6 minute read

Your Ally

Next Article
Regional Roundup

Regional Roundup

How protected is teacher planning time, really? Here’s what the law says

BY PAUL TAPP

ATPE Managing Attorney The ATPE Member Legal Services Department is receiving an unusually high number of questions this school year about planning or conference time, almost all related to teachers being required to do other things during their planning time, such as participating in grade level, learning community, 504, or Admission, Review, and Dismissal (ARD) committee meetings or even covering other teachers’ classes. Many of these issues are long-standing, but the staffing shortages many districts are experiencing during this new phase of the pandemic are contributing to these issues as administrators are finding it hard to find substitutes. That makes this a good opportunity to review the law on planning time.

Section 21.404 of the Texas Education Code states:

“Each classroom teacher is entitled to at least 450 minutes within each two-week period for instructional preparation, including parent teacher conferences, evaluating students’ work, and planning. A planning and preparation period under this section may not be less than 45 minutes within the instructional day. During the planning and preparation period, a classroom teacher may not be required to participate in any other activity.”

The commissioner of education has made three significant rulings regarding what a teacher may be required to do during their planning time. First, in the 1986 Strater v. Houston ISD decision, the commissioner stated that it was the teacher who determined what planning activities were best:

“The purpose of the planning and preparation period is to allow teachers ‘time to engage in parent-teacher conferences, reviewing students’ homework, and planning and preparation as the teacher, not the administration, deems best. The statute clearly relieves the teacher of any duty during this period of time and prohibits the district and its administration from requiring the teacher to engage in any other activity the administration determines to be useful and important.”

In the 2010 Canutillo Educators Association v. Canutillo ISD decision, the commissioner defined “instructional day”:

“The term “instructional day” as used in Texas Education Code section 21.404 is interpreted to mean the time when students are receiving instruction at the school where the teacher is located. Hence, planning and preparation time must occur during the time that students at the school where the teacher is located are receiving instruction.”

Finally, in the 2014 Bledsoe v. Huntington ISD decision, the commissioner made it clear a teacher could not be assigned or even voluntarily accept nonplanning duties during the required planning time:

“There is no exception provided for teaching duties performed during the planning and preparation period. Performance of teaching duties during the planning and preparation duties is not permitted by the Education Code and is not an exception to the Chapter 21 teacher contract requirement.”

These decisions by the commissioner of education have given teachers a great deal of authority over their planning time. However, they are opinions of the commissioner, and, as such, Commissioner Mike Morath can modify, overrule, or make exceptions to them. For example, there has never been a case where the commissioner has ruled specifically about a teacher being required to attend ARD or 504 meetings during their planning time. There is no stated exception in the law for ARDs or 504 conferences. That said, there is some reason no one has challenged having ARDs and 504s during planning time. It could be concern about going out on a limb and having the commissioner say that ARDS and 504s are OK during planning. That is a realistic possibility because, by their nature, they would fall under the heading of “planning.”

It could also be that the most likely alternative to having ARDs and 504s or other planningrelated meetings, such as team-planning meetings, during planning time is having them after normal school hours—meaning the educator would have to stay late to attend the meetings. Teacher contracts have an “additional duties” clause that allows the district to require them to stay late if needed. So, staying late would be a real possibility, and many teachers, given that choice,

continued on page 38

ATPE Stands by You

Each year, Texas educators rise to meet new and unexpected challenges. As you serve your students, ATPE stands by you each and every day, ready to support you with affordable and high-quality legal resources so you can have peace of mind.

How do you know ATPE delivers? One word: transparency. The complete details of your professional liability insurance policy* and legal resources** are publicly available, so you can be confident about ATPE’s benefits. Other organizations publish incomplete coverage details—but as an insured ATPE member, you know upfront exactly what you’re getting in your membership.

ATPE professional liability insurance policy* highlights include:

• Up to $8 million per claim and aggregate in liability insurance, including a $2 million limit for civil rights claims plus defense costs. • Up to $20,000 aggregate for employment rights defense with a $10,000 per-claim limit, win or lose. • Additional $5,000 per claim for favorable-outcome certification and termination claims.

• Up to $15,000 aggregate for criminal defense. • Up to $5,000 per claim for bail bond reimbursement. • Up to $10,000 aggregate for successful appeals beyond the school board or commissioner of education. The aggregate limit of liability is $25 million.

In addition to the above insured benefits, eligible ATPE members have access to a team of staff attorneys who may help with job-related legal concerns.**

View the details of the professional liability insurance policy at atpe.org/protection. For assistance, members must call (800) 777-2873 or submit a request through the online Member Legal Services Intake System.

*The Educators Professional Liability Insurance Policy is underwritten by the National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA., with $5.7 billion in net surplus and more than $22 billion in total admitted assets as of December 31, 2020. The insurer may not be subject to all insurance laws and regulations of this state. The foregoing notice is provided pursuant to Texas Insurance Code Article 21.54. ALL COVERAGE IS SUBJECT TO THE EXPRESS TERMS OF THE MASTER LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY ISSUED TO ATPE AND KEPT ON FILE AT THE ATPE STATE OFFICE. Coverage applies to an insured’s activities within his/her professional capacity and does not apply to activities that predate the coverage period. View the complete details of the insurance policy at atpe.org/protection. Eligibility for ATPE membership benefits is contingent upon ATPE’s receipt of the entire annual membership dues amount for your appropriate membership category. A disruption in payments to an authorized payment plan may result in discontinuation of such benefits, including cancellation of insurance coverage for the entire membership year retroactive to Aug. 1 or your membership date. ATPE reserves the right to determine eligibility for the appropriate membership category. The membership year runs from Aug. 1–Jul. 31. **The insured benefits and staff attorney services are provided through separate programs.

2022 ATPE SUMMIT:

BACK IN PERSON & FOCUSED ON THE FUTURE

After two virtual ATPE Summits, we’re more than ready to leave our computer screens behind and gather in Grapevine for the biggest reunion ATPE members have ever seen. Make plans to attend the ATPE Summit July 6–8 to connect with friends (both old and new), grow as an educator and leader, and shape ATPE’s future during the House of Delegates.

This article is from: