ANDREW GONZALES RESUME & PORTFOLIO
RESUME
ANDREW GONZALES 3831 N 8th St., Phoenix, AZ 85014 T: 925-525-5539 | E: andrewtgonzales@g.ucla.edu
EXPERIENCE 2020
Counterforce Lab
2019
Design and Project Management, UCLA
2017-2018
San Francisco International Airport
2016, Summer
Designer Produced competition-quality drawings and renders for the UCLA-based team’s LA Pando Days proposal Student Trainee II The UCLA campus architecture and maintenance department focuses primarily on non-façade altering interior renovations; prepared permit and CD sets for a currently in-construction TA office and teaching space; prepared and executed office/furniture relocation plans; provided renders for user visualization for in-progress and speculative design projects including classrooms, offices, reception areas (interior and exterior), and lobbies; conducted surveys on ADA accessibility for all athletic facilities on campus. Design Trainee Assisted in creating DD and CD drawing sets for both ground-up and renovation projects across the airport campus including a new materials testing lab and office fit-outs in terminals and out-buildings; wrote and compiled a document outlining the architectural guidelines for future SFO construction projects.
Levitch Associates Design Intern A small design-build firm focusing on high-end residential remodels and light commercial renovations for East Bay clients; updated permit and CD drawing sets, prepared spec books, provided renders for client and designer visualization, and pulled permits and conducted code analysis.
E D U C AT I O N 2018-Present
University of California, Los Angeles
2013-2017
University of California, Berkeley
M. Arch I, Masters in Architecture
B.A. in Architecture; minor in Forestry & Natural Resources
SKILLS •Revit
•Excel
•Rhino
•Powerpoint
•Chief Architect
•Vray
•Photoshop
•Enscape
•Illustrator
•After Effects
•InDesign
•Premiere Pro
•Microsoft Word
•Zbrush
AW A R D S
PERSONAL INTERESTS
2021 - TA Position, Structures III 2020 - TA Position, Structures II 2020 - AUD Currents Exhibition Participant 2019 - AUD Currents Exhibition Participant 2019 - NonArchitecture, Dying Finalist 2018 - UCLA Recruitment Fellowship Full tuition coverage for length of program 2016 - Design Village Competition Honorable Mention, Best-in-Show
•Hiking •Backpacking •Trailrunning •Climbing & bouldering •Flora and fauna identification •Painting / Drawing
TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S
A Remote Sensing Facility at Bears Ears National Monument Instructor: Jason Payne, UCLA, Studio Project | Winter 2021
pp.05
A Single Family Home in Cambria, CA Instructor: Jimenez Lai, UCLA, Studio Project | Fall 2020
pp.15
A Courtyard Housing Project Instructor: Garrett Ricciardi, UCLA, Studio Project | Fall 2019
pp.21
In Death We Glow | A Cemetery and Lighting Installation Partner: Jourdon Miller, nonArchitecture design competition Summer 2019
pp.26
An Innovation Hub at UCLA Instructor: Georgina Hjulich, UCLA, Studio Project | Winter 2020
pp.28
“Terminal As...” The Channel Islands Ferry Terminal Partner: Misty Liang, Instructor: Narineh Mirzaeian UCLA, Studio Project | Spring 2020
pp.34
Assorted Profesional Projects Render and design work produced between 2016 & 2019 in an office setting and as a freelancer
pp.42
San Francisco International Airport Architectural work produced between 2017 & 2018
pp.44
4
Selected Work 2016-2021
Planetaria The Bears Ears Remote Sensing Facility, Planetaria, with the aid of a SpiderCam camera system at Turkey Pen Ruin, seeks to decentralize the planetarium viewing experience and recreate the spatiality of Turkey Pen Ruin in the Census-Designated Area of Mexican Hat, Utah. The complex is compartmentalized into 9 pods, each containing a projection dome showing the artifacts at a different location at the archaeological dig site, and a secondary program pertaining to the functions of the complex, archaeological logistics, or of federal/tribal administration. By decoupling the scalar relationship between viewer and artifact, new understandings and appreciations may arise for the vast, complex cultures that once inhabited this region. Circulation between pods is choreographed to maximize site interactivity, and pod placement, orientation, and connectivity are orchestrated to suggest internal hierarchies and relationships. Circulation is further exploited in this project to push back against the idea that remote sensing is necessarily sedentary. Each pod is clad in tiles that mimic the colors of the surrounding landscape to highlight the beauty found here, and individual tiles fan out toward the top to provide light and air circulation to the upper program spaces without the need to introduce a secondary language for aperture. This project is located on ancestral Pueblo Territory along the San Juan River.
