China: The model of the future? Why China, WHO and "the secret head of WHO" (ZEIT) Bill Gates are acting together on "Corona". Page 105
Event 201: Was the "Corona pandemic" planned? How could the "corona virus" from a fictitious exercise scenario organised by Bill Gates become reality within a few weeks? Page 6
CHF 11.00 / Euro 9.00
Edition 33, July 2020
The vaccination business While medium-sized companies go bankrupt, the shares of the pharmaceutical industry experience soaring prices - at taxpayers’ expense. Page 31
Blackmail to "sustainability"
With the Corona dictatorship to the "New Normality" The fact that the WHO and its dependent governments have brought disaster to the world through corona measures without scientific evidence has already been explained in issue 32. Building on this, we want to deal in this issue with the question of what is actually to be achieved with the "corona crisis", which was obviously deliberately brought about. The first thing that stands out is that the current main players in disease control had already met in October 2019 to simulate the outbreak of a fictitious "corona virus". The Gates Foundation, the UN, Johns Hopkins University and even China - represented by a key figure in the "real onset" - were all sitting at the crisis table. Today, these actors, together with politicians and the media, are driving the world towards totalitarian measures that will achieve a wide range of financial and geopolitical objectives, to which we devote this issue. Is it realistic that the very people who are at the centre of the "corona crisis" today prophetically played out this event 70 days before the "onset"? Or does this tremendous "coincidence" only become understandable if one imagines that the event was planned by the "prophets"?
Aid payments to ailing companies are linked to the objectives of the Socialist Agenda 2030. Page 94
The "Corona Crisis" as an instrument of domination How "Corona" is being used to further the totalitarian transformation of the planet. Page 68
«We're ready for war, we've taken every precaution. But what about epidemics? How many doctors we have for that, how many planes, tents, what kind of scientists? If there was some sort of world government, we would be better prepared.» Bill Gates in an interview with the Süddeutsche Zeitung, January 2015
I
sn‘t it interesting? They had just started to practice a disaster scenario and a little later that scenario became real. Those involved in the exercise were confronted with one of the worst disasters they could have ever imagined. The event was epochal. It caused maximum panic all over the globe. Never before in modern times has a single event had such a dramatic and far-reaching impact on the whole of humanity. However, some observers noticed right from the start that some of the official history of the catastrophe did not fit together. The narrative on which the media, politics, education and science had agreed could not stand up to critical comparison and even contradicted basic scientific rules. Numerous highly renowned experts also appealed against the announced course of events and were thus declared undesirable persons. Especially in the period shortly after the catastrophe, neither doubt nor criticism was tolerated and persons who dared to object were defamed in the strongest possible terms. Those who did not stand behind the meaningful narrative disseminated on all channels and in all newspapers were morally reviled: Because they were considered antisocial, heartless and a threat to security if they held a different opinion. For anyone who did not support the government's countermeasures was putting even more lives at risk and was therefore a danger to everyone. A foreign body who opposed the plan without alternative and whose thoughts were simply intolerable. Over time, however, more and more people realised that they had been misled by the media and governments. They recognized blatant contradictions, many things did not fit in the official version at all. The scales fell from their eyes: How was it possible that the legal system as third and the media as fourth power could fail in such a way? After this realisation, many turned their attention to potential profiteers of the disaster and realised that they had indeed earned billions as a result of the event and that, in addition, important geopolitical goals had been fulfilled. In addition, this group of people had spoken of such a scenario long before the event. In some places it almost seemed as if they had wished for it to happen. The leading media also failed across the board when it came to the profiteers and (therefore possible masterminds).
Striking similarities Dear reader, I'm sure you can guess what this is about: The "attacks" of September 11th...oh sorry, we have already covered this topic (issue 10): In the meantime we are in the year 2020 and are facing a new mega catastrophe, which is suspiciously similar to the one in 2001 in its basic structure: The synchronicity of exercise and "real" event, the outrageous contradictions of the official story, the synchronisation of the media, the exclusion of critics and the powerful profiteers in the foreground and background. Whereas September 11th was still an exercise that took place on the same day and "coincidentally" simulated the hijackings of civilian airplanes, it took Corona about 70 days before the exercise became a reality just as "coincidentally". In October 2019, high-ranking personalities from the private and public sectors met in New York to simulate a fictitious pandemic, which was confusingly similar to today's "Corona pandemic" (see p.6 ff.). The similarities were striking: the described symptoms of the disease, the
ÂŤThe further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.Âť George Orwell, British author
spread and above all the economic and social consequences of the "virus" were very similar to what we are currently experiencing with "COVID-19". In addition to all this, the virus whose containment was played out was even a "corona virus". The exercise was organised by the Gates Foundation, Johns Hopkins University and the World Economic Forum. After the "discovery of the corona virus", the first two of this triumvirate in particular were the focus of media attention as never before. Bill Gates went from TV show to TV show to announce his mission to vaccinate seven billion people against Corona (see p.23 f.). What exactly qualifies Gates to act as a "world health expert" is still unclear. He has never had a medical education. Why he, of all people, is telling mankind what to do against Corona would be just one of the many questions that a critical press would have to ask. But Gates does not receive the slightest criticism from it. Of all the people in the world, it was exactly this Bill Gates who organised an exercise to fight a "corona virus" a few weeks before "onset". This is truly a reason to become highly attentive!
WHO, China & Co. Johns Hopkins University, which was almost unknown before Corona, is now promoted by many media sources as the most important source of data on COVID-19. As "chance" would have it, this university already played exactly this role during the exercise as provider of a card with corona case numbers. "Coincidentally" Bill Gates is also, next to the New York billionaire Michael Bloomberg, the biggest sponsor of Johns Hopkins University in the field of health (see p.15). Also WHO (connected via online to the group), UNO and a representative of China - a key figure of the "real corona onset" of all things - were at the table at Event 201. Today, they all act together as if synchronised to impose unprecedented restrictions on the whole world's freedom in the name of a pandemic crisis: Bill Gates, UNO, WHO, Johns Hopkins University and of course China as the "new standard in responding to disease outbreaks", as WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said (see p.105).
Continued on page 4
3
Issue 33, July 2020
Topic of the issue:
Corona: Planned "Crisis"? Amazing: The current key players in corona disease control met as early as October 2019 to simulate the onset of a fictitious "corona virus". The Gates Foundation, UNO, WHO, Johns Hopkins University and even China represented by a key figure of the "real outbreak" - were also sitting at the “crisis table“. Today, these actors, together with politicians and the media, are driving the world towards totalitarian measures that will achieve many different financial and geopolitical goals, to which we devote this issue. Is it realistic that the very people who are at the centre of the "Corona Crisis" today prophetically played out this event 70 days before "outbreak"? Or does this tremendous "coincidence" only become understandable when one imagines that the event was planned by the "prophets"?
Geopolitics Event 201: Was the "Corona Pandemic" planned?
4
Health
The Corona War: "Chance" for totalitarian transformation of the planet
6
The "Corona crisis" is seen by the elites as an "opportunity".
The main actors of the "corona crisis" simulated the outbreak of a fictitious "corona virus" as early as October 2019. Coincidence?
The world agrees: A vaccine is needed.
22
Heads of state around the world have adopted the unsupported claim "No vaccine, no return to normality".
How safe will the Corona inoculation be?
44
It is simple logic that the accelerated approval procedures for corona vaccinations will not ensure safety.
Technology
Lobbyism Will there be a mandatory vaccination against Corona?
68
With Corona into World Communism
27
86
Through Corona, the international socialist transformation will be accelerated considerably by Agenda 2030.
More and more important decision-makers are advocating compulsory vaccination.
What should be achieved with the vaccination?
50
Tracking, DNA reprogramming, modification of body processes... all this would (theoretically) be possible with vaccination.
Implementation of a globally planned economy under the guise of "sustainability"
94
Aid payments to ailing companies are often linked to the condition of planned economy "sustainability".
Geopolitics The vaccination business.
31
While small and medium-sized companies are being ruined by the millions, the shares of the pharmaceutical industry are experiencing soaring prices - at the taxpayers’ expense.
Who is Bill Gates (still) and what are his goals?
54
Bill Gates also uses his money to advance the development towards a world government.
Publishing house InfoXpress GmbH, Hohestr. 130, CH-4104 Oberwil Publisher André Barmettler Contact Tel +41 61 511 45 08 / info@expresszeitung.com Website www.expresszeitung.com Publication cycle 8 x per year by subscription Subscription price SSwitzerland: SFr 69.- / EU: EUR 59.Order https://shop.expresszeitung.com abo@expresszeitung.com
China: The new model for the whole world
105
Numerous influential personalities call China a model for the future. There are reasons for this.
Editors Tilman Knechtel (tk) / André Barmettler / Jonas Freud redaktion@expresszeitung.com Gerhard Wisnewski (gw), Torsten Mann (tm), Alexander Schnarf (as) Typesetting/layout Elementi Studio Logistics Zehnder Druckerei, CH-9500 Wil Fotos Unless otherwise noted: commons.wikimedia.org Cover picture Götz Wiedenroth, www.wiedenroth-karikatur.de Next issue August 2020
4
Geopolitics : Corona
Issue 33, July 2020
What is to be achieved with Continued from page 2 Where once wars against Afghanistan and Iraq were waged in violation of international law, the purpose of which fewer and fewer people have been able to understand over time, the world's population is now confronted with bizarre "protective measures". These are gradually coming under the same criticism as the wars in the Middle East, which have claimed well over a million lives. Increasingly, critical citizens are noticing that also with Corona there are inconsistencies: The word has got around that even those who died "with" and not only "of" the "Corona virus" are included in the statistics of case numbers, if one wants to believe the narrative of a dangerous virus disease at all. Countries that have not introduced rigorous lockdown measures have not recorded particularly high death rates. Some of the death rates once announced have shrunk by a factor of 20. As was the case with the swine flu in 2009, everything again points to a blatant false alarm, but the politics doesn’t want to change course. The list of contradictions is endless, as we work out in our issue number 32.
War without alternatives Just like the "war on terror", the "war" against Corona is also presented as without alternative. And yes: In the meantime, high-ranking personalities in large numbers are actually talking about a war against the "virus". And just like the real wars in Afghanistan and Iraq brought misfortune to millions of people, the "Corona war" does. A worldwide hunger crisis has already been announced by the United Nations, so it is not inappropriate to speak of "war by other means" or "hybrid warfare" (issue 31) in Corona. The fact that the numbers of the silent victims of the shutdown lonely and alone deceased pensioners, bankrupt entrepreneurs, starving people in the Third World, victims of postponed operations, etc. - will far exceed the numbers of the "Corona dead" is now hard to overlook. Comparable to the "war on terror", the costs and benefits of
= countermeasures are simply no longer justifiable. The 3000 victims of September 11, 2001 were avenged with over a million dead, and a virus disease that may not even exist is being met with a total collapse of the world economy. The result of the war against Corona is very similar to that of the real war: Although no soldiers die at the front, a state of emergency paralyses society and economy. Today not only in certain war-torn countries, but almost all over the world. The conventional war seems to be a phased-out model: The modern war is waged against invisible enemies such as "viruses" or "CO2" and can therefore be extended at will (see p.69 ff.). Those who address these contexts be it the official version of 9/11 or Corona - are optionally slandered as "tinfoil hat people", "conspiracy nuts", "paranoids", "righties", "right-wing radicals" or even "anti-Semites" (see p.99 and 115). Even almost 20 years later, not much has changed in terms of enforced conformity: As if by magic, all the governments of the world at that time had taken over the unchallenged narrative of the 19 Arab terrorists who had hijacked four planes and flown with two of them into the Twin Towers. Today, heads of state around the world are taking on the unsubstantiated claim that there can be no return to normality without a vaccine
(see p.22 ff.). There is no evidence that the persons and institutions capable of achieving such global alignment have been replaced or relinquished. We are apparently dealing with the same masterminds who, in the Corona case, are just staging themselves differently. This time not as patriots defending the Occident against terrorists, but as pandemic fighters who care about the health of the world population.
Profiteers While it was mainly arms and oil companies that made their money in the shadow of the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, today it is the pharmaceutical producers. Then as now, the "war" is financed with tax money. For the provision of a vaccine, sums are made available in particular by Western governments, which make the annual budget of some states with populations of millions look „very modest". Once again, few profiteers are filling their pockets, while the average citizen has to pay the bill (see p.31 ff.). However, this is only a marginal aspect of the entire "corona operation", because the geopolitical wheels that are turned with such a "crisis" are far more significant. And in this respect, Corona makes
5
Issue 33, July 2020
h the "Corona Crisis"?
= the September eleventh appear as a “nano-event“: If the military measures of the "war on terror" were limited to a few countries and the restrictions for the world population were as a result noticeable but relatively small, Corona has put the whole world in an unprecedented state of crisis. The rhetoric of "war", "mobilisation" or "Marshall Plan" by high-ranking decision-makers with regard to Corona already indicates that the global elites actually see the "corona crisis" as a kind of new start to the Second World War (see p.68 ff.). And unfortunately this is not inappropriate: The effects of Corona are comparable to those of a war. However, it is difficult not to detect a secret joy about the current conditions behind the hypocritical expressions of concern by politicians and other elites with extreme power. This was deliberately brought about by them in order to present their "solutions". The powerful feel very much in their element and see the crisis as an impetus for their agenda. They have already confirmed this with some unmasking statements. In the course of Corona, enormous "chances" (Kissinger, Rahm Emanuel) arise for the power elites to totalitarianise the planet according to their wishes. In their strategy paper "Rebuilding
?
America's Defenses" of September 2000, the US neoconservatives once wrote that a rebuilding of American defense and the desired upheaval in US politics could take a long time, if not for "a catastrophic and catalysing event [...] - like a new Pearl Harbor". A "catalyst" is a helpful tool to speed up and facilitate processes, and a "catalytic event" is definitely the "corona crisis" that accelerates the geopolitical developments that are already taking place. In addition to the shift of national competences to the United Nations, the
deliberately caused economic ruin is used to blackmail companies and citizens politically. Anyone who does not join the UN's plan for humanity (Agenda 2030) could soon face considerable disadvantages (see p.94 ff.). The denomination "catalyst" is an absolutely correct term: The development towards a planned economy, under the guise of ecology, is experiencing a considerable acceleration in the course of Corona. Those who do not submit to the requirements of Agenda 2030 will receive no or less aid. Those who do not distinguish themselves by loyalty to the regime will be crushed. The authoritative template for this red transformation in the green robe of disguise is the Chinese system, which the global elites repeatedly use as a positive example (see p.105 ff.). This is how everything comes together: The corona crash as a further step towards a technocratic world socialism, which will be characterised by the restriction of property rights, a "social credit system" and an omnipotent surveillance state. This explains why China, Bill Gates, the WHO, the UN and many other global elites are marching in step in the same direction. Corona is the event that was necessary to accelerate the progress of existing plans. An event like September 11th, which fits so perfectly into the concept for many elites‌ a rogue who believes it was deliberately brought about... (tk)
We have already pointed out the outrageous contradictions of the official Corona narrative in our issue 32. This can serve you, dear reader, as a basis for the content at hand and can also help you to educate people in your own environment as well as politicians, officials and other state employees about the fact that WHO & Co. have plunged the world into disaster without a scientific basis. To this end, we are making the digital edition of issue 32 available free of charge as a PDF file on the Internet. You can find it on our telegram channel and on www.expresszeitung.com.
6
Geopolitics
Issue 33, July 2020
Event 201:
Was the "C
Pandemic simulation of the onset of a "corona virus" on 18 October 2019 in New York.
T
he situation is threatening: A new type of corona virus is spreading all over the world. The news is full of it. The case numbers on the Corona World Map of Johns Hopkins University are rising and rising. The immune-resistant pathogen paralyses trade and travel and puts the world economy in free fall. It is October 18, 2019. Wait a second. Why October 18, 2019? According to the official narrative, didn't the corona epidemic break out in China earlier in January 2020? True - but what has just been described is not the real corona crisis in 2020, or the one that has been presented to us as real, but the scenario of an exercise that took place a few months earlier and which in many ways took away today's reality. On October 18, 2019, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, together
with Johns Hopkins University and the World Economic Forum, hosted a pandemic simulation in which political decision-makers, business leaders, media representatives and epidemic experts reacted together to the simulated onset of a virus. The name of the simulation: Event 201.
A new corona virus "It began in healthy looking pigs months, if not years ago: A new corona virus quietly spread through the herds. Gradually, the farmers began to get sick. Infected people contracted a respiratory disease with symptoms ranging from mild flu to severe lung disease. The sickest needed intensive care and many died. Experts agree that if it is not controlled quickly, it could lead to a severe pandemic. An outbreak that circles the globe and
will affect people everywhere," said the introduction to the exercise. (1) Correctly heard: Prophetically, a "corona virus" of all viruses was chosen from the numerous virus groups that exist. What are the chances of picking this type of virus of all things? In the simulation, the corona virus was derived from pigs on South American farms - for the "COVID 19 pandemic", as is well known, the sale of wild animals at a market in Wuhan is is believed to be the place of origin. Animals as vectors also unite practice and "reality". In order to contain the fictional virus, an emergency committee of very real and influential people met in New York on October 18, 2019 to discuss the joint approach to this emergency: people from South America, from where the virus had originated according to the exercise, were
7
Issue 33, JJulyuli 2020
Corona Pandemic" planned? "It began in healthy looking pigs months, if not years ago: A new corona virus quietly spread through the herds. Gradually, the farmers began to get sick. Infected people got a respiratory disease with symptoms ranging from a mild flu-like illness to a severe lung disease". Introduction to the fictitious virus scenario at Event 201 Pandemic simulation of the onset of a "corona virus" on 18 October 2019 in New York.
