INBETWEEN A COLLECTION OF WORK FROM ANDREW KLENKE VOLUME 01
ABOUT INBETWEEN It has been in the last few centuries that architecture and engineering have divided into thier own respective fields, yet in many ways they are still very close. With an interest in both architecture and engineering, I have put this collection of work together to demonstrate how integrated they are as one. Stuck at the crossroads of asethetics and function, I find myself in the inbetween. After completion of my B.S. in Architectural Engineering I plan on attending a graduate program to earn a Masters in Architecture. It is my goal to bring the two together throughout my career to work as both an architect and engineer, hoping to improve the way we design and construct buildings.
Contents 02
WELLNESS CENTER
10
PRAIRE ACRE
18
FOUNDATION BEYELER
26
WASHINGTON PLACE
30 SUSPENDED SLAB 34
HERFF ELEMENTARY
38
MADISON AGRISCIENCE
01
Wellness Center LOCATION: LAWRENCE, KANSAS STUDIO: ARCH 602 - ACCELERATED DESIGN IV YEAR: SUMMER 2019 DURATION: 5 WEEKS PROFESSOR: KAPILA SILVA Located in the heart of the historic district of downtown Lawrence, KS, we were tasked with designing a wellness center that could become a central focus of the city. Being across the street from the historic Douglas County courthouse and Watkins Museum of History, we had to consider the materiality and look of the building to respect the historic urban fabric while still representing growth and development in the city. The wellness center was to include weightlifting areas, hydrotherapy pools, saunas, yoga and aerobics studios, and a cardio theater as part of the program.
02
Wellness Center
03
A BREAK LOCKERS
STAIRS
SERVICE/STORAGE
SERVICE
LOCKERS
OFFICES
SILENT GARDEN
11TH ST.
STORE
FREE WEIGHTS & MACHINES
LOBBY JUICE BAR
SOCIAL GARDEN
A
MASSACHUSETTS ST. GROUND FLOOR PLAN Located on the corner of Massachusetts Street and 11th Street I needed to maintain the symetry of the intersection. Both the courthouse, located across 11th, and the musuem, located across Massachusetts, are iconic buildings setback and centered on thier lots with land around. Diagonally across the intersection is an existing building built up all the way to the property line like most of downtown. By mirroring the existing building to the southeast across the intersection. I was able to continue this strong axis, and angled the entrace and center atrium 45 degrees. This entrance becomes a gateway, being visibile to those driving into downtown. The multi-level atrium serves as a focal point as it is the main vertical circulation, spanning between all levels.
04
Wellness Center
LOCKERS STAIRS
YOGA
MULTIUSE CLASSROOM
AEROBICS
GARDEN
LOUNGE CARDIO THEATER
TRAINERS / NURSE / THERAPY
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
LAUNDRY
'-0"
5'
STORAGE
LOCKERS
MECH. VERTICAL ACCESS
STAIRS 30'
60'
LOCKERS
LOCKERS
HYDROTHERAPY POOL
MASSAGE LOUNGE
SILENT GARDEN
MASSAGE
JANITOR
DRY SAUNA
WET SAUNA
SAUNA EQUIPMENT
POOL EQUIPMENT
MECHANICAL
STORAGE
BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN 05
115’ x 115’ site area, extruded up 28’ to match similar heights of existing buildings.
06
Wellness Center
Center of building becomes a void, providing an atrium as the main source of vertical circulation.
Street faces of buildings push back to provide relief at the main intersection.
Corner at main intersection is chamfered, responding to the chamfered corner of the existing building across the intersection
DETAIL A
DETAIL B
SECTION A-A
Chamfered face is extruded outward to maximize entry space and provide an inviting form.
Basement circulation has program centered around atrium, with pathways on the outside.
Ground floor circulation has pathways centered around atrium, with program on the outside.
Second floor circulation has program centered around atrium, with pathways on the outside.
Following symetrical rules, a glass butterfly roof is centered above the atrium, and the floor plates of the building respond to maximize the natural daylight.
07
1” DOUBLE PANE GLASS
ALUMINUM MULLION 6” X 24” GLULAM RAFTER BEAM, 10”-0” O.C.
6” X 24” GLULAM COLUMN, 10’-0” O.C. 6” X 18” GLULAM BEAM
6 MIL ROOF MEMBRANE 7/16” ROOF SHEATING (3) LAYERS 2” RIGID INSULATION, CARVED AND SLOPED TO DRAIN 6 MIL VAPOR BARRIER 1-1/2” TONGUE AND GROVE WOOD DECKING, MAX SPAN 6’-0” 6” X 18” GLULAM ROOF JOIST, 5’-0” O.C.
DETAIL A
08
Wellness Center
FLASHING LIGHT GAUGE STEEL CORNICE 1/8” ALUMINUM CLADDING WITH BRUSHED FINISH ALUMINUM CLADDING CONNECTOR BRACKET ON LIGHT GAUGE STEEL STUD. FASTENED WITH SELFTAPPING SCREWS 1/8” PERFORATED ALUMINUM CLADDING WITH BRUSHED FINISH
ALUMINUM SIGNAGE, FASTENED TO CLADDING ALUMINUM MULLION 2-1/4” POLISHED CONCRETE FLOOR 1-1/2” TONGUE AND GROOVE WOOD DECKING, MAX SPAN 6’-0” W12X26 STEEL BEAM LIGHT GAUGE STEEL FRAMING FOR SLOPED CLADDING ALUMINUM CLADDING DRIP EDGE
DETAIL B
09
Praire Acre LOCATION: LAWRENCE, KANSAS STUDIO: ARCH 509 - DESIGN BUILD YEAR: FALL 2018 DURATION: 16 WEEKS PROFESSOR: PAOLA SANGUINETTI Rock Chalk Prairie Acre is an outdoor collaborative classroom space that is located in the Praire Acre restoration area on the University of Kansas campus. The space is an unplowed lanscape, allowing the native tall prairie grass to grow. The outdoor space is used for some classes and is located near single family residences, serving a park like purpose. Earlier sections of Studio 509 created a ribbon classroom seating area made of gabion walls with concrete seat tops. Our fall section was tasked with repairing some of the issues left unresolved in the original project as well as building a new canopy structure and paving.
10
Praire Acre
11
EXISTING SITE
EXCAVATION
POURING CONCRETE PATIO 12
Praire Acre
POURING CANOPY FOUNDATION
RAISING STEEL STRUCTURE
INSTALLING CEDAR ROOF
13
1 S102 4" CONTINUOUS CONCRETE SLAB
2 "
" /16 91
3 /4
57°
-6
18.
' 11
3' -
S102
'-
8"
Sim
2 S102
1
Sim
S102
CANOPY - FOUNDATION 1/2" = 1'-0"
CANOPY FOUNDATION PLAN While the studio was a class effort I was able to gain personal growth through the indiviudal experiences I had during the design and construction. As the only engineering student in this section of the studio I was able to work on the more technical side of the design and worked closely with our engineering consultants from Thornton Tomasetti out of Kansas City. I lead the development of the construction documents, particularly for the canopy structure. The above foundation is an example of the drawings I created with the help of the engineers and concrete contractors.
