Cultivating Elastic Thinking
Interventions for Insight Mindset
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy DSD Capstone Project
May
5, 2020 Final
Presentation
does the walker choose the path, or the path the walker?
Allison
Amira
psychology . unpeeling . archive . learning . ideation . excursions . testing . future . nudging . education . experimenting . new . innovation . research . behavior . engagement
2
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy Cultivating Elastic Thinking
value proposition value proposition
Every one of our clients is going through transformation, and they come to Gensler to help them innovate. We must think differently to unleash new insights that propel our work and our business.
Innovation Strategy Change Management Workplace Strategy + Design Education Practice Area
Allison Henry + Amira
3
Samiy Cultivating Elastic Thinking
definition definition
Elastic Thinking proper noun [i-’la-stik ‘thin-kin]
A cognitive process that allows us to solve novel challenges and deal with new situations Embracing ambiguity and relaxing logical thinking to spur new ideas
Allison Henry + Amira
4
Samiy Cultivating Elastic Thinking
1 2
research question
5
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy Cultivating Elastic Thinking
How might we... create an environment to generate better insights?
hypothesis
6
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy Cultivating Elastic Thinking
We might create an environment to generate better insights... by bringing the outside in.
title title
Thinking 7
review + researchprimary research findings intervention testing intervention design 1 4 3 2
Interviewed 17 Gensler experts
Read 6 books
Surveyed upwards of 10 research articles 3
Identified design principles
Inspiration tour
ITP visit
1 day of Portal prototype testing (9 participants)
2 in-office + 1 virtual Tangent talks (varying participation) 1 2
Survey and brainstorm activity synthesis
Narrative-building research overview research overview
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy Cultivating Elastic
lit
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Objective: Interview Gensler experts and survey academic research to identify design guidelines for elastic thinking interventions
What are the elements of elastic thinking?
title title
elements of elastic thinking elements of elastic thinking
Novelty search Relaxed attention
Personal purpose
Engaging in elastic thinking is about exploration. It requires having an opportunity to learn about new ideas. Concrete rules of engagement should be avoided to enable a truly exploratory experience.
To acheive elastic thinking, we must relax our minds to strike a balance between linear thinking (executive decision-making) and divergent thinking (all non-linear thinking).
Personal purpose is a key factor of motivation and is drawn out when people are confronted with a challenge they feel equipped to solve, and when they feel supported by external factors.
Thinking 9
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy Cultivating Elastic
title title
elements of elastic thinking elements of elastic thinking
User Needs
Thinking 10
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy Cultivating Elastic
Novelty search Relaxed attention Personal purpose
title title
elements of elastic thinking elements of elastic thinking
User Needs Design Goals
Novelty search
Relaxed attention
+ Direction without destination
Personal purpose
+ Psychological safety
+ Opportunity to explore and observe new things + Separation from tasks
+ Variety of forms & content
+ Participant are drawn to engage
+ Challenge of personal growth / stretch zone
+ Belonging
Thinking 11
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy Cultivating Elastic
Objective:
To create an environment to generate better insights by bringing the outside in
What did we design?
Elastic Thinking 13
Cultural Program for a Social Experience Physical Space for Individual Experience Portal Tangent
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy Cultivating
we designed two interventions
title title
design goals design goals
User Needs
Novelty search
+ Direction without destination
Design Goals
Relaxed attention
+ Psychological safety
+ Opportunity to explore and observe new things + Separation from tasks
+ Variety of forms & content
+ Participant are drawn to engage
Personal purpose
+ Challenge of personal growth / stretch zone
+ Belonging
Thinking 14
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy Cultivating
Elastic
portal portal
An iPad is used to scan QR codes and acts as a portal to an array of content Projector displays content from QR scans to enable an immersive browsing experience
Novelty search
portal portal Endless QR codes with unlimited ability to surf the web
Relaxed attention
Amber lighting has been associated with better performance on creativity tasks
Dedicated and scheduled 15-minute time minimum
portal portal
portal portal
Personal Purpose
Physical separation from the rest of the workplace allows for an immersive experience
No rules of engagement + available for use by anyone + use of Portal is elective
title
Allison Henry
tangent tangent
Speaker chooses how to engage with the audience
Speakers are selected based on their ability to bring in ideas from the outside
tangent tangent
Novelty search
Each Tangent speaker is distinct + has depth of knowledge on their own topics beyond architecture
tangent tangent
Relaxed attention
Time away from participants’ desks
Informal and social setting
Sharing a space and experience with others
tangent tangent
Personal Purpose
Hearing about the creative successes of others induces personal drive
Studio and office leader attendance
What did people think?
Objective:
To prove the design’s effectiveness in generating elastic thinking To prove the design’s usability and desirability
User Needs Design Goals
Novelty search
Relaxed attention
+ Direction without destination
+ Opportunity to explore and observe new things
+ Variety of forms & content
Personal purpose
+ Psychological safety
+ Separation from tasks
+ Participant are drawn to engage
+ Challenge of personal growth / stretch zone
+ Belonging
Effectiveness
Does the intervention induce elastic thinking?
Usability + Desirability
Does the intervention fulfill the design goals?
Elastic Thinking 26
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy Cultivating
we wanted to validate...
Elastic Thinking 27 methodology participants
Mindset Check
Effectiveness Survey
Brainstorm Activity
Usability Survey Effectiveness Usability + Desirability Pre Post 1 Week Later Portal Tangent 9 people 9 people 8 people 12 people 11 people 17 people Intervention
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy Cultivating
•
•
•
•
survey questions
Effectiveness Survey Usability Survey
Objective: Does the intervention induce elastic thinking?
Objective:
Does the intervention fulfill the design goals?
• Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] sparked a new idea or lead me to an aha moment.
• Nothing I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] taught me anything new.
• Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] made me approach something differently.
• Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] made me feel empowered to do something new.
Novelty search Relaxed attention
• Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] made me feel curious about a topic.
• Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] lead me to feel satisfied with the status quo.
• Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] made me explore a topic in greater depth.
+ Direction without destination
• I felt open to explore without an expected outcome in [intervention].
+ Opportunity to explore and observe new things
• I had an opportunity to interact with new things at [intervention].
+ Variety of forms & content
• I was satisfied by the variety of content at [intervention].
+ Psychological safety
• I felt safe to explore during [intervention].
+ Separation from tasks
• It is important that this experience be conducted in its own space.
+ Challenge of personal growth / stretch zone + Belonging Personal purpose
• Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] lead me to feel excited about the future.
• Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] makes me feel like I can make a positive contribution.
• Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] lead me to feel discouraged about trying new things.
Utility
• Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] had an impact on my project work.
• My experience at [intervention] was an opportunity for personal growth.
• [Intervention] is aligned with Gensler’s culture.
+ Participant are drawn to engage
• My interest was sustained during my time at [intervention].
• My visit to [intervention] was a good use of my time.
+ Utility
• I believe it is valuable to offer an experience like [intervention] at Gensler.
Cultivating Elastic Thinking 28
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy
we conducted an analysis we conducted an analysis
Allison Henry + Amira
Elastic Thinking 29
Samiy Cultivating
how
Allison Henry + Amira
Elastic Thinking 30
Samiy Cultivating
did we
4-4.8 4.9-6
+ Direction
destination +
+
Portal Tangent Effectiveness Usability + Desirability + Challenge of personal growth + Sense of belonging Portal Tangent Effectiveness Usability + Desirability +Psychological safety + Separation from tasks + Participant
Portal Tangent Effectiveness Usability + Desirability 75% 72% 69% 71% 74% 71% novelty
novelty
relaxed
relaxed
personal purpose personal purpose
do? how did we do? Overall, there is little difference between both interventions’ ability to generate better insights. 0-4
average agreement with usability questions on a scale of 0 to 6
without
Opportunity to explore new things
Variety of forms & content
remains engaged
search
search
attention
attention
overall
Allison Henry + Amira
Elastic Thinking 31
Samiy
Cultivating
Overall Tangent 196% increase in elastic thinking immediately after interventions Participants embraced non-linear thinking more after Portal and Tangent experiences, and effects linger after one week. 47% increase in elastic thinking 1 week later interventions* Which of the following best define your current state of mind? (Check all that apply.) ELASTIC Flexible/ adaptable, relaxed, open-minded, playful, divergent, creative, insightful LINEAR Strategic, rational, practical, directed, logical, linear, task-oriented 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Pre-Portal Post-Portal 1 Week Post-Portal ELASTIC LINEAR 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Pre-Tangent Post-Tangent 1 Week Post-Tangent ELASTIC LINEAR 1:1 2:1 1:3 1:4 1:3 2:1 Elastic Elastic Linear Linear For every linear mindset selected, there was one elastic mindset selected *results may have been impacted by COVID-19 WFH
change in mindset overall change in mindset Portal
novelty search novelty search
Interventions convey truly novel information but need some assistance in translating inspiration to insight. The challenge of designing an elastic thinking intervention is balancing hands-on guidance with hands-off exploration.
Effectiveness
“Something I saw/heard/ experienced in the intervention made me approach something differently.”
Usability
“I felt open to explore without an expected outcome during the intervention.”
It gives you an insight on other people’s creative process and how you could change, improve, rethink your process.
The curation [of Portal] might have been more successful if less focused on variety and more focused on what’s the medium of communication.
Allison Henry + Amira
Elastic Thinking 32
Samiy Cultivating
63% agree 83% agree 95% agree 92% agree Portal Portal Tangent Tangent
74
71
Portal Tangent
%
%
“ ” “ ” effectiveness
relaxed attention relaxed attention
While Tangent and Portal were successful in making participants feel safe to engage and inspiring a lsting feeling of curiosity, few went on to personally explore after the interventions.
effectiveness
Effectiveness
“Something I saw/ heard/experienced in the intervention made me feel curious about a topic.”
83% agree (aggregate)
“Something I saw/ heard/experienced in the intervention made me explore a topic in greater depth.” 57% agree (aggregate)
Usability
Portal Tangent 69%
71%
“I felt safe to explore during the intervention.” 86% agree (aggregate)
Allison Henry + Amira
Elastic Thinking 33
Samiy Cultivating
personal purpose personal purpose
effectiveness usability
“Something I experienced lead me to feel excited about the future.”
“The intervention is aligned with Gensler’s culture.”
“ ” Usability Effectiveness Tangent Tangent
Portal Portal
Tangent Tangent
72% 63%
75% 85%
Allison Henry + Amira
Elastic Thinking 34
Samiy Cultivating
Tangent and Portal were most effective in instilling personal purpose, but more could be done to show support for these interventions in order to unlock intrinsic
Both
motivation.
I wrote that [Portal] isn’t aligned with Gensler culture, but I think it should be. I think its really calming and inspiring. 55% agree 88% agree 87% agree 71% agree Portal Portal
conclusions
Following the guidelines we developed for inducing elastic thinking lead us to good results for generating an insight mindset, but more should be done to measure the quality of those insights.
There is overwhelming interest in these types of interventions. If Gensler invests in them to demonstrate their value, participants will be more likely to continuously engage in elastic thinking.
In the future, interventions should be designed to help people make the leap from engagement within the experience to insightful action outside of the experience.
35
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy Cultivating Elastic Thinking
Objective: To show the lasting effects of designing interventions for elastic thinking
Why does this matter?
bigger picture bigger picture
As a creative firm, Gensler must encourage elastic thinking to sustain its growth.
Motivating people to push the boundaries of their thinking catalyzes both personal purpose and organizational value.
Allison Henry + Amira
Samiy Cultivating Elastic Thinking
37
bigger picture bigger picture
OUTCOME
stay relevant and competitive
Organizations
Employees
38
bigger picture bigger picture
OUTCOME stay relevant and competitive ACTION interventions Portal Tangent
Organizations
OUTCOME opportunities to engage in elastic thinking
Employees
bigger picture bigger picture
Organizations
Employees
OUTCOME stay relevant and competitive ACTION interventions ACTION culture-building
OUTCOME self-directed purpose
Portal Tangent
OUTCOME opportunities to engage in elastic thinking
Organizations
Employees
OUTCOME opportunities to engage in elastic thinking
OUTCOME fuel innovation
OUTCOME self-directed purpose OUTCOME stay relevant and competitive ACTION interventions ACTION culture-building ACTION insightful work Portal Tangent bigger picture bigger picture
Organizations
fuel
Portal Tangent
OUTCOME opportunities to engage in elastic thinking Employees OUTCOME
innovation OUTCOME self-directed purpose OUTCOME stay relevant and competitive ACTION interventions ACTION culture-building ACTION integration ACTION insightful work
bigger picture bigger picture
Organizations
fuel
Portal Tangent
OUTCOME opportunities to engage in elastic thinking Employees OUTCOME
innovation OUTCOME self-directed purpose OUTCOME stay relevant and competitive ACTION interventions ACTION culture-building ACTION integration ACTION insightful work
bigger picture bigger picture
propelling the research propelling the research
Elastic Thinking Card Deck
A guide to designing interventions that spur an insight mindset
novelty search novelty search
Direction without destination
Opportunity to explore and observe new things
Variety of forms & content
Engaging in elastic thinking is about exploration. It requires having an opportunity to learn about new ideas. Being told to be creative is counter-productive to creativity. It is therefore critical that these conditions be satisfied without imposing concrete rules of engagement to create a truly exploratory experience.
relaxed attention relaxed attention
Offer loose rules of engagement without insinuating participant outcomes
• Set parameters, but there should be no right or wrong approach
Focus on creating a sense of wonder through exposure to novelty
Psychological safety
• Gain an understanding of your audience to gauge what they are likely to be familiar with and what they are less likely to know
Present novel information in a variety of ways
• Provide a variety of sources and formats
Separation from tasks
• E.g., video, conversation, article, abstract visual, sketch, smell, physical interaction,...
Participant are drawn to engage
As humans, we are shaped to exercise our executive function, producing logical and strategic thinking. In excess, this thinking is counter-productive to spurring novel thoughts. We must relax our minds and to achieve a balance between linear thinking (associated with executive function) and divergent thinking (all non-linear thinking) in order to engage in
personal purpose personal purpose
Ensure participants feel comfortable to engage with their guard down
• Ensure the atmosphere is friendly
Challenge of personal growth / stretch zone
• Participant should know they cannot fail
Separate interventions from socio-spatial environments associated with task mode
• Avoid visual access or auditory queues related to work, tasks, responsibilities
Belonging
• Create space and time to disengage from tasks and refocus on novel content
Design interventions such that participants want to engage without feeling forced to
• Do not incentivize attendance by touting participation benefits beyond the those directly offered by intervention itself
Critical to elastic thinking is the instrinsically motivated quality of being open and free to explore and absorb information. This quality of personal purpose is drawn out when people are confronted with a challenge they feel equipped to solve, and when they feel supported by external factors.
Let participants create links between ideas that typically belong to separate lines of thinking
Ensure participants sense that they are permitted and welcomed to engage
Fronts Fronts Backs Backs
• Demonstrate the connections between disparate concepts
• Demonstrate leadership support
• E.g., leaders attend, time and/ or space are dedicated to the engagement
Allison Henry + Amira
44
Samiy Cultivating Elastic
Thinking
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy
DSD Capstone Project Generating Better Insights
May
5, 2020 Final
Presentation
Cultivating Elastic Thinking
APPENDIX
what we learned along the way
• We strove to keep surveys concise to alleaviate survey fatigue, but more having enough questions per topic to ensure the validity of our results proved challenging.
• In order to increase the number of respondents to our Tangent surveys, it would have been helpful to identify participants in advance. This would have also enabled us to conduct a longitudinal study as we did with Portal.
• In order to drive responses to the last Tangent survey deployed 1 week after the talk, we offered a monetary reward to drive participation. This proved effective to soliciting responses, and may have been a helpful technique for driving responses to our other surveys.
• We were luck to have scheduled the first of our anticipated 3 days of testing for Portal on the last day before most of the NY office was working from home. We considered solutions to providing a virtual simulation of Portal to continue to get participants and feedback. We might have benefited from this as there was not a lot of consistency in Day 1 participants’ reported experiences.
• Some participants found the lack of guidance on what to do in Portal unsettling. We might have alleviated this by contriving connections between the QR code material more.
• In Portal, some mentioned that they would have liked to spend more time diving into material, but, especially for videos and podcasts, the length exceed the time limit. Ideally, Portal would not have a time limit and would thus resolve this issue. Nevertheless, it might be best for supporting psychological safety to only include content that can be digested in 15 mins as not to create anxiety about time spent away from one’s desk.
• We decided to omit sharing the results of the brainstorming test because it was difficult to compare the results when the tasks were not the same before and after the interventions. Streamlining the tests and removing the longitudinal component would have facilitated analysis and offered more survey reliability.
Thinking 47
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy Cultivating Elastic
INTERVENTION GUIDELINES CARDS
Objective:
How might we equip other with the knowledge to conceive and deploy elastic thinking interventions?
48
title
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy Cultivating Elastic Thinking
novelty search novelty search
Engaging in elastic thinking is about exploration. It requires having an opportunity to learn about new ideas. Being told to be creative is counterproductive to creativity. It is therefore critical that these conditions be satisfied without imposing concrete rules of engagement to create a truly exploratory experience.
Direction without destination
Opportunity to explore and observe new things
Variety of forms & content
Offer loose rules of engagement without insinuating participant outcomes
• Set parameters, but there should be no right or wrong approach
Focus on creating a sense of wonder through exposure to novelty
• Gain an understanding of your audience to gauge what they are likely to be familiar with and what they are less likely to know
Present novel information in a variety of ways
• Provide a variety of sources and formats
• E.g., video, conversation, article, abstract visual, sketch, smell, physical interaction,...
Front Back Front Back
relaxed attention relaxed attention
Psychological safety
Separation from tasks
Participant are drawn to engage
As humans, we are shaped to exercise our executive function, producing logical and strategic thinking. In excess, this thinking is counter-productive to spurring novel thoughts. We must relax our minds and to achieve a balance between linear thinking (associated with executive function) and divergent thinking (all non-linear thinking) in order to engage in elastic thinking.
Ensure participants feel comfortable to engage with their guard down
• Ensure the atmosphere is friendly
• Participant should know they cannot fail
Separate interventions from sociospatial environments associated with task mode
• Avoid visual access or auditory queues related to work, tasks, responsibilities
• Create space and time to disengage from tasks and refocus on novel content
Design interventions such that participants want to engage without feeling forced to
• Do not incentivize attendance by touting participation benefits beyond the those directly offered by intervention itself
Front Back
Front Back
personal purpose personal purpose
Challenge of personal growth / stretch zone
Belonging
Critical to elastic thinking is the intrinsically motivated quality of being open and free to explore and absorb information. This quality of personal purpose is drawn out when people are confronted with a challenge they feel equipped to solve, and when they feel supported by external factors.
Let participants create links between ideas that typically belong to separate lines of thinking
• Demonstrate the connections between disparate concepts
Ensure participants sense that they are permitted and welcomed to engage
• Demonstrate leadership support
• E.g., leaders attend, time and/ or space are dedicated to the engagement
Front Back Front Back
INTERVENTION DESIGN METHODOLOGY
Objective:
How might we actualize our design goals in Portal and Tangent?
aligning intervention design features with design goals
Design Goals
Direction without destination
Opportunity to explore and observe new things
Variety forms/formats/content
Psychological safety
Separation from tasks
Participant remains engaged (pull over push)
Challenge of personal growth
Belonging
Portal design features
Portal Tangent
Tangent design features
No rules of engagement
Endless QR codes with unlimited ability to surf the web
QR and iPad act as a portal to an array of content
Time minimum enables freedom to explore
Variety of sources Array of topics
Inclusive pilot study of Colab 3 Visual privacy
The room feels separate from the workplace
Dedicated and scheduled time in Portal
Use of Portal is elective
No expectations of the participants after Tangent
Speakers have depth of knowledge on their own topics
Each Tangent is distinct Speaker chooses how to engage with the audience
Seeing studio and office leader attendance
Informal setting and format
Located in a social space
Time away from participants’ desks
Elective attendance
Novel information spurs personal interest Hearing about the creative successes of others induces personal drive
The fact that this space exists gives its users permission to use and feel like it is a resource for them
Sparing a space and experience with others
53
testing methodology
Portal participants were age 24-35, 77% female, and mostly Collab-3 brand designers & strategists (there was one architectural designer and one office services employee represented).
Tangent participants ranged widely in age, gender, and role at Gensler (specifics were not recorded due to data colleciton method).
Mindset Check
Effectiveness Survey
Brainstorm Activity
Usability Survey Effectiveness Usability + Desirability participants participants
Post 1 Week Later Portal Tangent 9 people 9 people 8 people 12 people 11 people 17 people Intervention 54
•
•
•
•
Pre
Effectiveness Survey
Objective: Does the intervention induce elastic thinking?
Novelty search
Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] sparked a new idea or lead me to an aha moment.
^reverse coded Nothing I saw/heard/ experienced at [intervention] taught me anything new.
Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] made me approach something differently.
Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] made me feel empowered to do something new.
Relaxed attention
Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] made me feel curious about a topic.
^reverse coded Something I saw/heard/ experienced at [intervention] lead me to feel satisfied with the status quo.
Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] made me explore a topic in greater depth.
+ Direction without destination
I felt open to explore without an expected outcome in [intervention].
Usability Survey
Objective: Does the intervention fulfill the design goals?
+ Opportunity to explore and observe new things
I had an opportunity to interact with new things at [intervention].
+ Variety of forms & content
I was satisfied by the variety of content at [intervention].
+ Psychological safety
+ Separation from tasks
I felt safe to explore during [intervention].
It is important that this experience be conducted in its own space.
+ Participant remains engaged
My interest was sustained during my time at [intervention].
+ Belonging Personal purpose
Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] lead me to feel excited about the future.
Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] makes me feel like I can make a positive contribution.
^reverse coded Something I saw/heard/ experienced at [intervention] lead me to feel discouraged about trying new things.
+ Challenge of personal growth / stretch zone
My experience at [intervention] was an opportunity for personal growth.
[Intervention] is aligned with Gensler’s culture.
+ Utility Utility
Something I saw/heard/experienced at [intervention] had an impact on my project work.
My visit to [intervention] was a good use of my time.
I believe it is valuable to offer an experience like [intervention] at Gensler.
QUESTION ASKED: RATE YOUR AGREEMENT WITH THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO YOUR EXPERIENCE WITH [ THE INTERVENTION] ON A SCALE OF
0-6 (0=DO NOT AGREE AT ALL; 6=VERY MUCH AGREE).
55
USABILITY AND DESIRABILITY TESTING
Objective: Does the intervention fulfill the design goals? Testing methodology: Usability survey
56
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy Cultivating Elastic Thinking
how did we do? how did we do?
Overall, there is little difference between both interventions’ ability to generate better insights. 0-4 4-4.8 4.9-6 average agreement with effectiveness and usability questions on a scale of 0 to 6.
Direction without destination
Opportunity to explore new things + Variety of forms & content
Participant is prompted to act
Portal
+
+
Portal Tangent
Usability
+Psychological
+
+
Portal
75% 72% 69% 71% 74% 71%
+
+
Tangent Effectiveness Usability + Desirability
Challenge of personal growth
Sense of belonging
Effectiveness
+ Desirability
safety
Separation from tasks
Tangent Effectiveness Usability + Desirability
57
novelty search novelty search relaxed attention relaxed attention personal purpose personal purpose
novelty search novelty search
The feeling that there was a “right way” to engage with Portal worked against its goal of setting a direction without a destination. Tangent was more effective at making participants feel they could try a new approach to something.
score card score card
Nothing I saw/heard/ experienced in the intervention taught me anything new.
Something I saw/heard/ experienced in the intervention made me approach something differently.
Portal 0.5/6 [var 0.2]
Something I saw/heard/ experienced in the intervention sparked a new idea or lead me to an aha moment.
Portal 3.38/6 [var 0.6] 3.88/6 [var 0.8] average responses of 8 survey participants 1 week later
Tangent 1.2/6 [var 4.4]
Tangent 4.53/6 [var 3.7] 4.24/6 [var 3.0] average responses of 17 survey participants 1 week later
RATE YOUR AGREEMENT (0=DO NOT AGREE AT ALL; 6=VERY MUCH AGREE)
Portal Tangent
0 0 0
6 6 6 average response comparison of interventions
Portal Tangent Portal Tangent
Effectiveness Usability + Desirability
average responses
+ Direction without destination + Opportunity to explore new things + Variety of forms & content
5/6 5.1/6 4.9/6
5.5/6
4.9/6 5.1/6
4.24/6 [var 0.0] 3.75/6 [var 0.7] Portal Tangent 58
Portal Tangent 74% 69%
Something I saw/heard/ experienced in the intervention made me feel empowered to do something new.
relaxed attention relaxed attention
Portal Tangent 3.53/6 [var
5.06/6 [var
3.25/6
4.88/6
0 Portal
+Psychological safety + Separation from tasks + Participant is prompted to act Portal Tangent 5.7/6 5.1/6 4.9/6 N/A 5.2/6 4.6/6 Effectiveness Usability + Desirability average responses Something I saw/heard/ experienced in the intervention made me explore a topic in greater depth. Something I saw/heard/ experienced in the intervention made me feel curious about a topic.
1.3]
5.0]
[var 0.8]
[var 1.8] average responses of 17 survey participants 1 week later average responses of 8 survey participants 1 week later 0 0 PortalTangent 6 6
Tangent 6 69% 70%
59
score card score card Participants in each intervention felt curious during their experiences, but they agreed less that the intervention made them explore something further. Portal participants almost unanimously strongly agreed that the intervention made them feel safe to explore. Something I saw/heard/ experienced in the intervention lead me to feel satisfied with the status quo. 2.2/6 [var 1.9] 1.5/6 [var 0.0] Portal Tangent average response comparison of interventions RATE YOUR AGREEMENT (0=DO NOT AGREE AT ALL; 6=VERY MUCH AGREE)
personal purpose personal purpose
score card score card
Portal 4.4/6 [var 0.3]
Tangent 4.4/6 [var 1.6]
RATE YOUR AGREEMENT (0=DO NOT AGREE AT ALL; 6=VERY MUCH AGREE)
Something I saw/heard/ experienced in the intervention lead me to feel excited about the future. Portal + Tangent 75% 71%
Tangent Portal 0 6
Something I saw/heard/ experienced in the intervention makes me feel like I can make a positive contribution.
Tangent’s focus on a personal journey of discovery was more successful than Portal in making participants feel that they could make a positive contribution. + Challenge of personal growth + Sense of belonging
2.75/6 [var 0.4] average responses of 8 survey participants 1 week later
4.41/6 [var 3.4] average responses of 17 survey participants 1 week later
0 0
Portal Tangent 6 6 average response comparison of interventions
Effectiveness Usability + Desirability average responses
Portal Tangent 4.2/6 3.3/6 5.2/6
5/6
1.2/6 [var 0.9] 0.4/6 [var 0.5] Portal Tangent 60
Something I saw/heard/ experienced lead me to feel discouraged about trying new things.
Usability survey
Quantitative
findings Key Findings
• Our goal of creating a “psychologically safe” space that sustained participants’ interest was most unanimously met
• Most participants agreed that the experience should be conducted in its own private space
• The largest diversity of responses about related to whether Portal aligns with Gensler’s culture
RATE YOUR AGREEMENT WITH THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO YOUR EXPERIENCE AT TANGENT ON A SCALE OF 0-6 (0=DO NOT AGREE AT ALL; 6=VERY MUCH AGREE)
61 Portal
66%
Usability survey
Qualitative findings Key Findings
• Video content was most popular
• Participants enjoyed the variety and choice, but sought more agency over the content medium
• Participants achieved a state of relaxed attention
• Participants were divided on whether Portal should be a individual or social experience
• The time banding somewhat constrained the experience
DO YOU HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON YOUR EXPERIENCE IN PORTAL?
I loved the privacy the portal provided. Sometimes searching on the [work computer] screen can feel so confined and open to the people around me. I really liked that I was in an entire room to myself being able to search freely.
“ ”
“ ”
I wrote that this isn’t aligned with Gensler culture, but I think it should be, I think its really calming and inspiring.
“ ”
Adding indications of what type of experience (text-based, audio-based, visual, etc.) each entry point would be leading to would help me refine the type of experience I would have in the space in a limited amount of time.
“ ”
The curation might have been more successful if less focused on variety and more focused on what’s the medium of communication.
The space could offer opportunity for groups to learn/explore together. “ ”
62 Portal
Usability survey
Quantitative and Qualitative findings
Key Findings
• 27% of participants who had been to an in-person Tangent event felt that the event was better conducted virtually.
• All participants agreed that Tangent is aligned with Gensler’s culture
Keep up the incredible work you are doing! Tangent has continuously proven to be an invaluable experience to anyone seeking inspiration or creativity. I am so thankful to work for a firm that understands and appreciates the importance of leveraging diverse perspectives. ”
RATE YOUR AGREEMENT WITH THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO YOUR EXPERIENCE AT TANGENT ON A SCALE OF 0-6 (0=DO NOT AGREE AT ALL; 6=VERY MUCH AGREE)
I felt safe to explore during Tangent.
