid Center

Arterial Radiating Highways

N

Bisecting Interstate I-65

N

Waterfront Interstate I-71 and I-64

N

Interior Beltway I-264

N

N

Exterior Beltway and Arterial Highways I-265

Louisville infrastructure development 78

The Opportunity in the Vacancy


Race 1940

Race 2010

Percent of Black alone

Percent of Black alone

(Social Explorer, 1940 Census)

(Social Explorer, 2010 Census)

Legend

Legend

Insuf. Data < 1% 1% to 5% 5% to 10% 10% to 15% 15% to 30%

2 MI

30% to 40% 40% to 60% 60% to 75% 75% to 90% 90% to 95% > 95%

2 MI

Race 1940

Race 2010

Percent of White alone

Percent of White alone

(Social Explorer, 1940 Census)

Insuf. Data < 1% 1% to 5% 5% to 10% 10% to 15% 15% to 30%

(Social Explorer, 2010 Census)

Legend

Legend

Insuf. Data < 1% 1% to 5% 5% to 10% 10% to 15% 15% to 30%

2 MI

30% to 40% 40% to 60% 60% to 75% 75% to 90% 90% to 95% > 95%

Insuf. Data < 1% 1% to 5% 5% to 10% 10% to 15% 15% to 30%

2 MI

30% to 40% 40% to 60% 60% to 75% 75% to 90% 90% to 95% > 95%

Property Value 1960

Property Value 2010

Percent of Owner Occupied Housing worth more than $15,000

Percent of Owner Occupied Housing worth more than $150,000

(Social Explorer, 1960 Census)

(Social Explorer, 2010 Census)

Legend

Legend

Insuf. Data < 1% 1% to 5% 5% to 10% 10% to 15% 15% to 20%

2 MI

20% to 30% 30% to 40% 40% to 60% 60% to 75% 75% to 90% > 90%

Insuf. Data < 1% 1% to 5% 5% to 10% 10% to 15% 15% to 20%

2 MI

Population Density 1940

Population Density 2010

Number of people per square mile

Number of people per square mile

(Social Explorer, 1940 Census)

20% to 30% 30% to 40% 40% to 60% 60% to 75% 75% to 90% > 90%

(Social Explorer, 2010 Census)

Legend

2 MI

30% to 40% 40% to 60% 60% to 75% 75% to 90% 90% to 95% > 95%

<5 50 to 200 200 to 500 500 to 1K 1K to 3K 3K to 5K

Legend 5K to 7K 7K to 9K 9K to 15K >15K 2 MI

<5 50 to 200 200 to 500 500 to 1K 1K to 3K 3K to 5K

5K to 7K 7K to 9K 9K to 15K

Demographics Comparison of Louisville KY Master Thesis Project

79


Industrial Cities Typology 1910

80 1920

The Opportunity in the Vacancy 1930 1940 1950 1960

1920’s - Motordom Movement 1970

Legend

automobile and oil Housing and social Infrastructure historic events

Walnut St. in 1942

Market St. in 1933

Muhammed Ali Blvd (Former Walnut St. ) at present

Market St. at present

1980 1990

Suburban Sprawl Typology

2000 2010

1960’s - Urban Riots

The PRactice of Redlining

Garden Suburb War On Poverty

Howard, Uwin Wright, Ford, Corbusier

Modernism

Jane Jacobs VS. Robert Moses

Urban Regeneration

Post-Modernism Gehl, Rowe Duany, Plater-Zyberk, Speck

New Urbanism

History Of Automobile Dependence Timeline

Comparison Images

2008 - Stock market crash and housing crisis

1994 - nafta 1996 - PRWORA

1986 - Oil collapse

1974 - OPEC oil embargo

1971 - Desegregation busing

1968 - The fair housing act

1964 - The Civil Rights Act 1964 - The Economic Opportunity Act 1965 - Housing urban development department

1956 - The Federal Highway Act

1945 - WWII ends 1946 - Beginning of baby boom 1949 - Housing Act

1941 - U.S. enters WWII

1937 - Social Housing Act

1934 - Federal Housing Act- Federal Home Loans - M.I.D.

1933 - FDR's new deal

1929 - Beginning of great depression

1926 - Oil company depitition allowance

1922 - National City Lines

1908 - Mass production of model t


Legend Ohio River Lock and Dam Union Station Ford Motor Co Factory Location 1937 Flood Redlining ‘First Grade’ Redlining ‘Second Grade’ Redlining ‘Third Grade’ Redlining ‘Fourth Grade’ Industry Olmstead Parks Olmstead Parkways Street Car Route 1937 City Boundary

The Industrial location map City Legend History Of Automobile Dependence

N

Ohio Lock and Dam Body River of Water Union Street Station

Ford CoHighway Factory Location City The Industrial location map MajorMotor Road or

0 KM

2.5 KM

5 KM

10 KM

20 KM

0 mi

1.5 mi

3.1 mi

6.2 mi

12.4 mi

N

1937 Flood Interstate or Beltway Legend Redlining ‘First Grade’ Railroads Ohio Lock and Dam Body River of Water Redlining ‘Second Grade’ Union Station Street Redlining ‘Third Ford Motor CoHighway Factory Location Major RoadGrade’ or Redlining ‘Fourth 1937 Flood Interstate orGrade’ Beltway Industry Redlining ‘First Grade’ Railroads Olmstead Parks ‘Second Grade’ Redlining Olmstead Parkways Redlining ‘Third Grade’ Street Redlining Car Route‘Fourth Grade’ 1937 City Boundary Industry Olmstead Parks Olmstead Parkways Street Car Route 1937 City Boundary

0 KM

2.5 KM

5 KM

10 KM

20 KM

0 mi

1.5 mi

3.1 mi

6.2 mi

12.4 mi

Legend Rubbertown Bowman Field Ford Motor Co Factory Suburb Developments Civil Rights Protests Louisville Medical Center 1956 Urban Boundary Interstate 65, 64 and 71 Arterial Highways City Limits Bus Routes

Suburban Flight location map Legend Suburban Flight Rubbertown Body of Water

Bowman Street Field Ford CoHighway Factory Location MajorMotor Road or Suburb Developments Interstate or Beltway Civil Rights Protests Legend Railroads Louisville Center Rubbertown BodyMedical of Water Bowman Field Street Boundary 1956 Urban Ford CoHighway Factory Location MajorMotor Road or 1957 Harland Bartholemew ‘Slum Renewal’ Areas Suburb Developments Interstate or Beltway 1957 Harland Bartholemew Civil Rights Protests Land Use Railroads Louisville Medium DensityMedical HousingCenter High Density Housing 1956 Urban Boundary Low Density Housing

Suburban Flight location map

N

Interstate 65, 64 and 71 Arterial Highways City Limits Bus Routes Interstate 65, 64 and 71 Arterial Highways City Limits Bus Routes

1957 Harland Bartholemew Land Use Medium Density Housing High Density Housing Low Density Housing Commercial Industrial Semi-Public ‘Slum Renewal’ Areas

0 KM

2.5 KM

5 KM

10 KM

20 KM

0 mi

1.5 mi

3.1 mi

6.2 mi

12.4 mi

N

0 KM

2.5 KM

5 KM

10 KM

20 KM

0 mi

1.5 mi

3.1 mi

6.2 mi

12.4 mi

Master Thesis Project

81


Approximate size (2mi²) to accommodate the projected population growth by 2037 at a density high enough to support mass transit (50 dwellings per acre).

Approximate size (12mi²) to accommodate the Metropolitan population at a density high enough to support mass transit (50 dwellings per acre).

Metr opo lit an

Are a

of

39 7 sq

Approximate size (14mi²) to accommodate future Metropolitan population at a density high enough to support mass transit (50 dwellings per acre).

MI d an

ty of 4 dwellings per a densi cre tion ula pop

Population = 767,355 (approx 383,678 dwellings)

Louisville Density Diagram

Suburb

INTERSTATE

0M

20

0M

BODY OF WATER

10

M

50 M

25

urb Sub

Rin g

0M

20

d roa

City C en

0M

10

ter

0M

5 M

25

M

200

0M

10

50M M

25

0M

20

0M

10

Sub u

M

50 M

25

rb

City/Suburb Relationship Diagram 82

The Opportunity in the Vacancy


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Like most American cities, Louisville must reduce vehicle miles traveled. Cars will remain the dominate mode of transport, but there is opportunity to shift short trips away from cars. Shifting these trips can have broad impacts on our health, air quality, built environment and connectivity. Move Louisville represents a vision and action plan for transportation policy and investment for Louisville Metro. The Plan provides a path to a healthy, connected and sustainable transportation network that encourages investment, growth and prosperity.

6

Exerpt from Louisville Municipality Document 1. Must consider not only transportation but also destination. Where are people going and why?

2. As the use of cars goes down the use of public space goes up.

A

3. As long as the origin of trips is located outside of the city car use cannot truly be reduced.

B

Ca

A

r Private Space

City Center

B

A

A

A

B

A

B

B

B

Public Space

B

A

B

A B

A

B

B

City Center B

A B A

B

Replacing cars with small trips means relocating destinations in relation to the type of transit use.

In order to get people out of their cars Considering public space and accommodating the pedestrian scale is critical.

Attracting inhabitants from the suburb into the city is critical to support public space and reduce car use.

Key Ideas Diagram Master Thesis Project

83


Natural Environment Legend Tree Canopy Natural Areas Parks Watersheds (Various)

84

The Opportunity in the Vacancy

N

Unstable Soil Steep Slopes Floodway and Flood Plan Wetlands Potential Wetlands (Hydric Soil)

0 KM

2.5 KM

5 KM

10 KM

20 KM

0 mi

1.5 mi

3.1 mi

6.2 mi

12.4 mi


N

0 KM

2.5 KM

5 KM

10 KM

20 KM

0 mi

1.5 mi

3.1 mi

6.2 mi

12.4 mi

Urban Character Legend

Vacant Properties Owned by the Municipality and for Sale Historic Properties Urban Renewal Areas Historic Districts Suburbs

Form Districts Industry Traditional Marketplace Corridor Downtown Traditional Neighborhood Campus Regional Center Town Center Suburban Market Corridor Village Center Village Suburban Work Place Neighborhood Urban Boundary Urban Neighborhoods

Master Thesis Project

85


Variety of activities play areas separate from cars

less time traveling

Variety of transit options

commute without driving

interaction between neighbors

Pedestrian paths, smaller blocks and Closer Functions

0M

20

0M

10

minimizing driving teens

M

50 5M

2

Variety of housing allows for community continuity and inclusiveness

walking reduces carbon footprint

Active streets increases security through observation

Smaller high quality Homes with low maintenance gardens

Less money on travel expenses and housing necessities

Use Less Energy per person

Public Parks and green spaces nearby

Alternative Axon Diagram 86

The Opportunity in the Vacancy


High Density Mixed Use

City

District

Zoning redevelopment

Neighborhood zoning

Zoning changes that allow for variety of program and increased density.

Subdividing districts to a smaller scale neighborhoods to create guides for form and function at the street level.

Zoning Redevelopment

Live

Outer limit to expansive growth to protect the natural environment and reinforce infill development. This is typically a state legislation.

Smart growth policies and incentives

Work Play

Incentives promoting renovation, economic breaks for companies, and living close to where you work.

Home

Apartment

Own

rent

%

%

%

%

s

Metro

bu bike k

wal

Urban Renewal

Multiple transit options. distance guides

Vulnerable area identification

Green Space

Development Policies and incentives

Isolation from Major Streets

variety of activity

Locating public space in terms of user location and groups.

A long term scheme for public transit allows for functional success and future development.

Car Lane

Bike path

sidewalk

Pedestrian and cycling safety

Continuous Frontages

Provision of dividers between cars and pedestrians and cyclists ensures protection on streets and allows for better function of all transit types.

Continuous frontages maintains interest and promotes walkability.

Pedestrian and cycling Safety

continuous Frontages

Cycling and Pedestrian Network

Clear Signage

Standard guides for streets that create a connective functional network of sidewalks and bike lanes.

Signage assists with safety and understanding of street usage.

cycling and pedestrian network

Clear signage

Parking Policy Transition

Walkability

Parking policy transition plans allows for a gradual shift away from car use in conjunction with development.

Subdivision of blocks and hierarchy of streets creates ease of walking within the district.

Policies requiring multiple transit options be available at a certain distance from any location.

slow

Coverage at public transit stops

Principles include reducing speed, smaller lanes, 2-way streets, and adding visibility barriers to control the effect of cars on street safety.

Requirements of weather protection at all public transit stops to improve usage. coverage at public transit stops

Traffic Calming principles

Rent Control and Social Housing

Prioritization of areas of high risk in need of assistance, for example, low property value, high crime, or low job opportunities.

Policies that protect the rental market to keep areas affordable, and integrate social housing within urban neighborhoods.

Rent Control and social housing

developer

community

Providing collaborative investment opportunities allows for developers to fund projects within areas of high property value.

Collaborative investment

Neighborhood

Structure

Fire Code

Occupancy

Minimal Construction Development policies that bring abandoned buildings up to code in order to be reused and re-purposed.

Minimal Construction

Collaborative investment

municipality

Policies and classes that change the rules of right-or-way from cars to pedestrians and cyclists at certain types of intersections.

Traffic Calming Principles

Vulnerable area identification

Policies that provide economic incentive for the use and development of property in vulnerable areas.

2

1

Multiple Transit Options, distance guides

Development Policies and Incentives

Pedestrian and Cycling Right of Way 3

pedestrian and cycling right of way

walkability

Cafe

office Event Space

workshops

Studios

Temporary infill and collaborative uses

Temporary infill and collaborative uses Collaborative functional spaces provided to startups for minimal cost to generate activity.

Functional Redevelopment

Density Infill

Phasing plan that removes functions that do not fit within the context of the existing urban character.

Zoning and policy changes that allow for additional units to be added to properties to increase property value, activity and density.

functional Redevelopment

Density infill

Park scheme and protected areas

Green streets

Permeable surfaces

Policies that generate green infrastructures within the urban context, and protect natural areas.

Policies and guides that require the addition of greenery along streets to enhance street quality.

The use of permeable surfaces assists with water runoff and eases walkability.

Park Scheme and protected areas

Permeable surfaces

Green Streets

Air quality and heat island policies Policies to assist air quality, flow and heat. Air Quality and Heat Island policies

Flood Zone

secondary Flood Zone

body of water

Natural Disaster prevention initiatives

locations to pause

Orienting public spaces away from cars creates more pleasurable public spaces and opportunities.

developer

historic preservation

Providing public seating for rest and observation increases street activity and promotes walkability.

Isolation from Major Streets

Public transit Connection Plan

deduction opportunities

Locations to Pause

Generating a connection between different smaller public spaces.

Activity during various hours ensures community stability and assists safety.

Policies that coordinate public transit proposals directly with the connection of vulnerable areas.

community interaction

Public space network

Marketing scheme to generate interest and activity, and change the perception of inhabitants.

Public Transit Connection Plan

infill requirements

A new focus on walkability means locating functions within a reasonable distance.

Variety of Activity

Industry

Public space Transportation Plan

car

Accessibility And Walkability

Requiring housing variety through policy and percentage. This assists community stability and choice.

Public space network

Parking policy Transition

et

Complete Blocks

Housing Variety

Event planning and marketing

Public Transit Phasing and Scheme

stre

Policies that require new developments to have complete activation of the street, and omit large expanses of space in front of buildings.

accessibility and walkability

Large scale plan of generating spaces void of car activity.

Consideration of User and Accessibility

Public Transit Phasing Scheme

Complete Blocks

Policies that guide the provision of necessities and amenities within a area.

housing Variety

event planning and marketing

consideration of user and accessibility

Guides that direct historic preservation, facade protection and require pedestrian interaction and frontage.

Functional Requirement Policies

Necessities

Automobile Free Public space scheme

event

facade and urban character guides

functional Requirement Policies

Urban Growth boundary

Automobile free public space scheme

Facade and Urban Character Guides

neighborhood Zoning

Urban growth boundary

Smart Growth Policies and Incentives

Neighborhood

Connection to parks

Green Interventions

Policies and guides that promote easy access to smaller green spaces and parks.

Interventions such as green roofs, walls and balconies provides green interaction often sought out in the suburban typology.

Connection to parks

Natural disaster prevention initiatives Policies and developments that account for natural events such as flooding.

Recreation opportunities

Green interventions

Recreation opportunities

Gardening and Biodiversity

Providing a variety within green spaces by adding recreational functions, such as sports activities.

Developments of community gardens provides interaction and biodiversity adds to the natural appeal of an area.

Gardening and biodiversity

Spatial Framework Matrix Master Thesis Project

87


Downtown Three Criteria Analysis Axon

portland

Shawnee

Butchertown

Russell

Central Business District

Phoenix Hill

chickasaw parkland

California Smoketown Jackson

Limerick

Old Louisville

Park Hill

Shelby Park

paristown pointe

Germantown

park duvalle

Algonquin

Merriwether Schnitzelburg

Hallmark

University Saint Joseph

Audubon

Taylor Berry

South Louisville

Fairgrounds

Wilder Park Wyandotte / oakdale

Criteria 1 Legend Interstate Bus Route Major Street

N

0 M

500 M

1 kM

2 kM

4 kM

0 ft

1640 ft

3281 ft

1.2 mi

2.5 mi

Criteria 2 Legend Zoning - Industrial (Various)

N

Zoning - Commercial (Various)

Zoning - Waterfront (Various) Zoning - Office (Various)

Downtown Three Criteria Layer Maps 88

The Opportunity in the Vacancy

Zoning - Interstate Neighborhood Boundary

0 M

500 M

1 kM

2 kM

4 kM

0 ft

1640 ft

3281 ft

1.2 mi

2.5 mi

Zoning - Residential (Various)

Criteria 3 Legend Major City Functions

N

0 M

500 M

1 kM

2 kM

4 kM

0 ft

1640 ft

3281 ft

1.2 mi

2.5 mi


portland

Shawnee

Butchertown

Russell

Central Business District

Phoenix Hill

chickasaw parkland

California Smoketown Jackson

Limerick

Old Louisville

Park Hill

Shelby Park

paristown pointe

Germantown

park duvalle

Algonquin

Merriwether Schnitzelburg

Hallmark

University Saint Joseph

Audubon

Taylor Berry

South Louisville

Fairgrounds

Wilder Park Wyandotte / oakdale

Conclusion Legend Density Increase Urban Corridor - Street car Route Urban Axis - Metro Line Urban Corridor Intersection Urban Axis Intersection

N

0 M

500 M

1 kM

2 kM

4 kM

0 ft

1640 ft

3281 ft

1.2 mi

2.5 mi

Downtown three criteria Conclusion map Master Thesis Project

89


CBD Three Criteria Analysis Axon

TOURIST

and mus eum BOURBON

DISTRICT

Urban Ren ewal-N

4th st. live-Night

Life

ULU

Criteria 1 Legend Major Parking Areas Interstate Major Streets Secondary Streets Tertiary Streets Alley Ways and Small Streets Bus Route Bus Stop with Shelter Bus Stop without Shelter

N

0 KM

100 M

200 M

500 M

1 KM

0 mi

328 ft

656 ft

1640 ft

3281 ft

Criteria 2 Legend Commercial Tourist Civic Residential Office Health Recreational Park

CBD Three Criteria Layer Maps 90

The Opportunity in the Vacancy

N

0 KM

100 M

200 M

500 M

1 KM

0 mi

328 ft

656 ft

1640 ft

3281 ft

Criteria 3 Legend Major Event Spaces High Rise Buildings Tree Line Parks Active Districts

