QIN FANG L A N D S C A P E
A R C H I T E C T U R E
P O R T F O L I O
Master of Landscape Architecture|University of Pennsylvania 2016-2018 Bachelor of Landscape Architecture|Pennsylvania State University 2011-2016
1
2
C O N T E N T
Curriculum Vitae
Reactivating Slate Quarry
5
6-15
Interim Urbanism
16-25
Galapagos Islands El nino
26-33
Green Country Town Redux
34-41
Redefine the Edge
42-45
Other Works
46-51
Media Exploration
Construction Document
Design Competition
Internship Experience
3
4
U NI V E R SIT Y OF PENNSYLVANIA Master of Landscape Architecture 05/2016 - 08/2018
PE NNS YLVANIA ST AT E UNIVERSIT Y Bachelor of Landscape Architecture 08/2011 - 05/2016
OLIN Landscape architecture intern 06/2015 - 08/2015 Red Hook Houses Basis of Design and Optional Masterplan Chantilly Wintergarden University of Washinton north campus housing Wanda Square in Chicago
COUNT S ST UDIO Landscape architecture intern 06/2014 - 07/2014 ExpoGeorgia MasterPlan Qianshan New Village Beijing International Garden Expo
AS LA P EN N SY LVANIA-DE LAWARE C HAPTE R
Student Honor Award 05/2016
U RBAN ARBORE TA: T RA NS FORMING GROU ND Winner 05/2016 Philadelphia, PA
SOCI A L REVOLU TION DE S IGN C OMPE TITION Final Shortlist 06/2015 Yaroslavl, Russia
REPRESENTING LANDSCAPES: DIGITAL (Nadia Amoroso) 2015 REPRESENTING LANDSCAPES: HYBRID (Nadia Amoroso) 2016
5
01
Reactivating Slate Quarry New identity for the neglected treasure | LARP 601 | PennDesign
Project Type: Regional Research & Design Site Specific Design & Construction Document Individual Work Advisor: Mark Thomann Duration: 2016. 09-2016. 12 Site Location:
Pen Argyl, PA
manifesto
The slate quarry used to be a productive land when the slate industry is still operating. The quarry bring in economic development and population growth to Pen Argyl. After the industry fade away, the quarry site was abandoned. In order to embrace the existing condition, and reintroduce quarry sites to residents and visitors, a new productive approach, the vineyard, is applied in this area. The vineyard provides working and visiting opportunities for both visitors and local residents. The beauty of the vineyard would attract people come and appreciate the site while bring Pen Argyl economic growth and job opportunities. The hillside vineyard design makes use of existing topography change and show the slate pile in a unique way. Slate soil mix provide well-drained, warmth keeping growing material for grapes that produce wine. Quarry water is used for irrigation and treated wetland would clean up the water and recharge back to quarry. Combining the producing, economic, and visiting function of the Pen Argyl site, the design provides a new identity for Pen Argyl.
6
appalachian mountains
Slate reuse for pavement Quarry
Vineyard
Waste Slate reuse for seating area
7
REGIONAL ANALYSIS LEHIGH VALLEY WINE TRAIL
WINE REGION
WINE REGION
WINE REGION
WINE REGION
GRAPE GROWING CONDITION SLOPE
LABOR
EQUIPMENT
AIR & WATER DRAINAGE
EROSION
FROST
TERRACING RUN OFF CONTROL
0-5%
PORTLAND
ek Cre
Argyl
n PEN ARGYL
Pe
Big
5 to 15% 15 to 25%
BANGOR WINDGAP
25 to 35%
30
n. mi
klin Hil an
Fr
35%+
Am
ore
. mi n
S, SW, SE areas are prepered
in nta
M lue ou
18 min.
good aeration, loose texture, moderate fertility good internal and surface drainage adequate depth (30 to 40 inches) welldrained, sandy loam soil
EASTON
B
SOIL
25
ANNUL MAINTAINANCE $1,500-$2,000 / acre per year GROSS RETURNS $2,500 to $5,000 / acre per year
8
Ideal for seasonal and part-time labor (e.g. migrant workers, students, retirees, etc.).
nac Pin le
Tolino Vynec
LABOR REQUIREMENTS Full time labor: One person can handle most of the management for 3 to 5 acres. With help seasonally for pruning and harvest.
ll
ver Clo Hi
INITIAL INVESTMENT about $8,000 / acre in first 3 years
m
in.
Bethlehem Allentown
Ridge
INVESTMENT AND PROFIT
. min
25
ASPECT
Galen
Need running water to avoid frost problem provide irrigation water source
30
n Gle
l
WATER
t res
MARTINS CREEK
REGINAL ANALYSIS Rich in limestone and slate, Lehigh Valley, especially slate belt area, used to be an industrial valley where has lots of cement, slate, steel, zinc, coal industries. With the development of slate industry, towns like bangor, pen argyl become flourishing. However, declined slate industries left lots of abondoned quarries sites in Lehigh area with highly disturbed ground. The extreme topography change and barren ground makes the site difficult for reuse. Those quarry sites are extemely meaningful for local people since the older generation spend their whole life working in those quarry sites. However, the abondoned quarry site means little to younger generation, even if the sites are located right next to people's backyard. The negative aspects in Slate Belt, especially in Pen Argyl, are also potentials for developments. It is worthwhile to remind people about the flourish history in Pen argyl, reintroduce the identity of Pen Argyl to new residents, and bring back economic value of those abondoned sites.
Environmental Protection Agriculture Urban Suburban Industrail
Rural Inactive Railroad Active Railroad
PEN ARGYL SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION CRITERIA Topo & View Topo change create hillshade growing condition for viticulture Topo change provide view for visitors
FRANKLIN HILL WINERY
Accessibility Accessible quarry site though trails, roads. Have the design potential to create pathway into the quarry
7.9 acres
Quarry Industrail herritage Quarry water is the water resource for irrigation Quarry water could be used for fish production Quarry size variation creates more design opportunities for programs.
10.8 acres
Slate Pile Industrail herritage Slate could be used to create slate soil for viticulture development Slate piles facing SW, SE, S have more potential 11.6 acres SLATE PILE
QUARRY WATER
INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE
ACCESSIBILITY
12.81 acres
BANGOR EAST BANGOR PEN ARGYL WIND GAP PORTLAND
21.51 acres
MARTIN CREEK BEAR SWAMP
9
ASPECT & SLOPE ANALYSIS
10 ace ace
minimum internvention was made for 5%-15% slope
Slope is changed into 20% even slope
Slope is changed into 15% even slope
tetrerrr
plapla nti nti ng ng
terrterr
plapla ntinti ngng
Irrigation
25%-35%
Pump up
15-25%
5-15%
Water pump up from quarry and stored in the water tank on top of the slate pile
Quarry water used for irrigation, moving water decrease frost problem for the vineyard
Clean up
Quarry Water Reuse
Terracing farming was applyed for slope larger than 35%. Walls are build at the bottom of each terrace section to control runoff. Water chanel is designed alone the path to collect irrigation water run off
35%+
Clean water is recharged back to quarry, prevent pollution problem to quarry water and ground water
Treated wetland was designed at the bottom of the slate pile. Irrigation water flows into wetland, basicaly following existing slope
Recharge
SITE ANALYSIS DESIGN STRATEGY
Slope Intervention
ade g ggrrade siitn s tng w eexi w xi follo follo
e grad sitng rade w exi g g follow exisitn follo
ea g ar area antin ting e pl e plan slop slop 15% 15% area ting ea e plan g ar slop plantin 15% slope 15%
ea g ar area lantin ting pee pplan slo slop 200% 2 % ea g ar ntin area e pla ting slop plan 20% slope 2 0%
ace ace
SE S SW
MASTERPLAN DESIGN CIRCULATION
Service road
VEGETATION
Path towards high point outlook
Path towards Quarry outlook/vineyard
Overlook
Path towards water interaction points
Vineyard
Vineyard on gentle slope
Biking
Quarry
Picnic Area
Birch
Hiking
Vineyard on steep slope
Willow oak
Kayaking
Honey locust
Sweet gum
MASTERPLAN
11
LARGE SCALE SITE DESIGN
Broad
Ches tnut
St.
St.
Hend
ersho
S2
t’s All
ey
Main entrance
Quarry outlook
Quarry outlook Wine store Tasting room
Overlook
Gathering plaza
Tool shed / Service Building
Tree grove Center dining area
Arbor Ste
ph
en
Vineyard
Ja
ck
so
nR
P2
Outlook
oa
d
Tool shed/service building
S1 P1
Treated wetland Hillside vineyard Service road
0 25' 50' Scale: 1"=100'
12
100'
HILLSIDE VINEYARD
overlook path hillside vineyard
0 25' 50' Scale: 1"=200'
100'
0 25' 50' Scale: 1"=200'
100'
FLAT AREA VINEYARD
relic use vineyard
WINE TESTING CENTER
wine testing room
parking overlook
quarry
0 25' 50' Scale: 1"=200'
13
100'
14
15
02
Pilot Plots—Interim Urbanisms New identity for the neglected treasure | LARP 602 | PennDesign
Project Type: Regional Research & Urban Design Site Design Group of 2 Advisor: Javier Arpa Duration: 2016. 09-2016. 12 Site Location:
The Port of LA, CA
manifesto
The main goal of the project is to stitch san Pedro community with its waterfront area. At west-east direction, 5 connectors extend the existing streets in san Pedro community towards waterfront area. Three scenarios are provided for the development in order to give various options for investors. 1. When Public investors got efficient financing to launch the development, the development would be started with public facilities such as library and community centers. 2. When public investors don’t have sufficient economic support, private sectors are introduced to make up the development cost. Policy such as FAR Bonus exchange for providing public infrastructures and public realms would be applied to private sectors. 3. Third scenario is private sector to launch the project by building the F1 Racing track to generate economic support for public infrastructure development in later years.
