The NE GLRS STORY
Student Success: Imagine the Possibilities The Northeast Georgia Story
What’s your story? Everybody has a story! What’s your story? Who are the characters in your story? What happened in your story? Is it a tragedy? Or a Love Story? A Murder Mystery? Or a Drama? Do you like your story? But particular, do you like the ending to your story? Do you wish you could go back and re-write a few chapters? Sure, we all do! We may not be able to go back and re-write our story but with the start of each new school year we can write a new story. Do you want your new story to have a different ending?
If so….then something has to change You cannot re-write the same story and expect the ending to be different… Einstein said…
“We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.” IN OTHER WORDS… We cannot keep doing the same thing and expect to get a different result
think of your students as Apples…like GLRS apples Is it enough to look at your “apples” as a group?
Collage of apples
Is it enough to look at your “apples” individually?
You have to get down to the Core of the problem! The apple core!
Our Story Northeast Georgia NE GLRS is a contributing member of the NE GA RESA organization. NE GLRS participates in all RESA activities to include the annual data dig, monthly meetings, annual retreats , projects, and initiatives. NE GLRS collaborates with NE GA RESA in all content areas as needed based on data review. There are 13 school districts in the NE GA RESA region. This includes: Barrow, Clarke, Commerce City, Elbert, Greene, Jackson, Jefferson City, Madison, Morgan, Oconee, Oglethorpe, Social Circle City and Walton.
Our Cast of Characters Barrow Clarke Commerce City
Madison Morgan Oconee
Elbert
Oglethorpe
Greene
Social Circle City
Jackson
Walton
Jefferson City
Regional Demographic Data: Ethnicity, Gender, and Poverty Percentages *Data source should be GaDOE Data Collections, FTE ( http://www.gadoe.org/Technology-Services/Data-Collections/Pages/Full-Time-Equivalent-(FTE)-Resources.aspx)
System
FTE March 2014
Hispanic
American Indian
Black
Two or More Races
Pacific Islander
Asian
White
Female
F/R Lunch October2013
Male
Barrow
13,245
14%
12%
0%
4%
0%
5%
64%
48%
52%
61%
Clarke
12,724
23%
51%
0%
4%
0%
2%
19%
48%
52%
82%
Commerce
1,466
10%
12%
1%
4%
0%
1%
73%
49%
51%
62%
Elbert
3,064
8%
37%
0%
3%
0%
1%
50%
50%
50%
80%
Greene
2,275
9%
58%
0%
3%
0%
1%
29%
48%
52%
99%
Jackson
7,288
12%
4%
0%
3%
0%
2%
78%
49%
51%
53%
Jefferson
3,069
8%
9%
0%
3%
0%
2%
78%
48%
52%
31%
Madison
4,766
9%
9%
0%
4%
0%
1%
76%
48%
52%
62%
Morgan
3,289
5%
27%
0%
3%
0%
1%
63%
49%
51%
50%
Oconee
6,825
7%
4%
0%
3%
0%
4%
81%
48%
52%
24%
Oglethorpe
2,237
7%
18%
0%
4%
0%
1%
70%
48%
52%
60%
Social Circle
1,660
2%
25%
0%
2%
0%
1%
70%
49%
51%
55%
Walton
13,676
5%
22%
0%
3%
0%
2%
68%
50%
50%
52%
RESA total/average
75,584
9%
22%
0%
3%
0%
2%
63%
49%
51%
59%
Narrative Summary of Table Narrative Summary of Demographic Data: Department of Education March 2014 FTE data were used to review regional demographic data for school year 2013-14. The review found that 6 of 13 school systems experienced growth, though not substantive, in student enrollment including Barrow, Clarke, Greene Jackson, Jefferson City, and Morgan. Although not substantive, the remaining systems experienced a decrease in growth from March 2013-14. Subgroups remained stable over for the past eight years. A review of Free and Reduced data from Department of Education October 2013 (most recent) found increases, though not substantive, in the percentage of students qualifying as free and reduced lunch in 2 of 13 systems. Four systems had 2% decreases each. Remaining systems had no change.
