Andrew Magnus: Portfolio 2020

Page 1

ANDREW MAGNUS 2020 workbook 1


2


ANDREW MAGNUS 856.220.1197 asm2270@columbia.edu Columbia GSAPP, M.Arch 2022 Vanderbilt University, BA. Biochemistry and Art History, 2019 Skills: rhino + grasshopper, revit + dynamo, adobe suite, sketchup, vray, charcoal and ink media, 3DSMax, ArcGIS, AutoCAD

The XR School 3

Market Arcades 21

Pavilion for the Humanities 29

Spatial Data 33

VU Lanscape Plan 41

3


4


The XR SCHOOL Spring 2020 Critic: Gordon Kipping

What: K-8 School Where: East Village 5


6


9th street view

7


Activism, in all forms, is fundamentally about healing injustice. This implies that health and healing are radical practices, and architectures which promote healing should be built to enourage these transformations. The XR school encourages student activism by proximity with nature to engender a sense of environmental responsibility. Meant to bridge a traditional structure with more radical community involvement, the existing wings of the school are interjected by woven mass-timber bridge structures. This establishes a dynamic axis for occupants - community activities at the 8 site analysis


center operate year round, while school activities at the wings offer more specialized programs - and the terrace platforms persuade both students and community members to embrace stacked vertical farms. The result is an elevated system of urban farms that reflect the community garden network of the surrounding streets, and act as a magnet for environmental advocacy. operations

9


10 plans


roof + class views

11


The site at Old P.S. 64 in the East Village is sited precariously in time and in space. The building itself if flone prone and isolated in a food desert. This project affirms farming as medicine in three ways. Produce from the farm can provide key nutrients, gardens can act meditatively, and, by acting as a third space for children and families,

12 paper models; E/W section

the farm can strengthen social bonds. Two types of classrooms reflect the two main types of gardens. Traditional walled classrooms for younger students look onto gardens and provide a safe space. For middle-schoolers, flexible canvas partitions enable creative combinations of spaces to pollinate cross-disciplinary thinking strategies.


7th grade class; art class

13


14


E/W section

15


The structure of the intervention is a novel mass-timber (LVL) woven span, which can bridge the 80’ gap between classroom wings. Carbon neutral and column-free, these spans create the farm terrace 16 14

structure


connections

17


18


aerial

19


20


MARKET ARCADES Fall 2019 Critic: Lindsey Wikstrom

What: Fresh Food Market Where: City Hall Park 21


Market Arcades installs a fresh food market at the intersection of Broadway and Park Row, adjacent to City Hall Park. The assembly of structures, made of sidewalk-shed scaffolds from around the city and moveable panels, celebrates the entire life cycle of food and demystifies the growth, consumption, and waste process for New Yorkers. Moving counterclockwise, Market Arcades features an urban greenhouse, food storage, a market, and a composting center. 22

program

These forces revolve around a new pedestrian intersection, sheltered under repurposed sidewalk shed, to create a vibrant node between the Financial District and its adjacent neighborhoods. At a closer level, panels hanging from horizontal pipes are made of plastic-bag-reinforced-concrete, and use three plastic bags for every square foot of panel. For the 600+ panels in the structure, more than 10,000 plastic bags will be used in the tensile loops and decorative finishes that


panorama + section

23


24

diagram + model scenes


remind consumers of their waste practices as they shop at the market. By pairing the right to fresh food with an agile construction typology that is quintessentially New York, Market Arcades offers new life to this luxury food swamp. What will happen to the millions of square feet of sidewalk shed when a NYC proposal further regulates their use? Each year, the

Department of Buildings entertains up to five propositions that limit the extent and frequency of sidewalk decks and scaffolds. While this might improve storefront traffic or push landlords to improve conditions in a more timely manner, the imenent influx of industrial scale aluminum alloy beams offer uniqure opportunities to build volumes.

plastic-concrete panels

25


36”

3/4” STEEL SCREW 1”

3/4”