FINIANCING FRAMEWORK
PPP
PRIVATE INVESTORS
16
PUBLIC INVESTORS
EDGES & CONNECTORS
Fanfare Fountain Cruise Terminal
Cru is Visit e Term o in Hote rs Cente al ls & r Com mer cials
Visitor Center
Office Corridor
Commercial Corridor
Battleship Museum
Office Complex Lunch Space Passive Recreation
Maritime Museum
Bridge Aquarium
e Spac Event Hall rt Conce se Parking u Multi-
Concert Hall
r Cente Auto e Track c F1-Ra op Sh Auto re 4S Sto er Hotel in Conta
F1 Racing Track
m
lion
illion $49
Out-of-State Visitors staying in Hotels Out-of State Visitors not Staying in Hotels Non-Local Texas Visitors Staying in Hotels Non-Local Texas Visitors Not Staying in Hotels F1 Competitors & Related
RACE TRACK SCALE COMPARISON
Texas
mi
Austin $731 million
n
Travel Expenditure:
84
1m 16
$897 million
Major Income Source: Travel Expenditure
$ i.
$
Accumulated Income: $2800 million (4 years)
m il
$423 millio
Constructure Expenditure: 450 million
6
$1
6
ECONOMIC STUDY (AUSTIN, TX, US) Cost & Profits
Water front
Mix-Use Complex Commercial Space Library Active Recreation Community Center
Waterfront Platform
Library
Inner city
: 5.55km/3.45miles
STARTS & ENDS
$731 mil lio n
ABU DHABI
ZONES
303
Economic Components
Economic Impact
Visitors Other Major Sporting Events Concerts and Events Others
all events attributed directly to COTA operations
205 million
Gain
5
3.92
1.9 days
Time Period
State Gain City Gain Tax Gain
F1 Racing Days Avg. Length of Hotels Stays (Out of State Visitors) Avg. Length of Hotels Stays (In State Visitors)
TRACK SCALE TRACK COMPARISON SCALE TRACKCOMPARISON SCALE COMPARISON
San Pedro Race Track, LA, US SAN PEDRO RACE TRACK
Monte Cario, Monaco MONTE CARIO, MONTE MONACO CARIO, MONTE MONACO CARIO, MONACO
Track Length: 3.54km/2.20miles Corners: 15Corners: 15 Lap: 60 Lap: 60
Track Length: Track 3.34km/2.07miles Length: Track 3.34km/2.07miles Length: 3.34km/2.07miles Track Length: Track 5.51km/3.42miles Length: Track 5.51km/3.42miles Length: 5.51km/3.42miles Track Length: Track 5.55km/3.45miles Length: Track 5.55km/3.45miles Length: 5.55km/3.45miles Track Length: Track 3.54km/2.20miles Length: Track 3.54km/2.20miles Length: 3.54km/2. Corners: 19 Corners:2020 Corners: 19Corners: 19 Corners: 19 Corners: 20Corners: 20 Corners: Corners: 21Corners: 21 Corners: 21 Corners: 21 Corners: 15Corners: 15 Corners: 15 Lap: 55 Lap: 56 Lap: 55 Lap: 55 Lap: 55 Lap: 55 Lap: 56 Lap: 56 Lap: 56 Lap: 55 Lap: 55 Lap: 55 Lap: 60 Lap: 60 Lap: 60
track length: 3.54km (2.20 miles)
track length: 3.34km (2.07 miles)
Austin,TX, TX,U.S. US AUSTIN, TX, AUSTIN, U.S. TX,AUSTIN, U.S.