Planetaria: A Bears Ears Remote Sensing Facility
5
6
Selected Work 2016-2021
INTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL CHAPTER HOUSE
FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE SUITE
PRIVATE STAFF & ARCHAEOLOGIST QUARTERS
ARCHAEOLOGY LAB
STAFF BUNK HOUSE
AUGMENTED REALITY VIEW ROOM
REMOTE SENSING & ROBOTICS LAB
AUGMENTED REALITY VIEW ROOM
ARCHIVE
UPPER FLOOR PLAN BEARS EAR SOUTH REMOTE SENSING FACILITY
CANYON CLIFF DWELLING / STRUCTURE NATURAL BRIDGE POTTERY SHERDS ROCK ART
GROUND FLOOR PLAN BEARS EAR SOUTH REMOTE SENSING FACILITY
Planetaria: A Bears Ears Remote Sensing Facility
7
ARCHAEOLOGY LAB REMOTE SENSING & ROBOTICS LAB
AUGMENTED REALITY VIEW ROOM
8
AUGMENTED REALITY VIEW ROOM
Selected Work 2016-2021
INTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL CHAPTER HOUSE
FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE SUITE PRIVATE STAFF & ARCHAEOLOGIST QUARTERS STAFF BUNK HOUSE ARCHIVE
UNROLLED ELEVATION
BEARS EAR SOUTH REMOTE SENSING FACILITY
Planetaria: A Bears Ears Remote Sensing Facility
9
STEEL FRAME WARPED TERRACOTTA TILES
10
Selected Work 2016-2021
AUGMENTED REALITY POTTERY SHERD DISCOVERY DISPLAY
PLANETARIUM PROJECTION RIG
EXPLODED DOME SECTION BEARS EAR SOUTH REMOTE SENSING FACILITY
Planetaria: A Bears Ears Remote Sensing Facility
11
TO UT-95 & BLANDING
95
261 CR
2311
CR
2301
KANE GULCH RANGER STATION
C
T
KANE G
AI
TE
4.3M
L
U ES
D
G
O
I
Y)
TR
UL
H
T)
N TS O
L
(P ERMI
K ST A
RIM
RIG G I N G
CAN Y O N
ARCHAEOLOGICAL
(PAR
MAIN
TE N
AN CE TR AIL FF ON LY)
1MI
(F
(PACK)
37°31'27.5"N 109°53'45.2"W
O
WORK SITE (TPR)
CR
253
37°30'32.0"N 109°56'48.8"W CONTOUR (200’) FOOT
/ PACK TRAIL
INTERMITTENT STREAM PAVED ROAD UNPAVED ROAD COUNTRY ROUTE
CR
253
PACK STAGING AREA RANGER STATION T OD
IE
CA N
(PER
YO
STATE HIGHWAY N
MIT TE D
TR
GU
AI
ES
L
TS
3 .8
ON
MI
LY
)
261
TRAILHEAD & PARKING
(P A
CK )
TPR DIG SITE
WORK SITE
261
STAGING AREA CR
) CK
H
A
G (P E
U
ED
GU
R
N
D
IT RM
G
ES
GRAND GULCH LOCAL ACCESS MAP WITHIN
ON L
Y)
TS
37°28'54.7"N 109°55'43.1"W
2361
(PA
L AI
LC
TR
CEDAR MESA
T
TO NAVAJO NATION MEXICAN HAT, BLUFF & BEARS EARS VISITOR CENTER (SOUTH)
0’
500’ 1000’
1MI.
2000’
ACCESS FROM TURKEY PEN RUIN STAGING AREA VIA TODIE CANYON & GRAND GULCH TRAILS
ACCESS FROM KANE GULCH VIA KANE GULCH TRAIL
RANGER STATION
BOUNDARY WRT ALGORITHMIC RANGE BOUNDARY WRT DATA RANGES DATA POINT ACCESS POINT
GRAND GULCH D “T P ”S VISUAL BOUNDS IGITAL
0’ 50’ 100’
12
Selected Work 2016-2021
250’
URKEY
500’
EN
ITE
1000’
LL E Y
6
PULLEY
5
PULLEY 2
PU
PU
LL
EY
3
EY
PULL
PULLEY 3
1 37°30'35.9"N 109°56'46.0"W
37°30'31.5"N 109°56'46.3"W
2’-6”
37°30'31.5"N 109°56'46.3"W
PU
LL
EY
3
PULLEY
SPIDERCAM CAMERA RIG
EY
LL
PU
1
2
37°30'35.8"N 109°56'48.7"W
37°30'33.6"N 109°56'50.9"W
37°30'29.6"N 109°56'51.6"W
PU
EY
LL
5
Y
LE
PUL
6
4
circa 800 ce
EY
LL
PU
PUEBLO ii POTTERY SHERD
PUEBLO iii POTTERY SHERD
37°30'32.7"N 109°56'51.5"W
circa 1300 ce
SPIDERCAM I TURKEY PEN NSTALLATION AT
BASKETMAKER ii CORN COB circa 100 bce
0’ 10’ 20’
37°30'35.8"N 109°56'48.7"W
ACCESS
FROM KANE GULCH RANGER STATION VIA KANE GULCH TRAIL (4.3 MILES)
37°30'34.7"N 109°56'51.1"W
37°30'34.4"N 109°56'51.8"W
5
200’
37°30'35.9"N 109°56'46.0"W
37°30'35.1"N 109°56'51.2"W
37°30'33.6"N 109°56'50.9"W
100’
6
1
37°30'34.9"N 109°56'51.5"W
50’
37°30'34.3"N 109°56'50.4"W
37°30'34.0"N 109°56'45.4"W
37°30'34.3"N 109°56'52.0"W
OFFICE & LAB
37°30'33.6"N 109°56'52.4"W
BUNK HOUSE
37°30'33.4"N 109°56'52.6"W
37°30'32.7"N 109°56'51.5"W
STORAGE
MESS HALL
37°30'31.0"N 109°56'48.0"W GEAR HOUSE
37°30'32.4"N 109°56'51.9"W
2
CANYON CANYON BOTTOM & COTTONWOODS
37°30'31.5"N 109°56'46.3"W
CLIFF DWELLING / STRUCTURE NATURAL BRIDGE POTTERY SHERDS RIVER PATH & EXTENTS ROCK ART
37°30'29.6"N 109°56'51.6"W
4
SPIDERCAM RIGGING POINT
37°30'30.1"N 109°56'52.0"W
1
SPIDERCAM BOUNDS SPIDERCAM GROUND ACCESS POINT
37°30'27.9"N 109°56'46.9"W
SPIDERCAM POINT OF INTEREST SPIDERCAM HEIGHT SPIDERCAM DIRECTION ACCESS FROM TURKEY PEN RUIN STAGING AREA VIA TODIE CANYON & GRAND GULCH TRAILS (3.8
STABLE
MILES)
WORK SITE
“TURKEY PEN” S GRAND GULCH ETTLEMENT IN THE
3
37°30'26.5"N 109°56'46.8"W
0’
Planetaria: A Bears Ears Remote Sensing Facility
25’
50’
100’
200’
13
14
Selected Work 2016-2021
Better Gardens & Homes is a project that focuses on the everyday qualities of suburban home and landscaping design in order to provide commentary on the status of contemporary low-density neighborhoods. The facades, gardens, barrier, buffers, and promenades reflect the character of a tenuously connected family, each with their own personalities and umwelt reflected in the design of the suburban house and yards around them. The Pfeifer-Nguyen household is a blended, multigenerational family. Each member in this family, with their own perspectives and points of view, could construct their own narrative, resulting in an overwhelming number of design impetuses. As such, the central drama of this project is relegated to their overall interfamily dynamics, such that no single story perspectivally or temporally hijacks the project from performing functionally for all six family members: Eleanor, David, Qui, Anh, Jimmy, and To’an. Notions of suburbia, through tropes of conformity and flattened individuality, surveillance and spectacle, are questioned through the design of both the houses and the yards. The household’s internal strife is apparent in the units’ arrangement and frontality, aperture placement and sight lines. The relationship between front, side and backyard is further designed through ornamental objects intended to invoke traditional suburban landscaping: gazebos, garden gnomes, pink flamingos and others thus find their way into this work.