Student Full Time Equivalent 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0
Mar-10 Mar-11 Mar-12 Mar-13 Mar-14
Free and Reduced Lunch Trends by Systems 120%
100%
80%
60%
Oct-09 Oct-10 Oct-11
40%
Oct-12 Oct-13
20%
0%
State Achievement Test Data for Member Systems 2013-14 Performance on CRCT and EOCT CRCT Percent Proficient for ALL Students System
Barrow Clarke Commerce Elbert Greene Jackson Jefferson Madison Morgan Oconee Oglethorpe Social Circle Walton
ELA Meets and Exceeds
Reading Meets and Exceeds
Math Meets and Exceeds
Science Meets and Exceeds
Social Studies Meets and Exceeds
92
96
87
82
85
88
92
79
71
75
98
98
94
91
90
93
94
83
80
83
90
94
83
69
74
96
98
89
90
93
98
99
96
95
96
95
97
91
88
89
97
98
98
85
88
98
99
96
94
95
93
97
92
84
85
93
97
82
82
85
93
96
88
84
87
EOCT Percent Proficient for ALL Students Winter 2013 EOCT
System
9th Grade Literature Meets and Exceeds
American Literature Meets and Exceeds
Biology Meets and Exceeds
Physical Science Meets and Exceeds
Barrow
78
91
88
70
Clarke
63
89
36
64
Commerce
95
96
90
98
Elbert
74
93
45
89
Greene
100
100
33
100
Jackson
94
91
88
90
Jefferson
94
99
88
100
Madison
67
NA
50
66
Morgan
75
100
67
100
Oconee
98
98
95
97
Oglethorpe
92
93
81
87
Social Circle
NA
100
100
50
Walton
92
97
60
60
US History Meets and Exceeds 74
Economics Meets and Exceeds 82
Coordinate Algebra Meets and Exceeds 52
Analytic Geometry Meets and Exceeds
Math II Meets and Exceeds 50
GPS Geometry Meets and Exceeds 29
30
40
18
58 33
NA
70
35
31 NA
NA
82 80
83
NA
21
38 0
30 NA
21 NA
NA
88
75
74
100
53 88
61 61
33 100
NA
50
NA
NA
NA
0
NA
90
60
69
72
100
66
80
65
11
NA
NA
NA
NA NA
66
50
NA
80
86
50
NA
34
8
0
NA
23
0
NA
NA
52
51
59
NA
Spring 2014 EOCT
System Barrow
9th Grade Literature Meets and Exceeds 84
American Literature Meets and Exceeds
Biology Meets and Exceeds
Physical Science Meets and Exceeds
93
86
75
90
63
88
Commerce
95
100
88
96
Elbert
80
87
70
79
Greene
77
91
62
93
Jackson
90
96
86
94
Jefferson
97
97
93
75
Madison
84
91
83
80
Morgan
90
96
80
84
Oconee
96
100
91
96
NA
NA
100
US History Meets and Exceeds 74
Economics Meets and Exceeds 74
Coordinate Algebra Meets and Exceeds 28
85
Clarke
Oglethorpe
92
94
50
67
Walton
88
95
74
87
Analytic Geometry Meets and Exceeds
67
57
27
26 35
79
NA
17
42
60
85
58
50
79
100
92
100
76
14
93
0
95
81
NA
NA
56
100
80
86
NA
Social Circle
Math II Meets and Exceeds 25
GPS Geometry Meets and Exceeds 31
15 NA
NA NA
27 19
27 24
0 0
NA NA
43 41
39 70
29 0
NA NA
36
35
0
NA
52
38
0
NA
77
64
NA
NA
1
79
0
NA
34
22
NA
NA
34
32
NA
NA
RESA Progress Report on Title I High Priority (Focus) Schools RESA DISTRICT
Northeast Georgia RESA
Northeast Georgia RESA
Northeast Georgia RESA
SCHOOL SERVED IN 2013-2014
Winder Barrow High School
Clarke Middle School
Cedar Shoals High School
SCHOOL DISTRICT
CCRPI Component Score(s)/Points In 2012-2013
Progress Made During 2013-2014
Barrow County
CRCTs/EOCTs 19 out of 24 Readiness 13 out of 18 Graduation 13 out of 18 Progress 18.2 out of 25 Achievement Gap 12.5 out of 15 CP ED/EL/SWD & Exceeding the Bar 4.2 out of 10 TOTAL CCRPI 79 PTS
At the time of publication, subgroup graduation data were not available.
