The importance of lodge
By W Bro John Townsend
Freemasonry builds social capital From the moment the COVID-19 pandemic reached Australia on 19 January 2020, it changed life, and indeed lodge, for the foreseeable future.
F
rom the very outset of community transmission in March 2020, Lodge Kellerman 1027 suspended meetings and established a plan for keeping the lodge running despite lockdowns. Similar efforts resonated across the jurisdiction. As we adapt to the physical interventions to combat the virus while we await pharmacological alternatives, keeping our lodges active and vibrant is vital, not only for the survival of Freemasonry but for its intangible benefits. These are summarised in social capital theory, and it provides a structure to what countless masons have observed and discussed at length in this publication and at lodge meetings. Social capital theory has its roots arguably within 19th-century observations on the impact of the industrial revolution and globalisation on social cohesiveness (Durkheim, 1897; Tönnies, 1887), ironically by extrapolating Adam Smith’s (1776) theory of economic capital towards the less tangible elements of relationships. A lack of social capital has demonstrable public health effects on total mortality, infant mortality, cardiac disease, cerebrovascular disease [strokes], and injury (I. Kawachi, Kennedy, Lochner, & Prothrow-Stith, 1997). It is also arguably on the decline throughout Western society (Putnam, 1995). This is why keeping our masonic lodges active and vibrant during such difficult times is of utmost importance. This not only provides a basis for why our lodges are of such significance today but serves as a starting point for further reading.
36
September 2021
The connection to others through social capital has intangible benefits and a real payoff towards improving overall health.
Before explaining why this is of such importance, it is first necessary to briefly explain the concept of social capital, one which at first sight appears a paradox. Contemporary understanding of economic capital, such as cash or property, has its genesis in the works of Adam Smith’s reflections at the dawn of the industrial revolution. However, social capital is more difficult to define. Broadly, it deals with those people an individual knows, how that person is connected to others, and the nature of those relationships (Reimer, Lyons, Ferguson, & Polanco, 2008). Pierre Bourdieu (1986, p. 21) argues that social capital is ‘the aggregate of the actual or potential resources… of a durable network’ and forms the basis of conflict in a never-ending social and class struggle of individuals for advancement and resources. Benefits are essentially derived from the exclusivity of memberships of social groups (such as clubs, family groups, or norms and tokens
bestowed by recognised university degrees or qualifications) and the know ledge conveyed therein (Bourdieu, 1986). Unfortunately, social capital is on the decline, and we have all observed its impact within our own lodges and our ability to retain a viable membership. In the mid 1990s, Robert Putnam observed in his book Bowling Alone (1995) that social capital was on the decline in American society, and the same issues resonate here. We have all seen the impacts of what he described: a 35% drop in people having friends visit them at home and club meeting attendance dropping by 43% (Putnam, 2021). Putnam argues that there is a physical benefit to improving one’s social capital that enriches society as a whole, not just the individual. Groups, and our relationship with them, are fundamental to our selfesteem (Tajfel, 1970). This strikes at the heart of an overall benefit of being involved in community groups – masonic lodges included – and the public health relationship with social capital. There are also observable individual health benefits. Improved social capital improves personal mental health, cardiovascular health, lowers overall mortality, and reduces cerebrovascular disease incidence [strokes] (Ichiro Kawachi & Berkman, 2001; I. Kawachi et al., 1997). It may be news to some who have enjoyed a tipple in the South after a masonic lodge meeting, but improved social capital actually reduces the incidence of binge drinking (Weitzman & Kawachi, 2000) and
Integrity – Loyalty – Respect Freemason
