Cura:Tech Program Summary by Andrew Tran

Center for Urban and Regional Affairs (CURA)

A Civic Technology Incubator

CURA:Tech Program Summary January - November 2014 cura-tech.org

Neeraj Mehta Director, Community Based Research Kristen Murray Program Developer Andrew Tran Research Assistant

Collaborators Year at a Glance

The McKnight Foundation is following the lead of other national foundations in funding projects that harness the energy of community-led efforts to solve social challenges by merging existing public data with technologies that can deliver accessible information by supporting the CURA:Tech program.

annual report

University of Minnesota continues to support the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs through its land-grant mission.

Open Twin Cities provided technical support and partnership during the CURA:Tech process, through their mission to foster an inclusive community of civic collaboration and champion open government and civic technology for positive social impact. Open Twin Cities is part of the Northside Digital Innovation Alliance, a relationship formed through CURA:Tech.

Thank You Thank you to the people and organizations who advised, supported and informed this project:

CURA:Tech

Number of

especially Azul 7, Betsy Altheimer, Brad Brown, Bill Bushey, Steven Clift, DeAnna Cummings, Elise Ebhardt, Adja Gildersleve, Alaina Harkness, Lisa Helminiak, Reynolds-Anthony Harris, HousingLink, Dan Hylton, Anna Love Mickelson, Nancy Lyons, Tamir Nabrokov, David Nicholson, Alan Palazzolo, Fred Rose, Denny Royal, John Stavig, Ange Wang, and Sandy Wolfe Wood, and everyone who participated throughout.

N gu th sa

Table of Contents About....................................................................4 CURA:Tech Engagement Strategy.................6 Discover Issues.................................................10 Team Up............................................................12 Prototyping.......................................................16 Awards...............................................................24 What Did We Learn?.......................................26

CURA:Tech

About CURA:Tech

About CURA

Communities in our region are facing significant challenges for which they often do not have (or at least have not implemented) effective and affordable solutions. As we struggle, we also wrestle with the rapid changes that exist around us resulting in new, complex and shifting problems, but also open the door to new kinds of solutions. To navigate this choppy water, we need to be more innovative, flexible and adaptive. Here in the Twin Cities, there is a growing group of technologists and community leaders pursuing conversations and action around civic technology, open data and more collaboration between citizens with different skillsets and government.

The Center for Urban and Regional Affairs (CURA) connects the resources of the University of Minnesota with the interests and needs of urban communities and the region for the benefit of all.

CURA:Tech emerges from the belief that technology has the power to transform communities, and that the cross pollination of ideas by people of many different backgrounds working together can create bursts of creativity and innovation. We also believe that just as technology has become so completely embedded in whatever we’re doing at a personal level, technology can add significant value to our efforts in strengthening communities. Drawing on conversations with community-based organizations, local partners, and national leaders in civic technology work, we developed CURA:Tech to: • unearth local issues that civic technology can address • support collaborative development of these technologies • create benefit for low income communities and communities of color • contribute, with partners and participants, to the local conversation about civic technology development and public data access

CURA:Tech

CURA is founded on the belief that partnership between the university and the community is mutually beneficial. CURA pursues its urban and regional mission by facilitating and supporting connections between state and local governments, communities, nonprofit organizations, and relevant resources at the University, including faculty and students from appropriate campuses, colleges, centers, or departments. Central to our work is building and supporting an environment that links the skills and wisdom present within every community with the specialized knowledge and academic discipline of a vital urban university. Our center is home to a diverse array of community programs that together provide a rich, and unique blend of leadership, resources, and technical skills available to local communities at no cost. Through our research, community focused programs and collaborative partnerships; CURA’s community programs create innovative solutions that promote equity and opportunity in communities throughout the Twin Cities metropolitan region. CURA’s community programs use a decentralized exploration of alternative solutions to social problems. We put our resources and energy in the center of communities, supporting their efforts to innovate, experiment and persist in their work of dealing with the current and future challenges they face. Our partnership provides an essential ingredient for supporting their efforts. CURA’s community programs start with conversation on the ground with our community based partners asking questions and listening well to what they are saying.

Key Questions What is civic technology? Civic technologies are tools that help people connect, have a voice in public processes, access and deliver resources and information, visualize the present and imagine the future. Civic technologies can be digital, information-based tools like mobile apps, websites, data visualizations, animations, text messaging systems, or other phone-based systems. These digital technologies can also dovetail with “low-tech” tools, such as printed material, posters, physical games, and other objects.

What types of issues are right for civic technology to address? Good candidates for civic tech work include issues that can be addressed by making data or other information more available and accessible to people, so that they can make more informed decisions, access resources more effectively, or communicate to a wider audience. Data can be quantitative (numbers!), qualitative (processes, stories, words), or both. Projects can connect people to information, such as information that is public but may not be available and/or readily understandable in its current format. Projects might also collect data or other information, create new knowledge, stories, or possibilities. We were especially interested in how civic technology can increase and improve access to jobs, transportation, housing, education, health resources, a safe environment, and engagement with government and decision makers.

Why an incubator? We used an incubator approach to encourage collaboration and iterative development and testing of tools. In addition to providing monetary awards to support the sustained development of civic technologies, the incubator included gatherings, workshops and mentorship that built capacity and community. Public events invited a broader audiencee to learn what’s being worked on and contribute feedback.

Why a focus on projects that benefit communities of color and low-income communities? We were explicitly interested in how CURA:Tech could create benefit for low-income communities and communities of color. This focus of attention that was largely missing from the mainstream civic tech conversation. Participation in community-led, grass-roots civic tech work has come mainly from the technology fields—fields in which there is a stark lack of representation of people of color. In addition, people of color face disparities in a broad range of measures of well-being, including employment rates, income, health indicators, foreclosure rates, and graduation rates. As energy has built around civic technology in past several years, CURA and our partners felt it was important to explicitly seek out opportunities for civic tech projects to benefit communities of color and low-income communities, and to explore ways for more diverse perspectives to inspire, drive and contribute to civic technology development. We opted to use a focused approach to strive for focused benefit.

CURA:Tech

CURA:Tech Engagement Strategy When we started planning CURA:Tech, we noticed that... ••There was limited access to open data in the Twin Cities.

In some cities and regions, municipal governments have released numerous public datasets. This availability of data has fueled civic tech competitions in these cities. The Twin Cities had not yet seen a large release of public data, and so open data sets were not a viable starting point for civic tech projects.

••Community-driven civic technology was most often developed at local hackathons.

While there were a few individual technology developers and designers working on their own civic tech projects, the primary community space and vehicle for developing civic technologies were events called “hackathons,” organized by the local open government advocacy group Open Twin Cities, CURA, and others.

••The people who were typically involved in civic tech efforts were predominantly white and male.

Most of the individuals working on civic tech projects (on their own or at hackathons and other community events) were white and male, mirroring the demographics of the technology development sector.

••Relationships didn’t necessarily exist between the people who build technology and the people working on community issues that civic tech could address.

Existing relationships between civic-minded technologists and the community leaders and organizations already working on solving community issues (likely in non-techological ways) were limited, and there were few opportunities to meet one another, talk about challenges and potential solutions, and build collaborations.

tie NOV 9

CURA:Tech

FEB 27

n sig De C Se olla ss bo io ra ns ti o

H W um or an ks C ho e p nte re

Te am

rm at fo In

FEB 4 & 5

Ci t ho yCa st m ed p by Min O ne pe so n ta Tw in Ci

Related Efforts

io n

nc h La u ct je

JAN 22

MAR 28 & 29 APR 8, 15, 22, & 28

Co m Co m nf un Ci er ity ty en C of ce on M , h ne in os c ne te tio ap d ns ol by is

NOV 6

2013

Se ss Ap io Ce pl ns i c nt a er tio ed n De s fo sig r H n um W a or n ks ho p

CURA:Tech

Pr o

“C

Di sc ov er

ri Li tica st l F en ri in en g ds Lu ” nc h

Iss ue s

Process In response to these existing challenges, we used an incubator approach that layered additional resources on top of monetary awards to build the capacity of program participants to develop technology-based solutions. By providing continual feedback, mentorship, technical assistance, small grants to support the development of prototypes, and opportunities for our partners to create new relationships, we were able to facilitate a collaborative environment throughout the process.

MAR 22

JUL 11

Ph a An se no 2 un Aw ce ard d

pl Ap

Early NOV

2014

p Sy en s T W tem win or ic C ks R iti ho ac es p ism

as e Ph

ica tio

ns AUG 11

Da y o m De

Aw ar ds

Ch ec

in s

s AUG 3

SEP 30

C Da ity o ta f M W in or n ki ea ng p G olis ro O up p Spring 2014

SEP 16

JULY

TE pr DxH es e en nn ta ep tio in n : on Ci civ ty ic Po of te lic Mi ch y nn pa e ss ap ed ol CU is R O Da A H pe ta o n u an si Da n d ta Re g F nt oru al m H ou on sin O g pen

Late MAY

MAY 11

Ph a

pl ica

P An has no e 1 un A ce wa d rd

on Pr s ot ot yp in g

Communications and Resources To clarify the possibilities of civic technology and address the challenge of connecting civic-minded technologists and community organizations, we deployed several tools including a website, blog, and an online forum. The website communicated key information related to the programâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s process, the blog shared examples of civic tech, and the forum enabled participants to connect and discuss ideas.