7/8” STEEL HEX NUT 7/8” WHITE PLASTIC CAP 1.5” DIA. CRIMPED PIPE 17”

LOOPED PLASTIC TWINE (2” DIA.) BRAIDED PLASTIC TWINE (3/16”) PLASTIC REINFORCED CONCRETE

34”

1/4”

36”

8 x 20 mm PLASTIC FIBERS WOVEN HORIZONTAL TWINE (3/16”) EMBEDDED DIAGONAL TWINE (1/4”)

1”

3” DIA PIPE

1”

USE

1/4”

1 1/2” 2.5”

CUT

1”

1”

7/8”

BRAID

2”

1”

1/8”

3/8”

1”

LOOP

1/2”

This project pairs heavy-duty scaffolding with single use plastic to create lightweight panels that transform scaffolding into flexible spaces. Plastic bag twine in tension, as well as plastic shreds are used instead of glass fibers to reinforce the durability of the panel. Decorative flourishes and textures from casting within plastic bags deepens

26

construction scheme

1”

the connection between an inhabitant in the space and their consumption habits. Every square foot uses four single-use grocery bags. Weather proof and available at any scale, these panels are erected, removed, and shifted by one person (and a wrench) in minutes to transform entire spaces.


panel detail

27


28


PAVILION FOR THE HUMANITIES Fall 2019 Critic: Zachary White

What: Art Pavilion Where: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 29


30

program


When it was first proposed to accompany the Rio de Janeiro Climate 2020 conference, the Pavilion for the Humanities installed suspended masses of shipping containers inside a scaffold mesh. The experience inside the building is meant to be dizzying: a maze of ramps, stairs and elevators move tourists, locals, and politicians through art galleries, lecture halls, open vistas, and back to the ground. Trying to capture the frailty of the human condition, the building is exposed to air, hear, rain, wind and noise. These forces reverberate through the scaffolding. Expanding on

the work of Carla Juaçaba and Bia Lessa in 2012, this redrawing of the Pavilion for the Humanities moves to another land in need of reevaluation: New Jersey. Here, as before, the main goal for the Pavilion is to sustainably borrow construction materials. The scaffolding that builds the pavilion can be dismantled, replaced, or returned to the field. The living building, an optimistic view on architecture’s role in climate crises, offers hope. Below, a bricolage model from acrylic waste creates a living sectioned model, and closes to express the envelope detail.

1:200 model detail

31


32


SPATIAL DATA 2020 Critic: Quentin Yiu

What: ??? Where: Manhattan 33


I (used to) pass by these places on my morning commute. I took them for granted. After 6 weeks inside, my recollection has warped and collided these experiences in unexpected ways. Iterations of computational bricollage create a representation that challenges what memory and vision mean in a post-pandemic world. I hope to pass by these places again, but I’m unsure if it will feel the way I used to. First, a manual collage from photographs was fed to a computational script. 34

123rd street photographs


collage

35


36

computations


faberge

37


38


moodscapes

39


40


VU LANDSCAPE PLAN Released 2019 Office: VU Construction and Planning

What: Arboretum Master Plan Where: Vanderbilt University 41


WEST END NEIGHBORHOOD CANOPY AND GROUND 1996

2000 32 %

16 % 4%

2004 32 %

18 % 5%

20 %

18 %

5%

22 %

2008 32 % 21 %

2012 32 %

18 %

5%

23 %

6%

2016 32 %

18 %

5%

21 %

FutureVU Goal 32 %

18 %

28 %

22 %

36 %

47 %

6% 6%

7%

52 %

7%

50 %

8% 50 %

50 %

PEDESTRIAN WALK

2000 38 %

18 %

38 %

25 %

50 %

BUILDING

ROADWAY / PARKING

SHADED ROADS

2008

18 %

21 %

39 %

5%

24 %

SHADED WALKS

PEABODY CANOPY AND GROUND

2004

18 % 6%

23 %

10 %

HARDSCAPE

SHADED GREEN SPACE

1996

6%

8%

50 %

LANDSCAPE GREEN SPACE

7%

2012

36 %

4%

21 %

FutureVU Goal

21 %

36 %

4%

21 %

SHADED / SRI ROOF

2016

21 %

36 %

4%

23%

BLDG FOOTPRINT

22 %

21 % 50 %

8%

30 % 5%

6%

45 %

5%

5%

44 %

45 %

GREEN SPACE

5%

29 %

43 %

43 %

43 %

LANDSCAPE

5%

HARDSCAPE

SHADED GREEN SPACE

PEDESTRIAN WALK

SHADED WALKS

BUILDING

ROADWAY / PARKING

SHADED ROADS

BLDG FOOTPRINT

SHADED / SRI ROOF

HIGHLAND CANOPY AND GROUND 1996

2000

2004

34 %

30 %

33 %

19 %

3%

2%

37 %

34 %

34 %

35 %

GREEN SPACE

PEDESTRIAN WALK

SHADED WALKS

48 %

6%

2%

21 %

5%

6% 23 %

34 %

34 %

HARDSCAPE

SHADED GREEN SPACE

10 % 28 %

21 %

6%

7%

LANDSCAPE

33 %

22 %

3%

5%

FutureVU Goal 33 %

33 % 33 %

23 %

4%

5%

2016

33 % 33 %

21 %

2%

5%

2012

33 %

34 %

31 %

18 %

2008

BUILDING

ROADWAY / PARKING

SHADED ROADS

BLDG FOOTPRINT

SHADED / SRI ROOF

CENTRAL CORE CANOPY AND GROUND 1996

2000

19 % 49 %

3%

28 %

49 %

11 %

49 %

11 %

49 %

10 % 23 % 48 %

4%

31 %

30 %

HARDSCAPE

SHADED GREEN SPACE

PEDESTRIAN WALK

SHADED WALKS

31 %

25 %

34 %

30 %

52 %

12 %

10 %

10 %

32 %

FutureVU Goal

23 % 47 %

4%

29 %

11 %

32 %

2016

23 %

3%

29%

LANDSCAPE GREEN SPACE

2012

19 %

3%

29 %

32 %

32 %

2008

19 %

19 %

2%

11 %

2004

BUILDING

ROADWAY / PARKING

SHADED ROADS

BLDG FOOTPRINT

SHADED / SRI ROOF

HISTORIC MAIN CAMPUS CANOPY AND GROUND 1996

2000

23 %

41 %

5%

27 %

2004

23% 27 %

34 %

34 %

26%

5%

7%

7%

39 %

25%

41%

5%

2008

GREEN SPACE

42

GIS tree canopy analysis

SHADED GREEN SPACE

25 %

34 %

39 % 28 %

5%

2016

ROADWAY / PARKING

47 %

3% 8%

34 %

SHADED WALKS

10 % 29 %

27 %

3%

23 % 6%

23 %

34 %

HARDSCAPE PEDESTRIAN WALK

30 %

28 %

8%

34 %

FutureVU Goal

35 %

39 %

25 % 4%

8%

7%

LANDSCAPE

2012

BUILDING SHADED ROADS

BLDG FOOTPRINT

SHADED / SRI ROOF


For the development of Vanderbilt University’s Landscape Master Plan, I organized a diachronic analysis of canopy coverage, and found a 12% decrease since 1994. 2.9 million ft2 of tree coverage has vanished in the last two decades, largely due to capital projects like the newly built residential college system. Methodologically, to discover the most important facets of the campus’ built environment, stakeholder outreach was used

as data, to user experiences were mapped regionally to create site-specific goals. A similar method for gathering information and prioritizing assets was used for the mobility, access, and water-use portions of the document as well. The result was a document that proposed new land-use valuation for construction enables a net gain in year-toyear tree plantings, and preserves the makeup of this Nasvhille Arboretum. published spreads

43


ANDREW MAGNUS 856.220.1197 asm2270@columbia.edu

44


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.