Download this document
INTERSECTIONS
Principles Multimodal Intersections Intersections and Street Types Placemaking at Intersections Intersection Geometry Crosswalk Design Guidelines for Marking Crosswalks Signalizd Intersections Bicycle Accommodations at Intersections Transit Accommodations at Intersections
BOSTON TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
DRAFT - DECEMBER 2011
BOSTON COMPLETE STREETS GUIDELINES
Download this document
IV. INTERSECTIONS
TK
TK
TK
TK 212
BOSTON COMPLETE STREETS GUIDELINES
DRAFT - DECEMBER 2011
BOSTON TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Download this document
Transit Accommodations at Intersections 214 216 218 219
Bus Stop Location Transit Prioritization at Intersections Off-Bus Fare Collection Bus Bulbs
When designing intersections to accommodate transit vehicles, the major goals are to improve the reliability and efficiency of transit service. Intersections are where most transit stops occur and are a major source of delay for transit vehicles. Waiting at traffic signals accounts for at least 10% of overall bus trip time and up to 50% or more of bus delay.* The MBTA’s Bus Stop Planning and Design Guidelines serve as the primary reference for the design, location and spacing of transit stops in Boston. A majority of the MBTA’s transit stops are located at intersections on Boston streets. While many stops are demarcated only by signs, several hundred bus shelters have been installed through Boston’s Coordinated Street Furniture program. In addition, as part of the MBTA’s ongoing Key Bus Routes initiative, several streets such as Cambridge Street in Allston/Brighton, Dudley Street, and Blue Hill Avenue are being improved with new bus stops and shelters.
IV. INTERSECTIONS
This section covers design strategies to improve transit operations and reduce delay for transit vehicles at intersections. While individual strategies can be implemented independently, in many cases a combination of strategies including the location of the stop and signal prioritization will be the most effective. Implementation of these strategies should also be complemented by operational improvements being carried out by the MBTA, including smart fare payment systems and real-time tracking. These topics are covered in Chapter 5: Curbside Management. Transit lanes are covered in Chapter 3: Roadways. Bus Stop Design is covered in Chapter 2: Sidewalks.
* TCRP REPORT 90 “BUS RAPID TRANSIT, VOLUME 2: IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES”; TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD, WASHINGTON, D.C., 2003. BOSTON TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
DRAFT - DECEMBER 2011
BOSTON COMPLETE STREETS GUIDELINES
213
Download this document TRANSIT ACCOMMODATION AT INTERSECTIONS
Bus Stop Location Overview All bus stop locations must be ADA compliant, and should be safe, convenient, well-lit, and clearly visible. Proper spacing and siting of bus stops involves many considerations, such as the bus route, population density, popular destinations, transfer locations, intersection operations and geometry, parking restrictions, and sightlines.
Use
For more information on bus bulbs, please see page TK of this chapter. The frequency of stops should be a balance between passenger convenience and minimizing bus travel times. Spacing is typically determined by population density. The minimum spacing between bus stops is 750’. See the chart below for more details about bus stop spacing:
Where buses are required to pull out of traffic, bus stops should be located at the near- or far-side of intersections wherever possible and not at mid-block locations. Midblock bus stops require the most amount of curbside space. Intersections are also convenient for passengers because they can intercept other transit connections, crosswalks, pedestrian routes and building entrances easily. Where bus bulbs are provided, the length of the bus stop can be less than the prescribed minimums listed below because buses will not be required to pull out of traffic. The minimum bus stop length at bus bulbs should provide a clear and level landing pad at each door of the bus 1.
MBTA Bus Stop Spacing Distances IV. INTERSECTIONS
DENSITY POPULATION / SQUARE MILE MINIMUM
DISTANCE BETWEEN STOPS
2
750’
HIGH DENSITY (URBAN)
5,000 >
750’
3,500–5,000
750’–1,000’
LOW DENSITY (SUBURBAN)
< 3,500
> 1,000’–1,320’
BRT ROUTE
5,000 >
1,500’
MEDIUM DENSITY
SOURCE: MBTA BUS STOP GUIDELINES
The preferred and minimum lengths of bus stops for each location can be found below:
P
MBTA Bus Stop Lengths 40’ BUS PLACEMENT FAR-SIDE NEAR-SIDE
3 4
60’ BUS
Preferred
Minimum
Preferred
Minimum
80’
60’
100’
80’
100’
80’
120’
100’
FAR-SIDE, AFTER LEFT TURN
130’
100’
150’
120’
MIDBLOCK
130’
100’
150’
120’
5 6
SOURCE: MBTA BUS STOP GUIDELINES 214
BOSTON COMPLETE STREETS GUIDELINES
DRAFT - DECEMBER 2011
BOSTON TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Download this document
P
1 P
6
2 Curb space is lost if Bus Bulb is not provided.
P
P
4 3
IV. INTERSECTIONS
P
P
Bus shelter
Route information
P
Landing pads
5
Transit stop P
BOSTON TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
DRAFT - DECEMBER 2011
BOSTON COMPLETE STREETS GUIDELINES
215
Download this document TRANSIT ACCOMMODATION AT INTERSECTIONS
Bus Stop Location Considerations Selecting a location for a bus stop at an intersection depends on a variety of factors, such as the available curbside space, conditions of sidewalks, width of sidewalks, traffic and pedestrian volumes, the number and width of travels lanes, turning movements, sight distances, the presence of parking, bicycle facilities, and crosswalks. At signalized intersections, far-side placement is generally recommended, however locations selection should be done on a site-by-site basis in consultation with the MBTA and the BTD.
locating stops on the far-side of intersection include: >> Encourage pedestrians to cross behind the bus, reducing conflict and bus delay >> Allow buses to take advantage of gaps in traffic flow, especially with signal prioritization, rather than needing to be at the front of the queue at an intersection for a near-side stop >> Minimize conflicts between buses and right turning vehicles, and provide additional right turn capacity on the near-side of the intersection For a complete chart of advantages, disadvantages, and recommended circumstances for near-side, far-side, and mid-block bus stops, please see Appendix TK for the MBTA’s Bus Stop Placement Considerations.
Far-side bus stop locations may: >> Reduce delays as buses do not have to wait for a green after loading passengers. Additional advantages of
DISADVANTAGES MAY BLOCK THE INTERSECTION DURING PEAK PERIODS WITH QUEUING BUSES
IV. INTERSECTIONS
1 P
MAY OBSCURE SIGHT DISTANCES FOR VEHICLES EXITING THE SIDE STREET AND CROSSING THE INTERSECTION/TURNING LEFT
2
MAY INCREASE SIGHT DISTANCE PROBLEMS AT THE FAR-SIDE OF THE CROSSWALK FOR CROSSING PEDESTRIANS MAY RESULT IN TRAFFIC QUEUED INTO INTERSECTION WHEN A BUS IS STOPPED N TRAVEL LANE/QUEUING BUSES
P
MAY INCREASE NUMBER OF REAR-END ACCIDENTS SINCE DRIVERS DO NOT EXPECT BUSES TO STOP AGAIN AFTER STOPPING AT A RED LIGHT CAN RESULT IN THE BUS STOPPING TWICE, FIRSTLY FOR A RED LIGHT AND THEN AGAIN AT THE FAR-SIDE STOP, WHICH INTERFERENCES WITH BOTH BUS OPERATIONS AND ALL OTHER TRAFFIC
Far-side Stop ADVANTAGES
RECOMMENDED CIRCUMSTANCES
MINIMIZES CONFLICTS BETWEEN BUSES AND RIGHT TURNING VEHICLES TRAVELING IN THE SAME DIRECTION
WHEN TRAFFIC IS HEAVIER ON THE NEAR-SIDE OF AN INTERSECTION
PROVIDES ADDITIONAL RIGHT TURN CAPACITY BY MAKING CURB SPACE AVAILABLE
AT INTERSECTION WITH HEAVY RIGHT TURNS ON THE MAJOR APPROACH, OR HEAVY LEFT AND THROUGH MOVEMENTS FROM THE SIDE STREET
MINIMIZES SIGHT DISTANCE PROBLEMS ON APPROACHES TO THE INTERSECTION ENCOURAGES PEDESTRIANS TO CROSS BEHIND THE BUS CREATES SHORTER DECELERATION DISTANCES FOR BUSES SINCE THE BUS CAN USE THE INTERSECTION TO DECELERATE BUS DRIVERS CAN TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE GAPS IN TRAFFIC FLOW THAT ARE CREATED AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION BEHIND THE STOP
216
BOSTON COMPLETE STREETS GUIDELINES
1 2
WHEN PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND EXISTING LANDING AREA CONDITION ARE BETTER THAN THE NEAR-SIDE AT INTERSECTION WHERE TRAFFIC CONDITION AND SIGNAL PATTERNS MAY CAUSE DELAYS AT INTERSECTION WITH TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY TREATMENTS AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
DRAFT - DECEMBER 2011
BOSTON TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Download this document
P
P
1
P
2 3
2
P
1 Near-side Stop
Midblock Stop
ADVANTAGES
ADVANTAGES
MINIMIZES INTERFERENCE WHEN TRAFFIC IS HEAVY ON THE FAR-SIDE OF THE INTERSECTION
1
PASSENGER WAITING AREAS EXPERIENCE LESS PEDESTRIAN CONGESTION
ALLOWS PASSENGERS TO BOARD BUS CLOSEST TO CROSSWALK
2
MINIMIZES SIGHT DISTANCES PROBLEMS FOR VEHICLES AND PEDESTRIANS
WIDTH OF INTERSECTION IS AVAILABLE FOR THE BUS TO PULL AWAY FROM CURB AND REENTER TRAFFIC
3
MAY RESULT IN LESS INTERFERENCE WITH TRAFFIC FLOW
ELIMINATES THE POTENTIAL FOR DOUBLE STOPPING/ PARKING
1 2 IV. INTERSECTIONS
DISADVANTAGES REQUIRES ADDITIONAL CURB SPACE FOR NO-PARKING RESTRICTION
DISADVANTAGES INCREASES SIGHT DISTANCE PROBLEMS FOR CROSSING PEDESTRIANS INCREASES CONFLICTS WITH RIGHT-TURNING VEHICLES TRAVELING IN THE SAME DIRECTION MAY RESULT IN STOPPED BUSES OBSCURING CURBSIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND CROSSING PEDESTRIANS MAY BLOCK THE THROUGH LANE DURING PEAK PERIODS WITH QUEUING BUSES
ENCOURAGES PASSENGERS TO CROSS STREET AT MIDBLOCK (JAYWALKING) INCREASES WALKING DISTANCES FOR PASSENGERS CROSSING AT INTERSECTION RECOMMENDED CIRCUMSTANCES WHEN TRAFFIC OR STREET/SIDEWALK CONDITIONS AT THE INTERSECTION ARE NOT CONDUCIVE TO A NEAR- OR FARSIDE STOP WHEN THE PASSENGER TRAFFIC GENERATOR IS LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE BLOCK
RECOMMENDED CIRCUMSTANCES WHEN STREET CROSSINGS AND OTHER PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENTS ARE SAFER WITH THE BUS STOP ON THE NEARSIDE
IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS IS TOO FAR APART SOURCE: MBTA BUS STOP GUIDELINES
WHEN TRAFFIC IS HEAVIER ON THE FAR-SIDE OF THE INTERSECTION WHEN PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND EXISTING LANDING AREA CONDITIONS ARE BETTER THAN THE FAR-SIDE WHEN A BUS ROUTE CONTINUES STRAIGHT THROUGH AN INTERSECTION OR SET BACK A REASONABLE DISTANCE TO ENABLE RIGHT TURNS
BOSTON TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
DRAFT - DECEMBER 2011
BOSTON COMPLETE STREETS GUIDELINES
217
Download this document TRANSIT ACCOMMODATION AT INTERSECTIONS
Transit Prioritization at Intersections Overview By prioritizing transit at intersections, service can become more reliable, efficient, and environmentally friendly due to less queuing and stopping and starting, making transit a more attractive mode of transportation. Transit prioritization strategies include signal coordination, signal priority, transit only lanes, and queue jump or bypass lanes.
The first strategy for improved traffic flow is coordinated signal timing, which is discussed in further detail on page TK of this Chapter. In addition to signal coordination, transit signal priority enables transit vehicles to shorten or extend a traffic signal phase without disrupting the phase sequence or overall signal timing.
IV. INTERSECTIONS
1
218
BOSTON COMPLETE STREETS GUIDELINES
DRAFT - DECEMBER 2011
BOSTON TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Download this document
Use Transit only lanes at intersections provide transit vehicles a dedicated space to bypass traffic, and can typically be shared with bicyclists. Queue jump or bypass lanes are specially designated transit lanes at intersections that share a similar idea to the leading pedestrian interval discussed in Chapter 2 on page TK. Queue jump lanes 1 provide an early green signal or hold a green signal for transit vehicles while other vehicles traveling in the same direction are given a red light.
Signal coordination can reduce delay for transit as well as motor vehicle; however in addition to coordination, signal priority for transit vehicles allows transit to stay on schedule during peak hours when there is congestion. Signal priority allows delay to be reduced by extending a green for an approaching bus or shortening a red phase for a bus that is waiting. The difference in the time can be made up of in the next cycle of the signal, but all other signal operations can remain intact. All signal prioritization must be coordinated with the MBTA and BTDâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Traffic Management Center. Signal coordination and signal priority can be used with or without the presence of dedicated transit only lanes or queue jump and bypass lanes at intersections. Queue jump lanes can be can be used at intersections without a bus stop as well as with one at either the near- or far-side so long as there is enough space on the roadway.
Considerations
BOSTON TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
DRAFT - DECEMBER 2011
BOSTON COMPLETE STREETS GUIDELINES
IV. INTERSECTIONS
>> Providing a queue jump lane with a leading signal phase must take into consideration the overall signal cycle lengths and impacts to delay for other users. >> If space is not available for a queue jump lane or bypass lane, consider using a right-hand turn lane to double as a bus advantage lane by allowing buses to move up in the queue at a signal where right turn on red is permitted. If right-turn lanes are used, appropriate signage such as RIGHT LANE MUST TURN RIGHT must be accompanied by EXCEPT BUSES placards. >> Transit signal priority should be considered on all priority transit routes. >> Transit signal priority studies should be conducted to understand the impact to traffic on cross streets of the transit route. >> Signal coordination should not increase delay for all modes, and take into consideration the acceleration rates and speeds of bicyclists. >> Transit agencies must address and train employees on how to handle bus and bicycle interactions in transit and bus only lanes. >> Transit priority may be considered for late buses only in order to keep on schedule.
219
Download this document TRANSIT ACCOMMODATION AT INTERSECTIONS
Off-Bus Fare Collection Overview
Considerations
A significant cause of delay for transit vehicles is the queuing of customers paying fare on the vehicle. In addition to promoting “smart card” fares, prepayment is the fastest method of fare collection, and allows passengers to enter the vehicle from all doors without waiting in line to pay. Compared to an additional minute for exact fare or dip/swipe systems, off-bus fare collection can save up to a minute over 10 passengers.*
>> Off-bus fare collection requires more space and infrastructure than standard bus-stops. >> Electronic fare equipment may require staffing. If left unattended at stops, weather and compliance may become problems. >> An alternative to off-bus fare collection methods could be to have a second electronic fare collector to allow patrons with Charlie Cards to bypass cash-fare customers. >> Fare-free zones could be considered in extremely highvolume destinations
Use >> Off-bus fare collection should be used at transit stops where high ridership counts continuously delay vehicles due to large amounts of passengers boarding.
IV. INTERSECTIONS
* TCRP REPORT 90 “BUS RAPID TRANSIT, VOLUME 2: IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES”; TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD, WASHINGTON, D.C., 2003.
P
220
BOSTON COMPLETE STREETS GUIDELINES
DRAFT - DECEMBER 2011
BOSTON TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
Download this document TRANSIT ACCOMMODATION AT INTERSECTIONS
Bus Bulbs Overview
Considerations
Bus bulbs are curb extensions along the length of a bus stop that eliminate the need for buses to pull in and out of traffic. Similar to normal curb extensions found at intersections, bus bulbs have the same advantages of reducing crossing distances for pedestrians and providing additional space for street furniture, landscaping and pedestrian queuing.
>> Since the bus remains in the travel lane while stopped, bus bulbs can result in traffic delays or unsafe maneuvers by drivers and bicyclists to steer around buses. Designs must consider the Street Type, number of travel lanes, and headways of buses. >> Bus bulbs can interfere with right-turning vehicle movements at near-side intersections >> Bus bulbs are most effective at reducing travel time if they are utilized throughout a corridor by eliminating the need for buses to pull in and out of traffic all together. >> The MBTA operates different length buses. Bus bulbs will require different lengths depending on the service provided on the bus route. Consultation should be done with the MBTA and BTD to determine the appropriate design.
Use Bus bulbs are only appropriate on streets where on-street parking is present. Bus bulbs provide extra passenger queuing space 1 and are most appropriate at stops with higher passenger volumes. Bus bulbs are effective in enforcing parking restrictions within bus stops and do not require as much space as curbside stops because the bus does not need space to pull in and out of the stop, but may cause occasional traffic delay behind them. Bus bulbs will be installed on a case-by-case basis determined by an engineering study, and all designs must be approved by BTD.
P
IV. INTERSECTIONS
1 P
BOSTON TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
DRAFT - DECEMBER 2011
BOSTON COMPLETE STREETS GUIDELINES
221