LP: Writing an evaluative or critical analysis

Page 1

Writing an evaluative or critical analysis:

Differences:

1. Focus and purpose:

- Evaluative piece: The primary focus of an evaluative piece is to assess the strengths, weaknesses, significance and implications of a particular topic, decision or situation. It aims to provide judgments or opinions based on established criteria.

- Critical analysis: A critical analysis involves examining a topic, text or concept in depth, often focusing on its underlying assumptions, arguments and evidence. It aims to explore multiple perspectives and uncover insights through rigorous examination.

2. Criteria and evaluation:

- Evaluative piece: In an evaluative piece, the writer establishes specific criteria against which the topic is evaluated. The analysis revolves around assessing how well the subject meets these criteria and making judgments based on the evaluation.

- Critical analysis: While a critical analysis may involve evaluating the effectiveness or validity of certain aspects of the topic, it goes beyond mere evaluation. It delves into the underlying assumptions, contexts and implications of the subject matter, often questioning established norms or interpretations.

3. Audience and purpose:

- Evaluative piece: Evaluative pieces are often written with a specific audience in mind, such as decisionmakers, stakeholders or peers. The purpose is to inform and persuade the audience by presenting a balanced assessment supported by evidence.

- Critical analysis: Critical analyses may target a broader audience or scholarly community interested in the subject matter. The goal is to engage readers in critical thinking and provoke discussion or debate by challenging conventional perspectives or interpretations.

[Type here] [Type here] 1

Similarities:

1. Analytical thinking:

- Both evaluative pieces and critical analyses require analytical thinking skills. Writers must carefully examine the subject matter, identify key components and assess their significance or relevance within the context.

2. Use of evidence:

- Both types of writing rely on evidence to support arguments and judgments. Writers must provide relevant examples, data or scholarly references to validate their claims and enhance the credibility of their analysis.

3. Structured approach:

- Both evaluative pieces and critical analyses benefit from a structured approach to writing. Writers should organise their thoughts logically, present arguments coherently and adhere to academic or professional writing conventions.

4. Critical reflection:

- Both types of writing involve critical reflection on the subject matter. Writers must question assumptions, consider alternative viewpoints and evaluate the implications of their analysis or evaluation.

Conclusion

In summary, while evaluative pieces and critical analyses share some common elements, such as analytical thinking and the use of evidence, they differ in their focus, purpose and depth of analysis. Evaluative pieces emphasise making judgments based on established criteria, whereas critical analyses delve into deeper examination and questioning of underlying assumptions and contexts.

[Type here] 2

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.