14
Praire Acre
65.00°
11
6" ELEVATED POST ANCHOR SET 2" IN GROUND FOR 2X6 POST (TYP) REFER: 1 / S104 2 / S104 3 / S104
13' - 1 11/16"
(TYP)
1' - 10 17/32"
9.29°
(TYP)
1 S103
BASE PLATE LEVELED WITH 1/4" OF GROUT
1-1/2" X 5-1/2" X 3/16" HSS STEEL TUBE WELDED TO 5/8" STEEL BASE PLATE. RE: 1 / S203
CONTINOUS CAST-INPLACE 4000 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING AND FLOOR
0' - 4"
0' - 4"
1"-8 X 30" ANCHOR BOLT (TYP)
3' - 0"
2' - 2"
COMPACTED 1/4" GRAVEL (TYP)
#4 REBAR 12" SQUARE RINGS @ 12" O.C. (TYP)
0' - 4"
2' - 6" #4 REBAR (4) PER CAGE
0' - 6"
0' - 6"
0' - 6"
1' - 6"
CANOPY COLUMN FOOTING While working on the foundation plan, one of the primary concerns by the engineers was the uplift that the canopy might experience due to wind loads. This meant we had to specify and detail out each of the canopy column footings. The above detail is an example of one of the footings, specifying the concrete strength, anchor bolt size, steel base plate, and more. Working on details like this and then building it really helped me understand how these types of things come together and how many different elements can effect the design such as frost depth, windspeed, and snow loads.
15
0' - 1 1/2" 0' - 2 1/2" 0' - 1 1/2"
8' - 0"
2X4 2X6
1/4" STEEL PLATE INSERTED INTO BEAM AND BOLTED REFER: 1 / S406
0' - 6"
11' - 5 31/32"
SECURED WITH 3" DECK/WOOD SCREWS @ 12" O.C.
1/4" STEEL PLATE INSERTED INTO BEAM REFER: 1 / S406
16
Praire Acre
2X6 2X4
8' - 0"
0' - 2" 0' - 1 1/2"
0' - 5 1/2"
0' - 2"
0' - 2" 0' - 2"
CANOPY STRUCTURE One of the more complicated parts to design and construct was the canopy structure. The spiral shape that goes upward meant designing with compound curves in 3D models and finding a way to clearly represent them in construction drawings. To better understand its connections and constructions I modeled an exploded axonometric (as seen above) as well as an exploded axon for the wood T-beam connection to the curved steel (as seen to the left). The wood T-beam was challenging also.We wanted to use 2x6 cedar boards laying flat to provide the most shade coverage. In order to reduce the deflection of the lumber across the midspan we specified a 2x4 cedar board to be fastened to the bottom with a nailing pattern in order to stiffen the wood T-beam.
17
Foundation Beyeler LOCATION: RIEHEN, SWITZERLAND STUDIO: ARCH 281 - DESIGN WORKSHOP II: DESIGN THINKING YEAR: SPRING 2017 DURATION: 16 WEEKS PROFESSOR: NILOU VAKIL Foundation Beyeler Museum opened in 1997, after the establishment of the Beyeler Foundation in 1982 by Hildy and Ernst Beyeler. Designed by Renzo Piano in 1992, this modern art museum incorporates the natural beauty of its surroundings, embodying the peaceful views and natural light. For this studio we were tasked with performing a case study of the building, considering the design, construction, and operation of the museum. In the beginning we looked at the conceptual design by Piano and completed our own set of sketches based on simple massing (as shown to the right).
18
Foundation Beyeler
19
20
Foundation Beyeler
SKETCHUP MODEL As part of the studio we looked at a more detailed design by focusing on a small section of the building and modeling it to scale using SketchUp. As a side benefit I was able to greatly improve my proficiency in the SketchUp, resulting in an accurate model. We were able to reach out to Renzo Piano Building Workshop, who provided resources such as plan drawings and details in order to improve the accuracy of our case study.
21
22
Foundation Beyeler
WOOD MODEL After completion of the SketchUp model, each student in studio was tasked with individually creating a scale model. Using plywood, bass wood, acrylic, and cardboard I assembled the model. In order to improve accuracy and construction time, I used the SketchUp model as much as possible for measurements, and even used the model to help laser cut some of the materials. The model itself took around 3 weeks to complete (much longer than orignally planned). It resulted in a model that I am very proud to have worked on.
23
HVAC DIAGRAM During our case study of the museum we looked into how Piano designed some of the systems. Part of Piano’s concept was to allow natural light to enter the space through the roof. This meant that Piano did not want to utilize the ceiling plenum to house HVAC equipment or ductwork. To achieve this he designed a raised floor system that house an underfloor air distribution system, hiding all of the HVAC systems completely. He did however use the plenum space above as a return air plenum, naturally letting the heat rise to be returned or exhausted.
24
Foundation Beyeler
LIGHTING DIAGRAM One of the challenges in Piano’s natural light design was the risk of UV damage to all of the art work to be housed inside of the museum. Piano came up with a series of glass, louver, and metal meshes to create a filter system for the light. In the above diagram I show how the light is able to trickle down through the space and how its intensity is changed. The double glazed roof and the opaque shading panels on the roof provide the first layer of protection. It is then through metal grids and a mechanical louver system that the light can be further reduced and even controlled to protect the artwork while still providing natural light throughout the space - something Piano knew would be ground breaking for an art museum.
25
BWL - D
BWL - C
BWL - B
BWL - A
S1.2 2 SOUTH
DN
(2) 1 3/4" x 5 1/2" LVL STUDS ABOVE, REF ELEVATION
6x6 CEDAR OR TREATED POST ON SIMPSON ABU66 POST BASE, WITH SIMPSON CCQ46SDS2.5 POST CAP, TYP. U.N.O
11 ABV
11 ABV 1
A
S4.2
BWL - 1 CONT.
S4.2
10
09
(3)#2-2x10
A
07
A
(2)#2-2x10 {TREATED}
DROPPED
D
01
MUD & LAUNDRY
D
(3)#2-2x12 OR (2)1-3/4"x9-1/4" LVL
WH
DOG WASH
EC#3
07
A
ED-A
(3) 1 3/4" x 9 1/2" LVL
BEDROOM/ STUDY
E
D
DR-H A
W
DINING
A
REF FRZ 8' WALL W/ GLAZING ABV
MASTER BED
MIN 32" PANEL PER TABLE R602.10.5
B
B
(3) 1 3/4" x 5 1/2" LVL FULL HEIGHT STUDS
ED-A (2)#2-2x10
(2)#2-2x12 OR (2) 1-3/4"x9-1/4" LVL
06
B
DW
01
(3)#2-2x10
ED-A EC#3
11 ABV
08 (3)#2-2x10
(2 )2 x6
(2) 1 3/4" x 9 1/2" LVL {CONT. DROPPED, WRAPPED OR TRTD.}
1
x6 )2 (2
(3) 1 3/4" x 7 1/4" LVL ABOVE TRANSOM WINDOWS, REF ELEVATION
6x6 CEDAR OR TREATED POST ON SIMPSON ABU66 POST BASE, WITH SIMPSON ECCQ3-6SDS2.5 POST CAP, TYP. U.N.O
(2 )2 x6
DECK
D
D
SHELVES
D
COATS
P DR-A
DR-A
DR-C
D
DR-E D
ED-B D DR-A
DR-A
DR-C
LINEN
06 D DR-D
DR-D
A
(2) 1 3/4" x 11 1/4" LVL {CONT. TO CORNER}
04
03
(3 )2 x6
01
(3 )2 x6
02
(3 )2 x6
A
D
D
BATH BEDROOM
D (3) 1 3/4" x 9 1/2" LVL ED-A
D
01
D
DR-B
D
BWL - 2 CONT. EC#4
D
D
LIVING
MASTER BATH
MASTER CLOSET
DR-F
ENTRY
D
DR-G
05
DR-H
02
D
PWDR
D
A
06
1 S4.1
(3)#2-2x12 OR07 (2) 1-3/4"x9-1/4" LVL
A
EC#3
CS-PF
(3)#2-2x10 {TREATED, DN DROPPED}
FLOOR PLAN
Washington Place LOCATION: CATHLAMET, WA EMPLOYER: APEX ENGINEERS, INC. YEAR: 2019 DURATION: 17 WEEKS SUPERVISOR: MIKE BRUNIN As a structural engineering intern at Apex Engineers I was able to get a wide range of experience working on single-family residential, multi-family residential, commerical, and educational projects.Working on residential projects, I furthered my knowledge of structural materials working with a mix of light-framed wood, steel, and concrete structures. I was able to learn how each material interacted with each other as well as the architectural elements of the house. Washington Place is just one of many residential projects I was able to work on during my time with Apex.
26
Washington Place
19'-8"
2'-2"
19'-8"
11'-0"
27'-8"
11'-6"
6'-0" NOTE: WOOD DECK STRUCTURES BY OTHERS, EXACT LAYOUT TO BE DETERMINED AT A LATER DATE, TYP.
1
1
S4.2
S4.2
11-7/8" TJI 210 FLOOR JOISTS AT 16" OC
5 1/8" x 12" DOUG-FIR 24F-V4 GLULAM
BEAM POCKET
4'-9"
5'-0"
J
4'-0"
4'-0"
G
J
BEAM POCKET
11' - 0"
11' - 0"
B
15' - 9" 11' - 0"
12' - 0"
B
B
31'-6"
CRAWLSPACE
5 1/8" x 12" DOUG-FIR 24F-V4 GLULAM {CONT}
5 1/8" x 12" DOUG-FIR 24F-V4 GLULAM {CONT.}
BEAM POCKET
BEAM POCKET
11-7/8" TJI 210 FLOOR JOISTS AT 16" OC
3'-0"
13' - 3"
SPLICE BEAM OVER COLUMN WITH SIMPSON LCC5.25-3.5 COLUMN CAP
11-7/8" TJI 210 FLOOR JOISTS AT 16" OC
10' - 0"
11-7/8" TJI 210 FLOOR JOISTS AT 16" OC
10' - 0"
B
15' - 9"
26'-6"
B
5 1/8" x 12" DOUG-FIR 24F-V4 GLULAM {CONT.} B
31'-6"
12' - 0"
B
11-7/8" TJI 210 FLOOR JOISTS AT 16" OC
13' - 3"
11-7/8" TJI 210 FLOOR JOISTS AT 16" OC
DOUBLE JOISTS UNDER ISLAND ABOVE
8"x4'-0" CONC. BURIED WALL W/ (2) #4 BARS HORZ. CONT. AT TOP AND BOTTOM W/ (3) #4 BARS HORZ. CONT. AT 24" OC AND #4 VERT. BARS AT 24" OC ON 16"x8" CONC. FOOTING W/ (2) #4 BARS CONT.
6'-4" G
3"
40'-0"
G
9'-7"
3"
28'-5"
78'-0"
FOUNDATION PLAN
2'-0"
4'-0"
(2) SIMPSON L50 ANGLES, (1) EACH SIDE OF RAFTER
{H
IP
}
4'-0"
(3)#2-2x6 RAFTER
1/2 "L VL (2 )1
3/4 "x
5
#2-2x6 RAFTERS AT 16" OC
7'-0"
1 3/4" x 5 1/2" LVL CONT. SUB FASCIA W/ (3) #10 x 3-1/2" WOOD SCREWS INTO EACH RAFTER
9' - 0"
9' - 0"
2 S1.3
2'-0"
6'-0"
4'-0"
RAISED HEEL ROOF TRUSSES BY OTHERS
(2) SIMPSON L50 ANGLES, (1) EACH SIDE OF RAFTER
(2) SIMPSON L50 ANGLES, (1) EACH SIDE OF RAFTER TOP CHORD OF TRUSSES DROPPED 6" TO ALLOW FOR 2x6 OVERHANG ROOF FRAMING
2" / 1'-0"
SOLAR ZONE
2" / 1'-0"
14" TJI 360 RAFTERS DOUBLE EVERY OTHER AT 16" OC OR 16" TJI 210 RAFTERS AT 16" OC THIS AREA. BLOCKING REQUIRED BETWEEN RAFTERS AT EXTERIOR WALLS AND THIRD POINTS FOR MONOSLOPED ROOF.
RAISED HEEL ROOF TRUSSES BY OTHERS
GIRDER TRUSS BY OTHERS
2" / 1'-0"
TOP CHORD OF TRUSSES DROPPED 6" TO ALLOW FOR 2x6 OVERHANG ROOF FRAMING
1 3/4" x 5 1/2" LVL
#2-2x6 RAFTERS CANTILEVERED
(2) SIMPSON L50 ANGLES, (1) EACH SIDE OF RAFTER
(3)#2-2x6 RAFTER
9' - 0" 13' - 0"
9' - 0"
(2) SIMPSON L50 ANGLES, (1) EACH SIDE OF RAFTER SIM.
2 S1.3
(1) SIMPSON H2.5A HURRICANE CLIP PER TRUSS TO DOUBLE TOP PLATE
2x6 CANTILEVER RAFTER CONNECTION TO TRUSSES BY OTHERS
1'-0"
13' - 0"
4'-0"
(3)#2-2x6 RAFTER
3'-0" 11'-0"
#2-2x8 RAFTERS AT 16" O.C.
