Hit the Brakes!
What Do Sex, Gambling, and the Largest Retailer in the U.S. Have in Common?
Moratoriums in Alachua County
Corbin Hanson, Esq. Jeff Hays, AICP, CPM Missy Daniels, AICP, CPMWhat Do Sex, Gambling, and the Largest Retailer in the U.S. Have in Common?
Moratoriums in Alachua County
Corbin Hanson, Esq. Jeff Hays, AICP, CPM Missy Daniels, AICP, CPMBackground and Legal Basis
History of Use of Moratoria in Alachua County
– Code Conflicts with Current Community Standards / Balance Constitutional Protections (Sexually Oriented Businesses)
– Novel and Potentially Unwanted Uses (Internet Cafes / Medical Marijuana)
– Latent Issues in Policy or Code (Rural Commercial/Dollar General/Mining)
– New Untested Policy or Code (Cottage Neighborhoods)
• Stems from the local government's authority to adopt ordinances and zoning regulations
– Florida Constitution, Florida Statutes, Charter
Zoning in Progress is the first formal step
– Provides notice of a pending change to interested parties
• Adopt a moratorium ordinance with a reasonable duration
Alleviation of hardship, potential extensions
• Timeframe, notice, active pursuit of pending rule changes
• Showing progress if moratorium is extended, limited extension(s).
• Provide a rationale for the zoning in progress and moratorium –
What is the goal? –
What harms are you trying to address?
• Unwanted, but protected land uses
– Different than other uses because it implicates the First Amendment – Have to be careful how to regulate and the impacts of a moratorium
– Easy to end up in litigation
• Moratorium to review standards of the time and create regulations that will affect future applications
• Adopted definitions and zoning districts for each specific type of SOB
• In the early 2000s, Alachua County had a number of issues arise over various sexually oriented businesses and emerging business practices
• As a result, the County was left with outdated or arguably inapplicable standards to apply to uses that did not align with community standards and goals – Viewing booths regulated as "arcades"
• Litigation comes in many forms
– Federal cases regarding infringement of First Amendment rights – Circuit Court Certiorari appeals based on the application of the wrong law (such as whether a regulation on arcades applies to a sexually oriented business)
– Time and money associated with litigation
• Attorneys and experts alike
• Uncertainty for regulations
• How can you avoid this?
– A properly timed moratorium
• Starting with the zoning in progress to show some official action and notice the general public
• Adoption of an ordinance establishing the moratorium and the duration of the moratorium
• Use "Whereas" clauses to make findings explaining the issues to be addressed and outlining the process
• Smaller cities of Alachua County and SOBs
Internet Cafes / Medical Marijuana (Novel Uses)
• New and unique use not addressed by the Code (2012)
• Public comment and testimony that this use may have negative impacts on surrounding land uses
• Six-month moratorium
-to review, study, prepare and adopt amendments to the Comp Plan or Code, hold public hearings.
• Internet cafés defined (internet center/simulated gambling establishment)
• Included in Entertainment and Recreation use for zoning in 2012
• In 2013 the State outlawed internet cafes – removed from Code
Moratorium prepared but not adopted for dispensaries
Medical marijuana dispensaries – zoning same as pharmacies (State law) with setbacks from schools.
Created new use in code with the one setback standard
• Land use category created for rural properties with commercial zoning or commercial uses
• Allowed up to 10,000 square feet of commercial or office use • Mostly in very rural areas on major roads
Existing Uses
Most parcels (24 of 43) with the Rural CommercialAgriculture land use have residential uses
7 of 43 parcels are vacant
7 of 43 parcels have other uses (Ag, industrial, institutional)
2 of 43 parcels have commercial uses established
Note: Other similar distinctions as above occur often
To eliminate further retail development that might be out of scale
• Land Development Regulation Revisions to deal with Design and Compatibility
• Comprehensive Plan Revisions to limit to uses compatible with the rural area and limit scope of retail uses without Board approval.
• Adopted Scenic Road Ordinance
• Couldn’t stop original Dollar General
• Mitigated some impacts (architectural design guidelines)
• Eliminated risk of other similar commercial uses on other properties.
• Implemented Cottage Neighborhood Ordinance in 2018 • Specific Design for infill development • Cottages with Front Porches facing Central Green
Decoupled parking
• Allows double density of underlying land use
• Allowed vertical and horizontal attached units
On September 6, 2022, The BoCC reviewed our Cottage Neighborhood Ordinance and, after discussion, directed staff to undertake the following by the end of the first quarter 2023 (3/31/23):
Review of existing cottage neighborhood language in ULDC with emphasis on analysis based on following criteria: compatibility, building size, overall neighborhood size, traffic, density as related to affordable housing, number of stories, stormwater, parking and location within platted subdivisions.
• No cottage neighborhoods in previously platted subdivisions; • Minimum size for overall development now 2 acres (up from one);
House size limited to no more than 1,400 square feet;
Cottages shall be individual dwelling units only (not multifamily)
Retained the most important characteristics (density bonus)
Corbin Hanson, Esq.
chanson@alachuacounty.us
Jeff Hays, AICP, CPM
jhays@alachuacounty.us
Missy Daniels, AICP, CPM
mdaniels@alachuacounty.us