N

0 KM

100 M

200 M

500 M

1 KM

0 mi

328 ft

656 ft

1640 ft

3281 ft


TOURIST

and muse um BOURBON

DISTRICT

Urban R enewal-

4th st. live-Nig ht

Life

NULU

Conclusion Legend New Focal Points for Development

N

0 KM

100 M

200 M

500 M

1 KM

0 mi

328 ft

656 ft

1640 ft

3281 ft

Central Business District three criteria Conclusion Master Thesis Project

91


9th st analysis Criteria 1 Criteria 1 Legend Legend Parking Lot Lot Parking Above Ground Parking Structure Above Ground Parking Structure Below Ground Parking Structure Below Ground Parking Structure Interstate Interstate Interstate Direction Interstate Direction Street Direction Pedestrian Route Street Direction Bike Share Station Pedestrian Route BusBike StopShare Station

Bus Stop

92

The Opportunity in the Vacancy

0 KM N N 0 KM 0 mi0 mi

50 50 M M

100 100 M M

200200 M M

300 300 M M

164 164 ft ft

328 328 ft ft

656656 ft ft

984 984 ft ft


0 KM N Criteria 2 50 M

100 M

200 M

300 M

0 mi Legend Week Days Office Civic Bank Education

328 ft

656 ft

984 ft

164 ft

Weekend and Evenings Tourist Residential Constant (Minimal) Fine Arts Venue Food Commercial Services

Vacant Mixed Use

N

0 KM

50 M

100 M

0 mi

164 ft

328 ft

M 300 M 9th st200analysis Criteria 2 656 ft

Vacant Mixed Use

984 ft

Legend Week Days Office Civic Bank Education Weekend and Evenings Tourist Residential Constant (Minimal) Fine Arts Venue Food Commercial Services

Master Thesis Project

93


9th st analysis Criteria 3 Criteria 3 Legend Legend Sidewalks Sidewalks Parks Parks Public Space Public Space Strong Facade Strong Facade Average Facade Average Facade Poor Facade Poor Facade No Facade

No Facade

94

The Opportunity in the Vacancy

0 KM N N 0 KM

0 mi0 mi

50 50 M M

100100 M M

200200 M M

300300 M M

164 164 ft ft

328328 ft ft

656656 ft ft

984 984 ft ft


0 KM 50 M 100 M N Conclusion CBD Neighborhood Base Map

200 M

300 M

Legend 0 mi

656 ft

984 ft

164 ft

New Ohio Connections River Focus Area Buildings Parking Sidewalk Tree Canopy Road Interstate Street Center Lines

328 ft

N

0 KM

50 M

100 M

0 mi

164 ft

328 ft

M 300 M 9th st 200analysis Conclusion 656 ft

984 ft

Legend

New Connections Focus Area

Master Thesis Project

95


Demo Axon Legend Parking Lots Parking Structures or Buildings

Demo Plan Legend Parking Lots Parking Structures or Buildings Tree Canopy

k Plan Base Map hborhood

e re or Frontage elopment ynd Cycling Route er Lines king Lanes err Street Lines Car Median

96

The Opportunity in the Vacancy

0 KM 100 M Demo Plan 50 M CBDN Neighborhood Base Map 0 mi 164 ft 328 ft Legend Parking Lots Ohio River Parking BuildingsStructures or Buildings Tree Canopy Parking Sidewalk Tree Canopy Road Interstate Street Center Lines

200 M

300 M

656 ft

984 ft

N

0 KM

50 M

100 M

200 M

300 M

0 mi

164 ft

328 ft

656 ft

984 ft


Functions Commercial/retail Residential apt and condo Residential Home Office

New Work Axon Legend Commercial/Retail Residential Apt and Condo Residential Home Office

New Work Plan Legend Buildings Green Space Public Square or Frontage Facade Development Pedestrian and Cycling Route Street Center Lines Paralell Parking Lanes Bike Lane or Street Car Median

New Work Plan Base Map CBD Neighborhood Legend Buildings Ohio River Green Space Buildings Public ParkingSquare or Frontage Facade SidewalkDevelopment Pedestrian and Cycling Route Tree Canopy Street Road Center Lines Paralell Parking Lanes Interstate Bike or Street StreetLane Center Lines Car Median

N

0 KM

50 M

100 M

200 M

300 M

0 mi

164 ft

328 ft

656 ft

984 ft

Master Thesis Project

97


22nd

15th

Interstate

26th

Interstate

35th

Railroad

Railroad

Interstate

41st

9th

3rd

Residential

Floyd

Clay commercial

Sidewalk

Parallel Parking

Car Lane

Car Lane

Parallel Parking

Sidewalk

41st to 22nd street

Sidewalk

Parallel Parking

Bike Lane

Car Lane

Turn Lane

Car Lane

Bike Lane

Parallel Parking

Sidewalk

22nd street to 10th Street Sidewalk

Parallel Parking

Car Lane

Car Lane

Car Lane

Car Lane

Parallel Parking

Sidewalk

Car Lane

Car Lane

Car Lane

Car Lane

Parallel Parking

Sidewalk

10th Street to Floyd

Sidewalk

Parallel Parking

Floyd to Clay street

Market Street corridor analysis 98

The Opportunity in the Vacancy


market st.

41st st.

34th st.

26th st.

6th st.

Legend Zoning - Industrial (Various)

22nd st.

3rd st.

15th st.

Floyd st.

clay st.

0 M

Zoning - Commercial (Various)

Zoning - Residential (Various)

9th st.

100M

200M

0 ft 328ft 656ft

500 M

1 kM

1640 ft

3281 ft

Zoning - Waterfront (Various) Zoning - Office (Various)

Zoning - Interstate

Parking Lots

0 M

500 M

1 kM 3281 ft 4 kM Master Thesis Project

Market Street Parking zoning corridor analysis

0 ft

1640 ft

2.5 mi

99


Phase 1 Legend Street Hierarchy

Buildings Parking Lots

Phase 2 Legend Street Hierarchy

Secondary Network Buildings Parking Lots New Districts

Phase 3 Legend Street Hierarchy

Secondary Network Buildings Parking Lots New Districts New Buildings

District Phasing Diagram 100

The Opportunity in the Vacancy


Pedestrian Cycling Street

Minimum Construction

functional Requirements

Facade Guidelines

Phase 1 Greenery

Collaborative uses

Temporary activities

Function Development

Phase 2

Housing Variety

Regular Activity

Phase 3

Infill Development

Established locations

Alleyway Phasing Diagram Master Thesis Project

101


5 ft

8 ft

10 ft

10 ft

15 ft

5 ft

Tram or street car

Bike Lane

60 ft or 18.2 m

Sidewalk

Bike Lane

Parallel Parking

Car Lane

Car Lane

Sidewalk

Street Section-ProposedUrban Corridor Street Section Proposed Urban Corridor

5 ft

8 ft

10 ft

10 ft

5 ft

Car Lane

Bike Lane

40 ft or 12.2 m

Sidewalk

Bike Lane

Parallel Parking

Street Section Proposed Car street Street Section-Proposed - Car1 Street 1 102

The Opportunity in the Vacancy

Car Lane

Sidewalk


5 ft

10 ft

10 ft

5 ft

40 ft or 12.2 m

Sidewalk

Bike Lane

Car Lane

Car Lane

Street Section Proposed- Car Street 2

Bike Lane

Sidewalk

Street Section Proposed - Car street 2

10 ft

10 ft

20 ft or 6 m

Renovated Frontage

Pedestrian and cycling path

Street Section Proposed - pedestrian cycling StreetStreet

Developed Lot

Section Proposed - Pedestrian and cycling Street Master Thesis Project

103


Plan of New Public Square

Section of New Public Square 104

The Opportunity in the Vacancy

N

0 KM

10 M

25 M

50 M

0 mi

33 ft

82 ft

164 ft


Conceptual Rendering

0 KM

10 M

25 M

50 M

0 mi

33 ft

82 ft

164 ft

Master Thesis Project

105


Exterior Rendering

106

The Opportunity in the Vacancy


Master Thesis Project

107



Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.