Working Paper 3 GNOBEDD August 2010
2
Working Paper 3
Table of Contents
August 2010
Table of Contents
Section:
01 Task 3 Overview 09 Task 3 Overview
02
03
Biosciences District Overview
Community and Social Context
12 Physical Context
40 A Strategy for Meaningful Community Involvement
12 Natural Environment 17 Built Environment 21 Pedestrian and Vehicular Circulation 30 Utility Overview 32 Regulatory Context
40 Institutional / Governance 43 Commercial / Economic Development 45 Health Sciences / Healthcare 46 Neighborhood / Community 49 Stakeholder Matrix 69 Section Summary
04 Urban Design 72 Task Process 72 Baseline: Sub-Districts within the Biosciences District Boundaries 74 Baseline: Existing Land Use 76 Maps and Matrix Summary 77 Analysis 88 Section Summary
Acknowledgement
3
The AECOM Team would like to acknowledge the GNOBEDD Board and staff for their input and engagement during this task. This report has also been developed in coordination with the entire AECOM Team. The team includes: EDAW I AECOM, AECOM Economics, AECOM Transportation, Bright Moments, Cannon Design, CBRE, Chester Engineers, and The Ehrhardt Group.
05
06
07
TrafďŹ c Analysis
Utilities
Sustainability
92 TrafďŹ c Impact Analysis Review
102 Existing Utility Information
112 Sustainability Constraints and Opportunities
93 Other Proposals and Projects
104 Future Utility Loads
113 Sustainability Existing Conditions Matrix
97 Long-Term Demand and Biosciences District Plan 98 Section Summary
106 Utility Costs and Concerns 107 Sustainability 108 Section Summary
114 Section Summary
08 Biosciences District SWOT Analysis 118 Threats 119 Weaknesses 119 Strengths 121 Opportunities 122 Section Summary
4
Working Paper 3
Table of Contents
August 2010
List of Tables and Maps Section 1: Task 3 Overview No tables or maps
Section 2: Biosciences District Overview Tables Table 1.........................................................................Park and Recreation Resources in the Biosciences District Table 2.........................................................................VMT Count at Key Intersections in the Biosciences District Table 3.........................................................................ADT Count at Key Intersections in the Biosciences District
Maps Map 1.........................................................................Regional Context Map 2.........................................................................Neighbohoods Map 3.........................................................................Elevation Map 4.........................................................................Soils Map 5.........................................................................FEMA Floodplain 1999 Map 6.........................................................................Advisory Base Flood Elevation Map 7..........................................................................Aerial 12/2009 Map 8.........................................................................Figure Ground Map 9.........................................................................Key Developments: Existing & In-Progress Map 10.......................................................................Key Developments: Proposed Map 11........................................................................Historic Districts & Landmarks Map 12.......................................................................Blighted and Roadhome Properties Map 13.......................................................................EPA Reporting Facilities Map 14.......................................................................Existing Conditions Base Map 15.......................................................................Walking Distances Map 16.......................................................................Street Network Map 17........................................................................Transit Map 18.......................................................................Bikeways Map 19.......................................................................Planning Districts Map 20.......................................................................Existing Zoning Map 21.......................................................................Existing Land Use Map 22.......................................................................City and State Land Ownership Map 23.......................................................................Overlay Districts Map 24.......................................................................Opportunities and Constraints Analysis
Section 3: Community and Social Context Tables Table 4.........................................................................SigniďŹ cant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District
5
Section 4: Urban Design Tables Table 5........................................................................Matrix: Key Developments in and around the Biosciences District
Maps Map 25.......................................................................LSU & UMC Aerial Map 26.......................................................................Tulane University Downtown Campus Aerial Map 27.......................................................................Proposed VA Site Aerial Map 28........................................................................Xavier University Aerial Map 29.......................................................................Building Inventory Map 30.......................................................................Building Inventory Map 31.......................................................................Building Inventory Map 32.......................................................................Building Inventory Map 33.......................................................................Building Inventory Map 34.......................................................................Mid-City Map 35.......................................................................Gert Town Map 36.......................................................................Xavier University & Hwy Interchange Key Devleopments: Proposed Map 37.......................................................................LSU & UMC Key Developments: Proposed Map 38........................................................................Tulane University Key Developments: Proposed Map 39.......................................................................Bio-Tech District Zoning Anlaysis Map 40.......................................................................Bio-Tech District Prototypes Map 41.......................................................................Bio-Tech District Prototypes Map 42.......................................................................Bio-Tech District Prototypes Map 43.......................................................................Bio-Tech District Prototypes Map 44.......................................................................Bio-Tech District Prototypes Map 45.......................................................................Bio-Tech District Prototypes Map 46.......................................................................Bio-Tech District Prototypes
Section 5: Traffic Analysis No tables or maps
6
Working Paper 3
Table of Contents
August 2010
List of Tables, Figures & Maps (Cont.) Section 6: Utilities Maps Map 47.......................................................................Electrical Distribution System: Entergy Aerial Primary Map 48........................................................................Electrical Distribution System: Entergy Underground Primary Map 49.......................................................................Electrical Distribution System: Entergy High Voltage Transmission Lines Map 50.......................................................................Electrical Distribution System: SWB 25Hz, Specialized and Dedicated Feeders Map 51.......................................................................Natural Gas Distribution System: Entergy High Pressure Lines (4” and Greater) Map 52.......................................................................Communications Systems: Verizon Long Distance & Local Trunk Lines Map 53.......................................................................Communications Systems: Cox Communications Digital & Coaxial Lines Map 54.......................................................................Water Systems: SWB Potable Water (6” & Greater) Map 55.......................................................................Water Systems: SWB Wastewater (10” & Greater) Map 56.......................................................................Water Systems: SWB Stormwater (36” & Greater) Map 57.......................................................................Water Systems: Entergy Chilled Water & Steam Map 58.......................................................................Utilities: Electrical Distribution Systems Map 59.......................................................................Utilities: Communication Systems) Map 60.......................................................................Utilities: Water Systems
Section 7: Sustainability Tables Matrix.........................................................................Sustainability Opportunities & Constraints Matrix
Maps Map 61.......................................................................Spatially Dependent District Scale Sustainability Opportunities
Section 8: Biosciences District SWOT Analysis No tables or maps
7
Section 01: Task 3 Overview
9
Overview Task 3 Overview The purpose of Task 3 is to provide a detailed assessment of the existing physical, functional and regulatory conditions of the Greater New Orleans Biosciences Economic Development District (GNOBEDD). The analysis is based on a detailed review of existing data, plans, reports and other information collected during Task 1, Stakeholder Interviews, and Task 2, Data Gathering. The analysis is divided into eight sections: Biosciences District Overview; Community and Social Context; Urban Design; TrafďŹ c Analysis; Utilities; Sustainability; and Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) Analysis. Section 2, Biosciences District Overview, provides an overview of the existing conditions within the Biosciences District, including its physical and regulatory context. Detailed assessments on the community and social infrastructure, urban design as it relates to the areas around the proposed VA Hospital and University Medical Center (UMC) hospital campuses, trafďŹ c , utilities, sustainability and a SWOT analysis are provided in subsequent sections.
The vision of the Biosciences District is to: Build a globally competitive economy for the New Orleans region to diversify our opportunities and build a community through innovation that contains the healthiest, safest, smartest, and most sustainable neighborhoods in America.
10
Working Paper 3
Biosciences District Overview
August 2010
Section 02: Biosciences District Overview
11
12
Working Paper 3
Biosciences District Overview
August 2010
Biosciences District Overview Physical Context
Neighborhood context Map 2: Neighborhoods
City and Regional context Map 1: Regional Context New Orleans is one of the largest cities on the Gulf Coast. Throughout the history of the city, its strategic location on the mouth of the Mississippi River has made it one of the most important cities in the United States in terms of trade. The city is one of the largest and busiest ports in the world and is a hub for transportation and distribution of goods throughout the rest of the country. According to the American Association of Port Authorities, as of 2008, the Port of New Orleans and the Port of South Louisiana just north of the city ranked 59th and 14th in the world, respectively, in terms of cargo volume. Other key industries that support the city’s economy include oil and gas production and tourism. The New Orleans Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) is the third largest in the gulf region despite a decrease of approximately 13% from 2000 to 2008. As a result, it is also a major regional hub for the health care industry. The Biosciences District spans 1,500 acres in the heart of New Orleans and includes a number of institutions and hospitals that support the industry. They include the Louisiana State University (LSU) and Tulane Health Science Centers, Xavier University and its School of Pharmacy, and the Charity School of Nursing for Delgado Community College. Important educational institutions, hospitals and other research centers in the city and the region include: University of New Orleans, Delgado Community College, Loyola University, Dillard University, Children’s Hospital, Ochsner Baptist, Ochsner Hospital, Touro Infirmary, LSU School of Dentistry, Tulane National Primate Research Center, and Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge.
The Biosciences District is bounded by Loyola Avenue, Iberville Street, Carrollton Avenue and Earhart Boulevard; and encompasses portions of five neighborhoods within New Orleans: Central Business District (CBD), B.W. Cooper, Tulane-Gravier, Mid-City and Gert Town. The CBD is riverside of I-10. The B.W. Cooper neighborhood is located uptown of I-10 between Claiborne Avenue and Broad Street. Tulane-Gravier is also located between Claiborne Avenue and Broad Street but downtown of I-10. The area bounded by I-10, Carrollton Avenue and Broad Street, encompassing almost three quarters of the Biosciences District, is all part of Mid-City. Gert Town is located lakeside of Broad Street and uptown of I-10, and includes Xavier University. Other neighborhoods that adjoin the Biosciences District are Central City, French Quarter, Iberville and Dixon. The Biosciences District includes the Criminal Courts Building, parish prison, the headquarters for the New Orleans Police Department, as well as the homes of several famous jazz musicians in New Orleans history, including Louis Matthew Verges, John Bayersdorfer, Emile “Stalebread” Lacoume, Johnny De Droit and Louis “Satchmo” Armstrong, who was born in a house on Jane Alley, a street that was once behind the court building.
Natural Environment Physiography Geomorphic, or physiographic, regions are broad-scale subdivisions based on terrain texture, rock type, and geologic structure and history. Physiographic regions are described using a three-tiered classification system: division, province and section. Based on this system,
13
The Alluvial Plain of the Mississippi Delta. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File%3AMississippi_Delta_IR.jpg
the City of New Orleans is located in the division of the Atlantic Plain, the province of the Coastal Plain and the section of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain. In Louisiana, the Mississippi Alluvial Plain encompasses all the lands in the historic Mississippi River floodplain. The relatively level lowland plain is characterized by rich soils of silt and clay deposited over millions of years through periodic flooding. Historically, dominant plant communities include bottomland hardwood forests and cypress swamps.
Climate The climate of New Orleans is subtropical with hot, humid summers and short, generally mild winters. The average annual precipitation is 64.2 inches, a few inches more than many cities in the country receive. Generally,
the summer months are the wettest, while October is the driest month. Snow is a rare occurrence in the city. There are almost 220 days of sunny and partly sunny days each year. Prevailing winds in the region are from the south to south southwest and the average wind speed is 8.2 miles per hour. Heating degree days and cooling degree days reflect the amount of energy need to heat or cool a home or business. The subtropical climate creates a strong demand for air conditioning rather than heating. This is reflected in the total number of annual cooling degree days versus heating degree days of 2,655 and 1,513, respectively. Hurricanes pose a severe threat to the area due to its location on the gulf coast. New Orleans is surrounded by water on its northern, southern and eastern perimeters.
14
Working Paper 3
Biosciences District Overview
This fact, compounded with its low elevation and sinking coastline, makes it especially vulnerable to flooding. Portions of Greater New Orleans have been flooded by 10 significant hurricanes: Grand Isle Hurricane of 1909, New Orleans Hurricane of 1915, 1947 Fort Lauderdale Hurricane, Hurricane Flossy in 1956, Hurricane Betsy in 1965, Hurricane Georges in 1998, Hurricane Katrina in 2005, Hurricane Rita in 2005 and Hurricane Ike in 2008.
Topography Map 3: Elevation The elevation of the Biosciences District generally lies between five feet below sea level to five feet above sea level; the majority of the Biosciences District, including those areas within the Mid-City and Gert Town neighborhoods, is at sea level. The higher areas of the District are found riverside of I-10 in the vicinity of the Superdome and Union Passenger Terminal (UPT), with elevations around five feet above sea level.
August 2010
Urban Land is found primarily uptown of I-10, riverside of Jeff Davis Parkway and riverside of Claiborne Avenue in the CBD. Urban Land is designated in areas where more than 85% of the surface is covered by asphalt, concrete, buildings or other impervious surfaces. Harahan Clay is found only in the Gert Town neighborhood area within the Biosciences District. This poorly drained soil type is characterized by wetness, very high shrink-swell potential, very slow permeability, low strength and medium total subsidence potential. Flooding is also a potential hazard. Given the above, this soil is poorly suited to urban uses. If buildings are constructed, pilings and specially constructed foundations are needed.
Hydrology
Three soil types are found in the Biosciences District: Sharkey Clay, Urban Land and Harahan Clay.
New Orleans lies between three significant water bodies: the Gulf of Mexico, Lake Pontchartrain and the Mississippi River. Flooding from the Mississippi River has been an annual event well before the settlement of the city, and has helped shaped the delta as it reaches into the gulf. The periodic flooding of the river also left behind soil deposits that created natural levels along its banks upon which the city was originally built.
Sharkey Clay covers the majority of the Biosciences District and is found primarily downtown of I-10 and lakeside of Claiborne Avenue. The majority of Xavier University is situated on this soil type as well. Sharkey clay is a poorly drained, firm, mineral soil with very slow permeability and very high shrink-swell potential. Water may stand in low places for short periods after heavy rains. Flooding is rare but can occur after prolonged periods of heavy rains. The soil can support the foundation of most low structures without the use of piling.
Since the 1800s, efforts have been made to protect the developing city from the flood waters of the Mississippi through the creation of an extensive levee and canal system. The first canals were built from hollowed out logs with bricks being used for construction of newer canals, prior to the use of pipes. The overall drainage system, which is managed by the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans, includes a system of underground drainage canals, almost 150 drainage pumps and numerous pumping stations. The total miles of above and below ground canals exceed that of Venice, Italy.
Soils Map 4: Soils
15
The lobes of the Mississippi River Delta that formed over thousands of years due to deltaic switching. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mississippi_Delta_Lobes.jpg
Additional information on the canals can be found in Section 6: Utilities.
Floodplain Map 5: 1999 FEMA Floodplain Map 6: ABFE The 1999 FEMA floodplain maps for the city show that majority of the Biosciences District lies within the 100 year floodplain. The only areas of the District that lie in the 500 year floodplain are found along sections of I-10 and a small area around Claiborne Avenue and Canal Street.
Area Flood Rate Insurance Maps (FIRM) establishes a Base Flood Elevation (BFE) that indicates the minimum required building elevation to help avoid flooding. The existing FIRM maps date back to 1984. Due to the extensive flooding from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, these maps are currently being revised to provide a more accurate build level. In the interim, FEMA has established Advisory Base Flood Elevation (ABFE) to protect property owners from future flooding. ABFE is defined as the greater of either the existing FIRM BFE or the highest existing adjacent grade (HEAG) at the building site plus three feet.
16
Working Paper 3
Biosciences District Overview
August 2010
Hurricane Katrina Flooding in the Biosciences District, September 3, 2005. Source: http://www.katrina.noaa.gov/maps/images/katrina-ood-depth-estimation-08-31-2005.jpg
17
For the Biosciences District, the ABFE ranges from a BFE of 0 to 2.5 feet above sea level, with the areas within the 500 year floodplain designated as 3 feet above HEAG. The area bounded by Claiborne Avenue and I-10 has a BFE of 0 feet. The CBD has a BFE of 2.5 feet. Gert Town has a BFE of 0.5 and 1.5 feet. Existing elevations at the building site must be known in order to determine the minimum elevation of the building’s first occupiable floor, including basement.
high-rise office towers and commercial uses. The plan for the Biosciences District should include urban design principles that encourage new development to respect and reflect these edge conditions so there is a gradual transition between building forms inside and outside the District, rather than a hard edge.
Built Environment
There are numerous important developments in the Biosciences District that are either completed or inprogress (i.e. under construction). Development projects fall generally into three categories: institutional (schools, universities and hospitals), non-residential and residential. Institutional projects include Delgado School of Nursing, LSU Medical School, Tulane Medical School, Xavier University and several primary and secondary schools within and immediately around the Biosciences District. Non-residential landmark projects include City Hall, Louisiana Superdome, Union Passenger Terminal, Orleans Parish Prison, Police Headquarters, The Building
Edge Conditions Map 7: Aerial Map 8: Figure Ground The Biosciences District is primarily surrounded by one to two-story residential neighborhoods and those services or uses that support them, including schools and smallscale commercial and office uses. The downtown core is located on the riverside boundary of GNOBEDD along Loyola Avenue, with lodging, high density residential,
Key Developments: Existing and In-Progress Map 9: Key Developments Existing and In-Progress
The Biosciences District abuts a variety of land use including residential, industrial and high density commercial office. The former Lafitte Housing Development and the area within the CBD adjacent to the Louisiana Superdome are shown above.
18
Working Paper 3
Biosciences District Overview
August 2010
Block (Eco Park), Benson Tower and a number of hotel developments and redevelopments along Canal Street. Recently completed major residential projects are found primarily along Tulane Avenue and include the Canal Condominiums, Marquis Apartments, Falstaff Apartments and Crescent Club. The former Lafitte Housing development just outside of the Biosciences District boundary is currently being redeveloped by Providence Community Housing.
Key Developments: Proposed Map 10: Key Developments Proposed There are several large developments proposed within the Biosciences District that are in various stages of the planning process. These projects include most notably the new VA Hospital and University Medical Center located lakeside of Claiborne Avenue between Tulane Avenue and Canal and Rocheblave streets. Other notable planned developments include the Orleans Parish Prison redevelopment and expansions of Xavier University and Tulane Medical School under their proposed master plans.
Historic Landmarks Map 11: Historic Districts and Landmarks There are three historic districts that cover portions of the Biosciences District. The largest district is the MidCity Historic District, which is on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and covers much of the area lakeside of Claiborne Avenue and north of I-10. Canal Street includes two historic districts: one designated by the NRHP and the other designated by the city’s Historic District and Landmarks Commission (HDLC). Within the Biosciences District, the boundaries of these two historic districts are coterminous and include the properties bounded by Crozat and Iberville streets and Cleveland Avenue.
The Falstaff Brewery is one of several historic landmarks within the Biosciences District.
There are 20 historic properties within the Biosciences District. They are designated historic by the HDLC, NRHP or both. Notable historic landmarks within the District include the Dixie Brewery, Blue Plate Building, Criminal Courts Building, the home of Lafcadio Hearn, Pan Am Life Insurance Company Building, Xavier University’s Administration Building and the Charity Hospital School of Nursing. Other buildings that are not designated as historic by either NRHP or HDLC, but are good representations of the unique architectural styles of New Orleans or are important to the community should be identified so that recommendations for their preservation can be incorporated into the plan for the Biosciences District.
Blight Map 12: Blighted and Roadhome Properties There are over 220 blighted properties within the Biosciences District. Properties are determined as blighted in accordance with Chapter 28 (Postdisaster Recovery and Neighborhood Stabilization) of the municipal code or by the New Orleans Redevelopment
19
There are also 10 RCRA sites that are monitored for hazardous materials.
Parks and Open Space Map 14: Existing Conditions
A blighted property within the Biosciences District.
Authority (NORA). Properties that were designated as blighted prior to Katrina and Roadhome properties are also shown. The majority of blighted properties, including those considered blighted pre-Katrina, are found in Gert Town. Other blighted properties are found in the area generally bounded by Galvez, Canal and Banks streets and Carrollton Avenue.
Brownfields and Other EPA Reporting Facilities Map 13: EPA Reporting Facilities There are 15 sites within the Biosciences District that are monitored by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Three brownfields exist within the in the District: Old Falstaff Brewery located riverside of Broad Street; Dixon Tomato located just on the District boundary by the B.W. Cooper housing development; and David Drive Incinerator located on La Salle Street between Perdido and Gravier streets. Dixie Brewery on Tulane Avenue and the Coca Cola Bottling Company on Jefferson Davis Parkway are listed on the EPA’s Toxic Release Inventory.
There are approximately 29 acres of designated parks and open space within the Biosciences District. Parks are primarily located in three areas within the district: Gert Town, along Jefferson Davis Parkway and along Loyola Avenue. Most parks and open space are small pocket parks that are plazas or other passive recreation space; four playgrounds are located within the Biosciences District. The Gert Town Pool, the only pool in the area, suffered damage during Katrina and has not reopened. Gravier Park, located on the corner of Perdido and Gayoso streets, has the only park zoning designation within the Biosciences District. The Lafitte Corridor is a proposed greenway and revitalization project just outside the GNOBEDD Iberville Street boundary. The corridor is a three-mile long strip of land that stretches from the French Quarter to Canal Boulevard in Lakeview. The former rail line will create a continuous open space corridor for pedestrians and bicyclists and link a number of neighborhoods and existing park spaces. Once built, the corridor will provide an excellent recreational space for those living within the Biosciences District. Connections to this corridor from the Biosciences District will need to be assessed and included in the plan for the District. Urban Forest The extent and value of the tree canopy provides an important indicator of the level and quality of green infrastructure within a city. Urban trees provide important greenhouse gas reduction and other sustainability benefits including reducing the Urban
20
Working Paper 3
Biosciences District Overview
August 2010
Table 1: Park and Recreation Resources in the Biosciences District Park
District Acreage
Park Type
Owner
Manager
Use A=Active P=Passive
Facilities (2002)
Cancer Survivor’s Park
1
0.44
City
Parkway
P
Monuments, benches
Comiskey Playground
4
2.25
Neighborhood
City
NORD
A
Playground equipment, basketball, multipurpose field, baseball, booster club, lights, restrooms, sports activities
Duncan Plaza
1
6.83
Neighborhood
City
Parkway / DDD
P
Gazebo, benches, monuments
Elk Place
1
0.83
City
Parkway
P
Neutral ground, monuments
Gert Town Pool
4
1
Center
City
NORD
A
Pool
Gravier Park
4
0.43
City
Parkway
P
Multi-purpose field
Jefferson Davis Playground
4
3.5
Neighborhood
City
NORD
P
Playground equipment
Norwood Thompson Playground
4
1.3
Neighborhood
City
NORD
A
Playground equipment, basketball, multipurpose field, baseball, lights, restrooms
P
Monument
Pershing Place
4
0.35
City
Parkway
Jefferson Davis Playspot
4
10.93
Neighborhood
City
NORD
Simon Bolivar Plaza
1
0.15
City
Parkway
P
Union Passenger Terminal Plaza
1
0.9
City
Parkway
P
A/P
Source: Plan for the 21st Century. New Orleans 2030. Volume 3: Context and Appendix. January 2010
Neutral ground, monuments, playground
January 2010 Status
Active
Closed
Active
21
Heat Island effect, sequestering carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, reducing energy demand of buildings through shading, providing habitat, improving pedestrian comfort, and increasing property values. The nonprofit organization, American Forests, prepared an analysis of New Orleans’ tree canopy in 2002. The analysis found that 24% of the metropolitan area was covered by tree canopy, 33% was impervious surfaces; 28% was open space (not tree covered); and 12% was water. Using an aerial from December 2009, the AECOM Team analyzed the extent of tree cover within the Biosciences District and found that 3.6% of the District was covered by tree canopy. Most trees are found along Jefferson Davis Parkway, Canal Street and Banks Street, with a scattering of individual trees found throughout residential areas. American Forests recommends that there be 25% tree canopy cover in urban residential areas and 15% tree canopy in central business districts. The primary species of tree found within the Biosciences District are live oaks. Palms are located within the neutral ground of Canal Street; crepe myrtles are also found in the Biosciences District. It is estimated that 100,000 trees were lost during Hurricane Katrina. During the 2030 Master Plan process, preserving and restoring the tree canopy throughout the city was a key priority identified by the public. Increasing the urban tree canopy within the Biosciences District should be a high priority for the project.
Pedestrian and Vehicular Circulation Pedestrian Circulation Map 15: Walking Distances With the exception of the Pontchartrain Expressway / I-10 and certain sections of Earhart Boulevard, Poydras
One of the few tree-lined boulevards within the Biosciences District.
Street, and minor streets in the I-10 industrial corridor with abutting industrial or transportation uses, the streets in the Biosciences District have sidewalks, but many of these are in poor condition, especially in residential areas. In many areas, such as Gert Town, the disrepair is due to general lack of maintenance, resulting in the disappearance of some sections of the sidewalks. In some locations where trees have been planted in the planting strip between the sidewalk and the curb, tree roots cause the sidewalks to buckle—a common condition in New Orleans. The poor condition of the sidewalks results in very few areas within the Biosciences District that are ADA accessible, even where curb ramps are present. Despite a current major citywide initiative funded with federal money through the Regional Planning Commission (RPC) to provide accessible crossings, most of the delineated crossings in the Biosciences District are found on Canal Street and Carrollton Avenue, which are a result of the recent streetcar construction. More recently, sidewalks and accessibility have improved on other major streets through the RPC initiative. Minor streets, especially in
22
Working Paper 3
Biosciences District Overview
August 2010
crosses Claiborne Avenue. Tulane Medical School also has overhead walkways connecting their hospital with the garage across La Salle Street and the medical school buildings across Tulane Avenue. A map showing five minute walk distances from key existing and proposed developments within the Biosciences Districts is provided. However, the general condition of the sidewalks as well as the perception of lack of safety (an issue that arose during the stakeholder interviews) suggests that the Biosciences District currently has few pedestrian friendly areas. Recommendations on funding sources for the repair and continued maintenance of sidewalks and crosswalks should be incorporated into the plan for the Biosciences District. A sidewalk along Tulane Avenue within the Biosciences District.
residential areas, rarely have accessible and demarcated crosswalks. As in many cities, although the sidewalks are within the street ROW, which is city or state property, the abutting property owner is responsible for maintenance. Jurisdiction over sidewalks rests primarily with the Department of Public Works (DPW), but Parks and Parkways has the right to determine any plantings, and Safety and Permits has to give permits for overhanging balconies or other intrusions into the sidewalk at grade or above. Special regulatory and/or development districts have some control over materials, and the utilities have certain rights as well. (Detailed maps of utilities within the Biosciences District can be found in Section 6: Utilities). There are no established pedestrian paths in the Biosciences District other than sidewalks that are open to the general public. There is an elevated pathway connecting various buildings of the LSU campus that
Roadway Infrastructure Map 16: Street Network Important arterial and collector streets in the Biosciences District include the following: River/Lake
Up/Down River
Earhart Boulevard (in District)
Carrollton (in District)*
Washington Avenue
Jefferson Davis Parkway*
Poydras Street
Broad Street*
Tulane Avenue
Galvez Street*
Canal Street
Claiborne Avenue*
Basin Street (downriver of Canal)
Loyola Avenue/Elks Place (upriver of Canal)
* On upriver side of Canal, these street names are prefixed South or S. and on the downriver side, North or N. Ot the streets identified above, Tulane Avenue is perhaps
23
one of the most important within the Biosciences District as it links the institutional land uses on both ends of the District. Tulane Avenue is also part of US Route 61, which runs 1,400 miles from New Orleans to Minnesota. The route was an important north–south connection in the days before the interstate highway system. The highway is often called “The Blues Highway,” because of the course it takes from Minnesota, and into Louisiana (primarily New Orleans), which is considered the heart of the blues, as well as Dixieland jazz. Existing Traffic Conditions Regarding Level of Service (LOS) and congestion management, there is no universally available source of data, except for the RPC Congestion Management Program. Without copying what is available from websites or extracting the data through a formal request by GNOBEDD, it is reasonable to say that congestion seldom (if ever) occurs, except at peak hours – and then it is usually on the interstate system or on streets leading to it. While it does provide access to the interstate, the only roadway in or near the Biosciences District that is frequently congested is S. Carrollton Avenue between Claiborne and Tulane Avenues, especially between Earhart Boulevard and Washington Avenue. This likely results from a combination of badly times signals, too many driveways and the interstate entrances, in that order. Annual Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes are provided by the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) for several years, including 2008, 2004, and back into the 1990s. All count stations do not have data for exactly the same years, but in the Biosciences District, there are three stations for which Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) can be calculated, which are shown in Tables 2 and 3 on the next page. The second table presents ADT for 2008 and the previous period available for all count stations in or
near the Biosciences District. The shaded cells are near but outside the study area. ADT has decreased in all but one location, which is on the interstate, and the increase is only 9%. The greatest decrease of 52% has been on Tulane Avenue at Roman Street in the area of the proposed UMC, which is currently largely vacant. Parking On-street parking is generally metered on major streets and is free on minor streets. Outside the CBD and the immediate areas of LSU Health Sciences Center and the Criminal Justice area, there is little or no need for additional parking at present. Off-street parking for facilities developed in the last few decades has been guided through the parking requirements found in the existing zoning ordinance. In some cases, current demand does not appear to exceed supply, especially in the older medical district in the CBD where facilities are abandoned (e.g. Charity Hospital) or in the process of being phased out and relocated, including the existing VA hospital and LSU Medical School. Future uses in this area, however, may revive a demand for these available spaces. Parking demand may also be impacted by the current efforts to encourage transit ridership and bicycles for work trips. Parking requirements may also be adjusted during the revision to the comprehensive zoning ordinance, which may affect demand if requirements are reduced for individual uses, especially non-residential developments. As the ordinance is revised over the next year, great attention must be paid to the impact of changing parking policies by zoning district would have on development in the Biosciences District.
24
Working Paper 3
Biosciences District Overview
August 2010
Table 2: VMT Count at Key Intersections in the Biosciences District US 90 Tulane Ave I-10 Between split & Roman St & Gravier St
US 61 Tulane Ave & Carrollton Ave
VMT
VMT
VMT
2008
28,995
107,476
30,042
2004
60,193
164,377
49,144
2004
2001
2008
60,193
196,915
49,144
52%
45%
39%
Highest record year Record year VMT 2008 compared to highest record year
Table 3: ADT Count at Key Intersections in the Biosciences District Count Station
2008 ADT
2004 ADT
US 61 (Airline Hwy) & Joliet st
32,373
36,634
Change -12%
US 61 (Tulane Ave) & Carrollton Ave
23,470
38,394
-39% -39%
US 61 (Tulane Ave) & White St
21,959
36,136
US 61 & US 90 (Tulane Ave) & Roman St
17,467
36,261
-52%
US 90 (Broad St) & Palmyra St
23,244
42,951
-46%
I-10 between Carrollton Ave & Metairie Road/City Park Avenue
67,744
124,939
-46%
I-10 between Carrollton Ave & I-10/US 90 Business split
88,607
80,968
9%
At the US 90 Business I-10 split
98,851
101,366
-2%
I-10 between split & Cleveland Ave
66,343
101,467
-35%
I-10 between Cleveland Ave & Orleans Ave
69,466
91,600
-24%
Note: While the ďŹ gures in the tables above are derived from the DOTD website, anecdotal information obtained through conversations with DOTD personnel indicate that trafďŹ c volumes are returning to pre-Katrina levels on the interstate system.
25
Before discussing specific conditions that apply to the new VA hospital and UMC or other major projects in some state of development or construction, it should be noted that the current practice for the provision of off-street parking is that it is provided by your “home” institution, i.e., your place of employment and, in some cases, the institution at which you are a student. If, for whatever reason, during the course of a work day, an individual is required to spend any time at another institution, they must park on street, possibly pay as a visitor or use a mode other than private automobile to make the trip. While the last case is preferred from an environmental perspective, the distance between institutions poses serious problems in this regard. (See Section 5: Transportation Analysis for additional information). The VA hospital apparently has adequate parking for onsite staff and expected visitors, including patients. No parking is provided for students. It has been estimated that there will be an average of 600 individuals on site each day who are students or others that will not have available parking. Parking for such individuals is expected to be provided by host institutions. A similar plan applies to UMC, but staff parking is currently planned for within the proposed surface lots. Non faculty and students are not accommodated within the parking counts, but will be able to park in “visitor” areas. As with the VA, it is assumed that parking will be provided by the host institution -- or that you can walk, take transit or bike to the hospital. Further analysis on parking needs and accommodations should be completed for both the VA and UMC hospitals. Such research and potential resulting recommendations should look at the overall balance of parking to make sure that there is adequate parking, rather than an
overabundance of it which could impact the overall urban design of these campuses. The Cancer Center has a waiver for some required parking, as the LSU members of the consortium are expected to park across the street in their own surface lots. Evacuation Routes The Union Passenger Terminal (UPT) is the official evacuation mobilization location for individuals without private transportation to evacuate the city before a hurricane or other disaster for which sufficient warning is available. Evacuees are picked up by Regional Transit Authority (RTA) buses at designated sites and brought to the UPT, which is located at the extreme uptown river corner of the Biosciences District at Loyola and Earhart. Evacuation can be provided from UPT by highway coach (Greyhound) and /or rail (Amtrak). Evacuation routes from the city primarily are via contraflow interstate highways and the Lake Pontchartrain Causeway. Depending on the direction of the storm’s approach, US 90 (east or west), US 61 (west only), and US 11 (northeast only via US 90 east) also are available to evacuate the immediate urban area. From the Biosciences District, there are several opportunities to access these roadways as Tulane Avenue is in part both US 90 and US 61 and I-10 can be accessed at both the southeast and northwest extremities of the District.
Transit Map 17: Transit Map 18: Bikeways Bus and streetcar transit service is provided by RTA. RTA has both regularly scheduled line service and the RTA LIFT service, which provides accessible buses and taxis
26
Working Paper 3
Biosciences District Overview
August 2010
to ADA certified riders by appointment.
past the Criminal Justice area, and leaves the District as it crosses Earhart Boulevard. It then continues to its terminus at Broad Street and Washington Avenue where it provides a transfer with the Louisiana line. Weekday headways are 20 minutes.
Bus Service The more important bus line service in the Biosciences District includes: •
Galvez, a crosstown (up/downriver) route connecting downriver neighborhoods with the CBD. The route serves the sites of new hospitals, turns to river on Poydras, to Loyola, to Tulane, back to Galvez and back downriver. It enters the District when it crosses Iberville Street. It has 20-minute weekday headways.1
•
Tulane begins on Claiborne Avenue at the Jefferson Parish line (near Ochsner, which is farther out in Jefferson), travels downriver to Carrollton Avenue where it connects with the Claiborne line and the St. Charles streetcar, turns left and enters the Biosciences District when it crosses Earhart Boulevard, continues to Tulane Avenue, and then travels toward the river to Loyola and returns. It provides the only transit link between Xavier University and the remainder of the Biosciences District. The line has 20-minute weekday headways.
•
Broad, the major crosstown route prior to Katrina, is becoming more heavily traveled again. It connects New Orleans East along Chef Menteur Highway with Gentilly Boulevard and Broad Street (the same corridor across the city) and enters the Biosciences District at Broad Street and Iberville Street, continues across Canal Street within walking distance of the new VA Hospital site and
1 Headways are defined as the distance from the tip of one vehicle to the tip of the next one behind it, expressed as the time it takes for the trailing vehicle to cover that distance. A shorter headway signifies more frequent service.
•
Claiborne is a crosstown line that begins at Claiborne and Carrollton Avenues and travels down S. Claiborne Avenue to enter the Biosciences District as it crosses Earhart Boulevard. It turns to the river on Poydras Street, to Camp to Canal to river, to Poydras Street and return. This route is similar to the Tulane shuttle, but does not reach Tulane Avenue. It has 30-minute headways on weekdays at peak, but has 1 hour headways during the base period.
•
Louisiana, a route running along a series of river lake streets, passes Touro Hospital in uptown near the river, enters the Biosciences District as it crosses Earhart Boulevard on Washington Avenue, passes Xavier University, turns on Carrollton Avenue to access I-10, and continues out of the Biosciences District to the City Park Avenue/ Metairie Road interchange. It has variable 30 to 38-minute headways on weekdays.
•
The Jackson-Esplanade and the Martin Luther King and Westbank lines pass the river side of the Biosciences District on Loyola Avenue, but these are all subject to change as discussed below.
On time performance of the transit system has improved since the first years after Katrina, but even if service reaches 100% on time performance, the “no better than 15 minutes” schedules are not likely to attract premium riders.2 2 A “premium rider” (sometimes called a choice rider) is a person who is not “transit dependent” and who selects transit as a travel mode because they find it at least as satisfactory, if not more satisfactory, than driving a personal
27
Streetcar Service
The Canal Street streetcar line.
If headways do improve, it does not ensure the attraction of premium riders or a significant reduction of congestion, especially on the interstate system. Improved headways would, however, better serve workers within the city, especially those who are transit dependent and would restore at least some of the premium riders lost since Katrina. Peak hour congestion is suburban flight in action. The real test for transit rests with the acceptance of transit service in the suburbs (New Orleans East, Westbank, East Jefferson). The only potential effect this is likely to have on the Biosciences District (until the District itself becomes a major employment center) is the proposed changes in RTA service on Loyola Avenue. The actual effect cannot be determined or even estimated until RTA revises the service delivery plan, which can then be studied. vehicle. A “transit dependent” person is one that is unable to have access to a personal vehicle as a result of poverty, age (either too young or too old), or some disability.
The Biosciences District is served by an ADA accessible streetcar line along Canal Street. This line operates in the river/lake direction for the length of Canal Street, from the intersection of the Riverfront streetcar line on the river to the Cemeteries Terminal at City Park Avenue where it provides transfers to bus lines continuing to the lake and into Jefferson Parish. It also has a spur on N. Carrollton Avenue that terminates at the entrance to City Park. There is full operational access among the Canal, Riverfront, and St. Charles lines, but the St. Charles cars can operate on other lines only during emergencies and only to reach the heavy maintenance facility on Willow Street. The storage and light maintenance facility for the Canal/Riverfront cars is located on Canal Street at Dupre Street, and is partially in the Biosciences District. Headways on Canal Street are 15 minutes on weekdays. RTA has announced an intention to revise its routes and service delivery patterns. A major proposed change would be to create a transfer point at the UPT to shorten a number of routes that now travel along Loyola Avenue and that could have riders shifted to the new streetcar extension from Canal Street to the UPT. As the Biosciences District plan develops, close coordination with RTA will be necessary. Historically a streetcar line operated on Tulane Avenue. From 1900–1951 the St. Charles and Tulane lines operated in a loop as the St. Charles-Tulane Belt, taking passengers past the beautiful homes on St. Charles Ave., up S. Carrollton Ave. past the St. Charles Line’s present termination at S. Claiborne Ave., across the New Basin Canal (now the site of the Pontchartrain Expressway), turning at the former Pelican Stadium onto Tulane Ave. and back downtown. In 1950, the Tulane Avenue service became a trolley bus route. Today, the street is serviced by an RTA bus route as previously described.
28
Working Paper 3
Biosciences District Overview
August 2010
for the movement of patients, their families and caregivers. There is no designated route as the shuttle is a demand responsive service.
University and Hospital Shuttles Three shuttle services are provided within the Biosciences District, Tulane University, the VA Hospital and LSUHSC. •
•
Tulane University has a route that allows its students, faculty, and staff to travel between the downtown medical campus and the main campus uptown. The shuttle runs along Claiborne Avenue from the uptown campus driveway in the vicinity of Claiborne Avenue and Calhoun Street. The shuttle route includes portions of Canal Street and Loyola Avenue around the downtown campus. A map of the shuttle route has been requested of the University, but none has been provided. The VA Hospital has a system that is primarily
•
The existing LSUHSC facilities have several shuttle routes in operation, shown below and at right. The primary purpose of the shuttle is to ensure access to University Hospital by their medical, allied health, and other employees. LSUHSC currently allows employees and others with badges from other institutions to ride as well, but plans to eliminate the service when the new facilities are completed.
Numbers of shuttles in circulations and ridership information has been requested by the institutions but not provided to the AECOM Team. Additionally, it should be noted that both Tulane and LSUHSC hospitals use the
The three routes provided by the MCLNO shuttle service to the existing LSUHSC facilities. Source: http://www.auxent.lsuhsc.edu/parking/shuttle%20routes.pdf
29
The three routes provided by the MCLNO shuttle service to the existing LSUHSC facilities. Source: http://www.auxent.lsuhsc.edu/parking/shuttle%20routes.pdf
30
Working Paper 3
Biosciences District Overview
August 2010
the same subcontractor, New Orleans Tours, to manage and operate their shuttle services.
Utility Overview The biggest challenge related to utilities is that the Biosciences District is a densely developed urban area while its utility infrastructure was primarily designed to serve residential customers and long-established commercial clients. As bioscience related research and development increases within the District, new ways must be found to accommodate the demands of future growth and development. The problem with retrofitting such a densely developed area is the increased costs associated with the selective demolition needed to install new facilities. This must be done while trying to minimize the disruption to existing users caused by construction. As the Biosciences District develops, its utility requirements may shift to an increasingly diverse mixture of commercial, residential and industrial uses. The Biosciences District will create increased demands principally in the following areas: water, wastewater, power and telecommunications.
Storm Water Storm water is the only utility sector not expected to see an increase in demand, but must be carefully reviewed in light of any revisions in storm water design requisites or constraints. Since the area is already heavily developed, there will be very few conversions of green space to impervious surfaces. More than likely, additional green space will be installed as a result of urban planning, reducing the storm water system demand. As planning and development proceeds, there may also be a reduction in the amount of dedicated off-street surface
A stormwater canal along Washington Avenue by Xavier University.
parking which may also reduce storm water runoff. There is sufficient capacity in the city’s underground main conveyance canal systems, but many of the feeder drain lines leading from the catch basins to the canals are undersized and not regularly cleaned or maintained. The necessary capacity of these feeder lines needs to be investigated and sufficient upgrades should be factored into future planning. The Sewerage and Water Board (SWB) maintains all drain lines 36” and greater. DPW is responsible for maintenance of lines smaller than 36”, as well as all catch basins. Some flooding could be reduced if the catch basins were properly maintained, but DPW’s resources for this kind of work are vastly overextended .
Water Potable water supply is not a limiting issue. SWB indicates that between 115 and 135 million gallons per day (MGD) is currently being produced, with an in-place plant capacity of 200 MGD.
31
There is an effective density of large water mains throughout the Biosciences District, capable of meeting the needs of new entities to the area, which have been discussed. Depending on the required meter size, new supply lines may have to be routed to the customer’s desired point of delivery .
Most of the large Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLEC) only have a presence in and around the Poydras Street corridor, which is on the outer fringe of the District. There will have to be a significant increase in demand to incite these CLECs to make the necessary capital investment to extend their systems.
Wastewater
Energy
Wastewater conveyance availability does not appear to pose a problem. The city has some capacity issues in the French Quarter and the Downtown Development District due to the fact that the number of hotel rooms in the city has more than tripled in the last 20 years. Since most of the new development will be outside these areas, capacity does not appear to be an issue .
Energy, in the form of electricity and natural gas, provided by Entergy, appears to be adequate in the Biosciences District. Entergy can meet all of the hospitals’ reliability concerns, and there are few issues from other consumers in the area. Of particular concern for the electric provider is any unique, specialized or high demand application (mainly industrial needs) that may need to be accommodated at service levels above what has typically been required in the Biosciences District. With the exception of the potential for centralized plants, the development(s) being discussed do not appear to be outside the service capacity.
Telecommunications Telecommunication, on a small scale, is available throughout the Biosciences District. There are several plans to increase service in the Biosciences District to correspond with a number of apartment complexes and hotels that have recently opened. This increase in population density will further stress the existing telecommunications bandwidth , slowing down the rate of information exchange. It will need to be determined if the existing systems are sufficient for larger customers, such as universities and office buildings. Upgrades to private telecommunication capacity involve the least invasive requisites, processes and lead times to adapt to changing demand. High capacity, dedicated systems are presently in use and expansion planning is being pursued. With the exception of Xavier, many area universities are interconnected using the Louisiana Optical Network Initiative (LONI) system for which there is currently a small presence within the Biosciences District.
Chilled water and steam heat are available in a limited area of the Biosciences District and are currently very expensive, unless an expanded customer base can be developed . It is unlikely that many consumers, apart from the hospitals, will take advantage of this option. In the case of natural gas, New Orleans is well positioned to meet demands. The gas system infrastructure sustained little damage from Hurricane Katrina, and the system had been engaged in a comprehensive upgrade, which has essentially been completed.
32
Working Paper 3
Biosciences District Overview
August 2010
Example of Two-Family Residential Zoning
Example of Multiple-Famliy Residential Zoning
Example of CBD Zoning
Example of General Office Zoning
Regulatory Context
Biosciences District includes two primary city designated Planning Districts: District 4 (Mid-City) and District 1a (CBD). The majority of the Biosciences District is within the District 4 planning area, with the exception of the area riverside of Claiborne Avenue, which falls into District 1a. A portion of District 2 (Central City – Garden District) does cross the Biosciences District boundary, but includes only a small portion of I-10.
Planning Districts Map 19: Planning Districts Planning Districts are the primary reference used in the development of the City’s 2030 Master Plan and associated update to the zoning ordinance. The
33
Example of Heavy Industrial Zoning (Coca-Cola Bottling Company)
Example of Medical Service Zoning
Example of General Commercial Zoning
Example of Park Zoning (Gravier Park)
Existing Zoning
Biosciences District :
Map 20: Existing Zoning Zoning within the Biosciences District will be revised in the next year as part of the 2030 city-wide master planning process and associated update to the comprehensive zoning ordinance. However, at this time, the following zoning designations are found in the
•
CBD – The area riverside of I-10 and Claiborne Avenue.
•
Two-Family Residential – Located primarily between Bank Street and Tulane Avenue and four distinct pockets scattered throughout the rest of the Biosciences District: Gert Town, the area just
34
Working Paper 3
Biosciences District Overview
south of the heart of Xavier University, downtown of Tulane Avenue and lakeside of the police headquarters and the court house •
Multiple-Family Residential – Found along Carrollton Avenue and sites scattered throughout the Biosciences District.
•
General Commercial – Located along the major arterial streets of Tulane and Carrollton avenues and Broad and Galvez streets.
•
Neighborhood Commercial – Found primarily in some limited pockets along Banks Street.
•
General Office – This zone is found primarily along Canal Street. The court house and police headquarters are also zoned as General Office.
•
Medical Service – Located lakeside of Claiborne Avenue in the location of the current LSU medical school.
