Belinda Lee Selected Works 2012-2015 Yale School of Architecture, MArch I
Belinda Lee 11 University Pl, New Haven CT. 06511 (408) 489-8625 belinda.lee@yale.edu
1
Education
Yale University, Yale School of Architecture New Haven, CT Master of Architecture, 2015 Washington University in St Louis, Sam Fox School of Design & Visual Arts St Louis, MO Bachelor of Science in Architecture 2012, Structural Engineering Minor, Summa Cum Laude
Awards
David M. Schwarz Good Times Fellowship, Yale School of Architecture 2015 Awarded to provide a graduating student with a fellowship to travel in Europe. Gertraud A. Wood Traveling Fellowship, Yale School of Architecture 2014 Awarded each year to an outstanding second-year student in the first professional degree program. Rome: Continuity and Change Travel Grant Summer 2014 Hugh Ferriss Award for Architectural Drawing, Washington University in St Louis 2012 Awarded annually to a student who has excelled in architectural drawing in any medium.
Work Experience
Freeland Buck, New York, NY Architectural Design Intern Summer 2013 Worked on winning proposal, Kunshan Phoenix Cultural Mall. Collaboration with Joel Sanders Architects. Developed digital model for design and rendering. Produced final plans and diagrams. XianDai Architecture Design Group Shanghai, China Architecture Design Intern Summer 2010 Designed a proposal for a high school library in Yunnan province China. Six Mile Sculptureworks Granite City, IL Fabrication Assistant Summer 2011 Assisted resident artist in design and construction of 20 ft steel sculpture. Yale Fabrication Labs and Walker Hall Sculpture Studios Wood and Metal Shop Monitor 2008-2015
Academic
Senior Studio, Yale School of Architecture New Haven, CT Teaching Fellow, Spring 2015. Course taught by Stephen Harris and Marta Caldeira. Provided individual critiques on design problems for students in the last studio of the Yale undergraduate curriculum. Prepared and ran weekly tutorials and lectures. Introduction to Architecture, Yale School of Architecture New Haven, CT Teaching Fellow, Fall 2014. Course taught by Alec Purves. Prepared weekly discussions. Provided individual and group critiques on design and sketch assignments. Introduction to Planning and Development, Yale School of Architecture New Haven, CT Teaching Fellow, Fall 2013. Course taught by Alex Garvin. Vlock Building Project, Yale School of Architecture New Haven, CT Construction Document Drawing Coordinator Spring/Summer 2013 Coordinated the development and production of CD set using Revit for permit approval and construction for two single family houses in New Haven. Structures II, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO Teaching Assistant Spring 2012
Skills
Proficient in Revit; Adobe Illustrator, InDesign and Photoshop; AutoCAD; Rhino; Maxwell. Working knowledge in Adobe Premiere, Grasshopper, Vray, Keyshot. Experience in wood-working and metal-working. 2
Under Pressure Studio Fall 2012 Critic: Brennan Buck Two spaces on an imagined sloped site. This project connects evenly spaced points around the perimeter of the site to three points. The resulting lines either carve away at the ground plane or physically extend out from the perimeter to create a layered canopy about the site.
3
1/4”=1’ Model
4
5
Plan and Sections
1/2”=1’ Model
6
7
1/4”=1’ Model
8
Rock Lobster Studio Fall 2012 Critic: Brennan Buck This project organizes the exhibited material for a natural history museum categorically along the grain and chronologically against the grain. Radial, transleucent walls are used to display graphics. Paths and rooms interior rooms are created with spherical booleans through the walls.
9
1/8”=1’ Model
10
Plan and Section
11
1/8”=1’ Model
12
Detail
13
1/8”=1’ Model
14
15
16
17
Site Plan
18
Dance Machine Studio Fall 2012 Critic: Brennan Buck
The dance studio is created with a gridded system where lines extend from points spaced around the perimeter of the site. This system exaggerates perspectival views from the street and creates terraced seating that opens out onto the stage in the main hall. The dance studios are double height, trapped between multiple layers of radial walls to create multiple points of perspective. The performance space sits in the middle of the second level and steps up from the stage creating double height spaces lit from above around the perimeter of the first level. Visitors are drawn off the street from either of the openings on the first floor and can enter either the lobby or cafe. From the lobby, they can buy tickets for the show, and go up to a middle level and filter into their seats through three staircases. The performers enter through the same entrance through a back door of the shared lobby. The roof is also terraced and accessible from both the studios below and the highline.
19
1/16”=1’ Model
20
21
1/16”=1’ Model
22
2
3
1 3 4
5
5
5 6
Level 01 1-Lobby 2-Cafe 3-Changing Rooms 4-Lounge 5-Dance Studios 6-Offices
23
6
6
Level 02 Pre-Function
2
1
Level 03 Performance Hall
Roof 1-Roof Terraces 2-High Line
24
4
3 2 5
6
1-Lobby 2-Grand Stair 3-Pre-Function 4-Performance Hall 5-Changing Rooms 6-Lounge
25
1
6
5
1
2
3
4
1-Cafe 2-Lobby 3-Lounge 4-Dance Studios 5-Prefunction 6-Performance Hall
26
1/16”=1’ Model Aerial
27
1/16”=1’ View From Highline
28
Drawings Visualization II Fall 2012 Critic: Sunil Bald, Kent Bloomer
29
30
Building Project: Individual Prototype Studio Spring 2013 Critic: Alan Organschi
The prototype house explores the use of a double wall system to spatially organize a narrow house for a New Haven site. Initial studies of OMA’s Fukuoka housing project and the Eame’s house inform the layout and form. Standardized componenets for bathrooms, porches, doors, windows, laundry are placed within an exterior wall system and a thinner flexible interior wall separates the remaining living space from the intermediate space. The approach offers a prototypical solution for housing that can expand and contract using the same components.
33
Structure Model in collaboration with Bruce Hancock
Model in collaboration with Bruce Hancock, Hiba Bhatty, Alissa Chastain, Elena Baranes, Michael Cohen, Zach Huelsing, Zach Veach, Tyson Jang, Stanley Cho 34
1/8”=1’ Eames House Study Model
35
1/2”=1’ Model
36
37
Plans and Section
38
39
1/2”=1’ Model
40
41
1/2”=1’ Model
42
1/8”=1’ Study Model
43
1/4”=1’ Study Model
44
Building Project: Team Proposal Studio Spring 2013 Critics: Amy Lelyveld, Peter de Bretteville, Trattie Davies, Paul Brouard Team: Sunhi Chung, Kirk Henderson, Tyson Jang, Mun Hee Lee, Emily Bell
A box for living, a shed for shelter. The Team G proposal houses a flexible residential interior within a variable yet contextual structural shed. Technologically savvy yet simple in form, the exterior shed accommodates variation in windows, doors, and overall length and height. This allows the house design -- as a prototype -- to respond to varying site conditions while retaining its overall identity. In the interior, panels on the public ground floor efficiently partition space for domestic functions. Upstairs, the private bedrooms and baths reside in a protective, enclosing box that floats on the second floor. Deep window casements bridge from inside the box’s bedrooms out to the shed’s exterior. The house thus becomes a series of concentric dwelling spaces, moving from sidewalk, to porch, to ground floor open living space, to upstairs private dwelling space, and again to the outside. The box and shed remain independent of one another, retaining the advantages inherent in both, and allowing light to play in the spaces between.
45
46
47
48
1/4”=1’ Model
EAST
EAST
EAST
WEST
WEST
49
EAST
WEST WEST
Elevations
Plans
50
51
Sections
52
53
Section
54
55
56
1/2”=1’ Model
1/2”=1’ Model
57
58
Building Project: Construction Document Coordination Ssummer 2013 With Maya Alexander
59
60
Additive Components Visualization III Spring 2013 Critic: Ben Pell, John Eberhart In Collaboration with Haelee Jung
61
62
Casis Headquarters Studio Fall 2013 Critic: Mark Foster Gage
This building consists of four nested layers: an opaque exterior shell containing enclosed program, and intermediate space with open floor plans, a glazed exterior courtyard and a floating object that houses a dark exhibition space and creates a platform for the exhibition of the destinty module. The form is eroded from the ground up with the eroded portions being glazed so the building is focused outwards on the lower levels and inwards on the upper levels. The monolithic exterior is cladded in small tile that reflects light form a moat that surrounds the building. The exterior is clad in small tiles that break up the monolithic facade and subtly reflect light from a shallow moat surrounding the building. The interior closes as you move up through the building from being mostly open to selected veiws on the lower office floors to opaque and inwardly focused on the upper exhibition floors. The daylight model studies the lighting effects of the the top lit exhibition space. The focus for the top two levels is the destiny module. A skylight is diffuses the light and reflects it off the destiny module and the alternating opaque and transparent walls of the artium.
67
Rendering
68
69
Elevation Studies
70
Worms Eye Axon
71
72
73
Renderings
74
75
76
77
1/8”=1’ Model
78
79
Section
Renderings
80
3 1
1
4
5
3 2 2
1
4
3
FLOOR 03 1-Directors Office 2-Research Director 3-Open Office Space
FLOOR 02 1-Security offices 2-Public Services 3-Educational Director 4-Open Office Space
1
FLOOR 01 1-Entrance Lobby 2-Men’s Room 3-Women’s Room 4-Coat Room 5-Payload Office Space
1
2
2
FLOOR 08 Education Break Out Rooms
81
FLOOR 07 1-Open Exhibition 2-Destiny Module Display
FLOOR 06 1-Open Exhibition 2-Dark Exhibition Space
6 5
3
4 1
2
FLOOR -01 1-Lecture Hall 2-Prefunction Space 3-Theater Storage 4-Men’s Room 5-Women’s Room 6-Payload Operations Control
FLOOR -02 Service and Staging
2
2
1
FLOOR 05 1-Dragon X Display 2-Open Office Space
1
FLOOR 04 1-Meeting Room 2-Open Open Office Space
82
83
1/2”=1’ Daylight Model
84
85
86
1/8”=1’ Model 87
88
Systems Integration Spring 2014 Consultants: Martin Finio, Victoria Ponce de Leon, Larry Jones In Collaboration with Benjamin Smith and Jason Lee
Steel Grate Steel Structure
Drain
8” CMU 8” CMU
WP Membrane Rigid Insulation 3” Tieback
Tieback 6” Channel
Firesafe Insulation
Glass Facade System
Sprinkler Duct Work Glass Facade System
H&B PTA Anchor Compressible Fill
6” Channel 5/8” Gyp Rigid Insulation 3” Concrete Slab
WP Membrane Can Light
Concrete Slab
Drain
Duct Work 5/8” Gyp Can Light
Rigid Insulation 3”
Drainage Core Board
Waterstop
Drain
89
H
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14 X26
W14X26
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14X26
W14 X26
103' - 6"
W8X 15
W14X26
W 14X26
W14 X26 W18 X35
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
H
W18X35 W14X26
2
3
5
4
27' - 0"
16' - 7"
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14 X26 W14 X26
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14 X26
W1 4X 26
W18 X35
W14 X26
W14X26 W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
16' - 7"
1
2
3
27' - 0"
22' - 2"
16' - 7"
Date:
02/06/14 Author 1/16" = 1'-0"
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
10' - 9"
W14X26
W18X35 W14X26
Grade -2' - 10"
Level B2 -29' - 10"
W14X26
W14X26
B
D
C
E
F
G
W 14X26
W14 X26
W18 X35
W 14X26
13' - 9"
W14X 26
02/06/14
Level B1 -17' - 10"
Drawn by: Scale:
Author 1/16" = 1'-0"
Level B2 -29' - 10"
W 14X26
W18X35 W 14X26
Belinda Lee 408.489.8625 belinda.lee@yale.edu Benjamin Smith 706.294.0576 benjamin.l.smith@yale.edu
Consultant Team Martin Finio (Arch) 212.219.1026 mf@christofffinio.com Larry Jones (Mech) 203.927.4933 larry.jones@atelierten.com Victoria Ponce de Leon (Struct) 203.434.4569 poncedeleon@silman.com
Date:
02/14/14
Drawn by: Scale:
Author 3/64" = 1'-0"
S113
6
5
4
3
Casis Headquarters
1
Bulkhead 122' - 2" Roof 114' - 2"
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14 X26
9 1/ 2"
Benjamin Smith 706.294.0576 benjamin.l.smith@yale.edu
Consultant Team Martin Finio (Arch) 212.219.1026 mf@christofffinio.com Larry Jones (Mech) 203.927.4933 larry.jones@atelierten.com Victoria Ponce de Leon (Struct) 203.434.4569 poncedeleon@silman.com
Date:
02/06/14
Drawn by: Scale:
Author 1/16" = 1'-0"
Systems Integration Arch 3022 Project Team Jason Lee 703.853.3435 h.jasonly@gmail.com
Level 7 74' - 2"
Belinda Lee 408.489.8625 belinda.lee@yale.edu
Level 6 58' - 2"
Benjamin Smith 706.294.0576 benjamin.l.smith@yale.edu
Level 5 42' - 2"
Consultant Team
Level 4 30' - 2"
Martin Finio (Arch) 212.219.1026 mf@christofffinio.com
Level 3 18' - 2"
Larry Jones (Mech) 203.927.4933 larry.jones@atelierten.com
Level 2 6' - 2" Grade -2' - 10"
Level 1 -5' - 10"
W8X 15
W18 X35
W14 X26
W14X26
112' - 0 1/8"
W14X26
W14X26
W 14X26
82' - 4"
Jason Lee 703.853.3435 h.jasonly@gmail.com
Framing Elevation_West
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14X26
W14X26
G
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14X26
W8X 15
W14 X26
W18X35
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
F
W14 X26
6 4X2 W1
W14X26 W14X26
8' -
W18X35
W8X 15
W8X 15
W14 X26
H
S104
W14X26
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14X26
W14X26
E
9
W14 X26
W14 X26
W18X35
W14 X26
W18X35
W14 X26
W14X26
Author 1/16" = 1'-0"
Level 4 Structural Framing Plan
Date:
Belinda Lee 408.489.8625 belinda.lee@yale.edu
8
103' - 6"
W14X26
W14X 26
6 W14X2
W14X26
Drawn by: Scale:
W14X26
Level 1 -5' - 10"
Jason Lee 703.853.3435 h.jasonly@gmail.com
7
W14X26
W18X35
W14X26
W14X26
W14 X26
02/06/14
Grade -2' - 10"
Project Team
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26 W14X26
W14X26 W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W8X 15
Date:
Level 2 6' - 2"
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
Victoria Ponce de Leon (Struct) 203.434.4569 poncedeleon@silman.com
16' - 8"
Martin Finio (Arch) 212.219.1026 mf@christofffinio.com Larry Jones (Mech) 203.927.4933 larry.jones@atelierten.com
Level 3 18' - 2"
Level 8 102' - 2"
W14X26
W14X26
W18X35
W14X26
D
W14X26
Consultant Team
Martin Finio (Arch) 212.219.1026 mf@christofffinio.com
Systems Integration Arch 3022
W18X35
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26 W14X26
W14X26
10' - 9" 13' - 6"
16' - 7"
X26 W14
16' - 8"
W14 X26
W14X26
W14X26
C
Benjamin Smith 706.294.0576 benjamin.l.smith@yale.edu
103' - 6"
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14 X26
W8X 15
W18 X35
W1 4X
112' - 0 1/8"
W14 X26
W1 4X 26 W14 X26 26
W14X26
W14X26
82' - 4"
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26 W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14 X26
W14X26 W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
20' - 8"
W14X26 W14X26
W14X26
W14X2 6
W14X26
W14X2 6
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26 W14X26
W14 X26
W14 X26
W8X 15 W14 X26
W14 X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26 W14X26
W14X26
16' - 8" F
W14X26
W8X 15
W14 X26
W14X26
6 4X2 W1
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
22' - 2"
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14X26 W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W1 4X2 6
W14X26
W14X26
W14 X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26 W14X26
E
W14X26
9 1/ 2"
Level 4 30' - 2"
Casis Headquarters
6
5
4 16' - 7"
6 W14X2
W14X26
26 4X W1
W14X26
8' -
W14 X26
W14X26
D 16' - 8"
26 4X W1
25' - 3"
X26 W14 X26 W14
9
B
25' - 3"
13' - 9"
Belinda Lee 408.489.8625 belinda.lee@yale.edu
8
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
Jason Lee 703.853.3435 h.jasonly@gmail.com
7
3
W14X26
A
X26 W14
W14X26
W14X2 6
2 27' - 0"
Project Team
X26 W14
W14X26
1
Systems Integration Arch 3022
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W1 4X 26
W14X26
C
W14X26
W14X26
13' - 6"
B
16' - 7"
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W1 4X 26
10' - 9"
W14X26
Casis Headquarters
6
22' - 2"
W14X26
W14X26
A
5
4 16' - 7"
W14X26
3
Consultant Team
S107
20' - 8"
2 27' - 0"
Level 5 42' - 2"
Level 7 Structural Framing Plan
112' - 0 1/8"
S102
1
Systems Integration Arch 3022
W 14X26
82' - 4"
Level 2 Structural Framing Plan
Level 6 58' - 2"
W8X 15
W14 X26
W14X26
W14X26
W 14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W 14X26
H
Casis Headquarters
Project Team
Level 7 74' - 2"
Victoria Ponce de Leon (Struct) 203.434.4569 poncedeleon@silman.com
W8X 15
W18X35 W14 X26
W14X26
H
Level 8 102' - 2"
Larry Jones (Mech) 203.927.4933 larry.jones@atelierten.com
W14 X26 W14 X26
W1 4X 26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X2 6
W14X26
W14 X26
W14X2 6
W14X26
W14X26
W14 X26
6 4X2 W1
W14X26
W14X26
G
W8X 15
W14 X26
02/14/14 Author 3/64" = 1'-0"
Framing Elevation_East
Bulkhead 122' - 2" Roof 114' - 2"
W14 X26 W14 X26
W18X35
W14X26
W8X 15
W14 X26
W18X35
W14X26
W14 X26
W40X149
W14X26
W40X149
W14X26 W14 X26
W14X26
W14X26
Date: Drawn by: Scale:
S112 A
Benjamin Smith 706.294.0576 benjamin.l.smith@yale.edu
W14 X26
W14 X26
W18X35
W14X26
W14X26
9 1/ 2"
W14 X26
W14X26
W14 X26
W18X35
9 8' -
W14 X26
W14X26 W14 X26
W14X26
W1 4X2 6
W18X35
W18X35
W14X26
W14 X26
F
12/29/13 Author 1/16" = 1'-0"
Victoria Ponce de Leon (Struct) 203.434.4569 poncedeleon@silman.com
Level 1 -5' - 10" Level B1 -17' - 10"
Belinda Lee 408.489.8625 belinda.lee@yale.edu
8
103' - 6"
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
13' - 6"
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
16' - 8" E
13' - 9"
6 4X2 W1
W14X26
W14X26 W14X26
103' - 6"
W14 X26
Drawn by: Scale:
82' - 4"
Larry Jones (Mech) 203.927.4933 larry.jones@atelierten.com
Level 2 6' - 2"
Jason Lee 703.853.3435 h.jasonly@gmail.com
7
W14X26 W14X26
16' - 8"
W14 X26
W14 X26 W18 X35
W16x31
W18X50
W14X26
Date:
W14X26
W 14X26
W14X 26
W8X 15
W14 X26
W18x50
W 14X26
W16x31