NOV 18

CURA:Tech

CURA:Tech Engagement Strategy Resources: Civic Technology Research and Examples Due to the relative infancy of civic technology, we referenced a report by the Knight Foundation to better understand and communicate the nature of civic technology. Knight conducted a survey and uncovered five themes in civic tech. We used this as a framework to highlight tools in the civic tech landscape and as a resource for our program participants (several examples are included on the following page). 6

vic Tech: A Convergence of Fields

eview incorporates tech anies and projects from sevelds of work. Only projects rily focused on promoting utcomes were included.

collaborative consumption Tools for procuring paid services from local vendors and sharing of corporate-owned assets

government data Internal performance and analytics software

Peer-to-peer sharing of resident-owned goods and services Public data access and transparency

Funding for projects that enhance public services and spaces

civic tech Social causes, civic engagement

community organizing Political campaign management tools

crowd funding Funding for consumer and commercial products

Place-based networks and community forums Virtual, professional or practicebased networks

social networks

Source: http://www.knightfoundation.org/features/civictech/

CURA:Tech

Housing & Transportation Affordability Index Center for Neighborhood Technology (CNT) Chicago, IL

The Public Agenda buildingcommunity WORKSHOP Dallas, TX

The Housing and Transportation Affordability Index that allows users to examine housing and transportation costs at the neighborhood level. Users can access housing and transportation data in the form of maps, charts, and statistics making it accessible a diverse audience.

This interactive map allows users to understand the city council agenda in a geographic format and increases awareness of how citizens can be a part of the decision making process.

Source: htaindex.cnt.org

Stop Beef New Orleans, LA Stop Beef is a conflict mediation tool that allows users to report conflicts and find the best mediators to resolve the conflict before it results in violence.

Source: www.bcworkshop.org/bcW/the-public-agenda

E-Democracy Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN E-Democracy utilizes online tools to create a virtual public space to support participation and build democracy. Source: e-democracy.org

Source: stopbeef.com CURA:Tech

2014

JAN 22

FEB 4 & 5

Se A ss Ce ppl io nt ica ns er tio ed n De s fo sig r H n um W a or n ks ho p

In fo rm

at io n

nc h au ct L civic tech can address

Pr oj e

Discover Issues

FEB 27

About During this phase, we asked the question, “How can technology strengthen your community?” We focused our efforts on reaching out to voices that are often absent in the civic tech world: people of color, young people, and women. We used informal gatherings and 1:1s to inform people and organizations of opportunities for funding to support projects they’re currently doing or initiatives they are interested in but don’t have the capacity to do. Our info sessions also fostered initial bridging between technologists, designers, and people working on issues facing the community. Project Launch

Information Sessions / Mixers

Purpose: •• Provide resources and to inform audience about CURA:Tech, civic technology, and opportunities. •• Build interest in the program.

Purpose: •• Inform participants of program timeline, requirements, and upcoming opportunities. •• Explain general concepts to participants including civic technology and design thinking. •• Provide examples of potential tools and proposals. •• Explain CURA:Tech’s funding process.

January 27

Goals: •• Generate interest in the program and upcoming events. •• Provide resources and to inform audience about CURA:Tech, civic technology, and opportunities.

February 4 and 5

Goals: •• Generate participant interest in applying for the human-centered design workshop. •• Foster potential collaboration. Participants: February 4 session: 16 participants February 5 session: 15 participants Community-based Organizations: 14 Community Members: 2 Designers: 6 Local Government Staff: 1 Technologists: 8 Outcome: 22 info session attendees applied for Human Centered

CURA:Tech

Design Workshop

2014

MAR 28 & 29

APR 8, 15, 22, & 28

Ap pl ica tio ns 1

as e Ph

Co lla

bo ra tio n

ss io ns

De sig n te re d and develop proposals

H W um or an ks C ho e p n

Team Up

MAY 11

About Taking researcher Scott Page’s findings--that diverse teams of people solve problems better than experts in one area--to heart, we worked hard to engage a diverse group of people in CURA:Tech early and often. We wanted to offer opportunities for our partners to create new relationships and collaborate across skills, and to this end held a human-centered design workshop and a series of collaboration sessions. These opportunities were intended to build on and expand participants’ skills, knowledge and relationships to develop a well defined project proposal. While we did not require that Phase 1 applicants attend the workshop and collaboration sessions, feedback indicated that they found it valuable beyond the CURA:Tech process. Applications for Human Centered Design Workshop February 27

Purpose: •• Understand initial interest areas and potential project proposals. •• Identify potential expertise needed based on interest areas. •• Identify shared interests among participants.

Hats That Applicants Wear We asked our applicants what hats they wear. The graphic below represents the number of responses we received from the 54 applicants. student 6 other 14

Applicants: 54 writer

government employee 4

community member/resident

community member

community organizer project manager

16 23

non-proﬁt employee community organizer designer technologist

artist 16

artist writer

technologist

19 designer

other

project student manager government employe

nonprofit employee

CURA:Tech

Team Up and develop proposals

Human Centered Design Workshop

Collaboration Sessions

Format: Full-day, immersive workshops, facilitated by Azul 7, a Minneapolis-based design firm

Format: Evening gatherings, some in conjunction with Open Twin Cities meet-ups (the local Code for America brigade meeting)

March 28, 29

April 8, 15, 22, and 28

Participants: 51

Participants: 22, 18, 12, and 6 respectively

Goals: •• Provide human centered design training and exposure for program participants. •• Provide opportunities for people with diverse expertise and perspectives to work together in teams early. •• Encourage teams to make and learn from quick lowtech prototypes. •• Build capacity that participants can use in other areas of their work.

Goal: Create space for informal discussion about issues and potential solutions, as well as team-building among people with diverse skillsets.

What is human-centered design?

Human-centered design is a way of problem-solving that focuses on people and their unique experiences, environments and perspectives. It encourages a team of problem-solvers to build and test out ideas early, and refine their solutions by getting feedback from those who will use their designs firsthand. This approach grew out of the Stanford Design School’s ‘Design Thinking’ model based on five modes of thinking:

Empathize

Define

Why human-centered design?

Ideate

Prototype

Test

We included a human-centered design workshop and encouraged teams to use design strategies (problem identification, user feedback, testing, etc.) in part because of community partners’ input that projects focus on an issue and need, rather than on a technological solution. Thus, the workshop was intended to provide the skills for participants to identify the right issue and appropriate tool by focusing on people. 12

CURA:Tech

A participant creating a storyboard of an idea during the Human-centered Design Workshop

Participants’ Feedback “I enjoyed the workshop and found it applicable to all areas

“It would have been nice if we could have self organized

of my life.”

around topics that interested us and worked on an idea related to that topic.”

“The workshop allowed me to combine my business and social media background through prototyping.”

“I would have loved to have had a bit more time discuss skill sets and projects amongst the group. If there had been a

“I learned how little I know about the overall development

running signup/skills wall that people could populate, that

of an application and/or prototype that would best serve

might have been useful.”

the community. “ “The training challenged me to think outside the normal “I found the session to be a far-reaching learning experience

parameters that I would default. The support of CURA staff

that could be considered on life’s journey one of those

and Azul 7 made the training vigorous but overwhelmingly

experiences that will forever impact me.”

positive.”

“I wish there were more opportunities to meet people interested in similar issues who I could later collaborate with on a project.”

CURA:Tech

Team Up Applications for Phase 1 Awards Deadline: May 11 Goals: •• Collaboration among people who bring diverse skills and perspectives through the application process. •• Proposals that address locally identified issues and capitalize on multiple disciplines, backgrounds, and skills. •• Proposals to develop civic technology prototypes and get feedback from potential users of the tool along the way. Outcomes: •• 20 applications •• 14 applicants from teams who attended Human-Centered Design Workshop •• 6 applicants from teams who did not attend the workshop •• Of the 20 projects that applied for Phase 1 funding, 6 areas of focus emerged and are described below and on the adjacent page.

Community Building/Resource Sharing 3 proposals Community building projects addressed the importance of collective effort by helping individuals and organizations create and strengthen relationships. These projects also addresses resource and skill sharing to mobilize around shared interests. Advancing Communities of Color and Underrepresented Groups 5 proposals Under-served communities and communities of color lack resources to achieve social and economic mobility. These tools propose to benefit these communities by making access to jobs and information more equitable. Sustainable Food and Environmental Advocacy 4 proposals Information about sustainable food practices, such as composting and local food sources, is not always readily accessible to the public. Additionally, advocating for environmental issues can be a complex process for many individuals and communities. These projects seek to connect people with information and resources in their neighborhoods, cities, and regions. 14

CURA:Tech

Participants discussing ideas during a collaboration session.

Youth Capacity Building 4 proposals Youth, especially youth of color and youth from low-income backgrounds, face barriers in accessing information that can postively affect their health and educational and employment outcomes. These projects address these barriers by using civic technology to connect youth to resources that build their capacity and support their wellbeing. Civic Engagement 3 proposals Major barriers prevent individuals and communities from having an active voice in decisions that affect their neighborhoods, such as traditional town hall meetings that are not accessible to many community members. These projects make it easier for community members to participate in civic decision-making by going to where the people are, bringing the public meeting to the people, and increasing transparency of public decision-making processes.

CURA:Tech

2014

Late MAY

ec kin

Ph An ase no 1 un Aw ce ar d ds

Prototyping

JULY

CURA:Tech received 20 applicants for funding to develop a prototype. A review panel working with CURA staff selected seven applicants that demonstrated the criteria below in their proposals. •• Addresses a community-identified local issue •• Innovative (better than the way things are done now, novel) •• Informed by feedback from potential users during development •• Created by collaborative teams of at least three people working across skills, expertise, perspectives, organizations and/or sectors •• Has a digital form (though integrating low-tech elements is great, too, if it’s important for the design) •• Has a plan for sustainability (including, but not limited to, being built using open source technologies) •• Benefits low-income communities and communities of color