Tangent is aligned with Gensler's culture.
I had an opportunity to interact with new things at Tangent.
My interest was sustained during my time at Tangent.
I believe it is valuable to offer an experience like Tangent at Gensler.
My visit to Tangent was a good use of my time.
I was satisfied by the variety of content at Tangent.
I believe that this event is better conducted virtually than in-person.
I felt open to explore without an expected outcome in Tangent.
My experience at Tangent was an opportunity for personal growth. 0 (Strongly Disagree) 1 2 3 4 5 6 (Strongly Agree)
0% 9% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 9% 0%
0%
0%
9% 9% 9% 45% 18% 0% 18% 27% 18% 9% 27% 18% 18% 9% 18% 18% 27% 18% 9% 9% 0% 0% 27% 0% 9% 18% 27% 18% 27% 73% 64% 55% 91% 64% 45% 45% 36% 45% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
0% 0%
0% 0%
0%
63
Tangent
“
81%
Tangent #1 & #2 survey responses
Additional qualitative data
Key Findings
• Attendees are more engaged by creative fields outside of architecture
• Extremely strong interest in the proximal learning opportunities found in sharing creative processes
• Attendees are inspired by “uncommon paths” that tell strong narratives of personal purpose (aspiration mode)
• Improvement opportunity: more social impact programming
4.2/5
4.9/5
HOW THOUGHT PROVOKING WAS TANGENT?
TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU BELIEVE IT IS VALUABLE TO BRING IN VOICES FROM OUTSIDE GENSLER?
“ ”
It’s most valuable and interesting to hear about different types of design challenges other than workplace.
“ ”
I’d like to hear from someone who uses design in a meaningful way so that I can feel more confident and powerful in the work that I do each day to be a changemaker.
“ ”
There is no need to tie it back to architecture or the built environment . Just hearing about someones creative process, no matter what that is, is valuable.
“ ”
It gives you an insight on other people’s creative process and how you could change, improve, rethink your process.
HOW MIGHT ASPECTS OF THE TANGENT TALK INFLUENCE YOUR CREATIVE PROCESS? HOW CAN WE IMPROVE TANGENT IN THE FUTURE?
General inspiration is really important for our culture. Keep it up! 2 for 2 so far!!!
“ ”
64
Tangent
EFFECTIVENESS
65
Allison Henry + Amira Samiy Cultivating Elastic
Thinking
the intervention induce elastic thinking? Testing methodologies: Mindset check Effectiveness survey Brainstorm activity
TESTING Objective: Does
Mindset check
Portal’s impact on self-reported mindset
• Immediately after Portal, there is a decrease in linear thinking and increase in elastic thinking, but the share of linear to elastic thinking returned to its equilibrium one week later.
• Many participants report being flexible or open minded before the intervention, which may reflect their openness to the experience they are about to have.
WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING BEST DEFINE YOUR CURRENT STATE OF MIND?
LINEAR THINKING
WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING BEST DEFINE YOUR CURRENT STATE OF MIND?
(Percentage of respondents)
PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THIS IS YOUR CURRENT MINDSET (ONE WEEK LATER - C-19 WFH).
“ ”
Drawing lines in revit, very zen (relaxed/ practical)
“ ”
WFH, no pressing deadlines, ability to be in my own space, surrounded by things that keep me calm. (flexible, creative, rational)
“ ”
Trying to get things accomplished and stay productive while working from home (task-oriented)
Pre-Portal Post-Portal 1 Week Post-Portal
LINEAR ELASTIC
ELASTIC THINKING
linear
logical
directed
rational practical
strategic
task-oriented PrePortal PostPortal 1 Week Post-Portal
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
insightful
creative
divergent
relaxed open-minded playful
flexible / adaptable
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
PrePortal PostPortal 1 Week Post-Portal
66 Portal
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Mindset check
Tangent’s impact on self-reported mindset
• Participants reported more elastic mindsets immediately after Tangent, and there were still more elastic than linear mindsets reported one week later.
• C-19 has been a primary factor in self-reported mindsets being more elastic beyond the intervention’s impact.
WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING BEST DEFINE YOUR CURRENT STATE OF MIND?
task-oriented
linear
LINEAR THINKING
WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING BEST DEFINE YOUR CURRENT STATE OF MIND?
(Average percentage of responses by respondent)
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
directed logical
rational practical
strategic
PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THIS IS YOUR CURRENT MINDSET (C19 WFH)
“ ”
Focusing on tasks allows me to stop thinking about the pandemic for those brief moments.
(Pre-Tangent: task-oriented)
“ ”
Being that the future unsure, i feel being adaptable is necessary. (Pre-Tangent: flexible)
“ ”
It was interesting to hear how Lakshmi approaches creative problem solving through her work!
(Post-Tangent: playful, creative, insightful)
“ ”
Hearing someone’s personal experience of how they’ve gotten where they are and their motivation encourages me to explore my creative side.
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Pre Tangent Post Tangent 1 Week Post-Tangent
insightful
creative
relaxed open-minded playful divergent
Pre-Tangent Post-Tangent 1 Week Post-Tangent
LINEAR ELASTIC
(1 Week Post-Tangent: creative)
Working from home puts a lot of things/ tasks in perspective.
“ ” 5%
ELASTIC THINKING
flexible / adaptable
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Pre Tangent Post Tangent 1 Week Post-Tangent
67 Tangent
(1 Week Post-Tangent: flexible, task-oriented) 0%
Effectiveness survey
Quantitative findings
Key Findings
• Portal was most successful in making participants feel curious about a topic (relaxed attention) and excited about the future (purpose) and exposing them to new topics (novelty search).
• There is room for improvement on translating learning/ exposure to action (application to project work and feeling that you can make a positive contribution), although integrating a project connection within the experience would detract from the concept.
THE
FOLLOWING
If Portal were conducted virtually, I would be as interested in engaging with it as with the physical room.
Something I saw/heard/experienced in Portal made me feel curious about a topic.
Something I saw/heard/experienced lead me to feel discouraged about trying new things.
Something I saw/heard/experienced in Portal made me feel empowered to do something new.
Something I saw/heard/experienced in Portal lead me to feel excited about the future.
Something I saw/heard/experienced in Portal had an impact on my project work.
Something I saw/heard/experienced in Portal lead me to feel satisfied with the status quo.
Something I saw/heard/experienced in Portal makes me feel like I can make a positive contribution.
Something I saw/heard/experienced at Tangent made me explore a topic in greater depth.
Something I saw/heard/experienced in Portal sparked a new idea or lead me to an aha moment.
Nothing I saw/heard/experienced in Portal taught me anything new.
Something I saw/heard/experienced in Portal made me approach something differently.
4.1/6 [var 0.1]
4.88/6 [var 1.8]
0.4/6 [var 0.5]
3.75/6 [var 0.7]
4.4/6 [var 0.3]
STATEMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO YOUR EXPERIENCE AT TANGENT ON A SCALE OF 0-6 (0=DO NOT AGREE AT ALL; 6=VERY MUCH AGREE) 1.5/6 [var 0.0] 2.75/6 [var 0.4] 3.25/6 [var 0.8] 3.88/6 [var 0.8] 0.5/6 [var 0.2]
3.38/6 [var 0.6]
2.5/6 [var 0.4] RELAXED ATTENTION PURPOSE
68 Portal 0% 75% 0% 13% 0% 38% 13% 0% 0% 63% 0% 0% 13% 0% 13% 13% 38% 13% 38% 0% 0% 38% 0% 38% 13% 25% 0% 13% 13% 13% 25% 0% 13% 0% 13% 0% 25% 0% 13% 38% 13% 13% 38% 13% 50% 38% 25% 13% 0% 13% 50% 50% 0% 13% 13% 0% 38% 25% 0% 25% 13% 25% 25% 0% 25% 0% 0% 13% 0% 50% 25% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
NOVELTY SEARCH
RATE YOUR AGREEMENT WITH
Effectiveness survey
Qualitative findings
Key Findings
• The effects of inspiration are shortlived, so continuous access and cultural integration is important for sustaining its impact.
• Portal’s main value is its novelty exposure, which will require constant content evolution in a real-world installment.
• Although 50% of respondents felt that they would engage with Portal as a virtual experience, many commented that it would be taken for granted and forgotten.
Portal
DO YOU HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON YOUR EXPERIENCE IN PORTAL?
Physical space is expensive, would likely work better in campus environments. Someone would be needed to maintain and curate the material in the space. Wish we were on a campus instead of a high rise.
“ ”
“ ”
I feel like the way I responded to the survey really depended on what I was doing and how long ago the experience took place! Speaks to how much we need constant inspiration!
“ ”
Totally wish this space was permanent.
WHICH ASPECTS OF A VIRTUALLY-SIMULATED PORTAL EXPERIENCE WOULD CONCERN YOU MOST?
“ ”
It would feel quite similar to surfing the web on my personal device, like a laptop or phone. The immersive quality would be a big draw. Without it, it doesn’t feel as worthwhile of an engagement beyond my day-to-day.
“ ”
Seems like that already exists on the internet. What was cool about Portal is that it was a physical space and vibe that took all your focus and had the potential to transport you.
“ ”
If the access is always open, people wont appreciate it and or use it. Similar to Lynda / e-Learning tools.
69
Effectiveness survey
Quantitative findings
Key Findings
• Portal was most successful in making participants feel curious about a topic (relaxed attention), that they can make a positive contribution (purpose), and helping them approach something differently (novelty search).
• Overall, Tangent scores high on imbuing a sense of personal purpose, with all participants either agreeing or neutral in responding to statements relating to purpose.
Tangent
Something I saw/heard/experienced at Tangent made me feel curious about a topic.
Something I saw/heard/experienced at Tangent lead me to feel discouraged about trying new things.
Something I saw/heard/experienced at Tangent made me feel empowered to do something new.
Something I saw/heard/experienced at Tangent lead me to feel excited about the future.
Something I saw/heard/experienced at Tangent had an impact on my project work.
RATE YOUR AGREEMENT WITH THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO YOUR EXPERIENCE AT TANGENT ON A SCALE OF 0-6 (0=DO NOT AGREE AT ALL; 6=VERY MUCH AGREE) 2.2/6 [var 1.9]
Something I saw/heard/experienced at Tangent lead me to feel satisfied with the status quo.
Something I saw/heard/experienced at Tangent makes me feel like I can make a positive contribution.
Something I saw/heard/experienced at Tangent made me explore a topic in greater depth.
Something I saw/heard/experienced at Tangent sparked a new idea or lead me to an aha moment.
Nothing I saw/heard/experienced at Tangent taught me anything new.
Something I saw/heard/experienced at Tangent made me approach something differently.
I enjoyed the virtual Tangent experience more than the in-person Tangent experience. 0
70
0% 53% 0% 0% 0% 18% 12% 0% 0% 47% 0% 14% 0% 24% 6% 6% 0% 24% 6% 0% 0% 24% 0% 7% 6% 6% 6% 6% 12% 6% 7% 6% 0% 6% 41% 18% 35% 35% 29% 24% 18% 12% 29% 53% 12% 29% 29% 35% 12% 24% 29% 41% 0% 12% 21% 24% 0% 47% 12% 35% 0% 12% 18% 24% 35% 0% 18% 6% 6% 6% 12% 6% 0% 24% 12% 6% 41% 21% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
1 2 3 4 5 6
NOVELTY SEARCH RELAXED ATTENTION PURPOSE
4.41/6 [var 3.4] 3.53/6 [var 1.3] 4.24/6 [var 3.0] 1.2/6 [var 4.4] 4.53/6 [var 3.7] 2.9/6 [var 0.2] 4.4/6 [var 1.6] 4.24/6 [var 0.0] 1.2/6 [var 0.9] 5.06/6 [var 5.0] 3.2/6 [var 0.4]
Effectiveness survey
Qualitative findings
Key Findings
• Tangent is successful in connecting participants to a greater sense of personal purpose - demonstrating the many paths to creativity
• Tangent is successful as a virtual event due to its ability to accommodate other personal commitments of Gensler employees
Tangent
DO YOU HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON YOUR EXPERIENCE IN PORTAL?
“ ”
I have loved the diversity of all of the speakers! I think the biggest thing for me has been the realization that so much exists to study and work on in the world :)
“ ”
Because the event was virtual i was able to attend for the first time. Previously i was not able to join due to childcare on Thursday night. i thought it went great but she seemed like she knew her way around technology.
71
Brainstorm activity
Portal’s impact on insight generation
Key Findings
• Difficult to conclude anything from this data set due to more challenging post-Portal prompt
• About 50% of participants were able to generate more unique words after experiencing Portal
• Uniqueness + total number of the words generated in the brainstorming activity were correlated
PRE-PORTAL ACTIVITY: POST-PORTAL ACTIVITY:
List all the words or phrases that come to mind associated with things that are cold that start with the letter ‘S’
List all the words or phrases that come to mind associated with things that are round that start with the letter ‘B’
NOTE: due to the unsuccessful nature of this experiment, it was not conducted for Tangent
(DELTA PRE-PORTAL AND POST-PORTAL)
72 Portal
-14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Participant 1 Participant 2 Participant 3 Participant 4 Participant 5 Participant 6 Participant 7 Participant 8 Participant 9 Delta # Unique Words Delta # Total Words
PRELIMINARY RESEARCH FINDINGS
Objective:
What do we know about creativity, elastic thinking, innovation, and learning as they related to cognitive sciences and to design?
Interview Findings
Human sociability is a key intrinsic motivator for learning
Whether with a client, peers, or mentor, learning conditions are strongest when there is a social element
Productive inefficiencies enable groups to create opportunities for play and experimentation which are the pre-conditions for learning
- Joel Farris + Alfred Byun
Connected ecological models of learning—you learn as you grow within a cultural framework that supports learning
- Joel Farris + Alfred Byun
Learning is about your connections to your peers and having trust.
- Alexandra Daily-Diamond
Mentoring creates empathy and awareness of other employees.
- Johnathan Sandler
Just being put in a room with clients - Lauren Rondel + Katie Costa
Psychological safety inspires elastic thinking
Enthusiasm for learning is best achieved when there is room for failure, exploration, and beginner’s mindset
Psychological safety
- Alexandra Daily-Diamond
The enthusiastic novice can achieve more than the passive expert - Joel Farris
Learning is about accessing and filtering knowledge, not about having it
- Joel Farris + Alfred Byun
Many are reluctant to consider learning as a discreet task from focusing - Janet Pogue
Extrinsic motivation undermines intrinsic motivation - Justin Chase
Design thinking involves design feeling which in turn involves design believing -Joel Fariss
Learning involves failure -Justin Chase
Innovation ignores what you know - Alexandra Daily-Diamond
It’s not just creating time for learning, it’s also about considering where learning begins, and what the spatial and other environmental conditions need to be
- Joel Fariss + Alfred Byun
Stretch zones exist between comfort zones and stress zones - Darris James
Relaxed attention
- Lauren Rondel
74
Programmatic Approaches
Results of learning programs should be elevated in the organizational value system
Learning itself should be largely unrestricted, but the learner should know that their work is valued or has impact within the organization
The process of entering learning programs needs to be self-directed - Johnathan Sandler
Scaffolding is a mechanism for supporting learning by incrementally increasing opportunities to learn with a safety net
- Kevin Rosenstein
It is important to develop program that incentivizes learning by yielding a concrete outcome
An innovative culture requires both top-down and bottom-up strategies
- Amanda Ramos
Learning is about value perception
Fostering a learning mindset is about curating learning opportunities
- Joel Fariss + Alfred Byun
- Joel Fariss + Alfred Byun
Create real-life conditions - Katie Costa + Lauren Rondel
Create opportunities for a career lattice, not a career ladder - Cindy Coleman
- Kevin Rosenstein
Ensure awareness and accessibility to the right information champions
- Janet Pogue
Align corporate and personal learning
- Kevin Rosenstein
75
Secondary Research Findings
The three main drivers of intrinsic motivation are autonomy, relatedness, and competency
Personal Conditions + = Environmental Conditions Elastic Thinking V. Functional Fixedness
Humans are educable animals that have instinctive drives for curiosity, playfulness, sociability - Free to Learn
- Self-determination Theory
Your rewards system motivates you to think, make decisions, and set goals
Freedom, security, belonging, significance, meaning are the five primary needs.
-Brady Wilson
Human needs and motivation
In age mixing, proximal development (similar to the stretch zone), emotional support, and providing opportunities to observe new things all contribute to learning and development.
Inducing a playful mood improves creativity and insightful problemsolving - Free to Learn
Pull vs push strategies: only create supply until demand has emerged - Elastic
Growth mindset (non-fixed mindset) individuals don’t fear failure because they realize their performance can be improved and learning comes from failure
Balance between (executive) top-down and bottom-up operation determines the focus and breadth of thinking
- Elastic
- Free to Learn The form of information affects the substance of that information, and how we act/react upon it.
- Subliminal
Being told to be creative is counterproductive to creativity - Free to Learn
Compasses over Maps: Set a direction, but don’t anticipate an outcome - Whiplash
“Novelty search” yields better results than “Fitness function” (tried and true approach)
-Kenneth Stanley
- Growth Mindset
Productive “inefficiencies” (freedom to follow curiosity and fail) lead to better results
76
“The Wall”of our research findings
Allison Henry + Amira
Thinking 77
Samiy Cultivating Elastic
77