ARTICLE 13 ORANGE PAPER
Business Unusual Jane Fiona Cumming, Mike Peirce, Neela Bettridge
ARTICLE 13 ORANGE PAPER
Since 1998, we have reviewed, researched and commented on the social, environmental, economic, and ethical trends shaping organisational performance (public and private sector). This research - ‘Article 13 Orange Papers’ - represents our commitment to the dissemination of knowledge and good practice which is critical to the transition to a sustainable society. For further Article 13 Orange Papers Whilst this publication is free to view, we would welcome your recognition of our work by contributing to our chosen charity – please see our UNGC page NOTE: Article 13 Orange Papers are independent in their views and publishes articles written from a very broad spectrum of opinions. Unless stated, the views in these articles do not necessarily represent Article 13’s own views. We acknowledge all copyright featured on these papers
Business Unusual
March 2004
An Article 13 insight research report Jane Fiona Cumming, Mike Peirce, Neela Bettridge
Article 13 Insight Research 2004: www.article13.com
1
A perspective on innovation “The concept of innovation is often associated with the single big, new idea: the dramatic one-off breakthrough. However, in today’s world, innovation has to mean more than this. It has to become a continuous way of life. Only those companies that recognise this, and are equipped to deal with it, are going to succeed.� George Cox, Director General, Institute of Directors, IoD 2000.
Article 13 (www.article13.com) helps businesses identify and implement best social, ethical and environmental practice through corporate responsibility and governance programmes. Part think-tank, part guide and part engineer, Article 13 works with the public and private sectors, including governments, academic institutions, multinational and private enterprises. Benefits from Article 13's involvement include increased bottom line and transparency, shared understanding, wider risk management capability and a culture of innovation.
SERM Rating Agency was established in 1996 to develop a standardised system for measuring health and safety, social and ethical and environmental risks. It has established a unique algorithm to allow a range of CSR and sustainability risks to be measured and comparisons to be drawn between companies and sectors globally. The rating outputs are based on assessing both tangible (health and safety, social and ethical and environmental) risks and intangible (reputation) risks, in hard financial terms.
Article 13 Insight Research 2004: www.article13.com
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Can you think beyond new products and new services to entirely new business concepts – ones that meet deep customer needs in unconventional ways? Can you think of unconventional ways of recharging an existing business concept? Gary Hamel, Leading the Revolution, 2000. Companies face a complex and changing market and operating environment – from the impacts of global conflict to the technological leaps of the information age; from the demographic challenges to world-wide health and education provision to the environmental impacts of climate change and water scarcity. Multinational corporations and domestic business giants are increasingly expected by government and other elements of society to contribute to resolving these critical, yet apparently intractable, issues – a requirement recognised by parts of the business community in the 60 multi-sector partnerships announced during the Johannesburg Summit on Sustainable Development in 2002. This business response is more than the responsive protection of corporate reputation. Leading companies recognise the importance of sophisticated (formal and informal) networks in the planning and delivery of appealing business solutions; and indeed, many multi-stakeholder partnerships may have unexpected and remarkable consequences, possessing the potential to transform the vision and strategy of the organisation. In this climate of complexity, innovative practice in relation to global issues – political, social, technological, environmental and governancerelated - appears certain to become a central driver of competitive advantage in the coming decade.
Article 13 Insight Research 2004: www.article13.com
Article 13’s research in conjunction with SERM Rating Agency into the innovative activities of FTSE-350 companies has identified ten businesses that have embarked on initiatives which - albeit at pilot phase – represent stages on a path to business transformation: a direction confirmed by the ambitious vision statements they have conceived. These strategic breakthroughs encompass innovations in product and service, the creation of new routes to market through partnerships and informal networks, and innovations in technology and business process – all backedup by new strategic tools and measures to support forward-planning and measure and assure progress. Innovation is not restricted to the vanguard ten, let alone constrained to those companies that explicitly address the business-critical global issues (although it is hard to conceive of any successful transformation that does not address the changing nature of relationships between business and society). However, Article 13’s research suggests that the greatest opportunity for business transformation and competitive advantage lies with those companies that: - Have products and services which significantly impact on basic human rights including health and education; - Generate value through consumer brands, in particular in sectors with a tradition of strong NGO pressure, such as the oil & gas industries and the food and clothing retail sectors; - Are seeking to access new markets internationally and build a license to operate; - Are dependent on technologically-advanced solutions.
