11 minute read

LAB

Next Article
COPRODUCTS

COPRODUCTS

REPEATABLE PERFORMANCE: Whether working with high-tech lab instruments or everyday lab products like pipettes or sample bottles, adhering to standard operating procedures ensure that each lab team member knows how to perform a procedure independently and reproducibly without error.

PHOTO:PHIBRO ETHANOL

The Basics of Ethanol Plant Laboratory Quality Management

Ethanol Producer Magazine talks with Phibro Ethanol’s Dr. Andrew Hawkins about the essentials of top-tier LQM, including good training, recordkeeping, SOPs and more. By Tom Bryan

CONTRIBUTION: The claims and statements made in this article belong exclusively to the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Ethanol Producer Magazine or its advertisers. All questions pertaining to this article should be directed to the author(s).

Ethanol plant labs are the nerve centers of modern biofuel production: they are data generation hubs, troubleshooting resource centers and product quality check points. Producing ethanol and coproducts to today’s exacting specifications, with optimal efficiency and uptime, requires facility-wide discipline and, in the lab, steady adherence to a comprehensive quality management program.

Ethanol Producer Magazine recently caught up with Dr. Andrew Hawkins, director, laboratory services, Phibro Ethanol—who presented on laboratory quality management (LQM) at the International Fuel Ethanol Workshop & Expo in July. Here’s what he had to say about LQM.

EPM: Dr. Hawkins, at the 2021 International Fuel Ethanol Workshop & Expo in Des Moines, Iowa, you spoke about the keys to successful LQM. Briefly, what are the basic tenets of a lab quality management program, and how is the history of LQM—which you discussed at the FEW—relevant to today's lab practices?

Hawkins: We can learn from other industries that have applied a holistic approach to quality. LQM is a system that takes a 360-degree view of quality so that products and processes are of the highest standards possible. The basic principles of a good LQM program are not just solid procedures, but also well-trained staff, data recording, validation and calibration, and clear communication amongst all involved. EPM: Explain the role of QA/QC in an ethanol plant LQM program.

Hawkins: Quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) are two major components of a successful LQM program. QA covers in-process steps taken to ensure the process being monitored is as good as it can be. Things like well-trained staff, standard operating procedures, regular instrument validation and calibration—all are QA tasks. This systematic approach assures us the process is operating the best it can (i.e., the plant is efficiently making high quality ethanol). QC is a checkpoint to make sure the products—ethanol and each coproduct—meet all the specifications that customers expect when they receive that product. EPM: Explain the importance of SOPs in the U.S. corn ethanol industry. Why are they a vital component of training, and ultimately top-tier LQM?

Hawkins: Standard operating procedures (SOPs) are a way to clearly communicate and document all steps necessary to perform a procedure or task. SOPs are like a recipe for a cake—they tell us all the steps needed, in sufficient detail, so the outcome is a good cake! In the ethanol plant, SOPs ensure each staff member knows how to perform a procedure independently and reproducibly. Let’s say that procedure is measuring the amount of water in final ethanol product. A good SOP ensures each person does that measurement the same way, that the result is accurate, and that the same result would be had if a different staff member did the test. Along with training (i.e., how to use, validate and calibrate an instrument), SOPs are an essential backbone to a good LQM. EPM: Ethanol plant labs are the data hubs of the facility. Data recording is obviously a critical best practice in the lab. What are some of the top reasons for recording data, either by hand or digitally? Is it done correctly enough of the time? And what are the risks of not doing it consistently or accurately?

Hawkins: Data recording is a crucial component to good LQM. If it isn’t written down, it didn’t happen! Good data recording means as we learn more about our process, we have all the data needed to go back and do a deep dive for analysis and improvement. Sometimes, data recording is our best defense at solving a complex problem that we didn’t even notice until later. Let’s say we need to determine the root cause of an infection. Sometimes, solving that issue means gathering timing of valves, operations in the process from control room notes, and lab data all together to understand how to avoid the issue in the future. Good data records extend beyond just writing information down—they include an organizational scheme that is easy for others to understand so that data can be retrieved and accessed again in the future. EPM: Talk about how the LQM best practices you discussed at the FEW, in essence, define and govern Phibro’s own LQM program—Phibro CertiPhiedTM—which ensures that your own products meet exacting levels of quality and consistency when they arrive at an ethanol plant’s gate.

Hawkins: LQM practices are the backbone to Phibro’s trademarked CertiPhied program. In our Phibro Ethanol laboratory, we have our own metrology program and electronic data records to ensure our equipment is always working. Accurate data is the foundation of consistency and reliability. Once we know we can measure things accurately, we measure key properties of our products to ensure they meet specifications. The specifications were in turn developed to ensure that a product performs exactly how a customer expects in their plant, each time it is used.

Statement of Ownership, Management, and Circulation (Requester Publications Only)

1. Publication Title 2. Publication Number

3. Filing Date Ethanol Producer Magazine 023 _ 974 9/28/21

4. Issue Frequency 5. Number of Issues Published Annually 6. Annual Subscription Price (if any)

Monthly 12

7. Complete Mailing Address of Known Office of Publication (Not printer) (Street, city, county, state, and ZIP+4®) 308 Second Ave. N., Suite 304 Grand Forks, ND 58203 Grand Forks County Requested Contact Person Jessica Tiller Telephone (Include area code) 701-746-8385

8. Complete Mailing Address of Headquarters or General Business Office of Publisher (Not printer) 308 Second Ave. N., Suite 304 Grand Forks, ND 58203

9. Full Names and Complete Mailing Addresses of Publisher, Editor, and Managing Editor (Do not leave blank) Publisher (Name and complete mailing address) Joe Bryan 308 Second Ave. N., Suite 304 Grand Forks, ND 58203 Editor (Name and complete mailing address) Tom Bryan 308 Second Ave. N., Suite 304 Grand Forks, ND 58203 Managing Editor (Name and complete mailing address) Tom Bryan 308 Second Ave. N., Suite 304 Grand Forks, ND 58203

10. Owner (Do not leave blank. If the publication is owned by a corporation, give the name and address of the corporation immediately followed by the names and addresses of all stockholders owning or holding 1 percent or more of the total amount of stock. If not owned by a corporation, give the names and addresses of the individual owners. If owned by a partnership or other unincorporated firm, give its name and address as well as those of each individual owner. If the publication is published by a nonprofit organization, give its name and address.)

Full Name

Joe Bryan, CEO Tom Bryan, President & Editor in Chief

Complete Mailing Address

308 Second Ave. N., Suite 304 Grand Forks, ND 58203 308 Second Ave. N., Suite 304 Grand Forks, ND 58203

11. Known Bondholders, Mortgagees, and Other Security Holders Owning or Holding 1 Percent or More of Total Amount of Bonds, Mortgages, or Other Securities. If none, check box. NoneX

Full Name Complete Mailing Address

12. Tax Status (For completion by nonprofit organizations authorized to mail at nonprofit rates) (Check one)

The purpose, function, and nonprofit status of this organization and the exempt status for federal income tax purposes:

X

Has Not Changed During Preceding 12 Months Has Changed During Preceding 12 Months (Publisher must submit explanation of change with this statement.)

PS Form 3526-R, July 2014 [Page 1 of 4 (See instructions page 4)] PSN: 7530-09-000-8855 PRIVACY NOTICE: See our privacy policy on www.usps.com.

13. Publication Title

Ethanol Producer Magazine

Extent and Nature of Circulation Industry Trade Publication

a. Total Number of Copies (Net press run) 14. Issue Date for Circulation Data Below

November 2021

Average No. Copies Each Issue During Preceding 12 Months

No. Copies of Single Issue Published Nearest to Filing Date

4,292 3,000

(1)

b. Legitimate

Paid and/or Requested Distribution (By mail and outside the mail) (2)

(3) Outside County Paid/Requested Mail Subscriptions stated on PS Form 3541. (Include direct written request from recipient, telemarketing, and Internet requests from recipient, paid subscriptions including nominal rate subscriptions, employer requests, advertiser’s proof copies, and exchange copies.)

In-County Paid/Requested Mail Subscriptions stated on PS Form 3541. (Include direct written request from recipient, telemarketing, and Internet requests from recipient, paid subscriptions including nominal rate subscriptions, employer requests, advertiser’s proof copies, and exchange copies.)

Sales Through Dealers and Carriers, Street Vendors, Counter Sales, and Other Paid or Requested Distribution Outside USPS®

(4) Requested Copies Distributed by Other Mail Classes Through the USPS (e.g., First-Class Mail®)

c. Total Paid and/or Requested Circulation (Sum of 15b (1), (2), (3), and (4))

(1) Outside County Nonrequested Copies Stated on PS Form 3541 (include sample copies, requests over 3 years old, requests induced by a premium, bulk sales and requests including association requests, names obtained from business directories, lists, and other sources) 1,674 1,774

3 5

0 0

17 14

1,694 1,793 1,833 954

d. Non requested

Distribution (By mail and outside the mail) (2)

(3)

(4) In-County Nonrequested Copies Stated on PS Form 3541 (include sample copies, requests over 3 years old, requests induced by a premium, bulk sales and requests including association requests, names obtained from business directories, lists, and other sources)

Nonrequested Copies Distributed Through the USPS by Other Classes of Mail (e.g., First-Class Mail, nonrequestor copies mailed in excess of 10% limit mailed at Standard Mail® or Package Services rates)

Nonrequested Copies Distributed Outside the Mail (Include pickup stands, trade shows, showrooms, and other sources)

e. Total Nonrequested Distribution [Sum of 15d (1), (2), (3) and (4)] 3 3

117 50

111 0

2,064 1,007

f. Total Distribution (Sum of 15c and e) 3,758 2,800

g. Copies not Distributed (See Instructions to Publishers #4, (page #3)) 534 200

h. Total (Sum of 15f and g) 4,292 3,000

i. Percent Paid and/or Requested Circulation (15c divided by 15f times 100) 45%

* If you are claiming electronic copies, go to line 16 on page 3. If you are not claiming electronic copies, skip to line 17 on page 3.

*Claiming Electronic Copies - Go to line 16. 64%

PS Form 3526-R, July 2014 (Page 2 of 4)

16. Electronic Copy Circulation

Statement of Ownership, Management, and Circulation (Requester Publications Only)

Average No. Copies Each Issue During Previous 12 Months No. Copies of Single Issue Published Nearest to Filing Date

a. Requested and Paid Electronic Copies

b. Total Requested and Paid Print Copies (Line 15c) + Requested/Paid Electronic Copies (Line 16a) c. Total Requested Copy Distribution (Line 15f) + Requested/Paid Electronic Copies (Line 16a) d. Percent Paid and/or Requested Circulation (Both Print & Electronic Copies) (16b divided by 16c Í 100) 692

824 2,386 2,617 4,450 3,624 54% 72%

I certify that 50% of all my distributed copies (electronic and print) are legitimate requests or paid copies.

17. Publication of Statement of Ownership for a Requester Publication is required and will be printed in the issue of this publication.

18. Signature and Title of Editor, Publisher, Business Manager, or Owner November 2021

Date

Circulation Manager 9-28-21

I certify that all information furnished on this form is true and complete. I understand that anyone who furnishes false or misleading information on this form or who omits material or information requested on the form may be subject to criminal sanctions (including fines and imprisonment) and/or civil sanctions (including civil penalties).

The Specialist in Biofuels Plant Appraisals

• Valuation for nancing • Establishing an asking price • Partial interest valuation

Over 50 Years of Experience Call us for a free, no-obligation consultation today. 800-279-4757 | 701-793-2360

www.natwickappraisal.com natwick@integra.net

FUEL ETHANOL

BUTTERWORTH CLEANS BETTER

www.butterworth.com info@butterwor th.com

This article is from: