SITE VISIT REPORT PROJECT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
YASHASWINI | 1PC15AT063 | BGSSAP
PURPOSE OF THE SITE STUDY – PROPOSAL FOR A WAFFLE STORE, PROJECT BUDGET – 40,000/-
PROPOSAL OF A WAFFLE STORE IN A CONTEXT WITH A LOT OF COMMERCIAL, EDUCATIONAL, RESEDENTIAL ACTIVITIES, SITE PLACED ON THE 1ST MAIN ROAD OF TAVREKERE.
SITE – A SMALL PARCEL OF SPACE FROM A SUPERMARKET ON GROUND FLOOR. VISITNG SITE – UNDERSTOOD THE SITE , CONTEXTUAL WAFFLE STORES , CAFÉ , NEED OF THE CAFÉ .
NEAR BY CAFÉ – THERE ARE A LOT OF CAFÉ’S AND EATRIES IN THE SURROUNDING .
PRESENTLY USED AS STORE ROOM FOR THE DEPARTMENTAL STORE NEXT TO IT . IT IS ENCLOSED / PARTIONED BY PLYWOOD PANELS .
PRESENT CONDITION OF THE SITE:
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE FEASIBILITY STUDY 1. -
HOW OFTEN DO YOU GO TO CAFÉ / RESTAURANT ? ONCE A WEEK
2. -
WHAT DO YOU ACTUALLY PURCHASE ? COLD DRINKS , SANDWHICHES
3. -
DO YOU USUALLY GO TO THE SAME CAFÉ/RESTAURANT? VARIETY OF DIFFERENT CAFÉ AND RESTAURANTS.
4. -
DO YOU USUALLY PURCHASE THESE ITEMS TO GO OR TO SIT IN THE RESTAURANT /CAFÉ? SIT IN
5. -
HOW MUCH DO U USUALLY SPEND AT A CAFÉ / RESTAURANT? 50/- ABOVE
6. -
MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS WHEN YOU VISIT A CAFÉ /RESTAURANT ? PRICE ,QUALITY OF PRODUCTS , ATMOSPHERE
7. WOULD YOU BE INTRESTED IN A CAFÉ/RESTAURANT THAT HAS A READING / WORK AREA THAT IS SPECIFIALLY DESIGNATED TO BE QUIET AND ALLOW COSTUMERS TO WORK ? IT WILL ALSO HAVE A RANGE OF BOOKSAVAILABLE FOR COSTUMERS TO USE FREE OF CHARGE . QUITE INTRESTED 8. -
IF A CAFÉ LIKE THIS ONE WAS LOCATED NEAR YOUR HOUSE OR WORKPLACE HOW OFTEN DO YOU THINK YOU WOULD VISIT ? 2 TO 3TIMES A WEEK.
INFERENCE – • • • • •
IT SUITS THE CONTEXT , BUT SHOULD HAVE A REASONABLE PRICE RANGE . GOOD AMBIENCE AND EXPERIENCE . SHOULD BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE ENOUGH COSTUMERS . SHOULD HAVE A UNIQUE OUTLOOK . A WAFFLE STORE IS A GOOD COICE FOR THE SITE .
S W
ANALYSIS FOR KORMANGALA SITE
O T COMPARISION
S ANALYSIS FOR MG ROAD SITE
W O T
SITE 1 – VENKATESHWARA LAYOUT , KORMANGALA
KORMANGALA
SITE 2 – MG ROAD
(1,00,000) STRONG DEMAND
60% KORMANGALA SITE 1 OR 2
INVESTMENT 40,000
INVESTMENT 40,000/0.6X(60,000)+0.4(20,000)=36,000+8000 EMU=44,000/-
(60,000) WEAK DEMAND
40%
60%
60,000/-
20,000/-
(1,30,000) STRONG DEMAND
70,000/-
(80,000) WEAK DEMAND
20,000/-
MG ROAD
INVESTMENT 60,000
40%
MG ROAD
CONCLUSION- EMU HENCE PROVED THAT MG ROAD SITE IS BETTER THAN KORMANGALA STORE
INVESTMENT 60,000/0.6X(70,000)+0.4(20,000)=42,000+8000 EMU=50,000/-
8
G 3
B 1
A
E 6
2
E
C
5
4
F
G 7 NUMBER OF WEEKS
CRITICAL PATH
D
A-C-D-E-F-G = 4+2+2+4+4+2 =18
CPM CHART
A-B-E-G
=4+3+4+2
=13
CRASH ACTIVITY E BY 2 DAYS
A
B
4 CRITICAL PATH
C
D
E
F
2
2
4
4
G
2
TOTAL COST= DIRECT NORMAL COST+DURATION X INDIRECT COST + CRASH WEEK X CRASH COST SLOPE = 1700 + 21x150-2x250 =4350/-
CUMMULATIVE A-1200 B-1800 C-2000 D-2200 E-4200 F-5400 G-5800
Chart Title 400
G 1200
6000
F
5000
1500
500
E
4000 100 100
D
3000 200
2000
C
400
B
1000
200
A
1200
A
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
B
C
D
E
F
G
VIEW A
PLAN NOT TO SCALE
WAFFLE CAFÉ DESIGN IN KORMANGALA
VIEW B