track length: 5.51km (3.42 miles)
Tas Marina, Abu DhabiSAN PEDRO RACE YAS MARINA,YAS ABU MARINA, DHABI YAS ABU MARINA, DHABI ABU DHABI SAN PEDRO TRACKSAN RACE PEDRO TRACK RACE TRACK track length: 5.55km (3.45 miles)
17
CASE STUDY: CASE STUDY: CASE STUDY: AUSTIN, TX, AUSTIN, U.S. Racing AUSTIN, TX, U.S.Track Racing TX, U.S. (2014) Track Racing (2014) Track (2014) COST & PROFITS COST & PROFITS COST & PROFITS Constructure Constructure Expenditure: Constructure Expenditure: Expenditure: $450 million $450 million $450 million
TRAVEL EXPENDITURE TRAVEL EXPENDITURE TRAVEL EXPENDITURE Out-of-State Out-of-State Visitors Out-of-State staying Visitors in Hotels staying Visitors in staying Hotels in Hotels Out-of State Out-of Visitors State not Out-of Visitors Staying State not in Visitors Hotels Staying not inStaying Hotels in Hotels
LANDSCAPE STRTEGY
LANDSCAPE STRTEGY
ARCHITECTURE STRTEGY
DESIGN STRATEGY
18
LONG-TERM LANDSCAPE FRAMEWORK
Cruise Terminal
Fanfare Fountain
Visitor Center
Office Corridor
Battleship Museum
Maritime Museum
Commercial Corridor
Waterfront Platform
Library
Bridge
Aquarium
Concert Hall
F1 Racing Track
0
400
800
1,600 Feet
19
SEQUENTIAL EXPERIENCE
20
SUBAREA 1 - CRUISE TERMINAL RENOVATION
21
SUBAREA 2- FISH MARKET
22
RED CAR LINE RIDING EXPERIENCE
WATERFRONT PROMENADE 23
SUBAREA 3- F1 RACING TRACK
24
BIKING TRAIL
F1 RACING EVENT 25
03
Reactivating disturbed ground New identity for the neglected treasure | LARP 701 | PennDesign
Project Type: Regional Research Site Design Individual Work Advisor: Karen M’Closkey Duration: 2017. 09-2017. 12 Site Location:
San Cristobal Island, Galapagos Islands
manifesto
Wiht dramatic population increase within the restricted urban boundry in Puerto Baquerizo, urban development is pushing against nature resources without much considerations about the nature condition in the urban area. Current urban development is simply constructing more buildings on vacant parcels or mono-function playgrounds with no-shade. Those development is keep changing current vegetated vacant parcels into impervious surfaces. With more frequent El NiĂąo event in the future, the island is increasingly receiving large amount of rainfall. The three ravine channels in the city do not have enough space to contain excess amount of rain water from both high land and the impervious surface in the town. Excess amount of rain water bring damage to existing urban development in some areas. Thus, some vacant parcels are not suitable for future development because of the water flow and slope. Reserving some vacant parcels as the extensions of the ravines, and developing them as shaded zones for recreation in dry season and water absorption zone in wet season is my design strategy for San Cristobel Island.
26
27
REGINAL ANALYSIS HYBRID SITE ANALYSIS NORTH RAVINE
EL NINO FREQUENCY HISTORY
SOUTH RAVINE
28
equator
Punta Pitt
SAN CRISTOBAL ISLAND VEGETATION ZONES
Urban Settlement Rural Settlement Cropland Coastal Zone Arid Zone Humid Zone Water Flow
El Junco Puerto Baquerizo Moreno
El Progreso
Coastal Area Tourist Attractions Piers Beach Inner Town Hotels Sports Courts for Residents Shops Lack of shaded area Recreation lack of variety
El Junco Lagoon El Progreso Highland mist
the “rain forest” of the Galápagos garúa fogs
Miconia Zone
Zanthoxylum (or Brown) Zone
Scalesia Zone
Transition Zone
Coastal Zone
Arid Zone
Ravines Lack of management Lack identity Being treated as barriers
700 m 650 m 600 m 550 m 500 m 450 m 400 m 350 m 300 m 250 m 200 m 150 m 100 m 50 m 0m
HYDROLOGY DYNAMICS+HUMAN DYNAMICS
EXISTING
DRY SEASON
WET SEASON
29
SITE DESIGN
golden bay hotel
north ravine
30
31
Geo-Morphology + Intervension Strategies Existing
Connecting+Runoff
Ravine Channel Openings
Pattern Extension
Walls+Topo Change
Water Flow
Trees Jerusalem thorn (Parkinsonia aculeata) matazarno (Piscidia Carthagenensis) Galapagos Pisonia (Pisonia floribunda) palo verde (Parkinsonia aculeate)
Shrubs Galรกpagos lantana (Lantana peduncularis) Prickly pear cactus Yellow cordia (Cordia lutea)
Groundcover Grey matplant (Tiquilia nesiotica) Galapagos carpet weed(Sesuvium edmonstonei) J
32
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
33
04
Green Country Town Redux The epitome of green country town redux | LARCH 400 | PennState
Project Type: Master Plan Design Site Design Group Work, Individual Work Advisor: Bryan Hanes Duration: 2014. 09-2014. 12 Site Location:
Philadelphia, PA
manifesto
Let every house be placed, if the person pleases, in the middle of its plat, as to the breadth way of it, that so there may be ground on each side for gardens or orchards or fields, that it may be a Greene country towne, which will never be burnt, and always be wholesome. --William Penn
In order to address the changing needs over time on the eastern side of central Philadelphia, such as the needs of offering better connected walking experience, improving environmental conditions, providing more programmatic spaces, and so on.. Continuous pedestrian-friendly system came up as the master plan for future Philadelphia which embrace new goals for city development based on William Penn’s original idea for Green Country Town. The system provides leisure and recreation opportunities in new open spaces and better connected walking experience for local community, as well as provides a new perspective for visitors to enjoy the city.
