From connection association to virtual architecture

Page 1

„you have to do stuff that average people don’t understand because those are the only good things” Andy Warhol

acknowledgement: Péter Ángyán, Tab................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Zsuzsanna Szabó, Tab...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Judit Ángyán, Budapest........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Margít Klenota, Dombóvár.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. István Kistelegdi, Pécs........................................................................................................................................................................................................... Ádám Hatvani, Budapest................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Andrea Köröm, München...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Attila Lanczki, Pécs....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Zoltán Barth, Pécs........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Norbert Németh, Pécs............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Andrea Burovinyecz, Budapest.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Júlia Horváth, Budapest................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Ferenc Gorján, Siófok......................................................................................................................................................................................... Annamari Robotka, Párizs-Budapest.......................................................................................................................................................................... Reinhard Flesch, München................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Ingongo Gerner, München........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Tilos Rádio Budapest............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Deutsche Banh Gmbh, München...................................................................................................................................................................................... binaura.net.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. kitchenbudapest.hu................................................................................................................................................................................................................... nonamevj.blogspot.com...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... corpora.hu............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...

Attila Ángyán From connection association to Virtual Architecture


motto

02

"Andy Warhol is an artist, he is the iconpainter of the 20. century, filmmaker, model, the pope of the pop art. And a famous man. Quite famous. He is present in our daily life, where we would never think of him. He is present in the every day watched visual representation of the television shows; his behaviour; his philosophy in the fellowships; his idioms, his attitude in the articles of the chic magazines. The influences of his pictures appear in younger artists’ works over and over again. The objectivity of pop art is imperative. Art has no depths, everything is on the surface. Art is the same job as any other job. Sex is the same job as any other job. This book is like you discover things over and over again by walking in your own flat, on your street, in your city, that you see every day. Andy Warhol is a life philosopher. Flavoured with little little little little humour."

Péter Halász


consultants

Ifj. Kistelegdi István DLA

Hatvani Ádám, sporaarchitects

At present he works at the Pollack Mihály Faculty of Engineering, at University of Pécs. He is an associate professor of structure professorship and also the specialist of energy design. His main subjects are ecology in architecture, ecofriendly architecture, structure designing, complex design like thesis subjects on M.Arch., B.Arch. and environmental engineer faculties. Leader of the energy design atelier at the structure professorship.

sporaarchitects is a Budapest based office - architects, designers, and thinkers operating within the fields of architecture, urbanism, research and development. The four partners, Tibor Dékány (1968), Sándor Finta (born 1973, Budapest), Ádám Hatvani (1972) and Orsolya Vadász (1976) opened practice in 2002, after gaining experience working for different Hungarian and international studios. All of them graduated from the Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME). Among others, they currently work on one of Hungary’s most significant projects, the construction of the underground line called Metro4. This challenging design process requires matching innovative architecture with complex technological points of view.

He graduated at the Fachochschule Würzburg B.Arch. faculty in 1996, then at the University of Kassel M.Arch. faculty in 1999. He has been working at the Pollack Mihály Faculty of Engineering, at University of Pécs since 2006. He began his DLA thesis at the Architecture Faculty of University of Pécs, and he obtained his doctorate at the Breuer Marcell Master School of University of Pécs in 2006. A preparatory PHD work antedated it from 2001 to 2004. He defended his habilitation at University of Pécs, Pollack Mihály Faculty of Engineering in 2008. His research themes are ecological architecture from 1998 and energy design and postfossil future technologies from 2007. Architectural designer, or rather main designer, he has worked as a project leader for the Kistelegdi Architectural Office since 2005. He has worked for the Descher Kubina Architectural Office in München from 1999 to 2005. He is designer and co-designer of many realized buildings. The participation in the Climadesign master training and research at the University of Technology in München from 2008 facilitated the foundation of the Energy design research and architecture in Pécs. He is a member of the Capital Central Designer Council, and working group leader in the Climadesign Association in Munich. He is the co-founder of the Chamber of Hungarian Architects and Passivhouse Pécs Association, member of the Scientific Committee and the editor commitee of the Pollack Periodica magazine.

03

sporaarchitects was founded in order to develop an architectural practice that turns intense research and analysis of practical as well as theoretical issues into the driving forces of design. Often projects focus on ordinary aspects of everyday life, including the unappreciated or negative, that are enhanced or twisted in order to bring to the fore the unexpected potential of the things that surround us. At the core of our architecture is the ability to take a fresh look at things through experienced eyes. Rich of multiple expertises the office is fueled by designers and experienced architects that jointly develop projects from early sketches to on-site supervision. The mutual use of the complementing teams as consultants ensures that the projects will never suffer from being too conventional nor too naive. By continually developing rigorous methods of analysis, experimentation and execution, sporaarchitects is able to combine experimental design research with efficient production.

.................................................................... Ifj. Kistelegdi István DLA

.................................................................... Hatvani Ádám


designing place

04

M端nchen, marienhof


Chinesischer Turm

Siegestor

air photo München

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Neue Pinakothek

Alte Pinakothek

Englischer Garten

Odeonsplatz

Hofgarten

Maximilianplatz Feldherrnhalle München Hauptbahnhof Bayerische Staatoper

Karlsplatz Frauenkirche

MARIENHOF Hofbräuhaus

Neues Rathaus - Marienplatz Bayerische Landtag Oktoberfest - Theresienwiese

Isar

05

München Ostbahnhof


06

air photo M端nchen Altstadt, MARIENHOF


München guide

München (Austro-Bavarian: Minga) is the largest German province, the capital of Bavaria, behind Berlin

After the temporary decrease, the number started to grow again . According to the forecasts, the

and Hamburg Germany’s third, the European Union’s twelfth biggest city. The population of München is

population will be 1,4-1,6 million in the following years. 4,65 million people live in München’s agglomeration.

about 1,3 million, with the agglomeration the number of its people is 3.130.000. The Isar River flows across

In the 2006, from the registered foreigners: 43.026 Turkish, 24.697 Croatian, 22.101 Greek, 21.466

the city. München is one of Germany’s economic, traffic and cultural centre, and one of Europa’s liveliest

Austrian, 20.871 Italian, 20.169 Serbian, 16.485 Bosnian, 14.144 Polish, 8324 Iraqi, 7203 French, 5484

cities. The city's motto is "München mag Dich" (Munich likes you). Before 2006, it was "Weltstadt mit Herz"

Russian, 5325 Ukrainian, 5225 American.

(Cosmopolitan city with a heart). Its name derives from the German word, Mönch which means monk and can be found on München's coat of arms. München is located on Bavaria’s southern part, with the 4,359/km² population density it is the most densely populated city in Germany. The town’s river is the Isar,

1 400 000

1 200 000

which flows via München’s area 13,7 km long, from south-west to north-east. The Isar halves the city centre. Its most popular island is the Museum Island. Most streams of München flow into the Isar. Several lakes can be found in the outskirts of the city: Ammersee, Wörthsee, Starnberger See. Besides the Isar,

1 000 000

800 000

the city’s other big river is the Würm, which springs from Lake Starnberg. The town’s entire area is 310 km². München with this value is the sixth biggest city in Germany after Berlin, Hamburg, Cologne,

600 000

Dresden and Bremen. From the 310 km² area, 44,1% buildings and including the not inbuilt area as well, 17,1% area used for traffic, 15,6% agrarian/rural area, 15,5% artificially established green area (park, cemetery), 4,1% forest, 1,3% water (river, lake) and 2,2% other. The townspeople’ number grew above

400 000

200 000

100.000 in 1852, thanks to that it became city. After that the towspeople’ number grew forward, in 1883 it had 250.000 inhabitants, until 1901 this number doubled. München became the third biggest city in the

07

0 1400

1450

1500

German Reich after Berlin and Hamburg. The population was 840.000 in 1933 and one million in 1957. The first top of the development was in 1972 when the Bavarian capital had 1.338.924 inhabitants.

Population Growth of München

1550

1600

1650

1700

1750

1800

1850

1900

1950

2000


München guide

Economy and infrastructure In 2007 München was, in economical aspect, Germany’s most successful

Road transport München is a significant motorway junction. As the center of the southern part of the

city among the 50 tested towns. According to the INSM it also keeps Germany’s economically the most

country, several motorways and federal ways meet in its area. The first motorway has been opened in 1936.

successful city in the following years. The study considers the different economical factors like productivity,

At this time it was called route 26 (nowadays A8), it arrived into the city from the West. The history of the

gross income, investment, unemployment rate and the good qualified labour. On the list Stuttgart, Düssel-

other motorways goes back after the WW2. In the 1950s and 1960s the first route has been started to be

dorf, and Hamburg follow München. Among the German cities, in view of the purchasing power, München

built , it is the 2R federal way, which is the ring road around the city centre nowadays.

with big advantages was the first one with 26,648 euro per inhabitant. Rail transport München is an international junction. The Berlin - Frankfurt - München - Innsbruck ICE and Air traffic The Münchener Franz Josef Strauss International Airport opened in 1992. It is 29 km from the

the Hamburg - Nürnberg - München - Garmisch - Partenkirchen ICE arrive here. The trains of München -

city to the north-east , with 30,8 million passengers in 2006. It is Germany’s second, Europe’s seventh

Ausburg - Nürnberg - Berlin and München - Ingolstadt - Nürnberg - Frankfurt és a München - Stuttgart -

biggest airport, and based on the Lufthansa’s decision it is developed ahead to relieve Frankfurt. In 2003 a

Frankfurft - Köln - Dortmund start from here. The TVG has been travelling since 9 December 2007. Trains

new terminal has been opened . In 2011 it is possible that a third air- and landing strip will be built . In 2008

have been starting to München every 2 hours since 2008, several of these are Railjet.

the intended plans has been stopped after which a floating railway would have been built (can be found in the city centre ) from München main railway station to the airport. According to the plans the journey time

Colleges and universities Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Technical University of Munich

would have been 10 minutes, but because of the high charges the idea did not work . The new airport can

(TUM), Ukrainian Free University, Munich Business School (MBS), Munich University of Applied Sciences

be approached with S1 and S8 S-rails and on the A92 motorway.

(HM), Munich Intellectual Property Law Center (MIPLC), Bundeswehr University Munich, Pionierschule und Fachschule des Heeres für Bautechnik, Hochschule für Musik und Theater München, Akademie der

08

Public transport Important parts of München’s public transport are the S-rails (S-Bahn) and subway built

Bildenden Künste München, University of Television and Film Munich, Munich University of Philosophy,

for the Olympic in 1972 Presently there are 10 S-rails and 8 subways and 9 railways supporting the public

Munich School of Political Science, Katholische Stiftungsfachhochschule München, International Max

transport. In the city besides the above, there are 10 tram lines and 70 bus lines. The München subway

Planck Research School for Molecular and Cellular Life Sciences, Deutsche Journalistenschule.

network with its 100,8 km length is the first in Germany. Its underground part is 80,4 km long , which is the second longest in the country. 1,5 million people travel day by day.


München guide

Parks The city’s oldest park is the Hofgarten, which belongs to the residence. It has been built in the renaissance. North-east from this is Englisher Garten, which was opened in 1789 and extended from München centre almost until the east border of the city. With its 3,7 km² area, it is bigger than the New York Central Park, or the London Hyde Park. The west part of the city centre, from the Karlsplatz to the west, the Botanischer Garten can be found, where the Glass Palace stood until it was burnt down. To the west, there is the big Nymphenburg Palace Park, which has been built in French style. The Botanischer Garten borders the park from east, which is the most significant garden in Germany with its 0.22 km² area and 400.000 visitors per year. Hirschgarten is located south-west from Nymphenburg . In the city centre, behind the Neues Rathaus built in neogothic style one can find the Marienhof, which is also my chosen place for designing with its circa 17.000 m² area.

On München’s northern border is the Schleißheim Palacepark with three palaces in it. The park is one of Germany’s remained baroque parks. The Olympic Park is also significant green area , where the Lake Olympic and the Mount Olympic have been located too. Besides the Olympic Park, there are many parks and green areas in the city, such as the Luitpoldpark, the Westpark, and the Ostpark. In München’s eastern part, in the place of the old airport where the Messestadt Riem quarter was built, at the new Riemer Park the German garden exhibitioncalled the Bundesgartenschau took place in 2005.

09

The area on the Isar between the Deutsches Museum’s inland and the Flaucher island, is a popular place for picnic and bathing (designated nudist area, too). To the south from Flaucher in Hellabrunn the München’s zoo can be found.

Neues Rathaus


München, Marienhof

Choosing the place

I went to München in connection with a job in summer. One of my friends left me at the Odeonplatz, not far from the Marienhof. I have just run into a random event. Then I started out blindly on the street next to the Feldherrnhalle. I took my first photo in München on that square. The place appeared a bit neglected and what is more I did not have a thesis theme at this time. My first impression was that why they have not designed a multicultural meeting place here so far. I only saw a huge green area with a few couples sitting on the grass and a lot of bicycles. I passed round the square then I moved toward the shopping street...

10


M端nchen, Marienhof

History of M端nchen

Marienhof earlier

Like all German cities, M端nchen was also strickened by a lot air attacks of the Allies in the Second World War. 90% of the histrical city centre and 50% of the entire city was destroyed by the bombings. According to the estimations, 6000 people died, 15.000 people was wounded during the bombings. After the 18th December 1944 bomb attack the so far built-in Marienhof was in ruins.

1812

1806

1

1946 sight from the Rathaus

1175-1270

1915

1572

1285-1337

1705


München, Marienhof

1948 – 1971

Following the end of the Second World War the building remains were demolished, then the square behind the Rathaus was used by the drivers. The Marienhof was a parking place from 1948 to 1971. Adolf Abel architect imagined a city centre without cars, which eventually was not accomplished. The first passer-by zone, the Kaufingerstrasse was built by the Olympics in 1972.

„oasis of the cars”

1966 – 1967 subway construction place, the entrance to the subway was installed on the Marienhof. 1971 – 1973 information pavilion 1973 – 1991 occasional eventplace, park 1989 – 1990 excavations

12

1994 – until today green area after the Hansjakob Landschaftsarchitekt’s plans


München, Marienhof

Marienhof plans 1955-2006

1. prize: Braunfels, Barth (green concept)

1952

architectural division preliminary study

2. prize: Hilmer + Sattler

1955

city council’s assent to the building-in - plan of the elevated garage

3. prize: Lothar Schlör

1956

plans of cinema, hotel, apartman

1958

refusal of the plans, call for tender

city council’s assent to the realization of the 1. prize application

1959

remuneration of the winners in 1958

survey of the location of the deep-level garage

1989

1. prize: A. Freiherr von Branca

suspensions of the survey because doubtful result of the exploration

2. prize: R. Baumgartner, F. Simm, W. Terhalle

suspension of the planning works

3. prize: G. Roemmich

revision of the first three prizes

subway constructional works on Marienplatz/Marienhof

1990

report of the Office of Heritage about the excavation

1966

revision of the A. Freiherr von Branca’s plans

decision about establishment of a temporary green park

1971-1973

information point during the Olympic Games

Wienands’ building-in proposal

1973/1980

2. and 3 revision of the A. Freiherr von Branca’s plans

1991

technical acceptance of the park

1981

council meeting

1992

modification of the local building regulation

1982

A. Schönborn, Prof. K. Kagerer’s green conception

1996

action plan for reform of München’s city centre

A. Freiherr von Branca, A. Hempel’s gallery conception

1997

Hypo-Cultural Foundation’s artist competition, choosed entries for establishment:

1985

Haus-Rucker-Co architect group’s building-in proposal:

Gabriel Orozco (“long going ” building -in)

- cultural square

Rosemarie Trockel (free square)

- open air theatre, café, architectural elements

Daniel Buren (artistic compactness)

city study: Marienhof as the square of relaxation and calmness

13

assigment of the Braunfels architect office for working out the plans

1987

remuneration of the winner applications in 1985

Itsuku Hasegawa, Dan Graham (hybrid using) 1999

SPD’s proposal for a competition without building-in

2006

winner entry of the bbz landscape architect office and atelier pk architect office, Berlin


MĂźnchen, Marienhof

14

Prof. Esterer - Becvar, 1956

Adelheid v. SchĂśnborn, 1982

Prof. Kagerer, 1982

Freiherr v. Branca/ Hempel, 1982

Architekturgruppe Haus-Rucker-Co, 1985

Hilmer + Sattler, 1987

Braunfels/ Barth, 1987

Snozzi, 1987


M端nchen, Marienhof

Rosemarie Trockel, 1999

Gabriel Orozcos, 1999

15

Daniel Buren, 1999

Itsuko Hasegawa/ Hasegawa, 1999

bbz, atelier pk, 2006

Gn端chtel Triebswette, 2006

Levin Monsigny, 2006

Hansjakob, 2006


M端nchen, Marienhof site analysis

Protection of heritage

Passage and passer-by zones

Theatinerstr. 7

Residenzstr. 2 + 3

Weinstr. 11

Weinstr. 4 Marienplatz 8 Dienerstr. 14-19 + 22 Weinstr. 1 + 2

0

16

100 m

300 m

0

protected historical building

passer-by zone

Altstadt

passage

Marienhof

Marienhof


München, Marienhof site analysis

Passer-by

Cyclists

1670

22

2900 6

2500

9

< 1000 15

15 12

12 9

6

21 12 48

136

5000

15500

6500

17000 18 6500 11 100 m

0

local byroads

pedestrian traffic (1992)

passer-by zones

predicted pedestrian traffic

93 100 m

0

increasing pedestrian traffic (new S-rails station) predicted pedestrian traffic

number of bicyle parking places

Marienhof

unmarked bicycle path

bicycle traffic

Marienhof

17


MĂźnchen, Marienhof site analysis

Vehicles

Public transport

tram 19 ca. 4.000

S-rails Marienhof with S2 2015: ca. 31.300

10 pcs. of parking places for limited time 4 pcs. of parking places for disabled people 11 pcs. of parking places for limited time 11 pcs. of taxi parking places

9 pcs. of parking places for limited time

S-rails (S1-S8) Marienplatz passengers 2000: ca. 92.000 without S2 2015: ca. 72.500 with S2 2015: ca. 56.100

subway (U3/U6) Marienplatz passengers 2000: ca. 87.200 without S2 2015: ca. 89.400 with S2 2015: ca. 87.500

bus 52 ca. 6.000

U/S-Bahn Marienplatz new S-rails entrance bus 52

parking places for limited time

bypass

parking places for disabled people

blue zone

taxi parking place

passer-by zone Marienhof

tram 19

18

100 m

0

100 m

0

new S-rails line DienerstraĂ&#x;e

SchrammerstraĂ&#x;e


M端nchen, Marienhof site analysis

Greenery

Open places and squares

0

300 m

0

greenery

300 m

squares

Isar and fountains

Altstadt greenery Isar and fountains

19

Englischer Garten

Englischer Garten

Promenade-platz

Marienplatz

Max-Joseph-Platz

Odeonsplatz


MĂźnchen, Marienhof site analysis

Cultural institutes

Open air places

<180 <90 <60

<90

<60 <120 <30 <60

<120

<90 <180

<30

<90

<60

<150 <30 <180

<30

<120

<120

<90 <90 <60

<60

<210

<120 <180

<30

<180 0

<120

<120

300 m

100 m

0

museum, gallery music

open air places

cinema

passer-by zones

theatre

passage

cultural institute, library open buildings

20

Nationaltheater

Filmcasino

TheatinerstraĂ&#x;e

Filserbräugasse

Max-Joseph-Platz


M端nchen, Marienhof the process of designing

from Connections to the virtual

21

"Huge part of our surrounding world is in motion. The only exception is the rigid immobility of architecture. It has to be changed. Architecture has to come to life." (Marcos Novak)


2 o

c

M端nchen, Marienhof the process of designing

c Yo c r o Yo c o o u Y ro u o Yo fl c ro ou ro u fl c o an fl c t o an fl c .c fi o a t. c o an n o t n .c fi t.c m d o fi o /a T nd m o fin c m /a h t m d o Yo / t e he t T a il o /a T ro u h t a t tt he c o il e o an ut fl c o Y c u i aa u an t la o o an o Y ro ou g lo l u t o ro u a t ya o ng tlo g o . c fl n fi c ya o n/ k h o n fl c g loo o ya o a n/ k h ya m d d n t e o a n/ k .c fi i p re /a T k di e n t n di o n tt he .c fi lo : /d he pl re m d o p nd ip re il o m o : / m T a a/ aa u m tt he /a T lo : t a/ ng lo tt he m il o a/ c aa u co Y i o y o o Yo l c a ro u ng tlo ro ou o Yo n/ k h aa ut ro u di e ng lo c fl c fl c ya o r o p Y k o y o fl e: an n/ h ot c c l o a r o k t o Yo o an n/ h o u di e .c fi m t ro u re .c fl d c p o n e .c fi a ip re lo : o an / nd m d fl c o n t l / : m m d o o an at Th .c fi T a/ / t m T o a ti e tt he n .c fi h t a m d la o ti e / o n il o c /a T u m d la o aa u an t o Y tt he / u o l t r T a a o t ng lo g il o o u tt he ng lo o y aa u fl an k c il o ya o o y o a an k ng tl n/ k h aa ut /d he n t .c fi /d he di e ng lo ip re ya o n l i pl re r : n ya o pl e o m d o : : k m /a T o n/ h m a m tt he di e a/ / a r il o pl e / aa u : o t

outlook - HOW IS IT DONE BY OTHERS


München, Marienhof the process of designing, preludes

"the architecture itself is an abstraction established from information"

RÉSZTVEVŐK, ÖSSZEFÜGGÉSEK / PARTICIPANTS, RELATIONS

WESSELÉNYI-GARAY, Andor PODRECCA, Boris HABA, Péter BROWN, Azby TESAR, Heinz TASNÁDI, József FERENCZ, Marcel

BÁRTFAI, Zoltán FADGYAS, Bálint GYULAI, Levente HARGITAI, Ádám HORUZCI, Ádám PÁNCSICS, Dávid PAUER, Dániel SCHLÄFFER,Lajos

MOLNÁR, Csaba KARDOS, Eleonóra

BRADASCHIA, Maurizio EKLER, Dezső F R A N ÇO I S, Edouard JABORNEGG, Christian PÁLFFY, András BÁCSALMÁSY, Dóra Dr. BÁCSALMÁSY, Zoltán DÁRDAI, Balázs KOLLÁR, Bence KOVÁCS, Dávid SÁRI, István VANNAY, Miklós VASS-EYSEN, Áron HOLLÓ, Attila HORVÁTH, Gábor LOSONCZI, Anna TÖRÖK, Tamás LENGYEL, István MACULLO, Davide MOURA, Eduardo Souto de SIEW, Gaétan BÁN, Ferenc

PÁSZTOR, Erika Katalina

CSOMAY, Zsófia

FUJIMOTO, Sou ÁNGYÁN, Attila ARDEY, Emese BENE, Tamás FÁBRY, Zoltán GYURICZA, János SZABÓ, Tamás János SZOKOLYAI, Gábor TÁNZCOS, Tibor HECKER, Zvi MAJOR, György NJIRI Ć, Helena Paver P E R O V I Ć, Vasa J. TÓTH, Péter 3LHD

23

GREGORIČ , Tina / DEKLEVA, Aljoša FINTA, József BORBÁS, Péter HORVÁTH, Magdolna KULCSÁR, Attila NAGY, Krisztina NAGY, Tamás PÖLÖS, István RÜLL, Tamás VARGA, Márton KARÁCSONY, Tamás NAGY, György FRETTON, Tony TESAR, Heinz LÉVAI-KANYÓ, Judit

VARGA, Anikó

essence between the lines by attila ángyán


München, Marienhof virtual spaces

Until now the designing of physical environment was discussed in connection with architectural space-idea.

emergent and even more complex "informational space" and the "reality" can be. As in civic design, it was

Although with the appearance of designing programs, the final plans were transferred from paper format into

Le Corbusier, in technologic vision it was William Gibson science fiction writer, who created the concept,

virtual medium that can be seen through the screen. We can rotate, transform and we are in continuous

which defined this relation in our thinking during almost one and half decade. The meaning of the word

interaction with our building, which still needs many time for starting the construction.

"cyberspace" in common sense is the common mental space, which is "floating above the reality." It is a sort of "social hallucination" with independent identity, considering that in a given case we might be talking only

According to many sociologists’ accordant opinion, the characteristic process (and occurrence as well) at

about phenomena existing in this space, or the connecting existence of an identity independent from the

the millennium’s turn, also affecting the future years, are the development and the spreading of the

physical space. The phenomenon described in the definition in our view is that, which means actually a

information society nowadays. The spreading of the social networking services, the rapid development of the

separate culture and an individual, independent symbolic system supposition.

mobile technologies, and the rapid rising of the quantity of the information are bringing along the necessity of changing the use of the technologies and transposition into contemporary architecture.

The new space conception namely defines the information space not as an autonomous

The new societies bring along new priorities, new systems, and new concepts etc., which also mean new

phenomenon, but as something that complements the physical environment, and in this way

research themes for the sociologists. The informational channels are apparently the dominant elements of

defines it as a complex space that fits into the human environment culture.

information societies, which are the configuration and the high development of computerised networks. Because of the accentuated function of telematics, they were set into focus of the actual research, i.e.

This new paradigm even dilates the territory of the architecture: after the architectural space and the concept

infrastructural background of the information society. Not only its significance, but also its novelty and its

of the built environment, the concept of the sensible space becomes the summative knowledge of the age

curiosity raised the interest of the researchers.

logic construction. The concept of the sensible space, first of all, defines a new dimension for the symbol system of the environment shaping, secondly also takes the science that analyses the human subject into

24

In the age of information, we face a sort of changing, which urges the architects to think over again their

the process of the designing, ordering into the collective term of the interaction-design. It seems that

missions, querying the relevance of the concept of the „physical environment”. Thereto, we find the way in

architecture trends with a continuously dilating domain of interpretation head toward a summative symbol

this question, first we have to understand the relation of these new technologies to space. Developing

system.

informational technology became a more and more burning question, that is, what the relation between the


München, Marienhof virtual spaces

What is cyberspace?

further modifications, that there is obviously the multicolourism of this definition, too.

The definition of cyberspace actually is the web yet which existed from the moment of evolution of the

The external and the internal space

system. The most generally William Gibson describes the cyberspace as a collective hallucination or impression, the graphical representation of the computerised data. Other, according to the absolutist view

If we take as a basis the definitions that were formed for the external spaces form of the regional science,

of the cyberspace, it is the ether itself, which fills the inward of the computers out, or rather between each

then to the web connected external space, we could define only a sort of spaces, in which there are, in a

sphere, or this will be the home of the information age, where the citizens of the future will live. The

determining way, the localization, the moment of the connecting to the geographical space.

cyberspace might be interpreted as a space, that is an individual, abstract space of the new computerized world, which is alike extremely multicoloured in its interpretation and its appearance, as well.

The web as a network, consist of junctions, connecting lines i.e. We can call it the summary of the cable systems in its physical existence and, what is more, this is the thing, through which geographical situation

Virtual worlds

can be caught, the localization can be executed. According to the first, the concrete version, join points of the external and internal space are such physical tools as the servers (and from time to time the terminals),

25

Virtual worlds, opposite to the above-mentioned cyberspace, have a well defined, smaller meaning in the

which mean to connect truly to the virtual world with cable system of the web. According to the second,

web, but rather in the language system of the Internet. In the technical jargon it is known as virtual reality

more speculative theory, the users are themselves, who while using the web with the computer, map the

(VR),that is the effective graphic representation that appears 3D on the screen of the computer. The

virtual world in their faces. This last version specifically seems at the site maps, peacock spaces and virtual

practical definition is that using the keyboard of the computer we are stepping inside the engine left and

reality. Because of the novelty, the cyberspace and the cyber geography have many undeveloped themes

right. In the newest forms of the VR, we are able to roam not only in several softwares, but in worlds that

in store for the researchers, but at the same time many individual approaches and ideas born during until

are generated from many computers on the web, too. The expression “world” makes sense word for word.

now researches.

We should imagine such a special space, in which streets, buildings, and cities exist, what is more

characteristics of the cyberspace and for the approach to the classic geographical trends and tools. In

important, at some forms, there are people too, who are controlled by other people sitting in front of the

connection with the above, it might be a priority question for us how this "new space" attaches to the

computer. To this different approach of the cyberspace it might be added, besides the above-mentioned

conventional society spaces, how it influences those.

Further conclusions are needed for the discovery of the individual and common


München, Marienhof the conclusion projection onto the own plan

Designing of the own building by the above-mentioned

In 18 December 1944, the Allies bombed the built-in, street gashed, ca. 17 000 m2 big Marienhof (this is the present form). After the demolition of the ruins, many concepts were born for the field recovery and eventually it turned out to be a big green area. Although the place can be found 100 m from the München’s one of the liveliest square behind the Neues Rathaus, it is in a neglected status. In the regulation plans, it was set to stay a big green field. The bbz landschaftsarchitekten, Timo Herrmann, Berlin and the atelier pk, Philipp Koch, Berlin won the competition in 2006.

By the designing concept, the plan places a tree ring on the big green field, referring to the name of the square (Hof=courtyard), hiding the entrance of the subway and later the entrance of the S-rails, but holding the old function of the square, which concerns the present state as something that would not mean the final answer or solution. The basic element and integral part of my plan is the field and the park planned under S-rails, too. During the designing process, I would have liked to represent the state the area had before the bombing; however I would have liked to draw attention to the losses of the Second World War avoiding the building-in of the field. According to the calculations, in the course of the bombing about 6000 people have been killed and 15. 000 have been wounded. As a tool for the solution of this paradox state, the idea of representation in a virtual way came up. The using of this technology on this level may help us to understand the nowadays strange virtual language.

26

winning plan of bbz landschaftsarchitekten and atelier pk in 2006


München, Marienhof the conclusion projection onto the own plan

On the flowchart of the designing, firstly stood the field as well as the establishment of a strictly connecting underground cultural building, which could offer a new atmosphere to those who arrived to Marienhof to spend their free time perfectly. A place, where people can meet, where even though many of them meet day by day, they are just passing each other in the underpasses, the U-banh and S-banh channels. In the course of the surveying of the plans of the competition in 2006, I noticed two new entrances. It turned out, that under the Marienhof a new S-rails station will be built. I had to modify my designing concept considering the new station. Eventually a three-layered designing concept evolved, which considered the above, under the ground and historical factors and at the same time it was perfectly connected to München. I also reckon that personal attachment to the location is very important during the designing process. I was lucky enough to have time to get to know the culture, people in München by my friend Andrea Köröm well, and to experience what is needed to the designing of a site like this.

connections interactions

M

27

relaxation

building in 1930-1949


28

S-rails plans -01. level

S-rails 00. level

MĂźnchen, Marienhof S-rails plans


29

S-rails longitudinal section

S-rails plans -03. level

S-rails plans -02. level

M端nchen, Marienhof S-rails plans


München, Marienhof structure study

About the glass pools

30

As above the head being slab, the safety and fracture behaviour of the supplied glass was an important aspect, which as good as unequivocally defined the glass type of the beam and slab. A sort of glass had

I had to plan my entire building under the ground, because of the site conditions, that is why I had to

to be installed, at which the risk of the spontaneous fracture does not exist, and at its accidental damage it

emphasize especially the lighting of the interiors. I applied a rarely used technology for the solution of the

only breaks, and does not fall apart into small pieces. Besides this the architectural-aesthetic design

problem, which met the high requirements. The forming of the pools has been inspired by the borderline of

required high flexural resistance from the supplied material and structure.

the bombed building, whereas the then buildings got light from this courtyard as well. The laminated and stretched (TVG) glass met the requirements. The base of the stretched glass is the float The behaviour and especially rigid, fragile character of the glass does not allow us to calculate, based on

glass, which during its production spreads out when the 1500 ºC glass melt is managed onto a hot and

the same regulars like the conventional building materials, for instance we got used to at the steel.

thin tin bath. Due to the surface tension of the melt and the cleanness of the tin bath, the "glass ribbon"

Moreover, calculating the structure of the glass material is specifically difficult, because their bearing

made ductile in this way has perfect parallel surfaces. At this time the glass is 620 ºC, yet can be moulded,

capacity is slightly known. Most of the time the tests of the intended solutions on 1:1 model is imperative,

but already solid to manage to the forwarder roll line. During the controlled cooling, the glass ribbon is

which increases the building costs significantly. This costly phase is optional, many researches are in

relieved from the tension. With the heat treatment of the float glass, toughened and stretched glass can be

progress and many studies try to define the calculation of the basic standards and directives, however up

produced. The glass is heated up to 680 ºC, then during the producing of the toughened glass, it is cooled

until today, there is no existing, commonly accepted structural design method. The main case is that the

down suddenly to room temperature. The heating and cooling time affects the structure of the glass. In the

glass structures generally have slender ratio in structural aspect than the other structure elements. At their

case of toughened glass during sudden cooling, due to the special thermal characteristic of the material,

structural design one has to take into consideration special aspects for the static and economically optimal

the grid structure close to the surface evolves faster than in the middle core. In this way emerging tension

solution. Recently due to the widely used computer programs that work with the finite element method;

generates, to the typical of toughened glasses, the characteristic tension/pressure balance. In the case of

ultimate stress limit can be calculated relatively precisely, but the rapid damage of the glass structures

stretched glass, there is more time for the emergence of the grid structure, less tension evolves between

raises the question of the permanent bearing capacity, the behaviour of structure after the damage to which

the internal and external surface of the material.

so far there is no exact calculating method.


München, Marienhof structure study

Tensions waking in the glass define the behavior of the fracture. The float glass breaks with long, radially

too. Among the various length reinforced concrete primary beams, into the steel rafter seated glass beams

running cracks, that are sharp and splintery; but the appearance of the cracks, the entire damage does not

bear own and the dead weight of the heat-insulated glass pane, which is 700 kg, and above the glass there

occur. The toughened glass breaks in a net-like way into small, pointless pieces then its bearing capacity

is a permanent mass of the 30 cm water column (300 kg/m²). The glass-slabs with the modern computer

breaks off immediately. Spontaneous fracture also might occur, this chance is tried to keep out the

programs as shell structure can be calculated already relatively well.

so-called heat soak test. The TVG glass shows same fracture as the float glass, therefore can be used for

The influencing factors to the computing model:

glass-slab making.

– proper density of finite element system, – appropriate modeling of the supports ratio (whether it is able to engage the tension),

The stretched glass panes are fastened to each other with thin gluing, which interferes the slipping of the

– the correct choosing of the rigidity of the supports, its appropriate modeling,

layers on each other. The aim of the lamination is that after the damage of the glass-layers, certain layers

– the possibly exact determination of the loads,

do not fall apart into chips. This way it can be achieved that the stability of the structural steel works can be

– the correct determination of the temperature influences,

assured after the damage. The features of the bonded glasses do not change. For the production of the

– the correct statement of the loads of the passed onto the glass surface,

laminated glasses we can also use synthetic resin adhesive, but according to the valid German and

– what sort of loads are giving back from the supports onto the glasses (whether the glass works like a

Austrian standards in terms of the load bearing glass structures, chiefly above the head, they shall be

compression member),

installed only with foil glued-laminated structure. The PVB-foil became common among the gluing foils. The

– generally the bearing capacity of the joints between the silicone seated glass-slab and silicone,

thickness of the foil layer is 0,38 mm. In technical and structural aspect two or more layers have to be

– at heat insulated glasses just the external layer is the load bearing glass. In this case the internal glass,

applied, one layer is enough just in exceptional cases. Its features:

what kind of gauge in and what kind of method stands in the load cycles,

- ultimate stress limit (longitudinal and cross section): 20 N/mm²

– from multilayered glass made load bearing glass how much can be considered homogeneous, or rather

- breaking elongation (longitudinal and cross section): 300 %

when will the slipping of the certain layers happen, – the heat insulated glasses join along only their edges to the load bearing glasses, take that into

31

Above the glass-slab there is 300 mm high water column, one, in the structure placed system assures and

consideration,

refreshes the water. Further, it lights the underground building and the pool, which are the centre of the park,

– test of the turning-away possibilities around the supports, exclusion of point like bearing.


München, Marienhof structure study

The compliance of the required insulation value means big challenge, too. Below the pool, the interior place has to be suitable for steady usage, which requires the heating of the rooms. The temperature of the water of the pool follows the exterior temperature; in this way between the two sides there may be significant difference in temperature, especially in the winter months. Continuous tempering is needed in order to avoid the freezing of the water and the hereby happening damages. However, against moisture condensation that is happening on the interior surface, installation of the thermally insulated glass layer is needed. Two layers, gas filled, skirt forming, low-E coating TVG glass equip this function. Instead of spacers, the load bearing glass layer is directly placed on the beams. The other difficulty was the formation of the joints, proper water proofing, as well as the solution of the glass-slab perforating mechanical openings. The mechanical passages are integrated into the structural steelwork. Explicit specifications refer to the applicable material qualities, and engineering tolerance. The marked KO1 corrosion-resistant, weldable, powder-coated steel can be used for fittings and receptor profiles, at the making process of the units ±1 mm tolerance is allowable max. For the entire water proofing, the welds shall be sufficiently tight to prevent leakage of liquid and apply smaller bore diameters than the regular at the bolt-joints. As sealant, a sort of silicone have to be find, which resists the salts that hamper the algae of the pool.

32

Section detail of mechanical opening


München, Marienhof technical description

A new S-rails station will be established in München, on the Marienhof under the topographical no. 1499.

-03. level

The planned building will be formed in symbiosis with the S-rails with common mechanical rooms. My

Fire escapes, ramps, lifts, passages of The S-rails, ventilation holes, security room.

building attaches to the given S-rails’ plans. Bigger modification compared to the old plans is that the mechanical room on the -01. level will be transferred to the -02. level and a big auditorium will be formed.

-04. level

Based on the new concept, another park will be established instead of the park in the winning plan in 2006,

Passages of the S-rails, S-rails information desk, lifts, fire escape, ventilation holes, projection room,

considering my building is under the ground and also a memorial place will be established with experimental

storages, passages.

nature, and with the representation of the bombed buildings from the Second World War. -05. level 00. level, park

Voids, stage, backstage, dressing rooms, ventilation holes, lifts.

Public toilets, S-rails+own building mechanical ventilation holes, firefighters’ lift, glass pools, bicycle parking places, lift for the approach of the -01. level.

-06. level S-rails station

-01. level

3

Underpasses, public toilets, fire escapes, entrance to the S-rails station, entrance to the own building,

Location: The building will be established in symbiosis with the S-rails station that is set under the ground.

mechanical rooms, entrance to the subway (U3/6). Rooms of the own building: storages, passages,

Approach: subway (U3/6), S-rails 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; 14 pcs. of taxi parking place, 9 pcs. of limited

ventilation holes, reception, checkroom, café, lift, entrance to the -02. level, toilets, disabled persons’ toilet,

duration parking place, 289 pcs. of bicycle parking place.

rehearsal rooms, lecture hall.

Area of the building lot: 16 930 m

-02. level

The built-in floor area of the own building: 6016 m + 16930 m (park) sum.: 22 946 m

Fire escape, lifts, café 2, foyer, checkroom 2, ticket office, art galleries, toilets, disabled persons’ toilet,

Altogether built-in floor area : 28225 + 16930 m (park) össz.: 45 155 m

ramps, mechanical rooms, stairs, escalator of the S-rails, ventilation holes.

2

2

2

2

2

2


München, Marienhof technical description

Rooms 2

00. level (sum.: 146,8 m ) 2

ceramic

02 men’s dressing r.

2

ceramic

passage, café

2

ceramic

garbage storage

2

ceramic

storage

36,70 m

01 women’s toilet

36,70 m

02 men’s toilet

37,95 m

02 women’s toilet

35,45 m

2

2

ceramic

-03. level (sum.: 88,95 m )

2

ceramic

passage

68,12 m

31,87 m

2

ceramic

security’s room

20,83 m

674,40 m

2

magnesite screed

21,77 m

2

polyurethane coating

-04. level (sum.: 458,96 m )

257,38 m

2

polyurethane coating

projection room

28,13 m

02 women’s dressing r. 30,73 m

01 men’s toilet

2

2

-01. level (sum.: 1881,47 m )

-02. level (sum.: 1504,60 m ) 2

swedish finish

ticket

19,39 m

2

magnesite screed

foyer

23,18 m

2

swedish finish

checkroom

21,19 m

2

ceramic

storage

10,62 m

2

swedish finish

café

33,92 m

30,77 m

2

ceramic

men’s toilet

cleaning room

5,03 m

2

ceramic

women’s toilet

30,39 m

2

5,06 m

lecture hall

2

magnesite screed

2

ceramic

2

magnesite screed

2

padlószőnyeg

2

ceramic

2

auditorium

25,23 m 335,94 m

storage

19,33 m

2

swedish finish

passage

22,21 m

2

magnesite screed

2

magnesite screed

big lecture hall passage 34,45 m

2

magnesite screed

2

swedish finish

passage

2

magnesite screed

2

ceramic

2

swedish finish

-05. level (sum.: 403,27m )

22,78 m

2

ceramic

stage

2

elastic flooring

cleaning room

5,93 m

2

ceramic

back stage

85,69 m

2

elastic flooring

ceramic

women’s toilet

23,86 m

2

ceramic

passage

22,22 m

2

magnesite screed

2

ceramic

disabled persons’ toilet

4,73 m

2

ceramic

men’s dressing r.

23,06 m

2

ceramic

131,98 m

2

elastic flooring

passage, café

361,37 m

2

magnesite screed

women’s dressing r.

23,06 m

2

ceramic

01 rehearsal room

228,78 m

2

elastic flooring

01 art gallery

247,54 m

2

magnesite screed

bands’ dressing room

30,06 m

2

ceramic

02 rehearsal room

221,02 m

2

elastic flooring

02 art gallery

394,15 m

2

magnesite screed

2

ceramic

03 art gallery

335,94 m

2

magnesite screed

reception

24,40 m

foyer

41,36 m

checkroom

31,13 m

storage

20,71 m

café

36,04 m

men’s toilet

disabled persons’ toilet

34

01 men’s dressing r.

01 women’s dressing r. 30,52 m

21,80 m

2

219,18 m


München, Marienhof technical description

Structural installation

Skylights: Insulated skylights are geometrically laid out in the grass with laminated safety glasses with solar coating

Foundation

and glass pools.

In accordance with the structural plans there is slab foundation. Drainage Water proofing

From the green roof, 12 m from the outline/borderline of the building there is outwards line-sloping, on the

Water proofing is made by mass concrete.

other parts point-sloping is planned. The rainwater is collected and stored, used for the landscape irrigation, and water supplying of the toilets and dressing rooms. The remained rainwater is pumped to the public

Walling

duct.

In accordance with the structural plans there are reinforced concrete walls, on the -01. level added 20 cm heat insulation.

Internal finishing In the sanitary rooms there is ceramic tile.

Slab In accordance with the structural plans there is reinforced concrete.

Interior In accordance with the plans hard and heat finishing are made.

Partition walls The partition walls are made from 10,00 cm and 20,00 cm partition blocks.

External finishing The glass pools are furnished with Corian finishing; the finishing is integrated with photovoltaic. The finishing

Underlays

of the public toilets is Corian, the facades of the building is limestone.

The underlay is from 6,50 cm heated screed, detached with polifoam from the walls and columns. Ventilation Stairs

In accordance with the building engineering structural plans electrical ventilation are made in the internal

In accordance with the structural plans there is reinforced concrete with anti-slide flooring, steel railing, and

rooms with heat recovery.

beech handrail. Public utilities

35

Shut-off devices

The installations of the building are in accordance with the building engineering technical descriptions.

Insulated aluminium exterior shut-off devices. The parameters of the system: external and internal bumper

Water, electricity, gas, and sewage installations.

sealing. Coloration is according to the RAL colour palette.


M端nchen, Marienhof plans

Site plan scale=1:1000

36


Maf

MĂźnchen, Marienhof plans

feis

00. level scale=1:1000

sras

se

Schaferstr

asse

Schrammerstrasse

concept

Hofgra

ben

Albertgasse

rbrau

Marienhof site plan 1930-1944

e

Land

scha

Spor

erstr

37

gass

Dien

Filse

erstra

sse

Gruftstrasse

ftsra

sse

asse

Alte

nho

fstra

sse


München, Marienhof plans

-01. level scale = 1:1000

5 7 8 8

7

7

11

2

9

5 7

5

9 9

2

9

3

1 4 10

38

4

5

5 6

1 6

6

1 rehearsal room 2 café_passage 3 meeting room 4 storage 5 fire escape 6 dressing room 7 S-Bahn passage 8 mechanical room 9 toilet 10 passage to U-Bahn 3/6 11 entrance


-03. level scale = 1:1000

München, Marienhof plans

-02. level scale = 1:1000

2

2 6

6

5

2

4 6

3

2

8

1

3 4 2

6

3

2

2

4 4 4

39

2

2

7 2

1 café_passage 2 fire escape 3 S-Bahn passage 4 mechanical room 5 toilet 6 gallery 7 passage to U-Bahn 3/6 8 entrance


MĂźnchen, Marienhof plans

-04. level scale = 1:1000

5

5

7

1

4 4

3

3

2 5

5

6 5

40

1 auditorium 2 backstage 3 storage 4 S-Bahn passage 5 ďŹ re escape 6 passage to U-Bahn 3/6 7 projection room


MĂźnchen, Marienhof plans

-05. level scale = 1:1000

4

4 1 3

2 4

4

4

41

1 auditorium 2 backstage 3 dressing rooms 4 ďŹ re escape


MĂźnchen, Marienhof plans

-06. level scale = 1:1000

4

4

2

1 2 4

3

2 1 4

2

1

4

42

1 S-Bahn station 2 eco blend walls 3 information_computer room, color mapping control 4 ďŹ re escape


B-B section scale = 1:1000

München, Marienhof plans

A-A section scale = 1:1000

10

10 05 7 6

08

1

1

5

2

1

05

3

6

1 06

04

3 2

7

7

4

10 10

08

9

1 3 5

6

8 4

05

3

08

2 8 4

1010

9

06

1

06

06

04 12 07

43

06

06

12

06

3

08

06

09

11

1

03 2

01 12

02

10

11 06

11 06

01 12

06

07

1 S-Bahn passage 2 café 3 toilet 4 dressing room 5 gallery 6 lift 7 mechanical room 8 storage_auditorium 9 fire escape_ventilation 10 augmented reality wall 11 passage to U-Bahn 3/6 12 S-Bahn station 01 eco blend walls 02 glass pool skylight 03 glass slab 04 information_computer room 05 photovoltaik 06 sustainable piezoelectric flooring 07 geothermal energy 08 park_green roof 09 Neues Rathaus


München, Marienhof Bibliograpy

4

Aldo Rossi: essays about the architecture

DODGE, M. (1998) The Geographies of Cyberspace.

György Kepes (1944): Language of Vision

94th Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Boston, USA

Cornelis van de Ven (1987): Space in Architecture

ERDŐSI F. (1992) Telematika. Távközlési Book publisher, Budapest.

Le Corbusier (1925): The City of Tomorrow

GIBSON, W. (¹984) Neuromancer. Harper Collins, London.

Kevin Lynch (1960): The Image of the City

JAKOBI Á. (2000) The spatiality of the web.

Jane Jacobs (1961): The Death and Life of Great American Cities

MASUDA Y. (1988) The informational society as a postindustrial society OMIKK.

Csaba Ders (2008): Towards a new complexity

MCNABB, M. (1998) In: Carazo-Chandler, c. (1998): Cyberspace – Another geography.

William Gibson (1984): Neuromancer

Territories, Boundaries and Space. University of Canterbury, New Zealand.

Paul Dourish (2004): Where the Action is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction

MEMARZIA, K. (1997) Towards the Definition and Applications of Digital Architecture

BATTY, M. (1997) Virtual geography

MÉSZÁROS R. (2001) The society geographical approximation of the cybespace

BURCH, H. – CHESWICK, B. (1999) Internet Mapping Project. (www.cs.bell-labs.com)

NEMES NAGY J. (1998) Space in the society research Human-settlement-region series, Hilscher

CARAZO-CHANDLER, C. (1998) Cyberspace

Rezső Socialpolitic Assosation, Budapest.

CASTELLS, M. (1998) The Informational City – Information technology, economic restructuring and the

SARDAR, Z. – RAVETZ, J. R. (1995) Cyberspace: to boldly go …

urban-regional process. Basil Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.

Z. KARVALICS L. (1998) Isn’t there return? To concept history of the „informational society”

COUCLESIS, H. (1997) The Naive Geography of Cyberspace. Department of Geography and NCGIA,

Novak, Marcos - TransArchitecture: Building the Edge of Thought

University of California, USA.

Ágoston Lukács - The glass pool of the Erzsébet square Cultural Centre and Park

CRUMLISH, C. (1996) Internet for the running people Panem Book publisher, Budapest.

Corpora in Si(gh)te Book

DECEMBER, J. (1995) A Cybermap Gazetteer: Maps of the On-Line World for Browsing and Business.

Attila Fürstand - Space syntax in urban research

Telecommunications Traffic Statistics & Commentary. Telegeography, International Institute of

Andor Wesselényi-Garay - Borderline Architecture

Communication, London.

Deutsche Bahn - Anlagen zum Auslobungstext


München, Marienhof contents

45

01.............................................................................................................................Acknowledgement

23.........................................................................................................The processing of the designing

02.......................................................................Motto

24.......................................................................Virtual spaces

03..............................................................................................Consultants

25..............................................................................................Cyberspace

04........................................................................Designing area

26........................................................................Designing concept

05.............................................................................................................Air photo München

27.............................................................................................................Designing concept

06..............................Air photo München, Marienhof

28..............................Intended S-rails plans 00. level, -01. level

07.............................................................................................München review

29..........................................................Intended S-rails plans -02. level, -03. level, longitudinal section

08...........................................................München review

30...........................................................Glass pools study

09.....................................................................................................................München review

31...................................................................................................................Glass pools study

10..............................................................................Choosing the place

32..............................................................................Glass pools study

11.....................................................................................................Introducing of Marienhof

33.....................................................................................................Technical description

12.................Marienhof from 1948 - present

34.................Technical description, rooms

13.............................................................................................Marienhof plans

35.............................................................................................Technical description, structure

14.....................................................Marienhof plans

36.....................................................Marienhof planned building, site plan

15.....................................................................Marienhof plans

37.....................................................................Marienhof planned building 00. level

16......................................................Protection of heritage, passer-by zones in Münchenben

38......................................................Marienhof planned building -01. level

17...............................................Passer-by, cyclists on Marienhof

39...............................................Marienhof planned building -02. level, -03. level

18....................................................................................Public transport, motor vehicles on Marienhof

40...........................................................................Marienhof planned building -04. level

19......................................................Greenery, open places

41.......................................Marienhof planned building -05. level

20....................................................................................Cultural institutes, sitting places

42....................................................................................Marienhof planned building -06. level

21.................................From the connections to the virtual

43.................................Marienhof planned building A-A section, B-B section

22.................................................................................................Looking out

44.................................................................................................Bibliograpy


thank you

bye-bye


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.