strangely absent. Instead, a Chinese: George Gao, the Director General of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), who was to play a central role in the "real corona outbreak" in 2020. The only representative of a non-Anglo-American or non-European organisation besides Gao came from Singapore.
Coincidences exist... So the laboratories of the Chinese CDC were under the control of the CDC director who was already present at the Gates Foundation exercise. On December 31, 2019, it started: That was when the Chinese authorities reported no less than 27 cases of "unexplained pneumonia" to the World Health Organisation (WHO). (2) But why on earth is the alarm sounded for such a small number of sick people? That would be 0.000002 percent of the Chinese population! Simply ridiculous: In Germany alone, with its 82 million inhabitants, there are about half a million pneumonia cases per year, or 0.61 percent of the population. Extrapolated to China, with 1.3 billion inhabitants that would be about 8 million cases, and extrapolated to the 58 million inhabitants
Source: youtube.com, Event 201 Pandemic Exercise: Segment 1, Intro and Medical Countermeasures (MCM) Discussion, 04.11.2019, 14:25
Five months later
8
Geopolitics
Issue 33, July 2020
China reported the tiny num1. That ber of cases to the WHO at all, thus making it globally known.
2. That the WHO took it seriously. China and the WHO
The new respiratory disease in the exercise is not called "COVID-19", but "CAPS" (Coronavirus Associated Pulmonary Syndrome).
of Hubei Province, where Wuhan is located, that would still be about 350,000. And on top of that, the urgent report to the WHO was untypical: China is a highly secretive country with strict censorship. Every real problem is considered a state secret to protect its face and is only admit-
ted if there is no other way. And now China voluntarily walks to the WHO with a statistical nothing of 27 sick or "infected" people in an area like Wuhan or Hubei province to report them to the WHO? And the WHO did not recommend the Chinese to calm down, but took the matter seriously? Strange. There are already two oddities in this process:
In October 2019 during the simulation of the outbreak of a new corona virus
These circumstances indicate collusion. Could be that one person sounds the alarm over statistically irrelevant figures - but two? Possible explanation: China and the WHO are in cahoots and play together. After all, a Chinese woman had already lowered the criteria for classifying a disease as a pandemic: Margaret Chan, a Hong Kong Chinese, then head of the WHO. She had already decisively softened the criteria for classifying the swine flu as a pandemic: "In 2009, Chan was heavily criticised for her approval of the classification of swine flu (H1N1) as a pandemic, i.e. a disease that is widespread across countries and continents," said RP-Online. (3) Without softening the criteria, it would not have been possible to classify relatively harmless diseases (if one is to believe the narrative of a new viral disease) such as swine flu or COVID-19
On 24 January co-author of the first internationally published epidemiological description of the new "corona virus".
On February 20, co-author of another important study on the "Corona Virus".
Is it surprising that of all the numerous virus strains, a "corona virus" was chosen for the exercise and its fictitious outbreak became "real" within a few weeks? And not only that: the Chinese George F. Gao was at the centre of the fictitious and "real pandemic".
