6.1 Changes in rural settlements

6 Settlement dynamics

6.1 Changes in rural settlements

Rural settlements in both developed and developing countries have undergone considerable changes in recent decades for a number of reasons. These include: l rural–urban migration l urban–rural migration l the consequences of urban growth l technological change l rural planning policies l the balance of government funding between urban and rural areas

Changing rural environments in the UK

Revised

The UK reflects many of the changes occurring in rural areas in other developed countries. In the past rural society was perceived to be distinctly different from urban society. However, there has been rapid rural change over the past 50 years or so: l The economy of rural areas is no longer dominated by farming. As agricultural jobs have been lost, manufacturing, high technology and the service sector have increased. l Other significant new users of rural space are recreation, tourism and environmental conservation. l The rural landscape has evolved into a complex multiple-use resource and as this has happened the rural population has changed in character.

These economic changes have fuelled social change in the countryside with the in-migration of particular groups of people. In the post-war period the government has attempted to contain expansion into the countryside by creating green belts and by the allocation of housing to urban areas or to large key villages.

The rural landscape is a mental or visual picture of countryside scenery, which is difficult to define, as rural areas are constantly changing and vary from place to place. The rural population comprises people living in the countryside in farms, isolated houses, hamlets and villages. Under some definitions small market towns are classed as rural. Green belts are areas of open land retained round a city or town over which there are wide-ranging planning restrictions on development.

Changing agriculture

The countryside has been affected by major structural changes in agricultural production. Although agricultural land forms 73% of the total land area of the UK, less than 2% of the total workforce is now employed in agriculture. l The size of farms has steadily increased. l Such changes have resulted in a significant loss of hedgerows, which provide important ecological networks. l Agricultural wages are significantly below the national average and as a result farmers are among the poorest of the working poor. l As many farmers have struggled to make a living from traditional agricultural practices, a growing number have sought to diversify.

Typical mistake

Students sometimes fail to distinguish clearly between different forms of rural settlement, such as villages and hamlets, both in terms of written description and identification on Ordnance Survey maps. Some definitions include small market towns as being rural and it is important to be able to distinguish these from larger urban entities.

Expert tip

Farm diversification means establishing sources of income beyond those of traditional farming. Examples are bed-and-breakfast accommodation and farm shops. Some farms diversify in only one way, while others diversify in a number of different ways.

Counterurbanisation and the rural landscape

In recent decades counterurbanisation has replaced urbanisation as the dominant force shaping settlement patterns. This has resulted in a ‘rural population turnaround’ in many areas where depopulation had been in progress. Green belt restrictions have limited the impact of counterurbanisation in many areas adjacent to cities. But, not surprisingly, the greatest impact of counterurbanisation has been just beyond green belts where commuting is clearly viable. Here rural settlements have grown substantially and been altered in character considerably. Because of the geographical spread of counterurbanisation since the 1960s, the areas affected by rural depopulation have diminished. Depopulation is now generally confined to the most isolated areas of the country but exceptions can be found in other areas where economic conditions are particularly dire. Figure 6.1 is a simple model of the depopulation process.

Population decreases, ages and births fall below replacement level Unmarried young adults migrate to regional centres for better socio-economic opportunities

Counterurbanisation is the process of population decentralisation as people move from large urban areas to smaller urban settlements and rural areas. Rural depopulation is the decrease in population of rural areas, whether by out-migration or by falling birth rates as young people move away, usually to urban areas.

Ageing population – disintegration of balanced community

Reduction in business services due to falling demand, i.e. bus service, pub, general store, post office

Key social service provision cut, i.e. primary school, mobile library Loss of services induces out-migration of young families and ensures that in-migration is minimal

Figure 6.1 Model of rural depopulation

Source: Advanced Geography: Concepts & Cases, P. Guinness & G. Nagle (Hodder Education, 1999), p.76

The issue of rural services

Services are the basis for any community. Access to shops and post offices, healthcare and leisure activities create a feeling of belonging and a sustainable future for the area. However, rural services have been in decline for a number of decades, impacting heavily on the quality of life of many people, particularly those without a car. A 2008 report revealed that nearly half of communities had seen the loss of key local services in the previous four years.

ACRE (Action with Communities in Rural England) highlights the following reasons for rural service decline: l The effect of market forces and, in some cases, the arrival of supermarkets in local areas making local services no longer competitive. l The changing pattern of rural population, with more mobile residents with different shopping and consumer patterns becoming a greater part of the rural pattern of life. l A change in expectations of rural residents themselves, who are no longer prepared to make do with relatively poor and expensive services and, in many cases, with the means and opportunity to access better services.

Key villages

Between the 1950s and 1970s the concept of key settlements was central to rural settlement policy in many parts of Britain, particularly where depopulation was occurring (Figure 6.2). The concept relates to central place theory and assumes that focusing services, facilities and employment in one selected settlement will satisfy the essential needs of the surrounding villages and hamlets. The argument was that, with falling demand, dispersed services would decline rapidly in vulnerable areas. The only way to maintain a reasonable level

A key village is one designated as being one to develop in terms of the goods and services available to its own population and the population of the surrounding area.

of service provision in such an area was to focus on those locations with the greatest accessibility and the best combination of other advantages. In this way threshold populations could be assured and hopefully the downward spiral of service decline would be halted.

