Letters Doubting The Doubter In the Spring 2017 News article “Study Concludes Canadian Site Is 24,000 Years Old” about the possible 24,000-year-old cuts made by humans on a horse jawbone, I keep thinking about the doubt expressed by archaeologist Gary Haynes that the scratches on a horse jawbone were humanmade. How and why could all the scratches be the same type in a narrow parallel band if they were formed by nature? It would be even more unlikely if the same situation were found repeated on other bones, and the questionable likelihood that they were done by nature’s hand grows greater yet if the cuts are all very likely spots where humans would carry out butchering. Finally, if any cuts crossed one or more other cuts, wouldn’t that mean the crossing cuts were done at a different time...even just seconds apart, but not at one single swipe, or trample? How extraordinary for nature to have done all this repeatedly on bones that would have been likely sites for human butchering! Phil Yost Las Cruces, New Mexico
Very Ancient Geometry A physicist-statistician might not know about Hopewell, but the editors of American Archaeology should have commented on her ignorance in the statement that her work produced the “first potential quantitative evidence of knowledge of advanced geometrical constructs in a prehistoric North American society.” (See “Ancient Architects Used Geometry,” page 10, Spring 2017). A thousand years before Mesa Verde Ancestral Pueblo buildings, the Hopewell filled southern Ohio with dozens of complexes of precisely engineered pure geometric earthworks. These works, which from the air look like a textbook of Euclidean geometry, also used a standard measurement unit, and many were astronomically oriented. Alice B. Kehoe Professor of Anthropology, emeritus, Marquette University
American Archaeology welcomes your letters.
Write to us at 1717 Girard Blvd. NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106, or send us e-mail at tacmag@nm.net. We reserve the right to edit and publish letters in the magazine’s Letters department as space permits. Please include your name, address, and telephone number with all correspondence, including e-mail messages.
american archaeology
Editor’s Corner It’s very possible that you’ve heard of Kennewick Man, but what about Gordon Creek Woman? Maybe you’ve read something about Spirit Cave Man, or possibly Arlington Springs Man, but more than likely the name Minnesota Woman means nothing to you. Have you heard of Leanne, or Shuká Káa? In our feature “The Fates Of Very Ancient Remains” (see page 41) we acquaint our readers with these and other highly unusual individuals. What makes them so unusual is that they are among the few sets of human remains found in the U.S. that are 8,000 years or more in age. As our article explains, while these individuals have great antiquity in common, they often have very little else. Though it’s likely that he was just another face in the crowd when he walked the earth some 8,600 years ago, Kennewick Man achieved posthumous celebrity. Scientists and Native Americans waged a protracted, expensive, and highly-publicized legal battle for the right to claim him. Though they lost in court, the Native Americans ultimately prevailed, and this long drama ended early this year when Kennewick Man was reburied. Native Americans also engaged in a long legal battle to claim 10,600-year-old Spirit Cave Man, and they, too, recently prevailed. But meanwhile 11,000-yearold Leanne and her elder, 13,000-yearold Arlington Springs Man, have been in the custody of museums for decades. The Natives haven’t claimed them, and consequently the lawyers and media have ignored them. Why the difference? As one archaeologist noted, “It’s case by case, tribe by tribe, and location by location.”
3
