The Evolution of Complete Streets: The Path Ahead | FPC24

Page 1


EVOLUTION OF COMPLETE STREETS: CASSELBERRY

2024 Florida Planning Conference

CASSELBERRY OVERVIEW

• Less than 10 miles north of Orlando

• Population approx 30,000

• Approx 7.5 square miles

CASSELBERRY COMPLETE STREETS: WEAKNESSES

• Land use: suburban form, no traditional Town Center, autocentric

• Stroads galore (SR 436, US 17-92, SR 434)

• Limited resources/staff spread thin/many hats

• Authentic public engagement

• Adequately addressing equity

• Obtaining and using data effectively

CASSELBERRY COMPLETE STREETS: STRENGTHS

• Community values safety

• Small size + stable Commission + trust in Staff + passionate Staff = Ability to adapt quickly

• Partnerships (MetroPlan Orlando, FDOT, Seminole County, Bike/Walk Central Florida, nearby Cities)

• Funding (Sales Tax, Federal Funding through MPO)

CASSELBERRY COMPLETE STREETS: EVOLUTION OF POLICY

• 2010: Comp Plan’s “Traffic Circulation Element” (TCE) had a brief Complete Streets Policy

• 2016: first ever Multimodal Transportation Master Plan (MTMP) included Complete Streets Policy and Design guidelines

• 2017: Comp Plan updated with a new “Multimodal Transportation Element” (MTE) and Healthy Communities Element

CASSELBERRY COMPLETE STREETS: EVOLUTION OF POLICY

• 2019: MTMP updated to cross reference new MTE and major update to Policy

• Healthy Community Complete Streets Policy and Design Guidelines

• New goal

COMPLETE STREETS POLICY: GOAL

By 2040, with a balanced multimodal transportation system, the City of Casselberry will become the most walkable, rollable, and bikeable City in Central Florida, where active transportation becomes a viable and routine choice for daily mobility needs, thereby increasing community health, equity, economic vitality, and environmental stewardship.

CASSELBERRY COMPLETE STREETS: EVOLUTION OF POLICY

• 2019: MTMP updated to cross reference new MTE and major update to Policy

• Recognized influence of built environment on physical activity levels/community health

• Clarified broad applicability to both public and private development and streets

• Enhanced design guidelines with design speed = posted speed = target speed approach, 10 ft default travel lane width, and 25 mph default target speed

CASSELBERRY COMPLETE STREETS: EVOLUTION OF POLICY

• 2023: began developing the Mobility and Access Plan (MAP), a successor to the MTMP

• 2024: adopted a Vision Zero Goal and Vision Zero Action Plan to achieve zero fatalities and severe injuries on Cityowned streets by 2030 and all streets in the City by 2040

CASSELBERRY COMPLETE STREETS: EVOLUTION OF IMPLEMENTATION

• 2019: N Oxford Road

• 2019: Casselton Drive

• 2021: Concord Drive

• 2023: Lake Kathryn Circle

• 2024: Sunset Drive

• 2024: Southcot Drive

• 2025+: Winter Park Drive & more…

S Sunset Dr
2014
Casselton Dr
2019
Casselton Dr
Casselton Dr

Source: Google

Lake Kathryn Cir
Lake Kathryn Cir
Lake Kathryn Cir

Winter Park Drive Complete Street Improvements (Red Bug Lake Rd to SR 434)

CASSELBERRY COMPLETE STREETS: EVOLUTION OF IMPLEMENTATION

THE VALUE OF INCREMENTAL CHANGE

N Winter Park Dr near Helen St
Source: Google Streetview
N Winter Park Dr near Helen St

2024 Best Foot Forward Summit

Engineering Partner of the Year

Driver Yield Rates Increased from 36% to 75%

2023
W Melody Ln

CASSELBERRY COMPLETE STREETS: WHAT’S NEXT

• Completion of the new Mobility and Access Plan (MAP)

• Policy Updates

• New Projects to complete the City’s active transportation network

• Implement Winter Park Drive, Vision Zero, and other mobility projects and programs

• Coordinate with partners and leverage local funds to help “fix” SR 436 and other arterials

COMPLETE STREETS EVOLUTION

GUSTAVO CASTRO – TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

September 5, 2024

AGENDA

 Showcase Five Complete Streets Projects in Orlando.

 Discuss elements of each Complete Streets project.

 Lessons Learned over the years.

Princeton Street

ORLANDO COMPLETE STREETS

Amelia/Livingston Streets

Terry/Hicks Avenue

Edgewater Drive

Robinson Street

Edgewater Drive

In College Park

CITY OF ORLANDO

Amelia / Livingston Streets

In Creative Village

Princeton Street

In the Packing District

Orlando International Airport

Terry / Hicks Avenue

In Parramore / Griffin Park

Robinson Street

In Various Districts

ORLANDO COMPLETE STREETS - TIMELINE

COLLEGE PARK

EDGEWATER DRIVE

“ROAD DIET”

 First “Road Diet” in Orlando (2001).

 FDOT road re-pavement project in 2002.

 Transfer Edgewater Drive from FDOT to City jurisdiction.

 City goal to make Edgewater Drive more pedestrian & bicycle friendly.

 Enhance pedestrian crossings.

 Synchronize traffic signals to 25 mph.

 Conduct “Before and After” evaluations.

 New vision for College Park neighborhood.

EDGEWATER DRIVE

COLLEGE PARK

TEN YEARS LATER

COLLEGE PARK

TEN YEARS LATER

EDGEWATER DRIVE – NEXT STEPS

WIDEN SIDEWALKS ADD MEDIANS

• Maintain roadway typical section

• Add medians where possible

• Remove bicycle lanes

• Widen sidewalks to 11’

• Drop curb/valley gutter between lanes & parking

EDGEWATER DRIVE

PRELIMINARY 2021 RECOMMENDATIONS

 Analyses and Simulations = Powerful Tools.

 Public awareness and political support & timing = KEY.

 Temporary re-striping to test road performance + public acceptance.

 Conduct informal public surveys & request comments.

 Stay away from asking specific VOTE (yes/no).

 Crashes, injuries, bike-related & pedestrian-related remained low:

COLLEGE PARK

SUMMARY

1. “Before” = Represents an average of 1999, 2000 & 2001 (4 lanes).

2. “After” = Represents average of 2004-2010 (3 lanes).

3. MVM = Million Vehicle Miles.

ORLANDO COMPLETE STREETS - TIMELINE

CREATIVE VILLAGE

 High-Quality, sustainable neighborhood in Downtown Orlando.

 Centered around Education and Transit.

 Largest Transit-Oriented project in Central Florida.

 Showcase for responsible development & mobility best practices.

 Public/Private Partnership for funding.

W. Livingston Street
W. Amelia Street

W. AMELIA STREET - ROAD

RECONSTRUCTION

Two Lanes Road

Exclusive Bus Lane

Bike Lanes

Wide Sidewalks

High-Visibility Crosswalks

W. LIVINGSTON STREET - ROAD REALIGNMENT/RECONSTRUCTION

W. LIVINGSTON STREET - ROAD REALIGNMENT/RECONSTRUCTION

Four Wide Lanes

Painted Bike Lane

Bus Lane

Standard Sidewalks

Two Narrow Lanes

Painted Bike Lane

Separate Exclusive Bus Lane

Wide Sidewalks

High-Visibility Crosswalks

CONNECTED & AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE – PILOT PROGRAM

 Ran in Creative Village exclusive transit lane

 Future-Ready Master Plan

 Test in complex downtown environment

 August 2023 – July 2024

 Evaluate riders' preference

 Possible expansion to other areas if successful

 Data collected

 Creative Village Phase 1 completed in 2022.

 27% of Creative Village apartments are affordable/mixed income.

 50% of on-site student housing use transit, walking, bike, scooter.

 Model for success in historical underserved community.

CREATIVE VILLAGE

SUMMARY

ORLANDO COMPLETE STREETS - TIMELINE

THE PACKING DISTRICT PRINCIPLES

Princeton Commerce Center PD (now Packing District) is part of a large industrial / warehousing district between Orlando neighborhoods to the east and Orange County neighborhoods to the west.

 Create an urban framework (blocks, streets, open spaces) supporting denser mixed-use developments.

 Transform car-dominant district into complete mobility network with integrated pedestrian / bike facilities.

 Reinforce connectivity to regional trails & transit networks.

 Continue existing industrial operations as incremental redevelopment occurs.

 Reuse industrial buildings of significant character where possible.

THE PACKING DISTRICT - INFRASTRUCTURE

PARTNERSHIPS

Princeton Street (State Road 438)
Orange Blossom Trail (State Road 500/US 441)

PRINCETON STREET - LANE REPURPOSING

PRINCETON STREET

LANE REPURPOSING

 Four Narrow Lanes

 On-street Parking

 Separate Bicycle Facility

 Roundabout at Texas Av.

 Wide Sidewalks

 High-Visibility Crosswalks

PRINCETON STREET

LANE REPURPOSING

 Six Wide Lanes

 19,000 Vehicles/Day (Existing)

 No Bike Lanes

 Standard Sidewalks

 Wide Pedestrian Crossing Distance

BEFORE

 Four Narrow Lanes

 21,200 Vehicles/Day (Projected)

 On-street Parking

 Separate Bicycle Trail

 Roundabout at Texas Av.

 Wide Sidewalks

 High-Visibility Crosswalks

 Roads overdesigned/underutilized.

 PD Ordinance for Urban Renewal.

 Design-Build Road Project.

 Public / Private partnership critical for final implementation.

PACKING DISTRICT

SUMMARY

ORLANDO COMPLETE STREETS - TIMELINE

PARRAMORE / GRIFFIN PARK

 Griffin Park Housing Project isolated from the rest of Parramore district since 1973 because of FDOT Interstate 4 / State Road 408 interchange construction.

 Interstate 4 ultimate reconstruction in 2021 eliminated old interchange ramps enclosing the Griffin Park Housing Project.

 New Hicks Avenue (FKA Terry Avenue) constructed in footprint of interchange old ramps, connecting again Griffin Park community to Gore Street to the south and Anderson Street to the north in the Parramore district.

 FDOT conducted a Community Awareness Plan for the Hicks Avenue extension project to inform and involve affected communities.

 Hicks Avenue reconstruction includes two roundabouts, new onstreet parking, bicycle facilities & wide pedestrian sidewalks.

2023
Griffin Park
Griffin Park
Parramore
Parramore

TERRY / HICKS AVENUE - ROAD

RECONSTRUCTION PLANS

Two projects:

 South St. to Anderson St. (City project) and;

 Anderson St. to Gore St. (FDOT project).

 Two Narrow Lanes

 Wide Sidewalks.

 High Visibility Crosswalks.

 Protected Bicycle Facilities.

 Design speed 25mph.

 Two Roundabouts (FDOT project).

 On-Street Parking (FDOT project).

Griffin Park

TERRY / HICKS AVENUE - IMPLEMENTATION

 Two-phased approach for better coordination with FDOT highways work.

 Preferred design utilized existing Hicks Avenue Right-ofWay.

 No additional properties needed.

 No residents or property owners displaced.

 Consistent with Parramore Community Vision Plan.

Griffin Park

 Consistent with Parramore Community Vision Plan.

GRIFFIN PARK

SUMMARY

 Potential for future Urban Renewal projects.

 City / FDOT partnership successful.

 Safer streets.

 Better overall street connectivity.

Hicks Avenue Reconstruction
Hicks Avenue Reconstruction

ORLANDO COMPLETE STREETS - TIMELINE

ROBINSON STREET – FUTURE COMPLETE STREETS

A 2.3-mile corridor connecting four different character districts:

 Central Business District from Hughey Avenue to Rosalind Avenue.

 Lake Eola District from Rosalind Avenue to Hyer Avenue.

 Neighborhood District from Hyer Avenue to Bumby Avenue.

 Milk District from Bumby Avenue to Crystal Lake Drive/Maguire Blvd.

Data Oriented Conceptual Design:

 Robinson Street is serving many community destinations.

 Corridor land uses not expected to change significantly long-term.

 Redevelopment opportunities in portions of corridor.

