Odpady jądrowe – globalny raport Focus Europe

Page 48

WNWR 2019  —  4. RISKS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN HEALTH

48

The most problematic decay product is radium-226 for three reasons: its salts are mainly soluble; it has a long half-life (1,760 years); and it emits gamma rays. Another dangerous nuclide is radon-222 (half-life 3.8 days). Because it is an odourless, colourless gas, it and its progeny, although invisible, are readily distributed in the environment. Exposures to radon gas are considered to be the second leading cause of lung cancer worldwide after smoking tobacco.80 The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has estimated that indoor radon exposure causes or contributes to about 21,000 lung-cancer deaths in the United States annually.81 Partly for these reasons, the ICRP estimated that a lifetime excess absolute risk of 5 × 10-⁴ per Working Level Month (WLM) 82 should be used as the risk coefficient for radon-induced lung cancer, doubling its previous estimate.83 These cancer risks are expressed using either the Excess Relative Risk (ERR) model or the Excess Absolute Risk (EAR) model. ERR is the proportional increase in risk over the background rate (i.e. where people are not exposed). EAR is the additional risk above the background rate. However, several ICRP authors later added that the risk would have actually increased to 7 × 10-4 per WLM if lung cancer rates among Euro-American males had been used instead of inappropriate ICRP reference rates (namely males and females and Euro-American and Asian populations).84 In other words, the estimated risk rates for most uranium mine workers have approximately tripled rather than doubled since 1993. This increased awareness of uranium mining’s risks has not been reflected in tighter safety standards for uranium workers. URANIUM MINING Although many uranium mines are now closed, the past history of uranium mining throughout the world remains bleak, with many accidents and reports of ill health among uranium miners. Older epidemiology studies indicated significant excesses of lung cancer among uranium mining workers.85 Perhaps the best-documented example in Europe is the Wismut mine complex in former East Germany. The Soviet-run uranium mine complex was in operation until 1996. 59,000 of these miners employed between 1946 and 1989 were examined. Researchers found a significant increase in lung cancer risk with increasing radon exposure (ERR/WLM = 0.0019).86 An update of this study found that the lung-cancer risk actually increased threefold (to ERR/WLM = 0.006) with the extended observation period to 2013.87 Also, the authors found 3,942 miners from the cohort had died from lung cancer during their increased observation period from 1946 to 2013. Unfortunately, the new study omits the number of deaths from extra-pulmonary cancers, heart diseases and cerebro-vascular diseases which had been observed in the earlier cohort study. 80 Darby, S., Hill, D., Auvinen, A., Barros-Dios, J.M., Baysson, H., Bochicchio, F., Deo, H., Falk, R., Forastiere, F., Hakama, M. and

81 82

83 84 85 86

87

Heid, I. 2005, Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies, Bmj, 330(7485), pp. 223. Pawel, D.J. and Puskin, J.S. 2004, The US Environmental Protection Agency’s assessment of risks from indoor radon, Health physics, 87(1), pp. 68-74. One working level (WL) refers to the concentration of short-lived decay products of radon in equilibrium of 3,700 Bq/m³ (100 pCi/L) in air. A working level month (WLM) is the exposure to one working level for 170 hours per month. It is conventionally assumed that 1 WLM = ~10 mSv. Tirmarche, M., Harrison, J.D., Laurier, D., Paquet, F., Blanchardon, E. and Marsh, J. 2010, Lung cancer risk from radon and progeny and statement on radon, Annals of the ICRP, 40(1), pp.1-64. Tirmarche, M., Harrison, J., Laurier, D., Blanchardon, E., Paquet, F. and Marsh, J. 2012, Risk of lung cancer from radon exposure: contribution of recently published studies of uranium miners, Annals of the ICRP, 41(3-4), pp.368-377. Grosche, B., Kreuzer, M., Kreisheimer, M., Schnelzer, M. and Tschense, A. 2006, Lung cancer risk among German male uranium miners: a cohort study, 1946–1998, British journal of cancer, 95(9), pp. 1280. Kreuzer, M., Grosche, B., Schnelzer, M., Tschense, A., Dufey, F. and Walsh, L. 2010, Radon and risk of death from cancer and cardiovascular diseases in the German uranium miners cohort study: follow-up 1946–2003, Radiation and environmental biophysics, 49(2), pp.177-185. Kreuzer, M., Sobotzki, C., Schnelzer, M. and Fenske, N. 2017, Factors modifying the radon-related lung cancer risk at low exposures and exposure rates among German uranium miners, Radiation research, 189(2), pp.165-176.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Quantities of waste

2hr
pages 97-148

Summary

1min
page 94

Costs and financing

2min
page 93

Waste management policies and facilities

2min
page 92

Financing schemes for interim storage

2min
page 84

Integrated financing schemes

2min
page 87

6.4 Summary

5min
pages 88-89

Financing schemes for disposal

6min
pages 85-86

Quantities of waste

2min
page 91

Decommissioning costs

6min
pages 80-81

Accumulation of the funds

3min
page 78

Overview and nature of the funds

2min
page 77

5.5 Summary

2min
page 75

Extended storage

4min
pages 73-74

Deep borehole disposal

3min
page 70

LILW-repositories

3min
page 67

Host rocks

2min
page 66

5.1 Historical background

16min
pages 58-62

5.2 The context of nuclear waste management

5min
pages 63-64

4.7 Summary

2min
page 57

4.5 Risks from the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel

5min
pages 53-54

Risks to nuclear workers

3min
page 51

Uranium mine tailings

3min
page 49

Health risks from exposures to uranium

3min
page 47

4.1 Radiation risks of nuclear waste

2min
page 45

Uranium mining

3min
page 48

4.2 Risks from uranium mining, mine tailings, enrichment, and fuel fabrication

2min
page 46

3.4 Summary

4min
pages 43-44

Decommissioning waste

2min
page 34

Uranium mining, milling, processing and fuel fabrication

1min
page 22

Executive summary

28min
pages 11-20

Operational waste

2min
page 32

2.4 Summary

2min
page 30

2.3.1 The IAEA classification

5min
pages 25-26

2.1 Types of waste: the nuclear fuel chain

2min
page 21

Foreword

5min
pages 3-4

Key Insights

2min
pages 9-10
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.