W 14X26
Victoria Ponce de Leon (Struct) 203.434.4569 poncedeleon@silman.com
W8X 15
W16 X31
W18x50
W14X26
W14X26
W 14X26
H
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X2 6
W14X26
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14X26
Martin Finio (Arch) 212.219.1026 mf@christofffinio.com
Level 3 18' - 2"
Project Team
W14X2 6
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
D
Martin Finio (Arch) 212.219.1026 mf@christofffinio.com Larry Jones (Mech) 203.927.4933 larry.jones@atelierten.com
W14 X26
W1 4X2 6
W16 X31
W18X50
W1 4X2 6
W14X26
W18x50
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W16x31
F
W14 X26
W14 X26
W8X 15
Consultant Team
Consultant Team
Level 4 30' - 2"
W14X26
W18 X50
W8X 15
W16 X31
W18x50
W18X35
X26 W14
25' - 3"
Benjamin Smith 706.294.0576 benjamin.l.smith@yale.edu
W14 X26
W14X26
W14X26
W16X31
W14 X26
W14X26
W14X26
W16X31
W18x50
W18x50
W1 4X 26 W14X26
W14X26
W14X26 W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
X26 W14
W18X35
9 1/ 2"
W14X26
C
20' - 8"
25' - 3"
W24X76 W24X76
16' - 8"
W14X26
6 4X2 W1
16' - 8"
9 8' -
Benjamin Smith 706.294.0576 benjamin.l.smith@yale.edu
Level 5 42' - 2"
Systems Integration Arch 3022
W14X26
E
6 4X2 W1 6 4X2 W1
W14X26
W18x50
20' - 8"
Belinda Lee 408.489.8625 belinda.lee@yale.edu
8
X50 W21
X50 W21
H
Martin Finio (Arch) 212.219.1026 mf@christofffinio.com
Casis Headquarters
6
5
4 16' - 7"
W14X26
B
W14X26
10' - 9" 13' - 6"
Jason Lee 703.853.3435 h.jasonly@gmail.com
7
13' - 9"
D
G
Consultant Team
Drawn by: Scale:
Belinda Lee 408.489.8625 belinda.lee@yale.edu
Level 6 58' - 2"
A
C
G
Jason Lee 703.853.3435 h.jasonly@gmail.com
S106
Project Team
B
Project Team
Level 7 74' - 2"
Level 6 Structural Framing Plan
112' - 0 1/4"
Systems Integration Arch 3022
A
Systems Integration Arch 3022
Level 8 102' - 2"
W14 X26
82' - 4"
Casis Headquarters
6
22' - 2"
Bulkhead 122' - 2" Roof 114' - 2"
Victoria Ponce de Leon (Struct) 203.434.4569 poncedeleon@silman.com
S101
1
Casis Headquarters
A
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14X26
W14X26
W40X149
W14 X26
W14X26 W14X26
W14X26
W14X2 6 W18X35
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
B
Larry Jones (Mech) 203.927.4933 larry.jones@atelierten.com
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14X26
W14 X26
W14 X26 W14 X26
26 4X W1
W14X2 6
W14X26
C
D
Benjamin Smith 706.294.0576 benjamin.l.smith@yale.edu
103' - 6"
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14 X26
W40X149
25' - 3"
W18X35
W14 X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14 X26
W14X26
9 9 1/ 2"
02/14/14 Author 3/64" = 1'-0"
Framing Elevation_South
Belinda Lee 408.489.8625 belinda.lee@yale.edu
8 8' -
W14 X26
W14X26
W14X26
Level 1 Structural Framing Plan
114' - 1 5/8"
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W1 4X2 6
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
16' - 8" G
W14X26
W14X26
H 82' - 4"
13' - 9"
W14 X26
W14 X26
Author 1/16" = 1'-0"
6 4X2 W1
W14 X26
F
E
F
Project Team
W14X26
W14X26
G
Jason Lee 703.853.3435 h.jasonly@gmail.com
7
Date: Drawn by: Scale:
S115
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
11/24/12
Drawn by: Scale:
W18X35
W14X26
W14X26
W18 X35
Date:
Level B2 -29' - 10"
26 W14X
W14X26
W14X26
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14X26 W14X26 W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W16 X36
W14X26 W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
Victoria Ponce de Leon (Struct) 203.434.4569 poncedeleon@silman.com
W14 X26
Level B1 -17' - 10"
Systems Integration Arch 3022
W14X26
W14X26
E
Larry Jones (Mech) 203.927.4933 larry.jones@atelierten.com
W16X31
W14X26
W18X35
W16 X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26 W14X26
16' - 8" 20' - 8"
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W16x31
Martin Finio (Arch) 212.219.1026 mf@christofffinio.com
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14 X26
W14X26
Consultant Team
W14X26
103' - 6"
W14 X26 W14 X26
W14 X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
16' - 8"
W14X26
W18X35
Victoria Ponce de Leon (Struct) 203.434.4569 poncedeleon@silman.com
Level 1 -5' - 10"
H
16' - 7"
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14 X26
F
G
W14X26
W16x31
E
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26 W14X26
W14 X26
