Key Transparency Recommendations for Content Shaping and Moderation The recommendations below are drawn from the RDR Corporate Accountability Index, and reflect over a decade of civil society and academic research into platform accountability. Many of the companies that RDR ranks (including Facebook, Google, and Twitter) already meet some of these standards, but their disclosures are by no means comprehensive. As we have argued throughout this report, we don’t know nearly enough about how companies use algorithmic systems to determine what we see online—and what we don’t see. Congress should consider requiring internet platforms to disclose key information about their content shaping and content moderation practices as a first step toward potentially regulating the practices themselves. Access to Key Policy Documents • Companies should publish the rules (otherwise known as terms of service or community guidelines) for what user-generated content and behavior are or aren’t permitted. • Companies should publish the content rules for advertising (e.g., what kinds of products and services can or cannot be advertised, how ads should be formatted, and what kind of language may be prohibited in ads, such as curse words or vulgarity). • Companies should publish the targeting rules for advertising (e.g., who users are, where they live, and what their interests are can be used to target ads). Notification of Changes • Companies should notify users when the rules for user-generated content, for advertising content, or for ad targeting change so that users can make an informed decision about whether to continue using the platform. Rules and Processes for Enforcement • Companies should disclose the processes and technologies (including content moderation algorithms) used to identify content or accounts that violate the rules for user-generated content, advertising content, and ad targeting.
newamerica.org/oti/reports/its-not-just-content-its-business-model/
41
