Architecture Portfolio by Amelia Rose Smith

GRADUATE PORTFOLIO

AMELIA ROSE SMITH MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE (THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE) BACHELOR OF ENVIRONMENTS (ARCHITECTURE)

INTRODUCTION

AMELIA ROSE SMITH BACHELOR OF ENVIRONMENTS (ARCHITECTURE) MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE I am a passionate and innovative architectural graduate, looking for a full-time position after completing the Masters of Architecture at the University of Melbourne in June 2020. I have cultivated a diverse design-focused skill set across my six years of study at Melbourne University, completing both my Bachelors and Masters degrees there.

Throughout my studies, I have been drawn to architecture that aspires to represent, influence and define our social realities. Architecture that can transcend its status as a container of space, and instead become an integral part of the urban fabric interests me for its ability to influence the everyday lives of the people who interact with it.

ARCHITECTURE | PORTFOLIO

CONTENTS 01

INDEPENDENT THESIS

2020

SUBURBAN DREAMING Supervisor | Prof. Justyna Karakiewicz Mark Attained (83)

02 STUDIO E

2019

ARTICULATED MATTER Tutors | Darcy Zelenko & Danny Ngo Mark Attained (84)

STUDIO C

2018

MANIFEST(O) Tutors | Camilo Cruz & Fjalar De Haan Mark Attained (84)

04 AAT

2018

APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL TECHNIQUES Tutor | Noel Tighe Mark Attained (82)

05 CD

2017

CONSTRUCTION DESIGN Subject Coordinator | Blair Gardiner Mark Attained (66)

ARCHITECTURE | PORTFOLIO

INDEPENDENT THESIS SUBURBAN DREAMING

Supervisor | Prof. Justyna Karakiewicz Mark Attained (83)

This thesis proposes an interrogation of the endurance of the quarter acre dream as a dominant (sub)urban mythology. The critical discourses surrounding; the ontology of dwelling, habitus, and myth, serve to frame the architectural analysis of modern Australian vernaculars within this thesis, and their degradation into culs-de-sac of non-place. The premise of this project is that our current patterns of suburban development are outdated, unsustainable and problematic. The creation of socio-cultural expectations elide the role that ideology and power have in the formation of space/place, rendering architecture a natural, neutral “framework of everyday life” (Dovey, 2014). The description of myth in Barthes’ Mythologies (1966) provides the theoretical framework for the development of this design thesis, the myth as a form of injunction which

compels its audience to wrongly associate the form of the myth with an essence, expectation, dream, or object of desires, guides my attempt to both disrupt current suburban dreams and generate alternative future dreams. The design response of this thesis is broken into two parts; Part 1 aims at disrupting the domination of the detached suburban block as the natural architecture of the suburban dream through a close analytical reading of specific myth-objects. Part 2 explores alternative dreamscapes, possible futures and built visions that aim to disrupt the reification of suburban housing. The term dreamscape is very important to the progression of this project, it is within these imaginary visual fields that the myth-objects can be distorted and re-cast, an architectural re-framing of suburban housing.

M-ARCH | Semester 1 2020

A SUBURB IN THE SKY In Part I, six examples of suburban built form were interrogated; isolating aspects, artefacts, patterns and moments which have become objects of myth. In Part II, alternative suburban myths (dreams) are generated through the re-casting of myth-elements and the inversion of the mythologizing processes; shrinkage, featurism and the interior gaze. The goal; to explore through design different visions or dreamscapes of suburban built form. Suburban Dreamscapes is based in a program that dislocates myth-elements from their mythological purpose, a dislocation which allows for the creation of different suburban dreams; surreal visions of the suburban ideal, the elements are familiar but not, inherently confronting cultural expectations of suburban housing.

M-ARCH | Semester x YYYY

ANALYSIS Throughout Part | 01 of this project, I have utilised tripartite diagrams made up of scenes, signifying forms, and geometric abstractions in order to trace the mythologizing process of land-shrinkage vs. house growth. The images are to be read left to right, the initial sign that has been dislocated, and

then the development of the myth-object from the second half of the 20th C to now. I am visually trying to expose the dislocation of history, meaning and signification that enables these myth-objects to be consumed as suburban dreams.