3
INTRODUCTION, HYPOTHESIS AND METHODOLOGY Peter Drucker’s (1985) early contributions to the literature on business innovation assert that entrepreneurship lies in the careful analysis and exploitation of changes to a business and its external environment. Forget the “popular picture of innovators – half poppsychology, half-Hollywood” that “makes them look like a cross between Superman and the Knights of the Round Table”. Instead, Drucker suggests, “successful innovators are conservative. They have to be. They are not ‘risk-focused’; they are ‘opportunity-focused’.” In his book ‘Leading The Revolution’ (2000) Gary Hamel confirmed that the basis of business innovation lies in a sensitivity to the radical changes of the business environment: that business concept innovation is ‘a capacity to create new wealth-generating strategies – strategies that are as revolutionary as the time we live in’. It is Article 13’s hypothesis that a new model of innovation through business concept invigoration is emerging in the UK. The source of these strategies, perhaps unexpectedly, are the key challenges found within the social, environmental and ethical issues that form part of the current ‘corporate social responsibility’ and ‘sustainable development’ debates (see Tables 1 and 2). The scale of change in today’s business environment perhaps mirrors the transformations of the 19th Century. Then, the Industrial Revolution was forged by (and generated) a cadre of social entrepreneurs and philanthropists - in the company-towns of Bourneville, Port Sunlight and elsewhere – through the construction of a new model of business. Article 13’s contention is that a new model of innovation is emerging, rooted in the major national businesses and multinationals of the FTSE-350. Enlightened business leaders are recognising that business survival and growth requires them to address the current businesscritical global issues. In doing so, unexpected successes – new product offers, new partnerships and new processes - are acting as a further driver towards this alternative approach to innovation, iteratively driving and drawing business to build financial capital alongside social capital. Article 13 Insight Research 2004: www.article13.com
Methodology: To test its hypothesis, Article 13 conducted a wide-ranging review into the history and prospects for the practice of socially-focused approaches to innovation. The first work phase reviewed the academic and business literature and press coverage for the major themes in innovation and social entrepreneurship. This survey provided the basis for a round table visioning session with business practitioners and specialists from the environmental, ethics, community-engagement and innovation fields to identify the key challenges facing the world – issues that provide a source of risk (and opportunity) for business in the next twenty years (see Table 2, page 6). Independent data from SERM Rating Agency was analysed for the FTSE-350 companies (excluding the investment trusts) for evidence of management systems and business programmes that sought to address a sample of eight of the fourteen business-critical global issues that were identified at the round table (see Table 1, page 5). From the c. 300 companies (FTSE 350 less investment trusts), 40 leading organisations were then identified for an intensive case study review – a set of companies shown by the SERM Rating Agency research to be amongst the ‘most active’ in demonstrating their response to the eight business-critical global issues discussed above (see also Appendix 1, page 12). The case study review identified evidence of business transformation (or incremental innovation towards transformation) as a direct result of the companies’ response to these global issues. All members of the group had demonstrated awareness of some businesscritical global issues, having produced a social / sustainability report or an equivalent section to their corporate website. In addition to this information, the Article 13 review analysed the businesses’ annual reports and other public documents.
4
Table 1 - Eight Business-Critical World Issues:
FINDINGS: Literature Visioning
Review
and
Roundtable
Through an extensive literature review and visioning exercise, Article 13 outlined a context for its research into business innovation. Key elements of this background - rooted in the challenges of (and changes to) business’s operating environment - include:
Organisations face a complex and changing market and operating environment – there is rapid and open movement of information and knowledge between societies; social and environmental catastrophes and inequalities persist; corporate boundaries are continually changing and companies are expected to contribute to resolving the critical issues facing society.
In the 1990s, new tools and techniques in the measurement and reporting of social impact were led by overtly values-based businesses such as The Body Shop and Traidcraft. At the same time many mainstream companies also began to experiment, driven, for example, by public and campaigning organisation pressure and in some cases subsequent regulation. A large proportion of these companies took a cautious approach to their activities and communication and sought to capture ad hoc benefits – reducing energy and raw material costs as well as environmental impact; reducing recruitment costs and improving productivity through higher levels of employee loyalty and commitment.
Pressure for effective social responsibility management is slowly but surely becoming translated into standard commercial practice in the FTSE-350. Many of the quick wins – for example reducing costs from inefficient use of resources and improving employee loyalty – have been delivered and the on-going management processes have been mastered.
Article 13 Insight Research 2004: www.article13.com
Climate Change Water Governance Technology
Waste Community Health Sustainable Production
Data Survey Article 13’s survey based on research from SERM Rating Agency (see Table 5, page 8) demonstrates that corporate activity addressing the business-critical world issues is relatively consistent across all issues. Across ten industry sectors (FTSE Actuaries Industry Sectors), the average score per issue (on a scale of 1 to 10) ranges from 3.2 to 4.4. Health (4.4) and community issues (4.1) have the highest ratings. Companies performed more poorly on some long-standing environmental challenges (water – 3.2) as well as those issues that characterise the new environmental challenge (climate change and sustainable production – both 3.5). Scores on technology issues were also relatively poor (3.5). The survey identified more significant differentials in performance on a cross-sectoral comparison, with performance strongest amongst utilities and non-cyclical consumer goods – industries facing regulatory and consumer pressure. The utilities industry averaged a score of 8, performing strongly all issues including the environmental issues of waste and climate change. Non-cyclical consumer goods businesses – including food, drink and healthcare companies - averaged 7 with strong scores on community (9) and health (8), The sector’s scores were lower (6) for most environmental issues. The worst performing sector (averaging 1) was information technology. Other weak performers were cyclical services (2) and financial services (3).
5
Table 2 - Business-critical world issues (Issues identified in Article 13’s visioning and some of the identified roles of business and opportunities to innovate) Global Issues
Role (and Expectations) of Business?
Political: Political agenda
Global Issues Individual versus
•
Delivery of millennium development goals
community versus
•
Public/private partnership
global
Role (and Expectations) of Business? •
Act local, think global, promote access of local services/products
•
Staff involvement in the local community
•
Partnership development
conflict
•
Individuals working remotely
Social:
•
Restructuring of board
Conflict – and post
Poverty – inequality
•
Responsible procurement and governance
•
Generate secure employment
Environment:
•
Provision of food, shelter, healthcare, education and
Climate change
training
•
Carbon neutral
•
Energy efficiency and reduction
•
Loans, micro credit
Water scarcity
•
Water recycling and reuse
Education
•
Access to mentoring, capacity building and training
Waste / reuse /
•
Reduce waste, increase re-use and promote recycling
Health
•
Access, infrastructure for provision of health services
recycle
•
Development and distribution of drugs
•
Disease prevention
•
Provide adequate health and safety programme
•
Family planning and education
Demographics Technological:
– leadership •
Develop products with less materials, energy
•
Collect and communicate more information
•
Implementation of precautionary principle
Sustainable
•
Communicate benefits of sustainable production
•
Improve labelling and communication of information of
GMOs Cross over:
Technology –
•
Access to technology (computers)
production and
internet
•
Use of technology / training / engagement
consumption
products •
(responsible
Ethics: Governance –
•
Promote transparent governance
corruption, crime
•
Abide by the laws (but unfair and unjust laws)
•
Reform of laws
Article 13 Insight Research 2004: www.article13.com
consumerism)
Maximise efficiency of products and consider byproducts
•
Use components that have been produced in a socially and environmentally responsible manner
6
Case Studies Article 13’s subsequent case review of 40 companies took the analysis from the sectoral level to the practice of individual organisations. 10 of the 40 businesses demonstrated evidence of significant innovation and potential transformation regarding the business-critical world issues (see Table 3 below). As with the data analysis, community and health issues provided the most fertile area for business involvement. However, a number of programmes addressing climate change and sustainable production were also identified. Table 3 – The Ten Innovators: Areas of Innovation Company
Sector
Anglo American
Mining
BP
Oil
BT
Telecomms
Centrica
Tesco Scottish Power Unilever
Energy Sales and other Consumer Services Pharmaceuticals Retailer – Department Retailer – Food Electricity Food Processor
Waste Recycling Group
Environmental Control
GlaxoSmithKline Kingfisher
Area of Innovation Health and Community Climate Change Climate Change Community
Health General (process) Community Community Sustainable Production Waste
Common aspects – relating to the companies’ strategic positioning and operating environment - appear amongst the vanguard innovators. The ‘early adopter’ companies of this new route to transformation frequently operate in consumer environments with supply chains and customer bases in volatile countries, with product and process issues that contain significant social, environmental and ethical risks, and where resolution of the issues requires high levels of collaborative problem-solving and high levels of current uncertainty (see Table 4 on this page). Many approaches are currently cautious; pilot studies exploring the potential of new operating methods and alternative approaches to market. British Telecom, for example, decided in the autumn of 2003 to examine the potential of developing a wind-farm on its own land due to the absence of alternative ‘green’ suppliers.
Article 13 Insight Research 2004: www.article13.com
Market and Operating Environment Factors High income / informationrich consumers
Supply chain in developing countries Products / services with direct and significant impact on critical social issues Market access and growth in developing / volatile countries Strong tradition of NGO pressure Branded products / services
Business to Consumer
New Technology Industries
Companies Indicating Innovation BP BT Kingfisher Tesco Unilever Anglo American, BP Kingfisher, Tesco Centrica GlaxoSmithKline Scottish Power BP GlaxoSmithKline BP GlaxoSmithKline Centrica Kingfisher Scottish Power Tesco Unilever BP Centrica Kingfisher Tesco Scottish Power Tesco Unilever BP Waste Recycling Group
Table 4 – Analysing the Innovators: The Characteristics of the Vanguard This proposal was designed to break BT’s historic methods of energy use and reduce costs – transforming the resourcing of the organisation - as well as building its reputation by demonstrating the company’s environmental awareness and responsibility. Such apparently small-scale and piece-meal initiatives can represent part of a sustained and wide-ranging approach to the role of innovation in the delivery of competitive advantage – an incremental path to transformation. In the UK retail sector, Tesco, operating in a saturated market with limited opportunities to build new stores and a need for new and skilled staff, has piloted an approach to business development based on re-generation and social inclusion. 7
Table 5: Analysis of SERM Rating Agency research – average FTSE 350 companies performance in demonstrating their commitment to addressing the Article 13 identified business critical world issues on a score of 10 (strong) to 1 (weak), categorised by FTSE Actuaries Industry sectors Issues from Table 2
Resources
Basic Industries
General industries
• •
4 4 5 4 4 5 6 4
4 2 3 4 5 3 4 4
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3
Non- cyclical Consumer Goods • Beverages • Food producers & processors • Health • Personal care & household products • Pharma’ls & biotech • Tobacco 6 6 7 6 6 8 9 6
• •
•
5
4
2
3
7
Cyclical services • General retailers • Leisure and hotels • Media & entertainment • Support services • Transport 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 2
Non-cyclical services • Food and drug retailers • Telecommunication services
3 2 3 3 3 4 4 3
8 7 6 7 9 8 9 8
1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1
2 2 4 3 2 3 3 2
2
4
8
1
3
Mining Oil and gas
•
Climate change Water Governance Technology Waste Community Health Sustainable production Average Issues from Table 2
Climate change Water Governance Technology Waste Community Health Sustainable production Average
Chemicals Construction and building materials Forestry and paper
Article 13 Insight Research 2004: www.article13.com
Aerospace and defence Electronic and electrical equipment Engineering and machinery
• •
Utilities • •
Electricity Other utilities
Cyclical Consumer Goods • Automobiles and parts • Household goods and textiles
Information technology • Hardware • Software
Financials • • • • •
Banks Insurance Life assurance Real Estate Speciality and other finance
8
By developing what they term ‘regeneration partnership stores’, the company has been able to contribute to the regeneration of deprived areas, quantifying the new jobs provided and improvements in diet. The regeneration stores are the latest in a series of Tesco’s apparently phased initiatives ranging from procurement and supply chain management to customer information and staff incentive programmes - collectively working towards sector leadership and transformation of its business processes. The Tesco example also illustrates the critical role of partnership in enabling the implementation of complex projects and demonstrating sensitivity to the expectations of a wide range of stakeholders. The key to the effective delivery of the regeneration stores was the use of a phased pilot approach that generated learning through partnerships with local government and community groups. A series of local partnerships are equally central to the delivery of Scottish Power Learning, the energy company’s educational programme for work-place and life-skills. The programme was launched in partnership with the trade unions, extending its remit beyond Scottish Power employees to their families, retirees and also selected groups in the wider community – so contributing to the company’s networks with key employment groups as well as building human capital in its operating regions. The programme now draws on the skills and networks of the unions, governmental bodies such as the Learning and Skills Council, NGOs such as The Prince’s Trust, and small enterprises such as the Cumbernauld Theatre. Operating in politically sensitive and economically deprived communities, the mining company Anglo American is another company paying careful attention to groups outside its primary stakeholders. Anglo American’s subsidiaries have worked in partnership with local medical groups and NGOs to implement a series of initiatives to address serious community issues. For example, Anglo Coal's HIV initiative has increased condom usage and treated sex workers and their clients. Anglo American’s managed operations have extended antiretroviral therapy at company expense to HIV positive employees progressing to AIDS; and the company has now recognised publicly that the extension of interventions beyond the
Article 13 Insight Research 2004: www.article13.com
workplace into communities associated with its operations is vital for its sustainability. Centrica’s UK energy business, British Gas, received unfavourable media coverage in late 2003 following the death of an elderly couple whose power supply had been disconnected. This public pressure will be a key test of its long-standing relationship with Help the Aged, a partnership designed to make the lives of the elderly warmer and less isolated. Interestingly, BBC coverage of the case included comments from a Help the Aged spokesperson, who said: "I think the key issue here is that there is no system in place to flag up vulnerable people and though they [British Gas] knew there was vulnerability here they weren't able to tell social services," – her comments referring to the apparent implications of the Data Protection Act. An innovative example of British Gas’s partnership approach, looking beyond immediate delivery issues to the long-term health of its customer base, was its Benefits Advice scheme launched in December 2003. This pilot programme is designed to address the confusion experienced by pensioners trying to understand the system of claiming benefits. The formation of more unexpected relationships are also illustrated by the Article 13 review; the partnership may even be the critical innovation that creates a new market or transforms the costs and opportunity to access a new market, for examples the clinical trials alliance with a generic supplier announced by GlaxoSmithKline, the pharmaceuticals company. Other case studies illustrate the creation of customer value through new products and services. An environmental services company, the Waste Recycling Group, has generated a series of environmentally beneficial production processes which create new green products. These include a green waste composting alternative to peat based products, and the recycling and recovery of organic content of household waste for use as soil conditioner. The food processor, Unilever, has boldly embraced the sustainability agenda. As its corporate communications state, “We are committed to contribute to sustainable development. We see this as a hard-edged commercial imperative because we will only be able to maximise shareholder value and 9
prosper in the long-term if we operate in a much more sustainable way.” The multinational Unilever faces extraordinary challenges in translating its vision into reality. Its first step was to structure its initiatives across 3 areas where it has direct control and believes it can make a substantial difference: agriculture, fish and water. The agricultural programme seeks to ensure continued access “to the key agricultural raw materials, and ultimately to develop market mechanisms that allow consumers and customers to influence the sourcing of raw materials through their buying habits.” Unilever’s procurement innovation rests in the development of sustainability guidelines for its five key crops palm oil, tea, peas, spinach and tomatoes – through a process of stakeholder engagement including a multi-stakeholder advisory board. The global energy player, BP, has a similarly ambitious vision: “To do no damage to the environment” – a challenge that stimulates BP “to find innovative ways to manage our environmental impact at local, regional and global levels.” BP’s approach is multi-pronged, addressing climate change (through combinations of energy efficiency, flaring reductions and lower carbon products), biodiversity, water usage, waste and air emissions. BP believes that gas will be the transitional fuel for several decades; yet a critical activity for the business, leading the gradual transformation to a position ‘beyond petroleum’, is driven by BP’s challenge “to build a material and profitable renewables business” based on solar and wind. BP emphasises the use of solar power to reach the “as much as one third of the world’s population” which is currently without access to electricity. It also advocates the role of partnership in delivery, working with global funding agencies, NGOs and private sector organisations as well as managing the training of local people to install and maintain the solar products. Underlying the majority of the 10 cases of innovation are leadership commitments to the creation of social, environmental and economic value supported by effective measurement and management processes – the tools and measures that help organisations to implement and deliver business transformation. An outstanding example of business process innovation is demonstrated by the retailer Article 13 Insight Research 2004: www.article13.com
Kingfisher, which has introduced a ‘Ladder’ management model structured around a set of business-critical issues – a global agenda translated into the specific strategic challenges in the European home retail market. Kingfisher’s approach, published in detail in its Plan for Corporate Social Responsibility, is explicitly designed to enable different businesses within the group to innovate independently (reflecting their own market conditions) around a commonly accepted vision of the future challenges facing the organisation. Kingfisher’s shared vision and ‘Ladder’ approach is already delivering incremental changes to the group’s activity. The results to date have enabled the organisation to share and report on best practice, so encouraging employees’ individual creativity to think (and realise) the unthinkable. The test for the organisation is whether these immediate successes can generate a step change from a price-focused retail tradition to a responsible and sustainable competitive edge. The ten examples illustrate the range of approaches to socially-focused innovation: from a series of incremental changes to the fundamental alteration of a business’s historic direction; from the creation of new products and services, to the formation of new partnership networks to develop and deliver the products and services, and to the introduction of new management processes that underpin the partnerships and product offer. Table 6 - Understanding Approaches to Innovation Process Innovations Incremental Change
Transformation
Anglo American’s HIV treatment programmes BT’s wind-farm energy self-supply BP’s shift to renewables Centrica’s customer education Scottish Power’s community learning Unilever’s sustainable production procurement guidelines Kingfisher’s sustainability management process
Product / Service and Channels to Market Innovations GlaxoSmithKline’s alliance with generic drug manufacturer Tesco’s regeneration partnership stores Waste Recycling Group’s new products from recycled waste
Evidence only in vision statements currently
10
Several of the cases are small scale, the innovations still at pilot stage; yet a more important note of caution comes from the notable absence of evidence regarding the skills base and competencies of their organisations in terms of delivering the stated strategic objectives. It is these capacities which will be central to the companies’ ability to identify and exploit the sources for transformation in response to business-critical world issues.
The Emerging Model – Summarising the Article 13 Review The Article 13 review illuminates an emerging model of innovation - a source of business transformation driven by the growing significance of world issues to implementing corporate strategy and delivering sustainable profit. Current corporate responses to these business-critical issues are frequently limited to complying with legal obligations and other immediate stakeholder pressures. But a vanguard of companies is demonstrating significant evidence of innovating towards business transformation. These strategic breakthroughs encompass innovations in product and service, the creation of new routes to market through partnerships and informal networks, and innovations in technology and business process – all backed-up by new strategic tools and measures to support forward-planning and measure progress. Most approaches are currently characterised by a wide-ranging series of incremental changes, with no convincing examples yet existing of transformation implemented across the entirety of the company’s operations. Hints of this radical direction, however, are evident from the vision statements of several organisations. Partnerships are significant in building the credibility of many innovations, and can also be essential in providing the skills and networks required to deliver the innovation effectively. Other success factors for implementation include new strategic tools and measures to support planning and calibrate progress in previously unmeasured issues and themes. A collective approach to the measurement of these intangibles can have the knock-on effect of fostering a shared vision Article 13 Insight Research 2004: www.article13.com
of transformation and delivering a demonstrable approach to risk identification and management. It is Article 13’s belief that the fourteen business-critical world issues (Table 2, page 5) identified in its visioning exercise tie in with a growing recognition across society that commercial operations have an effect upon the natural and social world that impacts us all – as customers, investors, employees and members of local and global communities. These social and environmental impacts have economic implications - from rising insurance premiums due to the effects of climate change to the shortage and increasing price of key resources such as fossil fuels, fish and timber, and to the shortage of landfill sites in the UK leading to tax and waste disposal costs. And the economic effects are sharpening the awareness and investigation of how companies can use innovation to rethink their business and transform it for future success. The early agents of change identified in the Article 13 research are straining beyond the immediate concerns of their business operations, carefully and imaginatively assessing the possible routes to creating value over the next ten to twenty years. They face serious limitations – distrust and scepticism extending from the boardroom to the shop floor, from the stock market to town halls and parliaments. Yet these companies are seeking to overcome scepticism with practical results – they are daring to think the unthinkable, work with the unexpected and create the unknown. These pioneering companies (and the entrepreneurial individuals within them) have grasped the notion that the risk of staying the same is greater than the risk of changing signs of innovation at work. References: Drucker P 1985 Innovation and Entrepreneurship Pan Business Management, London Hamel G 2000 Leading the Revolution Harvard Business School Press, New York
11
Appendix 1: Weightings applied to SERM Rating Agency classifications to calculate response to business-critical world issues
Environ. Incidents
Green house gas (GHG) production
Green house gas (GHG) transport
Health historic liabilities
Safety Internal (workforce)
Safety External (public)
Water use
Waste water generation
Unrestrained corporate power
Lack of community involvement
Energy use
Raw materials
Waste generation
Historical liabilities (management)
Adverse marketing practices
Adverse business practices
Engagement in bribery & corruption
Poor human resources
Peripheral (noise, light, visual)
Health Internal (workforce)
Health External (public)
Abuse of human rights
Natural resources degradation
Negative impacts of technology
Climate change Water Governance Technology Waste Community Health Sustainable production
Climate change Water Governance Technology Waste Community Health Sustainable production
Article 13 Insight Research 2004: www.article13.com
12