FAIRMOUNT PARK
SCHUYLKILL RIVER
CITY HALL
I-95
DELAWARE WATER FRONT
34
1. PIAZZA STORMWATER PARK(ING) LOT 4. DELAWARE AVE MIXED USE & RESIDENTIAL ZONE 5. FESTIVAL PIER 6. WILLOW STREET PLAZA 7. SKY PARK 9. CHINATOWN ROOF GARDEN 11. OLD CITY ROOF GARDEN 2. LIBERTY LANDS PARK 3. WATERFRONT SQUARE 8. FRANKLIN SQUARE 10. INDEPENDENCE MALL
1
2
3
4
5 6
7
8
9
10 11
35
1630
1790
1830
1860
William Penn founded the city green country town
Development affect historical streams
Industrialization, development boom & population
The end of industrialization era.
growth
SUN RISE MARKET FARMERS MARKET BRUNCH CLUB BOOK FAIR SUN BATH
24 22
02
20
04
24 HOURS
06
16
08
14
10 12
1900
1940
Highway (I-95) creates disconnections between neighborhoods
36
1960
CAFE/EATING PHOTOGRAPHY TAICHI WI-FI LOUNGE ART GALLERY MOVIE THEATRE LIGHT INSTALLATION CONCERT FIRE WORK NIGHT CLUB
2000
Revitalization of Delaware river waterfront area
37
Outdoor Exercise Plaza Outdoor Eating Area Water Recreation
Bus Station
Skypark Cafe I-95 Green House Skypark Grill Amphitheater Movie Theatre
Bus Station
SOCIAL
38
WALKABILITY
Subway Station Wi-Fi Lounge
ECOLOGY
ECONOM
AFTER
Sky Park Subway Station
Second St.
d. Columbus Blv
Water St.
Front St.
ing
Skypark Grill
Callowhill St.
2nd St. & Wood St.
Sky Park Station
d.
2nd St. & Callowhill St.
Columbus Av. & Callowhill St.
Bus Park
Second St.
Columbus Av. & Callowhill St.
Columbus Blv
Callowhill St.
Front St.
2nd St. & Callowhill St.
Drop Off Area
BEFORE
Wood St.
Amphitheater
SKYPARK SUBWAY STATION
DROP OFF AREA
SKYPARK WELCOME CENTER
N FRONT ST.
39
05
Greenpoint Waterfront Redefination Flooding Resillience | LARCH 400 | PennState
Project Type: Master Plan Design Site Design Individual Work Advisor: Christopher Counts & Maria Counts Duration: 2014. 01-2014. 5 Site Location:
Brooklyn, New York City
manifesto
In order to create a flood resilience waterfront with more welcoming living condition, and higher land value in Green point, seven pencil high rises and large park space is purposed. The Luxury high rise towers serve as the economic engine in this development, supporting the parks in the rest area of the site. The combination of the development towers and public space forms this economic self-sustained and flood resilience master plan. Pencil high rises save area for public spaces, and provide best views towards both upper and lower Manhattan. Park space facing east river serves as flood barrier which protect the purposed development and the inner neighborhood. Public spaces facing the inner Green point serves as community spaces for the residents. Architecture and landscape strategies are designed together as a buffer zone, from north side to south side, to prevent the damage of future flooding events towards inner city.
40
41
FLOODING CONDITION ANALYSIS EXISTING
PROPOSED
10’ FLOOD
10’ FLOOD Not Affected Buildings Affected Buildings Flood
159.2 Acres; 11.92% Land Flooded; 122 Affected Buildings, including
14’ FLOOD
72 (59.02%) Industry Buildings Loss
47 (38.52%) Residential Buildings Loss
3 (2.46%)
Commercial Buildings Loss
1. Public spaces are sacrificed for community protection when flooded 2. Remaining platform in the park for public transportation
14’ FLOOD
575.1 Acres; 43.04% Land Flooded; 1363 Affected Buildings, including
17’ FLOOD
352 (25.83%) Industry Buildings Loss
963 (70.65%) Residential Buildings Loss
48 (3.52%)
Commercial Buildings Loss
1. Public spaces are sacrificed for community protection when flooded 2. Remaining platform in the park for public and emergency transportation
17’ FLOOD
809.1 Acres; 60.56% Land Flooded 2828 Affected Buildings, including
433 (15.31%) Industry Buildings Loss
2334 (82.53%) Residential Buildings Loss
61 (2.16%)
1. Public spaces and lower floors in the high rises are sacrificed for community protection when flooded 2. Remaining platform in the park for emergency transportation.
