8 minute read

Rhythms of Spiritual Scientific Research at Threefold

by Kevin Dann

The title page of The Book of Lambspring (1599) – an alchemical text by Nicolas Barnaud, a member of Rudolf II’s Prague alchemical circle – bears an illustration of a venerable grey-bearded man holding a staff in his right hand, while his left hand rests upon a threefold furnace. The prefatory text below vows to unveil “the one substance/In which all the rest is hidden,” and encourages the reader, through “Coction, time, and patience,” to doggedly pursue the alchemical philosopher’s art, but then pulls back to warn of the derision that he will receive if he shows his hard-won knowledge to the outside world. “Therefore be modest and secret,” the author counsels. A series of polar emblems follows: two Fish swimming opposite to each other; a battle between a Dragon and a Knight; the meeting of a Stag and a Unicorn in a forest clearing; a Lion and Lioness walking together; a fight between a Wolf and a Dog. The text accompanying each emblem gives specific spiritual instruction, but again, there are warnings: “Hold your tongue about it”; “Let those who receive the gift enjoy it in silence.” (1)

Simeon Amstutz (with Daniel Wall) created a geomation film of “The Book of Lambspring”

In a cave-like side chamber at the opening reception for the research exhibition “Art as Research and Scientific Inquiry as a Creative Act,” researcher-artist fellows Dan Wall and Simeon Amstutz gesture at the figures on their chalkboard diorama rendering of The Book of Lambspring. “The very first page of the book says to keep the knowledge secret,” they exclaim in puzzled disbelief, as they conduct an enthusiastic show-and-tell of their own process of discovery in transforming a 16thcentury alchemical text into a stop-motion film. In the main room, nine other researchers point and poke and spin geometrical models; hold up sculptures for close inspection; gesticulate before complex handmade charts, eagerly sharing their discoveries with the uninitiated audience. What would Nicolas Barnaud say to all this public proclamation of the Alchemical Art?

Since its founding by Ralph Courtney and Charlotte Parker in 1926, members of the Threefold Farm (now Threefold Educational Center) community have struggled mightily to penetrate and communicate the secrets of Nature and History. When, in 1933, the 33-year-old Ehrenfried Pfeiffer delivered his first American lecture at the first Anthroposophical Summer School Conference, he chose as his topic “Making Visible the Formative- Forces in Nature.” His teacher, mentor, and friend Rudolf Steiner advised Pfeiffer on his course of college study, and, for the last five years of his life, closely collaborated with him on his research. In a large circus tent set up in the oak grove beyond the Threefold Farm garden and barns, Pfeiffer began his 1933 Summer Conference address by condemning contemporary natural science’s relentless endeavor to turn Natura into a corpse, and society’s reckless use of the subearthly forces of nature – electricity, magnetism, and gravity.

Back in 1920, Pfeiffer (then a young engineering student) had asked Rudolf Steiner if there might be some way of using the constructive, synthetic forces as the foundation of a new altruistic technics that would have within itself the impulse of life rather than death. In response, Steiner set his student to the task of demonstrating the etheric forces in visible form, by developing a substance that would react with the Bildekräfte (etheric formative-forces) in plants and human blood. Though the odds against success were incalculable, Pfeiffer – with the help of Erika Sabarth, who discovered copper chloride as the proper reagent – made the formative forces visible through the process of sensitive crystallization. He attributed this success to their having followed Rudolf Steiner’s advice to make the laboratory a place where the elemental beings of nature would feel comfortable, through a spiritual atmosphere of prayer and meditation.

A meditative state was also required to interpret the crystallization images, which to the untrained eye of the flesh appeared as little more than crystalline Rorschach blots. Pfeiffer distinguished subtle differences in the crystallizations, but when he reported his results to Rudolf Steiner, Steiner interpreted them as indicating that the time was not yet right for humanity to make use of the etheric forces; that time would come about only when the appropriate social conditions had been established in at least a few regions on earth. (2) Until then, no experiments toward an etheric technology should be conducted. Already by 1933, when he addressed the very group of anthroposophists who had pioneered American efforts in founding social threefolding in New York City and then at Threefold Farm, Pfeiffer doubted that he would see the advent of the necessary conditions in his own lifetime, and felt sure that he would go to his grave keeping secret what little knowledge he had gained about the role of the etheric forces on existence in the sense-perceptible world. This was a decade before the most deadly sub-earthly force was discovered, with the splitting of the atom; in his biweekly lectures beginning in 1946 (Pfeiffer came to live and work at Threefold Farm in 1944), Pfeiffer repeatedly warned of the dangers of atomic radiation fallout, not so much for the immediate future, but for long-term Earth evolution. (3)

As Rosicrucian initiates who were working far into the future in their spiritual scientific researches, both Rudolf Steiner and Ehrenfried Pfeiffer constantly found themselves quite alone, without sufficient financial support or a circle of colleagues capable of taking up and extending their initiatives. In a single lecture in 1952, Pfeiffer touched on numerous researches indicated by Rudolf Steiner: working with absolute zero temperatures to realize “warmth energy”; the study of plant ashes vs. mineralized ashes, in relationship to a study of the etheric light emitted by the eye; “peptonization,” the creation of remedies by experimenting with day and night rhythms (Ehrenfried Pfeiffer said that he believed 100 Ph.D. theses could be written on this!); and superimposing ultraviolet upon infrared light. In this same talk, Pfeiffer returned to the subject of the “Strader Machine” or “Keely Motor,” and once again spoke of the secrecy surrounding more recent efforts to develop a technology based in the etheric. (4)

Three and a half centuries after The Book of Lambspring author cautioned about making esoteric knowledge public, this principle still held, not because of the potential for public derision, but because of the absence of the necessary social crucible into which this knowledge might be received.

The arc of Ehrenfried Pfeiffer’s life ended in frustration and disappointment, his work cut short largely for reasons beyond his control. When one looks upon the artifacts – the elegant mahogany- and glass-cased Fisher Scientific lab scales; fading photographs of plant experiments; didactic charts on soil physiology – from Pfeiffer’s laboratory, it is possible to feel wistful that this prodigious research project ended incomplete. Unlike the alchemists of old, the modern spiritual researcher can’t work in isolation, because his research can only rise and flourish in the context of a social “soil” that is capable of receiving it. But even though Ehrenfried Pfeiffer had to curtail his work during his lifetime, in a sense it has been carried forward ever since by the ongoing efforts of the Threefold Community (individuals and the institution as a whole) to realize Ralph Courtney’s ideal of a “Threefold Commonwealth” that would be fully engaged with the deep mystery of American destiny. True, the manifestations of this work are not always outwardly visible, and progress may not be immediately perceptible, but the eager acceptance of the very exoteric work on display at “Art as Research and Scientific Inquiry as a Creative Act” showed Threefold at its best, as an eager incubator of spiritual investigation.

In the last emblem in 'The Book of Lambspring', a Father and Son sit on either side of “the Ancient Master”: “They produce untold, precious fruit/They perish never more,/And laugh at death.” New researchers and new impulses of research continue to arise, take form, and give way to succeeding generations, and the visions of the standard-bearers of the past achieve renewed life in the hands of their successors.

Kevin Dann is a historian and author of “Expect Great Things: The Life and Search of Henry David Thoreau”, “The Road to Walden: 12 Life Lessons from a Sojourn to Thoreau’s Cabin”, “Across the Great Border Fault: The Naturalist Myth in America”, and “A Short Story of American Destiny: 1909–2009.”

1 Nicolas Barnaud’s text was originally published in Latin in 1599 in a collection of alchemical texts known as Quadriga aurifera. Arthur Edward Waite included the text as 'The Book of Lambspring' in volume 1 of 'The Hermetic Museum, Restored and Enlarged' (James Elliot and Company: London, 1893).

2 Using the crystallization method, Pfeiffer developed the ability to diagnose the nature and location of inflammations, infections, even cancer. Alla Selawry, Ehrenfried Pfeiffer,' A Pioneer in Spiritual Research and Practice: A Contribution to His Biography' (Mercury Press: Spring Valley, NY, 1992), p. 52.

3 See Pfeiffer, Notes and Lectures, Volume I, pp. 68, 85, 127, and in Volume II, his November 20, 1961 letter regarding atomic radiation.

4 Ehrenfried Pfeiffer, “Consciousness and Research Attitudes,” in Volume II of Notes and Lectures.

This article is from: