Ending the use of physical and emotional violence against children and adolescents in Peru
5.
Looking ahead: Lessons learned
Approval of the law banning physical and humiliating punishment in Peru was an important milestone for INFANT and ONNAS. These civil society organisations undertook various activities to increase awareness in Peruvian political and social spheres about the importance of moving away from a culture of violence towards one that treats children and their education with affection and respect. Unique to their work was the involvement of children and adolescents throughout the entire process: this became a movement led and implemented by children themselves, serving as a prime example of children’s leadership in changing matters that directly affect them. As noted by various interviewed stakeholders, these child protagonists gave the campaign a unique appeal among politicians and the general public. Some ONNAS children also went on to pursue governmental or political careers as adults, enabling them to continue supporting the cause. These ex‐ONNAS members acted as key allies to approve and implement the new legislation. As well as the campaigner’s intergenerational profile, several additional elements have been identified as important facilitators to their work:
INFANT and ONNAS identified a clear goal and defined a strategy to reach it. Their activities were guided by the need to change cultural views on violence, identifying legislative change as one way to achieve it. However, aware that legislative change does not directly translate into cultural change, they also focused on awareness, education, and capacity‐building. As a result, their strategy was multilateral, focusing on the political (top) and social level (bottom).
They focused on empowering parents and the general public with alternative ways to nurture children and adolescents. Taking an educational rather than a punitive approach, they provided parents with tools and knowledge about positively educating their children, lending coherence to their cause. Instead of relying on punishment to stop punishment (a punitive law), they therefore demonstrated by example, modelling alternative methods of change and success. As a result, the law’s regulations focus on raising awareness and disseminating information to educationalists and parents on how to change their practices positively.
They adapted their strategy based on learning on the ground. Self‐reflection and adaptivity to changing contexts were crucial, enabling them to adjust their strategy to emerging barriers. For example, their initial difficulties attracting media attention informed subsequent strategy changes. Unable to secure television time, they involved famous artists and public figures instead. Their responsiveness to changes in context (such as shifts in political roles and representatives) was also important in building support.
Fostering key allies was crucial, and INFANT and ONNAS invested significant effort in securing allies. Beyond their own collaborative partnership, they also sought political allies to facilitate the approval, regulation and implementation of legislation. This was crucial in achieving prioritisation of the legislative proposal to prohibit violence against children on the political agenda. They also formed alliances with public figures (artists, musicians, journalists and local
23
