A manda D anguole S antoro
Citys c beco apes min g gr and een a thro ctive ugh desi gn.
Contents
Contact Info
01 Prairie Vision: Hale Library’s New Front Porch
Amanda Santoro
• 1st Prize National Winner EPA Rainworks Challenge 2013 • ASLA Central States Merit Award 2013 02 Re-envisioning Campus Creek • ASLA Central States Honor Award 2016
03 Threads: Stitching Lives Across the Rails • Kansas APA New Horizons Award 2014
04 Meeting Ground: Where People and Ideas Collide 05 Recycling as Play: Master’s Report 06 North Kansas City High School 07 Winnetonka High School 08 Regional Law Enforcement Memorial Garden 09 Planting the Seed: A School Design Activity 10 Graphics: Rendering, Mapping + Hand Sketching
address: 4330 NW Claymont Dr. Kansas, MO 64116 email: amanda.santoro0815@gmail.com cell: 316.708.1992
Cityscapes have complex issues at multiple scales, which are critically important to solve. From streetscapes to master planning, cityscapes can become greener and active spaces that are framed through design decisions. Through this portfolio, I am depicting my best work encompassing my passion for green, multi-functional, and active spaces for people.
Prairie Vision
Hale Library’s New Front Porch Location: Manhattan, KS Year: Fall 2013 Interdisciplinary Team Project
CALL HALL
VET MEDICAL
Awards: • 1st Place in 2013 EPA Rainworks Competition (Site Design Category)
INTERNATIONAL STUDENT CENTER
• ASLA Central State Conference Merit Award
Outside the entrances of Hale Library on Kansas State University Campus, a landscape of 13,260 square ft transforms into a highly improved stormwater management system while educating a high volume of viewers. • The site will successfully manage stormwater from the surrounding watersheds, promote a campus greenway network, and educate passersby about this pocket of sustainable design on campus. • Features include water filtration and infiltration runnel systems, rain gardens, permeable paving, decreased lawn space, native plantings, shaded hardscape, and wet meadow areas. • Seating nooks encourage people to sit and observe the systems, university community, and wildlife. 6
HALE LIBRARY Prairie Vision sustainable model
ANDERSON LAWN
BEACH ART MUSEUM (Santoro & Heermann)
Disconnected Downspouts
West Entrance
East Entrance
Wet Meadow
Drainage Inlet
Buffalo Grass Border
Site Plan Transplanted Memorial Trees
N Seating Nooks
Cobble Runnel
Accent Grate & Sand-blasted Sidewalk
Butterfly Rain Garden
Permeable Paver Plaza
7
Conceptual Design & Planting Palette
My contribution to project focused on the conceptual design and planting palette choices based on seasonal characteristics and effective placement for stormwater management. • Lawn space provides a visual break between wet meadows and butterfly rain gardens.
• Wet meadow basins will detain water for a short time until overflowing into the storm drain.
• Native buffalo grass minimizes erosion on steeper slopes, where water flows over during 100 year storm events.
• Along the library facade, lower vegetation transitions into taller shrubs to add texture, color, diversity, and reduce the large vertical scale of Hale Library.
• Native forbs dominate butterfly rain gardens creating observable new habitats.
Seasonal Characteristics Eastern Redbud American Plum Side Oats Grama Prairie Dropseed Switch Grass Redtwig Dogwood ‘Hedgerows Gold’ Little Blue Stem Tussock Sedge Swamp Milkweed New England Aster Goldenrod
8
Jan.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
(Santoro & Heermann)
Wet Meadow Planting Palette
Transition Edges
Buffalo Grass
Side Oats Grama
Throughout Entire Meadow
Switch Grass
Little Blue Stem
New England Aster
Goldenrod
Prairie Dropseed
Indian Grass
In Basin Low Spots
Cord Grass
Swamp Milkweed
Bordering The Building Base
Tussock Sedge
Prairie Willow
American Plum
Redtwig Dogwood
9
Re-establishing Natural Water Processes
Evapotranspiration
Butterfly rain garden detention
(Heermann) Weirs slowing runoff Grate for water visibility
Runnel infiltration
Designed Stormwater Levels Overflow inlet set at higher elevation
10 Year Storm Level 5 Year Storm Level 2 Year Storm Level 1 Year Storm Level
Butterfly Rain Gardens Wet Meadow
10
Runnel
Existing Vegetation
Proposed Vegetation
(Sickmann)
Significant Overall Benefits • Restores a total of 9,147.60 ft2 (0.21 acres) of Flint Hills region native vegetation
• Removes 12,500 ft2 of irrigated lawn, reducing water consumption and minimizing motorized maintenance
• Retains 100% of the stormwater (24,000 gallons) from a one year storm. In a ten year storm, 65% of stormwater (45,900 gallons) is retained.
• Provides a new outdoor amenity for the more than 24,000 students, faculty and staff of Kansas State University and the greater community
• Removes 303.5 ft2 of impervious concrete for a permeable paver seating plaza totaling 870.5 ft2 adjacent to the east entrance.
• Promotes environmental awareness and stewardship by exposing campus users to a site scale example of green infrastructure.
11
Re-envisioning Campus Creek Location: Manhattan, KS Year: Student Work; Fall 2014 Interdisciplinary Team Project Role: Project Manager for Creek Channel Design Team and Final Graphic Development Team Awards:
• ASLA Central State Honor Award (Design Unbuilt) 2016
Deepening the 2012 Campus Master Plan, K-State’s Campus Creek transforms into an urbanized waterway that aims to reveals and demonstrates how it can become a resilient, environmentally, and socially beneficial campus amenity. • The channel becomes a more stabilized creek to help mitigate stormwater issues based on a watershed assessment and hydrology models developed by the studio. • Environmental benefits fostered by the design’s channel and native vegetation include reduced erosion and flooding, carbon sequestration, and improved water quality. • Socially beneficial features include plaza spaces for gatherings, outdoor amphitheater seating, creek-side trail systems, seating alcoves, and interpretive signage 12
B TYPE CHANNEL C TYPE CHANNEL
B TYPE CHANNEL
CHANNEL TYPOLOGIES & CHARACTERISTICSParameters
htly entrenched) ow) high)
Parameters Channel Types CHANNEL TYPOLOGIES & CHARACTERISTICS Rosgen Stream ClassiďŹ cation
Entrenchment Ratio: >1.4 - 2.2 (moderate) For the analysis of the current conditions and designWidth of the proposed Campus Creek Stream, the studio used Rosgen method of low) / Depth Ratio: >12the(moderately stream classification and natural channel design. This practice looks to return the channel to stability by designing the 3-dimensional Sinuosity: >1.2 (moderate profile of the stream to transport water in quasi-equilibrium at bankfull flow. Bankfull is a water capacity designation that occurssinuosity) Rosgen Stream ClassiďŹ cation on a 1.5 year re-occurrence interval, and it is considered the effective stream channel flow, where stream channel features like bars, Slope: 2 - 3.9 % riffles and pools are most often defined and formed.
E Type
and very low width to ream with a near box .
For the analysis of the current conditions and design of the proposed Campus Creek Stream, the studio used the Rosgen method of stream classification and natural channel design. This practice looks to return the channel to stability by designing the 3-dimensional For Kansas, the stable classifi cations types are B and C; however, some instances type E streams are present profimost le of common the streamstream to transport water in quasi-equilibrium at bankfull flow.inBankfull is a water capacity designation that occurs within the Flint hydro-physiographic province. Thconsidered e Campusthe Creek Channel design incorporated of thischannel channel types to on a Hills 1.5 year re-occurrence interval, and it is effective stream channel flow, whereallstream features like bars, create a stable stream thened campus corridor. riffl es andchannel pools areform mostwithin often defi and formed.
Description
For Kansas, the most common stream stable classifications types are B and C; however, in some instances type E streams are present within the Flint Hills hydro-physiographic province. The Campus Creek Channel design incorporated all of this channel types to create a stable stream channel form within the campus corridor.
B Type
Type B stream chanels have a more trapezoidal channel form with point bars and bankfull features typically forming on E TYPE CHANNEL alternating banks. Theses channels are straighter than other channel types, typically due to regulating valley slopes, resulting Parameters E Ratio: TYPE CHANNEL Entrenchment >2.2 (slightly entrenched) in a stream that has moderately high entrenchment. This create Width / Depth Ratio: <12 (very low) a stream with deeper scour pools and more developed riffles, Sinuosity: Parameters >1.5 (very high) Slope: 2% sometimes Entrenchment Ratio: >2.2 (slightly entrenched) forming occasional small rapid features.
Width / Depth Ratio: <12 (very low) Sinuosity: >1.5 (very high) Description Slope: 2% Type E streams have very high sinuosity and very low width to depth ratios. These parameters define a stream with a near box shaped profile and narrow bankfull width.
Description
Type E streams have very high sinuosity and very low width to depth ratios. These parameters define a stream with a near box shaped profile and narrow bankfull width.
Entrenchment Ratio: Width / Depth Ratio: Sinuosity: Slope:
Parameters >1.4 - 2.2 (moderate) Entrenchment >12 (moderately low)Ratio: Width / Depth Ratio: >1.2 (moderate sinuosity) 2 - 3.9Sinuosity: % Slope:
>2.2 (slightly entrenched) >12 (moderate / high) >1.2 (moderately high sinuosity) .1 - 2%
C Type
Description
Type B stream chanels have a more Description trapezoidal channel form Typetypically C streamforming channelson are the most common channel form in with point bars and bankfull features Hillsthan province. alternating banks. Theses channels the are Flint straighter otherThis form has very good flood plane B TYPE CHANNEL contact and moderate sinuosity. They form on narrow to wide channel types, typically due to regulating valley slopes, resulting stream valley onTh top of alluvial deposits. Wide bottom streams, inParameters a stream that has moderately high entrenchment. is create they are often wider that they are deep. The bed material is often B TYPE CHANNEL aEntrenchment stream with pools and more developed riffles, Ratio: deeper >1.4scour - 2.2 (moderate) ne but gravel banks are not uncommon. Width / Depth Ratio: >12 (moderately low) sometimes forming occasional small very rapidfifeatures. Parameters Sinuosity: >1.2 (moderate sinuosity) Slope: 2 - 3.9 % Entrenchment Ratio: >1.4 - 2.2 (moderate) Width / Depth Ratio: >12 (moderately low) Sinuosity: >1.2 (moderate sinuosity) Description Slope: 2 - 3.9 % Type B stream chanels have a more trapezoidal channel form with point bars and bankfull features typically forming on alternating banks. Theses channels are straighter than other Description channel types, typically due to regulating valley slopes, resulting Type B stream chanels have a more trapezoidal channel form in a stream that has moderately high features entrenchment. Thforming is create on with point bars and bankfull typically a stream with deeper scour pools and more developedthan riffles, alternating banks. Theses channels are straighter other sometimes forming occasional rapid features. channel types, typically duesmall to regulating valley slopes, resulting in a stream that has moderately high entrenchment. This create a stream with deeper scour pools and more developed riffles, sometimes forming occasional small rapid features.
C TYPE CHANNEL Parameters Entrenchment Ratio: Width / Depth Ratio: Sinuosity: Slope:
>2.2 (slightly entrenched) >12 (moderate / high) >1.2 (moderately high sinuosity) .1 - 2%
Description
Type C stream channels are the most common channel form in the Flint Hills province. This form has very good flood plane contact and moderate sinuosity. They form on narrow to wide stream valley on top of alluvial deposits. Wide bottom streams, they are often wider that they are deep. The bed material is often very fine but gravel banks are not uncommon.
Bankfull Bankfull
Bankfull Bankfull
Floodplain Floodplain
Bankfull
Floodplain Floodplain
Floodplain
(Rostek) Bankfull
Floodplain
BANK SUPPORTING VEGETATION BANK SUPPORTING VEGETATION
Bankfull
The banks of E type channel classifi cation are cation supported be Ththe e banks of the E type channel classifi are supported be well developed oodplains fland vegetation. Often brushes well fldeveloped oodplains and vegetation. Often and brushes and sedges, thesesedges, plants these support near verticalnear banks and banks have developed plants support vertical and have developed undercuts that supportthat wildlife habitat. undercuts support wildlife habitat.
Floodplain
BANK SUPPORTING VEGETATION BANK SUPPORTING VEGETATION Woody shrubs and debris help help to maintain stable banks along with Woody shrubs and debris to maintain stable banks along with densedense shrubs and grasses. shrubs and grasses.
Bankfull Floodplain
Bankfull
Bankfull
BANK SUPPORTING VEGETATION The banks of the C channel are supported by grasses and shrub vegetation with occasional trees supporting the banks.
Floodplain
Floodplain
13
The Prairie
(Rostek, Cocchiara, Liu)
Transformed area in the north part of campus, that creates opportunities for ecological studies, while providing a trail system through the native prairies grasses.
The Savanna This area becomes a transition area between the prairie and the woodlands. A series of more formal trails allow for intimate seating areas nearby the creek.
(Rostek, Cocchiara, Liu)
14
The Prairie
A “E” type channel
The Savanna
A “B” type channel
The Woodland
A “C” type channel
15
(Albracht, Heermann, Tudor)
The Woodland The transformed woodland area of the Campus Creek Corridor acts as an oasis for students living on campus. The naturalistic corridor extends towards formal areas that provide space for activity and gathering.
16
Connection to Promenade Silva Cells
a nn , (Sickm
Tree Roots
r) Tudo
Bankside Amphitheater
Mid-Campus Plaza An area of a high activity on campus perfect for a plaza and amphitheater to encourage students to spend time near the creek. This rendering is one of the many rendered details done to explain aspects of the master plan.
17
Iterations of strategies for an activated urban riverfront N
Conceptual Site Plan
Threads
Stitching Lives Across the Rails
Threads envisions stitching St. Joseph’s downtown to the riverfront, while forming a new city identity centered around a social riverfront hub and a repurposed interstate. • In its current configuration, a large electrical substation, multiple rail lines, and Interstate 229 divides a space used primarily for parking, while ignoring the human qualities of successful public spaces. • Rerouting Interstate 229, allows for a repurposed structure with buildings and pedestrian pathways that can create regional destination for St. Joseph, Missouri. • Proposed mixed-use buildings with connecting pedestrian bridges over the railroad allow for direct access to an activated riverfront and repurposed lively interstate. 18
Location: Saint Joseph, MO Year: Student Work; Fall 2013 Project Partner: Andrew Rostek Award: • Kansas APA New Horizons Award 2014
I- 2 Av e.
29
Visionary Moves
St. Jo
sep h
Through large scale moves, Threads reimagines potential for downtownâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s riverfront acting as a catalyst for economic growth and create a new St. Joseph destination.
4th Street
Interstate North Reroute
Substation Relocation Repurposed Interstate
Railroad Tracks
I-229 Reroute Existing I-229 to Remain Existing I-229 to be Repurposed Existing Substation Location Substation Relocation Existing railroad lines to remain Pony E x
press
Bridge
19 (Rostek)
20
(Santoro & Rostek) (Santoro & Rostek)
(Santoro & Rostek)
21
Regional Destination and New Identity
Threads creates a regional destination for St. Joseph by activating the riverfront with the repurposed interstate infrastructure that houses new businesses and an elevated trail. These unique aspects take the current underutilized space and makes it a safe public environment that provides an economic catalyst for the rest of downtown. Pedestrian bridges allow for more site permeability and access across the railroad. Visitors are able to engage with the river once again through the multi-purpose programmed spaces allowing for recreation and leisure. Overall, Threads stitches St. Josephâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s downtown and riverfront together, creating a social riverfront hub and a new city identity.
Overlook Pier
22
Riverfront Trail, Wetland Edge & Boat Launch
Skywalk
- Trails - Patios - Green Roofs
Viaduct Market - Restaurants - Cafes - Plazas - Studios
Skywalk
Viaduct Market
Pedestrian Bridge
(Santoro & Rostek)
Double Decker Destination
Flexible Event Plaza (Weekend Market)
23
Meeting Ground
Current Site Dilemmas
Location: Midtown Atlanta, GA Year: Student Competition; January 2016 Interdisciplinary Team Competition
• Low Density Development • Lacking a Sense of Urbanism • High Vacancy Rates • Overlooked Potential to Develop • Lack of Attractive Retail Options Nearby
Where People and Ideas Collide
Role: Team Leader
• Bicycle and pedestrian connections, linked to rail, streetcar, and bus stops, support this high density development and make it an attractive place to live, work and play.
COLLABORA TE
• Covering six blocks, it strategically connects a growing workforce of talented professionals and families from diverse communities with transit oriented development and adaptable mixed-use buildings and amenities, such as outdoor common areas that attract new businesses and foster creativity.
The District That Promotes Urban Activity
EN GA GE
Meeting Ground demonstrates how Midtown Atlanta will grow towards a truer sense of urbanism that cultivates innovation, interaction, and entrepreneurship. The 2016 ULI Hines Competition was set in Midtown Atlanta, Georgia looking at a transitional area near downtown and technology square and tasked to develop a vision plan that creates a comprehensive environment that is programmed, designed, built, and operated with elements that promote sustainable mixed-use experiences.
(Santoro & Tudor)
24
1.
5
Downtown Connector
Meeting Ground For Diverse Communities ile
m
Midtown Core
Piedmont Park
Midtown
ile m
le mi
MEETING GREEN
Beltline Atlanta
0.2 5
0.5
Georgia Institute of Technology
Arts Center
MEETING GROUND NETWORK STATION Old Fourth Ward
Planned Streetcar Route
Downtown
Existing Streetcar Route Existing Bike Routes Existing MARTA Stops MARTA Line
(Santoro & Tudor)
25
Deliverables for Competition
Peachtree St
North Ave
MEETING GROUND
Existing Street Circulations Proposed Street Diets Planned Streetcar Route Existing Tech Trolley Route Proposed Tech Trolley Route Existing Bus Stop Proposed Network Station for MARTA Rail and Bus Stops Proposed Streetcar Stop
The Boutique
VEHICULAR + PUBLIC TRANSIT FLOWS
5 THE SECOND STORY SHOPS
Spring St
NETWORK STATION Old Fourth Ward
P
9
20 1
Downtown Connector
Downtown
THE MEETING GREEN IS MIDTOWN’S PLACE FOR SOCIAL INTERACTION e d aP ikr gn
FS
tS ur tc ru
19% RESIDENTIAL - 1,412 UNITS
ity
nsity
COLLABORATE
MARTA New Entry
Studen
ks wor
Stop
10,000 124,600 SF 17.8 AC 6,373,894 SF 8 79 16.9% $25,096,450 $2,294,892,034
Net
n
ctio
nne t Co
New
tcar Stree
A MEETING GREEN FOR CULTURAL EVENTS
THE SECOND STORY BRINGS LIVELY ACTIVITY
NETWORK STATION BRINGS PEOPLE TOGETHER
Meeting Green encourages social interaction and offers a flexible place for relaxation and spontaneous play within a large open space. Student events, tech markets, art festivals, and local music concerts will fill the large cultural space.