To aid us in this process, we included professionals and experts in strategic communications and advocacy; civic tech; technology design and development; and social entrepreneurship as part of a selection panel. The panel selected the following projects to receive Phase 1 grant funding: PROJECT

Organization Type

TOOL

Activist Dashboard

Nonprofit (Center for Earth, Energy and Democracy)

Web application

Minority Health DIAL

Newly formed team

Graphic & audio media

Neighborhood Street Forum

Nonprofit (Cleveland Neighborhood Association)

Mobile video & website

Our City

Newly formed team

Web application

Tuloko Tools

LLC (Tuloko)

Website & mobile application

WhatsWerk

Nonprofit (Kitty Andersen Youth Science Center)

Video series

Youth in Crisis Technology Project - Text for Help Solution

Nonprofit (The Bridge for Youth)

Web application

Throughout the summer, we checked in with teams and connected them to mentors when requested. We also hosted a group gathering for teams to share progress and questions and check in with one another. 16

CURA:Tech

Project Description

3. The proposed tool: What will it do? The proposed tool will work in correlation with the ongoing Environmental Justice Mapping Tool being developed and described above. The EJ Map is currently mapping existing environmental “stressors” with various layers of other health and economic information that can be of use to communities and decision-makers in community planning. The proposed tool will provide community members with information and a “pathway” for the appropriate governmental points of citizen participation. The tool will be a “community guide to citizen participation.” Imagine this tool as a dashboard for citizen involvement. This dashboard will be crowd-sourced, providing information about the appropriate level of government, the agency(ies) responsible for decision making, and how to get information on timelines for decisionmaking. We also hope the dashboard will identify and make easily available appropriate “Our crowd-sourced online tool—the dashboard’—will bestage, paired with the information about elected officials at‘activist the local, state and national level. At this this will be(EJ) focused on major environmental issues such as permitting and enforcement Environmental tool Justice Mapping Tool to create a clearinghouse where individuals authorities in the areas of climate, energy and public health. By crowdsourcing this tool, can trackweabuild given issue and find useful resources such as public hearings, timelines on the expertise and knowledge of the broader community, and insure the tool will not for citizen government officials, andpotential relevant public agencies related to that relyinput, on a single nonprofit to populate data for every concern. This contributes to citizenissue.” empowerment and promotes the concept of ‘co-creation’, a vital piece of our democracy.

Activist Dashboard

Phase 1 Funding: $10,000 Team: Shalini Gupta - Executive Director and Director of Policy, Center for Earth, Energy and Democracy Dr. Cecilia Martinez - Director of Research, Center for Earth, Energy and Democracy Sammie Ardito Rivera - Climate Justice Organizer, Center for Earth, Energy and Democracy Sandra Wolfe Wood - Graphic designer Assoc Director, AIGA Minnesota Design for Good, design thinking practitioner Ange Wang, Digital designer, Adjunct Professor, College of Design, University of Minnesota, design thinking practitioner Anne Knauff - UX lead for web, Thomson Reuters

Q & A: Q: Who will benefit from this tool? A: This ‘activist dashboard’ benefits marginalized communities (environmental justice community members) and decision-makers through greater opportunities for community engagement. As noted earlier, the community—particularly communities of color and low-income communities— are often unaware of a potentially environmentally-impacting project or concern until it is well underway. Q: How does ‘Activist Dashboard’ strengthen the community? A: This tool, which compliments the EJ Mapping Tool (which conveys the state of the environment through an equity lens) is desperately needed. The EJ Mapping Tool provides a multi-layered, multi-faceted look at the condition of the environment and environmental health in the Twin Cities. However, now, with the Dashboard, community members will be able to act upon this information. A necessary key way to reach community members across the digital divide is to empower locally-based grassroots organizers to inform fellow activists using powerful visual images that illustrate current and future threats and inspire action to prevent damaging impacts.

CURA:Tech

ATTACHMENT 2 SAME HEALTH INFO SAMPLE REDESIGNED

Prototyping Minority Health DIAL

“The Minority Health DIAL (Data Innovation & Advancement Lab) Project will connect Hennepin County’s Public Health Department, a Hmong community�� based, and Hmong community members with artists, designers and other creative �� and ��evaluate ��better designed, professionals,�� to collaboratively �� develop, disseminate, more impactful, and effectively distributed Hepatitis B information for at-risk limited �� , �� English proficient Hmong immigrants and refugees, as a means to improve ��(LEP) 5�� their health and the health of the community. The Project will be a prototype for �� . �� multi-sector innovative and successful collaborations to improve public health �� communications with LEP communities and mitigate health disparities for under� �� . served communities of color.” �� .

Phase 1 Funding: $10,000 Team: David Kang - Creative Consultant, Media Producer, & Project Director, Hana Media & Development Raiza Beltran - Public Health Specialist & Community-based Organization, Neighborhood House Mong Vang - Design Specialist & Filmmaker

�� , �� .

�� . �� , �� .

�� . 40� �� , 4� � � �� (�� )� �� .

Q & A: Q: Who will benefit from

�� . 99-100% � UV-A � UV-B �� . �� 2� 5� �� , � � ‘Minority � Health DIAL’? 90% �� .

A: The DIAL’s ultimate goal is to help under-served communities of color, especially LEP communities, achieve well-being and better lives. In reaching our goal, the DIAL serves �� improved �� . �� LEP �� 200 �� members, public agencies, community organizations, and four�� key20� audiences: community �� .!!!! artist/creative professionals. Q: How have you engaged with potential users in the process? A: The DIAL Group actively participates in discussions with key stakeholders of public initiatives, the creative community, and community leaders/organizations. Engaging with the potential users is one of the key principles and activities of the DIAL, and one of the main project objectives. As we progress to engage more people and work on more DIAL-led campaigns, we will continue to grow our networks and the number of potential users of the tool and services. 18

CURA:Tech

Neighborhood Street Forum “We will pilot innovative community engagement in a typically under-represented Phase 1 Funding: $5,000 constituency by utilizing technology, video, and social media, to build a platform for engaged community residents. In phase one, four high school students will Team: produce weekly videos highlighting resident voices on important issues and asking D.A. Bullock - Filmmaker politiciansPostcard to respond.” from first iteration of project Ariah Fine - Executive Director, Cleveland Neighborhood Association Colin Kloecker - Collaborative Director, Works Progress STEP-UP Youth Interns

Q & A: Q: Can you briefly describe the project? A: It was an intentional part of the design of the project to have the young people to be the touch point for the community engagement—have them design how we want to use the tool or how the tool is going to develop. We really wanted to concentrate on people who are generally marginalized in the community engagement conversations: young people, people of color, and people who don’t show up to meetings. Then we tried to figure out how to make it more accessible to more people in the community to participate. Q: How does ‘Neighborhood Street Forum’ strengthen the community? A: Street Forum strengthens the community by providing a tool that’s outside of the traditional tools and the neighborhood organizing tool belt that we usually use. It’s using simple technology; it’s using the ability to shoot video on a mobile phone or just a camera that we can then bring and create a virtual documentation of community input. CURA:Tech

Prototyping Our City “The Goal of the Minneapolis Civic Agenda will be to facilitate transparency into the Phase 1 Funding: $10,000 governing process of City Council and increase public engagement through more open access to policy makers and allowing citizens a better understanding of the Team: decision making process.” Rosie Hoyem - Web Developer, Population Figure 2: Homepage Wireframe Center, University of Minnesota Bobbi Dahlstrom - Lawyer Matt Barthelemy - City of Minneapolis Neighborhood and Community Engagement Commission Ben Ortega - Software Architect, GovDelivery Inc. Ben Rosas - Web Developer, GovDelivery Sarah McKenzie - Editor, SW Journal and Adjunct Professor, School of Journalism, University of Minnesota

Multichannel Engagement We’ll explore utilizing mobile SMS alerts to keep stakeholders informed and further engage users. For example, Twilio is a popular and easy to integrate service for sending mobile alerts. Figure 4: Example Twilo Feature Flow

Q & A:

Q: How does ‘Our City’ strengthen the community? A: Our City strengthens the community by offering people an opportunity to engage and be aware of the discussion that is going on regarding issues that are of interest to them. Q: What did you enjoy about the project? A: The project has been a great learning experience. Pulling together an interdisciplinary team is definitely challenging but I think we all learned a lot about working on an interdisciplinary team. Focus on Relationships with Public Officials From the landing page, visitors will be able to click on the map and navigate to a district specific page. This page will highlight issues that are geographically specific to the area. We also learned a lot about the City Council process itself. Even living in Minneapolis, I didn’t really

11 process really works. We had to learn a lot about that to be able to understand how the legislative make it a more transparent process.

CURA:Tech

Tuloko Tools “Tuloko is an internet-based social enterprise that provides products and services focused on the development, growth, and employment of small, women, and minority owned businesses. By curating business information on diverse businesses, we help connect consumers, large corporations, government agencies, and educational institutions with these historically underutilized businesses.”

Phase 1 Funding: $10,000 Team: Sean Armstrong - Strategy and Technology, Toloko Duane Johnson - Business Development and Marketing, Tuloko

Q & A: Q: How does ‘Tuloko’ strengthen the community? A: Tuloko strengthens the community by providing a conduit for consumers to find and rate black owned businesses within their community. Basically, when people support these businesses, dollars can be recycled in the business. When the business gets customers and capital they can expand and hire people from the community so it can lower unemployment rates as well as lower crime rates within the area. Q: What were some of the challenges of the project? A: One, of course, is funding. Which was great that CURA believed in what we’re doing so far to give us some seed capital to expand this product. Trying to get stakeholders to buy into the product is 50/50; in terms of the consumers, they love it, they want it. I’m glad that CURA took the time to invest in a project like ours since we’re an LLC when historically a lot of these grants go to nonprofits. Now that the McKnight Foundation and CURA are seeing the good that we’re doing, where we are providing a double bottom line, this can help project us to the next level. CURA:Tech

Prototyping WhatsWerk “The issue we are addressing is connecting teens to experiences that will give them Phase 1 Funding: $10,000 knowledge and skills to pursue professional careers.” Team: Oanh Vu - Assistant Youth Crew Manager, Kitty Andersen Youth Science Center 5 sub-pages: - Jobs - Trainings - Volunteer - Calendar - About me

Trainings broken down by subject, then location, with registration links if necessary

Calendar holds events like job fairs, networking events, application deadlines, etc.