M-ARCH | Semester x YYYY

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT In order to translate the horizontal suburb into a volumetric structure, I explored different ideas of stacking, and played with the different elements of the suburb itself; the function of through-roads as opposed to culs-de-sac and laneways.

EVOLUTIONARY SOLVER To work with such a large number of variables effectively, I defined the problem in Grasshopper in order to run an evolutionary algorithm (Wallacei) that would enable to be test the feasibility of the volume as a suburb in the sky.

DISTANCE

PARAMETERS

FITNESS OBJECTIVES

VOLUME

SOLUTION SET ANALYSIS

EVOLUTIONARY SOLVER

PSEUDO CODE

SUNLIGHT

CHOSEN SOLUTION: 98|0

VOLUME ROTATION PLACEMENT DISTANCE

Bedroom Unit Lounge/Kitchen Utility

M-ARCH | Semester x YYYY

FO {01} SUNLIGHT Generation 98 | Solution 0 Outcome : 1/1999

RE-CASTING MYTH OBJECT(S) 1 4

9 2 1 4

3 5

8 13 10 19

16 17 16

M-ARCH | Semester 1 2020

LEGEND 1. 2x3m Roof Garden-Bed 2. Coated Metal Safety Rail 3. Metal stairs to external requistites. 4. Thin composite concrete slab 130mm, to be cast in situ over metal decking and roof beams. 5. Composite timber and steel roof truss system. 6. Transport pod-railing, tracks at 500mm spacing. 7. Transport Pod, composite metal and glass system, tracks and rollers to manufacturers specification. 8. Brick veneer wall with window detailing. 9. Single front door to upstairs entrance. 10. Weatherboard cladding

HOME | FRONT VIEW

11. Timber stud frame for Bedroom units. 12. Mixture of Queen and Single beds to suit the owners needs. 13. Traditional corrugated awnings at north facing windows. 1 4 . B u i l t- I n - R o b e s i n miniumum 2 out of 3 bedrooms. 15. Flexible LoungeBedroom space with Garage door opening for transport pod. 16. Super-Structure steel truss framing system, with Radial I-Beams shown. 17. Unit Framing I-Beam 18. Steel I-Beams framing pool area, bottom to be structural glass to allow filtered light to the floors below.

HOME | BACK VIEW INDEPENDENT THESIS | SM1 2020

Material Explorations: milk bottles into plastic bricks.

Mid-Scale Prototype: a piece of our plastic shelter.

STUDIO E : ARTICULATED MATTER 10

INFLATED CONCRETE MORPHOLOGIES Tutors | Darcy Zelenko & Danny Ngo Mark Attained (84) The brief of Studio E: Articulated Matter was to focus on digital fabrication technology as a part of an overall experimental design process. The design processes that we explored throughout semester aimed to “innovatively save material, create novel geometry and design unique effects” by utilising hands-on material knowledge in combination with extensive digital modeling workflows and digital fabrication techniques.

“articulation” of these material explorations into architectural outcomes, with the key question; “What is a smart articulation of matter in architecture?”, the driving thesis of our later explorations.

Similar to other ExLab subjects, our initial explorations centered around material “play”, through which we developed an extensive vocabulary of material techniques, and innovative methods of material manipulation.

The hands-on approach to multiple materials, methods, skills as well as digital processes, was a unique opportunity to engage with the design process at every stage; from material properties, to aesthetic/structural design, fabrication and finally construction.

The second half of semester focused on the

Throughout the second half of the semester our initial explorations into; material, machine, and technology had to be reconsidered and built upon in order to develop responses to our thesis question.

M-ARCH | Semester 2 2019

“LUNA” the freestanding concrete shell structure and the final constructed outcome of the studio.

VIDEO: THE PROCESS https://youtu.be/wsEu_xbnC1w STUDIO E | Articulated Matter

PLASTIC Across the first six weeks of semester we researched and ‘played’ with our set material; plastic. Our initial experimentation focused heavily on thermoforming plastics and the potential sustainability gains from using recycled plastics. As design became more of a consideration (moving from the scale of a hand-held item to that of a shelter) we continued experimenting and developing a design process that harnessed the thermoforming

potential of recycled sheet plastics. From mid-semester to week 9, our focus shifted to the construction and design of a shelter at 1:2 scale. I utilised my grasshopper and Karamba experience to design an intricate and elegant structure- the behavior of which we could predict prior to its construction.

PART 01: MATERIAL TESTING

CLEANING

HEATED IN OVEN

CNC ALUMINIUM MOULD

CAST OUTCOMES

THERMOFORMING

MAGNA BEND

FINAL PIECE

PART 02: PROTOTYPE 1x1m

CNC RECYCLED HDPE SHAPES

STUDIO E | Articulated Matter

PART 03: SHELTER DESIGN AT 1:2 SCALE

01_ SKETCH We started sketching out forms that aimed to achieve all of our design intentions as well as those defined by our brief.

02_ ANCHORS

04_ CLEAN UP

Setting anchor points along base curves effects the whole design, including the viability of the designs final fabrication.

The final Kanagroo generated form extended past the ground plane in certain areas and was messy around the edges, we manually cleaned it up in Rhino.

03_ KANGARO: SPRING LENGTHS

LOADS & MATERIAL PROP.

PRINCIPLE STRESS

DEFORMATIONS ANALYSIS MODEL OUTCOME

Running the FEA analyses helped our assembly and construction processes significantly. It allowed us to optimise the form and material usage, as well as indicating areas that would be problematic during

STRESS-LINE ANALYSIS MODEL

construction. These analyses were run with Karamba in Grasshopper.

DISPLACEMENT The unrolling of our final model mesh was extremely difficult; the way the we planned to thermoform the plastic and piece the whole construction together meant that we needed to produce strips out of the 1,000 disparate mesh faces. Ivy (a plugin for grasshopper) was used to help generate these strips.

PATH CREATION

MESH RATIONALISATION & UNROLL

LAID OUT FOR CNC

ASSEMBLY PROCESS

SEGMENTED MESH

MOST COMPLETE STAGE

DESIGN: INITIAL CONCRETE SIMULATIONS

14 PROTOTYPE: TESTING FABRIC AND INFLATION

FULL SCALE CONSTRUCTION: PROCESS M-ARCH | Semester 2 2019

CONCRETE | TEXTILES | INFLATION For the last four weeks of semester the class worked as one group to bring to life a fullscale shelter made from concrete bonded with textile as a flexible form-work. Initially we adopted the design approach which I had developed for the plastic project; using a mixture of Kangaroo and Karamba to generate and analyse a concrete shell structure. Once the definition was set up, we optimised the form in Octopus for minimum displacement, deflection and gravity loading. However, the team decided to utilise

an inflatable to act as both the construction method and re-useable formwork. We ended up with a compromised form that was loosely modeled after a deformed dome, seen in such precedents as the Bini shells in central Australia. The planning, sewing of the huge fabric pieces, construction of an airtight inflatable, and final concrete cast took 5 weeks in total. The final cast was done in 6 hours, the dome took 2 weeks to harden so that it could be moved. It is still standing out the front of the MSD building.

STUDIO E | Articulated Matter

STUDIO C : HACKING DESIGN MANIFEST(O) Tutors | Camilo Cruz & Fjalar De Haan Mark Attained (84)

The brief for Studio 35 was to design a system, or “meta-design” that would govern the creation of architectural artifacts, employed over site across an extended time frame of 50 years. These systems and outcomes were aimed at creating immediate as well as long-term solution to homelessness in Melbourne’s CBD. In 2012, the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released a new definition of homelessness (not including homelessness in Indigenous populations). The ABS definition designates homelessness as a lack of one or more of the elements that represent ‘home’. These elements may include ‘a sense of security, stability, privacy, safety and the ability to control living space’. Our design response focused on exploring the adaptive and evolutionary power of architecture to contend with the prevalent and unrelenting issue of homelessness. The project’s strengths lie in it’s ability to adapt to the needs of it’s user within an expandable, and organic and beautiful. The structure is designed not only to facilitate the construction of dwellings but also to give back to the city, and its citizens, by bringing dynamism and growth to the unused vertical space of the street.

M-ARCH | Semester 1 2018

1. COLUMN

2. LOAD PATH OPTIMIZATION

3. PIPED LOAD PATHS

4. CONNECTIONS

5. SMOOTHED AND OPTIMIZED PIPES

6. WHOLE STRUCTURE OPTIMIZED

7. COMPONETIZED

D.02 PROCESS | STRUCTURE 12 OPTIMIZATION & FORM FINDING

01_ COLUMN SECTIONS

SPINE NODE

<45

02_COLUMN TO SPINE NODE

03_SPINE SECTION 04_COLUMN TO BEAM CONNECTION

ANGLE: X-AXIS

COLUMN

<45

<60

05_NODE TO BEAM CONNECTION

POSITION AT COLUMN

<60

POSITION

<75

RULES: W

1. IF ( 1, <45 ) = TRUE , THEN ( 2, <45 ) = FALSE 2. IF ( a, <45 ) = TRUE AND ( b, <45 ) THEN c = ( c, <45 )

1. INCREASE VARIETY: COMPONENTS

2. INTENSIFY OPTIONS

3. CODE IN COMPLEXITY

4. DESIGNED RANDOMNESS

5. MANIFEST

6. UNIQUE CONNECTIONS

7. POTENTIAL FOR GROWTH....

8. OR DECAY...

9. OR RE-INVENTION

D.02 PROCESS | STRUCTURE 13 FLUID | ADAPTIVE | GROWTH STUDIO C | Hacking Design

SECTIONAL RENDER

M-ARCH | Semester 1 2018

DESIGN & IMPLEMENTATION The studio had a very particular design process; we determined an over-arching meta-design, it was an opportunity to think about the complexity involved in any architectural intervention, and attempt to design a process through which this kind of urban architecture could foster the agency of the individuals its designed for. It was also a project that because of its complexity and requirement to think about the generational implementation, growth or s h r i n k a g e - a l l ow e d

for the use of parametrically designed systems. The benefit of utilising these kinds of systems is there ability to retain complexity, and intricacy whilst still being able to be mass-produced. We designed a frame and infill system to utilise the left over or unactivated spaces of the city to house those in need.

STUDIO C |Hacking Design

HARMER AV HIGH CAPACITY ROOF DRAINAGE SYSTEM

PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS:

MEMBRANE RING FASTENS TO BODY INDEPENDENTLY OF GRATE TO ALLOW ACCESS TO SUMP WITHOUT BREAKING MEMBRANE SEAL

260

PUDDLE FLANGE WITH 4x WEEP HOLES

SPRAY FOAM INSULATION BETWEEN RIGID INSULATION AND DRAIN

SILICONE SEALANT PVC PIPE ADAPTER

POLY-TECH “MATACRYL” WATERPROOF MEMBRANE, HIGHLY FLEXIBLE MEMBRANE WITH CRACK-BRIDGING QUALITIES, HIGH IMPACT AND PUNCTURE RESISTANT FULLY CURED ONE HOUR AFTER APPLICATION.

50MM DOW STYROFOAM THERMAL INSULATION IS GREEN STAR COMPLIANT AND IS AN EXTREMELY SUSTAINABLE PRODUCT, CFC AND HCFC FREE, WITH ZERO OZONE DEPLETION POTENTIAL

100

TiSO FIXED STAINLESS STEEL AND GLASS PROTECTIVE BARRIER. MIN. HEIGHT FROM PARAPET 1000MM AS1657

151

4 A5.3

HILTI CURTAIN WALL 60 MM FIRE STOP BOARD, FIBREOUS MATERIAL THAT MEETS AS4072.1 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RESISTANCE TO THE INCIPIENT SPREAD OF FIRE

ROOF DRAINAGE SCALE 1:5 @ A1

MANNTECH SERIES 6 TELESCOPIC JIB BMU

SHIM TO HELP LEVEL POLY-TECH “MATACRYL” WATERPROOF MEMBRANE

50MM DOW STYROFOAM THERMAL INSULATION

DRY PACKER OR SIMILAR STIFF SAND CEMENT SEALS CONNECTION INTO

VIRIDIAN THERMOTECH: “ENERGYTECH” DOUBLE GLAZED IGU, HEAT STRENGTHENED LOW-E COATING AND OPACITY LAYER APPLIED TO ACHIEVE CONSISTENCY WITH OVERALL FACADE

BMU BASE PLATE BOLTED TO FIXING PLATE FIXING PLATE ANCHORED IN CONCRETE

HARMER AV HIGH CAPACITY ROOF DRAINAGE SYSTEM, INCORPORATES PUDDLE FLANGES WITH 4x WEEP HOLES. SPECIFICALLY FOR APPLICATION ON MEMBRANE ROOF SLABS WITH A CLIP-IN RING INDEPENDENT OF GRATE ALLOW ACCESS TO SUMP WITHOUT BREAKING MEMBRANE SEAL.

PLINTH SCREED

56.5

5 A5.3

80MM ROCKWOOL “ROXUL SAFE” CURTAIN WALL INSULATION, NON-COMBUSTIBLE STONE WOOL INSULATION WITH MELTING POINT OF APPROX. 1177°C (2150°F), DOES NOT PROMOTE SMOKE OR FLAME SPREAD WHEN EXPOSED TO FLAME, MINIMAL SHRINKAGE TO MAINTAIN CRITICAL LINE OF DEFENSE AGAINST FIRE

THE MANNTECH BMU TELESCOPIC JIB WAS CHOSEN OVER A REGULAR BMU SYSTEM BECAUSE OF THE FLEXIBILITY THAT ITS EXTENDED 40M REACH ALLOWS FOR SERVICING THE STEEPLY SLOPING FACADES OF THE EAST AND WEST WING. IT IS POSITIONED IN ORDER TO ALIGN WITH THE CORE BELOW IN ORDER TO SUPPORT THE BMU’S WEIGHT.

TO CREATE A FALL OF 1:80 OVER THE MAX 4000 DISTANCE BETWEEN HIGH POINT OF SLAB AND DRAINAGE OUTLET

HEMPEL WILL PROVIDE THE FINISH FOR THE CFCHS COLUMN, A SUSTAINABLE FINISH WHICH IS DURABLE WOULD BE PREFERRED.

PLINTH DETAIL SCALE 1:5 @ A1

APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL TECHNOLOGY Tutor | Noel Tighe Mark Attained (82) AAT was an extremely enjoyable subject, as it wove together both design and construction knowledge. It definitely gave me a better appreciation for the interconnection between architectural design and architectural engineering. The brief for this project was to design a mixed use tower, at least 30 storeys

tall, which each group member would design a distinct aspect of. My section of the building was the Crown area, the drawings which I have included articulate the crown detail drawings such as; the parapet, CFHS, spandrel and drainage details.

M-ARCH | Semester 1 2018

65 MM HANDRAIL AT ROOF BARRIER PER AS1657 TiSO FIXED STAINLESS STEEL AND GLASS PROTECTIVE BARRIER. MIN. HEIGHT FROM PARAPET 1000MM AS1657

SLOPE @ 1:25 125

ANODIZED ALUMINUM COPING FIXING BRACKET FOR MEMBRANE CHANEL SET INTO THE SLAB TO TAKE GLAZED PERIMETER BARRIER, FILLED WITH SILICONE SEALANT 180.5

CONCRETE UPSTAND TO BE FILLED AFTER THE FIXING BRACKET

ANGLED BRACKET FIXED TO CONCRETE SLAB IN ORDER TO CREATE AN ANGLE FOR WATER RUN OFF POLY-TECH “MATACRYL” WATERPROOF MEMBRANE 50MM DOW STYROFOAM THERMAL INSULATION ROOF SLOPE @ 1:80 SCREED POURED IN-SITU HOOK-ON STEEL CONNECTION AT ROOF SLAB

HILTI CURTAIN WALL 60 MM FIRE STOP BOARD CONCRETE ROOF SLAB 80MM ROCKWOOL “ROXUL SAFE” CURTAIN WALL INSULATION

50MM DOW STYROFOAM THERMAL INSULATION

COLUMN TOP PLATE BOLTED INTO ROOF SLAB TOP PLATE WELDED IN PLACE 20MM DIAMETER HOLE AT THE TOP AND THE BOTTOM OF EACH SECTION OF CFCHS TO VENT STEAM PRESSURE BUILD UP IN THE EVENT OF A FIRE 329.3

PARAPET TO ROOF SLAB DETAIL

CFCHS CONCRETE FILLED CIRCULAR HOLLOW SECTION 323.9 x 16 WITH RE-BAR 4x25 IN COMPLIANCE WITH AS1163

SCALE 1:5

VIRIDIAN HEAT STRENGTHENED IGU SPANDREL PANEL WITH OPACITY LAYER APPLIED ALUMINIUM MULLION WITH SILICONE BUTT JOINT NOTE: NO EXTRUDED ALUMINIUM COVER FOR SKIRTING DUCT (SEE TOWER MULLION DETAIL), AS FLOOR IS FOR MAINTENANCE ONLY, AND IS DOUBLE HEIGHT END PLATE BOLTED ONTO UNIT SYSTEM FIN PLATE, WELDED ONTO CFCHS AND BOLTED TO STEEL SUPPORT MEMBER VIRIDIAN THERMOTECH: “ENERGYTECH” DOUBLE GLAZED LOW E GLASS VERTICAL PLATES WITH BOLTED CONNECTIONS TO PROVIDE ANCHORAGE AND ALIGNMENT FOR SECTION WELDING, POTENTIALLY REMOVED AFTER WELD CFCHS TO BE FINISHED IN HEMPEL “HEMUCRYL” RANGE OF DURABLE TOPCOATS BACKING STRIPS FOR ALIGNMENT AND EASE OF ACCESS FOR IN-SITU WELDING. 30 MM CHS END PLATE, TO BE WELDED TOGETHER ON SITE. FULL STRENGTH, FULL PENETRATION WELDED BUTT JOINT. 250MM TO BE LEFT BETWEEN THE TOP PLATE TO BE WELDED AND THE POURED CONCRETE. ONCE WELD IS COMPLETED AND COLUMNS HAVE BEEN SPLICED, THE REMAINING COLUMNS CAN HAVE CONCRETE PUMPED INTO THEM FROM THE TOP VENT/DRAIN HOLE.

250 (MIN)

1 A5.3

2 A5.3 M-ARCH | Semester x YYYY

CHS CONNECTION AT SPANDREL PANEL SCALE 1:5 @ A1

CONSTRUCTION DESIGN Western BACE by Six Degrees Architects Subject Coordinator | Blair Gardiner Mark Attained (66)

Construction Design was the fnal construction subject in the Bachelor of Environments degree, the purpose of the subject was to learn how design intentions and outcomes translate into the physical built-object and the ways in which details, materials, structural components not only make the building function but also translate ideas into physical form. On the opposite page is the cut-through Axonometric drawing that I produced based on the construction drawings for Western BACE by Six Degrees.

1. PARAPET: Joint between two roofs; the walkover and the South wing. HR2- Hand rail on 15mm Galvanized brackets. MC2- Fascia Capping, parapet lining (internal face) Folded MC1 Capping- with 20mm drip-line, on External Face. Folded MC1 Flashing to South roof. 2. ROOFING: RS1; Roofing Panel Versiclad 75mm core (insulation) FC2; 150 PFC- with (TYPICAL) 2x 40 D holes for services to run through PU1; Purlins HJ24090 (min) Hyjoists by Carter Holt Harvey @900 CTS max. Insulation; Versiclad 75mm R2.6 ‘Space-maker’ structural insulated roof panels Tontine 190mm R3.5 batts minimum. 3. FIRST FLOOR SUSPENDED CEILING RB1; 380x100 PFC RB2; 600x115 GL18 UniLam by LTS exposed Laminated Beams 30mm pre-caber. RB2, notched to fit to PC1/RB1 connections. RB3; 410 UB 53 (178x403mm) All Structural Steel is Hot-Dipped Galvinised. FF Link Building Ceiling; R3.5 Insulation batts; Suspended Ceiling system of Furring Channels, Top Rail, Link and Cable Attachments to timber top plate. PB1; 13mm thick Plaster Board Lining, exposed side paint finished. 4. SHADING SUPPORT STRUCTURE ST1; 100x50x3.0 RHS hot dipped galvinised C450L0 ST2; 100x50x3.0 RHS hot dipped galvinised C450L0 5. EXTERNAL METAL CLADDING MC1; Metal cladding Type #1, ArchClad express panels with 294 face,’long, thin, flat appearance is required’ member widths @ 250mm, all fixings provided by manufacturer.

8mm Thermal Breaker between cladding and G1/2 Girt supports. 6. WINDOWS; WG.17, WG.16, W1.11, W1.10 Framing System; AWS ‘Series 826 Thermally Broken FrontGLAZE Framing’ GL1 Glazing Type 1 & BL1= Blind type 1; Blinds 1 – manual operation WH1; Window Header #1 150 PFC & WS1; Window Sill #1 150 PFC 10 Shelf Plate, 6FW hit 75, miss 150 each side to WS1/WH1; connects windows to structural frame. 7. SCREEN/INTERNAL STAIR DETAIL TC3; Timber Cladding #3 for Screens, Urban Salvage, 40 x 140mm (different from drawings by 2mm) re-milled recycled Spotted Gum (no red tones), Class 1 or 2 exterior grade, seasoned and dressed all round. 8.GROUND FLOOR CEILING Cable Tray; 3400 AFL Tasman Strut: All the services to the offices will run through these. 10. FIRST FLOOR LINK SLAB 180 Bondek Slab, 1 row props. SL92 Top, 40 min cover, fully tanked, graded to floor wastes. Re-ON20-300 T x 2000 Long. 11. FIRST FLOOR HOLLOW CORE SLAB 300mm hollow core, 80mm Max Screed, SL82 Fabric Design for 4.0KPa Live Load, 15MM set-down for carpet 12. MASONRY ELEMENTS BW1; Blockwork Type 1; 70mm Cavity, with 20mm Rigid Foilboard ‘Ultra 20’ 20mm R2.4 Insulation between. Internal Face; 200 half block: 190W x 190H x 190mmD. Rolled mortar joints. Mortar Colour: Grey Insulation. 13. SLAB ON GROUND

B-ENVS | Semester 1 2017

2 FFL 137.00 FFL 136.70

FFL 135.50

2 2

FFL 134.90

FFL 131.90

FFL 131.50 FFL 130.60 FFL 130.30

10 8

9 3 6

FFL 127.90 6

RL 127.730

15. FOUNDATIONS Existing RL 126 625- 30mm Silt (sand), 30mm Clay (silty), weathered Basalt rock up to 2.3m deep. New RL 127 730- Rolled, Blinding requirements; Min. depth= 1000 Bearing Capacity of the soil; 15 MPa (400 from footings)

FFL 128.65

Slab-on-ground, 15mm set-down for both. Mid-section Slab; SL72 Top, SL92 Bottom, 30 Cover, Lap 1 (Lap mesh) GRID + 25mm on 0.2 Polythene membrane. Slab to be formed over 100min Layer of compressible cardboard void former. 14. FOOTINGS SF1; Strip Footing #1 450mm wide, 600 min. PF1; Pad Footing #1 2000 x 2000, 600 min. BP1; Bored Pier #1 600. Min. Depth 1200, ReoSL92 x 2400 SQ in top of slab, but no reinforcement in BP, as it is massing concrete.

9 14

14 15