W14X26
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14X26
6
5 22' - 2"
W14X26
W14X26
W14X2 6
D
W18X50
W40X149
Grade -2' - 10"
Casis Headquarters
X26 W14
Benjamin Smith 706.294.0576 benjamin.l.smith@yale.edu
9 1/ 2"
W14X26
W14X26
W18X35
W18X35
W18X35
W40X149
W40X149 W18X35
W18X35
W18X35
25' - 3"
W18X35
W14X26
W16x31
D
8' -
Larry Jones (Mech) 203.927.4933 larry.jones@atelierten.com
Level 2 6' - 2"
Level 5 Structural Framing Plan
4 16' - 7"
26 4X W1
9
3
W14X26
C
Belinda Lee 408.489.8625 belinda.lee@yale.edu
8
13' - 9"
13' - 6"
7
W14X26
16' - 8"
W18X35
Jason Lee 703.853.3435 h.jasonly@gmail.com
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
B
Project Team
W14X26
W14X26
W18X35
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
13' - 6"
W14X26
W16x31
C
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
10' - 9"
W14X26
W14X26
10' - 9"
A
A
B
2 27' - 0"
W14X26
W14X26
1
W18X35
Systems Integration Arch 3022
W14X26
16' - 7"
W14X26
Casis Headquarters
6
22' - 2"
W14X26
5
4 16' - 7"
Author 1/16" = 1'-0"
Martin Finio (Arch) 212.219.1026 mf@christofffinio.com
S105
20' - 8"
3
2 27' - 0"
02/06/14
Drawn by: Scale:
Consultant Team
Level 4 30' - 2" Level 3 18' - 2"
W14X26
W 14X26
112' - 0 1/4"
FO100
1
Date:
Benjamin Smith 706.294.0576 benjamin.l.smith@yale.edu
Level 5 42' - 2"
Martin Finio (Arch) 212.219.1026 mf@christofffinio.com
W8X 15
82' - 4"
Level B2 Structural Framing Plan
Consultant Team
Victoria Ponce de Leon (Struct) 203.434.4569 poncedeleon@silman.com
W8X 15
W14 X26
Belinda Lee 408.489.8625 belinda.lee@yale.edu
Level 6 58' - 2"
Larry Jones (Mech) 203.927.4933 larry.jones@atelierten.com
W14 X26
W1 4X 26
W14 X26
W14 X26
W14X26
W14X2 6
Jason Lee 703.853.3435 h.jasonly@gmail.com
Level 7 74' - 2"
Benjamin Smith 706.294.0576 benjamin.l.smith@yale.edu
W8X 15 W14 X26
W14X26
W14X26
W1 4X 26
W14X2 6
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
9 1/ 2"
Project Team
Level 8 102' - 2"
W14 X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14 X26
W14X26
W14X26
W W14X26 14X26
W14X26
16' - 8"
W14X26
9
Systems Integration Arch 3022
Bulkhead 122' - 2" Roof 114' - 2"
Belinda Lee 408.489.8625 belinda.lee@yale.edu
8 8' -
W14 X26
W14X26 W14 X26
W14X26 W14X26
H 82' - 4"
7
13' - 9"
W1 4X2 6
F
G
6 4X2 W1
X26 W14
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
16' - 8"
W14X26
E
6
Project Team
W18X35
W14X26
5
Jason Lee 703.853.3435 h.jasonly@gmail.com
W14X26
W14X26
Author 1/16" = 1'-0"
W14X26
W1 4X2 6
W14X26
02/06/14
Drawn by: Scale:
W14X26
10' - 9"
W14X26
W14X26
25' - 3"
X26 W14
W14X26
16' - 8" 20' - 8"
Date:
W14X26
4
W14X2 6
6 4X2 W1
Victoria Ponce de Leon (Struct) 203.434.4569 poncedeleon@silman.com
F
W14X 26
X26 W14
W14X26
W14X2 6
D
Martin Finio (Arch) 212.219.1026 mf@christofffinio.com Larry Jones (Mech) 203.927.4933 larry.jones@atelierten.com
E
G
Consultant Team
20' - 8"
103' - 6"
16' - 8"
D
W18X35
6 4X2 W1
Benjamin Smith 706.294.0576 benjamin.l.smith@yale.edu
W14X26
13' - 6"
W14X26
C
W14X26
Belinda Lee 408.489.8625 belinda.lee@yale.edu
9 9 1/ 2"
26 W14X 26 W14X
W14X26
3
Systems Integration Arch 3022
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
W14X26
8 8' -
25' - 3"
13' - 9"
W14X26
W14X26
Casis Headquarters 1
16' - 7"
W14X26
W14X26
10' - 9" 13' - 6"
7
C
B
Casis Headquarters
6
22' - 2"
W14X26
W14X26
A
Project Team Jason Lee 703.853.3435 h.jasonly@gmail.com
5
4 16' - 7"
W14X26
A
B
3
2 27' - 0"
W14X26
1
Systems Integration Arch 3022
W14X26
16' - 7"
W14X26
22' - 2"
W14X26
Casis Headquarters
6
5
4 16' - 7"
W14X26
3
W14X26
2 27' - 0"
W14X26
1
Level B1 -17' - 10" Level B2 -29' - 10"
W 14X26
Victoria Ponce de Leon (Struct) 203.434.4569 poncedeleon@silman.com
Date:
02/14/14
Drawn by: Scale:
Author 3/64" = 1'-0"
Framing Elevation_North
Level 8 Structural Framing Plan
S114
S108
90
Boston Olympic Village Studio Spring 2014 Critic: Keller Easterling In Collaboration with JT Keely This linear ubran proposal organizes the Olymic Village along summer street. The remainder of the site is flooded to create a large wetland park which mitgates future flooding concerns for South Boston. The linear park is organized with strips running cross-wise creating a constantly changing landscape as you move down the street. The street is programed based on their relationship to the surrounding site. The north end of the street is geared towards entertainment and sports, the middle towards water activities and the south end towards food and leisure. The buildings are unitized and can move in relation to each other to create shared openings. There are several different types of units ranging from dorms to three bedrooms and can house between twenty four to forty eight people.
