Navigating in the Sustainability Direction: ESG and Firms Performance

Navigating in the Sustainability Direction: ESG and Firms Performance

Katia Passerini, Ayman El-Tarabishy, Arturo Pagan

Abstract

In recent years, the methods for assessing the impact of investing in companies with substantial environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices have undergone significant transformation. This evolution mirrors the earlier shift towards measuring the value of knowledge in businesses. Initially, companies focused on quantifying the impact of knowledge. Over time, they realized that embedding knowledge practices into their operations spurred innovation and growth better than simply measuring impact. Similarly, we must aim to standardize ESG measurements and acknowledge that ESG practices can be both sustainable and profitable, and their intentional implementation will lead to long-term success.

Why The Focus on ESG

A major shift towards broader accountability in business has emerged over the last decade, driven by a focus on the

human dimensions of business and the demand for solutions that create economic growth while respecting the environment and society. Much like the rise of the knowledge economy whose beginning focused on understanding knowledge returns, this shift now seeks to measure the value of ESG factors. History shows that embedding ESG factors into core business activities fosters innovation and long-term growth. This is because ESG encompasses Environmental, Social, and Governance. It focuses on a company's impact on nature (Environmental), its treatment of employees and the community (Social), and its internal management and compliance practices (Governance). Introduced in 2006 by the UN’s Principles for Responsible Investment, ESG factors have gained prominence, with significant growth in assets managed under ESG criteria. This section explores various interpretations and applications of ESG across industries.

ESG ratings and indices by agencies like MSCI, Sustainalytics, and FTSE Russell offer comparative evaluations of companies’ ESG performance. However, discrepancies in methodologies can lead to varied results. For instance, a company might receive a high rating from MSCI for strong environmental practices but score lower with Sustainalytics due to governance issues. Despite these differences, these ratings are crucial for investors aiming to integrate ESG criteria into their decision-making processes.

ESG is Here to Stay Because It Works

ESG practices are here to stay, supplementing traditional financial metrics by focusing on long-term impacts. Studies show that companies with strong ESG practices achieve better long-term growth, reduced regulatory issues, and innovation opportunities. ESG investing encourages redesigning products and processes to lower costs and environmental impact, de-commoditizing value chains. Accounting standards are evolving to integrate ESG performance into business strategies.

Companies adopting ESG practices can mitigate risks, enhance brand reputation, and attract loyal customers. For instance, IKEA’s initiative to use only renewable and recycled materials by 2030 has positioned it as a company focused on sustainability, boosting customer loyalty and market share.

Unilever, a multinational consumer goods company, has embraced ESG principles deeply. It ranks highly across various ESG indices due to its comprehensive sustainability plan, which includes reducing plastic waste, improving labor conditions in its supply chain, and enhancing governance structures. This commitment has improved its ESG ratings and driven long-term financial performance, illustrating the synergy between sustainability and profitability.

ESG can drive innovation by encouraging companies to develop sustainable products and services. For example, Beyond Meat’s development of plant-based meat alternatives addresses environmental concerns about meat production while tapping into a growing market. This innovation aligns with ESG goals and opens new revenue streams.

A Call For Action Looking at the Futur

Early ESG investors will see benefits over time. The key is recognizing that ESG investments are not a trade-off but a path to positive long-term outcomes for investors, society, and the environment. Developing a transparent metric system is essential for eliminating confusion and realizing the total value of ESG practices.

To harness the full potential of ESG, stakeholders must push for standardized metrics and greater transparency. Companies should integrate ESG into their core strategies, investors must demand ESG disclosures, and regulators must enforce consistent reporting standards. Regulations are increasingly favoring ESG integration. The EU's Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) requires asset managers to disclose how they consider ESG factors in their investment decisions. This regulatory push is compelling companies to adopt more transparent and sustainable practices, ensuring they remain competitive and compliant. This collective effort will drive sustainable growth and innovation..

The future of ESG lies in its integration into mainstream business and investment strategies. As ESG metrics become more standardized and transparent, companies that excel in these areas will lead the way in sustainable growth, setting new benchmarks for others to follow.

References

Atkins, B. (2020). ESG standards: Governments must set the ground rules. Forbes. Becker, G. (2021). ESG and the Future of Sustainable Investing. Financial Times.

Bonini, S., & Swartz, S. (2014). Profits with purpose: How organizing for sustainability can benefit the bottom line. McKinsey Quarterly.

Farina, S. (2021). Environmental, Social, and Governance Credit Factors. S&P Global Ratings.

Henisz, W., Dorobantu, S., & Nartey, L. (2014). Spinning Gold: The Financial Returns to External Stakeholder Engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12), 1727–1748.

Kaplan, R. (2022). ESG in Business Strategy. Harvard Business Review.

Liebowitz, J., & Suen, C. (2000). Developing knowledge management metrics for measuring intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1), 54–67.

Passerini, K. (2007). Knowledge Management and Measurement: What Have We Learned? International Journal of Knowledge Management, 11, 115–128.

An expanded version of this paper was presented at the Geneve Entrepreneurship Forum, Fribourg/Geneva, Switzerland, June 26-29, 2024. https://geneveforum.org/schedule/