The Second Story as an elevated pathway emphasizes connections between Georgia Tech, Peachtree Street, Technology Square, and Downtown. It weaves through the new development supporting an expansion of retail and dining options on multiple stories.
The convergence of rail, streetcar, and bus stops at MARTA’s new Network Station and Bank of America offers a myriad of possibilities for transit oriented development.
LOCAL JOBS OPEN SPACE AMENITIES DEVELOPABLE LAND TOTAL BUILDOUT AVERAGE F.A.R. DU PER ACRE LEVERAGED IRR CURRENT SITE VALUE PROJECTED SITE VALUE
12.8% UNLEVERAGED IRR WHERE PEOPLE WANT TO LIVE, WORK, AND PLAY
THE DISTRICT THAT PROMOTES URBAN ACTIVITY
CURRENT SITE DILEMMAS Low Density Development Lacking a Sense of Urbanism High Vacancy Rates
MEETING GROUND PROVIDES A TRUER URBAN EXPERIENCE FOR MIDTOWN
HIGHLIGHTS
HIGHLIGHTS
HIGHLIGHTS
Network Station Hotel University Facilities Street Improvements
The Commons Public Space Second Story Access Fitness Center Pedestrian Bridge
Varsity Restaurant Bank Of America Extension Second Story Expansion
PHASE 1: ESTABLISH ANCHORS
PHASE 2: FOSTER CONNECTIONS
PHASE 3: INFILL & EXPANSION
727,751 SF OFFICE / COMMERCIAL
747,262 SF OFFICE / COMMERCIAL 78,088 SF RETAIL 737,028 SF RESIDENTIAL
Overlooked Potential to Develop
538,441 SF PARKING
Lack of Attractive Retail Options Nearby
451,816 SF HOTEL
230,305 SF RETAIL 219,258 SF RESIDENTIAL
DOWNTOWN CONNECTOR
Influx
EN GA GE
rian
58% OFFICE / COMMERCIAL - 3,560,876 SF
ility
Mob
ous
Co
3
6% RETAIL - 352,052 SF
TECHWOOD DR
tiv
De
ion
ne c
llis
Co
on ent
Movem
nced
C
Enha
Pedest
21
7% HOTEL - 1,390 ROOMS
lity Bikabi
nt me
aced
Terr
2,085,856 SF OFFICE / COMMERCIAL 47,167 SF RETAIL 216,000 SF RESIDENTIAL 59,631 SF PARKING Stormwater management will integrate into complete street strategies.
Improved street infrastructure will reduce vehicular activity and greenhouse gas emissions. Street trees will cleanse the city air and create enjoyable pedestrian experiences. Safety will increase with first floor retail and open spaces that attract activity all times of the day. Public health will be promoted by increasing walkability, bikeability, and urban outdoor spaces. Wider sidewalks will slow down vehicular traffic and improve the pedestrian realm.
Bike lanes will be widened and separated from vehicular traffic to facilitate traffic flows. The streetcar will ease traffic and increase activity near this multi-modal transit hub.
MEETING GROUND IS AN URBAN DISTRICT FOR VALUABLE CONNECTIONS
26
1
P
10% STRUCTURED PARKING - 1,994 SPOTS
ntinu
g
18
9
R se di ne ciffO ait R e FS liate h o FS let
hips
in Seat
11
17
l FS
ent vem e Mo Bik
stru ial In able SocProgramm ace
n Sp
Ope
7
1 10
22
TEAM 161112
PEDESTRIAN + BICYCLE FLOWS Rela
6
North Ave
tions
New
20
15
P
MEETING GROUND FOR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES
A
12 13
Existing Bike Lane Planned Bike Lanes Proposed Bike Share Proposed Bike Storage / Share Proposed Primary Bike and Pedestrian Lanes Proposed Secondary Bike Lanes
le daptab
2 14
SPRING ST
Beltline Atlanta
le mi
MEETING GREEN
MIDTOWN ATLANTA IS WHERE PEOPLE AND IDEAS COLLIDE
Piedmont Park
Midtown
ile m
0.2 5
0.5
Georgia Institute of Technology
Midtown Core
MEETING GROUND Peachtree St
m
5
Arts Center
W Peachtree St
ile
Downtown Connector
1.
Downtown Connector
Planned Streetcar Route Existing Streetcar Route Existing Bike Routes Existing MARTA Stops MARTA Line
W Peachtree St
Spring St
The competition required a specific set of deliverables that I was in charge of submitting. Deliverables included a presentation board, design and financial narratives, and a pro forma.
WALKABLE, BIKEABLE, AND SUSTAINABLE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
THE COMMONS IS A PLACE FOR ACTIVITY AND THE EXCHANGE OF IDEAS
Leadership Role
MEETING GROUND COMPONENTS ACCESSIBILITY AND TRANSIT Walkability, bikeability, and public transit expansions ease traffic and improve Midtown connections. 1. 2. 3. 4.
Campus Pedestrian Bridge Second Story Walk/Bike Way North Avenue Bridge Improvement Network Station INNOVATIVE OPPORTUNITIES Superior office space and amenities attract new tech businesses, creating opportunities for growth. University Facilities Collaborative Offices Adaptive Start Up Business Space Bank of America Building Expansion
9. 10. 11.
Rooftop Garden Pocket Park Street Improvements COMMUNITY NEEDS People gather around places that provide essential resources and cultural identity.
7
3RD ST
19
16
12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. P
As people and ideas come together from surrounding communities, they meet in this dense mixed-use neighborhood of activity with improved streetscapes and enhanced bike lanes. The Second Story as an elevated pathway emphasizes connections between Georgia Tech’s growing student population, Peachtree Street’s historic charm, Technology Square’s influx of entrepreneurs, and Downtown’s tourist attractions. The path weaves through the new development supporting an expansion of retail and dining options on multiple stories. The convergence of rail, streetcar, and bus stops at MARTA’s new Network Station and Bank of America offers a myriad of possibilities for transit oriented development.
Creating Place
Meeting Green encourages social interaction and offers flexible places for relaxation and spontaneous play within a large open space. Student events, tech markets, art festivals, and local music concerts will fill the large cultural space, now respectfully framing the 1996 Summer Olympics historical marker. Art, architecture, and engineering students from local universities will leave their mark through design build projects, temporarily installed on the lawn or in the adjacent hotel gallery. The Commons, an intimate corridor, offers space that foster creativity and exchange of ideas. It is edged by flexible rent spaces for growing businesses and urban neighborhood amenities and local retail. As profits generate during phase two, public and private reinvestments will extend into streetscape improvements and create the Second Story. Along with Varsity’s revitalization, the Bank of America structure will be revitalized and repurposed through a floorplate extension offering flexible workspace and apartments more appropriate for this economically-thriving district.
Meeting Green Outdoor Cultural Venue Victory Torch Midtown Hotel The Commons Plaza Connection Cafe Fitness Center Grocery and Prepared Food Market Second Level Retail Varsity Restaurant Mixed-Income Housing Parking
PONCE DE LEON
Exchanging Ideas
Community development programs will kickstart new businesses, set the stage for economic activity, and create synergistic environments where ideas are exchanged. Such social amenities will attract job-seekers by providing career training and networking services that help people advance professionally. Technological advancements and the growing workforce of young talented entrepreneurs will have room to grow in these flexible office spaces. They will also find Meeting Ground an attractive place to stay after work. A grocery store, prepared food market, and fitness center offer healthy lifestyles options and promote social interaction. Marketing the development as a place for knowledge, technology, recreation, and retail creates an interesting destination and a vibrant place to be.
4 22
Meeting Ground demonstrates how Midtown Atlanta will grow towards a truer sense of urbanism that cultivates innovation, interaction, and entrepreneurship. Covering six blocks, it strategically connects a growing workforce of talented professionals and families from diverse communities with transit oriented development. It expands the knowledge district of Technology Square and Georgia Tech with adaptable mixed-use buildings and amenities, such as outdoor common areas that attract new businesses and foster creativity. Bicycle and pedestrian connections, linked to rail, streetcar, and bus stops, support this high density development and make it an attractive place to live, work and play.
Connecting People
SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENTS Ecologically sensitive designs promote healthy urban environments and livability.
4TH ST
Team 161112
MIDTOWN ATALANTA IS WHERE PEOPLE AND IDEAS COLLIDE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
5TH ST
5. 6. 7. 8.
MEETING GROUND
As team leader for this competition, I had many responsibilities. Mainly, I had to project manage by keeping us moving and on schedule for this two week competition. Additionally when our real estate team member slacked, I took on learning and completing the team’s pro forma with the help of many resources. Being in a leadership role for this competition allowed me to understand how to handle high stress situations, and not be afraid to step outside my expertise and learn about development and finances.
P NORTH AVE
8
MEETING GROUND 1. Summary Pro Forma
PEACHTREE ST
WEST PEACHTREE ST
0’
200’
N
The Midtown South Development Partnership will work with an experienced developer and private equity investors to finance the Meeting Ground construction on 774,556 square feet or 18 acres of developable land. Financing sources of the $1.7 billion development include 81% from private loans, 16% from equity ownership investments, and 3% from federal and state subsidies. Costs will be distributed among 3 phases over a 10 year plan to create 1,412 dwelling units with an average of 79 dwelling units per acre, 352,052 square feet of retail, and 3,560,876 square feet of office, accommodating 10,000 local jobs. A 20 story hotel also provides 1,390 rooms to visitors of the area.
Phasing to Build New Equity and Increase Existing Equity
The phasing buildout follows a gradual investment plan, first towards stronger market demands and followed by larger undertakings once neighboring real estate values are strengthened. Georgia Tech’s clear need for additional campus support facilities will anchor office tenants on block A in phase one with retail at its base pulling from flows of activity at Technology Square one block north. Each phase that follows builds additional residential, retail, and office space and expands the pedestrian realm. After connections link to MARTA, larger investments can be made in the Bank of America extension.
Rental Housing For-Sale Housing Rental Housing Rental Housing For-Sale Housing Office/Commercial Market-rate Retail Affordable Retail Hotel Structured Parking Surface Parking Other
Market-rate UpScale Affordable
Marketing for Tech Businesses with Resilient Design
Meeting Ground’s long term financial investment decisions draw from urban design lessons of surrounding buildings, including the Bank of America. New class A office space will be strategically designed to anchor tenants looking for adaptable floor plans that allow business expansion with attractive retail and outdoor amenities nearby. Given its location near public transit and pedestrian corridors, Meeting Ground capitalizes on an urban lifestyle that avoids expensive structured parking. Only 1,994 parking spaces are provided, which is half of the maximum zoning requirements. Rather than designing for suburban commuters, it is expected that most employees and residents of the neighborhood will rely on nearby public transit.
Alternative Financing Sources
Public subsidies will account for the remaining 3% of funds needed. A federal HOME grant will provide $3.5 million towards 20% affordable housing at the new Network Station and 10% affordable housing dispersed elsewhere in the development. Public space amenities and streetscape improvements will draw $2 million from the local Community Improvement District and $2 million from the Atlanta park impact fees. Meeting Ground qualifies for New Market Tax Credits because of its expansion of the high-quality job market. A partnership between Community Development Entity and the city will relieve equity investors of federal income taxes in exchange for 39% of profits over the first seven years. Tax Increment Financing strategies using TAD resources in partnership with Invest Atlanta could later leverage further transit oriented development. As the area attracts new workers, residents, and visitors, equity will increase and the city’s tax base will also significantly grow.
Total Net Operating Income Development Costs
Rental Housing For-Sale Housing Rental Housing Rental Housing For-Sale Housing Office/Commercial Retail (ALL) Hotel Structured Parking Surface Parking Other Demo & Remediation Land Acquisition Total Infrastructure Indirect costs
Market-rate UpScale Affordable
Total Development Costs Annual Cash Flow
Net Cash Flow Debt Service
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
135,665
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
142,216
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
148,963
Phase II - Foster Connections 2020 2021
Phase III - Infill & Expansion 2022 2023
Phase IV - Capturing Demand 2024 2025
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
12,529,030 800,461 1,058,879 16,583,370 1,355,485
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
13,154,244 900,651 1,130,255 17,688,381 1,417,718
17,909,768 1,226,254 1,562,649 37,216,871 5,600,436
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
18,784,223 1,286,127 1,662,479 39,646,407 5,849,967
24,740,237 2,598,353 1,794,062 101,901,652 6,971,528
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
Team 161112 2026
25,918,799 2,722,132 1,902,486 108,434,730 7,273,732
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
28,411,777 2,983,958 2,131,833 122,606,734 7,905,609
$ 452,819 $ 1,764,842 $
$ 469,207 $ 1,817,787 $
$ 205,766 $ 1,872,320 $
55,225,653 $ 5,085,602 $ 453,313 $
58,258,025 $ 5,249,383 $ 466,913 $
61,442,016 $ 4,879,199 $ $
64,785,206 $ 5,033,985 $ $
68,295,557 $ 5,710,090 $ $
71,981,424 $ 5,892,605 $ $
75,851,585 $ 6,080,596 $ $
79,915,254 6,274,227 -
2,353,326 $
2,429,210 $
2,227,050 $
93,091,793 $
98,265,570 $
129,837,194 $
137,048,394 $
212,011,478 $
224,125,908 $
236,854,665 $
250,229,392
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
-
17,581,525 1,172,102 4,688,407 59,486,367 13,883,299 (0) -
17,581,525 1,172,102 4,688,407 59,486,367 13,883,299 (0) -
18,474,912 4,618,728 170,498,254 2,672,537 1,920,445 -
18,474,912 4,618,728 170,498,254 2,672,537 1,920,445 -
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
59,099,519 3,939,968 15,759,872 61,081,384 4,995,009 39,371,264 19,451,801 -
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
59,099,519 3,939,968 15,759,872 61,081,384 4,995,009 39,371,264 19,451,801 -
69,178,134 $
63,093,905 $
$ $ 67,263,641 $
160,175,514 $
164,075,340 $
616,143,717 $
374,821,592 $
2,227,050 $ 23,248,022 $
93,091,793 $ 623,464,089 $
98,265,570 $ 748,271,966 $
129,837,194 $ 1,193,941,133 $
137,048,394 $ 1,194,607,562 $
212,011,478 $ 2,173,840,166 $
224,125,908 $ 2,175,173,024 $
273,511,196 $ (271,081,986) $
272,876,951 $ (270,649,901) $
160,175,514 $ (67,083,721) $
164,075,340 $ (65,809,769) $
616,143,717 $ (486,306,523) $
374,821,592 $ (237,773,198) $
$ 212,011,478 $
$ 224,125,908 $
2021
2022
3. Unit Development and Infrastructure Costs Development Costs Rental Housing $ Market-rate For-Sale Housing $ Rental Housing $ UpScale Rental Housing $ Affordable For-Sale Housing $ Office/Commercial $ Retail $ Hotel $ Structured Parking $ Surface Parking $ Other $ Infrastructure Costs Roads $
2018
2019
176,636,716 $
$
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
272,876,951 $
Year-by-Year Cumulative Absorption 2016 2017
-
-
2,429,210 $ 23,248,022 $
Total Buildout
$
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
69,300,155 $
$ $
-
-
273,511,196 $
Current Site Value (start of Year 0) Projected Site Value (end of Year 10)
148,389 $ 236,500,000 181,310,452 $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
2,353,326 $ 23,248,022 $ 0 25,096,450 $ (22,743,124) $ 14,158,922
2. Multiyear Development Program
269,910 $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ 25,096,450 $
Project Buildout by Development Units Upscale Rental Housing Rental Housing Market-rate For-Sale Housing Rental Housing Affordable For-Sale Housing Hotel Structured Parking Surface Parking Other Project Buildout by Area Upscale Rental Housing Rental Housing Market-rate For-Sale Housing Rental Housing Affordable For-Sale Housing Office/Commercial Market-rate Retail Hotel Structured Parking Surface Parking Other Total
$
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
25,096,450 $
458,489,968 75% 12.8% 16.9%
-
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
$
512,225 $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $
Demolition Remidiation
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $
Net Operating Income $ Total Asset Value $ Total Costs of Sale $ Total Development Costs $ $ $
Net Present Value Loan to Value Ratio (LVR) Unleveraged IRR Before Taxes Leveraged IRR Before Taxes
2027
27,142,105 2,850,610 2,015,027 115,329,740 7,585,001
$
Landscaping $ Land Acquisition Fees Total Infrastructure Costs Total Development Costs
161112
Phase I -Establish Anchors 2018 2019
Year 0 2016-2017
FINANCIAL PLAN
ATLANTA
Team Summary Board
2016 ULI Hines Student Competition
Net Operating Income
Responding to the diverse needs of Atlanta’s urban core, Meeting Ground provides attractive offices and outdoor spaces accessible to surrounding communities. Meeting Ground, as a mixed-use development strategically connecting Midtown, provides a place where people and ideas collide.
Team 161112
SUMMARY PRO FORMA
-
$
-
$
-
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
-
$
-
$
-
$
236,854,665 $ 2,175,173,024 $ $ $ 236,854,665 $
250,229,392 2,175,173,024 130,510,381 2,294,892,034
25,096,450 2,294,892,034
2020
2023
2024
2025
61 1,113 239 1,390 1,994 -
219 644
219 644
219 644
25 691 184 1,390 2,013 152
25 691 184 1,390 2,013 152
32 897 239 1,390 1,795 -
32 897 239 1,390 1,795 -
61 1,113 239 1,390 1,994 -
61 1,113 239 1,390 1,994 -
61 1,113 239 1,390 1,994 -
91,014 890,015 191,257 3,560,876 352,052 451,816 598,079 6,135,109
9,386 65,553 193,261
9,386 65,553 193,261
9,386 65,553 193,261
36,851 552,771 147,406 747,264 81,598 451,816 603,999 45,672
36,851 552,771 147,406 747,264 81,598 451,816 603,999 45,672
47,814 717,215 191,257 1,475,015 308,394 451,816 538,447 -
47,814 717,215 191,257 1,475,015 308,394 451,816 538,447 -
91,014 890,015 191,257 3,560,876 352,052 451,816 598,079 -
91,014 890,015 191,257 3,560,876 352,052 451,816 598,079 -
91,014 890,015 191,257 3,560,876 352,052 451,816 598,079 -
268,199
2,667,378
2,667,378
3,729,958
3,729,958
268,199
Unit Cost 171,064 ($ per unit) ($ per unit) 320,745 ($ per unit) 171,064 ($ per unit) ($ per unit) 163 ($ per s.f.) 122 ($ per s.f.) 56,649 ($ per room) 21,437 ($ per space) ($ per space) Public 504,000
268,199
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ 87,500 $ $ $ $
Total Costs
Private
6,135,109
4. Equity and Financing Sources 190,311,913 19,461,595 40,896,557 582,132,008 43,101,690 78,742,527 42,744,492 -
930,524 9,939,332 261,596,450 425,803,856 1,695,660,944
Equity Sources (total) Equity Sources (total) Equity Owner 1 Equity Owner 2 Loan Payoff Total Equity Financing Sources (total)
Initial
6,135,109
6,135,109 Percent of Total
Amount End
$ 135,652,875.51 $ 135,652,875.51
$ $
183,591,362.74 183,591,362.74
8% 8%
$ 271,305,751.02
$
367,182,725.49
16%
$ $ $ $
409,791,110.33 409,791,110.33 243,188,139.85 243,188,139.85 743,223,981.87
Phase I (Construction Draw) $ PhaseI (LT Fianancing) Phase II (Construction Draw) Phase II LT Fianancing Phase III (Permananet Loan) 5.25 -5.75 Total Financing Percentage Total Public Subsidies (total, if any) Federal HUD Tax Credit Affordable Housing (HUD gov) $ 350,000.00 CID Improvement +Atlanta Park Impact Proposed TAD (Invest Atlanta) MARTA
$ 1,396,203,232.05 $ $ $
34% 15% 32% 81%
3,500,000.00 4,000,000.00 35,600,000.00
27
Recycling As Play
Encouraging Recycling Through A Participatory Design Process With Children
KCDC Vision Framework
Location: Kansas City, MO Year: Student Work; Fall 2015 - Spring 2016 Master’s Report Focus For KCDC’s [Re]Considered Recycling Interdisciplinary Team Project Currently, Kansas City does not provide recycling for multifamily dwellings and commercial businesses. This with the knowledge that the population hopes to double creates a need for a recycling system that is convenient and pleasing and that will function for the city as well as improve the quality of the urban environment (Kansas City Design Center 2015). With this knowledge and a grant from MARC Solid Waste Management District, the Kansas City Design Center (KCDC) set out to produce a vision plan and conceptual designs for a downtown recycling system needed to be successful.
KC’s Recycling Currently 28
What KC Could Recycle
Recycling Waste Load Calculations
KCDC Recycling Vision Plan
29
Research Question
How does a participatory design process with children influence a recycling conceptual design?
• I worked with 5th graders from downtown’s Crossroads Academy for the community design charrette and an additional community involvement aspect added to the KCDC recycling project. 30
[ FALL SEMESTER ]
• Children are typically overlooked as community users, but my report looked to utilize their playful imagination and lack of preconceived notions in a participatory design process
[ STUDIO PROJECT ]
[ SPRING SEMESTER ]
For my master’s report, I was to build off KCDC’s recycling project that I was part of and incorporate my own focus and expertise. Participation in recycling is one of the main dilemmas; however, designing urban space and infrastructure that will be utilized requires understanding of how to engage and encourage Kansas City’s users.
[ COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT ]
• Studies • • •
Recycling Context
Advisory Council Meetings
Waste Load Calculations Forming Strategies Creation of Vision Plan
Professional Reviews
• • • •
Site Selection Site Specific Analysis Conceptual Site Designs Design Development
Advisory Council Meetings
Open House
Professional Reviews Open House Community Design Charrette
Charrette Overview Each charrette with the students was scheduled for a one hour session and required preparatory work. • A series of handouts as well as a precedent imagery poster were prepared for the students containing educational information about Kansas City’s recycling and as prompts for the charrette. • The first ten minutes consisted of an introduction of the researcher and her classmate followed by asking the students why they thought recycling was important, and a quick synopsis of Kansas City’s current state of recycling.
DESIGN SHEET
Draw, Build or Write Here!
INSPIRATION IMAGES
Date: Age:
SCENARIO
SCENARIO:
“Say you’re walking down the street drinking some soda from a can or water from a plastic bottle. You nish it and start to look around on where to toss it. You see a trash can a few feet ahead. Now what would make you go over here and recycle that instead of throwing it away? How can you distract someone from throwing the can into the trash can? It can be anything from something on the ground to an object/ contraption that moves, maybe you get something back from it; anything you can dream up.”
“Say you’re walking down the street drinking some soda from a can or water from a plastic bottle.You KANSAS CITY RECYCLING FACTS nish it and start to look 108,649 tons of waste produced in KC homes! Less than 3% of bins in the public space are for recycling in the downtown loop That’s like 15,521 elephants (270 trash bins and 8 recycling bins total) around on where to toss it.You see a trash can a 70 few feetI -ahead. Now what would make you go over here and recycle that instead of throwing it away? How can you distract someone from throwing the can into the trash can? 150 x100 I - 35 It can be anything from something on the ground Of that only 27% is recycled even though almost 80% of it could be recycled! to an object/contraption that moves, maybe you KC’s Recycling Currently What KC Could Recycle get something back from Sprint it; anything you can Centerdream up.”
Trash bins Recycling bins
I - 70
I - 670
ISSUE: Lack of access leads to a lack of participation and there is nothing to encourage people to recycle in Kansas City’s public space.
• The charrette time was set for 35 minutes, which started by giving the students a recycling scenario as a prompt paired with an image that places the students in the situation. This was meant to help get them in a focused mindset of encouraging recycling in public space.
31
Synthesis Of Charrette Ideas
From the two charrette sessions, I synthesized the different elements from the childrenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s ideas into categorizes to better understand the childrenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s perspective on what encourages people to recycle. With these ideas and the synthesis, I shared this information with classmates to watch how it would impact design outcomes.
Infrastructure Standard Bins Student 1 Student 2
X
Student 3
X
Student 4
X
Student 5 Student 6
Recycle Sorting Bin
Streetscape Amenity
Technology
Game/Puzzle
Play Equipment
X - Compost
X-benches
X - floor piano
X - laser tag
X
X - robot X
X - dichotomous key
X - Slots
X - obstacle course X - basketball hoop
Spatial Design Art
Structure
Student 1 Student 2
X
Student 3
Signage
Ground Plane Prompt
Place-making
Use Recycled Material
X - help animals
X -maze
X
X - rubber
X X -building
X
Student 4 Student 5 Student 6
X
X - maze
X
X - location directions
Money
Coupon/Voucher
Incentives Ticket Student 1
X - laser tag
Student 2
X - movie
Candy Bar
Prize X
X
Student 3
X - machine
Student 4 Student 5 Student 6
Totals
X - Powerball X
Infrastructure 14
32
X
Spatial Design
Incentives
12
8
Applications and Takeaways
Links are street corridors that connect the areas of activity around the city with the design intent to engage people in the public right-of-ways through increased awareness and education as well as increased access to recycling. A group of KCDC students, including myself, were focused on developing the design solutions for the Links strategy.
My report reflects on how impactful the participatory process with children was on the design outcomes. My big takeaways were that participation in the participatory process dictates its influence on those involved. My classmate and I who engaged with the children during the design charrette were the most influenced by their ideas and brought it back into the design.
33
PA 3 SH 16 PP2 4
â&#x20AC;˘ Providing access to light and greenspace was key in the layout of interior and exterior spaces. 34
CA3 4
AC 10
â&#x20AC;˘ A challenge the team faced was fitting all the needs of the school onto the urban site, as compared to many school who have expansive grounds.
Location: North Kansas City, MO Professional Work; BNIM
EP 5
North Kansas City High School is a 90 year old school being transformed with a new large building addition and improved campus grounds. New infrastructural updates create equitable campus facilities and spaces for this urban school.
Currently Under Construction HA 4
Building Addition, Site and Planting Design
AC 7
North Kansas City High School
26th Ave
1 2
Howell St
17 13
10
8
16
17
19
14 7
13
12
3 1
15
17
6 99
18
23rd Ave
18 17
1
Existing High School
2
Existing Training Facility
3
Brickyard
4
Existing Stadium Seating
5
Athletic Field
6
Performing Arts Hub
7
Classroom Wing
8
Field House
9
Main Entry
10
Existing Gymnasium
11
Existing Classroom Wing
12
Open Lawn
13
Secured Campus Entries
14
Dining Terrace Courtyard
15
Arts Courtyard
16
Loading/Service Dock
17
Parking
18
Bus Drop Off
19
Cafeteria
35
PLANT SCHEDULE CODE
TREES
AE 3 PP 1,492 sf PP 385 sf
BL
Betula nigra `Little King` / Fox Valley Birch
CA
Cercis canadensis `Alba` / White Eastern Red Bud
CC
Cercis canadensis / Eastern Redbud
CC2
Cotinus coggygria / Smoke Tree
CK
Cornus kousa / Kousa Dogwood
ZS
Zelkova serrata / Sawleaf Zelkova
CODE
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME
CA2
Cornus sericea `Alleman`s Compact` / Dwarf Red Twig Dogwood
CA3
Ceanothus americanus / New Jersey Tea
HA
Hydrangea arborescens `Annabelle` / Annabelle Smooth Hydrangea
HB
Hypericum beanii / Henry St. John`swort
HS
GROUND COVERS
PP 1,098 sf BC 7
Ilex glabra `Compacta` / Compact Inkberry
PA
Perovskia atriplicifolia / Russian Sage
TD
Taxus x media `Densiformis` / Dense Yew
CODE
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME
AC
Astilbe x arendsii `Cattleya / False Spiraea
AC2
Achillea x `Coronation Gold` / Hybrid Yarrow
CA3 4
AC 10
PA 3
PP 242 sf
PA 3
SH 16
PP2 4
Bouteloua curtipendula / Side Oats Grama
BG
Bouteloua gracilis / Blue Grama
PP2 4
LS 8
PA2 17 SH 15 CA4 17
BL 1
EP 2
NR 3
PA 3
BG 9
PP2 5
BG 4
CC2 1
CA4 15
NR 6
BC 7
NR 5
EP 4
PP2 4
BG 7 SH 10
LS 5
EP 2
PA 2
BC 9
LS 3
8,400
DESCRIPTION
SYMBOL
BG 16
CC 2
PW 3
NR 6
CG 8
PW 2
II 6
CG 31
PW 6
PW 6
RH2 4
PP2 7
NR 6
SH 21
AC2 4
RH2 7
EP 3
CC 3
EP 6
BC 6
BG 9
PP2 2 BG 9
NR 5
CG 9
PA 6
CA3 4
LS 5
Sporobolus heterolepis / Prairie Dropseed
SL
Schizachyrium scoparium / Little Bluestem Grass
VM
Vinca major / Periwinkle
CODE
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME
AF
Athyrium filix-femina / Common Lady Fern
AP
Adiantum pedatum / Northern Maidenhair Fern
CA4
Carex albicans / Whitetinge Sedge
Carex haydenii / Hayden`s Sedge
HL
Hosta lancifolia / Narrow Leaved Hosta
HP
Hosta plantaginea / Fragrant Plantain Lily
PA2
Polystichum acrostichoides / Christmas Fern
PO
Polygonatum odoratum `Variegatum` / Solomon`s-Seal
PW
Phlox divaricata / Wild Blue Phlox
sqft of native planting
DECOMPOSED GRANITE - TYPE 1
32 93 50
ROCK REVEAL - TYPE 1
32 93 00
STEEL EDGING - TYPE 1
32 93 00
SOD/SEED
CODE
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME
FR
Festuca rubra rubra / Creeping Red Fescue
39
4.4 PP
1,700
different species
Turf Type Tall Fescue / "Heat Wave" Turf Tall Fescue
acre site transformed
engaging
students MATCHLINE A1/L401 MATCHLINE A20/L401
BG 16
CA3 3 LS 9
Rudbeckia hirta / Black-eyed Susan
SH
PA 4
BG 13
CA3 4
Penstemon pallidus / Pale Beardtongue
RH2
BC 5
BG 7
EP 5
Nepeta racemosa `Walker`s Low` / Catmint
PP2
PROPERTY LINE
RH2 4
BC 16
AC 6
Liatris spicata / Spike Gayfeather
NR
SPEC
LIMIT OF WORK
BG 6
Echinacea purpurea / Purple Coneflower
LS
Carex grayi / Morning Star Sedge
CG 11 PW 3
EP
gallons of water falling on-site
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
LS 3
BC 15
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME
Carex pensylvanica / Pennsylvania Sedge
CH
NR 4
NR 6
PO 17
CG
SHADE MIX
138k
BC
BG 7
EP 5
CODE
CS3
Hamamelis vernalis / Spring Blooming Witchhazel
II
PP 1,292 sf
HA 4
GROUND COVERS
/ Existing Tree to Remain
One of my roles was developing the planting design. The projectâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s sustainability goals were to reduce landscape water usage and to reduce stormwater runoff as the north half of the site sits on the edge of a FEMA floodplain. With these goals in mind, a native and adaptive plant palette developed to increase infiltration through deeper root systems. Beyond the water benefits, the palette promotes environmental and social benefits as well. Creating new habitat, cleaning the air, connecting students to nature, and becoming an educational tool for students are a few of the myriad of benefits the design provides. SHRUBS
AC 7
BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME
Planting Design AE
PP 534 sf
BC 6
MATCHLINE A1/L402
MATCHLINE A20/L401
PP 539 sf PP 2,280 sf
PP 233 sf PP 1,818 sf
PP 52 sf
36 PW 11
CS3 45 PP
II 10
PP 159 sf
The site design relies heavily on the planting design to create active and passive spaces. • The new main entry has a native plant massing running from the door to the street to emphasize and identify it as the new entry • A bermed lawn breaks up the open space and provide lounging space between the old building and football field • Densely planted courtyard with meandering paths provides a intimate outdoor dining opportunity for students
(Santoro & Pericich)
• An industrial courtyard with a work lawn for student projects framed by native plants.
(Ross & Santoro)
37
Winnetonka High School
Building Addition, Site and Planting Design
Winnetonka High School is an existing school in the North Kansas City School District. Currently, the entry sequence into the building is unclear. A new building addition entry and plaza will emphasize the main entry, while adding functional office spaces and conference rooms. â&#x20AC;˘ The site design focused on emphasizing the entry through a vibrant native plant palette that extended from the existing building out to the street.
Location: Kansas City, MO Professional Work; BNIM
38
Sun Studies
Native Plant Palette
1
Entry Plaza
2
Student Gathering Area
3
Seat Wall
4
Existing Parking Lot
5
Native Planting Beds
6
Main Entry Hall
7
School Attendance Office
8
Principalâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Office and Administration Office
9
Vice Principalâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Office and Administration
5
3
5
2
Office
4
1
6
8
7
9
5
School Site
39
J
X
Beginning to End
Z
For Winnetonka, my role was all encompassing; including helping lead client meetings, coordinating with consultants, refining design elements and overall project documentation. The project is SEAT WALL - ELEVATION 2 CONCRETE currently under construction. W
H
Y
V
P-WHS-25
X
G
GENERAL NOTES:
U
1. 2.
35'-0"
7
1'-6"
8
8
9"
W
T
F
WINNETONKA
S
HIGH SCHOOL
6
V
5
E
4
R 2
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
U
3
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
2
REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR CONCRETE THICKNESS, REINFOCEMENT, AND SUB GRADE PREPARATION. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR JOINT TYPE AND LAYOUT T 1 SAW CUT TO BE 1/3 OVERALL DEPTH OF P PAVEMENT WHEN NO EXPANSION JOINT IS PRESENT, TYP.
1
Y
2
C
2
1/4" EXPANSION JOINT
3
CONCRETE REVEAL
4
STOPS/START EVERY OTHER HORZ. REBAR IN WALL AT CENTER OF REVEAL TYPICAL
X
4
C.I.P. CONCRETE SEAT WALL
3
ALIGN PAVING JOINTING WITH CENTER OF REVEAL (RE: ELEVATION L2.00)
B 4
V
1
U
A
1"
3
6
2
3
4
1 L3.00
4
2
7
8
8
4 L3.00
SCALE:1 1/2" = 1'-0"
10
11
6
12
13
14
5
15
1
2
H
12 13
1
PLANTING
2
PLANTING MIX (329300)
3
COMPACTED SUBGRADE PER GEOTECHINCAL REPORT
4
4
PARGE AND WATERPROOF
5
1.5" DIA WEEP HOLES AT 10' O.C.
7
M
2
CONCRETE STEM WALL BASE
3
C.I.P. CONCRETE 1'-0" FOOTING
4
PLANTING MIX (329300)
5
METAL EDGING (329300)
6
LANDSCAPE ROCK (329300)
7
METAL PANEL; MATCH ARCHITECTURE COLOR 17
2
5
7
8
GENERAL NOTES: 4 METAL EDGING (329300) 1. SUPPLIER / FABRICATOR SHALL SUB 2. SELECTION SAMPLES: FOR EACH FIN MANUFACTURER'S FULL RANGE OF A Z COMPACTED SUBGRADE (321313) 3. VERIFICATION SAMPLES: FOR EACH F SQUARE REPRESENTING ACTUAL PRO CONCRETE STEM WALL BASE BNIM Architect MINIMU 4. Architects INSTALLER QUALIFICATIONS: 2460 Pershing Road, Suite 100, Jackson County, Kansas City MO 64108 p.816.783.1500 f.816.783.1501 5. MANUFACTURER / FABRICATOR SHAL MO State Certificate of Authority #000377 Y C.I.P. CONCRETE FOOTING WORKMANSHIP ON ALL SIGNAGE CO 2460 Pershing Road, Suite 100, Kansas City, Missouri 64108 6. REQUESTS FOR SUBSTITUTIONS WILL p.816.783.1500 f.816.783.1501 MO State Certificate of Authority #000377 PLANTING MIX (329300) 7. ALL ELECTRICAL LIGHTING ELEMENT 920 Main Street, Tenth Floor, Kansas City, MO 64105 CONTRACTOR. p.816.701.2107 X METAL EDGING (329300) MO State Certificate of Authority #1999141112 8. MOCKUP: PROVIDE A FULL MOCKUP 1 CONT. LINE 920 Main Street,TECHNIQUES, Tenth Floor, Kansas City, MO 64105 APPLICATION AND OF p.816.701.2107 LANDSCAPE ROCK (329300) REFER TO E MO State Certificate of Authority #1999141112 PERMISSION OF ARCHITECT. 9.Lenexa Drive, DOSuiteNOT PROCEED REMAINING 8345 300, Lenexa, Kansas 66214WITH 2 SOLID WHITW W p.913.742.5000 f.913.742.5001 METAL PANEL; MATCH 10. REWORK MOCKUP AREA AS REQUIRE MO State Certificate of Authority #000556 3 STEEL BACK ARCHITECTURE COLOR 11. LED LIGHTING COMPONENTS SHALL 3770 Broadway, Kansas City, Missouri 64111 p.816.931.3377PROPER f.816.931.3378 HALO LIGHTING EFFECT. DES 4 RED LEXAN LASER CUT LETTERING AND GRIFFIN AND SUPPLIERS RECOMMENDATION AND GRIFFI LOGO IN PANELS BACKED WITH RED V TRANSLUCE LEXAN OR TRANSLUCENT RED 5 3/8" THICK M VINYL PUSH THROUGH LETTERING ±1'-6"
18
SAME LETTERING AND GRIFFIN LOGO
6
4" PERF. PIPE TO DAYLIGHT OR STORM. CLEAN GRAVEL. RE: CIVIL
9
C.I.P. CONCRETE FOOTING (033000)
F
11 1/4" CHAMFER
L
1
3
1'-6"
HIGH SCHOOL
4 L3.01
12 C.I.P. CONCRETE WALL (033000)
8
14
WINNETONKA
10 2"X4" KEY CONT.
7
N
7
13 ROUGHENED JOINT
8 E
14 #4 DOWEL @ 18" O.C. (321313)
M
15 5 - #4 BOTTOM CONTINUOUS
1'-0"
K
1'-9"
1
2
3
4 9"
2 L3.01
D
1'-9"
9 10
K
15
C
J
13 2"X4" KEY C
14 C.I.P. 10" TH
6
#5 REBAR @1/4" 12"=VERT. EACH FACE (033000) SCALE: 1'-0"
7
#4 REBAR @ 12" HORZ.2EACH FACE (033000) STEM CONCRETE
COMPACTED SUBGRADE (321313)
1
8
4" PERF. PIPE TO DAYLIGHT OR STORM. CLEAN 3 C.I.P. CONCRETE GRAVEL. RE: CIVIL
9
C.I.P. CONCRETE FOOTING (033000)
6
10 2"X4" KEY CONT.
7
11 1/4" CHAMFER
PLANTING MIX (329300)
5
METAL EDGING (329300)
12 C.I.P. CONCRETE WALL (033000)
4
13 ROUGHENED JOINT
6
6
8 9
15 #5 BARS HO
EACH FACE
FOOTING
4
2
18 COMPACT B
LANDSCAPE ROCK (329300) METAL PANEL; MATCH ARCHITECTURE COLOR
M
LANDSCAPE ROCK (329300)
10
LOGO IN PANELS BACKED WITH RED
12LEXAN OR TRANSLUCENT RED
2
L
14
METAL EDGING (329300) 15
5815 NE 48th St, Kansas City, MO 64119
Description
Date Issued
1'-0"
15
K
NOTE: SIGN IS DOUBLE-SIDED WITH SAME LETTERING AND GRIFFIN LOGO
Project No: 16019.01
Issued: 7 May 2018 Rev. #
LETTERING2'-0" 13VINYL PUSH THROUGH 1'-0"
1
7 Winnetonka HighschoolREQUIREME SUBMIT BEA New 1'-0" Entry Addition and Administrative Suite
100% Construction Documents
8 11LASER CUT LETTERING AND GRIFFIN
3
9 C.I.P. CONCRETE FOOTING (BELOW)
3
16 #4 DOWELS
17 5 - #5 BARS
N
15 5 - #4 BOTTOM CONTINUOUS 10
4
6
P
14 #4 DOWEL @ 18" O.C. (321313) 7
5
STRIP FOOT
5
Q
WALL BASE
16 J
17
NORTH
18 H
H
P-WHS-20
G
GEOTECHIN
PARGE AND WATERPROOF
3
3 L3.01
H
12 COMPACT S
4
R
1.5" DIA WEEP HOLES AT 10' O.C.
J
B
11 GEOTEXTILE
3 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
COMPACTED SUBGRADE PER GEOTECHINCAL REPORT
MONUMENTAL SIGN
3'-6"
37'-0"
9 METAL EDG
10 PLANTING M
5
2
4
35'-0"
3
3'-6"
1
T
PLANTING
1
8 1
24
8 LANDSCAPE
4
5
3 1'-0"
7 POWER RE:
23
2
NOTE: SIGN IS DOUBLE-SIDED WITH 2 PLANTING MIX (329300) SAME LETTERING AND GRIFFIN LOGO
13
8
9" EACH FACE (033000) #4 REBAR @ 12" HORZ.
MANUFACT
22
S
11
#5 REBAR @ 12" VERT. EACH FACE (033000)
6 FOOTING EM
U
19 SIGN IS DOUBLE-SIDED 20 21 NOTE: WITH
LASER CUT LETTERING AND GRIFFIN LOGO IN PANELS BACKED WITH RED LEXAN OR TRANSLUCENT RED VINYL PUSH THROUGH LETTERING
35'-0" 12
8
5
P
L
COMPACTED SUBGRADE (321313)
8
1% SLOPE
P-WHS-32
4
6 P-WHS-33
3
G
1'-0"
1
16
2
N
9"
32
1
1% SLOPE
14
LASER CUT 29LETTERING AND GRIFFIN 28 30 31 LOGO IN PANELS BACKED WITH RED LEXAN OR TRANSLUCENT RED VINYL PUSH THROUGH LETTERING
6
1'-6"
HIGH SCHOOL
TYPICAL EXPANSION JOINT
9
17
P
Q
8
9. 10. 11.
HIGH SCHOOL
J
11
METAL PANEL; MATCH ARCHITECTURE COLOR
4
3
R
7
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
T
S
8.
LANDSCAPE ROCK (329300)
NOTE: SIGN IS DOUBLE-SIDED WITH 9" SAME LETTERING AND GRIFFIN LOGO
WINNETONKA
5
8 1'-0"
K
8
1/8", TYP.
3
1
P-WHS-08
3 L3.00
TYPICAL CONTROL JOINT
Q
6
METAL EDGING (329300)
6
2
4
5
L
5
5
WINNETONKA 35'-0"
TAPERED PLATE DOWEL AND WELDING BASKET 9" - RE: SPECIFICATIONS M - RE: MANUFACTURER R RECOMMENDATIONS
5 L3.00
8
1/8", TYP.
4 1/4" THICK FOAM EXPANSION JOINT, TYP.
SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"
6. 7.
3
3 #4 DOWEL SPACED AT 36" O.C. WITH S N SLEEVE ON ONE END, TYP. GREASED
MAIN ENTRY PLAZA - SECTION P-WHS-10
27
PLANTING MIX (329300)
TYPICAL SAW CUT JOINT
EXPANSION FOAM, TYP.P-WHS-32
2
P-WHS-26
1
3
26
4. 5.
C.I.P. CONCRETE FOOTING
4
1
7
1/8", TYP. 1'-6"
2 SAW CUT TO BE 1/4" DEPTH WHEN HIDING
5
25
CONCRETE STEM WALL BASE
3
1
B.
2
W
24
2
SUPPLIER / FABRICATOR SHALL SUBMIT DETAILED SHOP DRAWINGS OF PRODUCTS AND ALL ASSEMBLIES. SELECTION SAMPLES: FOR EACH FINISH PRODUCT SPECIFIED, TWO COMPLETE SETS OF COLOR CHIPS REPRESENTING MANUFACTURER'S FULL RANGE OF AVAILABLE COLORS AND PATTERNS. VERIFICATION SAMPLES: FOR EACH FINISH PRODUCT SPECIFIED, TWO SAMPLES, MINIMUM SIZE 6 INCHES (150 MM) SQUARE REPRESENTING ACTUAL PRODUCT, COLOR, AND PATTERNS. INSTALLER QUALIFICATIONS: MINIMUM 5 YEAR EXPERIENCE INSTALLING SIMILAR SIGNAGE PRODUCTS. MANUFACTURER / FABRICATOR SHALL PROVIDE A 2 YEAR WARRANTY AGAINST DEFECTS IN MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP ON ALL SIGNAGE COMPONENTS AND ASSOCIATED ASSEMBLIES. REQUESTS FOR SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SIGNAGE DESIGN INTENT. ALL ELECTRICAL LIGHTING ELEMENTS, CONNECTIONS, COMPONENTS, AND POWER SOURCE SHALL BE SUPPLIED BY TH CONTRACTOR. 1 EVALUATION OFPAVING (321316) MOCKUP: PROVIDE A FULL MOCKUP FORCONCRETE DESIGN, LIGHTING COMPONENTS, SURFACE PREPARATION TECHNIQUES, AND APPLICATION OF WORKMANSHIP. ALTERNATE MOCKUP MATERIALS MAY BE UTILIZED WITH PERMISSION OF ARCHITECT. 2 C.I.P. WALLBY ARCHITECT AND OWNER. DO NOT PROCEED WITH REMAINING WORK UNTILCONCRETE MOCKUP IS APPROVED REWORK MOCKUP AREA AS REQUIRED TO PRODUCE ACCEPTABLE WORK. LED LIGHTING COMPONENTS SHALL3BE POSITIONED ONSOIL LEXAN MIX / ACRYLIC BACK OR STEEL BACK UP STRUCTURE FOR PLANTING (329300) PROPER HALO LIGHTING EFFECT. DESIGN LIGHTING COMPONENTS AND ASSOCIATED ASSEMBLIES PER MANUFACTURER AND 33SUPPLIERS RECOMMENDATIONS. 34 35 36
3.
Q
A. 1
CL
23
COMPACTED SUBGRADE (321313)
35'-0"
1 DZ
22
1'-0"
1
40
P-WHS-03
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
P-WHS-33
P-WHS-19
P-WHS-35
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"
A 1
G
2
3
4
5
2 COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE
(321313) 3 COMPACTED SUB GRADE PER
6
7
8
9
10
11
1 6" CONCRETE
1 6" CONCRETE
5
1 BUILDING FACADE 2
2 COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE (321313) 3 COMPACTED SUB GRADE PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (321313)
12
13
14
15 1 PEDESTRIAN
16
CONCRETE PAVING; RE: HARDSCAPE SCHEDULE FOR FINISH AND COLOR 2 EXPANSION JOINT; RE: PLANS
17
18
19
20
21
22
G
23
24
25
26
V
1 L7.00
Planting Design
A core aspect to the planting design was using a native/ adaptive plant palette that would provide multiple benefits to the project. • Emphasize the new entry with plant material that would be dense, colorful, and multi-seasonal • Select color characteristics reflecting the school colors to create a stronger identity • Use native or adapted species to reduce water needs and encourage biodiversity. • Reduce and improve stormwater runoff through natural filtration and infiltration
U
4 L7.00 T
S
R
2 L7.00 Q
P
N
M
L
K
J
H
G
3 L7.00 F
5 L7.00
41
(Ross & Santoro)
Regional Law Enforcement Memorial Garden
Honor Past Stories, Celebrate our Present Story, & Unfold a Bright Future The Regional Law Enforcement Memorial Garden honors and celebrates the men and women who have laid down their lives in the line of duty. Located at the Regional Police Academy, the garden is envisioned as a sequence of ever-changing spaces that tell the stories of those who made the ultimate sacrifice, as well as to honor past and current officers and their families, who make daily sacrifices to serve and protect. â&#x20AC;˘ The memorial experience begins as a somber, compressed sequence of spaces to then be released into a bright, hopeful meadow. The design is woven into the natural landscape starting at a high bluff journeying down into a native prairie bowl.
42
Location: Kansas City, MO Professional Work; BNIM
1 3 2
4
10 9
6 5
8
9 7
1
Drop-off
6
Ceremony Plaza
2
Street Parking
7
Meadow Walk
3
Donor Plaza
8
Trail of Heroes Connection
4
Memorial Entry Portal
9
Memorial Walk
5
Memorial Wall
10
Wet Meadow Bowl
NE Pleasant Valley Rd
KC Police Dept.
Regional Police Academy
43
Abstraction and Visualization As Storytelling Names of the fallen officers are extremely important in a memorial design; however, also finding a creative way to tell their stories and KCâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s history allows visitors to interact at a deeper level. Abstraction and visualization of data is one way to do this. A design study I did looked at the number of fallen officers each year in a timeline and how that story might be visualized. This lead to a graphic storytelling element for the memorial walls that leads visitors on a journey.
(Santoro & Yang)
44
45
Planting the Seed A School Design Activity
Citizens of the World Charter School Kansas City (CWC-KC) was selected for a Budding Botanist grant to expand an existing school garden program with the help of a volunteer team. Program for the grant included: • Replanting two planters along Broadway Blvd. that support biodiversity and attract pollinators. • An official monarch waystation as part of the natural play area at the school. • Worm composting stations and supplies in classrooms • A Tasting Local event turned into a zero-landfill event.
Prairie Dropseed 3’ tall
SideOats Grama 2.5’ tall
Blue Grama 2’ tall
Coneflower 3’ tall
Black-Eyed Susan 3’ tall
Yarrow 3’ tall
Location: Kansas City, MO Volunteer Grant Work
Scaled plant images were used during the design activity for the students to easily visualize their planting design.
46
Coreopis 2’ tall
Blazing Star 3’ tall
Milkweed 2’ tall
Design Day
The biggest goal of the grant was teaching the students about environmental sustainability and the importance of biodiversity. As part of the team, I created a planting design activity and presentation to create a hands-on learning experience. The students were given some basic design principles, site design rules and a native planting palette. Then in groups, students created designs for the two Broadway planters. Lastly, students presented their concepts. These design concepts were then taken by the team and I to create a final planting design for the two planters and monarch waystation. 47
Planting Day With designs finalized, the team and I did all the installation over a couple weekends. I was in charge of procuring some of the materials and laying out the design on site. To continue involving and teaching the students, a planting
North Planter 48
South Planter
day event was set up. Each of the students had the chance to plant and claim ownership of their new native pollinator gardens.
Monarch Waystation
49
Experimentation with modeling paste and charcoal achieves the stark contrast and the feeling of the actual bark and rocks textures.
50
Graphics
Renderings, Mapping, + Hand Graphics
The following pages show a variety of projects and media used to create different graphics. This spread depicts my study of a land art piece I created in school. The land art was based upon a lone tree on a hill in Marlatt Park. This site was selected due to the windblown look of the tree and how it visually points towards the top of the hill. The tree was barren except for a cluster of green leaves on the highest branches. This cluster of green leaves was the inspiration for the land artâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s main concept of changing perspectives through movement and detail. When drawing, I tend to generalize the landscape and focus in on one area of the land art in higher detail. The use of an orange hued paper captures the essence of the fall sunset. Evening light delineated using white charcoal where the light falls.
51
52
(Santoro & Schwaller)
During my time at BNIM, I have refined my ability to produce high quality conceptual renderings with quick turnaround. Many projects required illustrative site plans and perspectives as part of final deliverables and were used to help fundraise for the projects. My process initially begins with a detailed sketchup model with texture materials applied. Then using a rendering software called Enscape, materials and lighting are adjusted to produced a rendered image; followed by some post-processing in Photoshop. This process allowed for fast production with quality results.
53
Mapping has always fascinated me. Once you digitize data, you can analyze patterns and relationships in geographic space - relationships between certain health patterns and air or water pollution, between plants and climate, soils, landscape. We can tell stories with maps and use those stories to inform decisions. INDEPENDENCE
While at BNIM, I have had the opportunity to explore mapping with GIS. In 2016, we created an adaptive process to create a regional green infrastructure framework for the 9 counties of the Mid‐America Regional Council around KC. The purpose was to show the potential of an expanded approach to green infrastructure that connects our region’s natural resources to people in ways that create networks of environmental, economic and social benefits in all communities.
KANSAS CITY, MO
One of my roles for the project was to help visualize the analyzed data in a beautiful way that would help find these patterns that informed decision-making. LEE'S SUMMIT
This map visualizes an analysis of many social factors to determine where their is high social need.
54
´
0
5
10 Miles
This map illustrates the areas of high ecological value and need to understand conservation vs. restoration priority areas.
This map depicts an intersection analysis of the previous to create connections between environmental, economic, and social benefits within the watershed. This becomes a tool for selecting priorty green infrastructure projects that have multiple benefits.
55
56
Cityscapes have always intrigued me with their complexity of systems and site scales. I hope to work towards the future of cityscapes becoming green and active through design.
Thank you
57
Amanda Santoro
email: amanda.santoro0815@gmail.com cell: 316.708.1992