"Whose Eyeing Up Your Curls?"

Page 1

Afro-textured hair, and discrimination law “Whose eyeing up your curls?” By Ayesha Casely-Hayford “A Black woman applying to work at Harrods was told she would not get the role unless she chemically straightened her hair...” - Source: The Telegraph online 25 January 2017, 12:01 AM. This story came out five days after Donald Trumpʼs inauguration as the 45th President of the United States. This bothered me because I wonder who saw it, did you? It is often the case with discrimination cases, the facts are so unique and particular to the individual that if that individual is not given the support and necessary platform to voice what is happening to them, it gets lost. Worse than that, treated as relatively insignificant. Was this decision of Harrods an act of race discrimination? There are, to date, no tested cases in UK employment law addressing women and their hair style choices and whether an employerʼs action to control natural afro-texture is an act of discrimination on the grounds of race. There was however a recent case in the US with a similar scenario to the Harrods case, and which went all the way to the US Appeals Court. The facts concerned a woman called Chastity Jones who on getting ready to commence employment with “Catastrophe Management Solutions” in Alabama was told by HR that her locs were against company policy since they “tend to get messy”. The Appeals court ruled that employers can ban dreadlocks at work


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.