Tarleton State University Fort Worth Campus Program by The Broaddus Companies

Tarleton State University

FORT WORTH CAMPUS

Multipurpose Academic Building Preliminary Program

June 2015

Tarleton State University Steering Committee

Tarleton State University Stakeholder User Group

Consultant Team

Dr. F. Dominic Dottavio President

Dr. Kim Rynearson Assistant Vice President for Outreach and Off Campus Programs

Tye Minckler Vice President for Finance and Administration

Dr. Sundarrajan Sankar Professor and Director of Business Programs

Broaddus Planning Campus Master Planner and Facility Programmer

Dr. Karen Murray Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs

Dr. Sally Lewis Department Head and Assistant Professor, Medical Laboratory Sciences

Dr. Kyle McGregor Vice President of Advancement and External Relations

Dr. Sandra McDermott Assistant Professor and Director for Health & Service

Dr. David Weissenburger Chief of Staff

Dr. Juanita Reyes Director of Education & Related Programs for Outreach Center

Ms. Darla Doty Interim Vice President for Student Life

Ms. Kayla Kelly Advising Coordinator Ft. Worth Programs and Hickman Building Manager

Dugdale Strategy Learning Environment Specialist

Mr. Aaron Wand Director of Facility Services, SSC Service Solutions

Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary

2 Space Program

3 Schedule & Cost Analysis

4 Proposed Project Lifecycle

5 Signature Page

6 Appendix: Notes

General Information Project Name Tarleton State-Forth Worth Multipurpose Academic Building

Member Institution Tarleton State University

City Fort Worth, Texas

Date Prepared April 2015

Prepared By Broaddus Planning with support by Dugdale Strategy

Proposed Delivery Method Competitive Sealed Proposal (CSP)

Type of Project New Construction

Proposed Building Class Institutional

Planned Gross Area 142,588 gross square feet (gsf)

Number of Floors Above Grade Three

Number of Floors Below Grade Zero

Executive Summary

Project Statement Tarleton State University is entering a new frontier. Literally speaking, the university is embarking on creating a new 80-acre campus to serve its growing academic footprint in the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) Metropolitan area in south Fort Worth--the southwest “frontier” of the metro area. Figuratively, the university will aim to leverage this new campus as a way to elevate the higher education experience of its students by offering a contemporary learning environment that supports new modes and methods of learning and fosters a collegial and enriching environment. The first building on this new campus will be a 142,600 gross square foot, state-of-the-art, multipurpose academic building to serve as the heart of the university’s presence in Fort Worth, targeted to open its doors as early as Fall 2018 semester. This program document describes this academic building and associated site improvements requirements when the new campus opens. The university’s Fort Worth programs are growing rapidly (10-20% per year on average) as a result of the university’s niche in serving upper-level undergraduate students looking for a 4-year, public university experience while living and working in the DFW area. The university captures an under-served market in the DFW area, attracting a high number of low-income, first-generation college students and non-traditional adult students. Currently the university offers 43 degree programs ranging from accounting to criminal justice within four colleges (Business, Education, Science and Technology, Liberal and Fine Arts). The headcount enrollment for Spring 2015 was 1,605; with a concerted effort and if afforded the resources, the new campus could host as many as 5,000 students by 2025.

Project Location The 80-acre parcel designated for the new campus is located in a growing area in south Fort Worth along the recently competed Chisholm Trail Parkway, a toll road developed by the North Texas Tollway Administration (NTTA). The land is currently just outside of the city limits, but it is within the City’s Extra Territorial Jurisdiction. The university parcel is within a proposed 1,260-acre planned development called “Rock Creek Ranch,” a development led by Walton International. For the purposes of this program, it is understood that the City of Fort Worth will annex the university parcel once utilities are extended to serve the new campus. 2

Regional Location Map (top) showing Tarleton State’s 80-acre campus to the southwest of downtown Fort Worth. Sub-area Location Map (bottom) showing the campus as part of a larger Rock Creek Ranch development.

Project Justification

Concept Master Plan

Campus Entrance

Future Physical Plant

Formal Quad

Chisholm Quad

Multipurpose Academic Building 1

The need for this project is generated by two contrasting forces: 1) the universityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s enrollment growth in Fort Worth driven by market appeal of the universityâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s academic offerings and affordability and 2) the limitation of future growth due to constrained and inadequate existing facilities. Over the past several years, the university has grown by 10-20% per year rising from 579 students in Fall of 2007 to 1,576 students in Fall of 2014 (a net increase of 277% over nine years). Prior enrollment growth was served by increasing the amount of lease space in the Hickman Building, a 6-story office building in west Fort Worth. This solution has worked to cover the pragmatic needs of classroom space, but the space has not enabled the university to foster the collegial atmosphere and university environment conducive to providing the holistic, student-centered experience it hopes to achieve. Furthermore, the university is now running into space limitations. Phase One Drawing

see phase one inset Future Campus Development

Future Parking Provision Future Rec Fields Phase One Drawing (above) showing site and building development area including the Multipurpose Academic Building. Concept Plan Drawing (at left) showing the campus framework plan, future buildings, green open spaces, parking areas. 3

Issues to Overcome

Opportunities

The university’s growth in Fort Worth is limited by its current facilities in terms of both the amount of space and the quality of the space. That is the main issue to overcome in this project. While the university has done a resourceful job (and in many cases an extraordinary job) of working with what it is given within the Hickman Building and Schaffer Building to accommodate program growth and foster a culture of collegiality, it has reached a limit on growth and the campus culture is not what stakeholders would like it to be. It simply can’t continue to grow as it desired due to the spatial conditions in the space it leases in the Hickman Building.

Through the process of stakeholder engagement at the onset of the programming process, several important opportunities were identified. The over-arching opportunity is to create a new campus, starting with this first building, to advance the university’s mission in the region.

Other university-specific issues to overcome as identified by the user group include: • Tarleton State’s Fort Worth presence lacks a sense of permanence and place recognition; does not look or feel like a campus • Current facility limits growth potential • Lack of student amenities and support spaces

• Create a campus-feel that fosters a culture of collegiality, community, and engenders a sense of ownership among faculty, staff, and students. • Establish a first building that includes innovative spaces and fosters new methods for teaching/learning, with the flexibility to adapt to future needs. • Seek enrollment growth exceeding 10% per year, and attain 5,000 students by 2025 • Add new academic programs (e.g. kinesiology, communications, public health, finance) • Continue to be cost competitive and provide an excellent education for the value.

• Isolated faculty offices that are not fully utilized by commuting faculty • Continue to cater to students beyond traditional college age (older than 22), but also attract traditional age students Finally, there are some development-based issues to overcome that have a direct impact on project implementation. These issues include: • Obtaining funding of the Multipurpose Academic Building and associated site improvements through Tuition Revenue Bonds, which requires legislative action during the 84th State of Texas Legislative Session • Funding of roadway access and utility line extensions to the 80-acre campus boundary. This infrastructure is essential to the function of the Multipurpose Academic Building.

• Build on the university’s traditions and plant the Tarleton flag in Fort Worth through branding, marketing, social activities, alumni relations. • Continue to serve non-traditional and place-bound students (not to compete for students attracted to Stephenville) • Explore more partnership opportunities with regional community college districts including Hill, Tarrant, and Weatherford Counties • Become a faculty destination

Conceptual Illustration of Formal Quad

Conceptual Illustration of Formal Quad (above) depicts the Multipurpose Academic Building at the top of the hill and terminus of the green open space, framed by future academic buildings. University Drive, (foreground) is envisioned as a “complete street” along the campus’ western edge.

Space Program Summary

programs that will be housed within this building are business administration, communications, criminal justice, communications, education, and health professions. This space program supports the university in adding additional programs in the future. Approximately 50% of the total building program is dedicated to learning environments.

The university’s first building on this campus--the Multipurpose Academic Building--is programmed to support students’ complete university experience all under one roof. In total, the building program is approximately 142,600 gross square feet programmed on three levels. The building is programmed to serve approximately 3,100 students (headcount enrollment) at its maximum capacity. In comparison to the university’s existing buildings in Fort Worth (Hickman and Schaffer Buildings), the new building nearly triples the overall amount of space, it increases the number of classroom from 18 to 27 (50% increase), adds four laboratories, includes amenity spaces that are currently lacking, bolsters student support Summary Space Requirements Area and staff areas to capabilities,ofand includes an increase by in faculty Outline Program maintain a 15:1 student-faculty ratio.

In addition to learning environment space, the program includes support and amenity spaces for students, faculty, and staff. A central atrium is the ‘hub’ and main entrance of the building. A centrally-located learning commons provides resources that support the academic experience including group meeting space, resource desk, and writing center. Student support spaces for advising and administrative matters are consolidated into a ‘One Stop Shop.’ Additional amenities such as a wellness center and bookstore are included. Finally, utilitarian spaces for facility maintenance, utilities, and loading are included.

Tarleton State SW Metroplex (Fort Worth) Multipurpose Academic Building

The building’s core focus is academic instruction for upper-level undergraduate students and some graduate students. Academic Summary of Space Requirements by Area Areas Build-Out

%NASF

% Internal Circulation

DGSF

Description

Examples

Learning Environments

39,290

45%

0.15

45,184 Space used for formal instruction and learning; classes occur in these spaces

Classrooms, laboratories

Learning Commons

10,560

12%

0.15

Student Support

5,460

0.15

Public Gathering

6,370

0.15

Learning commons, writing lab, small meeting spaces Career services, academic advising, ad financial aid Central atrium, dividable multipurpose

Amenities Support

5,328

0.15

16,060

18%

0.15

12,144 Space used for any activity that supports learning 6,279 Advising and administrative space dedicated to assisting students 7,326 Large atrium and multipurpose room for hosting events 6,127 Spaces that provide benefits to faculty, staff, and students and support everyday functionaility 18,469 Spaced dedicated to facutly & staff use

Faculty and Staff Areas Programming Contingency (5%) Sub-Total

Building Support Grossing Efficiency

Total Gross Building Area

Build-Out NASF

4,153

87,221

100%

99,682

0.15

3,730 Spaces for building infrastructure

Offices, workstations

IT closets, receiving dock, facility main

72.5% Utilitarian spaces and building circulation Mechanical, restrooms, custodial stora (not including central atrium) closets, entrance vestibules, general c corridors, etc. 142,538

Program Definitions Net Assignable Square Feet (NASF) Net Square Feet (NASF) is the assignable area expressed in the square feet required to meet specific functional needs of a particular user group. This space is defined as interior wall to interior wall. This is the area “assignable” to a particular user group (e.g. student classroom space or faculty office). Internal Circulation Internal circulation quantifies the area needed for circulation between assignable spaces that may be grouped together. A 15% internal circulation factor is applied to the NASF.

Amenities / Support 6% Public Gathering 4%

Department Gross Square Feet (DGSF) The sum of the NASF and internal circulation, the DGSF represents a sub-total for each program area. Program Contingency An additional percentage of the NASF that is carried through the program to permit flexibility in an architect’s future design work. Grossing Efficiency The area required for hallways, corridors, mechanical areas, restrooms, vertical shafts and penetrations, interior and exterior walls, and janitorial closets. This program assumes a 70% efficient building.

Faculty / Staff 19% Learning Commons 13%

Student Support 5% Program Contingency 5% Learning Environments 47%

Space Comparison The following comparison table displays the increase in total capacity for Tarleton State-Fort Worth in terms of enrollment and facility space. This space comparison assumes the university eventually ends its lease at the Hickman Building as the new building will serve as the Comparison Existing vs Future central multipurpose academic hub. The university will continue to Outline Program lease space at the Schaffer Building for Medical Lab Sciences programs Tarleton State SW Metroplex (Fort Worth) Multipurpose Academic Building through the Phase One development of the new campus.

Tarleton Ft. Worth Existing Enrollment (Headcount) Enrollment (FTE) Faculty (Headcount) Faculty (FTE) Student-Faculty Ratio (FTE)

Total Gross Square Feet (GSF) Total assignable area (ASF) Education & General (E&G) ASF E&G per FTE Number of classrooms Number of laboratories Number of offices (faculty and staff)

Tarleton Ft. Worth Future

Existing Total 1,576 849 80 59 15:1 Hickman Building 31,900 24,000 24,000

Schaffer Building 19,699 11,611 11,611

2 8 7

Existing Schaffer Total Building 51,599 19,699 35,611 11,611 35,611 11,611 42 18 2 8 8 52 7

New Multipurpose Academic Building 142,588 84,071 78,251 47 27 4 159

Notes

Future Percent Total Increase 3,100 197% Will accommodate projected enrollment growth through 2020 1,670 197% Assumes current FTE ratio will remain the same in the future 143 179% 116 198% Assumes 37 full time faculty and that total headcount quantity of adjuncts and part time faculty are is divisible by 1/2 14:1 99% Future Total 162,287 95,682 89,862 47 29 12 166

Percent Increase 315% 269% 252% Does not include bookstore, cafĂŠ, and public gathering spaces 112% Target is between 45-60 for undergraduates 161% 150% 319% Includes faculty and staff offices (not admin. Assistant workstations)

Project Cost Estimate Summary The main goal of the conceptual cost estimate is to define the preliminary construction cost limitation (CCL) for the Phase One construction of the first building and associated site improvements. The CCL is the project construction budget, exclusive of other owner incurred cost which will comprise the total project cost (TPC)—or the total budget for the owner. The CCL serves as the basis for design.

• Telephone/data equipment and installation • Escalation • Building permits • Asbestos or other hazardous material abatement/removal

For this program, two cost estimates (Options A and B) were generated that demonstrate a range of costs. These costs can be further refined based on State of Texas funding outcomes and overall project budget moving forward. The intent of including two cost estimates is to demonstrate the range of construction costs. Refinement of the program and adding more detail will help clarify the cost estimate moving forward. The CCL includes: • Building construction costs (core and shell and interior development)

This construction cost estimate serves to provide cost information to allow project planning decisions at the scope development level. This early stage of cost estimating is based on the Program of Requirements (POR) for Phase One. This Phase One POR includes a facility program, site plan, and conceptual project schedule, but it does not include detailed design or construction-ready documents. Therefore, a design/estimating contingency is included with the cost estimate to account for this lack of detailed design. It is anticipated that the design/estimating contingency will be managed by the Owner, Architect, and Construction Manager team as more detailed, precise information is prepared and the project progresses.

• Demolition and site preparation costs • Other associated construction manager services, fees, and contingencies (including design/estimating). • Fixed equipment installed by the contractor (included in the building interior development price and reflected in the detailed room costs section of the estimate) The CCL does not include other owner’s costs. The owner’s costs are added to the CCL to arrive at the TPC. Owner’s costs include: • Professional design and specialty consulting fees

Assumptions used in the creations of the preliminary CCL and TPC for the Phase One cost estimate include the following: • Site utilities are extended to the 80-acre university parcel by other parties in advance of construction start • Access roadways to the 80-acre university parcel, including the exit/ entrance ramp to Chisholm Trail Parkway, are provided by other parties in advance of construction start • All costs for building and site improvements are included for construction occurring within the Phase 1 project boundary. See diagram below.

• Preconstruction and project management fees • Owner contingencies

• The CCL estimate adheres to the Texas A&M University System (TAMUS) design guidelines

• Moveable furniture and equipment

142588

TOTAL PROJECT SUMMARY (TPC)

Cost Estimate Summary - Option A Tarleton State University ‐ Fort Worth

The following summary tallies the CCL (line 3) and TPC (line 12) in current year WHOLE PROGRAM dollars. The TPC is escalated to the future mid-point of construction to account for construction market changes in materials and labor. Line Item Total $ 33,128,278 $ 5,134,883

1 Project Construction Costs 2 Contractors Fees + Insurance 3

CONSTRUCTION COST LIMITATION (CCL)

4 Professional Fees: (a) A/E Basic Services Fees (6.0% of CCL) (b) A/E Additional Services Fees (1.5% of CCL) (c) Planning and Programming Fee ‐ Full Master Plan (1.0%) 5 Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment (a) FF&E Allowance @ 5% (b) Equipment (Owner Furnished Owner Installed) 6 Other Work, Institution Managed (a) Instructional Technology ($1.00 per GSF) (b) Moving Expenses (1.5% of CCL) 7 Miscellaneous Expenses (a) Voice/Data Misc. Equipment (0.5% of CCL) (b) Testing & Commissioning (1.0% of CCL) (c) Owner's Other Costs (0.75% of CCL) 8 Project Contingency (a) Owner Construction Contingency (5.0% of CCL) (b) Owner Project Contingency (5.0% of CCL)

% of CCL 87% 13%

% of TPC 65% 10%

$ 38,263,161

100%

75%

$ 3,252,632 $ 2,296,000 $ 574,000 $ 382,632 $ 2,869,737 $ 1,913,158 $ 956,579 $ 717,000 $ 143,000 $ 574,000 $ 861,000 $ 191,000 $ 383,000 $ 287,000 $ 3,826,000 $ 1,913,000 $ 1,913,000

8.50% 6.00% 1.50% 1.00% 7.50% 5.00%

6% 4% 1% 1% 6% 4%

1.87% 0.37% 1.50% 2.25% 0.50% 1.00% 0.75% 10.00% 5.00% 5.00%

1% 0% 1% 2% 0% 1% 1% 7% 4% 4%

SUBTOTAL OWNER COSTS

$ 11,526,000

30.12%

23%

SUBTOTAL (CCL + OWNER'S COST)

$ 49,789,161

130.12%

97%

$ 1,319,412.77

3.45%

$ 51,109,000

133.57%

100%

$ 56,730,990

148.27%

111%

11 Project Management Fee @ 2.65% 12

TOTAL PROJECT COST (TPC) 2015 DOLLARS

13 TOTAL PROJECT COST ESCALATED TO SEPTEMBER 2017 CONSTRUCTION MIDPOINT 13 Project Square Footage Costs: (a) New Assignable Square Feet (ASF) (b) New Gross Square Feet (GSF) (c) New Shell Space (GSF) (d) (e) (f) (g) Notes: *

Project Total

$ 16,174,046 Backfill

Construction Cost per GSF Construction Cost per ASF Total Project Cost per GSF Total Project Cost per ASF

99,812 142,588 NONE $268.35 $383.35 $397.87 $512.05

Delta

142588

TOTAL PROJECT SUMMARY (TPC)

Cost EstimateTarleton State University ‐ Fort Worth Summary - Option B

1 Project Construction Costs 2 Contractors Fees + Insurance 3

CONSTRUCTION COST LIMITATION (CCL)

4 Professional Fees: (a) A/E Basic Services Fees (6.0% of CCL) (b) A/E Additional Services Fees (1.5% of CCL) (c) Planning and Programming Fee ‐ Full Master Plan (1.0%) 5 Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment (a) FF&E Allowance @ 5% (b) Equipment (Owner Furnished Owner Installed) 6 Other Work, Institution Managed (a) Instructional Technology ($1.00 per GSF) (b) Moving Expenses (1.5% of CCL) (c) Informational Technology 7 Miscellaneous Expenses (a) Voice/Data Misc. Equipment (0.5% of CCL) (b) Testing & Commissioning (1.0% of CCL) (c) Owner's Other Costs (0.75% of CCL) (d) Municipal Fees (0.75% of CCL) 8 Project Contingency (a) Owner Construction Contingency (5.0% of CCL) (b) Owner Project Contingency (5.0% of CCL)

Project Total

% of CCL 87% 13%

% of TPC 63% 10%

$ 47,740,146

100%

72%

$ 4,057,401

8.50% 6.00% 1.50% 1.00% 7.50% 5.00%

6% 4% 1% 1% 5% 4%

$ 2,711,550

5.68% 0.30% 1.50%

4% 0% 1%

$ 1,432,000

3.00% 0.50% 1.00% 0.75%

2% 0% 1% 1%

$ 4,774,000

10.00% 5.00% 5.00%

7% 4% 4%

$ 2,864,000 $ 716,000 $ 477,401 $ 3,580,511 $ 2,387,007 $ 1,193,504 $ 143,000 $ 716,000 $ 1,852,550 $ $ $ $

239,000 477,000 358,000 358,000

$ 2,387,000 $ 2,387,000

SUBTOTAL OWNER COSTS

$ 16,555,000

34.68%

25%

SUBTOTAL (CCL + OWNER'S COST)

$ 64,295,146

134.68%

97%

$ 1,703,821.37

3.57%

$ 65,999,000

138.25%

100%

$ 75,898,850

158.98%

115%

11 Project Management Fee @ 2.65% 12

TOTAL PROJECT COST (TPC) 2015 DOLLARS

13 TOTAL PROJECT COST ESCALATED TO SEPTEMBER 2018 CONSTRUCTION MIDPOINT 13 Project Square Footage Costs: (a) New Assignable Square Feet (ASF) (b) New Gross Square Feet (GSF) (c) New Shell Space (GSF) (d) (e) (f) (g) Notes: *

$ 16,174,046 Backfill

Construction Cost per GSF Construction Cost per ASF Total Project Cost per GSF Total Project Cost per ASF

99,812 142,588 NONE $334.81 $478.30 $532.29 $661.24

Delta

Project Schedule Option A The following conceptual schedule was developed as a part of the planning and programming charrette (held in December 2014) to identify critical milestones and chart a path forward from greenfield site to occupied campus. It includes several important sequential milestones that serve as â&#x20AC;&#x153;critical pathâ&#x20AC;? junctions. The schedule begins with obtaining State of Texas funding, leading on through, design, bid, construction and on to occupancy. This schedule demonstrates that once funding is obtained, the sequence of steps that follow would allow first building to be open for classes for the Fall 2018 semester.

2015 May Legislative Funding Authorization June Gubernatorial Signature

2016

4 mo

July Commission & Move-in Aug First day of classes

A/E RFQ issued

2 mo 16 mo 3 mo 12 mo

2 mo

2018

Feb Utilities & roads completed (by external parties)

Oct Need engineering info (from external parties)

September BOR approval of Capital Plan

Jun-Oct Master Plan

2017

Oct-Oct Design

Aug-Oct A/E Procuerement

Oct-Feb Bid

Feb-Jun Construction

Project Schedule Option B An alternative schedule was also created that reflects a more conservative and longer implementation timeline showing a Fall 2019 opening, one year later than the first schedule created. This alternative schedule considers a longer decision making and pre-project preparation process (e.g. utility and roadway design, engineering, and construction). Most importantly, this project schedule is the basis of tthe Option B cost estiamte and has a mid-point of construction im September of 2018.

2015

2016

2017

May Legislative Funding Authorization

Dec Utilities & roads completed (by external parties)

Feb Need engineering info (from external parties)

June Gubernatorial Signature September BOR approval of Capital Plan

16 mo 3 mo 14 mo

7 mo

Jun-Dec Master Plan

Jun - July Design

Mar-May A/E Procuerement Jan-Mar Pre-project planning 3 mo

2019 July Commission & Move-in Aug First day of classes 2 mo

March A/E RFQ issued

2 mo

2018

4 mo

Aug - Dec Bid

Jan - May Construction

Space Program

Campus Context Snapshot of concept plan showing the Multipurpose Academic Building, the first building on the campus and the focus of this program. Circulation Concept

Building Organization The spatial organization and adjacency of uses are important elements in creating a functional building. The following ‘blocking’ diagrams apply the building program to the footprint, orientation, and context of the first building site selected in the concept plan (see image at right). Overall Organization Concept Activity Gradient Multipurpose Acaedmic Building Tarleton State Ft. Worth

Multipurpose Acaedmic Building Tarleton State Ft. Worth

Support and Amenities Specialized, Low-traffic, quieter

elevators

main entrance (from west plaza and parking)

main entrance (from Campus Green)

High Activity “Buzz”

Central Atrium - “hub”

Atrium (may include stairs)

elevators

Learning Spaces

Atrium

Specialized, Low-traffic, quieter

w/ stairs

Lobby

secondary entrance (from Chisolm Trail Quad)

Building Organization The fundamental organizing principle for the first building is an “I” shape footprint with a central atrium that unites the north and south wings of the building. Programmatically, this is a very successful building organization where learning spaces are located in the larger south wing that connects towards future academic buildings to the south and the support and amenity spaces can be located in the northern wing. 16

Activity Gradient The building’s central atrium is a highly used and highly active space. Stemming from the central atrium, functional uses are organized partially based on level of traffic and noise. The quieter spaces are located on the far north and south sides with spaces increasing in both traffic levels, noise, and activity towards the center.

Circulation The main entrance to the building is located at the central atrium. The atrium is an open, airy, transparent space with stairs connecting multiple levels and walkways/bridges connecting the north and south wings. Circulation for the building extends from the central atrium to an elevator lobby in each wing. A secondary building entrance is located on the southside facing the Chisholm Quad. Loading/ receiving is on the north side of the building.

Blocking Diagrams The diagrams on this page depict the floor-by-floor functional uses and necessary adjacencies of the facility program.

Level 1 Floor Diagram

Student Support

Multipurpose Acaedmic Building Tarleton State Ft. Worth

One-stop Shop

loading dock

Building Support

Level 2 Floor Diagram Multipurpose Acaedmic Building Tarleton State Ft. Worth

Faculty and Staff Area

Level 3

Amenities Support

Multipurpose Acaedmic Building Tarleton State Ft. Worth

Student Life Health/Wellness Information Tech.

Loading/Receiving Maintenance

Floor Diagram Faculty and Staff Area Utility Room

Amenities Support

Learning Environments

Book Store Health/Wellness

Flexible Classrooms Specialized Spaces - Criminal Justice

Public Gathering Main Atrium

main entrance (from Campus Green)

atrium

main entrance (from west plaza and parking)

atrium

(open to below)

Learning Commons atrium

Commons Area Writing Center Cafe Media Lab Faculty Commons

Learning Environments secondary entrance (from Chisolm Trail Quad)

atrium

Learning Environments Flexible Classrooms

Large Dividable Classroom Counseling Center Flexible Classrooms Specialized Spaces - Business

vie

ws so tow uth ar we ds st

rva tio

Learning Environments

Flexible Classrooms Specialized Spaces - Health Professions, Education

Public Gathering Heritage Room

Level One Functional Use and Adjacency The most actively used and most public spaces are located on level one. The learning commons is a central resource for faculty and students. All student services are located on the north wing immediately adjacent and accessible to the central atrium. Large classrooms, the trading room for the business program, and the counseling center, which requires public access, comprise the learning environments on the first floor.

Level Two Functional Use and Adjacency Consistent with the overall building organization, level two has learning environments in the south wing and support functions (faculty and staff area and various amenity spaces) in the north wing.

Level Three Functional Use and Adjacency Level three has the highest amount of learning environment space. Most of the specialized spaces for health professions (the general science laboratories) and the executive-type spaces for the criminal justice program are located here. Also, the Heritage Hall, a special events/entertainment space, is on the this level. An outdoor observation deck is on the southern end of the this level and provides stunning views to the southwest. 17

Summary of Space Requirements by Area Outline Program

Space Program Summary

Tarleton State SW Metroplex (Fort Worth) Multipurpose Academic Building

The following table summarizes the space requirements for each component area of the total building. Summary of Space Requirements by Area Areas Build-Out

%NASF

% Internal Circulation

DGSF

Description

Examples

Learning Environments

39,290

45%

0.15

45,184 Space used for formal instruction and learning; classes occur in these spaces

Classrooms, laboratories

Learning Commons

10,560

12%

0.15

Student Support

5,460

0.15

Public Gathering

6,370

0.15

Learning commons, writing lab, small group meeting spaces Career services, academic advising, admissions, financial aid Central atrium, dividable multipurpose room

Amenities Support

5,328

0.15

16,060

18%

0.15

Faculty and Staff Areas Programming Contingency (5%) Sub-Total

Building Support Grossing Efficiency

Total Gross Building Area

Build-Out NASF

4,153

87,221

100%

99,682

0.15

3,730 Spaces for building infrastructure

Offices, workstations

IT closets, receiving dock, facility maintenance

72.5% Utilitarian spaces and building circulation Mechanical, restrooms, custodial storage, IT (not including central atrium) closets, entrance vestibules, general circulation corridors, etc. 142,538

Faculty / Staff 19%

Amenities / Support 6%

Volumetric Stacking Diagram As described in the level-by-level blocking diagrams, the building is organized based on functional use and adjacency. The volumetric stacking diagram (below) depicts the 3D arrangement of spaces all united by the central atrium (â&#x20AC;&#x153;Public Gatheringâ&#x20AC;? in purple) that extends vertically through all floors. Almost half of the entire program is dedicated to learning environments, with most of those spaces located in the south wing.

Public Gathering 7% 4%

Learning Commons 13%

Student Support 5% Program Contingency 5% Learning Environments 47%

Building Support

Faculty and Staff

Amenities Support

Student Support

Public Gathering

Learning Environments

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 1

Learning Commons 19

Qualities of the “Learning Landscape” The following are qualities of the “learning landscape” that help guide the spatial qualities of not just the learning environments but the learning commons, public areas, and even circulation spaces such as hallways, lobbies, and entrances.

Promote Active Learning Active learning prompts the student to engage in the learning process though interaction among peers and with the instructor. This method of learning is the antithesis of passive learning (e.g. formal lectures). In active learning, group conversations, participatory inquiry, class discussions, and creating work during class are all elements that make the classroom experience engaging. The spatial environment must be designed to enable active learning. Qualities of active learning environments include visibility, proximity, mobility, and flexibility. Integrating moveable furniture and technology support active learning. Integrate Informal Learning Spaces Learning does not occur only in a classroom or laboratory setting. Often times, learning happens in a group discussion in a cafe or atrium or in a quiet individual setting at the end of a hallway or in an informal seating area adjacent to a classroom.

A learning space that blends learning and doing in an active learning environment.

Flexibility and Adaptability with Growth Methods of learning and instructions are in constant flux. Planning spaces that can change over time to respond to evolved ways of teaching is paramount. Equally important is that designing with flexibility in mind makes it easier to adapt to enrollment growth. Spatial qualities such as flat-floor classrooms, retractable wall partitions, and limiting structural barriers and fixed furniture are all elements that support flexibility and adaptability. Environmental Quality Incorporating natural light, providing for views outside of the building, specifying appropriate artificial lighting, designing for noise control (including sound attenuation), and specifying environmental sustainability measures can all promote environmental quality. An informal, interactive space that hosts small groups and individuals. 20

Create Community Creating spaces for gathering, whether it be for a special event or everyday interaction among students and faculty, can help establish a sense-of-community and foster collegiality among peers. Blend Learning and Doing Today’s student seek a classroom environment that is interactive and participatory, not static. A focus on producing work during class time through group and individual activity is a way of blending learning and doing. The atrium at the Block School of Business at the University of Missouri-Kansas City (above)creates community, makes activity visible, and contributes to the identity of the building

Make Activity Visible Revealing movement, circulation, and learning within an academic building by using interior glass walls and open corridors is a great way to make the building ‘come alive’ as hub of learning. Use Space Intensely Creating learning environments that are flexible and adaptable will enable them to be used more frequently for different purposes, thus boosting efficiency. Also, policy decisions such as class scheduling and non-departmental classroom spaces are ways to boost intensity of use. Identity and Character Establishing a ‘sense of place’ by designing a building with distinct architectural character and high quality interior spaces where people want to gather, learn, explore, and linger will foster a learning landscape that connects people. Plan the User Experience Understanding a typical day in the life of a student, faculty member, or staff person is useful in planning the user experience. From classroom to study space to support/advising to socializing, a student’s day may take them to multiple parts of the building. Making the experience pleasant, convenient, and worthwhile is important.

The rooftop greenscape at the Clough Undergraduate Commons, Georgia Tech University 21

Learning Environments Approximately one half of the entire program is dedicated to learning environments. This area comprises any space where formal instruction takes place such as a classroom or laboratory. This area also includes specialty spaces that are specific to a degree program such as a trading room for the business program or a simulated teaching classroom for the education program. The south wing of the building contains the majority of learning environments with the most accessible and heavily utilized classrooms on level one. More specialized spaces are located on level three. Learning Environments 47%

An active learning classroom at the University of Minnesota

The financial trading simulation room at the Cox School of Business, Southern Methodist University.

An active learning classroom at the University of Missouri-Kansas City

A technology-infused seminar room 23

Learning Environments Outline Program Tarleton State SW Metroplex (Fort Worth) Multipurpose Academic Building Learning Environments Detailed Program

Total Occupancy

Criminal Justice

Health Professions

Education, Social Work, Comm., Psych

Business

Floor Number

Room Occupancy

Assignable Square Feet (ASF) per Seat

Suitability Matrix

840

6720

240

1120

13440

480

1200

Room with 30 dual monitor workstations, 2 seats each. One large projection screen for centralized display of data. Needs to be able to accommodate individual testing for up to 30 people

Large Flat Classroom

There are zero large classrooms specificed, but the small flat classrooms can be designed to join two together into one large room for 60 people

Large Dividable Classroom

2700

150

2 24

1400

2,800 26,860

100 1,030

(1)@150p to (3)@50p. Dividable into three parts, use high quality (sound proof) dividable partions that are full height Half-round, seminar-type classrooms

Medical Lab Science Teaching Labs

1500

4,500

120

Microbiology Teach Lab Lab Equipment Room Lab Preparation Room Kinesiology Room

1 0 0 0

1500 120 500 500

1,500 -

Space Name

Quantity

Space Area

Total (ASF)

Notes

FLEXIBLE CLASSROOMS Flexible Small Flat Classroom (Active Learning) Flexible Medium Flat Classroom (Active Learning) Data Intensive Learning Spaces

Tiered Case Rooms Sub-total

28 sf/seat (with moveable tables); Some of these rooms could be combinable into a larger room with 60-person occupancy

SPECIALIZED SPACES Health Professions

Multi-use labs; move majority of undergraduate MLS labs to new building; hematology/chemistry; microbiology/blood bank; lots of storage, countertop space, projecting islands in center for instrumentation, chemical hoods

One preparation room for each lab See Amenities Support

Confidential

6/4/2015

Page 1

Flexibility and Adaptability One hallmark of this building program is that many of the learning environments are meant to be flexible and adaptable. Characteristics of these spaces include moveable furniture, flat-floor classrooms, retractable partitions and ramped seating, and integrated technology. Classroom at the University of MissouriKansas City (far left, top) Moveable furniture, decentralized visual displays, and a flat floor help enable a flexible classroom environment, A dividable multi-purpose room (immediate left) can host multiple events at once or one very large event. Retractable lecture hall seating at Stanford University enables multiple uses to occur within one space (far left, bottom) One room can be set up in a range of layouts to enable different types of learning and instruction (at immediate left).

Learning Environments Outline Program Tarleton State SW Metroplex (Fort Worth) Multipurpose Academic Building

1320

1,320

Interview rooms

100

400

Financial News/Media Commons Criminal Justice Criminal Justice Conference Room

600

700

1 2 14

100 750

100 1,500 10,620

Individual Observation Room

100

200

Group Observation Room

200

400

Observation Viewer Room Observation Room Storage Directors Office Restroom Reception/Waiting Reception Workstatiton

4 4 1 0 1 1 15

100 100 120

400 400 120 0 200 90 1,810 39,290

Education Observation Room Teaching Classroom Sub-total

Business

Total (ASF)

Education, Social Work, Comm., Psych

Space Area

Health Professions

Quantity

Criminal Justice

Space Name Business Trading Room

Total Occupancy

Floor Number

Room Occupancy

Assignable Square Feet (ASF) per Seat

Suitability Matrix

x x

Notes Trading room to have 60 seats; 30 computer workstations; One large projection screen for centralized display of data; could have a room for business; nursing, IT, stats; 20sf per seat Small rooms for one-on-one or one-on-two interviews; rooms could be used for individual or small group study

Designed to be convertible into a mock trial set-up

x x 220

OTHER SPACES Counseling Center

Sub-total TOTAL

200 90

Student counseling center for graduate student training; community support student open to general public;

x x x x x x 220 1,470

Confidential

6/4/2015

Page 2

Features to Enhance Active Learning The following are qualities of the “learning landscape” that help guide the spatial qualities of not just the learning environments but the learning commons, public areas, and even circulation spaces such as hallways, lobbies, and entrances.

Active Learning Classroom that demonstrates visibility at the University of Iowa (top) and College of Engineering group learning space showing proximity at the University of Wisconsin-Madison (bottom).

Visibility

Mobility

• • • •

• Faculty - ease of circulating around the room • Students - ease in changing activities • Media – supports multiple layouts

To faculty To media To peers Ability to capture and share team products

Proximity

Flexibility

• Eye contact with students < 15’ • Visibility of facial expressions < 65’ • Shared work surfaces (physical & electronic)

• Transitioning between activities • Movable furnishings • Alternative layouts • Adaptable over time

Active Learning Classroom at the University of Minnesota demonstrating faculty mobility(top) and an active learning classroom at the University of Iowa showing flexibility with moveable furniture and multiple monitor screens (bottom).

Learning Commons One of the latest shifts in designing space for higher education, is the increase in spaces known as â&#x20AC;&#x153;Learning Commons,â&#x20AC;? which are areas for student interaction, study, resource attainment, and academic support. Often times, these spaces include faculty resource areas. Within this facility program, the learning commons is located off of the central atrium on level one as this space will be highly-utilized by all students and faculty. The learning commons feature distributed study seating, spaces for collaboration, resources areas and library support, a faculty commons (including spaces for instructional design), and a cafĂŠ, which is often the social hub of the space.

Learning Commons 13%

Learning commons with individual and group workstations in foreground and resource shelves in background at North Carolina State University;

Group study/interaction space with central monitors, multiple seating options. Source: Steelcase

A group study room with sliding glass door partitions, floor-to-ceiling marker boards, and flexible furniture at Duke University

An idea brainstorming alcove with moveable marker boards at the D.School at Stanford University

A cafe, an important amenity to accommodate the learning experience.

The Interactive Media Design Lab at the University of Michigan. 29

Learning Commons Outline Program Tarleton State SW Metroplex (Fort Worth) Multipurpose Academic Building

Quantity

Space Area

Total (ASF)

Room Occupancy

Total Occupancy

Space Name

Assignable Square Feet (ASF) per Seat

Learning Commons Detailed Program

1 18

2000 160

2000 2880

75 8

75 144

1 1 1 0

300 120 800 1500

300 120 800 0

60 0 24

Notes

LEARNING COMMONS Commons Area Small Group Meeting Rooms (multiple functions; dispersed) Writing Center Writing Lab Office Media Lab Distributed Study Seating

Sub-total

To be included in grossing circulation factor; Allocation for learning corridors and distributed clusters throughout building; informal moveable seating, moveable whiteboards, etc

6100

303

FACULTY COMMONS Faculty Training Room Faculty Commons Conference Room Video Recording Room Multimedia Faculty Interview Room CII Instructional Design Office Sub-total

1 1 1 1 1

240 800 300 120 200

1 6

120

1 2 1

200 120 600

40 33 25

6 24 12 1 2

120 1,780

1 46

200 240 600

2 1 0

RESOURCE/LIBRARIAN Service Desk Staff Offices Collections/Stacks Sub-total

Confidential

1,040

2 2 0 Small collection, circulation and reference material 4

3/19/2015

Page 1

Learning Commons Outline Program

Total (ASF)

Help Desk Service Counter User Services Coordinator Office

1 1

150 120

2 1

A/V Services Coordinator Office

120

Equipment Check-out Area

150

Space Name

Total Occupancy

Space Area

Room Occupancy

Quantity

Assignable Square Feet (ASF) per Seat

Tarleton State SW Metroplex (Fort Worth) Multipurpose Academic Building

Notes

IT Service and Support

Sub-total

Can be staffed by help desk service counter employees

540

CafĂŠ Point-of-Sale Counter Food Prep Counter/Serving Area

1 1

200 300

1 2

Storage Seating Area

1 1

200 400

Sub-total TOTAL

Confidential

1,100 10,560

Seating should be designed as work settings with accessible electric outlets. 0 353

3/19/2015

31 Page 2

Student Support Envisioned as a â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;one-stop shop,â&#x20AC;&#x2122; the student support spaces within the facility program are consolidated onto level one and immediately accessible from the central atrium. The student support spaces share a common reception lobby. From that lobby, all of the functions are accessible. This is a concept that provides convenience and clarity to students seeking answers to questions regarding their university experience.

Student Support 5%

A 6-person shared conference space with sliding glass-door wall. Source: Gensler

An interactive digital display guides visitors at the Welcome Center at the University of Wisconsin.

A shared reception lobby for student services at DePaul University. 33

Student Support Outline Program Tarleton State SW Metroplex (Fort Worth) Multipurpose Academic Building

Space Area (ASF)

Total (ASF)

Assignable Square Feet (ASF) per Seat

Room Occupancy

Reception Area

350

Check-in/Front Desk Shared Office

1 1

150 120

na na

1 1

Medium Conference Room

350

700

1 6

300

300 1620

Sub-total

120 300 150

1200 300 150 1650

na 20 na

1 15 0

Sub-total

10 1 1 12

120 90 90

480 90 90 660

na na na

1 1 0

Sub-total

4 1 1 6

Space Name

Total Occupancy

Quantity

Student Support Detailed Program

Notes

"ONE-STOP SHOP" Shared Entrance Lobby

Storage Room

1 To be shared with admission, registrar, financial aid, recruitment 1 1 Temporary office for part time veterans affairs, alumni relations, or other student support staff 24 To be shared between admission, registrar, financial aid, welcome center 0 27

Academic Advising Advisor Offices Waiting Room Storage Room

10 15 Separate waiting area 0 25

Career Advising Advisor Offices Admin. Assistant Workstation Storage Room

4 1 0 5

Student Support Outline Program

Room Occupancy

Total Occupancy

na na na

1 1 0

1 1 0 2

120 90 90

240 90 90 420

na na na

1 1 0

Sub-total

2 1 1 4

2 1 0 3

120 600 90

120 600 90 810 5,460

na na na

1 1 0

Sub-total

1 1 1 3

1 1 0 2 62

Total (ASF)

120 90 90 300

Space Name

Space Area (ASF)

120 90 90

Sub-total

1 1 1 3

Quantity

Assignable Square Feet (ASF) per Seat

Tarleton State SW Metroplex (Fort Worth) Multipurpose Academic Building

Notes

"ONE-STOP SHOP" (CONTINUED) Admissions Admissions Director Office Admin. Assistant Workstation Storage Room Financial Aid Financial Assistance Office Admin. Assistant Workstation Storage Room Welcome Center Staff Office Briefing Room/Gallery Storage Room TOTAL

Public Gathering As the â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;social glueâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; of the building, the public gathering spaces facilitate circulation and interaction among students, staff, faculty, and visitors. The main public gathering space is the central atrium, which is a light-filled space that extends from level one through level three. Ramps and/or stairs might connect through the atrium to connect multiple levels and unite the north and south wings. The public gathering space is large enough to host special events. Additionally, the Heritage Hall, located on level three, is conceptualized as a special event space to host receptions, small speaking events. Heritage Hall connects to an outdoor observation deck, with views out to Chisholm Quad.

Public Gathering 4% 7%

Public Gathering Outline Program Tarleton State SW Metroplex (Fort Worth) Multipurpose Academic Building

Total Occupancy

Room Occupancy

Total (ASF)

Space Name

Assignable Square Feet (ASF) per Seat

Quantity

Space Area

Public Gathering Detailed Program

Notes

PUBLIC GATHERING Public Atrium

4,000

Heritage Room

1,500

Event Storage

120

Catering Kitchen Art/Digital Media Display

1 6

300 75

300 450

6 -

Sub-total TOTAL

February 17, 2015

6370 6,370

200

100

200 To operate as the central organizing hub of the building; to be located near or at main entrance; Should be a multi-story space; Should include seating areas, places for group gathering, area for graphic displays/projections 100 Entertaining space, hosting special events, receptions, Tarleton ethos, alumni relations, Development & Advancement entertainment suite, possibly at top of building opening onto roof terrace. Catering kitchen adjacent. - To be located adjacent to Heritage Room and Public Atrium 6 To be located adjcanet to Heritage Room - Alcoves, wall space, etc.; could be attached to Learning Commons, or alcove in atrium 306 306

1 37

Amenities Support Functional uses that support the university experience but are not part of the core academic function are included within amenities support. These spaces round-out the overall experience of students, faculty, and staff. Student life spaces, the university bookstore, a wellness facility, and information technology support spaces are included within this area.

Amenities / Support 6%

Amenities Support Outline Program Tarleton State SW Metroplex (Fort Worth) Multipurpose Academic Building

Quantity

Space Area

Total (ASF)

Room Occupancy

Total Occupancy

Assignable Square Feet (ASF) per Seat

Amenities Support Detailed Program

500

25 Each room could be shared by multiple organizations

1 1 0 3

120 90 100

120 90 0 710

1 1

1 1 0 27

Data/Telecommunication Coordinator Office Network Administrator Office IT Staff Office IT Storage Equipment Maintenance Room

120

1 1 1 1

120 120 300 200

1 1 1 2

Main Server Room

300

1,160

1 Room will require high amount of ventilation and fan cooling; For MDF and IDF rooms, see Building Support 7 0 0 0

Space Name

Notes

STUDENT LIFE Student Organization Meeting Rooms Staff Office for Student Life Admin Assistant Workstation Reception Area Sub-total

INFORMATION TECH.

Sub-total

BOOKSTORE/RETAIL Store Area Storage Area Sub-total

1 1 2

1050 300

1050 300 1,350

1 1 2

800 400 280

800 400 560

24 16 40

24 to be shared with potential Kinesiology program 16 80 7sf/locker

168

24 7sf/locker

2 8

180 2,108 5,328

WELLNESS/EXERCISE Exercise Room - Studio Exercise Room - Equipment Changing Room/Lockers Student Changing Room/Lockers Faculty/Staff Mother's Room Sub-total TOTAL

2 146 180

Faculty and Staff Areas At approximately 20% of the overall program, faculty and staff areas consume a large amount of space. This is necessary to support faculty and staff growth in proportion with student enrollment growth. For this program, all adjunct/traveling faculty and all staff will be placed in workstations organized in an open office concept. This is a contemporary paradigm in office planning that balances collaboration with individual work. It also reduces the footprint of office space. All full-time faculty will have enclosed offices. Finally, this program includes department hubs, which are shared open spaces for each academic College to use as social/collaboration spaces.

Faculty / Staff 19%

Faculty and Staff Areas Outline Program Faculty and Staff Areas Detailed Program

Tarleton State SW Metroplex (Fort Worth) Multipurpose Academic Building

Science and Technology

Liberal and Fine Arts

Education

Faculty Offices

120

10680

Adjunct Faculty/Traveling Faculty Workstations Admin Assistant Workstation Departmental Hubs Facutly Commons

2430

4 4

90 250

360 1000

4 0

Space Name

Quantity

Space Area

Total (ASF)

Business

Total Occupancy

Floor Number

Room Occupancy

Assignable Square Feet (ASF) per Seat

Office/Workstation Allotments

Notes

FACULTY OFFICES

Sub-total

124

14470

120

16 Each room could be shared by multiple organizations

Assumes one admin assistant for each College One 'hub"--or common lobby--for each College See Learning Commons as the Faculty Commons will be adjacent 4

STAFF WORKSTATIONS (shell half) Staff Workstations Staff Breakroom Sub-total TOTAL - Full Program

16 1 17

90 150

1440 150 1,590 16,060

1 1

16 1 17 137

Includes kitchenette 4

Building Support Areas The â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;back-of-houseâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; spaces that make a building operate are included as building support areas. The loading dock, maintenance workshop, IT closets, and mechanical spaces are components of building support.

Building Support Outline Program Tarleton State SW Metroplex (Fort Worth) Multipurpose Academic Building

Assignable Square Feet (ASF) per Seat

Room Occupancy

500 120 250 500

500 120 250 500 1370

na na na na

0 0 0

0 Dock leveler, dumpster; includes loading area 0 0 Waste dumpster; Recycling bins 0 0

Total Occupancy

Total (ASF)

Space Name

Space Area

Quantity

Building Support Detailed Program

Notes

RECEIVING/LOADING Materials Receiving Room Receiving Office Trash and Recycling Holding General Building Storage Sub-total

1 1 1 1 4

MDF Room

350

IDF Closets

100

500 850

Sub-total

5 6

0 0

800

120

1 4

500

500 1,510 3,730

INFORMATION TECH.

UTILITIES General Building Mechanical and Electrical Room Fire Controls Room Facility Operations/Maintenance Office Maintenance Workshop Sub-total TOTAL

0 -

Schedule and Cost Analysis

Competitive Sealed Proposals (CSP) Delivery Method Schedule Tarleton State – Fort Worth Mulitpurpose Academic Building Tarleton State University Broaddus Planning

Project Schedule - Option A

February 17, 2015

The following schedule achieves building completion targeted for Fall of 2018. This schedule hinges on the completion of transportation and infrastructure investments by entities other than the university in a timely fashion.

Schedule Milestone

Date

Legislative Funding Approved

05/01/15

BOR Approval

9/4/15 at Board Meeting

Issue A/E RFQ

9/8/15

RFQ Due

9/25/15

A/E Interviews

10/6/15

SD Due

1/6/16

50% DD Due

4/8/16

100% DD Due

6/6/16

BOR Approval

7/11/16 (exact date TBD)

THECB Application Due

7/18/16*

THECB Approval

7/25/16*

50% CD due

8/12/16

75% CD Due

9/23/16

100% CD Due

10/28/16

Issue Bid Package

11/11/16

Bids Due

1/31/17

BOR Construction Approval

2/10/17 (exact date TBD)

Begin Construction

2/27/17

Construction Complete

6/27/18 (16 months)

Assumptions: 1. Assumes funding in place by May 1, 2015 2. Assumes BOR Approval of Design Development Set occurs at BOR meeting in third quarter of 2016 (exact date is TBD) 3. * Indicate “if necessary” for THECB approval

142588

TOTAL PROJECT SUMMARY (TPC) Tarleton State University ‐ Fort Worth WHOLE PROGRAM

Cost Estimate - Option A The following table summarize the construction cost limitation (CCL) and Total Project Cost (TPC). Line Item Total $ 33,128,278 $ 5,134,883

1 Project Construction Costs 2 Contractors Fees + Insurance 3

CONSTRUCTION COST LIMITATION (CCL)

Project Total

% of CCL 87% 13%

% of TPC 65% 10%

$ 38,263,161

100%

75%

$ 3,252,632 $ 2,296,000 $ 574,000 $ 382,632 $ 2,869,737 $ 1,913,158 $ 956,579 $ 717,000 $ 143,000 $ 574,000 $ 861,000 $ 191,000 $ 383,000 $ 287,000 $ 3,826,000 $ 1,913,000 $ 1,913,000

8.50% 6.00% 1.50% 1.00% 7.50% 5.00%

6% 4% 1% 1% 6% 4%

1.87% 0.37% 1.50% 2.25% 0.50% 1.00% 0.75% 10.00% 5.00% 5.00%

1% 0% 1% 2% 0% 1% 1% 7% 4% 4%

SUBTOTAL OWNER COSTS

$ 11,526,000

30.12%

23%

SUBTOTAL (CCL + OWNER'S COST)

$ 49,789,161

130.12%

97%

$ 1,319,412.77

3.45%

$ 51,109,000

133.57%

100%

$ 56,730,990

148.27%

111%

11 Project Management Fee @ 2.65% 12

TOTAL PROJECT COST (TPC) 2015 DOLLARS

$ 16,174,046 Backfill

Construction Cost per GSF Construction Cost per ASF Total Project Cost per GSF Total Project Cost per ASF

99,812 142,588 NONE $268.35 $383.35 $397.87 $512.05

Delta

Cost Estimate - Option A (continued) GENERAL CONDITIONS

Tarleton State University ‐ Fort Worth 0.100 PROJECT DURATION

MONTHS WEEKS SHIFT WORK WEEK

16.00 69.28 8.00 1.00 COUNT

1.010 FIELD MANAGEMENT LABOR General Superintendent Site Superintendent Assistant Site Superintendent Assistant Site Superintendent Assistant Site Superintendent Site Engineer Site Engineer Safety Engineer Site Admin 1 Site Admin 2 Labor Burden

69.28 69.28 34.64 0.00 0.00 34.64 0.00 13.86 69.28 0.00 0.40

UNIT OF MEASURE

UNIT COST

SUBTOTAL

WKS WKS WKS WKS WKS WKS WKS WKS WKS WKS %

$ 2,884.62 $ 2,019.23 $ 1,346.15 $ 1,346.15 $ 1,346.15 $ 1,153.85 $ 1,153.85 $ 1,250.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 243,812.31

$ 199,846.15 $ 139,892.31 $ 46,630.77 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 39,969.23 $ ‐ $ 17,320.00 $ 86,600.00 $ ‐ $ 97,524.92

TOTAL

TOTAL FIELD MANAGEMENT $ 627,783.38

1.020 STANDARD FIELD COST Site Crane Rental Site Trailers Farm Storage Sheds Ladders and Equipment Survey Equipment Job Signs Temporary Fence/Barricades City Project Support Temporary Toilets Temporary Water Temporary Utilities Furniture Rentals Postage Progress Photos Survey (2‐man crew) OSHA Requirements First Aid Blueprinting Field Phones Field Fax Field Internet

16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00

MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS

$ 25,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 210.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 250.00 $ 285.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 736.10 $ 220.83 $ 166.00 $ 110.00 $ 50.00 $ 55.00 $ 40.00 $ 600.00 $ 105.00 $ 85.00 $ 220.00 $ 130.00 $ 119.00

$ 400,000.00 $ 192,000.00 $ 3,360.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,560.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 11,777.60 $ 3,533.28 $ 2,656.00 $ 1,760.00 $ 800.00 $ 880.00 $ 640.00 $ 9,600.00 $ 1,680.00 $ 1,360.00 $ 3,520.00 $ 2,080.00 $ 1,904.00

Job Signs Temporary Fence/Barricades City Project Support Temporary Toilets Temporary Water 0.100 Temporary Utilities PROJECT DURATION Furniture Rentals MONTHS Postage WEEKS Progress Photos SHIFT Survey (2‐man crew) WORK WEEK OSHA Requirements First Aid Blueprinting 1.010 Field Phones FIELD MANAGEMENT LABOR Field Fax General Superintendent Field Internet Site Superintendent Field Travel Assistant Site Superintendent

16.00 MONTHS $ 250.00 16.00 MONTHS $ 285.00 16.00 MONTHS $ 1,500.00 Tarleton State University ‐ Fort Worth 16.00 MONTHS $ 736.10 16.00 MONTHS $ 220.83 16.00 MONTHS $ 166.00 16.00 MONTHS $ 110.00 16.00 16.00 MONTHS $ 50.00 69.28 16.00 MONTHS $ 55.00 8.00 16.00 MONTHS $ 40.00 1.00 16.00 MONTHS $ 600.00 16.00 MONTHS $ UNIT OF MEASURE UNIT COST 105.00 16.00 MONTHS $ 85.00 16.00 MONTHS $ 220.00 16.00 MONTHS $ 130.00 69.28 WKS $ 2,884.62 16.00 MONTHS $ 119.00 69.28 WKS $ 2,019.23 16.00 MONTHS $ 205.00 34.64 WKS $ 1,346.15

GENERAL CONDITIONS

Cost Estimate - Option A (continued) COUNT

Assistant Site Superintendent Assistant Site Superintendent Site Engineer 1.030 Site Engineer TEMPORARY LIGHT & POWER Service Safety Engineer Distribution Site Admin 1 Energy Consumption BY OWNER Site Admin 2 Labor Burden

1.060 BUILDING CLEANING 1.020 Dumpsters STANDARD FIELD COST Equipment Site Crane Rental Glass Cleaning Site Trailers Farm Daily Clean Storage Sheds Final Clean Ladders and Equipment Survey Equipment Job Signs Temporary Fence/Barricades 1.800 City Project Support OFFICE MANAGEMENT LABOR Project Executive Temporary Toilets Senior Project Mgr. Temporary Water Project Mgr. 1 Temporary Utilities Project Mgr. 2 Furniture Rentals Project Mgr. 3 Postage Administrative Asst. Progress Photos Administrative Asst. Survey (2‐man crew) Comptroller OSHA Requirements Accounting First Aid Labor Burden Blueprinting Field Phones Field Fax Field Internet Field Travel

0.00 0.00 34.64 0.00 1.00 13.86 142588.00 69.28 0.00 0.40

WKS WKS WKS WKS LUMP SUM WKS SF WKS SF WKS %

$ 4,000.00 $ 4,560.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 11,777.60 $ 3,533.28 $ 2,656.00 $ 1,760.00 $ 800.00 $ 880.00 $ 640.00 $ 9,600.00 $ SUBTOTAL1,680.00 $ 1,360.00 $ 3,520.00 $ 2,080.00 $ 199,846.15 $ 1,904.00 $ 139,892.31 $ 3,280.00 $ 46,630.77

TOTAL

$ 1,346.15 $ ‐ TOTAL STANDARD FIELD COSTS $ 677,390.88 $ 1,346.15 $ ‐ $ 1,153.85 $ 39,969.23 $ 1,153.85 $ ‐ $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 1,250.00 $ $ 17,320.00 $ 0.65 $ 92,682.20 $ 1,250.00 $ 86,600.00 $ 0.15 $ BY OWNER $ 1,250.00 ‐ $ 243,812.31 $ 97,524.92 TOTAL TEMPORARY LIGHT & POWER $ 94,182.20 TOTAL FIELD MANAGEMENT $ 627,783.38

69.28 1.00 16.00 142588.00 16.00 346.40 16.00 142588.00 16.00

EA LUMP SUM MONTHS SF MONTHS DAYS MONTHS SF MONTHS

16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 6.93 16.00 34.64 16.00 69.28 16.00 0 16.00 0 16.00 69.28 16.00 0 16.00 6.93 16.00 13.86 16.00 0.40 16.00

MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS WKS MONTHS WKS MONTHS WKS MONTHS WKS MONTHS WKS MONTHS WKS MONTHS WKS MONTHS WKS MONTHS WKS MONTHS % MONTHS

16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00

MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS

$ 310.00 $ 500.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 0.10 $ 12,000.00 $ 17.28 $ 210.00 $ 0.17 $ 150.00

$ 21,476.80 $ 500.00 $ 400,000.00 $ 14,258.80 $ 192,000.00 $ $ 5,985.79 3,360.00 $ 24,239.96 $ 2,400.00

$ 100.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 250.00 TOTAL BUILDING CLEANING $ 4,000.00 $ 66,461.35 $ 285.00 $ 4,560.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 2,692.31 $ 736.10 $ $ 18,652.31 11,777.60 $ 1,923.08 66,615.38 $ 220.83 $ $ 3,533.28 $ 1,634.62 113,246.15 $ 166.00 $ $ 2,656.00 $ 1,634.62 ‐ $ 110.00 $ $ 1,760.00 $ 1,442.31 ‐ $ 50.00 $ $ 800.00 $ 961.54 66,615.38 $ 55.00 $ $ 880.00 $ 961.54 ‐ $ 40.00 $ $ 640.00 $ 1,730.77 11,990.77 $ 600.00 $ $ 9,600.00 $ 1,346.15 18,652.31 $ 105.00 $ $ 1,680.00 $ 295,772.31 118,308.92 $ 85.00 $ $ 1,360.00 $ 220.00 $ 3,520.00 TOTAL OFFICE MANAGEMENT LABOR $ 130.00 $ 2,080.00 $ 414,081.23 $ 119.00 $ 1,904.00 $ 205.00 $ 3,280.00 TOTAL GENERAL CONDITIONS $ 1,879,899.05 TOTAL STANDARD FIELD COSTS $ 677,390.88

1.030 TEMPORARY LIGHT & POWER Service Distribution Energy Consumption BY OWNER

1.00 142588.00

LUMP SUM SF SF

$ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 0.65 $ 92,682.20 $ 0.15 BY OWNER

PROJECT ESTIMATE DETAIL

Cost Estimate - Option A (continued)Tarleton State University ‐ Fort Worth $ 54,912,064.68

2.000 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.200 Site Clearing

385.11 COUNT

UNIT OF MEASURE

IN 31.00

UNIT COST

SUBTOTAL

TOTAL

$ 35,000.00 IN 31.00 TOTAL EXISTING CONDITIONS $ ‐

3.000 CONCRETE 3.110 Foundations ‐ Drilled Piers 3.110 Foundations ‐ Stem Wall 3.110 Foundations ‐ Pier Caps 3.110 Foundations ‐ Slab‐on‐Grade 3.110 Foundations ‐ Formwork 3.200 Foundations‐ Reinforcing Steel 3.350 Foundations ‐ Finishing 3.310 Structure ‐ Columns 3.310 Structure ‐ Beams (Two‐Way) 3.310 Structure ‐ Elevated Slab 3.310 Structure ‐ Roof Lid 3.110 Structure ‐ Formwork 3.200 Structure ‐ Reinforcing Steel 3.350 Structure ‐ Finishing 3.700 Misc. Vaults 3.700 Parking Lots 3.700 Site Roads (Phase ‐ 1 Only) 3.700 Curb & Gutter 3.700 Sidewalks (Phase ‐ 1 Only) 3.110 Concrete Access. (Lumber, Chairs, Stirrups, Dowels) 3.110 Concrete Access. (Hoisting and Pumping) 3.400 Precast Concrete Cladding

792 142 40 1,760 47,529 24.72 47,529 299 1,760 5,281 880 142,588 14.43 142,588 1.00 34,760 28,944 3,447 2451 1.00 142,588.00 NONE

LF CY EA CY SF TN SF CY CY CY CY SF TN SF LS SF SF SF SF LS SF SF

$ 51.00 $ 145.00 $ 1,550.00 $ 155.00 $ 14.00 $ 2,550.00 $ 5.55 $ 205.00 $ 205.00 $ 188.00 $ 205.00 $ 15.66 $ 2,550.00 $ 9.10 $ 5,500.00 $ 9.33 $ 11.22 $ 15.67 $ 5.10 $ 163,893.82 $ 0.85 $ 46.50

$ 40,399.93 $ 20,606.19 $ 61,392.06 $ 272,853.58 $ 665,410.67 $ 63,025.53 $ 263,787.80 $ 61,348.05 $ 360,870.86 $ 992,834.96 $ 180,435.43 $ 2,232,928.08 $ 36,808.83 $ 1,297,550.80 $ 5,500.00 $ 324,310.80 $ 324,751.68 $ 54,010.57 $ 12,501.63 $ 163,893.82 $ 121,199.80 NONE TOTAL CONCRETE

4.000 4.100 4.200 4.251 4.402 4.466

MASONRY Concrete Masonry Unit (Interiors) Face Brick (Façade) Cut Stone (Façade) Masonry Accessories (Grout, Wall Ties, Liners) Hoisting, Lifting, Scaffolding

2,446.10 16,144.24 6,359.85 1.00 1.00

SF SF SF LS LS

$ 18.75 $ 41.00 $ 48.00 $ 101,305.12 $ 111,435.63

$ 7,556,421.08

$ 45,864.32 $ 661,913.91 $ 305,272.94 $ 101,305.12 $ 111,435.63 TOTAL MASONRY $ 1,225,791.92

3.700 3.700 3.110 3.110 3.400

Curb & Gutter Sidewalks (Phase ‐ 1 Only) Concrete Access. (Lumber, Chairs, Stirrups, Dowels) Concrete Access. (Hoisting and Pumping) Precast Concrete Cladding

3,447 2451 1.00 142,588.00 NONE

SF SF LS SF SF

$ 15.67 $ 5.10 $ 163,893.82 $ 0.85 $ 46.50

Cost Estimate - Option A (continued) 4.000 4.100 4.200 4.251 4.402 4.466

MASONRY Concrete Masonry Unit (Interiors) Face Brick (Façade) Cut Stone (Façade) Masonry Accessories (Grout, Wall Ties, Liners) Hoisting, Lifting, Scaffolding

$ 54,010.57 $ 12,501.63 $ 163,893.82 $ 121,199.80 NONE TOTAL CONCRETE

2,446.10 16,144.24 6,359.85 1.00 1.00

SF SF SF LS LS

$ 18.75 $ 41.00 $ 48.00 $ 101,305.12 $ 111,435.63

$ 7,556,421.08

$ 45,864.32 $ 661,913.91 $ 305,272.94 $ 101,305.12 $ 111,435.63 TOTAL MASONRY $ 1,225,791.92

5.000 5.350 5.450 5.450

METALS Metal Pan Stairs and Handrail Misc. Structural Steel ‐ Bldg Misc. Metal Items (Connections and mending plates)

300.00 78.42 1.00

TR TN LS

$ 310.00 $ 93,000.00 $ 3,100.00 $ 243,112.54 $ 33,611.25 $ 33,611.25 TOTAL METALS

6.000 6.133 6.132 6.131 6.130 6.128 6.128 6.127

WOODS, PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES Roof Blocking In‐Wall Blocking Counters ‐ (Work Station, Desk Type) Casework ‐Storage Cabinets (Non‐Laboratory) Moldings/Trims Moldings/Trims ‐ Atrium Finishes Misc. Carpentry Items (Nails, Adhesives, Etc.)

1,151.10 2,877.76 360.00 240.00 2,877.76 9,505.87 1.00

LF LF LF LF LF SF LS

$ 14.50 $ 1.38 188.00 281.00 $ 3.10 $ 16.50 $ 4,117.22

$ 16,691.02 $ 3,956.92 $ 67,680.00 $ 67,440.00 $ 8,921.06 $ 156,846.80 $ 4,117.22 TOTAL CARPENTRY

7.000 7.010 7.245 7.481 7.716 7.952 7.764 7.764

THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION 3‐Ply Built‐Up Roofing (Refl. Coatings R‐13) ‐ Bldg Sheet Metal Work (Copings & Fenestrations) Dens Glass Wall Sheathing (Double‐Sided) Caulk and Sealants (incl. fire caulk) Insulation (Batt, Rolled, Blown) Waterproofing ‐ Glazing Joints Waterproofing at sub‐grade

47,529.33 7,129.40 39,137.56 1.00 142,588.00 1.00 15,348.06

SF LF SF LS SF LS SF

$ 9.88 $ 26.50 $ 4.05 $ 114,070.40 $ 0.60 19,568.78 $ 12.30

$ 369,723.79

$ 325,653.02

$ 469,589.81 $ 188,929.10 $ 158,507.10 $ 114,070.40 $ 85,552.80 $ 19,568.78 $ 188,781.15

TOTAL THERMAL AND MOSITURE PRO. $ 1,224,999.14 8.000 OPENINGS 8.234 Storefront Glazing @ Grade Entrance ‐ Bldg

5,381.41

$ 36.00 $ 193,730.90

7.716 7.952 7.764 7.764

Caulk and Sealants (incl. fire caulk) Insulation (Batt, Rolled, Blown) Waterproofing ‐ Glazing Joints Waterproofing at sub‐grade

1.00 142,588.00 1.00 15,348.06

LS SF LS SF

OPENINGS Storefront Glazing @ Grade Entrance ‐ Bldg Glass Entry Doors (Throughout) Vestibule Glazing Curtainwall ‐ Atrium (Framing, Glazing, Tinting) Punched Windows (Aluminum) Interior Glazing (Vision lites) Mirrors 6080 (Bathrooms) 3070 Wood Doors 3070 Hollow Metal Doors 6070 Hollow Metal Doors 3070 Hollow Metal Door Frames 6070 Hollow Metal Door Frames Door Hardware (Handset, Hinges, Closers) Door Stocking on Floors

$ 114,070.40 $ 85,552.80 $ 19,568.78 $ 188,781.15

TOTAL THERMAL AND MOSITURE PRO. $ 1,224,999.14

Cost Estimate - Option A (continued) 8.000 8.234 8.235 8.670 8.364 8.365 8.475 8.540 8.606 8.671 8.737 8.868 8.868 8.933 8.933

$ 114,070.40 $ 0.60 19,568.78 $ 12.30

5,381.41 SF 5.00 EA 2,150.00 SF 7,338.29 SF PROJECT DETAIL 3,913.76 SF 635.00 SF 16.00 EA 237.65 EA 95.06 EA 83.88 EA 332.71 EA 83.88 EA 416.58 EA 416.58 EA

$ 36.00 $ 3,100.00 $ 34.00 $ 98.00 $ 36.00 $ 22.00 $ 400.00 $ 310.00 $ 288.00 $ 770.00 $ 375.00 $ 410.00 $ 385.00 $ 25.00

$ 193,730.90 $ 15,500.00 $ 73,100.00 $ 719,152.59 $ 140,895.20 $ 13,970.00 $ 6,400.00 $ 73,670.47 $ 27,376.90 $ 64,583.98 $ 124,764.50 $ 34,388.87 $ 160,383.54 $ 10,414.52 TOTAL OPENINGS $ 1,658,331.46

9.000 9.010 9.010 9.112 9.215 9.317 9.419 9.522 9.624 9.624 9.828 9.931 9.931 9.920 9.843 9.755 9.668 9.580 9.881 9.881

FINISHES Perimeter Framing (Exterior Knee Wall) Interior Framing (Shaft Walls) Light Gauge Metal Framing (Interior Partitions) Light Gauge Metal Framing @ (Ceilings) Drywall Sheeting (Single Layer) Drywall Sheeting (Double Layer) Tape and Float GWB Painting ‐ Walls (Primer + Finish) Painting ‐ Misc. (Primer + Finish) Ceramic Wall Tile Ceramic Floor Tile Ceramic Base Tile Terrazzo Flooring ‐ Vestibule (Includes Prep, Level, Grind and Se Vinyl Composition Tile (VCT) Vinyl Composition Base (VCB) Acoustic Tile Ceiling (Class I) Acoustic Tile Ceiling (Class II) Carpet Tile @ Offices Misc. Finish Items

12,230.49 21,110.00 28,777.61 28,517.60 58,913.21 22,432.34 65,076.43 65,076.43 6,507.64 6,936.80 21,388.20 2,138.82 3,564.70 85,552.80 6,395.03 28,517.60 57,035.20 1,584.31 1.00

SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF LF SF SF LF SF SF SY LS

$ 12.50 $ 9.87 $ 7.66 $ 8.90 $ 1.20 $ 2.10 $ 0.65 $ 0.80 $ 1.20 $ 6.88 $ 6.35 $ 9.20 $ 25.60 $ 4.30 $ 3.10 $ 4.10 $ 3.88 $ 38.00 $ 21,359.88

$ 152,881.08 $ 208,292.37 $ 220,436.53 $ 253,806.64 $ 70,695.85 $ 47,107.91 $ 42,299.68 $ 52,061.15 $ 7,809.17 $ 47,725.18 $ 135,815.07 $ 19,677.14 $ 91,256.32 $ 367,877.04 $ 19,824.58 $ 116,922.16 $ 221,296.58 $ 60,203.82 $ 21,359.88 TOTAL FINISHES $ 2,157,348.15

52 10.000 SPECIALTIES 10.345 Visual Display Boards ‐ Whiteboards

47.53

$ 1,550.00 $ 73,670.47

Page 1

9.755 9.668 9.580 9.881 9.881

Vinyl Composition Base (VCB) Acoustic Tile Ceiling (Class I) Acoustic Tile Ceiling (Class II) Carpet Tile @ Offices Misc. Finish Items

6,395.03 28,517.60 57,035.20 1,584.31 1.00

LF SF SF SY LS

$ 3.10 $ 4.10 $ 3.88 $ 38.00 $ 21,359.88

Cost Estimate - Option A (continued) 10.000 10.345 10.421 10.223 10.208 10.208 10.086 10.025

SPECIALTIES Visual Display Boards ‐ Whiteboards Projection Screens ‐ Motorized Louvers and Vents Corner Guards Pest Control ‐ Termite Treatment Lockers ‐ Two Tier (Louvered fronts) Toilet Specialties

$ 19,824.58 $ 116,922.16 $ 221,296.58 $ 60,203.82 $ 21,359.88 TOTAL FINISHES $ 2,157,348.15

47.53 23.76 6.00 NONE 47,529.33 40.00 9.00

EA EA EA EA SF EA EA

$ 1,550.00 $ 3,110.00 $ 1,850.00 $ 31.00 $ 0.12 $ 385.00 $ 3,100.00

$ 73,670.47 $ 73,908.11 $ 11,100.00 NONE $ 5,703.52 $ 15,400.00 $ 27,900.00 TOTAL SPECIALTIES

11.000 EQUIPMENT 11.032 Equipment ‐ CFCI 11.032 Equipment ‐ CFCI Labor

1.00 1.00

LS LS

$ 207,682.10

$ 400,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 TOTAL EQUIPMENT $ 500,000.00

12.000 FURNISHINGS ‐ (FURNISHINGS AND EQUIP ‐ ALLOWANCE)

TOTAL FURNISHINGS $ ‐ 13.000 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 13.000 Lightning Protection (Whole Building)

IN 26.01

$ ‐

IN 26.01

TOTAL SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION $ ‐ 14.000 14.000 14.000 14.000

CONVEYING EQUIPMENT Traction Elevator ‐ Passenger Traction Elevator ‐ Freight (Penthouse Inc) Cab Finish Allowance

2.00 1.00 2.00

EA EA EA

$ 270,000.00 $ 540,000.00 $ 440,000.00 $ 440,000.00 $ 8,500.00 $ 17,000.00 TOTAL CONVEYING EQUIPMENT $ 997,000.00

21.000 21.344 21.345 21.346

FIRE SUPRESSION Upright Piping Branch Piping Pendant Heads

142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00

SF SF SF

PROJECT DETAIL

$ 0.88 $ 125,477.44 $ 0.50 $ 71,294.00 $ 0.70 $ 99,811.60 53 Page 2

14.000 14.000 14.000 14.000

CONVEYING EQUIPMENT Traction Elevator ‐ Passenger Traction Elevator ‐ Freight (Penthouse Inc) Cab Finish Allowance

2.00 1.00 2.00

EA EA EA

Cost Estimate - Option A (continued) 21.000 21.344 21.345 21.346 21.300 21.301 21.288

FIRE SUPRESSION Upright Piping Branch Piping Pendant Heads Hangers and Misc. Connections Break Tank Fire Pump

$ 270,000.00 $ 540,000.00 $ 440,000.00 $ 440,000.00 $ 8,500.00 $ 17,000.00 TOTAL CONVEYING EQUIPMENT $ 997,000.00

142,588.00 SF 142,588.00 SF 142,588.00 SF 142,588.00 SF 142,588.00 SF 142,588.00 SF PROJECT DETAIL

$ 0.88 $ 0.50 $ 0.70 $ 0.08 $ 0.25 $ 0.66

$ 125,477.44 $ 71,294.00 $ 99,811.60 $ 11,407.04 $ 35,647.00 $ 94,108.08

Page 2

TOTAL FIRE SUPRESSION $ 437,745.16 22.000 22.000 22.000 22.000 22.000 21.000 22.000

PLUMBING Plumbing Systems ‐ Domestic Water Plumbing Systems ‐ Storm Drain (Building) Plumbing Systems ‐ Natural Gas Piping Plumbing Systems ‐ Fixtures and Drains Plumbing Systems ‐ Insulation Plumbing Systems ‐ Misc. Items

142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 1.00

SF SF SF SF SF SF

$ 11.33 $ 2.10 $ 1.10 $ 3.10 $ 0.88 $ 55,000.00

$ 1,615,522.04 $ 299,434.80 $ 156,846.80 $ 442,022.80 $ 125,477.44 $ 55,000.00

TOTAL PLUMBING $ 2,694,303.88 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000

HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING HVAC Systems ‐ Galvanized Duct and Acces. HVAC Systems ‐ (RTU's) HVAC Systems ‐ Fan Powered and VAV Boxes HVAC Systems ‐ Heating and Chilled Water Piping HVAC Systems ‐ Air Handling and Fan Coil Units HVAC Systems ‐ Exahaust Supply and Intakes HVAC Systems ‐ Vibration Isolation HVAC Systems ‐ Insulation HVAC Systems ‐ Controls HVAC Systems ‐ Fire Caulking HVAC Systems ‐ Misc.

142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 1.00

SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF LS

$ 4.10 $ 9.20 $ 3.10 $ 5.50 $ 4.22 $ 1.88 $ 0.90 $ 0.66 $ 4.33 $ 0.33 $ 121,984.03

$ 584,610.80 $ 1,311,809.60 $ 442,022.80 $ 784,234.00 $ 601,721.36 $ 268,065.44 $ 128,329.20 $ 94,108.08 $ 617,406.04 $ 47,054.04 $ 121,984.03

TOTAL HVAC 26.000 26.000 5426.000 26.000

ELECTRICAL Electrical Systems ‐ Primary Electrical Systems ‐ Secondary Electrical Systems ‐ House Panels

142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00

SF SF SF

$ 6.44 $ 918,266.72 $ 5.33 $ 759,994.04 $ 3.20 $ 456,281.60

$ 5,001,345.39

23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000

HVAC Systems ‐ Insulation HVAC Systems ‐ Controls HVAC Systems ‐ Fire Caulking HVAC Systems ‐ Misc.

142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 1.00

SF SF SF LS

$ 0.66 $ 4.33 $ 0.33 $ 121,984.03

Cost Estimate - Option A (continued) 26.000 26.000 26.000 26.000 26.000 26.000 26.000 26.000 26.000 26.000

ELECTRICAL Electrical Systems ‐ Primary Electrical Systems ‐ Secondary Electrical Systems ‐ House Panels Electrical Systems ‐ Fire Alarm Electrical Systems ‐ Lighting Electrical Systems ‐ Metering and Sub‐Panels Electrical Systems ‐ Lightning Protection Electrical Systems ‐ HVAC Power Electrical Systems ‐ Misc

$ 94,108.08 $ 617,406.04 $ 47,054.04 $ 121,984.03

TOTAL HVAC

142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 1.00

SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF LS

$ 6.44 $ 5.33 $ 3.20 $ 1.88 $ 5.55 $ 3.99 $ 1.20 $ 0.44 $ 99,918.54

$ 918,266.72 $ 759,994.04 $ 456,281.60 $ 268,065.44 $ 791,363.40 $ 568,926.12 $ 171,105.60 $ 62,738.72 $ 99,918.54

TOTAL ELECTRICAL 27.000 COMMUNICATIONS 27.000 Tele‐communications ‐ Whole Building Program

1.00

$ 5,001,345.39

$ 4,096,660.18

$ 427,764.00 $ 427,764.00 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS $ 427,764.00

28.000 ELECTRONIC SAFETY AND SECURITY 28.000 Safety and Security‐Turnkey

1.00

$ 313,693.60 $ 313,693.60 TOTAL SAFETY AND SECURITY

31.000 31.102 31.103 31.104 31.104 31.104 31.222

EARTHWORK Site Clearing (Whole Site‐ Rough) Site Clearing (Phase‐1 Final) Mass Grading (Phase ‐ 1 Cut‐n‐Fill) Building Pad (Phase‐1) Parking Lots final grade (Phase ‐1) Site Roads final grade (Phase ‐1)

FUTURE 592,995 32,944 2724 2317 2746

SF SF CY CY CY CY

$ 0.15 $ 0.30 $ 14.66 $ 12.33 $ 12.33 $ 12.33

FUTURE $ 177,898.50 $ 482,961.48 $ 33,582.81 $ 28,568.61 $ 33,861.61 TOTAL EARTHWORK

32.000 32.100 32.200 32.300 32.400

EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS Site Signage Stripping and directionals Landscaping Hardscaping

1 1 1 1

AL AL AL AL

$ 313,693.60

$ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 12,300.00 $ 12,300.00 $ 225,000.00 $ 225,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00

$ 756,873.01

31.000 31.102 31.103 31.104 31.104 31.104 31.222

Cost Estimate - Option A (continued)

FUTURE 592,995 32,944 2724 2317 2746

SF SF CY CY CY CY

$ 0.15 $ 0.30 $ 14.66 $ 12.33 $ 12.33 $ 12.33

FUTURE $ 177,898.50 $ 482,961.48 $ 33,582.81 $ 28,568.61 $ 33,861.61 TOTAL EARTHWORK

32.000 32.100 32.200 32.300 32.400

EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS Site Signage Stripping and directionals Landscaping Hardscaping

1 1 1 1

AL AL AL AL

$ 756,873.01

$ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 12,300.00 $ 12,300.00 $ 225,000.00 $ 225,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 TOTAL EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS $ 327,300.00

33.000 UTILITIES 33.450 33.450 33.450 33.450 33.450 33.450 33.220 33.220 33.143 33.001 33.061 33.012 32.964 33.964 32.915

H20 pipe 8" H20 pipe 12" WW pipe 8" STM pipe 24" STM pipe 30" STM pipe 36" STM pipe 42" STM pipe 54" Box Culverts Inlets Manholes Tele Data Infrastructure Allowance Electrical Service ‐ Underground + Transformer Electrical Service ‐ Transformer Light Pole/Lights/Standards

2,407 LF 2,429 LF 1,490 LF PROJECT DETAIL 840 LF 460 LF 601.5 LF 579 LF 132 LF 3 EA 9 EA 21 EA 1000 LF 521 LF 1 LS 1 AL

$ 61.00 $ 146,811.75 $ 75.00 $ 182,193.75 $ 63.00 $ 93,885.75 $ 55.00 $ 46,200.00 $ 57.88 $ 26,610.33 $ 65.33 $ 39,296.00 $ 71.89 $ 41,624.31 $ 112.33 $ 14,827.56 $ 5,100.00 $ 15,300.00 $ 3,977.00 $ 35,793.00 $ 3,465.00 $ 72,765.00 $ 67.33 $ 67,330.00 $ 71.22 $ 37,105.62 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 TOTAL UTILITIES $ 969,743.07

47.000 FUTURE EXPANSION 47.001 Central Utility Plant‐Turnkey

NONE

$ ‐

NONE

TOTAL FUTURE EXPANSION $ ‐

Page 3

2/17/2015

Cost Estimate - Option A (continued) PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY (CCL)

2/17/2015

Tarleton State University ‐ Fort Worth WHOLE PROGRAM

PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY (CCL) Tarleton State University ‐ Fort Worth WHOLE PROGRAM

142588 CSI DIVISION FIELD COSTS 1.000 General Conditions 142588 2.000 Existing Conditions CSI DIVISION 3.000 Concrete FIELD COSTS 4.000 Masonry 1.000 General Conditions 5.000 Metals 2.000 Existing Conditions 6.000 Wood, Plastics, and Composites 3.000 Concrete 7.000 Thermal and Moisture Protection 4.000 Masonry 8.000 Openings 5.000 Metals 9.000 Finishes 6.000 Wood, Plastics, and Composites 10.000 Specialties 7.000 Thermal and Moisture Protection 11.000 Equipment 8.000 Openings 12.000 Furnishings (Contractor Fixed ‐ Allowance) 9.000 Finishes 13.000 Special Construction 10.000 Specialties 14.000 Conveying Equipment 11.000 Equipment 21.000 Fire Suppression 12.000 Furnishings (Contractor Fixed ‐ Allowance) 22.000 Plumbing 13.000 Special Construction 23.000 Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning 14.000 Conveying Equipment 26.000 Electrical 21.000 Fire Suppression 27.000 Communications 22.000 Plumbing 28.000 Electronic Safety and Security 23.000 Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning 31.000 Earthwork 26.000 Electrical 32.000 Exterior Improvements 27.000 Communications 33.000 Utilities 28.000 Electronic Safety and Security 47.000 Misc. Central Utility Plant 31.000 Earthwork SUBTOTAL (PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COSTS) 32.000 Exterior Improvements CONTRACTORS FEES + INSURANCE 33.000 Utilities General Contractor Fees 47.000 Misc. Central Utility Plant Contractor Construction Contingency SUBTOTAL (PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COSTS) Insurances CONTRACTORS FEES + INSURANCE Payment and Performance Bond General Contractor Fees SUBTOTAL (CONTRACTORS FEES + INSURANCE) Contractor Construction Contingency PROJECT TOTALInsurances Payment and Performance Bond

7.00% 5.00% 2.00% 1.50% 7.00% 5.00% 2.00% 15.50% 1.50%

SUBTOTAL (CONTRACTORS FEES + INSURANCE) PROJECT TOTAL

15.50%

TOTAL DIVISION COST

COST/SF

% COST

$ 1,879,899 $ ‐ TOTAL DIVISION COST $ 7,556,421 $ 1,225,792 $ 1,879,899 $ 369,724 $ ‐ $ 325,653 $ 7,556,421 $ 1,224,999 $ 1,225,792 $ 1,658,331 $ 369,724 $ 2,157,348 $ 325,653 $ 207,682 $ 1,224,999 $ 500,000 $ 1,658,331 $ ‐ $ 2,157,348 $ ‐ $ 207,682 $ 997,000 $ 500,000 $ 437,745 $ ‐ $ 2,694,304 $ ‐ $ 5,001,345 $ 997,000 $ 4,096,660 $ 437,745 $ 427,764 $ 2,694,304 $ 313,694 $ 5,001,345 $ 756,873 $ 4,096,660 $ 327,300 $ 427,764 $ 969,743 $ 313,694 $ ‐ $ 756,873 $ 33,128,278 $ 327,300 $ 969,743 $ 2,318,979 $ ‐ $ 33,128,278 1,656,414 $ $ 662,566 $ 496,924 $ 2,318,979 $ 1,656,414 5,134,883 $

$ 13.18 $ ‐ COST/SF $ 52.99 $ 8.60 $ 13.18 $ 2.59 $ ‐ $ 2.28 $ 52.99 $ 8.59 $ 8.60 $ 11.63 $ 2.59 $ 15.13 $ 2.28 $ 1.46 $ 8.59 $ 3.51 $ 11.63 $ ‐ $ 15.13 $ ‐ $ 1.46 $ 6.99 $ 3.51 $ 3.07 $ ‐ $ 18.90 $ ‐ $ 35.08 $ 6.99 $ 28.73 $ 3.07 $ 3.00 $ 18.90 $ 2.20 $ 35.08 $ 5.31 $ 28.73 $ 2.30 $ 3.00 $ 6.80 $ 2.20 $ ‐ $ 5.31 $ 232.34 $ 2.30 $ 6.80 $ 16.26 $ ‐ $ 232.34 11.62 $ $ 4.65 $ 3.49 $ 16.26 $ 11.62 36.01 $

4.91% 0.00% % COST 19.75% 3.20% 4.91% 0.97% 0.00% 0.85% 19.75% 3.20% 3.20% 4.33% 0.97% 5.64% 0.85% 0.54% 3.20% 1.31% 4.33% 0.00% 5.64% 0.00% 0.54% 2.61% 1.31% 1.14% 0.00% 7.04% 0.00% 13.07% 2.61% 10.71% 1.14% 1.12% 7.04% 0.82% 13.07% 1.98% 10.71% 0.86% 1.12% 2.53% 0.82% 0.00% 1.98% 86.58% 0.86% 2.53% 6.06% 0.00% 4.33% 86.58% 1.73% 1.30% 6.06% 13.42% 4.33%

$ 662,566 $ 4.65 $ 38,263,161 $ 268.35 $ 496,924 $ 3.49

1.73% 100.00% 1.30%

$ 5,134,883 $ 36.01

13.42%

$ 38,263,161 $ 268.35

100.00%

Competitive Sealed Proposals (CSP) Delivery Method Schedule Tarleton State â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Fort Worth Mulitpurpose Academic Building Tarleton State University Broaddus Planning

Project Schedule - Option B

February 17, 2015

The following schedule illustrates a longer timeframe than the previous schedule (Option A). Option B shows owner occupancy in August of 2019.

Schedule Milestone

Date

Legislative Funding Approved

June 2015

BOR Approval

9/4/15

Project Added to Capital Plan with Approvals

11/13/15

Issue A/E RFQ

3/01/16

RFQ Due

3/24/16

Develop A/E Shortlist

4/06/16

A/E Interviews

4/19/16

Chancellor Approval of Ranked Order

5/9/16

Execute A/E Agreement

6/06/16

Design Initiation Meeting

6/9/16

SD Due

9/15/16

100% DD Due

12/15/16

THECB Application Due

5/4/17

100% CD Due

7/20/17

Advertise for CSP

8/10/17

Receive CSP

9/07/17

CSP Evaluation

9/19/17

BOR Construction Approval

11/03/17

Chancellor Approval of Ranked Order

11/10/17

Begin Construction (notice to proceed)

1/04/18

Construction Substantially Complete

5/03/19

Owner Occupancy

August 2019

142588

TOTAL PROJECT SUMMARY (TPC) Tarleton State University ‐ Fort Worth WHOLE PROGRAM

Cost Estimate - Option B Line Item Total $ 41,333,460 $ 6,406,686

1 Project Construction Costs 2 Contractors Fees + Insurance 3

CONSTRUCTION COST LIMITATION (CCL)

4 Professional Fees: (a) A/E Basic Services Fees (6.0% of CCL) (b) A/E Additional Services Fees (1.5% of CCL) (c) Planning and Programming Fee ‐ Full Master Plan (1.0%) 5 Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment (a) FF&E Allowance @ 5% (b) Equipment (Owner Furnished Owner Installed) 6 Other Work, Institution Managed (a) Instructional Technology ($1.00 per GSF) (b) Moving Expenses (1.5% of CCL) (c) Informational Technology 7 Miscellaneous Expenses (a) Voice/Data Misc. Equipment (0.5% of CCL) (b) Testing & Commissioning (1.0% of CCL) (c) Owner's Other Costs (0.75% of CCL) (d) Municipal Fees (0.75% of CCL) 8 Project Contingency (a) Owner Construction Contingency (5.0% of CCL) (b) Owner Project Contingency (5.0% of CCL)

Project Total

% of CCL 87% 13%

% of TPC 63% 10%

$ 47,740,146

100%

72%

$ 4,057,401

8.50% 6.00% 1.50% 1.00% 7.50% 5.00%

6% 4% 1% 1% 5% 4%

$ 2,711,550

5.68% 0.30% 1.50%

4% 0% 1%

$ 1,432,000

3.00% 0.50% 1.00% 0.75%

2% 0% 1% 1%

$ 4,774,000

10.00% 5.00% 5.00%

7% 4% 4%

$ 2,864,000 $ 716,000 $ 477,401 $ 3,580,511 $ 2,387,007 $ 1,193,504 $ 143,000 $ 716,000 $ 1,852,550 $ $ $ $

239,000 477,000 358,000 358,000

$ 2,387,000 $ 2,387,000

SUBTOTAL OWNER COSTS

$ 16,555,000

34.68%

25%

SUBTOTAL (CCL + OWNER'S COST)

$ 64,295,146

134.68%

97%

$ 1,703,821.37

3.57%

$ 65,999,000

138.25%

100%

$ 75,898,850

158.98%

115%

11 Project Management Fee @ 2.65% 12

TOTAL PROJECT COST (TPC) 2015 DOLLARS

$ 16,174,046 Backfill

Construction Cost per GSF Construction Cost per ASF Total Project Cost per GSF Total Project Cost per ASF

99,812 142,588 NONE $334.81 $478.30 $532.29 $661.24

Delta

Cost Estimate - Option B (continued) GENERAL CONDITIONS

Tarleton State University ‐ Fort Worth 0.100 PROJECT DURATION

MONTHS WEEKS SHIFT WORK WEEK

18.00 77.94 8.00 1.00 COUNT

77.94 77.94 38.97 0.00 0.00 38.97 0.00 15.59 77.94 0.00 0.40

UNIT OF MEASURE

UNIT COST

SUBTOTAL

WKS WKS WKS WKS WKS WKS WKS WKS WKS WKS %

$ 2,884.62 $ 2,019.23 $ 1,346.15 $ 1,346.15 $ 1,346.15 $ 1,153.85 $ 1,153.85 $ 1,250.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 274,288.85

$ 224,826.92 $ 157,378.85 $ 52,459.62 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 44,965.38 $ ‐ $ 19,485.00 $ 97,425.00 $ ‐ $ 109,715.54

TOTAL

TOTAL FIELD MANAGEMENT $ 706,256.31

16.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00

MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS

$ 25,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 210.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 250.00 $ 285.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 828.11 $ 248.43 $ 166.00 $ 110.00 $ 50.00 $ 55.00 $ 40.00 $ 600.00 $ 105.00 $ 85.00 $ 220.00 $ 130.00

$ 400,000.00 $ 216,000.00 $ 3,780.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 5,130.00 $ 27,000.00 $ 14,906.03 $ 4,471.81 $ 2,988.00 $ 1,980.00 $ 900.00 $ 990.00 $ 720.00 $ 10,800.00 $ 1,890.00 $ 1,530.00 $ 3,960.00 $ 2,340.00

Survey Equipment Job Signs Temporary Fence/Barricades City Project Support Temporary Toilets Temporary Water Temporary Utilities Furniture Rentals Postage Progress Photos Survey (2‐man crew) OSHA Requirements First Aid Blueprinting Field Phones Field Fax Field Internet Field Travel

Cost Estimate - Option B (continued)

18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00

MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS MONTHS

$ 100.00 $ 250.00 $ 285.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 828.11 $ 248.43 $ 166.00 $ 110.00 $ 50.00 $ 55.00 $ 40.00 $ 600.00 $ 105.00 $ 85.00 $ 220.00 $ 130.00 $ 119.00 $ 205.00

$ 1,800.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 5,130.00 $ 27,000.00 $ 14,906.03 $ 4,471.81 $ 2,988.00 $ 1,980.00 $ 900.00 $ 990.00 $ 720.00 $ 10,800.00 $ 1,890.00 $ 1,530.00 $ 3,960.00 $ 2,340.00 $ 2,142.00 $ 3,690.00

TOTAL STANDARD FIELD COSTS $ 714,217.83 1.030 TEMPORARY LIGHT & POWER Service Distribution Energy Consumption BY OWNER

1.00 142588.00

LUMP SUM SF SF

$ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 0.65 $ 92,682.20 $ 0.15 BY OWNER TOTAL TEMPORARY LIGHT & POWER $ 94,182.20

1.060 BUILDING CLEANING Dumpsters Equipment Glass Cleaning Daily Clean Final Clean

77.94 1.00 142588.00 389.70 142588.00

EA LUMP SUM SF DAYS SF

$ 310.00 $ 500.00 $ 0.10 $ 17.28 $ 0.17

$ 24,161.40 $ 500.00 $ 14,258.80 $ 6,734.02 $ 24,239.96 TOTAL BUILDING CLEANING $ 69,894.18

1.800 OFFICE MANAGEMENT LABOR

Project Executive Senior Project Mgr. Project Mgr. 1 Project Mgr. 2 Project Mgr. 3 Administrative Asst. Administrative Asst. Comptroller Accounting Labor Burden

7.79 38.97 77.94 0 0 77.94 0 7.79 15.59 0.40

WKS WKS WKS WKS WKS WKS WKS WKS WKS %

$ 2,692.31 $ 1,923.08 $ 1,634.62 $ 1,634.62 $ 1,442.31 $ 961.54 $ 961.54 $ 1,730.77 $ 1,346.15 $ 332,743.85

$ 20,983.85 $ 74,942.31 $ 127,401.92 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 74,942.31 $ ‐ $ 13,489.62 $ 20,983.85 $ 133,097.54

TOTAL OFFICE MANAGEMENT LABOR $ 465,841.38

TOTAL GENERAL CONDITIONS $ 2,050,391.90

Cost Estimate - Option B (continued)

PROJECT ESTIMATE DETAIL

Tarleton State University ‐ Fort Worth $ 54,912,064.68

2.000 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.200 Site Clearing 2.200 Water quality and SWPPP

385.11 COUNT

UNIT OF MEASURE

IN 31.00 1.00

LS LS

UNIT COST

SUBTOTAL

TOTAL

$ 35,000.00 IN 31.00 $ 65,000.00 $ 65,000.00 TOTAL EXISTING CONDITIONS $ 65,000.00

396 100 20 880 23,765 12.37 23,765 299 880 2,641 440 71,294 12.45 71,294 1.00 276,682 69,063 3,447 2451 1.00 142,588.00 NONE

LF CY EA CY SF TN SF CY CY CY CY SF TN SF LS SF SF SF SF LS SF SF

$ 51.00 $ 145.00 $ 1,550.00 $ 155.00 $ 14.00 $ 2,550.00 $ 5.55 $ 205.00 $ 205.00 $ 188.00 $ 205.00 $ 15.66 $ 2,550.00 $ 9.10 $ 5,500.00 $ 9.33 $ 11.22 $ 15.67 $ 5.10 $ 83,224.00 $ 0.85 $ 46.50

$ 20,199.97 $ 14,570.78 $ 30,696.03 $ 136,426.79 $ 332,705.33 $ 31,550.29 $ 131,893.90 $ 61,348.05 $ 180,435.43 $ 496,417.48 $ 90,217.72 $ 1,116,464.04 $ 31,758.84 $ 648,775.40 $ 5,500.00 $ 2,581,443.06 $ 774,881.25 $ 54,010.57 $ 12,501.63 $ 83,224.00 $ 121,199.80 NONE TOTAL CONCRETE

4.000 MASONRY 4.100 Concrete Masonry Unit (Interiors) 4.200 Face Brick (Façade)

3,459.30 22,831.41

SF SF

$ 18.75 $ 64,861.95 $ 41.00 $ 936,087.63

$ 6,956,220.36

3.700 3.700 3.110 3.110 3.400

Curb & Gutter Sidewalks (Phase ‐ 1 Only) Concrete Access. (Lumber, Chairs, Stirrups, Dowels) Concrete Access. (Hoisting and Pumping) Precast Concrete Cladding

3,447 2451 1.00 142,588.00 NONE

SF SF LS SF SF

$ 15.67 $ 5.10 $ 83,224.00 $ 0.85 $ 46.50

Cost Estimate - Option B (continued) 4.000 4.100 4.200 4.251 4.402 4.466

MASONRY Concrete Masonry Unit (Interiors) Face Brick (Façade) Cut Stone (Façade) Masonry Accessories (Grout, Wall Ties, Liners) Hoisting, Lifting, Scaffolding

$ 54,010.57 $ 12,501.63 $ 83,224.00 $ 121,199.80 NONE TOTAL CONCRETE

3,459.30 22,831.41 8,994.19 1.00 1.00

SF SF SF LS LS

$ 18.75 $ 41.00 $ 48.00 $ 143,267.07 $ 157,593.78

$ 6,956,220.36

$ 64,861.95 $ 936,087.63 $ 431,721.13 $ 143,267.07 $ 157,593.78 TOTAL MASONRY $ 1,733,531.56

5.000 5.350 5.450 5.450

METALS Metal Pan Stairs and Handrail Misc. Structural Steel ‐ Bldg Misc. Metal Items (Connections and mending plates)

600.00 221.01 1.00

TR TN LS

$ 310.00 $ 186,000.00 $ 3,100.00 $ 685,135.34 $ 87,113.53 $ 87,113.53 TOTAL METALS

6.000 6.133 6.132 6.131 6.130 6.128 6.128 6.127

813.95 4,069.77 720.00 480.00 2,034.88 9,505.87 1.00

LF LF LF LF LF SF LS

$ 14.50 $ 1.38 188.00 281.00 $ 3.10 $ 16.50 $ 7,348.66

$ 11,802.33 $ 5,595.93 $ 135,360.00 $ 134,880.00 $ 6,308.14 $ 156,846.80 $ 7,348.66 TOTAL CARPENTRY

7.000 7.010 7.245 7.481 7.716 7.952 7.764 7.764

23,764.67 3,564.70 55,348.86 1.00 142,588.00 1.00 20,348.85

SF LF SF LS SF LS SF

$ 11.55 $ 26.50 $ 6.10 $ 135,000.00 $ 0.60 55,348.86 $ 12.30

$ 958,248.87

$ 458,141.87

$ 274,481.90 $ 94,464.55 $ 337,628.06 $ 135,000.00 $ 85,552.80 $ 55,348.86 $ 250,290.81

TOTAL THERMAL AND MOSITURE PRO. $ 1,232,766.98 8.000 OPENINGS

7.245 7.481 7.716 7.952 7.764 7.764

Sheet Metal Work (Copings & Fenestrations) Dens Glass Wall Sheathing (Double‐Sided) Caulk and Sealants (incl. fire caulk) Insulation (Batt, Rolled, Blown) Waterproofing ‐ Glazing Joints Waterproofing at sub‐grade

3,564.70 55,348.86 1.00 142,588.00 1.00 20,348.85

LF SF LS SF LS SF

Cost Estimate - Option B (continued) 8.000 OPENINGS 8.234 Storefront Glazing @ Grade Entrance ‐ Bldg 8.235 Glass Entry Doors (Throughout) 8.670 Vestibule Glazing 8.364 Curtainwall ‐ Atrium (Framing, Glazing, Tinting) 8.365 Punched Windows (Aluminum) 8.475 Interior Glazing (Vision lites) 8.540 Mirrors 6080 (Bathrooms) 8.606 3070 Wood Doors 8.671 3070 Hollow Metal Doors 8.737 6070 Hollow Metal Doors 8.868 3070 Hollow Metal Door Frames 8.868 6070 Hollow Metal Door Frames 8.933 Door Hardware (Handset, Hinges, Closers) 8.933 Door Stocking on Floors

$ 26.50 $ 6.10 $ 135,000.00 $ 0.60 55,348.86 $ 12.30

$ 94,464.55 $ 337,628.06 $ 135,000.00 $ 85,552.80 $ 55,348.86 $ 250,290.81

TOTAL THERMAL AND MOSITURE PRO. $ 1,232,766.98

7,610.47 SF 5.00 EA 2,150.00 SF PROJECT DETAIL 10,377.91 SF 5,534.89 SF 635.00 SF 16.00 EA 237.65 EA 95.06 EA 83.88 EA 332.71 EA 83.88 EA 416.58 EA 416.58 EA

$ 36.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 34.00 $ 135.00 $ 36.00 $ 22.00 $ 400.00 $ 310.00 $ 288.00 $ 850.00 $ 435.00 $ 465.00 $ 433.00 $ 50.00

$ 273,976.87 $ 19,000.00 $ 73,100.00 $ 1,401,018.08 $ 199,255.90 $ 13,970.00 $ 6,400.00 $ 73,670.47 $ 27,376.90 $ 71,294.00 $ 144,726.82 $ 39,002.01 $ 180,379.41 $ 20,829.03 TOTAL OPENINGS $ 2,543,999.49

9.000 9.010 9.010 9.112 9.215 9.317 9.419 9.522 9.624 9.624 9.828 9.931 9.931 9.920 9.843 9.755 9.668 9.580 9.881 9.881

FINISHES Perimeter Framing (Exterior Knee Wall) 34,593.04 Interior Framing (Shaft Walls) 21,110.00 Light Gauge Metal Framing (Interior Partitions) 40,697.69 Light Gauge Metal Framing @ (Ceilings) 28,517.60 Drywall Sheeting (Single Layer) 81,196.92 Drywall Sheeting (Double Layer) 30,917.29 Tape and Float GWB 89,691.36 Painting ‐ Walls (Primer + Finish) 89,691.36 Painting ‐ Misc. (Primer + Finish) 8,969.14 Ceramic Wall Tile 6,936.80 Ceramic Floor Tile 21,388.20 Ceramic Base Tile 2,138.82 Terrazzo Flooring ‐ Vestibule/Atrium (Includes Prep, Level, Grind 1,782.35 Vinyl Composition Tile (VCT) 85,552.80 Vinyl Composition Base (VCB) 9,043.93 Acoustic Tile Ceiling (Class I) 28,517.60 Acoustic Tile Ceiling (Class II) 57,035.20 Carpet Tile @ Offices 1,584.31 Misc. Finish Items 1.00

SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF LF SF SF LF SF SF SY LS

$ 12.50 $ 9.87 $ 7.66 $ 8.90 $ 1.20 $ 2.10 $ 0.65 $ 0.80 $ 1.20 $ 6.88 $ 6.35 $ 9.20 $ 25.60 $ 4.30 $ 3.10 $ 4.10 $ 3.88 $ 38.00 $ 25,526.16

$ 432,412.99 $ 208,292.37 $ 311,744.33 $ 253,806.64 $ 97,436.30 $ 64,926.30 $ 58,299.39 $ 71,753.09 $ 10,762.96 $ 47,725.18 $ 135,815.07 $ 19,677.14 $ 45,628.16 $ 367,877.04 $ 28,036.19 $ 116,922.16 $ 221,296.58 $ 60,203.82 $ 25,526.16 TOTAL FINISHES $ 2,578,141.87

10.000 SPECIALTIES 10.345 Visual Display Boards ‐ Whiteboards

47.53

$ 1,550.00 $ 73,670.47

Page 1

9.755 9.668 9.580 9.881 9.881

Vinyl Composition Base (VCB) Acoustic Tile Ceiling (Class I) Acoustic Tile Ceiling (Class II) Carpet Tile @ Offices Misc. Finish Items

9,043.93 28,517.60 57,035.20 1,584.31 1.00

LF SF SF SY LS

$ 3.10 $ 4.10 $ 3.88 $ 38.00 $ 25,526.16

Cost Estimate - Option B (continued) 10.000 10.345 10.421 10.223 10.208 10.208 10.086 10.025

$ 28,036.19 $ 116,922.16 $ 221,296.58 $ 60,203.82 $ 25,526.16 TOTAL FINISHES $ 2,578,141.87

47.53 23.76 12.00 NONE 23,764.67 40.00 18.00

EA EA EA EA SF EA EA

$ 1,550.00 $ 3,110.00 $ 1,850.00 $ 31.00 $ 0.12 $ 385.00 $ 3,100.00

$ 73,670.47 $ 73,908.11 $ 22,200.00 NONE $ 2,851.76 $ 15,400.00 $ 55,800.00 TOTAL SPECIALTIES

11.000 EQUIPMENT 11.032 Equipment ‐ CFCI (ALLOWANCE) 11.032 Equipment ‐ CFCI Labor

1.00 1.00

LS LS

$ 243,830.34

$ 800,000.00 $ 800,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 TOTAL EQUIPMENT $ 1,000,000.00

12.000 FURNISHINGS ‐ (FURNISHINGS AND EQUIP ‐ ALLOWANCE) 12.000 Misc.

142,588.00

$ 5.00 $ 712,940.00

TOTAL FURNISHINGS $ 712,940.00 13.000 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 13.000 Lightning Protection (Whole Building)

IN 26.01

$ ‐

IN 26.01

TOTAL SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION $ ‐ 14.000 14.000 14.000 14.000

CONVEYING EQUIPMENT Traction Elevator ‐ Passenger Traction Elevator ‐ Freight (Penthouse Inc) Cab Finish Allowance

2.00 1.00 2.00

EA EA EA

$ 540,000.00 $ 1,080,000.00 $ 770,000.00 $ 770,000.00 $ 8,500.00 $ 17,000.00 TOTAL CONVEYING EQUIPMENT $ 1,867,000.00

21.000 FIRE SUPRESSION 21.344 Upright Piping

142,588.00

$ 0.88 $ 125,477.44 65

14.000 14.000 14.000 14.000

CONVEYING EQUIPMENT Traction Elevator ‐ Passenger Traction Elevator ‐ Freight (Penthouse Inc) Cab Finish Allowance

2.00 1.00 2.00

EA EA EA

Cost Estimate - Option B (continued) 21.000 FIRE SUPRESSION 21.344 Upright Piping 21.345 Branch Piping 21.346 Pendant Heads 21.300 Hangers and Misc. Connections 21.301 Break Tank 21.288 Fire Pump

$ 540,000.00 $ 1,080,000.00 $ 770,000.00 $ 770,000.00 $ 8,500.00 $ 17,000.00 TOTAL CONVEYING EQUIPMENT $ 1,867,000.00

142,588.00 SF 142,588.00 SF 142,588.00 SF 142,588.00 SF PROJECT DETAIL 142,588.00 SF 142,588.00 SF

$ 0.88 $ 0.50 $ 0.70 $ 0.08 $ 0.25 $ 0.66

$ 125,477.44 $ 71,294.00 $ 99,811.60 $ 11,407.04 $ 35,647.00 $ 94,108.08

Page 2

TOTAL FIRE SUPRESSION $ 437,745.16 22.000 22.000 22.000 22.000 22.000 21.000 22.000

142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 1.00

SF SF SF SF SF SF

$ 11.33 $ 2.10 $ 1.10 $ 3.10 $ 0.88 $ 55,000.00

$ 1,615,522.04 $ 299,434.80 $ 156,846.80 $ 442,022.80 $ 125,477.44 $ 55,000.00

TOTAL PLUMBING $ 2,694,303.88 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000

142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 1.00

SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF LS

$ 6.10 $ 11.20 $ 4.50 $ 6.50 $ 5.66 $ 2.65 $ 1.15 $ 1.33 $ 5.20 $ 0.88 $ 161,017.50

$ 869,786.80 $ 1,596,985.60 $ 641,646.00 $ 926,822.00 $ 807,048.08 $ 377,858.20 $ 163,976.20 $ 189,642.04 $ 741,457.60 $ 125,477.44 $ 161,017.50

TOTAL HVAC 26.000 ELECTRICAL

66 26.000 Electrical Systems ‐ Primary

26.000 Electrical Systems ‐ Secondary

142,588.00 142,588.00

SF SF

$ 8.33 $ 1,187,758.04 $ 6.55 $ 933,951.40

$ 6,601,717.46

23.000 23.000 23.000 23.000

HVAC Systems ‐ Insulation HVAC Systems ‐ Controls HVAC Systems ‐ Fire Caulking HVAC Systems ‐ Misc.

142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 1.00

SF SF SF LS

$ 1.33 $ 5.20 $ 0.88 $ 161,017.50

Cost Estimate - Option B (continued) 26.000 26.000 26.000 26.000 26.000 26.000 26.000 26.000 26.000 26.000

$ 189,642.04 $ 741,457.60 $ 125,477.44 $ 161,017.50

TOTAL HVAC

142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 142,588.00 1.00

SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF LS

$ 8.33 $ 6.55 $ 4.33 $ 2.33 $ 6.77 $ 4.33 $ 2.20 $ 0.65 $ 126,511.20

$ 1,187,758.04 $ 933,951.40 $ 617,406.04 $ 332,230.04 $ 965,320.76 $ 617,406.04 $ 313,693.60 $ 92,682.20 $ 126,511.20

TOTAL ELECTRICAL 27.000 COMMUNICATIONS 27.000 Tele‐communications ‐ (ALLOWANCE)

1.00

$ 6,601,717.46

$ 5,186,959.32

$ 800,000.00 $ 800,000.00 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS $ 800,000.00

28.000 ELECTRONIC SAFETY AND SECURITY 28.000 Safety and Security (ALLOWANCE)

1.00

$ 650,000.00 $ 650,000.00 TOTAL SAFETY AND SECURITY

31.000 31.102 31.103 31.104 31.104 31.104 31.222

FUTURE 592,995 32,944 2724 15371 3837

SF SF CY CY CY CY

$ 0.15 $ 0.30 $ 14.66 $ 12.33 $ 12.33 $ 12.33

FUTURE $ 177,898.50 $ 482,961.48 $ 33,582.81 $ 189,527.17 $ 47,307.81 TOTAL EARTHWORK

32.000 32.100 32.100 32.200 32.300

EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS Site Signage‐Monument Site Signage‐Way finding Stripping and directionals Landscaping

1 1 1 1

AL AL AL AL

$ 650,000.00

$ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 16,500.00 $ 16,500.00 $ 400,000.00 $ 400,000.00

$ 931,277.78

31.102 31.103 31.104 31.104 31.104 31.222

Site Clearing (Whole Site‐ Rough) Site Clearing (Phase‐1 Final) Mass Grading (Phase ‐ 1 Cut‐n‐Fill) Building Pad (Phase‐1) Parking Lots final grade (Phase ‐1) Site Roads final grade (Phase ‐1)

Cost Estimate - Option B (continued)

FUTURE 592,995 32,944 2724 15371 3837

SF SF CY CY CY CY

$ 0.15 $ 0.30 $ 14.66 $ 12.33 $ 12.33 $ 12.33

FUTURE $ 177,898.50 $ 482,961.48 $ 33,582.81 $ 189,527.17 $ 47,307.81 TOTAL EARTHWORK

32.000 32.100 32.100 32.200 32.300 32.400 32.460

EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS Site Signage‐Monument Site Signage‐Way finding Stripping and directionals Landscaping Hardscaping Water Collection Cistern

1 1 1 1 1 1

AL AL AL AL AL AL

$ 931,277.78

$ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 16,500.00 $ 16,500.00 $ 400,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ 125,000.00 $ 125,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 TOTAL EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS $ 661,500.00

33.000 33.450 33.450 33.450 33.450 33.450 33.450 33.220 33.220 33.143 33.001 33.061 33.012 32.964 33.964 32.915

UTILITIES H20 pipe 8" H20 pipe 12" WW pipe 8" STM pipe 24" STM pipe 30" STM pipe 36" STM pipe 42" STM pipe 54" Box Culverts Inlets Manholes Tele Data Infrastructure Allowance Electrical Service ‐ Underground + Transformer Electrical Service ‐ Transformer Light Pole/Lights/Standards

PROJECT DETAIL 2,407 LF 2,429 LF 1,490 LF 840 LF 460 LF 601.5 LF 579 LF 132 LF 3 EA 9 EA 21 EA 1000 LF 521 LF 1 LS 1 AL

47.000 FUTURE EXPANSION

Page 3

6/4/2015

Cost Estimate - Option B (continued) PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY (CCL)

6/4/2015

Tarleton State University ‐ Fort Worth WHOLE PROGRAM

PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY (CCL) Tarleton State University ‐ Fort Worth WHOLE PROGRAM

142588 CSI DIVISION FIELD COSTS 1.000 General Conditions 142588 CSI DIVISION 2.000 Existing Conditions FIELD COSTS 3.000 Concrete 4.000 Masonry 1.000 General Conditions 5.000 Metals 2.000 Existing Conditions 6.000 Wood, Plastics, and Composites 3.000 Concrete 7.000 Thermal and Moisture Protection 4.000 Masonry 8.000 Openings 5.000 Metals 9.000 Finishes 6.000 Wood, Plastics, and Composites 10.000 Specialties 7.000 Thermal and Moisture Protection 11.000 Equipment 8.000 Openings 12.000 Furnishings (Contractor Fixed ‐ Allowance) 9.000 Finishes 13.000 Special Construction 10.000 Specialties 14.000 Conveying Equipment 11.000 Equipment 21.000 Fire Suppression 12.000 Furnishings (Contractor Fixed ‐ Allowance) 22.000 Plumbing 13.000 Special Construction 23.000 Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning 14.000 Conveying Equipment 26.000 Electrical 21.000 Fire Suppression 27.000 Communications 22.000 Plumbing 28.000 Electronic Safety and Security 23.000 Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning 31.000 Earthwork 26.000 Electrical 32.000 Exterior Improvements 27.000 Communications 33.000 Utilities 28.000 Electronic Safety and Security 47.000 Misc. Central Utility Plant 31.000 Earthwork 32.000 Exterior Improvements SUBTOTAL (PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COSTS) 33.000 Utilities CONTRACTORS FEES + INSURANCE 47.000 Misc. Central Utility Plant General Contractor Fees

SUBTOTAL (PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COSTS) Contractor Construction Contingency Insurances CONTRACTORS FEES + INSURANCE Payment and Performance Bond General Contractor Fees Contractor Construction Contingency SUBTOTAL (CONTRACTORS FEES + INSURANCE) Insurances PROJECT TOTAL Payment and Performance Bond

TOTAL DIVISION COST

$ 2,050,392 $ 14.38 $ 0.46 TOTAL DIVISION COST 65,000 $ COST/SF $ 6,956,220 $ 48.79 $ 1,733,532 $ 12.16 $ 2,050,392 $ 14.38 $ 65,000 958,249 $ $ $ 0.46 6.72 $ 458,142 $ $ 6,956,220 $ 48.79 3.21 $ 1,232,767 $ $ 1,733,532 $ 12.16 8.65 $ 958,249 2,543,999 $ 6.72 17.84 $ $ $ 458,142 2,578,142 $ 3.21 18.08 $ $ $ 243,830 $ $ 1,232,767 $ 8.65 1.71 $ 1,000,000 $ $ 2,543,999 $ 17.84 7.01 $ 712,940 $ $ 2,578,142 $ 18.08 5.00 $ $ $ 243,830 ‐ $ 1.71 ‐ $ 1,867,000 $ 7.01 13.09 $ 1,000,000 $ $ 437,745 $ $ 712,940 $ 5.00 3.07 $ 2,694,304 $ ‐ 18.90 $ ‐ $ $ 6,601,717 $ 46.30 $ 1,867,000 $ 13.09 $ 437,745 5,186,959 $ 3.07 36.38 $ $ $ 800,000 $ $ 2,694,304 $ 18.90 5.61 $ 650,000 $ $ 6,601,717 $ 46.30 4.56 $ 931,278 $ $ 5,186,959 $ 36.38 6.53 $ 661,500 $ $ 800,000 $ 5.61 4.64 $ 969,743 $ $ 650,000 $ 4.56 6.80 $ $ $ 931,278 ‐ $ 6.53 ‐ $ $ $ 661,500 41,333,460 $ 4.64 289.88 $ 969,743 $ 6.80 ‐ $ 7.00% $ $ 2,893,342 $ ‐ 20.29 41,333,460 $ 289.88 5.00% $ $ 2,066,673 $ 14.49 2.00% $ 826,669 $ 5.80 1.50% $ $ 620,002 $ 7.00% 2,893,342 $ 20.29 4.35 5.00% $ 2,066,673 $ 14.49 $ 6,406,686 $ 44.93 2.00% $ 826,669 $ 5.80 15.50% $ 47,740,146 $ 334.81 1.50% $ 620,002 $ 4.35

SUBTOTAL (CONTRACTORS FEES + INSURANCE) PROJECT TOTAL

COST/SF

15.50%

% COST 4.29% 0.14% % COST 14.57% 3.63% 4.29% 2.01% 0.14% 0.96% 14.57% 2.58% 3.63% 5.33% 2.01% 5.40% 0.96% 0.51% 2.58% 2.09% 5.33% 1.49% 5.40% 0.00% 0.51% 3.91% 2.09% 0.92% 1.49% 5.64% 0.00% 13.83% 3.91% 10.86% 0.92% 1.68% 5.64% 1.36% 13.83% 1.95% 10.86% 1.39% 1.68% 2.03% 1.36% 0.00% 1.95% 1.39% 86.58% 2.03% 0.00% 6.06%

86.58% 4.33% 1.73% 1.30% 6.06% 4.33% 13.42% 1.73% 100.00% 1.30%

$ 6,406,686 $ 44.93

13.42%

$ 47,740,146 $ 334.81

100.00%

Proposed Project Life Cycle

Proposed Project Life Cycle A high quality yet economical building is the expected outcome of the project. The construction should meet the TAMU System Design Guidelines with the expectation that building elements will have an â&#x20AC;&#x153;Institutionalâ&#x20AC;? lifecycle noted in the chart. It should be noted that the life cycle spans are based on good to excellent preventative maintenance measures. The maintenance of the existing building is not good based on available funding. Therefore, construction must consider low maintenance, high quality materials that meet or exceed the lifespans noted.

Building Elements Lifespan; Reference Building Design Guidelines

Structural Foundation Slab on Grade Foundation Subgrade Waterproofing/Drainage Building Structure Exterior Walls Exterior Windows Exterior Doors Roofing Interior Partitions Interior Doors Interior Finishes Elevators Equipment Furnishings Plumbing Rough-in Plumbing Fixtures HVAC Boilers/Chillers HVAC Equipment HVAC Distribution Fire Protection System Fire Detection System Electrical Rough-in Electrical Equipment Lighting Communications

Institutional Commercial Apartments 80 yrs 50 yrs 30 yrs 40 yrs 80 yrs 80 yrs 40 yrs 40 yrs 20 yrs 20 yrs 20 yrs 15 yrs 25 yrs 25 yrs 20 yrs 80 yrs 30 yrs 30 yrs 20 yrs 40 yrs 40 yrs 20 yrs 80 yrs 30 yrs 30 yrs 20 yrs

50 yrs 50 yrs 40 yrs 40 yrs 20 yrs 15 yrs 20 yrs 10 yrs 20 yrs 20 yrs 15 yrs 50 yrs 30 yrs 30 yrs 20 yrs 40 yrs 40 yrs 20 yrs 50 yrs 30 yrs 30 yrs 20 yrs

30 yrs 30 yrs 30 yrs 30 yrs 20 yrs 15 yrs 15 yrs 5 yrs 20 yrs 15 yrs 10 yrs 30 yrs 30 yrs 15 yrs 15 yrs 30 yrs 30 yrs 20 yrs 30 yrs 30 yrs 20 yrs 15 yrs

Signature Page

Program of Requirements Sign Off The representatives of _________________________________ are in agreement that the Program of Requirements (POR) contained here within adequately identifies, describes, and documents the needs of the project. Approval of the POR indicates an understanding of the purpose and content described in this document. 7.1 User Group:

Print Name Title Signature Date

Print Name Title Signature Date 7.2 System Member Administration:

Print Name Title Signature Date

Appendix: Needs Assessment Notes

Functional Needs Assessment TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY-SW METROPLEX (FT. WORTH)

DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM: UNIVERSITY STAKEHOLDER: DATE:

All Programs - Group Stakeholder Session Summary All Stakeholders November 20-21, 2014

Current State

Challenges

Goals and Opportunities

• • • •

• Ft. Worth presence lacks a sense of permanence and place recognition; does not look or feel like a campus • Current facility limits growth potential • Lack of student amenities and support spaces • Isolated faculty offices that are not fully utilized by commuting faculty • With all of the market factors favoring Tarleton, there is a feeling that the current program is under-performing--the program is a “diamond mine” waiting to be discovered--but it needs a facility to help it reach its true potential • Continue to cater to students beyond traditional college age (older than 22), but also attract traditional age students

• Create a campus-feel that fosters a culture of collegiality, community, and engenders a sense of “ownership” among faculty, staff, students • Seek a first building that employs innovative spaces, new strategies for teaching/learning, and is flexible so it can change moving forward • Build on Tarleton traditions and plant the Tarleton flag in Ft. Worth through branding and marketing, social activities, alumni relations, excellent education for value • Seek enrollment growth exceeding 10% per year, and attain 5,000 students by 2025 • Add new programs (kinesiology, communications, public health, finance) • Continue to serve non-traditional and place-bound students (not to compete for students attracted to Stephenville) • Continue to be cost competitive • Explore more partnership opportunities with Tarrant County Community College’s programs where Tarleton can offer upper-level programs catering to students seeking Bachelors degrees • Become a faculty destination

• • • • •

• • •

Fall 2014 enrollment = 1,576 (headcount) Growing at a rate of 10%-20% per year 43 degree programs are offered within 4 Colleges Most programs are bachelors-level, but there are several masters-level programs and one doctorallevel program (educational leadership) High amount of non-traditional students 100% commuter college Cost-competitive education; high number of lowincome, first generation students Capturing an under served market in DFW area Operating out of lease space in two building: Schaffer Building (19,699 gsf with 11,611 nasf E &G) for Medical Lab Sciences and the Hickman Building (31,900 gsf with 24,000 nasf E&G) Current program growth is limited by amount of space available Ad-hoc leasing method has created dis-aggregated footprint within Hickman building; lack of continuity Faculty offices are spread out, segregated

Space Needs • A campus and first building with a sense of permanence and campus feel • Flexible, adaptable, high-tech learning environments • Student support spaces (e.g. advising, admissions, etc) • Student amenity spaces (e.g. student org offices, rec space, learning commons, resource center etc.) • Informal gathering spaces (e.g. atrium, activity hub, cafe, activated hallways, etc.) • Space to expand into • Multipurpose rooms • Outdoor spaces for recreation

See stakeholder interview summaries for more specific space needs. 81

Functional Needs Assessment

DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM: UNIVERSITY STAKEHOLDER: DATE:

TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY-SW METROPLEX (FT. WORTH)

Current State • Sandi over-sees several programs: nursing, criminal justice, communications social work, medical lab sciences

NURSING • • • •

Nursing programs are new (less than 3 years old) Approximate nursing enrollment = 20 Faculty = 4 Offers a bridge from associates program to bachelors program • Will be starting a Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) program in the Spring 2014 • Uses Tarrant County Community College-River Campus simulation lab • Hybrid teaching methods used (of the 15 courses required, 8 are face-to-face and 7 are online)

CRIMINAL JUSTICE • Approximately 150 students at bachelors, masters, and doctoral level • Corporate office-like setting is preferable

SOCIAL WORK

Challenges COMMUNICATION • New degree program in Ft. Worth • Education space needs should be similar to O.A. Grant expansion

Major Nursing

MS o

Nursing Administration

Nursing Education

Kinesiology

future

Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice Admin.

Social Work

Communications

future

PhD

future future

future

Space Needs NURSING

COMMUNICATION

• Flexible classrooms, interactive • Moveable furniture • All skills training/sim center functions to continue at TCCD-River Campus

• • • •

• Executive education, boardroom-like spaces • Half-round, ramped floor seminar rooms with seating up to 50 • High-technology in room

• There is untapped potential to grow the program, but they are not growing they way they want due to facility limits

Goals and Opportunities

future

• 57 students in Fall 2014; 70 by January 2015 • Highly interactive, social student cohorts; tight-knit group; social action-oriented

CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Health Professions, Criminal Justice, Communications Dr. Sandi McDermott, Assistant Professor,Director for Health & Service November 20, 2014

Active learning environment, flexible, high-tech Foster collaboration Writing lab Video media lab

• Increase nursing enrollment by 20%/year • Establish a collegial culture at new campus • Incorporate leadership, ethics, community issues into curriculum • Maintain cost competitiveness

Functional Needs Assessment TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY-SW METROPLEX (FT. WORTH)

DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM: UNIVERSITY STAKEHOLDER: DATE:

Current State • Approximate enrollment = 517 • 20 faculty members teach, 4 or 5 faculty offices in Ft. Worth. Remainder of faculty have offices in Stephenville • More than half of current business school enrollment resides outside of Stephenville • Approximately 70% of current faculty have been hired within the last three years • Learning is getting more interactive; about 40% of class time is lecture-based; 25% of time is class discussion; 5% is small group discussion; 30% other

Business Administration Dr. Sundarrajan Sankar, Professor and Director of Business Programs November 20, 2014

Challenges Major

Bachelor

Business Administration

Accounting

Master o

HR Management

Information Systems

Management Leadership

Marketing

Business

Information Technology

• Ft. Worth presence lacks a sense of permanence and place recognition • Unbalanced faculty-student geographic balance (most faculty commute in from Stephenville for their classes only while students are from DFW area)

Goals and Opportunities • Goal to obtain top accreditation in American Association of Colleges and Schools of Business International by 2017 (new dean hired to accomplish this goal) • Seeking to grow by 8-10% each year and reach about 1,200-1,500 students in 10 years • Seeking to grow MBA program • Seeking to start offering finance degrees • Focus on executive education • Use metropolitan location as a magnet to attract talented guest speakers

Space Needs • • • •

Flexible classrooms with capacity of approximately 40 Small group meeting rooms (capacity 6-8) Informal seating areas/alcoves/common spaces A business commons dedicated to business case preparation, presentation practice similar to UT-Austin McComb School • Need for a large gathering space of approximately 200 people for large guest lectures, award ceremonies, etc. • A trading room for up to 65 people with 15-20 computer workstations for simulated financial trading • Trading room to have one large projection screen or monitor for centralized display of information

• Similar to what TCU, A&M, Baylor, and SMU have • Executive education rooms - guest rooms for visiting educators; would like to provide one program per month featuring a different visiting educator • Financial news/media gathering space/lobby area • Interview rooms with privacy for advising and competitive student group presentation preparation • Need for multi-point, ITV video web conferences • Integrated technology is the expectation for all rooms • Sim-podiums, smart boards, document camera • Move towards using Zoom for web-conferencing

Functional Needs Assessment TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY-SW METROPLEX (FT. WORTH)

DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM: UNIVERSITY STAKEHOLDER: DATE:

Advising, Auxiliaries, General Instruction Ms Kayla Kelly, Advising Coordinator November 20, 2014

Current State

Challenges

ADVISING

• Lack of student services and amenities • Lack of student meeting spaces • Lack of “one-stop shop” for services

• • • •

Academic advising for all students Holistic approach (beyond just selecting courses) High number of non-traditional students 7 advisors • CJ, Business, Social Work and Nursing, Education, Psychology • Advise in office

Goals and Opportunities • Create spaces for students to work together and socialize outside of class • Create a space the fosters a collegiate culture • Create environment that supports advising

Space Needs ONE-STOP SHOP • • • • • • •

Admissions Registrar Academic Advising Career Advising Financial Aid IT/Tech spot for students Regional recruitment center

OTHER • Student organization offices • Exercise room

• Alumni center • Development and Advancement Entertainment Suite • Elegant yet convertible, catering kitchen?

Functional Needs Assessment TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY-SW METROPLEX (FT. WORTH)

DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM: UNIVERSITY STAKEHOLDER: DATE:

Current State • Medical lab programs are not slated to move to new building, but will likely be part of the second campus building dedicated to health professions • 10 full time faculty members and approximately 5 adjuncts per semester • Operates in Schaffer Building (20,000 gsf) with some lectures at the Hickman Building • 8 lab rooms

MEDICAL LAB SCIENCES • 10-month program (including field work) • Enrollment = 159 students (92 for sciences-MLS; 39 for technology-MLT; 17 for histotechnology; 11 for health professions tech) • 50% of classtime is in lab; 50% in seminar/lecture • About 90% undergraduate; 10% graduate • Current 40-seat MLS classrooms is used all day • MLT classroom is used 2-3 days per week • Program features mandatory, hands-on lab training experience (field work) at over 100 DFW area hospitals, clinics, and labs • Existing adjacency next to Baylor All Saints is not required for program • Testing done in two forms: practicum (for hands-on skills) and computer-based

Medical Lab Sciences and Health Professions Dr. Sally Lewis November 21, 2014

Challenges Major

Medical Lab Sciences

Histotechnology

Medical Lab Technology

Public Health Health Professions Tech

MS o

• Current space lacks common spaces for gathering • Current building is not owned by university • Lack of space for information resources/library

future o

Goals and Opportunities • Start a Public Health Program in Ft. Worth (currently only offered in Stephenville) • Three tracks: 1) lab; 2) Pre-PH for undergraduates; 3) Health Educator (likely to be the largest • Goal for 25 students in year #1 and to grow faster than 50% in 10-years • Continue to grow and expand medical lab programs • All medical lab programs expected to grow 5-10% per year

Space Needs • • • • •

40-seat classrooms, flat-floor for seminars Information resources library/commons Common spaces for gathering Faculty collaboration space General bio and chem lab for core skills training (up to 2 labs needed) • Testing space for proctored computer exams • 40 testing stations; could be shared with accounting •

Functional Needs Assessment TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY-SW METROPLEX (FT. WORTH)

DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM: UNIVERSITY STAKEHOLDER: DATE:

Current State • Current enrollment for all education programs = approximately 575 students (highest enrollment of any Tarleton program in Ft. Worth) • Programs: counseling, counseling psychology, educational administration (Masters), educational leadership (Doctoral), family and consumer sciences, interdisciplinary studies (teacher education), psychology • Most growth occuring in interdisciplinary studies • Teacher certification (early childhood, math, ESL) • 50% of time spent outside of the classroom for teaching observation on location • Learning is highly collaborative, group-based projects • Uses hybrid model to blend face-to-face and online learning

Challenges Major

Counseling

Counseling Psychology

Educational Admin.

PhD

Educational Leadership

• Center for Instruction Innovation could be utilized more if had better support and if it was better advertised to faculty • Lack of a faculty commons does not foster interaction, collegiality

Family and Consumer Sci.

Interdisciplinary Studies

Psychology

Goals and Opportunities • Seeking to add kinesiology program (lots of demand) • Seeking to add undergraduate-level educational leadership program • Seeking overall increase in enrollment from 575 to 1,100 in 10 years

Space Needs • Flexible active learning classrooms • Need a space for large group gatherings of up to 150 people • Would like to host Effective Schools Program (guest lecture series) • Multi-purpose room for kinesiology classes that could be used for student recreation • Need a simulated classroom space similar to a real classroom; would like to have 5 such spaces • Human subject research space • One room; approx 8’x12’; Double sided glass for observation

Education Dr. Juanita Reyes, Director of Education & Related Programs November 21, 2014

• Need a counseling center for students and community • Used partially for graduate student training • Components of the space include: reception, observation, small room for private discussion, rooms for small group discussion • No need for child care

1301 S. Capital of Texas Hwy. Austin, TX 78746 www.broaddusplanning.com