 Different mobility patterns – No one-size fits-all solution.

Lake Eola
Central Business
Neighborhood
Milk District

ROBINSON STREET – CHARACTER DISTRICTS

SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT

 Corridor serves higher than average population densities.

 Corridor has significant Millennial population.

 Corridor has higher than average elderly population.

 Corridor has significant transit-dependent population.

 Majority of trips along the corridor are destination trips.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

 Data gathering phase – Over 30 representatives interviewed.

 Project Visioning Team as technical/decision making group.

 Community Liaisons Group of business, institutions, leaders.

 Various public workshops and on-line surveys.

ROBINSON STREET – PREFERRED ALTERNATIVES

Final project design divided into two sections:

 Section 1 – Hughey Avenue to Mills Avenue.

 Section 2 – Mills Avenue to Crystal Lake Drive.

SECTION 1 – HUGHEY AV. TO MILLS AV.
SECTION 2 – MILLS AV. TO CRYSTAL LAKE DRIVE

ROBINSON STREET – FINAL

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT LAKE EOLA DISTRICT

ROBINSON STREET – FINAL

NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT MILK DISTRICT

ROBINSON STREET

 Project Implementation delayed because of funding availability.

 City / FDOT partnership successful.

 Complex intergovernmental coordination (City / Private Sector / Utilities / FDOT)

SUMMARY

OVERALL LESSONS LEARNED

 Data Analysis and Simulations are Powerful Tools.

 Public awareness and political support & timing = KEY.

 Option of temporary re-striping to test performance/public acceptance.

 Keep public informed/conduct surveys/request comments.

 Stay away from asking a yes/no VOTE.

 Crashes, injuries, bike-related & pedestrian-related remained low after implementation in all cases.

 Complete Streets are now Best Mobility Practices.

 Critical implementation issues: Equity, Public Engagement, Funding and Intergovernmental Coordination.

 Building Quality Mobility Alternatives to support placemaking.

QUALITY OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVES IS CRITICAL

“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic”

Any sufficiently completed street is indistinguishable from a place

COMPLETE STREETS EVOLUTION QUESTIONS?

4,

ABOUT THE PROJECT

In 2022, the American Planning Association hires WGI to update the 2010 Planner Advisory Service report on Complete Streets

Approach:

- What’s“Tried and True” - “Lessons Learned” - “What’s on the Horizon”

NEXT GENERATION OF COMPLETE STREETS

Multimodal Transportation

Complete Networks

Context

Safety

Equity and Access

Economic Development

Environment and Climate

Public Health

Technology

Programming and Management

HOW

Placemaking?!!

What’s going on with these bike lanes?!!

NOT TO PRESENT COMPLETE STREETS

Transit !!
USDOT

NEXT GENERATION OF COMPLETE STREETS

Multimodal Transportation

First Generation

Walk, Bike, Transit Stops

Lessons Learned

• Challenge: translating CS concepts and designs into implementable projects

• Pushback

• Endurance of car-centric planning

What’s Next

• New modes - e-bikes, scooters, electric vehicles, microtransit, shared-use mobility, delivery drones, autonomous vehicles

• First/Last mile to transit

NEXT GENERATION OF COMPLETE STREETS

Complete Networks

First Generation

Intent: roadways that provide complete transportation networks for all modes

Lessons Learned

• Reality: segments

• New practice of

• Gap analysis

• Low Stress Bicycle Network

What’s Next

• Technology assisted analysis

• Condition assessment

• Land Use + Network

• Existing & latent demand

CapeCoralFL

SPECIAL CASE

PARKING & CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT

First Generation

Management by signs for free parking and loading

Lessons Learned

• Increasing competition for curbs

• Parking is real estate

• Excess and unmanaged parking negatively impacts place

What’s Next

• “Right Size” parking

• Performance-Based parking

• New supply in multi-use facilities

NEXT GENERATION OF COMPLETE STREETS

Context

First Generation

Intent: providing a variety of typologies and crosssections for urban, sub-urban and rural roads

Lessons Learned

• Reality: early efforts lacked an examination of non-physical factors inherent in context