•
Light Industrial – This zoning is found at the Superdome and New Orleans Arena sites, as well as in and around the existing LSU medical school and around the Gert Town neighborhood.
•
Heavy Industrial – This zone is found on either side of I-10 north of Claiborne Avenue, with the exception of the area around Xavier University.
•
Park – Only one park zone, designated for Gravier Park, is found in the Biosciences District
Existing and Future Land Use Map 21: Existing Land Use The Future Land Use map is currently being reviewed and adopted by City Council. As revisions may occur to the map during the adoption process as part of the city-wide master planning process. Therefore, only information regarding currently adopted land use, as identified by the city, is provided.
August 2010
The Biosciences District includes five distinct land uses categories: Residential (Single and Two-Family), Commercial, Institutional, Industrial and Recreation/Open Space. •
Residential (Single and Two-Family) – This land use is found in four distinct pockets in the Biosciences District: between the commercial corridors of Tulane Avenue and Canal Street; the areas on either side of Broad Street between Jefferson Davis Parkway and Galvez Street bounded by Gravier and Perdido Streets; and the Gert Town neighborhood.
•
Commercial – This land use is primarily found along the major arterials of Canal Street and Tulane and Carrollton avenues. Pockets of commercial are also found along Jefferson Davis Parkway and in the CBD.
•
Institutional – This land use is found in the areas of all universities and hospitals in the Biosciences District. The Criminal Courts Building, police headquarters, parish prison, Superdome and UPT are also categorized as Institutional.
•
Industrial – This land use is primarily found on either side of I-10 riverside of Jefferson Davis Parkway, and includes the railroad tracks on the uptown side of the Biosciences District.
•
Recreation / Open Space – This land use is found primarily along the major arterial roads of Canal Street, Carrollton Avenue, Jefferson Davis Parkway, Loyola Avenue, Poydras Street and Washington Avenue. The Norwood Thompson Playground, Gert Town Pool and Comiskey Playground are also classified as Recreation / Open Space.
35
Property Ownership Map 22: City and State Land Ownership The majority of the Biosciences District is under private ownership. State-owned lands are located primarily on either side of Claiborne Avenue uptown of Tulane Avenue. These properties include the Superdome, LSU Medical Center and the State Supreme Court. The most significant tract of city-owned land within the Biosciences District includes the Criminal Court Building, police headquarters and parish prison. Other properties include the New Orleans Public Library and City Hall.
Overlay Districts Map 23: Overlay Districts Almost all of the Biosciences District is impacted by an overlay district. Five cultural districts are found within the Biosciences District including the Lafitte Greenway New City Cultural District, Downtown Development Cultural District, Museum City Park Cultural District, Rampart Basin Street Corridor Cultural District, and South Broad Street Cultural District. These cultural districts are established under the auspices of the Louisiana Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism. Cultural districts are established for the purpose of revitalizing a community by creating hub of cultural activity; allowing income and corporate franchise tax credits for eligible expenses for historic structures; and allowing sales and use tax exemptions from the sale of one-of-a-kind art work. The Canal Street Development Corporation is a quasigovernmental entity that was established to “stimulate business development of the CBD and adaptive reuse and development of Canal Street.” Traditionally focused on historic renovations and other redevelopment projects, the organization is currently focused on the
realization of those projects identified in The Canal Street Vision and Development Strategy, including the recent streetscape improvements. Several city overlay zones occur within the Biosciences District: Downtown Design Review District; Inner City Urban Corridor; and Regional Medical Center Redevelopment. The Downtown Design Review district covers most the CBD and is intended to “provide for a superior environment, compatibility of development, architectural continuity and to ensure the achievement of urban design goals in the CBD and adjacent riverfront areas.” The Inner City Urban Corridor district is found along Carrollton Avenue and is intended to promote urban design that “supports a harmonious relationship between commercial uses and the surrounding residential neighborhood.” The Regional Medical Center Redevelopment covers the area that was covered by the 2008 New Orleans Medical District Strategic Integration Plan authored by Eva Klein & Associates. The majority of the Biosciences District falls within an Enterprise Zone (EZ). According to the RPC website, the EZ program “provides tax credits and sales and use tax refunds to businesses locating or expanding in designated enterprise zone areas.” In order to qualify for the program, business must “create a minimum of five new permanent jobs and fulfill other employee criteria, including certifying that 35% of new employees are unemployable by traditional standards, lacking in basic skills, receiving some form of public assistance or are residents of an enterprise zone in that parish.” One-time tax credits of $2,500 per each net new permanent job created, as well as tax refunds on certain purchases, are also provided through the program.
36
Working Paper 3
Biosciences District Overview
Analysis Map 24: Opportunities and Constraints Analysis An analysis of the Biosciences District shows that there are a number of key opportunities and constraints within the District from a planning and urban design perspective. The adjacency of the of the proposed VA and UMC hospitals to the existing medical district means that majority of the institutional and medical related facilities in the Biosciences District will continue to be in and around Claiborne Avenue. However, the proposed expansion of Xavier University will increase the institutional presence in the lakeside end of the Biosciences District. Tulane Avenue is a critical connector between these institutional land uses and should be considered the backbone to the Biosciences District. As a result, its design as a street and the uses along it will help shape and reinforce the overall look and feel of the District. I-10 also plays a significant role in the look and feel of the Biosciences District. In its current elevated configuration, it forms a significant barrier between the uptown and downtown halves of the District. There is a movement to explore reconfiguring the portion of I-10 along Claiborne Avenue to bring it back down to grade. This would provide a strong opportunity to knit both sides of the Biosciences District on either side of Claiborne together both physically and psychologically. However, as such discussions are very preliminary, the planning for the Biosciences District should continue to consider I-10 in its current elevated state and make strong recommendations for how to design the District should it be brought back down to grade. Other key land uses within the Biosciences District include the core residential areas in Mid-City and Gert Town. Mid-city is a vibrant neighborhood with a
August 2010
strong identity that should be reinforced through the planning of the Biosciences District. Gert Town has significant blight issues and is isolated by Carrollton and Washington Avenues and Earhart Boulevard. Another key issue is the limited ability to cross of the Washington Avenue Canal which both physically and psychologically divides Gert Town from Xavier University. Stronger connections across the canal should be explored in order to strengthen the relationship and potential synergies between the University and Gert Town residents. Opportunity zones for potential infill development and redevelopment are found in the uptown portion of the Biosciences District along Earhart Boulevard, as well as the areas bounded by Tulane Avenue and I-10 on either side of Broad Street. As programming requirements are identified for the Biosciences District, these are the locations to which development should be directed in addition to smaller infill development opportunities throughout the rest of the District. Potential gateway opportunities exist throughout the Biosciences District; however, the most likely gateway locations are found at the key intersections of Tulane Avenue/ Carrollton Avenue, Canal Street/ Carrollton Avenue and Canal Street/ Loyola Avenue. Recommendations for the design and enhancement of these areas should be explored as the planning process advances. There are many opportunities for increasing the sustainable aspects of the Biosciences District. They include possible building reuse, infill (re)development, improved pedestrian connections and increased energy efficiency. In addition, identifying key streets to allow for improved stormwater management throughout the District is critical. Such explorations should be integrated with the Dutch Dialogue explorations/recommendations
37
for the City. Additional recommendations regarding sustainability are found in Section 7 of this document.
0
0
0
FO
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
NT AIN EB
0
5
5
0
LE
0
-5
-5
AU
0
DR
0
0
0
0
0
PA L M-10 ET TO
0
ST
0
AIRL
0
Y
0
INE HW
0
0
0
0
0
0
DR EX EL
0
0
0
0
0
DR
0
0
0
0
0
-5 -1
0
0
0
0
0
0
FO NT AIN EB
0
0 0
0
AU
0
LE
0
0
0
0
DR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SB
0
5
0
0
A RO
D
0 0
ST
0 0
0
0 0
0
I-1 0
0
0
0
0
0
CA N0A L
0
0 0
0
ST 0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
E AV 0
-5
0
NV IL
0
0
0
S
0
0
0
0
O AIB
0
5
0
E AV
JR
BL VD
0
0
LV D
-1 0
EA RH AR T0 B
0
KIN G
E RN
LU TH ER
CL
MA RT IN
-5
0
0
ST
LE -10 ST
NE AV E
BA NK S
BIE
0
TU LA
0
0
5
-5
0
0
0
0 -5
0
5
0 5
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-5
0
0
0
5
0
-1 0
0
CA 0 N AL
0
ST
MA RT 0 IN
0
0
0
LU TH ER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
JR
5
0
KIN G
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
BL VD
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
5
US 9
0
0B
0
AV E
0
NA DE
A0V E
LA
UR SU LIN ES
ES P
0
0
0
0
0
0
AN S
0
OR LE 0
0
0 0 0
0
5
0
0
0
AV E
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
5
5
5
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
5
0
5
0
0
DR AS
0
PO Y
0
0
0
0
ST
0
10
0
0 0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
HO W AR D
0
0
0
0 0
5
5
AV E
5
5
5
5
0 0
5
0 5
5
0
0 0
0
5
10
5
5
5
0
5
5
0
0
0
5
5 55
0
5
0
0
0 0
10
5
5
0
0
5 0
5
5 5
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
10
0
0
0
10
10
10
0
5
10
0
5
NA DE
0
LA
00
ES P
5
0
0
5
10
10
NAPOLEON
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
5
0
AV E
5
0
0
0
N
AV E N LL TO
5
ST
0 -1
0 0 0
S
C
AR 0
AVE
0
RO LL TO N 0
0
K AR YP CIT
0 0
0
0
0 00
0
CA RR O 5
W Y PK DA VIS F
5
0
5
0
BR OA DW AY
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
5
Y PK W
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
N
JE F 0
0
10
0
0
SJ
EF FD AV IS 0
0 0
50
0
E E AV VILL NASH
0
0 0
0
0
S
PK W DA VIS FF
Y 0
JE S ST D BR OA
0 0
0
0
0
ST
5
S
BR OA
D
ST 0
0
0 0
0
5
0 0 0
0 0
SG
T ZS AL VE
0 0
0
0 5
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0
0
ST Z LV E GA S
0
0 0 0
0
0
5 5
0
0 0 0
N 0 0
0
0
BR OA D0 0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0 0
5
0
CL S
0
5
GENT 0
RIE RD 5 METAI
0 5
0
0 5
0
0
0 0
STAT E ST
0
0
0
SIM
0
AV E
E E AV RN
LIV AR
0
5
ILLY BLV D 0
0
0
5
0
0
0
ST IR O
0
N
0
0 0
0 AIB OR NE
AV E
N 5
0 5
0
LOYO
0 5
DR YA DE S5 ST
0
ST
M 5
GA LV EZ 0
5
10
0
0
0
N
0
0 0
0
0 0
AV 0E
0
IB CL A
0
0 0
5 5
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
AV E
00
10
10
00
0 10
0
00
0
15
5
5
0
0
N CLAIBORNE
00
0 0
0
0
AVE EFE O'KE 5
LA AV E 5
5
5
OR NE
0
EL K S PL RA MP AR T ST 5 5
OS AN ED
ON GT HIN
BO
S WA
ON
-5
5
5 10
0
IN BA S 5
RA M N 5 10
0 0
PA RT 5
5 5
5
0
0 5
5
ST 5
0 0 5
5 5
10
5
0 5
M C 10
5 5
5
10
5
5
5 5
AVE
0
10
0
00
0
0
0
ZINE ST
ST 5
AVE ST5 CH ARLE S
5
5
ST
O LAIB
ON
CAMP
SC
S CK JA
5
L TO
5
15
5
5
ON CENTER BLVD CONVENTI 10
5 5
5
MAGA
0
10
0
10
5
TCHOUPITOULAS ST
0
DE
0
N
0
E AV 0
10
0
-1 ON GT HIN 0
15
10
S WA
T
5
5
10 5
5 5
5 0
PET ER SS
0
10
5
0
0
ST
BLVD 0 0
CA TU R
0 0
10 20
0
5 0
5
5
5
5
0
5
PL
5 0
SH AN E
0
5
AIN -5
5
5
D UR
10
0 15
ARTR TCH PON 0 0 10 20
0
0
E AV RD NA ER 15
YO BA 0 0
DO W
NT OW
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
ELEVATION
UP TO W
N
15
10
5
0
-5
-10
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
±
0
Parks
Water
Study Area
Elevation Contours
LEGEND
E
0 0
B ST
SID
10
0
5
5
KE
-5
0
0 0
5
LA
10 5 -5
0 0 0 00
E
0 0
AVE 0 0
ID
0 0
A P TUREAUD 0 00
00
RS
0
VE
0
0
RI
0
0
0
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 3
0 10
15
10 10 10 10
0 0
E AV 0
0
0
T
0 0
-1 0
AVE
-5
0
0
0
LE
AU
DR
ST
BR OA DW AY
NT AIN EB
M
STAT E ST
ET TO ST
INE HW Y
DR EX EL DR
LE
AV E RO LL TO N AR
AU DR
SB
A RO
D
ST
I-1 0
NV IL
TU LA
ST
LE ST
S
C
EA RH AR TB
E AV
KIN G
E RN
LU TH ER
O IB LA
MA RT IN
NE AV E
BA NK S
BIE
W Y PK DA VIS F JE F N
CA RR O ST
Y PK W DA VIS FF
C S
FO NT AIN EB
Y PK W EF FD AV IS SJ
JR
BL VD
LV D
ST D BR OA S
N CA NA L
CA NA L
MA RT IN
LU TH ER
ST
ST Z LV E GA S
KIN G
JR
BL VD
NA DE
AV E
LA
UR SU LIN ES
ES P
US 9
AV E
BR OA D 0B
N
AV E N LL TO S
OR LE AN S AV E
C S
0 LA IB OR NE
JE S ST D BR OA
FO
PA L
AIRL
E E AV VILL NASH
T ZS AL VE SG
GENT
ILLY BLV D PO Y
DR AS
ST
N
ST IR O M HO W AR D
N
AVE
LOYO
AV E
ST GA LV EZ
LA AV E
K AR YP CIT
ST
IB AV E
ES P
LA
NA DE
AV E
N CLAIBORNE
PL SH AN E M C
ST
SIM
AV E LIV AR
E
BO
AV NE OR LAIB OS AN ED
ON GT HIN
ON
S WA
DR YA DE S
BA S
IN
ST AVE
ST PA RT
CL A N S
AVE
±
SOILS 1,000
N
Feet 2,000
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
N
NT OW
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
0
UP TO W
DO W
Urban Land
Sharkey Clay
Harahan Clay
Commerce Silty Clay Loam
Commerce Silt Loam
Soils Data
Water
Study Area
LEGEND
E
RIE RD METAI
N
RA M
TCHOUPITOULAS ST
AV E OR NE ST
EL K PL RA MP AR T AVE EFE O'KE
SC
ST CH ARLE S
L TO
ON
ST CAMP
E AV
S CK JA
ZINE ST MAGA
ST DE CA TU R T ETE RS S NP
SID KE LA
BLVD ON GT HIN
E
S WA
ID
AIN D UR
RS
ARTR TCH PON
AVE
VE
YO BA
E AV RD NA ER
RI
A P TUREAUD
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 4
B ST
CONVENTION CENTER BLVD
E AV
E AV
T
NAPOLEON AVE
LE
AU
DR
ST
BR OA DW AY
NT AIN EB
M
STAT E ST
ET TO ST
INE HW Y
DR EX EL DR
LE
AV E RO LL TO N AR
AU DR
SB
A RO
D
ST
I-1 0
NV IL
TU LA
ST
LE ST
S
EA RH AR TB
E AV
KIN G
NE OR AIB
LU TH ER
CL
MA RT IN
NE AV E
BA NK S
BIE
W Y PK DA VIS F JE F N
CA RR O
ST
Y PK W DA VIS FF
C S
FO NT AIN EB
Y PK W EF FD AV IS SJ
JR
BL VD
LV D
ST D BR OA S
N
CA NA L
CA NA L
MA RT IN
LU TH ER
ST
ST Z LV E GA S
KIN G
JR
BL VD
NA DE
AV E
LA
UR SU LIN ES
ES P
US 9
AV E
BR OA D
0B
N
AV E N LL TO
S
OR LE AN S AV E
C S
0 LA IB OR NE
JE S ST BR OA D
FO
PA L
AIRL
E E AV VILL NASH
T ZS AL VE SG
GENT
ILLY BLV D PO Y
DR AS
ST
N
ST IR O M
HO W AR D
N
AVE
LOYO
AV E
ST GA LV EZ
LA AV E
K AR YP CIT
ST
IB
AV E
ES P
LA
NA DE
AV E
N CLAIBORNE
PL SH AN E M C
ST
SIM
AV E LIV AR
E
BO
AV NE OR LAIB OS AN ED
ON GT HIN
ON
S WA
DR YA DE S
BA S
IN
ST
AVE
ST PA RT
CL A N
S
AVE
Water
Study Area
±
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
0
N
NT OW
FEMA FLOOD PLAIN 1999
UP TO W
DO W
100-500 YR FLOOD
100 YR FLOOD
Flood Zone
LEGEND
E
RIE RD METAI
N
RA M
TCHOUPITOULAS ST
AV E OR NE
ST EL K PL RA MP AR T
AVE EFE O'KE
SC
ST CH ARLE S
L TO
ON
ST CAMP
E AV S CK JA
ZINE ST MAGA
ST DE CA TU R
T ETE RS S NP
SID KE
BLVD
ON GT HIN
LA
S WA
E
RD
ID
AIN ARTR TCH PON
U
RS
AVE
VE
YO BA E AV RD NA ER
RI
A P TUREAUD
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 5
B ST
CONVENTION CENTER BLVD
E AV
E AV
T
NAPOLEON AVE
LE
AU
DR
ST
BR OA DW AY
NT AIN EB
M
STAT E ST
ET TO ST
INE HWY
DR EX EL DR
LE
AV E RO LL TO N AR
AU DR
SB
A RO
D
ST
I-1 0
NV IL
TU LA
ST
LE ST
S
EA RH AR TB
E AV
KIN G
NE OR AIB
LU TH ER
CL
MA RT IN
NE AV E
BA NK S
BIE
W Y PK DA VIS F JE F N
CA RR O
ST
Y PK W DA VIS FF
C S
FO NT AIN EB
Y PK W EF FD AV IS SJ
JR
BL VD
LV D
ST D BR OA S
N
CA NA L
CA NA L
MA RT IN
LU TH ER
ST
ST Z LV E GA S
KIN G
JR
BL VD
NA DE
AV E
LA
UR SU LIN ES
ES P
US 9
AV E
BR OA D
0B
N
AV E N LL TO
S
OR LE AN S AV E
C S
0 LA IB OR NE
JE S ST BR OA D
FO
PA L
AIRL
E E AV VILL NASH
T ZS AL VE SG
GENT
ILLY BLV D PO Y
DR AS
ST
N
ST IR O M
HO W AR D
N
AVE
LOYO
AV E
ST GA LV EZ
LA AV E
K AR YP CIT
ST
IB
ST
SIM
AV E LIV AR
E
BO
AV NE OR LAIB OS AN ED
ON GT HIN
ON
S WA
DR YA DE S
AV E
BA S
IN
ST
AVE
ST PA RT
ES P
LA
NA DE
AV E
N CLAIBORNE
PL SH AN E M C
RIE RD METAI
N
RA M
TCHOUPITOULAS ST
CL A N
S
AVE
N
NT OW
N
±
1,000
Feet 2,000
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
0
ADVISORY BASE FLOOD ELEVATION
UP TO W
DO W
ABFE of site is 7 feet. Therefore, the structure's first floor (including basement) is recommended to be elevated to 7 feet or higher.
BFE of 5 feet < 7 feet (HEAG + 3 feet)
Compare BFE with HEAG + 3 feet.
The site BFE is 5 and HEAG is 4.
EXAMPLE:
For the Parish, FEMA recommends the above elevations for new construction within the floodplain to be elevated to either the Base Flood Elevation OR at least 3 feet above the highest adjacent existing grade (HAEG), whichever is higher.
NOTES: BFE = Base Flood Elevation HEAG = Highest Existing Adjacent Grade
BFE 6 or 3 ft Above HEAG
BFE 5 or 3 ft Above HEAG
BFE 4 or 3 ft Above HEAG
BFE 2.5 or 3 ft Above HEAG
BFE 1.5 or 3 ft Above HEAG
BFE 0.5 or 3 ft Above HEAG
BFE 0 or 3 ft Above HEAG
BFE -1 or 3 ft Above HEAG
3 ft Above HEAG
Zones
Water
Study Area
LEGEND
E
AV E OR NE
ST EL K PL RA MP AR T
AVE EFE O'KE
SC
ST CH ARLE S
L TO
ON
ST CAMP
E AV S CK JA
ZINE ST MAGA
ST DE CA TU R
T ETE RS S NP
SID KE
ON GT HIN
LA
S WA
E
RD
ID
BLVD AIN ARTR TCH PON
U
RS
AVE
VE
YO BA E AV RD NA ER
RI
A P TUREAUD
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 6
B ST
CONVENTION CENTER BLVD
E AV
E AV
T
NAPOLEON AVE
SC
LAIB
OR NE
10 § ¦ ¨
AVE
W A SH IN G TO N AV E
EA R
RO BL VD
AR RT
CA NA L ST
10 § ¦ ¨
E
AV E LL TO N F JE F S
C N HA
AV E S
ST D OA BR
Y
NE
S
ST Z LV E GA
PK W
LA
N
NT OW
N
±
1,000
Feet 2,000
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
0
AERIAL - 12/2009
UP TO W
DO W
Study Area
SID KE LA
DA VI S
TU
AVE O LA L OY
E ID RS VE RI
LEGEND
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 7
N
NT OW
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
FIGURE GROUND
Âą
0
E SID KE LA UP TO W
DO W
E ID RS VE RI
Water
Building Footprints
Biosciences District Buildings
Study Area
LEGEND
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 8
TA IN EB
LE AU
DR
ST
DW AY
BR OA
FO N
PA L M ET TO ST
AIRL IN E HWY
STAT E ST
24
15
25
6
3
7
8
12
17
34
¬ « 155
193
¬ «
38
41
¬ « 153
42
31
188
30
198
¬ «
191
22
23
32
18
19
20
53
21
1
51
49
¬ « ¬ «
2
16
10
FO NT AIN EB
9
4
27 28
26
11
52
47 48
46
35 40
36 37
LE AU DR
43
29
13
¬ « ¬ « ¬ « « ¬« ¬ ¬ « « ¬ ¬¬ « «« ¬ «¬ ¬ ¬ « « ¬ ¬ « «¬ ¬ «¬ «« ¬ « ¬ «¬ ¬ « « «¬ « « ¬ ¬ «¬ ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « « ¬ « ¬¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ «¬ « « ¬ « ¬ ¬ « ¬ «¬ « ¬ « ¬ «
5
¬ «
S
AV E N LL TO CA RR O
SB
AD RO
ST
156
¬ «
161
¬ «
I-1 0
¬ «
N 162
¬ «
163
¬ «
CA 192 NA LS T
AV E N 210
¬ «
¬ «
TU LA
160
NV IL
154
S
CL
MA RT IN
208
206
AIB
OR
185
¬ «
159
¬ «
190
¬ «
189
¬ «
EA RH AR TB LV D
158
200
¬ «
¬ «
KIN G
E AV NE
TH ER
205
204
¬ « ¬ « 202
¬ «
LU
201
¬ « ¬ «
194
¬ «
¬ « ¬ « ¬ « 209
207
¬ «
203
ST
¬ «
ST
LE
NE AV E
BA NK S
BIE
Y W
199
DA VIS JE FF N
JR
BL VD
186
¬ «
195
¬ «
¬ « 196
CA NA LS
MA RT IN
LU
T
54
TH ER
KIN G
¬ «
¬ « 197
JR
55
¬ «
BL VD
58
¬ «
57
¬ «
AV E
NA DE
62
¬ «
US 90
61
60
¬ « ¬ «
B
59
« ¬ « ¬ 56
UR SU LIN ES
LA AV E
178
¬ «
177
187
¬ «
83
¬ «
¬ «
66
81
AN S
¬ «
OR LE
¬ «
176
¬ «
BR OA D N
157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165
175
80
64
63
78
¬ «¬ « 164
¬ « 165
67
Canal Condominiums Marquis Apartments Falstaff Apartments Crescent Club The Terraces Meridian Apartments St. Michael's Senior Housing Canal Street Hotel Providence Community Housing
152
69
70
University Hospital Seton Hall Library LSU/ Lions CSRB Parking LSU School of Nursing LSU Medical School Student Dormitory Not Available LSU Clinical Education Building LSU Outpatient Clinics LSU Medical School Parking L&M Building Dibert Building
66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79
73
74
82
¬ «
81 Louisiana Cancer Research Center 82 Bio-Innovation Center 85 Old VA Hospital
Other
80 Louisiana Tumor Registry
University of New Orleans
Perdido Building Primary Care Clinic Tulane Hospital & Clinic Tidewater Building DCI Building Women's Center Tulane Hospital & Clinic Tulane Cancer Clinic Elk Place Building Student Dormitory Tulane Medical School Tulane Cancer Center Tulane Hospital & Clinic TUMS Annex
Tulane Medical School
54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 84 135 136
LSU Medical School
83 Delgado Nursing School 84 Delgado Nursing School Parking
Delgado Nursing School
185
¬ «
84
79
85
84
136 135
179
65
¬ « ¬ «
¬ « 184
PO Y
150
¬ «
DR AS
180
ST
76
¬ « 181
183
151
77
68
75
HO W AR D
182
72
71
74
¬ «¬ «¬ « ¬ « « ¬ ¬ «¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ ¬ « «« ¬ « ¬ ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ «
AV E
Important Developments Hyatt Regency Gravier Jung Hotel Quality Inn Patio Hotel Crystal Inn Rose Inn Charity Hospital St. Joseph Church Louisiana Superdome New Orleans Arena Benson Tower City Hall Civil Court Public Library Vacant United States Postal Service Union Passenger Terminal Regional Transit Authority Entergy Entergy Tulane Avenue The Building Block (Eco Park) New Orleans Civil District Court District Attorney for Orleans Parish Not Available Orleans Parish Prison (closed) Police Headquarters Police Headquarters Not Available Not Available Sheriff's Office Not Available Not Available
Residential
150 151 152 153 154 155 156 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210
Non-Residential
IR O
¬ «
W Y PK DA VIS FF
¬ «
WY
PK AV IS EF FD SJ
ST BR OA D S
DR EX EL14 DR
E E AV NASH VILL
N
CA RR O LL TO S
ST LV EZ
JE S ST BR OA D
N
PK AL VE ZS T SG
S
GA S
ST
M
D
GENTILL Y BLV
0 AV E OR NE CL AIB
AV E
AV E NE 157
¬ «
IB OR CL A
ES P
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
ES P
Administration Building Administration Annex Convent Gymnasium College of Pharmacy House of Studies Student Center St. Joeseph Residence Hall Katharine Drexel Residence Hall Central Power Plant St. Michael's Residence Hall Xavier South Campul Police; Residence; Shipping & Receiving NCF Academic Science Complex Counseling Center Maintenance Gert Town Swimming Pool Bolden Child Care Center Art Village (Building "E") Art Village (Building "D") Art Village (Building "C") Art Village (Building "B") NCF/ASC Addition Library Resource Center; Pharmacy Addition University Center Claver Residence Hall University Health Services Living/ Learning Center DePorres Residence Hall Residence Art Village (Building "A") Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence
Xavier University
LA
Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Detiege Health Center
NA DE
Warren Easton High School Israel Augustine Middle School Jesuit High School St. John Lutheran School Esperanza Charter School Fisk-Howard School Cameron College Schwarz Alternative School RNE AVE New Orleans Christian Academy N CLAIBO
AV E
189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197
Schools
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52
Xavier University (Cont.)
Existing Schools, Universities & Hospitals
CAMP ST
ME
MAGA ZINE ST
VE KA AR YP CIT
BA S
IN
ST AVE
ST
RD TAIRIE
N
RA MP AR T TCHOUPITOULAS ST
PL SH AN E M C
GA LV EZ
LOYO LA AV E
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
±
0
N
NT OW
KEY DEVELOPMENTS: EXISTING & IN-PROGRESS
UP TO W
DO W
Xavier University
UNO
Tulane Medical
Old VA Hospital
Louisiana Cancer Research Center
LSU Medical
Delgado Nursing
Bio-Innovation Center
Buildings
Future Correctional Center
Justice Building
Major Projects
Major Residential Developments
Parks
Water
Study Area
LEGEND
E
ST
AVE O'KE EFE
SID KE LA
N PL EL K
ST PA RT RA M S
E
ST
SIM
AV E
E
BO LIV AR
AV NE OR
ST
LAIB SC
OS AN ED ON GT HIN
ON
S WA
DR YA DE S
L TO
ON
ARLE S
E AV ON GT HIN
S CK JA
ST CH
ST DE CA TU R T NP ET E RS S
ID
VD N BL S WA
RS
TR AI
AVE
VE
AR TCH PON RD
E AV RD NA ER
RI
U YO BA
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 9
A P TUREAUD B ST CONVENTION CENTER BLVD
E AV
E AV
T
NAPOLEON AVE
TA IN EB
LE AU
DR
ST
DW AY
BR OA
FO N
PA L M ET TO ST
AIRL IN E HWY
STAT E ST
24
15
5
¬ «
25 119
3
7
8
S 12 17 116
34
¬ « 155
193
¬ «
41
¬ « 153
AV E N LL TO CA RR O
42
188
30
198
¬ «
191
¬ «
114
23
32
18
19
20
22
21
53
113
112
1
51
49
¬ « ¬ «
2
118
10
EB
115 9 16
4
FO NT AIN
6
LE AU
38
47 48 126
128
52
36 37 35 40120
127 46
27 28
26
117 11
DR
124
31
122
125
123
43
121
29
13
¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ «« ¬ ¬ ¬ « « ¬ « «¬ «¬ ¬ «¬ ¬ « ¬ « « ¬ ¬ « ¬ « «« ¬ « ¬ « ¬ «¬ ¬ «¬ « ¬ «¬ « « ¬ «¬ «« ¬ « «¬ ¬ ¬ « ¬ « ¬ «¬ ¬ « ¬ ¬ « « ¬ « « ¬ « ¬ «¬ ¬ «¬ «¬ « ¬ « ¬ ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « « ¬ « ¬ «¬ « ¬ ¬ « « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ «¬ ¬ «¬ « « ¬ «
DR EX EL14 DR
E E AV NASH VILL
WY
PK AV IS EF FD SJ
SB
AD RO
ST
156
¬ «
161
¬ «
I-1 0
162
¬ «
163
¬ «
CA 192 NA LS
¬ «
N
199
T
AV E N 210
¬ «
¬ «
TU LA
160
NV IL
154
CL
TIN
S
MA R
208
206
AIB
O
185
¬ «
159
¬ «
190
¬ «
189
¬ «
EA RH AR TB LV D
158
KIN
G
VE EA RN
TH ER
205
200
¬ «
¬ «
¬ «
202
204
¬ «
LU
201
¬ « ¬ «
194
¬ «
¬ « ¬ «
203
¬ « ¬ « 209
207
¬ «
ST
¬ «
ST
LE
NE AV E
BA NK S
BIE
Y W
¬ «
W Y PK DA VIS FF
DA VIS JE FF N
JR
BL VD
186
¬ «
195
¬ «
¬ « 196
91
101
¬ «
94
T
97
86
¬ «
90
89
98
96
MA RT IN
LU
87
TH ER
KIN G
¬ « 54
88
99
JR
57
58
¬ «
¬ «
BL VD
55
¬ «
109
¬ «
62
¬ «
US 90
61
¬ « ¬ « 60
B
59
110
¬ «
« ¬ « ¬ 56
108
¬ «
Canal Condominiums Marquis Apartments Falstaff Apartments Crescent Club The Terraces Meridian Apartments St. Michael's Senior Housing Canal Street Hotel Providence Community Housing
95
« ¬ « ¬
100
¬ «
¬ « 197
157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165
Residential
¬ « « ¬ « ¬ ¬ ¬ « «« ¬ ¬ ¬ « « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « 92 93
CA NA LS
Important Developments Hyatt Regency Gravier Jung Hotel Quality Inn ES Patio Hotel PL AN Crystal Inn AD Rose Inn E Charity Hospital AV St. Joseph Church E Louisiana Superdome New Orleans Arena Benson Tower City Hall Civil Court Public Library Vacant United States UR Postal Service Union Passenger SU Terminal Regional Transit LAuthority IN Entergy ES Entergy AV E Tulane Avenue The Building Block (Eco Park) New Orleans Civil District Court District Attorney for Orleans Parish Not Available Orleans Parish Prison (closed) Police Headquarters Police Headquarters Not Available Not Available Sheriff's Office Not Available Not Available
107
178
¬ «
Perdido Building Primary Care Clinic Tulane Hospital & Clinic Tidewater Building DCI Building Women's Center Tulane Hospital & Clinic Tulane Cancer Clinic Elk Place Building Student Dormitory Tulane Medical School Tulane Cancer Center Tulane Hospital & Clinic TUMS Annex
177
187
¬ «
83
¬ «
81
¬ «
¬ «
66
102
¬ «
106
AN S
¬ «
OR LE
105
¬ «
AV E
104
¬ «
64
84
79
¬ «
85
¬ «
84
65
179
301
164
¬ « 184
PO Y
¬ «
63
67
150
¬ «
152
68
181
¬ «
183
151
77
¬ «
ST
76
DR AS
180
¬ «
78
¬ «
304
¬ «¬ «
69
82
73
74
¬ «
75
HO W AR D
182
72
71
305 70
Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Detiege Health Center
189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197
74
AV E
Warren Easton High School Israel Augustine Middle School Jesuit High School St. John Lutheran School Esperanza Charter School Fisk-Howard School Cameron College Schwarz Alternative School New Orleans Christian Academy
Schools
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52
Xavier University (Cont.)
¬ «¬ ¬ «« ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ «« ¬ « ¬ ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ «
300
303
¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « 175
302
¬ «
¬ « ¬ «
¬ «¬ « ¬ « ¬ « ¬ « 136 135
80
Administration Building Administration Annex Convent Gymnasium College of Pharmacy House of Studies Student Center St. Joeseph Residence Hall Katharine Drexel Residence Hall Central Power Plant St. Michael's Residence Hall Xavier South Campul Police; Residence; Shipping & Receiving NCF Academic Science Complex Counseling Center Maintenance Gert Town Swimming Pool Bolden Child Care Center Art Village (Building "E") Art Village (Building "D") Art Village (Building "C") Art Village (Building "B") NCF/ASC Addition Library Resource Center; Pharmacy Addition University Center Claver Residence Hall University Health Services Living/ Learning Center DePorres Residence Hall Residence Art Village (Building "A") Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence Residence
¬ «¬ «
165
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Xavier University
Existing Schools, Universities & Hospitals
¬ «
81 Louisiana Cancer Research Center 82 Bio-Innovation Center 85 Old VA Hospital
Other
80 Louisiana Tumor Registry
University of New Orleans
66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79
¬ «
176
¬ «
103
University Hospital Seton Hall Library LSU/ Lions CSRB Parking LSU School of Nursing LSU Medical School Student Dormitory Not Available LSU Clinical Education Building LSU Outpatient Clinics LSU Medical School Parking L&M Building Dibert Building
Tulane Medical School
54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 84 135 136
LSU Medical School
83 Delgado Nursing School 84 Delgado Nursing School Parking
Delgado Nursing School
¬ «
¬ «
111
¬ «
BR OA D
N
IR O
M
N
CA RR O LL TO S
ST BR OA D S
JE S ST BR OA D
ST LV EZ GA S
N
PK AL VE ZS T SG
S
ST
150 151 152 153 154 155 156 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210
AV E
D GENTILL Y BLV
0 AV E OR NE CL AIB
AV E NE 157
¬ «
IB OR CL A
Non-Residential
Future ACB (Clinic) Future Garage Future ACB (Clinic) & Retail Future Inpatient Future Diagnotstic & Treatment Inpatient ACB (Clinic) Future ACB (Clinic) & Retail Parking Garage Diagnostic & Treatment
Dixie Brewery Research Central Energy Plant Patient Parking Rehabilitation & Transitional Living Residence Residence Residence Residence Staff Parking Outpatient Inpatient Administration Emergency Ambulance & Walk-In Diagnostic & Treatment Diagnostic & Treatment Pumping Station
112 New Recreational Fields and Tennis Complex 113 New Convocational Center 114 New Parking for Convocational Center 115 New Campus Lawn 116 New Lifestyle Center and Parking Structure 117 Central Plant - Modifications and Upgrades 118 New Chapel 119 College of Pharmacy - Planned Expansion 120 New Auditorium and Parking
Xavier University
86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
VA Hospital Preferred Alternative
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111
ES P
University Medical Center Preferred Alternative
LA
NA DE
AV E
N CLAIBORNE
121 New Auditorium and Parking 122 New Dormitories 123 New Dormitories 124 New Dormitories 125 New Dormitories 126 New Dormitories 127 University Center Expansion for Permanent Fitness 128 New Center for Academic Success
Xavier University (Cont.)
Proposed University & Hospital Develpoments 300 Research 301 Academic & Parking 302 Research 303 Residential or Academic & Parking 304 Residential & Parking 305 Hospital
Tulane Medical School
CAMP ST
ME
MAGA ZINE ST
VE KA AR YP CIT
BA S
IN
ST AVE
ST
RD TAIRIE
N
RA MP AR T TCHOUPITOULAS ST
PL SH AN E M C
GA LV EZ LOYO LA AV E
AVE
UP TO W
N
DO W
NT OW
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
KEY DEVELOPMENTS: PROPOSED
±
0
Water
Parks
Xavier University
UNO
Tulane Medical
Old VA Hospital
Louisiana Cancer Research Center
LSU Medical
Delgado Nursing
Bio-Innovation Center
Buildings
Major Projects
Major Residential Developments
Future Correctional Center
Justice Building
VA_Hospital_future
VA Preferred Alternative
University_Medical_Center
UMC Preferred Alternative
Study Area
LEGEND
E
ST
AVE O'KE EFE
SID KE LA
N PL EL K
ST PA RT RA M S
ST DE CA TU R T NP ET E RS S
E
ST
SIM
E
BO LIV AR
AV NE OR
ST
LAIB SC
OS AN ED ON GT HIN
ON
S WA
DR YA DE S
L TO
ON
ARLE S
E AV ON GT HIN
S CK JA
ST CH
ID
S WA
RS
VD N BL RD
VE
U YO BA
E AV RD NA ER
RI
AI ARTR TCH PON
AVE
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 10
A P TUREAUD B ST CONVENTION CENTER BLVD
E AV
E AV
T
NAPOLEON AVE
LE
AU
DR
ST
BR OA DW AY
NT AIN EB
M
STAT E ST
ET TO ST
INE HW Y
DR EX EL DR
LE
AV E RO LL TO N AR
AU DR
SB
A RO
D
ST
I-1 0
NV IL
TU LA
ST
LE ST
S
EA RH AR TB
E AV
KIN G
NE OR AIB
LU TH ER
CL
MA RT IN
NE AV E
BA NK S
BIE
W Y PK DA VIS F JE F N
CA RR O ST
Y PK W DA VIS FF
C S
FO NT AIN EB
Y PK W EF FD AV IS SJ
JR
BL VD
LV D
ST D BR OA S
N CA NA L
CA NA L
MA RT IN
LU TH ER
ST
ST Z LV E GA S
KIN G
JR
BL VD
NA DE
AV E
LA
UR SU LIN ES
ES P
US 9
AV E
BR OA D 0B
N
AV E N LL TO S
OR LE AN S AV E
C S
0 LA IB OR NE
JE S ST D BR OA
FO
PA L
AIRL
E E AV VILL NASH
T ZS AL VE SG
GENT
ILLY BLV D PO Y
DR AS
ST
N
ST IR O M HO W AR D
N
AVE
LOYO
AV E
ST GA LV EZ
LA AV E
K AR YP CIT
ST
IB AV E
ES P
LA
NA DE
AV E
N CLAIBORNE
PL SH AN E M C
ST
SIM
AV E LIV AR
E
BO
AV NE OR LAIB OS AN ED
ON GT HIN
ON
S WA
DR YA DE S
BA S
IN
ST AVE
ST PA RT
CL A N S
AVE
±
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
0
N
NT OW
HISTORIC DISTRICTS & LANDMARKS
UP TO W
DO W
Only those historic districts that overlay the Biosciences District are shown on this map.
The New Orleans Historic District Landmarks Commission has jurisdiction over ten local historic districts, and many individually nominated and designated landmarks in all areas of the City that are outside of the boundaries of the Central Business District.
Notes: HDLC = Historic District Landmark Commission
Water
Parks
National Register/City HDLC
National Register
City HDLC
Historic Landmarks
Mid City Historic District
Canal Street Historic District
HDLC Canal Street District
Study Area
LEGEND
E
RIE RD METAI
N
RA M
TCHOUPITOULAS ST
AV E OR NE ST
EL K PL RA MP AR T AVE EFE O'KE
SC
ST CH ARLE S
L TO
ON
ST CAMP
E AV
S CK JA
ZINE ST MAGA
ST DE CA TU R T ETE RS S NP
SID KE LA
BLVD ON GT HIN
E
S WA
ID
AIN D UR
RS
ARTR TCH PON
AVE
VE
YO BA
E AV RD NA ER
RI
A P TUREAUD
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 11
B ST
CONVENTION CENTER BLVD
E AV
E AV
T
NAPOLEON AVE
LE
AU
DR
ST
BR OA DW AY
NT AIN EB
M
STAT E ST
ET TO ST
INE HW Y
DR EX EL DR
LE
AV E RO LL TO N AR
AU DR
SB
A RO
D
ST
I-1 0
NV IL
TU LA
ST
LE ST
S
EA RH AR TB
E AV
KIN G
NE OR AIB
LU TH ER
CL
MA RT IN
NE AV E
BA NK S
BIE
W Y PK DA VIS F JE F N
CA RR O ST
Y PK W DA VIS FF
C S
FO NT AIN EB
Y PK W EF FD AV IS SJ
JR
BL VD
LV D
ST D BR OA S
N CA NA L
CA NA L
MA RT IN
LU TH ER
ST
ST Z LV E GA S
KIN
G
JR
BL VD
NA DE
AV E
LA
UR SU LIN ES
ES P
US 9
AV E
BR OA D 0B
N
AV E N LL TO S
OR LE AN S AV E
C S
0 LA IB OR NE
JE S ST D BR OA
FO
PA L
AIRL
E E AV VILL NASH
T ZS AL VE SG
GENT
ILLY BLV D PO Y
DR AS
ST
N
ST IR O M HO W AR D
N
AVE
LOYO
AV E
ST GA LV EZ
LA AV E
K AR YP CIT
ST
IB AV E
ES P
LA
NA DE
AV E
N CLAIBORNE
PL SH AN E M C
ST
SIM
AV E LIV AR
E
BO
AV NE OR LAIB OS AN ED
ON GT HIN
ON
S WA
DR YA DE S
BA S
IN
ST AVE
ST PA RT
CL A N S
AVE
UP TO W
N
DO W
NT OW
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
±
0
Parks
Water
Building Footprint
Roadhome
Blighted Property (Pre-Katrina)
Blighted Property (NORA)
Blighted Property (Chapter 28)
Study Area
BLIGHTED AND ROADHOME PROPERTIES
Legend
E
RIE RD METAI
N
RA M
TCHOUPITOULAS ST
AV E OR NE ST
EL K PL RA MP AR T AVE EFE O'KE
SC
ST CH ARLE S
L TO
ON
ST CAMP
E AV
S CK JA
ZINE ST MAGA
ST DE CA TU R T ETE RS S NP
SID KE
BLVD ON GT HIN
LA
S WA
E
RD
ID
AIN ARTR TCH PON U
RS
YO BA
VE
AVE
RI
A P TUREAUD E AV RD NA ER
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 12
B ST
CONVENTION CENTER BLVD
E AV
E AV
T
NAPOLEON AVE
FO
N
TA IN
EB
LE
AU
D
R
PA L M ET TO ST
AIRL INE HW Y
DR EX EL DR
FO NT A IN
S EB LE AU DR
AV E N LL TO O R AR C
NA ST
SB
RO
AD
ST
AV E N IMPERIAL CLEANERS
L
LOUISIANA COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY LIMITED
I-1 0
CA
N
O R AR C
VE KA
Y PK W
TU LA
IL
NE
ST
LE
AV E
KS
NV
BA N
BIE ST
ER
G
E AV
K IN
E RN
TH
EA R HA RT
JR
BL VD
DIXON TOMATO
FORMER GLAZIER LIQUOR WAREHOUSE
BL VD
NA L ST
GRAINGER
UR LIN ES
RT
IN
LU
TH
ER
K IN
G
JR
BL VD
LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER
MA
NA DE
AV E
LA AV E
OR LE AN S AV E
US
90
B
D ILLY BLV
TULANE UNIVERSITY HOSPIAL/CLINIC
MEDICAL CENTER OF LA AT NEW ORLEANS
PO Y
DR
AS
ST
W
AR
D
BROWN'S DAIRY
HO
EYE EAR NOSE & THROAT HOSPITAL
WETMORE CLINIC
GE NT DAVID DRIVE INCINERATOR (TRASH/RECYCLING)
MEDICAL CTR OF NEW ORLEANS
SU
ES P
MEDICAL CENTER OF LA AT NEW ORLEANS
DIXIE BREWING CO INC
CA
STRIP EASE OF NEW ORLEANS
OLD FALSTAFF BREWERY
LINDY BOGGS MEDICAL CENTER
O AIB
LU
CL
TIN
S
MA R
1200 S BROAD STREET
DA V IS FF JE
Y W PK DA V IS FF JE N
AR YP
THOMPSON-HAYWARD CHEMICAL COMPANY
STRIP EASE OF NEW ORLEANS INC
ST
AY
W
AD
BR O
Y PK W DA V IS FF JE S
ST AD O BR S
D OA BR N
LL TO B S
ST Z AL VE
G S
S
ST D RO A
C
O IR M N
CIT
E E AV VILL NA SH
T ZS LV E GA S
AV E
2032 LAPEYROUSE ST
ENDATA INC
FRANKLIN PRINTING CO INC
JULIAN CLEANERS
SEWERAGE & WATER BOARD OF NEW ORLEANS EAST BANK
MARTIN GREATER FILM GRAPHICS INC
LA
NA
DE
LYKES BLDG
ES P
AV E
AVE N CLAIBORNE
835 CONVENTION CNTR BLVD
PIER 2 JULIA ST
UP TO W
N
DO W
NT OW
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
EPA REPORTING FACILITIES
±
0
Parks
Water
TRI (Toxic Release)
RCRA (Haz Mat)
Brownfield
Study Area
LEGEND
E
RD
LOYO
S
0 AV E E RN LA IB O
G N
ST AL VE Z LA AV E
SID
RIE ME TAI
ST STAT E
ST
AV E NE OR A IB
ST
AV E EF E O'KE
IN BA S
ST PA RT M
CL N
PL EL K
T PA R RA M S
ST
N
RA
TCHOUPITO ULAS ST
PL E AN SH M C
ST SIM
AV E LIV AR
ON
BO
GT
ON
AN HIN
ES
AS W
D
BLVD CONVENTION CENTER
RY AD
ST
ST E S AV
AV E ED
N
ARLE
NE
SO ST CH
OR LAIB
ST
SC
CK
CA MP
L TO
ZINE
E AV JA
MA GA
ST R CA TU DE
ST RS ET E
ON
NP
GT
KE
BLVD
HIN
LA
AIN
S WA
E
ARTR AVE
ID
TCH
RD
E AV
RS
PO N
U
RD
VE
YO BA
NA
RI
A P TURE AUD
ER
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 13
B ST
E AV
E AV
T OS
NAPO LEON AVE
FO
NT AIN EB
LE
AU
DR
PA L M ET TO
Broad Place Park
Cuccia-Byrnes Playground
Larry Gilbert Stadium
ST
BR OA DW AY
ST
INE HW Y
EL DR
Gert-Town Pool
DR EX
Norwood Thompson Playground
AIRL
St. Patrick Playground
Cadiz Park
FO NT AIN EB LE AU
AV E
DR
SB
A RO
D
ST
I-1 0
CA RR O
AV E N Comiskey Playground
ST
N CA NA L
Broadmoor Community Center
Little General Taylor Park
Broadmoor Playspot
RO LL TO N AR C S
Gravier Park
Jefferson Davis Playspot
NV IL
NE AV E
ST
LE ST
S
C
O IB LA
EA RH AR TB
E AV
KIN G
E RN
LU TH ER
Taylor Playground
MA RT IN
Rosenwald Center Playground
TU LA
BA NK S
BIE
JR
BL VD
LV D
Easton Park Playground
Jack Bartlett Park
Moss Place
W Y PK DA VIS F JE F N
N. Alexander Golden Age Center
Y PK W DA VIS FF JE
Little Flower Playground
STAT E ST
Y PK W EF FD AV IS SJ
ST D BR OA S
CA NA L
LU TH ER
KIN G
Keller Community Center
MA RT IN
LA
N
UR SU LIN ES
JR
BL VD
E
AV E
0B
DeSoto Park
AN S AV E
Carondelet/Canal Park
OR LE
ILLY BLV D GENT
Lemann Playground 1
Cancer Survivors Park
ST
Duncan Plaza
DR AS
Gayarre Park
Kruttschnett Place
Union Passenger Terminal Plaza
PO Y
Stallings Gentilly Playground
Capdeville Place
Martin Luther King Jr. Walk
US 9
AV E
ADPlace LePage
ES P
Pershing Park/Billy Goat Park
ST
Kennedy Place
Alcee Fortier Park
BR OA D N
LL TO S
ST Z LV E GA S
S ST
D
BR OA
C S
0 LA IB OR NE
N
IR O M N
AVE
E E AV VILL NASH
T ZS AL VE SG
HO W AR D
AV E Lemann Playground 2
Elks Place
Simon Bolivar Plaza
AV E
Lee Circle
Lafayette Square
Louis Armstrong Park
Treme Center
Lewis Playground
Edison Place
LA
NA DE
St. Mary's Park
Piazza D'Italia
ES P
AV E
Hunter's Field Playground
N CLAIBORNE
Woldenburg Park
British Plaza
Bienville Place
Washington Artillery
Jackson Square
Cabrini Playspot
AVE
UP TO W
N
DO W
NT OW
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
EXISTING CONDITIONS BASE
Âą
0
Parks
Water
Railroad
Other Buildings
Biosciences District Buildings
Study Area
LEGEND
E
K AR YP CIT
LOYO
AV E
ST GA LV EZ
LA AV E
IB CL A
ST AVE EFE O'KE
BA S
IN
ST AVE
PL SH AN E M C
ST
SIM
ZINE ST
ST PA RT
OR NE ST
N
RA M
TCHOUPITOULAS ST
N EL K PL RA MP AR T S
SID KE LA
RIE RD METAI
AV E LIV AR BO
E
ST
AV NE OR LAIB OS AN ED
ON GT HIN
ON
S WA
DR YA DE S
ST
SC
ST CH ARLE S
L TO
ON
CAMP
E AV
S CK JA
MAGA
ST DE CA TU R
T ETE RS S NP
E
BLVD ON GT HIN
ID
S WA
RS
AIN D UR
VE
YO BA
E AV RD NA ER
RI
ARTR TCH PON
AVE
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 14
A P TUREAUD B ST
CONVENTION CENTER BLVD
E AV
E AV
T
NAPOLEON AVE
UP TO W
LA
KE
SID
E
N ID
E
N
RS
NT OW
VE
DO W
RI
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 15
Du bli
St
re S
n
t
Da nt e
Jo lie tS t
AU
M on Le on id
ro e
as
Ea gle
St
St
St
St
nS t
ST on
M on
ve S t
He we sS
St
St
t
ro e
Ha m
St
ilt o
n
St
St
St
r St
S Prieur St
S Derbigny St
S Miro St
z St
S Prieu
S Galve
St
eblav e St
St
York St
nna
t
C
AR
St
RO LL TO N
He n
S
Ale
ne ss ey
So lo m
t
S Prieur St
SB
S
A RO D
I-1 0
S
on
xa nd
S
Oly m
S er St
St P
pia
M ur
at ric
Be rn
kS
ad
ott e
St
N
t
St
N
at St
N
N
St
N St
Oly m
Mu ra t
N S
Co
S rte zS
Cli oS t
Tu rn
St
lvd
S
S
Sc ott
t
ac hu
s
Pie rc e
N
St
D
St
St
N
Pie
rc e
av id
So lo
An
Be rn
St P
pia
N
CA RR O
on
LL TO
de r
S h Jo
S rb De
St
S
ign
CL E RN
JR
w illo W
E AV
G
l xP Re
KIN
St
t
St
uth
S Ro
lvd
on
y
te
St
St
St
Dr
rts be on e er Fr
St
St
t tS
t
Av e
To u
Mystery St
BL VD
St
St
US 9 0B
Oa k
t
St
t
ow l
t
Dr
Av e
ve
Du m
St
Ju lia S
Th ali aS
Sug ar B
10
La fitt e
Orchid
t
ain e St
De
Bell St
ge S t
OR LEO ArNle San AVs EA
St
St
Cre te S
Lep a
§ ¦ ¨
Pl
Bellec hasse
so S
upre
AV E
nAe VsE Av e
sic ho re Fe St lic ity St
Te rp
t
NG ayo
ND
NA DE
ST
LA
UR SU ULr sINu EliS
Er ato
us eS
Ib er vil le
lo
St
Ma M rti AR nL T IN uth L er UTH K inER g BKIN lvdG J R
ye tte
t
ST
Pe rdid oS
St
yr aS
CA NA L
St
Bie nv ille
ou is
t
St
rS
nn
t
Soto
Er ato
ST
t
St
Ho wa rd
St
DR AS
ou is
PO Y
St L
Av e
ti
St
Av eH H
N
St
N
Ba rra ck s
Or lea ns
St
Perd ido S
GENT
Soto
To n
ST
ST
N
St
M iro
Ro ch eb la ve
e
St
N
Pa ul
D
or ge no
is
Ro us
St
St
M
ILLY BLV D
or ph
se lin
y
St
stri St
Bie nv ille
St
St
St Jo St
us eS
t
t
S Diam ond St Higg ins St
seph
lo
Lafaye tte St
St
To u
St An n Or St lea ns Av e St Pe te rS
AV E
St
E
y St
is LA ra a M NAD
ES P
N Derbign
St
chez
Andr ew
Nat
Da ba die Pr ie
an
St
Old
m
St
m
St
Ro
y
Ro
Au br
N
an
Old
N Rocheblave
Poey farre St
N Mae
St
St
re c
St
S Mae stri Pl Girod St
on
Ke rle
s
St
bu
ag a
St
St
Co lu m
St
Uni on
Ct
St
Co mm
Pl
Ba sin
nn
Lafaye tte St
y sit er iv Un
t
St
St A
St
se
y
On z
Au br
Da ba die
La pe yr ou
ho lls
rS
rN ic
Rd
St Pe te
Dr
La ha rp e
Ca llio pe Ca St llio Cli pe oS St t
IR O
ne Mil
OWo AwRa Drd AVA Ev
Julia
M
Go ve rn o
St
g
St
De
BR OA D
NW hite
ES P
Z
ns on
on Pl
Bungalow Ct Allard Blvd
Piche loup Pl
Taft Pl Wilson Dr Ha rd in Mo ss
Av e
St
Vignaud St
Be ll S
St Pe te
La fa
Pa lm
Av e
sS t
on
St
St A
St L
Gra vie r
ing B
t
er K
Av e
St Po yd ra
St
Cle ve lan d
Th ali aS
ar d
Ma rti nL
Ho w
Ba nk s
Ju lia
St ra Cla
BL VD
Th al ia
Tha lia S
LV D
sS t
St
EA RH AR TB
Po yd ra
Ib er vil le
t n r S le L ieu o Pr min Se
O AIB
S
t
LU TH ER
t yS
MA RT IN
ST
Th alia S
ST
LE
NE AV E
on ns
TU LA
NV IL
BA NK S
BIE
Re nd
Bell St
o
St Ida St
Olga St
Roosevelt Pl
St
t
Sa lc ed
St Solom
rc e
t
on
zS
N N
St
N GA LV E
Jo h
St
Maurepas St
an
or n
eA ve
ur St
St
St
St
so n
St
Canal St
e
W ilk in
ain
ic ho lls St
AVE
Pe M re ad A is Pir nto on ate in St A l e Al
Du m
rN
Av e
St Ph ilip
Ur su lin es
St
Go ve rn o
Ba rra ck s
Urquhart St
St
N Villere St
N Robertson
N CLAIBORNE
N Derbigny St
N Roman St
N Prieur St
N Tonti St
n Center Blvd
±
1,000
N DO W NT OW
ID
E
N
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
STREET NETWORK
UP TO W
Local Roads
Major Roads
US Highways
Ramp
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
0
Type
Freeway
Streets
Parks
CLASS
Water
Study Area
Interstate / Hwy
Legend
E
Ponce De Leon St
m
St
Cla ib
St
SID
Grand Route St John
Ro
ny
St
St
St
Da vid N
Pie
iS
Re nd
Mos s St
N
Lo pe
St
Ha ga n
St
N
pr e
Elaine Pl
Du
St
N
N
De rb ig
St
Vil le re
St
Dr
e
St
ad o
Sa lc ed o
Ga yo so N
W hit
Ga yo so
St
St
e
De lg
St
ny
N
be rts on
Tr em
th
ad ot
at ric k
St
St
Ale xa n
He nn es se y m
St
St
AV E
N
Co nt
Tha lia St Th alia St
t ti S
t oS Mir
t
n To
Pe rdid oS
St
d
Er ato
un
Av e
aro
Ho wa rd
Te le m
St
ST
rk
CA NA L
Cla
S Je ffe JJEe r FffFe r
so n Da vis DPa Pk KvW isY wy Pk wy
DsA oVn IS
St
t
on
St
Re nd
pe zS t
ou is
igny S Derb
ST
St
Ge no is
St
S
Lo
St L
S S
N
pr e
N
oc he bla ve
us eS
ss
S
alc ed o
St
St
Du
N
Pl
D
St
R
St
t
0
N
N er big
t
G
ay os o
Ja ne BR OA
ST
no is
N
ti
St
Ga lv ez S
St
St
St
D
IB
lau d
PL
rS
D
ns on
To n
M iro
N Jo h
Pr ie ur
an
N
CL A
AV E
Ro
N St C ST
lo
m
Cla ib
N
RA M
PA RT
eA ve
SH AN E
St Pe te
Th er ali K aS Ma ing t rti B lv nL d uth er Ev K in eS gB t
uth
Dix on
Ma rti nL
E
St
S Roman St
ve St
d lce Sa t oS
t
St
eS
St
hr os ine
Ca llio p
Eu p
Dix on
/a irl in e
Gra vie r
C ar ro llt on
S Ov er pa
SS S
S
St
or ge
St
Ro
St
N
or ne
Av e
St
OR NE
St
N
St
N
St
To u
hit e
N
tS t
Je ff
Da vis
ec ou r
s St S Dorgenoi
AV E
He m
S Rochebla
t
t
D
St
S Tonti St
DR
S Johnson
AU
sle yA ve
t
Elb a
Ed en S
Ev eS t
Th ali aS
S Miro St
LE
t
Wa lm
eS
Cli oS t
Ca llio p
FO NT AIN EB
S
St
St
Da rt S
Thal ia
Ct
r
Ull oa
Grape St
S Tonti
t
h
Hewe s St
er S
Mc Ke
an d
St
Hig
Dr ex el D
Tula ne A ve
rt St
Dr
S S
DR
O liv e
EL
S Roch
O le
Ed in
Ct
St
St
bu Co rg oli dg h S t e Ct
us DR EX
Dix on
St
n
Pe ac h
Du bli
Y
O rp he
et to
Co la pis sa
ti S t
Pl
Pa lm
oc he bla
M ar s
SSTt
SM iro St
St
tTto O
St
EeT
SR
sh ey
lm M
St INE HW
Sh o
S
or tez S
sS
Ho lly gr ov e
Ea gle
Dix on
eli tz
St
PPA aL
nso
rie ur
SJ oh
t
t
ne
St
St
AIRL
St
St
ch u
St
Ct
Fe rn
in
St
Ba ud
er lin e
ST ele ma is
Fe rn
n
St ro
Fo r
er S
ile S
SP
Mo b
DR
St
an d
Ca m
br on
Da nt e
Du bli
Lo w
S
Br oa dw ay S SCt
en o
St
t
SG
lar k
St
Y
W
St
or tS t
St
eS
on
S
Al
S
ve
ti
N Sc ot N t T S e t le m ac N hu Co N s rte Ge St zS no t is St N Cla rk St N N Ge Je N no ffe Je is Nf r f s J e St on Ers FFo Da nDA DVa vis ISv Pk is PK wy PWk Yw y
St
Av e
ch eb la
St
et te
St
PK W
Re nd
oa d
Ro
To n
t
Ga lv e
Pe ar
St
St
O le
Sh
Bu rd
Pin
Ge no is
SC
Br
N
S
N
N
n
St
Pk wy EF FD AV IS
S
t
re St
t
St
S
ST
N
N
St
10
rk
ay os oS
W
ve S
M iro
Z
zS t Ga lv e
zS t
St
N
ny
§ ¦ ¨
t
S
Cla
Da vis
SJ
Lo pe zS t SL alc op ed ez oS St t
SS
ch eb la
ti
S
G
AL VE
Jo h
St
et te
or tS t
Fe rn ay S
S
Pk wy
SJ eff er so n
S
G
St
t
SG
S
Ro
To n
St
S S S
S
Pr ie ur
De r
big
AV
De rb ig
ny
St
Vil le re
He at o
er so n
Da vis
St
S
ay os oS
hit eS t
St
St
S
St
C
LA IB OR NE
e
Last St Q uin ce St
n
St
Fig
xt
LE
Mc alis ter E
la
Hic ko ry St
Pa no
Pl
Sy ca mo
Ne ro n
St
NT AIN EB
Ne ls on
FO
t
St
Be lfa st S
Fe rn
Bu rd
bo
rg h
St
on
t
W
Bertr and St
ny
man
N
S S
bu
Ad Lo a we rli ms ne S St t Pin e
ST
St
Sh
Au du
St
Co lle g
eC t
Au du b on St Au du Blo bo omin nC gdal t eC t
enne s Pl
e Pl
Re nd
SS
alc ed oS
up re St
ig
S Ro
S De rbigny St
lia St
Freret
Ro
Tr em
Cr oz at
iS
D
hit eS t
S
Du p
S
St
S
De rb
ns on
S
ium
Boliv ar St
Dr
Clar a St
Mag no
t
z
St
DW AY
S
pe zS t
SW
S
BRS OB AD ro SaTd
hit eS t
Br oa dA ve
S
S
S
St
Sta d
lia Ave
St
ras Pl
Pa lm
ayB SRtO A
n
bo
Br oa dw
Ve rsa ille sB lvd
Vi nc Vendom
o
t
Jo h
ns on
t
S
W
ouge
a Po yd
BB ASas INin
St
N
Bu rg
un dy
M ar ks
bo
St
Au du
nB lvd
Pl
nS t
Br oa dw
Au du
St
rd
bo
Blv d
ille sB lvd
un
tree t Dr
Pan am aC t State Stree t Dr
hv VIill LLeEA AV veE
ay os oS
S
S
ma nS
ne Av e
Bertr and St
t
Le R
St
Pl az
N
N
St
hin e
St
be rts on
St
EL Pl K PL RA MP AR T
ST
bo n
t
Co nt
er ty
La Sall eS
ras
AVE
St E S Ro be rts La Sa on lle St S Vil S t le re S Li bert St y St N Vil S ler Lib eS er Ma S t ty Sa ra St ra is to St Tr em e St Cr oz Ba at sin St
Ex ch a
Ro ya lS St
DDE eCc AaTt UuRr SSt T
T
AVE
Lib
Ja ne
SM S iro Mir S S Ga t o lve St z SS G t ASLVG EaZlv SeTz St
SR o
laib or
St
Cla ra St
oli aS
St
La Sa lle St
St S
LIV
Poyd
LOYO LA
St
Penn St
Carro ll St
STSt
Da up
Bo ur
Pl
t
t
Ed in
on
Ca lho
State S
Nas NA SH
SC
Wil low
Ma gn
tS t
Ma gno
Fr ere t ibe rty
BO
Blv d
St
elet St
E
St
ga
Elk
S
ST
Picayu ne
Constan ce St
Pl
Ch ar tre s
nS
ETE RS S
K AR YP
Fr ere
SL
SIM
ON
SS AR AV a ra E tog aS t S R am pa Or rt eth St aC DaRs YtlAe DH ESa le STy
Dr ya de s
St
S Ra mpart
O'Ok KEee EFfe E AV AvEe
Caro nd CHAR LES AV
Chur ch
Ca CAm MP p St
Mag MA GA az ZIN inEe ST St
ng e
St
Cli nto
M C
St
10 CIT
e
nce St
Do rs ie re
s St
t St
§ ¦ ¨
t
vE AAV
Tchoupito TCHOUPITO ulasST ULAS St
Pr itc ha
Au du
Au du b
Be nW ein er Dr St
un
Ve rsa
Nas hvill e Ave
St
Octavia St
oS da n Tole Nn
ne
SJ eff
SL
t
to O inGgT sHhIN
Commerce St
NP eter
NP
Cla yS ron
Pe ac Dix h Pa St on lm St Pa ett lm o S et t to St Pa O ve lme rp t as to S s t
Ca lho
Ct
Joseph
Jeffe rson Ave
Upperline St
SG
Ave leonAVE
NF
RIE RD METAI
Pa lm
er Av e
SST taAT teES t ST
E
Mel odia
AV NE OR LAIB
Robert St
SC
Cadiz St LEON Napo NAPO
oS da n Tole
St
AaS WW
Ct
Ba ro n
l
Jena St
Napoleon Ave
hing St General Pers
kwy ve P O AN na A isia LE D TO Lou t ise S ha Delac ylor St ral Ta Gene Milan St ST
4th
t
us
t
St
e Av
St
ST
P ad
dS 3r
m Mo
4t
ilip Ph
n so ck Ja
w re
S Peters St
E AV
ve nA
St
St
t hS
dS 3r
E AV
in
nd
Cons ta
Bro
ON GT HIN
gto shin Wa
o Cli
d 2n
t tS 1s
CK JA
N SO
ph se Jo
A St St e
Fulton St
ain hartr
t
S WA
Ch ar tre s
St
KE
tc Pon
Blvd S lia Ju
ll Be
Conventio ON CENTER BLVD CONVENTI
Port Of No Pl
LA
RD
Rd
Rd
VE DA AR RN
St Anthony St
RS
U
u yo Ba
u yo Ba BE ST
Anne tte St
St Anthony St
VE
Dr
ntcTR PHoAR TC PON
lvd
Ave udAVE
St
Pauger St
RI
nd kla Oa
B BLnVD trai AIN har
YO BA
Republic St
Havana St
AUD Turea AAPPTURE
New Orleans
Allen St
Annette St
St Anthony St
Feet 2,000
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 16
LE AU
Å ¬ (
TA IN EB
Å ¬ (
FO N
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
DR
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
PA L
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
M ST
Å ( ¬
ET Å (TO ¬
Å ¬ (
AIRL HWY
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
IN E
Å ( ¬
 (
DR EX EL
E
ME
ST
DW AY
BR OA
 (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
(
DR
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
CA RR S
FO NT AIN EB
(
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
LE AU DR
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
( ¬ Å
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
AD RO S BÅ ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
ST
CA
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
( ¬ Å
N Ŭ ¬ ( Å AL S ( T Ŭ ( ¬ Å ( Ŭ ( ¬ Å (
I-1 0
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
N
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å ( Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
LE
BA NK S
Å ( ¬
E
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
ST
S
IB
Å (¬ ¬ Å ( Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ( ¬
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
EA RH AR T Å BLVD ( ¬
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
E AV
KIN G
E Å (N OR¬
ER
TH Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å (Å ¬ ( ¬
LU
Å ¬ (
A CL
MA RT IN
Å ( NE AV ¬
ST
ÅÅ ¬ ( ( ¬
IL
Å ( ¬ NV
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
TU LA
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
BIE
JR
BL V ÅD ( ¬
E AV
Å ( ¬
Ŭ ¬ ( Å ( Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Ŭ ¬ ( Å ( Ŭ ¬ ( Å ( Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å ( Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
CA NA LS
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
T
MA RT IN WA
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
TH ER
Å ¬ (
LU
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
KIN G
Å ( ¬
JR
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
BL VD
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
UR SU LIN ES
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
AV E
AD E
Å LA ¬ ( N
ES P AV E
US 90
B
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
AN S
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
OR LE
Ŭ ¬ ( Å ( Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
AV E
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
PO Y
Å ¬ ( Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
ST
Å ( ¬
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
DR AS
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ( ¬
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
HO W AR D
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Ŭ ( Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ( Ŭ ¬ ( Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
AV E
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
(¬Å Å ¬ (
ON GT IN SH
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
D
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ¬ (
Ŭ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
STAT E ST
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ ( E AV NASH VILL
O Å LLT ¬ (
O
N
AV E
Å ( ¬ Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
CA RR O LL TO Å ( ¬ OS AN ED
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ WY PK AV IS EF FD SJ
 (
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
ÅÅ ¬ ( Å ( (¬ ¬
Å ¬ (
ÅÅ ¬ ( ( ¬
LA
Å ¬ (
ES P
Å AVE ¬ (
NA DE
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
NAPOLEON AVE
Å ¬ (
 (
Å ¬ (
N
AV E J S ST
W Y PK DA VIS
Å ¬ (
Y W PK
Å ( ¬ JE FF N
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
EF F
Å ¬ (
AD S Å BRO ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
 (
Å ¬ (
DA VIS
Å ¬ ( AL VE ZS T SG
ST BR OA D S
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
BR O N
T A Å DS ¬ (
Å ¬ (
VE KA PAR
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( ST LV EZ GA S
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( E
N
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
ÅY ( IT¬ Å ( C ¬
S
Å ¬ (
Å AV ¬ ( BO LIV AR
Å ¬ (
GENTILL Y BLV
Å ¬ (
0
Å E AV ¬ (
E
Å ¬ ( CL Å ( AIB¬ OR N
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
N CLAIBORNE
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
AVE
Å ( ¬
SIM
Å ( ¬
ON
L TO
ON
Å ¬ (
S CK JA
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
ST
EZ
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
DR YA DE S
G
Å ALV ¬ (
N
Å ¬ (
ST
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ ( Å LOYOLA AV ¬ ( Å ( ¬ ÅE Ŭ ( ( ¬
ŠŬ ( ¬ ( Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
( ¬ Å (Å ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬ Ŭ ¬ ( Å (
Å ¬ ( ST IR O M
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
O'KE EFE
Å ¬ (
( ¬ AV Å E NE CL¬ ÅA ( IB OR
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
AVE
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
E E AV RN
Å ¬ ( Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
O LAIB SC Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ ÅELK ¬ (
ST
N
Å ( PL¬ Å ( ¬
RA M
PA RT
Å ¬ (
S
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ( ¬
PL SH AN E
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ( ¬ ÅBA ¬ ( Å SIN ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ ( ST
Å ¬ (
E
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ ( CH AR LES AV
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ ( ST
Å ¬ ( CAMP ST
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
±
Parks
Water
1,000
N
Feet 2,000 DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
N
NT OW
TRANSIT
UP TO W
DO W
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
0
Streetcar Emergency Evacuation Routes
Bus Routes - 2009 RTA
Proposed Streetcar Line
Study Area
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Legend
E
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
ST RA MP AR T N
Å ¬ (
ST DE CA TU R
T NP ET E RS S
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
MAGA ZINE ST
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
TCHOUPITOULAS ST
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
SID
RD TAIRIE
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
M C
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Ŭ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( Ŭ ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ( Ŭ ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ Å ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ( Ŭ ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ¬ Å ( Å( ¬ (
Å ( Å ¬ ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
 (
Å ( ¬ Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ¬ Å ( Å( ¬ ( Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ ¬ Å ( Å( ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ ¬ Å ( Å( ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ ( E AV ON GT HIN
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
CONVENTION CENTER BLVD
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬ S WA
KE
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
LA
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ ( Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ ¬ Å( ¬ ( Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
 (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
 (
Å ¬ ( Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
 (
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ ( Å ¬ Å ( ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
BLVD AIN RD
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ Å ( ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ Å ( ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
E
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ Å Å( ¬ ¬ (
ID
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
U YO BA
Å Å ( ¬ ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
RS
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ Å ( ( ¬ Å ¬ ( Å ( ¬
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ Å ( ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ¬ ( Å ( Å ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( E AV RD NA ER
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ B ST
Å ¬ Å( ( ¬
VE
Å ( ¬ Å ¬ (
Å ¬ ( Å ( ¬
RI
Å ¬ (
AVE
Å ( ¬ Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
A P TUREAUD
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ ( Å ( ¬
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 17
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ( ARTR ¬ TCH PON Å ( ¬ Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬ Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ ( Å ¬ (
E AV
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬ T
Å ( ¬
Å ( ¬
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
NT AIN EB
LE
AU
DR
ST
BR OA DW AY
FO
PA L M
STAT E ST
ET TO ST
AIRL INE HW Y
¬ (Å
EL
¬ (Å
DR EX
¬ (Å
DR
¬ Å ( ¬ Å ( ¬ Å ( ¬ Å ( ¬ Å (
LE
¬ Å (
AU DR
¬ Å ( ¬ Å ( ¬ Å ( ¬ Å ( ¬ Å (
SB
¬ Å (
A RO
D
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
ST
CA
N ¬( Å ( ¬ AL S Å T ¬( Å ( ¬ Å ¬( Å ( ¬ Å
I-1 0
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
CA RR O N
¬ Å (
AV E RO LL TO N AR C S
FO NT AIN EB
¬ Å (
Y PK W EF FD AV IS SJ
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
N
AV E
¬( Å ( ¬ Å ¬( Å ( ¬ Å ¬( Å ( ¬ Å
NV LE
Å ¬ (Å ¬ (
ST
S
¬( Å ( ¬ Å ¬( Å ( ¬ Å ¬( Å ( ¬ Å
EA RH AR TB
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
E AV
KIN G
NE OR AIB
LU TH ER
CL
MA RT IN
NE AV E
ST
¬Å Å ( ¬ (
IL
BA NK S
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
BIE
TU LA
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
Y PK W DA VIS
W Y PK DA VIS F JE F N
LL TO S
JR
BL VD
LV D
¬( Å ( ¬ Å ¬( Å ( ¬ Å ¬( Å ( ¬ Å
¬( Å ( ¬ Å ¬( Å ( ¬ Å
ST D BR OA S
¬( Å ( ¬ Å ¬( Å ( ¬ Å ¬( Å ( ¬ Å
CA NA L
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
MA RT IN
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
LU TH ER
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
ST
KIN G
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
JR
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
BL VD
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
NA DE
US 9
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
AV E
LA
UR SU LIN ES
ES P AV E
ST 0B
¬( Å ( ¬ Å ¬( Å ( ¬ Å
BR OA D N
¬ (Å
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
OR LE
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
AN S
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
AV E
AV E
JE S ST D BR OA
ST Z LV E GA S
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
ILLY BLV D GENT
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
DR AS
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
PO Y
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
ST
N
¬ (Å
E E AV VILL NASH
T ZS AL VE SG
C S
0 LA IB OR NE
AV E
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
HO W AR D
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
IR O M N
AVE
LOYO
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
AV E
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
AV E
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
¬( Å ( ¬ Å
¬Å Å ( ¬ (
Å ¬ (( ¬ Å
LA
Å ¬ (
ES P
NA DE
AV E
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
N CLAIBORNE
¬ Å (
¬ Å (
AVE
¬ Å (
K AR YP CIT
ST
ST GA LV EZ
LA AV E
ST AVE EFE O'KE
IB CL A N
OR NE ST
EL K PL RA MP AR T S
IN BA S
ST PA RT
FF S WA
Å ¬ (
¬ Å (
ON GT HIN
¬ Å (
¬ Å (
SIM
OS AN ED
Å ¬ (
LIV AR
L TO
ON
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
BO
S CK JA
¬ Å (
¬ Å (
ON
ZINE ST
ST
¬ Å (
Å ¬ (
DR YA DE S
E
¬ Å ( AVE
AV NE OR LAIB
ST
SC
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
CAMP
E AV
Å ¬ ( ST CH ARLE S
Å ¬ (
¬ Å (
MAGA
N
RA M
TCHOUPITOULAS ST
ST DE CA TU R T ETE RS S NP
PL SH AN E M C
¬ Å (
¬ Å (
¬ Å ( Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
¬ Å ( ¬ Å (
¬ Å (
¬ Å (
¬ Å ( ¬ Å (
¬ Å ( ¬ Å (
BLVD ON GT HIN
Å ¬ (
S WA
Å ¬ (
¬ Å (
¬ Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
¬ Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
¬ Å (
¬ Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
¬ Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
¬ Å (
¬ Å (
¬ Å (
¬ (Å ¬ Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
¬ (Å
¬ Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ¬ (
¬ (Å Å ¬ (
¬ Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
¬ Å (
¬ Å (
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
¬ Å (
¬ Å (
¬ Å (
Å ¬ (
±
Parks
Water
N
1,000
Feet 2,000 DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
N
NT OW
BIKEWAYS
UP TO W
DO W
Shared Use Trails - 2010 MP
Bike Routes - 2010 MP
CIP_2009_Budgeted_Bikeways
Streetcar
Study Area
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
0
Å ¬ (
Legend
Å ¬ (
E
¬ Å (
SID
Å ( ¬
¬ Å ( ¬ Å (
¬ Å (
NAPOLEON
Å ¬ (
Å ( ¬
¬ Å ( Å ¬ (
¬ Å (
Å ¬ (
E AV
E AV
T
AVE
¬ Å (
¬ Å (
Å ( ¬
KE
Å ( ¬
LA
RD
E
AIN U
ID
YO BA
¬ Å (
RS
ARTR TCH PON
AVE
¬ Å (
VE
A P TUREAUD E AV RD NA ER
¬ Å (
RI
B ST
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 18
RIE RD METAI
¬ Å (
CONVENTION CENTER BLVD
¬ Å (
¬ Å (
NT AIN EB
LE
AU
DR
M ET TO ST
INE HW Y
DR EX EL DR
District 3 Uptown and Carrollton
PA L
STAT E ST
LE
AV E RO LL TO N AR
AU DR
SB
A RO
D
ST
I-1 0
CA RR O
ST
NV IL
TU LA
ST
LE ST
S
EA RH AR TB
NE OR AIB
JR
BL VD
CA NA L
MA RT IN
LU TH ER
ST
KIN G
JR
BL VD
UR SU LIN ES
District 2 Central City - Garden District E AV
KIN G
LV D
District 4 Mid-City
LU TH ER
CL
MA RT IN
NE AV E
BA NK S
BIE
W Y PK DA VIS F JE F N
N
CA NA L
Y PK W DA VIS FF
C S
FO NT AIN EB
Y PK W EF FD AV IS SJ
ST D BR OA S
AV E
NA DE
US 9
0B
N
AV E
BR OA D
LA
OR LE AN S AV E
GENT
AV E N
ILLY BLV D PO Y
DR AS
ST
N
LL TO
S
ST Z LV E GA S
JE S ST BR OA D
FO
ST
BR OA DW AY
AIRL
E E AV VILL NASH
T ZS AL VE SG
C S
0 LA IB OR NE
AV E
ES P
LOYO
IR O M
HO W AR D
N
District 5 Lakeview
ST
ST GA LV EZ
LA AV E
ST
AV E
LA
NA DE
AV E
District 1b Vieux Carre
ES P
District 1a CBD, Warehouse District
AV E
AVE EFE
IB CL A N
AVE
AVE
K AR YP CIT
ST
N CLAIBORNE
AVE
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
±
0
N
NT OW
PLANNING DISTRICTS
UP TO W
DO W
District 1b
District 3
District 4
District 7
District 5
District 2
District 1a
Planning Districts
Water
Study Area
LEGEND
E
RIE RD METAI
ZINE ST
PL SH AN E M C
ST
SIM
AV E LIV AR
OS AN ED
ON GT HIN
BO
S WA
ON
E
E AV
DR YA DE S
AV NE OR LAIB
ST CH ARLE S
L TO
ON
CAMP
SC
S CK JA
MAGA
E AV
O'KE
ST PA RT
OR NE
ST EL K PL RA MP AR T
S
ST IN BA S
N
RA M
TCHOUPITOULAS ST
ST DE CA TU R
T ETE RS S NP
SID KE
BLVD
ON GT HIN
LA
S WA
E
RD
ID
AIN ARTR TCH PON
U
RS
AVE
VE
YO BA E AV RD NA ER
RI
A P TUREAUD
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 19
B ST
CONVENTION CENTER BLVD
E AV
T
NAPOLEON AVE
LE
AU
DR
ST
BR OA DW AY
NT AIN EB
M
STAT E ST
ET TO ST
INE HW Y
DR EX EL DR
LE
AV E RO LL TO N AR
AU DR
SB
A RO
D
ST
I-1 0
NV IL
TU LA
ST
LE ST
S
C
EA RH AR TB
E AV
KIN G
E RN
LU TH ER
O IB LA
MA RT IN
NE AV E
BA NK S
BIE
W Y PK DA VIS F JE F N
CA RR O ST
Y PK W DA VIS FF
C S
FO NT AIN EB
Y PK W EF FD AV IS SJ
JR
BL VD
LV D
ST D BR OA S
N CA NA L
CA NA L
MA RT IN
LU TH ER
ST
ST Z LV E GA S
KIN
G
JR
BL VD
UR SU LIN ES
NA DE
AV E
LA
US 9
AV E
BR OA D 0B
N
ES P
OR LE AN S AV E
AV E
AV E N LL TO S
C S
0 LA IB OR NE
JE S ST D BR OA
FO
PA L
AIRL
E E AV VILL NASH
T ZS AL VE SG
GENT
ILLY BLV D PO Y
DR AS
ST
N
ST IR O M HO W AR D
N
AVE
LOYO
AV E
ST GA LV EZ
LA AV E
K AR YP CIT
ST
IB AV E
ES P
LA
NA DE
AV E
N CLAIBORNE
PL SH AN E M C
ST
SIM
E
LIV AR
AV NE OR LAIB OS AN ED
BO
ON GT
ON
S WA
DR YA DE S
BA S
IN
ST AVE
ST PA RT
CL A N S
AVE
NT OW
N
500
1,000
Feet 2,000
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
±
0
DO W
EXISTING ZONING
UP TO W
N
Other
Heavy Industrial
Light Industrial
Medical Service
General Office
Park
General Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial
Multiple-Family Residential
Two-Family Residential
Single Family Residential
CBD
VCE - VCC
HMR - HMC
Water
Study Area
LEGEND
E
RIE RD METAI
N
RA M
TCHOUPITOULAS ST
AV E OR NE ST
EL K PL RA MP AR T AVE EFE O'KE
SC
ST CH ARLE S
L TO
ON
ST CAMP
E AV
S CK JA
ZINE ST MAGA
ST DE CA TU R T ETE RS S NP
SID KE LA
ON GT HIN
E
S WA
ID
BLVD AIN ARTR TCH PON D UR
RS
AVE
VE
YO BA
E AV RD NA ER
RI
A P TUREAUD
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 20
B ST
CONVENTION CENTER BLVD
E AV
HIN E AV
T
NAPOLEON AVE
LE
AU
DR
ST
BR OA DW AY
NT AIN EB
M
STAT E ST
ET TO ST
INE HW Y
DR EX EL DR
LE
AV E RO LL TO N AR
AU DR
SB
A RO
D
ST
I-1 0
NV IL
TU LA
ST
LE ST
S
EA RH AR TB
E AV
KIN G
NE OR AIB
LU TH ER
CL
MA RT IN
NE AV E
BA NK S
BIE
W Y PK DA VIS F JE F N
CA RR O
ST
Y PK W DA VIS FF
C S
FO NT AIN EB
Y PK W EF FD AV IS SJ
JR
BL VD
LV D
ST D BR OA S
N
CA NA L
CA NA L
MA RT IN
LU TH ER
ST
ST Z LV E GA S
KIN G
JR
BL VD
NA DE
AV E
LA
UR SU LIN ES
ES P
US 9
AV E
BR OA D
0B
N
AV E N LL TO
S
OR LE AN S AV E
C S
0 LA IB OR NE
JE S ST BR OA D
FO
PA L
AIRL
E E AV VILL NASH
T ZS AL VE SG
GENT
ILLY BLV D PO Y
DR AS
ST
N
ST IR O M
HO W AR D
N
AVE
LOYO
AV E
ST GA LV EZ
LA AV E
K AR YP CIT
ST
IB
AV E
ES P
LA
NA DE
AV E
N CLAIBORNE
PL SH AN E M C
ST
SIM
AV E LIV AR
E
BO
AV NE OR LAIB OS AN ED
ON GT HIN
ON
S WA
DR YA DE S
BA S
IN
ST
AVE
ST PA RT
CL A N
S
AVE
Industrial
N
NT OW
N
±
500
1,000
Feet 2,000
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
0
EXISTING LAND USE
UP TO W
DO W
Recreation/Open Space
Institutional
Commercial
Residential - Multi-Family
Residential - Single and Two Family
Residential - Single-Family
LANDUSE
Water
Study Area
LEGEND
E
RIE RD METAI
N
RA M
TCHOUPITOULAS ST
AV E OR NE
ST EL K PL RA MP AR T
AVE EFE O'KE
SC
ST CH ARLE S
L TO
ON
ST CAMP
E AV S CK JA
ZINE ST MAGA
ST DE CA TU R
T ETE RS S NP
SID KE
BLVD
ON GT HIN
LA
S WA
E
RD
ID
AIN ARTR TCH PON
U
RS
AVE
VE
YO BA E AV RD NA ER
RI
A P TUREAUD
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 21
B ST
CONVENTION CENTER BLVD
E AV
E AV
T
NAPOLEON AVE
LE
AU
DR
ST
BR OA DW AY
NT AIN EB
M
STAT E ST
ET TO ST
INE HW Y
DR EX EL DR
LE
AV E RO LL TO N AR
AU DR
SB
A RO
D
ST
I-1 0
NV IL
TU LA
ST
LE ST
S
C
EA RH AR TB
E AV
KIN G
E RN
LU TH ER
O IB LA
MA RT IN
NE AV E
BA NK S
BIE
W Y PK DA VIS F JE F N
CA RR O ST
Y PK W DA VIS FF
C S
FO NT AIN EB
Y PK W EF FD AV IS SJ
JR
BL VD
LV D
ST D BR OA S
N CA NA L
CA NA L
MA RT IN
LU TH ER
ST
ST Z LV E GA S
KIN G
JR
BL VD
NA DE
AV E
LA
UR SU LIN ES
ES P
US 9
AV E
BR OA D 0B
N
AV E N LL TO S
OR LE AN S AV E
C S
0 LA IB OR NE
JE S ST D BR OA
FO
PA L
AIRL
E E AV VILL NASH
T ZS AL VE SG
GENT
ILLY BLV D PO Y
DR AS
ST
N
ST IR O M HO W AR D
N
AVE
LOYO
AV E
ST GA LV EZ
LA AV E
K AR YP CIT
ST
IB AV E
ES P
LA
NA DE
AV E
N CLAIBORNE
PL SH AN E M C
ST
SIM
AV E LIV AR
E
BO
AV NE OR LAIB OS AN ED
ON GT HIN
ON
S WA
DR YA DE S
BA S
IN
ST AVE
ST PA RT
CL A N S
AVE
N
NT OW
N
±
1,000
Feet 2,000
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
0
CITY AND STATE LAND OWNERSHIP
UP TO W
DO W
City-Owned Property
State Lands and Buildings
Parks
Water
Curblines
Railroad
Study Area
LEGEND
E
RIE RD METAI
N
RA M
TCHOUPITOULAS ST
AV E OR NE ST
EL K PL RA MP AR T AVE EFE O'KE
SC
ST CH ARLE S
L TO
ON
ST CAMP
E AV
S CK JA
ZINE ST MAGA
ST DE CA TU R T ETE RS S NP
SID KE LA
BLVD ON GT HIN
E
S WA
ID
AIN D UR
RS
ARTR TCH PON
AVE
VE
YO BA
E AV RD NA ER
RI
A P TUREAUD
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 22
B ST
CONVENTION CENTER BLVD
E AV
E AV
T
NAPOLEON AVE
LE
AU
DR
ST
BR OA DW AY
NT AIN EB
M
STAT E ST
ET TO ST
INE HW Y
DR EX EL DR
LE
AV E RO LL TO N AR
AU DR
SB
A RO
D
ST
I-1 0
NV IL
TU LA
ST
LE ST
S
C
EA RH AR TB
E AV
KIN G
E RN
LU TH ER
O IB LA
MA RT IN
NE AV E
BA NK S
BIE
W Y PK DA VIS F JE F N
CA RR O ST
Y PK W DA VIS FF
C S
FO NT AIN EB
Y PK W EF FD AV IS SJ
JR
BL VD
LV D
ST D BR OA S
N CA NA L
CA NA L
MA RT IN
LU TH ER
ST
ST Z LV E GA S
KIN G
JR
BL VD
UR SU LIN
NA DE
AV E
LA
ES
ES P
US 9
AV E
BR OA D 0B
N
AV E N LL TO S
OR LE AN S AV E
C S
0 LA IB OR NE
JE S ST D BR OA
FO
PA L
AIRL
E E AV VILL NASH
T ZS AL VE SG
GENT
ILLY BLV D PO Y
DR AS
ST
N
ST O IR M HO W AR D
N
AVE
LOYO
AV E
ST GA LV EZ
LA AV E
K AR YP CIT
ST
IB AV E
ES P
LA
NA DE
AV E
N CLAIBORNE
PL SH AN E M C
ST
SIM
AV E LIV AR
E
BO
AV NE OR LAIB OS AN ED
ON GT HIN
ON
S WA
DR YA DE S
BA S
IN
ST AVE
ST PA RT
CL A N S
AVE
Water
N
NT OW
N
±
1,000
Feet 2,000
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New Orleans GIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
0
OVERLAY DISTRICTS
UP TO W
DO W
Inner City Urban Corridor
Downtown Design Review District
Regional Medical Center Redevelopment
City Overlay Zones
South Broad Street Cultural District
Rampart Basin Street Corridor Cultural District
Museum City Park Cultural District
Lafitte Greenway New City Cultural District
Downtown Development District
Canal Street Development Corporation
Districts
Louisiana Enterprise Zone
Study Area
LEGEND
E
RIE RD METAI
N
RA M
TCHOUPITOULAS ST
AV E OR NE ST
EL K PL RA MP AR T AVE EFE O'KE
SC
ST CH ARLE S
L TO
ON
ST CAMP
E AV
S CK JA
ZINE ST MAGA
ST DE CA TU R T ETE RS S NP
SID KE
BLVD ON GT HIN
LA
S WA
E
RD
ID
AIN U
RS
ARTR TCH PON
AVE
VE
YO BA
E AV RD NA ER
RI
A P TUREAUD
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
MAP 23
B ST
CONVENTION CENTER BLVD
E AV
E AV
T
NAPOLEON AVE
MAP 24
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 2: Biosciences District Overview
38
Working Paper 3
Community Context
August 2010
Section 03: Community and Social Context
39
40
Working Paper 3
Community Context
August 2010
Community and Social Context A Strategy for Meaningful Community Involvement New Orleans citizens, following the 2005 flooding caused by Hurricane Katrina and the unaddressed needs by government agencies, found it necessary to plan for hurricane recovery to receive government funds. Specifically, they participated in two major master planning processes for the rebuilding of public schools and the development of a City Master Plan. Constituents and stakeholders within the CBD and several in-town neighborhoods are now being asked to participate in the creation of a Biosciences District Plan that offers great promise for significant economic development in the city. However, in the context of what has been described as “planning fatigue” by many local residents, the GNOBEDD Outreach Team strongly recommends that future and immediate engagement of the community be conducted as the first step in the programmatic and visioning phases of the Biosciences District Plan. Toward that purpose, below is a categorical listing of key stakeholders, information citing their roles, and recommended workshops that should be conducted to develop plans for the Biosciences District in key areas of concern and focus. This process is recommended as the next phase of work for action-oriented planning that will brand GNOBEDD as the key coordinator and arbiter of the Bioscience District’s development and substantively advance the process with critical input by the community. A key element in preparing for this phase of work is the development and vetting of the bioscience-market research for GNOBEDD being developed by others on the AECOM Team. It is also recognized that given the breadth of the District and its constituents, many
institutions will play a key role in the process for shaping policy and implementing procedures for the Biosciences District’s development. Nonetheless, the market drivers of education, research, clinical services and translational products must frame and distinguish this effort from others that have preceded it. Please review the listings below and note that many of these groups can be combined for recommended presentations and workshops. The categories are based on our best thinking about groups that must collaborate and, in some cases, act in specific capacities to make the Biosciences District successful. Many of these roles will align with their current engagements; others will result from the Biosciences District plan’s needs for expanded services and roles
I. Institutional/Governance Governance •
GNOBEDD Board of Commissioners
•
Governing Hospital Board
•
Louisiana State University
•
Tulane University
•
Xavier University
•
Delgado Community College
•
University of New Orleans
•
Dillard University
•
Southern University of New Orleans
This group of stakeholders has institutional governing power that will be necessary to develop the academic and workforce collaborations necessary for the Biosciences District. The LSU and Tulane medical school programs, in addition to their health sciences
41
and health care divisions, will be critical to the research and development as well as health care components of the Biosciences District Plan. Xavier’s pharmacy school in addition to Delgado’s nursing school will provide important career pathways for local residents. It will be necessary for these four universities, in particular, to collaborate their workforce objectives and customize training according to the existing supply and demand for various tiers of employment within the Biosciences District, but also help shape the future supply and demand to ensure a robust local workforce. The other universities will also participate in contributing to a local workforce. The Louisiana Cancer Research Consortium is a critical research and development collaboration that will require funding partnerships to ensure that all participating academic institutions are equally represented and feel compelled to invest mutual resources. Lastly, the GNOBEDD Board of Commissioners and the Governing Hospital Board represent leadership from many of these academic institutions, and it will be important for these representatives to broker the collaborative relationships necessary for the Biosciences District to function cohesively. Recommendation: Convene this group of stakeholders to begin a collaborative assessment of the programs and resources that can collectively contribute to the Biosciences District’s development. A careful review of stakeholder comments should provide some insight on how to best foster cooperation and begin to break down the walls around the silos of information and resources that will be needed to develop the Biosciences District. A presentation of the initial marketing document is a critical element in laying the groundwork for a more collaborative environment.
City •
City of New Orleans
•
City Council
•
New Orleans Business Retention and Expansion
•
New Orleans Dept. of Public Works
•
New Orleans Fire Dept.
•
New Orleans Parks and Parkways
•
New Orleans Safety and Permitting
•
New Orleans Housing and Code Enforcement
•
Division of Recovery Management
•
Division of Neighborhood Stabilization
•
Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans
•
City Economic Development
•
Orleans Parish Municipal Court
•
Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriff’s Office
These various municipal agencies will be necessary for the logistics of the District. The City of New Orleans and the City Council will have to help build local support for the Biosciences District, manage hospital controversies, approve property acquisitions and street closures as various parts of the Biosciences District are built. The Business Retention and Expansion Department can assist with permitting issues as they arise, Parks and Parkways will assist with the development of Tulane Avenue, the Sewerage and Water Board will have to manage the flooding concerns that many residents living around the footprint of the two hospitals in particular have. Recommendation: Convene this group of city agencies and policy makers to share the needs of the Biosciences District based on input from the initial phase of our work. Begin the
42
Working Paper 3
Community Context
process of ensuring that bureaucratic hurdles are kept to a minimum and that issues can be addressed in a holistic manner. This group should also be briefed on the marketing strategy for GNOBEDD’s promotion.
August 2010
discuss appropriate ways the State can work with the city as an initial objective toward the development of the Biosciences District, both in its scientific, educational and research intent, as well as in its broader communitybased impacts.
State Federal
•
Louisiana Recovery Authority
•
Division of Administration
•
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
•
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development
•
FEMA
•
Louisiana Department of Health & Hospitals
•
Speaker Jim Tucker
•
State Rep. Walter Hines
•
State Rep. Walter Leger
•
State Rep. Neil Abramson
•
State Sen. Karen Carter Peterson
•
State Sen. J.P. Morrell
The Louisiana Recovery Authority will sunset by July, 2010. The Authority is the conduit for several million dollars of federal funds and holds significant discretion over unmarked funds that must be distributed in the next few years. The Division of Administration holds statutory power over the development of the LSU and VA hospitals, and it is critical that they work with the State to invest the appropriate resources to ensure that the hospitals function well in New Orleans. The various state senators and representatives will be critical to introducing and championing legislation that will ensure an adequate budget for the Biosciences District to succeed, as well as for a strong, enforceable Community Benefits Agreement . Recommendation: Convene this group to provide marketing elements and
Given the recurrent exposure in the New Orleans area for both natural and man-made calamities, the United Stated Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) have ongoing responsibility, ranging from fixing the levies and mitigating the impact of storm surge to providing effective assistance to the region’s population as part of emergency response. In addition to the potential hurricane threat, the existing situation in the Gulf of Mexico portends an uncertain impact to the region environmentally and economically. Meanwhile, FEMA must complete the Katrina Recovery, while being very vigilant for the next South Louisiana catastrophe. Protection from flooding and business interruptions are basic economic development necessities given the reality of the region’s economic cycle. Recommendation: Pursue a more detailed understanding of the effort to protect the core city from natural and man-made disasters. Advocate for adequate funding for the region. Convene the relevant parties and make the marketing presentation. Ask the group to add an element to the marketing plan that speaks to a safe, flood free and uncontaminated environment. Explore the programmatic possibilities for the Biosciences District to house research and educational functions that tie preventative and responsive policies to the region’s
43
ongoing needs.
Planning •
Regional Planning Commission
•
City Planning Commission
•
Regional Transit Authority
•
Goody Clancy
•
Waggonner and Ball
•
Eskew Architects
•
New Orleans Redevelopment Authority
•
Downtown Development District
These various public and private planning entities can help ensure that the Biosciences District has a regional appeal in its programs and workforce opportunities, while also remaining sensitive to local design concerns. The RPC, City Planning Commission, and RTA can collaborate on the development of Tulane Avenue for the benefit of residents and improved transit to, from, and within the Biosciences District. Goody Clancy, in particular, can provide lessons learned from their extensive master planning efforts over the last two years. Waggonner and Ball and the Downtown Development District can help ensure that elements of sustainability are included in the Biosciences District Plan, as well as maintain a design that enhances rather than subsumes Downtown New Orleans. Recommendation: Convene this group to provide the marketing plan and challenge them to coordinate federal and other resources for development of the Biosciences District in concert with economic development plans in other parts of the region.
Utilities •
Cox Cable
•
Bell South
•
Entergy
The utility companies must be engaged to ensure that increased utility expenditures for the Biosciences District are beneficial to the District and residents and not disproportionately passed on to residents. The utilities will be critical to negotiating a cost-sharing plan for utility usage for the District. Recommendation: This group of stakeholders should be briefed on the information collected on future development plans for the Biosciences District. They should be challenged to work together to ensure that the needed utilities are provided and that resources for necessary improvements are in place.
II. Commercial/Economic Development Economic Development •
GNO, Inc.
•
Greater New Orleans Foundation
•
Bureau of Governmental Research
•
Black Economic Development Council
•
Committee for a Better New Orleans
•
New Orleans Business Council
•
Louisiana Minority Business Council
•
New Orleans Chamber of Commerce
•
Horizon Initiative
•
New Orleans Convention Center
•
Louisiana Sports & Exposition District
44
Working Paper 3
Community Context
•
Phoenix of New Orleans
•
New City Group
•
Louisiana Economic Development
•
Greater New Orleans Hotel Lodging Association
•
Jefferson Parish Economic Development Corporation (JEDCO)
August 2010
Recommendation: Convene this group for a presentation of the marketing plan and seek their input on developing the plan in the context of their programmatic efforts.
Workforce Development •
Louisiana Technology Council
•
St. Tammany Parish Economic Development Fund
•
Job Corps
•
ECO Park
•
Job One
•
Louisiana State University Office of Technology Development
•
Delgado Community College – School of Nursing
•
Delgado Community College – Allied Healthcare Campus
•
SEIU
•
United Teachers of New Orleans
•
New Orleans Workers Center for Racial Justice
•
New Orleans Interfaith Worker Justice Center
These various public and private economic development agencies are important for the economic opportunities that the Biosciences District can provide for both New Orleans and the surrounding region. The Black Economic Development Council, Committee for a Better New Orleans, Louisiana Minority Business Council, and Horizon Initiative are committed to more inclusive business practices that focus on minority contracting and new business opportunities that address the needs of typically underserved communities. GNO, Inc. and the Greater New Orleans Foundation focus on regional economic development, which will be important for the Biosciences District. The Bureau of Governmental Research is concerned with the financing of the Biosciences District and the tax distribution impact it could potentially have on the city. The Chamber and Business Council can help develop a prospectus for potential investors in the Biosciences District because of their close connection to business development and needs in the city. Phoenix of New Orleans and the New City Group will help direct ancillary development and housing surrounding the Biosciences District to ensure that it meets the priorities of local residents and maximizes synergistic development occurring in the footprint.
The various workforce development institutions will help develop career pathways for local employment in the Biosciences District. It will be important for them to review and add to the workforce study already commissioned by GNOBEDD, which characterizes the supply and demand for various tiers of employment within the Biosciences District. These workforce development agencies can help develop and supplement the appropriate curricula within institutions of higher learning to ensure that local residents have adequate training to meet job demands. SEIU, The United Teachers of New Orleans, and the workers center will help ensure that jobs are unionized; offer living wages, benefits, and pathways for upward career mobility for the communities they work with; in addition to ensuring that training programs meet any remedial literacy requirements.
45
Recommendation: Convene this group for a marketing presentation and share the findings of the workforce inventory study. This group will need to interface with the institutional partners described earlier. Collectively, the workforce group and the institutions must develop a comprehensive plan to ensure that training opportunities are afforded local residents in preparation for the jobs that will be created as the Biosciences District develops.
Financial Institutions Developers •
New Orleans Saints
•
First Trust Corporation
•
Louisiana Fund 1
•
VCE Capital
•
Iberia Bank
•
Liberty Bank
•
Capital One Bank
•
Omni Bank
•
Corporate Realty
This group of stakeholders represents the potential financing and development interests in the local community that are focused on the Biosciences District. The New Orleans Saints are already planning development around the Superdome. Recommendation: Convene this group for a presentation on the marketing plan. Conduct a workshop that might include investors in biosciences districts outside New Orleans to discuss the financing instruments that can enhance the Biosciences District’s development.
Primary and Secondary Schools •
Recovery School District
•
Orleans Parish School Board
•
Warren Easton High School
•
Lagniappe School
•
Esperanza High School
•
Booker T. Washington School
•
Albert Wicker Elementary School
•
Dryades YMCA
These primary and secondary schools surround the District and can potentially include health sciences in their curricula to develop a steady workforce beginning at an early age. It will be important to coordinate with the Recovery School District and Orleans Parish School Board to develop these curricula and ensure that students graduating from these schools have a direct stepping stone into a health sciences career. The Recovery School District has plans to possibly locate the Math and Science School within the Biosciences District. It should be noted that the Dryades YMCA has a training component in place for nurses. Recommendation: Convene this group for a marketing presentation and bring this group of stakeholders into the workforce development component of the plan.
III. Health Sciences / Healthcare •
BioInnovation Center
•
Louisiana State University – Health Sciences Center
•
Tulane University – School of Medicine
46
Working Paper 3
Community Context
August 2010
•
Xavier University – Pharmacy School
•
VA Hospital
•
University Medical Center
•
Pennington Biomedical Research Foundation
•
Ochsner Health Center
•
LA Hospital Association
•
Hospital Corp of America
•
Louisiana Cancer Research Consortium
•
BW Cooper
•
New Orleans Children’s Health Project
•
Lafitte
•
LSU Community Clinics
•
Harmony Oaks
•
New Orleans Council on Aging
•
JCH Development
•
Steps to a Healthier Louisiana
•
Domain Companies
•
Children’s Hospital
•
Providence Community Housing
•
Neighborworks
These institutions represent the health sciences research and development leaders within the Biosciences District, the regional health care service providers, and the health care governance agencies within the state of Louisiana. Their collaboration will be critical to ensure that translational medicine is a significant outcome of Biosciences District. In particular, collaboration between LSU and Tulane is critical for optimizing research and development in the areas that are relevant to health care needs of the local population and for advancing the cancer research consortium. The VA Hospital and UMC are anchor institutions within the Biosciences District that will be critical to restoring emergent health care needs that have been unmet since the closing of Charity Hospital after Hurricane Katrina. The LSU community clinics, the New Orleans Children’s Health Project and other clinic-based health care providers are important parts of a distributive health care model that must be maintained and enhanced to ensure that healthcare services are available outside of the two hospitals.
Recommendation: In some instances, these groups are subgroups of the institutional bodies described earlier. It should be discussed whether we should convene this group separate from the institutional grouping.
IV. Neighborhood/Community Housing
BW Cooper, Lafitte and Harmony Oaks represent three of the big four public housing redevelopments in the City of New Orleans. Harmony Oaks has already begun signing leases for new residents, and BW Cooper and Lafitte are still under the construction phase. All three of these housing developments are in close proximity to the Biosciences District, and available workforce housing within or in addition to these developments will be important for maintaining a local workforce that has public transit opportunities to, from and within the Biosciences District to create a live-work environment. JCH and Domain are private developers who can potentially assist with creating workforce housing, and Providence Community Housing is working with Builders of Hope to relocate current homes within the hospital footprints so they can be preserved and transformed through “green” enhancements. Providence also works closely with Lafitte housing developers to enforce Section III hiring requirements and equitable surrounding
47
development, including the Lafitte Greenway and its potential connectivity to the Biosciences District.
Faith-Based •
Associated Catholic Charities
•
Archdiocese of New Orleans
•
Baptist Community Ministries
•
Grace Episcopal
These faith-based groups have been the most active in organizing residents who live in the footprint of the Biosciences District, particularly the two hospitals. Associated Catholic Charities and the Archdiocese, in partnership with the Sojourner Truth Center, have been providing outreach services to residents who will be displaced by the hospitals, helping them negotiate compensation packages with Voelkert and serving as the local information clearinghouse for resident concerns. Grace Episcopal has mainly served as the venue for resident meetings, specifically those concerned with the closure of Charity Hospital and the process issues associated with construction of the two new hospitals.
Neighborhood Groups •
Bienville-Conti-Tulane Collaborative
•
Broad Community Connections
•
Fauborg St. John Neighborhood Association
•
Friends of Lafitte Corridor
•
Gert Town Revival Institute
•
Gert Town Community Center
•
Gert Town Enterprise Economic Redevelopment
•
Iberville Residents Council
•
Lafitte Residents Council
•
Mid-City Neighborhood Organization
•
Tulane/Canal Neighborhood Development Corporation
These neighborhood associations represent residents who live in and around the Biosciences District. Broad Community Connections and the Mid-City Neighborhood Organization are actively involved in the development of Tulane Avenue as a robust transit node. The Gert Town organizations, which have not been significantly engaged to date, are concerned with development in and around Xavier University where Gert Town is located. The Iberville and Lafitte Residents Councils are made up of residents from these public housing developments who are concerned with access to affordable housing. The Friends of Lafitte Corridor works closely with Waggonner and Ball Architects on sustainability elements along the Lafitte Greenway. The Bienville-Conti-Tulane Collaborative and Tulane/Canal Neighborhood Development Corporation work closely with residents near the hospitals’ footprints, in addition to Phoenix of New Orleans, to develop ancillary economic development and housing plans next to the hospitals that benefit residents. They are also concerned with the small businesses that will be displaced by the hospitals.
Preservation •
Carrollton Avenue Preservation Alliance
•
Committee to Reopen Charity Hospital
•
National Trust for Historic Preservation
•
Smart Growth Louisiana
•
The Foundation for Historical Louisiana
•
Preservation Resource Center
In the context of the Bioscience District Plan, these groups are mainly concerned with design of the VA and LSU hospitals in addition to the land acquisition
48
Working Paper 3
Community Context
and street closure processes that have taken place to date. The Committee to Reopen Charity Hospital is the most vocal “opponent” of the new hospitals and (by association) GNOBEDD because they believe that reopening Charity would be a less expensive alternative and result in no residential or commercial displacement. The remaining preservation groups are concerned with the noncontextual design of the hospitals, the surface parking lots and the resulting effect this will have on Downtown New Orleans. Some organizations, such as those of the National Trust and Smart Growth, do not oppose the hospitals, but are actively involved in the Hospital Working Group of the New City Group to help create alternatives that have more efficient design components, particularly for the UMC. The Preservation Resource Center is most concerned with the public outreach and consultation process for the hospitals and GNOBEDD.
August 2010
United Way has a strong pulse on the mental health needs of local residents. Family Services of Greater New Orleans offers significant resources for domestic violence survivors; and executive director, Ron McClain, is an ally for GNOBEDD who is willing to organize constituent support for the Biosciences District Plan. UNITY of Greater New Orleans organizes the homeless population in the city. Lastly, the Louisiana Justice Institute is a legal advocacy organization spearheading efforts to produce a strong Community Benefits Agreement in conjunction with other community advocates. They work closely with Mary Howell, who has represented residents living in the hospital’s footprint and led the litigation against the hospital land acquisition process. Recommendation: Convene the neighborhood and advocacy groups for a presentation of the marketing plan. Introduce the Community Benefits Agreement concept and challenge this group to develop a CBA for the Biosciences District.
Social Justice •
Louisiana Justice Institute + Mary Howell
•
Louisiana Public Health Initiative
•
Family Services of Greater New Orleans
•
Puentes
•
Sojourner Truth Center
•
United Way District 6
•
UNITY of Greater New Orleans
•
Urban League of Greater New Orleans
•
Young Leadership Council
•
Volunteers of America
These various social justice organizations represent those that live in or near the Biosciences District and underserved communities in the City of New Orleans.
Conclusion: It is recognized that beyond the physical design of the Biosciences District, the numerous community resources and constituency groups will play an important role in conceptualization of the Biosciences District Plan and its successful implementation. In the subsequent phases of the planning exercise, it is critical that these organizations be engaged in productive tasks, particularly in the visioning phases, to assess capacity, enhance value and garner support for the project. We shall specify the approach to enlist these organizations in the planning effort to achieve desired outcomes for each subsequent task and for the long-term operation of the Biosciences District.
49
Stakeholder Matrix Below is a matrix providing the names, contact information, mission, structure, and accomplishments of significant stakeholders relevant to the Biosciences District. This database is intended to benchmark the capacity of significant health, community, economic, transit, housing, and education institutions and organizations, which we will rely on for a successful Community Benefits Agreement. It will also serve as a long-term directory for GNOBEDD that can be easily referenced and updated as needed. Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Mission
Structure
LSU Health Sciences Center
Dr. Steve Nelson 504-568-4007
Received NIH Grant for $6.8 million to partner with Dillard University to establish a minority health and health disparities research center on Dillard’s campus.
For Profit The mission of the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans (LSUHSC-NO) is to provide education, research, and public service through direct patient care and community outreach. LSUHSC-NO comprises the Schools of Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Graduate Studies, Medicine, Nursing, and Public Health.
LSU Community Clinics
Dr. Cassandra Youmans 504-903-5155
6 community clinics: 3 on Westbank and 3 on Eastbank working with schools and neighborhoods to provide healthcare for uninsured and underinsured
For Profit
LSU Health Sciences Foundation
Bert Wallace 504-568-3712
Expand awareness of LSUHSC’s contributions to medical research, higher education, and quality health care. And, develop financial support for their endeavors and provide the means through which financial support is received
Foundation
Health Care Effectiveness Program (HCE) created in 1997, has made significant, measurable strides in the prevention and management of disease. The HCE Program encompasses all HCSD hospitals and clinics.
Public
Health
LSU Health Care Services Division
50
Working Paper 3
Community Context
August 2010
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
University Medical Center
Accomplishments
Mission
Veterans Affairs Julie Cattelliar Medical Center 800-935-8387
Louisiana Public Clayton Health Institute Williams 504-301-9004
Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System Replacement Medical Center Project will create an environment that honors Veterans and their families. As a model for healthcare of the future it will set the standards for patient-centered care, flexibility, and sustainability. The new campus will respect our neighborhoods, authentically reflect the culture of the region, and be the cornerstone for the emerging biosciences industry in New Orleans.
Chancellor Ron Workforce Development and Education Unit; School of Nursing Wright; Dr. Harold Gaspard; Patricia Egers 504-571-1330
Xavier University
Dr. Norman Francis, President / Dr. Gene D’Amour, Senior VP for Resources and GNOBEDD board member 504-520-7541
Leading HBCU, headed by Dr. Francis, the longest serving college president in America. Number one in the country in graduating Pre-Med African Americans. Conducting research in nanomedicine. Prime candidate for drug research opportunities.
Government
Non-Profit
Received $100 million grant from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to help the area’s varied health care providers form an organized health care system.
Delgado Community College
Structure Public
University Medical Center (UMC) has received the HealthGrades 2010/2011 Outstanding Patient Experience Award. UMC is one of only eight hospitals in Louisiana with this recognition, which honors institutions providing the best patient experience in the nation.
Delgado Community College provides Public a learning centered environment in which to prepare students from diverse backgrounds to attain their educational, career, and personal goals, to think critically, to demonstrate leadership and to be productive and responsible citizens. Xavier University of Louisiana, founded by Saint Katharine Drexel and the Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament, is Catholic and historically Black. The ultimate purpose of the University is to contribute to the promotion of a more just and humane society by preparing its students to assume roles of leadership and service in a global society. This preparation takes place in a diverse learning and teaching environment that incorporates all relevant educational means, including research and community service.
Non-Profit Catholic University / HBCU / Founded in 1925
51
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Mission
Structure
Tulane University
Dr. Ben Sachs 504-988-5462
Member of GNOBEDD Board; Dean School of Medicine
One of the nation’s most recognized centers for medical education, Tulane University School of Medicine is a vibrant center for education, research and public service.
Private
Pennington Biomedical Research Foundation
Jennifer Winstead 225-763-3104
Leader in obesity research and disease prevention
Promote healthier lives through research and education in nutrition and preventive medicine
Foundation
Greater New Orleans Biosciences Economic Development District
Jim McNamara, President & CEO 504-593-6442
Created in 2005 to convene the various institutions of the District. Initiated a planning process led by AECOM in September 2009 to build a master plan.
Facilitating the creation of high paying jobs in the region by increasing the current health and biosciences workforce. Growing the academic research institutions in the region by increasing investment in clinical, biosciences, and health-related research and training. Enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration among the biosciences by locating key research institutions and private sector bioscience companies within a designated biosciences district.
LSU Healthcare Network
Offer patient care at Baptist Uptown, Behavioral Sciences Center, East Jefferson, Kenner Regional, and West Jefferson
The LSU “Healthcare Network is a group of multi-specialty physician practices comprised of distinguished members of the LSU Medical Center Faculty. The physicians are Highly skilled LSU clinicians ranging from medical to surgical specialties. The LSU Healthcare Network offers the best in state-of-the-art medicine to the people of Louisiana.
For Profit
LA Cancer Research Consortium
Institutions participating include LSU Health Sciences Center, Tulane University, and Xavier University
Supports a clinical research program where participating centers conduct a large number of cooperative group, industry-sponsored, and local investigator-initiated trials done with cancer patients to find out whether promising approaches to cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment are safe and effective
Public
52
Working Paper 3
Community Context
August 2010
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Mission
New Orleans Health Department
Dr. Sandra Robinson 504-234-8526
Member of GNOBEDD Board
Protect, maintain and enhance the health status of our citizens, our visitors, and our communities, through disease mapping, prevention, and management while advocating and supporting health maintenance, prevention and promotion activities.
Structure
Ochsner Health System
Dr. Patrick Quinlan 504-842-4051
Member of GNOBEDD Board; part of the LCRC; specializing in neurology, cancer, cardiovascular, and transplants
Ochsner Health System is a non-profit, academic, multi-specialty, healthcare delivery system dedicated to patient care, research and education. The system includes eight hospitals and over 35 health centers located throughout Southeast Louisiana.
Non-Profit
In 2001 the DDD sold bonds in the amount of $7.3 million to fund its Downtown-wide capital improvement program, including $5 million for the Canal Street streetscape program. [The $17 million Canal Street streetscape project is also funded by the City of New Orleans via the Canal Street Development Corporation.]
“The Downtown Development District of New Orleans (DDD) was created by the Louisiana Legislature in 1974 as the nation’s first assessmentbased business improvement district (BID) to provide enhanced services in economic development, cleaning and safety. Its mission is to drive the development of Downtown New Orleans by •Cultivating economic development in such industries as bioscience, the arts, digital media and tourism •Ensuring Downtown is clean and safe •Serving as the voice and advocate for Downtown’s future •Promoting Downtown as a worldclass destination for residents and visitors “
Non-Profit Business Improvement District
Economic Development Downtown Development District
Kurt M. Wiegle, President & CEO
53
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Mission
CBNO / MAC
Keith Twitchell, Director
The Metropolitan Area Committee was founded in 1966 as the first major community organization in New Orleans to reach across race and class lines. The Committee for a Better New Orleans was founded in 2000 with a similar commitment to comprehensive diversity. In 2001 the two organizations decided to merge. The resulting CBNO/MAC is a diverse community organization, working to bring all voices to the table to build a better future for all New Orleanians. Among its major accomplishments are the following: 1) Initiating the citywide property inventory database (2002); 2) Reworking of the city’s Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) system (2004); 3) Development of a model Citizen Participation Program (CPP) for New Orleans (2004) and leadership of post-Katrina work to redesign and implement a New Orleans CPP (2006 – ongoing)
Non-Profit CBNO is a racially and culturally diverse group whose mission is to provide leadership and catalyze change toward the achievement of a Blueprint for a Better New Orleans. CBNO/ MAC will accomplish its mission by providing and maintaining an advocacy role that encourages the kinds of partnership, collaboration and candid conversation that reflect the interests of the citizens of New Orleans.
Structure
Horizon Initiative
Virginia Miller, Director
Primary advocates for Public-Private Partnership to oversee economic development in New Orleans
The Horizon Initiative is a group of over 400 culturally, racially and socially diverse business and civic leaders dedicated to increasing prosperity and the quality of life for all New Orleanians through economic development.
Non-Profit
Business Council of New Orleans
Bob Brown, Director
Primary business development advocacy organization in New Orleans representing the major corporate and private entities in the region.
The Business Council’s mission is to work to implement clear, predictable laws that foster honest, efficient, transparent and accountable government. The Business Council strives to ensure a competitive business environment that attracts productive companies, individuals and families to our community.
Non-Profit
54
Working Paper 3
Community Context
August 2010
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Mission
Structure
Liberty Bank and Trust Company
Alden McDonald, President and CEO
Founded in 1972, with 3 million dollars in assets, Liberty Bank has grown to a multi-state financial institution operating in Louisiana, Mississippi, Kansas, Texas, and Michigan. Currently, Liberty Bank has $340 million dollars in assets.
The mission of Liberty Bank and Trust is to provide cost effective delivery of high-quality, innovative, customerdriven products and services to diverse markets with a focus on disadvantaged minority communities who traditionally have been underserved. Concurrent with the Bank’s mission we will strive to maintain the Company’s status as a catalyst for economic and community development while generating a fair return to shareholders and being an excellent corporate citizen.
For Profit Banking and Financial Institution
First Bank and Trust Corporation
Joseph Canizaro 504-584-5000
Branches located in Louisiana in New Orleans, Metairie, Algiers, Kenner, Harahan, Covington, Harvey, Baton Rouge, Amite, Greensburg, Hammond, Kentwood, Lafayette and Praireville, and branches in Mississippi in Biloxi, Ocean Springs and Winona.
Offer personalized and responsive banking to meet the needs of businesses and individuals in our community. Our goal is to provide quality banking services to help you.
For Profit Banking and Financial Institution
VCE Capital
Richard Montgomery 504-569-7900
VCE Partners manage the investment fund TVP, LP, which is focused on life science opportunities from the Pennington Biomedical Research Center. TVP will also invest in companies outside of the Pennington Center that run clinical trials or conduct research collaborations with the Center.
Southeast-based venture capital firm that invests opportunistically. Provide equity capital to early and expansion stage companies with proprietary technology platforms or unique products addressing large markets.
For Profit Venture Capital Firm
Iberia Bank
Cleland Powell 504-569-7900
Operate 95 branch offices throughout Louisiana, Alabama, and Florida. Headquartered in Lafayette, Louisiana, we serve clients in South Central Louisiana (Acadiana), the Greater New Orleans area (including Houma), the Northshore of New Orleans (including Slidell, Covington and Mandeville), Northeast Louisiana (the Monroe/ Ruston region), Shreveport (Northwest Louisiana), Baton Rouge, Alabama, and Florida (including Jacksonville and South Florida regions).
Exceed client satisfaction by delivering unparalleled customer service at every point of contact. Committed to offering products and services customized to meet your financial needs. Provide a comprehensive financial product line including Retail, Commercial, Private Banking, Mortgage, Cash Management, Online Banking and Investment services.
For Profit Banking and Financial Institution
55
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Mission
Structure
Capital One Bank
Steven Hemperley 504-240-5161
One of the nation’s top 10 banks based on deposits; serves New York, New Jersey, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Maryland, and Washington D.C. markets
Offer a broad array of financial products and services to consumers, small businesses, and commercial clients
For Profit Banking and Financial Institution
Omni Bank
Kyle Waters 504-533-2895
Founded in 1988 in response to the need for a community-oriented, community-involved financial institution serving the Louisiana “super-region.”
Create value and make a difference by: Providing exceptional customer service; Focusing on needs-based selling to attract, retain and deepen customer relationships; Being an employer of choice; Making a difference in our communities
Corporate Realty
Mike Siegel
Provide retail leasing, office leasing, and investment brokerage; property management services; client support services
Full service commercial real-estate company in New Orleans
For Profit
New Orleans BioInnovation Center
Aaron Miscenich, Executive Director
Assist in the development of biotechnology-related companies looking to commercialize technologies from Greater New Orleans area universities, including LSU Health Sciences Center, Tulane Health Sciences Center, the University of New Orleans and Xavier University.
Business Incubator
Regional Planning Commission
Walter Brooks, Executive Director; Caitlin Cain, Econ. Dev. 504-483-8519
Promote the general welfare and prosperity of the entire region by harmonizing the activities of federal, state, parish, municipal and other governmental agencies in the region.
Public
GNO, Inc.
Michael Hecht, President & CEO 504-527-6907
Generate wealth and improve the quality of life in the region. Attracting and retaining businesses; advocating for policies to improve the competitive climate; and, ensuring the availability of a high-quality workforce, GNO, Inc. intends to counter negative perceptions and ensure that there is a clear understanding of the supreme opportunities available in the Greater New Orleans region.
Non-Profit
Will submit regional application for federal Sustainable Cities Grant to improve transit-oriented development surrounding GNOBEDD
56
Working Paper 3
Community Context
August 2010
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Mission
Structure
New Orleans Business Retention & Expansion
Ernest Gethers 504-658-0927
Commercial and recreational development along Tulane Ave, a strip along Canal and Claiborne, and along the Lafitte Greenway on Claiborne Ave; Residential development planned on the upper end of Canal St. near the BioInnovation Center.
Assist with land acquisition and expedite permitting process
Public
New Orleans Department of Public Works
Robert Mendoza 504-658-8000
Construct, maintain, and administer transportation elements affecting vehicular, pedestrian, and rail movement within the public right-ofway.
Public
Jefferson Parish Economic Development Commission
Dottie Stephenson 504-833-1881 x 346
Produced Jefferson EDGE 2010 5-year economic development strategic plan for Jefferson Parish.
Proactively influence the economy through the retention and creation of quality jobs, entrepreneurship and investment in Jefferson Parish to attract, grow and create new business in the area.
Public
St. Tammany Parish Economic Development Foundation
Brenda Reine Bertus 985-809-7874
Parish profile; population projections; economic trends; growth index to identify top five areas for economic expansion
Improve the quality of life in the parish by strengthening and supporting the business climate in the region by retaining and attracting business and employment
Public
Louisiana Technology Council
Mark Lewis 504-304-2911
Established 8 Special Interest groups to provide a forum to review the latest technology and issues affecting the tech market and promote business development by creating regional business opportunities.
Assist with the technological development of individuals and member organizations by providing programs, events, organizational support and other value added services that contribute to their competitiveness and growth.
Non-Profit
Bureau of Governmental Research
Janet Howard 504-525-4152 x 107
Produced report critiquing New Orleans most recent master plan
Informed public policy making and the effective use of public resources for the improvement of government in the New Orleans metropolitan area.
Private NonProfit
Dryades Savings Bank
Kimberly Lee 504-671-3468
Member of GNOBEDD Board
Dryades Bank is the most capable, Bank highest quality, high-touch, customer focused financial institution in both the lines of business we provide and the markets we serve; a leader among our peers in customer service, community involvement and financial performance; and, an engine for community development.
57
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Mission
Structure
Job Corps
Amelia Oliver 504-484-3500
“Academic training and specialized vocational training in: Clinical Certified Medical Assistant; Health Occupations Technology; Medical Office Support “
Job Corps is a no-cost education and career technical training program administered by the U.S. Department of Labor that helps young people ages 16 through 24 improve the quality of their lives through career technical and academic training.
Government
Ernest N. Morial New Orleans Convention Center
Stephen J. Perry 504-566-5049
Event activity has attracted more than 11 million out-of-state visitors, generating a statewide economic impact of $39.12 billion from 19852007.
The freshly renovated New Orleans Ernest N. Morial Convention Center is an essential component of what makes the city’s major business events so successful. With 1.1 million square feet of contiguous exhibit space, the Convention Center is the sixth largest convention facility in the nation, and it consistently ranks in the country’s top ten of facilities that hold the most conventions and tradeshows annually.
Public
Domain Companies
Matt Schwartz 504-274-1930
Developers of the Preserve and Crescent Club apartment complexes
Private real-estate development firm
For Profit
JCH Development
Tara Carter Hernandez 504-274-1930
Redeveloping the former Blue Plate Mayonnaise manufacturing facility into 72 mixed-income loft residences
Develop projects that are sustainable and positively impact the quality of life of its communities
For Profit
Louisiana Minority Business Council
Phala Mire 504-523-7110
Identify, certify, and maintain database of MBE’s in Louisiana
To provide business development services and facilitate opportunities and access among corporations, the public sector and certified MBEs allowing for mutually beneficial relationships.
Public
New Orleans Chamber of Commerce
Charles Teamer 504-799-4260
Provides advocacy and business support programs for New Orleans based businesses
Support and advocate for New Orleans Businesses
Non-Profit
New Orleans Regional Transit Authority
Justin Augustine; Stefan Marks 504-827-8300
Secured the Tiger Grant I DOT award for the Loyola St. streetcar extension
Operate in a manner that creates sustainability for our environment and our future with a commitment to safety to ensure fewer accidents and less carbon emissions.
Public
New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board
Marcia St. Martin; Charles Spooner 504-585-2190
Provide the city with adequate drainage, sewerage collection, and drinking water.
Public
Infrastructure
58
Working Paper 3
Community Context
August 2010
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Mission
State of Louisiana Division of Administration
Jerry Jones 225-219-1218
Control the Administration of the University Medical Center
Public Unique among government departments, the Division of Administration serves the people of Louisiana mainly by providing essential services to the whole of state government. As provided in Title 39 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes, “The functions of the Division of Administration shall comprise all administrative functions of the state in relation to the duties outlined in law.” To accomplish these functions, the Division of Administration is comprised of 25 sections, some functioning as control-oriented entities and others as service-oriented entities.
Louisiana Department of Transportation
Sherri LeBas 225-379-1200
Oversee $66 million in stimulus transit funding for the state of Louisiana
To deliver transportation and public works systems that enhance quality of life and facilitate economic growth.
Public
U.S. Army Corp of Engineers - Team New Orleans
Colonel Alvin Lee
Team New Orleans provides comprehensive water resources management to include navigation, hurricane and storm damage risk reduction and environmental stewardship for south Louisiana to ensure public safety and benefit the nation; also prepared to conduct contingency operations as well as support the national response plan.
Public
FEMA
Mark Landry
Support citizens and first responders to ensure that as a nation we work together to build, sustain, and improve our capability to prepare for, protect against, respond to, recover from, and mitigate all hazards.
Public
Funded the reconstruction and renovation of Recovery School District schools since 2007
Structure
59
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Mission
Structure
Entergy New Orleans
Charles Rice, President
Entergy New Orleans, a subsidiary of Entergy Corporation, is an electric and gas utility serving Orleans Parish. Following Hurricane Katrina, Entergy emerged from bankruptcy and has restored eclectic and gas services to the City. The company is currently upgrading gas service and maintaining the electricity generation and delivery. It has recently initiated major conservation and energy efficiency policies.
Formed in the early 1900s as New Orleans Public Service Inc., or NOPSI, the company originally provided gas and electric service and maintained the streetcar and bus lines with one simple goal: to provide courteous, continuous and efficient service at all times. Although the company eventually relinquished operation of the streetcar and bus lines, Entergy New Orleans maintains a similar goal with a new slogan: keep the lights on and the gas flowing.
Public Utility / For Profit Entity
Common Good
Nolan Marshall, III 504-338-3823
Coalition of 58 Member Institutions
Non-Profit The historic impasse between white economic power and black political power throttles the development of the whole city, leaving us fighting racially over pieces of a shrinking pie rather than debating how to share a growing one equitably. Government, business and civic leaders each have key and irreplaceable roles to play in a healthy city. Civil society leaders can and must become catalysts, conveners and agents of mutual accountability in communication and decision-making among state, market and civil society leaders. The overarching goal of all New Orleans leaders must be a city that is not just rebuilt, but transformed on principles of inclusion, efficiency, transparency, equity and civility.
Associated Catholic Charities
Jim Kelly 504-301-0014 x 106
Offer case management services through the Sojourner Truth Community Center, particularly for residents displaced by public housing redevelopment and the hospital footprints
Non-Profit Respecting the dignity and potential of each human person, Catholic Charities Archdiocese of New Orleans collaborates with the wider community to serve those in need. Impelled by the love and teaching of Jesus Christ, we offer life-giving programs, advocate for the voiceless, and empower the poor and vulnerable to foster a more just society.
Community
60
Working Paper 3
Community Context
August 2010
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Mission
Structure
Greater New Orleans Urban League
Nolan Rollins, Director
In the area of education, the Urban League has targeted its direct service and advocacy efforts toward empowering parents, recognizing and promoting educational excellence, and closing the achievement gap with direct service in early learning and extended learning (after school / summer programs). In the area of economic development, ULGNO targets its work in strengthening industry via building the capacity of workforce, supporting the reestablishment of small businesses and re-envisioning the Urban League’s home community – the Bienville Corridor. ULGNO recognizes the direct service is only one component in a broader strategy to truly facilitate self-sufficiency. As such, the Center for Policy and Social Justice intends to identify and inform public discourse and policy to eradicate institutional barriers which inhibit the broader aims of the organization’s programmatic thrust.
Today, there are 105 Urban League affiliates throughout the country. Through advocacy, community organization and mobilization and program services in areas of education, economic development, employment and training, youth services and child and family support, the League’s mission of helping individuals to attain economic self-sufficiency remains virtually unchanged.
Non-Profit
Baptist Community Ministries
Byron Harrell, President and CEO
One of the largest foundations in Louisiana, BCM is a major funder for many projects in the City of New Orleans. The President of BCM was recently appointed to the Board of United Medical Center by LSU.
“
Non- Profit
Mid-City Neighborhood Association
Jennifer Farwell, President
Primary neighborhood group in the area adjacent to the site of the VA hospital development. Active in rebuilding following Katrina.
Working to improve the quality of life for all residents of Mid-City New Orleans.
Sojourner Truth Community Center
Carol Carter, Director
Primary meeting place for neighborhoods adjacent to Hospital district to the East of Canal Street
Non-Profit Sojourner Truth Community Center, administered by the Archdiocese of New Orleans provides long term case management, with direct assistance as part of a holistic approach to recovery from Hurricane Katrina.
Baptist Community Ministries (BCM) is committed to the development of a healthy community offering a wholesome quality of life to its residents and to improving the physical, mental, and spiritual health of the individuals we serve. “ Non-Profit
61
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Mission
Structure
Broad Community Connections
Jeff Schwartz, Director
Active Community Development group in the neighborhood adjacent to GNOBEDD; working to return former Robert’s grocery store on Broad and Bienville back to commerce
Broad Community Connections’ mission is to revitalize Broad Street from Tulane Avenue to Bayou Road as a vibrant commercial corridor, bringing together the surrounding neighborhoods and fostering their economic, residential, and cultural development.
Non-Profit “Main Street” Corporation
Faubourg St. John Neighborhood Association
Mike Pearce, President
Represent neighborhoods adjacent to Bayou St. John
The Faubourg St. John Neighborhood Association (FSJNA), organized in 1977, is a benevolent group interested in continuing improvements in this historic New Orleans neighborhood through its people, children, historic waterway, public spaces and other environs.
Non-Profit
Iberville Residents Council
Kim Piper, President 504-524-1478
In May, 2009 HANO’s board created an advisory committee for Iberville residents to help develop solutions to improve the public housing site.
Represent the residents of the Iberville Public Public Housing Development
Friends of Lafitte Corridor
Bart Everson, President 504-482-0925
Working to ensure that a “mixed use district with central greenway” is codified in the new Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, and that the land within the Greenway zone itself, including the 16 1/2 acre parcel recently acquired by the city, is zoned compatibly with the goals of the project. And, ensuring that the Lafitte Corridor Revitalization Plan is charged with the task of making recommendations for land use and zoning along the Corridor and coordinating the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance rewrite with that work.
The Friends of Lafitte Corridor seeks to preserve and revitalize the Lafitte Corridor and adjacent neighborhoods from the French Quarter to Canal Boulevard by advocating for and facilitating the creation of a greenway that encourages active living and economic development and links neighborhoods, cultural features, historic sites, retail areas and public spaces.
Non-Profit
Lafitte Residents Council
Emelda Paul, President
Host monthly meetings of former Lafitte residents; and participate in regular planning sessions hosted by Providence and Enterprise to gather feedback about potential designs for a New Lafitte
Represent the residents of the former Lafitte Public Housing Development
Non-Profit
Tulane Canal Neighborhood Development Corporation
Sister Vera Butler 504-486-6266
Stay in touch with small local businesses that will be displaced by the hospital footprints
Represent the residents and businesses of this area
Non-Profit
62
Working Paper 3
Community Context
August 2010
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Mission
Structure
Phoenix of New Orleans
Paul Ikemire 504-267-4685
Rebuilt several residences and community buildings in the Lower Mid-City area and have a plan for ancillary residential and commercial development around GNOBEDD
Dedicated to the rebuilding and recovery effort of Lower Mid-City
Non-Profit
Puentes
Lucas Dias 504-821-7728
Programs in housing, public safety, public leadership, and advocacyorganizing
Build assets and create access for the Latino community of the Greater New Orleans area
Non-Profit
Council on Aging
Robert Bermudez 504-821-4121
Insuring that a comprehensive and coordinated assortment of social, recreational, educational, and nutritional services are provided to persons aged 60 and over in the city of New Orleans.
Protect the rights, promote the well being, and enhance the self-esteem of New Orleans elderly by generating opportunities for self-reliance and independence.
Non-Profit
Young Leadership Council
Christy Norsworthy 504-585-1500
YLC has raised more than $25 million to support community projects in and around the New Orleans area since 1986. YLC has 1,300 membervolunteers, and is led by a 25-member board of directors and four staff members. Each community initiative is led by one or more volunteer project leaders.
Non-partisan civic organization created to develop leadership through community projects.
Non-Profit
UNITY of Greater New Orleans
Martha Kegel 504-821-4496
Work with the state to increase permanent supportive housing
Coordinate community partnerships to prevent, reduce, and end homelessness
Non-Profit
Active Social Justice organization working in New Orleans to insure rights of poor people
The Louisiana Justice Institute (LJI) is a civil rights legal advocacy organization, devoted to fostering social justice campaigns across Louisiana for communities of color and for impoverished communities. LJI understands that as a state-based civil rights organization, it can and must serve as an agent for social change in Louisiana. Its creation is responsive to a specific and urgent need to resurrect capacity for statewide, systemic, legal advocacy on behalf of those most in need of assistance – Louisiana’s minority and Louisiana’s poor residents.
Non- Profit
Louisiana Tracie Justice Institute Washington, Director
63
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Mission
Structure
BW Cooper
Darrell J. Williams 504-822-9452 504-822-8840
Successful resident management program in partnership with HANO since 1995 providing residential self sufficiency in public housing and improved quality of life for tenants
Redevelop the former Calliope Public Housing Project and provide 410 units of rental housing: 294 affordable and 116 market-rate.
Public
Providence Community Housing
Jim Kelly 504-821-7222
Cleaned & gutted 1,983 homes & apts. Completed construction of 1,227 homes and apts; 204 homes and apts under construction, 1,360 homes and apts in development, and 1,172 homes and apts in pre-development
Foster healthy, diverse and vibrant communities by developing, operating and advocating for affordable, mixedincome housing, supportive services and employment opportunities for individuals, families, seniors and people with special needs with the goal of bringing home 20,000 Katrina victims home through the development of 7,000 homes and apartments.
Non-Profit
Joyce New Orleans Redevelopment Wilkerson, Executive Authority Director
With significant bonding capacity and the power of expropriation, NORA can implement recommended community plans. NORA is the only existing agency with the legislative authority and capacity to implement comprehensive neighborhood revitalization plans. Given its financial and legislative resources, NORA will play a central role in planning and implementing comprehensive neighborhood revitalization. NORA recently received more than $29 million dollars from HUD to initiate redevelopment in 13 target areas of the City
The New Orleans Redevelopment Authority (NORA) is an organization created by the State Legislature in 1968, through the passage of the New Orleans Community Improvement Act. Its primary mission is to provide investment capital for affordable housing and mixed use development.
NORA is both a 501(c)3 non-profit and Certified Community Development Entity (EDE)
Harmony Oaks
Developing Mixed Income housing in Central City
Project managed by McCormack, Barron, Salazar - company has developed model mixed income communities throughout the country,
For Profit
Housing
Alvin Harrison, Project Manager
64
Working Paper 3
Community Context
August 2010
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Mission
Structure
Dillard is a fully accredited private, historically black university committed to providing students with a quality four-year liberal arts education since 1869
Private
Southern University at New Orleans (SUNO) primarily serves the educational and cultural needs of the Greater New Orleans metropolitan area. SUNO creates and maintains an environment conducive to learning and growth, promotes the upward mobility of students by preparing them to enter into new as well as traditional careers, and equips them to function optimally in the mainstream of American society
Public
Provide rigorous and relevant instruction for all students at all academic levels to ensure each achieves maximum potential.
OPSB Charter School
United Neighborhood Organization opened its first charter school in New Orleans, LA. In 2007 to serve the growing Latino population after Hurricane Katrina. The Esperanza Charter school serves over 300 students from the New Orleans and surrounding areas.
Private Charter School
Education/Workforce Development Dillard University
Dr. Marvalene Hughes 504-816-4640
Southern University of New Orleans
Dr. Victor Ukpolo 504-286-5000
Warren Easton High School
Alexina Medley 504-324-7400
Esperanza Charter School
Stacey Barry 504-373-6272
Albert Wicker Elementary School
Sabrina Pence 504-373-6220
Lagniappe Academy Charter School
Joe Daschbach 504-355-0950
Dillard’s highly acclaimed nursing program is the first of its kind in Louisiana. In 2007, graduates earned a 100 percent pass rate on the National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses. Received NIH Grant for $6.8 million to partner with LSU to establish a minority health and health disparities research center on its campus.
U.S. Dept. of Education Blue Ribbon School; Adopted by Actress Sandra Bullock
OPSB School
Secured former Bell school site for operation to begin in Fall 2010
Promote academic excellence, resilience and self-awareness in New Orleans children. By parenting with families, community organizations and other institutions who share our core beliefs, Lagniappe Academies will inspire students to celebrate their cultural heritage and to embrace new opportunities.
Public Charter School
65
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Booker T. Washington High School
Elise Adams 504-373-6206
Only operating Grade 8
Mission
Structure RSD Public School
United Teachers Larry Carter of New Orleans 504-304-2160
Filed a class action suit in 2010 against BESE, Department of Education, and the Recovery School District for wrongful termination of all OPSB teachers after Hurricane Katrina
Union of teachers and school employees in NOPS, RSD and charter schools in Orleans Parish representing the professional voice of more than 1,300 teachers, para-educators and clerical workers and more than 200 retirees.
Union
Recovery School District
Paul G. Vallas, Superintendent
Currently, 70 RSD schools are open in New Orleans, including 33 traditional public schools and 37 public charter schools. Over the past 2 years the RSD has seen significant improvement in student academic achievement. The RSD has also been responsible for building or completely renovating 6 schools and is on track to completing a rebuilding 87 schools over the next 15 years.
The Recovery School District is a special school district administered by the Louisiana Department of Education. Created by legislation passed in 2003, the RSD is designed to take underperforming schools and transform them into successful places for children to learn. The RSD is also the lead agency in rebuilding New Orleans public schools guided by a School Facilities Master Plan that was adopted in 2008.
The Recovery School District (RSD) is a special state school district administered by the Louisiana Department of Education
Orleans Parish School Board
Darryl Kilbert, Superintendent
The Orleans Parish School Board is a district of seven district managed sites and twelve charter schools that occupy fourteen campuses. The OPSB schools are some of the top performing schools in New Orleans.
OPSB is he legal and financial entity responsible for the land and buildings in Orleans Parish. The mission of the New Orleans Public School System is to provide quality learning environments that promote academic excellence and engage the family and community in the support of student achievement.
The Orleans Parish School Board is the local, independent body responsible for responsible for operating 7 schools and overseeing 12 charters in Orleans Parish. It is the Local Education Authority for Orleans Parish.
66
Working Paper 3
Community Context
August 2010
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Mission
Structure
Job One
Bryan Moore, Director
Job One has been responsible for placing over 19,000 citizens in productive jobs over the past 5 years.
“JOB1 is the City of New Orleans’ office of workforce development. Its purpose is to identify and align the supply of workers in New Orleans with the needs of growing businesses. Through a combination of monitoring the needs of a knowledgebased economy, to providing career counseling and training, JOB1 leverages the capabilities of local citizens to fill necessary position while working with local businesses to customize training, screen applicants and help forecast future demand. “
Job One is a City administered agency responsible for implementing the job placement plan for Orleans Parish, utilizing Workforce Investment Act (WIA) and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (AARA) federal funds.
Dryades YMCA / James Singleton Charter School
Douglas Evans, Director
The Dryades Street YMCA was founded in 1905 as the “Colored Young Men’s Christian Association.” Following a fire that destroyed the original building in 2001, the Dryades YMCA has rebuilt - creating a Charter School for pre-k to 8 grades students, operating a School of Commerce training nurses and related professions, and operating a community center in Central City New Orleans.
The mission of the Dryades YMCA / Singleton Charter School is to develop charter, competence, and commitment for inner-city youth in New Orleans.
Non-Profit Youth Services Organization
Goody Clancy
David Dixon, Principal
Lead Urban Planner for the development of the City’s Master Plan and CZO. Recently, asked to do Peer Review of design of UMC Hospital plans.
Quality work in urban planning, architecture and design
For Profit
New Orleans City Planning Commission
Yolanda Rodriguez, Director
Nearing completion of City Master Plan, the first Master Plan since the 1950’s. Currently working on Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
Primary City Agency responsible for Planning and Development
City Agency
Other
67
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
New Orleans Saints
Tom Benson, Owner
Won 2010 Super Bowl / Owns land and NFL Franchise - Inspirational Team with is planning development in downtown strong community support New Orleans
Mission
Structure
Grace Episcopal Church
Rev. Terry Williams
Community meeting site for many in the Mid-City neighborhood
Carrollton Avenue Preservation Alliance
Jim Logan 504-522-5900
“Alliance of 5 neighborhood associations: Fontainebleau Neighborhood Association; Uptown Triangle Neighborhood; Carrollton / Riverbend Residents Inc.; Upper Carrollton Residents Inc.; and the MidCity Neighborhood Association “
An allegiance of neighborhood associations whose geographical boundaries border on Carrollton Avenue. The group enables members to share information and ideas on improving the quality of our neighborhoods, address redevelopment issues, and provide support for protecting the residential character of Carrollton Avenue
Non-Profit
Committee to Reopen Charity Hospital
Brad Ott 504-269-4951
Conducted many studies on the architectural integrity of Charity Hospital after Katrina and estimated costs for restoring it
Make the case that Charity Hospital be re-opened
Non-Profit
Louisiana Trust for Historic Preservation
Walter Gallas 504-636-3048
Organized state-wide network of preservationists was a critical component to promote the preservation of the heritage and historic resources of Louisiana through education, technical assistance, outreach and advocacy. The Louisiana Trust for Historic Preservation is the statewide partner of the National Trust for Historic preservation.
Promote the preservation of the cultural heritage and historic resources of Louisiana
Non-Profit
Smart Growth Louisiana
Jack Davis 504-636-3048
Jack Davis is part of the New City Collaborative in the Hospital Working Group
Thwart the advance of harmful sprawl by encouraging manageable and planned development
Non-Profit
The Foundation for a Historical Louisiana
Carolyn Bennett Unite community leaders, business 504-944-4010 people, historians, teachers, and preservationists in a coalition approach to historic education and preservation advocacy
For Profit
“Grace Episcopal Church, a community Church / NonProfit of acceptance and hope, celebrates God’s love and reaches out to the many peoples of New Orleans. “
Non-Profit Promote the preservation of the cultural and architectural heritage of Louisiana through education, advocacy, and stewardship
68
Working Paper 3
Community Context
August 2010
Table 4: Significant Stakeholders in the Biosciences District (Cont.) Organization
Contact
Accomplishments
Mission
Structure
Preservation Resource Center
Patti Gay 225-387-2464 x 16
Run Operation Comeback and Project Home Again after Katrina
Promote the preservation, restoration, and revitalization of New Orleans’ historic architecture and neighborhoods
Non-Profit
Family Service of Greater New Orleans
Ron McClain 504-301-9004
60,000 hours of service annually to nearly 16,500 individuals
Provide case management and services to the poor and public advocacy on issues of community health, juvenile incarceration, etc.
Non-Profit
Greater New Orleans Foundation
Albert Ruesga
Focusing on five major areas: Housing, Address the needs of the community Environment, Regionalism, Community and build consensus for solutions IMPACT, and Special Initiatives, the Foundation has embraced the role of convener, bringing local and national expertise and funding to a common table. Beyond grant making, we research the pressing needs of New Orleans, evaluate solutions, and provide coordinated responses
Volunteers of America
Victor Smeltz
Offer services for Children, Youth and Families, Developmental Disabilities, Elderly, Hurricane Recovery, and Mental Health
Extend a hand up to children, families, seniors and persons with disabilities through a wide array of helping programs in 16 parishes in south Louisiana. Since Hurricane Katrina, Volunteers of America has energized new initiatives to rebuild and help survivors recover
Foundation
Non-Profit
69
Section Summary •
A categorical listing of key stakeholders is provided citing their roles, mission, accomplishments and recommended workshops that should be conducted to develop plans for the Biosciences District in key areas of concern and focus.
•
Listing includes the following groupings: •
Instiutional / Governance (Governance, City, State, Federal, Planning, Utilities)
•
Commercial / Economic Development (Economic Development, Workforce Development, Financial Institutions Developers, Primary and Secondary Schools)
•
Health Sciences / Healthcare (Health Sciences
•
Neighborhood / Community (Housing, Faith-Based, Neighborhood Groups, Preservation, Social Justice)
•
This process is recommended as the next phase of work for action-oriented planning that will brand GNOBEDD as the key coordinator and arbiter of the Bioscience District’s development and substantively advance the process with critical input by the community.
•
A matrix provides the names, contact information, mission, structure, and accomplishments of significant stakeholders relevant to the Biosciences District. This database is intended to benchmark the capacity of significant health, community, economic, transit, housing, and education institutions and organizations, which we will rely on for a successful Community Benefits Agreement. It will also serve as a long-term directory for GNOBEDD that can be easily referenced and updated as needed.
70
Working Paper 3
Urban Design
August 2010
Section 04: Urban Design
71
72
Working Paper 3
Urban Design
August 2010
Urban Design The AECOM Team has examined the following three items related to the urban design of the Biosciences District: 1.
Provide analysis of the architectural character and context of existing buildings within the Biosciences District.
2.
Highlight key facilities while defining their general use and condition.
3.
Provide a building system assessment of select structures to evaluate their capacity / appropriateness for redevelopment, while considering future planned improvements within the Biosciences District and how these will affect the surrounding context.
Task Process The Team's approach includes utilizing base maps of the Biosciences District (composite existing and proposed), published public documents (notably excerpt from the December 2008 New Orleans Medical District Strategic Integration Report to help define the overall character of the Biosciences District) and web-based site document tools (Google Earth) to define overall context and identify an inventory of structures centered around the six main identified areas of focus: 1.
VA Hospital Complex
2. LSU Health Science Center Complex 3. Tulane University –Downtown Medical Campus 4. Xavier University 5. Old Charity Hospital/ VA Hospital Complex 6. Nodal development along the two primary vehicular arteries (Tulane Avenue and Canal Street) Follow-up activity should include a GNOBEDD team
review of this inventory and an in-field, multidiscipline team survey of selected buildings from this inventory.
Baseline: Sub-Districts within the Biosciences District Boundaries The following narrative builds upon and in some cases repeats parts of the December 2008 New Orleans Medical District Strategic Integration Report. The Biosciences District is bounded by Earhart Boulevard, Carrollton Avenue, Iberville Street, and Loyola Avenue/Elk Place. The Biosciences District can be thought of as composed of sub-districts or areas defined by their similar land uses, urban form and scale, built typology, pedestrian accommodation, historic significance and relationship to the city fabric and economy. They provide a sense of the land use pattern in a larger district. A number of subdistricts have been identified in the Biosciences District. 1.
Urban Medical Public Corridor: These areas are those that the public would most likely identify as the existing “Medical District.” Clustered around Tulane Avenue are: Tulane University Health Sciences Center, LSU Health Sciences Center, the Old Charity Hospital complex, and the VA Hospital facilities.
2. Utilitarian and Emergency Access: The areas between the Tulane University Health Sciences Center and old Charity Hospital along Tulane Avenue are characterized by utilitarian elements, such as loading areas, parking garage entrances, emergency room entrances and utility infrastructure. The windowless building facades and lack of pedestrian amenities create an overall impression of a back-of-house area
73
where the public, in particular the pedestrian, is not welcome. It is a vehicle oriented environment, with the exception of the old VA Hospital that fronts on Perdido Street and does provide some pedestrian amenities. As a significant segment of the highly visible Tulane Avenue corridor, this area is an important target for visual improvement coordinated with planning for the Tulane Avenue improvement lakeside of Claiborne Avenue. 3. Light Industrial Land: The areas generally lakeside of Claiborne Avenue and downtown of I-10 are characterized largely by a haphazard mix of industrial properties, a few of which are in good condition but most of which are in need of redevelopment. 4. Undefined Vacant Land: Much of the land immediately adjacent to Claiborne Avenue and I-10 is either fallow or occupied by temporary parking lots, which are placeholders for future development. The land under the I-10 expressway also falls into this category. The existence of this condition contributes to a very pronounced feeling of disconnect on either side of Claiborne Avenue. 5. Historic Residential: Riverside of Galvez Street between Tulane Avenue and Canal Streets are residential neighborhoods within the Mid-City National Historic District. The structures in these areas are mostly of the local vernacular shotgun style and would not be considered important individually, but together they form a consistent historic building fabric. Most are blighted and in need of major renovation. 6. Business / Office Buildings and Sports / Entertainment Complex: The Poydras Street corridor uptown of Claiborne Avenue has a strong downtown atmosphere of business and major entertainment venues. This area is well
utilized by pedestrians, and gives an impression of a relatively safe and active precinct with an acceptable quantity of pedestrian amenities. 7.
Public Uses and Undefined Urban Corridor: The Loyola Avenue corridor is defined by two very contrasting urban conditions. Lakeside of Loyola Avenue is the municipal government complex with public open space amenities. Riverside are vacant and under-utilized buildings, and a series of temporary parking lots that cover entire blocks of land. The overall impression is that Loyola Avenue is the dividing line in an area of transformation.
8. Theater District, Energized Downtown Visitor Thoroughfare and Quasi-Downtown Space: A significant part of Canal Street’s downtown section passes through the Biosciences District. This part of the street currently includes a poorly developed transitional zone between the bustling downtown corridor and the residential section of the street in Mid-City. The theaters, though in need of renovation and reopening, serve to anchor the downtown corner of the existing Medical District. The area from Loyola Avenue to Claiborne Avenue is currently a stretch with several new developments, notably the New Orleans BioInnovation Center as well as other development proposals being explored. Streetscape renovations also have recently been completed. The uptown side of Canal Street between Claiborne Avenue and Rocheblave Street will be remarkably transformed over the next several years by the new VA Hospital and the UMC developments. The downtown side of Canal Street, on the other hand, is full of used car and car rental lots, car repair shops and obsolete office structures. This area could benefit greatly from complete redevelopment and land use changes, providing a new front door for the Biosciences District.
74
Working Paper 3
Urban Design
Baseline: Existing Land Use The Biosciences District is dominated by a few land uses. Institutional, medical and industrial uses, parking (travel or movement activities) and vacant land and structures (no human activity or unclassifiable activity) make up nearly three-quarters of the land in the District.
August 2010
uptown of I-10. Riverside of Claiborne Avenue, there are a handful of small warehouse buildings along Poydras Street near the intersection with Galvez Street, many of which are vacant. There is a large Entergy substation with an entrance from Perdido Street at Magnolia Street. Finally, Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans (MCLNO) operates a warehouse, laundry and thermal energy facility on LaSalle Street at Perdido Street.
Residential Activities Residential land uses are found almost exclusively lakeside of Claiborne Avenue/I-10, where the lot and block pattern is still reminiscent of past neighborhoods. The largest concentration of residential structures falls in the portion of Mid-City bounded by Carrollton Avenue, Claiborne Avenue, Tulane Avenue and Canal Street. Many of these structures were flooded by Hurricane Katrina. Commercial Activities Tulane Avenue and Poydras and Canal streets are the primary commercial corridors of the Biosciences District and are where most of the shopping, business and trade activities are located. Poydras Street is lined with multistory office buildings – including City Hall, 1515 Poydras, 1555 Poydras and 1615 Poydras. On the other hand, automobile oriented businesses and hotels dominate the streetscape along Canal Street riverside of Claiborne Avenue. Lakeside of Claiborne Avenue, Tulane Avenue is the primary commercial corridor, while Canal Street has many small businesses and becomes increasingly residential in feel. Industrial, Manufacturing and Waste Related Activities Industrial and manufacturing activities are not heavily represented in the Biosciences District. Such uses are primarily located riverside of Jefferson Davis Parkway
Social, Institutional, or Infrastructure-Related Activities Institutional activities, particularly educational and medically related buildings, make up a significant percentage of land in the Biosciences District. Xavier University is located on the lakeside boundary of the District. Tulane University Medical Center occupies the riverside end of the District, while LSU Medical Center occupies the roughly adjacent area uptown of Tulane Avenue. Between Tulane and LSU are a number of shared medical facilities, including the former VA Hospital and the former Charity Hospital, as well as the Delgado Community College Charity School of Nursing. Additionally, the Blood Center of Southeast Louisiana is located along Johnson Street, near the intersection of Tulane Avenue and Galvez Street. Parking In the existing medical district, 24% of the total land area is dedicated to off-street parking—a sizable component of the existing land use. Most of the off-street parking is surface parking that services the LSU and Tulane University Medical Centers; however, there are also a handful of parking garages that handle hospital and patient parking. All in all, it is estimated that there are over 7,000 off-street parking spaces, approximately 80% of which are contracted for use by faculty, staff and students of the medical institutions. Nearly all streets
75
have on-street parking on one or both sides. In the existing medical area, there are an estimated total of 3,000 on-street parking spaces. Of those approximately one third is metered, the remaining two thirds is unmetered. In the rest of the Biosciences District, on-street parking is the main source of public parking. The number of spaces and amount of land dedicated to parking for the Biosciences District as a whole have not been calculated. Religious and Cultural Institutions Religious and cultural institutions in the Biosciences District include: •
St. Mark’s Fourth Baptist Church, located at the intersection of Galvez and Perdido streets.
•
St. Joseph Catholic Church on Tulane Avenue at Derbigny Street.
•
The Deutsches Haus, an organization which celebrates German heritage in New Orleans, located at the intersection of Cleveland Avenue and Galvez Street.
•
Society of St. Vincent de Paul, at the intersection of Canal Street and N. Dorgenoise Street.
•
Iglesia Vida, at the intersection of N. Broad and Iberville streets.
Leisure / Recreational Activities In the vicinity of the existing medical facilities, there are several parcels or spaces specifically devoted to leisure or recreational activity in the area around the existing medical schools. Two of these can best be defined as parks or public green spaces – the larger is Duncan Plaza, located in front of the municipal government complex on Loyola Avenue. It is approximately 3.7 acres and
contains a number of pieces of public art, walking paths and a gazebo. The smaller of the two is Nanny Goat Park, a quarter-acre triangular piece of land located at the confluence of Banks Street and Tulane Avenue. Nanny Goat Park contains a statue and benches for sitting. Lastly, St. Mark’s Church operates an indoor recreation center adjacent to its church on Galvez Street, and the LSU Medical Center dormitories feature two full outdoor basketball courts. Other small parks and open spaces are found lakeside of Claiborne Avenue, including Gert Town Pool, the parks along Jefferson Davis Parkway and Gravier Park, the only zoned park within the Biosciences District. While zoned as a park, its only features include some pedestrian lighting and a few benches. In addition to the parcels and spaces formally dedicated to leisure and recreational activities, there are a number of informal green spaces and open spaces located on private property, such as lawns and landscaped areas surrounding the buildings of the hospitals and educational institutions. However, these scattered spaces and the four above-mentioned spaces do little in terms of adding to the attractiveness of the area. Their utilization is almost nonexistent; there are no amenities either within the spaces or near the spaces that would lead workers and residents to actually stop within these areas. No Human Activity or Unclassifiable Activity Much of the land in the Biosciences District is underutilized – either undeveloped land or built upon land with vacant structures. In the existing medical district, nearly two-thirds of the unused land in the area riverside of Claiborne Avenue is occupied by vacant structures; the former Charity Hospital and VA Hospital are the largest examples of this type of use. There are also a
76
Working Paper 3
Urban Design
number of vacant hotels, office buildings, warehouses, parking garages and residences. The remaining 38% of the “unused” land is undeveloped. These vacant lots are most common in the area bounded by Galvez Street, Claiborne Avenue, Canal Street and Tulane Avenue, although they also exist around the LSU Health Sciences Center. The vacant parcels are for the most part not contiguous, and vary in size from nearly a block in size down to very small parcels. When combined with the sizable amount of surface parking, over half of the land (53%) in the existing Medical District is currently underutilized.
August 2010
Campus defined by Elk Place, Canal Street, S Claiborne Avenue, and Poydras Street. Development for this area is defined in the Tulane University, School of medicine, Science, and Engineering Masterplan for Research Space Downtown dated May 30, 2008. 4.
Delgado Community College identified as #83 on the GNOBEDD Biosciences District plan.
5.
New Orleans BioInnovation Center (NOBIC) identified as #82 on the GNOBEDD Biosciences District plan (currently under construction). This will be a wet-lab facility with the goal of assisting companies with the commercialization of biotechnologies coming out of the surrounding universities.
6.
Xavier University Campus, as defined by the provided Xavier Master Plan Documents. This plan is dependent upon the phased purchase and removal of several of the immediate surrounding neighborhood structures, primarily one story residential slab on grade structures.
Task: Maps and Matrix Summary The following areas within the Biosciences District have been excluded from this inventory process because they are part of separate, predetermined plans or whose inherent nature is believed unsuitable for Academic / Medical related commercial development. These areas have been highlighted on the attached Biosciences District plans. 1.
The proposed LSU Health Science Complex, bordered by S. Claiborne Avenue, Canal Street, S. Galvez Street, and Poydras Street. Within this area, the Louisiana Cancer Research Consortium (LCRC), a 10 story building at the intersection of S. Claiborne and Tulane avenues is currently under construction. Note: Planning documents for this project have been requested but not yet received by the AECOM Team.
7.
Historic Residential Neighborhoods between S. Rocheblave Street and S. Carrollton (N/S) Avenue and Tulane Avenue and Canal Street (E/W): These are residential neighborhoods within the Mid-City National Historic District. The structures in these areas are mostly of the local vernacular shotgun style and would not be considered important individually, but together they form a consistent and historic residential fabric.
2.
The New VA Hospital Complex defined by Rocheblave Street, Tulane Avenue, Claiborne Avenue and Canal Street. Note: Planning documents for this project have been requested but not yet received by the AECOM Team.
8.
3.
Tulane University Downtown Health Sciences
The remaining building inventory is the focus of this task. These are existing structures that are considered significant and offer potential individual and shared opportunities within the Biosciences District plan. These structures have been identified both on a base map and corresponding matrix along with the following applied classifications.
77
The classification terminology utilized is intended to help establish potential for future development and is not intended to define value (intrinsic, subjective, emotional or otherwise). The remaining building inventory is the focus of this task. These are existing structures that are considered significant and offer potential individual and shared opportunities within the Biosciences District. These structures have been identified both on a base map and corresponding matrix along with the following applied classifications. The classification terminology utilized is intended to help establish potential for future development and is not intended to define value (intrinsic, subjective, emotional or otherwise).
Typology 1.
Residential
2. Industrial, Manufacturing and Waste Related Activities 3. Social, Institutional or Infrastructure Related Activity 4. Parking
salvage/ reuse/ redevelopment D = Visually Poor Condition, Possibly Abandoned, potential candidate for removal/ infill/ new development E = Unknown (*) Requires further inventory, in-field, multidiscipline team survey
Task: Analysis Introduction The basic equation of Bioscience Industry Development is that real world challenges related to health, nutrition, energy, ecology and defense fuel Basic and Applied Research, which result in commercial applications and enterprises. Ideally, there is a continuous Translational Process from Discovery to Applications where greater collaboration equates to greater impact. Clustering physical and intellectual resources helps to build a powerful engine for growth. Goals are to: 1.
Benefit from the intersection/ overlap/ adjacency of major institutional entities, providing infrastructure which affords collaboration while eliminating implied and physical impediments.
2.
Encourage the smart development and utilization of common ground among these institutions, providing potential sites for bioscience tech parks, workforce training facilities, and officing for 21st century industries.
3.
Promote a coordinated, mixed-use zoning strategy in the areas surrounding major institutional sites, to provide housing, recreation and dining opportunities within easy walking distance. Zoning should focus upon improving inhabitant’s quality of life within this Biosciences District; it should
5. Religious/ Cultural 6. Leisure/ Recreational 7.
Business
8. Mixed Use 9. Unknown
Physical Description A = Iconic building, potential center for development B = Visually Good Condition, potential candidate for reuse/ redevelopment C = Visually Fair Condition, potential candidate for
78
Working Paper 3
Urban Design
August 2010
Table 5: Matrix: Key Developments in and around the Biosciences District Building Number
Institution
Building Use
Typology
Notes
KEY DEVELOPMENTS 54
LSU Medical School
55
LSU Medical School
University Hospital Seton Hall
56
LSU Medical School
Library
57
LSU Medical School
LSU/Lions
58
LSU Medical School
CSRB
59
LSU Medical School
Parking
60
LSU Medical School
School of Nursing
61
LSU Medical School
Medical School
62
LSU Medical School
Student Dormitory
63
LSU Medical School
Not Available
64
LSU Medical School
Not Available
65
LSU Medical School
Outpatient Clinics
66
Tulane Medical School
Perdido Building
67
Tulane Medical School
Primary Care Clinic
68
Tulane Medical School
Hospital & Clinic
69
Tulane Medical School
Tidewater Building
70
Tulane Medical School
DCI Building
71
Tulane Medical School
Women's Center
72
Tulane Medical School
Hospital & Clinic
Run/Owned by Tulane or HCA?
73
Tulane Medical School
Cancer Clinic
74
Tulane Medical School
Elk Place Building
75
Tulane Medical School
Student Dormitory
76
Tulane Medical School
1430 Building Medical School
77
Tulane Medical School
JBJ Building Cancer Center
Converting to Research?
78
Tulane Medical School
Hospital & Clinic
Run/Owned by Tulane or HCA?
79
Tulane Medical School
TUMS Annex
80
UNO
Louisiana Tumor Registry
81
Louisiana Cancer Research Center
82
Bio Innovation Center
83
Delgado Nursing School
84
Delgado Nursing School
85
Old VA Hospital
86
Veterans Administration
Dixie Brewery Research
Proposed Development
87
Veterans Administration
Central Energy Plant
Proposed Development
88
Veterans Administration
Patient Parking
Proposed Development
89
Veterans Administration
Rehabilitation & Transitional Living
Proposed Development
90
Veterans Administration
Residence
Proposed Development
91
Veterans Administration
Residence
Proposed Development
93
Veterans Administration
Residence
Proposed Development
94
Veterans Administration
Residence
Proposed Development
95
Veterans Administration
Outpatient
Proposed Development
96
Veterans Administration
Inpatient
Proposed Development
97
Veterans Administration
Administration
Pan Am Bldg, Proposed Development
Converting to Research?
LSU land ownership? Parking To be vacated
98
Veterans Administration
Emergency Ambulance & Walk In
Proposed Development
99
Veterans Administration
Diagnostic & Treatment
Proposed Development
100
Veterans Administration
Diagnostic & Treatment
Proposed Development
101
Veterans Administration
Pumping Station
Proposed Development
79
Table 5: Matrix: Key Developments in and around the Biosciences District (Cont.) Building Number 102
Institution LSU Medical School
Building Use
Typology
ACB (Clinic)
Notes Long Term Planned Growth
103
LSU Medical School
Garage
Long Term Planned Growth
104
LSU Medical School
ACB (Clinic) & Retail
Long Term Planned Growth
105
LSU Medical School
Inpatient
Long Term Planned Growth
106
LSU Medical School
Diagnostic & Treatment
Long Term Planned Growth
107
LSU Medical School
Inpatient
Proposed Development
108
LSU Medical School
ACB (Clinic)
Proposed Development
109
LSU Medical School
ACB (Clinic) & Retail
Long Term Planned Growth
110
LSU Medical School
Parking Garage
Proposed Development
111
LSU Medical School
Diagnostic & Treatment
Proposed Development
112
Tulane Medical School
Research
Proposed Development
113
Tulane Medical School
Academic & Parking
Proposed Development
114
Tulane Medical School
Research
Proposed Development
115
Tulane Medical School
Residential or Academic & Parking
Proposed Development
116
Tulane Medical School
Residential & Parking
Proposed Development
117
Tulane Medical School
Hospital
Proposed Development
135
L&M Building
136
Dibert Building
Vacant?
151
Gravier
Residential Residential
152
Jung Hotel
153
Quality Inn
155
Crystal Inn
157
Canal Condominiums
Residential
159
Falstaff Apartments
Residential
164
Canal Street Hotel
175
Charity Hospital
176
St. Joseph Church
180
City Hall
181
Civil Court
182
Public Library
183
**
Vacant
187
Entergy
188
Entergy
190
Israel Augustine Middle School
193
Esperanza Charter School
195
Cameron College
196
Schwarz Alternative School
197
New Orleans Christian Academy
198
Tulane Avenue
Does Tulane control this site?
SURROUNDING AREA INVENTORY B1
Gas Station
B2
Commercial
7D*
B3
Commercial Vacant?
7C*
Firehouse
3E*
B4
9E*
B5 B6
9E*
B7 B8
7D*
9E* Murphy Building & Parking Garage
4C*
Tulane land ownership
80
Working Paper 3
Urban Design
August 2010
Table 5: Matrix: Key Developments in and around the Biosciences District (Cont.) Building Number B9
Institution
Building Use
Lafcadia Hearn Residence
Typology
Notes
1A*
B10
Vacant
7D*
B11
Vacant
9E*
B12
Commercial/Light Industrial
2C*
B13
Parking
4C*
B14
Commercial
7B*
Does Tulane control this site?
B15
Commercial/Light Industrial
7C*
LSU land ownership?
B16
Parking
4C*
Commercial?
7B*
B18
Commercial
9E*
B19
Commercial
7D*
B20
Medical Related?
9E*
B17
B21
NOT USED
B22
NOT USED
B23
NOT USED
LSU land ownership?
LSU land ownership?
B24
Budget Rental Car
7D*
B25
Vacant
7D*
B26
Vacant
4D*
B27
Tower Commercial?
7B*
B28
Parking or Vacant?
7D*
B29
Parking
4D*
B30
Commercial?
3B*
B31
Commercial
7B*
B40
Lower Mid City
8D*
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B41
Lower Mid City
8D*
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B42
Church
5B*
B43
Lower Mid City
8D*
Light Industrial
B44
Lower Mid City
8D*
Parking, Commercial
B45
Parking
4D*
B46
Parking
4D*
B47
Commercial, Parking
8D*
B48
Parking, Vacant
8D*
B49
Parking, Commercial
8D*
B50
Parking, Commercial
8D*
LSU?
Maintenance Building
9E*
Commercial
7B*
Mid City?
8D*
Commercial, Vacant
B54
Mid City?
8D*
Commercial, Vacant
B55
Mid City?
8D*
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B56
Mid City?
8D*
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B57
Residential Condo Tower Vacant 1C* or New?
B51 B52 B53
B58
Short term Surface Parking Lots
B70
Mid City
8D*
Comm, Res, Vacant
B71
Mid City
8D*
Comm, Res, Vacant
B72
Mid City
8D*
Comm, Res, Vacant
B73
Parking
4D*
B74
N.O. Council on Aging
3B*
B75
N.O. Council on Aging
3B*
81
Table 5: Matrix: Key Developments in and around the Biosciences District (Cont.) Building Number
Institution
Building Use
Typology
B76
Commercial
B77
United Way
3C*
B78
Commercial?
7C*
B79
Vacant Land?
9E*
B80
Religious
5D*
B81
Residential
1C*
B82 B83
Rite Aid
Notes
7C*
Vacant?
7B*
Commercial
7D*
B84
Church
5B*
B85
Vacant
7D*
B86
Vacant Land?
9E*
B87
Residential
1D*
B88
Commercial
7C*
B89
Mid City
8D
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B90
Mid City
8D*
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B91
Mid City
8D
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B92
Mid City
8D*
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B93
Mid City
8D
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B94
Mid City
8D*
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B95
Mid City
8D
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
Residential?
1C*
B96
Tulane Tower
B97
Vacant
7D*
B98
Vacant?
7D*
B99
Mid City, L.F. Gaubert Site for redevelopment?
8D*
B100
Juvenile Curfew Center
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
3C*
B101
Mid City
8D*
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B102
Mid City
8D*
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B103
Hotel
1D*
B104
Mid City
8D*
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B105
Mid City
8D*
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B106
Light Industrial/Commercial
7D*
B107
Vacant
1D*
B108
Mid City
8D*
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B109
Mid City
8D
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B110
Mid City
8D
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B111
Mid City
8D
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B112
Mid City
8D
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B113
Falstaff Brewery
7A
Condo apartments
B120
Gert Town
8D*
Residential
B121
Gert Town
8D*
Residential
B122
Gert Town
8D*
Residential
B123
Gert Town
8D*
Residential
Commercial
7C
B124
Fox News
B125
Commercial
7B*
B126
Vacant
9D*
B127
Gert Town
8D*
B128
Commercial
7D*
B129
Commercial
7D*
Residential
82
Working Paper 3
Urban Design
August 2010
Table 5: Matrix: Key Developments in and around the Biosciences District (Cont.) Building Number
Institution
Building Use
Typology
Notes
B130
Gert Town
8D*
Commercial
B131
Gert Town
8D*
Commercial
B132
Gert Town
8D*
Commercial
B133
Gert Town
8D*
Commercial/Light Industrial
B134
Commercial
8D*
B135
Gert Town
8D*
Commercial/Light Industrial?
B136
Gert Town
8D*
Residential
B137
Gert Town
8D*
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B138
Commercial?
8D*
B139
Gert Town
8D
B140
Commercial/Light Industrial
2D
B141
Commercial/Light Industrial
2D
B142
Gert Town
8D
Residential
B143
Gert Town
8D
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B144
Gert Town
8D
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
B160
Commercial
7D*
Commercial
7D*
B161 B162
Burger King
Residential
7D*
B163
Apartments
1D*
B164
Storage
7D*
B165
Apartments
1D*
B166
Lt Industrial
7D*
B167
Lt Industrial
7D*
B168
Lt Industrial
7C*
B169
Parking/Supply Lot?
4D*
B170
Lt Industrial
7C*
B171
Commercial/Light Industrial?
7D*
B172
Commercial/Light Industrial?
7D*
Vacant?
9E*
B174
Vacant?
9E*
B175
Vacant?
9E*
B176
Outlet Mall?
7D*
B177
Mid City
8D*
B178
Mid City
8D*
Lt Indus, Comm
B179
Mid City
8D*
Res, Comm, Vacant
B173
Carrollton Shopping Ctr
Res, Lt Indus, Comm, Vacant
83
streets. Street trees are a scarce commodity in the Biosciences District riverside of Claiborne Avenue/I-10. Linked open and green spaces, as well as attractive, tree-lined roadways are physical elements which will facilitate thematic and real linkage of integrated activities and commerce within the District. The implementation of sustainable concepts would go a long way towards creating a vibrant and walkable Biosciences District.
focus upon scale, connectivity, and political control rather than land use categories. 4.
Promote well conceived and convenient transportation modalities to support and encourage collaboration among these institutions. Strong transportation connector spines (such as Tulane Avenue and Canal Street) are critical to the Biosciences District cohesiveness/ effectiveness and can become pleasant pedestrian and bicycle routes as well.
5.
Facilitate a diverse range (size and complexity) of start-up and expanding businesses by eliminating physical and bureaucratic impediments to development and leasing space at a range of price points.
3.
Several major street arteries, such as Tulane Avenue and Canal Street, are not living up to their potential. Development along Canal Street is not supportive of its grand cross section. Major transportation arteries within the Biosciences District such as Tulane Avenue and Canal Street and primary cross streets (S Carrollton, S Jeff Davis, Broad, Galvez, and S Claiborne) present great opportunities to strengthen a distinctive and attractive overall image of the District. However, these roadways currently act more like commuter thoroughfares. Recognizing that “first impressions” for many visitors comes from the vistas along these thoroughfares, this emphasizes the heightened importance of land uses along them. Stabilizing and improving the vitality of the properties along these roadways is critical in improving the perception of the strength of the Biosciences District itself.
4.
Tulane Avenue is a strong central axis which could best link the large academic /medical institutions in the Biosciences District. The lakeside edge of the Biosciences District is dependent upon a well-defined border along Carrollton Avenue and a strong terminus to this Tulane Avenue axis. Xavier University has long term aspirations to link to Tulane Avenue across I-10 with a true physical connection. In the interim, they could strive to be
Observations /Thoughts 1.
2.
From our Case Study Analysis of six similar urban bioscience districts, we propose that there is a prescribed limiting distance to where academic / medical related commercial incubator /research space is most successful, essentially related to a maximum 15 minute walking distance or a 5 minute trolley loop. The logic of this research has been transposed to the Biosciences District plan to represent what we believe are the best zones for potential academic or health science related commercial development (see maps at the end of this section). There are currently few well-thought out and/or planned outdoor gathering and activity spaces within the Biosciences District. The lack of such places magnifies the current unattractiveness of the area, and makes it difficult to conceive of the district as a unified place. Plantings could be better used to enhance pedestrian zones along
84
Working Paper 3
Urban Design
August 2010
In Amsterdam, Urban Alliance won a competition for ideas to improve the public space of a socially unsafe area. Theyâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;ve used one of these dark vacant underpasses to their advantage to create interactive urban wallpaper. The 24-meter long wall of a pedestrian tunnel in Biljimer is now lined with 2,500 LEDs and covered with a ribbed semi-transparent wall. The curves in the wall make it less vulnerable to grafďŹ ti, something underpasses are usually riddled with. The resolution is stretched horizontally, so images appear to be in better focus from the side, inviting the display to be viewed from outside of the tunnel as well as within. As people walk through the tunnel, the lights react to movement and brighten up a once unsafe and uninviting area. Source: Underspaces 1 website: http://pruned.blogspot.com/2009/09/under-spaces-1.html
85
better displayed at this location. A transportation linkage strategy for intercampus trafďŹ c and pedestrian link to Xavier University campus needs to be developed. 5.
Xavier University has signiďŹ cant strength in pharmaceutical formulations and research, but could also be well positioned to commercialize ideas and products with the assistance of partners to take their research to the next level (commercial applications for drug research / delivery). The abandoned shopping center lakeside of S Carrollton Avenue presents a large amount of vacant building /land which could potentially accommodate a drug manufacturing facility with good access to highways for transport and shipping.
6.
Overhead pedestrian bridges satisfy some security and disabled accessibility concerns in moving occupants between buildings/across roadways. However, such bridges also contribute to disinvestment in the pedestrian realm at street level and should only be used as a last resort. Alternatives to overhead bridges, including improved pedestrian amenities such as well marked, ample walkways, changes in street patterns and street surface at areas designated for pedestrian use, better lighting, more mass transit amenities (benches, shelters, etc.), and more pedestrian-scale plantings, could result in successful pedestrian pathways which would also enrich the streetscape. A lively streetscape will serve to strengthen the cohesiveness and security of the Biosciences District.
7.
The Claiborne Avenue/I-10 exchange is a physical barrier that bisects the Biosciences District into two distinct halves. The area under the overpass is not conducive to pedestrian trafďŹ c (feels dark
LED Lighting used to enhance the pedestrian experience in dynamic ways. Source: http://pruned.blogspot.com/2009/09/under-spaces-1.html
and unsafe). A creative solution which serves to unite each half of these roadways is needed. Better illumination, improving the walking path experience with amenities such as a community artwork installation, mass transit station, etc. would bring noticeable improvement. (A few examples of successful applied ideas are shown throughout this Section.)
86
Working Paper 3
8.
9.
Urban Design
The new VA hospital and University Medical Center Campus indicate that their “fronts” are intended to face Canal Street, with services and parking frontage along Tulane Avenue. While this approach will serve to improve the image of Canal Street it also has the potential to create a utilitarian edge for eight consecutive blocks of Tulane Avenue between S Claiborne Avenue and S Rocheblave Street. This condition has the unfortunate potential to be similar to the current situation along Cleveland Avenue near Tulane Hospital where utilities, loading docks and emergency entrances give a utilitarian, even forbidding feel. As Tulane Avenue is a major roadway within the Biosciences District, this aspect needs to be carefully reconsidered. As with any well planned urban campus, the plan should address all significant boundary thoroughfares with an attractive face which enhances the neighborhood. The design of structures along Tulane Avenue must address vehicular and pedestrian traffic as well as the context of the adjoining and surrounding cityscape.
August 2010
a.
There is a large amount of low-quality open space (parking lots, vacant lots and private yards) in the half of the Biosciences District northwest of Claiborne Avenue/I-10. Some streets within this area are avoided by pedestrians due to specific conditions which cause them to be unfriendly. Some areas, particularly around temporary parking lots, have no sidewalks, containing only soil and sometimes debris.
b.
Certain streets are oriented toward vehicular traffic only, with building facades that do not have any windows or doors. Other pathways pass by the front of vacant and blighted buildings, which present a safety/security issue for pedestrians.
c.
Crosswalks to assist pedestrians in crossing smaller streets are difficult to find on many streets. Where they do exist, they typically consist of nothing more than striping. There are few pedestrian signals at these crossings. Fortunately, since most vehicles travel on
The current plan for the new University Medical Center campus is contingent upon a phased building approach. This implies that much of the site will remain unimproved for a significant period. This leaves a large portion of the Canal Street corridor underdeveloped for an undefined period. As Canal Street is a major roadway within the Biosciences District it is critical this aspect of the streetscape be addressed more attractively.
10. A comprehensive street improvements effort, including defining gateways and incorporating wayfinding signage, lighting and sidewalk improvements is warranted to improve the cohesiveness of the Biosciences District.
Waterfront Park in Louisville, Kentucky is now a premier public open space. 12 acre greenspace links the downtown to the Ohio River underneath the highway exchange. Source: http://pruned.blogspot.com/2009/09/under-spaces-1.html
87
the primary corridors of the Biosciences District, the lack of signals generally does not represent a significant hazard for pedestrian crossings. Many pedestrian crossings do need restriping and attention to signage. d.
Transit stops are not well marked and do not contain amenities that would encourage transit ridership. RTA should be encouraged to contribute to the resolution of these deficiencies in meaningful ways.
e.
The Biosciences District lacks consistent and distinctive gateway and wayfinding signage which would help to establish its presence and define clear routes for passage within it. Existing identity signage, directional signage, green space and paved pedestrian areas lack consistency in design, creating a haphazard appearance.
f.
The Biosciences District lacks pedestrian scale lighting along the majority of streets and in defined public open spaces.
11. The street intersection at S Claiborne Avenue and Tulane Avenue represent a physical and symbolic connection between the downtown Tulane and LSU campuses. This could be a prime location for collaborative development between these institutions, be it a jointly sponsored educational institute or university supported interdisciplinary resource center to support combined commercialization efforts or similar collaborative use. 12. A reasonable solution to the abandoned Charity Hospital and VA complex needs to be adopted, along with a timetable for its implementation. There are 23 buildings in this complex which range in historical significance and reuse value. Currently, we understand that LSU has plans to
Under highway retail in Zaanstadt, Netherlands; combination of retail, signage and lighting. Source: http://pruned.blogspot.com/2009/09/under-spaces-1.html
keep four of these buildings, with the proposed use still unclear. These abandoned structures will continue to be magnet for controversy within the emerging Biosciences District and will prove counter-productive to development efforts until a consensus decision is achieved. Additional survey of this complex is still required by the AECOM Team, to be followed by test fits of potential alternative programs for reuse.
88
Working Paper 3
Urban Design
August 2010
Section Summary •
This seciton on Urban Design provides the following: 1.
An analysis of the architectural character and context of existing buildings within the Biosciences District.
2.
Highlights key facilities while defining their general use and condition.
3.
A building system assessment of select structures to evaluate their capacity /appropriateness for redevelopment, while considering future planned improvements within the Biosciences District and how these will affect the surrounding context. •
The six main identified areas of focus include: VA Hospital Complex, LSU Health Science Center Complex, Tulane University –Downtown Medical Campus, Xavier University, Old Charity Hospital/ VA Hospital Complex, and nodal development along the two primary vehicular arteries (Tulane Avenue and Canal Street)
•
The Biosciences District is dominated by a few land uses. Institutional, medical and industrial uses, parking (travel or movement activities) and vacant land and structures (no human activity or unclassifiable activity) make up nearly three-quarters of the land in the District. An overview is provided on the following land uses: residential; commercial; industrial, manufacturing and waste related activities; social, institutional or infrastructure-related activities; parking; religious and cultural institutions; leisure and recretional activities; no human activity or unclassifiable activity.
•
Maps and matrix summary are provided for existing structures that are considered significant and offer potential individual and shared opportunities within the Biosciences District. These structures have been identified both on a base map and corresponding matrix along with the following applied classifications. The classification terminology utilized is intended to help establish potential for future development and is not intended to define value (intrinsic, subjective, emotional or otherwise).
•
Clustering physical and intellectual resources helps to build a powerful engine for growth. Specific goals should be to:
•
1.
Benefit from the intersection/ overlap/ adjacency of major institutional entities;
2.
Encourage the smart development and utilization of common ground among these institutions;
3.
Promote a coordinated, mixed-use zoning strategy in the areas surrounding major institutional sites;
4.
Promote well conceived and convenient transportation modalities; and,
5.
Facilitate a diverse range (size and complexity) of start-up and expanding businesses.
Key observations include: 1.
A maximum 15 minute walking distance or a 5 minute trolley loop is the prescribed limiting distance to where academic /medical related commercial incubator /research space is most successful.
2.
There are currently few well-thought out and/or planned outdoor gathering and activity spaces within the Biosciences District. Linked open and green spaces, as well as attractive, tree-lined roadways are physical
89
elements which will facilitate thematic and real linkage of integrated activities and commerce within the District. 3.
Several major street arteries, such as Tulane Avenue and Canal Street, are not living up to their potential.
4.
Tulane Avenue is a strong central axis which could best link the large academic /medical institutions in the Biosciences District.
5.
Xavier University has significant strength in pharmaceutical formulations and research, but could also be well positioned to commercialize ideas and products with the assistance of partners to take their research to the next level.
6.
Overhead pedestrian bridges contribute to disinvestment in the pedestrian realm at street level and should only be used as a last resort.
7.
The Claiborne Avenue/I-10 exchange is a physical barrier that bisects the Biosciences District into two distinct halves. A creative solution for the area under the overpass should have better illumination and improving the walking path experience with amenities such as a community artwork installation, mass transit station, etc. would bring noticeable improvement.
8.
The new VA hospital and University Medical Center Campus plans should address all significant boundary thoroughfares with an attractive face which enhances the neighborhood and must address vehicular and pedestrian traffic as well as the context of the adjoining and surrounding cityscape.
9.
Canal Street is a critical streetscape that must be addressed more attractively.
10. A comprehensive street improvements effort, including defining gateways and incorporating wayfinding signage, lighting and sidewalk improvements is warranted to improve the cohesiveness of the Biosciences District. 11. The street intersection at S Claiborne Avenue and Tulane Avenue represent a physical and symbolic connection between the downtown Tulane and LSU campuses. This could be a prime location for collaborative development between these institutions. 12. A reasonable solution to the abandoned Charity Hospital and VA complex needs to be adopted, along with a timetable for its implementation. •
Follow-up activity should include a GNOBEDD team review of this inventory and an in-field, multidiscipline team survey of selected buildings from this inventory.
SID KE LA N
NT OW
N
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
Dashed Line Indicates Existing Development
UP TO W
DO W
E ID RS VE RI
E
LSU & UMC Aerial
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 25
SID KE LA N
NT OW
N
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
Dashed Line Indicates Existing Development
UP TO W
DO W
E ID RS VE RI
E
Tulane University Downtown Campus Aerial
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 26
SID KE LA N
NT OW
N
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
Dashed Line Indicates Existing Development
UP TO W
DO W
E ID RS VE RI
E
Proposed VA Site Aerial
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 27
SID KE LA N
NT OW
N
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
Dashed Line Indicates Existing Development
UP TO W
DO W
E ID RS VE RI
E
Xavier University Aerial
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 28
B2
B9
B13
B17
B1
B8
B12
B16
B18
B14
B10
B3
B19
B15
B11
B4,5 & 6
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
Building Inventory
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 29
B21
B25
B30
B52
B20
B24
B28
B51
B74
B42
B31
B57
B27
B23
B26
B22
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
Building Inventory
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 30
B76
B80 & B81
B85
B97
B75
B79
B84
B96
B100
B88
B86 & B87
B98
B83
B78
B82
B77
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
Building Inventory
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 31
B106
B126
B140
B162
B103
B125
B134
B161
B163
B141
B128
B107
B164
B160
B129
B124
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
Building Inventory
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 32
B166
B171
B165
B170
B172
B167
B176
B168
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
Building Inventory
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 33
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
Mid-City
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 34
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
Gert Town
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 35
UP TO W
LA
KE
SID
E
N ID
E
N
RS
NT OW
VE
DO W
RI
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 36
UP TO W
LA
KE
SID
E
N ID
E
N
RS
NT OW
VE
DO W
RI
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 37
UP TO W
LA
KE
SID
E
N ID
E
N
RS
NT OW
VE
DO W
RI
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 38
UP TO W
LA
KE
SID
E
N ID
E
N
RS
NT OW
VE
DO W
RI
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 39
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
Baltimore, MD MD Baltimore,
U niversity o aryland University off M Maryland B io o-P Park Bio-Park
Science & Tech Park at Johns Hopkins University
Bio-Tech District Prototypes
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 40
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
Chicago Technology Park Chicago, IL
Bio-Tech District Prototypes
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 41
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
Fitzsimons Life Sciences District Aurora, CO
Bio-Tech District Prototypes
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 42
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
The Cortex District St. Louis, MO
Bio-Tech District Prototypes
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 43
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
University Technology Park Chicago, IL
Bio-Tech District Prototypes
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 44
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
University City Science Center Philadelphia, PA
Bio-Tech District Prototypes
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 45
GNOBEDD
AECOM • Bright Moments • Cannon Design • CBRE • Chester Engineers • The Ehrhardt Group
BioSquare at Boston University Boston, MA
Bio-Tech District Prototypes
Biosciences District Plan
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 4: Urban Design
MAP 46
90
Working Paper 3
Traffic Analysis
August 2010
Section 05: Traffic Analysis
91
92
Working Paper 3
Traffic Analysis
August 2010
Biosciences District Transportation Analysis Tulane Avenue at S. Broad Street and Tulane Avenue at S. Galvez Street;
The transportation analysis consists of three areas of investigation: •
A review of the two Traffic Impact Analyses (TIA): one for UMC and one for the new VA hospital, also known as the Southeast Louisiana Veterans Medical Center (SLVMC), to ensure their mutual compatibility and to serve as a baseline for comparisons with other plans;
•
A series of discussions regarding various other projects and proposals that are in process; these will continue to require updating; and
•
An estimate of long-term transportation needs based on an estimate of changes in the transportation demand model variables and based on the mid and long-term Biosciences District Plan proposals.
Traffic Impact Analysis Review As part of the environmental clearance process, both UMC and SLVMC completed a TIA for their respective sites. Although both TIA reports were prepared independently, the reports were produced by the same consulting firm, Urban Systems, Inc. The SLVMC report is dated August 2009, while the UMC report is dated March 2010. Both reports referenced and accounted for the other adjoining project within their respective study. In reviewing both reports, it was noted that the SLVMC study involved more (although minor) mitigation recommendations than the UMC study. The SLVMC report recommends the following: •
Modifying intersection geometry at Tulane Avenue at S. Rocheblave Street to accommodate a left turn phasing at the intersection to support access to employee and staff parking facility;
•
Retiming signal phases at the intersections of
•
Removing the traffic signal at the intersection of Bienville Street at S. Galvez Street;
•
Permitting left turns at specific intersections along Tulane Avenue, which are currently prohibited;
•
Prohibiting left turns from lakebound Canal Street; and,
•
Changing the traffic flow from two-way to one-way along S. Rocheblave Street (two-way operations from Canal Street to Tulane Avenue and one-way operations from Tulane Avenue to Gravier Street).
The UMC report recommended the following: •
Implementing traffic signal control of the intersection of Tulane Avenue at S. Roman Street.
•
Coordinating the new traffic signal with existing Tulane Avenue traffic signals.
Based on review of the analysis and conclusions of both studies, neither project will adversely impact either Tulane Avenue or Canal Street in terms of exceeding the capacity of either roadway. The surrounding area traffic network within the Biosciences District will not be significantly adversely affected by the net gain in trips generated by either or both projects. The traffic analyses both indicate that Canal Street and Tulane Avenue and the majority of the area streets both currently and after construction will operate at a Level of Service (LOS) C or better. The exceptions are listed below. It must be remembered that LOS D, although not desirable, is considered to be acceptable during peak hours. Detailed LOS findings are below: •
Tulane Avenue at Broad Street outbound after construction in PM peak will be LOS D
93
•
S. Galvez Street at Tulane Avenue southbound after construction in PM peak will be LOS D
•
S. Rocheblave Street at Tulane Avenue southbound after construction in PM peak will be LOS D
•
Cleveland Avenue at S. Derbigny Street currently and after construction in AM peak has LOS E (This is I-10 exit.)
•
Cleveland Avenue at S Claiborne Avenue right turn AM peak currently and after construction has LOS E (This is I-10 exit.)
•
S. Derbigny Street at Tulane Avenue northbound after construction will be LOS E. (It is unclear, but this appears to be an entrance to a proposed parking lot.)
•
Roman Street at Canal Street is projected to be LOS D after construction.
•
S. Roman Street at Tulane Avenue in AM peak is E in both direction, in PM peak is LOS E southbound and LOS D northbound, and will be LOS F in all cases after construction. (This also appears to be a parking entrance.)
Other Proposals and Projects US 61 / Tulane Avenue Corridor Improvements The Regional Planning Commission (RPC) has commissioned the consulting engineering firm, URS, to study potential improvements to the Tulane Avenue Corridor. As proposed, the street would be reconfigured from six lanes and parking with a two-foot median barrier and sidewalks, to four lanes, bicycle lanes and parking with a 14-foot median. The curb would not be relocated and sidewalks would remain the current width, a nominal 12 feet.
The draft study states that the existing traffic volumes can be maintained when the capacity is reduced. It is uncertain whether or not URS had the data needed to consider both the increased SLVMC and UMC trips when the preliminary evaluation was completed. However, Urban Systems, the engineering firm that conducted the TIAs, has indicated that based on current data, the fourlane roadway would have adequate capacity to support the new hospitals. The current Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) only provides funding for the planning portion of the Tulane Avenue improvement project, not construction. Therefore, it is possible that the proposed improvements may not be completed prior to the completion of the two medical centers due to lack of funding. This could cause increased congestion and difficulty in accessing parking for the hospitals due to restricted turning movements forcing U-turns to access parking. In addition to a lack of construction funding, even for the portion between Claiborne Avenue and Broad Street, there are concerns regarding landscape, lighting, sustainability and utility coordination, which have yet to be resolved. Also, the segment of Tulane Avenue between Claiborne and Loyola avenues is not included in the project because it is not a US highway and, therefore, not eligible for the funding source being used for the current study. At present, UMC, SLVMC, and the Louisiana Cancer Research Center (LCRC) have three different landscape plans for Tulane Avenue and another consultant was hired by DPW to prepare concept drawings, suggesting a possible fourth plan. Pending coordination among the stakeholders and other projects, URS did not develop a landscape plan. The Parks and Parkways Department has only very recently been informally consulted with on
94
Working Paper 3
Traffic Analysis
the plans. Generally, Parks and Parkways and the utility companies prefer to keep the trees and utility lines as far apart as possible; this is only the case in the VA Hospital plan and for the Tulane Avenue portion of the LCRC plan.
Trips Between and Among the Hospitals and Medical Schools At present, University Hospital/LSU operates several shuttle bus routes tying together the various elements of the two medical schools, and several parking facilities with University Hospital. The shuttle also connects to Tulane University, but primary connections between Tulane’s Uptown and Downtown campuses are through their own shuttle service. The reason for the University Hospital/LSU shuttle service is to facilitate access to the University Hospital. The distance today from the LSU Health Sciences Center to the corner of LaSalle Street and Tulane Avenue is about 3,000 feet along Gravier and LaSalle streets, with the overwhelming majority of medical facilities along that route. While 3,000 feet is twice the length of the customary measure of walking distance, which is 1,500 feet, several origins and destinations are found along this route within 1,500 feet of each other. Once the UMC is completed and all UMC/LSU personnel are housed at the UMC site or LSU Medical School, which are planned to be connected with an elevated walkway, the UMC plans to terminate this shuttle service. This future condition will result in the extreme opposite of conditions that existed several decades ago, when the two schools and the two hospitals, Charity and VA, were on the riverside of Claiborne Avenue. Then all internal trips were easily accomplished on foot. In the future,
August 2010
walking between the existing medical districts in the CBD and the new hospitals will be much more difficult. The distance along Cleveland Avenue from Rocheblave Street to Loyola Avenue is approximately 4,520 feet or three times the customary walking distance. This leaves anyone moving between these facilities with a walk of 10 to 15 minutes or more; a bicycle ride; a transit ride after a minimum wait of 15 or 20 minutes (current RTA headways on Canal and Tulane, respectively); or a need to use an automobile. This last is hardly desirable, especially in light of sustainability goals and the fact that each institution supplies parking only for their employees and, in the case of hospitals, their visitors. Students, medical residents and others employed by one institution and needing to visit another would need to use paid parking in the visitors’ parking facility of the institution being visited. Prior to detailed analysis, the alternative solutions appear to be: •
Shorter RTA headways of 3 to 5 minutes on Canal Street and Tulane Avenue lines and an extension of operating hours;
•
A shuttle route circulating on Gravier and Canal streets between LaSalle and Galvez streets, or a demand responsive shuttle;
•
An internal system along the Cleveland Avenue ROW; or
•
A vehicle fleet, which can be shared by the various individuals making the trips, either on an internal route or public streets.
The probabilities of these alternative solutions are currently unclear. 1.
The cost of shorter RTA headways would likely make that solution untenable.
95
2.
•
Frequency of trip (daily, weekly, occasional, other),
•
Should it run on a headway, and if so, what should it be or should it be demand responsive;
Urgency (amount of time that can reasonably spent making the trip),
•
Origin and destination,
b. Should a fare be charged to riders or their institutions, or should it be free;
•
Location of assigned parking, if any,
•
Home institution, and
•
Group (physician, resident, medical student, Delgado nursing student, other student, faculty, full-time allied health employee, other employee, other).
A shuttle route may be feasible, but a number of items must be defined and compared: a.
c.
What would be the source of the subsidy;
d. Would the service be available to the public; e. Who would operate the service; f.
Who would own the equipment;
g. If RTA or other entity operates under contract, who would be the contracting party? 3.
The current site plan for the UMC eliminates the possibility of an internal system, as the building appears to block Cleveland Avenue in addition to it being closed as a public street.
4.
A fleet to be shared among various travelers requires identification of an appropriate vehicle, which includes the management issues of capital, replacement, and maintenance responsibility; insurance; security; suitability to operate on public streets in mixed traffic; and parking. In many ways, it has the same administrative issues as the shuttle option, but potentially has the added burdens of maintenance and greater liability resulting from multiple operators that may not be licensed or insurable in the customary sense.
Prior to pursuing any of these alternative solutions in detail, there is a need to identify the number of daily trips by: •
Purpose,
•
Time of day,
To obtain this information, a number of sources must be tapped. It would seem that the two most reliable would include: •
The academic/administrative staff from each educational institution responsible for the schedules of students and medical residents, and
•
An on board survey of the riders of the existing shuttle service over the course of a week during the regular academic year.
Connection to Xavier University Both short and longer-term plans must be made to satisfy the travel demand for students, faculty and others between Xavier University and the five institutions discussed above. If the investigations discussed above are successful, the trip demand data needed would be available but the greater distance could require other alternative solutions. In preliminary conversations with Xavier, a route from the proposed garage on the uptown side of Washington Avenue through the campus on the downtown side to Jefferson Davis Parkway to Tulane Avenue was discussed. The existing Tulane RTA route serves Xavier
96
Working Paper 3
Traffic Analysis
and connects with the other institutions. However, as discussed above, it has 20-minute headways.
Xavier University Vicinity Improvements Transportation improvements that Xavier is pursuing, or at least considering, include the following: •
A pedestrian bridge in the vicinity of Fern Street, connecting the academic area on the downtown side of Washington Avenue with the site of the convocation center and the adjacent parking garage/transportation center. The bridge is currently being studied through an RPC project.
•
Install a traffic signal at Washington Avenue and Pine Street where the vehicular bridge crosses the canal.
•
Obtain the ROWs of Short and Pine streets between Drexel and Howard streets, Broadway between Drexel and Dixon streets, Howard Avenue between Short Street and the merge of the I-10 exit, and Dixon Street between Pine Street and Jefferson Davis Parkway.
•
Dixon Street is the only ROW they wish to close and convert to a pedestrian corridor.
•
Pine Street would become the main vehicular entrance to campus.
•
Short and Howard streets would be realigned slightly to create a loop around the end of the campus.
•
As discussed at earlier, a parking facility is planned on the uptown side of Washington Avenue to provide for increased demand and the surface parking being removed by the convocation center.
A longer-term improvement would be a realignment of the intersection of Carrollton with Washington/Palmetto.
August 2010
Criminal Justice Area Parking While no parking demand data is readily available, a visit to the area illustrates the serious lack of parking and the difficult circulation patterns in the immediate area. The only apparent public off-street parking is a surface lot at the uptown river corner of Broad and Gravier Streets. The sheriff is considering the addition of a parking garage to the ongoing redesign and reconstruction of the Orleans Parish Prison complex, which is adjacent to the Criminal Courts, Municipal Court, and police headquarters. Potential sites currently being considered are the site of the House of Detention and the CCC (Correctional Center). Both facilities are now unoccupied due to physical condition and could be demolished.
Coroner’s Office Currently, a new facility to house the coroner’s office and police crime lab is being designed for a site on the UPT on the downtown lake corner of Earhart Boulevard and Claiborne Avenue. Even a cursory analysis indicates that there are two serious concerns with this site: 5.
It is a considerable distance from both police headquarters (1.4 miles via Broad and Earhart) and from the UMC site (1.9 to 2 miles, depending on the route), making any collaboration with the coroner more difficult; and
6.
The site, although owned by the city, is a transportation facility. A small adjacent portion of the site has already been alienated by a sale some years ago. However, to construct this essentially unrelated use on what is intended to be a railroad yard is not a sustainable plan, especially given that it is separated by a considerable distance from related institutions and that the Federal Railroad Administration will not likely be favorably inclined to support the future development of a facility that
97
is being dissected by the City at a time when rail travel is being investigated. In a discussion with the sheriff and his staff, it is our understanding that funding for the police lab is not fully available. If there were a source of income attached to the site, it would be more easily financed. This suggests that the possibility of relocating the proposed facility to a site in conjunction with the contemplated criminal justice area parking garage would be a reasonable change in plans. This is especially reasonable in light of the availability of almost six acres of city property on Poydras Street between Broad and Galvez streets, which is adjacent to other law enforcement facilities and only one-half mile from the UMC site.
RTA: Streetcar, UPT Transfer, etc. While trips to and within the Biosciences District will always be (at least in part) dependent on RTA service, the current financial constraints on that agency make longterm reliance on their service for some trips matters of future inquiry as the Biosciences District needs evolve and are better defined. It certainly is to the benefit of the community as a whole to increase the use of service provided by RTA and to reduce or eliminate other services. In the short term, RTA service in the Biosciences District will evolve as RTA restructures the citywide service plan, including the use of UPT as a transfer terminal in place of Canal Street for many lines, and the development of the Canal Street to UPT streetcar service on Loyola Avenue.
Long-Term Demand and Plan The third aspect of the transportation analysis will be an estimate based on the changes in TAZ variables in
the regional travel demand model that result from the proposed residential and employment centers developed in the plan for the Biosciences District. The needs beyond the early years following the opening of the new hospitals can only be reasonably estimated after the land use plan and the resulting density of residential and employment uses are defined.
98
Working Paper 3
Traffic Analysis
August 2010
Section Summary •
•
•
•
The transportation analysis consists of three areas of investigation: •
A review of the two Traffic Impact Analyses (TIA): one for UMC and one for the new VA hospital, also known as the Southeast Louisiana Veterans Medical Center (SLVMC), to ensure their mutual compatibility and to serve as a baseline for comparisons with other plans;
•
A series of discussions regarding various other projects and proposals that are in process; these will continue to require updating; and
•
An estimate of long-term transportation needs based on an estimate of changes in the transportation demand model variables and based on the mid and long-term Biosciences District Plan proposals.
UMC and SLVMC Traffic Impact Analysis Review: •
Neither project will adversely impact either Tulane Avenue or Canal Street in terms of exceeding the capacity of either roadway.
•
The surrounding area traffic network within the Biosciences District will not be significantly adversely affected by the net gain in trips generated by either or both projects.
•
The traffic analyses both indicate that Canal Street and Tulane Avenue and the majority of the area streets both currently and after construction will operate at a Level of Service (LOS) C or better.
US 61/ Tulane Avenue Corridor Improvemennts: •
RPC is stuyding potential improvements to the Tulane Avenue Corridor. As proposed, the street would be reconfigured from six lanes and parking with a two-foot median barrier and sidewalks, to four lanes, bicycle lanes and parking with a 14-foot median. The curb would not be relocated and sidewalks would remain the current width, a nominal 12 feet.
•
The current Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) only provides funding for the planning portion of the Tulane Avenue improvement project, not construction. Therefore, it is possible that the proposed improvements may not be completed prior to the completion of the two medical centers due to lack of funding. This could cause increased congestion and difficulty in accessing parking for the hospitals due to restricted turning movements forcing U-turns to access parking.
•
At present, UMC, SLVMC, and the Louisiana Cancer Research Center (LCRC) have three different landscape plans for Tulane Avenue and another consultant was hired by DPW to prepare concept drawings, suggesting a possible fourth plan.
Trips Betweeen the Hospitals and Medical Schools:: •
Once the UMC is completed, the UMC plans to terminate this shuttle service.
•
Walking between the existing medical districts in the CBD and the new hospitals will be much more difficult.
•
Anyone moving between these facilities with a walk of 10 to 15 minutes or more; a bicycle ride; a transit
99
ride after a minimum wait of 15 or 20 minutes; or a need to use an automobile. •
•
•
Xavier University: •
Both short and longer-term plans must be made to satisfy the travel demand for students, faculty and others between Xavier University and the five institutions.
•
Transportation improvements that Xavier is pursuing, or at least considering, include the following: a pedestrian bridge in the vicinity of Fern Street; a traffic signal at Washington Avenue and Pine Street; a pedestrian corridor; and a parking facility among others.
Criminal Justice Area Parking: •
•
There are several concerns with the current site selected for the coroner’s office. There is a possibility of relocating the proposed facility to a site in conjunction with the contemplated criminal justice area parking garage.
RTA: •
•
Serious lack of parking and the difficult circulation patterns in the immediate area. The sheriff is considering the addition of a parking garage to the ongoing redesign and reconstruction of the Orleans Parish Prison complex.
Coroner’s Office: •
•
Prior to detailed analysis, the alternative solutions appear to be: shorter RTA headways of 3 to 5 minutes on Canal Street and Tulane Avenue lines and an extension of operating hours; a shuttle route circulating on Gravier and Canal streets between LaSalle and Galvez streets, or a demand responsive shuttle; an internal system along the Cleveland Avenue ROW; or a vehicle fleet, which can be shared by the various individuals making the trips, either on an internal route or public streets.
RTA service in the Biosciences District will evolve as RTA restructures the citywide service plan, including the use of UPT as a transfer terminal in place of Canal Street for many lines, and the development of the Canal Street to UPT streetcar service on Loyola Avenue.
Long-Term Demand and Plan: •
An estimate based on the changes in TAZ variables in the regional travel demand model that result from the proposed residential and employment centers developed in the plan for the Biosciences District can only be reasonably estimated after the land use plan and the resulting density of residential and employment uses are defined.
100
Working Paper 3
Utilities
Section 06: Utilities
August 2010
101
102
Working Paper 3
Utilities
August 2010
Utilities The AECOM Team has acquired detailed and complex information related to existing utility systems within and adjacent to the Biosciences District for the purposes of assembling a thorough understanding of the extent, condition and any intended system modifications of resident utilities. The information from these groups was (without exception) received as complex and extensively annotated large-scale map sheets. In all cases, utility company policy dictated that information is only shared in hard-copy format. This required reviewing the data with respect to specific significant/determinant criteria for the overall system as it related to the intended planning concepts for the Biosciences District. These would be of design consideration for future analyses.
Existing Utility Information
and passes through the UMC footprint along S. Prieur Street. The Jacobs report states UMC’s desire to relocate this line underground so that it travels across the property along S. Derbigny Street. No specifications could be secured on the other high voltage lines in the Biosciences District. Apparently, federal guidelines prevent that information from being disclosed unless an actual design necessitates it. 4.
Electric Distribution System – Sewerage and Water Board – Specialized/Dedicated This system is the 25 Hz - AC power that the Sewerage and Water Board (SWB)produces to operate most of its large pumping stations.
5.
Gas Distribution – Principal Conduits – High Pressure (4" and above) Lines smaller than 4” were not shown. The Biosciences District is very well provided with a modern and well maintained gas distribution system that had been continuously upgraded throughout the past several decades. At present, the system is served almost entirely with highpressure distribution, which affords the ability to provide relatively large institutional demand with small distribution piping. This allows extraordinary flexibility and adaptability to demand shifts without impacting an existing user base.
6.
Gas Distribution – Principal Conduits – (Abstracts) A varying depiction – developed as a working document.
7.
Communication Systems – Verizon - Long Distance and Local Trunk Lines This map shows the limited extent of Verizon’s system. Most telecommunications companies operating within New Orleans only have a presence in an around the Poydras business corridor.
To facilitate this effort, critical decisions were made as to the level of information and detail that needed to be assimilated for the entire Biosciences District. Following this, abstracts of this data were prepared by producing single-line (albeit complex) drawings for each of the principal utilities on a standard background base map. Maps were prepared for: 1.
2.
3.
Electric Distribution System – 24,000 volt – Aerial This map shows excellent density and how 24 kV of primary electricity is available to almost every plot of land within the Biosciences District. Electric Distribution System – 24,000 volt – Underground This system is found primarily in the Downtown Development District where no overhead wires are allowed. Electric Distribution System – 230,000 volt – Aerial There are two high voltage lines that traverse the Biosciences District, one of which is 230 kV
103
8.
9.
Communication Systems – Cox – Fiber optic lines Only fiber optic lines are shown. There are coaxial (analog) lines available throughout the Biosciences District. However, it is unlikely that the businesses GNOBEDD is attempting to attract would be interested in this older technology. As a matter of completeness, mapping was also developed for the distribution of coaxial-analog and fiber-analog distribution in the Biosciences District. (A total of three related drawings are provided) Water System - Sewerage & Water Board – Potable Water (6” and above) Potable water is readily available throughout the Biosciences District. No 2” or 4” lines were shown, as these are used to service residential and light commercial customers. The Sewerage and Water Board is currently operating at twothirds capacity, so supply is not an issue. Any pressure concerns would require an upgrade of the supply line to the location and/or special fire requirements.
10. Water System - Sewerage & Water Board – Wastewater (10” and above) The standard sewer line down most streets is 8”. This was not shown since this heavily developed area was amply provided with this class of sewerage. Large sewer lines are available throughout the Biosciences District and, if necessary, can be routed to customers without traversing extreme distances. 11. Water System - Sewerage & Water Board – Storm Water (36” and above) The SWB is responsible for maintaining all storm water lines 36” and greater. The city’s Department of Public Works is responsible for the maintenance of all smaller lines. The board’s pumping system can currently handle 1” of rain in the first hour of a
storm and 0.5” of rain per hour after that. Should a rainfall event exceed this, it would overwhelm the system and an understanding of the impact would extend to site-specific considerations. 12. Water System – Entergy Thermal This system currently services Tulane Hospital, University Hospital and the old VA Hospital. The lines servicing University and the VA hospitals are aerial lines that are attached to the pedestrian bridges along and across Gravier Street. There are plans for Entergy Thermal to design and build a central plant for UMC. There have been discussions about the possibility of building a larger facility that could service both UMC and VA Hospital. This larger facility can increase the economies of scale for Entergy Thermal, which can lead to their services being more affordable to other tenants of the Biosciences District.
Continued Data Gaps The following companies were contacted and specific requests were made for information. However, at this time, we are awaiting requested information and/or the utility is/has been unresponsive when we attempted to obtain information on their systems within the Biosciences District: 1.
AT&T
2. Qwest Communications 3. Centry Link 4. Metro Media Fiber Network Of these: 1.
AT&T’s information is critical because it is one of the two largest providers, Cox Communications being the other, of local telecom services.
104
Working Paper 3
Utilities
August 2010
However, the SWB states that there is adequate water capacity surrounding the complex and the increased demand should pose no problem.
Although this information was promised (following several discussions), it remains to be received.
Future Utility Loads Important future developments in the Biosciences District that will have an impact on utility systems include the Orleans Parish Prison, VA Hospital and UMC. Xavier University is also expected to place an increasing demand on utilities. There continues to be key data gaps regarding potential system loadings, systems demand, surface flows and run-off from these developments. Information that has been obtained to date is summarized below and will be updated as information becomes available.
Orleans Parish Prison Sheriff Marlin Gusman has a great deal of ongoing and planned construction for the correctional facilities under his management. Under the present development scenario, once all construction upgrades are completed, the utility demands of this stakeholder will change dramatically from the present requirements. The principal impacts are: 1.
The total number of prisoners housed prior to Hurricane Katrina will again be re-established from the present reduced population. While the prisoners and staff will be housed in newer and more modern facilities, sewerage volume demand variance is expected to be negligible.
2.
Present design plans include a central plant concept to be constructed, which will drastically change the potable water demand. The current HVAC system utilizes localized units for individual buildings, while the proposed central plant will use chilled and hot water for climate control.
3.
Operational, security and reliability concerns have been centered on an agreement in principal between the sheriff and electrical provider (Entergy) to provide for the installation of a single (dedicated) feeder to service the new centralized facility plant.
4.
Further investigations have found a severe wastewater issue near the prison complex. The area was initially designed for residential use, and the current commercial application is straining the system to the extent that sewage has overflowed from manholes near the complex. a.
The facility currently empties into an 8” line located on Perdido Street. The closest sewer lift station is located at 2431 Palmyra Street. b. Two new residential complexes have recently opened where low-demand (and dormant) commercial buildings once stood. This population density increase is further straining the system. c. In the recent past, there have been discussions of installing an additional lift station to alleviate this problem. However, the SWB has no system upgrades currently planned. d. The SWB claims there is sufficient capacity for the current flow and the overflows are being caused by the amount of debris that is being placed into the system. Reportedly, the SWB constantly has to remove debris from the downstream manholes coming from the prison complex. The two entities appear to be at a stalemate on this issue.
Veteran’s Administration Hospital
105
1.
The SWB has resolved all the utility upgrade concerns of the VA Hospital.
2.
The VA Hospital intends to have all aerial electrical lines within its footprint removed, and plans to move the existing overhead lines adjacent to the property on S. Galvez Street below ground.
3.
Our research has turned up no “gray water” applications other than the VA Hospital. The new hospital is a LEED building and will require 18% less drainage than its predecessor. It will also have tanks holding approximately two million gallons for gray water applications.
University Medical Center 1.
The SWB has resolved all the utility upgrade concerns of the UMC.
Xavier University 1.
The LONI1 system currently has two Points of Presence in the District – at 433 Bolivar Street and
1 The Louisiana Optical Network Initiative, or LONI, is a state-of-the-art, fiber optics network that runs throughout Louisiana, and connects Louisiana and Mississippi research universities to one another as well as National LambdaRail and Internet2. LONI connects Louisiana’s major research universities–Louisiana State University (LSU), Louisiana Tech University, LSU Health Sciences Center in New Orleans, LSU Health Sciences Center in Shreveport, Southern University, Tulane University, University of Louisiana at Lafayette and University of New Orleans–allowing greater collaboration on research that produces results faster and with greater accuracy. LONI provides Louisiana researchers with one of the most advanced optical networks in the country and the most powerful distributed supercomputer resources available to any academic community with over 85 teraflops of computational capacity. (Courtesy of loni.org)
1555 Poydras Street – and the University of New Orleans serves as the local hub of the system. Currently, Xavier is not one of the Member Institutions of the LONI network. GNOBEDD should help facilitate Xavier’s membership to the network. This would enable Xavier to readily share its data at a high rate of speed with research universities all over the state and the surrounding region. Currently, Xavier uses retail DSL communications. If membership is not possible, Xavier may want to become an Associate Institution, which would give them limited access to the system. 2.
Xavier is in negotiations with Entergy concerning the installation of a second electrical feeder to its campus as a reliability upgrade. The volatile SE Louisiana weather causes frequent power outages to the campus. The university has no reliable form of backup power that can be distributed campuswide. The second feeder will provide much needed redundancy without the university having to incur the costs associated with installing and maintaining a backup power system that can be used throughout the campus. Xavier has requested such an upgrade in the past and was denied because Entergy said it only provided that type of service to hospitals. Tulane University recently received such an upgrade, which Xavier believes has opened the door for them now to be accommodated in a same fashion.
Further information on these key developments and associated mapping will be provided when the complete body of information is available. The AECOM team will re-visit this task component at an appropriate time. The Team also investigated whether there were other entities having utility related involvements that might
106
Working Paper 3
Utilities
have bearings on our work (such FEMA, COE, etc.) related to such issues as outstanding contractual or obligation restrictions, design limitations or development constraints. The Team has found none within the Biosciences District.
Utility Costs and Concerns Three (3) diagrammatic representations have been prepared and have been provided which depict specific utility concerns within the Biosciences District. These issues have been grouped by utility-type and also intended to graphically identify conditions that could impact development within the Biosciences District. Overall, our findings indicated that every address location within the Biosciences District has access to all basic utilities: water, wastewater, stormwater, electricity, gas and telecommunications. While availability is not an issue, adequate supply can pose a problem depending on the functional demands of future development beyond that of existing facility use. To date, very little information has been provided concerning the projected utility demands of any potential and/or new facilities. In regard to the current ongoing projects (e.g. LA Cancer Center, Veterans Administration Hospital & University Medical Center) utility short-falls are not an issue of concern as they have preliminarily resolved their utility upgrade concerns as part of their design efforts. Since this is brand new construction on sites that will be completely cleared, upgrades can be readily accommodated with proper planning. However, a very different scenario exists with the Orleans Parish Prison Complex (OPP) which must maintain operations concurrent with design modifications. Further complicating OPP’s desired design and upgrade planning is the fact that most of their
August 2010
construction is financed by FEMA which reserves design approval prior to providing funding. It is imperative that if there are opportunities for OPP to benefit from any green technology initiatives, immediate action should be taken in planning to provide adequate lead-time while the design(s) can still be easily amended within an anticipated more restrictive time-frame. Although not a supply/demand consideration, some of the proposed utility reconfigurations are solely for aesthetic purposes. It is reported that it will cost $20 million to bury the 230,000 volt electrical line along S. Prieur Street and re-route it under S. Derbigny Street. An alternative is to re-route aerially along S. Claiborne Ave., which can be done for $1.9 million. With the current budget crisis in the State of Louisiana, UMC may be seeking ways to lower their construction costs. At this time, the AECOM Team has reviewed the specific existing and proposed Biosciences District upgrades and has reviewed each in light of utility considerations to prepare the attached drawings. Moving forward, we will analyze demand requisites for such specific additional structures/projects when the locations are identified to determine whether or not the existing utilities are adequate and/or other issues of concern come to light. To do so, some basic information is required: •
Specific Application – What type of facility is it and what purpose does it serve?
•
Size – What is the square footage and/or how many units will it house?
•
Green Technology – How “Eco-friendly” is the design of the structure?
With this data, we can make reasonable baseline projections of the utility demands required for the
107
structure that is being proposed based on conventional engineering practice. Where one-of-a-kind projects are proposed, we may require further information from the team in projecting demand requisites.
Sustainability Sustainable street lighting options were examined, including specifications on lights that meet the necessary hurricane wind loads. However, it was found that the lumen output does not meet current City of New Orleans standards. The city is currently replacing mercury vapor lights with more energy efficient, high pressure sodium fixtures. Each conversion experiences between 17% and 38% energy savings. An even greater savings can be realized by using LED technology, which would save between 30% and 42% energy over that of high pressure sodium. LED fixtures have a longer life span, but also cost more than twice that of high pressure sodium. No other information relating to issues of sustainability and alternative energy resources were identified that had direct bearing on our investigations of utility issues and/or utility infrastructure considerations within the Biosciences District.
108
Working Paper 3
Utilities
August 2010
Section Summary •
Maps and overviews are provided for the following existing utilities within the Biosciences District: electricity; gas; communications; and, water including thermal.
•
Continued data gaps were identified for the following providers and associated systems: AT&T, Qwest Communications, Centry Link, Metro Media Fiber Network. Of these, AT&T’s information is critical as it is one of the largest providers in the area.
•
Important future developments in the Biosciences District that will have an impact on utility systems include the Orleans Parish Prison, VA Hospital and UMC. Xavier University is also expected to place an increasing demand on utilities.
•
•
•
Orleans Parish Prison: •
Sewerage volume demand variance is expected to be negligible.
•
Present design plans include a central plant concept to be constructed, which will drastically change the potable water demand. The SWB states that there is adequate water capacity surrounding the complex and the increased demand should pose no problem.
•
A single (dedicated) feeder will be installed to service the new centralized facility plant.
•
There is a severe wastewater issue near the prison complex. The area was initially designed for residential use, and the current commercial application is straining the system to the extent that sewage has overflowed from manholes near the complex. The SWB claims there is sufficient capacity for the current flow and the overflows are being caused by the amount of debris that is being placed into the system.
•
Orleans Parish Prison Complex (OPP) must maintain operations concurrent with design modifications. Most of their construction is financed by FEMA which reserves design approval prior to providing funding. It is imperative that if there are opportunities for OPP to benefit from any green technology initiatives, immediate action should be taken in planning to provide adequate lead-time while the design(s) can still be easily amended within an anticipated more restrictive time-frame.
VA Hosptial: •
The SWB has resolved all the utility upgrade concerns of the VA Hospital.
•
All aerial electrical lines within its footprint will be removed, and there are plans to move the existing overhead lines adjacent to the property on S. Galvez Street below ground.
•
The new hospital is a LEED building and will require 18% less drainage than its predecessor. It will also have tanks holding approximately two million gallons for gray water applications.
UMC: •
•
The SWB has resolved all the utility upgrade concerns of the UMC.
Xavier University: •
Xavier is not one of the Member Institutions of the LONI network. GNOBEDD should help facilitate
109
Xavier’s membership to the network. This would enable Xavier to readily share its data at a high rate of speed with research universities all over the state and the surrounding region. •
Xavier is in negotiations with Entergy concerning the installation of a second electrical feeder to its campus as a reliability upgrade. The second feeder will provide much needed redundancy
•
Further information on these key developments and associated mapping will be provided when the complete body of information is available. The AECOM team will re-visit this task component at an appropriate time.
•
The Team also investigated whether there were other entities having utility related involvements that might have bearings on our work (such FEMA, COE, etc.) related to such issues as outstanding contractual or obligation restrictions, design limitations or development constraints. The Team has found none within the Biosciences District.
•
Utility Costs and Concerns:
•
•
Every address location within the Biosciences District has access to all basic utilities: water, wastewater, stormwater, electricity, gas and telecommunications. While availability is not an issue, adequate supply can pose a problem depending on the functional demands of future development beyond that of existing facility use.
•
Moving forward, we will analyze demand requisites for such specific additional structures/projects when the locations are identified to determine whether or not the existing utilities are adequate and/or other issues of concern come to light.
Sustainability: •
Sustainable street lighting options were examined, including specifications on lights that meet the necessary hurricane wind loads. However,he lumen output does not meet current City of New Orleans standards. The city is currently replacing mercury vapor lights with more energy efficient, high pressure sodium fixtures.