91
1/32”=1’ Model
92
Site Map
93
OFF 10
7
7 8
8 10 10
10
8
7 OFF
78
OFF 10
7
7 8
8 10 10
10
8
7 OFF
78
Plan
94
Detail Plan
95
Unit Plans and Diagrams
96
97
Renderings
98
1/32”=1’ Model
99
1/16”=1’ Model
100
Cube Patternism Spring 2014 Critic: Brennan Buck In Collaboration with Constance Vale Our project employs a regular grid system of walls that becomes irregular when intersected with a set of hierarchically scaled spheres. Depending on the scale of the spherical boolean intersection, the implied rooms can either be entirely open to the adjacent cells or almost entirely closed. When the walls are sparse, they are read as structural and functional for dividing space. As the density of the walls increases, they can be read as a poche tracing the figure of the spheres. A larger sphere that cuts through 8 of the cells is a compositional - rather than computational – move. This sphere creates a second layer of hierarchy through the opening up of a single larger room surrounded on three sides by smaller ancillary rooms. The elevation simultaneously reinforces the spherical system by describing it on its surface, while obscuring it by projecting as a dense pattern of dissimilar ellipses and figural planes.
101
Physical Model 102
Aggregation Studies
103
Unit Studies
Sections and Elevation
Pattern Studies
104
105
Physical Model
106
Drawing Formal Analysis Fall 2012 Critics: Peter Eisenman, Matt Roman
This final drawing combines the analytical diagrams of buildings by Bramante, Romano, Palladio, Brunelleschi, and Alberti. Bramante’s Santa Maria della Pace adheres strictly to the gridded logic of the courtyard so the column in the corner combines the two orientations of the side columns into a single column. Laurana’s Palazzo Ducale offset’s the columns from the grid of the courtyard so the columns along the side of the courtyard are repeated twice and then connected with a wall. The result is that in Bramante’s scheme the two adjacent sides of the courtyard seem to merge into one at the corners while in Laurana’s scheme, two adjacent sides remain separate entities that are connected with a third element.
31
32
The Unreason of the Modern: The Transformation of the Sacred Studio Fall 2014 Critic: Peter Eisenman with Miroslava Brooks In Collaboration with Bruce Hancock A Catholic Church in New Haven. Liturgical space and the problem of testimony share an idea of movement and self reflection within the structure of the church. The inherent movement in confession, of standing outside oneself as a witness, should inform liturgical space. With the early Christian basilicas, the unidirectional movement toward the altar reflected a platonic unity. However, as early as St. Augustine, the unity of the self and God is questioned in the form of confession, “I will confess what I don’t know of myself,” (Confessions - Book on Memory, p. 244). The replication of the self to confess the unknown is an irrational act that, at the time of St. Augustine, did not affect liturgical space. The transept introduced another direction countering the nave within the body of the church. The conventional crossing offers stability in defining a center that smoothes out the problem of self reflection through testimony. Instead, our intersection is the collision of the sacred into the profane. The body of the church embodies the replication of the self and its inevitable conflict with itself.
107
Site Map
108
Ferrara Cathedral Alignment Analysis
109
Ferrara Cathedral Anomaly Analysis
110
New Haven Grid Analysis
111
New Haven Grid Analysis
112
113
Form Studies
114
115
Process Models
116
117
Axon
Sections
118
Plan Level -1
119
Plan Level 1
120
Plan Level 2
121
Plan Level 3
122
Ruin Drawing Visualization IV Summer 2013 Critic: John Eberhart, John Blood
65
Oil Pastel 20”x 90” Drawing of Philip Johnson’s Knese Tifereth Israel Synogogue in a ruined state.
66
Unreal City Studio Spring 2015 Critic: Niall Mclaughlin with Andrew Benner
A public building on a site in an imagined newly autonomous London designed through a process of doing and undoing in 5 artifacts. Recently, London’s mayor suggested that the city should seek greater devolved powers from the United Kingdom. This sprawling urban area generates a significant proportion of the nation’s wealth. It does so by selling knowledge and services, to the world. If it became separate, it would take its place among very few autonomous cities that operate without any natural hinterland, thriving off the abstract movement of international trade. It already has formed an international community through its inveterate appetite for immigration. Almost no one in London is from London. To be really at home there you need to be from abroad. How would you make public architecture in a city so divorced from the key determinants of place: people, landscape, ways of making things from what lies nearby? Architects in the twentieth century produced an abstract language for buildings to signify this duality - everywhere/elsewhere. It gradually replaced classicism as the representative system of choice to embody the more abstract institutional values associated with modernity. We wonder whether it is possible to reconsider the representative capacity of architecture. At heart, public architecture has always laid claim to be a representation of the world. (From Studio Brief )
123
Artifact 1: Personal Precedent
124
125
The Borough of City of London: Virtual History Site Analysis
126
127
1:100 Model
128
The City of London has decided to clear a space and build a tower between Bank and Monument. Queen Victoria must be cut off at Walbrook and Old Jewry must be extended to connect to Pancras. The public square will prominently feature the second most important facade on the Mansion House as well as the corner of Mercers Hall and the London Internet Church formerly known as Saint Stephen of Walbrook Church of England.
129
The Borough of City of London: Archaeological Site 130 Analysis
The tower will stand ninety meters tall and extend twelve meters into the ground. Before it will be cleared an empty, open space measuring one hundred and twelve meters long by sixty meters wide. Below this will be housed twenty nine thousand one hundred and sixty servers, handling the vast and ever expanding data processing needs of the City. The ground above this twinkling hall of machines is to be covered over by a four and a half cm deep layer of pure, white sand. The sand is soft and dampens the sound of the servers below. The open space above is quiet. The tower is a cooling stack. The heat of the servers is dispersed as steam, silently billowing and swirling about the light-weight truss structure, all that is solid melts into air. The vapour forms a spiralling tower that rises towards the sky where it mingles with the clouds. The excess heat will make the sand warm.
131
The Borough of City of London: The Ghost of Mies 132 On Poultry
A man is on his way into work. He is transferring at Monument to Bank. The train tannoy announces the stop. He replaces some papers in his case and shuts it with a click. The person next to him is playing tetris. The next stop is being announced on the ticker tape display, yellow dots flickering along. He stands up as the train stops, gets out and walks down the platform. He is not thinking about anything in particular. Sometimes he thinks there is someone watching him, but not today. At one point he emerges from a tunnel into an atrium space which he is crossing to reach his platform. The space is vast, above rises the cooling tower of the server hall obscured in mist. Slivers of light fall through the structural tracery, dancing and splintering across the tiled floor. Twittering noises come from up there, and digital blinkings. The steam shushes overhead, surging this way or that depending on the servers’ cooling needs. The man passes through the space on his way. He pays little heed. He does, however, notice some sand on the floor, doubtless brought down on people’s soles. It makes the floor a little slippery, like French chalk. He feels the rolling of the grains underfoot. It makes him uncomfortable and he isn’t quite sure why. There are little drifts of the stuff in the corners, where the shadows also gather. Sand penetrates tiny crevices.
133
134
Above, in the cold, the warm sand is causing the air to shimmer. The buildings surrounding seem to quiver and shift, their facades seem to dissolve, the air is like liquid. Crushed mica traces of cloud whipped by the wind, gusts haze the air. The steam rises. In his next train the man sits. He notices the book of the woman opposite. She is reading ‘The Rings of Saturn’ Doesn’t he have something about sand? What is it he says, thinks the man, reminded. He notices a speck on his lapel and flicks it off.
135
136
As he ascends to his office on one of the upper floors of one of London’s newer, glassier towers, in a glass elevator on the facade, he looks out across the city and sees the tower of the servers in the distance and the steam plume rising to the heavens. His face is close to the cold pane. Some colleagues enter the lift. “Morning Ulrich� someone says. He sighs, and his breath mists the glass, for a moment obscuring the tower in the distance.
137
138
In another tower is a man with a spyglass. He is looking for particles in the air, for the silica twinkling of digital dust, in the clouds. The morning sun is gilding the skyline. The light is piercing. The steam spiral burns golden. The man is watching Ulrich climbing in the glass elevator at speed. He moves the eyepiece, following the motion. In a moment he is caught by a strong emotion, he does not quite know what. His hand is shaking, and the picture in the viewfinder jumps and shudders and disintegrates.
139
140