Better Gardens & Homes
15
16
Selected Work 2016-2021
Better Gardens & Homes
17
18
Selected Work 2016-2021
Top left: the children’s play structure and migratory bird resting spot Bottom left: a one-sided gazebo with an interior chrome finish placed in a lush, street-facing garden Top right: a breezeblock courtyard with 3-dish bird bath Below: The forest-facing, escapist view out of daughter Anh’s room, and the street-facing surveillance view out of grandmother Eleanor’s private living quarters.
Better Gardens & Homes
19
20
Selected Work 2016-2021
Folded Courtyard Housing Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., as a wide, fast thoroughfare, acts as a major tear in the urban fabric of Crenshaw Manor/Baldwin Hills – mat/courtyard-style buildings to the west and single-family object-style houses to the east. The desire in this project to extend the courtyard mat across the site stemmed from a previous analysis of Mies van der Rohe’s Lakeshore Drive Apartments, which stand indifferent to the site conditions. This very much parallels the post-war single-family housing boom that occurred across the country. Reacting conceptually and formally to the problematic boulevard, the courtyard typology arrayed across the site, destabilizes and buckles as it nears the street. The courtyard, as the base unit in this project, is destabilized in 4 standard ways from the horizontal norm: an upward folding unit, a downward folding unit, a sheared unit, and a vertical unit. Because circulation is imbedded within the base horizontal unit, aligning any combination of the variants allows for continuous circulation along the east/west axis. Construction materials, like the circulation, fold along with the courtyard; thus, on horizontal units, the floor and ceiling/roof are concrete, while the interior and exterior walls are glass. Conversely, as the courtyard folds upward, materials invert. Screens sometime replace glass for privacy or to create an enclosed interior that is not sealed from the exterior. Towers in the current era of construction are generally seen as private islands in the city; in an effort to unravel that logic, the main tower in this project is an entirely public, vertical, ecological park with aquaria, an aviary and other green spaces enclosed in a screened tower. Smaller community spaces such as workout rooms, gathering spaces and laundromats are scattered throughout the project. Folded Courtyard Housing
21
The base modules are evident in the ground floor plan, as well as the embedded circulation that allows modules to align and stack. Gardens with varying degrees of privacy create buffers between the units and the noisy traffic along the main boulevard. The system only breaks at the outer edge of each side, where the units suddenly depart from the angled grid to acknowledge the site boundaries.
22
Selected Work 2016-2021
Folded Courtyard Housing
23
While individual courtyard modules rarely react to site conditions, the overall housing composition is highly reactive: terracing, stacking and ultimately rising up against MLK Blvd. This, in part, registers the discontinuity in the urban fabric, creates a strong juxtaposition to the single family homes across the street, and is a nod toward downtown, which is only visible from the upper floors of the garden towers.
24
Selected Work 2016-2021
Folded Courtyard Housing
25
In Death We Glow
26
Selected Work 2016-2021
How might cities be reimagined if death were a normalized part of everyday life? This compeition entry does this literally by dropping a cemetery park into the center of a busy intersection (now off-limits to cars). The above ground sculpture park is coupled with an underground light installation powered by the decomposition heat energy of a decaying body, allowing the living a few weeks to publically grieve in the electric glow of their departed with the support of the entire community. In Death We Glow
27
An Innovation Hub at UCLA A cursory search into what defines an innovation center reveals the programmatic uncertainty inherent to this type of architecture; in addition to this ambiguity, siting it within a courtyard adjacent to a sculpture garden imbues any potential Innovation Center with a folly-like nature. As such, the architecture I propose for this site is largely indifferent to its surroundings, is internally focused, and rejects the given ground plane for one recessed into the ground in order to present the bystander with a floating cube. The project explores notions of porosity through careful consideration of tectonic asymmetries. Voids within each of the two structural cores are mirrored diagonally from floor to floor creating a rhythmic distribution of space; this planar move is highlighted and intensified by the sectional inclusion of double height side galleries, and it is reinforced by the exterior circulation. The two interior thresholds – opaque concrete and transparent glass – set up an important dichotomy that is questioned in the third threshold – the fuzzy façade. Consisting of fins of varying length, density, and tone, the four faces of the building are abstractions of the views cloaked by the initial insertion of this Innovation Center. Environmental considerations are introduced in the façade with the deepest fins occurring on the south and west facades, and the shallowest fins on the north and east facades. This consideration extends into the ground plan, where bioretention cells catch rain dripping down the fins along with runoff from the surrounding hardscape. Resolution, on a final note, becomes an important factor in understanding this building, as the low-grade fidelity of the façade gives way to increasing levels of resolution as we pass through each of the thresholds.
28
Selected Work 2016-2021
An Innovation Hub at UCLA
29
30
Selected Work 2016-2021
6’-10”
8’-6”
10’-0”
10’-0”
K
J
H
G
F 80’-2” 10’-0”
10’-0”
10’-0”
8’-6”
6’-10”
E
D
C
B
A
1
17’-8” 2
DN
FIFTH FLOOR
22’-6”
UP
3
9’-2”
81’-2” 4
17’-8”
UP 5
UP
14’-10”
FOURTH FLOOR
6
8’-6”
6’-10”
E
D
C
B
A
10’-0”
10’-0”
10’-0”
10’-0”
8’-6”
10’-0”
K
J
H
G
F 80’-2”
THIRD FLOOR
6’-10”
1
17’-8” 2
22’-6”
UP
3
9’-2”
81’-2” 4 SECOND FLOOR
17’-8”
UP 5
UP
14’-10” 6
FIRST FLOOR
(TOP) FOURTH FLOOR PLAN (BOTTOM) FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1’-0” = 3/32”
An Innovation Hub at UCLA
31
32
Selected Work 2016-2021
An Innovation Hub at UCLA
33
The Oxnard coastline will change rapidly with sea level rise: fragmenting or otherwise destroying agricultural lands, economic centers, and neighborhoods. While this poses an existential threat to coastal communities everywhere, we see this as an opportunity to explore Anthropocene landscapes and the ways in which we interact with the artificial and the natural. The new Oxnard coastline of our creation resembles a series of barrier islands in dialogue with both the city and the Channel Islands farther west, generated from landfill on the remaining unflooded land; it embraces and ultimately captures the incoming tide to create novel ecosystems - wetlands, highlands, marshes, lakes -- and infrastructural networks -- desalination and water treatment, boat locks, watercraft storage, maintenance, access, and travel. The new ferry terminal, in synthesizing the concepts of the master plan, juxtaposes material, texture, object, and enclosure in order to heighten the awareness of artificiality and utility within a Fourth Nature landscape that merges technology, ecology, and infrastructure. This ferry terminal, as the long arm connecting ecosystems, infrastructures, and populations, embodies a multitude of conceptual frameworks as it sweeps across this newly constructed landscape. Elevational differences of land, sea, and structure imbue the ferry terminal with moments of tunnel, bridge, wall, and portal. Material and textural qualities express moments of otherness from the landscape in the brutality of the facade and its rich patterning as well as inclusion where introduced ecologies overwhelm the rigid surface with softness and life. And finally, technology and infrastructure leap out in moments of designed objects while being far more pervasive among the Anthropocene ecologies in which this terminal is built. 34
Selected Work 2016-2021
Terminal As... Bridge Wall Infrastructure Gate Landscape
Terminal As...
35
36
Selected Work 2016-2021
Terminal As...
37
38
Selected Work 2016-2021
Terminal As...
39
40
Selected Work 2016-2021
Terminal As...
41
42
Selected Work 2016-2021
Right: A speculative rendering produced for a real-estate/architecture company interested in attracting investors to help realize their goal of opening a lively corner cafe in a renovated mixed-use property.
Above: A concept rendering of a screened stairwell for a house remodel in Albany, CA. Left: The entry lobby of a renovated vertarinary clinic in Alameda, CA. I worked directly with the client and our in-house carpentry team to design and install this front desk.
Assorted Professional Projects
43
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT While I worked on many projects at SFO, mostly interior fitouts, the only ground-up construction I assisted in was the new Materials Testing Facility, completed in 2021. Here, asphalt and concrete mixes for runway work could be tested and approved on site without having to involve third-party analysts. I assisted in developing the permit set and producing presentation materials, including all of the drawings and details shown here.
44
Selected Work 2016-2021
San Francisco International Airport
45
A
B
10' - 0"
4' - 0"
59' - 4"
6' - 0"
13' - 5"
12' - 7 1/2"
17' - 10"
CMU/PT-1/PT-4 - / RB
CMU/PT-1/PT-4 - / RB
CMU/PT-1/PT-4 - / RB
SC
SC
SC
A03.1 2
0B6
4' - 8"
9' - 6" FP09
7' - 0"
FP09 8 9
DN
CONCRETE TESTING
FP19
PT-4
PT-4
1040.1.10
16' - 2"
3 EQ. RISERS .. 2T @ 11"
1' - 0"
7
A05.1
0B6
FP16
8' - 4"
6
PT-4
A05.1
ASPHALT TESTING
PROCESSING
4' - 7"
1040.1.08
1040.1.06
0B3-B
FP05
0B3-B
1040.1.12
FP23
5' - 10 1/ 2"
1040.1.08
8' - 8"
1' - 6"
14' - 10"
A05.1
13' - 4"
1040.1.15M
0B3-A
0B3
12
A05.2
4' - 0"
4' - 8
FEC
2
1040.1.09E
0B3
FP09
2' - 0"
0B6 4
3
2
A05.1
0B3 FP09
SOILS TESTING 1040.1.11 5' - 9 1/ 2"
ELECTRICAL
A03.6
10
9' - 2"
FP09
11 PT-4
2
10"
A05.1
10 1/2" MECHANICAL
1
SPECIAL SYSTEMS
1040.1.13E
1040.1.15M
FEC
1040.1.06A
10' - 0"
1040.1.07
5' - 8"
A03.6
1040.1.09F
4' - 0" 1
FP10
1040.1.10
5 A03.5
1040.1.06A
5' - 9 1/ 2"
38' - 8"
7.13'
5' - 0"
TESTING SCREEN CLOSET
3' - 8"
1040.1.06
FP02
1040.1.11
3
2%
A03.1
5
PT-3
JANITOR 1040.1.07A
1040.1.07
FP21
0B3
PT-3
RESTROOM FP09
BREAK ROOM 1040.1.05
FP12
0B3
FP22
1040.1.13E 1040.1.07A
CMU/PT-1 - / RB
CMU/PT -
CMU/PT-1/PT-4 - / RB
CMU/PT-2 - / RB
CMU - PT - / RB
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
11' - 4 1/2"
8' - 5 1/ 2"
8' - 8 1/ 2"
6' - 0 1/ 2"
4 A03.1
ACT CMU/PT-1/PT-3 RB SC
6' - 8"
ACT CMU/PT-1/PT-3 - / RB SC
9' - 9 1/ 2"
69' - 4"
1
LEVEL 1(REF. EL) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
SHEET NOTES KEY FP01 FP02
07/01/2018
FP05 FP09
46
FP10 FP12 FP16 FP17 FP18 FP19 FP20 FP21 FP22 FP23
NOTE VISUAL DISPLAY BOARD REMOVEABLE FLOOD DAM - O.F.O.I.; PROVIDE PRECISION BLOCK TO 4'-0" AFF AT FLOOD DAM BRACKET LOCATION CORNER GUARD PROVIDE WALL BACKING AT CASEWORK AND EQUIP. WHERE NOTED FIXED LADDER TO LOW ROOF PROVIDE FRP PANELS TO +48" A.F.F. S.S. HANDRAIL, WALL MOUNTED. SEE 1/A00.5 S.S. HANDRAIL, POST MOUNTED FEC, CENTER IN WALL C.I.P. CONC. STAIRS, SEE 1/A00.5 OPERABLE GATE, SEE 06/A08.2 WALL MOUNTED UTILITY SHELF @ 5'-0" A.F.F. PROVIDE RP-2 PANELS TO +48" A.F.F. HOSE BIBB MOUNTED AT ELEVATION +1'-0" A.F.F.
GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL GYP. BD. PARTITIONS ARE FULL HEIGHT U.O.N. 2. NOT ALL EXTERIOR WINDOWS ARE SHOWN IN PLAN. SEE A03.1 AND A10.1 FOR WINDOW TYPES AND LOCATIONS. 3. DIMENSIONS TO F.O. CMU ARE NOMINAL DIMENSIONS. FINISH NOTES: 1. DO NOT PAINT CMU U.O.N. 2. INSTALL RESILIENT BASE (RB) AT GYP. BD. PARTITIONS AND WALL FURRING ONLY. 3. PAINT GYP BD WALLS, METAL ROOF DECK, AND EXPOSED WATERPROOFING WAINSCOT P-1 U.O.N. LEGEND EXTENT OF WALL BACKING CMU WALL MTL. STUD WALL
Copyright © 2017-2018 City And County Of San Francisco. These construction documents are the sole property of The City And County Of San Francisco and are protected by the Copyright Act. Any reproduction, publication, or use by any method, in whole or in part, without the express written consent of the San Francisco Airport Commission is prohibited
Selected Work 2016-2021
C 28' - 10"
ACT CMU/PT-1 - / RB
1
ACT CMU/PT-1/PT-3 - / RB
A03.2
San Francisco International Airport
SC
SC
1 4' - 10"
4' - 0"
NORTH ACCESS ROAD
FP23
STORAGE 1040.1.02A
4
1040.1.02
EAST WATER DETENTION BASIN
PAVEMENT AND GROUNDS YARD
A03.2
AREA OF WORK
1
FP05
5.50' 7.16'
7.13'
DN
A03.2
A03.1 FP02
SC
SC
6' - 0" FP23
FP20
5' - 4"
6' - 0"
4
FP16
3' - 4" 18' - 3 1/2"
SEAL
APPROVED: CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER APPROVED: DIRECTOR OF ARCHITECTURE APPROVED:
DESIGNED BY: LUIS MORENO DRAWN BY: AK, AG, LM SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER
CHECKED BY: LYNN FILAR DATE: 07/01/2018 SIZE ARCH-D
A02.1 If this drawing is not ARCH D (36"x24") NOMINAL SIZE, it has been revised from its original size and scales noted are no longer applicable
San Francisco International Airport
C:\Users\luis.moreno\Documents\CT #11117_ MatLab_MAIN_luis.morenoDVK29.rvt
CMU -
CONTRACT NO.
ACT CMU/PT-1/PT-3 -
6.44'
DN
11117.61
7.08'
FP09
4' - 0"
1040.1.03
FP01
FLOOR PLAN
ADMINISTRATION
PT-3
FP17
2
SHEET TITLE
A03.1
7
MATERIALS TESTING LAB
6
3
CONFORM BID SET
7.13'
5' - 4"
A05.1
FP16
07/01/2018
1
3 A03.5
PROJECT TITLE
1040.1.01
C
1' - 6"
1
3' - 4"
DATE
1040.1.01
5' - 0"
12' - 8"
2
19' - 7 11/32'" - 8 1/2"
CORRIDOR
5' - 10"
FP18
8"
7' - 4"
1040.1.02
4' - 0" 7.16'
NO
1040.1.04
A03.1
REVISIONS
6' - 4 1/ 2"
0B3-B
Revision Description
1
FP09
FP09
13' - 4"
PT-3
RECORDS STORAGE
BY
4' - 0"
0B3-B
1' - 0" 38' - 8"
FP09
5' - 0"
0B6-B
Key Map
20' - 4"
A03.1
12' - 0"
2' - 8"
d.
SFO
D
13' - 4"
BID SET
47
Thank you for browsing! Andrew Gonzales andrewtgonzales@g.ucla.edu 925-525-5539