Commercial Buildings Loss
DESIGN STRATEGY 1-4 floor: Commercial as sacrificed Area
BUILDING WALL REINFORCEMENT
4 flood+: Residential, Hotel and Office as protected Area
Sea Wall
Flood Wall
SEA WALL/FLOOD WALL
44
Levee
LEVEE/BARRIER ISLAND
Barrier Island
Allow/Absorb
WETLAND BUFFER/BEACH
SITE DESIGN
SPORTS FIELD
LANDFORMS BUFFER PLAYGROUND EVENT LAWN
WETLAND BUFFER COMMUNITY PARK
KAYAK LAUNCH URBAN BEACH WATER TRANSPORTATION STOPS
SPORTS FIELD
TERRACE GARDEN
OPEN LAWN
PLAYGROUND INFINITY POOL
BUSHWICK INLET RESILIENCE PARK
45
MEDIA EXPLORATION
46
DESIGN COMPETITION SOCIAL REVOLUTION DESIGN COMPETITION
“Under the Bridge“ Location: Duration:
Yaroslavl, Russia 1 Months
Competition Project Site Inventory and Analysis Team Work with Xiaoyan Dong Final shortlist
concert hall
urban park 47
11 06 .25
0
CK
BA
RM
0
.5
11 02
NG
1108
DI
IL
BU
07
11
0%
1.1
06 .5 SL 0 O PE :
10 98 10 97
10 96
0 10' 20' 40' 80'
PLAN
N
1096
1095
1094
Y
A
AZ
PL
EA
AR TR
EN
0
.0
07
11
S:
LP
FF
O
1097
P
O
DR
1093
R.P.I
ES
TC BC : 1 : 1 107 10 .6 7.1 0 0
1098
04
1101 1100
9
1106 1105
LP: 1104.50
3 110 2 110
11
109
11
05
1105.25
P.I
LP 11 : 05 .50
.I
R.P
R.P.I
06
11
1107
11
TC BC : 1 : 1 108 10 .0 7.5 0 0
TC BC : 1 : 1 107 10 .7 7.2 0 0
06
.2
5
0
FO
AT
PL
5
.2
0
LP 11 : 05 .5
06
11
R.P.I
1 .1 107
%
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND GRADING SCALE: 1"=60'-0" 11
07
.4
0
11 07 .90
TC BC : 1 : 1 108 10 .0 7.5
99
5.5
110
10
10 .25
0
06
110
:1 06
TC BC : 1 : 1 108 10 .3 7.8 0 0
TC: BC 1109.0 : 11 08.5 0 0
5.8
01
LP
TC BC : 1 : 1 108 10 .0 7.5 0 0
1108 .40
TC: 1110.00 BC: 1109.50
E:1
11
11 11
AC
SP
R.P.I
06
G
IN
RK
1108
8
110 TW :1 BW 118. :110 00 5.20 TW :1 BW 118.00 :110 5.50
OP
03
8.00 TC: 110 7.50 BC: 110
11
13 0 7.0 0 10 .5 : 1 106 TC : 1 BC P.I 11
TC BC : 1 : 1 108 10 .4 7.9 0 0
TC BC : 1 : 1 108 10 .6 8.1 0 0
11 08 .2 5
TC BC : 1 : 1 109 10 .2 8.7 0 0 TC BC : 1 : 1 108 10 .9 8.4 0 0
1108.25
6
PA
08
11
.85%
110
A
:1 10 7.5 0
SLOPE:1
AD
LP
.70
1110
TC BC : 1 : 1 107 10 .5 7.0 0 0
TC BC : 1 : 1 108 10 .7 8.2 0 0
TC BC : 1 : 1 109 10 .1 8.6 0 0
TW:11 11.50 BW:11 08.80
SL
11
.I
TC BC : 1 : 1 107 10 .9 7.4 0 0
TC BC : 1 : 1 108 10 .6 8.1 0 0
1108
04
R.P 0
07
11
1109.60
7.50 R.P.I
05
11 TC BC : 1109 : 11 .0 08.5 6.5
TC BC : 1 : 1 109 10 .4 8.9 0 0
1109
TC BC : 1 : 1 110 10 .1 9.6 0 0
TC BC : 1 : 1 109 10 .6 9.1 0 0
LP: 110
11
.I
10
TC BC : 1 : 1 109 10 .6 9.1 0 0
5%
:1
TC BC : 1 : 1 108 10 .9 8.4 0 0
.8
TC BC : 1 : 1 109 10 .3 8.8 0 0
TC BC : 1 : 1 110 10 .3 9.8 0 0
1.00 TC: 111 0.50 BC: 111
LP
.I
TC BC : 1 : 1 109 10 .1 8.6 0 0
L
TC BC : 1 : 1 110 10 .0 9.5 0 0
.25
TC BC : 1 : 1 108 10 .7 8.2 0 0
5
.2
07
11
TC BC : 1 : 1 109 10 .7 9.2 0 0
1110
1111 11
1106
0
.4
08
11
0
7.5
PA TW RK O ING W AY LO RO T AD S
0
.1
11
11
1109
.7%
11
8
T BC C: 1 : 1 11 10 0.0 9.5 0 0
R.P TC BC : 1 : 1 109 10 .5 9.0 0 0
TC BC : 1 : 1 110 10 .1 9.6 0 0
1110
1111
TC BC : 1 : 1 112 11 .0 1.5 0 0
0
1107
5
.2 09 :1
0 LP 8 :1 10
0 0
11
.7 PE
TC BC : 1 : 1 109 10 .9 9.4 0 0
O
5
11 10 .2 5
1112.00
.2
08
11
SL 9.5
110
11
111
E:8
1109
R.P
10
0
0 : LP 08.5 11 1 P:
.4
TC BC : 1 : 1 110 10 .4 9.9 0 0
10
TC BC : 1 : 1 110 10 .1 9.6 0 0
0
.5
11
11
.I
R.P 0
09
11
0
.25
P PL ARK AN IN TI G L NG O BE T DS
.I
.8
11
TC BC : 1 : 1 110 11 .8 0.3 0 0
0
R.P
09
11
TC BC : 1 : 1 111 11 .2 0.7 0 0
.1
1112.50
11
: .50 LP 10 .I 11 R.P 0.5
11
09
TC : BC 1113 : 11 .00 12.5 0
Y 11
11
10
Y WA :1
TW:1109.00 BW:1105.50
OP
48 ENTR LP
11
11
1113.00
11 12 .5 0
TW:1111.00 BW:1108.50
SL
1 11
1112.80
11
1113.00
1112 .50 TC: 1113 BC: .0 1112 0 SLOPE: .50 1.8%
1112
11
11
0 1.0 0 11 0.5 : 1 11 TC : 1 BC
12
1113.00
0 2.0 0 11 1.5 : 1 11 TC : 1 BC
11
11
11 11
TW:1109.00 BW:1105.50
.0 1107 TC: 1106.5 BC:
11
3
TW:1109.00 BW:1106.50
: LP 5.50 0 11
HPS: 1113.50
111
CONSTRUCTION DRAWING DRAW
LARC
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND GRADING
FINA STOR GRAD
TW:11 18.50 BW:11 02.50
PROJE CFE ST MANAG
7
TW :1 BW 118. :110 00 5.90 TW :1 BW 111.00 :110 8.50
1106
SITE L
R.P .I
CFE PEN STATE C
REVIS NO. 1.
NAME QIN FAN
DATE 12.07. 2
1107 SLOPE:1 6.7%
PLAN
DRAW
1108
FILE N FANG Q PLAN
LEGEN
10 95
MATERIAL DESIGN
SHE
L
TREE PLAZA PLANTING 1. 2. 7' * 7' PRE-CAST CONCRETE PAVER
3. 4.
5.
EES BUILDING
6. 7.
8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. TABLE
14. 15.
BENCH
APPLIED SCIENCE BUILDING
KEY GTS
All plant materials shall be in accordance with the American standards for nursery stock (ANSI Z60.1-2004). Plant according to ANSI A300 PART 6. If the tree is container grown, score or prune the outside of the tree root package to redirect circling fibrous roots. If the tree is balled and wrapped, carefully remove soil from the top of the tree root package until the primary toot is located. Prune or remove any winding or girding roots. Cut any wires, wire baskets, and/or containers and carefully remove from the tree root package before placing it in the hole. Carefully remove all twine, cords, and/or wraps and remove from the tree root package before placing it in the hole. Dispose of properly. Dig the planting hole a minimum of 2 times width of root ball for at least the first 2 inches of depth. Below 12 inches, dig hole wide enough to permit adjustment. Do not dig the hole deeper than root ball depth. Scarify the subgrade, sides and the bottom of the planting hole when planting in clay soil (more than 15% clay). Make sure the planting depth is correct by locating the primary root. This is the top of the tree root package. The top of the tree root package shall be elevated above the finished grade. The elevated distance shall be equivalent to the caliper size. For, example, the top of a tree root package for a 2” caliper three shall be 2” above the finished grade. Carefully place the tree in the hole. Lift and set the tree by root ball only. Do not lift using the tree trunk and do not use tree trunk as a lever. Loosen backfill before filling planting hole. Fill planting hole half way with excavated planting soil, water to eliminate air pockets. Do not tamp. Finish filling planting hole, tamp soil gently, and water immediately. Do not place backfill on the top of the tree root package. Apply a 1-2” layer of compost above the tree opening and planting area. Maintain a 4” distance from the trunk flare. Apply a 2-3” layer of wood mulch above the compost. Maintain a 4” distance from the trunk flare. Skate trees, if necessary, to stay in plumb position. Use Arbor Tie Staking and Guying (DeepRoot), installed per Manufacturer’s recommendations. Remove after 1 year. Dispose of properly. Do not use tree wrap, paints or bindings. Prune tree only to remove structural defects or to improve tree structure.
QUANT. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE (H/S) CONDITION REMARKS 18 Gleditsia triacanthos 'Skyline' Skyline honeylocust 40'/25' B&B
MIXED BED PLANTING (3) RC (8) VA (1) CF (1) AA (21) AGO
(1) CF
(3) AT
(4) RC (9) SO
Key Quant. Name Coniferous Trees AB 3 Abies koreana 'Kristal Kugel' Deciduous Trees AA 2 Amelanchier aborea CF 4 Cornus florida HV 3 Hamamelis virginiana Evergreen Shrubs RC 20 Rhododendron carolinianum Deciduous Shrubs AA 17 Aronia LB 5 Lindera benzoin VA 5 Viburnum alnifolia Perennial Grass BC 23 Bouteloua Herbaceous Perennials AM 57 Achillea millefolium AGO 139 Acorus gramineus 'Variegatus' AT 15 Asclepias tuberosa CV 9 Coreopsis EP 32 Echinacea purpurea EM 8 Eupatorium maculatum HH 23 Heliopsis helianthoides HL 9 Hemerocallis lilioasphodelus LS 60 Lobelia RF 61 Rudbeckia fulgida VA 13 Vernonia Groundcovers PA 23 HCK 110 Hosta 'Captain Kirk'
(3) AA (11) AM (24) LS
(10) HCK (2) EM (1) AB
(3) AT (12) HH (9) RF (3) AA
(17) AM
(1) HV
(1) EM (3) EM
(11) AM (7) BC (9) CV
(12) EP (7) LS
EES BUILDING
(10) AGO
(40) AGO (11) EP (2) VA (9) AT
(18) RF
(4) HH
(2) LB (4) AA
(1) HCK (1) AB (3) LB (2) RC
(3) RC (1) CF
(8) HCK
(7) HH
(20) RF (8) BC
(15) PA
(1) AA (8) PA
(4) HL (18) AM (3) RC
(9) EP
(8) BC (3) VA
(1) AB (2) HL (4) HCK
(3) AA (1) CF (19) LS (3) HCK
Common Name
SIZE (H/S)
Crystal Ball Korean Fir
10'/15'
B&B
Remarks
Serviceberry Flowering Dogwood Common Witchhazel
3'-4' 1.5" Cal. 20-30’/20-25’
B&B B&B B&B
Carolina Rhododendron
3’ – 6’
Red Chokeberry Spicebush Hobblebush
3'-4' 3'-4' 6-10’
#5 pot #5 pot #5 pot
Side Oats Grama
3’/2’
#SP4 pot
12" O.C.
Yarrow Japanese Sweet Flag Weed Thread Leaf Coreopsis Purple Coneflower Joe Pye Weed Oxeye Sunflower Yellow Daylily Blue Lobelia Blackeyed Susan Ironweed
7'/3' 1'/1' 2'/1' 2.5'/2' 4'/2' 7'/3' 4'/4' 3'/2' 2.5'/1' 2'/2' 7'/3'
#SP5 pot #SP3 pot #SP5 pot #SP3 pot #SP3 pot #1 pot #SP5 pot #SP5 pot #SP3 pot #SP3 pot #1 pot
18" O.C. 10" O.C. 18" O.C. 15" O.C. 18" O.C. 30" O.C. 18" O.C. 24" O.C. 15" O.C. 18" O.C. 30" O.C.
Christmas Fern Captain Kirk Hosta
1.5'/3'
#SP4 pot #SP5 pot
12" O.C. 30" O.C.
(3) RC (1) HV
(4) AA
(3) HL
(51) AGO
(17) AGO
MEADOW PLANTING (1) JV
(2) CR M #1
(1) MA
M #2 (2) CR
M #2 (1) MA
M #3
M #1
(1) MA
M #2 M #2 M #2
(1) JV M #2
M #1
(1) MA
M #2
M #1 M #2
M #2
M #1
M #1 M #2
M #2
M #1
M #2
M #2
M #2
M #2
M #2
M #2 M #1
(1) MA (1) JV
M #1
M #2
M #2
M #1
M #1
(1) MA
M #2
M #2
M #2
(1) JV
(2) CR
M #1
M #2
49
OLIN INTERNSHIP
LILYPAD STRATEGY The core principal of the Lily Pad is raised earth at the center of buildings, creating a permanent flood barrier that provides failsafe flood protection to the level of FFEs adjacent to the lily pad.
OVERALL FLOOD PROTECTION AND RESILIENCE STRATEGIES- 3 OPTIONS
OPTION 1 •
Located at the campus perimeter
•
Walls, terraces and berms as flood protection strategy
•
Create minimal modification to existing buildings and open space
•
Lowest initial implementation costs
OPTION 2 •
Variations of the lily pad flood protection strategy
•
Less vulnerable to catastrophic failure
•
Creates opportunities for new gateways to the neighborhood
•
New retail corridor that activates the campus edge, provides new amenities, and job opportunities
OPTION 3
50
•
The greatest level of change to the existing campus
•
New buildings that create a robust retail corridor
•
Lily pads and new structures as flood protection strategy
•
The greatest amount of new open spaces and amenities
OPTION 2: Flood protection on Lorraine Street during daytime
OPTION 2: Flood protection on Lorraine Street during storm condition
OPTION 2: Natural play area in Central Mall
OPTION 3: Urban farm in Central Mall
51
QIN FANG
52
Landscape Architecture Portfolio Composed Winter at 2018 +1 (814) 321-1896 qinfangupenn@outlook.com