• Florida developed early model of context classification

What’s Next

• Flexibility in updated standards

• MUTCD

• AASHTO Green Book (2026-27)

• Planners’ Role

• Conversations – role of streets

FDOT

NEXT GENERATION OF COMPLETE STREETS

Safety

First Generation

Traffic calming

Bike lanes (preferably separate)

Lessons Learned

• Reality: “Check the Box” Sharrows

• Record-setting casualties – bike/pedestrian

• Street design as contributing factor in crashes

• Post-COVID bad habits

• Concerns over micromobility batteries

What’s Next

• Safety #1 priority @ all levels

• Proven countermeasures

• Pushback from motorists

• Deconfliction

NEXT GENERATION OF COMPLETE STREETS

Equity & Access

First Generation

Mainly addressed ADA accessibility

Lessons Learned

• Reality: ADA retrofits have taken time. This is being addressed through ADA Transition Plans

• Transportation advocates began to promote “access to destinations & opportunity”

What’s Next

• Planners’ role in promoting services and CS access

• Land use play a large role – 15 minute city

• Finer grain supply & demand

NEXT GENERATION OF COMPLETE STREETS

Economic Development

First Generation

Strong ties to economic benefits of placemaking – foot traffic, mixed use, open streets

Lessons Learned

• CS results in even or enhanced revenue (varies by business type, locational factors)

• Pushback from store owners

• COVID lessons – benefits not evenly shared

What’s Next

• Cities restricting/closing streateries

• Impacts of work-from-home

• New trends in multi-use streets

• Right-sized parking

NEXT GENERATION OF COMPLETE STREETS

Environment & Climate

First Generation

Air pollution and stormwater were main concerns, with mention of looming threats of climate change

Lessons Learned

• Localized air and water pollution still an issue

• Green and Complete Streets

• CS as climate GHG mitigation

• Transportation is now top contributor of GHGs

What’s Next

• An emerging focus on resilience and adaptation, especially heat

• Quantification of impacts

• Electric cars will continue demand for auto-oriented infrastructure & developmenT

AltaPlanning

NEXT GENERATION OF COMPLETE STREETS

Public Health

First Generation

• Public health practitioners were among the first CS partners

• Safe Routes to School

• Strong data sets

Lessons Learned

• Reality – only 11% of school age children walk or bike to school (ACS, 2022)

• Biking still seen as recreational

• Main inhibitor to biking – infrastructure

• E-bike riders still get a workout when biking

What’s Next

• E-bike promotion

• Promote physical & mental health

• TDM programs

• 1st/last miles – schools, transit

NEXT GENERATION OF COMPLETE STREETS

Technology

First Generation

• Use of GIS for planning

• Limited set of technologies – signals, broadband

Lessons Learned

• Mid 2010’s – surge in transportation technology posing risks & benefits

• New planning technology (modeling, data viz)

• Skepticism – technology in search of purpose

What’s Next

• New planning approaches to deal with uncertainty

• New management techniques with real time data & AI

• Simplified transit

NEXT GENERATION OF COMPLETE STREETS

Programming & Management

First Generation

Early open streets for events,

markets and cycling

Programming by street signs

Streets as static infrastructure

Lessons Learned

• Strategy: Unlock value from ROW

• COVID-19: streets for safe social & physical activities

• Highway technology for adaptive operations

What’s Next

• Technology to change traffic flow & street uses

• Digital signage with real time information

• Street design for flexibility

What it Means for Planners

WHAT PLANNING SKILLS APPLY?

▪ Planning for Flexibility

▪ Scenarios, Quick Build

▪ Safety Countermeasures

▪ Crash Modification/Reduction Factors

▪ Data Driven Planning

▪ Data Collection, Performance-Based Planning

▪ Public Engagement

▪ USDOT Meaningful Public Involvement

▪ Funding

▪ New selection criteria – climate, equity, partners

▪ Planning for Operations

SPECIAL CASE LIDAR

USES

Where Precision is Essential

Mapping Tight Urban Environments

Detailed Digital Record for Multiple Uses

• Before/After Studies

• Condition Reports

• ADA Compliance/Transition Plans

• Visualization

• Digital Twins.

• Predictive Modeling and Future

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.