IP {H 1/2 "L VL 5 3/4 "x
(3)#2-2x6 RAFTER
}
IP {H
(2 )1
VL "L 1/2
9' - 0"
5
4'-0"
"x 3/4
1 3/4" x 5 1/2" LVL CONT. SUB FASCIA W/ (3) #10 x 3-1/2" WOOD SCREWS INTO EACH RAFTER
)1 (2
}
(3)#2-2x6 RAFTER
9' - 0"
SUB FASCIA
#2-2x6 RAFTERS CANTILEVERED
SOLAR ZONE
GIRDER TRUSS BY OTHERS
(3)#2-2x6 RAFTER (3)#2-2x6 RAFTER {ON WALL}
(2) SIMPSON L50 ANGLES, (1) EACH SIDE OF RAFTER
1 3/4" x 5 1/2" LVL CONT. SUB FASCIA W/ (3) #10 x 3-1/2" WOOD SCREWS INTO EACH RAFTER
(2) SIMPSON L50 ANGLES, (1) EACH SIDE OF RAFTER
1'-0"
ROOF FRAMING PLAN I was involved in helping produce the construction documents and found it to be a very interesting project. As seen in the Floor Plan the architect was wanting to have an open space throughout the main living area with large glass windows on both the plan north and plan south walls, These along with a 4’-0” cantileverd roof made some of the structural design complicated. By looking at the Roof Framing Plan, you can see how we maintained the open space over the living area by having the monosloped roof made of deep I-Joists. The corners of the cantilevered roof were also designed to not only support the cantilever but resist the increased amount of uplift.
Drawings produced under the supervision of Apex Engineers, Inc. and are not to be reproduced, distributed, or used for construction.
27
(2) 1 3/4" x 5 1/2" LVL STUDS W/ SIMPSON A23 INTO BEAM BELOW
T.O. CHIMNEY 18' - 9"
(3) 1 3/4" x 7 1/4" LVL W/ SIMPSON HUCQ610-SDS EACH END
T.O. UPPER PLATE 15' - 9"
(2)#2-2x6 TOP PLATE W/ SIMPSON A23 EACH END
T.O. PLATE 10' - 0" (3) 1 3/4" x 9 1/2" LVL
(3)#2-2x10
4 S1.2
3 S1.2
(2) 2x6 STUDS W/ SIMPSON A23 INTO BEAM ABOVE
MAIN FLOOR 0' - 0" GRADE -1' - 6"
(3) 1 3/4" x 5 1/2" LVL FULL HEIGHT STUDS
SOUTH ELEVATION One way we achieved having such an open space in the living room and having multiple open windows was by implementing what is known as a moment frame. Usually in stick constrution the OSB or plywood act to resist lateral loads across the building and keep walls from leaning. With multiple windows this is hard to implement so we had to design a moment resisting frame which used both standard lumber and LVL’s.
28
Washington Place
(2) ROWS 8d (0.133"x2-1/2") NAILS AT 8" OC
(2) 1 3/4" x 5 1/2" LVL ONE EACH SIDE
FILL GAP WITH PLYWOOD BEYOND TJI JOISTS
BEVELED PLATE AS REQUIRED BY SLOPE
BEVELED 2x4 BLOCKING
DOUBLE TOP PLATE
SIMPSON H2.5A TIE
1 1/2"
A
(2) ROWS 8d (0.133"x2-1/2") NAILS AT 8" OC (EACH SIDE) TJI JOIST, REF PLAN
BEVELED 2x4 BLOCK EACH SIDE
SIMPSON H2.5A TIE
DOUBLE TOP PLATE
BEVELED PLATE AS REQUIRED BY SLOPE
6'-0" MAX
SECTION A-A
LSL BLOCKING BETWEEN EACH RAFTER. VENTILATE PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECS, REF ARCH.
A
(2) ROWS 8d (0.133"x2-1/2") NAILS AT 8" OC (EACH SIDE)
(2) 1 3/4" x 5 1/2" LVL ONE EACH SIDE
5 1/2"
(2) ROWS 8d (0.133"x2-1/2") NAILS AT 8" OC
#2-2x4 (FLAT)
#2-2x4 (FLAT)
12'-0" MIN
NOTE AT SIM. LOCATION: SINGLE LVL REQUIRED FOR 4'-0" MAX OVERHANG W/ MIN 8'-0" BACKSPAN
ROOF OVERHANG DETAIL In order to make the 4’-0” cantilever work for the roof, while keeping a thin exterior profile, we designed a roof overhang detail.To make the span possible we sistered standard framing lumber to the engineered I-Joist on the roof and specified a nailing pattern and back span for stablitiy. I learned a great deal about how certain elements of a building are made possible, as seen by this detail.
Drawings produced under the supervision of Apex Engineers, Inc. and are not to be reproduced, distributed, or used for construction.
29
Suspended Slab LOCATION: LAWRENCE, KS EMPLOYER: APEX ENGINEERS, INC. YEAR: 2019 DURATION: 2 WEEKS SUPERVISOR: MIKE BRUNIN Throughout my internship with Apex Engineers I was able to work on many different projects, including several suspended porch slabs. These suspended porch slabs usually were built as unofficial storage and storm shelters underneath the front porch of a residence with an entrace from the basement. Many jurisdictions required engineered drawings for just this section of the house, as occupying space under suspended concrete can be dangerous if not done properly.
30
Suspended Slab
2 S2.0
3'-0" DOOR, REF ARCH
10" 3"
FDTN WALL, REF PLANS (BY OTHERS), TYP
7'-0" 10" 2"
EXT FACE OF FRAMING ABOVE AND EXT FACE OF KEY IN FOUNDATION WALL, REF ARCH
10" 2" 4'-10"
4'-10"
W8x18 DROPPED WITH 2" LUGS AT 24" OC ON TOP OF TOP FLANGE (2) 8'-0" #4 REBAR AT CORNERS
(2) 8'-0" #4 REBAR AT CORNERS BEAM POCKET
BEAM POCKET
10" 4"
2'-7"
10" 4"
2'-7"
2'-7"
2'-0"
#4x10'-0" BARS AT 12" OC, CENTERED OVER BEAM WITH 1 12" TOP COVER
2'-7"
2'-0" 8"
8" 3'-10"
3'-10" 8"
3'-10"
3'-10"
12'-2"
6" (MIN) TO 9" (MAX) CONC SLAB WITH #4 BARS AT 12" OC BOTH-WAYS WITH 112" BOTTOM COVER.
1 S2.0
SUSPENDED SLAB PLAN The suspended slab above is just one example of some of the slab designs I have done. Typically I will draft the plan drawings and run calculations on the slab span. The above plan shows the detailing of a unique suspended slab that sits on foundation walls with a dropped steel beam along the midspan of the slab. This slab was unique and a little more complicated due to its shape and long midspan.
Drawings produced under the supervision of Apex Engineers, Inc. and are not to be reproduced, distributed, or used for construction.