9
Issue 33, July 2020
as a pandemic and to impose measures. Only since Margaret Chan's change does it no longer matter how many people fall ill or die worldwide. It is enough for a "pathogen" to spread rapidly in at least 2 of the 6 WHO regions, no matter how dangerous it is. And if criticism get stronger, the WHO, on the other hand, repeatedly puts itself protective in front of China: "The World Health Organization on Wednesday again called on critics to stop criticism of China's handling of the corona virus outbreak," the South China Morning Post said in early February 2020. (4) Representatives of the WHO parent organization UN sat around a table with the Chinese CDC director George Gao during the October 2019 exercise. After Gao had participated in the prophetic exercise of October 2019, he presented himself in January 2020 as a co-discoverer of the new and "real corona virus". Thus, on January 24, 2020, he published a paper entitled: "A novel coronavirus of global health concern". (5) On 20 February he published another paper entitled "A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019". (6) Well, what a surprise! There you sat in October 2019 in an exercise about an epidemic with a fictitious new corona virus, and three months later (you) fulfil your own prophecy and publish a paper about a new corona virus! Michael Ryan, the director of the WHO emergency program could not be present, but was briefly connected. And of all people, UNO, WHO and George Gao were now in the centre of the realisation of Event 201! Everything was right: The name "Corona virus" as well as the worldwide spread and the serious consequences for the global economy and traffic. Exactly as predicted by the exercise, the world went crazy in February 2020 because of the allegedly new "Corona virus". (tk/gw)
Source: 1. youtube.com, Event 201 Pandemic Exercise: Segment 1, Intro and Medical Countermeasures (MCM) Discussion, 04.11.2019, 14:25 2. Briefing der Wuhan Municipal Health and Health Commission über die aktuelle Situation der Lungenentzündung in unserer Stadt; Wuhan Municipal Health Commission, 31.12.2019 3. rp-online.de, Margaret Chan…hat das Mittel gegen Ebola, 01.08.2015 4. South China Morning Post, online, 06.02.2020 5. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, A Novel Coronavirus Outbreak of Global Health Concern, 24.01.2020 6. nejm.org, A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019, 20.02.2020
"The scenario presented to you this morning could easily become our reality one day. I fully expect that we will be hit by a rapidly spreading, highly lethal pandemic of respiratory pathogens. The question is: Are we prepared to respond globally to the next major pandemic event?" Michael Ryan, Director, WHO Emergency Response Programme, at Event 201 Source: youtube.com, Event 201 Pandemic Exercise: Segment 1, Intro and Medical Countermeasures (MCM) Discussion, 04.11.2019, 09:58
Switched on in October 2019 during an onset exercise of a "Corona Virus".
Four months later at a conference in Geneva on the new "Corona Virus”.
Geopolitics
10
Issue 33, July 2020
s te a G l il B d n a O H W e th , a in h C
D
id you know that the WHO's agenda has long been set by a super-rich person? This was claimed by the German newspaper ZEIT as well as the ARTE television station in its documentary "The WHO: In the grip of the lobbyists"(1) The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is the second largest donor to the WHO after the USA. The GAVI vaccination alliance set up by Gates (see p.37) ranks fourth among the donors. This is why the German weekly newspaper ZEIT concludes: "The secret head of the WHO is called Bill Gates", is the title of an article. (2) If the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation were to stop sending millions of US dollars to Geneva every year, the WHO would possibly collapse. The billionaire would have a correspondingly great influence on the content of the programme. Although China is not a leading donor to the organisation, it is also striking that since 2006 the WHO director's post has been filled by people who are closely involved with China. As Director-General, Margaret Chan was the first Chinese woman to chair a UN specialised agency. She was followed in 2017 by the Ethiopian Tedros Adhanom. He was part of the Politburo of the Marxist-Leninist "People's Liberation Front of Tigray" (TPLF). Tedros is known, among other things, for his praises of the communist dictatorship in China. China has invested billions in Ethiopia. For example, 70% of the country's roads were built or paid by China. And Tedros seems to see China as a model for the development of his country. No wonder, as a long-time member of a Marxist terror organisation/party. It is therefore no coincidence that China, the WHO and "the secret head of the WHO" Bill Gates pulled together in unfounded epidemic panics of the past and also in the "onset of corona". (tk)
Source: 1. youtube.com, Die WHO - Im Griff der Lobbyisten – Doku HD, 14.03.2018 2. zeit.de, Der heimliche WHO-Chef heisst Bill Gates, 04.04.2017
Bill Gates and China's President Xi Jinping at the Bo'ao Forum in China 2013 The Gates Foundation had already declared on 27th January 2020 that it would provide five million US dollars in emergency donations to fight the "corona epidemic" in China. Later, the foundation promised to use up to 100 million US dollars. Xi respectfully thanked Gates in mid-February with a letter for his support. The relationship between the two could hardly be more harmonious. Source: german.cri.cn, Xi Jinping schreibt Antwort auf Brief von Bill Gates, 22.02.2020
Tedros Adhanom, not a physician
Former leading member of a Marxist terrorist party, now head of WHO
Bill Gates, not a physician
Multi-billionaire with investments in the pharmaceutical industry
Today they decide on global health policy. WHO chief Tedros and Bill Gates at the 2018 Malaria Summit in London.