The rural transport problem

The considerable increase in car ownership in recent decades has had a devastating effect on public transport. While this has not disadvantaged rural car owners very much it has considerably increased the isolation of the poor, the elderly and the young. The lack of public transport puts intense pressure on low-income households to own a car, a large additional expense that many could do without. Recent increases in the price of fuel have exacerbated this problem. There has been continuing concern that Britain’s remaining rural railway lines are under threat in a repeat of the ‘Beeching cuts’ of the 1960s.

The rural housing problem

The lack of affordable housing in village communities has resulted in a large number of young people having to move to market towns or larger urban centres. Only 12% of rural housing is subsidised, compared with 25% in urban areas. The issue of second homes has become increasingly contentious.

X

X X

X X X X

X

X X X

X

X X

X

X

X X

Key settlement

X X

X X

Hinterland village with arrow showing key settlement to which it is assigned

Source: Advanced Geography: Concepts & Cases, P. Guinness & G. Nagle (Hodder Education, 1999), p.79

Figure 6.2 Key settlement concept

Case study The Isle of Purbeck

Table 6.1 Issues in rural settlement on the Isle of Purbeck

Location and development

Population change

The rural housing problem

Rural service decline

Public transport

Rural deprivation

The Isle of Purbeck forms the southeastern part of Purbeck District in Dorset. It is classed as a remote rural district. Here the rural settlement is concentrated in clustered villages with Corfe Castle being the largest. Although these villages are set in a network of isolated farms and houses, there are relatively few hamlets in the region. Lower-order urban services are provided by the towns of Swanage and Wareham, with higher-order urban services being found in the Bournemouth–Poole conurbation. The population of Purbeck District as a whole has risen consistently over the past 40 years and is considerably older than that of the country as a whole, mainly because of the popularity of the area for retirement. However, the out-migration of young adults in search of wider economic opportunities and lower-cost accommodation is also a factor. House prices in the area have risen at a rate above the national average. This has been due largely to competition from a number of different groups of people. This high level of competition for a limited number of available properties has pushed the cost of housing to a level well beyond the reach of most local people. The problem is compounded by the fact that local employment opportunities are limited and wages are low. The Dorset Rural Facilities Survey 2002 found a continuing decline in rural services. Service decline makes people more reliant on transport, both public and private, to gain access to basic services. The main causal factors have been increasing competition from urban supermarkets and the increasing personal mobility of most of the rural population. Public motor transport on the Isle of Purbeck is limited. There is extra minibus coverage through volunteer schemes, but this is also limited in extent. Deprivation in terms of housing is particularly acute in high-priced housing counties such as Dorset. The lack of opportunity (opportunity deprivation) in health and social services, education and retail facilities also affects disadvantaged people, particularly those living in the most isolated rural areas. Mobility deprivation is also evident as public transport is very limited on the Isle of Purbeck. Deprivation is concentrated in the long-established population. Those who have migrated into the area generally have a significantly higher level of income.

1 Define the term ‘rural population’. 2 What proportion of the UK’s workforce is now employed in agriculture? 3 What is counterurbanisation? 4 Give two reasons for rural service decline. 5 What is the main housing issue in rural areas? 6 (a) Where is the Isle of Purbeck? (b) Why have house prices risen at a rate above the national average?

Answers on p.216

Contemporary issues in rural settlements in LEDCs

The main process affecting rural settlements in developing countries has been rural–urban migration. In some areas it has provided a safety valve by: l reducing rural population growth and pressure on food, water and other resources l helping to limit unemployment and underemployment l providing a valuable source of income through the remittances of migrants

However, in some rural communities the scale of rural–urban migration has been so great that it has resulted in: l rural depopulation and an ageing population l the closure of services, both public and private, as population declines l insufficient labour to maintain agricultural production at its former levels

In southern African countries such as Botswana the devastating impact of AIDS has resulted in rural depopulation in many areas.

Rural poverty accounts for over 60% of poverty worldwide, reaching 90% in some developing countries like Bangladesh. In almost all countries access to education, health care, potable water, sanitation, housing, transport and communication is far worse than for the urban poor. Much urban poverty is created by the rural poor’s efforts to get out of poverty by moving to cities. About a third of the population of Mongolia live as nomadic herders on sparsely populated grasslands. Most live in very isolated locations. In recent years, droughts and unusually cold and snowy winters have decimated livestock, destroying the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of households. Many have moved to Ulaanbaatar, the capital city, where they live in impoverished conditions, mainly on the periphery of the city. This exemplifies the concept of the urbanisation of poverty.

Now test yourself

Tested

7 What proportion of poverty worldwide is accounted for by rural poverty? 8 What is the ‘urbanisation of poverty’?

Answers on p.216

Revised

Urbanisation of poverty is the increasing concentration of poverty in urban areas in developing countries due at least partly to high levels of rural–urban migration.