31
6" (MIN) TO 9" (MAX) CONC SLAB, REF PLAN 10'-0" LONG #4 BARS SPACED PER PLAN CENTERED OVER STEEL BEAM, PLACED 1" - 112" FROM TOP OF SLAB
CAULKING
2"
6"
112"
PER PLAN
SLOPE SLAB 1 8" - 4" PER FT
1
METAL FLASHING OVER EPDM, REF BUILDER
2" LUGS AT 24" O.C., ENTIRE LENGTH OF BEAM
STEEL BEAM, REF PLAN
DRILL AND EPOXY OR EMBED, REF PLAN FOUNDATION WALL, REF PLAN FORMWORK PROVIDED BY TEMPORARY PLYWOOD FORMS (BY OTHERS), SHORE AS REQUIRED
SUSPENDED SLAB SECTION While detailed parts of the suspended slab section above already existed from previous projects in the company, the long span of the suspended slab had to be supported along the mid-span in order to reduce the amount of steel reinforcement and thickness of the concrete. I was tasked with modifying our existing detail to include the dropped steel beam under the suspended slab as well as have a “zero step” walk out from the interior residence by dropping the floor joist below the top of the foundation wall. Part of the project also required calculations to be run for the suspended slab as seen to the right. Even though the slab has rebar in each direction, we treated it as a concrete beam for a 1’-0” section.
32
Suspended Slab
SEALANT LAYER, REF BUILDER
Printed: 6 AUG 2019, 3:03PM File = G:\Lawrence\Projects\K2CZ1E~X\GOAMXT~U\0KR386~3\C7A4YC~F\Calcs.ec6 . Software copyright ENERCALC, INC. 1983-2019, Build:10.19.1.30 . APEX ENGINEERS INC
Concrete Beam Lic. # : KW-06005244
DESCRIPTION: Suspended slab section CODE REFERENCES
Calculations per ACI 318-14, IBC 2015, CBC 2016, ASCE 7-10 Load Combination Set : ASCE 7-16
Material Properties f'c = 1/2 fr = f'c * 7.50 \ Density O LtWt Factor Elastic Modulus =
3.50 ksi = 443.706 psi 145.0 pcf = 1.0 = 3,122.0 ksi
fy - Main Rebar = E - Main Rebar =
I
Phi Values =
E1
Flexure : Shear :
Fy - Stirrups E - Stirrups = Stirrup Bar Size #
40.0 ksi 29,000.0 ksi Number of Resisting Legs Per Stirrup =
0.90 0.750 0.850
40.0 ksi 29,000.0 ksi 3 1
.
Cross Section & Reinforcing Details
Rectangular Section, Width = 12.0 in, Height = 8.50 in Span #1 Reinforcing.... 1-#4 at 1.50 in from Bottom, from 0.0 to 6.580 ft in this span Span #2 Reinforcing.... 1-#4 at 1.50 in from Bottom, from 0.0 to 6.580 ft in this span
1-#4 at 1.50 in from Top, from 1.580 to 6.580 ft in this span 1-#4 at 1.50 in from Top, from 0.0 to 5.0 ft in this span
.
Beam self weight calculated and added to loads Load for Span Number 1 Uniform Load : L = 0.040 k/ft, Tributary Width = 1.0 ft, (Live Load) Load for Span Number 2 Uniform Load : L = 0.040 k/ft, Tributary Width = 1.0 ft, (Live Load)
DESIGN SUMMARY
Maximum Bending Stress Ratio = Section used for this span Mu : Applied Mn * Phi : Allowable
Location of maximum on span
0.210 Typical Section -1.013 4.831 0.000
Span # where maximum occurs
Vertical Reactions
Load Combination Overall MAXimum Overall MINimum +D+H +D+L+H, LL Comb Run (*L) +D+L+H, LL Comb Run (L*) +D+L+H, LL Comb Run (LL) +D+Lr+H, LL Comb Run (*L) +D+Lr+H, LL Comb Run (L*)
:1 k-ft k-ft ft
Maximum Deflection
Max Downward Transient Deflection Max Upward Transient Deflection Max Downward Total Deflection Max Upward Total Deflection
Design OK 0.000 in 0.000 in 0.002 in 0.000 in
Ratio = Ratio = Ratio = Ratio =
.
0 <360.0 0 <360.0 50914 >=180.0 0 <180.0
Span # 2 Support notation : Far left is #1 Support 1 0.369 -0.016 0.253 0.237 0.369 0.352 0.253 0.253
Support 2 1.174 0.164 0.845 1.009 1.009 1.174 0.845 0.845
.
Support 3 0.369 -0.016 0.253 0.369 0.237 0.352 0.253 0.253
Drawings produced under the supervision of Apex Engineers, Inc. and are not to be reproduced, distributed, or used for construction.
33
Herff Elementary LOCATION: BOERNE, TX EMPLOYER: MEP ENGINEERING, INC. YEAR: SUMMER 2017 - WINTER 2018 DURATION: 1.5 YEARS (IN CONSTRUCTION) SUPERVISOR: JOSH PETERSON While interning with MEP Engineering I have been able to work on a wide range of projects in south central Texas.This new elementary school in the hill country outside of San Antonio was the largest project I was able to personally work on during my time with MEP. The vast size of the project can be seen in the eletrical site plan above. This was a great experience for me. I worked on the design of the project in the summer of 2017 and was able to help with construction administration in the summer of 2018.
34
Herff Elementary
Drawings produced under the supervision of MEP Engineering, Inc. and are not to be reproduced, distributed, or used for construction.
35
C1
C2
D4
AT
C4
C6 AU
C7 AV
AW
C11 AX
C12
AY
AZ.1
AZ.2 AZ.4 AZ.5
AZ.3
AZ
5TH GRADE C,250 CLASSROOM TYP 4
SMALL C,250 CLASSROOMTYP 2
A35
ELEVATOR
C126
CUSTODIAL
X,300
4' MB
4' MB
4' MB 34/22 SA
14/14 SA
S36
TW
CK
FPB-6-19
TW
14/14 SA C,250 TYP 2
T FPB-6-18
4' MB
24/16 RA
T FPB-6-20
4' MB
FPB-6-21 T
14/16 RA
F.E.C.
CL
5TH GRADE CLASSROOM
CM
C109
IFP
4' MB
C,300 TYP 2
AY CN CN.3
TW
FPB-7-18
16/14 SA
4' MB
4' MB 12 C107 /6 SA
5TH GRADE CLASSROOM
IFP
5TH GRADE CLASSROOM C108
C107
C,325 TYP 4
STAIR
AZ.3
C,300 TYP 2
C120 CQ
FPB-6-21 20/18 RA
5TH GRADE CLASSROOM
TYP 2 M,250 TYP 2
4' MB
10
IFP
14/12 RA
TWC
12/14 SA
C,250 TYP 2 FPB-6-20
AZ
4' MB
14/14 SA
U, ---
IFP12/6 SA4' MB
FPB-7-16
C105
IFP TW
TYP 2
FB,525 TYP 2
T FPB-7-17
TWC
4' MB
S36
S36
C122
TW
4TH GRADE CLASSROOM
CJ
30/22 RA
S36 S36 S36 S36
PROJECT AREA
4' MB
CP
IFP
TWC T FPB-6-19 FPB-6-18
8
4' MB
TYP 2 FPB-7-18 T
CP
24/20 RA
CG
11 8
4' MB
C110
TYP
C121
FPB-7-17
54/22 SA
C9
C3
TW
C115
T FPB-6-17 TWC
U, ---
4' MB
CF
C,250 TYP 4
S36 S36 S36 S36 S24
TYP 2
FPB-7-15
IFP
5TH GRADE CLASSROOM
9
S24
FB,600 TYP 2
PROJECT AREA
4' MB
CE
TYP
X,75 DEWC 6
S36
T FPB-7-16
C,300 TYP 2
C,250 TYP 4
FPB-6-17
16/14 RA
6
S36 S36
IFP
S36
S36
4' MB
C,250 TYP 2
TYP
40/30 RA
C5
TW 14/14 SA
S36 S36
4' MB
4
A,100 S36
GLS
1
50/22 SA
4' MB
IFP
16/14 SA
C104
FPB-7-15 T
9 50/22 RA
S36 S36
10/10 RA
S36
TWC
C,250 TYP 2
28/20 SA
FPB-7-14 T
TWC
4TH GRADE CLASSROOM
S36 S36
FPB-7-10 10/12 SA
S24
S36
TWC
CM
CN CN.3
C117
S36 S36
S36
TW
GLS 44/26 RA
S36
C116.1
S36
S36
14/12 SA
CL
50/20 SA
28/20 SA
C,250 TYP 4
C116
IFP
4' MB
SA
C103
B,200
A,50
TR
4' MB
0 /2
24/20 SA
4TH GRADE CLASSROOM
C119 7
FCU-3
CQ
C,300 TYP 4
C,300 TYP 4
20/18 RA
4TH GRADE CLASSROOM C106
CR
CR
C1
C2 C3
C4
C5
C6
C8
C9
C10
C11
AREA C - FIRST FLOOR HVAC While studying architectural engineering, I have been able to learn about all of the engineering systems that make a building possible. What I have really enjoyed while working with MEP Engineering is the ability to work on many different systems such as HVAC, plumbing, and electrical. As seen in the drawing above I was able to help with the construction documents of the school. With over a hundred airside mechancial units, I was able to see how these large systems came together. This particular project used a chilled water and hot water central plant in order to condition the space.
36
CD
28
T
A,100 REF
CH
TYP
DEWC S36S36 S24S24 S36S36
IDF
16
14/14 RA
CJ
CK
TYP
TEACHER WORKROOM
5
B,200
8/10 EA
4' MB T, --TYP
AZ.6
Y1,300
C116.2
2
3
X1, --- 10/10 RA
C118
STORAGE T FPB-7-10
FPB-7-13
4' MB
ELECTRICAL
S24
FPB-7-14
IFP
TS
T FPB6-15 4' MB
C123
4' MB
TWC
AU
S24
IFP
AX
C111
TS 4' MB
CH
AZ.4 AZ.5
5TH GRADE CLASSROOM
4' MB
T FPB-7-13
CG
A37 CB
AZ.2
FPB-6-16
TWC
TW
4TH GRADE
CLASSROOM C,250 TYP 4 C102 IFP 20/18 RA 4' MB
AZ.7
14/14 SA
C124
PROJECT AREA
14/12 SA
24/20 SA
CF
A36 CA
16/20 RA
AW
PROJECT AREA
TYP 2 FB,425 TYP 2
14/12 SA
C8.8
C7
8
FPB-7-12
CE
T 14 T 15
TWC 24/18 RA
T FPB-6-16
8
C125
IFP
T 13
FPB-6-14
TW
T FPB-6-12
TYP 2
S24
8/10 SA
4' MB
FPB-7-12 T
C10
4' MB
X,50
12/12 EA
TWC
14/12 RA FB,600 TYP 2
AV
T 12 C,320
C,280 TYP 4
14/14 SA
T FPB-7-11
TW
IFP DEWC
T FPB-6-13
B,150
FPB-6-15
14/14 SA
4' MB
11
C8.8
18/20 SA
C,250 TYP 2
FPB-7-11
IFP
GIRLS
8/10 EA
B,150
7
A37 CB
C113
C,250 TYP 2
C8
U, ---
FCU-6
CC
16/14 RA
CD
SMALL CLASSROOM
REF
B,150
C129.1
34/20 RA
TWC
C127
14/14 SA
CC
AT
C129
28/22 SA
BOYS
C128
FPB-6-13
AZ.6 AZ.7 A34
S36
KILN
FPB-6-12
10/12 SA
S36
C101
X,300
S36
Y,810
TW
4' MB C,300 TYP 2
16/14 SA
IFP
17
10/10 EA
14/14 RA
ART CLASSROOM
14/12 SA
10/12 RA
ELEV. CONTROL
14/12 SA
4TH GRADE 4' MB CLASSROOM
FPB-6-11
10/12 SA
A107 A36 CA
14/12 SA
C112
C114
A35
S36
10' MB
T FPB-6-14
18/16 RA
16/16 SA
4' MB
4' MB
IFP
T FPB-6-11
4' MB
4' MB
D4
IFP
A34
Herff Elementary
C12
AZ.1
D4 C1
C2
AT
C4
D5
C6 AU
C7 AV
AW
C11
C12
AY
AZ AZ.1
AZ.2
AZ.4 AZ.5
AZ.6
AZ.7 C1
C2
D5
A33
STAIR
C4
C6
A106
T/R
C8 AU
AX
C10
AZ.2
C12
A103
C7
A33
AZ.3
A42
A100
A42
A34
D4
3 +60"
LC1A-2
A35
A35
A35
J
C114.1 A36
1
AT
C8 LC1B-6 9
C127
CC
FPB-7-11
GIRLS
LC1A-35
C126
4TH GRADE CLASSROOM
LC1A-53
LC1B-8 9
J
J
J
J
9 LC1B-9
C113
FPB-6-13 FPB-6-15
C102
AV
+60"
LC1A-47
CH
FPB-7-13
J CJ 1
IDF
2
4TH GRADE CLASSROOM
5TH GRADE CLASSROOM
GFI/AC
LC1A-20
LC1A-14
LC1B-7
FPB-6-18
5TH GRADE CLASSROOM
PROJECT AREA LC1B-7
C122
C109
LC1A-60 J
LC1B-15
+60" LC1A-5
3
AY
PROJECT AREA
C3
CN CN.3
F.E.C.
LC1B-4
CN
3
CPCP
3
CPCP
+60"
LC1A-56 LC1A-59
J
1
FPB-6-20
FPB-7-16
3
FPB-6-21 LC1A-28
LC1A-43
LC1A-37
+60"
J
1
LC1A-36
FPB-7-17
LC1A-32
FPB-7-18
4TH GRADE CLASSROOM
+60" 3
CN.3
LC1A-6 LC1A-54
+60"
LC1A-40
C121
LC1A-62 J
CL CM
LC1A-60
3
+60"
CL CM
1
C9
LC1B-7
FPB-7-15
1
CJ CK
FPB-6-19
AC
+60" LC1B-14
C5
LC1A-62
CJ CK LC1A-26
LC1A-1 3
CNCN CN.3 CN.3
CG
CG
C110
GFI
GLS
4TH GRADE CLASSROOM
C115
LC1A-52
C117
LC1A-29
CM
LC1A-51 3 E3.1C
LC1B-13
2 E3.1C
LC1A-21
CF
LC1A-58
LC1A-22
CKCK
C103
CE CF
WP/GFI
1
GLS
C116.1
AZ
LC1A-8
LC1A-51
FPB-6-17
J
C118
FPB-7-10 CJ
C119
LC1A-61
LC1A-22
J
LC1A-4
FPB-7-14
C104
ELECTRICAL
GFI/+42"TR
CD
CD
+60" LC1A-38
3
TEACHER WORKROOM C116
AZ.6
LC1A-34
LC1A-30
AC/GFI
LC1A-27
AZ.2
3 +60"
LC1A-17
STORAGE
C123 3
+60"
AX
LC1B-10
C116.2 3
LC1A-45
CHCH
LC1A-24
C8.8 LC1A-10 AW
J
CG
A37 CB
AX
3 +60"
PROJECT AREA
AZ.1 AC/GFI
J
1
C124 AU
LC1B-2
LC1A-31
GFI
AZ.4 AZ.5
C111
PROJECT AREA
1
LC1A-57
5TH GRADE CLASSROOM
FPB-6-16
LC1B-3
CE
LC1A-57
CFCF
AC
LC1A-24
AW
LC1A-8
LC1B-11
AT
LC1A-3
LC1A-46
LC1A-55
AZ.7 C8.8
LC1B-3 LC1B-2
LC1A-7 AC/GFI
A37
AV
10 GFI
LC1B-12
FPB-7-12
CECE
A43 A36 CA
LC1A-42 LC1A-39
C7
+60"
A43
FPB-6-14
C10
GFI
3
AC/GFI
1
3
AC
CUSTODIAL
4TH GRADE CLASSROOM
3
J
C8.8 C8.8
C125 LC1A-25
LC1B-16,18,20
C129
J
3
A37 CB
A42
8
ART CLASSROOM
+60"
FPB-6-12
J
+60"
LC1A-12
9 LC1B-5
C101
CDCD
C128
BOYS
J
+60" 1
LC1A-23 A43
C129.1
LC1A-33
C112
LC1A-18
C113.1 1 SMALL CLASSROOM
ELEV. CONTROL
+60"
A37
CCCC
LC1A-50
CLOSET 3
LC1A-41
LC1A-53
A36
5TH GRADE CLASSROOM
LC1A-33
LC1A-16
LC1A-48
A36 CA
FPB-6-11
1
C114
CLOSET
LC1A-46
LC1A-55
A34 A34
KILN
J
SMALL CLASSROOM
CL
AZ.3
F.E.C.
D4 A34
LC1A-61
A33 A33
AZ
CORRIDOR
J
1
1
4TH GRADE CLASSROOM
C105 LC1A-32 LC1A-19
LC1A-44
C106
J
+60"
STAIR
3 LC1A-49
5TH GRADE CLASSROOM
5TH GRADE CLASSROOM
C107
C108
AZ.3
LC1A-54
AZ
CQ
CQ
CQ
CR
CR
WP/GFI
LC1A-56
LC1A-59
LC1A-6
C120
LC1A-58
CRCR
C1
C2 C3
C4
C5
C6
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
C1
C2 C3
C4
C5
C6
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
AZ.1
AREA C - FIRST FLOOR POWER While I was able to gain primarily mechanical experince on this project, I was also able to work with the electrical team on completing construction documents for the power, lighting, and special systems throughout the school. This was a difficult role, as the electrical design was the last to be completed, having waited on the architecture, HVAC, and plumbing equipment to be finalized. By seeing the design from the mechanical to the electical side helped me understand the effect that changes in the systems and sizes can play on each other and cause furthur design changes or delays.
Drawings produced under the supervision of MEP Engineering, Inc. and are not to be reproduced, distributed, or used for construction.
37
Madison Agriscience LOCATION: SAN ANTONIO, TX EMPLOYER: MEP ENGINEERING, INC. YEAR: SUMMER 2017 - SUMMER 2018 DURATION: 1 YEAR (COMPLETE) SUPERVISOR: JOSH PETERSON While I was able to work on many K-12 projects at MEP Engineering, Inc, I would say that this project was one of the most unique ones. This was a new building being added to an existing high school campus, with a magnet school specifically for agriculture. This new building housed about 12,000 sqft of shop/garage space with about 12,000 sqft of indoor class space, including a 5,000 sqft walk-in meat cooler. Part of the agriculture program was to teach high school students trades such as welding, wood working, mechanics, and meat processing.
38
Madison Agriscience
Drawings produced under the supervision of MEP Engineering, Inc. and are not to be reproduced, distributed, or used for construction.
39
12 25
8/8 EA 8
28/20 SA
1
8ø EA
10/12 EA
EF-6 28
A110
26
CLASSROOM
F1.7
TYP 2
4ø EA TYP 5
OM BO
C,275 TYP 6
IB 'J 18
A108
16
TYP 4 6ø EA
BOYS RR
3
E AN CR
27 TYP
12
19
B,120
12/10 SA
TYP
T F1.6 F1.4 T
LIRH-1
F1.4
A107
EF-14 18/16 SA
MFG115
TYP 4
F1.5
14/14 RA
17
16/16 SA 14/14 SA
8
CLASSROOM F1.1 T
STAFF OFFICE
B,180
A100
A104
LOBBY B,120
VEST. A121
23 8
A123
X100
A,100 11
FCU-1
8
EF-3
TYP 2 4ø EA TYP 2 4ø OA
20 T
4ø OA
IDF
A122
EWLH-2
1
RISER
EF-7
A124
LIRH-3 T
EWLH-1 T 20 25
L-3 12
EF-8
MECH./ELEC. A125
OVERALL FIRST FLOOR - HVAC 1/8" = 1'-0"
This project started during my first summer with MEP Engineering, and really provided a great experience for me. During the initial development I was one of the only individuals working on it. I was able to run preliminary calculations, size equipment, and layout duct work. While the final drawings were different than when I started on it, there are a few decisions I made which are contained in the final design. In particular by working with the other engineers I helped locate the roof top unit above the restrooms and designed how the ducts would drop below, especially the Y-shaped transition when the ductwork splits to keep the central corridor open with clerestory windows.
Madison Agriscience
TYP 4 EF-10
EF-9 T LIRH-4
HVAC PLAN
40
22 TYP 4
B,240 TYP 6
CUST.
C,300
STORAGE A120
E AN CR
12/6 SA
14 DDC
13 X,125
C,230
IB 'J 18
OM BO
7 TYP 4
7 TYP 2
10ø SA
14/14 SA
A100A
FD
A102 ROOF ACCESS A101
LIRH-4
LIRH-3
4ø EA
12/12 SA
D X,170
12/12 SA
C,210 TYP 2
F1.5 T
A118
16/8 EA
8/8 OA W
8/8 EA
8
T 20
STAFF RR PACKAGING
A103 FD
LAUNDRY
10/10 EA
T 20
T, --TYP
E AN CR
COOKED MEAT-COOLER 32°F MFG117 BLAST FREEZER -20°F MFG116
16/14 SA REF. OVEN HC O.F.O.I ICE M. FD 13 C,350
FOOD SAFETY LAB
OM BO
A119
6 TYP
F1.2
8 18
IB 'J 18
SMOKER
C,300
T F1.2
8
12/16 SA 23
10ø SA
18 D,500 TYP 2
34ø EA
B100
29
AX102
AX101
B102
16/16 RA
CORRIDOR
HVLS-2
PAINT BOOTH
TYP
B,150
CORRIDOR
T
TYP 2
AG. ENG. & FAB LAB
5
F1.1
9
HVLS-1
21
12/6 SA
15
A105
12/6 SA
12/12 SA
20
M,200 TYP 4
12/12 SA
18/16 RA
8/6 EA
F1.3
T F1.3
4ø EA
16/14 SA
OFFICE B,400 C,220 TYP 4
14/14 SA
EF-13
10/6 EA
4
A106
10ø SA
8/6 EA
12/6 SA
A109 H EF-13 10
M, ---
STAFF RR
REF. O.F.O.I
B,160
MEAT P. CLASSROOM
LIRH-2
X,150
18/16 RA
MEAT PROCESSING 45°F
MEDIA RESOURCE
10ø SA
10 H EF-14
24
LIRH-2 T L-2
18/16 SA
20/18 SA
TYP
8
D
T LIRH-1
13
50/20 SA
X,225
16/16 RA
10/6 EA
15
C,300
20/30 RA
A112
T 20
T F1.7
DC-1
F1.6
GIRLS RR
4ø EA
B,150 X,225
MFG114
6/6 EA
M, ---
2 TYP
7 TYP 2
4ø EA
FRESH/RAW MEAT-COOLER 32°F12/6 SA
14/14 SA
A113
EF-12
10/12 SA
CORRIDOR
L-1
10/10 EA
28/20 SA
EF-11
EF-5
A
A.5
B
C
D
E
FG
H
J
K
L
M
3 HP1-22 W1E
W1 DC
A2
Q
F
F
A1
CORRIDOR AX101
BOYS RR A110
A1F
A1F
A1FE
A1
A1E
G
CLASSROOM A108
A1
HP1-26
~
B
B
~
d1
F
F
d2
A1
~ d2
D2
B
G8
STAFF RR A106
D
Q HP1-28
OFFICE A105
A1
A1E
~
HP1-24
BE
B
BE
B
G8
A
3
TYP.
AG. ENG. & FAB LAB B100
A1
PAINT BOOTH B102
1
C1E
A1
A1E E HP1-20
A1
2
VEST. A121 A1
G8
A1E
HP1-26
P
A1E
LOBBY X100
X1
A1E
D D2 DS
A1
B
BE
A1
IB 'J 18
OM BO
E AN CR
B
A1
D
BE
W1E
5
HP1-26
5.2
G8
Q HP1-28
5 G8E N/L
3
A1E
A1
A1
A1
G8 A1E
LOBBY X100
X2
DC W1
D2
ROOF ACCESS A101
STAFF OFFICE A100
BE
~ d1
B
HP1-32
B
B
B
B
B
X2 DS
STAFF RR A100A B HP1-26
B
STORAGE A120
X1
OC
PACKAGING A118
LRP
HP1-32
~
CLASSROOM A104
B
IDF A122
W1E D2E
D2
P
CUST. A123
OD
A1FE A1
DR
E HP1-20
A1
A1
A1
A1E
X2
E
3
A1
D2 D A2
B D
A1 d1
OD
W1
A2
A1
~ d2
B
G8
LC1-22
A
A2 W
F F HP1-20
A1E d2
DAYLIGHT ZONE G8
4
~
A1
E AN CR
F F HP1-20
G8E
X1
ICE M.
LAUNDRY A102
A2E
OM BO
A1
A3
D
A2
IB 'J 18
COOKEDBLAST FREEZER -20째F MEAT-COOLER 32째F MFG116 MFG117
A1
A3 REF. OVEN HC O.F.O.I
4 3
3 B
SMOKER A119
A3
HP1-28
M
CORRIDOR AX102 G8
A3E
F
F
F
A3
FOOD SAFETY LAB A103
F
FE
F
R 3
A2E A3
HP1-26
G8
F
F
BE
7
B OC
A1
CORRIDOR AX101
A3
W1E
4K
A3E
2
E AN CR
D
HP1-26
A1FE
IB 'J 18
OM BO
d3
B
HP1-26
A HP1-26
A1
G8
3
A3
W1E
F
3
3
D1
A1 3
D
F
d1
A1E
MEDIA RESOURCE A107
A3
A3 FE
G8
MEAT P. CLASSROOM A109
HP1-20
~
A1
D2 G8E
A3E
F
B
E AN CR
D2
X1
A3
MEAT PROCESSING 45째F MFG115
F
B
OM BO
A3
F
F
F
HP1-24
IB 'J 18
F
FE
F
~ d4
B
G8
G8
REF. O.F.O.I
W1 F
1.1
A1
D HP1-26
K
F
A1E
W1
X2
X1
3
A1
3 HP1-28
GIRLS RR A112
3
W1
A1
5 N/L
F HP1-20
CORRIDOR A113 OC
A1F
X1 A1E
A1F
HP1-26 A1FE
K
C1E
B HP1-20
G
DS
6
C1E
TIME CLOCK
3
LP1-3
FRESH/RAW MEAT-COOLER 32째F FE F MFG114
DS
OC X1
4 OR
E
C1E HP1-28
F
A
HP1-28 C1E
HP1-26
RISER A124
C1E
5.9
6 W1
F
W1
HP1-26 4
OR
6.9 7
MECH./ELEC. A125
LIGHTING PLAN I started on the HVAC design side of this project and I eventually worked on the electrical power and lighting, which was unique in this project. For example, the shop to the right in the drawing above had numerous connections due to the welders, wood shop, lifts, and boom cranes. The lighting was just as important to keep the space well lit and safe for the students. Another area that was challenging was the meat cooler, where the school wanted to have industrial sized meat grinders, saws, and more. Part of the issue here was sanitizing the equipment. The school wanted all power and ligthing equipment to be resistent to 140 degree pressurized hot water that would be sprayed on floors, walls, and ceilings.
Drawings produced under the supervision of MEP Engineering, Inc. and are not to be reproduced, distributed, or used for construction.
41