Jobs organized by simple categorical tags. Links take you to external applications

Volunteer experiences also organized categorically. Locations listed with application links.

Teen Tech Crew - 9 high school aged youth based at the Science Museum of Minnesota’s Kitty Andersen Youth Science Center in Saint Paul, MN, who work together to bring visibility to community issues and empower youth through technology

Individual user profile -- can sign in thru FB / google to manage favorited jobs, send reminders, and recommendations

Q & A: Q: How does ‘WhatsWerk’ strengthen the Community? A: We’re bridging that gap between the youth and organizations. We’re bringing up our youth by giving them knowledge that they need to succeed later on in life and where they are at in life as well. Q: What did you enjoy about the project? A: It’s just nice to work towards a goal that we know we want and that affects us specifically as youth. It’s pretty much what drives our lives in the future and it’s what we have--jobs and a little more education--but see others need. We can even improve this for ourselves through this project, so it’s nice to have something that’s helping not only yourself but everyone else in your community. Q: What were some of the challenges of the project? A: During the human centered design process, one of the biggest challenges was just getting out of the “solution” mindset and figuring out not what needs to be made specifically, but first what’s the need and what do we need to address. Once we actually did that, that helped us find out what we need to do much better than going straight to the solution of a website. 22

CURA:Tech

The Bridge for Youth

CURA:Tech Phase One Application

Youth in Crisis Technology Project - Text for Help Solution

Images (up to 10 pages

Selected initial wireframes developed in 2013 by The BridgeSolution for Youthwill anddirectly RBA “Theexcerpts Youth infrom Crisis Technology Project (YCTP) Text for Help Consulting connect counselors to youth in crisis through SMS: a communication means that

Phase 1 Funding: $10,000

can be silent and private. Help will no longer be a phone call away; it will land in Team: a young person’s mobile device. Marie Harvat - Project Manager Information Technology, The Bridge for Youth Lindsay Vanderheiden - Operations Lead Call Center Coordinator, The Bridge for Youth Janet Hallaway - Outreach, marketing, and fundraising lead Interim Development Director, The Bridge for Youth Dev Jam - Technical Development Partner External Partners - Polaris, Project tecting lead, Leah Meyer, IT Innovation Advisory Committee

Q & A: Q: How does the ‘Youth in Crisis Technology Project - Text for Help Solution’ strengthen the community? A: Our tool will strengthen the community through empowering teens to be able reach out when they’re in crisis and be able to provide youth with the right resource at the right time. Q: What were some challenges of the project? A: In a nonprofit, one of the challenges is always money, so building out a tool that’s helpful and that has practical application requires resources, and so we’re seeking resources through a number of 1 April 13, 2014 different means to be able to build that tool. Q: What did you enjoy about the project? A: I have enjoyed connecting and interacting with people who aren’t in our immediate nonprofit world: folks in the for-profit technology sector, people at the university, people at CURA, and being able to make connections that are broader than what we had before. CURA:Tech

2014

SEP 16

2 as e Ph

Ph a An se no 2 un Aw ce ard d s

Ap pl ica tio ns

y Da o De m

Awards

Early NOV

SEP 30

The Phase 2 award supported the continued development of several of the tools prototyped during Phase 1. All seven Phase 1 teams applied for a Phase 2 award, and three projects were funded: Activist Dashboard Tuloko Green Book Network WhatsWerk Neighborhood Street Forum was also funded through another CURA program to continue development. Demo Day

September 16 Format: Public presentation Participants: 60 (including the members of seven Phase 1 teams) Goals: •• Share the prototypes and findings of Phase 1 teams •• Create space for networking and community-building •• Build awareness of civic technology, the people developing it, and the issues it can address

CEED: Activist Dashboard Organization Type: Nonprofit Tool: Web application Phase 2 Funding: $35,000

“Our crowd-sourced online tool—the ‘activist dashboard’— will be paired with the Environmental Justice (EJ) Mapping Tool to create a clearinghouse where individuals can track a given issue and find useful resources such as public hearings, timelines for citizen input, government officials, and relevant public agencies related to that issue.“

!"##"$%#&'#"()*&+",-."(*&/"#0"(& 1!'+/2 !"#$"%&'()& *)+'"(' ,$&-./'0$(1

!"##"$%#&'#"()*&+",-."(*&/"#0"(&1!'+/2&%3&4&5430"60-6"#"()*&74,%8%0*& ,-#04%#%#)&05-&9-%8"(3&"4,:&,4$498"&-7&9;(#%#)&<==&0-#3&-7&5430"&$"(&>4*?

/-FFB#%0*&/-#0G,0A I#"%3:4&J(40,:"00 1<KL2&MMM6MMMM 3B%0:?84(4N)B4%8?,-B

3!4567&5!'&89:&;+<8='>? @#,%#"(40-(3&4("&A#-5#&0-&9"&B4C-(&3-;(,"3&-7&8"4>D&B"(,;(*D&>%-E%#3D& 4#>&;80(467%#"&$4(0%,;840"3&0:40&,4#&,(-33&0:"&98-->&9(4%#&4#>&$84,"#04& 94((%"(?

!"#$%

3@*&A@-BCD&9&E"& ,-#,"(#"D? F:%3&%B$4,03&*-;(&,:%8>("#G3&:"480:&

&$'()

*+#"$%'

%#&0:"&7-88-5%#)&54*3H

!"+#)($%'

,$'+-)$.+

CURA:Tech

/+0"1234)$.+

Tuloko: Green Book Network Organization Type: LLC Tool: Web application Phase 2 Funding: $25,000

“Tuloko is tech startup that creates Internet products and services focused on the development and growth of women and minority-owned businesses. By curating information on these diverse firms, we help connect consumers, large corporations, and government procurement departments with these historically underutilized businesses.“

Teen Tech Crew: WhatsWerk

Organization Type: Nonprofit Tool: Web-based Video Series Phase 2 Funding: $10,000 “WhatsWerk is a fun and educational YouTube web series that teaches teens the necessary skills to get and maintain a job. It also seeks to connect teens to the resources, experiences, and youth serving organizations and employers that will help them in their career pathway.”

Cleveland Neighborhood Association: Neighborhood Street Forum

Organization Type: Nonprofit Tool: Mobile Video and Website Funding through CURA’s Neighborhood Partnership Initiative program: $10,000 “We will launch an innovative, multifaceted community engagement campaign to engage residents— especially under-represented constituencies. Utilizing technology, video, and social media, we seek to ensure responsiveness and action by elected officials and representatives, and to empower residents to have greater input into the decisions that affect their lives.” CURA:Tech

What did we learn? The CURA:Tech process was a learning experience for us in which we continuously adjusted our approach based on the needs that fostered collaboration and provided the appropriate support to make our partners’ projects successful. We learned the following themes in this process:

Focus on the issue first, not the technology, and leverage the leadership and knowledge of people and organizations who are already working on this issue. Early on, community partners highlighted the importance of maintaining focus on social and political issues and opportunities, rather than on flashy technical solutions. Technology can tantalize us with its newness, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it is offering a solution that will make a difference in people’s lives. We found that using a humancentered design process helped keep focus on the issue being addressed and the feedback of people facing that issue. The people and organizations already working on these issues, and their expertise and experience, are key assets in this process.

It can’t just be technologists who are involved in creating civic technology. People who bring diverse skills, experience, perspectives, relationships, and content knowledge need to be a part of building civic technology—not just at the point when there is a tool to be tested, but throughout the process, as the problem is being identified, as potential solutions are being imagined, and throughout deployment.

Developing tools that are effective—and that last—is an energy and time intensive endeavor. Hackathons and other events are great at building community and can produce quick technology results, but these results can be fleeting. A technology project that lasts takes investment in project management, research, outreach, partnershipbuilding, and consideration of ongoing support and funding. It’s important to think early about how the tool will be sustained, where its longer-term home will be, and how it will reach its audience.

Collaborative work can bring diverse perspectives and skills to bear on a tough issue, and it’s important to take the time to build a strong working relationship among the collaborators. In Minneapolis–St. Paul, we found that there isn’t a lot of natural mixing between the technology and design communities and the social justice and nonprofit communities. These communities often bring different frameworks and approaches to problem-solving, and while there is much potential for new solutions to come out of these interdisciplinary partnerships, it takes relationship building, learning, and time to forge a productive partnership.

CURA:Tech

Invest in face-to-face interaction and community building. Building technology and building community are not mutually exclusive. Most of the CURA:Tech Phase 1 teams talked about the value in asking real peopleâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;potential users of the tools they were developingâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;to share their experiences and feedback during the prototyping process. These interactions allowed the team to test both their assumptions and the prototype to develop a tool that is better vetted to meet the needs of its intended user. We also heard from CURA:Tech participants how much they valued the face-to-face time with one another. For people and organizations supporting the civic tech field, it is worth it to invest in community building efforts that build relationships and capacity of people working in this space.

CURA:Tech

Center for Urban and Regional Affairs (CURA)

A Civic Technology Incubator

CURA:Tech Program Summary January - November 2014 cura-tech.org