TO
ST
M
ET TO
EA
ST
RH
AR
T BL VD
PA L M ET TO ST OV ER PA S
S
PA LM ET TO ST O VE R PA SS
PA L M ET TO ST
PA LM ET TO ST
FO LE AU
ST
EB
TO
IN
ET
NTA
PA LM
DR
ST
DR EX E L DR
EA RHART B
LVD
ST ST AD D RO O A S B S BR
CA
NA L S LS T T
CA NA
EA RH
I-1
AR T
0 W
BLV D
S BR O A
V IS PKWY
DA
ET
S
FF JE
D
RS FF E JE N
ON Y PK W DA VIS
PA L
S C C ARR AR O R LL O LLT TO O NA N V AV E E S
OA BR
Y PK W S DA VI N O
ER S FF JE S
SS PA ER DA VI S OV FF JE
SS PA ER
OV IS DAV
SSJEFF PA ER OV DA VIS
FF ER JE S
SO N FF E JE S
N N CAR CA R O L O LTO LLT N O AV N AV E E Y PK W
Y W PK AV IS RS ON
DA VIS
ST
FF E JE N
RS ON D AV BR E OA D AV E S
M
SS
ST
OR
AN OR S A LE V E AN S
LE
AV E
JU LIA
M A TI RT N LU IN LU THE TH R K ER IN G KI NG B LV BLV D D
MAR
ST
S
PO
YD
RA
PO
IT
NTC H
S EX
EX
W
EA
PO RH NT AR C T B LV H E X D E
PO PO YDRA YD S RA ST S ST
NV IL
CA LL IO
PE
L
LA AVE LOYO
B IE
ST
CA
LL
PE
ST
H O HO W W A R AR D D AV AV E E
IO
OR
LE
AN S
AV E
ES ES PL PL AN A N AD AD E A E VE AV E
HO V
NA
L
L
ST
ST
CA NA
CA
T
ST
O IR M TOULOUSES
ST
T
EZ
ST
N
MO
ST N OA BR D OA ST D
OS S
S BR BR OA OA D S D T ST S
BR
N
PA LM
NK
AS S
VE RP ST O AD RO SB
S GA GA LVE LV Z EZ ST ST
S
ST
DW AY LE AV E NASH VIL
IB
NE CLA IB OR S
AV E
CLA S
E AV E OR N
BA
ELK
BR N
N GA GA LV LV EZ EZ ST ST N
R
PL
E CA
0 I- 1
ST
OA N B D RO ST AD AV E NE CLA IB OR
N R N AM RA P M AR PA T RT ST ST LL IOP E ST
UP TO W
N
DO W
NT OW
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New OrleansGIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: ENTERGY Aerial Primary
±
0
Parks
Building Footprints
Biosciences District Buildings
Water
Railroad
24,000 Volts
E
GA LV S R PE TE ST
N
ST SI N BA
R
S IM SIM O N O N BOLIV BO LIV AR AV AR AV E E
AVE LOYOLA
PL ELK
SID KE LA
RD
AV E
LA
YO LO
AVE OLA LOY
RT ST MPA
S RA
ST MP AR T RA S
E
E METAIRI
AVE ASHV ILLE
ST IA
NO
YT AN
AVE RLES
ST CHA
ID
P
HING
RS
RAM
E
WAS E N AV TO
VE
I- 10
HING DA
PR
LE TO O ST
PL
ED TOL
ET
E
E ON
RD AR
AV
WAS
RI
BASIN ST
MA RG
E
I-10
OU
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 6: Utilities
MAP 47
BAY
TCHOUP AS ST ITOUL
AN
ST
LO UISI AN A
VE NA TO
TO
ST
M
ET TO
EA
ST
RH
AR
T BL VD
PA L M ET TO ST OV ER PA S
S
PA LM ET TO ST O VE R PA SS
PA L M ET TO ST
PA LM ET TO ST
FO LE AU
ST
EB
TO
IN
ET
NTA
PA LM
DR
ST
DR EX E L DR
EA RHART B
LVD
ST AD D RO O A S B S BR
ST
CA
NA L S LS T T
CA NA
EA RH
I-1
AR T
0 W
BLV D
S BR O A
V IS PKWY
DA
ET
S
FF JE
D
RS FF E JE N
ON Y PK W DA VIS
PA L
S C C ARR AR O R LL O LLT TO O NA N V AV E E S
OA BR
Y PK W S DA VI N O
ER S FF JE S
SS PA ER DA VI S OV FF JE
SS PA ER
OV IS DAV
SSJEFF PA ER OV DA VIS
FF ER JE S
SO N FF E JE S
N N CAR CA R O L O LTO LLT N O AV N AV E E Y PK W
Y W PK AV IS RS ON
DA VIS
ST
FF E JE N
RS ON D AV BR E OA D AV E S
M
SS
ST
OR
AN OR S A LE V E AN S
LE
AV E
JU LIA
M A TI RT N LU IN LU THE TH R K ER IN G KI NG B LV BLV D D
MAR
ST
S
PO
YD
RA
PO
IT
NTC H
S EX
EX
W
EA
PO RH NT AR C T B LV H E X D E
PO PO YDRA YD S RA ST S ST
NV IL
CA LL IO
PE
L
LA AVE LOYO
B IE
ST
CA
LL
PE
ST
H O HO W W A R AR D D AV AV E E
IO
OR
LE
AN S
AV E
ES ES PL PL AN A N AD AD E A E VE AV E
HO V
NA
L
L
ST
ST
CA NA
CA
T
ST
O IR M TOULOUSES
ST
T
EZ
ST
N
MO
ST N OA BR D OA ST D
OS S
S BR BR OA OA D S D T ST S
BR
N
PA LM
NK
AS S
VE RP ST O AD RO SB
S GA GA LVE LV Z EZ ST ST
S
ST
DW AY LE AV E NASH VIL
IB
NE CLA IB OR S
AV E
CLA S
E AV E OR N
BA
ELK
BR N
N GA GA LV LV EZ EZ ST ST N
R
PL
E CA
0 I- 1
ST
OA N B D RO ST AD AV E NE CLA IB OR
N R N AM RA P M AR PA T RT ST ST LL IOP E ST
UP TO W
N
DO W
NT OW
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New OrleansGIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: ENTERGY Underground Primary
±
0
Parks
Building Footprints
Biosciences District Buildings
Water
Railroad
24,000 Volts
E
GA LV S R PE TE ST
N
ST SI N BA
R
S IM SIM O N O N BOLIV BO LIV AR AV AR AV E E
AVE LOYOLA
PL ELK
SID KE LA
RD
AV E
LA
YO LO
AVE OLA LOY
RT ST MPA
S RA
ST MP AR T RA S
E
E METAIRI
AVE ASHV ILLE
ST IA
NO
YT AN
AVE RLES
ST CHA
ID
P
HING
RS
RAM
E
WAS E N AV TO
VE
I- 10
HING DA
PR
LE TO O ST
PL
ED TOL
ET
E
E ON
RD AR
AV
WAS
RI
BASIN ST
MA RG
E
I-10
OU
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 6: Utilities
MAP 48
BAY
TCHOUP AS ST ITOUL
AN
ST
LO UISI AN A
VE NA TO
ST
PA L
M
ET TO
EA
ST
RH
AR T BL VD
PA L M ET TO ST OV
ER PA SS
PA LM ET TO ST O VE R PA SS
PA L M ET TO ST
PA L M ET TO ST
FO
ET
IN
TO
N TA
PA LM
EB
ST
LE
AU DR
DR
ST
EX EL DR
EA RHART B
LVD
ST AD RO OAD S B S BR ST
CA
NA L S LS T T
CA
NA
EA RH
I-1 0
AR T
W
BL VD
V IS PKW Y
DA
TO
FF JE
DA VIS
SO FF ER JE N
N Y W PK DA VIS
ET
S C CA ARR RR O O L LT LLT O O NA N V AV E E S
DW OA BR
WY PK S DA VI N SO
JE FF ER S
SS PA ER OV S DA VI JE FF
SS PA ER OV IS DAV
SSJEFF RPA OV E DA VIS
FF E JE S
RS ON
FF E JE S
N N CAR CA R R OL R O LTO LLT N O AV N AV E E
Y W PK
Y PK W
RS O
N
DA VIS T
FF E JE
S BR O A
N
RS ON
D AV E OA D AV E BR S
O M
ST S
SS BR BR OA OA D S D T ST
S
OR LE AN OR S A LE V E AN S
AV E
JU
LIA
ST
MA M A RTI RT N LU IN TH LU E TH R K ER IN KIN G B LV G BL D VD
OA N B D RO ST AD
BR N
S
PO
YD
RA
PO
IT
NTC
S EX
H
EX
W
EA
RH
T
PO N TC AR T BLV H E X D E
PO YD PO RA YD S RA ST S ST
N OA BR D OA ST D S
BR N N G A GA LV LV EZ EZ ST ST
N
PA LM
AS S
ER P OV ST AD SB RO
S G A GA LV E LV Z EZ ST ST S
ST
VIL LE
CA LL
IO PE
LA AVE LOYO
AV E
ST
CA
LL
PE
ST
HO H O W W AR AR D D AV AV E E
IO
OR LE
AN
S
AV E
ES ES PLA PL N A N AD AD E A E VE AV E
ELK
HO V
L
ST
ST
NA L
NA
CA
CA
GA
O IR M
ST N
SS MO
PL
T
TOULOUSES
E
ST
T
I- 10
LV EZ
S ER PE T ST
N ST
SI N BA
ST
E AV NE OR IB CLA
PL ELK
AY E VILLE AV NASH
NE OR IB CLA S
AV E
CLA IB S
E AV NE OR
ST
SIM SIM O N O N BOLIV BO LIV AR AV AR AV E E
AVE LOYOLA
BA NK S
E
AV YO LA LO
AVE OLA LOY
ST PART
S RAM
ST MP AR T RA S
E ST
N R N AM RA P M AR PA T RT ST ST CA L LIOP
UP TO W
N
DO W
NT OW
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New OrleansGIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS: ENTERGY High Voltage Transmission Lines
±
0
Parks
Building Footprints
Biosciences District Buildings
Water
Railroad
Unknown Voltage
230,000 Volts
Transmission Lines
Entergy High Voltage
E
E RD METAIRI
LE AV E SHVIL
ST
IA YT AN PR
PL
NO
ET
TO HING
DA
AR
LE TO O ST
RG
ED TOL
ITOU L
MA
WAS E
N AV
AVE
TO
RLES
RD ST CHA
SID KE
MP
LA
RA
E
E ON
E
ID
I- 10
HING
RS
WAS
VE
IN ST BAS
RI
I-10
U
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 6: Utilities
MAP 49
YO BA
TCHOUP
AS ST
N BIE
AN
ST UISI LO AN A
VE NA
N
NT OW
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New OrleansGIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: SEWERAGE & WATER BOARD OF NEW ORLEANS 25 Hz, Specialized and Dedicated Feeders
Âą
0
E SID KE LA UP TO W
DO W
E ID RS VE RI
Parks
Building Footprints
Biosciences District Buildings
Water
Railroad
Abandoned Feeder
6600 Volts
480 Volts ( To Be Installed)
480 Volts ( To Be Abandoned)
480 Volts
Specialized/Dedicated Feeders
25 Hz Electrical System
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 6: Utilities
MAP 50
TO
ST
M
ET TO
EA
ST
RH
AR
T BL VD
PA L M ET TO ST OV ER PA S
S
PA LM ET TO ST OVE RPA SS
PA L M ET TO ST
PA LM ET TO ST ET
FO NTA IN LE AU
ST
EB
TO
20"
PA LM
" DR
16
DR EX E L DR
20 "
4"
" EA RHART B
8"
12
12"
LVD
4"
6"
6"
ST ST AD D RO O A S B S BR
CA NA
NA L S LS T T
CA
EA RH
I- 1
AR T
0
W
BLV D
S BR O A
4"
4"
V IS PKWY
DA
ET
ST
8"
6" 6"
6" Y
RS FF E JE N
ON
4"
Y PK W DA VIS
PA L
S C C ARR AR O R LL O LLT TO O NA N V AV E E S
OA BR
6" FF JE
S
8"
Y PK W S
DA VI N O ER S FF
JE
S
SS
8" PA ER DA VI S OV FF JE
SS
PA ER OV IS DAV
SSJEFF PA ER OV DA VIS
PK DA VIS SO N FF ER JE S
Y PK W
W ST
DA VIS
RS ON FF E JE
S
N N CAR CA R O L O LTO LLT N O AV N AV E E
4"
FF E JE N
RS ON
D AV BR E OA D AV E S
NK
M
SS
ST
OR
AV E
JU LIA
ST
MAR M A TI RT N LU IN LU THE TH R K ER IN G KI NG B LV BLV D D
8"
AN OR S A LE V E AN S
LE
S
PO
YD
RA
PO
IT
NTC H
S EX
EX
W
20 "
8" EA
PO RH NT AR C T B LV H E X D E
6"
PO PO YDRA YD S RA ST S ST
4"
B IE
CA LL IO
PE
L
LA AVE LOYO
12 "
6"
NV IL
ST
CA
LL
PE
ST
H O HO W W A R AR D D AV AV E E
IO
OR
LE
AN
S
AV E
ES ES PL PL AN A N AD AD E A E VE AV E
HO V
CA NA CA L ST NA L ST
T
ST
O IR M TOULOUSES
ST T
EZ
ST
N
MO
S
OS S BR BR OA OA D S D T ST
S
ST N OA BR D OA ST D
ST ST
PA LM
BA
AS S
VE RP ST O AD RO SB
ST DW AY
LE AV E NASH VIL
AV E NE
IB
S GA GA LVE LV Z EZ ST ST S
R
S
CLA IB OR
CLA S
E AV E OR N
BR N
CLA IB OR
ELK
BR N N GA GA LV LV EZ EZ N
8" 20"
6" 4"
R
PL
E CA
0 I- 1
ST OA N B D RO ST AD
4" AV E NE
4" S IM SIM O N O N BOLIV BO LIV AR AV AR AV E E
AVE LOYOLA
PL ELK
N R N AM RA P M AR PA T RT ST ST LL IOP E ST
Parks
N
NT OW
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New OrleansGIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
±
0
NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: ENTERGY High Pressure Lines (4” & Greater)
UP TO W
DO W
Building Footprints
Biosciences District Buildings
Water
Railroad
20"
16"
12"
10"
8"
6"
4"
(4” & Greater)
High Pressure Lines
E
GA LV S R PE TE
ST
N N ST
BA SI
RD
8" AV E
LA YO LO
AVE OLA LOY
RT ST MPA S RA
ST MP AR T RA S
SID KE LA
E METAIRI
AVE ASHV ILLE
ST IA
NO
YT AN
DA
PR
LE TO O ST
PL
ED TOL
ET
8"
AR
HING
AVE
E
P
ID
RAM
E WAS E N AV TO
RS
I- 10 HING
VE
WAS
8"
RLES
E
E ON
RD ST CHA
AV
10"
RI
BASIN ST
MA RG
E
I-10
OU
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 6: Utilities
MAP 51
BAY TCHOUP
AS ST ITOUL
AN
ST LO UISI AN A
VE NA TO
6"
10"
4"
6"
16 "
ET TO
EA
ST
RH
AR T BL VD
PA L M ET TO ST OV ER
PA SS
PA LM ET TO ST O VE RPA SS
PA L M ET TO ST
PA L M ET TO ST
FO
ET
EB
ST
IN
TO
N TA
PA LM
LE AU DR
DR
ST
M
EX EL DR
EA RHART B
LVD
JE ST ST AD RO OAD S B S BR
DA VIS
CA NA
NA L S LS T T
CA
EA RH
I-1 0
AR T
W
BL VD
V IS PKW Y DA
ST
SS PA ER OV S DA VI JE FF
SS
PA ER OV IS DAV
SSJEFF RPA OV E DA VIS FF
FF E JE S
RS ON FF ER JE S
N N CAR CA R R OL R O LTO LLT N O AV N AV E E
Y W PK
Y PK W SO N
DA VIS
T
SO FF ER JE N
N Y W PK DA VIS
PA L
S
S BR O A
N
JE
FF E
RS ON
D AV E OA D AV E BR S
O M
ST S
SS BR BR OA OA D S D T ST S
LE AN OR S A LE V E AN S AV E
JU
LIA
ST
MA M A RTI RT N LU IN TH LU E TH R K ER IN KIN G B LV G BL D VD
OA N B D RO ST AD
BR N
S
PO
YD
RA
PO
IT
NTC
S EX
H
EX
W
EA
RH
ST
PO N TC AR T BLV H E X D E
PO YD PO RA YD S RA ST S ST
N OA BR D OA ST D
BR N N G A GA LV LV EZ EZ ST ST
N
TO
OR
VIL LE
CA LL
IO PE
LA AVE LOYO
AV E
ST
CA
LL
PE
ST
HO H O W W AR AR D D AV AV E E
IO
OR LE
AN
S
AV E
ES ES PLA PL N A N AD AD E A E VE AV E
ELK
ET
S C CA ARR RR O O L LT LLT O O NA N V AV E E S
DW OA BR
WY PK DA VI N SO
JE FF ER S
S G A GA LVE LV Z EZ ST ST S
ST
PL HO V
L
ST
ST
NA L
NA
CA
CA
ST LV EZ
O IR M N
ST
N
GA T
TOULOUSES
E T
I- 10
PA LM
AS S
ER P OV ST AD SB RO
E ST
N R N AM RA P M AR PA T RT ST ST CA L LIOP
Parks
N
NT OW
N
±
1,000
Feet 2,000
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New OrleansGIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
0
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS: VERIZON Long Distance & Local Trunk Lines
UP TO W
DO W
Building Footprints
Biosciences District Buildings
Water
Railroad
Local
Long Distance
Trunk Lines
Verizon Long Distance & Local
E
SS MO
AV E NE
B
S ER PE T ST
ST
E AV NE OR IB CLA
PL ELK
AY E VILLE AV NASH
IB CLA S
OR
CLA IB S
E AV E OR N
ST
SIM SIM O N O N BOLIV BO LIV AR AV AR AV E E
AVE LOYOLA
BA NK S
E
AV
YO LA LO
AVE OLA LOY
ST PART
S RAM
ST MP AR T RA S
SID
E RD METAIRI
LE AV E SHVIL
ST IA YT AN PR
PL
NO
ET
DA
AR
LE TO O ST
RG
ED TOL
ITOU L
MA
RD
ST CHA
RLES AVE
ST
A SI N
MP
KE
RA
TO HING
LA
WAS E
N AV
E
E ON
E TO
ID
I- 10
HING
RS
WAS
VE
IN ST BAS
RI
I-10
U
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 6: Utilities
MAP 52
YO BA TCHOUP
AS ST
N B IE
AN
ST UISI LO AN A
VE NA
M
ET TO
EA
ST
RH
AR T BL VD
PA L M ET TO ST OV ER
PA SS
PA LM ET TO ST O VE RPA SS
PA L M ET TO ST
PA L M ET TO ST
FO
ET
EB
ST
IN
TO
N TA
PA LM
LE AU DR
DR
ST
ST
EX EL DR
EA RHART B
LVD
JE ST ST AD RO OAD S B S BR
DA VIS
CA NA
NA L S LS T T
CA
EA RH
I-1 0
AR T
W
BL VD
V IS PKW Y DA
PA L
SS PA ER OV S DA VI JE FF
SS
PA ER OV IS DAV
SSJEFF RPA OV E DA VIS FF
FF E JE S
RS ON FF ER JE S
N N CAR CA R R OL R O LTO LLT N O AV N AV E E
Y W PK
Y PK W SO N
DA VIS
T
SO FF ER JE N
N Y W PK DA VIS
TO
S C CA ARR RR O O L LT LLT O O NA N V AV E E S
DW OA BR
S DA VI N SO
JE FF ER S
WY PK
S BR O A
N
JE
FF E
RS ON
D AV E OA D AV E BR S
O M
ST S
SS BR BR OA OA D S D T ST S
OR LE AN OR S A LE V E AN S AV E
JU
LIA
ST
MA M A RTI RT N LU IN TH LU E TH R K ER IN KIN G B LV G BL D VD
OA N B D RO ST AD
BR N
S
PO
YD
RA
PO
IT
NTC
S EX
H
EX
W
EA
RH
ST
PO N TC AR T BLV H E X D E
PO YD PO RA YD S RA ST S ST
N OA BR D OA ST D
BR N N G A GA LV LV EZ EZ ST ST
N
ET
VIL LE
CA LL
IO PE
LA AVE LOYO
AV E
ST
CA
LL
PE
ST
HO H O W W AR AR D D AV AV E E
IO
OR LE
AN
S
AV E
ES ES PLA PL N A N AD AD E A E VE AV E
ELK
PA LM
AS S
ER P OV ST AD SB RO
S G A GA LVE LV Z EZ ST ST S
ST
PL HO V
L
ST
ST
NA L
NA
CA
CA
ST LV EZ
O IR M
ST
N
GA T
TOULOUSES
E T
I- 10
SS MO
AV E NE
B
S ER PE T ST
N ST
A SI N
ST
E AV NE OR IB CLA
PL ELK
AY E VILLE AV NASH
IB CLA S
OR
CLA IB S
E AV E OR N
ST
SIM SIM O N O N BOLIV BO LIV AR AV AR AV E E
AVE LOYOLA
BA NK S
E
AV
YO LA LO
AVE OLA LOY
ST PART
S RAM
ST MP AR T RA S
E ST
N R N AM RA P M AR PA T RT ST ST CA L LIOP
Parks
N
NT OW
N
±
1,000
Feet 2,000
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New OrleansGIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
0
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS: COX COMMUNICATIONS Digital & Coaxial Lines
UP TO W
DO W
Building Footprints
Biosciences District Buildings
Water
Railroad
Digital
Coaxial
Line Type
E
E RD METAIRI
LE AV E SHVIL
ST IA YT AN PR
PL
NO
ET
DA
AR
LE TO O ST
RG
ED TOL
ITOU L
MA
RD
ST CHA
SID KE
MP
LA
RA
TO HING
RLES AVE
WAS E
N AV
E
E ON
E TO
ID
I- 10
HING
RS
WAS
VE
IN ST BAS
RI
I-10
U
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 6: Utilities
MAP 53
YO BA TCHOUP
AS ST
N B IE
AN
ST UISI LO AN A
VE NA
EA
ST
RH
AR T BL VD
PA L M ET TO ST OV
ER PA SS
PA LM ET TO ST O VE R PA SS
PA L M ET TO ST
PA L ET TO
6''
M ST
PA LM ET
FO N TA
6''
IN
TO
EB
ST
LE
AU DR
6''
6''
DR DR
12 ''
EX EL
6''
ST
8''
12 ''
8''
6''
6'' 12 ''
6''
12 ''
EA RHART B
6''
LVD
6''
20 ''
6''
ET TO
6''
6'' 12 ''
6'' ST AD RO OAD S B S BR
6''
ST
6''
6''
8''
20 ''
DA VIS
CA
8''
10 ''
NA
LS
CA
NA T
L
12 ''
ST
8''
EA RH
I-1 0
AR T
W
BL VD
S BR O A
6''
V IS PKW Y
DA
M
6''
SO FF ER JE N
N Y W
12 ''
PK DA VIS RS ON FF E JE N
PA L
6''
30 ''
6''
LE AN OR S A LE V E AN S
6''
TO
6''
OR
AV E
6''
ET
12 '' 6''
6'' 6''
6'' ST
ST
JU
LIA
ST
12 ''
6'' MA M A RTI RT N LU IN TH LU E TH R K ER IN KIN G B LV G BL D VD
8''
12 ''
PA LM
S C CA ARR RR O O L LT LLT O O NA N V AV E E S
6''
12 ''
6''
S
6'' DW OA BR
6''
6''
6'' 6'' DA VI N SO
JE FF ER S
6'' WY PK
DA VI JE FF
50 '' SS PA ER OV S
6'' 6''
FF JE
6''
SS PA ER OV IS
DAV
SSJEFF RPA OV E DA VIS
FF E
RS ON
FF E JE S
JE S
6''
BR N
S
ST
6''
N N CAR CA R R OL R O LTO LLT N O AV N AV E E
W PK
Y PK W
N RS O
Y
12 '' 12 ''
20 '' 6'' 8''
6''
6'' 6'' D AV E OA D AV E BR S
20 '' 6'' AS S
ER P OV ST AD SB RO
6'' PO
YD
6'' RA
PO
IT
NTC
S EX
8''
H
EX
W
12 ''
EA
N
DA VIS
6'' T
N
BR RH
T
N OA BR D OA ST D S
PO N TC AR T BLV H E X D E
36''
PO YD PO RA YD S RA ST S ST
12 ''
6''
VIL LE
AV E
6''
M
O
ST SS S
20 ''
CA LL
IO PE
LA AVE LOYO
20 ''
ST
CA
LL
6''
PE
ST
HO H O W W AR AR D D AV AV E E
IO
OR LE
AN
S
AV E
ES ES PLA PL N A N AD AD E A E VE AV E
HO V
L
ST
ST
NA L
NA
CA
CA
GA
O IR M
ST N
SS MO
S
S G A GA LV E LV Z EZ ST ST
6''
6''
BR BR OA OA D S D T ST
S
6'' 6''
6''
ST
6''
N G A GA LV LV EZ EZ ST ST
6'' 6''
AY E VILLE AV NASH
6'' 6''
6'' NE OR IB CLA S
AV E
CLA IB S
E AV NE OR
6'' 6''
30 ''
6''
12 '' PL
OA N B D RO ST AD
O IB
12 ''
CLA
6''
6'' E AV RN E
6'' ELK
T
TOULOUSES
E
ST
T
I- 10
LV EZ
S ER PE T ST
N ST
SI N BA
BA NK S
N
SIM SIM O N O BO BO LIVAR LIV AR AVE AV E
6'' AVE LOYOLA
6'' 6''
12'' E
AV YO LA LO
6'' AVE OLA LOY
PL ELK
6'' ST PART
S RAM
ST MP AR T RA S
E ST
N R N AM RA P M AR PA T RT ST ST CA L LIOP
UP TO W
N
DO W
NT OW
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New OrleansGIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
WATER SYSTEMS: SEWERAGE & WATER BOARD OF NEW ORLEANS Potable Water (6” & Greater)
±
0
Parks
Building Footprints
Biosciences District Buildings
Water
Railroad
50"
36"
30"
20"
12"
10"
8"
6"
Potable Water
E
E RD METAIRI
LE AV E SHVIL
ST
IA YT AN PR
NO
PL
DA
ET
LE TO O ST
AR
ED TOL
RG
TO HING
''
ITOU L
MA
WAS E
N AV
AVE
TO
12
RLES
N BIE
ST CHA
SID KE LA
MP
E
RA
E
HING
ID
I- 10
WAS
RS
E ON
RD
VE
IN ST BAS
RI
I-10
U
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 6: Utilities
MAP 54
YO BA
TCHOUP
AS ST
AN
ST UISI LO AN A
VE NA
6''
ST
PA L
M
ET TO
EA
ST
RH
AR T BL VD
PA L M ET TO ST OV
ER PA SS
PA LM ET TO ST O VE R PA SS
PA L M ET TO ST
PA L M ET TO ST
FO
ET TO
N TA
PA LM
30 ''
ST
IN EB LE
'' AU DR
DR
33
EX EL
''
DR
10 '' 10'' EA RHART B
10 '' LVD
20 ''
18 '' ST AD RO OAD S B S BR ST
10 ''
10 ''
DA VIS
TO
S C CA ARR RR O O L LT LLT O O NA N V AV E E S
ST
18 ''
10 '' DW
18 '' OA BR
12'' SO
OV E DA VIS FF JE
15 '' DA VI JE FF
12 '' JE FF ER S
WY PK S DA VI N
SS PA ER OV
10 '' SS PA ER OV IS DAV
SSJEFF RPA
12 '' FF E JE S
RS ON
FF E
Y W PK
Y PK W
RS O
N
DA VIS
12 '' T
JE S
10 ''
CA NA
NA
LS
CA
N N CAR CA R R OL R O LTO LLT N O AV N AV E E
10 ''
T
L
EA RH
I-1 0
30 ''
ST
AR T
W
BL VD
S BR O A
SO FF ER JE N
N
V IS PKW Y Y W PK DA VIS
ET
42''
S
20 '' 18 ''
15 '' AS S
ER P OV ST AD SB RO
10 ''
JE
FF E
RS ON
D AV E OA D AV E BR S
N
DA
12 ''
15 '' 12 ''
PA LM
O M
12 ''
ST
10''
LE AN OR S A LE V E AN S
33 ''
OR
AV E
18 ''
SS S
BR BR OA OA D S D T ST
S
15 ''
JU
LIA
ST
MA M A RTI RT N LU IN TH LU E TH R K ER IN KIN G B LV G BL D VD
15 ''
S
ST OA N B D RO ST AD
BR N
YD
''
RA
15
PO
24 ''
PO
IT
NTC
S EX
H
EX
W
EA
RH
T
30 ''
PO YD PO RA YD S RA ST S ST
PO N TC AR T BLV H E X D E
24 ''
12 ''
69 ''
BR N N G A GA LV LV EZ EZ ST ST
N
ST
NE
15 '' 12 ''
S G A GA LV E LV Z EZ ST ST S
10 ''
AY E VILLE AV NASH
21 '' IB
OR
CLA IB S
CLA S
AV E
10 ''
21 ''
VIL LE
CA LL
30 ''
IO PE
LA AVE LOYO
AV E
18''
10''
ST
CA
LL
IO
PE
ST
HO H O W W AR AR D D AV AV E E
24 ''
OR LE
AN
S
21 ''
AV E
ES ES PLA PL N A N AD AD E A E VE AV E
HO V
L
ST
ST
NA L
NA
CA
CA
GA
O IR M
ST N
SS MO
ELK
N OA BR D OA ST D S
10''
18 '' E AV NE OR
ST
PL
T
TOULOUSES
E
ST
T
I- 10
LV EZ
S ER PE T ST
N ST
SI N BA
BA NK S
66
E AV NE OR IB CLA
66 '' 18 ''
''
SIM SIM O N O N BOLIV BO LIV AR AV AR AV E E
12 '' AVE
24'' LOY OLA
PL ELK
E ST
N R N AM RA P M AR PA T RT ST ST CA L LIOP
UP TO W
N
DO W
NT OW
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New OrleansGIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
WATER SYSTEMS: SEWERAGE & WATER BOARD OF NEW ORLEANS Wastewater (10” & Greater)
±
0
Parks
Building Footprints
Biosciences District Buildings
Water
Railroad
33" and Greater
30"
24"
21"
20"
18"
15"
12"
10"
Wastewater
E
E RD METAIRI
E
AV YO LA LO
AVE OLA LOY
ST PART
S RAM
ST MP AR T RA S
15 LE AV E SHVIL
ST
IA YT AN PR
PL
NO
ET
DA
AR
TO HING
LE TO O ST
RG
ED TOL
ITOU L
MA
WAS E
N AV
AVE
TO
RLES
N BIE
ST CHA
SID KE
MP
LA
RA
E
E
I- 10
HING
ID
WAS
RS
E ON
RD
VE
IN ST BAS
RI
I-10
U
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 6: Utilities
MAP 55
YO BA
TCHOUP
AS ST
AN
ST UISI LO AN A
VE NA
12 ''
24 ''
ST
M
ET TO
EA
ST
RH
AR T BL VD
PA L M ET TO ST OV
ER PA SS
PA LM ET TO ST O VE R PA SS
PA L M ET TO ST
PA L M ET TO ST
FO
ET
IN
TO
N TA
PA LM
EB
ST
LE
AU DR
DR
ST
EX EL DR
36 "
42 " 42"
36 "
6' EA RHART B
LVD
8' ST AD RO OAD S B S BR ST
CA NA
NA L S LS T T
CA
EA RH
I-1 0
AR T
W
BL VD
V IS PKW Y
DA
PA L
S C CA ARR RR O O L LT LLT O O NA N V AV E E S
DW OA BR
WY PK S DA VI N SO
JE FF ER S
SS
10 ' PA ER OV S DA VI JE FF
54 " OV E DA VIS FF JE
DA VIS
10 '
8'
SO FF ER JE N
N Y W PK DA VIS
TO
S BR O A
78 "
OR LE AN OR S A LE V E AN S
AV E
36 "
ET
60PA S S " 6'
ER OV IS DAV
SSJEFF
RPA
JE
FF E
RS ON
FF E JE S
S
7'
N N CAR CA R R OL R O LTO LLT N O AV N AV E E
W PK
Y PK W
RS O
N
DA VIS T
Y
20 '
FF E JE N
RS ON
D AV E OA D AV E BR S
JU
LIA
ST
MA M A RTI RT N LU IN TH LU E TH R K ER IN KIN G B LV G BL D VD
OA N B D RO ST AD
BR
78 "
S
PO
YD
RA
PO
IT
NTC
S EX
H
EX
W
EA
RH
T
PO N TC AR T BLV H E X D E
PO YD PO RA YD S RA ST S ST
N OA BR D OA ST D S
BR N N G A GA LV LV EZ EZ ST ST
N
PA LM
AS S
ER P OV ST AD SB RO
8' S G A GA LV E LV Z EZ ST ST S
AY E VILLE AV NASH
NE
20 ' IB
OR
CLA IB S
CLA S
AV E
7' E AV NE OR
ST
VIL LE
CA LL
IO PE
LA AVE LOYO
AV E
ST
CA
LL
PE
ST
HO H O W W AR AR D D AV AV E E
IO
OR LE
AN
S
AV E
ES ES PLA PL N A N AD AD E A E VE AV E
ELK
M
O
ST SS S BR S BR OA OA D S D T ST
HO V
NA CA L ST NA L ST
CA
GA
O IR M
ST N
SS MO
PL
ST
E AV NE OR
PL ELK
T
TOULOUSES
E
ST
T
I- 10
LV EZ
S ER PE T ST
N ST
SI N BA
N
CLA
IB
10 ' 60 " 54"
ST
SIM SIM O N O N BOLIV BO LIV AR AV AR AV E E
AVE LOYOLA
BA NK S
E
AV YO LA LO
AVE
13' OLA LOY
ST PART
S RAM
ST MP AR T RA S
E ST
N R N AM RA P M AR PA T RT ST ST CA L LIOP
UP TO W
N
DO W
NT OW
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New OrleansGIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
WATER SYSTEMS: SEWERAGE & WATER BOARD OF NEW ORLEANS Stormwater (36” & Greater)
±
0
Parks
Building Footprints
Biosciences District Buildings
Water
Railroad
78'
20'
13'
10'
8'
7'
6'
4'
78"
60"
54"
48"
42"
36"
Stormwater
E
E RD METAIRI
LE AV E SHVIL
ST
IA YT AN PR
PL
NO
ET
4' ' 78 DA
AR
LE TO O ST
RG
ED TOL
ITOU L
MA
TO HING
AVE
WAS E
N AV
RLES
RD ST CHA
SID KE LA
MP
E
RA
E
TO
ID
I- 10
HING
RS
E ON
WAS
VE
IN ST BAS
RI
I-10
U
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 6: Utilities
MAP 56
YO BA
TCHOUP
AS ST
N BIE
48"
AN
ST UISI LO AN A
VE NA
ET TO
EA
ST
RH
AR T BL VD
PA L M ET TO ST OV ER
PA S S
PA LM ET TO ST O VE RPA SS
PA L M ET TO ST
PA L M ET TO ST
FO
ET
EB
ST
IN
TO
N TA
PA LM
LE AU DR
DR
ST
M
EX EL DR
EA RHART B
LVD
JE
ST ST AD RO OAD S B S BR
DA VIS
CA NA
NA L S LS T T
CA
EA RH
I-1 0
AR T
W
BL VD
V IS PKW Y
DA
ST
SS PA ER OV S DA VI JE FF
SS
PA ER OV IS DAV
SSJEFF RPA OV E
DA VIS FF
FF E JE S
RS ON FF ER JE S
N N CAR CA R R OL R O LTO LLT N O AV N AV E E Y W PK
Y PK W SO N
DA VIS T
SO FF ER JE N
N Y W PK DA VIS
PA L
S
S BR O A
N
JE
FF E
RS ON
D AV E OA D AV E BR S
O M
ST S
SS BR BR OA OA D S D T ST
S
OR LE AN OR S A LE V E AN S AV E
JU
LIA
ST
MA M A RTI RT N LU IN TH LU E TH R K ER IN KIN G B LV G BL D VD
OA N B D RO ST AD
BR
N S
PO
YD
RA
PO
NTC
S EX IT
H
EX
W
EA
RH
ST
PO N TC AR T BLV H E X D E
PO YD PO RA YD S RA ST S ST
N OA BR D OA ST D BR N
N G A GA LV LV EZ EZ ST ST N
TO
VIL LE
CA LL
IO PE
LA AVE LOYO
AV E
ST
CA
LL
PE
ST
HO H O W W AR AR D D AV AV E E
IO
OR LE
AN
S
AV E
ES ES PLA PL N A N AD AD E A E VE AV E
ELK
ET
S C CA ARR RR O O L LT LLT O O NA N V AV E E
S
DW OA BR
WY PK DA VI N SO
JE FF ER S
S G A GA LV E LV Z EZ ST ST S
ST
PL HO V
L
ST ST
NA L NA
CA CA
ST LV EZ
O IR M N
ST
N
GA T
TOULOUSES
E T
I- 10
PA LM
AS S
ER P OV ST AD SB RO
E ST
N R N AM RA P M AR PA T RT ST ST CA L LIOP
±
N
NT OW
N
1,000
Feet 2,000
Data ranges from 1999 - 2009
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, Environmental Protection Agency.
500
WATER SYSTEM: ENTERGY THERMAL Chilled Water & Steam
UP TO W
DO W
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New OrleansGIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
0
Parks
Building Footprints
Biosciences District Buildings
Water
Railroad
Steam & Condensate Dist.
Chilled Water Supply/Return Dist.
Chilled Water & Steam
E
SS MO
AV E NE
B
S ER PE T ST
ST
E AV NE OR IB CLA
PL
ELK
AY E VILLE AV NASH
IB CLA S
OR
CLA IB S
E AV E OR N
ST
SIM SIM O N O N BOLIV BO LIV AR AV AR AV E E
AVE LOYOLA
BA NK S
E
AV YO LA LO
AVE OLA LOY
ST PART S RAM
ST MP AR T RA S
SID
E RD METAIRI
LE AV E SHVIL
ST
IA YT AN PR
PL
NO
ET
DA
AR
LE TO O ST
RG
ED TO L
ITOU L
MA
RD
ST CHA
TO HING
RLES AVE
ST A SI N
MP
KE
RA
LA
WAS E
N AV
E
E ON
E
TO
ID
I- 10 HING
RS
WAS
VE
IN ST BAS
RI
I-10
U
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 6: Utilities
MAP 57
YO BA
TCHOUP AS ST
N B IE
AN
ST
UISI LO AN A
VE NA
VD
S S CA C RR AR O RO LL LL TO TO N N AV AV E E
PA LM ET TO ST
PA LM ET TO ST
ET TO ST
FO NTA INE BL E AU
PA LM
DR EX EL DR
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS: ENTERGY - AERIAL PRIMARY The Orleans Parish Prison (Sheriff Gusman) is currently in negotiations with Entergy for the installation of a new dedicated electrical feeder for the prison complex which will provide a reliability upgrade over the present supply system.
DR
POTENTIAL UTILITY CONVEYANCE: Future site of pedestrian bridge over Palmetto St. & Washington Ave. This bridge can also be used as an elevated conveyance structure to carry utility lines from XU’s main campus to its buildings located in the Gert Town area.
S TO V ER PA SS
VE PA LM RP ET AS TO S
EA RHART B
LVD
W Y PK DA VIS N FE RS O
W Y PK
DA VIS N
FF ER SO
JE S
JE F S AN LED TO O ST AN ED TOL
CA CA N A NA L S LS T T
I-1
EA RH AR T
0 W
BLV D
FF E JE N
DA VIS PKWY N RS O
W Y PK DA VIS
N SBR O A
SS MO
S
ST
AN OR S A LE VE AN S
OR LE
AV E
JU
LI A
ST
MAR MA TIN RT IN L UTH LU E TH R K ER IN K IN G B LV G BLV D D
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS: ENTERGY - HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSMISSION LINES This 230,000 volt aerial electrical power line above S. Prieur St. is to be re-routed underground and traverse the property under S. Derbigny St. This will clear the airspace above all of the critical buildings of the complex.
T T D S DS OA OA BR S S BR
JE FF
O
SS PA ER OV IS AV D JE FF
SS
OV ER PA SSJEF FD AV IS ER PA OV
DA VIS
ST
ST
AY
Y PK W
DA VI S FF ER SO N S JE
N
JE
FF E
RS O D AV BR E OA D AV E S
S
PO
YD RA
PO
CH
IT
NT
S EX
EX
W
ES E S PL P L AN A N AD AD E A E VE AV E
M IR N
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS: SWB - 25 HZ, SPECIALIZED/DEDICATED FEEDERS This proprietary 480 volt electrical feeder serving dedicated SWB lifting station pumps is to be re-routed around the VA Hospital Complex at the request of the VA. This will prevent the feeder from traversing the property and thereby avoiding construction and development conflicts in this area. T
N O A BR D OA ST D S
BR
EA R H PO A R NT C T BLV H E X D E
POY PO DRA YD S RAS ST ST
VIL
LE
E
L O YO
AV
L A AVE
CA LL IO PE
ST
ST
HO H W OWA AR R D D AV AV E E
CA LL IO PE
OR LE AN
S
AV E
HO V
CA
CA NA LS NA T LS T
T
0
Parks
TOULOUSES
NT OW
N
Feet 2,500
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New OrleansGIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
±
1,250
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, the EPA and vaious utility agencies.
625
UTILITIES: Electrical Distribution Systems
N
DO W
Building Footprints
Biosciences District Buildings
Water
Railroad
Study Area
POTENTIAL UTILITY CONVEYANCE
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS
Biosciences District Plan
UP TO W
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS: ENTERGY - AERIAL PRIMARY This portion of a 24,000 volt electrical line, identified between these points, is to be relocated underground to enhance the visual aesthetics of the streetscape at the request of the VA Hospital development.
N
S M OS BR BR OA OA D S D T ST S
ET TO
OA BR
S GA GA LV LV EZ EZ S T ST S
PA LM
ST
AS S ST OV ER P SB RO AD
NK S
AV E
N
BR
ST
OA N B D RO ST AD AV E OR NE AIB CL
BA
CL AIB OR NE AV IB OR E NE S
A AVE LO YOL
PL ELK
DW AV E NA SH VILLE
CLA
S
AVE LOYOL A
PL EL K
N GA GA LV LV EZ EZ ST ST
N
GA LV
EZ
ST E I-10
N
TE R PE
ST
E S
LA
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS: ENTERGY - AERIAL PRIMARY Xavier University (XU) is presently in negotiations with Entergy to provide a second electrical feeder to the campus. This will afford XU much needed operational reliability by providing electrical power redundancy without having to install a backup power system network throughout the entire campus.
AV E
LO YO LA
ST MPART S RA
TS T PA R
ON GT HIN
RA M
WAS E
N AV
S
TO
AVE
HING WAS
ARLES
N ST BA SI
SID KE T
ST CH
E
MP RA
ID
E
RS
I- 10
VE
E ON
D UR
RI
I-10
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 6: Utilities
MAP 58
YO BA
BASIN ST
N BIE
O ST
AVE
VD
S S CA C RR AR O RO LL LL TO TO N N AV AV E E
OV ER PA SS
PA LM ET TO ST
PA LM ET TO ST
ET T O ST
FO NTA INE BL E AU
PA LM
DR EX EL DR
EA RHART B
LVD
T T D S DS OA OA BR S S BR
S
W Y PK
W Y DA VIS
PK DA VIS N FE RS O JE F
N FF ER SO
JE AN LED TO O ST AN ED TOL
CA CA N A NA L S LS T T
I-1
EA RH AR T
0
W
BLV D
SBR O A
S
DA VIS PKWY N
AN OR S A LE V E AN S
OR LE
AV E
JU
LI A
ST
MAR MA TIN RT IN L UTH LU E TH R K ER IN K IN G B LV G BLV D D
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS: Tulane’s Point of Presence to the LONI system, a state-of-the-art, fiber optics network which currently connects LA and MS research universities.
S
FF E JE N
RS O W Y PK DA VIS N
SS MO
S
PO
YD RA
PO
CH
IT
NT
S EX
M IR EX
W
LE
E
L O YO
AV
L A AVE
ST
HO H W OWA AR R D D AV AV E E
S
AV E
HO V
CA
CA NA LS NA T LS T
TOULOUSES
T
CA LL IO PE
CA LL IO PE
ST
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS: The fiber optic lines of most of the City’s Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLEC) are only available in and around the Poydras St. business corridor.
EA R H PO A R NT C T BLV H E X D E
POY PO DRA YD S RAS ST ST
VIL
OR LE AN
ES E S PL P L AN A N AD AD E A E VE AV E
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS: The Orleans Parish Prison (Sheriff Gusman) has expressed the need for improvements to the telecommunications infrastructure currently serving the prison complex.
N BIE
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS: LSU's Point of Presence to the LONI system, a state-of-the-art, fiber optics network which currently connects LA and MS research universities.
DR
POTENTIAL UTILITY CONVEYANCE: Future site of pedestrian bridge over Palmetto St. & Washington Ave. This bridge can also be used as an elevated conveyance structure to carry utility lines from XU’s main campus to its buildings located in the Gert Town area.
ST
VE PA LM RP ET AS TO S
JE FF
O
SS PA ER OV IS AV D JE FF
SS OV ER PA
SSJEF FD AV IS ER PA OV DA VIS
ST
ST
AY
Y PK W
DA VI S FF ER SO N S JE
N
JE
FF E
RS O
D AV BR E OA D AV E S
ST S M OS BR BR OA OA D S D T ST
S
ET TO
OA BR
S GA GA LV LV EZ EZ S T ST S
PA LM
ST
AS S ST OV ER P SB RO AD
NK S
AV E
BR
N
T
N O A BR D OA ST D S
BR
N
N GA GA LV LV EZ EZ ST ST N
ST
OA N B D RO ST AD
AV E OR NE AIB CL
BA
AV E
ST
E I-10
EZ
S
GA LV
N
PE ST
N
NT OW
N
1,250
Feet 2,500
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, the EPA and vaious utility agencies.
625
UTILITIES: Communication Systems
UP TO W
DO W
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New OrleansGIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
±
0
Parks
Building Footprints
Biosciences District Buildings
Water
Railroad
Study Area
POTENTIAL UTILITY CONVEYANCE
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
Biosciences District Plan
E
N
N ST BA SI
SID KE LA
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS: Xavier University (XU) is interested in becoming a member of the LONI system, a state-of-the-art, fiber optics network which currently connects LA and MS research universities. This will require the installation of a node on XU's campus.
CL AIB OR NE IB AV OR E NE S
A AVE LO YOL
PL ELK
DW AV E NA SH VILLE
CLA
S
AVE LOYOL A
PL EL K
E
TE R T
LO YO LA
ST MPART
S RA
TS T PA R
ON GT HIN
RA M
WAS E
N AV
S
TO
AVE
HING WAS
ARLES
D UR
ST CH
ID
MP RA
RS
E
VE
E ON
I- 10
RI
I-10
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 6: Utilities
MAP 59
YO BA
BASIN ST
O ST
AVE
VD
S S CA C RR AR O RO LL LL TO TO N N AV AV E E
PA LM ET TO ST
PA LM ET TO ST
ET TO ST
FO NTA INE BL E AU
PA LM
DR EX EL DR
WATER SYSTEMS: SWB – WASTEWATER Intentional and malicious actions by prison inmates have at times resulted in debris being introduced into the sewer. SWB crews have repeatedly needed to remove blockages from downstream manholes that have caused backups in and adjacent to the prison complex.
DR
POTENTIAL UTILITY CONVEYANCE: Future site of pedestrian bridge over Palmetto St. & Washington Ave. This bridge can also be used as an elevated conveyance structure to carry utility lines from XU’s main campus to its buildings located in the Gert Town area.
S TO V ER PA SS
ST
AY
LVD
T T D S DS OA OA BR S S BR
AN LED TO O ST AN ED TOL
CA CA N A NA L S LS T T
W Y PK
W Y PK DA VIS
I-1
EA RH AR T
0 W
BLV D
JE
FF E
S
AN OR S A LE VE AN S
OR LE
AV E
JU
LI A
ST
MAR MA TIN RT IN L UTH LU E TH R K ER IN K IN G B LV G BLV D D
S
PO
YD RA
PO
CH
IT
NT
S EX
EX
W
EA R H PO A R NT C T BLV H E X D E
POY PO DRA YD S RAS ST ST
VIL
LE
E
L O YO
AV
L A AVE
CA LL IO PE
O ST
ST
ST
HO H W OWA AR R D D AV AV E E
CA LL IO PE
OR LE AN
S
AV E
ES E S PL P L AN A N AD AD E A E VE AV E
HO V
CA
CA NA LS NA T LS T
T
TOULOUSES
ST
T
EZ
ST
M IR
WATER SYSTEMS: ENTERGY THERMAL - CHILLED WATER & STEAM Location of UMC's new Central Plant which will distribute chilled water and steam throughout the hospital complex. There are current negotiations in place to potentially build a larger plant to be shared with the new VA Hospital complex. A larger facility can lead to reduced energy costs through economies of scale.
ST
DA VIS PKWY N RS O
W Y PK DA VIS
N
N
SBR O A
N
JE
FF E
WATER SYSTEMS: SWB - POTABLE WATER The construction of the proposed Central Plant for Orleans Parish Prison at this location will dramatically increase the potable water demand of the complex. However, the SWB can accommodate the projected increased demand with the adequate reserve available in the present 20” water main located on S. White St.
EA RHART B
Y PK W
DA VI S
VE PA LM RP ET AS TO S
JE FF
O
S JE
SS PA ER OV IS AV D JE FF
SS
OV ER PA SSJEF FD AV IS ER PA OV
DA VIS
ST
S
DA VIS N FE RS O JE F
N FF ER SO
JE S
BR
N
RS O D AV BR E OA D AV E S
T
N O A BR D OA ST D S
BR
N
N GA GA LV LV EZ EZ ST ST
N
SS MO
AV E
S M OS BR BR OA OA D S D T ST S
ET TO
ST
OA BR
S GA GA LV LV EZ EZ S T ST S
PA LM
NK S
AS S ST OV ER P SB RO AD
BA
AV E
N
GA LV
S TE R PE
ST
E I-10
N
N ST BA SI
N
NT OW
N
1,250
Feet 2,500
DATA SOURCES: City of New Orleans, New Orleans Regional Planning Commission, the EPA and vaious utility agencies.
625
UTILITIES: Water Systems
UP TO W
DO W
CITATION:Infrastructure Data provided by the City of New OrleansGIS department and New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board and Orleans Parish Communications District (911). Geospatial processing provided by the Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard and St. Tammany Parishes.
±
0
Parks
Building Footprints
Biosciences District Buildings
Water
Railroad
Study Area
POTENTIAL UTILITY CONVEYANCE
WATER SYSTEMS
Biosciences District Plan
E SID KE LA
OA N B D RO ST AD AV E OR NE AIB CL
E
WATER SYSTEMS: SWB – STORMWATER The City and the SWB have considered covering this canal because of public safety concern. If undertaken, this could dramatically reduce the current capacity if the existing cross sectional area is contracted which could result in reduced draining efficiency and localized flooding.
CL AIB OR NE AV IB OR E NE S
A AVE LO YOL
PL ELK
DW AV E
NA SH VILLE
CLA
S
AVE LOYOL A
PL EL K
FF ER SO N
AVE
LO YO LA
ST MPART S RA
TS T PA R
ON GT HIN
RA M
WAS E
N AV
S
TO
AVE
HING WAS
ARLES
D UR
ST CH
ID
MP RA
RS
E
VE
E ON
I- 10
RI
I-10
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 6: Utilities
MAP 60
YO BA
BASIN ST
N BIE
110
Working Paper 3
Sustainability
August 2010
Section 07: Sustainability
111
112
Working Paper 3
Sustainability
August 2010
Sustainability Constraints and Opportunities Sustainability in its broadest sense - covering environmental, economic and social aspects – is a key objective of GNOBEDD. By integrating sustainability principles upfront into the design and planning of the Biosciences District, there is great opportunity to optimize its long term performance and efficiency, so that residents, students and workers, businesses and city agencies can operate in a sustainable, equitable and low impact way. Sustainability is an important principle for the City, evidenced by (for example) the calculation of its greenhouse gas inventory, designation as a Solar City, the GreeNOLA report, energy efficiency programs, a Mayoral task force focusing on energy and environment, and numerous coalitions and groups working to help New Orleans become a sustainability exemplar. In order to help understand what the sustainability objectives and targets for the Biosciences District should be, it is important to consider the current conditions of the Biosciences District, potential opportunities and constraints in a holistic way, integrating the specialties of the different Team members. For example, considered alone, ecology is often seen as a regulatory constraint and sustainability as primarily a transportation or energy issue. However, a site’s ecological capabilities can provide diverse and often no-cost additional sustainable design measures and services. Urban design measures such as urban heat island mitigation, urban forestry, storm-water management and open space networks can all leverage ecological opportunities to achieve maximum environmental benefits such as greenhouse gas reduction, achieving water balance and generating green premiums. Drawing out such cross disciplinary relationships and identifying the most relevant sustainable development opportunities within the GNOBEDD project context are the two primary goals of this task.
As a tool to assist in the sustainability assessment, the Team has created a matrix which identifies and compares the sustainability themes, grouped as listed overleaf. For each one the existing conditions, opportunities, constraints, and potential community benefits have been identified. The matrix should be seen as a working tool to help facilitate discussion and idea generation, both with Team members and with stakeholders, but clearly shows even at this stage the tremendous opportunity that exists for the creation of a truly sustainable place. The constraints and opportunities will be expanded and vetted during the forthcoming tasks, particularly the workshops, and will help establish answers to questions such as: •
How can stormwater management solutions provide both neighborhood amenities and reduce flooding within the Biosciences District?
•
What building energy performance do we want to achieve to help reduce the City’s greenhouse gas emissions?
•
What percentage of building energy can be supplied by low carbon sources to lower running costs for businesses and residents?
•
What transportation mode shift does GNOBEDD want to achieve to help improve air quality and public health?
•
What kind of community amenities and services will be provided within the Biosciences District to foster a vibrant community?
•
How can ecological opportunities inherent to the site be optimized to enhance community character and natural services such as urban agriculture, urban heat island reduction, or water quality improvement?
•
What construction material can be salvaged and
113
•
reused on site to save costs and reduce landfill?
◊
Safety
How can green collar jobs be supported by GNOBEDD’s sustainability aspirations?
◊
Disaster Planning
◊
Environmental Justice and Equity
◊
Universities
◊
Community Benefits Agreement
Sustainability Existing Conditions Matrix Structure • Below are the systems analyzed in the sustainability matrix: •
•
•
•
Comprehensive Biosciences District Sustainability Programming ◊
LEED ND and comprehensive Biosciences District performance
Green infrastructure and Natural Systems: ◊
Physiography (Landform)
◊
Financing for Sustainability
◊
Hydrology and Flooding
◊
Comprehensive GNOBEDD GHG reduction
◊
Topography
◊
Soils
◊
Climate/ Microclimate
◊
Habitat and Biodiversity
•
2009 ICLEI New Orleans Carbon Footprint Report
◊
Agriculture and Natural Resources
•
GREENOLA report
•
A Plan for the 21st Century: New Orleans 2030, particularly chapters on Environmental Quality; Transportation; Community Facilities, Services and Infrastructure.
•
Energy Smart New Orleans
•
Sustainable Energy and Environmental Transition Task Force Report April 2010
Transportation and Urban Design ◊
Streetscapes/ Non-motorized Transportation
◊
Motorized Transportation/Mass Transit
◊
Green Building
◊
Open Space/ Landscape/Urban Forest
◊
Density
Energy and Water Supply and Waste ◊
Biosciences District Energy Supply
◊
Biosciences District Water Supply
◊
Solid waste
Economic and Social Sustainability ◊
Public Health
◊
Green Collar Jobs
◊
Community Services/ Amenities
The AECOM Team has reviewed a number of policy documents to help in the development of the matrix, including but not limited to:
114
Working Paper 3
Sustainability
August 2010
Section Summary •
Sustainability is an important principle for the City.
•
By integrating sustainability principles upfront into the design and planning of the Biosciences District, there is great opportunity to optimize its long term performance and efficiency, so that residents, students and workers, businesses and city agencies can operate in a sustainable, equitable and low impact way.
•
In order to help understand what the sustainability objectives and targets for the Biosciences District should be, it is important to consider the current conditions of the Biosciences District, potential opportunities and constraints in a holistic way, integrating the specialties of the different Team members. Drawing out such cross disciplinary relationships and identifying the most relevant sustainable development opportunities within the GNOBEDD project context are the two primary goals of this task.
•
A matrix is provided which identifies and compares the sustainability themes including: Green Infrastructure and Natural Systems; Transportation and Urban Design; Energy, Water Supply and Waste; Economic and Social Sustainability; Comprehensive Biosicence District Sustainability Programming.
•
For each one the existing conditions, opportunities, constraints, and potential community benefits have been identified. The matrix should be seen as a working tool to help facilitate discussion and idea generation, both with Team members and with stakeholders, but clearly shows even at this stage the tremendous opportunity that exists for the creation of a truly sustainable place.
115
MAP 61
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 7: Sustainability
Green Infrastructure and Natural Systems
Sustainability Theme
Hydrology and Flooding
Physiography (Landform)
Feature
Stormwater; most surface water conveyed in Attempt to provide retention for 10 year storm event on site to concrete lined pipes/canals; frequent street achieve Army Corps target. Retain more if possible. Piped, flooding; occasional extreme flooding. Current covered conveyance/retention is good for safety, reduces debris city stormwater system (including site) entering system, and vector control; however daylighting of designed to retain 1 inch of rain for first hour of conveyance and good design as amenity water feature and storm and 1/2 inch for every hour after. Army linear parks could increase community value, reduced flood risk Corps in process of upgrading system to retain and other values. Holland has many good precedents of this. 10 year storm event. Stormwater management Converting underground canals to unlined, open topped, more features planned for the UMC include natural canals could also reduced subsidence risk and improve bioswales and other devices such as urban biodiversity/habitat. Medians in Jefferson Davis, Broad, underground retention tanks and cisternsthat Galves could provide good opportunities. District for stormwater store rainwater that can be used to irrigate the retention in such areas, in addition to site by site strategies like site. done at the VA (2 million cubic feet retained in underground cisterns), could significantly reduce flood risk in GNOBEDD. Preliminary calculations indicate that a canal, ponds or capped retention in the median of Jeff Davis Pkwy may be able to provide 15 25 acre feet of stormwater which could reduce street flooding (acre feet to be verified). Rainbarrels, cisterns, rain gardens, bioswales and green roofs on individual sites may also provide retention/flood reduction. Bioswales, small canals on smaller streets also may be beneficial for retention and aesthetics.
X
Restoring higher water table through increased retention and infiltration of surface water on site through bioswales, canals, retention ponds, etc could reduce subsidence risk and improve water quality. Conversion of concrete lined conveyance to bioswales/open non lined canals could improve this function if designed as aesthetically pleasing water features/linear parks/greenways. Pumping water from Bayou St John into canals during dry season may also increase water table reducing subsidence, and may be necessary to maintain aesthetically pleasing water features/linear parks.
Relatively high water table; but lower than historic natural water table.
Daylighting could attract nuisance species; debris could be a problem without proper maintenance; and safety could be reduced if not well designed/maintained. Existing typical infrastructure strategy of capped canals is well established and daylighting may be seen as a step backwards since capping has historically been seen as a best practice. Retention capacity of bioswales/ponds/or open canals in medians may be limited by inlet elevations at pump stations. Lowering inlets at pump stations could increase retention capacity further but would be costly.
local best practices case studies; reference Lefitte Greenway Master Plan and Dutch Dialogs for analog imagery.
case studies
Existing grid, buildings, and infrastructure a challenge to incorporate historic natural processes as design features/community benefits. Social acceptance/interest in natural landform may be low.
Vacant/underutilized areas are opportunity to reestablish natural beneficial processes associated with the historic landform (i.e. water quality, landscape productivity, air quality, habitat, etc). Landform as inspiration with new design elements for the district.
Landscape currently urban with substantial vacant/underutilized land, little natural character remains.
Potentially requires re engineering existing drainage infrastructure; increased space needed for conveyance/retention; potential safety, vector risk; cost; subsidence threat to resilience of infrastructure.
Requires replication or reestablishment of natural flooding local restoration examples processes and soil conditions; may attract nuisance species.
Additional info needed
Historic landform was floodplain and deciduous Consider reestablishment of native ecology for educational, swamp; native vegetation was bald cypress and recreational, mental well being, and biodiversity purposes. mixed hardwood forest.
Constraints
Established flood mitigation strategies heavily relied upon. Magnitude of potential flooding significant challenge.
Opportunities
Key Opportunity
Site flat, periodically flooded, below sea level. Reducing risks associated with flooding can become opportunity Hydrologic processes highly engineered and for innovative design solutions; could become model for city and primary risk to community. globally.
Existing Condition
Sources
Community character; Dutch Dialogue (website has great recreation; stormwater inventory or precedents and management; mental well being diagrams); Chester Engineers; Lefitte Greenway Master Plan; AECOM Water Experts; Site Assessment for UMC, March 2010
Resilience of construction/safety Dutch Dialogue; Chester Engineers; AECOM Water Experts
community character; mental health; stormwater management
Education; foster conservation The Cooperative Soil Survey behavior; mental well being; stormwater management; improve air quality; community h Education; recreation;
Stormwater management; health Chester Engineering; stakeholder and safety; community character interviews
Potential Community Benefits
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 7: Sustainability
MATRIX
Green Infrastructure and Natural Systems Green Infrastructure and Natural Systems
Sustainability Theme
Climate/ Microclimate
Soils
Topography
Feature
Minor habitat areas identified on the site. Habitat could be incorporated into stormwater management Street trees, parks, vacant areas provide habitat infrastructure, parks, urban tree canopy, and landscapes. for birds. Increasing urban habitat could improve opportunities for residents to interact with nature which is a recreation opportunity, educational opportunity, and has been shown to have mental health benefits. Knowledge of nature improves conservation behavior.
X
Stormwater management; structural integrity of buildings/infrastructure
Stormwater management, recreation
Reduced energy use, improved City of New Orleans Baseline GHG pedestrian comfort, increased Report 2001, Mayor's Office of carbon sequestration from trees, Environmental Affairs; Baton habitat improvement Rouge Tree and Landscape Ordinance; Urban Ecosystem Analysis for New Orleans Metro Area, 2002 American Forests
Dutch Dialogue; Chester Engineers; Cooperative Soil Survey; City of New Orleans; Environmental Protection Agency
City of New Orleans, Environmental Protection Agency
ICLEI 2009 GHG report; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
Sources
Education, recreation, mental New Orleans 2030 Master Plan; health, conservation behavior, Building for Life, Kellert; Kaplan stormwater, carbon and Kaplan sequestration, urban heat island reduction
Continued long term Health and safety, cost savings, US Climate Change Science monitoring and integration of global exemplar Program mitigation measure for expected climate change impacts to area
Baton Rouge policy as precedent; consider UHI modeling by AECOM in later phases of work
Contact wind modeling experts Resilience of structures, safety within AECOM; consider modeling for hurricane winds and building design in later phases of work
map 2' contours to identify microtopography
Possible nuisance species could be attracted (alligators, Confirm nuisance species risk snapping turtles, snakes, nutria, etc). Invasive species need by looking at local park to be controlled. analogs; identify precedents for urban habitat in NO
Increased temperatures, sea level rise, changes in precipitation patterns, changes in hydrologic regime, biodiversity shifts, etc may all impact development. Uncertainty and uniqueness of impacts must be expected and planned for.
few technical, cost of trees ; district airflow modeling required for best design optimization.
Urban heat island effect; results in 5 degrees F Increase urban tree canopy, local wind flow, reduction of paved dark surfaces, and reflectance of surfaces to reduce effect. increase in temps which reduces energy efficiency and user comfort.
Climate change adaptive design required for all systems. Design for change is important consideration and opportunity. More frequent flooding and storms is likely most significant expected impact.
Existing grid orientation well established; increases in hurricane severity predicted with Climate Change.
Urban/building design for hurricane force wind resistance, flood protection could improve community resilience and become global/local exemplar. Consider probability of direction of most extreme winds when laying out streets and buildings to improve resiliency.
Severe hurricanes always a risk.
Climate Change Adaptation, Resilience, and Resistance
Soil subsidence at 1 cm per year; threat to stormwater conveyance infrastructure, buildings, roads, etc; restoring natural groundwater regime may reduce subsidence, but would require significant change to current hydrology management strategy
Soil has very high shrink/swell potential; due to Design for soil subsidence to increase sustainability; consider natural clay and/or peat soils combined with maintaining ground water at more constant levels to reduce reduced ground water levels due to pumping subsidence. leading to subsidence. Some soils have low permeability.
Lowest areas may provide opportunities for stormwater retention; higher areas best for building, but also may provide more retention volume for flood control; low areas may be more suitable for parks; reduce subsidence risk through increasing height of water table.
X
Potential Community Benefits
High flooding risk; FEMA requirements for finished floor elevations; long term subsidence will continue to lower elevations; sea level rise increasing risk over time.
Additional info needed
Elevations mostly 5' to +5' above sea level; slight variations across site; frequent localized street flooding (often due to clogged drains). Elevation continues to lower at 1 cm per year due to subsidence caused by drainage infrastructure.
Constraints
Predictions for sea level rise and storm strength/frequency latest sea level rise Long term often changing and science somewhat vague. Current projections/trends per resilience/sustainability; local FEMA guidelines have potential to change in future. Intergovernmental Panel on precedent Precautionary adaptation planning relatively new approach Climate Change (IPCC) updates and often a difficult sell. to be evaluated; Precedents for Climate Change Adaptation/Resilience planning that address sea level rise in similar contexts.
Opportunities
Key Opportunity
Sea Level Rise, Storm Surge; Sea level predicted Opportunity for innovative design solutions that could become to rise 7 15 inches to Climate Change by next model for city and globally; Perimeter levee around project site century, additional rise expected after that; could help protect from more frequent flood events resulting more frequent strong hurricanes also a from sea level rise, however valves would also need to be possibility. Estimates for sea level rise may be installed on underground drainage canals/sewers to prevent too low per recent IPCC and other reports. Rise additional inflow during flood event. Existing high ground along may be up to 1 meter or more, but 7 15 inches Jeff Davies, Lafitte, the I 10 expressway, and along eastern site is current accepted estimate. boarder may be designed to act as secondary levee without significant investment. Consider designing project site for higher sea level rise and more frequent site flooding as precautionary measure.
Existing Condition
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 7: Sustainability
MATRIX
Transportation and Urban Design
Green Infrastructure and Natural Systems
Sustainability Theme
Potential Community Benefits
Sources
Pedestrian crossings lacking and pedestrian comfort low; lacking crosswalk signals in many places. Tulane Ave upgrades will improve Streetscapes/ Non walkability. motorized t t ti
Building street frontage good in residential areas, and so so in non residential areas. Vacant lots and deteriorated structures common.
Increase traffic calming measures like street trees, lane reductions, "bump outs" at dangerous crossing areas, marked crosswalks, and other traffic calming/pedestrian comfort measures; comply with relevant LEED ND credit
Increase "eyes on the street", street life, and enhanced streetscape aesthetic by requiring relevant building design measures per LEED ND or other best practices.
Sidewalks reported to be missing in many Complete sidewalk system and safe street crossings essential for places; streetscape appearance makes choosing improved neighborhood character, walkability, and safety. to walk as undesirable
X
X
X
Existing poor condition of many streetscapes is a significant Local precedents challenge and may require up front investments; New streetscape design best practices will require buy in.
Streetscape quality inventory
Sidewalk quality inventory; streetscape quality inventory
Up front investment needed. Costly, maintenance important.
Existing condition of many streets/buildings a challenge; Parking desires of businesses often incompatible with creating vibrant streetscapes.
Detailed understanding of past, present and future site ecology
New model of design; project desire for innovation in ecological design; precedents needed.
Precedents within New Orleans; great precedents in San Francisco, Santa Monica, and Long Beach, CA; Detroit, MI
Safety; bump outs potentially combined with stormwater management
Safety; community character; property value; GHG reduction
Safety; community character; property value; GHG reduction
Numerous
Mental/physical well being, healthy food source, community identity, community beautification, carbon footprint reduction, increase landscape productivity
LEED ND; Transportation Analysis
Stakeholder interviews; LEED ND
Stakeholder Interviews
New Orleans 2030 Master Plan; Sustainable Energy and Environment Task Force April 2010 Document
Potential zoning changes needed. Potential soil contamination in areas. Perception that community gardens are not aesthetically appealing is common yet easily solvable. Conditional use permits for sale of food grown within district may be needed.
Significant opportunities for community agriculture on vacant lots within project site (community gardens with rental plots, small urban farm businesses, restaurant associated gardens, community supported agriculture, private gardens for single or multi family residential, or school garden/farm areas. These may be interim, early intervention measures to utilize and improve appearance of vacant yet productive space, or as long term community amenities/small business opportunities. City is considering making NORA lots available for these activities, creation of Community Land Trusts also proposed. This is a potential major identity feature of the project.
Much interest in community agriculture in New Orleans. Plenty of land opportunities within GNOBEDD. Potentially zoning and regulatory barriers to urban farming.
X
Additional info needed
Many invasive plants are also culturally significant. Local invasive species. Is site Education, recreation, mental New Orleans 2030 Master Plan Controversy amongst landscape industry about restricting contributing significantly to health, conservation behavior, sale/use of invasive species. Invasive species control can the problem. stormwater, carbon be management intensive. sequestration, urban heat island reduction
Constraints
Requires replication or reestablishment of natural flooding Identify restoration precedents Education, recreation, mental Cooperative Soil Survey processes and soil conditions; may attract nuisance well being, conservation species. behavior, stormwater, carbon sequestration, urban heat island reduction
Restrict planting of invasive species with the GNOBEDD District. Promote use of non invasive and native plants. Native and locally adapted plants also require less irrigation and maintenance.
Opportunities
Key Opportunity
Historic native vegetation was bald cypress and Consider reestablishment of native ecology for educational, mixed hardwood forest, consider mental health, and biodiversity purposes. reestablishment for educational and biodiversity purposes. Near school or in focal area is best.
Invasive species a problem in local natural areas.
Existing Condition
Agriculture and Natural Resources Ecosystem services/natural Consider comprehensive ecosystem services/natural resources/biomimicry on site such as solar and resources/biomimicry concept as guiding component of wind energy, water supply and flood sustainable community development approach. Systematically protection, favorable soils for food growing, identify opportunities and constraints throughout the design biomimicry ideas pool in species adaptations process from macro to micro temporal and spatial scales. and natural patterns/processes associated with local environments, among others. These resources/services and ecosystem characteristics can provide inspiration and information toward building a more sustainable community (aka biomimicry).
Habitat and Biodiversity
Feature
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 7: Sustainability
MATRIX
ation and Urban Design
Transportation and Urban Design
Sustainability Theme
Motorized Transportation/ Mass Transit
transportation
Feature
Plans for bike friendly streets (and storage facilities) being implemented, continue to design Biosciences District to facilitate bike ridership; attempt to match housing strategy with jobs strategy to increase potential for bike to work. Bikes particularly suitable for students. Good street grid, potential for many destinations and residents within the district; shuttle between Tulane and Xavier university proposed to link all medical facilities/schools; multimodal transport facility proposed near Xavier.
Significant emissions reductions possible through reducing VMT through increasing workforce housing matched to biosciences employers; providing student housing in district; and transportation demand management for commuters. Residents living within district can have reduced VMT if diverse amenities/services programmed within the district.
Opportunities for parking and auto communing balanced with transit and non motorized communing. Structured parking could improve streetscape/urban design character. Pedestrian friendly streets, parking design. Incentives to reduce driving emissions (i.e. parking fees, priority parking spots for EV's, etc) % bike parking to be provided as standard alongside car parking allocation.
Bike able streets and infrastructure plan in place and being implemented. Safety improvements still needed.
Good bus/streetcar infrastructure within the biosciences district. Effectiveness/ frequency need improvement. RTA to use UPT as a transfer terminal in place of Canal Street. Development of the Canal to UPT streetcar service on Loyola Avenue.
Auto transit in Biosciences District likely results in high vehicle miles traveled (VMT) emissions relatively high due to long commutes of students/employees. For NO as a whole, transport emissions make up 43% of GHG inventory.
Surface parking common practice within the district.
Existing and proposed green Buildings within Potential for LEED ND District preliminary analysis indicates all the district (NO has 84 LEED registered prerequisites can be met and 40+ credits are likely achievable projects, some of which are within the district) ; within the district. Some grant funding available for LEED ND VA hospital LEED Certified?; green building projects (where affordable housing part of project) City of New ordinance proposed by the City of NO; Orleans developing Green Building Ordinance, development could comply and/or help facilitate implementation of the ordinance. significant opportunity for reuse/recycling of demolition material. Potential to require LEED certification of particular level of for all buildings within district. CBA includes sustainble design and construction.
Potential for residents to walk to jobs, services is high. Important to match housing strategy with jobs strategy within Biosciences District (i.e. housing cost/quality appropriate for income demographic at job centers).
Opportunities
Residents/users choosing walking as mode of transit is lower due to low community services/amenities within walking distance and lack of match between local residents and local employment. High potential to improve this through good urban design. Walkability between medical campuses/businesses is difficult due to long distance between destinations.
Existing Condition
Key Opportunity
X
X
X
Additional info needed
New Orleans 2030 Master Plan; stakeholder interviews
Stakeholder Interviews; Transportation Analysis
Sources
Reduced carbon dioxide Xavier and Tulane Stakeholder emissions, improved street life interviews; Transportation Analysis and community character; cost savings to residents due to reduced auto costs.
Health; street life and community character; GHG reduction
Reduced carbon dioxide emissions, improved street life and community character; improved safety/eyes on the street; improved health
Potential Community Benefits
Evaluate business as usual commercial parking design within the district
NO Sustainable Energy and Environmental Task Force; GREENOLA;
Improved street life, community Stakeholder Interviews; character, and walkability. Transportation Analysis
LEED ND may be costly, however preliminary analysis Determine potential of City to Numerous including health indicates that project certification may be relatively cost implement Green Building benefits (better indoor air effective compared to most others due to favorable Ordinance; complete detailed quality). existing conditions. City's Green Building Ordinance may or analysis of LEED ND potential; may not happen in near future, TBD. Impact of could map current LEED requirements on development progressing. registered buildings within district (using USGBC database.
Surface parking will likely be common in Biosciences District if current auto use trends are continued. Businesses often prefer generous, visible, and highly accessible parking often resulting in extensive surface parking lots with street frontage.
Getting significant number of people to both live and work Estimate District Trips/VMT for Reduced carbon dioxide Stakeholder Interviews; within the district will be a challenge. Perception issues existing and proposed emissions, improved street life Transportation Analysis associated with walking vs. driving. Long distance (more development. and community character; cost than 5 10 minute walk) between medical savings to residents due to facilities/institutions leads to increased driving between reduced auto costs. destinations.
Getting non local employees to use transit to reach the District; employees living locally and taking transit; ineffective connections between institutions/medical facilities within the District
Primary concern of many entities within the Biosciences District will be for parking/cars. Many employees will live far away and need to drive rather than walk.
Improvements in neighborhood character/safety necessary for area attractiveness. Due to long distance between medical facilities/schools, improving pedestrian connectivity for employees/users may require investments in bike infrastructure/bus/streetcar/shuttles.
Constraints
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 7: Sustainability
MATRIX
Green Building
Major GHG reduction potential; Green building ordinance having specific energy efficiency requirements so new buildings are highly efficient; Federal / state grant programs for energy efficiency retrofits; promotion of energy efficiency programs in city owned and commercial buildings; development of Residential / commercial energy conservation ordinance (RECO or CECO) which mandates energy efficiency performance level. Facilitate with adoption of PACE (property assessed clean energy) mechanism for funding energy related improvements. Tulane is signatory to University College and University President Commitment to Climate Change (UCUPCCC) Remediate brownfields during development, potentially financial incentives, benefit to surrounding neighborhoods
Increase parks to levels appropriate for users; medians (Jeff Davies 145', Broad 30' and Galvez 45') as opportunities for parks/recreation and/or ecosystem services (i.e. stormwater management, urban heat island reduction, carbon sequestration, habitat) Diverse plant palette of non invasive, locally adapted and native plants suitable for use within the district. Irrigation demand reduction is major benefit. Urban habitat could be enhanced with native plants.
Brownfields (TBD)
Few parks within Biosciences District. Comisky Center Park, linear parks/medians along Jeff Davies, Broad, and Galvez. Vacant lands and unkempt streetscape greenspace common.
Landscape planting pallet should be emphasize locally adapted and native plants to reduce irrigation demand. Restrict use of invasive plant species within the GNOBEDD District.
Opportunities
Energy efficiency: Some energy efficiency retrofit programs / grants available through utilities and federal funding; bioscience labs and hospitals tend to have high energy demands both for electricity (equipment and cooling) and hot water. Poor energy efficiency of old existing stock. Newer hospital and university buildings likely to be better. Universities (e.g. Tulane) have energy management programs and energy efficiency retrofit programs in place.
Existing Condition
Density
Increase trees within the district to increase biological carbon storage. Plant large growing, resilient tree species.
Biological carbon sequestration in trees and vegetation
Multiple, diverse uses across the site, although Site has good urban design framework (i.e. diverse land use the site underserved for amenities such as zoning with good street connectivity) in place to provide highly restaurants, grocery, retail, entertainment, etc. walkable, dense urban community with high level of services and amenities. Density, pedestrian friendly street design, and transit could allow residents and users to have access to high level of services and amenities within the district
Increase urban tree canopy to enhance carbon sequestration, reduce urban heat island, improve comfort, biodiversity, property values; consider planting trees that are resilient in hurricanes (i.e. native Live Oaks relatively resilient to hurricane winds)
Urban tree canopy sparse across District
Several important parks adjacent to Biosciences Potential to connect linear parks/medians along Jeff Davies, District. Broad, Galvez with Lefitte Greenway and City Park just north of Open Space/ the site. Landscape/Urban Forest
Feature
Transporta
Transportation and Urban Design
Sustainability Theme
Key Opportunity
X
X
X
X
Additional info needed
Determine if brownfields on the site
Appropriate species, sequestration rates
Phasing up front investments in services and amenities Locations of existing can be beneficial to increasing residents, but can be costly services/amenities; current to developers and economically challenging to businesses. FAR/density; zoning for mixed use, TOD
Hurricane survival, maintenance
Human health, community/streetscape character; greenhouse gas reduction.
Improve pedestrian comfort, GREENOLA; American Forests 2002 sequester carbon, reduce urban Report heat island/building energy use; increase property values; biodiversity
Improve pedestrian comfort, Louisiana Garden Club; sequester carbon, reduce urban GREENOLA; New Orleans 2030 heat island/building energy use; Master Plan increase property values; biodiversity
Other hurricane resilient species
New Orleans 2030 Master Plan
Cost; potential for hurricane losses.
Biodiversity, water supply, community character.
Community character; New Orleans 2030 Master Plan recreation; stormwater management; mental well being
Community character; Lefitte Greenway Master Plan; recreation; stormwater Dutch Dialogue management; mental well being
Current planting regimes followed by city and universities
Sources
NOEEP (New Orleans Energy Efficiency Programs); Entergy energy efficiency programs; USGBC LEED project database; Energy Smart New Orleans Program; Sustainable Energy and Environment Task Force April 2010 Document
Human health, ecological health; LEED ND community character
Lower running costs
Potential Community Benefits
Frequent road crossings of medians may limit linear parks/medians functionality as a greenway/park space.
Requires buy in from landscape designers, suppliers, and maintenance entities.
Land needs to be acquired for additional parks, large Total park area needed to parcels may be difficult to secure. Safety and accessibility serve the project, location of of medians must be addressed. existing future population densities
Potentially costly; potentially complex process
Capacity to apply or / administer grants; additional Age of current building stock requirements as perceived/real barrier to development; (to assess current energy education of commercial and residential population on efficiency performance); energy conservation; Potential increased cost, but volume of new development becoming less so for new construction; retrofitting existing expected in district; appetite construction more costly for bioscience firms to be housed in green buildings
Constraints
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 7: Sustainability
MATRIX
Social and Economic Sustainability
Energy and Water Supply and Waste
Sustainability Theme
Biofuels/research synergy sought by universities
Key component of regional green economy. Could also provide renewable fuel source for district.
Large area can provide space and optimal urban design for multiple synergistic businesses; Shared green infrastructure through coordinated urban design can reduce costs. Universities and hospitals can be economy of scale purchasers of green products which may help get these industries off the ground.
A lot of interest among all stakeholders to include in Biosciences District; Sustainable Communities Working Coalition collaborators; EcoPark, and GreenNO working together to Green Collar Jobs access grants to support this.
Public Health
Clean tech/industrial practices compatible with EcoPark concept. District could improve opportunities for healthy lifestyles among users (i.e. access to healthy food supply, improved walkability and recreational activities, improved air quality, improved mental well being, medical theme of district is opportunity to create health theme for the district)
X
New model of design; precedents/buy in needed
Convincing skeptics that BioSciences District will not increase harmful pollution is a challenge. Facilitating healthy lifestyle changes through good urban design will take time.
Further research needed
Further research needed
Availability of recycling may be tied to City restarting their Verify University programs program. Independent District recycling program may be costly.
No recycling or composting program in the city City has repaired recycling facilities; project could be opportunity to help facilitate restoration of service; Consider comprehensive currently, was wiped out by Katrina. Universities howeber have recycling programs. program for biosciences facilities and Universities focusing on unique medical waste opportunities. University programs may be expanded to serve the entire district. Recycling of materials from structures to be removed is opportunity.
Physical health; mental well being; community character; environmental health
Potential reduced GHG emissions; reduced natural resource use; improved community character; improved conservation behavior of users
Costly to retrofit existing buildings; reclaimed water Evaluate water demand of Reduced GHG emissions; infrastructure may be costly. Expanding use of low water typical landscape in NO. Is low community identity landscape palettes may require buy in from designers and water landscape common? compromise with engrained landscape aesthetic trends.
Water use reduction not priority within the city; Potential to capture rainwater and graywater reclaimed from water supply plentiful. Not much mention of waste for non potable uses; reduced water use decreases GHG; water use efficiency within local sustainability potential for water efficient fixtures in new buildings and existing plans. buildings; water efficiency measures in new construction should be low cost; water efficient landscaping is low cost.
X
Community/streetscape character; greenhouse gas reduction.
Potential Community Benefits
District energy generation requires up front cost, significant Location of central plant / CHP Community identity, GHG liasion between developers; cost of extending existing in the city; heat density map? reduction, long term reduced system; additional cost of permitting for renewable energy Potential for ground source running costs technologies; capital cost of renewables. Air quality heating / cooling being concerns relating to energy from waste/anaerobic practical in area of high water digestion plants. table; availability of leasing PV systems in NO (commonplace now in e.g. CA); identification of large roof areas for larger scale PV installation.
Need to map population density (proposed and existing)
Additional info needed
Current grid electricity supply from gas (50%) Extend / create district energy network from Entergy system to coal (25%). Existing steam and chilled water improve viability; co location of building uses with district system in part of district [32,000 ton complementary heat loads to maximize opportunities for CHP/ chilled water cooling plant run by Entergy? ]. CCHP. Provide renewable energy generated within the district Tulane University: 40 campus facilities are such as solar, wind, biofuels, biomass, anaerobic digestion; served by new Central Plant structure (1301 potential cogeneration opportunities associated with pump Audubon St. at Plum Street); Xavier has large stations (?); public realm energy requirements supplied by central plant for efficient heating and cooling. A renewabes such as PV; Creating solar empowerment district to new Central Energy Plant (CEP) is proposed as facilitate installation of soalr; Shared district energy generation part of the UMC to be built near the among compatible land uses. Significant GHG reduction intersection of Tulane and S. Claiborne opportunity. Avenues. Some programs promoting renewable energy use such as Solar Cities, Entergy programs, SB 90; 50% solar tax credit. Limited PV installations in the city on residences; Average photovoltaic (sola panel)output for NO: 1250kWh/kW/yr. Highly visible water management/renewable energy project sought by Mayor's Office.
Constraints
Must overcome perception issues to attain adequate residential density/demographic to achieve sustainable infill development.
Opportunities
Key Opportunity
Good grid block density, jobs density and Existing urban form is very suitable for sustainable infill residential (historic) density well suited for high development. performance infill development.
Existing Condition
Potential contaminated buildings/soils within the project (lead). Some perception amongst public that District could be threat to public health. Current district urban form not condusive to healthy lifestyles.
Solid Waste
District Water Supply
District Energy Supply
Feature
Ecopark interview; CBRE Analog Research
New Orleans 2030 Master Plan; GREENOLA; Sustainable Energy and Environment Task Force April 2010 Document
New Orleans 2030:Master Plan; Sustainable Energy and Environmental Task Force; GREENNOLA; Tulane University; stakeholder interviews.
Chester Engineering; stakeholder interviews
New Orleans 2030:Master Plan; Sustainable Energy and Environmental Task Force; GREENOLA; Alliance for Affordable energy; Entergy website
Sources
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 7: Sustainability
MATRIX
Comprehensive District Sustainability Programming
Social and Economic Sustainability Social and Economic Sustainability
Sustainability Theme
Existing Condition
Community Benefits Agreement (CBA) will be CBA Goals well aligned with sustainability opportunities. part of project development strategy and sustainability measures are integral component
Comprehensive GNOBEDD GHG reduction
Financing for Sustainability
Creating Tax Increment Financing District, a Special Financing District, or Climate Financing Districts could provide funding for investments in public infrastructure, stormwater management, streetscape improvements, etc. Could provide incentive to attract developers and residents. PACE financing (see green building); ARRA funding for energy efficiency, other HUD/EPA/Sustainable communities grants
Develop comprehensive GHG inventory and reduction plan for GNOBEDD. 15% reduction from BAU is typical reduction target for 2020, 80% reduction by 2050. Consider higher reduction target due to long term build out of the project.
Community Benefits Agreement (CBA) will be part of project development strategy
Citywide Greenhouse Gas (GHG) inventory conducted. NO Climate Action Plan being developed by 2012. Unknown current and proposed GHG impact of GNOBEDD
Project site has very strong potential to achieve Potential for LEED ND District preliminary analysis indicates all LEED ND and LEED ND due to existing urban form and land prerequisites can be met and 40+ credits (minimum required for comprehensive use. certification) are likely achievable within the district. district performance
Community Benefits Agreement
Universities
Leverage these to support compatible measures across the district; students often early adapters and their involvement could be helpful.
All interested in sustainability (operations as well as educating students for green collar jobs). Biofuels common theme (algal based fuel mentioned). Tulane and Xavier most interested in creating more sustainable campus. Delgado most interested in green collar jobs.
Localized district energy supply and on site renewables ares opportunity for sustained energy supply during disaster; stormwater strategies could improve flood resilience of the District. Local food production could provide sustained healthy food source during disaster.
District improvements should improve environmental health, mitigate Environmental Justice issues, and provide missing services for neighbors
TBD
Perception among neighbors that biosciences district may cause environmental health Environmental concerns; current contamination within the Justice and Equity district is Environmental Justice issues.
Disaster Planning
Safety
Good urban form in place to provide robust services/amenities. Achieve LEED ND NPD Credits 3 and 4 to improve livability, local services and improve walkability
Opportunities
Currently seen as greatest challenge in district urban fabric including jobs, universities, and transit provide according to many stakeholders. Safety potential for safe livable community. Basic streetscape concerns due to quality of infrastructure improvements (pedestrian safety, lighting, aesthetics) could go a (sidewalks, streets, etc) and crime(?) history of long way to improving safety performance and perception. neighborhood; also perceived safety risk due to general appearance of neighborhood
Basic services (libraries, schools, post office, etc) and amenities (restaurants, parks, Community Services/ Amenities entertainment, etc) exist, but much improvement needed.
Feature
Key Opportunity
X
X
X
X
X
X
Additional info needed
Further research needed
Further research needed
Further research needed
Further research needed
Perform detailed LEED ND credit assessment for the project
Effective planning, coordination, and long term enforcement is increased cost.
Louisana GHG reduction target?
Complex financing and management, increased taxes/fees, Explore relevant precedents etc may mean difficult to get buy in.
Up front investment in planning, strict design guidelines, some required measures may be costly and provide little benefit.
Complex financing; integrating sustainability measures that Community value of various provide more global environmental benefit (i.e. GHG sustainability benefits reduction) vs. local community benefit (i.e. jobs) may be challenging to get buy in.
Cross boundary collaboration challenging.
up front investments needed
up front investments needed
Strongly tied to residential density and user demographics. Further research needed Current perception issues and degraded infrastructure require up front investments and perceptions shifts.
Constraints
numerous
numerous
numerous
Sources
Stakeholder interviews
GREENOLA
LSU stakeholder interview
LEED ND; stakeholder interviews
ICLEI 2009 NO GHG Report
AECOM Economists
LEED ND
health, safety, community GNOBEDD character, property values, flood protection, education
Community leadership in sustainability
health, safety, community character, property values
Health, safety, resilience
Health, safety, community character, property values
Health, safety, community character, property values
Potential Community Benefits
TASK 3: ANALYSIS SECTION 7: Sustainability
MATRIX
116
Working Paper 3
SWOT Analysis
August 2010
Section 08: Biosciences District SWOT Analysis
117
118
Working Paper 3
SWOT Analysis
August 2010
Biosciences District SWOT Analysis As part of Task 3, the AECOM Team has conducted a SWOT analysis to identify the key threats, weaknesses, strengths, and opportunities for the development of the Biosciences District. This analysis is based on the Team’s review of existing conditions, the biosciences industry in Louisiana and New Orleans in particular, the sociodemographic and economic trends, real estate market trends, and institutional forces in Louisiana. The SWOT analysis provides an understanding of key fundamental opportunities and challenges that will need to be addressed in order to establish and implement a successful bioscience cluster in New Orleans.
this funding has seen nearly a 20% drop – among the worst deciles of states on that count. Even the 2008 venture capital investments into the industry were only $29.2 million, placing the state 42nd. 4.
All successful research parks have relied on a broad base of funding sources. While there are grants and loans by federal, state and local government agencies, the Biosciences District is lacking long-term commitments. Several initiatives stalled due to inadequate financial support for the projects, particularly adequate funding for site planning and infrastructure investments.
5.
State and local government agencies need to play key roles in the ongoing funding of these research initiatives. State and local budget problems force year-by-year funding requests, which hinders longterm planning initiatives.
6.
While the state does have a small, active and growing bioscience industry base, it lacks many key industry components. Its bioscience industry location quotient, per Battelle, puts it in the bottom quintile of states. Secondly, its activity (including patents and clinical trials) falls outside of the top 30 among all U.S. states. Lastly, the employment and higher education degrees in biosciences in Louisiana are well below the average of all states.
7.
The recent BP oil-spill catastrophe will have significant negative impacts on the economy of New Orleans, Louisiana and the entire Gulf region. The extent of such impacts cannot be quantified at this time.
8.
The forthcoming conclusion to the current NASA space shuttle program will cost the area several thousand jobs over the next two years. Overall, Economy.com forecasts long-term conditions to remain lackluster, which may pose a threat to the appeal of a biotech cluster in New Orleans.
Threats The following section profiles the factors that may likely pose a threat to GNOBEDD’s long-term success if not remediated or addressed appropriately. 1.
Significant competition from other states seeking to promote their life science industry. Almost every major state in the U.S. is providing significant funding to attract key life science industry players.
2.
The large up-front funding requirement and long product development to market timeframe presents risks to funding. Therefore, to mitigate such concerns, access and involvement of venture capitalists and angel investors, who understand the biotech industry growth model and its inherent risks, becomes crucial to ensure long-term sustainable viability of the park.
3.
Battelle’s state profile for Louisiana shows its R&D per capita funding from National Institute for Health (NIH) at under $34 per capita, which is less than half the national average, placing it 39th among all states in the U.S. Compared to 2009,
119
9.
Cooperation between LSU and Tulane is critical for the advancement of transforming their scientific research into a strong economic cluster. While the various researchers have been collaborative, it is important for university leadership to work together as the synergy will provide much greater opportunities for everyone. The world-renowned Research Triangle was not successful until Duke and UNC agreed to work together.
Weaknessess
Louisiana lag national averages and are among the worst of all states in U.S. The teacher quality and professional development scores in the same study placed Louisiana 41st among all U.S. states. 5.
Workforce development is a major challenge to the growth of the medical and life science industry in New Orleans. With 1,100 new jobs needed for the new VA Hospital opening, it is imperative that the region improve scientific education and job training for local residents.
6.
Most medical district professionals are strictly academic oriented – not entrepreneurial research scientists. Tulane physicians have more research focus than LSU.
The following section profiles the weaknesses that may prove to be impediments to the success of the Biosciences District. 1.
2.
3.
4.
Much of the Biosciences District’s 1,500 acres was devastated by Katrina flooding. The area is dominated by small parcels with narrow streets and insufficient infrastructure improvements. There is no eminent domain authority for economic development, making it difficult for private developers to invest in new construction. GNOBEDD needs to acquire key land parcels for future development There are numerous government agencies that impact future development, as well as strong community groups. It will be important to create a smooth development approval process for the private sector. Louisiana’s less-educated workforce combined with below-average per capita incomes is a threat to the growth in the bioscience industry. Overall, less than 43% of population over 25 years of age has some college or associate degree compared to more than 52% nationwide. For bioscience education in particular, according to Battelle’s 2009 report, the NAEP, ACT and AP scores in
Strengths The following section profiles the key strengths of the Biosciences District. 1.
Billions of dollars of investment are being made in the Biosciences District for new VA and LSUUMC hospitals’ expansion of university facilities at Xavier, LSU and Tulane’ new courthouse and jail complex’ New Orleans BioInnovation Center (“NOBIC”) etc.
2.
LONI is a key ultra high-speed data transmission infrastructure system that connects major universities throughout the state. It is imperative that the plans to connect this system throughout the entire Biosciences District are carried out.
3.
The Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge has developed a very systemized clinical research practice, and has a large institutional database that goes beyond individual researchers. They want to grow the clinical research base and partner with New Orleans
120
Working Paper 3
SWOT Analysis
scientists. 4.
The LSU and Tulane University Health Sciences Centers, Xavier University School of Pharmacy, University of New Orleans, and Delgado College are educational partners that (if committed to the commercialization of intellectual capital) can be key drivers for a successful technology-based economic development initiative. Additionally, GNOBEDD has access to research centers such as South Louisiana Institute for Infectious Disease Research (SLIIDR), Louisiana Vaccine Center (LVC), Clinical and Translational Research, Education and Commercialization Project (CTRECP), Tulane National Primate Research Center, and Pennington Biomedical Research Center.
5.
The regional strengths include the Primate Center (research into tropical and infectious diseases), vaccines, neuroscience, sports medicine and clinical trials.
6.
Xavier University is one of the nation’s top pharmacy schools. They excel in clinical trials and do significant collaborations with Tulane and LSU Medical schools.
7.
Ochsner Health Systems is southeast Louisiana’s largest non-profit, academic, multi-specialty, healthcare delivery system with eight hospitals and over 38 health centers in Louisiana. Ochsner employees more that 12,000 employees, over 750 physicians in 90 medical specialties and subspecialties. They conduct over 300 clinical research trials annually. In addition they have an electronically linked hospital and healthcare system, allowing for the most consistent patient care, for both routine health needs and more complex medical conditions. This expertise would be invaluable for development of a unique Translational medicine model for Louisiana.
August 2010
8.
The employment growth rate in New Orleans has exceeded national average since 2006. Moody’s Economy.com indicates that lingering Katrina recovery spending and the resilience of the tourism sector are providing a boost to employment and incomes. A well developed pipeline and rail infrastructure, including strategic port facilities, will help grow domestic and international trade. Moody’s predicts that the economic contraction will be much milder than nationally as evident in jobs, retail sales, industrial production and house prices, which have outperformed national averages in recent years.
9.
Compared to other U.S. metro areas, New Orleans has competitive industrial land prices from $1.00 to $5.00 per square foot (PSF) and commercial land prices ranging from $10.00 to $20.00 PSF, depending on site size, entitlements and location. Office market rents ranging from $1.00 to $1.50 PSF and flex space rents at under $1.00 PSF are lower than national averages. These rent levels, relative to competitive clusters in other U.S. metro areas, can help attract industry tenants.
10. There are many incentives available for new businesses in Louisiana. The Louisiana Business & Technology Center assists Louisiana companies in searching for appropriate solicitations, providing detailed information about the requirements and the process of submitting a proposal, and conducting training workshops to assist companies with the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)/ Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Programs. Additional incentives include the state’s Angel Investor Tax Credit for investing in early stage, wealth-creating businesses; and Research & Development Tax Credit encourages existing businesses with operating facilities in Louisiana to establish or
121
continue research and development activities within the state. 11. Battelle notes that Louisiana inventors totaled more than 350 bioscience patents during the last six years, with an innovation focus in drugs and pharmaceuticals, biochemistry, and surgical and medical instruments. Also, in 2009, 245 clinical trials were initiated in Louisiana, with majority (~145) in advanced Phase III and IV stages. These trials cover a broad array of disease categories, including heart disease, cancer, neurologic, nutrition, infectious disease, etc.
Opportunities The following section profiles the factors that present an opportunity for GNOBEDD to build upon. 1.
A new venture capital fund, Argent Technology Ventures, is being formed to raise $125 million for seed capital in the health care area.
2.
If universities and institutions cooperate, there could be synergies with the VA Hospital and new University Medical Center in neuroscience, orthopedic, cardiovascular and transplants.
3.
With the New Orleans Saints and the NFL, there could be synergies in the neuroscience, orthopedic, infectious diseases/tropical medicine, integrated medicine/sports medicine fields
4.
There are unique opportunities, such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy, which has ground-breaking new treatments for diabetes, autism, heart disease, birth Injuries, brain Injuries, dementia, and infections to name a few.
5.
There is an opportunity for a successful translation medicine program if the institutions can work together on clinical trials, electronic records and
a central database system. Louisiana Economic Development could lead an incentive program to get everyone to participate. With the Primate Center, Tulane’s clinical research, LSU’s research and clinical base of ethnic opportunities, Louisiana could establish an outstanding program.
122
Working Paper 3
SWOT Analysis
August 2010
Section Summary •
•
•
•
A SWOT analysis is provided to identify the key threats, weaknesses, strengths, and opportunities for the development of the Biosciences District. The SWOT analysis provides an understanding of key fundamental opportunities and challenges that will need to be addressed in order to establish and implement a successful bioscience cluster in New Orleans. Threats include: •
Significant competition from other states.
•
The large up-front funding requirement and long product development to market timeframe presents risks to funding.
•
The Biosciences District is lacking long-term funding commitments.
•
While the state does have a small, active and growing bioscience industry base, it lacks many key industry components such as those with higher education degrees.
Weakness include: •
GNOBEDD has no eminent domain authority for economic development and there are numerous government agencies and community groups that impact future development.
•
Louisiana’s less-educated workforce combined with below-average per capita incomes is a threat to the growth in the bioscience industry and workforce development is a major challenge.
•
Most medical district professionals are strictly academic oriented – not entrepreneurial research scientists.
Strengths include: •
Billions of dollars of investment are being made in the Biosciences District.
•
LONI is a key ultra high-speed data transmission infrastructure system that connects major universities throughout the state.
•
The Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge want to grow the clinical research base and partner with New Orleans scientists.
•
The LSU and Tulane University Health Sciences Centers, Xavier University School of Pharmacy, University of New Orleans, and Delgado College are educational partners that (if committed to the commercialization of intellectual capital) can be key drivers for a successful technology-based economic development initiative.
•
Xavier University is one of the nation’s top pharmacy schools.
•
Presence of Ochsner Health Systems: southeast Louisiana’s largest non-profit, academic, multi-specialty, healthcare delivery system with eight hospitals and over 38 health centers in Louisiana.
•
The employment growth rate in New Orleans has exceeded national average since 2006.
•
Compared to other U.S. metro areas, New Orleans has competitive industrial and commercial land prices.
•
There are many incentives available for new businesses in Louisiana.
123
•
Opportunities include: •
A new venture capital fund is raising seed capital in the health care area.
•
Potential synergies with the VA Hospital, new University Medical Center, the New Orleans Saints and the NFL.
•
There are unique opportunities, such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy, which has ground-breaking new treatments for diabetes, autism, heart disease, birth Injuries, brain Injuries, dementia, and infections to name a few.
•
There is an opportunity for a successful translation medicine program if the institutions can work together on clinical trials, electronic records and a central database system.