Clarke County
CRCTs/EOCTs 20 out of 24 Readiness 16 out of 18 Graduation 11 out of 18 Progress 15.9 out of 25 Achievement Gap 6 out of 15 CP ED/EL/SWD & Exceeding the Bar 1 out of 10 TOTAL CCRPI 68.6 PTS
Clarke M.S. improved 18.5% from 2011 (baseline Focus year) to 2014 in overall SWD CRCT performance. 2011: 5 tested subjects CRCT (SWD) = 38.5% 2014: 5 tested subjects CRCT (SWD) = 57% *SLDS data at time of report
Clarke County
CRCTs/EOCTs 15 out of 24 Readiness 11 out of 18 Graduation 14 out of 18 Progress 15.5 out of 25 Achievement Gap 10 out of 15 CP ED/EL/SWD & Exceeding the Bar 2.9 out of 10 TOTAL CCRPI 68 PTS
At the time of publication, subgroup graduation data were not available.
Northeast Georgia RESA
Northeast Georgia RESA
Northeast Georgia RESA
Northeast Georgia RESA
Clarke Central High School
Elbert Middle School
Anita White Carson Middle School
Harmony Elementary School
Clarke County
CRCTs/EOCTs 16 out of 24 Readiness 10 out of 18 Graduation 14 out of 18 Progress 16.6 out of 25 Achievement Gap 10 out of 15 CP ED/EL/SWD & Exceeding the Bar 1.8 out of 10 TOTAL CCRPI 70.5 PTS
At the time of publication, subgroup graduation data were not available.
Elbert County
CRCTs/EOCTs 20 out of 24 Readiness 16 out of 18 Graduation 10 out of 18 Progress 16.7 out of 25 Achievement Gap 7 out of 15 CP ED/EL/SWD & Exceeding the Bar 1.4 out of 10 TOTAL CCRPI 71.2 PTS
Elbert M.S. improved 16.3% from 2011 (baseline Focus year) to 2014 in overall SWD CRCT performance. 2011: 5 tested subjects CRCT (SWD) = 38.7% 2014: 5 tested subjects CRCT (SWD) = 55% *SLDS data at time of report (5-8)
Greene County
CRCTs/EOCTs 19 out of 24 Readiness 15 out of 18 Graduation 7 out of 18 Progress 17.1 out of 25 Achievement Gap 9 out of 15 CP ED/EL/SWD & Exceeding the Bar 2.5 out of 10 TOTAL CCRPI 70.2 PTS
Carson M.S. improved 22.4% from 2011 (baseline Focus year) to 2014 in overall SWD CRCT performance. 2011: 5 tested subjects CRCT (SWD) = 35.6% 2014: 5 tested subjects CRCT (SWD) = 58% *SLDS data at time of report
Walton County
CRCTs/EOCTs 20 out of 24 Readiness 14 out of 18 Graduation 10 out of 18 Progress 17.1 out of 25 Achievement Gap 11 out of 15 CP ED/EL/SWD & Exceeding the Bar 5.6 out of 10 TOTAL CCRPI 78 PTS
Harmony E.S. improved 15.2% from 2011 (baseline Focus year) to 2014 in overall SWD CRCT performance. 2011: 5 tested subjects CRCT (SWD) = 46.8% 2014: 5 tested subjects CRCT (SWD) = 62% *SLDS data at time of report
Total enrollment and subgroups based on 2013-3014 Data GOSA
Regional Total Enrollment- 78,854 Regional SWD Total Enrollment -10,054 12.7% Regional Black Total Enrollment-17,743 23% Regional White Total Enrollment-47,379 60% Regional Hispanic Total Enrollment-8,803 11%
Regional Enrollment by Exceptionality *=fewer than 10 students to report
Autism 699
Significant Developmental Delays 1127
Blind *
Speech and Language Impairment 1531
Deaf *
Specific Learning Disability 2666
Deaf/Blind *
Traumatic Brain Injury *
Emotional Behavioral Disorders 660 Hard of Hearing 24 Mild Intellectual Disability 525 Moderate Intellectual Disability 236 Severe Intellectual Disability 30 Profound Intellectual Disability * Other Health Impairment 1289 Orthopedic Impairment *
Visual Impairment 11
Review of Regional Special Education Data
s p ed s um m a r y rep or t s h t t p: / / arc hi ve s ua t . d oe. k1 2. ga. u s / Rep or t i ng F W. as p x? Page Req = 2 11 & PI D = 61 & PT I D = 67 & CT I D = 21 6& S t at eI d= A L L & T = 0& F Y = 20 1 4
Indicators State targets
Grad
2013-14 2012-13 2011-12 2010-11
rate
2013-14
Drop Out Read 5.9 CRCT
Read GHSGT
Math GHSGT
Math CRCT
LRE
Post School Outcomes
5.2 5.3 5.3
81.6 79.5 77.5 70
66.4 62.7 58.9 63
10.3 37.7 31.4 45
72.9 69.8 66.8 56
65 67 65 65
79.9 80 80 79
9
4
2
5
3
9
1
5
2012-13
2
9
3
7
7
6
2
10
2011-12
3
7
3
5
7
7
2
8
2010-11
13
7
3
3
2
2
2
6
47.4 35.7 35.7 85
Dropout Data
http://gosa.georgia.gov/ report card-current report card-K 12 Public schools- indicators and demographics
State All Dropout Rate 3.7 State SWD Dropout Rate 5.9 Regional ALL Dropout Rate 3.2 Regional SWD Dropout Rate 5.2
Fal l and S pri ng E nrol lm ent by Grade Number of Students Enrolled by Grade
G ra d u a t i o n Ra t e
h t tp : / / a r c h i v e s u a t. d o e. k 1 2 . g a . u s / R e p o r t i n g F W. a s p x ? P a g e R e q = 2 1 1 & P I D = 6 1 & P T ID = 6 7 & C T I D = 2 1 6 & S ta te Id = A L L & T = 0 & F Y = 2 0 1 4 G A D O E d a t a a n d r e p o r t i n g - G r a d u a t i o n R a t e s
State All Grad Rate 72.5% ● State SWD Grad Rate 36.5% ● Regional All Grad Rate 79.4% ● Regional SWD Grad Rate 41.2% ●
●
So 58.8% of SWD in our region are not graduating with a regular education diploma. DO WE KNOW WHO THEY ARE? Can we look ahead and predict who will not graduate in the future?
attendance Absent 6-15 days
Absent more than 15 days
Regional All
34.4
8.8
Regional SWD
37.9
12.8
Achievement h t t p : / / g o s a . ge o rg ia .g ov/ - Rep o r t c a rd - C u r re n t rep o r t c a rd - K 1 2
State All CRCT Reading 96% State SWD CRCT Reading 86.1% Regional ALL CRCT Reading 97.3% Regional SWD CRCT Reading 86%
Student Achievement data Math CRCT
Student Acheievement Data EOCT’s
Student achievement Data writing
Retention
Least Restrictive Environment Regional LRE 77% (80% of the school day in gen ed) State LRE 65% (80% of the school day in gen ed)
Beginning of the P-12 pipeline http://gosa.georgia.gov/-report card-current report card-Pre kindergarten
State 58.13 % of the total population of 4 year olds are served State 55.13% are at risk Regional 67.6 of the total population of 4 year olds are served Regional 54.56% are at risk
Student learning data Universal screeners, eoct, act and sat, crct benchmarks GA helath survey etc‌
Regional Enrollment by Exceptionality *=fewer than 10 students to report
Autism 699
Significant Developmental Delays 1127
Blind *
Speech and Language Impairment 1531
Deaf *
Specific Learning Disability 2666
Deaf/Blind *
Traumatic Brain Injury *
Emotional Behavioral Disorders 660 Hard of Hearing 24 Mild Intellectual Disability 525 Moderate Intellectual Disability 236 Severe Intellectual Disability 30 Profound Intellectual Disability * Other Health Impairment 1289 Orthopedic Impairment *
Visual Impairment 11
How do he racial ethic subgroups represented in sped compare to total enrollment For example if 40% of your all enrollment is black? What is your %age of SWD’s that are black? Numbers way off? What does that tell you? Getting this data from DOE
2014 Cohort Looking at the SLDS GOSA data go back to their data in this region and follow them to 12th grade performance and breakdown into exceptionalities and ethnic groups
Perception data
Process dAta
All artifacts are authentic and I reuse my paper so if there is something on the back of something you are reading and it does not make sense that is because I am reusing the paper.